Year,StateAbbr,LocationAbbr,LocationDesc,Category,Indicator,ShortIndicatorText,Type,DataSource,Data_Value_Unit,Data_Value_Type,Data_Value,Data_Value_Footnote_Symbol,Data_Value_Footnote_Text,Geolocation,Break_Out_Category1,Break_Out1,LocationID,TypeID,Break_Out1_ID,IndicatorID,MWF_Participant,IndicatorGroupId,TopicId
2020,AK,AK,Alaska,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,647,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,2,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,AK,AK,Alaska,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,24,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,2,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,AK,AK,Alaska,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,2,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,AK,AK,Alaska,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,2,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,AK,AK,Alaska,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,2,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,AK,AK,Alaska,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,731463,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,2,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2020,AK,AK,Alaska,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,545179,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,2,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,AK,AK,Alaska,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,229789,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,2,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,AK,AK,Alaska,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,2,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,AK,AK,Alaska,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,315390,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,2,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,AK,AK,Alaska,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,42.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,2,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,AK,AK,Alaska,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,2,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,AK,AK,Alaska,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,57.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,2,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,AK,AK,Alaska,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,623,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,2,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,AK,AK,Alaska,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,3.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,2,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,AK,AK,Alaska,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,39.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,2,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,AK,AK,Alaska,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,16831,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,2,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,AK,AK,Alaska,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,212958,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,2,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,AL,AL,Alabama,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,531,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,AL,AL,Alabama,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,264,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,AL,AL,Alabama,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,104,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,AL,AL,Alabama,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,148,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,AL,AL,Alabama,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,AL,AL,Alabama,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,5024803,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2020,AL,AL,Alabama,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4467001,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,AL,AL,Alabama,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3469133,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,AL,AL,Alabama,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,40776,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,AL,AL,Alabama,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,997868,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,AL,AL,Alabama,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,77.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,AL,AL,Alabama,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,AL,AL,Alabama,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,22.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,AL,AL,Alabama,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,267,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,AL,AL,Alabama,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,16.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,AL,AL,Alabama,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,60.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,AL,AL,Alabama,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,741024,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,AL,AL,Alabama,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2687334,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,AL,Autauga,Autauga County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1001,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Autauga,Autauga County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1001,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Autauga,Autauga County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1001,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Autauga,Autauga County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1001,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Autauga,Autauga County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1001,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Autauga,Autauga County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,58877,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1001,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Autauga,Autauga County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,51542,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1001,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Autauga,Autauga County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,33680,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1001,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Autauga,Autauga County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1001,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Autauga,Autauga County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,17863,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1001,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Autauga,Autauga County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,65.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1001,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Autauga,Autauga County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1001,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Autauga,Autauga County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,34.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1001,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Autauga,Autauga County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1001,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Autauga,Autauga County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,1001,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Autauga,Autauga County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,65.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1001,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Autauga,Autauga County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,1001,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Autauga,Autauga County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,33680,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1001,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Baldwin,Baldwin County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1003,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Baldwin,Baldwin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1003,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Baldwin,Baldwin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1003,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Baldwin,Baldwin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1003,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Baldwin,Baldwin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1003,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Baldwin,Baldwin County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,233140,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1003,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Baldwin,Baldwin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,199866,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1003,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Baldwin,Baldwin County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,177795,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1003,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Baldwin,Baldwin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1003,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Baldwin,Baldwin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,22072,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1003,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Baldwin,Baldwin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,89,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1003,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Baldwin,Baldwin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1003,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Baldwin,Baldwin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,11,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1003,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Baldwin,Baldwin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1003,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Baldwin,Baldwin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,3.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1003,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Baldwin,Baldwin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,85.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1003,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Baldwin,Baldwin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,6657,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1003,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Baldwin,Baldwin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,171138,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1003,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Barbour,Barbour County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1005,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Barbour,Barbour County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1005,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Barbour,Barbour County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1005,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Barbour,Barbour County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1005,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Barbour,Barbour County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1005,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Barbour,Barbour County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,25180,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1005,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Barbour,Barbour County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,26669,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1005,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Barbour,Barbour County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,13309,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1005,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Barbour,Barbour County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1005,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Barbour,Barbour County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,13360,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1005,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Barbour,Barbour County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,49.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1005,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Barbour,Barbour County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1005,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Barbour,Barbour County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,50.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1005,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Barbour,Barbour County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1005,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Barbour,Barbour County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,1005,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Barbour,Barbour County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,49.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1005,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Barbour,Barbour County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,1005,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Barbour,Barbour County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,13309,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1005,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Bibb,Bibb County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1007,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Bibb,Bibb County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1007,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Bibb,Bibb County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1007,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Bibb,Bibb County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1007,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Bibb,Bibb County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1007,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Bibb,Bibb County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,22223,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1007,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Bibb,Bibb County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,20589,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1007,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Bibb,Bibb County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6397,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1007,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Bibb,Bibb County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1007,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Bibb,Bibb County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,14192,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1007,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Bibb,Bibb County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,31.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1007,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Bibb,Bibb County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1007,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Bibb,Bibb County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,68.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1007,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Bibb,Bibb County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1007,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Bibb,Bibb County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,1007,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Bibb,Bibb County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,31.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1007,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Bibb,Bibb County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,1007,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Bibb,Bibb County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,6397,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1007,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Blount,Blount County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1009,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Blount,Blount County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1009,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Blount,Blount County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1009,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Blount,Blount County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1009,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Blount,Blount County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1009,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Blount,Blount County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,59081,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1009,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Blount,Blount County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,49372,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1009,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Blount,Blount County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8829,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1009,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Blount,Blount County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1009,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Blount,Blount County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,40543,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1009,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Blount,Blount County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,17.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1009,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Blount,Blount County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1009,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Blount,Blount County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,82.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1009,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Blount,Blount County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1009,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Blount,Blount County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,17.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1009,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Blount,Blount County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,1009,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Blount,Blount County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,8829,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1009,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Blount,Blount County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,1009,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Bullock,Bullock County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1011,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Bullock,Bullock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1011,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Bullock,Bullock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1011,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Bullock,Bullock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1011,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Bullock,Bullock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1011,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Bullock,Bullock County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,10309,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1011,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Bullock,Bullock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,10076,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1011,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Bullock,Bullock County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1011,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Bullock,Bullock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1011,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Bullock,Bullock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10076,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1011,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Bullock,Bullock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1011,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Bullock,Bullock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1011,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Bullock,Bullock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1011,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Bullock,Bullock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1011,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Bullock,Bullock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,1011,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Bullock,Bullock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,1011,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Bullock,Bullock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,1011,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Bullock,Bullock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,1011,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1013,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1013,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1013,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1013,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1013,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,19045,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1013,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,20308,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1013,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9026,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1013,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,9026,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1013,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11281,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1013,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,44.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1013,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,44.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1013,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,55.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1013,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1013,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,1013,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,1013,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,1013,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,1013,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1015,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1015,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1015,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1015,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1015,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,116266,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1015,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,108191,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1015,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,51761,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1015,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1015,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,56429,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1015,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,47.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1015,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1015,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,52.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1015,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1015,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1015,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,47.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1015,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,492,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1015,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,51269,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1015,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Chambers,Chambers County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1017,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Chambers,Chambers County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1017,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Chambers,Chambers County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1017,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Chambers,Chambers County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1017,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Chambers,Chambers County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1017,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Chambers,Chambers County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,34678,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1017,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Chambers,Chambers County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,27260,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1017,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Chambers,Chambers County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,27260,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1017,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Chambers,Chambers County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1017,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Chambers,Chambers County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1017,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Chambers,Chambers County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1017,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Chambers,Chambers County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1017,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Chambers,Chambers County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1017,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Chambers,Chambers County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1017,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Chambers,Chambers County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,89.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1017,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Chambers,Chambers County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,10.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1017,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Chambers,Chambers County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,24439,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1017,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Chambers,Chambers County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2821,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1017,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1019,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1019,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1019,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1019,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1019,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,24958,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1019,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,16264,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1019,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5225,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1019,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1019,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11039,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1019,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,32.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1019,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1019,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,67.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1019,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1019,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,1019,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,32.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1019,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,1019,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,5225,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1019,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Chilton,Chilton County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1021,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Chilton,Chilton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1021,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Chilton,Chilton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1021,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Chilton,Chilton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1021,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Chilton,Chilton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1021,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Chilton,Chilton County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,45024,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1021,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Chilton,Chilton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,37157,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1021,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Chilton,Chilton County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,236,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1021,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Chilton,Chilton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1021,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Chilton,Chilton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,36921,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1021,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Chilton,Chilton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1021,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Chilton,Chilton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1021,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Chilton,Chilton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1021,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Chilton,Chilton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1021,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Chilton,Chilton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1021,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Chilton,Chilton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,1021,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Chilton,Chilton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,236,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1021,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Chilton,Chilton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,1021,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Choctaw,Choctaw County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1023,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Choctaw,Choctaw County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1023,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Choctaw,Choctaw County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1023,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Choctaw,Choctaw County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1023,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Choctaw,Choctaw County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1023,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Choctaw,Choctaw County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,12619,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1023,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Choctaw,Choctaw County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,15219,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1023,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Choctaw,Choctaw County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1023,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Choctaw,Choctaw County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1023,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Choctaw,Choctaw County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,15219,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1023,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Choctaw,Choctaw County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1023,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Choctaw,Choctaw County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1023,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Choctaw,Choctaw County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1023,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Choctaw,Choctaw County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1023,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Choctaw,Choctaw County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,1023,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Choctaw,Choctaw County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,1023,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Choctaw,Choctaw County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,1023,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Choctaw,Choctaw County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,1023,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Clarke,Clarke County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1025,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Clarke,Clarke County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1025,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Clarke,Clarke County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1025,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Clarke,Clarke County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1025,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Clarke,Clarke County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1025,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Clarke,Clarke County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,22995,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1025,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Clarke,Clarke County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,35683,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1025,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Clarke,Clarke County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,24019,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1025,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Clarke,Clarke County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1025,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Clarke,Clarke County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11664,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1025,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Clarke,Clarke County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,67.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1025,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Clarke,Clarke County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1025,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Clarke,Clarke County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,32.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1025,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Clarke,Clarke County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1025,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Clarke,Clarke County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,23.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1025,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Clarke,Clarke County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,43.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1025,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Clarke,Clarke County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,8531,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1025,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Clarke,Clarke County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,15488,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1025,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1027,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1027,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1027,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1027,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1027,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,14193,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1027,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7909,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1027,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,965,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1027,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1027,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6944,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1027,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,12.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1027,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1027,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,87.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1027,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1027,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,12.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1027,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,1027,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,965,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1027,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,1027,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Cleburne,Cleburne County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1029,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Cleburne,Cleburne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1029,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Cleburne,Cleburne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1029,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Cleburne,Cleburne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1029,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Cleburne,Cleburne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1029,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Cleburne,Cleburne County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,15035,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1029,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Cleburne,Cleburne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,10499,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1029,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Cleburne,Cleburne County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10499,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1029,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Cleburne,Cleburne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1029,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Cleburne,Cleburne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1029,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Cleburne,Cleburne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1029,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Cleburne,Cleburne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1029,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Cleburne,Cleburne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1029,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Cleburne,Cleburne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1029,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Cleburne,Cleburne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,69.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1029,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Cleburne,Cleburne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,30.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1029,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Cleburne,Cleburne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,7322,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1029,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Cleburne,Cleburne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3177,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1029,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Coffee,Coffee County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1031,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Coffee,Coffee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1031,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Coffee,Coffee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1031,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Coffee,Coffee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1031,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Coffee,Coffee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1031,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Coffee,Coffee County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,53565,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1031,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Coffee,Coffee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,49873,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1031,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Coffee,Coffee County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,35574,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1031,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Coffee,Coffee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1031,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Coffee,Coffee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,14299,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1031,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Coffee,Coffee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,71.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1031,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Coffee,Coffee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1031,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Coffee,Coffee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,28.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1031,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Coffee,Coffee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1031,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Coffee,Coffee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,1031,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Coffee,Coffee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,71.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1031,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Coffee,Coffee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,1031,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Coffee,Coffee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,35574,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1031,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Colbert,Colbert County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1033,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Colbert,Colbert County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1033,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Colbert,Colbert County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1033,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Colbert,Colbert County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1033,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Colbert,Colbert County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1033,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Colbert,Colbert County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,57236,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1033,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Colbert,Colbert County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,63784,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1033,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Colbert,Colbert County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,55556,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1033,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Colbert,Colbert County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1033,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Colbert,Colbert County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8229,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1033,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Colbert,Colbert County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,87.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1033,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Colbert,Colbert County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1033,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Colbert,Colbert County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,12.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1033,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Colbert,Colbert County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1033,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Colbert,Colbert County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,11.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1033,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Colbert,Colbert County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,75.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1033,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Colbert,Colbert County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,7404,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1033,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Colbert,Colbert County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,48152,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1033,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Conecuh,Conecuh County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1035,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Conecuh,Conecuh County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1035,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Conecuh,Conecuh County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1035,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Conecuh,Conecuh County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1035,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Conecuh,Conecuh County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1035,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Conecuh,Conecuh County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,11552,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1035,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Conecuh,Conecuh County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,10768,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1035,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Conecuh,Conecuh County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4782,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1035,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Conecuh,Conecuh County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1035,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Conecuh,Conecuh County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5985,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1035,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Conecuh,Conecuh County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,44.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1035,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Conecuh,Conecuh County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1035,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Conecuh,Conecuh County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,55.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1035,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Conecuh,Conecuh County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1035,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Conecuh,Conecuh County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,10.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1035,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Conecuh,Conecuh County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,34.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1035,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Conecuh,Conecuh County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1114,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1035,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Conecuh,Conecuh County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3669,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1035,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Coosa,Coosa County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1037,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Coosa,Coosa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1037,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Coosa,Coosa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1037,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Coosa,Coosa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1037,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Coosa,Coosa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1037,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Coosa,Coosa County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,10383,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1037,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Coosa,Coosa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,10537,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1037,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Coosa,Coosa County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6912,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1037,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Coosa,Coosa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1037,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Coosa,Coosa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3624,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1037,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Coosa,Coosa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,65.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1037,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Coosa,Coosa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1037,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Coosa,Coosa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,34.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1037,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Coosa,Coosa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1037,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Coosa,Coosa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,65.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1037,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Coosa,Coosa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,1037,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Coosa,Coosa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,6912,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1037,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Coosa,Coosa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,1037,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Covington,Covington County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1039,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Covington,Covington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1039,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Covington,Covington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1039,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Covington,Covington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1039,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Covington,Covington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1039,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Covington,Covington County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,37469,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1039,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Covington,Covington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,33791,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1039,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Covington,Covington County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11526,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1039,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Covington,Covington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,11201,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1039,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Covington,Covington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,22265,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1039,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Covington,Covington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,34.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1039,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Covington,Covington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,33.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1039,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Covington,Covington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,65.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1039,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Covington,Covington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1039,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Covington,Covington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1039,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Covington,Covington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,1039,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Covington,Covington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,325,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1039,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Covington,Covington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,1039,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Crenshaw,Crenshaw County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1041,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Crenshaw,Crenshaw County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1041,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Crenshaw,Crenshaw County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1041,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Crenshaw,Crenshaw County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1041,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Crenshaw,Crenshaw County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1041,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Crenshaw,Crenshaw County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,13157,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1041,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Crenshaw,Crenshaw County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,15599,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1041,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Crenshaw,Crenshaw County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2890,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1041,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Crenshaw,Crenshaw County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1041,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Crenshaw,Crenshaw County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,12709,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1041,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Crenshaw,Crenshaw County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,18.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1041,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Crenshaw,Crenshaw County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1041,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Crenshaw,Crenshaw County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,81.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1041,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Crenshaw,Crenshaw County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1041,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Crenshaw,Crenshaw County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,1041,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Crenshaw,Crenshaw County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,18.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1041,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Crenshaw,Crenshaw County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,1041,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Crenshaw,Crenshaw County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2890,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1041,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Cullman,Cullman County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1043,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Cullman,Cullman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1043,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Cullman,Cullman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1043,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Cullman,Cullman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1043,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Cullman,Cullman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1043,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Cullman,Cullman County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,88044,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1043,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Cullman,Cullman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,98228,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1043,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Cullman,Cullman County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,92681,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1043,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Cullman,Cullman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1043,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Cullman,Cullman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5547,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1043,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Cullman,Cullman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,94.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1043,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Cullman,Cullman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1043,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Cullman,Cullman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,5.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1043,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Cullman,Cullman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1043,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Cullman,Cullman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,94.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1043,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Cullman,Cullman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1043,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Cullman,Cullman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,92657,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1043,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Cullman,Cullman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,24,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1043,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Dale,Dale County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1045,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Dale,Dale County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1045,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Dale,Dale County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1045,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Dale,Dale County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1045,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Dale,Dale County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1045,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Dale,Dale County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,49214,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1045,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Dale,Dale County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,44643,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1045,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Dale,Dale County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,30455,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1045,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Dale,Dale County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1045,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Dale,Dale County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,14187,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1045,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Dale,Dale County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,68.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1045,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Dale,Dale County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1045,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Dale,Dale County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,31.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1045,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Dale,Dale County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1045,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Dale,Dale County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,3.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1045,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Dale,Dale County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,64.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1045,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Dale,Dale County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1699,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1045,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Dale,Dale County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,28756,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1045,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Dallas,Dallas County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1047,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Dallas,Dallas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1047,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Dallas,Dallas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1047,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Dallas,Dallas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1047,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Dallas,Dallas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1047,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Dallas,Dallas County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,38190,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1047,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Dallas,Dallas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,31719,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1047,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Dallas,Dallas County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,19050,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1047,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Dallas,Dallas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,2868,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1047,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Dallas,Dallas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,12669,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1047,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Dallas,Dallas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,60.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1047,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Dallas,Dallas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1047,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Dallas,Dallas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,39.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1047,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Dallas,Dallas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1047,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Dallas,Dallas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,1047,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Dallas,Dallas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,51,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1047,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Dallas,Dallas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,1047,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Dallas,Dallas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,16182,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1047,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1049,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1049,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1049,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1049,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1049,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,71630,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1049,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AL,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,63031,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1049,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,24622,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1049,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1049,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,38409,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1049,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,39.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1049,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1049,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,60.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1049,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1049,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,9.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1049,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,29.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1049,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,6014,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1049,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,18607,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1049,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Elmore,Elmore County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1051,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Elmore,Elmore County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1051,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Elmore,Elmore County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1051,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Elmore,Elmore County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1051,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Elmore,Elmore County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1051,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Elmore,Elmore County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,88116,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1051,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Elmore,Elmore County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,75276,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1051,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Elmore,Elmore County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,75276,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1051,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Elmore,Elmore County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1051,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Elmore,Elmore County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1051,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Elmore,Elmore County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1051,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Elmore,Elmore County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1051,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Elmore,Elmore County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1051,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Elmore,Elmore County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1051,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Elmore,Elmore County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,44.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1051,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Elmore,Elmore County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,55.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1051,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Elmore,Elmore County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,33835,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1051,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Elmore,Elmore County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,41440,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1051,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Escambia,Escambia County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1053,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Escambia,Escambia County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1053,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Escambia,Escambia County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1053,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Escambia,Escambia County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1053,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Escambia,Escambia County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1053,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Escambia,Escambia County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,36665,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1053,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Escambia,Escambia County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,32028,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1053,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Escambia,Escambia County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,19241,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1053,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Escambia,Escambia County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1053,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Escambia,Escambia County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,12787,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1053,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Escambia,Escambia County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,60.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1053,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Escambia,Escambia County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1053,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Escambia,Escambia County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,39.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1053,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Escambia,Escambia County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1053,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Escambia,Escambia County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1053,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Escambia,Escambia County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,56.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1053,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Escambia,Escambia County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1287,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1053,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Escambia,Escambia County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,17954,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1053,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Etowah,Etowah County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1055,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Etowah,Etowah County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1055,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Etowah,Etowah County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1055,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Etowah,Etowah County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1055,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Etowah,Etowah County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1055,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Etowah,Etowah County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,103393,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1055,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Etowah,Etowah County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,91041,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1055,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Etowah,Etowah County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,68594,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1055,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Etowah,Etowah County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1055,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Etowah,Etowah County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,22447,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1055,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Etowah,Etowah County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,75.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1055,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Etowah,Etowah County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1055,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Etowah,Etowah County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,24.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1055,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Etowah,Etowah County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1055,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Etowah,Etowah County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,39,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1055,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Etowah,Etowah County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,36.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1055,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Etowah,Etowah County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,35512,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1055,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Etowah,Etowah County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,33082,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1055,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1057,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1057,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1057,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1057,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1057,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,16307,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1057,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,14610,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1057,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11072,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1057,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1057,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3537,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1057,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,75.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1057,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1057,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,24.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1057,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1057,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,34.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1057,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,41.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1057,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,5038,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1057,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,6034,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1057,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1059,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1059,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1059,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1059,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1059,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,32063,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1059,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,28337,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1059,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,17534,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1059,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1059,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10803,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1059,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,61.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1059,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1059,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,38.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1059,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1059,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,18.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1059,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,43.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1059,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,5194,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1059,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,12340,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1059,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Geneva,Geneva County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1061,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Geneva,Geneva County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1061,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Geneva,Geneva County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1061,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Geneva,Geneva County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1061,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Geneva,Geneva County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1061,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Geneva,Geneva County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,26675,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1061,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Geneva,Geneva County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,17540,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1061,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Geneva,Geneva County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1061,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Geneva,Geneva County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1061,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Geneva,Geneva County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,17540,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1061,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Geneva,Geneva County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1061,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Geneva,Geneva County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1061,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Geneva,Geneva County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1061,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Geneva,Geneva County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1061,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Geneva,Geneva County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,1061,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Geneva,Geneva County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,1061,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Geneva,Geneva County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,1061,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Geneva,Geneva County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,1061,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1063,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1063,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1063,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1063,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1063,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,7704,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1063,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7851,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1063,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3531,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1063,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,3531,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1063,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4320,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1063,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,45,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1063,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,45,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1063,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,55,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1063,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1063,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,1063,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,1063,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,1063,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,1063,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Hale,Hale County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1065,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Hale,Hale County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1065,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Hale,Hale County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1065,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Hale,Hale County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1065,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Hale,Hale County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1065,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Hale,Hale County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,14792,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1065,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Hale,Hale County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,14052,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1065,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Hale,Hale County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10788,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1065,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Hale,Hale County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1065,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Hale,Hale County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3264,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1065,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Hale,Hale County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,76.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1065,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Hale,Hale County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1065,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Hale,Hale County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,23.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1065,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Hale,Hale County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1065,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Hale,Hale County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,2.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1065,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Hale,Hale County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,74.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1065,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Hale,Hale County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,382,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1065,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Hale,Hale County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,10405,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1065,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1067,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1067,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1067,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1067,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1067,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,17167,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1067,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,16240,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1067,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3259,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1067,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1067,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,12980,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1067,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,20.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1067,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1067,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,79.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1067,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1067,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,2.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1067,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,17.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1067,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,422,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1067,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2837,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1067,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Houston,Houston County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1069,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Houston,Houston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1069,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Houston,Houston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1069,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Houston,Houston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1069,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Houston,Houston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1069,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Houston,Houston County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,107190,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1069,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Houston,Houston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,90901,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1069,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Houston,Houston County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,71315,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1069,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Houston,Houston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1069,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Houston,Houston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,19586,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1069,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Houston,Houston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,78.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1069,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Houston,Houston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1069,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Houston,Houston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,21.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1069,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Houston,Houston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1069,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Houston,Houston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,2.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1069,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Houston,Houston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,76.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1069,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Houston,Houston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2050,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1069,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Houston,Houston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,69265,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1069,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1071,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1071,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1071,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1071,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1071,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,52519,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1071,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,78034,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1071,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,57981,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1071,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1071,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,20053,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1071,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,74.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1071,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1071,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,25.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1071,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1071,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,22,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1071,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,52.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1071,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,17169,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1071,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,40812,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1071,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1073,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1073,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1073,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1073,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1073,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,673341,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1073,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,590069,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1073,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,582585,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1073,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1073,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7484,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1073,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1073,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1073,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1073,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1073,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,13.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1073,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,85.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1073,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,78697,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1073,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,503889,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1073,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Lamar,Lamar County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1075,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Lamar,Lamar County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1075,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Lamar,Lamar County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1075,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Lamar,Lamar County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1075,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Lamar,Lamar County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1075,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Lamar,Lamar County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,13943,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1075,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Lamar,Lamar County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,15579,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1075,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Lamar,Lamar County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4453,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1075,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Lamar,Lamar County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1075,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Lamar,Lamar County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11126,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1075,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Lamar,Lamar County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,28.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1075,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Lamar,Lamar County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1075,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Lamar,Lamar County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,71.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1075,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Lamar,Lamar County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1075,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Lamar,Lamar County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,28.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1075,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Lamar,Lamar County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,1075,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Lamar,Lamar County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,4453,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1075,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Lamar,Lamar County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,1075,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Lauderdale,Lauderdale County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1077,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Lauderdale,Lauderdale County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1077,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Lauderdale,Lauderdale County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1077,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Lauderdale,Lauderdale County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1077,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Lauderdale,Lauderdale County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1077,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Lauderdale,Lauderdale County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,93610,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1077,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Lauderdale,Lauderdale County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,90661,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1077,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Lauderdale,Lauderdale County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,87034,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1077,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Lauderdale,Lauderdale County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1077,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Lauderdale,Lauderdale County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3626,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1077,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Lauderdale,Lauderdale County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,96,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1077,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Lauderdale,Lauderdale County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1077,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Lauderdale,Lauderdale County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1077,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Lauderdale,Lauderdale County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1077,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Lauderdale,Lauderdale County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,32.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1077,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Lauderdale,Lauderdale County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,63.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1077,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Lauderdale,Lauderdale County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,29400,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1077,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Lauderdale,Lauderdale County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,57635,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1077,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1079,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1079,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1079,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1079,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1079,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,33063,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1079,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,20531,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1079,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1212,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1079,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1079,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,19319,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1079,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,5.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1079,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1079,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,94.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1079,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1079,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,5.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1079,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,1079,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1212,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1079,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,1079,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1081,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1081,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1081,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1081,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1081,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,174601,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1081,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,126886,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1081,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,118602,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1081,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1081,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8284,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1081,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,93.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1081,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1081,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,6.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1081,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1081,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,12.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1081,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,81.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1081,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,15392,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1081,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,103209,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1081,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Limestone,Limestone County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1083,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Limestone,Limestone County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1083,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Limestone,Limestone County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1083,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Limestone,Limestone County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1083,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Limestone,Limestone County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1083,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Limestone,Limestone County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,104322,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1083,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Limestone,Limestone County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,72075,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1083,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Limestone,Limestone County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,69169,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1083,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Limestone,Limestone County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1083,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Limestone,Limestone County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2906,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1083,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Limestone,Limestone County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,96,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1083,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Limestone,Limestone County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1083,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Limestone,Limestone County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1083,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Limestone,Limestone County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1083,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Limestone,Limestone County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,67.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1083,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Limestone,Limestone County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,28.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1083,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Limestone,Limestone County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,48762,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1083,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Limestone,Limestone County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,20406,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1083,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Lowndes,Lowndes County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1085,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Lowndes,Lowndes County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1085,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Lowndes,Lowndes County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1085,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Lowndes,Lowndes County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1085,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Lowndes,Lowndes County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1085,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Lowndes,Lowndes County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,10297,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1085,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Lowndes,Lowndes County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9606,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1085,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Lowndes,Lowndes County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1690,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1085,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Lowndes,Lowndes County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1085,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Lowndes,Lowndes County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7916,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1085,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Lowndes,Lowndes County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,17.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1085,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Lowndes,Lowndes County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1085,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Lowndes,Lowndes County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,82.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1085,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Lowndes,Lowndes County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1085,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Lowndes,Lowndes County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,1085,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Lowndes,Lowndes County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,17.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1085,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Lowndes,Lowndes County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,1085,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Lowndes,Lowndes County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1690,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1085,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1087,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1087,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1087,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1087,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1087,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,19476,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1087,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,18345,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1087,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,18345,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1087,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1087,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1087,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1087,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1087,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1087,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1087,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,49.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1087,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,50.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1087,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,9074,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1087,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,9272,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1087,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1089,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1089,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1089,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1089,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1089,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,389696,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1089,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,386287,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1089,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,379246,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1089,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1089,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7041,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1089,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1089,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1089,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1089,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1089,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,9.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1089,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,88.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1089,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,36944,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1089,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,342302,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1089,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Marengo,Marengo County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1091,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Marengo,Marengo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1091,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Marengo,Marengo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1091,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Marengo,Marengo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1091,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Marengo,Marengo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1091,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Marengo,Marengo County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,19264,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1091,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Marengo,Marengo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,24473,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1091,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Marengo,Marengo County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,17004,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1091,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Marengo,Marengo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,8516,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1091,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Marengo,Marengo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7468,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1091,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Marengo,Marengo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,69.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1091,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Marengo,Marengo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,34.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1091,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Marengo,Marengo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,30.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1091,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Marengo,Marengo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1091,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Marengo,Marengo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,14.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1091,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Marengo,Marengo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,19.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1091,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Marengo,Marengo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,3613,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1091,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Marengo,Marengo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,4876,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1091,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1093,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1093,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1093,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1093,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1093,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,29287,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1093,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,25853,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1093,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,24664,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1093,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1093,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1190,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1093,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,95.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1093,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1093,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,4.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1093,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1093,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,28.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1093,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,67.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1093,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,7262,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1093,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,17402,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1093,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1095,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1095,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1095,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1095,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1095,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,97608,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1095,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,98131,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1095,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,74210,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1095,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1095,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,23921,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1095,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,75.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1095,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1095,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,24.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1095,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1095,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,14.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1095,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,60.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1095,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,14570,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1095,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,59640,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1095,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Mobile,Mobile County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1097,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Mobile,Mobile County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1097,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Mobile,Mobile County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1097,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Mobile,Mobile County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1097,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Mobile,Mobile County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1097,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Mobile,Mobile County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,414250,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1097,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Mobile,Mobile County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,344233,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1097,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Mobile,Mobile County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,249261,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1097,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Mobile,Mobile County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1097,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Mobile,Mobile County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,94972,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1097,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Mobile,Mobile County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,72.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1097,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Mobile,Mobile County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1097,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Mobile,Mobile County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,27.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1097,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Mobile,Mobile County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1097,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Mobile,Mobile County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1097,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Mobile,Mobile County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,65.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1097,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Mobile,Mobile County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,24013,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1097,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Mobile,Mobile County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,225249,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1097,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1099,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1099,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1099,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1099,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1099,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,19723,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1099,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,20733,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1099,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9216,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1099,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1099,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11517,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1099,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,44.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1099,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1099,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,55.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1099,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1099,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,9.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1099,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,35.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1099,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1890,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1099,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,7326,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1099,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1101,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1101,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1101,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1101,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1101,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,228448,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1101,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,182164,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1101,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,177837,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1101,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,2255,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1101,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4327,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1101,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,97.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1101,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1101,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1101,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1101,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,2.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1101,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,94.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1101,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,4120,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1101,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,171463,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1101,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1103,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1103,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1103,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1103,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1103,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,123336,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1103,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,115994,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1103,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,90710,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1103,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1103,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,25284,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1103,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,78.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1103,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1103,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,21.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1103,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1103,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,28.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1103,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,49.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1103,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,33569,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1103,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,57141,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1103,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1105,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1105,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1105,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1105,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1105,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,8452,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1105,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,8102,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1105,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3104,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1105,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1105,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4998,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1105,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,38.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1105,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1105,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,61.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1105,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1105,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,1105,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,38.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1105,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,1105,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3104,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1105,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Pickens,Pickens County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1107,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Pickens,Pickens County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1107,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Pickens,Pickens County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1107,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Pickens,Pickens County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1107,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Pickens,Pickens County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1107,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Pickens,Pickens County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,19062,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1107,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Pickens,Pickens County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,20328,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1107,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Pickens,Pickens County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6881,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1107,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Pickens,Pickens County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1107,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Pickens,Pickens County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,13447,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1107,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Pickens,Pickens County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,33.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1107,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Pickens,Pickens County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1107,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Pickens,Pickens County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,66.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1107,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Pickens,Pickens County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1107,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Pickens,Pickens County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,1107,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Pickens,Pickens County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,33.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1107,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Pickens,Pickens County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,1107,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Pickens,Pickens County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,6881,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1107,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1109,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1109,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1109,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1109,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1109,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,32981,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1109,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,29151,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1109,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,16204,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1109,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1109,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,12947,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1109,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,55.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1109,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1109,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,44.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1109,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1109,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,1109,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,55.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1109,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,1109,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,16204,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1109,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1111,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1111,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1111,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1111,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1111,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,21971,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1111,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,19937,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1111,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,19937,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1111,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1111,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1111,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1111,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1111,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1111,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1111,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,43.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1111,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,56.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1111,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,8707,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1111,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,11230,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1111,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Russell,Russell County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1113,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Russell,Russell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1113,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Russell,Russell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1113,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Russell,Russell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1113,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Russell,Russell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1113,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Russell,Russell County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,59226,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1113,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Russell,Russell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,54435,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1113,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Russell,Russell County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,53559,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1113,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Russell,Russell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1113,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Russell,Russell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,876,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1113,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Russell,Russell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1113,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Russell,Russell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1113,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Russell,Russell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1113,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Russell,Russell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1113,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Russell,Russell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,18,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1113,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Russell,Russell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,80.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1113,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Russell,Russell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,9783,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1113,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Russell,Russell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,43776,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1113,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1117,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1117,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1117,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1117,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1117,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,223708,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1117,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,161677,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1117,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,72977,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1117,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1117,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,88700,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1117,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,45.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1117,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1117,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,54.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1117,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1117,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,1.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1117,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,43.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1117,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2232,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1117,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,70745,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1117,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,St. Clair,St. Clair County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1115,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,St. Clair,St. Clair County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1115,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,St. Clair,St. Clair County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1115,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,St. Clair,St. Clair County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1115,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,St. Clair,St. Clair County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1115,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,St. Clair,St. Clair County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,91333,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1115,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AL,St. Clair,St. Clair County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,63158,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1115,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,St. Clair,St. Clair County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,12611,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1115,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,St. Clair,St. Clair County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1115,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,St. Clair,St. Clair County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,50547,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1115,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,St. Clair,St. Clair County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,20,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1115,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,St. Clair,St. Clair County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1115,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,St. Clair,St. Clair County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,80,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1115,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,St. Clair,St. Clair County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1115,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,St. Clair,St. Clair County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,1.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1115,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,St. Clair,St. Clair County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,18.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1115,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,St. Clair,St. Clair County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1196,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1115,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,St. Clair,St. Clair County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,11415,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1115,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Sumter,Sumter County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1119,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Sumter,Sumter County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1119,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Sumter,Sumter County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1119,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Sumter,Sumter County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1119,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Sumter,Sumter County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1119,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Sumter,Sumter County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,12295,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1119,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Sumter,Sumter County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,14592,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1119,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Sumter,Sumter County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3468,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1119,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Sumter,Sumter County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1119,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Sumter,Sumter County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11124,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1119,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Sumter,Sumter County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,23.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1119,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Sumter,Sumter County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1119,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Sumter,Sumter County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,76.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1119,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Sumter,Sumter County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1119,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Sumter,Sumter County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,1119,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Sumter,Sumter County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,23.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1119,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Sumter,Sumter County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,1119,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Sumter,Sumter County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3468,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1119,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Talladega,Talladega County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1121,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Talladega,Talladega County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1121,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Talladega,Talladega County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1121,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Talladega,Talladega County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1121,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Talladega,Talladega County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1121,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Talladega,Talladega County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,82069,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1121,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Talladega,Talladega County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,62547,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1121,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Talladega,Talladega County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,43432,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1121,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Talladega,Talladega County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1121,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Talladega,Talladega County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,19114,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1121,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Talladega,Talladega County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,69.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1121,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Talladega,Talladega County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1121,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Talladega,Talladega County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,30.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1121,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Talladega,Talladega County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1121,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Talladega,Talladega County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,6.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1121,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Talladega,Talladega County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,62.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1121,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Talladega,Talladega County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,4148,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1121,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Talladega,Talladega County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,39284,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1121,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Tallapoosa,Tallapoosa County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1123,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Tallapoosa,Tallapoosa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1123,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Tallapoosa,Tallapoosa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1123,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Tallapoosa,Tallapoosa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1123,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Tallapoosa,Tallapoosa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1123,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Tallapoosa,Tallapoosa County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,41229,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1123,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Tallapoosa,Tallapoosa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,45328,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1123,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Tallapoosa,Tallapoosa County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,45328,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1123,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Tallapoosa,Tallapoosa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1123,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Tallapoosa,Tallapoosa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1123,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Tallapoosa,Tallapoosa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1123,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Tallapoosa,Tallapoosa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1123,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Tallapoosa,Tallapoosa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1123,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Tallapoosa,Tallapoosa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1123,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Tallapoosa,Tallapoosa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,51.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1123,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Tallapoosa,Tallapoosa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,48.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1123,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Tallapoosa,Tallapoosa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,23417,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1123,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Tallapoosa,Tallapoosa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,21911,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1123,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Tuscaloosa,Tuscaloosa County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1125,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Tuscaloosa,Tuscaloosa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1125,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Tuscaloosa,Tuscaloosa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1125,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Tuscaloosa,Tuscaloosa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1125,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Tuscaloosa,Tuscaloosa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1125,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Tuscaloosa,Tuscaloosa County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,227153,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1125,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Tuscaloosa,Tuscaloosa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,203653,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1125,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Tuscaloosa,Tuscaloosa County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,197358,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1125,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Tuscaloosa,Tuscaloosa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1125,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Tuscaloosa,Tuscaloosa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6294,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1125,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Tuscaloosa,Tuscaloosa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,96.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1125,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Tuscaloosa,Tuscaloosa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1125,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Tuscaloosa,Tuscaloosa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,3.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1125,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Tuscaloosa,Tuscaloosa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1125,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Tuscaloosa,Tuscaloosa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,19.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1125,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Tuscaloosa,Tuscaloosa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,77.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1125,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Tuscaloosa,Tuscaloosa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,39263,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1125,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Tuscaloosa,Tuscaloosa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,158096,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1125,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Walker,Walker County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1127,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Walker,Walker County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1127,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Walker,Walker County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1127,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Walker,Walker County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1127,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Walker,Walker County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1127,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Walker,Walker County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,65100,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1127,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Walker,Walker County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,63898,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1127,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Walker,Walker County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,63898,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1127,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Walker,Walker County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1127,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Walker,Walker County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1127,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Walker,Walker County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1127,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Walker,Walker County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1127,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Walker,Walker County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1127,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Walker,Walker County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1127,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Walker,Walker County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,66.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1127,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Walker,Walker County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,33.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1127,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Walker,Walker County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,42673,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1127,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Walker,Walker County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,21224,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1127,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1129,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1129,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1129,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1129,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1129,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,15296,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1129,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,12722,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1129,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1129,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1129,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,12722,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1129,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1129,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1129,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1129,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1129,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,1129,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,1129,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,1129,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,1129,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Wilcox,Wilcox County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1131,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Wilcox,Wilcox County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1131,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Wilcox,Wilcox County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1131,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Wilcox,Wilcox County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1131,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Wilcox,Wilcox County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1131,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Wilcox,Wilcox County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,10518,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1131,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Wilcox,Wilcox County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,18399,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1131,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Wilcox,Wilcox County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,17176,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1131,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Wilcox,Wilcox County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,3380,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1131,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Wilcox,Wilcox County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1223,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1131,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Wilcox,Wilcox County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,93.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1131,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Wilcox,Wilcox County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,18.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1131,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Wilcox,Wilcox County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,6.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1131,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Wilcox,Wilcox County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1131,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Wilcox,Wilcox County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,31.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1131,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Wilcox,Wilcox County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,43.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1131,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Wilcox,Wilcox County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,5830,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1131,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Wilcox,Wilcox County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,7967,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1131,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Winston,Winston County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1133,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Winston,Winston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1133,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Winston,Winston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1133,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Winston,Winston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1133,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Winston,Winston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1133,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Winston,Winston County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,23491,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1133,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Winston,Winston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,22970,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1133,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Winston,Winston County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,16320,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1133,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Winston,Winston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1133,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Winston,Winston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6650,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1133,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Winston,Winston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,71,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1133,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Winston,Winston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1133,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Winston,Winston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,29,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1133,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Winston,Winston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1133,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Winston,Winston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,71,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1133,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Winston,Winston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,1133,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Winston,Winston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,16320,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1133,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AL,Winston,Winston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,1133,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,AR,Arkansas,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,676,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,AR,AR,Arkansas,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,357,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,AR,AR,Arkansas,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,114,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,AR,AR,Arkansas,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,228,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,AR,AR,Arkansas,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,AR,AR,Arkansas,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,3012232,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2020,AR,AR,Arkansas,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2866138,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,AR,AR,Arkansas,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2458935,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,AR,AR,Arkansas,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,10099,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,AR,AR,Arkansas,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,407203,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,AR,AR,Arkansas,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,85.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,AR,AR,Arkansas,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,AR,AR,Arkansas,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,14.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,AR,AR,Arkansas,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,319,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,AR,AR,Arkansas,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,33.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,AR,AR,Arkansas,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,52,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,AR,AR,Arkansas,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,958487,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,AR,AR,Arkansas,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1490349,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,AR,Arkansas,Arkansas County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5001,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Arkansas,Arkansas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5001,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Arkansas,Arkansas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5001,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Arkansas,Arkansas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5001,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Arkansas,Arkansas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5001,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Arkansas,Arkansas County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,17105,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5001,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Arkansas,Arkansas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,27471,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5001,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Arkansas,Arkansas County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,25506,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5001,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Arkansas,Arkansas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5001,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Arkansas,Arkansas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1966,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5001,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Arkansas,Arkansas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,92.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5001,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Arkansas,Arkansas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5001,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Arkansas,Arkansas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,7.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5001,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Arkansas,Arkansas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5001,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Arkansas,Arkansas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,3.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5001,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Arkansas,Arkansas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,89.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5001,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Arkansas,Arkansas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,937,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5001,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Arkansas,Arkansas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,24569,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5001,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Ashley,Ashley County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5003,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Ashley,Ashley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5003,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Ashley,Ashley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5003,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Ashley,Ashley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5003,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Ashley,Ashley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5003,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Ashley,Ashley County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,18960,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5003,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Ashley,Ashley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,19215,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5003,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Ashley,Ashley County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,14965,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5003,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Ashley,Ashley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1333,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5003,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Ashley,Ashley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4250,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5003,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Ashley,Ashley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,77.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5003,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Ashley,Ashley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,6.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5003,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Ashley,Ashley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,22.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5003,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Ashley,Ashley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5003,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Ashley,Ashley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,3.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5003,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Ashley,Ashley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,67.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5003,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Ashley,Ashley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,668,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5003,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Ashley,Ashley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,12964,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5003,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Baxter,Baxter County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5005,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Baxter,Baxter County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5005,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Baxter,Baxter County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5005,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Baxter,Baxter County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5005,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Baxter,Baxter County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5005,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Baxter,Baxter County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,41655,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5005,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Baxter,Baxter County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,29187,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5005,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Baxter,Baxter County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,23193,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5005,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Baxter,Baxter County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5005,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Baxter,Baxter County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5995,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5005,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Baxter,Baxter County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,79.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5005,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Baxter,Baxter County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5005,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Baxter,Baxter County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,20.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5005,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Baxter,Baxter County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5005,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Baxter,Baxter County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,24.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5005,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Baxter,Baxter County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,54.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5005,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Baxter,Baxter County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,7220,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5005,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Baxter,Baxter County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,15973,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5005,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,24,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5007,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,22,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5007,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5007,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5007,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5007,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,286353,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5007,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,209302,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5007,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,207240,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5007,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,194,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5007,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2061,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5007,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5007,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5007,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5007,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5007,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,90.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5007,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,8.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5007,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,189266,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5007,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,17781,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5007,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5009,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5009,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5009,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5009,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5009,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,37352,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5009,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,33256,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5009,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,21988,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5009,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5009,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11268,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5009,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,66.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5009,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5009,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,33.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5009,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5009,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,66.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5009,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,5009,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,21988,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5009,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,5009,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Bradley,Bradley County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5011,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Bradley,Bradley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5011,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Bradley,Bradley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5011,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Bradley,Bradley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5011,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Bradley,Bradley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5011,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Bradley,Bradley County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,10498,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5011,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Bradley,Bradley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,11853,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5011,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Bradley,Bradley County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8214,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5011,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Bradley,Bradley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5011,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Bradley,Bradley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3639,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5011,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Bradley,Bradley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,69.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5011,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Bradley,Bradley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5011,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Bradley,Bradley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,30.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5011,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Bradley,Bradley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5011,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Bradley,Bradley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,16.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5011,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Bradley,Bradley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,52.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5011,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Bradley,Bradley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1971,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5011,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Bradley,Bradley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,6243,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5011,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5013,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5013,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5013,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5013,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5013,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,4725,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5013,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5167,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5013,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5013,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5013,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5167,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5013,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5013,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5013,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5013,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5013,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,5013,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,5013,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,5013,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,5013,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5015,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5015,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5015,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5015,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5015,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,28202,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5015,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,20818,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5015,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,15613,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5015,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5015,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5206,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5015,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,75,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5015,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5015,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,25,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5015,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5015,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,74.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5015,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,0.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5015,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,15583,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5015,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,29,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5015,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Chicot,Chicot County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5017,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Chicot,Chicot County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5017,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Chicot,Chicot County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5017,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Chicot,Chicot County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5017,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Chicot,Chicot County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5017,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Chicot,Chicot County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,10143,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5017,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Chicot,Chicot County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,12296,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5017,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Chicot,Chicot County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9470,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5017,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Chicot,Chicot County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5017,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Chicot,Chicot County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2825,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5017,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Chicot,Chicot County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,77,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5017,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Chicot,Chicot County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5017,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Chicot,Chicot County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,23,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5017,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Chicot,Chicot County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5017,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Chicot,Chicot County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,30.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5017,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Chicot,Chicot County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,46.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5017,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Chicot,Chicot County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,3705,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5017,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Chicot,Chicot County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,5765,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5017,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5019,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5019,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5019,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5019,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5019,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,21362,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5019,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,20031,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5019,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,14258,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5019,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5019,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5773,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5019,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,71.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5019,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5019,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,28.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5019,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5019,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,15.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5019,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,56.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5019,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,3017,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5019,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,11241,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5019,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5021,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5021,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5021,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5021,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5021,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,14508,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5021,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,19237,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5021,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,14625,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5021,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,256,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5021,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4612,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5021,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,76,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5021,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5021,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,24,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5021,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5021,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,14.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5021,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,60.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5021,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2726,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5021,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,11643,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5021,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Cleburne,Cleburne County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5023,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Cleburne,Cleburne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5023,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Cleburne,Cleburne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5023,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Cleburne,Cleburne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5023,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Cleburne,Cleburne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5023,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Cleburne,Cleburne County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,24665,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5023,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Cleburne,Cleburne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,45443,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5023,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Cleburne,Cleburne County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,45443,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5023,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Cleburne,Cleburne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,756,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5023,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Cleburne,Cleburne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5023,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Cleburne,Cleburne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5023,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Cleburne,Cleburne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5023,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Cleburne,Cleburne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5023,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Cleburne,Cleburne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5023,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Cleburne,Cleburne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,31.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5023,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Cleburne,Cleburne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,66.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5023,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Cleburne,Cleburne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,14491,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5023,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Cleburne,Cleburne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,30196,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5023,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Cleveland,Cleveland County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5025,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Cleveland,Cleveland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5025,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Cleveland,Cleveland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5025,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Cleveland,Cleveland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5025,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Cleveland,Cleveland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5025,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Cleveland,Cleveland County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,7544,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5025,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Cleveland,Cleveland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,12624,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5025,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Cleveland,Cleveland County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7026,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5025,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Cleveland,Cleveland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5025,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Cleveland,Cleveland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5598,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5025,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Cleveland,Cleveland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,55.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5025,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Cleveland,Cleveland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5025,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Cleveland,Cleveland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,44.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5025,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Cleveland,Cleveland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5025,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Cleveland,Cleveland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,5025,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Cleveland,Cleveland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,55.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5025,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Cleveland,Cleveland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,5025,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Cleveland,Cleveland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,7026,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5025,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Columbia,Columbia County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5027,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Columbia,Columbia County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5027,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Columbia,Columbia County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5027,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Columbia,Columbia County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5027,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Columbia,Columbia County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5027,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Columbia,Columbia County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,22741,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5027,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Columbia,Columbia County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,22847,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5027,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Columbia,Columbia County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,15283,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5027,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Columbia,Columbia County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5027,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Columbia,Columbia County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7564,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5027,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Columbia,Columbia County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,66.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5027,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Columbia,Columbia County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5027,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Columbia,Columbia County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,33.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5027,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Columbia,Columbia County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5027,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Columbia,Columbia County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,14.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5027,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Columbia,Columbia County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,52.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5027,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Columbia,Columbia County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,3387,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5027,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Columbia,Columbia County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,11897,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5027,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Conway,Conway County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5029,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Conway,Conway County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5029,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Conway,Conway County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5029,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Conway,Conway County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5029,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Conway,Conway County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5029,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Conway,Conway County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,20729,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5029,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Conway,Conway County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,21039,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5029,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Conway,Conway County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,21039,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5029,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Conway,Conway County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5029,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Conway,Conway County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5029,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Conway,Conway County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5029,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Conway,Conway County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5029,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Conway,Conway County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5029,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Conway,Conway County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5029,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Conway,Conway County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,12,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5029,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Conway,Conway County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,88,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5029,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Conway,Conway County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2514,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5029,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Conway,Conway County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,18525,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5029,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Craighead,Craighead County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5031,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Craighead,Craighead County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5031,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Craighead,Craighead County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5031,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Craighead,Craighead County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5031,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Craighead,Craighead County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5031,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Craighead,Craighead County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,111576,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5031,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Craighead,Craighead County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,96491,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5031,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Craighead,Craighead County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,87734,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5031,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Craighead,Craighead County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,3665,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5031,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Craighead,Craighead County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8756,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5031,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Craighead,Craighead County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,90.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5031,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Craighead,Craighead County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,3.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5031,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Craighead,Craighead County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,9.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5031,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Craighead,Craighead County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5031,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Craighead,Craighead County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,2.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5031,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Craighead,Craighead County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,84.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5031,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Craighead,Craighead County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2363,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5031,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Craighead,Craighead County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,81706,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5031,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5033,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5033,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5033,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5033,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5033,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,60107,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5033,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,55210,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5033,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,53599,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5033,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5033,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1612,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5033,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,97.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5033,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5033,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5033,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5033,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,86.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5033,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,10.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5033,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,47753,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5033,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,5846,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5033,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Crittenden,Crittenden County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5035,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Crittenden,Crittenden County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5035,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Crittenden,Crittenden County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5035,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Crittenden,Crittenden County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5035,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Crittenden,Crittenden County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5035,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Crittenden,Crittenden County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,48067,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5035,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Crittenden,Crittenden County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,41639,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5035,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Crittenden,Crittenden County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,34718,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5035,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Crittenden,Crittenden County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5035,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Crittenden,Crittenden County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6922,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5035,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Crittenden,Crittenden County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,83.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5035,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Crittenden,Crittenden County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5035,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Crittenden,Crittenden County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,16.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5035,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Crittenden,Crittenden County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5035,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Crittenden,Crittenden County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,5.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5035,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Crittenden,Crittenden County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,77.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5035,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Crittenden,Crittenden County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2297,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5035,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Crittenden,Crittenden County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,32420,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5035,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Cross,Cross County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5037,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Cross,Cross County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5037,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Cross,Cross County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5037,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Cross,Cross County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5037,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Cross,Cross County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5037,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Cross,Cross County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,16762,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5037,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Cross,Cross County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,17458,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5037,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Cross,Cross County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,12848,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5037,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Cross,Cross County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5037,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Cross,Cross County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4610,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5037,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Cross,Cross County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,73.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5037,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Cross,Cross County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5037,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Cross,Cross County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,26.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5037,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Cross,Cross County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5037,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Cross,Cross County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,5037,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Cross,Cross County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,73.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5037,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Cross,Cross County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,5037,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Cross,Cross County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,12848,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5037,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Dallas,Dallas County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5039,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Dallas,Dallas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5039,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Dallas,Dallas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5039,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Dallas,Dallas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5039,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Dallas,Dallas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5039,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Dallas,Dallas County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,6445,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5039,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Dallas,Dallas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9610,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5039,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Dallas,Dallas County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8205,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5039,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Dallas,Dallas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1152,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5039,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Dallas,Dallas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1405,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5039,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Dallas,Dallas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,85.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5039,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Dallas,Dallas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,12,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5039,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Dallas,Dallas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,14.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5039,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Dallas,Dallas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5039,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Dallas,Dallas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,27.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5039,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Dallas,Dallas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,45.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5039,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Dallas,Dallas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2652,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5039,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Dallas,Dallas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,4401,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5039,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Desha,Desha County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5041,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Desha,Desha County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5041,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Desha,Desha County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5041,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Desha,Desha County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5041,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Desha,Desha County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5041,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Desha,Desha County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,11330,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5041,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Desha,Desha County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,11200,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5041,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Desha,Desha County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9472,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5041,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Desha,Desha County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5041,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Desha,Desha County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1728,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5041,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Desha,Desha County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,84.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5041,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Desha,Desha County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5041,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Desha,Desha County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,15.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5041,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Desha,Desha County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5041,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Desha,Desha County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,10.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5041,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Desha,Desha County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,74.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5041,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Desha,Desha County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1152,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5041,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Desha,Desha County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,8320,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5041,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Drew,Drew County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5043,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Drew,Drew County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5043,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Drew,Drew County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5043,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Drew,Drew County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5043,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Drew,Drew County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5043,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Drew,Drew County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,17309,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5043,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Drew,Drew County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,15491,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5043,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Drew,Drew County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,13770,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5043,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Drew,Drew County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5043,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Drew,Drew County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1721,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5043,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Drew,Drew County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,88.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5043,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Drew,Drew County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5043,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Drew,Drew County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,11.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5043,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Drew,Drew County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5043,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Drew,Drew County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,29.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5043,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Drew,Drew County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,59.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5043,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Drew,Drew County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,4512,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5043,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Drew,Drew County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,9258,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5043,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Faulkner,Faulkner County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5045,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Faulkner,Faulkner County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5045,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Faulkner,Faulkner County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5045,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Faulkner,Faulkner County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5045,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Faulkner,Faulkner County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5045,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Faulkner,Faulkner County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,123666,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5045,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Faulkner,Faulkner County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,110938,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5045,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Faulkner,Faulkner County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,110938,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5045,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Faulkner,Faulkner County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5045,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Faulkner,Faulkner County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5045,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Faulkner,Faulkner County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5045,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Faulkner,Faulkner County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5045,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Faulkner,Faulkner County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5045,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Faulkner,Faulkner County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5045,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Faulkner,Faulkner County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,42.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5045,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Faulkner,Faulkner County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,57.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5045,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Faulkner,Faulkner County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,47411,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5045,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Faulkner,Faulkner County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,63527,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5045,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5047,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5047,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5047,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5047,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5047,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,17122,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5047,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,18384,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5047,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,15191,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5047,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5047,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3193,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5047,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,82.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5047,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5047,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,17.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5047,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5047,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,59.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5047,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,23,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5047,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,10962,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5047,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,4230,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5047,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Fulton,Fulton County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5049,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Fulton,Fulton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5049,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Fulton,Fulton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5049,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Fulton,Fulton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5049,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Fulton,Fulton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5049,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Fulton,Fulton County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,12033,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5049,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Fulton,Fulton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5067,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5049,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Fulton,Fulton County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5049,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Fulton,Fulton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5049,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Fulton,Fulton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5067,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5049,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Fulton,Fulton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5049,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Fulton,Fulton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5049,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Fulton,Fulton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5049,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Fulton,Fulton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5049,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Fulton,Fulton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,5049,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Fulton,Fulton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,5049,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Fulton,Fulton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,5049,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Fulton,Fulton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,5049,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Garland,Garland County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5051,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Garland,Garland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5051,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Garland,Garland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5051,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Garland,Garland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5051,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Garland,Garland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5051,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Garland,Garland County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,100162,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5051,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Garland,Garland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,112962,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5051,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Garland,Garland County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,110292,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5051,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Garland,Garland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5051,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Garland,Garland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2670,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5051,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Garland,Garland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,97.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5051,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Garland,Garland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5051,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Garland,Garland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5051,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Garland,Garland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5051,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Garland,Garland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,5051,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Garland,Garland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,97.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5051,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Garland,Garland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,5051,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Garland,Garland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,110292,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5051,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5053,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5053,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5053,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5053,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5053,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,17975,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5053,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,16000,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5053,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10092,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5053,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,738,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5053,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5908,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5053,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,63.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5053,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,4.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5053,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,36.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5053,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5053,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,15.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5053,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,42.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5053,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2486,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5053,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,6868,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5053,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5055,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5055,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5055,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5055,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5055,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,45818,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5055,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,37638,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5055,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,34085,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5055,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5055,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3553,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5055,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,90.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5055,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5055,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,9.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5055,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5055,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5055,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,90.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5055,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,113,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5055,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,33971,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5055,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Hempstead,Hempstead County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5057,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Hempstead,Hempstead County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5057,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Hempstead,Hempstead County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5057,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Hempstead,Hempstead County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5057,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Hempstead,Hempstead County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5057,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Hempstead,Hempstead County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,19993,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5057,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Hempstead,Hempstead County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,13967,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5057,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Hempstead,Hempstead County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,12581,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5057,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Hempstead,Hempstead County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,52,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5057,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Hempstead,Hempstead County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1386,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5057,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Hempstead,Hempstead County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,90.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5057,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Hempstead,Hempstead County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5057,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Hempstead,Hempstead County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,9.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5057,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Hempstead,Hempstead County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5057,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Hempstead,Hempstead County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,9.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5057,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Hempstead,Hempstead County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,80.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5057,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Hempstead,Hempstead County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1283,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5057,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Hempstead,Hempstead County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,11246,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5057,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Hot Spring,Hot Spring County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5059,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Hot Spring,Hot Spring County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5059,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Hot Spring,Hot Spring County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5059,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Hot Spring,Hot Spring County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5059,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Hot Spring,Hot Spring County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5059,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Hot Spring,Hot Spring County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,33034,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5059,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Hot Spring,Hot Spring County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,30393,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5059,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Hot Spring,Hot Spring County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,30393,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5059,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Hot Spring,Hot Spring County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5059,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Hot Spring,Hot Spring County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5059,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Hot Spring,Hot Spring County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5059,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Hot Spring,Hot Spring County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5059,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Hot Spring,Hot Spring County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5059,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Hot Spring,Hot Spring County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5059,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Hot Spring,Hot Spring County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,28.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5059,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Hot Spring,Hot Spring County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,71.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5059,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Hot Spring,Hot Spring County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,8536,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5059,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Hot Spring,Hot Spring County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,21857,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5059,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5061,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5061,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5061,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5061,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5061,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,12755,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5061,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,14673,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5061,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,14335,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5061,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1252,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5061,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,338,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5061,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,97.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5061,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,8.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5061,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5061,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5061,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,48.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5061,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,40.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5061,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,7130,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5061,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,5953,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5061,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Independence,Independence County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5063,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Independence,Independence County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5063,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Independence,Independence County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5063,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Independence,Independence County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5063,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Independence,Independence County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5063,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Independence,Independence County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,37892,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5063,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Independence,Independence County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,34522,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5063,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Independence,Independence County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,24188,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5063,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Independence,Independence County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5063,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Independence,Independence County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10334,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5063,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Independence,Independence County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,70.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5063,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Independence,Independence County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5063,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Independence,Independence County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,29.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5063,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Independence,Independence County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5063,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Independence,Independence County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,16.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5063,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Independence,Independence County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,53.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5063,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Independence,Independence County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,5583,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5063,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Independence,Independence County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,18605,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5063,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Izard,Izard County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5065,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Izard,Izard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5065,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Izard,Izard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5065,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Izard,Izard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5065,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Izard,Izard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5065,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Izard,Izard County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,13576,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5065,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Izard,Izard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,12093,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5065,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Izard,Izard County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1944,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5065,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Izard,Izard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5065,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Izard,Izard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10149,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5065,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Izard,Izard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,16.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5065,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Izard,Izard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5065,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Izard,Izard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,83.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5065,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Izard,Izard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5065,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Izard,Izard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,2.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5065,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Izard,Izard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,14,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5065,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Izard,Izard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,256,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5065,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Izard,Izard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1688,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5065,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5067,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5067,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5067,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5067,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5067,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,16737,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5067,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,15403,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5067,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10326,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5067,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5067,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5077,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5067,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,67,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5067,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5067,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,33,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5067,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5067,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,12.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5067,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,54.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5067,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1921,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5067,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,8405,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5067,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5069,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5069,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5069,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5069,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5069,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,66811,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5069,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,72213,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5069,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,58133,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5069,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5069,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,14079,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5069,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,80.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5069,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5069,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,19.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5069,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5069,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,6.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5069,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,74.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5069,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,4498,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5069,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,53635,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5069,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5071,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5071,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5071,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5071,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5071,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,25692,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5071,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,28525,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5071,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,28020,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5071,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5071,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,506,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5071,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5071,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5071,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5071,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5071,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,66.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5071,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,31.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5071,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,18937,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5071,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,9083,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5071,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5073,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5073,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5073,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5073,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5073,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,6294,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5073,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,6537,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5073,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,819,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5073,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,554,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5073,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5719,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5073,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,12.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5073,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,8.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5073,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,87.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5073,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5073,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5073,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,5073,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,264,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5073,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,5073,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5075,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5075,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5075,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5075,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5075,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,16196,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5075,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,19319,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5075,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,15286,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5075,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5075,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4033,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5075,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,79.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5075,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5075,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,20.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5075,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5075,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,41.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5075,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,37.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5075,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,7957,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5075,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,7329,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5075,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5077,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5077,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5077,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5077,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5077,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,8529,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5077,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,10207,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5077,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8593,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5077,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5077,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1614,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5077,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,84.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5077,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5077,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,15.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5077,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5077,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,47.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5077,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,36.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5077,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,4883,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5077,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3710,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5077,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5079,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5079,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5079,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5079,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5079,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,12879,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5079,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,16246,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5079,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9004,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5079,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5079,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7243,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5079,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,55.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5079,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5079,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,44.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5079,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5079,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,4.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5079,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,50.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5079,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,767,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5079,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,8237,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5079,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Little River,Little River County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5081,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Little River,Little River County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5081,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Little River,Little River County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5081,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Little River,Little River County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5081,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Little River,Little River County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5081,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Little River,Little River County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,11971,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5081,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Little River,Little River County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7419,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5081,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Little River,Little River County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1319,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5081,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Little River,Little River County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5081,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Little River,Little River County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6099,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5081,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Little River,Little River County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,17.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5081,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Little River,Little River County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5081,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Little River,Little River County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,82.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5081,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Little River,Little River County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5081,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Little River,Little River County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,17.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5081,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Little River,Little River County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,5081,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Little River,Little River County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1319,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5081,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Little River,Little River County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,5081,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5083,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5083,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5083,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5083,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5083,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,21097,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5083,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,19309,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5083,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,18322,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5083,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5083,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,988,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5083,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,94.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5083,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5083,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,5.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5083,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5083,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,49.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5083,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,45.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5083,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,9478,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5083,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,8843,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5083,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Lonoke,Lonoke County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5085,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Lonoke,Lonoke County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5085,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Lonoke,Lonoke County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5085,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Lonoke,Lonoke County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5085,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Lonoke,Lonoke County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5085,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Lonoke,Lonoke County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,74042,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5085,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Lonoke,Lonoke County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,63128,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5085,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Lonoke,Lonoke County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,62859,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5085,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Lonoke,Lonoke County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5085,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Lonoke,Lonoke County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,269,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5085,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Lonoke,Lonoke County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5085,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Lonoke,Lonoke County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5085,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Lonoke,Lonoke County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5085,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Lonoke,Lonoke County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5085,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Lonoke,Lonoke County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,26.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5085,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Lonoke,Lonoke County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,73.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5085,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Lonoke,Lonoke County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,16654,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5085,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Lonoke,Lonoke County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,46204,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5085,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5087,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5087,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5087,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5087,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5087,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,16551,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5087,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,11907,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5087,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5087,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5087,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11907,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5087,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5087,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5087,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5087,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5087,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,5087,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,5087,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,5087,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,5087,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5089,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5089,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5089,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5089,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5089,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,16862,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5089,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,12896,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5089,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,12623,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5089,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5089,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,273,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5089,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,97.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5089,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5089,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5089,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5089,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,97.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5089,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5089,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,12623,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5089,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5089,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Miller,Miller County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5091,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Miller,Miller County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5091,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Miller,Miller County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5091,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Miller,Miller County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5091,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Miller,Miller County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5091,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Miller,Miller County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,42570,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5091,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Miller,Miller County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,71339,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5091,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Miller,Miller County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4303,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5091,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Miller,Miller County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,147,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5091,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Miller,Miller County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,67036,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5091,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Miller,Miller County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5091,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Miller,Miller County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5091,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Miller,Miller County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,94,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5091,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Miller,Miller County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5091,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Miller,Miller County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,5091,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Miller,Miller County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,5.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5091,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Miller,Miller County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,5091,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Miller,Miller County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,4156,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5091,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Mississippi,Mississippi County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,22,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5093,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Mississippi,Mississippi County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5093,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Mississippi,Mississippi County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5093,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Mississippi,Mississippi County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5093,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Mississippi,Mississippi County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5093,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Mississippi,Mississippi County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,40503,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5093,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Mississippi,Mississippi County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,42485,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5093,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Mississippi,Mississippi County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,28337,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5093,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Mississippi,Mississippi County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5093,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Mississippi,Mississippi County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,14149,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5093,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Mississippi,Mississippi County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,66.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5093,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Mississippi,Mississippi County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5093,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Mississippi,Mississippi County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,33.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5093,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Mississippi,Mississippi County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5093,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Mississippi,Mississippi County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,3.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5093,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Mississippi,Mississippi County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,63.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5093,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Mississippi,Mississippi County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1509,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5093,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Mississippi,Mississippi County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,26828,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5093,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5095,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5095,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5095,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5095,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5095,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,6765,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5095,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,12062,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5095,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10421,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5095,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5095,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1641,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5095,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,86.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5095,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5095,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,13.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5095,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5095,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,9.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5095,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,76.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5095,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1196,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5095,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,9225,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5095,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5097,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5097,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5097,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5097,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5097,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,8459,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5097,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4353,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5097,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5097,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5097,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4353,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5097,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5097,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5097,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5097,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5097,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,5097,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,5097,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,5097,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,5097,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Nevada,Nevada County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5099,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Nevada,Nevada County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5099,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Nevada,Nevada County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5099,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Nevada,Nevada County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5099,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Nevada,Nevada County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5099,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Nevada,Nevada County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,8284,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5099,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Nevada,Nevada County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5078,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5099,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Nevada,Nevada County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,115,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5099,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Nevada,Nevada County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5099,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Nevada,Nevada County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4963,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5099,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Nevada,Nevada County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5099,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Nevada,Nevada County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5099,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Nevada,Nevada County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,97.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5099,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Nevada,Nevada County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5099,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Nevada,Nevada County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,2.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5099,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Nevada,Nevada County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,5099,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Nevada,Nevada County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,115,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5099,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Nevada,Nevada County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,5099,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5101,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5101,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5101,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5101,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5101,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,7198,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5101,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,8552,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5101,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,793,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5101,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5101,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7759,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5101,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,9.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5101,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5101,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,90.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5101,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5101,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,9.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5101,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,5101,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,793,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5101,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,5101,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Ouachita,Ouachita County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5103,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Ouachita,Ouachita County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5103,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Ouachita,Ouachita County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5103,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Ouachita,Ouachita County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5103,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Ouachita,Ouachita County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5103,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Ouachita,Ouachita County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,22592,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5103,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Ouachita,Ouachita County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,24167,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5103,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Ouachita,Ouachita County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,17889,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5103,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Ouachita,Ouachita County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5103,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Ouachita,Ouachita County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6277,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5103,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Ouachita,Ouachita County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,74,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5103,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Ouachita,Ouachita County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5103,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Ouachita,Ouachita County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,26,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5103,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Ouachita,Ouachita County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5103,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Ouachita,Ouachita County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,20.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5103,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Ouachita,Ouachita County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,53.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5103,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Ouachita,Ouachita County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,4907,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5103,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Ouachita,Ouachita County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,12982,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5103,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5105,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5105,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5105,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5105,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5105,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,9997,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5105,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,8462,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5105,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7289,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5105,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5105,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1174,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5105,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,86.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5105,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5105,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,13.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5105,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5105,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,45.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5105,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,40.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5105,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,3846,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5105,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3442,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5105,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Phillips,Phillips County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5107,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Phillips,Phillips County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5107,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Phillips,Phillips County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5107,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Phillips,Phillips County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5107,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Phillips,Phillips County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5107,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Phillips,Phillips County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,16445,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5107,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Phillips,Phillips County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,20059,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5107,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Phillips,Phillips County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11451,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5107,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Phillips,Phillips County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5107,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Phillips,Phillips County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8609,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5107,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Phillips,Phillips County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,57.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5107,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Phillips,Phillips County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5107,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Phillips,Phillips County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,42.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5107,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Phillips,Phillips County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5107,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Phillips,Phillips County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,2.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5107,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Phillips,Phillips County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,54.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5107,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Phillips,Phillips County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,505,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5107,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Phillips,Phillips County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,10946,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5107,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5109,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5109,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5109,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5109,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5109,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,10165,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5109,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,8255,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5109,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5109,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5109,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8255,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5109,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5109,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5109,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5109,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5109,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,5109,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,5109,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,5109,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,5109,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Poinsett,Poinsett County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5111,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Poinsett,Poinsett County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5111,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Poinsett,Poinsett County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5111,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Poinsett,Poinsett County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5111,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Poinsett,Poinsett County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5111,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Poinsett,Poinsett County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,22893,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5111,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Poinsett,Poinsett County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,28472,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5111,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Poinsett,Poinsett County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,14721,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5111,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Poinsett,Poinsett County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5111,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Poinsett,Poinsett County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,13751,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5111,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Poinsett,Poinsett County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,51.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5111,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Poinsett,Poinsett County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5111,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Poinsett,Poinsett County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,48.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5111,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Poinsett,Poinsett County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5111,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Poinsett,Poinsett County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,2.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5111,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Poinsett,Poinsett County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,49.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5111,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Poinsett,Poinsett County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,650,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5111,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Poinsett,Poinsett County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,14071,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5111,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5113,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5113,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5113,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5113,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5113,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,19182,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5113,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,14862,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5113,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11341,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5113,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5113,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3521,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5113,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,76.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5113,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5113,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,23.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5113,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5113,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,25.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5113,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,51.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5113,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,3729,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5113,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,7612,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5113,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Pope,Pope County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5115,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Pope,Pope County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5115,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Pope,Pope County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5115,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Pope,Pope County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5115,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Pope,Pope County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5115,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Pope,Pope County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,63346,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5115,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Pope,Pope County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,55872,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5115,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Pope,Pope County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,54493,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5115,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Pope,Pope County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5115,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Pope,Pope County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1379,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5115,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Pope,Pope County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,97.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5115,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Pope,Pope County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5115,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Pope,Pope County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5115,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Pope,Pope County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5115,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Pope,Pope County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,38.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5115,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Pope,Pope County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,59,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5115,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Pope,Pope County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,21538,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5115,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Pope,Pope County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,32955,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5115,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Prairie,Prairie County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5117,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Prairie,Prairie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5117,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Prairie,Prairie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5117,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Prairie,Prairie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5117,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Prairie,Prairie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5117,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Prairie,Prairie County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,8248,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5117,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Prairie,Prairie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7877,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5117,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Prairie,Prairie County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6176,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5117,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Prairie,Prairie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5117,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Prairie,Prairie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1702,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5117,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Prairie,Prairie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,78.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5117,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Prairie,Prairie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5117,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Prairie,Prairie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,21.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5117,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Prairie,Prairie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5117,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Prairie,Prairie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,2.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5117,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Prairie,Prairie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,75.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5117,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Prairie,Prairie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,208,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5117,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Prairie,Prairie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,5967,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5117,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5119,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5119,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5119,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5119,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5119,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,399073,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5119,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,377870,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5119,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,374123,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5119,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5119,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3747,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5119,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5119,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5119,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5119,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5119,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,5.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5119,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,93.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5119,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,20943,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5119,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,353179,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5119,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5121,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5121,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5121,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5121,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5121,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,18581,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5121,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9260,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5121,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7860,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5121,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5121,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1400,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5121,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,84.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5121,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5121,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,15.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5121,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5121,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,2.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5121,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,82.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5121,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,202,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5121,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,7657,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5121,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Saline,Saline County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5125,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Saline,Saline County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5125,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Saline,Saline County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5125,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Saline,Saline County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5125,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Saline,Saline County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5125,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Saline,Saline County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,123681,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5125,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Saline,Saline County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,108619,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5125,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Saline,Saline County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,104781,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5125,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Saline,Saline County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5125,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Saline,Saline County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3838,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5125,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Saline,Saline County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,96.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5125,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Saline,Saline County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5125,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Saline,Saline County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,3.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5125,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Saline,Saline County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5125,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Saline,Saline County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,50.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5125,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Saline,Saline County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,46.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5125,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Saline,Saline County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,54678,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5125,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Saline,Saline County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,50103,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5125,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5127,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5127,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5127,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5127,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5127,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,9811,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5127,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2890,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5127,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5127,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5127,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2890,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5127,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5127,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5127,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5127,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5127,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,5127,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,5127,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,5127,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,5127,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Searcy,Searcy County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5129,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Searcy,Searcy County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5129,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Searcy,Searcy County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5129,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Searcy,Searcy County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5129,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Searcy,Searcy County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5129,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Searcy,Searcy County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,7827,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5129,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Searcy,Searcy County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7661,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5129,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Searcy,Searcy County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5129,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Searcy,Searcy County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5129,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Searcy,Searcy County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7661,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5129,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Searcy,Searcy County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5129,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Searcy,Searcy County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5129,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Searcy,Searcy County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5129,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Searcy,Searcy County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5129,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Searcy,Searcy County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,5129,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Searcy,Searcy County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,5129,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Searcy,Searcy County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,5129,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Searcy,Searcy County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,5129,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Sebastian,Sebastian County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5131,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Sebastian,Sebastian County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5131,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Sebastian,Sebastian County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5131,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Sebastian,Sebastian County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5131,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Sebastian,Sebastian County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5131,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Sebastian,Sebastian County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,127739,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5131,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Sebastian,Sebastian County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,122491,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5131,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Sebastian,Sebastian County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,122491,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5131,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Sebastian,Sebastian County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5131,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Sebastian,Sebastian County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5131,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Sebastian,Sebastian County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5131,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Sebastian,Sebastian County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5131,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Sebastian,Sebastian County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5131,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Sebastian,Sebastian County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5131,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Sebastian,Sebastian County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,14.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5131,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Sebastian,Sebastian County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,85.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5131,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Sebastian,Sebastian County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,18147,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5131,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Sebastian,Sebastian County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,104345,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5131,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Sevier,Sevier County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5133,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Sevier,Sevier County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5133,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Sevier,Sevier County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5133,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Sevier,Sevier County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5133,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Sevier,Sevier County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5133,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Sevier,Sevier County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,15778,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5133,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Sevier,Sevier County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,13463,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5133,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Sevier,Sevier County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6449,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5133,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Sevier,Sevier County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5133,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Sevier,Sevier County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7015,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5133,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Sevier,Sevier County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,47.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5133,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Sevier,Sevier County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5133,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Sevier,Sevier County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,52.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5133,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Sevier,Sevier County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5133,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Sevier,Sevier County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,5133,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Sevier,Sevier County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,47.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5133,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Sevier,Sevier County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,5133,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Sevier,Sevier County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,6449,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5133,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Sharp,Sharp County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5135,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Sharp,Sharp County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5135,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Sharp,Sharp County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5135,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Sharp,Sharp County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5135,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Sharp,Sharp County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5135,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Sharp,Sharp County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,17282,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5135,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Sharp,Sharp County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,15624,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5135,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Sharp,Sharp County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5135,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Sharp,Sharp County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5135,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Sharp,Sharp County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,15624,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5135,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Sharp,Sharp County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5135,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Sharp,Sharp County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5135,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Sharp,Sharp County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5135,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Sharp,Sharp County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5135,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Sharp,Sharp County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,5135,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Sharp,Sharp County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,5135,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Sharp,Sharp County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,5135,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Sharp,Sharp County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,5135,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,St. Francis,St. Francis County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5123,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,St. Francis,St. Francis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5123,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,St. Francis,St. Francis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5123,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,St. Francis,St. Francis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5123,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,St. Francis,St. Francis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5123,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,St. Francis,St. Francis County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,23046,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5123,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AR,St. Francis,St. Francis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,25449,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5123,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,St. Francis,St. Francis County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,21821,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5123,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,St. Francis,St. Francis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5123,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,St. Francis,St. Francis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3628,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5123,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,St. Francis,St. Francis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,85.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5123,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,St. Francis,St. Francis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5123,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,St. Francis,St. Francis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,14.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5123,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,St. Francis,St. Francis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5123,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,St. Francis,St. Francis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,24.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5123,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,St. Francis,St. Francis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,61.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5123,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,St. Francis,St. Francis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,6247,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5123,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,St. Francis,St. Francis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,15574,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5123,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Stone,Stone County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5137,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Stone,Stone County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5137,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Stone,Stone County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5137,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Stone,Stone County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5137,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Stone,Stone County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5137,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Stone,Stone County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,12364,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5137,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Stone,Stone County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,16687,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5137,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Stone,Stone County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,16106,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5137,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Stone,Stone County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5137,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Stone,Stone County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,582,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5137,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Stone,Stone County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,96.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5137,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Stone,Stone County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5137,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Stone,Stone County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,3.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5137,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Stone,Stone County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5137,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Stone,Stone County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,53.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5137,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Stone,Stone County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,42.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5137,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Stone,Stone County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,8954,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5137,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Stone,Stone County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,7152,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5137,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,25,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5139,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5139,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5139,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5139,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5139,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,38925,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5139,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,38494,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5139,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,21853,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5139,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5139,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,16642,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5139,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,56.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5139,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5139,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,43.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5139,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5139,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,11.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5139,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,45.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5139,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,4317,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5139,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,17536,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5139,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Van Buren,Van Buren County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5141,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Van Buren,Van Buren County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5141,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Van Buren,Van Buren County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5141,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Van Buren,Van Buren County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5141,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Van Buren,Van Buren County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5141,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Van Buren,Van Buren County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,15765,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5141,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Van Buren,Van Buren County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,14012,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5141,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Van Buren,Van Buren County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,14012,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5141,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Van Buren,Van Buren County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5141,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Van Buren,Van Buren County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5141,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Van Buren,Van Buren County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5141,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Van Buren,Van Buren County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5141,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Van Buren,Van Buren County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5141,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Van Buren,Van Buren County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5141,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Van Buren,Van Buren County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,60,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5141,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Van Buren,Van Buren County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,40,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5141,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Van Buren,Van Buren County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,8405,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5141,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Van Buren,Van Buren County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,5606,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5141,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5143,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5143,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5143,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5143,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5143,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,246662,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5143,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,235415,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5143,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,235415,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5143,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5143,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5143,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5143,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5143,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5143,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5143,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5143,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,5143,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,235415,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5143,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,5143,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,White,White County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5145,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,White,White County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5145,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,White,White County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5145,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,White,White County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5145,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,White,White County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5145,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,White,White County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,76810,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5145,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AR,White,White County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,95615,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5145,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,White,White County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,91265,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5145,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,White,White County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5145,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,White,White County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4350,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5145,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,White,White County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,95.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5145,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,White,White County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5145,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,White,White County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,4.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5145,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,White,White County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5145,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,White,White County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,63,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5145,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,White,White County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,32.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5145,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,White,White County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,60196,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5145,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,White,White County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,31069,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5145,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Woodruff,Woodruff County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5147,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Woodruff,Woodruff County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5147,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Woodruff,Woodruff County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5147,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Woodruff,Woodruff County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5147,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Woodruff,Woodruff County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5147,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Woodruff,Woodruff County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,6200,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5147,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Woodruff,Woodruff County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5476,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5147,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Woodruff,Woodruff County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4276,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5147,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Woodruff,Woodruff County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5147,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Woodruff,Woodruff County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1201,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5147,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Woodruff,Woodruff County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,78.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5147,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Woodruff,Woodruff County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5147,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Woodruff,Woodruff County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,21.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5147,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Woodruff,Woodruff County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5147,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Woodruff,Woodruff County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,5147,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Woodruff,Woodruff County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,78.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5147,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Woodruff,Woodruff County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,5147,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Woodruff,Woodruff County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,4276,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5147,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Yell,Yell County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5149,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Yell,Yell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5149,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Yell,Yell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5149,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Yell,Yell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5149,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Yell,Yell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5149,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Yell,Yell County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,20216,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5149,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Yell,Yell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,18580,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5149,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Yell,Yell County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,17604,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5149,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Yell,Yell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5149,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Yell,Yell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,976,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5149,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Yell,Yell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,94.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5149,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Yell,Yell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5149,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Yell,Yell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,5.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5149,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Yell,Yell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5149,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Yell,Yell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,57.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5149,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Yell,Yell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,37,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5149,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Yell,Yell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,10721,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5149,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AR,Yell,Yell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,6883,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5149,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,AZ,AZ,Arizona,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,951,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,4,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,AZ,AZ,Arizona,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,298,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,4,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,AZ,AZ,Arizona,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,68,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,4,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,AZ,AZ,Arizona,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,4,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,AZ,AZ,Arizona,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,228,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,4,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,AZ,AZ,Arizona,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,7177986,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,4,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2020,AZ,AZ,Arizona,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,6948635,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,4,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,AZ,AZ,Arizona,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4011354,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,4,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,AZ,AZ,Arizona,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,587996,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,4,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,AZ,AZ,Arizona,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2937281,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,4,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,AZ,AZ,Arizona,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,57.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,4,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,AZ,AZ,Arizona,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,8.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,4,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,AZ,AZ,Arizona,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,42.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,4,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,AZ,AZ,Arizona,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,653,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,4,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,AZ,AZ,Arizona,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,4,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,AZ,AZ,Arizona,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,49.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,4,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,AZ,AZ,Arizona,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2523,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,4,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,AZ,AZ,Arizona,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3420835,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,4,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,CA,Alameda,Alameda County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6001,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Alameda,Alameda County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6001,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Alameda,Alameda County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6001,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Alameda,Alameda County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6001,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Alameda,Alameda County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6001,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Alameda,Alameda County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,1679844,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6001,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Alameda,Alameda County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1696829,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6001,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Alameda,Alameda County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1661514,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6001,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Alameda,Alameda County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6001,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Alameda,Alameda County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,35314,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6001,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Alameda,Alameda County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,97.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6001,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Alameda,Alameda County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6001,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Alameda,Alameda County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6001,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Alameda,Alameda County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6001,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Alameda,Alameda County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,8.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6001,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Alameda,Alameda County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,89,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6001,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Alameda,Alameda County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,151372,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6001,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Alameda,Alameda County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1510142,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6001,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Alpine,Alpine County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6003,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Alpine,Alpine County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6003,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Alpine,Alpine County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6003,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Alpine,Alpine County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6003,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Alpine,Alpine County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6003,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Alpine,Alpine County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,1198,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6003,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Alpine,Alpine County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,725,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6003,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Alpine,Alpine County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6003,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Alpine,Alpine County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6003,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Alpine,Alpine County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,725,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6003,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Alpine,Alpine County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6003,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Alpine,Alpine County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6003,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Alpine,Alpine County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6003,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Alpine,Alpine County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6003,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Alpine,Alpine County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6003,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Alpine,Alpine County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6003,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Alpine,Alpine County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6003,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Alpine,Alpine County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6003,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Amador,Amador County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,20,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6005,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Amador,Amador County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6005,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Amador,Amador County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6005,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Amador,Amador County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6005,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Amador,Amador County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6005,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Amador,Amador County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,40541,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6005,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Amador,Amador County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,35077,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6005,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Amador,Amador County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6005,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Amador,Amador County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6005,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Amador,Amador County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,35077,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6005,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Amador,Amador County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6005,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Amador,Amador County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6005,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Amador,Amador County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6005,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Amador,Amador County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,20,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6005,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Amador,Amador County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6005,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Amador,Amador County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6005,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Amador,Amador County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6005,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Amador,Amador County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6005,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Butte,Butte County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,32,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6007,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Butte,Butte County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6007,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Butte,Butte County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6007,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Butte,Butte County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6007,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Butte,Butte County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6007,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Butte,Butte County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,210083,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6007,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Butte,Butte County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,22118,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6007,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Butte,Butte County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6007,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Butte,Butte County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6007,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Butte,Butte County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,22118,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6007,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Butte,Butte County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6007,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Butte,Butte County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6007,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Butte,Butte County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6007,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Butte,Butte County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,32,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6007,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Butte,Butte County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6007,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Butte,Butte County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6007,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Butte,Butte County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6007,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Butte,Butte County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6007,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,CA,California,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3057,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,CA,CA,California,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,417,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,CA,CA,California,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,48,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,CA,CA,California,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,189,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,CA,CA,California,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,149,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,CA,CA,California,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,39499738,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2020,CA,CA,California,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,38051212,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,CA,CA,California,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,21879582,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,CA,CA,California,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,690001,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,CA,CA,California,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,16171630,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,CA,CA,California,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,57.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,CA,CA,California,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,CA,CA,California,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,42.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,CA,CA,California,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2640,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,CA,CA,California,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,30.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,CA,CA,California,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,24.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,CA,CA,California,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,11459916,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,CA,CA,California,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,9199793,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,CA,Calaveras,Calaveras County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6009,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Calaveras,Calaveras County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6009,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Calaveras,Calaveras County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6009,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Calaveras,Calaveras County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6009,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Calaveras,Calaveras County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6009,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Calaveras,Calaveras County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,45327,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6009,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Calaveras,Calaveras County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,47702,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6009,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Calaveras,Calaveras County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6009,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Calaveras,Calaveras County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6009,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Calaveras,Calaveras County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,47702,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6009,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Calaveras,Calaveras County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6009,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Calaveras,Calaveras County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6009,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Calaveras,Calaveras County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6009,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Calaveras,Calaveras County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6009,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Calaveras,Calaveras County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6009,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Calaveras,Calaveras County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6009,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Calaveras,Calaveras County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6009,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Calaveras,Calaveras County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6009,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Colusa,Colusa County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6011,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Colusa,Colusa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6011,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Colusa,Colusa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6011,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Colusa,Colusa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6011,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Colusa,Colusa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6011,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Colusa,Colusa County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,21853,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6011,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Colusa,Colusa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,15339,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6011,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Colusa,Colusa County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6011,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Colusa,Colusa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6011,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Colusa,Colusa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,15339,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6011,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Colusa,Colusa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6011,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Colusa,Colusa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6011,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Colusa,Colusa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6011,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Colusa,Colusa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6011,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Colusa,Colusa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6011,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Colusa,Colusa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6011,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Colusa,Colusa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6011,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Colusa,Colusa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6011,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Contra Costa,Contra Costa County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,33,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6013,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Contra Costa,Contra Costa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6013,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Contra Costa,Contra Costa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6013,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Contra Costa,Contra Costa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6013,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Contra Costa,Contra Costa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6013,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Contra Costa,Contra Costa County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,1165562,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6013,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Contra Costa,Contra Costa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,503985,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6013,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Contra Costa,Contra Costa County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,485058,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6013,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Contra Costa,Contra Costa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,124,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6013,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Contra Costa,Contra Costa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,18927,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6013,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Contra Costa,Contra Costa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,96.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6013,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Contra Costa,Contra Costa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6013,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Contra Costa,Contra Costa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,3.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6013,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Contra Costa,Contra Costa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,26,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6013,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Contra Costa,Contra Costa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,20.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6013,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Contra Costa,Contra Costa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,75.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6013,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Contra Costa,Contra Costa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,103558,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6013,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Contra Costa,Contra Costa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,381892,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6013,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Del Norte,Del Norte County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6015,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Del Norte,Del Norte County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6015,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Del Norte,Del Norte County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6015,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Del Norte,Del Norte County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6015,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Del Norte,Del Norte County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6015,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Del Norte,Del Norte County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,27709,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6015,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Del Norte,Del Norte County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,23351,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6015,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Del Norte,Del Norte County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6015,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Del Norte,Del Norte County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6015,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Del Norte,Del Norte County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,23351,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6015,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Del Norte,Del Norte County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6015,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Del Norte,Del Norte County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6015,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Del Norte,Del Norte County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6015,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Del Norte,Del Norte County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6015,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Del Norte,Del Norte County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6015,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Del Norte,Del Norte County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6015,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Del Norte,Del Norte County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6015,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Del Norte,Del Norte County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6015,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,El Dorado,El Dorado County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,19,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6017,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,El Dorado,El Dorado County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6017,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,El Dorado,El Dorado County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6017,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,El Dorado,El Dorado County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6017,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,El Dorado,El Dorado County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6017,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,El Dorado,El Dorado County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,191114,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6017,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CA,El Dorado,El Dorado County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,252274,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6017,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,El Dorado,El Dorado County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6017,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,El Dorado,El Dorado County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6017,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,El Dorado,El Dorado County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,252274,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6017,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,El Dorado,El Dorado County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6017,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,El Dorado,El Dorado County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6017,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,El Dorado,El Dorado County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6017,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,El Dorado,El Dorado County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,19,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6017,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,El Dorado,El Dorado County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6017,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,El Dorado,El Dorado County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6017,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,El Dorado,El Dorado County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6017,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,El Dorado,El Dorado County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6017,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Fresno,Fresno County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,100,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6019,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Fresno,Fresno County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6019,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Fresno,Fresno County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6019,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Fresno,Fresno County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6019,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Fresno,Fresno County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6019,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Fresno,Fresno County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,1008966,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6019,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Fresno,Fresno County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,838372,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6019,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Fresno,Fresno County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3507,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6019,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Fresno,Fresno County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,3507,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6019,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Fresno,Fresno County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,834865,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6019,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Fresno,Fresno County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6019,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Fresno,Fresno County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6019,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Fresno,Fresno County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6019,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Fresno,Fresno County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,97,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6019,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Fresno,Fresno County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6019,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Fresno,Fresno County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6019,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Fresno,Fresno County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6019,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Fresno,Fresno County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6019,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Glenn,Glenn County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6021,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Glenn,Glenn County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6021,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Glenn,Glenn County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6021,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Glenn,Glenn County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6021,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Glenn,Glenn County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6021,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Glenn,Glenn County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,28893,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6021,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Glenn,Glenn County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,10728,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6021,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Glenn,Glenn County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6021,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Glenn,Glenn County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6021,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Glenn,Glenn County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10728,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6021,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Glenn,Glenn County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6021,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Glenn,Glenn County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6021,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Glenn,Glenn County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6021,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Glenn,Glenn County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6021,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Glenn,Glenn County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6021,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Glenn,Glenn County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6021,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Glenn,Glenn County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6021,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Glenn,Glenn County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6021,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Humboldt,Humboldt County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,38,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6023,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Humboldt,Humboldt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6023,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Humboldt,Humboldt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6023,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Humboldt,Humboldt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6023,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Humboldt,Humboldt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6023,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Humboldt,Humboldt County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,136351,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6023,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Humboldt,Humboldt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,89415,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6023,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Humboldt,Humboldt County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,43904,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6023,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Humboldt,Humboldt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6023,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Humboldt,Humboldt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,45512,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6023,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Humboldt,Humboldt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,49.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6023,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Humboldt,Humboldt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6023,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Humboldt,Humboldt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,50.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6023,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Humboldt,Humboldt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,36,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6023,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Humboldt,Humboldt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6023,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Humboldt,Humboldt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,49.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6023,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Humboldt,Humboldt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6023,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Humboldt,Humboldt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,43904,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6023,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Imperial,Imperial County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,21,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6025,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Imperial,Imperial County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6025,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Imperial,Imperial County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6025,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Imperial,Imperial County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6025,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Imperial,Imperial County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6025,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Imperial,Imperial County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,179489,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6025,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Imperial,Imperial County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,151941,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6025,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Imperial,Imperial County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,259,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6025,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Imperial,Imperial County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,259,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6025,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Imperial,Imperial County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,151682,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6025,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Imperial,Imperial County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6025,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Imperial,Imperial County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6025,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Imperial,Imperial County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6025,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Imperial,Imperial County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,19,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6025,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Imperial,Imperial County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6025,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Imperial,Imperial County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6025,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Imperial,Imperial County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6025,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Imperial,Imperial County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6025,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Inyo,Inyo County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,31,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6027,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Inyo,Inyo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6027,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Inyo,Inyo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6027,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Inyo,Inyo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6027,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Inyo,Inyo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6027,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Inyo,Inyo County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,19023,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6027,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Inyo,Inyo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,55778,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6027,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Inyo,Inyo County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,910,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6027,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Inyo,Inyo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,686,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6027,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Inyo,Inyo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,54867,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6027,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Inyo,Inyo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6027,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Inyo,Inyo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6027,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Inyo,Inyo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6027,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Inyo,Inyo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,21,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6027,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Inyo,Inyo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6027,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Inyo,Inyo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6027,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Inyo,Inyo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6027,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Inyo,Inyo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6027,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Kern,Kern County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,144,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6029,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Kern,Kern County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,24,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6029,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Kern,Kern County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6029,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Kern,Kern County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6029,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Kern,Kern County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,23,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6029,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Kern,Kern County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,909997,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6029,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Kern,Kern County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,458947,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6029,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Kern,Kern County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,18282,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6029,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Kern,Kern County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,18141,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6029,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Kern,Kern County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,440665,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6029,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Kern,Kern County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6029,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Kern,Kern County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6029,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Kern,Kern County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,96,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6029,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Kern,Kern County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,120,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6029,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Kern,Kern County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6029,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Kern,Kern County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6029,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Kern,Kern County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6029,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Kern,Kern County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6029,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Kings,Kings County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6031,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Kings,Kings County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6031,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Kings,Kings County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6031,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Kings,Kings County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6031,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Kings,Kings County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6031,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Kings,Kings County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,152627,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6031,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Kings,Kings County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,124389,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6031,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Kings,Kings County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,88599,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6031,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Kings,Kings County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,88599,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6031,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Kings,Kings County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,35790,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6031,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Kings,Kings County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,71.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6031,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Kings,Kings County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,71.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6031,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Kings,Kings County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,28.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6031,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Kings,Kings County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6031,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Kings,Kings County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6031,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Kings,Kings County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6031,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Kings,Kings County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6031,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Kings,Kings County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6031,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,43,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6033,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6033,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6033,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6033,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6033,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,68174,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6033,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,57395,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6033,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6033,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6033,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,57395,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6033,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6033,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6033,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6033,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,43,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6033,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6033,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6033,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6033,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6033,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Lassen,Lassen County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6035,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Lassen,Lassen County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6035,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Lassen,Lassen County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6035,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Lassen,Lassen County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6035,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Lassen,Lassen County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6035,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Lassen,Lassen County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,32719,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6035,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Lassen,Lassen County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,15531,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6035,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Lassen,Lassen County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6035,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Lassen,Lassen County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6035,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Lassen,Lassen County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,15531,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6035,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Lassen,Lassen County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6035,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Lassen,Lassen County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6035,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Lassen,Lassen County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6035,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Lassen,Lassen County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6035,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Lassen,Lassen County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6035,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Lassen,Lassen County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6035,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Lassen,Lassen County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6035,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Lassen,Lassen County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6035,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Los Angeles,Los Angeles County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,200,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6037,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Los Angeles,Los Angeles County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,81,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6037,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Los Angeles,Los Angeles County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6037,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Los Angeles,Los Angeles County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,46,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6037,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Los Angeles,Los Angeles County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,27,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6037,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Los Angeles,Los Angeles County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,9989165,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6037,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Los Angeles,Los Angeles County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4634852,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6037,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Los Angeles,Los Angeles County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3153498,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6037,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Los Angeles,Los Angeles County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,229887,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6037,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Los Angeles,Los Angeles County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1481354,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6037,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Los Angeles,Los Angeles County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,68,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6037,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Los Angeles,Los Angeles County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6037,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Los Angeles,Los Angeles County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,32,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6037,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Los Angeles,Los Angeles County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,119,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6037,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Los Angeles,Los Angeles County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,39.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6037,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Los Angeles,Los Angeles County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,11.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6037,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Los Angeles,Los Angeles County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1840792,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6037,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Los Angeles,Los Angeles County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,543199,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6037,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Madera,Madera County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,64,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6039,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Madera,Madera County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6039,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Madera,Madera County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6039,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Madera,Madera County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6039,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Madera,Madera County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6039,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Madera,Madera County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,156620,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6039,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Madera,Madera County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,116636,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6039,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Madera,Madera County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,606,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6039,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Madera,Madera County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,606,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6039,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Madera,Madera County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,116030,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6039,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Madera,Madera County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6039,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Madera,Madera County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6039,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Madera,Madera County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6039,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Madera,Madera County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,61,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6039,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Madera,Madera County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6039,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Madera,Madera County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6039,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Madera,Madera County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6039,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Madera,Madera County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6039,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Marin,Marin County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6041,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Marin,Marin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6041,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Marin,Marin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6041,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Marin,Marin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6041,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Marin,Marin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6041,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Marin,Marin County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,261776,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6041,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Marin,Marin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,190383,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6041,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Marin,Marin County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,182575,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6041,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Marin,Marin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6041,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Marin,Marin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7808,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6041,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Marin,Marin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,95.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6041,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Marin,Marin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6041,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Marin,Marin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,4.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6041,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Marin,Marin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6041,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Marin,Marin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6041,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Marin,Marin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,95.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6041,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Marin,Marin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6041,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Marin,Marin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,182575,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6041,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Mariposa,Mariposa County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6043,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Mariposa,Mariposa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6043,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Mariposa,Mariposa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6043,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Mariposa,Mariposa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6043,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Mariposa,Mariposa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6043,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Mariposa,Mariposa County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,17124,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6043,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Mariposa,Mariposa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,6044,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6043,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Mariposa,Mariposa County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1883,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6043,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Mariposa,Mariposa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6043,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Mariposa,Mariposa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4161,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6043,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Mariposa,Mariposa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,31.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6043,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Mariposa,Mariposa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6043,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Mariposa,Mariposa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,68.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6043,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Mariposa,Mariposa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6043,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Mariposa,Mariposa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,31.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6043,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Mariposa,Mariposa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6043,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Mariposa,Mariposa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1883,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6043,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Mariposa,Mariposa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6043,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Mendocino,Mendocino County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,38,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6045,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Mendocino,Mendocino County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6045,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Mendocino,Mendocino County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6045,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Mendocino,Mendocino County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6045,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Mendocino,Mendocino County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6045,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Mendocino,Mendocino County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,91354,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6045,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Mendocino,Mendocino County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,55596,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6045,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Mendocino,Mendocino County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6045,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Mendocino,Mendocino County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6045,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Mendocino,Mendocino County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,55596,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6045,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Mendocino,Mendocino County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6045,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Mendocino,Mendocino County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6045,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Mendocino,Mendocino County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6045,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Mendocino,Mendocino County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,38,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6045,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Mendocino,Mendocino County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6045,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Mendocino,Mendocino County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6045,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Mendocino,Mendocino County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6045,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Mendocino,Mendocino County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6045,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Merced,Merced County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,24,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6047,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Merced,Merced County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6047,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Merced,Merced County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6047,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Merced,Merced County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6047,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Merced,Merced County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6047,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Merced,Merced County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,281726,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6047,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Merced,Merced County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,215506,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6047,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Merced,Merced County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,123797,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6047,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Merced,Merced County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6047,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Merced,Merced County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,91710,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6047,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Merced,Merced County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,57.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6047,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Merced,Merced County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6047,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Merced,Merced County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,42.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6047,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Merced,Merced County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,22,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6047,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Merced,Merced County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6047,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Merced,Merced County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,57.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6047,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Merced,Merced County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6047,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Merced,Merced County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,123797,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6047,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Modoc,Modoc County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6049,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Modoc,Modoc County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6049,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Modoc,Modoc County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6049,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Modoc,Modoc County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6049,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Modoc,Modoc County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6049,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Modoc,Modoc County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,8658,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6049,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Modoc,Modoc County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4730,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6049,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Modoc,Modoc County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6049,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Modoc,Modoc County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6049,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Modoc,Modoc County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4730,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6049,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Modoc,Modoc County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6049,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Modoc,Modoc County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6049,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Modoc,Modoc County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6049,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Modoc,Modoc County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6049,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Modoc,Modoc County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6049,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Modoc,Modoc County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6049,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Modoc,Modoc County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6049,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Modoc,Modoc County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6049,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Mono,Mono County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6051,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Mono,Mono County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6051,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Mono,Mono County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6051,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Mono,Mono County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6051,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Mono,Mono County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6051,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Mono,Mono County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,13206,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6051,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Mono,Mono County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,17024,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6051,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Mono,Mono County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6051,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Mono,Mono County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6051,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Mono,Mono County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,17024,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6051,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Mono,Mono County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6051,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Mono,Mono County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6051,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Mono,Mono County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6051,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Mono,Mono County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6051,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Mono,Mono County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6051,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Mono,Mono County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6051,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Mono,Mono County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6051,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Mono,Mono County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6051,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Monterey,Monterey County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,121,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6053,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Monterey,Monterey County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6053,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Monterey,Monterey County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6053,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Monterey,Monterey County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6053,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Monterey,Monterey County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6053,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Monterey,Monterey County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,438500,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6053,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Monterey,Monterey County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,141245,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6053,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Monterey,Monterey County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6053,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Monterey,Monterey County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6053,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Monterey,Monterey County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,141245,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6053,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Monterey,Monterey County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6053,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Monterey,Monterey County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6053,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Monterey,Monterey County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6053,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Monterey,Monterey County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,121,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6053,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Monterey,Monterey County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6053,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Monterey,Monterey County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6053,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Monterey,Monterey County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6053,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Monterey,Monterey County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6053,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Napa,Napa County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,30,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6055,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Napa,Napa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6055,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Napa,Napa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6055,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Napa,Napa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6055,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Napa,Napa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6055,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Napa,Napa County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,137608,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6055,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Napa,Napa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,127998,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6055,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Napa,Napa County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,20000,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6055,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Napa,Napa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,240,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6055,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Napa,Napa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,107998,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6055,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Napa,Napa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,15.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6055,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Napa,Napa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6055,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Napa,Napa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,84.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6055,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Napa,Napa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,28,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6055,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Napa,Napa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6055,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Napa,Napa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6055,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Napa,Napa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6055,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Napa,Napa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6055,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Nevada,Nevada County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6057,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Nevada,Nevada County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6057,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Nevada,Nevada County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6057,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Nevada,Nevada County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6057,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Nevada,Nevada County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6057,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Nevada,Nevada County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,102199,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6057,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Nevada,Nevada County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,54484,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6057,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Nevada,Nevada County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6057,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Nevada,Nevada County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6057,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Nevada,Nevada County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,54484,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6057,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Nevada,Nevada County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6057,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Nevada,Nevada County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6057,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Nevada,Nevada County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6057,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Nevada,Nevada County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6057,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Nevada,Nevada County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6057,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Nevada,Nevada County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6057,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Nevada,Nevada County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6057,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Nevada,Nevada County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6057,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,55,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6059,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,27,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6059,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6059,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,21,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6059,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6059,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,3184101,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6059,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2284735,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6059,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2094393,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6059,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,59,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6059,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,190342,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6059,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,91.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6059,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6059,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,8.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6059,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,28,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6059,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,76.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6059,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,14.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6059,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1738115,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6059,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,332321,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6059,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Placer,Placer County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,48,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6061,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Placer,Placer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6061,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Placer,Placer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6061,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Placer,Placer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6061,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Placer,Placer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6061,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Placer,Placer County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,405741,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6061,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Placer,Placer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,202951,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6061,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Placer,Placer County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,137939,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6061,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Placer,Placer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6061,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Placer,Placer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,65011,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6061,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Placer,Placer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,68,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6061,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Placer,Placer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6061,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Placer,Placer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,32,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6061,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Placer,Placer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,46,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6061,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Placer,Placer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,1.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6061,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Placer,Placer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,66.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6061,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Placer,Placer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,3211,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6061,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Placer,Placer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,134728,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6061,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Plumas,Plumas County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,33,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6063,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Plumas,Plumas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6063,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Plumas,Plumas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6063,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Plumas,Plumas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6063,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Plumas,Plumas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6063,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Plumas,Plumas County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,19769,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6063,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Plumas,Plumas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,26451,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6063,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Plumas,Plumas County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,52,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6063,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Plumas,Plumas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,36,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6063,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Plumas,Plumas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,26399,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6063,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Plumas,Plumas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6063,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Plumas,Plumas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6063,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Plumas,Plumas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6063,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Plumas,Plumas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,31,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6063,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Plumas,Plumas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6063,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Plumas,Plumas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6063,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Plumas,Plumas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,16,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6063,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Plumas,Plumas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6063,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Riverside,Riverside County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,91,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6065,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Riverside,Riverside County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,28,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6065,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Riverside,Riverside County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6065,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Riverside,Riverside County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6065,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Riverside,Riverside County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6065,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Riverside,Riverside County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,2422764,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6065,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Riverside,Riverside County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1394739,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6065,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Riverside,Riverside County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,713106,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6065,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Riverside,Riverside County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,88160,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6065,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Riverside,Riverside County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,681633,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6065,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Riverside,Riverside County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,51.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6065,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Riverside,Riverside County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,6.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6065,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Riverside,Riverside County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,48.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6065,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Riverside,Riverside County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,63,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6065,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Riverside,Riverside County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,45.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6065,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Riverside,Riverside County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6065,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Riverside,Riverside County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,633406,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6065,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Riverside,Riverside County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6065,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Sacramento,Sacramento County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,67,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6067,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Sacramento,Sacramento County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6067,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Sacramento,Sacramento County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6067,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Sacramento,Sacramento County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6067,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Sacramento,Sacramento County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6067,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Sacramento,Sacramento County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,1586241,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6067,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Sacramento,Sacramento County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1472728,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6067,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Sacramento,Sacramento County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,981393,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6067,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Sacramento,Sacramento County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,15873,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6067,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Sacramento,Sacramento County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,491335,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6067,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Sacramento,Sacramento County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,66.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6067,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Sacramento,Sacramento County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6067,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Sacramento,Sacramento County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,33.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6067,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Sacramento,Sacramento County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,58,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6067,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Sacramento,Sacramento County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6067,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Sacramento,Sacramento County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,52.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6067,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Sacramento,Sacramento County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,4784,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6067,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Sacramento,Sacramento County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,773685,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6067,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Benito,San Benito County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,31,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6069,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Benito,San Benito County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6069,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Benito,San Benito County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6069,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Benito,San Benito County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6069,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Benito,San Benito County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6069,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Benito,San Benito County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,64507,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6069,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Benito,San Benito County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,55812,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6069,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Benito,San Benito County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2378,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6069,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Benito,San Benito County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,2378,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6069,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Benito,San Benito County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,53434,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6069,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Benito,San Benito County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,4.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6069,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Benito,San Benito County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,4.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6069,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Benito,San Benito County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,95.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6069,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Benito,San Benito County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,27,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6069,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Benito,San Benito County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6069,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Benito,San Benito County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6069,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Benito,San Benito County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6069,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Benito,San Benito County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6069,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Bernardino,San Bernardino County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,115,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6071,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Bernardino,San Bernardino County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,23,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6071,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Bernardino,San Bernardino County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6071,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Bernardino,San Bernardino County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6071,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Bernardino,San Bernardino County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,20,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6071,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Bernardino,San Bernardino County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,2182740,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6071,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Bernardino,San Bernardino County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1975680,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6071,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Bernardino,San Bernardino County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,70227,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6071,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Bernardino,San Bernardino County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,53234,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6071,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Bernardino,San Bernardino County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1905453,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6071,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Bernardino,San Bernardino County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,3.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6071,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Bernardino,San Bernardino County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,2.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6071,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Bernardino,San Bernardino County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,96.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6071,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Bernardino,San Bernardino County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,92,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6071,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Bernardino,San Bernardino County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6071,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Bernardino,San Bernardino County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6071,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Bernardino,San Bernardino County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6071,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Bernardino,San Bernardino County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6071,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Diego,San Diego County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,73,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6073,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Diego,San Diego County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,23,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6073,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Diego,San Diego County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6073,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Diego,San Diego County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6073,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Diego,San Diego County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6073,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Diego,San Diego County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,3297252,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6073,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Diego,San Diego County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2955559,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6073,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Diego,San Diego County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2693967,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6073,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Diego,San Diego County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,528,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6073,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Diego,San Diego County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,261592,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6073,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Diego,San Diego County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,91.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6073,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Diego,San Diego County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6073,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Diego,San Diego County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,8.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6073,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Diego,San Diego County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,50,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6073,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Diego,San Diego County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,77.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6073,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Diego,San Diego County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,13.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6073,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Diego,San Diego County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2300690,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6073,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Diego,San Diego County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,390553,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6073,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Francisco,San Francisco County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6075,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Francisco,San Francisco County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6075,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Francisco,San Francisco County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6075,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Francisco,San Francisco County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6075,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Francisco,San Francisco County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6075,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Francisco,San Francisco County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,870014,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6075,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Francisco,San Francisco County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,20763,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6075,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Francisco,San Francisco County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,20661,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6075,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Francisco,San Francisco County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6075,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Francisco,San Francisco County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,102,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6075,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Francisco,San Francisco County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6075,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Francisco,San Francisco County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6075,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Francisco,San Francisco County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6075,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Francisco,San Francisco County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6075,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Francisco,San Francisco County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,83.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6075,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Francisco,San Francisco County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,15.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6075,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Francisco,San Francisco County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,17366,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6075,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Francisco,San Francisco County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3295,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6075,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Joaquin,San Joaquin County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,64,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6077,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Joaquin,San Joaquin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6077,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Joaquin,San Joaquin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6077,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Joaquin,San Joaquin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6077,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Joaquin,San Joaquin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6077,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Joaquin,San Joaquin County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,780517,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6077,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Joaquin,San Joaquin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,493497,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6077,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Joaquin,San Joaquin County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,254,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6077,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Joaquin,San Joaquin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6077,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Joaquin,San Joaquin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,493243,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6077,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Joaquin,San Joaquin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6077,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Joaquin,San Joaquin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6077,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Joaquin,San Joaquin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6077,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Joaquin,San Joaquin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,63,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6077,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Joaquin,San Joaquin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6077,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Joaquin,San Joaquin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6077,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Joaquin,San Joaquin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,254,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6077,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Joaquin,San Joaquin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6077,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Luis Obispo,San Luis Obispo County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,51,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6079,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Luis Obispo,San Luis Obispo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6079,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Luis Obispo,San Luis Obispo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6079,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Luis Obispo,San Luis Obispo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6079,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Luis Obispo,San Luis Obispo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6079,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Luis Obispo,San Luis Obispo County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,282231,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6079,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Luis Obispo,San Luis Obispo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,157999,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6079,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Luis Obispo,San Luis Obispo County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,43464,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6079,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Luis Obispo,San Luis Obispo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,76,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6079,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Luis Obispo,San Luis Obispo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,114535,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6079,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Luis Obispo,San Luis Obispo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,27.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6079,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Luis Obispo,San Luis Obispo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6079,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Luis Obispo,San Luis Obispo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,72.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6079,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Luis Obispo,San Luis Obispo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,48,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6079,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Luis Obispo,San Luis Obispo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6079,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Luis Obispo,San Luis Obispo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,27.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6079,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Luis Obispo,San Luis Obispo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6079,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Luis Obispo,San Luis Obispo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,43360,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6079,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Mateo,San Mateo County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,49,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6081,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Mateo,San Mateo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,20,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6081,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Mateo,San Mateo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6081,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Mateo,San Mateo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6081,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Mateo,San Mateo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6081,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Mateo,San Mateo County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,762453,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6081,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Mateo,San Mateo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1322791,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6081,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Mateo,San Mateo County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1299388,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6081,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Mateo,San Mateo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6081,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Mateo,San Mateo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,23403,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6081,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Mateo,San Mateo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6081,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Mateo,San Mateo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6081,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Mateo,San Mateo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6081,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Mateo,San Mateo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,29,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6081,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Mateo,San Mateo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,90.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6081,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Mateo,San Mateo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,7.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6081,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Mateo,San Mateo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1196587,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6081,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,San Mateo,San Mateo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,102801,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6081,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Santa Barbara,Santa Barbara County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,57,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6083,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Santa Barbara,Santa Barbara County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6083,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Santa Barbara,Santa Barbara County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6083,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Santa Barbara,Santa Barbara County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6083,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Santa Barbara,Santa Barbara County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6083,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Santa Barbara,Santa Barbara County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,448096,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6083,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Santa Barbara,Santa Barbara County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,342188,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6083,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Santa Barbara,Santa Barbara County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,14252,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6083,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Santa Barbara,Santa Barbara County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,102,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6083,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Santa Barbara,Santa Barbara County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,327936,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6083,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Santa Barbara,Santa Barbara County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,4.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6083,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Santa Barbara,Santa Barbara County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6083,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Santa Barbara,Santa Barbara County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,95.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6083,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Santa Barbara,Santa Barbara County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,53,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6083,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Santa Barbara,Santa Barbara County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6083,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Santa Barbara,Santa Barbara County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,4.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6083,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Santa Barbara,Santa Barbara County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,56,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6083,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Santa Barbara,Santa Barbara County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,14094,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6083,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Santa Clara,Santa Clara County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,123,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6085,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Santa Clara,Santa Clara County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,28,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6085,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Santa Clara,Santa Clara County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6085,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Santa Clara,Santa Clara County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,20,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6085,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Santa Clara,Santa Clara County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6085,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Santa Clara,Santa Clara County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,1930598,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6085,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Santa Clara,Santa Clara County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3598403,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6085,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Santa Clara,Santa Clara County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1482201,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6085,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Santa Clara,Santa Clara County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1675,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6085,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Santa Clara,Santa Clara County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2116202,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6085,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Santa Clara,Santa Clara County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,41.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6085,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Santa Clara,Santa Clara County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6085,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Santa Clara,Santa Clara County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,58.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6085,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Santa Clara,Santa Clara County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,95,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6085,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Santa Clara,Santa Clara County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,27.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6085,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Santa Clara,Santa Clara County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,9.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6085,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Santa Clara,Santa Clara County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1000019,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6085,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Santa Clara,Santa Clara County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,345442,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6085,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Santa Cruz,Santa Cruz County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,50,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6087,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Santa Cruz,Santa Cruz County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6087,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Santa Cruz,Santa Cruz County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6087,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Santa Cruz,Santa Cruz County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6087,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Santa Cruz,Santa Cruz County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6087,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Santa Cruz,Santa Cruz County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,270353,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6087,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Santa Cruz,Santa Cruz County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,220604,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6087,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Santa Cruz,Santa Cruz County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6087,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Santa Cruz,Santa Cruz County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6087,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Santa Cruz,Santa Cruz County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,220604,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6087,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Santa Cruz,Santa Cruz County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6087,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Santa Cruz,Santa Cruz County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6087,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Santa Cruz,Santa Cruz County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6087,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Santa Cruz,Santa Cruz County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,50,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6087,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Santa Cruz,Santa Cruz County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6087,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Santa Cruz,Santa Cruz County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6087,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Santa Cruz,Santa Cruz County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6087,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Santa Cruz,Santa Cruz County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6087,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Shasta,Shasta County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,52,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6089,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Shasta,Shasta County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6089,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Shasta,Shasta County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6089,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Shasta,Shasta County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6089,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Shasta,Shasta County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6089,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Shasta,Shasta County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,181893,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6089,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Shasta,Shasta County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,67135,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6089,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Shasta,Shasta County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6089,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Shasta,Shasta County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6089,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Shasta,Shasta County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,67135,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6089,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Shasta,Shasta County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6089,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Shasta,Shasta County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6089,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Shasta,Shasta County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6089,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Shasta,Shasta County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,52,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6089,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Shasta,Shasta County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6089,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Shasta,Shasta County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6089,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Shasta,Shasta County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6089,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Shasta,Shasta County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6089,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Sierra,Sierra County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6091,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Sierra,Sierra County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6091,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Sierra,Sierra County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6091,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Sierra,Sierra County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6091,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Sierra,Sierra County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6091,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Sierra,Sierra County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,3228,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6091,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Sierra,Sierra County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3018,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6091,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Sierra,Sierra County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6091,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Sierra,Sierra County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6091,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Sierra,Sierra County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3018,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6091,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Sierra,Sierra County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6091,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Sierra,Sierra County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6091,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Sierra,Sierra County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6091,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Sierra,Sierra County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6091,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Sierra,Sierra County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6091,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Sierra,Sierra County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6091,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Sierra,Sierra County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6091,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Sierra,Sierra County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6091,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Siskiyou,Siskiyou County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,30,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6093,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Siskiyou,Siskiyou County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6093,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Siskiyou,Siskiyou County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6093,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Siskiyou,Siskiyou County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6093,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Siskiyou,Siskiyou County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6093,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Siskiyou,Siskiyou County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,43962,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6093,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Siskiyou,Siskiyou County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,29319,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6093,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Siskiyou,Siskiyou County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6093,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Siskiyou,Siskiyou County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6093,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Siskiyou,Siskiyou County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,29319,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6093,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Siskiyou,Siskiyou County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6093,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Siskiyou,Siskiyou County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6093,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Siskiyou,Siskiyou County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6093,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Siskiyou,Siskiyou County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,30,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6093,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Siskiyou,Siskiyou County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6093,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Siskiyou,Siskiyou County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6093,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Siskiyou,Siskiyou County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6093,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Siskiyou,Siskiyou County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6093,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Solano,Solano County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,19,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6095,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Solano,Solano County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6095,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Solano,Solano County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6095,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Solano,Solano County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6095,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Solano,Solano County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6095,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Solano,Solano County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,453274,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6095,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Solano,Solano County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,393089,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6095,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Solano,Solano County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,351082,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6095,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Solano,Solano County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6095,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Solano,Solano County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,42007,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6095,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Solano,Solano County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,89.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6095,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Solano,Solano County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6095,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Solano,Solano County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,10.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6095,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Solano,Solano County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6095,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Solano,Solano County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6095,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Solano,Solano County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,86.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6095,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Solano,Solano County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,11623,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6095,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Solano,Solano County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,339459,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6095,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Sonoma,Sonoma County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,109,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6097,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Sonoma,Sonoma County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6097,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Sonoma,Sonoma County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6097,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Sonoma,Sonoma County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6097,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Sonoma,Sonoma County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6097,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Sonoma,Sonoma County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,488345,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6097,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Sonoma,Sonoma County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,392112,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6097,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Sonoma,Sonoma County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11838,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6097,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Sonoma,Sonoma County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,56,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6097,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Sonoma,Sonoma County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,380274,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6097,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Sonoma,Sonoma County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6097,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Sonoma,Sonoma County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6097,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Sonoma,Sonoma County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,97,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6097,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Sonoma,Sonoma County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,105,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6097,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Sonoma,Sonoma County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6097,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Sonoma,Sonoma County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,2.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6097,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Sonoma,Sonoma County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1191,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6097,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Sonoma,Sonoma County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,10519,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6097,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Stanislaus,Stanislaus County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,51,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6099,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Stanislaus,Stanislaus County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6099,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Stanislaus,Stanislaus County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6099,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Stanislaus,Stanislaus County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6099,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Stanislaus,Stanislaus County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6099,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Stanislaus,Stanislaus County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,552710,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6099,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Stanislaus,Stanislaus County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,405720,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6099,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Stanislaus,Stanislaus County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6099,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Stanislaus,Stanislaus County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6099,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Stanislaus,Stanislaus County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,405720,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6099,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Stanislaus,Stanislaus County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6099,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Stanislaus,Stanislaus County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6099,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Stanislaus,Stanislaus County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6099,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Stanislaus,Stanislaus County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,51,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6099,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Stanislaus,Stanislaus County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6099,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Stanislaus,Stanislaus County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6099,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Stanislaus,Stanislaus County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6099,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Stanislaus,Stanislaus County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6099,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Sutter,Sutter County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6101,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Sutter,Sutter County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6101,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Sutter,Sutter County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6101,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Sutter,Sutter County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6101,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Sutter,Sutter County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6101,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Sutter,Sutter County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,99480,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6101,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Sutter,Sutter County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,89571,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6101,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Sutter,Sutter County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,67708,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6101,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Sutter,Sutter County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6101,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Sutter,Sutter County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,21862,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6101,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Sutter,Sutter County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,75.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6101,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Sutter,Sutter County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6101,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Sutter,Sutter County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,24.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6101,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Sutter,Sutter County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6101,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Sutter,Sutter County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6101,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Sutter,Sutter County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,75.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6101,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Sutter,Sutter County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6101,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Sutter,Sutter County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,67708,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6101,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Tehama,Tehama County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,38,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6103,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Tehama,Tehama County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6103,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Tehama,Tehama County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6103,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Tehama,Tehama County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6103,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Tehama,Tehama County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6103,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Tehama,Tehama County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,65615,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6103,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Tehama,Tehama County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,32097,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6103,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Tehama,Tehama County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6103,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Tehama,Tehama County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6103,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Tehama,Tehama County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,32097,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6103,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Tehama,Tehama County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6103,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Tehama,Tehama County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6103,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Tehama,Tehama County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6103,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Tehama,Tehama County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,38,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6103,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Tehama,Tehama County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6103,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Tehama,Tehama County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6103,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Tehama,Tehama County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6103,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Tehama,Tehama County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6103,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Trinity,Trinity County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6105,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Trinity,Trinity County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6105,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Trinity,Trinity County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6105,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Trinity,Trinity County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6105,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Trinity,Trinity County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6105,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Trinity,Trinity County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,16088,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6105,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Trinity,Trinity County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,8486,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6105,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Trinity,Trinity County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6105,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Trinity,Trinity County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6105,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Trinity,Trinity County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8486,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6105,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Trinity,Trinity County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6105,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Trinity,Trinity County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6105,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Trinity,Trinity County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6105,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Trinity,Trinity County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6105,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Trinity,Trinity County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6105,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Trinity,Trinity County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6105,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Trinity,Trinity County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6105,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Trinity,Trinity County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6105,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Tulare,Tulare County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,80,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6107,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Tulare,Tulare County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6107,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Tulare,Tulare County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6107,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Tulare,Tulare County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6107,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Tulare,Tulare County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6107,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Tulare,Tulare County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,473736,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6107,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Tulare,Tulare County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,389570,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6107,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Tulare,Tulare County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,273,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6107,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Tulare,Tulare County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6107,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Tulare,Tulare County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,389297,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6107,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Tulare,Tulare County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6107,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Tulare,Tulare County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6107,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Tulare,Tulare County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6107,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Tulare,Tulare County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,79,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6107,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Tulare,Tulare County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6107,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Tulare,Tulare County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6107,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Tulare,Tulare County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6107,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Tulare,Tulare County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6107,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Tuolumne,Tuolumne County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,47,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6109,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Tuolumne,Tuolumne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6109,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Tuolumne,Tuolumne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6109,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Tuolumne,Tuolumne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6109,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Tuolumne,Tuolumne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6109,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Tuolumne,Tuolumne County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,55516,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6109,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Tuolumne,Tuolumne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,61741,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6109,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Tuolumne,Tuolumne County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6109,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Tuolumne,Tuolumne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6109,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Tuolumne,Tuolumne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,61741,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6109,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Tuolumne,Tuolumne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6109,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Tuolumne,Tuolumne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6109,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Tuolumne,Tuolumne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6109,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Tuolumne,Tuolumne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,47,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6109,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Tuolumne,Tuolumne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6109,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Tuolumne,Tuolumne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6109,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Tuolumne,Tuolumne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6109,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Tuolumne,Tuolumne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6109,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Ventura,Ventura County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,59,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6111,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Ventura,Ventura County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,37,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6111,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Ventura,Ventura County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6111,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Ventura,Ventura County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,25,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6111,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Ventura,Ventura County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6111,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Ventura,Ventura County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,842921,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6111,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Ventura,Ventura County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,606956,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6111,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Ventura,Ventura County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,574068,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6111,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Ventura,Ventura County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,21229,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6111,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Ventura,Ventura County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,32887,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6111,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Ventura,Ventura County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,94.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6111,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Ventura,Ventura County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,3.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6111,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Ventura,Ventura County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,5.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6111,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Ventura,Ventura County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,22,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6111,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Ventura,Ventura County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,91.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6111,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Ventura,Ventura County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6111,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Ventura,Ventura County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,552840,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6111,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Ventura,Ventura County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6111,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Yolo,Yolo County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,20,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6113,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Yolo,Yolo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6113,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Yolo,Yolo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6113,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Yolo,Yolo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6113,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Yolo,Yolo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6113,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Yolo,Yolo County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,216255,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6113,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Yolo,Yolo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,245902,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6113,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Yolo,Yolo County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,50229,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6113,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Yolo,Yolo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6113,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Yolo,Yolo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,195673,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6113,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Yolo,Yolo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,20.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6113,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Yolo,Yolo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6113,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Yolo,Yolo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,79.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6113,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Yolo,Yolo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,19,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6113,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Yolo,Yolo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6113,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Yolo,Yolo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,20.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6113,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Yolo,Yolo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,6113,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Yolo,Yolo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,50229,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6113,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Yuba,Yuba County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,491,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6115,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Yuba,Yuba County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,42,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6115,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Yuba,Yuba County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6115,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Yuba,Yuba County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,20,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6115,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Yuba,Yuba County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6115,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Yuba,Yuba County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,81932,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6115,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Yuba,Yuba County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,8837203,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6115,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Yuba,Yuba County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5486317,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6115,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Yuba,Yuba County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,164546,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6115,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Yuba,Yuba County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3350886,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6115,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Yuba,Yuba County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,62.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6115,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Yuba,Yuba County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6115,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Yuba,Yuba County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,37.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6115,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Yuba,Yuba County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,449,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6115,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Yuba,Yuba County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,15.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6115,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Yuba,Yuba County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,43.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6115,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Yuba,Yuba County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1399632,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6115,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CA,Yuba,Yuba County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3806090,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6115,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,44,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8001,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,35,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8001,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8001,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8001,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,23,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8001,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,520163,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8001,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,569392,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8001,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,351205,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8001,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,53575,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8001,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,218187,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8001,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,61.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8001,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,9.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8001,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,38.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8001,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8001,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,17.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8001,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,11.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8001,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,100695,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8001,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,65735,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8001,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Alamosa,Alamosa County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8003,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Alamosa,Alamosa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8003,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Alamosa,Alamosa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8003,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Alamosa,Alamosa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8003,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Alamosa,Alamosa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8003,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Alamosa,Alamosa County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,16362,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8003,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Alamosa,Alamosa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9718,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8003,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Alamosa,Alamosa County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,206,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8003,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Alamosa,Alamosa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,206,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8003,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Alamosa,Alamosa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9512,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8003,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Alamosa,Alamosa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8003,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Alamosa,Alamosa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,2.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8003,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Alamosa,Alamosa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,97.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8003,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Alamosa,Alamosa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8003,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Alamosa,Alamosa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8003,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Alamosa,Alamosa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8003,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Alamosa,Alamosa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8003,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Alamosa,Alamosa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8003,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Arapahoe,Arapahoe County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,25,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8005,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Arapahoe,Arapahoe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,22,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8005,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Arapahoe,Arapahoe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8005,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Arapahoe,Arapahoe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8005,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Arapahoe,Arapahoe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8005,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Arapahoe,Arapahoe County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,655112,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8005,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Arapahoe,Arapahoe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,767115,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8005,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Arapahoe,Arapahoe County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,740867,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8005,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Arapahoe,Arapahoe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,396721,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8005,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Arapahoe,Arapahoe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,26248,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8005,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Arapahoe,Arapahoe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,96.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8005,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Arapahoe,Arapahoe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,51.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8005,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Arapahoe,Arapahoe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,3.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8005,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Arapahoe,Arapahoe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8005,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Arapahoe,Arapahoe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,25.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8005,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Arapahoe,Arapahoe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,19.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8005,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Arapahoe,Arapahoe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,196092,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8005,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Arapahoe,Arapahoe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,147463,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8005,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Archuleta,Archuleta County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8007,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Archuleta,Archuleta County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8007,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Archuleta,Archuleta County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8007,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Archuleta,Archuleta County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8007,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Archuleta,Archuleta County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8007,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Archuleta,Archuleta County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,13424,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8007,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Archuleta,Archuleta County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,10988,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8007,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Archuleta,Archuleta County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8007,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Archuleta,Archuleta County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8007,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Archuleta,Archuleta County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10988,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8007,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Archuleta,Archuleta County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8007,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Archuleta,Archuleta County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8007,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Archuleta,Archuleta County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8007,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Archuleta,Archuleta County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8007,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Archuleta,Archuleta County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8007,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Archuleta,Archuleta County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8007,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Archuleta,Archuleta County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8007,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Archuleta,Archuleta County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8007,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Baca,Baca County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8009,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Baca,Baca County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8009,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Baca,Baca County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8009,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Baca,Baca County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8009,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Baca,Baca County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8009,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Baca,Baca County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,3486,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8009,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Baca,Baca County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2151,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8009,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Baca,Baca County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2151,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8009,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Baca,Baca County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,2151,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8009,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Baca,Baca County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8009,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Baca,Baca County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8009,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Baca,Baca County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8009,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Baca,Baca County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8009,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Baca,Baca County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8009,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Baca,Baca County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8009,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Baca,Baca County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8009,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Baca,Baca County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8009,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Baca,Baca County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8009,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Bent,Bent County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8011,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Bent,Bent County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8011,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Bent,Bent County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8011,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Bent,Bent County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8011,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Bent,Bent County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8011,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Bent,Bent County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,5635,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8011,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Bent,Bent County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2776,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8011,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Bent,Bent County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2523,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8011,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Bent,Bent County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,121,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8011,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Bent,Bent County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,253,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8011,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Bent,Bent County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,90.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8011,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Bent,Bent County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,4.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8011,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Bent,Bent County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,9.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8011,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Bent,Bent County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8011,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Bent,Bent County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,13.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8011,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Bent,Bent County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,73.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8011,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Bent,Bent County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,371,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8011,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Bent,Bent County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2031,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8011,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Boulder,Boulder County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,33,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8013,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Boulder,Boulder County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,22,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8013,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Boulder,Boulder County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8013,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Boulder,Boulder County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8013,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Boulder,Boulder County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8013,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Boulder,Boulder County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,330811,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8013,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Boulder,Boulder County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,325986,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8013,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Boulder,Boulder County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,320818,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8013,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Boulder,Boulder County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,482,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8013,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Boulder,Boulder County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5167,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8013,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Boulder,Boulder County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8013,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Boulder,Boulder County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8013,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Boulder,Boulder County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8013,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Boulder,Boulder County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8013,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Boulder,Boulder County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,2.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8013,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Boulder,Boulder County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,95.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8013,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Boulder,Boulder County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,8808,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8013,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Boulder,Boulder County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,311255,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8013,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Broomfield,Broomfield County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8014,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Broomfield,Broomfield County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8014,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Broomfield,Broomfield County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8014,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Broomfield,Broomfield County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8014,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Broomfield,Broomfield County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8014,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Broomfield,Broomfield County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,74513,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8014,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Broomfield,Broomfield County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,89449,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8014,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Broomfield,Broomfield County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,89449,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8014,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Broomfield,Broomfield County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8014,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Broomfield,Broomfield County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8014,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Broomfield,Broomfield County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8014,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Broomfield,Broomfield County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8014,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Broomfield,Broomfield County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8014,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Broomfield,Broomfield County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8014,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Broomfield,Broomfield County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8014,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Broomfield,Broomfield County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8014,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Broomfield,Broomfield County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,89449,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8014,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Broomfield,Broomfield County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8014,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Chaffee,Chaffee County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8015,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Chaffee,Chaffee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8015,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Chaffee,Chaffee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8015,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Chaffee,Chaffee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8015,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Chaffee,Chaffee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8015,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Chaffee,Chaffee County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,19571,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8015,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Chaffee,Chaffee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,12292,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8015,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Chaffee,Chaffee County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5592,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8015,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Chaffee,Chaffee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,5438,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8015,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Chaffee,Chaffee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6700,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8015,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Chaffee,Chaffee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,45.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8015,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Chaffee,Chaffee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,44.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8015,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Chaffee,Chaffee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,54.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8015,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Chaffee,Chaffee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8015,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Chaffee,Chaffee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8015,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Chaffee,Chaffee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8015,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Chaffee,Chaffee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8015,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Chaffee,Chaffee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8015,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Cheyenne,Cheyenne County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8017,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Cheyenne,Cheyenne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8017,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Cheyenne,Cheyenne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8017,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Cheyenne,Cheyenne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8017,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Cheyenne,Cheyenne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8017,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Cheyenne,Cheyenne County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,1736,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8017,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Cheyenne,Cheyenne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1065,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8017,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Cheyenne,Cheyenne County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,357,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8017,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Cheyenne,Cheyenne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,357,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8017,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Cheyenne,Cheyenne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,708,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8017,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Cheyenne,Cheyenne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,33.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8017,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Cheyenne,Cheyenne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,33.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8017,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Cheyenne,Cheyenne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,66.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8017,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Cheyenne,Cheyenne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8017,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Cheyenne,Cheyenne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8017,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Cheyenne,Cheyenne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8017,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Cheyenne,Cheyenne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8017,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Cheyenne,Cheyenne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8017,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Clear Creek,Clear Creek County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8019,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Clear Creek,Clear Creek County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8019,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Clear Creek,Clear Creek County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8019,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Clear Creek,Clear Creek County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8019,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Clear Creek,Clear Creek County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8019,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Clear Creek,Clear Creek County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,9404,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8019,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Clear Creek,Clear Creek County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,11454,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8019,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Clear Creek,Clear Creek County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,190,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8019,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Clear Creek,Clear Creek County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8019,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Clear Creek,Clear Creek County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11265,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8019,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Clear Creek,Clear Creek County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8019,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Clear Creek,Clear Creek County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8019,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Clear Creek,Clear Creek County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8019,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Clear Creek,Clear Creek County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8019,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Clear Creek,Clear Creek County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8019,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Clear Creek,Clear Creek County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8019,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Clear Creek,Clear Creek County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8019,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Clear Creek,Clear Creek County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8019,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,CO,Colorado,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,833,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,CO,CO,Colorado,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,401,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,CO,CO,Colorado,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,54,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,CO,CO,Colorado,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,94,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,CO,CO,Colorado,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,227,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,CO,CO,Colorado,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,5784308,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2020,CO,CO,Colorado,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5480628,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,CO,CO,Colorado,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4123671,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,CO,CO,Colorado,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,746087,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,CO,CO,Colorado,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1356957,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,CO,CO,Colorado,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,75.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,CO,CO,Colorado,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,13.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,CO,CO,Colorado,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,24.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,CO,CO,Colorado,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,432,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,CO,CO,Colorado,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,16.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,CO,CO,Colorado,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,42.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,CO,CO,Colorado,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,906046,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,CO,CO,Colorado,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2338079,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,CO,Conejos,Conejos County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8021,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Conejos,Conejos County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8021,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Conejos,Conejos County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8021,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Conejos,Conejos County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8021,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Conejos,Conejos County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8021,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Conejos,Conejos County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,7464,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8021,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Conejos,Conejos County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3793,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8021,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Conejos,Conejos County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8021,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Conejos,Conejos County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8021,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Conejos,Conejos County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3793,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8021,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Conejos,Conejos County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8021,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Conejos,Conejos County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8021,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Conejos,Conejos County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8021,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Conejos,Conejos County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8021,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Conejos,Conejos County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8021,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Conejos,Conejos County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8021,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Conejos,Conejos County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8021,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Conejos,Conejos County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8021,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Costilla,Costilla County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8023,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Costilla,Costilla County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8023,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Costilla,Costilla County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8023,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Costilla,Costilla County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8023,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Costilla,Costilla County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8023,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Costilla,Costilla County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,3506,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8023,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Costilla,Costilla County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1957,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8023,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Costilla,Costilla County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,557,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8023,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Costilla,Costilla County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,84,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8023,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Costilla,Costilla County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1400,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8023,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Costilla,Costilla County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,28.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8023,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Costilla,Costilla County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,4.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8023,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Costilla,Costilla County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,71.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8023,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Costilla,Costilla County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8023,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Costilla,Costilla County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8023,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Costilla,Costilla County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8023,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Costilla,Costilla County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8023,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Costilla,Costilla County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8023,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Crowley,Crowley County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8025,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Crowley,Crowley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8025,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Crowley,Crowley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8025,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Crowley,Crowley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8025,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Crowley,Crowley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8025,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Crowley,Crowley County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,5893,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8025,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Crowley,Crowley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2479,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8025,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Crowley,Crowley County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2479,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8025,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Crowley,Crowley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,202,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8025,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Crowley,Crowley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8025,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Crowley,Crowley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8025,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Crowley,Crowley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,8.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8025,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Crowley,Crowley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8025,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Crowley,Crowley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8025,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Crowley,Crowley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,91.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8025,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Crowley,Crowley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8025,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Crowley,Crowley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2277,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8025,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Crowley,Crowley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8025,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Custer,Custer County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8027,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Custer,Custer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8027,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Custer,Custer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8027,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Custer,Custer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8027,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Custer,Custer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8027,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Custer,Custer County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,4712,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8027,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Custer,Custer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1675,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8027,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Custer,Custer County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8027,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Custer,Custer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8027,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Custer,Custer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1675,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8027,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Custer,Custer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8027,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Custer,Custer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8027,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Custer,Custer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8027,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Custer,Custer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8027,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Custer,Custer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8027,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Custer,Custer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8027,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Custer,Custer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8027,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Custer,Custer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8027,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Delta,Delta County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,22,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8029,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Delta,Delta County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8029,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Delta,Delta County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8029,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Delta,Delta County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8029,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Delta,Delta County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8029,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Delta,Delta County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,31232,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8029,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Delta,Delta County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,21498,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8029,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Delta,Delta County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2796,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8029,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Delta,Delta County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,150,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8029,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Delta,Delta County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,18703,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8029,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Delta,Delta County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,13,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8029,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Delta,Delta County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8029,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Delta,Delta County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,87,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8029,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Delta,Delta County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8029,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Delta,Delta County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,4.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8029,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Delta,Delta County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8029,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Delta,Delta County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,918,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8029,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Delta,Delta County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1727,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8029,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Denver,Denver County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8031,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Denver,Denver County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8031,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Denver,Denver County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8031,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Denver,Denver County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8031,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Denver,Denver County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8031,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Denver,Denver County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,717630,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8031,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Denver,Denver County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,713103,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8031,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Denver,Denver County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,713103,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8031,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Denver,Denver County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8031,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Denver,Denver County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8031,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Denver,Denver County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8031,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Denver,Denver County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8031,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Denver,Denver County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8031,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Denver,Denver County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8031,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Denver,Denver County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8031,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Denver,Denver County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,99.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8031,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Denver,Denver County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1849,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8031,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Denver,Denver County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,711254,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8031,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Dolores,Dolores County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8033,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Dolores,Dolores County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8033,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Dolores,Dolores County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8033,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Dolores,Dolores County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8033,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Dolores,Dolores County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8033,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Dolores,Dolores County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,2338,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8033,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Dolores,Dolores County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1040,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8033,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Dolores,Dolores County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8033,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Dolores,Dolores County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8033,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Dolores,Dolores County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1040,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8033,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Dolores,Dolores County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8033,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Dolores,Dolores County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8033,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Dolores,Dolores County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8033,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Dolores,Dolores County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8033,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Dolores,Dolores County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8033,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Dolores,Dolores County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8033,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Dolores,Dolores County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8033,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Dolores,Dolores County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8033,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,25,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8035,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,19,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8035,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8035,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8035,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8035,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,360102,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8035,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,296473,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8035,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,178583,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8035,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,143850,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8035,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,117890,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8035,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,60.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8035,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,48.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8035,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,39.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8035,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8035,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,7.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8035,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8035,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,22662,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8035,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,11797,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8035,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Eagle,Eagle County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,22,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8037,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Eagle,Eagle County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8037,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Eagle,Eagle County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8037,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Eagle,Eagle County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8037,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Eagle,Eagle County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8037,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Eagle,Eagle County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,55665,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8037,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Eagle,Eagle County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,74910,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8037,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Eagle,Eagle County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,56232,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8037,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Eagle,Eagle County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,190,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8037,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Eagle,Eagle County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,18678,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8037,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Eagle,Eagle County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,75.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8037,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Eagle,Eagle County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8037,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Eagle,Eagle County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,24.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8037,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Eagle,Eagle County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8037,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Eagle,Eagle County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8037,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Eagle,Eagle County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,74.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8037,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Eagle,Eagle County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8037,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Eagle,Eagle County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,56043,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8037,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,El Paso,El Paso County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,49,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8041,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,El Paso,El Paso County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,26,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8041,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,El Paso,El Paso County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8041,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,El Paso,El Paso County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8041,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,El Paso,El Paso County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,25,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8041,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,El Paso,El Paso County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,731847,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8041,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CO,El Paso,El Paso County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,577276,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8041,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,El Paso,El Paso County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,37785,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8041,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,El Paso,El Paso County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,30358,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8041,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,El Paso,El Paso County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,539491,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8041,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,El Paso,El Paso County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,6.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8041,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,El Paso,El Paso County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,5.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8041,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,El Paso,El Paso County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,93.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8041,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,El Paso,El Paso County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,23,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8041,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,El Paso,El Paso County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,1.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8041,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,El Paso,El Paso County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8041,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,El Paso,El Paso County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,7427,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8041,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,El Paso,El Paso County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8041,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Elbert,Elbert County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8039,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Elbert,Elbert County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8039,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Elbert,Elbert County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8039,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Elbert,Elbert County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8039,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Elbert,Elbert County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8039,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Elbert,Elbert County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,26206,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8039,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Elbert,Elbert County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5593,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8039,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Elbert,Elbert County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2189,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8039,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Elbert,Elbert County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,2189,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8039,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Elbert,Elbert County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3403,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8039,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Elbert,Elbert County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,39.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8039,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Elbert,Elbert County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,39.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8039,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Elbert,Elbert County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,60.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8039,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Elbert,Elbert County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8039,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Elbert,Elbert County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8039,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Elbert,Elbert County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8039,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Elbert,Elbert County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8039,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Elbert,Elbert County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8039,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Fremont,Fremont County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8043,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Fremont,Fremont County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8043,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Fremont,Fremont County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8043,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Fremont,Fremont County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8043,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Fremont,Fremont County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8043,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Fremont,Fremont County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,48981,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8043,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Fremont,Fremont County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,43766,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8043,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Fremont,Fremont County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,35819,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8043,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Fremont,Fremont County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,6024,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8043,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Fremont,Fremont County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7947,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8043,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Fremont,Fremont County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,81.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8043,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Fremont,Fremont County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,13.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8043,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Fremont,Fremont County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,18.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8043,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Fremont,Fremont County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8043,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Fremont,Fremont County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,1.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8043,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Fremont,Fremont County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,67,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8043,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Fremont,Fremont County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,471,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8043,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Fremont,Fremont County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,29324,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8043,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Garfield,Garfield County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,46,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8045,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Garfield,Garfield County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8045,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Garfield,Garfield County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8045,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Garfield,Garfield County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8045,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Garfield,Garfield County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8045,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Garfield,Garfield County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,61776,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8045,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Garfield,Garfield County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,39674,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8045,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Garfield,Garfield County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8292,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8045,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Garfield,Garfield County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,348,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8045,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Garfield,Garfield County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,31382,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8045,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Garfield,Garfield County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,20.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8045,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Garfield,Garfield County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8045,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Garfield,Garfield County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,79.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8045,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Garfield,Garfield County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,40,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8045,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Garfield,Garfield County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8045,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Garfield,Garfield County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,20,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8045,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Garfield,Garfield County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8045,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Garfield,Garfield County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,7944,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8045,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Gilpin,Gilpin County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8047,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Gilpin,Gilpin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8047,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Gilpin,Gilpin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8047,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Gilpin,Gilpin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8047,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Gilpin,Gilpin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8047,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Gilpin,Gilpin County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,5810,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8047,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Gilpin,Gilpin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,15940,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8047,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Gilpin,Gilpin County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8047,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Gilpin,Gilpin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8047,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Gilpin,Gilpin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,15940,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8047,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Gilpin,Gilpin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8047,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Gilpin,Gilpin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8047,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Gilpin,Gilpin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8047,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Gilpin,Gilpin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8047,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Gilpin,Gilpin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8047,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Gilpin,Gilpin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8047,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Gilpin,Gilpin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8047,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Gilpin,Gilpin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8047,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Grand,Grand County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8049,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Grand,Grand County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8049,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Grand,Grand County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8049,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Grand,Grand County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8049,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Grand,Grand County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8049,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Grand,Grand County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,15733,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8049,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Grand,Grand County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,23962,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8049,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Grand,Grand County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3055,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8049,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Grand,Grand County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1601,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8049,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Grand,Grand County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,20908,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8049,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Grand,Grand County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,12.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8049,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Grand,Grand County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,6.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8049,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Grand,Grand County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,87.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8049,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Grand,Grand County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8049,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Grand,Grand County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8049,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Grand,Grand County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,6.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8049,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Grand,Grand County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8049,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Grand,Grand County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1454,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8049,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Gunnison,Gunnison County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8051,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Gunnison,Gunnison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8051,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Gunnison,Gunnison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8051,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Gunnison,Gunnison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8051,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Gunnison,Gunnison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8051,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Gunnison,Gunnison County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,16945,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8051,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Gunnison,Gunnison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,15050,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8051,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Gunnison,Gunnison County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,413,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8051,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Gunnison,Gunnison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,413,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8051,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Gunnison,Gunnison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,14637,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8051,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Gunnison,Gunnison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8051,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Gunnison,Gunnison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,2.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8051,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Gunnison,Gunnison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,97.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8051,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Gunnison,Gunnison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8051,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Gunnison,Gunnison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8051,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Gunnison,Gunnison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8051,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Gunnison,Gunnison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8051,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Gunnison,Gunnison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8051,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Hinsdale,Hinsdale County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8053,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Hinsdale,Hinsdale County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8053,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Hinsdale,Hinsdale County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8053,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Hinsdale,Hinsdale County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8053,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Hinsdale,Hinsdale County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8053,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Hinsdale,Hinsdale County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,794,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8053,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Hinsdale,Hinsdale County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,495,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8053,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Hinsdale,Hinsdale County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8053,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Hinsdale,Hinsdale County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8053,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Hinsdale,Hinsdale County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,495,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8053,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Hinsdale,Hinsdale County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8053,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Hinsdale,Hinsdale County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8053,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Hinsdale,Hinsdale County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8053,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Hinsdale,Hinsdale County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8053,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Hinsdale,Hinsdale County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8053,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Hinsdale,Hinsdale County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8053,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Hinsdale,Hinsdale County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8053,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Hinsdale,Hinsdale County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8053,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Huerfano,Huerfano County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8055,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Huerfano,Huerfano County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8055,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Huerfano,Huerfano County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8055,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Huerfano,Huerfano County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8055,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Huerfano,Huerfano County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8055,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Huerfano,Huerfano County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,6810,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8055,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Huerfano,Huerfano County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4703,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8055,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Huerfano,Huerfano County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3617,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8055,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Huerfano,Huerfano County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,896,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8055,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Huerfano,Huerfano County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1085,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8055,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Huerfano,Huerfano County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,76.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8055,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Huerfano,Huerfano County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,19,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8055,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Huerfano,Huerfano County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,23.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8055,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Huerfano,Huerfano County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8055,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Huerfano,Huerfano County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8055,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Huerfano,Huerfano County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,57.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8055,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Huerfano,Huerfano County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8055,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Huerfano,Huerfano County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2722,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8055,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8057,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8057,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8057,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8057,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8057,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,1376,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8057,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,562,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8057,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,492,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8057,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8057,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,70,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8057,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,87.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8057,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8057,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,12.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8057,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8057,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8057,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,87.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8057,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8057,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,492,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8057,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,43,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8059,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,28,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8059,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8059,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8059,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8059,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,582928,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8059,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,633140,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8059,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,594623,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8059,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1931,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8059,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,38517,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8059,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,93.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8059,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8059,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,6.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8059,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8059,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,33.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8059,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,60.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8059,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,211274,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8059,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,381418,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8059,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Kiowa,Kiowa County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8061,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Kiowa,Kiowa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8061,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Kiowa,Kiowa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8061,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Kiowa,Kiowa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8061,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Kiowa,Kiowa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8061,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Kiowa,Kiowa County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,1452,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8061,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Kiowa,Kiowa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,763,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8061,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Kiowa,Kiowa County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,763,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8061,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Kiowa,Kiowa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,763,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8061,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Kiowa,Kiowa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8061,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Kiowa,Kiowa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8061,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Kiowa,Kiowa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8061,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Kiowa,Kiowa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8061,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Kiowa,Kiowa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8061,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Kiowa,Kiowa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8061,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Kiowa,Kiowa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8061,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Kiowa,Kiowa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8061,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Kiowa,Kiowa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8061,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Kit Carson,Kit Carson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8063,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Kit Carson,Kit Carson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8063,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Kit Carson,Kit Carson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8063,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Kit Carson,Kit Carson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8063,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Kit Carson,Kit Carson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8063,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Kit Carson,Kit Carson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,7064,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8063,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Kit Carson,Kit Carson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,6312,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8063,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Kit Carson,Kit Carson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5928,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8063,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Kit Carson,Kit Carson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,5928,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8063,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Kit Carson,Kit Carson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,384,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8063,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Kit Carson,Kit Carson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,93.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8063,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Kit Carson,Kit Carson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,93.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8063,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Kit Carson,Kit Carson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,6.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8063,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Kit Carson,Kit Carson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8063,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Kit Carson,Kit Carson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8063,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Kit Carson,Kit Carson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8063,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Kit Carson,Kit Carson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8063,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Kit Carson,Kit Carson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8063,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,La Plata,La Plata County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,45,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8067,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,La Plata,La Plata County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8067,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,La Plata,La Plata County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8067,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,La Plata,La Plata County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8067,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,La Plata,La Plata County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8067,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,La Plata,La Plata County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,55642,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8067,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CO,La Plata,La Plata County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,44708,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8067,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,La Plata,La Plata County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,33131,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8067,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,La Plata,La Plata County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,3607,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8067,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,La Plata,La Plata County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11577,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8067,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,La Plata,La Plata County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,74.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8067,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,La Plata,La Plata County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,8.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8067,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,La Plata,La Plata County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,25.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8067,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,La Plata,La Plata County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,33,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8067,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,La Plata,La Plata County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8067,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,La Plata,La Plata County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,65.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8067,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,La Plata,La Plata County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,161,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8067,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,La Plata,La Plata County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,29363,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8067,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8065,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8065,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8065,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8065,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8065,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,7409,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8065,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7530,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8065,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,190,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8065,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,190,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8065,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7339,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8065,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8065,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,2.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8065,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,97.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8065,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8065,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8065,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8065,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8065,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8065,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Larimer,Larimer County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,27,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8069,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Larimer,Larimer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,19,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8069,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Larimer,Larimer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8069,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Larimer,Larimer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8069,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Larimer,Larimer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8069,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Larimer,Larimer County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,359686,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8069,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Larimer,Larimer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,307059,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8069,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Larimer,Larimer County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,286620,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8069,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Larimer,Larimer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1091,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8069,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Larimer,Larimer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,20439,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8069,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Larimer,Larimer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,93.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8069,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Larimer,Larimer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8069,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Larimer,Larimer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,6.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8069,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Larimer,Larimer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8069,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Larimer,Larimer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,35.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8069,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Larimer,Larimer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,57.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8069,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Larimer,Larimer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,109344,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8069,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Larimer,Larimer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,175879,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8069,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Las Animas,Las Animas County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8071,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Las Animas,Las Animas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8071,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Las Animas,Las Animas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8071,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Las Animas,Las Animas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8071,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Las Animas,Las Animas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8071,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Las Animas,Las Animas County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,14564,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8071,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Las Animas,Las Animas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,11737,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8071,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Las Animas,Las Animas County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8071,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Las Animas,Las Animas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8071,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Las Animas,Las Animas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11737,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8071,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Las Animas,Las Animas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8071,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Las Animas,Las Animas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8071,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Las Animas,Las Animas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8071,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Las Animas,Las Animas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8071,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Las Animas,Las Animas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8071,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Las Animas,Las Animas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8071,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Las Animas,Las Animas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8071,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Las Animas,Las Animas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8071,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8073,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8073,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8073,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8073,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8073,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,5669,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8073,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,6503,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8073,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,954,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8073,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,954,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8073,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5549,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8073,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,14.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8073,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,14.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8073,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,85.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8073,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8073,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8073,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8073,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8073,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8073,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8075,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8075,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8075,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8075,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8075,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,21495,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8075,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,14282,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8075,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1010,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8075,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1010,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8075,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,13272,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8075,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,7.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8075,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,7.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8075,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,92.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8075,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8075,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8075,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8075,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8075,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8075,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Mesa,Mesa County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8077,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Mesa,Mesa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8077,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Mesa,Mesa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8077,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Mesa,Mesa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8077,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Mesa,Mesa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8077,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Mesa,Mesa County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,155939,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8077,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Mesa,Mesa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,129840,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8077,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Mesa,Mesa County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,125452,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8077,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Mesa,Mesa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,312,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8077,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Mesa,Mesa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4388,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8077,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Mesa,Mesa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,96.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8077,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Mesa,Mesa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8077,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Mesa,Mesa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,3.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8077,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Mesa,Mesa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8077,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Mesa,Mesa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,23.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8077,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Mesa,Mesa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,73,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8077,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Mesa,Mesa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,30327,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8077,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Mesa,Mesa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,94814,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8077,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Mineral,Mineral County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8079,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Mineral,Mineral County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8079,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Mineral,Mineral County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8079,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Mineral,Mineral County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8079,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Mineral,Mineral County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8079,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Mineral,Mineral County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,867,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8079,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Mineral,Mineral County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1728,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8079,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Mineral,Mineral County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8079,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Mineral,Mineral County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8079,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Mineral,Mineral County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1728,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8079,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Mineral,Mineral County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8079,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Mineral,Mineral County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8079,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Mineral,Mineral County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8079,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Mineral,Mineral County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8079,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Mineral,Mineral County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8079,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Mineral,Mineral County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8079,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Mineral,Mineral County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8079,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Mineral,Mineral County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8079,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Moffat,Moffat County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8081,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Moffat,Moffat County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8081,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Moffat,Moffat County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8081,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Moffat,Moffat County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8081,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Moffat,Moffat County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8081,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Moffat,Moffat County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,13267,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8081,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Moffat,Moffat County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,8638,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8081,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Moffat,Moffat County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8343,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8081,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Moffat,Moffat County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8081,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Moffat,Moffat County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,295,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8081,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Moffat,Moffat County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,96.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8081,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Moffat,Moffat County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8081,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Moffat,Moffat County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,3.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8081,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Moffat,Moffat County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8081,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Moffat,Moffat County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8081,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Moffat,Moffat County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,96.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8081,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Moffat,Moffat County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8081,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Moffat,Moffat County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,8343,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8081,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Montezuma,Montezuma County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8083,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Montezuma,Montezuma County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8083,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Montezuma,Montezuma County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8083,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Montezuma,Montezuma County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8083,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Montezuma,Montezuma County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8083,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Montezuma,Montezuma County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,25858,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8083,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Montezuma,Montezuma County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,23007,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8083,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Montezuma,Montezuma County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8083,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Montezuma,Montezuma County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8083,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Montezuma,Montezuma County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,23007,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8083,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Montezuma,Montezuma County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8083,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Montezuma,Montezuma County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8083,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Montezuma,Montezuma County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8083,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Montezuma,Montezuma County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8083,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Montezuma,Montezuma County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8083,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Montezuma,Montezuma County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8083,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Montezuma,Montezuma County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8083,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Montezuma,Montezuma County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8083,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Montrose,Montrose County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8085,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Montrose,Montrose County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8085,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Montrose,Montrose County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8085,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Montrose,Montrose County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8085,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Montrose,Montrose County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8085,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Montrose,Montrose County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,42798,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8085,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Montrose,Montrose County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,41749,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8085,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Montrose,Montrose County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,65,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8085,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Montrose,Montrose County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,65,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8085,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Montrose,Montrose County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,41684,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8085,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Montrose,Montrose County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8085,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Montrose,Montrose County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8085,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Montrose,Montrose County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8085,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Montrose,Montrose County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8085,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Montrose,Montrose County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8085,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Montrose,Montrose County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8085,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Montrose,Montrose County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8085,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Montrose,Montrose County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8085,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8087,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8087,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8087,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8087,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8087,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,29065,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8087,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,22800,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8087,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11131,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8087,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1020,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8087,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11669,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8087,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,48.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8087,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,4.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8087,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,51.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8087,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8087,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8087,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,44.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8087,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8087,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,10112,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8087,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Otero,Otero County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,23,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8089,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Otero,Otero County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,23,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8089,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Otero,Otero County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8089,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Otero,Otero County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8089,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Otero,Otero County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,22,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8089,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Otero,Otero County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,18667,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8089,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Otero,Otero County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,16719,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8089,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Otero,Otero County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,16719,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8089,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Otero,Otero County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,16646,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8089,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Otero,Otero County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8089,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Otero,Otero County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8089,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Otero,Otero County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,99.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8089,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Otero,Otero County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8089,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Otero,Otero County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8089,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Otero,Otero County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8089,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Otero,Otero County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8089,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Otero,Otero County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,73,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8089,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Otero,Otero County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8089,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Ouray,Ouray County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8091,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Ouray,Ouray County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8091,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Ouray,Ouray County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8091,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Ouray,Ouray County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8091,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Ouray,Ouray County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8091,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Ouray,Ouray County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,4869,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8091,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Ouray,Ouray County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2999,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8091,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Ouray,Ouray County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8091,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Ouray,Ouray County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8091,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Ouray,Ouray County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2999,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8091,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Ouray,Ouray County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8091,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Ouray,Ouray County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8091,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Ouray,Ouray County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8091,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Ouray,Ouray County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8091,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Ouray,Ouray County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8091,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Ouray,Ouray County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8091,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Ouray,Ouray County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8091,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Ouray,Ouray County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8091,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Park,Park County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8093,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Park,Park County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8093,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Park,Park County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8093,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Park,Park County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8093,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Park,Park County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8093,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Park,Park County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,17421,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8093,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Park,Park County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2516,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8093,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Park,Park County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,253,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8093,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Park,Park County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,253,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8093,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Park,Park County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2263,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8093,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Park,Park County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,10,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8093,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Park,Park County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,10,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8093,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Park,Park County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,90,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8093,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Park,Park County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8093,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Park,Park County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8093,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Park,Park County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8093,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Park,Park County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8093,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Park,Park County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8093,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Phillips,Phillips County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8095,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Phillips,Phillips County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8095,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Phillips,Phillips County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8095,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Phillips,Phillips County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8095,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Phillips,Phillips County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8095,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Phillips,Phillips County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,4534,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8095,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Phillips,Phillips County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2978,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8095,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Phillips,Phillips County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2943,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8095,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Phillips,Phillips County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,2943,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8095,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Phillips,Phillips County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,35,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8095,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Phillips,Phillips County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8095,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Phillips,Phillips County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,98.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8095,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Phillips,Phillips County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8095,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Phillips,Phillips County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8095,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Phillips,Phillips County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8095,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Phillips,Phillips County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8095,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Phillips,Phillips County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8095,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Phillips,Phillips County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8095,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Pitkin,Pitkin County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,25,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8097,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Pitkin,Pitkin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8097,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Pitkin,Pitkin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8097,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Pitkin,Pitkin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8097,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Pitkin,Pitkin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8097,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Pitkin,Pitkin County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,17342,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8097,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Pitkin,Pitkin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,34151,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8097,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Pitkin,Pitkin County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,31804,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8097,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Pitkin,Pitkin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8097,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Pitkin,Pitkin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2347,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8097,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Pitkin,Pitkin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,93.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8097,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Pitkin,Pitkin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8097,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Pitkin,Pitkin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,6.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8097,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Pitkin,Pitkin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,21,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8097,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Pitkin,Pitkin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8097,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Pitkin,Pitkin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,92.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8097,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Pitkin,Pitkin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,244,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8097,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Pitkin,Pitkin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,31560,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8097,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Prowers,Prowers County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8099,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Prowers,Prowers County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8099,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Prowers,Prowers County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8099,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Prowers,Prowers County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8099,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Prowers,Prowers County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8099,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Prowers,Prowers County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,11986,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8099,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Prowers,Prowers County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,10837,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8099,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Prowers,Prowers County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10837,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8099,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Prowers,Prowers County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,3371,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8099,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Prowers,Prowers County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8099,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Prowers,Prowers County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8099,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Prowers,Prowers County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,31.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8099,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Prowers,Prowers County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8099,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Prowers,Prowers County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8099,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Prowers,Prowers County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8099,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Prowers,Prowers County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,66.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8099,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Prowers,Prowers County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,219,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8099,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Prowers,Prowers County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,7247,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8099,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Pueblo,Pueblo County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8101,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Pueblo,Pueblo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8101,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Pueblo,Pueblo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8101,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Pueblo,Pueblo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8101,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Pueblo,Pueblo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8101,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Pueblo,Pueblo County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,168467,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8101,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Pueblo,Pueblo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,134356,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8101,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Pueblo,Pueblo County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,131792,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8101,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Pueblo,Pueblo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,27930,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8101,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Pueblo,Pueblo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2563,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8101,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Pueblo,Pueblo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8101,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Pueblo,Pueblo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,20.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8101,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Pueblo,Pueblo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8101,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Pueblo,Pueblo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8101,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Pueblo,Pueblo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8101,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Pueblo,Pueblo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,77.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8101,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Pueblo,Pueblo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8101,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Pueblo,Pueblo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,103862,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8101,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Rio Blanco,Rio Blanco County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8103,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Rio Blanco,Rio Blanco County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8103,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Rio Blanco,Rio Blanco County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8103,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Rio Blanco,Rio Blanco County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8103,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Rio Blanco,Rio Blanco County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8103,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Rio Blanco,Rio Blanco County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,6518,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8103,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Rio Blanco,Rio Blanco County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4110,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8103,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Rio Blanco,Rio Blanco County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4045,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8103,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Rio Blanco,Rio Blanco County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8103,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Rio Blanco,Rio Blanco County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,66,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8103,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Rio Blanco,Rio Blanco County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8103,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Rio Blanco,Rio Blanco County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8103,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Rio Blanco,Rio Blanco County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8103,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Rio Blanco,Rio Blanco County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8103,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Rio Blanco,Rio Blanco County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8103,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Rio Blanco,Rio Blanco County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,98.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8103,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Rio Blanco,Rio Blanco County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8103,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Rio Blanco,Rio Blanco County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,4045,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8103,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Rio Grande,Rio Grande County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8105,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Rio Grande,Rio Grande County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8105,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Rio Grande,Rio Grande County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8105,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Rio Grande,Rio Grande County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8105,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Rio Grande,Rio Grande County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8105,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Rio Grande,Rio Grande County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,11538,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8105,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Rio Grande,Rio Grande County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5773,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8105,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Rio Grande,Rio Grande County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8105,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Rio Grande,Rio Grande County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8105,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Rio Grande,Rio Grande County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5773,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8105,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Rio Grande,Rio Grande County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8105,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Rio Grande,Rio Grande County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8105,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Rio Grande,Rio Grande County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8105,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Rio Grande,Rio Grande County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8105,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Rio Grande,Rio Grande County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8105,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Rio Grande,Rio Grande County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8105,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Rio Grande,Rio Grande County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8105,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Rio Grande,Rio Grande County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8105,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Routt,Routt County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,20,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8107,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Routt,Routt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8107,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Routt,Routt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8107,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Routt,Routt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8107,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Routt,Routt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8107,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Routt,Routt County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,24839,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8107,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Routt,Routt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,30711,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8107,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Routt,Routt County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,27560,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8107,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Routt,Routt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,346,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8107,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Routt,Routt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3151,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8107,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Routt,Routt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,89.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8107,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Routt,Routt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8107,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Routt,Routt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,10.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8107,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Routt,Routt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8107,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Routt,Routt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,31.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8107,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Routt,Routt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,57.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8107,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Routt,Routt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,9606,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8107,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Routt,Routt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,17607,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8107,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Saguache,Saguache County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8109,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Saguache,Saguache County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8109,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Saguache,Saguache County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8109,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Saguache,Saguache County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8109,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Saguache,Saguache County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8109,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Saguache,Saguache County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,6383,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8109,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Saguache,Saguache County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4160,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8109,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Saguache,Saguache County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,114,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8109,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Saguache,Saguache County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,114,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8109,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Saguache,Saguache County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4046,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8109,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Saguache,Saguache County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8109,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Saguache,Saguache County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,2.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8109,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Saguache,Saguache County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,97.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8109,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Saguache,Saguache County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8109,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Saguache,Saguache County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8109,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Saguache,Saguache County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8109,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Saguache,Saguache County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8109,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Saguache,Saguache County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8109,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,San Juan,San Juan County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8111,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,San Juan,San Juan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8111,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,San Juan,San Juan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8111,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,San Juan,San Juan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8111,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,San Juan,San Juan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8111,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,San Juan,San Juan County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,710,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8111,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CO,San Juan,San Juan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2011,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8111,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,San Juan,San Juan County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8111,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,San Juan,San Juan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8111,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,San Juan,San Juan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2011,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8111,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,San Juan,San Juan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8111,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,San Juan,San Juan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8111,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,San Juan,San Juan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8111,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,San Juan,San Juan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8111,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,San Juan,San Juan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8111,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,San Juan,San Juan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8111,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,San Juan,San Juan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8111,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,San Juan,San Juan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8111,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,San Miguel,San Miguel County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8113,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,San Miguel,San Miguel County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8113,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,San Miguel,San Miguel County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8113,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,San Miguel,San Miguel County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8113,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,San Miguel,San Miguel County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8113,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,San Miguel,San Miguel County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,8055,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8113,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CO,San Miguel,San Miguel County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,15918,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8113,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,San Miguel,San Miguel County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1432,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8113,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,San Miguel,San Miguel County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8113,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,San Miguel,San Miguel County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,14486,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8113,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,San Miguel,San Miguel County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8113,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,San Miguel,San Miguel County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8113,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,San Miguel,San Miguel County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,91,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8113,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,San Miguel,San Miguel County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8113,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,San Miguel,San Miguel County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8113,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,San Miguel,San Miguel County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8113,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,San Miguel,San Miguel County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8113,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,San Miguel,San Miguel County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1432,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8113,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Sedgwick,Sedgwick County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8115,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Sedgwick,Sedgwick County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8115,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Sedgwick,Sedgwick County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8115,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Sedgwick,Sedgwick County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8115,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Sedgwick,Sedgwick County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8115,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Sedgwick,Sedgwick County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,2390,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8115,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Sedgwick,Sedgwick County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1487,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8115,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Sedgwick,Sedgwick County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8115,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Sedgwick,Sedgwick County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8115,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Sedgwick,Sedgwick County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1487,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8115,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Sedgwick,Sedgwick County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8115,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Sedgwick,Sedgwick County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8115,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Sedgwick,Sedgwick County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8115,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Sedgwick,Sedgwick County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8115,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Sedgwick,Sedgwick County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8115,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Sedgwick,Sedgwick County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8115,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Sedgwick,Sedgwick County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8115,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Sedgwick,Sedgwick County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8115,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Summit,Summit County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,19,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8117,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Summit,Summit County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8117,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Summit,Summit County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8117,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Summit,Summit County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8117,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Summit,Summit County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8117,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Summit,Summit County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,30971,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8117,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Summit,Summit County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,58411,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8117,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Summit,Summit County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,32361,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8117,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Summit,Summit County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8117,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Summit,Summit County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,26050,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8117,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Summit,Summit County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,55.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8117,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Summit,Summit County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8117,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Summit,Summit County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,44.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8117,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Summit,Summit County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8117,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Summit,Summit County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8117,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Summit,Summit County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,55.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8117,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Summit,Summit County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8117,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Summit,Summit County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,32361,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8117,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Teller,Teller County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,24,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8119,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Teller,Teller County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,21,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8119,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Teller,Teller County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8119,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Teller,Teller County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8119,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Teller,Teller County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,19,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8119,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Teller,Teller County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,24726,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8119,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Teller,Teller County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,16368,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8119,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Teller,Teller County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,15618,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8119,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Teller,Teller County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,15365,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8119,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Teller,Teller County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,751,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8119,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Teller,Teller County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,95.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8119,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Teller,Teller County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,93.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8119,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Teller,Teller County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,4.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8119,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Teller,Teller County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8119,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Teller,Teller County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,1.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8119,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Teller,Teller County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8119,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Teller,Teller County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,253,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8119,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Teller,Teller County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8119,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8121,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8121,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8121,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8121,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8121,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,4815,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8121,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2510,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8121,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2510,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8121,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,2510,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8121,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8121,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8121,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8121,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8121,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8121,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8121,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8121,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8121,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8121,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Weld,Weld County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,33,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8123,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Weld,Weld County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,30,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8123,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Weld,Weld County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8123,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Weld,Weld County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,20,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8123,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Weld,Weld County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8123,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Weld,Weld County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,331358,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8123,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Weld,Weld County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,222707,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8123,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Weld,Weld County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,212929,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8123,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Weld,Weld County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,8609,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8123,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Weld,Weld County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9778,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8123,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Weld,Weld County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,95.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8123,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Weld,Weld County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,3.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8123,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Weld,Weld County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,4.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8123,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Weld,Weld County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8123,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Weld,Weld County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,51,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8123,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Weld,Weld County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,40.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8123,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Weld,Weld County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,113525,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8123,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Weld,Weld County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,90795,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8123,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Yuma,Yuma County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8125,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Yuma,Yuma County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8125,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Yuma,Yuma County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8125,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Yuma,Yuma County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8125,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Yuma,Yuma County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8125,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Yuma,Yuma County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,9979,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8125,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Yuma,Yuma County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5771,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8125,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Yuma,Yuma County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5771,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8125,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Yuma,Yuma County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,5771,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8125,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Yuma,Yuma County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8125,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Yuma,Yuma County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8125,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Yuma,Yuma County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8125,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Yuma,Yuma County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8125,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Yuma,Yuma County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8125,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Yuma,Yuma County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8125,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Yuma,Yuma County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8125,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Yuma,Yuma County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8125,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CO,Yuma,Yuma County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,8125,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CT,CT,Connecticut,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,466,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,9,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,CT,CT,Connecticut,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,87,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,9,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,CT,CT,Connecticut,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,31,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,9,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,CT,CT,Connecticut,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,33,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,9,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,CT,CT,Connecticut,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,23,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,9,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,CT,CT,Connecticut,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,3600260,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,9,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2020,CT,CT,Connecticut,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2736539,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,CT,CT,Connecticut,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2473983,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,CT,CT,Connecticut,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,4167,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,CT,CT,Connecticut,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,262556,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,CT,CT,Connecticut,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,90.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,CT,CT,Connecticut,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,CT,CT,Connecticut,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,9.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,CT,CT,Connecticut,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,379,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,9,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,CT,CT,Connecticut,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,4.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,CT,CT,Connecticut,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,85.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,CT,CT,Connecticut,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,131788,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,CT,CT,Connecticut,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2338028,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,CT,Fairfield,Fairfield County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,62,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,9001,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Fairfield,Fairfield County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,9001,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Fairfield,Fairfield County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,9001,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Fairfield,Fairfield County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,9001,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Fairfield,Fairfield County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,9001,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Fairfield,Fairfield County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,955895,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,9001,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Fairfield,Fairfield County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,738968,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9001,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Fairfield,Fairfield County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,710431,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9001,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Fairfield,Fairfield County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,600,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9001,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Fairfield,Fairfield County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,28538,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9001,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Fairfield,Fairfield County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,96.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9001,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Fairfield,Fairfield County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9001,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Fairfield,Fairfield County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,3.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9001,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Fairfield,Fairfield County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,44,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,9001,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Fairfield,Fairfield County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,5.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9001,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Fairfield,Fairfield County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,91,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9001,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Fairfield,Fairfield County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,37464,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9001,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Fairfield,Fairfield County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,672366,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9001,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Hartford,Hartford County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,47,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,9003,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Hartford,Hartford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,9003,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Hartford,Hartford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,9003,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Hartford,Hartford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,9003,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Hartford,Hartford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,9003,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Hartford,Hartford County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,897932,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,9003,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Hartford,Hartford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,826310,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9003,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Hartford,Hartford County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,762548,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9003,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Hartford,Hartford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,317,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9003,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Hartford,Hartford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,63761,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9003,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Hartford,Hartford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,92.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9003,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Hartford,Hartford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9003,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Hartford,Hartford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,7.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9003,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Hartford,Hartford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,33,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,9003,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Hartford,Hartford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,3.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9003,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Hartford,Hartford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,89.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9003,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Hartford,Hartford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,25263,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9003,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Hartford,Hartford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,736968,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9003,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Litchfield,Litchfield County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,76,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,9005,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Litchfield,Litchfield County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,9005,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Litchfield,Litchfield County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,9005,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Litchfield,Litchfield County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,9005,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Litchfield,Litchfield County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,9005,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Litchfield,Litchfield County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,184874,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,9005,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Litchfield,Litchfield County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,106757,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9005,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Litchfield,Litchfield County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,67285,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9005,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Litchfield,Litchfield County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,825,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9005,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Litchfield,Litchfield County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,39472,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9005,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Litchfield,Litchfield County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,63,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9005,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Litchfield,Litchfield County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9005,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Litchfield,Litchfield County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,37,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9005,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Litchfield,Litchfield County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,67,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,9005,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Litchfield,Litchfield County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,19.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9005,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Litchfield,Litchfield County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,43,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9005,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Litchfield,Litchfield County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,20503,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9005,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Litchfield,Litchfield County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,45958,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9005,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Middlesex,Middlesex County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,44,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,9007,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Middlesex,Middlesex County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,9007,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Middlesex,Middlesex County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,9007,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Middlesex,Middlesex County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,9007,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Middlesex,Middlesex County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,9007,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Middlesex,Middlesex County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,163923,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,9007,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Middlesex,Middlesex County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,74964,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9007,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Middlesex,Middlesex County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,63713,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9007,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Middlesex,Middlesex County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,81,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9007,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Middlesex,Middlesex County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11251,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9007,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Middlesex,Middlesex County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,85,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9007,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Middlesex,Middlesex County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9007,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Middlesex,Middlesex County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,15,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9007,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Middlesex,Middlesex County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,39,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,9007,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Middlesex,Middlesex County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,6.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9007,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Middlesex,Middlesex County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,78.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9007,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Middlesex,Middlesex County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,5038,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9007,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Middlesex,Middlesex County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,58593,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9007,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CT,New Haven,New Haven County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,32,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,9009,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CT,New Haven,New Haven County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,9009,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CT,New Haven,New Haven County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,9009,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CT,New Haven,New Haven County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,9009,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CT,New Haven,New Haven County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,9009,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CT,New Haven,New Haven County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,863498,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,9009,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CT,New Haven,New Haven County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,713144,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9009,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CT,New Haven,New Haven County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,699159,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9009,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CT,New Haven,New Haven County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9009,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CT,New Haven,New Haven County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,13985,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9009,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CT,New Haven,New Haven County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9009,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CT,New Haven,New Haven County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9009,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CT,New Haven,New Haven County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9009,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CT,New Haven,New Haven County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,22,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,9009,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CT,New Haven,New Haven County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,2.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9009,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CT,New Haven,New Haven County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,95.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9009,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CT,New Haven,New Haven County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,16946,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9009,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CT,New Haven,New Haven County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,682213,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9009,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CT,New London,New London County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,89,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,9011,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CT,New London,New London County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,9011,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CT,New London,New London County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,9011,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CT,New London,New London County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,9011,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CT,New London,New London County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,9011,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CT,New London,New London County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,268248,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,9011,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CT,New London,New London County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,177033,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9011,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CT,New London,New London County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,136065,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9011,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CT,New London,New London County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,363,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9011,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CT,New London,New London County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,40969,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9011,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CT,New London,New London County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,76.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9011,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CT,New London,New London County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9011,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CT,New London,New London County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,23.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9011,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CT,New London,New London County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,74,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,9011,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CT,New London,New London County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,14.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9011,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CT,New London,New London County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,62,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9011,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CT,New London,New London County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,25951,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9011,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CT,New London,New London County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,109750,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9011,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Tolland,Tolland County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,65,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,9013,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Tolland,Tolland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,9013,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Tolland,Tolland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,9013,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Tolland,Tolland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,9013,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Tolland,Tolland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,9013,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Tolland,Tolland County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,149650,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,9013,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Tolland,Tolland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,42262,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9013,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Tolland,Tolland County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2000,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9013,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Tolland,Tolland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1379,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9013,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Tolland,Tolland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,40262,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9013,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Tolland,Tolland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,4.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9013,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Tolland,Tolland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,3.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9013,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Tolland,Tolland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,95.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9013,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Tolland,Tolland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,54,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,9013,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Tolland,Tolland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,1.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9013,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Tolland,Tolland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,9013,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Tolland,Tolland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,622,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9013,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Tolland,Tolland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,9013,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Windham,Windham County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,51,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,9015,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Windham,Windham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,9015,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Windham,Windham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,9015,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Windham,Windham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,9015,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Windham,Windham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,9015,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Windham,Windham County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,116240,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,9015,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Windham,Windham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,57100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9015,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Windham,Windham County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,32782,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9015,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Windham,Windham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,602,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9015,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Windham,Windham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,24318,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9015,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Windham,Windham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,57.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9015,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Windham,Windham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9015,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Windham,Windham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,42.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9015,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Windham,Windham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,46,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,9015,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Windham,Windham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,9015,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Windham,Windham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,56.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9015,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Windham,Windham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,9015,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,CT,Windham,Windham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,32179,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9015,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,DC,DC,District of Columbia,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,11,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,DC,DC,District of Columbia,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,11,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,DC,DC,District of Columbia,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,11,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,DC,DC,District of Columbia,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,11,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,DC,DC,District of Columbia,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,11,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,DC,DC,District of Columbia,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,690093,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,11,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,False,,WFR_ST
2020,DC,DC,District of Columbia,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,690093,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,11,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,DC,DC,District of Columbia,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,690093,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,11,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,DC,DC,District of Columbia,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,11,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,DC,DC,District of Columbia,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,11,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,DC,DC,District of Columbia,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,11,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,DC,DC,District of Columbia,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,11,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,DC,DC,District of Columbia,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,11,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,DC,DC,District of Columbia,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,11,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,DC,DC,District of Columbia,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,11,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,DC,DC,District of Columbia,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,11,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,DC,DC,District of Columbia,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,690093,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,11,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,DC,DC,District of Columbia,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,11,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,DE,DE,Delaware,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,225,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,10,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,DE,DE,Delaware,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,46,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,10,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,DE,DE,Delaware,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,34,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,10,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,DE,DE,Delaware,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,10,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,DE,DE,Delaware,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,10,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,DE,DE,Delaware,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,991886,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,10,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2020,DE,DE,Delaware,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,801422,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,10,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,DE,DE,Delaware,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,609473,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,10,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,DE,DE,Delaware,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,8777,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,10,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,DE,DE,Delaware,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,191949,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,10,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,DE,DE,Delaware,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,76,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,10,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,DE,DE,Delaware,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,10,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,DE,DE,Delaware,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,24,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,10,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,DE,DE,Delaware,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,179,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,10,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,DE,DE,Delaware,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,10,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,DE,DE,Delaware,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,74.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,10,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,DE,DE,Delaware,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1602,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,10,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,DE,DE,Delaware,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,599094,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,10,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,DE,Kent,Kent County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,80,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,10001,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,DE,Kent,Kent County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,10001,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,DE,Kent,Kent County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,10001,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,DE,Kent,Kent County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,10001,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,DE,Kent,Kent County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,10001,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,DE,Kent,Kent County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,182256,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,10001,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,DE,Kent,Kent County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,103369,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,10001,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,DE,Kent,Kent County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,69402,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,10001,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,DE,Kent,Kent County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,6713,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,10001,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,DE,Kent,Kent County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,33968,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,10001,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,DE,Kent,Kent County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,67.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,10001,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,DE,Kent,Kent County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,6.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,10001,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,DE,Kent,Kent County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,32.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,10001,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,DE,Kent,Kent County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,64,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,10001,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,DE,Kent,Kent County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,1.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,10001,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,DE,Kent,Kent County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,59.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,10001,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,DE,Kent,Kent County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1423,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,10001,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,DE,Kent,Kent County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,61266,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,10001,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,DE,New Castle,New Castle County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,27,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,10003,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,DE,New Castle,New Castle County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,10003,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,DE,New Castle,New Castle County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,10003,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,DE,New Castle,New Castle County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,10003,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,DE,New Castle,New Castle County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,10003,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,DE,New Castle,New Castle County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,570718,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,10003,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,DE,New Castle,New Castle County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,450091,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,10003,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,DE,New Castle,New Castle County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,430845,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,10003,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,DE,New Castle,New Castle County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1902,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,10003,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,DE,New Castle,New Castle County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,19246,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,10003,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,DE,New Castle,New Castle County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,95.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,10003,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,DE,New Castle,New Castle County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,10003,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,DE,New Castle,New Castle County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,4.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,10003,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,DE,New Castle,New Castle County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,10003,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,DE,New Castle,New Castle County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,10003,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,DE,New Castle,New Castle County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,95.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,10003,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,DE,New Castle,New Castle County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,10003,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,DE,New Castle,New Castle County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,428943,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,10003,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,DE,Sussex,Sussex County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,118,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,10005,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,DE,Sussex,Sussex County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,19,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,10005,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,DE,Sussex,Sussex County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,10005,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,DE,Sussex,Sussex County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,10005,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,DE,Sussex,Sussex County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,10005,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,DE,Sussex,Sussex County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,238912,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,10005,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,DE,Sussex,Sussex County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,247961,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,10005,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,DE,Sussex,Sussex County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,109226,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,10005,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,DE,Sussex,Sussex County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,162,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,10005,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,DE,Sussex,Sussex County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,138735,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,10005,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,DE,Sussex,Sussex County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,44,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,10005,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,DE,Sussex,Sussex County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,10005,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,DE,Sussex,Sussex County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,56,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,10005,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,DE,Sussex,Sussex County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,99,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,10005,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,DE,Sussex,Sussex County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,10005,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,DE,Sussex,Sussex County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,43.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,10005,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,DE,Sussex,Sussex County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,180,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,10005,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,DE,Sussex,Sussex County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,108884,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,10005,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Alachua,Alachua County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12001,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Alachua,Alachua County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12001,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Alachua,Alachua County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12001,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Alachua,Alachua County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12001,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Alachua,Alachua County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12001,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Alachua,Alachua County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,278684,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12001,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Alachua,Alachua County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,202126,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12001,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Alachua,Alachua County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,184789,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12001,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Alachua,Alachua County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12001,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Alachua,Alachua County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,17337,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12001,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Alachua,Alachua County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,91.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12001,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Alachua,Alachua County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12001,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Alachua,Alachua County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,8.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12001,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Alachua,Alachua County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12001,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Alachua,Alachua County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12001,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Alachua,Alachua County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,91.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12001,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Alachua,Alachua County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12001,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Alachua,Alachua County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,184789,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12001,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Baker,Baker County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12003,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Baker,Baker County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12003,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Baker,Baker County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12003,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Baker,Baker County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12003,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Baker,Baker County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12003,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Baker,Baker County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,28309,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12003,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Baker,Baker County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9428,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12003,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Baker,Baker County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5940,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12003,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Baker,Baker County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,5940,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12003,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Baker,Baker County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3488,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12003,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Baker,Baker County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,63,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12003,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Baker,Baker County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,63,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12003,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Baker,Baker County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,37,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12003,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Baker,Baker County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12003,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Baker,Baker County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12003,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Baker,Baker County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12003,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Baker,Baker County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12003,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Baker,Baker County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12003,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Bay,Bay County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12005,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Bay,Bay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12005,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Bay,Bay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12005,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Bay,Bay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12005,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Bay,Bay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12005,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Bay,Bay County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,174461,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12005,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Bay,Bay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,169233,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12005,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Bay,Bay County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,169085,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12005,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Bay,Bay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12005,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Bay,Bay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,149,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12005,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Bay,Bay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12005,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Bay,Bay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12005,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Bay,Bay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12005,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Bay,Bay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12005,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Bay,Bay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,83.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12005,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Bay,Bay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,16.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12005,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Bay,Bay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,141573,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12005,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Bay,Bay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,27511,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12005,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Bradford,Bradford County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12007,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Bradford,Bradford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12007,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Bradford,Bradford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12007,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Bradford,Bradford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12007,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Bradford,Bradford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12007,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Bradford,Bradford County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,28364,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12007,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Bradford,Bradford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,16612,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12007,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Bradford,Bradford County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8016,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12007,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Bradford,Bradford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1719,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12007,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Bradford,Bradford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8595,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12007,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Bradford,Bradford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,48.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12007,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Bradford,Bradford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,10.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12007,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Bradford,Bradford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,51.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12007,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Bradford,Bradford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12007,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Bradford,Bradford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12007,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Bradford,Bradford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,37.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12007,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Bradford,Bradford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12007,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Bradford,Bradford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,6297,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12007,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Brevard,Brevard County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,27,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12009,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Brevard,Brevard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12009,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Brevard,Brevard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12009,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Brevard,Brevard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12009,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Brevard,Brevard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12009,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Brevard,Brevard County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,608007,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12009,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Brevard,Brevard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,635475,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12009,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Brevard,Brevard County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,621330,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12009,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Brevard,Brevard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12009,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Brevard,Brevard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,14145,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12009,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Brevard,Brevard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,97.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12009,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Brevard,Brevard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12009,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Brevard,Brevard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12009,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Brevard,Brevard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12009,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Brevard,Brevard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,4.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12009,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Brevard,Brevard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,93.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12009,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Brevard,Brevard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,26365,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12009,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Brevard,Brevard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,594965,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12009,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Broward,Broward County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,36,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12011,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Broward,Broward County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,36,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12011,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Broward,Broward County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,27,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12011,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Broward,Broward County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12011,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Broward,Broward County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12011,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Broward,Broward County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,1941516,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12011,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Broward,Broward County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1696874,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12011,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Broward,Broward County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1696874,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12011,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Broward,Broward County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12011,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Broward,Broward County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12011,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Broward,Broward County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12011,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Broward,Broward County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12011,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Broward,Broward County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12011,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Broward,Broward County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12011,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Broward,Broward County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,11,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12011,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Broward,Broward County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,89,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12011,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Broward,Broward County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,186534,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12011,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Broward,Broward County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1510340,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12011,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12013,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12013,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12013,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12013,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12013,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,13615,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12013,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4368,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12013,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3625,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12013,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,3625,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12013,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,744,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12013,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,83,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12013,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,83,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12013,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,17,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12013,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12013,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12013,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12013,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12013,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12013,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Charlotte,Charlotte County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12015,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Charlotte,Charlotte County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12015,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Charlotte,Charlotte County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12015,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Charlotte,Charlotte County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12015,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Charlotte,Charlotte County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12015,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Charlotte,Charlotte County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,187960,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12015,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Charlotte,Charlotte County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,176145,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12015,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Charlotte,Charlotte County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12015,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Charlotte,Charlotte County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12015,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Charlotte,Charlotte County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,176145,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12015,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Charlotte,Charlotte County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12015,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Charlotte,Charlotte County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12015,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Charlotte,Charlotte County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12015,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Charlotte,Charlotte County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12015,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Charlotte,Charlotte County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12015,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Charlotte,Charlotte County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12015,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Charlotte,Charlotte County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12015,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Charlotte,Charlotte County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12015,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Citrus,Citrus County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,54,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12017,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Citrus,Citrus County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12017,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Citrus,Citrus County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12017,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Citrus,Citrus County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12017,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Citrus,Citrus County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12017,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Citrus,Citrus County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,154403,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12017,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Citrus,Citrus County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,88934,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12017,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Citrus,Citrus County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11127,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12017,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Citrus,Citrus County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12017,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Citrus,Citrus County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,77807,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12017,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Citrus,Citrus County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,12.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12017,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Citrus,Citrus County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12017,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Citrus,Citrus County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,87.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12017,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Citrus,Citrus County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,51,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12017,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Citrus,Citrus County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12017,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Citrus,Citrus County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,12.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12017,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Citrus,Citrus County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,232,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12017,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Citrus,Citrus County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,10895,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12017,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12019,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12019,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12019,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12019,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12019,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,218797,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12019,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,182410,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12019,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12019,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12019,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,182410,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12019,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12019,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12019,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12019,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12019,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12019,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12019,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12019,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12019,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Collier,Collier County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12021,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Collier,Collier County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12021,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Collier,Collier County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12021,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Collier,Collier County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12021,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Collier,Collier County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12021,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Collier,Collier County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,377079,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12021,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Collier,Collier County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,267215,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12021,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Collier,Collier County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,233780,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12021,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Collier,Collier County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12021,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Collier,Collier County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,33434,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12021,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Collier,Collier County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,87.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12021,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Collier,Collier County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12021,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Collier,Collier County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,12.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12021,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Collier,Collier County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12021,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Collier,Collier County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12021,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Collier,Collier County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,86.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12021,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Collier,Collier County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1531,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12021,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Collier,Collier County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,232250,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12021,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Columbia,Columbia County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12023,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Columbia,Columbia County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12023,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Columbia,Columbia County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12023,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Columbia,Columbia County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12023,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Columbia,Columbia County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12023,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Columbia,Columbia County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,69889,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12023,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Columbia,Columbia County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,19504,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12023,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Columbia,Columbia County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12023,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Columbia,Columbia County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12023,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Columbia,Columbia County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,19504,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12023,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Columbia,Columbia County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12023,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Columbia,Columbia County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12023,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Columbia,Columbia County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12023,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Columbia,Columbia County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12023,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Columbia,Columbia County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12023,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Columbia,Columbia County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12023,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Columbia,Columbia County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12023,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Columbia,Columbia County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12023,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,DeSoto,DeSoto County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12027,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,DeSoto,DeSoto County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12027,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,DeSoto,DeSoto County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12027,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,DeSoto,DeSoto County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12027,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,DeSoto,DeSoto County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12027,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,DeSoto,DeSoto County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,34080,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12027,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,FL,DeSoto,DeSoto County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,21964,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12027,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,DeSoto,DeSoto County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8311,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12027,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,DeSoto,DeSoto County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,8311,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12027,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,DeSoto,DeSoto County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,13653,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12027,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,DeSoto,DeSoto County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,37.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12027,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,DeSoto,DeSoto County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,37.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12027,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,DeSoto,DeSoto County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,62.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12027,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,DeSoto,DeSoto County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12027,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,DeSoto,DeSoto County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12027,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,DeSoto,DeSoto County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12027,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,DeSoto,DeSoto County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12027,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,DeSoto,DeSoto County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12027,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Dixie,Dixie County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12029,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Dixie,Dixie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12029,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Dixie,Dixie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12029,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Dixie,Dixie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12029,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Dixie,Dixie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12029,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Dixie,Dixie County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,16805,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12029,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Dixie,Dixie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4940,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12029,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Dixie,Dixie County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12029,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Dixie,Dixie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12029,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Dixie,Dixie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4940,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12029,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Dixie,Dixie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12029,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Dixie,Dixie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12029,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Dixie,Dixie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12029,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Dixie,Dixie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12029,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Dixie,Dixie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12029,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Dixie,Dixie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12029,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Dixie,Dixie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12029,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Dixie,Dixie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12029,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Duval,Duval County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,24,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12031,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Duval,Duval County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12031,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Duval,Duval County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12031,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Duval,Duval County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12031,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Duval,Duval County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12031,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Duval,Duval County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,996373,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12031,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Duval,Duval County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,788993,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12031,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Duval,Duval County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,782344,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12031,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Duval,Duval County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,760954,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12031,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Duval,Duval County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6649,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12031,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Duval,Duval County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12031,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Duval,Duval County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,96.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12031,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Duval,Duval County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12031,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Duval,Duval County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12031,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Duval,Duval County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,2.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12031,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Duval,Duval County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12031,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Duval,Duval County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,21391,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12031,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Duval,Duval County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12031,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Escambia,Escambia County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12033,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Escambia,Escambia County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12033,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Escambia,Escambia County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12033,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Escambia,Escambia County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12033,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Escambia,Escambia County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12033,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Escambia,Escambia County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,322424,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12033,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Escambia,Escambia County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,330790,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12033,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Escambia,Escambia County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,279245,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12033,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Escambia,Escambia County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,21005,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12033,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Escambia,Escambia County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,51545,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12033,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Escambia,Escambia County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,84.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12033,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Escambia,Escambia County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,6.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12033,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Escambia,Escambia County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,15.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12033,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Escambia,Escambia County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12033,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Escambia,Escambia County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,6.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12033,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Escambia,Escambia County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,71.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12033,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Escambia,Escambia County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,20414,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12033,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Escambia,Escambia County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,237826,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12033,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,FL,Florida,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1597,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,FL,FL,Florida,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,300,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,FL,FL,Florida,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,125,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,FL,FL,Florida,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,120,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,FL,FL,Florida,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,48,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,FL,FL,Florida,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,21569932,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2020,FL,FL,Florida,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,18952021,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,FL,FL,Florida,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,14886493,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,FL,FL,Florida,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1299965,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,FL,FL,Florida,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4065528,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,FL,FL,Florida,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,78.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,FL,FL,Florida,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,6.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,FL,FL,Florida,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,21.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,FL,FL,Florida,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1297,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,FL,FL,Florida,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,6.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,FL,FL,Florida,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,65,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,FL,FL,Florida,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1275646,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,FL,FL,Florida,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,12311798,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,FL,Flagler,Flagler County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12035,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Flagler,Flagler County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12035,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Flagler,Flagler County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12035,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Flagler,Flagler County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12035,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Flagler,Flagler County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12035,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Flagler,Flagler County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,115968,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12035,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Flagler,Flagler County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,91570,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12035,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Flagler,Flagler County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12035,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Flagler,Flagler County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12035,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Flagler,Flagler County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,91570,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12035,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Flagler,Flagler County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12035,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Flagler,Flagler County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12035,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Flagler,Flagler County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12035,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Flagler,Flagler County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12035,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Flagler,Flagler County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12035,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Flagler,Flagler County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12035,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Flagler,Flagler County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12035,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Flagler,Flagler County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12035,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12037,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12037,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12037,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12037,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12037,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,12456,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12037,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,15468,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12037,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4378,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12037,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,4378,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12037,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11091,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12037,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,28.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12037,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,28.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12037,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,71.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12037,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12037,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12037,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12037,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12037,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12037,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Gadsden,Gadsden County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12039,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Gadsden,Gadsden County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12039,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Gadsden,Gadsden County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12039,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Gadsden,Gadsden County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12039,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Gadsden,Gadsden County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12039,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Gadsden,Gadsden County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,43701,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12039,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Gadsden,Gadsden County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,34668,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12039,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Gadsden,Gadsden County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9398,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12039,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Gadsden,Gadsden County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12039,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Gadsden,Gadsden County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,25269,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12039,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Gadsden,Gadsden County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,27.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12039,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Gadsden,Gadsden County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12039,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Gadsden,Gadsden County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,72.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12039,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Gadsden,Gadsden County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12039,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Gadsden,Gadsden County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12039,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Gadsden,Gadsden County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,27.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12039,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Gadsden,Gadsden County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12039,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Gadsden,Gadsden County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,9398,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12039,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Gilchrist,Gilchrist County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12041,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Gilchrist,Gilchrist County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12041,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Gilchrist,Gilchrist County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12041,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Gilchrist,Gilchrist County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12041,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Gilchrist,Gilchrist County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12041,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Gilchrist,Gilchrist County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,17928,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12041,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Gilchrist,Gilchrist County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2393,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12041,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Gilchrist,Gilchrist County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12041,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Gilchrist,Gilchrist County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12041,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Gilchrist,Gilchrist County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2393,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12041,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Gilchrist,Gilchrist County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12041,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Gilchrist,Gilchrist County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12041,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Gilchrist,Gilchrist County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12041,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Gilchrist,Gilchrist County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12041,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Gilchrist,Gilchrist County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12041,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Gilchrist,Gilchrist County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12041,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Gilchrist,Gilchrist County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12041,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Gilchrist,Gilchrist County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12041,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Glades,Glades County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12043,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Glades,Glades County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12043,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Glades,Glades County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12043,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Glades,Glades County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12043,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Glades,Glades County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12043,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Glades,Glades County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,12179,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12043,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Glades,Glades County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5952,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12043,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Glades,Glades County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1499,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12043,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Glades,Glades County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1499,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12043,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Glades,Glades County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4453,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12043,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Glades,Glades County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,25.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12043,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Glades,Glades County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,25.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12043,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Glades,Glades County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,74.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12043,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Glades,Glades County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12043,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Glades,Glades County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12043,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Glades,Glades County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12043,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Glades,Glades County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12043,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Glades,Glades County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12043,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Gulf,Gulf County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12045,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Gulf,Gulf County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12045,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Gulf,Gulf County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12045,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Gulf,Gulf County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12045,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Gulf,Gulf County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12045,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Gulf,Gulf County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,14181,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12045,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Gulf,Gulf County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,20903,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12045,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Gulf,Gulf County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,20903,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12045,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Gulf,Gulf County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,20903,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12045,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Gulf,Gulf County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12045,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Gulf,Gulf County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12045,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Gulf,Gulf County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12045,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Gulf,Gulf County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12045,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Gulf,Gulf County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12045,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Gulf,Gulf County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12045,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Gulf,Gulf County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12045,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Gulf,Gulf County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12045,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Gulf,Gulf County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12045,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12047,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12047,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12047,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12047,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12047,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,13988,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12047,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5515,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12047,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12047,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12047,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5515,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12047,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12047,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12047,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12047,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12047,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12047,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12047,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12047,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12047,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Hardee,Hardee County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12049,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Hardee,Hardee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12049,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Hardee,Hardee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12049,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Hardee,Hardee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12049,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Hardee,Hardee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12049,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Hardee,Hardee County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,25313,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12049,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Hardee,Hardee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,14105,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12049,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Hardee,Hardee County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8565,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12049,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Hardee,Hardee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,6320,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12049,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Hardee,Hardee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5540,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12049,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Hardee,Hardee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,60.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12049,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Hardee,Hardee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,44.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12049,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Hardee,Hardee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,39.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12049,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Hardee,Hardee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12049,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Hardee,Hardee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,15.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12049,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Hardee,Hardee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12049,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Hardee,Hardee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2245,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12049,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Hardee,Hardee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12049,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Hendry,Hendry County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12051,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Hendry,Hendry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12051,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Hendry,Hendry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12051,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Hendry,Hendry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12051,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Hendry,Hendry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12051,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Hendry,Hendry County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,39707,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12051,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Hendry,Hendry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,24094,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12051,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Hendry,Hendry County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,23289,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12051,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Hendry,Hendry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12051,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Hendry,Hendry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,805,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12051,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Hendry,Hendry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,96.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12051,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Hendry,Hendry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12051,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Hendry,Hendry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,3.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12051,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Hendry,Hendry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12051,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Hendry,Hendry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,43.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12051,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Hendry,Hendry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,53.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12051,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Hendry,Hendry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,10447,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12051,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Hendry,Hendry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,12842,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12051,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Hernando,Hernando County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12053,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Hernando,Hernando County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12053,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Hernando,Hernando County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12053,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Hernando,Hernando County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12053,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Hernando,Hernando County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12053,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Hernando,Hernando County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,195508,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12053,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Hernando,Hernando County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,142577,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12053,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Hernando,Hernando County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11014,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12053,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Hernando,Hernando County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12053,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Hernando,Hernando County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,131564,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12053,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Hernando,Hernando County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,7.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12053,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Hernando,Hernando County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12053,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Hernando,Hernando County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,92.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12053,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Hernando,Hernando County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12053,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Hernando,Hernando County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12053,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Hernando,Hernando County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,7.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12053,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Hernando,Hernando County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,325,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12053,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Hernando,Hernando County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,10688,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12053,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Highlands,Highlands County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,27,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12055,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Highlands,Highlands County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12055,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Highlands,Highlands County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12055,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Highlands,Highlands County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12055,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Highlands,Highlands County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12055,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Highlands,Highlands County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,101222,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12055,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Highlands,Highlands County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,86258,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12055,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Highlands,Highlands County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,39631,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12055,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Highlands,Highlands County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12055,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Highlands,Highlands County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,46627,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12055,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Highlands,Highlands County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,45.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12055,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Highlands,Highlands County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12055,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Highlands,Highlands County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,54.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12055,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Highlands,Highlands County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,26,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12055,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Highlands,Highlands County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12055,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Highlands,Highlands County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,45.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12055,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Highlands,Highlands County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12055,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Highlands,Highlands County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,39631,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12055,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Hillsborough,Hillsborough County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,170,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12057,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Hillsborough,Hillsborough County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,19,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12057,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Hillsborough,Hillsborough County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12057,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Hillsborough,Hillsborough County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12057,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Hillsborough,Hillsborough County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12057,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Hillsborough,Hillsborough County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,1463380,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12057,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Hillsborough,Hillsborough County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1351233,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12057,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Hillsborough,Hillsborough County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1277417,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12057,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Hillsborough,Hillsborough County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,61,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12057,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Hillsborough,Hillsborough County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,73816,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12057,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Hillsborough,Hillsborough County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,94.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12057,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Hillsborough,Hillsborough County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12057,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Hillsborough,Hillsborough County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,5.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12057,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Hillsborough,Hillsborough County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,151,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12057,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Hillsborough,Hillsborough County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,2.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12057,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Hillsborough,Hillsborough County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,92,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12057,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Hillsborough,Hillsborough County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,34869,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12057,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Hillsborough,Hillsborough County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1242486,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12057,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Holmes,Holmes County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12059,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Holmes,Holmes County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12059,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Holmes,Holmes County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12059,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Holmes,Holmes County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12059,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Holmes,Holmes County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12059,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Holmes,Holmes County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,19622,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12059,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Holmes,Holmes County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5794,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12059,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Holmes,Holmes County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12059,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Holmes,Holmes County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12059,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Holmes,Holmes County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5794,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12059,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Holmes,Holmes County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12059,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Holmes,Holmes County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12059,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Holmes,Holmes County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12059,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Holmes,Holmes County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12059,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Holmes,Holmes County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12059,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Holmes,Holmes County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12059,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Holmes,Holmes County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12059,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Holmes,Holmes County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12059,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Indian River,Indian River County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12061,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Indian River,Indian River County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12061,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Indian River,Indian River County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12061,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Indian River,Indian River County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12061,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Indian River,Indian River County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12061,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Indian River,Indian River County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,160345,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12061,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Indian River,Indian River County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,152715,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12061,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Indian River,Indian River County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,152715,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12061,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Indian River,Indian River County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12061,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Indian River,Indian River County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12061,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Indian River,Indian River County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12061,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Indian River,Indian River County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12061,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Indian River,Indian River County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12061,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Indian River,Indian River County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12061,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Indian River,Indian River County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12061,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Indian River,Indian River County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12061,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Indian River,Indian River County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12061,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Indian River,Indian River County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,152715,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12061,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12063,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12063,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12063,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12063,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12063,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,47214,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12063,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,19991,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12063,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12063,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12063,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,19991,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12063,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12063,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12063,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12063,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12063,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12063,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12063,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12063,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12063,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12065,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12065,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12065,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12065,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12065,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,14560,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12065,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7805,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12065,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12065,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12065,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7805,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12065,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12065,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12065,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12065,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12065,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12065,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12065,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12065,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12065,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12067,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12067,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12067,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12067,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12067,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,8252,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12067,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2138,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12067,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12067,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12067,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2138,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12067,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12067,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12067,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12067,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12067,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12067,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12067,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12067,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12067,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,132,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12069,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12069,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12069,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12069,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12069,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,385875,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12069,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,358167,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12069,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,71525,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12069,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12069,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,286642,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12069,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,20,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12069,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12069,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,80,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12069,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,129,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12069,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12069,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,20,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12069,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12069,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,71525,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12069,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,20,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12071,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12071,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12071,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12071,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12071,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,764679,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12071,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,587497,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12071,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,459063,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12071,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,135767,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12071,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,128434,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12071,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,78.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12071,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,23.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12071,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,21.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12071,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12071,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,3.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12071,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,51.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12071,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,21859,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12071,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,301436,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12071,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Leon,Leon County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,25,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12073,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Leon,Leon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12073,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Leon,Leon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12073,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Leon,Leon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12073,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Leon,Leon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12073,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Leon,Leon County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,292378,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12073,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Leon,Leon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,210519,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12073,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Leon,Leon County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,189799,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12073,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Leon,Leon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12073,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Leon,Leon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,20720,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12073,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Leon,Leon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,90.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12073,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Leon,Leon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12073,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Leon,Leon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,9.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12073,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Leon,Leon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,21,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12073,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Leon,Leon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,4.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12073,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Leon,Leon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,85.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12073,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Leon,Leon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,9557,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12073,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Leon,Leon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,180241,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12073,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Levy,Levy County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12075,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Levy,Levy County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12075,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Levy,Levy County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12075,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Levy,Levy County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12075,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Levy,Levy County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12075,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Levy,Levy County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,43051,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12075,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Levy,Levy County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9015,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12075,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Levy,Levy County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12075,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Levy,Levy County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12075,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Levy,Levy County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9015,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12075,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Levy,Levy County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12075,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Levy,Levy County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12075,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Levy,Levy County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12075,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Levy,Levy County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12075,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Levy,Levy County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12075,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Levy,Levy County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12075,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Levy,Levy County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12075,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Levy,Levy County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12075,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Liberty,Liberty County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12077,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Liberty,Liberty County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12077,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Liberty,Liberty County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12077,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Liberty,Liberty County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12077,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Liberty,Liberty County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12077,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Liberty,Liberty County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,7974,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12077,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Liberty,Liberty County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5435,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12077,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Liberty,Liberty County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12077,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Liberty,Liberty County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12077,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Liberty,Liberty County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5435,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12077,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Liberty,Liberty County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12077,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Liberty,Liberty County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12077,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Liberty,Liberty County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12077,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Liberty,Liberty County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12077,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Liberty,Liberty County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12077,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Liberty,Liberty County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12077,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Liberty,Liberty County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12077,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Liberty,Liberty County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12077,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12079,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12079,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12079,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12079,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12079,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,17976,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12079,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,8659,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12079,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7191,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12079,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12079,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1468,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12079,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,83,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12079,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12079,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,17,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12079,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12079,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,4.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12079,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,78.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12079,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,360,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12079,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,6831,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12079,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Manatee,Manatee County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12081,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Manatee,Manatee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12081,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Manatee,Manatee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12081,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Manatee,Manatee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12081,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Manatee,Manatee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12081,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Manatee,Manatee County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,401443,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12081,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Manatee,Manatee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,486649,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12081,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Manatee,Manatee County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,486417,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12081,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Manatee,Manatee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12081,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Manatee,Manatee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,232,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12081,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Manatee,Manatee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12081,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Manatee,Manatee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12081,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Manatee,Manatee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12081,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Manatee,Manatee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12081,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Manatee,Manatee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,4.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12081,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Manatee,Manatee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,95.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12081,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Manatee,Manatee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,20038,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12081,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Manatee,Manatee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,466379,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12081,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,140,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12083,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12083,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12083,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12083,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12083,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,377370,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12083,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,208202,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12083,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,54806,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12083,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12083,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,153397,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12083,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,26.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12083,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12083,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,73.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12083,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,137,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12083,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12083,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,25.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12083,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1210,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12083,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,53596,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12083,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12085,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12085,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12085,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12085,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12085,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,158529,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12085,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,140505,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12085,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,17659,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12085,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12085,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,122845,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12085,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,12.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12085,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12085,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,87.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12085,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12085,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12085,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,12.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12085,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12085,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,17659,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12085,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Miami-Dade,Miami-Dade County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,24,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12086,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Miami-Dade,Miami-Dade County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12086,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Miami-Dade,Miami-Dade County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12086,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Miami-Dade,Miami-Dade County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12086,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Miami-Dade,Miami-Dade County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12086,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Miami-Dade,Miami-Dade County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,2692459,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12086,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Miami-Dade,Miami-Dade County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2961463,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12086,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Miami-Dade,Miami-Dade County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2905911,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12086,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Miami-Dade,Miami-Dade County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12086,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Miami-Dade,Miami-Dade County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,55552,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12086,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Miami-Dade,Miami-Dade County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12086,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Miami-Dade,Miami-Dade County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12086,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Miami-Dade,Miami-Dade County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12086,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Miami-Dade,Miami-Dade County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12086,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Miami-Dade,Miami-Dade County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,5.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12086,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Miami-Dade,Miami-Dade County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,93,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12086,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Miami-Dade,Miami-Dade County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,150758,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12086,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Miami-Dade,Miami-Dade County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2755153,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12086,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12087,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12087,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12087,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12087,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12087,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,82809,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12087,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12087,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12087,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12087,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12087,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12087,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12087,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12087,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12087,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12087,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12087,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12087,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12087,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Nassau,Nassau County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12089,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Nassau,Nassau County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12089,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Nassau,Nassau County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12089,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Nassau,Nassau County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12089,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Nassau,Nassau County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12089,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Nassau,Nassau County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,90993,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12089,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Nassau,Nassau County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,44244,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12089,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Nassau,Nassau County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,39030,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12089,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Nassau,Nassau County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,39030,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12089,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Nassau,Nassau County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5214,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12089,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Nassau,Nassau County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,88.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12089,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Nassau,Nassau County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,88.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12089,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Nassau,Nassau County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,11.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12089,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Nassau,Nassau County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12089,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Nassau,Nassau County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12089,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Nassau,Nassau County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12089,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Nassau,Nassau County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12089,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Nassau,Nassau County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12089,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Okaloosa,Okaloosa County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,21,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12091,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Okaloosa,Okaloosa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12091,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Okaloosa,Okaloosa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12091,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Okaloosa,Okaloosa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12091,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Okaloosa,Okaloosa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12091,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Okaloosa,Okaloosa County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,211809,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12091,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Okaloosa,Okaloosa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,251953,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12091,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Okaloosa,Okaloosa County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,161084,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12091,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Okaloosa,Okaloosa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,142205,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12091,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Okaloosa,Okaloosa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,90869,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12091,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Okaloosa,Okaloosa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,63.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12091,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Okaloosa,Okaloosa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,56.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12091,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Okaloosa,Okaloosa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,36.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12091,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Okaloosa,Okaloosa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12091,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Okaloosa,Okaloosa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12091,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Okaloosa,Okaloosa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,7.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12091,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Okaloosa,Okaloosa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12091,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Okaloosa,Okaloosa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,18879,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12091,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Okeechobee,Okeechobee County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12093,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Okeechobee,Okeechobee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12093,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Okeechobee,Okeechobee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12093,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Okeechobee,Okeechobee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12093,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Okeechobee,Okeechobee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12093,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Okeechobee,Okeechobee County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,39641,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12093,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Okeechobee,Okeechobee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,21976,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12093,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Okeechobee,Okeechobee County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12093,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Okeechobee,Okeechobee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12093,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Okeechobee,Okeechobee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,21976,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12093,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Okeechobee,Okeechobee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12093,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Okeechobee,Okeechobee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12093,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Okeechobee,Okeechobee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12093,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Okeechobee,Okeechobee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12093,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Okeechobee,Okeechobee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12093,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Okeechobee,Okeechobee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12093,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Okeechobee,Okeechobee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12093,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Okeechobee,Okeechobee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12093,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,43,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12095,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12095,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12095,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12095,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12095,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,1429899,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12095,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1364840,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12095,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1083069,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12095,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12095,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,281771,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12095,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,79.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12095,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12095,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,20.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12095,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,32,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12095,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,3.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12095,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,76.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12095,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,42204,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12095,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1040864,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12095,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Osceola,Osceola County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,30,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12097,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Osceola,Osceola County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12097,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Osceola,Osceola County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12097,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Osceola,Osceola County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12097,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Osceola,Osceola County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12097,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Osceola,Osceola County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,390855,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12097,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Osceola,Osceola County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,295156,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12097,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Osceola,Osceola County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,288762,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12097,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Osceola,Osceola County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12097,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Osceola,Osceola County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6394,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12097,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Osceola,Osceola County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,97.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12097,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Osceola,Osceola County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12097,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Osceola,Osceola County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12097,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Osceola,Osceola County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,22,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12097,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Osceola,Osceola County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,7.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12097,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Osceola,Osceola County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,90,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12097,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Osceola,Osceola County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,23194,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12097,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Osceola,Osceola County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,265568,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12097,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Palm Beach,Palm Beach County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,33,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12099,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Palm Beach,Palm Beach County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12099,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Palm Beach,Palm Beach County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12099,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Palm Beach,Palm Beach County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12099,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Palm Beach,Palm Beach County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12099,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Palm Beach,Palm Beach County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,1492466,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12099,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Palm Beach,Palm Beach County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1339320,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12099,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Palm Beach,Palm Beach County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,898643,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12099,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Palm Beach,Palm Beach County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12099,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Palm Beach,Palm Beach County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,440677,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12099,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Palm Beach,Palm Beach County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,67.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12099,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Palm Beach,Palm Beach County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12099,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Palm Beach,Palm Beach County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,32.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12099,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Palm Beach,Palm Beach County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,23,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12099,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Palm Beach,Palm Beach County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12099,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Palm Beach,Palm Beach County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,66.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12099,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Palm Beach,Palm Beach County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,7450,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12099,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Palm Beach,Palm Beach County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,891193,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12099,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Pasco,Pasco County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,74,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12101,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Pasco,Pasco County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12101,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Pasco,Pasco County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12101,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Pasco,Pasco County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12101,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Pasco,Pasco County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12101,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Pasco,Pasco County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,565745,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12101,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Pasco,Pasco County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,376613,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12101,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Pasco,Pasco County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,38913,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12101,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Pasco,Pasco County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12101,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Pasco,Pasco County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,337700,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12101,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Pasco,Pasco County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,10.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12101,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Pasco,Pasco County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12101,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Pasco,Pasco County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,89.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12101,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Pasco,Pasco County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,71,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12101,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Pasco,Pasco County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,2.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12101,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Pasco,Pasco County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,8.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12101,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Pasco,Pasco County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,8242,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12101,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Pasco,Pasco County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,30671,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12101,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Pinellas,Pinellas County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12103,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Pinellas,Pinellas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12103,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Pinellas,Pinellas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12103,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Pinellas,Pinellas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12103,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Pinellas,Pinellas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12103,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Pinellas,Pinellas County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,958752,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12103,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Pinellas,Pinellas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,965171,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12103,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Pinellas,Pinellas County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,965171,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12103,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Pinellas,Pinellas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12103,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Pinellas,Pinellas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12103,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Pinellas,Pinellas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12103,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Pinellas,Pinellas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12103,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Pinellas,Pinellas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12103,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Pinellas,Pinellas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12103,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Pinellas,Pinellas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,21.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12103,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Pinellas,Pinellas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,78.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12103,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Pinellas,Pinellas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,205850,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12103,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Pinellas,Pinellas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,759321,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12103,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,151,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12105,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12105,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12105,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12105,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12105,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,729233,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12105,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,566711,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12105,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,358289,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12105,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12105,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,208422,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12105,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,63.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12105,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12105,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,36.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12105,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,138,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12105,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,7.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12105,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,55.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12105,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,42436,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12105,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,315854,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12105,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,32,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12107,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12107,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12107,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12107,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12107,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,73347,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12107,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,24366,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12107,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12107,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12107,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,24366,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12107,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12107,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12107,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12107,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,32,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12107,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12107,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12107,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12107,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12107,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Santa Rosa,Santa Rosa County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12113,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Santa Rosa,Santa Rosa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12113,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Santa Rosa,Santa Rosa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12113,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Santa Rosa,Santa Rosa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12113,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Santa Rosa,Santa Rosa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12113,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Santa Rosa,Santa Rosa County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,189133,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12113,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Santa Rosa,Santa Rosa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,175478,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12113,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Santa Rosa,Santa Rosa County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,77949,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12113,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Santa Rosa,Santa Rosa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,62372,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12113,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Santa Rosa,Santa Rosa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,97529,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12113,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Santa Rosa,Santa Rosa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,44.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12113,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Santa Rosa,Santa Rosa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,35.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12113,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Santa Rosa,Santa Rosa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,55.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12113,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Santa Rosa,Santa Rosa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12113,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Santa Rosa,Santa Rosa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,8.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12113,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Santa Rosa,Santa Rosa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12113,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Santa Rosa,Santa Rosa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,15577,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12113,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Santa Rosa,Santa Rosa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12113,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Sarasota,Sarasota County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12115,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Sarasota,Sarasota County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12115,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Sarasota,Sarasota County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12115,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Sarasota,Sarasota County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12115,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Sarasota,Sarasota County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12115,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Sarasota,Sarasota County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,435664,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12115,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Sarasota,Sarasota County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,342398,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12115,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Sarasota,Sarasota County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,225173,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12115,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Sarasota,Sarasota County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,51457,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12115,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Sarasota,Sarasota County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,117225,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12115,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Sarasota,Sarasota County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,65.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12115,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Sarasota,Sarasota County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,15,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12115,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Sarasota,Sarasota County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,34.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12115,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Sarasota,Sarasota County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12115,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Sarasota,Sarasota County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,50.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12115,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Sarasota,Sarasota County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12115,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Sarasota,Sarasota County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,173716,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12115,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Sarasota,Sarasota County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12115,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Seminole,Seminole County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,38,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12117,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Seminole,Seminole County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,19,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12117,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Seminole,Seminole County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12117,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Seminole,Seminole County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12117,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Seminole,Seminole County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12117,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Seminole,Seminole County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,471058,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12117,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Seminole,Seminole County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,459725,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12117,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Seminole,Seminole County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,378371,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12117,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Seminole,Seminole County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12117,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Seminole,Seminole County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,81354,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12117,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Seminole,Seminole County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,82.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12117,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Seminole,Seminole County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12117,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Seminole,Seminole County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,17.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12117,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Seminole,Seminole County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,19,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12117,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Seminole,Seminole County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,14.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12117,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Seminole,Seminole County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,68,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12117,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Seminole,Seminole County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,66882,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12117,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Seminole,Seminole County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,312405,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12117,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,St. Johns,St. Johns County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,23,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12109,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,St. Johns,St. Johns County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12109,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,St. Johns,St. Johns County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12109,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,St. Johns,St. Johns County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12109,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,St. Johns,St. Johns County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12109,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,St. Johns,St. Johns County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,276916,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12109,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,FL,St. Johns,St. Johns County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,154684,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12109,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,St. Johns,St. Johns County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,42678,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12109,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,St. Johns,St. Johns County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,34420,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12109,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,St. Johns,St. Johns County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,112006,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12109,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,St. Johns,St. Johns County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,27.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12109,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,St. Johns,St. Johns County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,22.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12109,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,St. Johns,St. Johns County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,72.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12109,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,St. Johns,St. Johns County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12109,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,St. Johns,St. Johns County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,5.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12109,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,St. Johns,St. Johns County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12109,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,St. Johns,St. Johns County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,8259,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12109,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,St. Johns,St. Johns County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12109,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,St. Lucie,St. Lucie County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,22,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12111,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,St. Lucie,St. Lucie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12111,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,St. Lucie,St. Lucie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12111,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,St. Lucie,St. Lucie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12111,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,St. Lucie,St. Lucie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12111,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,St. Lucie,St. Lucie County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,331275,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12111,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,FL,St. Lucie,St. Lucie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,240514,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12111,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,St. Lucie,St. Lucie County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,231857,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12111,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,St. Lucie,St. Lucie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12111,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,St. Lucie,St. Lucie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8657,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12111,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,St. Lucie,St. Lucie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,96.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12111,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,St. Lucie,St. Lucie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12111,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,St. Lucie,St. Lucie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,3.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12111,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,St. Lucie,St. Lucie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12111,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,St. Lucie,St. Lucie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,6.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12111,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,St. Lucie,St. Lucie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,89.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12111,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,St. Lucie,St. Lucie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,15544,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12111,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,St. Lucie,St. Lucie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,216314,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12111,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Sumter,Sumter County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,21,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12119,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Sumter,Sumter County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12119,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Sumter,Sumter County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12119,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Sumter,Sumter County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12119,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Sumter,Sumter County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12119,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Sumter,Sumter County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,130897,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12119,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Sumter,Sumter County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,120551,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12119,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Sumter,Sumter County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12119,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Sumter,Sumter County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12119,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Sumter,Sumter County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,120551,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12119,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Sumter,Sumter County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12119,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Sumter,Sumter County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12119,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Sumter,Sumter County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12119,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Sumter,Sumter County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,21,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12119,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Sumter,Sumter County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12119,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Sumter,Sumter County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12119,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Sumter,Sumter County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12119,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Sumter,Sumter County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12119,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Suwannee,Suwannee County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12121,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Suwannee,Suwannee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12121,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Suwannee,Suwannee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12121,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Suwannee,Suwannee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12121,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Suwannee,Suwannee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12121,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Suwannee,Suwannee County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,43510,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12121,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Suwannee,Suwannee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,8578,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12121,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Suwannee,Suwannee County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6367,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12121,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Suwannee,Suwannee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12121,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Suwannee,Suwannee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2211,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12121,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Suwannee,Suwannee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,74.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12121,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Suwannee,Suwannee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12121,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Suwannee,Suwannee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,25.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12121,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Suwannee,Suwannee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12121,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Suwannee,Suwannee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12121,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Suwannee,Suwannee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,74.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12121,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Suwannee,Suwannee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12121,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Suwannee,Suwannee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,6367,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12121,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12123,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12123,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12123,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12123,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12123,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,21760,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12123,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,12268,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12123,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8272,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12123,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12123,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3997,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12123,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,67.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12123,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12123,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,32.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12123,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12123,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12123,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,67.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12123,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12123,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,8272,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12123,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12125,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12125,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12125,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12125,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12125,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,16126,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12125,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4508,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12125,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12125,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12125,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4508,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12125,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12125,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12125,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12125,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12125,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12125,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12125,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12125,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12125,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Volusia,Volusia County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,47,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12127,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Volusia,Volusia County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12127,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Volusia,Volusia County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12127,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Volusia,Volusia County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12127,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Volusia,Volusia County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12127,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Volusia,Volusia County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,554901,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12127,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Volusia,Volusia County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,481221,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12127,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Volusia,Volusia County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,335461,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12127,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Volusia,Volusia County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12127,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Volusia,Volusia County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,145761,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12127,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Volusia,Volusia County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,69.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12127,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Volusia,Volusia County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12127,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Volusia,Volusia County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,30.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12127,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Volusia,Volusia County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,38,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12127,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Volusia,Volusia County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,3.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12127,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Volusia,Volusia County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,66.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12127,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Volusia,Volusia County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,15986,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12127,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Volusia,Volusia County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,319475,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12127,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Wakulla,Wakulla County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12129,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Wakulla,Wakulla County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12129,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Wakulla,Wakulla County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12129,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Wakulla,Wakulla County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12129,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Wakulla,Wakulla County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12129,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Wakulla,Wakulla County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,33907,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12129,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Wakulla,Wakulla County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,21034,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12129,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Wakulla,Wakulla County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,598,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12129,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Wakulla,Wakulla County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12129,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Wakulla,Wakulla County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,20436,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12129,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Wakulla,Wakulla County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12129,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Wakulla,Wakulla County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12129,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Wakulla,Wakulla County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,97.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12129,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Wakulla,Wakulla County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12129,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Wakulla,Wakulla County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,2.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12129,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Wakulla,Wakulla County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12129,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Wakulla,Wakulla County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,598,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12129,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Wakulla,Wakulla County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12129,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Walton,Walton County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12131,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Walton,Walton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12131,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Walton,Walton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12131,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Walton,Walton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12131,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Walton,Walton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12131,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Walton,Walton County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,75855,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12131,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Walton,Walton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,95966,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12131,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Walton,Walton County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12131,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Walton,Walton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12131,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Walton,Walton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,95966,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12131,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Walton,Walton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12131,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Walton,Walton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12131,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Walton,Walton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12131,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Walton,Walton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12131,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Walton,Walton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12131,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Walton,Walton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12131,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Walton,Walton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12131,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Walton,Walton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12131,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12133,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12133,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12133,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12133,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12133,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,25357,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12133,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,10442,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12133,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1162,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12133,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12133,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9280,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12133,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,11.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12133,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12133,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,88.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12133,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12133,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12133,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,11.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12133,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,12133,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,FL,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1162,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12133,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Appling,Appling County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13001,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Appling,Appling County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13001,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Appling,Appling County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13001,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Appling,Appling County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13001,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Appling,Appling County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13001,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Appling,Appling County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,18428,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13001,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Appling,Appling County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5184,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13001,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Appling,Appling County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4293,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13001,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Appling,Appling County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13001,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Appling,Appling County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,891,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13001,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Appling,Appling County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,82.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13001,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Appling,Appling County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13001,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Appling,Appling County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,17.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13001,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Appling,Appling County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13001,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Appling,Appling County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13001,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Appling,Appling County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,82.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13001,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Appling,Appling County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13001,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Appling,Appling County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,4293,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13001,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Atkinson,Atkinson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13003,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Atkinson,Atkinson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13003,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Atkinson,Atkinson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13003,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Atkinson,Atkinson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13003,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Atkinson,Atkinson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13003,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Atkinson,Atkinson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,8301,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13003,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Atkinson,Atkinson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3682,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13003,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Atkinson,Atkinson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3587,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13003,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Atkinson,Atkinson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,116,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13003,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Atkinson,Atkinson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,95,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13003,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Atkinson,Atkinson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,97.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13003,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Atkinson,Atkinson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,3.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13003,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Atkinson,Atkinson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13003,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Atkinson,Atkinson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13003,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Atkinson,Atkinson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13003,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Atkinson,Atkinson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,94.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13003,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Atkinson,Atkinson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13003,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Atkinson,Atkinson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3470,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13003,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bacon,Bacon County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13005,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bacon,Bacon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13005,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bacon,Bacon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13005,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bacon,Bacon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13005,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bacon,Bacon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13005,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bacon,Bacon County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,11123,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13005,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bacon,Bacon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4563,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13005,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bacon,Bacon County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4502,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13005,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bacon,Bacon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,59,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13005,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bacon,Bacon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,61,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13005,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bacon,Bacon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13005,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bacon,Bacon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13005,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bacon,Bacon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13005,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bacon,Bacon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13005,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bacon,Bacon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13005,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bacon,Bacon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,97.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13005,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bacon,Bacon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13005,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bacon,Bacon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,4443,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13005,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Baker,Baker County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13007,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Baker,Baker County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13007,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Baker,Baker County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13007,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Baker,Baker County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13007,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Baker,Baker County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13007,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Baker,Baker County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,2844,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13007,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Baker,Baker County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,673,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13007,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Baker,Baker County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,619,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13007,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Baker,Baker County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13007,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Baker,Baker County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,54,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13007,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Baker,Baker County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,92,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13007,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Baker,Baker County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13007,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Baker,Baker County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13007,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Baker,Baker County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13007,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Baker,Baker County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13007,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Baker,Baker County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,92,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13007,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Baker,Baker County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13007,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Baker,Baker County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,619,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13007,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Baldwin,Baldwin County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13009,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Baldwin,Baldwin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13009,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Baldwin,Baldwin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13009,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Baldwin,Baldwin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13009,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Baldwin,Baldwin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13009,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Baldwin,Baldwin County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,43773,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13009,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Baldwin,Baldwin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,41508,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13009,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Baldwin,Baldwin County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,41400,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13009,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Baldwin,Baldwin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13009,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Baldwin,Baldwin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,108,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13009,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Baldwin,Baldwin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13009,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Baldwin,Baldwin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13009,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Baldwin,Baldwin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13009,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Baldwin,Baldwin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13009,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Baldwin,Baldwin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,53,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13009,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Baldwin,Baldwin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,46.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13009,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Baldwin,Baldwin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,21983,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13009,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Baldwin,Baldwin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,19417,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13009,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Banks,Banks County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13011,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Banks,Banks County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13011,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Banks,Banks County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13011,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Banks,Banks County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13011,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Banks,Banks County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13011,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Banks,Banks County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,18069,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13011,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Banks,Banks County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9055,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13011,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Banks,Banks County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8064,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13011,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Banks,Banks County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13011,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Banks,Banks County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,992,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13011,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Banks,Banks County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,89,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13011,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Banks,Banks County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13011,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Banks,Banks County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,11,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13011,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Banks,Banks County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13011,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Banks,Banks County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13011,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Banks,Banks County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,89,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13011,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Banks,Banks County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13011,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Banks,Banks County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,8064,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13011,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Barrow,Barrow County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13013,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Barrow,Barrow County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13013,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Barrow,Barrow County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13013,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Barrow,Barrow County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13013,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Barrow,Barrow County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13013,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Barrow,Barrow County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,83963,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13013,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Barrow,Barrow County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,100071,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13013,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Barrow,Barrow County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,62797,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13013,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Barrow,Barrow County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,182,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13013,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Barrow,Barrow County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,37274,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13013,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Barrow,Barrow County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,62.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13013,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Barrow,Barrow County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13013,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Barrow,Barrow County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,37.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13013,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Barrow,Barrow County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13013,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Barrow,Barrow County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,20.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13013,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Barrow,Barrow County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,42.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13013,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Barrow,Barrow County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,20259,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13013,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Barrow,Barrow County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,42357,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13013,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bartow,Bartow County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13015,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bartow,Bartow County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13015,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bartow,Bartow County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13015,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bartow,Bartow County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13015,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bartow,Bartow County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13015,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bartow,Bartow County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,109311,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13015,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bartow,Bartow County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,88822,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13015,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bartow,Bartow County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,88319,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13015,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bartow,Bartow County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13015,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bartow,Bartow County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,503,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13015,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bartow,Bartow County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13015,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bartow,Bartow County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13015,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bartow,Bartow County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13015,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bartow,Bartow County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13015,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bartow,Bartow County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13015,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bartow,Bartow County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,99.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13015,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bartow,Bartow County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,101,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13015,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bartow,Bartow County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,88218,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13015,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Ben Hill,Ben Hill County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13017,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Ben Hill,Ben Hill County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13017,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Ben Hill,Ben Hill County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13017,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Ben Hill,Ben Hill County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13017,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Ben Hill,Ben Hill County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13017,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Ben Hill,Ben Hill County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,17153,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13017,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Ben Hill,Ben Hill County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,13351,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13017,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Ben Hill,Ben Hill County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,13245,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13017,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Ben Hill,Ben Hill County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13017,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Ben Hill,Ben Hill County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,106,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13017,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Ben Hill,Ben Hill County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13017,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Ben Hill,Ben Hill County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13017,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Ben Hill,Ben Hill County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13017,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Ben Hill,Ben Hill County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13017,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Ben Hill,Ben Hill County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13017,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Ben Hill,Ben Hill County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,99.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13017,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Ben Hill,Ben Hill County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13017,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Ben Hill,Ben Hill County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,13245,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13017,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Berrien,Berrien County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13019,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Berrien,Berrien County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13019,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Berrien,Berrien County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13019,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Berrien,Berrien County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13019,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Berrien,Berrien County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13019,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Berrien,Berrien County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,18159,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13019,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Berrien,Berrien County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,6936,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13019,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Berrien,Berrien County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6936,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13019,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Berrien,Berrien County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13019,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Berrien,Berrien County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13019,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Berrien,Berrien County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13019,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Berrien,Berrien County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13019,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Berrien,Berrien County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13019,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Berrien,Berrien County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13019,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Berrien,Berrien County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13019,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Berrien,Berrien County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13019,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Berrien,Berrien County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13019,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Berrien,Berrien County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,6936,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13019,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bibb,Bibb County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13021,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bibb,Bibb County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13021,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bibb,Bibb County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13021,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bibb,Bibb County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13021,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bibb,Bibb County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13021,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bibb,Bibb County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,157104,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13021,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bibb,Bibb County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,124655,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13021,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bibb,Bibb County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,122917,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13021,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bibb,Bibb County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13021,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bibb,Bibb County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1738,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13021,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bibb,Bibb County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13021,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bibb,Bibb County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13021,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bibb,Bibb County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13021,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bibb,Bibb County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13021,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bibb,Bibb County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13021,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bibb,Bibb County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,98.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13021,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bibb,Bibb County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13021,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bibb,Bibb County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,122917,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13021,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bleckley,Bleckley County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13023,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bleckley,Bleckley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13023,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bleckley,Bleckley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13023,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bleckley,Bleckley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13023,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bleckley,Bleckley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13023,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bleckley,Bleckley County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,12577,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13023,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bleckley,Bleckley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,8033,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13023,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bleckley,Bleckley County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8033,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13023,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bleckley,Bleckley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13023,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bleckley,Bleckley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13023,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bleckley,Bleckley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13023,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bleckley,Bleckley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13023,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bleckley,Bleckley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13023,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bleckley,Bleckley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13023,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bleckley,Bleckley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,25.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13023,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bleckley,Bleckley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,74.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13023,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bleckley,Bleckley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2080,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13023,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bleckley,Bleckley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,5953,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13023,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Brantley,Brantley County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13025,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Brantley,Brantley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13025,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Brantley,Brantley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13025,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Brantley,Brantley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13025,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Brantley,Brantley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13025,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Brantley,Brantley County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,18040,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13025,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Brantley,Brantley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2457,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13025,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Brantley,Brantley County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1571,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13025,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Brantley,Brantley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13025,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Brantley,Brantley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,886,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13025,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Brantley,Brantley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,63.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13025,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Brantley,Brantley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13025,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Brantley,Brantley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,36.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13025,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Brantley,Brantley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13025,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Brantley,Brantley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13025,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Brantley,Brantley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,63.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13025,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Brantley,Brantley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13025,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Brantley,Brantley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1571,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13025,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Brooks,Brooks County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13027,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Brooks,Brooks County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13027,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Brooks,Brooks County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13027,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Brooks,Brooks County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13027,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Brooks,Brooks County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13027,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Brooks,Brooks County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,16232,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13027,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Brooks,Brooks County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7514,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13027,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Brooks,Brooks County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5614,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13027,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Brooks,Brooks County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13027,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Brooks,Brooks County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1899,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13027,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Brooks,Brooks County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,74.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13027,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Brooks,Brooks County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13027,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Brooks,Brooks County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,25.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13027,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Brooks,Brooks County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13027,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Brooks,Brooks County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13027,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Brooks,Brooks County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,74.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13027,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Brooks,Brooks County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13027,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Brooks,Brooks County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,5614,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13027,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bryan,Bryan County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,44,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13029,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bryan,Bryan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13029,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bryan,Bryan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13029,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bryan,Bryan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13029,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bryan,Bryan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13029,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bryan,Bryan County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,44999,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13029,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bryan,Bryan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,29721,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13029,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bryan,Bryan County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2687,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13029,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bryan,Bryan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,253,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13029,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bryan,Bryan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,27035,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13029,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bryan,Bryan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13029,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bryan,Bryan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13029,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bryan,Bryan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,91,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13029,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bryan,Bryan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,42,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13029,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bryan,Bryan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13029,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bryan,Bryan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,8.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13029,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bryan,Bryan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13029,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bryan,Bryan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2433,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13029,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bulloch,Bulloch County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,91,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13031,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bulloch,Bulloch County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13031,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bulloch,Bulloch County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13031,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bulloch,Bulloch County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13031,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bulloch,Bulloch County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13031,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bulloch,Bulloch County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,81378,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13031,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bulloch,Bulloch County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,55794,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13031,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bulloch,Bulloch County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,39264,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13031,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bulloch,Bulloch County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,25,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13031,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bulloch,Bulloch County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,16530,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13031,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bulloch,Bulloch County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,70.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13031,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bulloch,Bulloch County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13031,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bulloch,Bulloch County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,29.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13031,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bulloch,Bulloch County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,88,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13031,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bulloch,Bulloch County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,7.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13031,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bulloch,Bulloch County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,62.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13031,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bulloch,Bulloch County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,4407,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13031,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Bulloch,Bulloch County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,34832,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13031,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Burke,Burke County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13033,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Burke,Burke County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13033,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Burke,Burke County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13033,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Burke,Burke County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13033,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Burke,Burke County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13033,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Burke,Burke County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,24621,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13033,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Burke,Burke County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7581,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13033,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Burke,Burke County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6171,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13033,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Burke,Burke County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13033,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Burke,Burke County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1409,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13033,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Burke,Burke County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,81.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13033,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Burke,Burke County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13033,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Burke,Burke County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,18.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13033,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Burke,Burke County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13033,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Burke,Burke County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13033,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Burke,Burke County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,81.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13033,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Burke,Burke County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13033,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Burke,Burke County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,6171,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13033,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Butts,Butts County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13035,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Butts,Butts County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13035,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Butts,Butts County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13035,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Butts,Butts County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13035,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Butts,Butts County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13035,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Butts,Butts County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,25542,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13035,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Butts,Butts County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,34877,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13035,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Butts,Butts County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,34470,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13035,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Butts,Butts County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,2356,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13035,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Butts,Butts County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,407,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13035,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Butts,Butts County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13035,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Butts,Butts County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,6.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13035,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Butts,Butts County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13035,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Butts,Butts County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13035,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Butts,Butts County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,7.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13035,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Butts,Butts County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,84.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13035,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Butts,Butts County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2647,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13035,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Butts,Butts County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,29467,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13035,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13037,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13037,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13037,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13037,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13037,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,5560,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13037,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5221,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13037,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4693,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13037,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13037,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,528,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13037,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,89.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13037,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13037,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,10.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13037,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13037,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,30.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13037,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,59.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13037,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1585,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13037,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3107,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13037,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Camden,Camden County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13039,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Camden,Camden County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13039,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Camden,Camden County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13039,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Camden,Camden County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13039,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Camden,Camden County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13039,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Camden,Camden County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,54911,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13039,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Camden,Camden County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,46327,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13039,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Camden,Camden County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,46049,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13039,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Camden,Camden County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,35475,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13039,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Camden,Camden County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,278,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13039,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Camden,Camden County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13039,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Camden,Camden County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,76.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13039,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Camden,Camden County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13039,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Camden,Camden County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13039,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Camden,Camden County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13039,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Camden,Camden County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,22.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13039,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Camden,Camden County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13039,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Camden,Camden County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,10575,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13039,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Candler,Candler County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13043,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Candler,Candler County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13043,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Candler,Candler County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13043,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Candler,Candler County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13043,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Candler,Candler County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13043,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Candler,Candler County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,11001,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13043,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Candler,Candler County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5031,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13043,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Candler,Candler County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4515,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13043,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Candler,Candler County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13043,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Candler,Candler County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,516,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13043,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Candler,Candler County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,89.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13043,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Candler,Candler County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13043,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Candler,Candler County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,10.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13043,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Candler,Candler County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13043,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Candler,Candler County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13043,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Candler,Candler County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,89.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13043,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Candler,Candler County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13043,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Candler,Candler County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,4515,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13043,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13045,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13045,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13045,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13045,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13045,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,119463,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13045,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,97872,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13045,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,97346,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13045,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13045,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,526,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13045,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13045,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13045,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13045,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13045,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13045,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,93.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13045,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,5853,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13045,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,91494,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13045,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Catoosa,Catoosa County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13047,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Catoosa,Catoosa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13047,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Catoosa,Catoosa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13047,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Catoosa,Catoosa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13047,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Catoosa,Catoosa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13047,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Catoosa,Catoosa County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,67976,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13047,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Catoosa,Catoosa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,59842,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13047,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Catoosa,Catoosa County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,59842,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13047,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Catoosa,Catoosa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13047,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Catoosa,Catoosa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13047,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Catoosa,Catoosa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13047,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Catoosa,Catoosa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13047,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Catoosa,Catoosa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13047,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Catoosa,Catoosa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13047,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Catoosa,Catoosa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,12.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13047,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Catoosa,Catoosa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,87.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13047,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Catoosa,Catoosa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,7477,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13047,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Catoosa,Catoosa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,52365,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13047,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Charlton,Charlton County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13049,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Charlton,Charlton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13049,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Charlton,Charlton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13049,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Charlton,Charlton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13049,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Charlton,Charlton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13049,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Charlton,Charlton County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,12530,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13049,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Charlton,Charlton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,6539,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13049,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Charlton,Charlton County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6539,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13049,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Charlton,Charlton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,874,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13049,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Charlton,Charlton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13049,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Charlton,Charlton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13049,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Charlton,Charlton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,13.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13049,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Charlton,Charlton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13049,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Charlton,Charlton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13049,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Charlton,Charlton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13049,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Charlton,Charlton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,85.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13049,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Charlton,Charlton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,49,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13049,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Charlton,Charlton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,5615,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13049,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Chatham,Chatham County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,88,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13051,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Chatham,Chatham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13051,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Chatham,Chatham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13051,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Chatham,Chatham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13051,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Chatham,Chatham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13051,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Chatham,Chatham County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,294904,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13051,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Chatham,Chatham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,305056,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13051,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Chatham,Chatham County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,231557,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13051,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Chatham,Chatham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,21397,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13051,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Chatham,Chatham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,73499,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13051,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Chatham,Chatham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,75.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13051,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Chatham,Chatham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13051,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Chatham,Chatham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,24.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13051,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Chatham,Chatham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,74,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13051,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Chatham,Chatham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13051,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Chatham,Chatham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,68,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13051,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Chatham,Chatham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2836,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13051,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Chatham,Chatham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,207324,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13051,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Chattahoochee,Chattahoochee County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13053,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Chattahoochee,Chattahoochee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13053,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Chattahoochee,Chattahoochee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13053,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Chattahoochee,Chattahoochee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13053,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Chattahoochee,Chattahoochee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13053,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Chattahoochee,Chattahoochee County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,9482,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13053,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Chattahoochee,Chattahoochee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2691,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13053,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Chattahoochee,Chattahoochee County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2691,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13053,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Chattahoochee,Chattahoochee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13053,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Chattahoochee,Chattahoochee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13053,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Chattahoochee,Chattahoochee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13053,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Chattahoochee,Chattahoochee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13053,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Chattahoochee,Chattahoochee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13053,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Chattahoochee,Chattahoochee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13053,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Chattahoochee,Chattahoochee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13053,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Chattahoochee,Chattahoochee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13053,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Chattahoochee,Chattahoochee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13053,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Chattahoochee,Chattahoochee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2691,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13053,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Chattooga,Chattooga County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13055,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Chattooga,Chattooga County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13055,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Chattooga,Chattooga County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13055,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Chattooga,Chattooga County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13055,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Chattooga,Chattooga County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13055,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Chattooga,Chattooga County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,24921,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13055,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Chattooga,Chattooga County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,24784,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13055,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Chattooga,Chattooga County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,20245,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13055,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Chattooga,Chattooga County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,572,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13055,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Chattooga,Chattooga County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4539,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13055,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Chattooga,Chattooga County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,81.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13055,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Chattooga,Chattooga County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,2.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13055,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Chattooga,Chattooga County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,18.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13055,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Chattooga,Chattooga County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13055,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Chattooga,Chattooga County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13055,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Chattooga,Chattooga County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,79.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13055,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Chattooga,Chattooga County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13055,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Chattooga,Chattooga County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,19673,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13055,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13057,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13057,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13057,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13057,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13057,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,268043,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13057,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,212568,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13057,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,209302,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13057,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13057,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3265,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13057,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13057,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13057,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13057,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13057,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,5.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13057,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,92.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13057,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,12306,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13057,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,196996,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13057,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Clarke,Clarke County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13059,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Clarke,Clarke County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13059,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Clarke,Clarke County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13059,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Clarke,Clarke County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13059,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Clarke,Clarke County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13059,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Clarke,Clarke County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,128489,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13059,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Clarke,Clarke County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,116073,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13059,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Clarke,Clarke County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,113692,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13059,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Clarke,Clarke County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13059,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Clarke,Clarke County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2381,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13059,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Clarke,Clarke County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,97.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13059,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Clarke,Clarke County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13059,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Clarke,Clarke County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13059,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Clarke,Clarke County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13059,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Clarke,Clarke County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13059,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Clarke,Clarke County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,97.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13059,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Clarke,Clarke County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13059,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Clarke,Clarke County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,113692,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13059,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13061,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13061,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13061,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13061,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13061,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,2835,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13061,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2178,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13061,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1118,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13061,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1118,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13061,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1060,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13061,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,51.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13061,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,51.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13061,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,48.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13061,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13061,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13061,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13061,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13061,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13061,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Clayton,Clayton County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13063,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Clayton,Clayton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13063,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Clayton,Clayton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13063,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Clayton,Clayton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13063,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Clayton,Clayton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13063,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Clayton,Clayton County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,297417,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13063,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Clayton,Clayton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,255312,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13063,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Clayton,Clayton County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,255241,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13063,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Clayton,Clayton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13063,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Clayton,Clayton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,71,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13063,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Clayton,Clayton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13063,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Clayton,Clayton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13063,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Clayton,Clayton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13063,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Clayton,Clayton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13063,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Clayton,Clayton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13063,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Clayton,Clayton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13063,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Clayton,Clayton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13063,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Clayton,Clayton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,255241,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13063,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Clinch,Clinch County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13065,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Clinch,Clinch County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13065,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Clinch,Clinch County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13065,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Clinch,Clinch County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13065,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Clinch,Clinch County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13065,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Clinch,Clinch County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,6723,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13065,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Clinch,Clinch County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3796,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13065,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Clinch,Clinch County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3488,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13065,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Clinch,Clinch County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,359,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13065,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Clinch,Clinch County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,307,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13065,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Clinch,Clinch County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,91.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13065,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Clinch,Clinch County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,9.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13065,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Clinch,Clinch County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,8.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13065,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Clinch,Clinch County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13065,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Clinch,Clinch County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13065,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Clinch,Clinch County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,82.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13065,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Clinch,Clinch County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13065,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Clinch,Clinch County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3129,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13065,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Cobb,Cobb County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13067,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Cobb,Cobb County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13067,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Cobb,Cobb County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13067,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Cobb,Cobb County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13067,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Cobb,Cobb County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13067,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Cobb,Cobb County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,766209,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13067,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Cobb,Cobb County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,768053,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13067,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Cobb,Cobb County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,767495,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13067,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Cobb,Cobb County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13067,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Cobb,Cobb County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,558,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13067,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Cobb,Cobb County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13067,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Cobb,Cobb County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13067,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Cobb,Cobb County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13067,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Cobb,Cobb County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13067,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Cobb,Cobb County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,99.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13067,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Cobb,Cobb County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13067,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Cobb,Cobb County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,767495,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13067,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Cobb,Cobb County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13067,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Coffee,Coffee County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,34,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13069,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Coffee,Coffee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13069,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Coffee,Coffee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13069,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Coffee,Coffee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13069,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Coffee,Coffee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13069,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Coffee,Coffee County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,43047,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13069,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Coffee,Coffee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,20014,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13069,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Coffee,Coffee County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,15606,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13069,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Coffee,Coffee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13069,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Coffee,Coffee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4408,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13069,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Coffee,Coffee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,78,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13069,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Coffee,Coffee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13069,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Coffee,Coffee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,22,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13069,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Coffee,Coffee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,30,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13069,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Coffee,Coffee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13069,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Coffee,Coffee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,78,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13069,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Coffee,Coffee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13069,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Coffee,Coffee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,15606,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13069,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Colquitt,Colquitt County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,31,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13071,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Colquitt,Colquitt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13071,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Colquitt,Colquitt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13071,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Colquitt,Colquitt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13071,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Colquitt,Colquitt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13071,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Colquitt,Colquitt County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,45866,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13071,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Colquitt,Colquitt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,20919,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13071,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Colquitt,Colquitt County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,14719,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13071,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Colquitt,Colquitt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,13623,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13071,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Colquitt,Colquitt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6200,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13071,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Colquitt,Colquitt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,70.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13071,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Colquitt,Colquitt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,65.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13071,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Colquitt,Colquitt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,29.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13071,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Colquitt,Colquitt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,27,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13071,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Colquitt,Colquitt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13071,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Colquitt,Colquitt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,5.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13071,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Colquitt,Colquitt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13071,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Colquitt,Colquitt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1096,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13071,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Columbia,Columbia County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13073,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Columbia,Columbia County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13073,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Columbia,Columbia County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13073,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Columbia,Columbia County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13073,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Columbia,Columbia County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13073,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Columbia,Columbia County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,156773,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13073,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Columbia,Columbia County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,115818,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13073,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Columbia,Columbia County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,115481,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13073,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Columbia,Columbia County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13073,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Columbia,Columbia County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,337,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13073,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Columbia,Columbia County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13073,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Columbia,Columbia County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13073,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Columbia,Columbia County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13073,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Columbia,Columbia County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13073,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Columbia,Columbia County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,5.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13073,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Columbia,Columbia County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,94.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13073,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Columbia,Columbia County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,5907,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13073,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Columbia,Columbia County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,109574,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13073,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Cook,Cook County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13075,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Cook,Cook County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13075,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Cook,Cook County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13075,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Cook,Cook County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13075,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Cook,Cook County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13075,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Cook,Cook County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,17232,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13075,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Cook,Cook County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9748,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13075,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Cook,Cook County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1461,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13075,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Cook,Cook County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13075,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Cook,Cook County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8288,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13075,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Cook,Cook County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,15,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13075,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Cook,Cook County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13075,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Cook,Cook County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,85,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13075,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Cook,Cook County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13075,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Cook,Cook County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13075,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Cook,Cook County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,15,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13075,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Cook,Cook County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13075,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Cook,Cook County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1461,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13075,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Coweta,Coweta County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,26,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13077,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Coweta,Coweta County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13077,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Coweta,Coweta County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13077,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Coweta,Coweta County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13077,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Coweta,Coweta County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13077,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Coweta,Coweta County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,146653,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13077,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Coweta,Coweta County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,124363,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13077,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Coweta,Coweta County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,121125,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13077,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Coweta,Coweta County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,255,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13077,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Coweta,Coweta County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3238,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13077,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Coweta,Coweta County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,97.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13077,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Coweta,Coweta County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13077,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Coweta,Coweta County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13077,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Coweta,Coweta County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,20,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13077,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Coweta,Coweta County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,3.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13077,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Coweta,Coweta County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,41.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13077,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Coweta,Coweta County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,3830,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13077,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Coweta,Coweta County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,51998,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13077,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13079,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13079,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13079,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13079,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13079,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,12100,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13079,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5118,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13079,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2971,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13079,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13079,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2147,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13079,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,58.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13079,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13079,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,41.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13079,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13079,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13079,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,58.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13079,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13079,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2971,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13079,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Crisp,Crisp County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13081,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Crisp,Crisp County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13081,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Crisp,Crisp County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13081,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Crisp,Crisp County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13081,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Crisp,Crisp County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13081,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Crisp,Crisp County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,20042,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13081,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Crisp,Crisp County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,15264,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13081,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Crisp,Crisp County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11009,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13081,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Crisp,Crisp County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13081,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Crisp,Crisp County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4255,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13081,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Crisp,Crisp County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,72.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13081,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Crisp,Crisp County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13081,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Crisp,Crisp County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,27.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13081,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Crisp,Crisp County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13081,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Crisp,Crisp County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13081,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Crisp,Crisp County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,72.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13081,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Crisp,Crisp County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13081,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Crisp,Crisp County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,11009,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13081,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Dade,Dade County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13083,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Dade,Dade County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13083,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Dade,Dade County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13083,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Dade,Dade County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13083,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Dade,Dade County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13083,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Dade,Dade County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,16224,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13083,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Dade,Dade County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,15395,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13083,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Dade,Dade County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,15395,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13083,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Dade,Dade County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13083,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Dade,Dade County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13083,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Dade,Dade County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13083,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Dade,Dade County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13083,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Dade,Dade County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13083,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Dade,Dade County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13083,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Dade,Dade County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13083,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Dade,Dade County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13083,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Dade,Dade County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13083,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Dade,Dade County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,15395,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13083,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Dawson,Dawson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13085,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Dawson,Dawson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13085,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Dawson,Dawson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13085,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Dawson,Dawson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13085,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Dawson,Dawson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13085,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Dawson,Dawson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,27047,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13085,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Dawson,Dawson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,15725,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13085,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Dawson,Dawson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,15685,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13085,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Dawson,Dawson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13085,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Dawson,Dawson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,40,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13085,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Dawson,Dawson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13085,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Dawson,Dawson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13085,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Dawson,Dawson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13085,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Dawson,Dawson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13085,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Dawson,Dawson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13085,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Dawson,Dawson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,97.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13085,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Dawson,Dawson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,307,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13085,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Dawson,Dawson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,15378,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13085,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Decatur,Decatur County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13087,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Decatur,Decatur County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13087,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Decatur,Decatur County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13087,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Decatur,Decatur County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13087,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Decatur,Decatur County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13087,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Decatur,Decatur County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,29338,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13087,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Decatur,Decatur County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,15413,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13087,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Decatur,Decatur County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,12996,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13087,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Decatur,Decatur County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13087,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Decatur,Decatur County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2417,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13087,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Decatur,Decatur County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,84.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13087,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Decatur,Decatur County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13087,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Decatur,Decatur County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,15.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13087,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Decatur,Decatur County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13087,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Decatur,Decatur County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13087,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Decatur,Decatur County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,84.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13087,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Decatur,Decatur County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13087,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Decatur,Decatur County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,12996,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13087,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13089,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13089,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13089,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13089,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13089,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,763831,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13089,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,702386,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13089,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,702386,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13089,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13089,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13089,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13089,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13089,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13089,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13089,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13089,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13089,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13089,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,702386,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13089,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Dodge,Dodge County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13091,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Dodge,Dodge County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13091,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Dodge,Dodge County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13091,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Dodge,Dodge County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13091,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Dodge,Dodge County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13091,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Dodge,Dodge County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,19849,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13091,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Dodge,Dodge County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,10026,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13091,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Dodge,Dodge County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7405,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13091,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Dodge,Dodge County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13091,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Dodge,Dodge County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2621,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13091,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Dodge,Dodge County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,73.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13091,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Dodge,Dodge County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13091,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Dodge,Dodge County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,26.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13091,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Dodge,Dodge County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13091,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Dodge,Dodge County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13091,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Dodge,Dodge County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,73.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13091,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Dodge,Dodge County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13091,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Dodge,Dodge County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,7405,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13091,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Dooly,Dooly County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13093,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Dooly,Dooly County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13093,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Dooly,Dooly County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13093,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Dooly,Dooly County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13093,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Dooly,Dooly County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13093,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Dooly,Dooly County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,11142,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13093,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Dooly,Dooly County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7569,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13093,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Dooly,Dooly County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6699,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13093,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Dooly,Dooly County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13093,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Dooly,Dooly County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,871,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13093,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Dooly,Dooly County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,88.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13093,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Dooly,Dooly County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13093,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Dooly,Dooly County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,11.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13093,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Dooly,Dooly County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13093,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Dooly,Dooly County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13093,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Dooly,Dooly County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,88.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13093,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Dooly,Dooly County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13093,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Dooly,Dooly County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,6699,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13093,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Dougherty,Dougherty County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13095,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Dougherty,Dougherty County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13095,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Dougherty,Dougherty County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13095,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Dougherty,Dougherty County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13095,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Dougherty,Dougherty County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13095,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Dougherty,Dougherty County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,85366,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13095,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Dougherty,Dougherty County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,86182,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13095,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Dougherty,Dougherty County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,82491,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13095,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Dougherty,Dougherty County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13095,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Dougherty,Dougherty County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3691,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13095,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Dougherty,Dougherty County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,95.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13095,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Dougherty,Dougherty County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13095,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Dougherty,Dougherty County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,4.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13095,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Dougherty,Dougherty County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13095,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Dougherty,Dougherty County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13095,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Dougherty,Dougherty County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,95.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13095,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Dougherty,Dougherty County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13095,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Dougherty,Dougherty County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,82491,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13095,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13097,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13097,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13097,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13097,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13097,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,144497,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13097,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,104388,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13097,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,103698,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13097,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13097,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,690,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13097,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13097,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13097,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13097,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13097,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13097,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,99.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13097,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13097,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,103698,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13097,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Early,Early County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13099,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Early,Early County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13099,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Early,Early County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13099,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Early,Early County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13099,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Early,Early County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13099,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Early,Early County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,10813,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13099,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Early,Early County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5878,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13099,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Early,Early County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5431,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13099,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Early,Early County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13099,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Early,Early County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,447,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13099,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Early,Early County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,92.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13099,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Early,Early County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13099,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Early,Early County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,7.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13099,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Early,Early County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13099,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Early,Early County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13099,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Early,Early County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,92.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13099,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Early,Early County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13099,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Early,Early County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,5431,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13099,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Echols,Echols County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13101,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Echols,Echols County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13101,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Echols,Echols County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13101,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Echols,Echols County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13101,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Echols,Echols County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13101,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Echols,Echols County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,3696,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13101,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Echols,Echols County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,846,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13101,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Echols,Echols County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13101,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Echols,Echols County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13101,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Echols,Echols County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,846,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13101,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Echols,Echols County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13101,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Echols,Echols County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13101,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Echols,Echols County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13101,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Echols,Echols County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13101,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Echols,Echols County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13101,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Echols,Echols County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13101,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Echols,Echols County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13101,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Echols,Echols County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13101,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Effingham,Effingham County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,60,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13103,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Effingham,Effingham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13103,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Effingham,Effingham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13103,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Effingham,Effingham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13103,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Effingham,Effingham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13103,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Effingham,Effingham County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,65150,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13103,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Effingham,Effingham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,37392,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13103,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Effingham,Effingham County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2931,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13103,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Effingham,Effingham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13103,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Effingham,Effingham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,34461,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13103,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Effingham,Effingham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,7.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13103,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Effingham,Effingham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13103,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Effingham,Effingham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,92.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13103,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Effingham,Effingham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,59,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13103,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Effingham,Effingham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13103,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Effingham,Effingham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,7.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13103,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Effingham,Effingham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13103,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Effingham,Effingham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2931,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13103,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Elbert,Elbert County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13105,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Elbert,Elbert County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13105,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Elbert,Elbert County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13105,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Elbert,Elbert County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13105,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Elbert,Elbert County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13105,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Elbert,Elbert County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,19627,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13105,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Elbert,Elbert County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,8745,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13105,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Elbert,Elbert County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8367,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13105,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Elbert,Elbert County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,25,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13105,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Elbert,Elbert County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,378,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13105,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Elbert,Elbert County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,95.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13105,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Elbert,Elbert County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13105,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Elbert,Elbert County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,4.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13105,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Elbert,Elbert County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13105,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Elbert,Elbert County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13105,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Elbert,Elbert County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,95.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13105,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Elbert,Elbert County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13105,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Elbert,Elbert County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,8343,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13105,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Emanuel,Emanuel County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13107,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Emanuel,Emanuel County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13107,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Emanuel,Emanuel County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13107,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Emanuel,Emanuel County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13107,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Emanuel,Emanuel County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13107,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Emanuel,Emanuel County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,22730,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13107,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Emanuel,Emanuel County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,11981,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13107,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Emanuel,Emanuel County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10393,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13107,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Emanuel,Emanuel County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13107,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Emanuel,Emanuel County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1588,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13107,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Emanuel,Emanuel County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,86.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13107,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Emanuel,Emanuel County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13107,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Emanuel,Emanuel County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,13.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13107,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Emanuel,Emanuel County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13107,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Emanuel,Emanuel County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13107,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Emanuel,Emanuel County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,86.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13107,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Emanuel,Emanuel County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13107,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Emanuel,Emanuel County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,10393,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13107,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Evans,Evans County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13109,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Evans,Evans County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13109,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Evans,Evans County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13109,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Evans,Evans County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13109,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Evans,Evans County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13109,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Evans,Evans County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,10757,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13109,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Evans,Evans County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,6487,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13109,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Evans,Evans County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13109,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Evans,Evans County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13109,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Evans,Evans County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6487,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13109,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Evans,Evans County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13109,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Evans,Evans County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13109,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Evans,Evans County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13109,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Evans,Evans County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13109,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Evans,Evans County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13109,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Evans,Evans County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13109,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Evans,Evans County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13109,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Evans,Evans County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13109,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Fannin,Fannin County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13111,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Fannin,Fannin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13111,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Fannin,Fannin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13111,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Fannin,Fannin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13111,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Fannin,Fannin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13111,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Fannin,Fannin County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,25396,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13111,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Fannin,Fannin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,15134,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13111,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Fannin,Fannin County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,14921,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13111,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Fannin,Fannin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,40,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13111,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Fannin,Fannin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,213,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13111,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Fannin,Fannin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13111,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Fannin,Fannin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13111,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Fannin,Fannin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13111,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Fannin,Fannin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13111,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Fannin,Fannin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,5.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13111,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Fannin,Fannin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,93.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13111,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Fannin,Fannin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,796,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13111,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Fannin,Fannin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,14086,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13111,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13113,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13113,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13113,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13113,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13113,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,119441,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13113,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,90181,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13113,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,88450,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13113,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,15048,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13113,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1732,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13113,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13113,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,16.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13113,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13113,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13113,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13113,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,80.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13113,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,562,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13113,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,72839,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13113,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13115,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13115,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13115,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13115,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13115,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,98593,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13115,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,88582,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13115,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,88582,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13115,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13115,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13115,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13115,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13115,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13115,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13115,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13115,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13115,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13115,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,88582,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13115,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Forsyth,Forsyth County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13117,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Forsyth,Forsyth County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13117,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Forsyth,Forsyth County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13117,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Forsyth,Forsyth County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13117,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Forsyth,Forsyth County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13117,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Forsyth,Forsyth County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,252786,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13117,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Forsyth,Forsyth County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,210649,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13117,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Forsyth,Forsyth County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,209923,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13117,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Forsyth,Forsyth County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13117,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Forsyth,Forsyth County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,726,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13117,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Forsyth,Forsyth County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13117,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Forsyth,Forsyth County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13117,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Forsyth,Forsyth County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13117,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Forsyth,Forsyth County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13117,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Forsyth,Forsyth County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13117,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Forsyth,Forsyth County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,98.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13117,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Forsyth,Forsyth County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2080,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13117,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Forsyth,Forsyth County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,207843,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13117,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13119,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13119,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13119,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13119,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13119,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,23429,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13119,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,18388,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13119,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,17494,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13119,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13119,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,893,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13119,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,95.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13119,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13119,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,4.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13119,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13119,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,4.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13119,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,61.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13119,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,823,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13119,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,11291,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13119,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Fulton,Fulton County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13121,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Fulton,Fulton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13121,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Fulton,Fulton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13121,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Fulton,Fulton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13121,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Fulton,Fulton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13121,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Fulton,Fulton County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,1069023,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13121,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Fulton,Fulton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1133665,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13121,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Fulton,Fulton County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1133581,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13121,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Fulton,Fulton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13121,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Fulton,Fulton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,84,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13121,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Fulton,Fulton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13121,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Fulton,Fulton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13121,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Fulton,Fulton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13121,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Fulton,Fulton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13121,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Fulton,Fulton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13121,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Fulton,Fulton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,58.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13121,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Fulton,Fulton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,56121,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13121,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Fulton,Fulton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,664317,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13121,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,GA,Georgia,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1728,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,GA,GA,Georgia,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,570,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,GA,GA,Georgia,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,312,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,GA,GA,Georgia,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,101,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,GA,GA,Georgia,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,150,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,GA,GA,Georgia,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,10725800,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2020,GA,GA,Georgia,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9135654,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,GA,GA,Georgia,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8671136,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,GA,GA,Georgia,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,213063,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,GA,GA,Georgia,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,464518,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,GA,GA,Georgia,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,94.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,GA,GA,Georgia,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,2.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,GA,GA,Georgia,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,5.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,GA,GA,Georgia,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1158,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,GA,GA,Georgia,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,15.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,GA,GA,Georgia,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,71.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,GA,GA,Georgia,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1431455,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,GA,GA,Georgia,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,6524430,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,GA,Gilmer,Gilmer County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13123,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Gilmer,Gilmer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13123,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Gilmer,Gilmer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13123,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Gilmer,Gilmer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13123,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Gilmer,Gilmer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13123,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Gilmer,Gilmer County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,31429,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13123,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Gilmer,Gilmer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,14259,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13123,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Gilmer,Gilmer County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,12299,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13123,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Gilmer,Gilmer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13123,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Gilmer,Gilmer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1961,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13123,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Gilmer,Gilmer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,86.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13123,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Gilmer,Gilmer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13123,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Gilmer,Gilmer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,13.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13123,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Gilmer,Gilmer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13123,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Gilmer,Gilmer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13123,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Gilmer,Gilmer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,86.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13123,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Gilmer,Gilmer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13123,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Gilmer,Gilmer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,12299,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13123,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Glascock,Glascock County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13125,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Glascock,Glascock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13125,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Glascock,Glascock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13125,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Glascock,Glascock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13125,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Glascock,Glascock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13125,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Glascock,Glascock County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,2883,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13125,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Glascock,Glascock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,895,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13125,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Glascock,Glascock County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,662,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13125,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Glascock,Glascock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13125,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Glascock,Glascock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,233,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13125,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Glascock,Glascock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,73.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13125,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Glascock,Glascock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13125,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Glascock,Glascock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,26.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13125,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Glascock,Glascock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13125,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Glascock,Glascock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13125,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Glascock,Glascock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,73.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13125,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Glascock,Glascock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13125,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Glascock,Glascock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,662,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13125,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Glynn,Glynn County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,44,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13127,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Glynn,Glynn County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,30,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13127,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Glynn,Glynn County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13127,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Glynn,Glynn County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13127,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Glynn,Glynn County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,30,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13127,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Glynn,Glynn County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,84470,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13127,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Glynn,Glynn County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,69345,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13127,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Glynn,Glynn County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,67913,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13127,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Glynn,Glynn County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,67913,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13127,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Glynn,Glynn County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1432,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13127,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Glynn,Glynn County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,97.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13127,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Glynn,Glynn County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,97.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13127,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Glynn,Glynn County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13127,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Glynn,Glynn County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13127,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Glynn,Glynn County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13127,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Glynn,Glynn County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13127,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Glynn,Glynn County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13127,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Glynn,Glynn County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13127,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Gordon,Gordon County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13129,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Gordon,Gordon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13129,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Gordon,Gordon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13129,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Gordon,Gordon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13129,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Gordon,Gordon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13129,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Gordon,Gordon County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,57696,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13129,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Gordon,Gordon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,46783,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13129,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Gordon,Gordon County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,46783,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13129,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Gordon,Gordon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13129,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Gordon,Gordon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13129,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Gordon,Gordon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13129,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Gordon,Gordon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13129,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Gordon,Gordon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13129,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Gordon,Gordon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13129,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Gordon,Gordon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13129,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Gordon,Gordon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,99.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13129,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Gordon,Gordon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,378,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13129,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Gordon,Gordon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,46405,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13129,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Grady,Grady County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13131,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Grady,Grady County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13131,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Grady,Grady County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13131,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Grady,Grady County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13131,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Grady,Grady County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13131,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Grady,Grady County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,26221,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13131,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Grady,Grady County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,11111,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13131,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Grady,Grady County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9158,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13131,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Grady,Grady County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,83,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13131,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Grady,Grady County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1953,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13131,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Grady,Grady County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,82.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13131,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Grady,Grady County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13131,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Grady,Grady County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,17.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13131,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Grady,Grady County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13131,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Grady,Grady County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13131,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Grady,Grady County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,81.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13131,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Grady,Grady County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13131,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Grady,Grady County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,9075,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13131,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,26,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13133,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13133,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13133,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13133,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13133,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,19025,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13133,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,18020,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13133,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6368,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13133,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,993,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13133,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11652,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13133,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,35.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13133,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,5.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13133,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,64.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13133,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13133,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13133,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,29.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13133,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13133,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,5375,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13133,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Gwinnett,Gwinnett County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13135,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Gwinnett,Gwinnett County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13135,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Gwinnett,Gwinnett County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13135,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Gwinnett,Gwinnett County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13135,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Gwinnett,Gwinnett County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13135,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Gwinnett,Gwinnett County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,957801,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13135,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Gwinnett,Gwinnett County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,806830,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13135,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Gwinnett,Gwinnett County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,806073,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13135,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Gwinnett,Gwinnett County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13135,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Gwinnett,Gwinnett County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,756,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13135,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Gwinnett,Gwinnett County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13135,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Gwinnett,Gwinnett County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13135,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Gwinnett,Gwinnett County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13135,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Gwinnett,Gwinnett County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13135,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Gwinnett,Gwinnett County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,5.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13135,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Gwinnett,Gwinnett County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,94.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13135,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Gwinnett,Gwinnett County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,45025,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13135,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Gwinnett,Gwinnett County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,761049,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13135,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Habersham,Habersham County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13137,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Habersham,Habersham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13137,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Habersham,Habersham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13137,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Habersham,Habersham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13137,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Habersham,Habersham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13137,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Habersham,Habersham County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,46105,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13137,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Habersham,Habersham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,37900,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13137,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Habersham,Habersham County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,32259,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13137,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Habersham,Habersham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13137,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Habersham,Habersham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5642,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13137,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Habersham,Habersham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,85.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13137,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Habersham,Habersham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13137,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Habersham,Habersham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,14.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13137,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Habersham,Habersham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13137,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Habersham,Habersham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13137,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Habersham,Habersham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,40.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13137,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Habersham,Habersham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13137,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Habersham,Habersham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,15196,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13137,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Hall,Hall County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13139,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Hall,Hall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13139,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Hall,Hall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13139,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Hall,Hall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13139,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Hall,Hall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13139,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Hall,Hall County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,203589,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13139,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Hall,Hall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,141888,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13139,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Hall,Hall County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,139560,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13139,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Hall,Hall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,208,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13139,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Hall,Hall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2327,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13139,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Hall,Hall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13139,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Hall,Hall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13139,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Hall,Hall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13139,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Hall,Hall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13139,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Hall,Hall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,1.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13139,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Hall,Hall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,97,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13139,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Hall,Hall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1664,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13139,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Hall,Hall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,137688,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13139,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13141,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13141,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13141,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13141,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13141,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,8722,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13141,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7860,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13141,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5418,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13141,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,711,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13141,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2443,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13141,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,68.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13141,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13141,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,31.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13141,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13141,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,15.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13141,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,44.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13141,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1200,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13141,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3507,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13141,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Haralson,Haralson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13143,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Haralson,Haralson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13143,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Haralson,Haralson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13143,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Haralson,Haralson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13143,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Haralson,Haralson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13143,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Haralson,Haralson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,29985,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13143,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Haralson,Haralson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,23926,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13143,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Haralson,Haralson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,23926,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13143,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Haralson,Haralson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13143,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Haralson,Haralson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13143,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Haralson,Haralson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13143,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Haralson,Haralson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13143,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Haralson,Haralson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13143,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Haralson,Haralson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13143,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Haralson,Haralson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,27.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13143,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Haralson,Haralson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,72.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13143,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Haralson,Haralson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,6513,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13143,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Haralson,Haralson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,17413,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13143,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Harris,Harris County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13145,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Harris,Harris County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13145,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Harris,Harris County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13145,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Harris,Harris County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13145,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Harris,Harris County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13145,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Harris,Harris County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,34927,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13145,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Harris,Harris County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,46005,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13145,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Harris,Harris County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,42546,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13145,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Harris,Harris County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1246,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13145,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Harris,Harris County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3459,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13145,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Harris,Harris County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,92.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13145,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Harris,Harris County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,2.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13145,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Harris,Harris County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,7.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13145,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Harris,Harris County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13145,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Harris,Harris County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13145,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Harris,Harris County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,89.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13145,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Harris,Harris County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13145,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Harris,Harris County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,41300,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13145,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Hart,Hart County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13147,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Hart,Hart County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13147,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Hart,Hart County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13147,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Hart,Hart County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13147,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Hart,Hart County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13147,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Hart,Hart County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,25866,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13147,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Hart,Hart County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,13780,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13147,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Hart,Hart County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7191,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13147,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Hart,Hart County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13147,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Hart,Hart County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6589,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13147,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Hart,Hart County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,52.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13147,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Hart,Hart County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13147,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Hart,Hart County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,47.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13147,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Hart,Hart County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13147,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Hart,Hart County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,3.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13147,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Hart,Hart County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,48.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13147,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Hart,Hart County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,464,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13147,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Hart,Hart County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,6727,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13147,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Heard,Heard County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13149,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Heard,Heard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13149,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Heard,Heard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13149,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Heard,Heard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13149,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Heard,Heard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13149,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Heard,Heard County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,11465,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13149,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Heard,Heard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,8671,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13149,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Heard,Heard County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8671,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13149,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Heard,Heard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13149,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Heard,Heard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13149,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Heard,Heard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13149,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Heard,Heard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13149,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Heard,Heard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13149,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Heard,Heard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13149,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Heard,Heard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13149,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Heard,Heard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13149,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Heard,Heard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13149,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Heard,Heard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,8671,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13149,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13151,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13151,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13151,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13151,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13151,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,241818,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13151,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,234388,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13151,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,234117,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13151,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13151,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,271,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13151,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13151,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13151,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13151,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13151,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,3.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13151,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,96.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13151,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,7446,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13151,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,226670,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13151,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Houston,Houston County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13153,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Houston,Houston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13153,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Houston,Houston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13153,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Houston,Houston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13153,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Houston,Houston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13153,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Houston,Houston County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,164242,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13153,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Houston,Houston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,197040,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13153,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Houston,Houston County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,196954,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13153,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Houston,Houston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13153,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Houston,Houston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,86,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13153,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Houston,Houston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13153,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Houston,Houston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13153,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Houston,Houston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13153,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Houston,Houston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13153,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Houston,Houston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13153,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Houston,Houston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13153,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Houston,Houston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13153,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Houston,Houston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,196954,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13153,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Irwin,Irwin County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13155,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Irwin,Irwin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13155,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Irwin,Irwin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13155,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Irwin,Irwin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13155,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Irwin,Irwin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13155,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Irwin,Irwin County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,9643,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13155,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Irwin,Irwin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3009,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13155,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Irwin,Irwin County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13155,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Irwin,Irwin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13155,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Irwin,Irwin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3009,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13155,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Irwin,Irwin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13155,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Irwin,Irwin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13155,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Irwin,Irwin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13155,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Irwin,Irwin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13155,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Irwin,Irwin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13155,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Irwin,Irwin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13155,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Irwin,Irwin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13155,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Irwin,Irwin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13155,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13157,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13157,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13157,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13157,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13157,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,76712,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13157,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,57230,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13157,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,53224,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13157,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,57,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13157,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4005,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13157,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,93,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13157,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13157,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13157,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13157,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,64.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13157,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,28.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13157,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,36794,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13157,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,16373,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13157,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13159,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13159,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13159,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13159,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13159,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,14638,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13159,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7723,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13159,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7352,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13159,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,2377,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13159,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,372,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13159,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,95.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13159,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,30.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13159,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,4.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13159,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13159,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,21.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13159,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,42.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13159,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1662,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13159,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3313,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13159,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jeff Davis,Jeff Davis County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13161,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jeff Davis,Jeff Davis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13161,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jeff Davis,Jeff Davis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13161,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jeff Davis,Jeff Davis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13161,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jeff Davis,Jeff Davis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13161,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jeff Davis,Jeff Davis County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,14777,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13161,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jeff Davis,Jeff Davis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5860,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13161,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jeff Davis,Jeff Davis County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5203,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13161,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jeff Davis,Jeff Davis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13161,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jeff Davis,Jeff Davis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,657,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13161,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jeff Davis,Jeff Davis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,88.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13161,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jeff Davis,Jeff Davis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13161,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jeff Davis,Jeff Davis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,11.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13161,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jeff Davis,Jeff Davis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13161,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jeff Davis,Jeff Davis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13161,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jeff Davis,Jeff Davis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,88.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13161,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jeff Davis,Jeff Davis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13161,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jeff Davis,Jeff Davis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,5203,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13161,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13163,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13163,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13163,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13163,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13163,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,15658,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13163,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,10287,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13163,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9843,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13163,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13163,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,444,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13163,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,95.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13163,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13163,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,4.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13163,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13163,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13163,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,95.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13163,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13163,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,9843,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13163,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jenkins,Jenkins County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13165,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jenkins,Jenkins County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13165,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jenkins,Jenkins County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13165,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jenkins,Jenkins County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13165,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jenkins,Jenkins County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13165,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jenkins,Jenkins County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,8662,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13165,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jenkins,Jenkins County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5045,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13165,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jenkins,Jenkins County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4972,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13165,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jenkins,Jenkins County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13165,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jenkins,Jenkins County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,74,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13165,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jenkins,Jenkins County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13165,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jenkins,Jenkins County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13165,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jenkins,Jenkins County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13165,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jenkins,Jenkins County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13165,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jenkins,Jenkins County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13165,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jenkins,Jenkins County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,98.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13165,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jenkins,Jenkins County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13165,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jenkins,Jenkins County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,4972,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13165,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13167,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13167,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13167,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13167,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13167,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,9168,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13167,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4075,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13167,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3552,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13167,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13167,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,524,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13167,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,87.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13167,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13167,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,12.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13167,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13167,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13167,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,87.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13167,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13167,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3552,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13167,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jones,Jones County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13169,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jones,Jones County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13169,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jones,Jones County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13169,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jones,Jones County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13169,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jones,Jones County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13169,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jones,Jones County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,28356,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13169,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jones,Jones County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,19929,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13169,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jones,Jones County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,19732,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13169,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jones,Jones County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,67,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13169,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jones,Jones County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,197,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13169,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jones,Jones County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13169,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jones,Jones County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13169,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jones,Jones County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13169,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jones,Jones County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13169,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jones,Jones County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13169,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jones,Jones County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,98.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13169,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jones,Jones County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13169,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Jones,Jones County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,19665,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13169,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lamar,Lamar County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13171,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lamar,Lamar County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13171,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lamar,Lamar County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13171,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lamar,Lamar County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13171,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lamar,Lamar County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13171,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lamar,Lamar County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,18550,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13171,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lamar,Lamar County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,8083,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13171,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lamar,Lamar County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7625,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13171,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lamar,Lamar County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13171,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lamar,Lamar County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,458,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13171,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lamar,Lamar County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,94.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13171,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lamar,Lamar County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13171,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lamar,Lamar County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,5.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13171,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lamar,Lamar County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13171,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lamar,Lamar County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,15.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13171,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lamar,Lamar County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,79,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13171,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lamar,Lamar County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1239,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13171,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lamar,Lamar County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,6386,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13171,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lanier,Lanier County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13173,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lanier,Lanier County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13173,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lanier,Lanier County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13173,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lanier,Lanier County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13173,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lanier,Lanier County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13173,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lanier,Lanier County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,9916,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13173,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lanier,Lanier County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3786,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13173,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lanier,Lanier County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3433,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13173,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lanier,Lanier County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,553,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13173,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lanier,Lanier County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,354,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13173,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lanier,Lanier County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,90.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13173,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lanier,Lanier County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,14.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13173,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lanier,Lanier County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,9.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13173,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lanier,Lanier County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13173,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lanier,Lanier County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13173,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lanier,Lanier County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,76.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13173,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lanier,Lanier County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13173,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lanier,Lanier County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2879,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13173,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Laurens,Laurens County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13175,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Laurens,Laurens County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13175,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Laurens,Laurens County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13175,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Laurens,Laurens County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13175,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Laurens,Laurens County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13175,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Laurens,Laurens County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,49497,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13175,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Laurens,Laurens County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,27575,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13175,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Laurens,Laurens County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,22665,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13175,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Laurens,Laurens County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13175,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Laurens,Laurens County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4910,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13175,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Laurens,Laurens County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,82.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13175,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Laurens,Laurens County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13175,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Laurens,Laurens County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,17.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13175,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Laurens,Laurens County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13175,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Laurens,Laurens County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13175,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Laurens,Laurens County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,82.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13175,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Laurens,Laurens County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13175,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Laurens,Laurens County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,22665,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13175,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,19,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13177,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13177,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13177,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13177,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13177,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,33179,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13177,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,19810,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13177,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,17281,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13177,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13177,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2529,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13177,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,87.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13177,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13177,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,12.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13177,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13177,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13177,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,87.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13177,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13177,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,17281,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13177,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Liberty,Liberty County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,46,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13179,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Liberty,Liberty County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13179,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Liberty,Liberty County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13179,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Liberty,Liberty County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13179,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Liberty,Liberty County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13179,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Liberty,Liberty County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,65220,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13179,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Liberty,Liberty County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,63286,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13179,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Liberty,Liberty County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,56658,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13179,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Liberty,Liberty County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,24492,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13179,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Liberty,Liberty County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6628,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13179,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Liberty,Liberty County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,89.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13179,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Liberty,Liberty County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,38.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13179,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Liberty,Liberty County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,10.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13179,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Liberty,Liberty County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,29,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13179,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Liberty,Liberty County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13179,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Liberty,Liberty County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,50.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13179,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Liberty,Liberty County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13179,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Liberty,Liberty County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,32166,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13179,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13181,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13181,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13181,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13181,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13181,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,7704,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13181,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5354,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13181,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5170,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13181,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13181,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,184,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13181,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,96.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13181,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13181,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,3.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13181,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13181,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13181,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,96.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13181,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13181,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,5170,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13181,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Long,Long County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,29,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13183,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Long,Long County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13183,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Long,Long County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13183,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Long,Long County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13183,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Long,Long County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13183,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Long,Long County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,16287,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13183,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Long,Long County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3768,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13183,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Long,Long County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2084,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13183,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Long,Long County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,523,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13183,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Long,Long County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1685,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13183,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Long,Long County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,55.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13183,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Long,Long County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,13.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13183,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Long,Long County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,44.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13183,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Long,Long County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,23,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13183,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Long,Long County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13183,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Long,Long County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13183,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Long,Long County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13183,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Long,Long County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13183,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lowndes,Lowndes County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,77,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13185,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lowndes,Lowndes County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13185,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lowndes,Lowndes County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13185,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lowndes,Lowndes County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13185,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lowndes,Lowndes County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13185,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lowndes,Lowndes County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,118316,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13185,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lowndes,Lowndes County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,89768,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13185,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lowndes,Lowndes County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,77823,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13185,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lowndes,Lowndes County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,182,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13185,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lowndes,Lowndes County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11945,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13185,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lowndes,Lowndes County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,86.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13185,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lowndes,Lowndes County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13185,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lowndes,Lowndes County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,13.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13185,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lowndes,Lowndes County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,66,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13185,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lowndes,Lowndes County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,1.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13185,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lowndes,Lowndes County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,85.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13185,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lowndes,Lowndes County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1271,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13185,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lowndes,Lowndes County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,76370,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13185,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lumpkin,Lumpkin County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,20,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13187,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lumpkin,Lumpkin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13187,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lumpkin,Lumpkin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13187,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lumpkin,Lumpkin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13187,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lumpkin,Lumpkin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13187,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lumpkin,Lumpkin County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,33596,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13187,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lumpkin,Lumpkin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,10123,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13187,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lumpkin,Lumpkin County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5874,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13187,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lumpkin,Lumpkin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13187,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lumpkin,Lumpkin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4248,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13187,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lumpkin,Lumpkin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,58,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13187,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lumpkin,Lumpkin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13187,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lumpkin,Lumpkin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,42,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13187,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lumpkin,Lumpkin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,19,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13187,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lumpkin,Lumpkin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13187,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lumpkin,Lumpkin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,58,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13187,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lumpkin,Lumpkin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13187,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Lumpkin,Lumpkin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,5874,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13187,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13193,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13193,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13193,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13193,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13193,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,12021,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13193,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9320,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13193,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9256,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13193,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13193,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,64,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13193,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13193,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13193,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13193,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13193,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13193,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,99.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13193,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13193,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,9256,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13193,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,19,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13195,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13195,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13195,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13195,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13195,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,30263,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13195,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,10041,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13195,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8220,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13195,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1636,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13195,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1822,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13195,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,81.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13195,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,16.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13195,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,18.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13195,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13195,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13195,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,65.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13195,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13195,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,6583,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13195,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13197,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13197,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13197,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13197,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13197,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,7520,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13197,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,6465,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13197,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6465,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13197,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13197,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13197,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13197,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13197,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13197,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13197,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13197,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13197,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13197,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,6465,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13197,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,McDuffie,McDuffie County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13189,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,McDuffie,McDuffie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13189,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,McDuffie,McDuffie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13189,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,McDuffie,McDuffie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13189,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,McDuffie,McDuffie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13189,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,McDuffie,McDuffie County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,21587,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13189,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,McDuffie,McDuffie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,16749,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13189,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,McDuffie,McDuffie County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,16749,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13189,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,McDuffie,McDuffie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13189,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,McDuffie,McDuffie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13189,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,McDuffie,McDuffie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13189,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,McDuffie,McDuffie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13189,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,McDuffie,McDuffie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13189,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,McDuffie,McDuffie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13189,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,McDuffie,McDuffie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13189,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,McDuffie,McDuffie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13189,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,McDuffie,McDuffie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13189,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,McDuffie,McDuffie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,16749,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13189,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,McIntosh,McIntosh County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,30,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13191,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,McIntosh,McIntosh County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,25,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13191,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,McIntosh,McIntosh County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13191,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,McIntosh,McIntosh County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13191,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,McIntosh,McIntosh County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,25,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13191,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,McIntosh,McIntosh County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,10982,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13191,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,McIntosh,McIntosh County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,10196,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13191,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,McIntosh,McIntosh County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9665,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13191,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,McIntosh,McIntosh County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,9665,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13191,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,McIntosh,McIntosh County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,531,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13191,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,McIntosh,McIntosh County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,94.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13191,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,McIntosh,McIntosh County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,94.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13191,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,McIntosh,McIntosh County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,5.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13191,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,McIntosh,McIntosh County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13191,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,McIntosh,McIntosh County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13191,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,McIntosh,McIntosh County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13191,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,McIntosh,McIntosh County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13191,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,McIntosh,McIntosh County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13191,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Meriwether,Meriwether County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13199,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Meriwether,Meriwether County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13199,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Meriwether,Meriwether County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13199,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Meriwether,Meriwether County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13199,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Meriwether,Meriwether County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13199,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Meriwether,Meriwether County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,20619,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13199,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Meriwether,Meriwether County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,10819,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13199,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Meriwether,Meriwether County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10163,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13199,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Meriwether,Meriwether County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13199,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Meriwether,Meriwether County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,656,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13199,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Meriwether,Meriwether County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,93.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13199,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Meriwether,Meriwether County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13199,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Meriwether,Meriwether County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,6.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13199,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Meriwether,Meriwether County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13199,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Meriwether,Meriwether County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,14.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13199,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Meriwether,Meriwether County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,79.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13199,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Meriwether,Meriwether County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1538,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13199,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Meriwether,Meriwether County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,8625,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13199,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Miller,Miller County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13201,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Miller,Miller County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13201,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Miller,Miller County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13201,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Miller,Miller County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13201,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Miller,Miller County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13201,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Miller,Miller County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,5987,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13201,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Miller,Miller County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1736,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13201,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Miller,Miller County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1736,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13201,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Miller,Miller County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13201,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Miller,Miller County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13201,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Miller,Miller County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13201,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Miller,Miller County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13201,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Miller,Miller County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13201,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Miller,Miller County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13201,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Miller,Miller County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13201,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Miller,Miller County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13201,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Miller,Miller County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13201,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Miller,Miller County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1736,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13201,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Mitchell,Mitchell County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13205,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Mitchell,Mitchell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13205,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Mitchell,Mitchell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13205,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Mitchell,Mitchell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13205,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Mitchell,Mitchell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13205,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Mitchell,Mitchell County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,21677,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13205,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Mitchell,Mitchell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,12485,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13205,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Mitchell,Mitchell County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10200,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13205,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Mitchell,Mitchell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,983,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13205,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Mitchell,Mitchell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2285,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13205,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Mitchell,Mitchell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,81.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13205,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Mitchell,Mitchell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,7.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13205,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Mitchell,Mitchell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,18.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13205,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Mitchell,Mitchell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13205,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Mitchell,Mitchell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13205,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Mitchell,Mitchell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,73.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13205,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Mitchell,Mitchell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13205,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Mitchell,Mitchell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,9217,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13205,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13207,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13207,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13207,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13207,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13207,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,28046,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13207,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,15540,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13207,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9638,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13207,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13207,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5903,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13207,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,62,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13207,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13207,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,38,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13207,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13207,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,17,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13207,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,45,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13207,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2642,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13207,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,6995,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13207,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13209,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13209,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13209,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13209,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13209,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,8577,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13209,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3736,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13209,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2775,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13209,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13209,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,961,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13209,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,74.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13209,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13209,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,25.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13209,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13209,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,2.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13209,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,72.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13209,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,82,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13209,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2692,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13209,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13211,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13211,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13211,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13211,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13211,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,20174,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13211,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7523,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13211,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6314,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13211,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13211,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1209,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13211,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,83.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13211,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13211,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,16.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13211,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13211,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13211,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,83.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13211,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13211,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,6314,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13211,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Murray,Murray County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13213,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Murray,Murray County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13213,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Murray,Murray County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13213,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Murray,Murray County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13213,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Murray,Murray County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13213,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Murray,Murray County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,39938,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13213,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Murray,Murray County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,26848,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13213,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Murray,Murray County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,26717,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13213,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Murray,Murray County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13213,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Murray,Murray County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,130,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13213,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Murray,Murray County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13213,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Murray,Murray County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13213,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Murray,Murray County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13213,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Murray,Murray County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13213,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Murray,Murray County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13213,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Murray,Murray County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,99.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13213,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Murray,Murray County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13213,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Murray,Murray County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,26717,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13213,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Muscogee,Muscogee County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13215,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Muscogee,Muscogee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13215,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Muscogee,Muscogee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13215,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Muscogee,Muscogee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13215,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Muscogee,Muscogee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13215,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Muscogee,Muscogee County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,206960,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13215,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Muscogee,Muscogee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,268476,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13215,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Muscogee,Muscogee County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,268476,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13215,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Muscogee,Muscogee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13215,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Muscogee,Muscogee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13215,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Muscogee,Muscogee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13215,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Muscogee,Muscogee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13215,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Muscogee,Muscogee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13215,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Muscogee,Muscogee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13215,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Muscogee,Muscogee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,19.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13215,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Muscogee,Muscogee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,80.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13215,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Muscogee,Muscogee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,51994,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13215,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Muscogee,Muscogee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,216482,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13215,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13217,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13217,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13217,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13217,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13217,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,112780,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13217,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,82557,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13217,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,80411,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13217,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13217,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2146,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13217,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,97.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13217,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13217,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13217,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13217,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,97.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13217,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13217,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,80411,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13217,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13217,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Oconee,Oconee County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,24,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13219,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Oconee,Oconee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13219,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Oconee,Oconee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13219,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Oconee,Oconee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13219,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Oconee,Oconee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13219,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Oconee,Oconee County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,42021,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13219,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Oconee,Oconee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,23912,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13219,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Oconee,Oconee County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,21248,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13219,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Oconee,Oconee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,548,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13219,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Oconee,Oconee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2664,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13219,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Oconee,Oconee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,88.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13219,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Oconee,Oconee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,2.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13219,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Oconee,Oconee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,11.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13219,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Oconee,Oconee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,22,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13219,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Oconee,Oconee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13219,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Oconee,Oconee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,86.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13219,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Oconee,Oconee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13219,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Oconee,Oconee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,20700,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13219,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Oglethorpe,Oglethorpe County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13221,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Oglethorpe,Oglethorpe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13221,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Oglethorpe,Oglethorpe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13221,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Oglethorpe,Oglethorpe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13221,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Oglethorpe,Oglethorpe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13221,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Oglethorpe,Oglethorpe County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,14865,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13221,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Oglethorpe,Oglethorpe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4389,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13221,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Oglethorpe,Oglethorpe County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1183,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13221,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Oglethorpe,Oglethorpe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1183,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13221,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Oglethorpe,Oglethorpe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3207,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13221,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Oglethorpe,Oglethorpe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,26.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13221,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Oglethorpe,Oglethorpe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,26.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13221,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Oglethorpe,Oglethorpe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,73.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13221,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Oglethorpe,Oglethorpe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13221,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Oglethorpe,Oglethorpe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13221,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Oglethorpe,Oglethorpe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13221,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Oglethorpe,Oglethorpe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13221,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Oglethorpe,Oglethorpe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13221,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Paulding,Paulding County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13223,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Paulding,Paulding County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13223,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Paulding,Paulding County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13223,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Paulding,Paulding County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13223,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Paulding,Paulding County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13223,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Paulding,Paulding County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,169660,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13223,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Paulding,Paulding County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,120898,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13223,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Paulding,Paulding County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,120874,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13223,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Paulding,Paulding County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13223,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Paulding,Paulding County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,25,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13223,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Paulding,Paulding County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13223,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Paulding,Paulding County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13223,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Paulding,Paulding County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13223,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Paulding,Paulding County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13223,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Paulding,Paulding County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13223,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Paulding,Paulding County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13223,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Paulding,Paulding County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,120874,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13223,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Paulding,Paulding County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13223,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Peach,Peach County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13225,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Peach,Peach County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13225,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Peach,Peach County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13225,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Peach,Peach County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13225,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Peach,Peach County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13225,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Peach,Peach County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,28035,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13225,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Peach,Peach County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,20345,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13225,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Peach,Peach County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,20174,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13225,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Peach,Peach County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13225,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Peach,Peach County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,170,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13225,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Peach,Peach County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13225,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Peach,Peach County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13225,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Peach,Peach County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13225,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Peach,Peach County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13225,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Peach,Peach County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13225,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Peach,Peach County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,99.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13225,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Peach,Peach County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13225,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Peach,Peach County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,20174,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13225,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Pickens,Pickens County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13227,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Pickens,Pickens County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13227,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Pickens,Pickens County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13227,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Pickens,Pickens County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13227,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Pickens,Pickens County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13227,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Pickens,Pickens County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,33333,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13227,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Pickens,Pickens County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,24689,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13227,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Pickens,Pickens County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,18587,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13227,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Pickens,Pickens County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,2750,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13227,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Pickens,Pickens County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6102,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13227,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Pickens,Pickens County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,75.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13227,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Pickens,Pickens County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,11.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13227,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Pickens,Pickens County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,24.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13227,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Pickens,Pickens County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13227,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Pickens,Pickens County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,27.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13227,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Pickens,Pickens County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,36.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13227,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Pickens,Pickens County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,6762,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13227,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Pickens,Pickens County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,9075,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13227,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Pierce,Pierce County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13229,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Pierce,Pierce County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13229,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Pierce,Pierce County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13229,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Pierce,Pierce County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13229,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Pierce,Pierce County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13229,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Pierce,Pierce County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,19722,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13229,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Pierce,Pierce County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7479,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13229,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Pierce,Pierce County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6538,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13229,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Pierce,Pierce County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,242,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13229,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Pierce,Pierce County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,941,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13229,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Pierce,Pierce County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,87.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13229,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Pierce,Pierce County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,3.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13229,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Pierce,Pierce County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,12.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13229,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Pierce,Pierce County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13229,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Pierce,Pierce County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13229,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Pierce,Pierce County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,84.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13229,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Pierce,Pierce County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13229,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Pierce,Pierce County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,6296,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13229,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13231,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13231,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13231,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13231,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13231,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,18935,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13231,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3949,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13231,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3054,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13231,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13231,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,894,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13231,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,77.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13231,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13231,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,22.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13231,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13231,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,58.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13231,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,18.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13231,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2312,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13231,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,742,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13231,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13233,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13233,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13233,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13233,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13233,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,42925,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13233,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,36534,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13233,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,36534,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13233,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13233,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13233,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13233,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13233,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13233,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13233,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,2.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13233,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,97.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13233,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,856,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13233,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,35678,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13233,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13235,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13235,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13235,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13235,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13235,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,9863,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13235,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,6666,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13235,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6230,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13235,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13235,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,436,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13235,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,93.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13235,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13235,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,6.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13235,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13235,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13235,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,93.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13235,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13235,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,6230,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13235,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,21,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13237,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13237,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13237,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13237,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13237,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,22140,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13237,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,22099,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13237,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11874,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13237,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13237,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10225,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13237,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,53.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13237,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13237,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,46.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13237,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,19,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13237,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,53.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13237,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13237,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,11874,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13237,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13237,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Quitman,Quitman County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13239,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Quitman,Quitman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13239,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Quitman,Quitman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13239,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Quitman,Quitman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13239,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Quitman,Quitman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13239,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Quitman,Quitman County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,2224,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13239,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Quitman,Quitman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3066,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13239,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Quitman,Quitman County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,995,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13239,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Quitman,Quitman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,995,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13239,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Quitman,Quitman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2070,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13239,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Quitman,Quitman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,32.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13239,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Quitman,Quitman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,32.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13239,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Quitman,Quitman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,67.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13239,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Quitman,Quitman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13239,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Quitman,Quitman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13239,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Quitman,Quitman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13239,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Quitman,Quitman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13239,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Quitman,Quitman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13239,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Rabun,Rabun County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13241,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Rabun,Rabun County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13241,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Rabun,Rabun County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13241,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Rabun,Rabun County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13241,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Rabun,Rabun County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13241,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Rabun,Rabun County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,16894,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13241,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Rabun,Rabun County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,14161,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13241,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Rabun,Rabun County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11321,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13241,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Rabun,Rabun County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,29,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13241,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Rabun,Rabun County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2840,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13241,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Rabun,Rabun County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,79.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13241,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Rabun,Rabun County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13241,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Rabun,Rabun County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,20.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13241,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Rabun,Rabun County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13241,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Rabun,Rabun County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,49.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13241,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Rabun,Rabun County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,30.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13241,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Rabun,Rabun County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,6956,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13241,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Rabun,Rabun County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,4336,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13241,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13243,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13243,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13243,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13243,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13243,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,6377,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13243,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4813,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13243,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3788,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13243,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13243,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1025,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13243,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,78.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13243,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13243,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,21.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13243,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13243,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13243,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,78.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13243,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13243,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3788,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13243,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Richmond,Richmond County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13245,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Richmond,Richmond County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13245,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Richmond,Richmond County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13245,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Richmond,Richmond County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13245,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Richmond,Richmond County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13245,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Richmond,Richmond County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,206328,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13245,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Richmond,Richmond County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,222252,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13245,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Richmond,Richmond County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,221633,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13245,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Richmond,Richmond County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,61,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13245,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Richmond,Richmond County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,618,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13245,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Richmond,Richmond County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13245,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Richmond,Richmond County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13245,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Richmond,Richmond County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13245,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Richmond,Richmond County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13245,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Richmond,Richmond County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,10.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13245,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Richmond,Richmond County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,88.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13245,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Richmond,Richmond County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,23965,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13245,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Richmond,Richmond County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,197607,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13245,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Rockdale,Rockdale County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13247,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Rockdale,Rockdale County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13247,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Rockdale,Rockdale County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13247,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Rockdale,Rockdale County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13247,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Rockdale,Rockdale County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13247,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Rockdale,Rockdale County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,93614,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13247,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Rockdale,Rockdale County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,71659,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13247,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Rockdale,Rockdale County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,68651,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13247,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Rockdale,Rockdale County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13247,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Rockdale,Rockdale County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3008,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13247,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Rockdale,Rockdale County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,95.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13247,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Rockdale,Rockdale County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13247,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Rockdale,Rockdale County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,4.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13247,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Rockdale,Rockdale County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13247,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Rockdale,Rockdale County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13247,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Rockdale,Rockdale County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,95.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13247,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Rockdale,Rockdale County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13247,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Rockdale,Rockdale County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,68651,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13247,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Schley,Schley County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13249,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Schley,Schley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13249,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Schley,Schley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13249,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Schley,Schley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13249,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Schley,Schley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13249,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Schley,Schley County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,4538,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13249,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Schley,Schley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4540,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13249,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Schley,Schley County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4540,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13249,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Schley,Schley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13249,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Schley,Schley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13249,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Schley,Schley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13249,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Schley,Schley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13249,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Schley,Schley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13249,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Schley,Schley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13249,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Schley,Schley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13249,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Schley,Schley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13249,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Schley,Schley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13249,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Schley,Schley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,4540,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13249,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Screven,Screven County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13251,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Screven,Screven County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13251,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Screven,Screven County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13251,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Screven,Screven County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13251,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Screven,Screven County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13251,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Screven,Screven County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,14060,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13251,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Screven,Screven County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,6229,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13251,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Screven,Screven County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4684,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13251,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Screven,Screven County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,43,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13251,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Screven,Screven County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1545,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13251,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Screven,Screven County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,75.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13251,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Screven,Screven County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13251,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Screven,Screven County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,24.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13251,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Screven,Screven County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13251,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Screven,Screven County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13251,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Screven,Screven County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,74.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13251,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Screven,Screven County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13251,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Screven,Screven County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,4642,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13251,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Seminole,Seminole County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13253,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Seminole,Seminole County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13253,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Seminole,Seminole County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13253,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Seminole,Seminole County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13253,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Seminole,Seminole County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13253,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Seminole,Seminole County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,9138,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13253,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Seminole,Seminole County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3954,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13253,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Seminole,Seminole County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2701,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13253,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Seminole,Seminole County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13253,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Seminole,Seminole County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1254,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13253,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Seminole,Seminole County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,68.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13253,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Seminole,Seminole County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13253,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Seminole,Seminole County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,31.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13253,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Seminole,Seminole County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13253,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Seminole,Seminole County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13253,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Seminole,Seminole County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,68.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13253,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Seminole,Seminole County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13253,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Seminole,Seminole County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2701,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13253,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Spalding,Spalding County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13255,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Spalding,Spalding County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13255,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Spalding,Spalding County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13255,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Spalding,Spalding County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13255,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Spalding,Spalding County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13255,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Spalding,Spalding County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,67413,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13255,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Spalding,Spalding County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,62269,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13255,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Spalding,Spalding County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,60571,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13255,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Spalding,Spalding County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13255,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Spalding,Spalding County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1699,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13255,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Spalding,Spalding County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,97.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13255,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Spalding,Spalding County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13255,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Spalding,Spalding County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13255,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Spalding,Spalding County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13255,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Spalding,Spalding County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,61.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13255,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Spalding,Spalding County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,35.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13255,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Spalding,Spalding County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,38220,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13255,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Spalding,Spalding County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,22351,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13255,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Stephens,Stephens County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13257,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Stephens,Stephens County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13257,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Stephens,Stephens County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13257,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Stephens,Stephens County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13257,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Stephens,Stephens County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13257,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Stephens,Stephens County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,26800,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13257,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Stephens,Stephens County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,26007,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13257,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Stephens,Stephens County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,25141,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13257,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Stephens,Stephens County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13257,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Stephens,Stephens County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,866,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13257,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Stephens,Stephens County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,96.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13257,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Stephens,Stephens County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13257,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Stephens,Stephens County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,3.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13257,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Stephens,Stephens County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13257,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Stephens,Stephens County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,5.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13257,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Stephens,Stephens County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,90.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13257,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Stephens,Stephens County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1546,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13257,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Stephens,Stephens County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,23596,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13257,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Stewart,Stewart County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13259,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Stewart,Stewart County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13259,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Stewart,Stewart County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13259,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Stewart,Stewart County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13259,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Stewart,Stewart County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13259,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Stewart,Stewart County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,5295,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13259,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Stewart,Stewart County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5277,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13259,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Stewart,Stewart County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1074,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13259,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Stewart,Stewart County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13259,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Stewart,Stewart County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4203,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13259,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Stewart,Stewart County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,20.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13259,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Stewart,Stewart County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13259,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Stewart,Stewart County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,79.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13259,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Stewart,Stewart County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13259,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Stewart,Stewart County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13259,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Stewart,Stewart County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,20.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13259,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Stewart,Stewart County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13259,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Stewart,Stewart County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1074,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13259,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Sumter,Sumter County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13261,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Sumter,Sumter County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13261,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Sumter,Sumter County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13261,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Sumter,Sumter County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13261,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Sumter,Sumter County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13261,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Sumter,Sumter County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,29553,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13261,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Sumter,Sumter County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,16389,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13261,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Sumter,Sumter County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,15222,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13261,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Sumter,Sumter County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13261,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Sumter,Sumter County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1167,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13261,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Sumter,Sumter County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,92.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13261,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Sumter,Sumter County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13261,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Sumter,Sumter County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,7.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13261,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Sumter,Sumter County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13261,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Sumter,Sumter County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,2.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13261,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Sumter,Sumter County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,90.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13261,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Sumter,Sumter County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,393,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13261,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Sumter,Sumter County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,14829,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13261,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Talbot,Talbot County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13263,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Talbot,Talbot County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13263,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Talbot,Talbot County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13263,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Talbot,Talbot County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13263,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Talbot,Talbot County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13263,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Talbot,Talbot County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,5731,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13263,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Talbot,Talbot County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4583,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13263,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Talbot,Talbot County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4436,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13263,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Talbot,Talbot County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13263,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Talbot,Talbot County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,147,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13263,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Talbot,Talbot County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,96.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13263,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Talbot,Talbot County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13263,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Talbot,Talbot County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,3.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13263,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Talbot,Talbot County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13263,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Talbot,Talbot County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,81.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13263,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Talbot,Talbot County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,15.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13263,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Talbot,Talbot County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,3743,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13263,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Talbot,Talbot County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,693,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13263,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Taliaferro,Taliaferro County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13265,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Taliaferro,Taliaferro County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13265,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Taliaferro,Taliaferro County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13265,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Taliaferro,Taliaferro County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13265,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Taliaferro,Taliaferro County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13265,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Taliaferro,Taliaferro County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,1557,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13265,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Taliaferro,Taliaferro County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,625,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13265,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Taliaferro,Taliaferro County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13265,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Taliaferro,Taliaferro County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13265,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Taliaferro,Taliaferro County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,625,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13265,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Taliaferro,Taliaferro County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13265,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Taliaferro,Taliaferro County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13265,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Taliaferro,Taliaferro County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13265,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Taliaferro,Taliaferro County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13265,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Taliaferro,Taliaferro County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13265,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Taliaferro,Taliaferro County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13265,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Taliaferro,Taliaferro County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13265,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Taliaferro,Taliaferro County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13265,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Tattnall,Tattnall County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13267,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Tattnall,Tattnall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13267,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Tattnall,Tattnall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13267,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Tattnall,Tattnall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13267,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Tattnall,Tattnall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13267,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Tattnall,Tattnall County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,22852,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13267,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Tattnall,Tattnall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,12616,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13267,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Tattnall,Tattnall County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8080,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13267,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Tattnall,Tattnall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13267,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Tattnall,Tattnall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4536,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13267,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Tattnall,Tattnall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,64,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13267,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Tattnall,Tattnall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13267,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Tattnall,Tattnall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,36,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13267,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Tattnall,Tattnall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13267,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Tattnall,Tattnall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13267,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Tattnall,Tattnall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,64,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13267,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Tattnall,Tattnall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13267,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Tattnall,Tattnall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,8080,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13267,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13269,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13269,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13269,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13269,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13269,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,7814,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13269,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4073,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13269,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3837,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13269,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13269,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,236,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13269,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,94.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13269,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13269,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,5.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13269,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13269,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13269,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,94.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13269,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13269,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3837,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13269,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Telfair,Telfair County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13271,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Telfair,Telfair County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13271,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Telfair,Telfair County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13271,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Telfair,Telfair County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13271,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Telfair,Telfair County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13271,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Telfair,Telfair County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,12461,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13271,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Telfair,Telfair County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9562,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13271,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Telfair,Telfair County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5558,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13271,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Telfair,Telfair County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13271,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Telfair,Telfair County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4004,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13271,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Telfair,Telfair County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,58.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13271,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Telfair,Telfair County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13271,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Telfair,Telfair County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,41.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13271,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Telfair,Telfair County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13271,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Telfair,Telfair County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13271,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Telfair,Telfair County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,58.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13271,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Telfair,Telfair County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13271,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Telfair,Telfair County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,5558,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13271,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Terrell,Terrell County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13273,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Terrell,Terrell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13273,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Terrell,Terrell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13273,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Terrell,Terrell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13273,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Terrell,Terrell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13273,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Terrell,Terrell County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,9153,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13273,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Terrell,Terrell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5966,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13273,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Terrell,Terrell County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5073,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13273,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Terrell,Terrell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13273,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Terrell,Terrell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,893,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13273,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Terrell,Terrell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,85,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13273,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Terrell,Terrell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13273,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Terrell,Terrell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,15,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13273,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Terrell,Terrell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13273,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Terrell,Terrell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13273,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Terrell,Terrell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,85,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13273,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Terrell,Terrell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13273,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Terrell,Terrell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,5073,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13273,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Thomas,Thomas County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,25,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13275,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Thomas,Thomas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13275,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Thomas,Thomas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13275,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Thomas,Thomas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13275,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Thomas,Thomas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13275,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Thomas,Thomas County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,45766,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13275,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Thomas,Thomas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,29968,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13275,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Thomas,Thomas County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,28081,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13275,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Thomas,Thomas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1484,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13275,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Thomas,Thomas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1887,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13275,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Thomas,Thomas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,93.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13275,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Thomas,Thomas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13275,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Thomas,Thomas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,6.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13275,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Thomas,Thomas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13275,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Thomas,Thomas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13275,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Thomas,Thomas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,88.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13275,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Thomas,Thomas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13275,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Thomas,Thomas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,26597,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13275,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Tift,Tift County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13277,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Tift,Tift County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13277,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Tift,Tift County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13277,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Tift,Tift County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13277,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Tift,Tift County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13277,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Tift,Tift County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,41348,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13277,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Tift,Tift County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,35004,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13277,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Tift,Tift County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,29974,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13277,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Tift,Tift County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13277,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Tift,Tift County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5030,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13277,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Tift,Tift County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,85.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13277,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Tift,Tift County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13277,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Tift,Tift County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,14.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13277,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Tift,Tift County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13277,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Tift,Tift County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,9.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13277,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Tift,Tift County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,76.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13277,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Tift,Tift County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,3178,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13277,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Tift,Tift County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,26796,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13277,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Toombs,Toombs County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13279,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Toombs,Toombs County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13279,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Toombs,Toombs County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13279,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Toombs,Toombs County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13279,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Toombs,Toombs County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13279,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Toombs,Toombs County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,27052,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13279,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Toombs,Toombs County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,17351,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13279,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Toombs,Toombs County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,16213,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13279,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Toombs,Toombs County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13279,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Toombs,Toombs County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1138,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13279,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Toombs,Toombs County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,93.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13279,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Toombs,Toombs County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13279,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Toombs,Toombs County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,6.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13279,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Toombs,Toombs County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13279,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Toombs,Toombs County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13279,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Toombs,Toombs County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,93.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13279,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Toombs,Toombs County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13279,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Toombs,Toombs County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,16213,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13279,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Towns,Towns County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13281,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Towns,Towns County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13281,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Towns,Towns County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13281,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Towns,Towns County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13281,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Towns,Towns County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13281,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Towns,Towns County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,12539,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13281,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Towns,Towns County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,16666,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13281,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Towns,Towns County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1774,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13281,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Towns,Towns County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13281,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Towns,Towns County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,14892,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13281,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Towns,Towns County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,10.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13281,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Towns,Towns County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13281,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Towns,Towns County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,89.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13281,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Towns,Towns County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13281,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Towns,Towns County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13281,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Towns,Towns County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,10.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13281,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Towns,Towns County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13281,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Towns,Towns County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1774,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13281,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Treutlen,Treutlen County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13283,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Treutlen,Treutlen County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13283,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Treutlen,Treutlen County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13283,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Treutlen,Treutlen County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13283,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Treutlen,Treutlen County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13283,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Treutlen,Treutlen County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,6390,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13283,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Treutlen,Treutlen County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3228,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13283,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Treutlen,Treutlen County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2945,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13283,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Treutlen,Treutlen County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13283,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Treutlen,Treutlen County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,284,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13283,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Treutlen,Treutlen County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,91.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13283,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Treutlen,Treutlen County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13283,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Treutlen,Treutlen County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,8.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13283,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Treutlen,Treutlen County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13283,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Treutlen,Treutlen County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13283,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Treutlen,Treutlen County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,91.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13283,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Treutlen,Treutlen County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13283,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Treutlen,Treutlen County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2945,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13283,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Troup,Troup County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13285,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Troup,Troup County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13285,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Troup,Troup County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13285,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Troup,Troup County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13285,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Troup,Troup County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13285,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Troup,Troup County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,69388,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13285,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Troup,Troup County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,48845,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13285,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Troup,Troup County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,48702,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13285,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Troup,Troup County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13285,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Troup,Troup County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,143,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13285,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Troup,Troup County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13285,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Troup,Troup County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13285,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Troup,Troup County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13285,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Troup,Troup County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13285,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Troup,Troup County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,7.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13285,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Troup,Troup County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,92.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13285,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Troup,Troup County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,3655,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13285,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Troup,Troup County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,45047,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13285,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Turner,Turner County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13287,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Turner,Turner County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13287,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Turner,Turner County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13287,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Turner,Turner County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13287,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Turner,Turner County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13287,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Turner,Turner County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,8971,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13287,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Turner,Turner County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5048,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13287,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Turner,Turner County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3950,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13287,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Turner,Turner County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13287,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Turner,Turner County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1098,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13287,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Turner,Turner County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,78.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13287,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Turner,Turner County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13287,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Turner,Turner County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,21.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13287,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Turner,Turner County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13287,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Turner,Turner County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13287,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Turner,Turner County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,78.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13287,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Turner,Turner County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13287,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Turner,Turner County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3950,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13287,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Twiggs,Twiggs County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13289,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Twiggs,Twiggs County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13289,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Twiggs,Twiggs County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13289,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Twiggs,Twiggs County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13289,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Twiggs,Twiggs County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13289,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Twiggs,Twiggs County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,7986,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13289,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Twiggs,Twiggs County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2953,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13289,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Twiggs,Twiggs County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2432,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13289,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Twiggs,Twiggs County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13289,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Twiggs,Twiggs County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,521,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13289,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Twiggs,Twiggs County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,82.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13289,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Twiggs,Twiggs County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13289,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Twiggs,Twiggs County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,17.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13289,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Twiggs,Twiggs County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13289,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Twiggs,Twiggs County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13289,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Twiggs,Twiggs County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,82.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13289,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Twiggs,Twiggs County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13289,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Twiggs,Twiggs County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2432,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13289,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13291,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13291,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13291,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13291,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13291,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,24766,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13291,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,21499,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13291,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,20710,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13291,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13291,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,789,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13291,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,96.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13291,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13291,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,3.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13291,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13291,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13291,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,96.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13291,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13291,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,20710,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13291,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Upson,Upson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13293,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Upson,Upson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13293,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Upson,Upson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13293,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Upson,Upson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13293,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Upson,Upson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13293,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Upson,Upson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,27712,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13293,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Upson,Upson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,24304,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13293,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Upson,Upson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,17223,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13293,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Upson,Upson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13293,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Upson,Upson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7081,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13293,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Upson,Upson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,70.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13293,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Upson,Upson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13293,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Upson,Upson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,29.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13293,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Upson,Upson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13293,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Upson,Upson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,22.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13293,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Upson,Upson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,48.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13293,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Upson,Upson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,5423,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13293,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Upson,Upson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,11800,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13293,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Walker,Walker County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13295,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Walker,Walker County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13295,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Walker,Walker County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13295,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Walker,Walker County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13295,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Walker,Walker County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13295,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Walker,Walker County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,67711,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13295,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Walker,Walker County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,58816,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13295,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Walker,Walker County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,58816,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13295,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Walker,Walker County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13295,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Walker,Walker County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13295,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Walker,Walker County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13295,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Walker,Walker County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13295,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Walker,Walker County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13295,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Walker,Walker County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13295,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Walker,Walker County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,6.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13295,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Walker,Walker County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,93.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13295,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Walker,Walker County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,3677,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13295,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Walker,Walker County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,55139,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13295,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Walton,Walton County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13297,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Walton,Walton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13297,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Walton,Walton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13297,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Walton,Walton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13297,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Walton,Walton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13297,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Walton,Walton County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,97135,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13297,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Walton,Walton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,65225,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13297,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Walton,Walton County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,64382,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13297,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Walton,Walton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,89,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13297,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Walton,Walton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,842,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13297,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Walton,Walton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13297,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Walton,Walton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13297,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Walton,Walton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13297,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Walton,Walton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13297,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Walton,Walton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,58.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13297,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Walton,Walton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,40,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13297,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Walton,Walton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,38192,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13297,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Walton,Walton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,26102,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13297,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Ware,Ware County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13299,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Ware,Ware County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13299,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Ware,Ware County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13299,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Ware,Ware County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13299,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Ware,Ware County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13299,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Ware,Ware County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,36218,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13299,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Ware,Ware County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,34395,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13299,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Ware,Ware County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,33526,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13299,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Ware,Ware County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13299,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Ware,Ware County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,869,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13299,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Ware,Ware County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,97.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13299,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Ware,Ware County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13299,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Ware,Ware County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13299,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Ware,Ware County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13299,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Ware,Ware County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13299,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Ware,Ware County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,97.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13299,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Ware,Ware County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13299,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Ware,Ware County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,33526,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13299,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13301,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13301,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13301,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13301,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13301,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,5205,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13301,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3062,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13301,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2873,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13301,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,226,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13301,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,189,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13301,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,93.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13301,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,7.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13301,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,6.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13301,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13301,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13301,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,86.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13301,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13301,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2647,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13301,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13303,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13303,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13303,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13303,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13303,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,19927,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13303,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,10579,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13303,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8027,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13303,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13303,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2552,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13303,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,75.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13303,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13303,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,24.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13303,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13303,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13303,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,75.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13303,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13303,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,8027,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13303,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,21,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13305,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13305,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13305,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13305,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13305,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,30155,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13305,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,13299,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13305,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11711,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13305,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,665,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13305,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1588,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13305,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,88.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13305,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13305,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,11.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13305,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13305,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13305,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,83.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13305,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13305,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,11046,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13305,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13307,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13307,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13307,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13307,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13307,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,2350,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13307,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,959,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13307,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13307,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13307,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,959,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13307,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13307,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13307,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13307,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13307,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13307,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13307,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13307,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13307,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Wheeler,Wheeler County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13309,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Wheeler,Wheeler County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13309,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Wheeler,Wheeler County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13309,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Wheeler,Wheeler County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13309,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Wheeler,Wheeler County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13309,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Wheeler,Wheeler County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,7430,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13309,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Wheeler,Wheeler County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4152,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13309,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Wheeler,Wheeler County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4152,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13309,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Wheeler,Wheeler County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13309,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Wheeler,Wheeler County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13309,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Wheeler,Wheeler County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13309,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Wheeler,Wheeler County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13309,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Wheeler,Wheeler County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13309,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Wheeler,Wheeler County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13309,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Wheeler,Wheeler County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13309,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Wheeler,Wheeler County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13309,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Wheeler,Wheeler County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13309,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Wheeler,Wheeler County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,4152,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13309,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,White,White County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13311,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,White,White County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13311,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,White,White County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13311,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,White,White County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13311,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,White,White County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13311,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,White,White County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,28090,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13311,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,White,White County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,13023,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13311,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,White,White County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10753,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13311,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,White,White County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,187,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13311,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,White,White County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2270,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13311,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,White,White County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,82.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13311,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,White,White County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13311,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,White,White County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,17.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13311,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,White,White County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13311,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,White,White County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13311,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,White,White County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,81.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13311,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,White,White County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13311,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,White,White County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,10566,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13311,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Whitfield,Whitfield County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13313,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Whitfield,Whitfield County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13313,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Whitfield,Whitfield County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13313,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Whitfield,Whitfield County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13313,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Whitfield,Whitfield County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13313,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Whitfield,Whitfield County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,102727,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13313,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Whitfield,Whitfield County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,94034,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13313,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Whitfield,Whitfield County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,94034,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13313,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Whitfield,Whitfield County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,147,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13313,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Whitfield,Whitfield County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13313,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Whitfield,Whitfield County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13313,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Whitfield,Whitfield County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13313,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Whitfield,Whitfield County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13313,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Whitfield,Whitfield County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13313,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Whitfield,Whitfield County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13313,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Whitfield,Whitfield County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,99.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13313,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Whitfield,Whitfield County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13313,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Whitfield,Whitfield County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,93886,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13313,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Wilcox,Wilcox County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13315,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Wilcox,Wilcox County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13315,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Wilcox,Wilcox County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13315,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Wilcox,Wilcox County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13315,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Wilcox,Wilcox County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13315,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Wilcox,Wilcox County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,8731,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13315,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Wilcox,Wilcox County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5168,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13315,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Wilcox,Wilcox County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4204,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13315,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Wilcox,Wilcox County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13315,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Wilcox,Wilcox County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,964,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13315,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Wilcox,Wilcox County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,81.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13315,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Wilcox,Wilcox County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13315,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Wilcox,Wilcox County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,18.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13315,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Wilcox,Wilcox County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13315,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Wilcox,Wilcox County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13315,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Wilcox,Wilcox County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,81.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13315,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Wilcox,Wilcox County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13315,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Wilcox,Wilcox County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,4204,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13315,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Wilkes,Wilkes County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13317,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Wilkes,Wilkes County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13317,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Wilkes,Wilkes County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13317,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Wilkes,Wilkes County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13317,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Wilkes,Wilkes County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13317,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Wilkes,Wilkes County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,9556,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13317,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Wilkes,Wilkes County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4860,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13317,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Wilkes,Wilkes County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4071,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13317,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Wilkes,Wilkes County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13317,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Wilkes,Wilkes County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,789,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13317,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Wilkes,Wilkes County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,83.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13317,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Wilkes,Wilkes County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13317,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Wilkes,Wilkes County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,16.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13317,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Wilkes,Wilkes County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13317,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Wilkes,Wilkes County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13317,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Wilkes,Wilkes County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,83.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13317,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Wilkes,Wilkes County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13317,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Wilkes,Wilkes County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,4071,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13317,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Wilkinson,Wilkinson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13319,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Wilkinson,Wilkinson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13319,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Wilkinson,Wilkinson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13319,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Wilkinson,Wilkinson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13319,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Wilkinson,Wilkinson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13319,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Wilkinson,Wilkinson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,8844,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13319,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Wilkinson,Wilkinson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,6069,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13319,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Wilkinson,Wilkinson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3987,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13319,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Wilkinson,Wilkinson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13319,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Wilkinson,Wilkinson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2082,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13319,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Wilkinson,Wilkinson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,65.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13319,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Wilkinson,Wilkinson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13319,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Wilkinson,Wilkinson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,34.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13319,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Wilkinson,Wilkinson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13319,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Wilkinson,Wilkinson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13319,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Wilkinson,Wilkinson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,65.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13319,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Wilkinson,Wilkinson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13319,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Wilkinson,Wilkinson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3987,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13319,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Worth,Worth County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13321,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Worth,Worth County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13321,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Worth,Worth County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13321,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Worth,Worth County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13321,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Worth,Worth County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13321,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Worth,Worth County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,20719,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13321,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Worth,Worth County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,10166,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13321,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Worth,Worth County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8325,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13321,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Worth,Worth County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,949,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13321,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Worth,Worth County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1842,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13321,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Worth,Worth County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,81.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13321,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Worth,Worth County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,9.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13321,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Worth,Worth County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,18.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13321,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Worth,Worth County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13321,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Worth,Worth County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13321,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Worth,Worth County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,72.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13321,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Worth,Worth County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,13321,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,GA,Worth,Worth County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,7376,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13321,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,HI,HI,Hawaii,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,117,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,15,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,HI,HI,Hawaii,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,15,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,HI,HI,Hawaii,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,15,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,HI,HI,Hawaii,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,15,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,HI,HI,Hawaii,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,15,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,HI,HI,Hawaii,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,1451911,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,15,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,False,,WFR_ST
2020,HI,HI,Hawaii,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1394816,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,15,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,HI,HI,Hawaii,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,119044,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,15,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,HI,HI,Hawaii,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,15,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,HI,HI,Hawaii,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1275772,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,15,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,HI,HI,Hawaii,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,8.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,15,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,HI,HI,Hawaii,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,15,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,HI,HI,Hawaii,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,91.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,15,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,HI,HI,Hawaii,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,111,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,15,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,HI,HI,Hawaii,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,15,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,HI,HI,Hawaii,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,8.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,15,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,HI,HI,Hawaii,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,5928,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,15,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,HI,HI,Hawaii,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,113116,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,15,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,IA,Adair,Adair County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19001,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Adair,Adair County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19001,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Adair,Adair County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19001,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Adair,Adair County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19001,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Adair,Adair County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19001,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Adair,Adair County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,7477,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19001,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Adair,Adair County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,6914,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19001,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Adair,Adair County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6176,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19001,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Adair,Adair County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19001,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Adair,Adair County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,738,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19001,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Adair,Adair County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,89.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19001,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Adair,Adair County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19001,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Adair,Adair County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,10.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19001,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Adair,Adair County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19001,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Adair,Adair County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,62.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19001,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Adair,Adair County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,26.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19001,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Adair,Adair County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,4323,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19001,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Adair,Adair County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1853,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19001,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19003,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19003,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19003,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19003,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19003,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,3697,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19003,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3619,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19003,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3619,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19003,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19003,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19003,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19003,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19003,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19003,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19003,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,51.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19003,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,48.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19003,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1856,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19003,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1763,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19003,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Allamakee,Allamakee County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19005,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Allamakee,Allamakee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19005,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Allamakee,Allamakee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19005,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Allamakee,Allamakee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19005,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Allamakee,Allamakee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19005,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Allamakee,Allamakee County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,14067,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19005,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Allamakee,Allamakee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7153,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19005,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Allamakee,Allamakee County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5731,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19005,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Allamakee,Allamakee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19005,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Allamakee,Allamakee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1422,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19005,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Allamakee,Allamakee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,80.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19005,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Allamakee,Allamakee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19005,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Allamakee,Allamakee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,19.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19005,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Allamakee,Allamakee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19005,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Allamakee,Allamakee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19005,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Allamakee,Allamakee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,80.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19005,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Allamakee,Allamakee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19005,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Allamakee,Allamakee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,5731,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19005,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Appanoose,Appanoose County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19007,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Appanoose,Appanoose County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19007,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Appanoose,Appanoose County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19007,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Appanoose,Appanoose County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19007,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Appanoose,Appanoose County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19007,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Appanoose,Appanoose County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,12282,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19007,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Appanoose,Appanoose County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,36087,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19007,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Appanoose,Appanoose County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,36087,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19007,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Appanoose,Appanoose County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19007,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Appanoose,Appanoose County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19007,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Appanoose,Appanoose County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19007,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Appanoose,Appanoose County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19007,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Appanoose,Appanoose County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19007,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Appanoose,Appanoose County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19007,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Appanoose,Appanoose County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,20.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19007,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Appanoose,Appanoose County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,79.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19007,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Appanoose,Appanoose County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,7264,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19007,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Appanoose,Appanoose County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,28823,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19007,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Audubon,Audubon County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19009,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Audubon,Audubon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19009,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Audubon,Audubon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19009,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Audubon,Audubon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19009,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Audubon,Audubon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19009,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Audubon,Audubon County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,5671,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19009,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Audubon,Audubon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2959,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19009,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Audubon,Audubon County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2658,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19009,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Audubon,Audubon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19009,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Audubon,Audubon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,301,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19009,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Audubon,Audubon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,89.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19009,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Audubon,Audubon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19009,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Audubon,Audubon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,10.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19009,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Audubon,Audubon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19009,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Audubon,Audubon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,28.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19009,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Audubon,Audubon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,61.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19009,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Audubon,Audubon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,847,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19009,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Audubon,Audubon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1811,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19009,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19011,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19011,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19011,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19011,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19011,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,25536,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19011,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,15478,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19011,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10994,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19011,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,4721,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19011,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4484,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19011,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,71,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19011,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,30.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19011,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,29,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19011,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19011,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,8.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19011,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,31.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19011,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1358,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19011,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,4916,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19011,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Black Hawk,Black Hawk County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19013,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Black Hawk,Black Hawk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19013,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Black Hawk,Black Hawk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19013,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Black Hawk,Black Hawk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19013,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Black Hawk,Black Hawk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19013,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Black Hawk,Black Hawk County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,130980,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19013,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Black Hawk,Black Hawk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,114142,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19013,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Black Hawk,Black Hawk County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,113109,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19013,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Black Hawk,Black Hawk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,7700,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19013,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Black Hawk,Black Hawk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1033,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19013,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Black Hawk,Black Hawk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19013,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Black Hawk,Black Hawk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,6.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19013,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Black Hawk,Black Hawk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19013,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Black Hawk,Black Hawk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19013,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Black Hawk,Black Hawk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,2.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19013,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Black Hawk,Black Hawk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,89.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19013,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Black Hawk,Black Hawk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,3178,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19013,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Black Hawk,Black Hawk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,102230,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19013,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19015,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19015,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19015,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19015,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19015,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,26691,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19015,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,23194,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19015,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,20368,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19015,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19015,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2827,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19015,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,87.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19015,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19015,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,12.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19015,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19015,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,25.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19015,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,62.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19015,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,5896,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19015,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,14472,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19015,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Bremer,Bremer County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19017,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Bremer,Bremer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19017,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Bremer,Bremer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19017,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Bremer,Bremer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19017,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Bremer,Bremer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19017,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Bremer,Bremer County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,24974,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19017,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Bremer,Bremer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,50373,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19017,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Bremer,Bremer County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,46401,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19017,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Bremer,Bremer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,3186,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19017,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Bremer,Bremer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3971,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19017,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Bremer,Bremer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,92.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19017,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Bremer,Bremer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,6.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19017,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Bremer,Bremer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,7.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19017,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Bremer,Bremer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19017,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Bremer,Bremer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,67.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19017,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Bremer,Bremer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,18.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19017,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Bremer,Bremer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,33983,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19017,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Bremer,Bremer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,9233,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19017,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Buchanan,Buchanan County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19019,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Buchanan,Buchanan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19019,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Buchanan,Buchanan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19019,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Buchanan,Buchanan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19019,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Buchanan,Buchanan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19019,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Buchanan,Buchanan County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,20586,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19019,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Buchanan,Buchanan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,11428,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19019,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Buchanan,Buchanan County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8174,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19019,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Buchanan,Buchanan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,2591,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19019,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Buchanan,Buchanan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3254,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19019,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Buchanan,Buchanan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,71.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19019,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Buchanan,Buchanan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,22.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19019,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Buchanan,Buchanan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,28.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19019,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Buchanan,Buchanan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19019,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Buchanan,Buchanan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19019,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Buchanan,Buchanan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,48.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19019,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Buchanan,Buchanan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19019,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Buchanan,Buchanan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,5583,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19019,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Buena Vista,Buena Vista County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19021,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Buena Vista,Buena Vista County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19021,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Buena Vista,Buena Vista County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19021,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Buena Vista,Buena Vista County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19021,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Buena Vista,Buena Vista County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19021,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Buena Vista,Buena Vista County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,20776,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19021,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Buena Vista,Buena Vista County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,15677,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19021,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Buena Vista,Buena Vista County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,13742,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19021,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Buena Vista,Buena Vista County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1831,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19021,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Buena Vista,Buena Vista County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1936,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19021,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Buena Vista,Buena Vista County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,87.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19021,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Buena Vista,Buena Vista County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,11.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19021,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Buena Vista,Buena Vista County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,12.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19021,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Buena Vista,Buena Vista County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19021,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Buena Vista,Buena Vista County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,6.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19021,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Buena Vista,Buena Vista County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,69,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19021,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Buena Vista,Buena Vista County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1087,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19021,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Buena Vista,Buena Vista County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,10824,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19021,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19023,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19023,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19023,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19023,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19023,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,14311,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19023,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,8643,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19023,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3794,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19023,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,3794,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19023,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4849,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19023,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,43.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19023,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,43.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19023,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,56.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19023,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19023,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19023,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19023,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19023,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19023,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19025,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19025,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19025,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19025,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19025,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,9886,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19025,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7010,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19025,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4057,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19025,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,2470,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19025,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2953,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19025,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,57.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19025,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,35.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19025,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,42.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19025,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19025,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19025,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19025,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19025,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19025,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19027,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19027,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19027,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19027,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19027,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,20702,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19027,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,20241,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19027,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,18090,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19027,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19027,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2152,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19027,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,89.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19027,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19027,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,10.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19027,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19027,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,5.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19027,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,83.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19027,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1184,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19027,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,16906,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19027,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19029,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19029,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19029,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19029,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19029,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,13104,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19029,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9665,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19029,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7651,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19029,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19029,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2014,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19029,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,79.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19029,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19029,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,20.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19029,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19029,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19029,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,79.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19029,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19029,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,7651,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19029,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Cedar,Cedar County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19031,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Cedar,Cedar County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19031,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Cedar,Cedar County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19031,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Cedar,Cedar County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19031,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Cedar,Cedar County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19031,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Cedar,Cedar County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,18495,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19031,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Cedar,Cedar County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,10742,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19031,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Cedar,Cedar County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7275,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19031,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Cedar,Cedar County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,2171,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19031,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Cedar,Cedar County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3467,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19031,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Cedar,Cedar County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,67.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19031,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Cedar,Cedar County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,20.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19031,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Cedar,Cedar County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,32.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19031,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Cedar,Cedar County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19031,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Cedar,Cedar County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19031,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Cedar,Cedar County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,47.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19031,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Cedar,Cedar County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19031,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Cedar,Cedar County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,5104,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19031,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Cerro Gordo,Cerro Gordo County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19033,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Cerro Gordo,Cerro Gordo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19033,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Cerro Gordo,Cerro Gordo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19033,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Cerro Gordo,Cerro Gordo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19033,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Cerro Gordo,Cerro Gordo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19033,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Cerro Gordo,Cerro Gordo County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,42965,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19033,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Cerro Gordo,Cerro Gordo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,36392,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19033,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Cerro Gordo,Cerro Gordo County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,36029,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19033,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Cerro Gordo,Cerro Gordo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,9102,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19033,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Cerro Gordo,Cerro Gordo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,363,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19033,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Cerro Gordo,Cerro Gordo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19033,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Cerro Gordo,Cerro Gordo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,25,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19033,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Cerro Gordo,Cerro Gordo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19033,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Cerro Gordo,Cerro Gordo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19033,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Cerro Gordo,Cerro Gordo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19033,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Cerro Gordo,Cerro Gordo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,74,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19033,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Cerro Gordo,Cerro Gordo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19033,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Cerro Gordo,Cerro Gordo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,26927,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19033,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19035,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19035,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19035,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19035,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19035,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,11632,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19035,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,12404,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19035,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11053,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19035,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,10779,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19035,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1350,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19035,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,89.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19035,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,86.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19035,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,10.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19035,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19035,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,2.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19035,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19035,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,274,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19035,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19035,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Chickasaw,Chickasaw County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19037,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Chickasaw,Chickasaw County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19037,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Chickasaw,Chickasaw County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19037,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Chickasaw,Chickasaw County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19037,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Chickasaw,Chickasaw County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19037,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Chickasaw,Chickasaw County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,11970,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19037,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Chickasaw,Chickasaw County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,6696,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19037,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Chickasaw,Chickasaw County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1553,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19037,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Chickasaw,Chickasaw County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1553,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19037,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Chickasaw,Chickasaw County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5143,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19037,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Chickasaw,Chickasaw County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,23.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19037,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Chickasaw,Chickasaw County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,23.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19037,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Chickasaw,Chickasaw County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,76.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19037,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Chickasaw,Chickasaw County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19037,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Chickasaw,Chickasaw County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19037,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Chickasaw,Chickasaw County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19037,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Chickasaw,Chickasaw County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19037,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Chickasaw,Chickasaw County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19037,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Clarke,Clarke County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19039,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Clarke,Clarke County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19039,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Clarke,Clarke County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19039,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Clarke,Clarke County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19039,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Clarke,Clarke County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19039,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Clarke,Clarke County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,9726,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19039,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Clarke,Clarke County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9123,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19039,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Clarke,Clarke County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9123,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19039,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Clarke,Clarke County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19039,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Clarke,Clarke County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19039,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Clarke,Clarke County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19039,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Clarke,Clarke County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19039,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Clarke,Clarke County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19039,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Clarke,Clarke County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19039,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Clarke,Clarke County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,49.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19039,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Clarke,Clarke County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,50.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19039,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Clarke,Clarke County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,4514,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19039,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Clarke,Clarke County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,4609,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19039,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19041,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19041,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19041,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19041,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19041,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,16333,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19041,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,18153,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19041,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,17274,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19041,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19041,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,879,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19041,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,95.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19041,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19041,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,4.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19041,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19041,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,5.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19041,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,89.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19041,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,946,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19041,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,16328,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19041,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Clayton,Clayton County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19043,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Clayton,Clayton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19043,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Clayton,Clayton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19043,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Clayton,Clayton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19043,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Clayton,Clayton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19043,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Clayton,Clayton County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,16996,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19043,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Clayton,Clayton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9482,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19043,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Clayton,Clayton County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4093,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19043,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Clayton,Clayton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,808,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19043,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Clayton,Clayton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5390,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19043,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Clayton,Clayton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,43.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19043,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Clayton,Clayton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,8.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19043,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Clayton,Clayton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,56.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19043,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Clayton,Clayton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19043,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Clayton,Clayton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19043,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Clayton,Clayton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,34.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19043,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Clayton,Clayton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19043,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Clayton,Clayton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3285,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19043,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19045,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19045,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19045,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19045,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19045,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,46418,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19045,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,38883,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19045,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,32166,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19045,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,6746,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19045,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6717,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19045,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,82.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19045,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,17.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19045,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,17.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19045,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19045,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19045,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,65.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19045,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19045,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,25420,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19045,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19047,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19047,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19047,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19047,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19047,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,16453,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19047,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,14102,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19047,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,13370,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19047,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19047,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,731,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19047,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,94.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19047,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19047,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,5.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19047,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19047,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,28.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19047,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,66.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19047,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,4039,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19047,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,9331,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19047,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Dallas,Dallas County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,21,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19049,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Dallas,Dallas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19049,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Dallas,Dallas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19049,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Dallas,Dallas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19049,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Dallas,Dallas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19049,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Dallas,Dallas County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,100486,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19049,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Dallas,Dallas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,55526,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19049,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Dallas,Dallas County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,45567,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19049,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Dallas,Dallas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,491,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19049,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Dallas,Dallas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9958,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19049,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Dallas,Dallas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,82.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19049,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Dallas,Dallas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19049,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Dallas,Dallas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,17.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19049,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Dallas,Dallas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19049,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Dallas,Dallas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,48.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19049,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Dallas,Dallas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,32.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19049,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Dallas,Dallas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,26810,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19049,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Dallas,Dallas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,18065,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19049,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Davis,Davis County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19051,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Davis,Davis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19051,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Davis,Davis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19051,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Davis,Davis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19051,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Davis,Davis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19051,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Davis,Davis County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,9109,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19051,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Davis,Davis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2808,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19051,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Davis,Davis County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2808,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19051,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Davis,Davis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19051,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Davis,Davis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19051,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Davis,Davis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19051,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Davis,Davis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19051,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Davis,Davis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19051,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Davis,Davis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19051,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Davis,Davis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19051,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Davis,Davis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19051,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Davis,Davis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2808,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19051,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Davis,Davis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19051,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Decatur,Decatur County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19053,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Decatur,Decatur County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19053,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Decatur,Decatur County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19053,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Decatur,Decatur County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19053,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Decatur,Decatur County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19053,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Decatur,Decatur County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,7610,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19053,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Decatur,Decatur County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,6084,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19053,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Decatur,Decatur County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6084,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19053,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Decatur,Decatur County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19053,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Decatur,Decatur County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19053,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Decatur,Decatur County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19053,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Decatur,Decatur County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19053,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Decatur,Decatur County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19053,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Decatur,Decatur County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19053,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Decatur,Decatur County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,31.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19053,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Decatur,Decatur County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,68.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19053,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Decatur,Decatur County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1931,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19053,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Decatur,Decatur County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,4153,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19053,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Delaware,Delaware County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19055,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Delaware,Delaware County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19055,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Delaware,Delaware County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19055,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Delaware,Delaware County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19055,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Delaware,Delaware County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19055,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Delaware,Delaware County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,17458,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19055,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Delaware,Delaware County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7615,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19055,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Delaware,Delaware County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5819,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19055,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Delaware,Delaware County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,965,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19055,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Delaware,Delaware County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1796,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19055,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Delaware,Delaware County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,76.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19055,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Delaware,Delaware County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,12.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19055,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Delaware,Delaware County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,23.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19055,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Delaware,Delaware County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19055,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Delaware,Delaware County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19055,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Delaware,Delaware County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,63.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19055,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Delaware,Delaware County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19055,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Delaware,Delaware County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,4854,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19055,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Des Moines,Des Moines County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19057,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Des Moines,Des Moines County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19057,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Des Moines,Des Moines County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19057,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Des Moines,Des Moines County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19057,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Des Moines,Des Moines County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19057,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Des Moines,Des Moines County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,38831,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19057,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Des Moines,Des Moines County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,39203,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19057,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Des Moines,Des Moines County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,38295,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19057,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Des Moines,Des Moines County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19057,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Des Moines,Des Moines County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,909,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19057,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Des Moines,Des Moines County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,97.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19057,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Des Moines,Des Moines County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19057,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Des Moines,Des Moines County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19057,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Des Moines,Des Moines County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19057,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Des Moines,Des Moines County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,34.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19057,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Des Moines,Des Moines County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,61.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19057,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Des Moines,Des Moines County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,13447,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19057,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Des Moines,Des Moines County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,23955,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19057,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Dickinson,Dickinson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19059,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Dickinson,Dickinson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19059,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Dickinson,Dickinson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19059,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Dickinson,Dickinson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19059,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Dickinson,Dickinson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19059,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Dickinson,Dickinson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,17747,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19059,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Dickinson,Dickinson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,18438,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19059,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Dickinson,Dickinson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,16587,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19059,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Dickinson,Dickinson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19059,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Dickinson,Dickinson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1851,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19059,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Dickinson,Dickinson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,90,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19059,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Dickinson,Dickinson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19059,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Dickinson,Dickinson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,10,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19059,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Dickinson,Dickinson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19059,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Dickinson,Dickinson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,18.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19059,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Dickinson,Dickinson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,45.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19059,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Dickinson,Dickinson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,3410,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19059,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Dickinson,Dickinson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,8378,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19059,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Dubuque,Dubuque County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,37,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19061,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Dubuque,Dubuque County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19061,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Dubuque,Dubuque County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19061,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Dubuque,Dubuque County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19061,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Dubuque,Dubuque County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19061,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Dubuque,Dubuque County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,99229,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19061,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Dubuque,Dubuque County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,74592,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19061,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Dubuque,Dubuque County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,69194,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19061,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Dubuque,Dubuque County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,13994,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19061,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Dubuque,Dubuque County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5398,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19061,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Dubuque,Dubuque County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,92.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19061,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Dubuque,Dubuque County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,18.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19061,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Dubuque,Dubuque County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,7.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19061,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Dubuque,Dubuque County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,26,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19061,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Dubuque,Dubuque County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19061,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Dubuque,Dubuque County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,73.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19061,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Dubuque,Dubuque County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,512,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19061,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Dubuque,Dubuque County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,54687,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19061,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Emmet,Emmet County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19063,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Emmet,Emmet County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19063,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Emmet,Emmet County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19063,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Emmet,Emmet County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19063,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Emmet,Emmet County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19063,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Emmet,Emmet County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,9332,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19063,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Emmet,Emmet County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7713,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19063,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Emmet,Emmet County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6322,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19063,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Emmet,Emmet County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19063,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Emmet,Emmet County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1391,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19063,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Emmet,Emmet County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,82,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19063,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Emmet,Emmet County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19063,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Emmet,Emmet County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,18,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19063,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Emmet,Emmet County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19063,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Emmet,Emmet County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19063,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Emmet,Emmet County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,77.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19063,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Emmet,Emmet County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,310,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19063,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Emmet,Emmet County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,6012,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19063,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19065,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19065,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19065,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19065,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19065,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,19399,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19065,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,12890,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19065,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8580,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19065,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,8580,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19065,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4310,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19065,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,66.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19065,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,66.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19065,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,33.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19065,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19065,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19065,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19065,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19065,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19065,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19067,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19067,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19067,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19067,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19067,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,15552,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19067,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,10360,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19067,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9415,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19067,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,9415,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19067,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,945,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19067,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,90.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19067,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,90.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19067,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,9.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19067,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19067,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19067,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19067,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19067,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19067,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19069,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19069,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19069,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19069,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19069,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,9983,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19069,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,6514,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19069,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5622,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19069,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1450,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19069,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,892,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19069,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,86.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19069,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,22.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19069,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,13.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19069,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19069,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19069,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,64,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19069,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19069,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,4171,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19069,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Fremont,Fremont County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19071,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Fremont,Fremont County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19071,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Fremont,Fremont County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19071,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Fremont,Fremont County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19071,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Fremont,Fremont County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19071,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Fremont,Fremont County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,6560,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19071,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Fremont,Fremont County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4289,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19071,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Fremont,Fremont County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19071,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Fremont,Fremont County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19071,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Fremont,Fremont County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4289,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19071,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Fremont,Fremont County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19071,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Fremont,Fremont County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19071,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Fremont,Fremont County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19071,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Fremont,Fremont County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19071,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Fremont,Fremont County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19071,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Fremont,Fremont County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19071,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Fremont,Fremont County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19071,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Fremont,Fremont County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19071,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19073,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19073,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19073,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19073,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19073,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,8746,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19073,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5744,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19073,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5380,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19073,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,770,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19073,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,364,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19073,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,93.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19073,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,13.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19073,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,6.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19073,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19073,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19073,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,80.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19073,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19073,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,4610,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19073,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Grundy,Grundy County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19075,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Grundy,Grundy County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19075,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Grundy,Grundy County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19075,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Grundy,Grundy County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19075,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Grundy,Grundy County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19075,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Grundy,Grundy County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,12312,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19075,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Grundy,Grundy County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7734,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19075,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Grundy,Grundy County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7734,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19075,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Grundy,Grundy County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1931,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19075,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Grundy,Grundy County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19075,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Grundy,Grundy County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19075,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Grundy,Grundy County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,25,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19075,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Grundy,Grundy County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19075,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Grundy,Grundy County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19075,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Grundy,Grundy County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,75,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19075,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Grundy,Grundy County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19075,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Grundy,Grundy County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,5803,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19075,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Grundy,Grundy County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19075,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Guthrie,Guthrie County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19077,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Guthrie,Guthrie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19077,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Guthrie,Guthrie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19077,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Guthrie,Guthrie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19077,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Guthrie,Guthrie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19077,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Guthrie,Guthrie County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,10612,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19077,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Guthrie,Guthrie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,6759,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19077,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Guthrie,Guthrie County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4486,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19077,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Guthrie,Guthrie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,2571,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19077,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Guthrie,Guthrie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2272,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19077,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Guthrie,Guthrie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,66.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19077,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Guthrie,Guthrie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,38,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19077,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Guthrie,Guthrie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,33.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19077,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Guthrie,Guthrie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19077,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Guthrie,Guthrie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19077,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Guthrie,Guthrie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,28.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19077,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Guthrie,Guthrie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19077,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Guthrie,Guthrie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1915,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19077,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19079,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19079,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19079,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19079,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19079,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,15020,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19079,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,10983,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19079,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10477,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19079,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,10477,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19079,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,506,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19079,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,95.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19079,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,95.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19079,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,4.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19079,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19079,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19079,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19079,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19079,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19079,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19081,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19081,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19081,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19081,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19081,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,10757,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19081,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,6834,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19081,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5968,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19081,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,474,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19081,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,867,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19081,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,87.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19081,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,6.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19081,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,12.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19081,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19081,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19081,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,80.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19081,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19081,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,5493,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19081,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Hardin,Hardin County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19083,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Hardin,Hardin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19083,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Hardin,Hardin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19083,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Hardin,Hardin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19083,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Hardin,Hardin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19083,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Hardin,Hardin County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,16821,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19083,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Hardin,Hardin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,12027,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19083,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Hardin,Hardin County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10562,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19083,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Hardin,Hardin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,3073,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19083,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Hardin,Hardin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1464,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19083,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Hardin,Hardin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,87.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19083,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Hardin,Hardin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,25.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19083,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Hardin,Hardin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,12.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19083,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Hardin,Hardin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19083,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Hardin,Hardin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19083,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Hardin,Hardin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,62.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19083,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Hardin,Hardin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19083,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Hardin,Hardin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,7490,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19083,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19085,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19085,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19085,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19085,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19085,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,14546,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19085,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7742,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19085,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5317,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19085,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19085,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2426,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19085,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,68.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19085,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19085,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,31.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19085,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19085,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19085,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,68.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19085,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19085,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,5317,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19085,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19087,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19087,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19087,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19087,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19087,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,20412,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19087,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,16129,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19087,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,16129,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19087,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,14159,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19087,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19087,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19087,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,87.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19087,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19087,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19087,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,4.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19087,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19087,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,741,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19087,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19087,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19089,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19089,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19089,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19089,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19089,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,9487,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19089,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5855,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19089,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4269,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19089,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,629,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19089,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1586,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19089,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,72.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19089,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,10.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19089,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,27.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19089,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19089,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19089,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,62.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19089,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19089,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3640,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19089,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Humboldt,Humboldt County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19091,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Humboldt,Humboldt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19091,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Humboldt,Humboldt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19091,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Humboldt,Humboldt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19091,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Humboldt,Humboldt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19091,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Humboldt,Humboldt County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,9595,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19091,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Humboldt,Humboldt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,6411,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19091,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Humboldt,Humboldt County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4854,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19091,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Humboldt,Humboldt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,468,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19091,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Humboldt,Humboldt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1557,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19091,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Humboldt,Humboldt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,75.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19091,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Humboldt,Humboldt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,7.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19091,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Humboldt,Humboldt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,24.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19091,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Humboldt,Humboldt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19091,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Humboldt,Humboldt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19091,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Humboldt,Humboldt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,68.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19091,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Humboldt,Humboldt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19091,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Humboldt,Humboldt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,4385,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19091,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,IA,Iowa,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1069,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,IA,IA,Iowa,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,546,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,IA,IA,Iowa,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,141,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,IA,IA,Iowa,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,158,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,IA,IA,Iowa,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,203,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,IA,IA,Iowa,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,3188669,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2020,IA,IA,Iowa,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2684404,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,IA,IA,Iowa,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2409673,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,IA,IA,Iowa,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,368621,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,IA,IA,Iowa,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,274731,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,IA,IA,Iowa,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,89.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,IA,IA,Iowa,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,13.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,IA,IA,Iowa,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,10.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,IA,IA,Iowa,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,523,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,IA,IA,Iowa,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,15.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,IA,IA,Iowa,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,55.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,IA,IA,Iowa,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,427209,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,IA,IA,Iowa,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1489156,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,IA,Ida,Ida County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19093,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Ida,Ida County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19093,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Ida,Ida County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19093,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Ida,Ida County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19093,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Ida,Ida County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19093,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Ida,Ida County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,7007,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19093,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Ida,Ida County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4605,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19093,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Ida,Ida County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1919,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19093,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Ida,Ida County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1319,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19093,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Ida,Ida County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2686,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19093,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Ida,Ida County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,41.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19093,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Ida,Ida County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,28.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19093,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Ida,Ida County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,58.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19093,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Ida,Ida County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19093,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Ida,Ida County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,13,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19093,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Ida,Ida County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19093,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Ida,Ida County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,599,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19093,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Ida,Ida County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19093,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Iowa,Iowa County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19095,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Iowa,Iowa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19095,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Iowa,Iowa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19095,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Iowa,Iowa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19095,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Iowa,Iowa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19095,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Iowa,Iowa County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,16679,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19095,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Iowa,Iowa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,11206,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19095,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Iowa,Iowa County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4140,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19095,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Iowa,Iowa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,4140,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19095,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Iowa,Iowa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7066,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19095,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Iowa,Iowa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,36.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19095,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Iowa,Iowa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,36.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19095,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Iowa,Iowa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,63.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19095,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Iowa,Iowa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19095,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Iowa,Iowa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19095,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Iowa,Iowa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19095,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Iowa,Iowa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19095,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Iowa,Iowa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19095,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19097,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19097,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19097,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19097,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19097,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,19437,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19097,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,10772,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19097,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8575,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19097,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,784,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19097,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2197,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19097,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,79.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19097,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,7.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19097,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,20.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19097,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19097,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19097,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,72.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19097,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19097,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,7791,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19097,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19099,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19099,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19099,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19099,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19099,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,37802,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19099,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,46192,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19099,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,42575,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19099,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19099,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3617,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19099,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,92.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19099,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19099,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,7.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19099,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19099,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,6.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19099,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,36.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19099,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,3116,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19099,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,16784,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19099,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19101,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19101,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19101,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19101,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19101,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,15659,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19101,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,10922,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19101,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10922,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19101,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,9351,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19101,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19101,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19101,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,85.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19101,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19101,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19101,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,14.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19101,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19101,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1571,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19101,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19101,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,62,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19103,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19103,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19103,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19103,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19103,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,152984,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19103,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,134149,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19103,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,124023,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19103,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,36795,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19103,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10126,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19103,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,92.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19103,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,27.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19103,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,7.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19103,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,52,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19103,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19103,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,65,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19103,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19103,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,87228,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19103,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Jones,Jones County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19105,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Jones,Jones County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19105,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Jones,Jones County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19105,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Jones,Jones County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19105,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Jones,Jones County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19105,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Jones,Jones County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,20647,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19105,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Jones,Jones County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,11129,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19105,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Jones,Jones County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5155,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19105,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Jones,Jones County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,5155,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19105,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Jones,Jones County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5974,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19105,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Jones,Jones County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,46.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19105,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Jones,Jones County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,46.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19105,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Jones,Jones County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,53.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19105,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Jones,Jones County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19105,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Jones,Jones County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19105,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Jones,Jones County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19105,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Jones,Jones County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19105,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Jones,Jones County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19105,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Keokuk,Keokuk County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19107,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Keokuk,Keokuk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19107,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Keokuk,Keokuk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19107,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Keokuk,Keokuk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19107,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Keokuk,Keokuk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19107,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Keokuk,Keokuk County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,9995,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19107,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Keokuk,Keokuk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5840,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19107,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Keokuk,Keokuk County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5752,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19107,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Keokuk,Keokuk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,3547,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19107,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Keokuk,Keokuk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,88,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19107,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Keokuk,Keokuk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19107,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Keokuk,Keokuk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,60.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19107,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Keokuk,Keokuk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19107,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Keokuk,Keokuk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19107,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Keokuk,Keokuk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,37.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19107,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Keokuk,Keokuk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19107,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Keokuk,Keokuk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2206,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19107,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Keokuk,Keokuk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19107,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Kossuth,Kossuth County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19109,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Kossuth,Kossuth County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19109,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Kossuth,Kossuth County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19109,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Kossuth,Kossuth County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19109,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Kossuth,Kossuth County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19109,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Kossuth,Kossuth County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,14786,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19109,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Kossuth,Kossuth County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9533,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19109,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Kossuth,Kossuth County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7401,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19109,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Kossuth,Kossuth County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,2202,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19109,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Kossuth,Kossuth County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2132,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19109,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Kossuth,Kossuth County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,77.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19109,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Kossuth,Kossuth County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,23.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19109,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Kossuth,Kossuth County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,22.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19109,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Kossuth,Kossuth County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19109,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Kossuth,Kossuth County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19109,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Kossuth,Kossuth County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,54.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19109,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Kossuth,Kossuth County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19109,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Kossuth,Kossuth County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,5199,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19109,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19111,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19111,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19111,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19111,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19111,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,33512,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19111,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,33030,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19111,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,33030,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19111,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,853,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19111,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19111,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19111,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,2.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19111,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19111,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19111,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,5.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19111,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,62.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19111,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1743,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19111,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,20719,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19111,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Linn,Linn County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,43,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19113,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Linn,Linn County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19113,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Linn,Linn County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19113,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Linn,Linn County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19113,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Linn,Linn County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19113,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Linn,Linn County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,230263,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19113,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Linn,Linn County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,183756,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19113,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Linn,Linn County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,172061,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19113,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Linn,Linn County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,43096,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19113,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Linn,Linn County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11696,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19113,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Linn,Linn County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,93.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19113,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Linn,Linn County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,23.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19113,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Linn,Linn County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,6.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19113,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Linn,Linn County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,32,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19113,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Linn,Linn County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19113,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Linn,Linn County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,69.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19113,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Linn,Linn County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1574,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19113,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Linn,Linn County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,127391,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19113,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Louisa,Louisa County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19115,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Louisa,Louisa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19115,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Louisa,Louisa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19115,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Louisa,Louisa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19115,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Louisa,Louisa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19115,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Louisa,Louisa County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,10806,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19115,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Louisa,Louisa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5769,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19115,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Louisa,Louisa County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2774,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19115,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Louisa,Louisa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,831,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19115,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Louisa,Louisa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2995,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19115,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Louisa,Louisa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,48.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19115,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Louisa,Louisa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,14.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19115,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Louisa,Louisa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,51.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19115,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Louisa,Louisa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19115,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Louisa,Louisa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19115,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Louisa,Louisa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,33.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19115,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Louisa,Louisa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19115,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Louisa,Louisa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1943,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19115,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Lucas,Lucas County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19117,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Lucas,Lucas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19117,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Lucas,Lucas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19117,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Lucas,Lucas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19117,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Lucas,Lucas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19117,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Lucas,Lucas County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,8615,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19117,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Lucas,Lucas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4558,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19117,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Lucas,Lucas County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4558,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19117,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Lucas,Lucas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19117,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Lucas,Lucas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19117,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Lucas,Lucas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19117,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Lucas,Lucas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19117,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Lucas,Lucas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19117,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Lucas,Lucas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19117,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Lucas,Lucas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19117,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Lucas,Lucas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19117,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Lucas,Lucas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,4558,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19117,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Lucas,Lucas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19117,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Lyon,Lyon County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19119,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Lyon,Lyon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19119,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Lyon,Lyon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19119,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Lyon,Lyon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19119,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Lyon,Lyon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19119,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Lyon,Lyon County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,11917,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19119,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Lyon,Lyon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9078,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19119,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Lyon,Lyon County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2105,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19119,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Lyon,Lyon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1018,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19119,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Lyon,Lyon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6973,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19119,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Lyon,Lyon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,23.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19119,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Lyon,Lyon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,11.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19119,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Lyon,Lyon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,76.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19119,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Lyon,Lyon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19119,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Lyon,Lyon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,12,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19119,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Lyon,Lyon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19119,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Lyon,Lyon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1087,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19119,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Lyon,Lyon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19119,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19121,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19121,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19121,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19121,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19121,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,16626,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19121,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,6721,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19121,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6721,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19121,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19121,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19121,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19121,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19121,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19121,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19121,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,26.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19121,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,73.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19121,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1809,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19121,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,4912,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19121,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Mahaska,Mahaska County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19123,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Mahaska,Mahaska County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19123,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Mahaska,Mahaska County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19123,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Mahaska,Mahaska County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19123,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Mahaska,Mahaska County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19123,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Mahaska,Mahaska County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,22148,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19123,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Mahaska,Mahaska County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,20699,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19123,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Mahaska,Mahaska County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,20699,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19123,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Mahaska,Mahaska County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1232,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19123,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Mahaska,Mahaska County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19123,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Mahaska,Mahaska County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19123,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Mahaska,Mahaska County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19123,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Mahaska,Mahaska County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19123,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Mahaska,Mahaska County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19123,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Mahaska,Mahaska County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,2.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19123,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Mahaska,Mahaska County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,91.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19123,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Mahaska,Mahaska County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,471,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19123,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Mahaska,Mahaska County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,18996,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19123,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19125,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19125,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19125,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19125,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19125,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,33377,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19125,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,26350,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19125,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,26102,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19125,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,10279,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19125,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,248,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19125,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19125,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,39,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19125,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19125,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19125,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,4.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19125,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,36.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19125,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1087,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19125,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,9680,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19125,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19127,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19127,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19127,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19127,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19127,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,40059,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19127,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,33775,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19127,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,32946,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19127,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1375,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19127,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,829,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19127,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,97.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19127,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,4.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19127,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19127,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19127,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,16.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19127,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,76.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19127,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,5688,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19127,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,25883,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19127,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Mills,Mills County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19129,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Mills,Mills County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19129,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Mills,Mills County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19129,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Mills,Mills County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19129,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Mills,Mills County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19129,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Mills,Mills County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,14405,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19129,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Mills,Mills County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7845,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19129,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Mills,Mills County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6948,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19129,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Mills,Mills County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19129,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Mills,Mills County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,898,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19129,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Mills,Mills County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,88.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19129,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Mills,Mills County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19129,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Mills,Mills County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,11.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19129,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Mills,Mills County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19129,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Mills,Mills County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19129,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Mills,Mills County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,88.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19129,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Mills,Mills County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19129,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Mills,Mills County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,6948,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19129,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Mitchell,Mitchell County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19131,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Mitchell,Mitchell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19131,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Mitchell,Mitchell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19131,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Mitchell,Mitchell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19131,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Mitchell,Mitchell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19131,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Mitchell,Mitchell County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,10582,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19131,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Mitchell,Mitchell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4971,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19131,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Mitchell,Mitchell County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3933,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19131,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Mitchell,Mitchell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,535,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19131,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Mitchell,Mitchell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1038,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19131,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Mitchell,Mitchell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,79.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19131,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Mitchell,Mitchell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,10.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19131,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Mitchell,Mitchell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,20.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19131,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Mitchell,Mitchell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19131,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Mitchell,Mitchell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19131,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Mitchell,Mitchell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,68.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19131,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Mitchell,Mitchell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19131,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Mitchell,Mitchell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3398,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19131,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Monona,Monona County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19133,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Monona,Monona County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19133,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Monona,Monona County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19133,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Monona,Monona County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19133,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Monona,Monona County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19133,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Monona,Monona County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,8742,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19133,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Monona,Monona County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5737,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19133,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Monona,Monona County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19133,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Monona,Monona County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19133,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Monona,Monona County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5737,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19133,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Monona,Monona County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19133,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Monona,Monona County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19133,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Monona,Monona County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19133,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Monona,Monona County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19133,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Monona,Monona County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19133,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Monona,Monona County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19133,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Monona,Monona County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19133,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Monona,Monona County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19133,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19135,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19135,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19135,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19135,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19135,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,7582,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19135,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4111,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19135,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4111,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19135,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19135,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19135,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19135,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19135,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19135,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19135,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19135,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19135,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,4111,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19135,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19135,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19137,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19137,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19137,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19137,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19137,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,10335,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19137,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7528,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19137,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7201,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19137,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19137,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,327,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19137,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,95.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19137,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19137,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,4.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19137,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19137,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19137,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,95.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19137,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19137,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,7201,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19137,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Muscatine,Muscatine County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19139,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Muscatine,Muscatine County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19139,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Muscatine,Muscatine County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19139,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Muscatine,Muscatine County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19139,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Muscatine,Muscatine County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19139,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Muscatine,Muscatine County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,43113,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19139,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Muscatine,Muscatine County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,31453,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19139,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Muscatine,Muscatine County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,29066,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19139,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Muscatine,Muscatine County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,3644,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19139,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Muscatine,Muscatine County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2386,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19139,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Muscatine,Muscatine County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,92.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19139,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Muscatine,Muscatine County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,11.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19139,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Muscatine,Muscatine County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,7.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19139,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Muscatine,Muscatine County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19139,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Muscatine,Muscatine County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19139,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Muscatine,Muscatine County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,80.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19139,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Muscatine,Muscatine County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19139,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Muscatine,Muscatine County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,25422,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19139,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,O'Brien,O'Brien County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19141,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,O'Brien,O'Brien County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19141,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,O'Brien,O'Brien County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19141,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,O'Brien,O'Brien County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19141,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,O'Brien,O'Brien County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19141,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,O'Brien,O'Brien County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,14154,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19141,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,O'Brien,O'Brien County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,12332,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19141,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,O'Brien,O'Brien County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10238,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19141,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,O'Brien,O'Brien County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,7660,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19141,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,O'Brien,O'Brien County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2094,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19141,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,O'Brien,O'Brien County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,83,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19141,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,O'Brien,O'Brien County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,62.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19141,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,O'Brien,O'Brien County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,17,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19141,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,O'Brien,O'Brien County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19141,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,O'Brien,O'Brien County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19141,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,O'Brien,O'Brien County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,20.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19141,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,O'Brien,O'Brien County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19141,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,O'Brien,O'Brien County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2578,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19141,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Osceola,Osceola County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19143,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Osceola,Osceola County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19143,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Osceola,Osceola County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19143,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Osceola,Osceola County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19143,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Osceola,Osceola County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19143,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Osceola,Osceola County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,6189,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19143,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Osceola,Osceola County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,8334,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19143,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Osceola,Osceola County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2626,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19143,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Osceola,Osceola County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19143,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Osceola,Osceola County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5709,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19143,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Osceola,Osceola County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,31.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19143,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Osceola,Osceola County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19143,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Osceola,Osceola County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,68.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19143,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Osceola,Osceola County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19143,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Osceola,Osceola County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19143,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Osceola,Osceola County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,31.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19143,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Osceola,Osceola County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19143,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Osceola,Osceola County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2626,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19143,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Page,Page County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19145,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Page,Page County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19145,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Page,Page County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19145,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Page,Page County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19145,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Page,Page County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19145,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Page,Page County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,15180,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19145,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Page,Page County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,15226,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19145,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Page,Page County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,13129,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19145,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Page,Page County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19145,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Page,Page County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2096,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19145,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Page,Page County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,86.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19145,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Page,Page County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19145,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Page,Page County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,13.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19145,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Page,Page County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19145,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Page,Page County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,20.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19145,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Page,Page County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,65.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19145,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Page,Page County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,3103,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19145,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Page,Page County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,10026,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19145,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Palo Alto,Palo Alto County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19147,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Palo Alto,Palo Alto County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19147,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Palo Alto,Palo Alto County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19147,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Palo Alto,Palo Alto County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19147,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Palo Alto,Palo Alto County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19147,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Palo Alto,Palo Alto County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,8961,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19147,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Palo Alto,Palo Alto County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,6431,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19147,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Palo Alto,Palo Alto County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3718,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19147,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Palo Alto,Palo Alto County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,42,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19147,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Palo Alto,Palo Alto County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2714,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19147,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Palo Alto,Palo Alto County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,57.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19147,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Palo Alto,Palo Alto County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19147,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Palo Alto,Palo Alto County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,42.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19147,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Palo Alto,Palo Alto County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19147,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Palo Alto,Palo Alto County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19147,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Palo Alto,Palo Alto County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,57.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19147,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Palo Alto,Palo Alto County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19147,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Palo Alto,Palo Alto County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3676,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19147,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Plymouth,Plymouth County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19149,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Plymouth,Plymouth County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19149,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Plymouth,Plymouth County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19149,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Plymouth,Plymouth County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19149,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Plymouth,Plymouth County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19149,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Plymouth,Plymouth County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,25681,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19149,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Plymouth,Plymouth County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,15520,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19149,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Plymouth,Plymouth County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3722,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19149,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Plymouth,Plymouth County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,3722,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19149,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Plymouth,Plymouth County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11798,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19149,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Plymouth,Plymouth County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,24,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19149,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Plymouth,Plymouth County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,24,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19149,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Plymouth,Plymouth County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,76,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19149,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Plymouth,Plymouth County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19149,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Plymouth,Plymouth County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19149,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Plymouth,Plymouth County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19149,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Plymouth,Plymouth County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19149,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Plymouth,Plymouth County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19149,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Pocahontas,Pocahontas County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19151,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Pocahontas,Pocahontas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19151,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Pocahontas,Pocahontas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19151,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Pocahontas,Pocahontas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19151,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Pocahontas,Pocahontas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19151,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Pocahontas,Pocahontas County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,7075,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19151,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Pocahontas,Pocahontas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4941,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19151,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Pocahontas,Pocahontas County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19151,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Pocahontas,Pocahontas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19151,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Pocahontas,Pocahontas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4941,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19151,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Pocahontas,Pocahontas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19151,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Pocahontas,Pocahontas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19151,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Pocahontas,Pocahontas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19151,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Pocahontas,Pocahontas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19151,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Pocahontas,Pocahontas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19151,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Pocahontas,Pocahontas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19151,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Pocahontas,Pocahontas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19151,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Pocahontas,Pocahontas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19151,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,22,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19153,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19153,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19153,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19153,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19153,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,492769,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19153,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,457629,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19153,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,455609,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19153,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,25050,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19153,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2021,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19153,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19153,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,5.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19153,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19153,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19153,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,32.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19153,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,48.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19153,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,147929,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19153,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,220019,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19153,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Pottawattamie,Pottawattamie County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19155,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Pottawattamie,Pottawattamie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19155,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Pottawattamie,Pottawattamie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19155,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Pottawattamie,Pottawattamie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19155,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Pottawattamie,Pottawattamie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19155,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Pottawattamie,Pottawattamie County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,93560,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19155,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Pottawattamie,Pottawattamie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,72626,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19155,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Pottawattamie,Pottawattamie County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,71522,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19155,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Pottawattamie,Pottawattamie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,2381,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19155,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Pottawattamie,Pottawattamie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1104,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19155,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Pottawattamie,Pottawattamie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19155,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Pottawattamie,Pottawattamie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,3.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19155,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Pottawattamie,Pottawattamie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19155,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Pottawattamie,Pottawattamie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19155,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Pottawattamie,Pottawattamie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,10.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19155,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Pottawattamie,Pottawattamie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,85,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19155,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Pottawattamie,Pottawattamie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,7386,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19155,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Pottawattamie,Pottawattamie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,61755,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19155,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Poweshiek,Poweshiek County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19157,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Poweshiek,Poweshiek County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19157,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Poweshiek,Poweshiek County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19157,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Poweshiek,Poweshiek County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19157,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Poweshiek,Poweshiek County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19157,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Poweshiek,Poweshiek County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,18643,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19157,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Poweshiek,Poweshiek County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,14185,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19157,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Poweshiek,Poweshiek County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11772,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19157,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Poweshiek,Poweshiek County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,8676,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19157,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Poweshiek,Poweshiek County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2412,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19157,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Poweshiek,Poweshiek County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,83,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19157,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Poweshiek,Poweshiek County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,61.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19157,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Poweshiek,Poweshiek County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,17,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19157,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Poweshiek,Poweshiek County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19157,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Poweshiek,Poweshiek County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,11.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19157,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Poweshiek,Poweshiek County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,10.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19157,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Poweshiek,Poweshiek County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1590,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19157,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Poweshiek,Poweshiek County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1507,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19157,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Ringgold,Ringgold County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19159,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Ringgold,Ringgold County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19159,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Ringgold,Ringgold County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19159,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Ringgold,Ringgold County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19159,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Ringgold,Ringgold County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19159,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Ringgold,Ringgold County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,4639,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19159,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Ringgold,Ringgold County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2242,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19159,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Ringgold,Ringgold County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2242,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19159,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Ringgold,Ringgold County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19159,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Ringgold,Ringgold County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19159,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Ringgold,Ringgold County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19159,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Ringgold,Ringgold County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19159,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Ringgold,Ringgold County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19159,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Ringgold,Ringgold County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19159,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Ringgold,Ringgold County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19159,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Ringgold,Ringgold County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19159,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Ringgold,Ringgold County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2242,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19159,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Ringgold,Ringgold County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19159,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Sac,Sac County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19161,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Sac,Sac County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19161,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Sac,Sac County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19161,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Sac,Sac County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19161,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Sac,Sac County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19161,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Sac,Sac County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,9791,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19161,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Sac,Sac County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,6531,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19161,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Sac,Sac County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,736,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19161,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Sac,Sac County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19161,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Sac,Sac County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5796,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19161,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Sac,Sac County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,11.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19161,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Sac,Sac County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19161,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Sac,Sac County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,88.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19161,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Sac,Sac County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19161,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Sac,Sac County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19161,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Sac,Sac County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,11.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19161,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Sac,Sac County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19161,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Sac,Sac County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,736,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19161,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,48,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19163,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19163,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19163,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19163,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19163,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,174488,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19163,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,147208,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19163,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,135796,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19163,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,756,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19163,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11411,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19163,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,92.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19163,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19163,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,7.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19163,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,44,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19163,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19163,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,91.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19163,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,108,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19163,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,134933,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19163,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19165,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19165,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19165,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19165,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19165,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,11699,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19165,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,11415,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19165,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10532,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19165,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19165,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,884,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19165,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,92.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19165,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19165,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,7.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19165,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19165,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,4.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19165,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,87.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19165,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,558,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19165,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,9973,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19165,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Sioux,Sioux County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19167,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Sioux,Sioux County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19167,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Sioux,Sioux County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19167,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Sioux,Sioux County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19167,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Sioux,Sioux County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19167,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Sioux,Sioux County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,35869,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19167,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Sioux,Sioux County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,35412,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19167,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Sioux,Sioux County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,13647,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19167,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Sioux,Sioux County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1351,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19167,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Sioux,Sioux County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,21764,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19167,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Sioux,Sioux County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,38.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19167,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Sioux,Sioux County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,3.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19167,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Sioux,Sioux County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,61.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19167,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Sioux,Sioux County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19167,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Sioux,Sioux County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,3.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19167,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Sioux,Sioux County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,31.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19167,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Sioux,Sioux County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1165,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19167,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Sioux,Sioux County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,11131,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19167,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Story,Story County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19169,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Story,Story County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19169,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Story,Story County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19169,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Story,Story County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19169,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Story,Story County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19169,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Story,Story County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,98615,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19169,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Story,Story County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,107961,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19169,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Story,Story County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,105027,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19169,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Story,Story County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,4524,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19169,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Story,Story County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2934,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19169,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Story,Story County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,97.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19169,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Story,Story County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,4.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19169,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Story,Story County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19169,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Story,Story County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19169,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Story,Story County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,38.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19169,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Story,Story County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,53.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19169,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Story,Story County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,41540,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19169,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Story,Story County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,57631,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19169,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Tama,Tama County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19171,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Tama,Tama County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19171,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Tama,Tama County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19171,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Tama,Tama County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19171,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Tama,Tama County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19171,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Tama,Tama County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,17072,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19171,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Tama,Tama County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,26039,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19171,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Tama,Tama County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10861,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19171,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Tama,Tama County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,3805,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19171,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Tama,Tama County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,15178,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19171,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Tama,Tama County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,41.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19171,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Tama,Tama County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,14.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19171,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Tama,Tama County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,58.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19171,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Tama,Tama County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19171,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Tama,Tama County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,14.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19171,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Tama,Tama County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,12.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19171,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Tama,Tama County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,3740,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19171,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Tama,Tama County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3316,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19171,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19173,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19173,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19173,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19173,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19173,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,5861,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19173,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,6020,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19173,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6020,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19173,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19173,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19173,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19173,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19173,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19173,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19173,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19173,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19173,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,6020,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19173,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19173,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19175,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19175,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19175,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19175,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19175,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,12097,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19175,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,24633,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19175,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,24633,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19175,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19175,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19175,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19175,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19175,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19175,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19175,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,70.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19175,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,29.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19175,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,17308,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19175,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,7325,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19175,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Van Buren,Van Buren County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19177,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Van Buren,Van Buren County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19177,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Van Buren,Van Buren County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19177,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Van Buren,Van Buren County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19177,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Van Buren,Van Buren County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19177,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Van Buren,Van Buren County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,7204,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19177,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Van Buren,Van Buren County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3274,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19177,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Van Buren,Van Buren County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3274,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19177,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Van Buren,Van Buren County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19177,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Van Buren,Van Buren County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19177,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Van Buren,Van Buren County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19177,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Van Buren,Van Buren County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19177,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Van Buren,Van Buren County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19177,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Van Buren,Van Buren County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19177,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Van Buren,Van Buren County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19177,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Van Buren,Van Buren County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19177,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Van Buren,Van Buren County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,3274,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19177,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Van Buren,Van Buren County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19177,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Wapello,Wapello County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19179,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Wapello,Wapello County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19179,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Wapello,Wapello County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19179,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Wapello,Wapello County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19179,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Wapello,Wapello County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19179,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Wapello,Wapello County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,35341,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19179,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Wapello,Wapello County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,40685,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19179,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Wapello,Wapello County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,40685,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19179,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Wapello,Wapello County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19179,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Wapello,Wapello County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19179,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Wapello,Wapello County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19179,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Wapello,Wapello County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19179,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Wapello,Wapello County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19179,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Wapello,Wapello County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19179,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Wapello,Wapello County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,4.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19179,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Wapello,Wapello County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,59.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19179,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Wapello,Wapello County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1740,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19179,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Wapello,Wapello County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,24357,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19179,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19181,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19181,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19181,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19181,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19181,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,52548,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19181,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,47235,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19181,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,47235,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19181,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,13822,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19181,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19181,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19181,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,29.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19181,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19181,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19181,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,63.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19181,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,7.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19181,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,29788,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19181,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3624,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19181,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19183,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19183,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19183,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19183,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19183,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,22511,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19183,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,13082,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19183,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11432,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19183,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,8047,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19183,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1649,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19183,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,87.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19183,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,61.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19183,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,12.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19183,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19183,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,1.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19183,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,24,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19183,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,247,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19183,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3138,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19183,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19185,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19185,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19185,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19185,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19185,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,6509,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19185,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3331,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19185,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3331,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19185,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19185,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19185,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19185,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19185,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19185,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19185,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19185,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19185,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,3331,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19185,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19185,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,20,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19187,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,19,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19187,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19187,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19187,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,19,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19187,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,36954,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19187,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,29991,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19187,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,29813,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19187,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,29813,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19187,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,179,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19187,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19187,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,99.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19187,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19187,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19187,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19187,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19187,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19187,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19187,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Winnebago,Winnebago County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19189,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Winnebago,Winnebago County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19189,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Winnebago,Winnebago County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19189,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Winnebago,Winnebago County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19189,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Winnebago,Winnebago County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19189,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Winnebago,Winnebago County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,10650,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19189,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Winnebago,Winnebago County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7741,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19189,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Winnebago,Winnebago County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6343,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19189,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Winnebago,Winnebago County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19189,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Winnebago,Winnebago County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1399,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19189,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Winnebago,Winnebago County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,81.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19189,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Winnebago,Winnebago County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19189,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Winnebago,Winnebago County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,18.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19189,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Winnebago,Winnebago County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19189,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Winnebago,Winnebago County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19189,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Winnebago,Winnebago County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,81.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19189,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Winnebago,Winnebago County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19189,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Winnebago,Winnebago County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,6343,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19189,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Winneshiek,Winneshiek County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19191,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Winneshiek,Winneshiek County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19191,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Winneshiek,Winneshiek County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19191,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Winneshiek,Winneshiek County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19191,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Winneshiek,Winneshiek County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19191,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Winneshiek,Winneshiek County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,20031,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19191,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Winneshiek,Winneshiek County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,11673,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19191,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Winneshiek,Winneshiek County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9280,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19191,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Winneshiek,Winneshiek County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1655,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19191,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Winneshiek,Winneshiek County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2393,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19191,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Winneshiek,Winneshiek County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,79.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19191,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Winneshiek,Winneshiek County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,14.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19191,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Winneshiek,Winneshiek County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,20.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19191,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Winneshiek,Winneshiek County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19191,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Winneshiek,Winneshiek County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19191,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Winneshiek,Winneshiek County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,65.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19191,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Winneshiek,Winneshiek County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19191,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Winneshiek,Winneshiek County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,7625,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19191,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Woodbury,Woodbury County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19193,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Woodbury,Woodbury County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19193,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Woodbury,Woodbury County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19193,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Woodbury,Woodbury County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19193,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Woodbury,Woodbury County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19193,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Woodbury,Woodbury County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,105829,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19193,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Woodbury,Woodbury County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,88090,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19193,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Woodbury,Woodbury County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,79821,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19193,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Woodbury,Woodbury County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1526,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19193,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Woodbury,Woodbury County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8270,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19193,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Woodbury,Woodbury County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,90.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19193,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Woodbury,Woodbury County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19193,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Woodbury,Woodbury County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,9.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19193,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Woodbury,Woodbury County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19193,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Woodbury,Woodbury County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19193,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Woodbury,Woodbury County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,88.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19193,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Woodbury,Woodbury County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19193,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Woodbury,Woodbury County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,78295,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19193,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Worth,Worth County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19195,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Worth,Worth County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19195,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Worth,Worth County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19195,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Worth,Worth County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19195,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Worth,Worth County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19195,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Worth,Worth County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,7425,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19195,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Worth,Worth County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4359,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19195,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Worth,Worth County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3106,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19195,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Worth,Worth County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19195,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Worth,Worth County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1253,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19195,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Worth,Worth County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,71.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19195,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Worth,Worth County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19195,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Worth,Worth County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,28.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19195,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Worth,Worth County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19195,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Worth,Worth County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19195,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Worth,Worth County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,71.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19195,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Worth,Worth County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19195,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Worth,Worth County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3106,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19195,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Wright,Wright County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19197,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Wright,Wright County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19197,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Wright,Wright County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19197,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Wright,Wright County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19197,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Wright,Wright County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19197,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Wright,Wright County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,12914,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19197,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Wright,Wright County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9715,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19197,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Wright,Wright County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8749,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19197,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Wright,Wright County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,2734,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19197,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Wright,Wright County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,966,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19197,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Wright,Wright County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,90.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19197,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Wright,Wright County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,28.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19197,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Wright,Wright County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,9.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19197,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Wright,Wright County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19197,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Wright,Wright County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19197,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Wright,Wright County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,61.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19197,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Wright,Wright County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,19197,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IA,Wright,Wright County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,6015,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19197,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Ada,Ada County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,54,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16001,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Ada,Ada County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16001,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Ada,Ada County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16001,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Ada,Ada County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16001,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Ada,Ada County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16001,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Ada,Ada County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,497984,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16001,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Ada,Ada County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,450984,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16001,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Ada,Ada County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,265982,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16001,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Ada,Ada County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,265982,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16001,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Ada,Ada County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,185002,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16001,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Ada,Ada County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,59,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16001,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Ada,Ada County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,59,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16001,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Ada,Ada County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,41,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16001,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Ada,Ada County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,49,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16001,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Ada,Ada County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16001,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Ada,Ada County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16001,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Ada,Ada County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16001,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Ada,Ada County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16001,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16003,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16003,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16003,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16003,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16003,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,4424,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16003,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2283,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16003,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,567,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16003,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,567,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16003,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1716,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16003,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,24.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16003,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,24.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16003,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,75.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16003,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16003,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16003,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16003,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16003,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16003,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Bannock,Bannock County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,21,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16005,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Bannock,Bannock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16005,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Bannock,Bannock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16005,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Bannock,Bannock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16005,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Bannock,Bannock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16005,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Bannock,Bannock County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,87177,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16005,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Bannock,Bannock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,79652,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16005,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Bannock,Bannock County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1086,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16005,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Bannock,Bannock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1086,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16005,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Bannock,Bannock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,78566,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16005,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Bannock,Bannock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16005,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Bannock,Bannock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16005,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Bannock,Bannock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16005,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Bannock,Bannock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16005,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Bannock,Bannock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16005,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Bannock,Bannock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16005,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Bannock,Bannock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16005,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Bannock,Bannock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16005,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Bear Lake,Bear Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16007,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Bear Lake,Bear Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16007,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Bear Lake,Bear Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16007,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Bear Lake,Bear Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16007,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Bear Lake,Bear Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16007,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Bear Lake,Bear Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,6370,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16007,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Bear Lake,Bear Lake County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5896,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16007,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Bear Lake,Bear Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16007,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Bear Lake,Bear Lake County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16007,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Bear Lake,Bear Lake County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5896,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16007,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Bear Lake,Bear Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16007,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Bear Lake,Bear Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16007,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Bear Lake,Bear Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16007,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Bear Lake,Bear Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16007,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Bear Lake,Bear Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16007,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Bear Lake,Bear Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16007,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Bear Lake,Bear Lake County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16007,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Bear Lake,Bear Lake County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16007,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Benewah,Benewah County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16009,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Benewah,Benewah County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16009,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Benewah,Benewah County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16009,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Benewah,Benewah County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16009,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Benewah,Benewah County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16009,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Benewah,Benewah County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,9576,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16009,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Benewah,Benewah County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5949,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16009,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Benewah,Benewah County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,330,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16009,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Benewah,Benewah County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16009,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Benewah,Benewah County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5619,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16009,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Benewah,Benewah County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,5.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16009,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Benewah,Benewah County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16009,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Benewah,Benewah County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,94.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16009,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Benewah,Benewah County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16009,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Benewah,Benewah County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16009,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Benewah,Benewah County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,5.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16009,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Benewah,Benewah County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16009,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Benewah,Benewah County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,330,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16009,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Bingham,Bingham County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,24,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16011,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Bingham,Bingham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16011,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Bingham,Bingham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16011,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Bingham,Bingham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16011,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Bingham,Bingham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16011,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Bingham,Bingham County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,48068,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16011,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Bingham,Bingham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,22562,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16011,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Bingham,Bingham County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,15444,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16011,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Bingham,Bingham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,15444,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16011,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Bingham,Bingham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7119,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16011,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Bingham,Bingham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,68.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16011,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Bingham,Bingham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,68.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16011,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Bingham,Bingham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,31.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16011,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Bingham,Bingham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16011,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Bingham,Bingham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16011,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Bingham,Bingham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16011,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Bingham,Bingham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16011,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Bingham,Bingham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16011,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Blaine,Blaine County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,20,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16013,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Blaine,Blaine County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16013,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Blaine,Blaine County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16013,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Blaine,Blaine County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16013,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Blaine,Blaine County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16013,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Blaine,Blaine County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,24327,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16013,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Blaine,Blaine County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,21504,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16013,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Blaine,Blaine County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16013,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Blaine,Blaine County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16013,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Blaine,Blaine County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,21504,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16013,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Blaine,Blaine County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16013,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Blaine,Blaine County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16013,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Blaine,Blaine County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16013,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Blaine,Blaine County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,20,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16013,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Blaine,Blaine County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16013,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Blaine,Blaine County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16013,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Blaine,Blaine County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16013,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Blaine,Blaine County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16013,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Boise,Boise County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,19,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16015,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Boise,Boise County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16015,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Boise,Boise County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16015,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Boise,Boise County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16015,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Boise,Boise County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16015,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Boise,Boise County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,7647,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16015,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Boise,Boise County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4055,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16015,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Boise,Boise County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1521,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16015,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Boise,Boise County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,933,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16015,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Boise,Boise County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2534,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16015,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Boise,Boise County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,37.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16015,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Boise,Boise County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,23,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16015,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Boise,Boise County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,62.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16015,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Boise,Boise County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16015,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Boise,Boise County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16015,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Boise,Boise County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16015,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Boise,Boise County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16015,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Boise,Boise County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16015,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Bonner,Bonner County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,43,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16017,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Bonner,Bonner County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16017,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Bonner,Bonner County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16017,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Bonner,Bonner County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16017,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Bonner,Bonner County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16017,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Bonner,Bonner County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,47390,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16017,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Bonner,Bonner County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,22478,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16017,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Bonner,Bonner County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,59,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16017,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Bonner,Bonner County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,59,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16017,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Bonner,Bonner County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,22420,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16017,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Bonner,Bonner County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16017,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Bonner,Bonner County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16017,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Bonner,Bonner County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16017,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Bonner,Bonner County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,42,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16017,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Bonner,Bonner County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16017,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Bonner,Bonner County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16017,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Bonner,Bonner County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16017,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Bonner,Bonner County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16017,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Bonneville,Bonneville County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,33,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16019,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Bonneville,Bonneville County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16019,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Bonneville,Bonneville County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16019,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Bonneville,Bonneville County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16019,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Bonneville,Bonneville County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16019,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Bonneville,Bonneville County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,124626,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16019,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Bonneville,Bonneville County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,107928,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16019,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Bonneville,Bonneville County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16019,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Bonneville,Bonneville County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16019,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Bonneville,Bonneville County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,107928,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16019,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Bonneville,Bonneville County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16019,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Bonneville,Bonneville County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16019,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Bonneville,Bonneville County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16019,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Bonneville,Bonneville County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,33,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16019,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Bonneville,Bonneville County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16019,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Bonneville,Bonneville County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16019,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Bonneville,Bonneville County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16019,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Bonneville,Bonneville County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16019,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Boundary,Boundary County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16021,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Boundary,Boundary County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16021,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Boundary,Boundary County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16021,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Boundary,Boundary County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16021,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Boundary,Boundary County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16021,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Boundary,Boundary County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,12113,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16021,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Boundary,Boundary County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,10741,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16021,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Boundary,Boundary County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3407,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16021,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Boundary,Boundary County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,3407,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16021,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Boundary,Boundary County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7335,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16021,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Boundary,Boundary County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,31.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16021,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Boundary,Boundary County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,31.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16021,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Boundary,Boundary County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,68.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16021,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Boundary,Boundary County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16021,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Boundary,Boundary County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16021,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Boundary,Boundary County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16021,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Boundary,Boundary County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16021,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Boundary,Boundary County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16021,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Butte,Butte County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16023,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Butte,Butte County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16023,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Butte,Butte County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16023,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Butte,Butte County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16023,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Butte,Butte County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16023,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Butte,Butte County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,2577,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16023,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Butte,Butte County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1480,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16023,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Butte,Butte County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,121,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16023,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Butte,Butte County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,121,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16023,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Butte,Butte County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1358,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16023,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Butte,Butte County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,8.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16023,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Butte,Butte County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,8.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16023,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Butte,Butte County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,91.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16023,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Butte,Butte County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16023,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Butte,Butte County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16023,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Butte,Butte County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16023,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Butte,Butte County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16023,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Butte,Butte County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16023,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Camas,Camas County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16025,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Camas,Camas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16025,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Camas,Camas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16025,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Camas,Camas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16025,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Camas,Camas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16025,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Camas,Camas County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,1089,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16025,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Camas,Camas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,443,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16025,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Camas,Camas County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16025,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Camas,Camas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16025,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Camas,Camas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,443,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16025,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Camas,Camas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16025,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Camas,Camas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16025,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Camas,Camas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16025,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Camas,Camas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16025,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Camas,Camas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16025,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Camas,Camas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16025,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Camas,Camas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16025,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Camas,Camas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16025,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Canyon,Canyon County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,80,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16027,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Canyon,Canyon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16027,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Canyon,Canyon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16027,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Canyon,Canyon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16027,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Canyon,Canyon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16027,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Canyon,Canyon County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,232714,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16027,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Canyon,Canyon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,163771,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16027,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Canyon,Canyon County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6048,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16027,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Canyon,Canyon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,3937,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16027,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Canyon,Canyon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,157723,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16027,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Canyon,Canyon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,3.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16027,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Canyon,Canyon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,2.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16027,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Canyon,Canyon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,96.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16027,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Canyon,Canyon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,66,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16027,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Canyon,Canyon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16027,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Canyon,Canyon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16027,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Canyon,Canyon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16027,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Canyon,Canyon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16027,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Caribou,Caribou County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16029,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Caribou,Caribou County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16029,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Caribou,Caribou County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16029,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Caribou,Caribou County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16029,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Caribou,Caribou County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16029,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Caribou,Caribou County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,7015,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16029,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Caribou,Caribou County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4984,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16029,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Caribou,Caribou County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16029,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Caribou,Caribou County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16029,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Caribou,Caribou County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4984,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16029,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Caribou,Caribou County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16029,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Caribou,Caribou County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16029,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Caribou,Caribou County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16029,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Caribou,Caribou County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16029,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Caribou,Caribou County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16029,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Caribou,Caribou County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16029,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Caribou,Caribou County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16029,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Caribou,Caribou County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16029,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Cassia,Cassia County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16031,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Cassia,Cassia County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16031,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Cassia,Cassia County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16031,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Cassia,Cassia County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16031,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Cassia,Cassia County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16031,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Cassia,Cassia County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,24699,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16031,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Cassia,Cassia County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,13581,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16031,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Cassia,Cassia County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,394,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16031,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Cassia,Cassia County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,394,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16031,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Cassia,Cassia County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,13187,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16031,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Cassia,Cassia County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16031,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Cassia,Cassia County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,2.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16031,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Cassia,Cassia County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,97.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16031,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Cassia,Cassia County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16031,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Cassia,Cassia County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16031,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Cassia,Cassia County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16031,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Cassia,Cassia County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16031,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Cassia,Cassia County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16031,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16033,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16033,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16033,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16033,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16033,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,792,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16033,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,622,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16033,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16033,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16033,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,622,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16033,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16033,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16033,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16033,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16033,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16033,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16033,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16033,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16033,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Clearwater,Clearwater County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16035,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Clearwater,Clearwater County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16035,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Clearwater,Clearwater County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16035,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Clearwater,Clearwater County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16035,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Clearwater,Clearwater County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16035,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Clearwater,Clearwater County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,8750,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16035,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Clearwater,Clearwater County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,6243,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16035,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Clearwater,Clearwater County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,282,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16035,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Clearwater,Clearwater County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,282,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16035,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Clearwater,Clearwater County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5961,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16035,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Clearwater,Clearwater County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,4.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16035,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Clearwater,Clearwater County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,4.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16035,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Clearwater,Clearwater County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,95.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16035,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Clearwater,Clearwater County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16035,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Clearwater,Clearwater County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16035,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Clearwater,Clearwater County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16035,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Clearwater,Clearwater County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16035,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Clearwater,Clearwater County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16035,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Custer,Custer County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16037,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Custer,Custer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16037,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Custer,Custer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16037,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Custer,Custer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16037,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Custer,Custer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16037,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Custer,Custer County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,4266,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16037,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Custer,Custer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1984,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16037,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Custer,Custer County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16037,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Custer,Custer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16037,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Custer,Custer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1984,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16037,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Custer,Custer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16037,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Custer,Custer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16037,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Custer,Custer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16037,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Custer,Custer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16037,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Custer,Custer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16037,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Custer,Custer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16037,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Custer,Custer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16037,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Custer,Custer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16037,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Elmore,Elmore County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,23,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16039,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Elmore,Elmore County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16039,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Elmore,Elmore County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16039,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Elmore,Elmore County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16039,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Elmore,Elmore County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16039,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Elmore,Elmore County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,28668,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16039,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Elmore,Elmore County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,26882,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16039,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Elmore,Elmore County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8059,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16039,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Elmore,Elmore County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,75,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16039,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Elmore,Elmore County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,18824,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16039,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Elmore,Elmore County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,30,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16039,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Elmore,Elmore County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16039,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Elmore,Elmore County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,70,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16039,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Elmore,Elmore County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,21,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16039,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Elmore,Elmore County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16039,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Elmore,Elmore County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,29.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16039,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Elmore,Elmore County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16039,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Elmore,Elmore County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,7984,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16039,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16041,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16041,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16041,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16041,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16041,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,14269,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16041,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,10529,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16041,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,535,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16041,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,535,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16041,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9993,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16041,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,5.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16041,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,5.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16041,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,94.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16041,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16041,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16041,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16041,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16041,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16041,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Fremont,Fremont County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16043,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Fremont,Fremont County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16043,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Fremont,Fremont County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16043,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Fremont,Fremont County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16043,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Fremont,Fremont County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16043,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Fremont,Fremont County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,13404,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16043,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Fremont,Fremont County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,6932,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16043,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Fremont,Fremont County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6864,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16043,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Fremont,Fremont County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,6864,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16043,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Fremont,Fremont County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,68,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16043,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Fremont,Fremont County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16043,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Fremont,Fremont County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,99,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16043,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Fremont,Fremont County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16043,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Fremont,Fremont County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16043,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Fremont,Fremont County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16043,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Fremont,Fremont County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16043,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Fremont,Fremont County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16043,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Fremont,Fremont County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16043,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Gem,Gem County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16045,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Gem,Gem County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16045,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Gem,Gem County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16045,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Gem,Gem County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16045,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Gem,Gem County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16045,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Gem,Gem County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,19258,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16045,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Gem,Gem County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7405,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16045,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Gem,Gem County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7186,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16045,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Gem,Gem County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,7186,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16045,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Gem,Gem County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,219,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16045,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Gem,Gem County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,97,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16045,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Gem,Gem County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,97,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16045,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Gem,Gem County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16045,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Gem,Gem County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16045,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Gem,Gem County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16045,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Gem,Gem County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16045,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Gem,Gem County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16045,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Gem,Gem County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16045,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Gooding,Gooding County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16047,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Gooding,Gooding County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16047,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Gooding,Gooding County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16047,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Gooding,Gooding County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16047,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Gooding,Gooding County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16047,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Gooding,Gooding County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,15643,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16047,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Gooding,Gooding County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,8303,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16047,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Gooding,Gooding County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16047,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Gooding,Gooding County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16047,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Gooding,Gooding County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8303,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16047,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Gooding,Gooding County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16047,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Gooding,Gooding County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16047,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Gooding,Gooding County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16047,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Gooding,Gooding County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16047,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Gooding,Gooding County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16047,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Gooding,Gooding County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16047,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Gooding,Gooding County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16047,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Gooding,Gooding County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16047,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,ID,Idaho,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,715,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,ID,ID,Idaho,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,99,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,ID,ID,Idaho,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,ID,ID,Idaho,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,ID,ID,Idaho,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,89,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,ID,ID,Idaho,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,1847772,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2020,ID,ID,Idaho,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1405388,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,ID,ID,Idaho,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,441663,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,ID,ID,Idaho,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,392941,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,ID,ID,Idaho,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,963725,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,ID,ID,Idaho,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,31.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,ID,ID,Idaho,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,28,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,ID,ID,Idaho,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,68.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,ID,ID,Idaho,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,616,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,ID,ID,Idaho,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,ID,ID,Idaho,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,1.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,ID,ID,Idaho,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,ID,ID,Idaho,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,24656,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,ID,Idaho,Idaho County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,23,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16049,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Idaho,Idaho County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16049,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Idaho,Idaho County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16049,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Idaho,Idaho County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16049,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Idaho,Idaho County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16049,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Idaho,Idaho County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,16561,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16049,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Idaho,Idaho County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,8356,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16049,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Idaho,Idaho County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1118,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16049,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Idaho,Idaho County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1118,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16049,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Idaho,Idaho County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7238,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16049,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Idaho,Idaho County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,13.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16049,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Idaho,Idaho County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,13.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16049,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Idaho,Idaho County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,86.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16049,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Idaho,Idaho County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,21,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16049,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Idaho,Idaho County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16049,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Idaho,Idaho County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16049,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Idaho,Idaho County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16049,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Idaho,Idaho County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16049,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16051,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16051,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16051,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16051,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16051,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,31055,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16051,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7387,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16051,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,639,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16051,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,639,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16051,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6748,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16051,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,8.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16051,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,8.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16051,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,91.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16051,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16051,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16051,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16051,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16051,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16051,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Jerome,Jerome County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16053,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Jerome,Jerome County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16053,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Jerome,Jerome County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16053,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Jerome,Jerome County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16053,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Jerome,Jerome County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16053,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Jerome,Jerome County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,24222,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16053,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Jerome,Jerome County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,13670,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16053,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Jerome,Jerome County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,802,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16053,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Jerome,Jerome County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,802,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16053,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Jerome,Jerome County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,12869,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16053,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Jerome,Jerome County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,5.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16053,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Jerome,Jerome County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,5.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16053,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Jerome,Jerome County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,94.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16053,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Jerome,Jerome County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16053,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Jerome,Jerome County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16053,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Jerome,Jerome County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16053,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Jerome,Jerome County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16053,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Jerome,Jerome County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16053,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Kootenai,Kootenai County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,96,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16055,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Kootenai,Kootenai County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16055,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Kootenai,Kootenai County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16055,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Kootenai,Kootenai County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16055,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Kootenai,Kootenai County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16055,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Kootenai,Kootenai County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,172646,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16055,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Kootenai,Kootenai County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,135787,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16055,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Kootenai,Kootenai County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,161,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16055,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Kootenai,Kootenai County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,161,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16055,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Kootenai,Kootenai County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,135626,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16055,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Kootenai,Kootenai County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16055,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Kootenai,Kootenai County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16055,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Kootenai,Kootenai County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16055,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Kootenai,Kootenai County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,95,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16055,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Kootenai,Kootenai County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16055,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Kootenai,Kootenai County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16055,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Kootenai,Kootenai County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16055,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Kootenai,Kootenai County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16055,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Latah,Latah County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,24,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16057,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Latah,Latah County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16057,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Latah,Latah County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16057,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Latah,Latah County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16057,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Latah,Latah County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16057,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Latah,Latah County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,39611,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16057,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Latah,Latah County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,41494,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16057,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Latah,Latah County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,26081,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16057,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Latah,Latah County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,26081,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16057,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Latah,Latah County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,15413,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16057,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Latah,Latah County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,62.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16057,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Latah,Latah County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,62.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16057,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Latah,Latah County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,37.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16057,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Latah,Latah County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,23,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16057,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Latah,Latah County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16057,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Latah,Latah County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16057,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Latah,Latah County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16057,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Latah,Latah County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16057,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Lemhi,Lemhi County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16059,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Lemhi,Lemhi County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16059,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Lemhi,Lemhi County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16059,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Lemhi,Lemhi County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16059,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Lemhi,Lemhi County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16059,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Lemhi,Lemhi County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,7948,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16059,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Lemhi,Lemhi County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3618,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16059,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Lemhi,Lemhi County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16059,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Lemhi,Lemhi County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16059,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Lemhi,Lemhi County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3618,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16059,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Lemhi,Lemhi County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16059,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Lemhi,Lemhi County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16059,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Lemhi,Lemhi County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16059,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Lemhi,Lemhi County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16059,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Lemhi,Lemhi County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16059,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Lemhi,Lemhi County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16059,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Lemhi,Lemhi County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16059,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Lemhi,Lemhi County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16059,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Lewis,Lewis County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16061,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Lewis,Lewis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16061,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Lewis,Lewis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16061,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Lewis,Lewis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16061,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Lewis,Lewis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16061,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Lewis,Lewis County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,3531,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16061,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Lewis,Lewis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3168,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16061,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Lewis,Lewis County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,75,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16061,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Lewis,Lewis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16061,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Lewis,Lewis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3094,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16061,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Lewis,Lewis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16061,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Lewis,Lewis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16061,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Lewis,Lewis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,97.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16061,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Lewis,Lewis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16061,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Lewis,Lewis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16061,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Lewis,Lewis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16061,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Lewis,Lewis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16061,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Lewis,Lewis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16061,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16063,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16063,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16063,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16063,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16063,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,5133,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16063,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2413,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16063,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16063,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16063,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2413,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16063,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16063,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16063,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16063,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16063,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16063,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16063,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16063,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16063,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16065,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16065,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16065,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16065,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16065,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,52876,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16065,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,31480,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16065,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,29063,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16065,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,29063,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16065,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2418,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16065,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,92.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16065,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,92.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16065,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,7.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16065,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16065,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16065,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16065,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16065,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16065,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Minidoka,Minidoka County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16067,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Minidoka,Minidoka County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16067,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Minidoka,Minidoka County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16067,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Minidoka,Minidoka County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16067,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Minidoka,Minidoka County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16067,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Minidoka,Minidoka County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,21674,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16067,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Minidoka,Minidoka County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,11301,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16067,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Minidoka,Minidoka County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11142,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16067,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Minidoka,Minidoka County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,11142,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16067,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Minidoka,Minidoka County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,160,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16067,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Minidoka,Minidoka County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16067,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Minidoka,Minidoka County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,98.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16067,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Minidoka,Minidoka County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16067,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Minidoka,Minidoka County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16067,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Minidoka,Minidoka County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16067,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Minidoka,Minidoka County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16067,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Minidoka,Minidoka County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16067,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Minidoka,Minidoka County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16067,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Nez Perce,Nez Perce County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16069,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Nez Perce,Nez Perce County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16069,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Nez Perce,Nez Perce County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16069,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Nez Perce,Nez Perce County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16069,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Nez Perce,Nez Perce County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16069,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Nez Perce,Nez Perce County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,42088,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16069,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Nez Perce,Nez Perce County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,40450,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16069,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Nez Perce,Nez Perce County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,37634,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16069,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Nez Perce,Nez Perce County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16069,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Nez Perce,Nez Perce County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2817,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16069,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Nez Perce,Nez Perce County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,93,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16069,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Nez Perce,Nez Perce County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16069,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Nez Perce,Nez Perce County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16069,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Nez Perce,Nez Perce County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16069,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Nez Perce,Nez Perce County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16069,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Nez Perce,Nez Perce County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,40.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16069,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Nez Perce,Nez Perce County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16069,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Nez Perce,Nez Perce County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,16342,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16069,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Oneida,Oneida County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16071,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Oneida,Oneida County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16071,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Oneida,Oneida County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16071,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Oneida,Oneida County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16071,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Oneida,Oneida County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16071,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Oneida,Oneida County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,4554,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16071,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Oneida,Oneida County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2342,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16071,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Oneida,Oneida County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16071,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Oneida,Oneida County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16071,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Oneida,Oneida County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2342,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16071,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Oneida,Oneida County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16071,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Oneida,Oneida County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16071,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Oneida,Oneida County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16071,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Oneida,Oneida County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16071,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Oneida,Oneida County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16071,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Oneida,Oneida County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16071,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Oneida,Oneida County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16071,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Oneida,Oneida County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16071,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Owyhee,Owyhee County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16073,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Owyhee,Owyhee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16073,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Owyhee,Owyhee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16073,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Owyhee,Owyhee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16073,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Owyhee,Owyhee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16073,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Owyhee,Owyhee County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,11978,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16073,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Owyhee,Owyhee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4754,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16073,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Owyhee,Owyhee County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4470,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16073,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Owyhee,Owyhee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,4470,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16073,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Owyhee,Owyhee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,284,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16073,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Owyhee,Owyhee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,94,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16073,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Owyhee,Owyhee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,94,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16073,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Owyhee,Owyhee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16073,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Owyhee,Owyhee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16073,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Owyhee,Owyhee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16073,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Owyhee,Owyhee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16073,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Owyhee,Owyhee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16073,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Owyhee,Owyhee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16073,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Payette,Payette County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16075,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Payette,Payette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16075,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Payette,Payette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16075,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Payette,Payette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16075,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Payette,Payette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16075,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Payette,Payette County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,25589,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16075,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Payette,Payette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,15313,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16075,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Payette,Payette County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,104,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16075,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Payette,Payette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,104,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16075,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Payette,Payette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,15208,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16075,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Payette,Payette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16075,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Payette,Payette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16075,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Payette,Payette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16075,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Payette,Payette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16075,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Payette,Payette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16075,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Payette,Payette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16075,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Payette,Payette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16075,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Payette,Payette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16075,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Power,Power County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16077,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Power,Power County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16077,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Power,Power County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16077,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Power,Power County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16077,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Power,Power County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16077,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Power,Power County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,7879,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16077,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Power,Power County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5028,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16077,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Power,Power County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4596,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16077,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Power,Power County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,4596,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16077,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Power,Power County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,432,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16077,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Power,Power County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,91.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16077,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Power,Power County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,91.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16077,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Power,Power County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,8.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16077,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Power,Power County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16077,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Power,Power County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16077,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Power,Power County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16077,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Power,Power County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16077,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Power,Power County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16077,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Shoshone,Shoshone County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16079,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Shoshone,Shoshone County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16079,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Shoshone,Shoshone County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16079,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Shoshone,Shoshone County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16079,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Shoshone,Shoshone County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16079,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Shoshone,Shoshone County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,13189,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16079,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Shoshone,Shoshone County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,13669,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16079,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Shoshone,Shoshone County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,94,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16079,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Shoshone,Shoshone County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,94,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16079,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Shoshone,Shoshone County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,13575,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16079,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Shoshone,Shoshone County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16079,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Shoshone,Shoshone County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16079,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Shoshone,Shoshone County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16079,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Shoshone,Shoshone County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16079,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Shoshone,Shoshone County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16079,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Shoshone,Shoshone County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16079,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Shoshone,Shoshone County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16079,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Shoshone,Shoshone County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16079,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Teton,Teton County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16081,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Teton,Teton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16081,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Teton,Teton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16081,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Teton,Teton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16081,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Teton,Teton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16081,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Teton,Teton County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,11731,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16081,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Teton,Teton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4405,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16081,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Teton,Teton County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16081,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Teton,Teton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16081,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Teton,Teton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4405,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16081,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Teton,Teton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16081,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Teton,Teton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16081,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Teton,Teton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16081,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Teton,Teton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16081,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Teton,Teton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16081,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Teton,Teton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16081,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Teton,Teton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16081,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Teton,Teton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16081,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Twin Falls,Twin Falls County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16083,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Twin Falls,Twin Falls County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16083,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Twin Falls,Twin Falls County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16083,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Twin Falls,Twin Falls County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16083,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Twin Falls,Twin Falls County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16083,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Twin Falls,Twin Falls County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,90279,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16083,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Twin Falls,Twin Falls County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,61986,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16083,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Twin Falls,Twin Falls County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7801,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16083,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Twin Falls,Twin Falls County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,7801,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16083,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Twin Falls,Twin Falls County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,54184,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16083,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Twin Falls,Twin Falls County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,12.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16083,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Twin Falls,Twin Falls County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,12.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16083,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Twin Falls,Twin Falls County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,87.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16083,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Twin Falls,Twin Falls County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16083,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Twin Falls,Twin Falls County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16083,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Twin Falls,Twin Falls County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16083,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Twin Falls,Twin Falls County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16083,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Twin Falls,Twin Falls County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16083,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Valley,Valley County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16085,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Valley,Valley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16085,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Valley,Valley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16085,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Valley,Valley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16085,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Valley,Valley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16085,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Valley,Valley County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,11838,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16085,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Valley,Valley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5224,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16085,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Valley,Valley County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16085,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Valley,Valley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16085,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Valley,Valley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5224,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16085,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Valley,Valley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16085,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Valley,Valley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16085,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Valley,Valley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16085,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Valley,Valley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16085,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Valley,Valley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16085,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Valley,Valley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16085,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Valley,Valley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16085,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Valley,Valley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16085,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16087,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16087,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16087,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16087,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16087,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,10544,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16087,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,6349,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16087,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16087,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16087,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6349,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16087,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16087,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16087,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16087,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16087,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16087,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16087,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16087,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ID,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16087,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17001,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17001,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17001,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17001,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17001,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,65530,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17001,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,52659,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17001,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,52577,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17001,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17001,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,82,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17001,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17001,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17001,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17001,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17001,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,18,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17001,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,81.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17001,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,9465,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17001,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,43112,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17001,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Alexander,Alexander County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17003,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Alexander,Alexander County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17003,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Alexander,Alexander County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17003,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Alexander,Alexander County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17003,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Alexander,Alexander County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17003,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Alexander,Alexander County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,5168,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17003,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Alexander,Alexander County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,6331,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17003,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Alexander,Alexander County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6331,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17003,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Alexander,Alexander County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17003,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Alexander,Alexander County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17003,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Alexander,Alexander County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17003,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Alexander,Alexander County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17003,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Alexander,Alexander County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17003,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Alexander,Alexander County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17003,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Alexander,Alexander County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,30,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17003,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Alexander,Alexander County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,70,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17003,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Alexander,Alexander County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1899,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17003,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Alexander,Alexander County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,4432,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17003,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Bond,Bond County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17005,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Bond,Bond County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17005,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Bond,Bond County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17005,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Bond,Bond County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17005,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Bond,Bond County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17005,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Bond,Bond County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,16663,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17005,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Bond,Bond County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,13132,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17005,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Bond,Bond County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,13132,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17005,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Bond,Bond County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17005,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Bond,Bond County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17005,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Bond,Bond County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17005,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Bond,Bond County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17005,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Bond,Bond County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17005,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Bond,Bond County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17005,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Bond,Bond County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,55.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17005,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Bond,Bond County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,44.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17005,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Bond,Bond County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,7299,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17005,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Bond,Bond County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,5833,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17005,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17007,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17007,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17007,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17007,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17007,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,53326,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17007,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,29977,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17007,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,29371,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17007,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17007,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,607,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17007,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17007,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17007,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17007,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17007,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,17007,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,98,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17007,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,17007,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,29371,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17007,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17009,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17009,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17009,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17009,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17009,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,6217,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17009,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3434,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17009,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3434,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17009,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17009,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17009,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17009,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17009,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17009,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17009,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,88.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17009,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,11.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17009,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,3036,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17009,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,398,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17009,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Bureau,Bureau County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,27,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17011,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Bureau,Bureau County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,23,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17011,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Bureau,Bureau County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,19,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17011,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Bureau,Bureau County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17011,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Bureau,Bureau County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17011,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Bureau,Bureau County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,33118,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17011,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Bureau,Bureau County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,22378,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17011,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Bureau,Bureau County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,21835,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17011,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Bureau,Bureau County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1032,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17011,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Bureau,Bureau County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,543,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17011,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Bureau,Bureau County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,97.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17011,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Bureau,Bureau County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,4.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17011,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Bureau,Bureau County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17011,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Bureau,Bureau County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17011,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Bureau,Bureau County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17011,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Bureau,Bureau County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,92.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17011,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Bureau,Bureau County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,83,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17011,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Bureau,Bureau County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,20719,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17011,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17013,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17013,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17013,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17013,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17013,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,4411,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17013,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5445,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17013,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5445,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17013,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17013,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17013,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17013,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17013,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17013,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17013,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,17013,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17013,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,17013,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,5445,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17013,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17015,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17015,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17015,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17015,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17015,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,15664,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17015,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7983,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17015,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7588,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17015,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17015,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,396,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17015,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,95,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17015,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17015,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17015,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17015,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,17015,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,95,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17015,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,17015,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,7588,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17015,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17017,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17017,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17017,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17017,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17017,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,12956,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17017,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,8412,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17017,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8412,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17017,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17017,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17017,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17017,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17017,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17017,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17017,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,17017,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17017,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,17017,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,8412,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17017,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Champaign,Champaign County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,36,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17019,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Champaign,Champaign County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,27,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17019,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Champaign,Champaign County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17019,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Champaign,Champaign County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17019,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Champaign,Champaign County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17019,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Champaign,Champaign County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,205469,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17019,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Champaign,Champaign County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,149826,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17019,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Champaign,Champaign County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,149364,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17019,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Champaign,Champaign County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,333,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17019,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Champaign,Champaign County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,462,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17019,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Champaign,Champaign County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17019,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Champaign,Champaign County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17019,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Champaign,Champaign County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17019,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Champaign,Champaign County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17019,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Champaign,Champaign County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,11.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17019,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Champaign,Champaign County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,87.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17019,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Champaign,Champaign County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,17506,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17019,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Champaign,Champaign County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,131525,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17019,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Christian,Christian County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17021,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Christian,Christian County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17021,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Christian,Christian County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17021,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Christian,Christian County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17021,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Christian,Christian County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17021,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Christian,Christian County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,33900,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17021,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Christian,Christian County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,25451,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17021,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Christian,Christian County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,25451,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17021,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Christian,Christian County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17021,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Christian,Christian County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17021,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Christian,Christian County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17021,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Christian,Christian County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17021,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Christian,Christian County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17021,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Christian,Christian County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17021,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Christian,Christian County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,9.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17021,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Christian,Christian County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,90.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17021,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Christian,Christian County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2513,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17021,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Christian,Christian County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,22938,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17021,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17023,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17023,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17023,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17023,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17023,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,15407,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17023,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9803,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17023,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9803,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17023,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17023,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17023,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17023,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17023,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17023,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17023,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,9.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17023,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,90.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17023,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,906,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17023,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,8898,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17023,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17025,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17025,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17025,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17025,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17025,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,13267,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17025,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7489,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17025,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7489,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17025,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17025,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17025,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17025,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17025,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17025,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17025,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,98.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17025,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,1.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17025,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,7357,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17025,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,132,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17025,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,20,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17027,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,20,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17027,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17027,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17027,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17027,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,36896,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17027,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,27375,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17027,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,27375,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17027,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17027,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17027,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17027,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17027,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17027,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17027,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,59.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17027,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,40.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17027,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,16273,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17027,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,11102,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17027,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Coles,Coles County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17029,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Coles,Coles County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17029,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Coles,Coles County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17029,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Coles,Coles County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17029,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Coles,Coles County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17029,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Coles,Coles County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,46737,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17029,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Coles,Coles County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,40777,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17029,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Coles,Coles County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,40736,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17029,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Coles,Coles County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17029,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Coles,Coles County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,42,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17029,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Coles,Coles County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17029,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Coles,Coles County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17029,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Coles,Coles County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17029,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Coles,Coles County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17029,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Coles,Coles County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,13.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17029,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Coles,Coles County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,86.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17029,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Coles,Coles County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,5617,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17029,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Coles,Coles County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,35119,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17029,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Cook,Cook County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,162,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17031,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Cook,Cook County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,146,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17031,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Cook,Cook County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17031,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Cook,Cook County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,125,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17031,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Cook,Cook County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17031,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Cook,Cook County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,5262741,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17031,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Cook,Cook County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4938611,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17031,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Cook,Cook County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4899999,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17031,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Cook,Cook County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,37613,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17031,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Cook,Cook County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,38612,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17031,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Cook,Cook County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17031,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Cook,Cook County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17031,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Cook,Cook County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17031,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Cook,Cook County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17031,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Cook,Cook County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,49.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17031,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Cook,Cook County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,49.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17031,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Cook,Cook County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2432134,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17031,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Cook,Cook County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2430253,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17031,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17033,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17033,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17033,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17033,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17033,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,18639,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17033,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,15956,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17033,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,15956,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17033,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17033,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17033,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17033,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17033,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17033,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17033,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,20.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17033,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,79.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17033,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,3206,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17033,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,12750,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17033,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17035,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17035,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17035,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17035,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17035,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,10428,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17035,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3928,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17035,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3928,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17035,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17035,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17035,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17035,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17035,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17035,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17035,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,5.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17035,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,94.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17035,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,213,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17035,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3715,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17035,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,De Witt,De Witt County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17039,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,De Witt,De Witt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17039,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,De Witt,De Witt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17039,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,De Witt,De Witt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17039,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,De Witt,De Witt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17039,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,De Witt,De Witt County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,15441,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17039,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,De Witt,De Witt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9989,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17039,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,De Witt,De Witt County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9849,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17039,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,De Witt,De Witt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,42,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17039,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,De Witt,De Witt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,140,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17039,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,De Witt,De Witt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17039,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,De Witt,De Witt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17039,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,De Witt,De Witt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17039,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,De Witt,De Witt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17039,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,De Witt,De Witt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,17039,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,De Witt,De Witt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,98.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17039,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,De Witt,De Witt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,17039,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,De Witt,De Witt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,9807,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17039,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,19,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17037,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17037,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17037,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17037,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17037,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,100233,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17037,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,75195,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17037,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,73650,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17037,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17037,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1545,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17037,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,97.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17037,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17037,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17037,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17037,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,17037,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,97.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17037,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,17037,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,73650,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17037,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17041,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17041,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17041,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17041,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17041,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,19742,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17041,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,11987,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17041,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11987,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17041,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17041,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17041,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17041,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17041,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17041,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17041,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,58.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17041,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,41.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17041,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,7014,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17041,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,4974,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17041,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,DuPage,DuPage County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,53,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17043,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,DuPage,DuPage County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,47,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17043,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,DuPage,DuPage County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17043,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,DuPage,DuPage County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,33,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17043,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,DuPage,DuPage County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17043,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,DuPage,DuPage County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,931153,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17043,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,DuPage,DuPage County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1317371,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17043,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,DuPage,DuPage County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1290794,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17043,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,DuPage,DuPage County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,2194,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17043,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,DuPage,DuPage County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,26577,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17043,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,DuPage,DuPage County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17043,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,DuPage,DuPage County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17043,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,DuPage,DuPage County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17043,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,DuPage,DuPage County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17043,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,DuPage,DuPage County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,96.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17043,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,DuPage,DuPage County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,1.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17043,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,DuPage,DuPage County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1265675,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17043,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,DuPage,DuPage County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,22925,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17043,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Edgar,Edgar County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17045,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Edgar,Edgar County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17045,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Edgar,Edgar County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17045,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Edgar,Edgar County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17045,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Edgar,Edgar County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17045,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Edgar,Edgar County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,16755,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17045,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Edgar,Edgar County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,10495,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17045,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Edgar,Edgar County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10495,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17045,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Edgar,Edgar County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17045,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Edgar,Edgar County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17045,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Edgar,Edgar County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17045,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Edgar,Edgar County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17045,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Edgar,Edgar County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17045,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Edgar,Edgar County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17045,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Edgar,Edgar County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,17045,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Edgar,Edgar County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17045,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Edgar,Edgar County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,17045,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Edgar,Edgar County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,10495,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17045,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Edwards,Edwards County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17047,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Edwards,Edwards County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17047,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Edwards,Edwards County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17047,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Edwards,Edwards County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17047,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Edwards,Edwards County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17047,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Edwards,Edwards County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,6205,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17047,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Edwards,Edwards County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4913,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17047,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Edwards,Edwards County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4145,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17047,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Edwards,Edwards County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17047,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Edwards,Edwards County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,767,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17047,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Edwards,Edwards County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,84.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17047,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Edwards,Edwards County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17047,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Edwards,Edwards County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,15.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17047,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Edwards,Edwards County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17047,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Edwards,Edwards County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,29.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17047,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Edwards,Edwards County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,54.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17047,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Edwards,Edwards County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1471,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17047,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Edwards,Edwards County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2675,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17047,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Effingham,Effingham County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17049,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Effingham,Effingham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17049,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Effingham,Effingham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17049,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Effingham,Effingham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17049,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Effingham,Effingham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17049,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Effingham,Effingham County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,34614,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17049,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Effingham,Effingham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,18893,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17049,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Effingham,Effingham County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,18893,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17049,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Effingham,Effingham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17049,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Effingham,Effingham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17049,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Effingham,Effingham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17049,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Effingham,Effingham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17049,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Effingham,Effingham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17049,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Effingham,Effingham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17049,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Effingham,Effingham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,21.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17049,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Effingham,Effingham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,78.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17049,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Effingham,Effingham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,4075,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17049,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Effingham,Effingham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,14819,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17049,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17051,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17051,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17051,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17051,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17051,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,21460,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17051,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,13818,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17051,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,13818,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17051,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17051,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17051,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17051,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17051,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17051,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17051,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,27.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17051,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,72.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17051,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,3831,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17051,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,9987,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17051,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Ford,Ford County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17053,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Ford,Ford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17053,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Ford,Ford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17053,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Ford,Ford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17053,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Ford,Ford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17053,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Ford,Ford County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,13533,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17053,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Ford,Ford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9183,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17053,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Ford,Ford County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9183,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17053,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Ford,Ford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,550,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17053,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Ford,Ford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17053,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Ford,Ford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17053,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Ford,Ford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17053,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Ford,Ford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17053,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Ford,Ford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17053,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Ford,Ford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,17053,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Ford,Ford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,94,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17053,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Ford,Ford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,17053,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Ford,Ford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,8633,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17053,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,21,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17055,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,21,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17055,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17055,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,20,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17055,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17055,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,37636,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17055,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,35909,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17055,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,35909,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17055,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17055,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17055,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17055,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17055,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17055,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17055,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,92.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17055,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,7.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17055,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,33115,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17055,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2794,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17055,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Fulton,Fulton County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17057,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Fulton,Fulton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17057,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Fulton,Fulton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17057,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Fulton,Fulton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17057,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Fulton,Fulton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17057,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Fulton,Fulton County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,33440,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17057,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Fulton,Fulton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,24740,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17057,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Fulton,Fulton County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,24740,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17057,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Fulton,Fulton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,2262,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17057,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Fulton,Fulton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17057,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Fulton,Fulton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17057,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Fulton,Fulton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,9.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17057,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Fulton,Fulton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17057,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Fulton,Fulton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17057,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Fulton,Fulton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,21.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17057,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Fulton,Fulton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,69.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17057,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Fulton,Fulton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,5228,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17057,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Fulton,Fulton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,17250,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17057,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Gallatin,Gallatin County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17059,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Gallatin,Gallatin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17059,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Gallatin,Gallatin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17059,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Gallatin,Gallatin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17059,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Gallatin,Gallatin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17059,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Gallatin,Gallatin County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,4947,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17059,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Gallatin,Gallatin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4200,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17059,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Gallatin,Gallatin County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4200,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17059,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Gallatin,Gallatin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17059,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Gallatin,Gallatin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17059,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Gallatin,Gallatin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17059,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Gallatin,Gallatin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17059,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Gallatin,Gallatin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17059,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Gallatin,Gallatin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17059,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Gallatin,Gallatin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,44.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17059,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Gallatin,Gallatin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,55.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17059,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Gallatin,Gallatin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1883,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17059,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Gallatin,Gallatin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2316,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17059,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17061,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17061,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17061,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17061,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17061,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,11915,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17061,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,10893,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17061,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10893,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17061,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17061,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17061,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17061,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17061,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17061,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17061,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,24.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17061,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,75.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17061,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2654,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17061,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,8239,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17061,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Grundy,Grundy County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,19,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17063,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Grundy,Grundy County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17063,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Grundy,Grundy County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17063,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Grundy,Grundy County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17063,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Grundy,Grundy County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17063,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Grundy,Grundy County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,52514,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17063,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Grundy,Grundy County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,33321,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17063,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Grundy,Grundy County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,23140,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17063,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Grundy,Grundy County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,3338,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17063,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Grundy,Grundy County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10182,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17063,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Grundy,Grundy County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,69.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17063,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Grundy,Grundy County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,10,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17063,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Grundy,Grundy County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,30.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17063,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Grundy,Grundy County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17063,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Grundy,Grundy County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,17063,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Grundy,Grundy County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,59.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17063,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Grundy,Grundy County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,17063,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Grundy,Grundy County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,19802,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17063,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17065,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17065,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17065,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17065,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17065,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,7977,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17065,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,6926,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17065,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6926,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17065,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17065,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17065,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17065,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17065,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17065,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17065,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17065,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,17065,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,6926,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17065,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,17065,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17067,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17067,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17067,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17067,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17067,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,17552,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17067,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,10274,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17067,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10274,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17067,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17067,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17067,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17067,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17067,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17067,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17067,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,19.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17067,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,80.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17067,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1974,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17067,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,8300,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17067,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Hardin,Hardin County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17069,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Hardin,Hardin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17069,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Hardin,Hardin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17069,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Hardin,Hardin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17069,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Hardin,Hardin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17069,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Hardin,Hardin County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,3634,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17069,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Hardin,Hardin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3429,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17069,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Hardin,Hardin County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3429,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17069,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Hardin,Hardin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1156,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17069,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Hardin,Hardin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17069,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Hardin,Hardin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17069,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Hardin,Hardin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,33.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17069,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Hardin,Hardin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17069,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Hardin,Hardin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17069,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Hardin,Hardin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,59,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17069,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Hardin,Hardin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,7.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17069,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Hardin,Hardin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2024,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17069,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Hardin,Hardin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,249,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17069,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Henderson,Henderson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17071,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Henderson,Henderson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17071,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Henderson,Henderson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17071,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Henderson,Henderson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17071,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Henderson,Henderson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17071,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Henderson,Henderson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,6339,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17071,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Henderson,Henderson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,8016,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17071,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Henderson,Henderson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7280,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17071,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Henderson,Henderson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,292,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17071,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Henderson,Henderson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,736,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17071,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Henderson,Henderson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,90.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17071,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Henderson,Henderson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,3.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17071,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Henderson,Henderson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,9.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17071,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Henderson,Henderson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17071,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Henderson,Henderson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,3.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17071,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Henderson,Henderson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,83.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17071,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Henderson,Henderson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,260,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17071,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Henderson,Henderson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,6729,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17071,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,39,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17073,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,38,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17073,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,27,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17073,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17073,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17073,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,49138,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17073,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,32369,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17073,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,32148,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17073,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,16826,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17073,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,221,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17073,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17073,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,52,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17073,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17073,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17073,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,17073,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,47.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17073,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,17073,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,15322,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17073,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,IL,Illinois,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1815,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,IL,IL,Illinois,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1639,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,IL,IL,Illinois,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,859,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,IL,IL,Illinois,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,622,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,IL,IL,Illinois,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,151,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,IL,IL,Illinois,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,12785245,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2020,IL,IL,Illinois,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,11640823,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,IL,IL,Illinois,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11457094,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,IL,IL,Illinois,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,382465,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,IL,IL,Illinois,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,183729,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,IL,IL,Illinois,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,IL,IL,Illinois,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,3.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,IL,IL,Illinois,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,IL,IL,Illinois,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,176,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,IL,IL,Illinois,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,41.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,IL,IL,Illinois,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,53.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,IL,IL,Illinois,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,4843036,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,IL,IL,Illinois,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,6231593,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,IL,Iroquois,Iroquois County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,27,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17075,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Iroquois,Iroquois County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,24,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17075,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Iroquois,Iroquois County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,22,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17075,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Iroquois,Iroquois County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17075,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Iroquois,Iroquois County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17075,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Iroquois,Iroquois County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,26984,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17075,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Iroquois,Iroquois County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,17868,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17075,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Iroquois,Iroquois County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,17693,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17075,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Iroquois,Iroquois County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,94,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17075,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Iroquois,Iroquois County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,176,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17075,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Iroquois,Iroquois County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17075,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Iroquois,Iroquois County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17075,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Iroquois,Iroquois County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17075,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Iroquois,Iroquois County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17075,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Iroquois,Iroquois County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17075,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Iroquois,Iroquois County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,98,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17075,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Iroquois,Iroquois County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,83,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17075,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Iroquois,Iroquois County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,17515,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17075,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17077,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17077,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17077,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17077,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17077,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,52896,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17077,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,50620,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17077,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,50620,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17077,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17077,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17077,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17077,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17077,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17077,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17077,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,55.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17077,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,44.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17077,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,28196,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17077,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,22424,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17077,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17079,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17079,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17079,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17079,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17079,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,9247,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17079,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,12427,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17079,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,12427,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17079,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17079,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17079,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17079,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17079,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17079,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17079,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,17079,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17079,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,17079,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,12427,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17079,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17081,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17081,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17081,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17081,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17081,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,37029,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17081,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,28417,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17081,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,28417,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17081,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17081,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17081,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17081,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17081,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17081,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17081,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17081,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,17081,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,28417,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17081,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,17081,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Jersey,Jersey County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17083,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Jersey,Jersey County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17083,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Jersey,Jersey County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17083,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Jersey,Jersey County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17083,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Jersey,Jersey County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17083,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Jersey,Jersey County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,21444,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17083,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Jersey,Jersey County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,23062,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17083,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Jersey,Jersey County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,23062,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17083,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Jersey,Jersey County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17083,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Jersey,Jersey County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17083,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Jersey,Jersey County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17083,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Jersey,Jersey County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17083,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Jersey,Jersey County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17083,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Jersey,Jersey County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17083,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Jersey,Jersey County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,55.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17083,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Jersey,Jersey County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,44.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17083,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Jersey,Jersey County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,12824,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17083,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Jersey,Jersey County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,10238,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17083,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Jo Daviess,Jo Daviess County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17085,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Jo Daviess,Jo Daviess County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17085,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Jo Daviess,Jo Daviess County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17085,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Jo Daviess,Jo Daviess County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17085,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Jo Daviess,Jo Daviess County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17085,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Jo Daviess,Jo Daviess County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,22035,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17085,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Jo Daviess,Jo Daviess County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,10677,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17085,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Jo Daviess,Jo Daviess County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10656,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17085,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Jo Daviess,Jo Daviess County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17085,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Jo Daviess,Jo Daviess County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,21,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17085,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Jo Daviess,Jo Daviess County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17085,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Jo Daviess,Jo Daviess County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17085,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Jo Daviess,Jo Daviess County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17085,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Jo Daviess,Jo Daviess County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17085,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Jo Daviess,Jo Daviess County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,17085,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Jo Daviess,Jo Daviess County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,99.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17085,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Jo Daviess,Jo Daviess County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,17085,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Jo Daviess,Jo Daviess County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,10656,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17085,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17087,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17087,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17087,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17087,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17087,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,13307,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17087,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7601,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17087,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7601,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17087,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17087,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17087,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17087,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17087,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17087,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17087,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,42.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17087,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,57.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17087,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,3221,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17087,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,4380,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17087,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Kane,Kane County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,41,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17089,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Kane,Kane County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,38,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17089,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Kane,Kane County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,22,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17089,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Kane,Kane County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17089,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Kane,Kane County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17089,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Kane,Kane County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,516155,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17089,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Kane,Kane County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,462910,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17089,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Kane,Kane County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,462701,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17089,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Kane,Kane County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,99511,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17089,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Kane,Kane County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,208,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17089,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Kane,Kane County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17089,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Kane,Kane County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,21.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17089,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Kane,Kane County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17089,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Kane,Kane County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17089,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Kane,Kane County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,1.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17089,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Kane,Kane County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,77,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17089,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Kane,Kane County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,6770,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17089,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Kane,Kane County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,356420,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17089,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Kankakee,Kankakee County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,24,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17091,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Kankakee,Kankakee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17091,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Kankakee,Kankakee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17091,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Kankakee,Kankakee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17091,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Kankakee,Kankakee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17091,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Kankakee,Kankakee County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,107236,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17091,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Kankakee,Kankakee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,79387,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17091,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Kankakee,Kankakee County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,77343,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17091,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Kankakee,Kankakee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,307,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17091,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Kankakee,Kankakee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2044,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17091,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Kankakee,Kankakee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,97.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17091,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Kankakee,Kankakee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17091,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Kankakee,Kankakee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17091,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Kankakee,Kankakee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17091,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Kankakee,Kankakee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,4.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17091,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Kankakee,Kankakee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,92.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17091,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Kankakee,Kankakee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,3384,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17091,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Kankakee,Kankakee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,73651,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17091,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Kendall,Kendall County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17093,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Kendall,Kendall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17093,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Kendall,Kendall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17093,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Kendall,Kendall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17093,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Kendall,Kendall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17093,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Kendall,Kendall County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,132291,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17093,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Kendall,Kendall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,55171,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17093,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Kendall,Kendall County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,55171,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17093,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Kendall,Kendall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,28925,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17093,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Kendall,Kendall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17093,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Kendall,Kendall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17093,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Kendall,Kendall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,52.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17093,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Kendall,Kendall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17093,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Kendall,Kendall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17093,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Kendall,Kendall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,17093,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Kendall,Kendall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,47.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17093,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Kendall,Kendall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,17093,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Kendall,Kendall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,26246,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17093,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17095,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17095,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17095,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17095,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17095,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,49736,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17095,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,39072,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17095,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,39072,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17095,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,5635,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17095,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17095,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17095,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,14.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17095,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17095,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17095,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,16.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17095,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,68.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17095,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,6610,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17095,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,26827,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17095,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,La Salle,La Salle County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,38,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17099,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,La Salle,La Salle County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,30,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17099,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,La Salle,La Salle County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17099,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,La Salle,La Salle County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17099,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,La Salle,La Salle County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17099,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,La Salle,La Salle County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,109359,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17099,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,La Salle,La Salle County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,75013,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17099,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,La Salle,La Salle County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,69323,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17099,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,La Salle,La Salle County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,6045,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17099,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,La Salle,La Salle County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5690,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17099,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,La Salle,La Salle County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,92.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17099,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,La Salle,La Salle County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,8.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17099,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,La Salle,La Salle County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,7.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17099,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,La Salle,La Salle County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17099,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,La Salle,La Salle County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17099,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,La Salle,La Salle County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,83.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17099,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,La Salle,La Salle County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,677,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17099,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,La Salle,La Salle County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,62601,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17099,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,102,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17097,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,92,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17097,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,40,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17097,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,29,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17097,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,23,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17097,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,713217,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17097,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,787484,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17097,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,774591,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17097,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,26342,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17097,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,12893,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17097,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17097,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,3.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17097,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17097,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17097,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,34.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17097,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,60.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17097,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,269301,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17097,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,478948,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17097,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17101,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17101,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17101,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17101,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17101,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,15234,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17101,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9515,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17101,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9515,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17101,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17101,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17101,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17101,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17101,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17101,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17101,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,44.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17101,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,55.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17101,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,4269,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17101,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,5246,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17101,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17103,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17103,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17103,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17103,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17103,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,34021,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17103,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,25375,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17103,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,24750,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17103,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17103,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,625,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17103,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,97.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17103,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17103,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17103,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17103,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,17103,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,97.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17103,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,17103,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,24750,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17103,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Livingston,Livingston County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17105,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Livingston,Livingston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17105,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Livingston,Livingston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17105,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Livingston,Livingston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17105,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Livingston,Livingston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17105,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Livingston,Livingston County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,35752,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17105,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Livingston,Livingston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,22602,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17105,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Livingston,Livingston County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,22388,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17105,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Livingston,Livingston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1317,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17105,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Livingston,Livingston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,214,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17105,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Livingston,Livingston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17105,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Livingston,Livingston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,5.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17105,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Livingston,Livingston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17105,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Livingston,Livingston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17105,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Livingston,Livingston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,5.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17105,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Livingston,Livingston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,87.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17105,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Livingston,Livingston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1194,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17105,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Livingston,Livingston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,19877,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17105,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17107,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17107,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17107,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17107,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17107,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,27879,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17107,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,19125,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17107,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,19058,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17107,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,50,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17107,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,67,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17107,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17107,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17107,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17107,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17107,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,5.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17107,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,93.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17107,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17107,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,17908,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17107,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17115,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17115,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17115,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17115,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17115,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,103647,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17115,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,89222,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17115,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,89222,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17115,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17115,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17115,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17115,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17115,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17115,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17115,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,4.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17115,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,95.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17115,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,3958,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17115,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,85264,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17115,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Macoupin,Macoupin County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,32,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17117,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Macoupin,Macoupin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,32,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17117,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Macoupin,Macoupin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17117,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Macoupin,Macoupin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,26,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17117,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Macoupin,Macoupin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17117,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Macoupin,Macoupin County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,44810,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17117,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Macoupin,Macoupin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,40144,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17117,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Macoupin,Macoupin County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,40144,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17117,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Macoupin,Macoupin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17117,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Macoupin,Macoupin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17117,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Macoupin,Macoupin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17117,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Macoupin,Macoupin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17117,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Macoupin,Macoupin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17117,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Macoupin,Macoupin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17117,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Macoupin,Macoupin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,58.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17117,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Macoupin,Macoupin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,41.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17117,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Macoupin,Macoupin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,23491,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17117,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Macoupin,Macoupin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,16653,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17117,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,35,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17119,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,34,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17119,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17119,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,20,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17119,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17119,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,265498,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17119,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,238893,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17119,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,237558,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17119,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,667,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17119,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1335,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17119,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17119,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17119,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17119,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17119,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,19.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17119,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,79.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17119,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,47470,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17119,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,189421,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17119,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17121,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17121,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17121,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17121,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17121,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,37613,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17121,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,63450,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17121,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,63450,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17121,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17121,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17121,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17121,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17121,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17121,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17121,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,31.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17121,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,68.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17121,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,19711,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17121,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,43740,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17121,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17123,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17123,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17123,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17123,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17123,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,11691,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17123,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7704,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17123,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7648,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17123,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,412,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17123,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,57,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17123,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17123,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,5.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17123,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17123,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17123,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,17123,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,93.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17123,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,17123,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,7235,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17123,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Mason,Mason County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17125,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Mason,Mason County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17125,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Mason,Mason County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17125,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Mason,Mason County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17125,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Mason,Mason County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17125,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Mason,Mason County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,13026,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17125,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Mason,Mason County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7392,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17125,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Mason,Mason County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7392,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17125,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Mason,Mason County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17125,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Mason,Mason County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17125,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Mason,Mason County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17125,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Mason,Mason County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17125,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Mason,Mason County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17125,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Mason,Mason County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17125,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Mason,Mason County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,17125,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Mason,Mason County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17125,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Mason,Mason County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,17125,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Mason,Mason County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,7392,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17125,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Massac,Massac County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17127,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Massac,Massac County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17127,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Massac,Massac County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17127,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Massac,Massac County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17127,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Massac,Massac County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17127,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Massac,Massac County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,14125,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17127,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Massac,Massac County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,11644,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17127,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Massac,Massac County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11644,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17127,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Massac,Massac County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17127,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Massac,Massac County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17127,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Massac,Massac County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17127,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Massac,Massac County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17127,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Massac,Massac County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17127,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Massac,Massac County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17127,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Massac,Massac County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,40.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17127,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Massac,Massac County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,59.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17127,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Massac,Massac County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,4754,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17127,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Massac,Massac County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,6890,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17127,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,McDonough,McDonough County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17109,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,McDonough,McDonough County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17109,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,McDonough,McDonough County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17109,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,McDonough,McDonough County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17109,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,McDonough,McDonough County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17109,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,McDonough,McDonough County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,27079,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17109,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,McDonough,McDonough County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,22471,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17109,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,McDonough,McDonough County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,21652,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17109,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,McDonough,McDonough County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,4067,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17109,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,McDonough,McDonough County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,819,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17109,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,McDonough,McDonough County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,96.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17109,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,McDonough,McDonough County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,18.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17109,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,McDonough,McDonough County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,3.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17109,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,McDonough,McDonough County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17109,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,McDonough,McDonough County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,31.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17109,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,McDonough,McDonough County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,46.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17109,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,McDonough,McDonough County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,7116,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17109,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,McDonough,McDonough County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,10469,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17109,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,McHenry,McHenry County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,39,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17111,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,McHenry,McHenry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,37,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17111,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,McHenry,McHenry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,35,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17111,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,McHenry,McHenry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17111,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,McHenry,McHenry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17111,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,McHenry,McHenry County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,309770,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17111,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,McHenry,McHenry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,208764,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17111,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,McHenry,McHenry County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,208318,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17111,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,McHenry,McHenry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,109,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17111,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,McHenry,McHenry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,446,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17111,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,McHenry,McHenry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17111,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,McHenry,McHenry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17111,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,McHenry,McHenry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17111,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,McHenry,McHenry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17111,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,McHenry,McHenry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17111,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,McHenry,McHenry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,99.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17111,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,McHenry,McHenry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,75,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17111,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,McHenry,McHenry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,208134,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17111,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,McLean,McLean County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,34,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17113,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,McLean,McLean County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,30,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17113,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,McLean,McLean County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,20,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17113,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,McLean,McLean County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17113,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,McLean,McLean County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17113,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,McLean,McLean County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,170870,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17113,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,McLean,McLean County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,126669,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17113,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,McLean,McLean County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,125681,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17113,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,McLean,McLean County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,619,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17113,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,McLean,McLean County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,988,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17113,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,McLean,McLean County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17113,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,McLean,McLean County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17113,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,McLean,McLean County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17113,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,McLean,McLean County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17113,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,McLean,McLean County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17113,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,McLean,McLean County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,89.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17113,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,McLean,McLean County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,11378,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17113,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,McLean,McLean County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,113684,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17113,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Menard,Menard County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17129,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Menard,Menard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17129,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Menard,Menard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17129,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Menard,Menard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17129,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Menard,Menard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17129,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Menard,Menard County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,12265,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17129,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Menard,Menard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9546,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17129,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Menard,Menard County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9546,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17129,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Menard,Menard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17129,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Menard,Menard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17129,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Menard,Menard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17129,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Menard,Menard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17129,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Menard,Menard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17129,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Menard,Menard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17129,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Menard,Menard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,9.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17129,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Menard,Menard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,90.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17129,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Menard,Menard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,927,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17129,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Menard,Menard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,8619,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17129,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Mercer,Mercer County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17131,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Mercer,Mercer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17131,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Mercer,Mercer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17131,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Mercer,Mercer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17131,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Mercer,Mercer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17131,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Mercer,Mercer County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,15633,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17131,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Mercer,Mercer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9056,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17131,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Mercer,Mercer County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9056,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17131,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Mercer,Mercer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,2691,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17131,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Mercer,Mercer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17131,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Mercer,Mercer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17131,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Mercer,Mercer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,29.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17131,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Mercer,Mercer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17131,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Mercer,Mercer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17131,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Mercer,Mercer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,17131,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Mercer,Mercer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,70.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17131,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Mercer,Mercer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,17131,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Mercer,Mercer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,6365,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17131,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17133,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17133,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17133,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17133,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17133,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,34898,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17133,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,23280,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17133,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,23280,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17133,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,61,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17133,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17133,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17133,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17133,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17133,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17133,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,78.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17133,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,21.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17133,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,18255,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17133,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,4964,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17133,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17135,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17135,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17135,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17135,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17135,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,28157,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17135,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,21542,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17135,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,21542,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17135,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17135,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17135,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17135,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17135,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17135,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17135,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,27.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17135,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,72.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17135,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,5994,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17135,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,15548,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17135,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17137,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17137,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17137,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17137,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17137,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,32798,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17137,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,26249,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17137,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,26249,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17137,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17137,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17137,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17137,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17137,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17137,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17137,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,19.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17137,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,80.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17137,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,5163,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17137,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,21086,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17137,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Moultrie,Moultrie County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17139,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Moultrie,Moultrie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17139,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Moultrie,Moultrie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17139,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Moultrie,Moultrie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17139,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Moultrie,Moultrie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17139,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Moultrie,Moultrie County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,14486,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17139,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Moultrie,Moultrie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,10871,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17139,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Moultrie,Moultrie County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10871,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17139,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Moultrie,Moultrie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17139,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Moultrie,Moultrie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17139,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Moultrie,Moultrie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17139,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Moultrie,Moultrie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17139,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Moultrie,Moultrie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17139,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Moultrie,Moultrie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17139,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Moultrie,Moultrie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,20.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17139,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Moultrie,Moultrie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,79.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17139,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Moultrie,Moultrie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2212,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17139,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Moultrie,Moultrie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,8658,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17139,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Ogle,Ogle County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,24,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17141,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Ogle,Ogle County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17141,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Ogle,Ogle County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17141,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Ogle,Ogle County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17141,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Ogle,Ogle County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17141,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Ogle,Ogle County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,51678,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17141,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Ogle,Ogle County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,27026,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17141,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Ogle,Ogle County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,25694,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17141,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Ogle,Ogle County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17141,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Ogle,Ogle County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1332,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17141,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Ogle,Ogle County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,95.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17141,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Ogle,Ogle County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17141,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Ogle,Ogle County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,4.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17141,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Ogle,Ogle County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17141,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Ogle,Ogle County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17141,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Ogle,Ogle County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,95,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17141,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Ogle,Ogle County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,21,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17141,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Ogle,Ogle County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,25674,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17141,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Peoria,Peoria County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,27,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17143,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Peoria,Peoria County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,25,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17143,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Peoria,Peoria County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17143,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Peoria,Peoria County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17143,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Peoria,Peoria County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17143,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Peoria,Peoria County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,181225,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17143,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Peoria,Peoria County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,134778,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17143,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Peoria,Peoria County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,132315,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17143,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Peoria,Peoria County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,3274,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17143,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Peoria,Peoria County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2463,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17143,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Peoria,Peoria County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17143,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Peoria,Peoria County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,2.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17143,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Peoria,Peoria County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17143,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Peoria,Peoria County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17143,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Peoria,Peoria County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,6.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17143,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Peoria,Peoria County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,89.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17143,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Peoria,Peoria County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,8302,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17143,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Peoria,Peoria County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,120739,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17143,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17145,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17145,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17145,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17145,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17145,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,20880,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17145,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,20352,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17145,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,20352,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17145,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17145,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17145,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17145,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17145,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17145,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17145,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,71.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17145,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,28.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17145,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,14602,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17145,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,5750,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17145,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Piatt,Piatt County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17147,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Piatt,Piatt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17147,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Piatt,Piatt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17147,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Piatt,Piatt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17147,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Piatt,Piatt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17147,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Piatt,Piatt County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,16654,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17147,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Piatt,Piatt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9234,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17147,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Piatt,Piatt County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9234,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17147,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Piatt,Piatt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17147,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Piatt,Piatt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17147,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Piatt,Piatt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17147,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Piatt,Piatt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17147,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Piatt,Piatt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17147,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Piatt,Piatt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17147,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Piatt,Piatt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,17147,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Piatt,Piatt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17147,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Piatt,Piatt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,17147,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Piatt,Piatt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,9234,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17147,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17149,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17149,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17149,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17149,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17149,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,14633,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17149,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,13321,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17149,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,13321,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17149,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,171,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17149,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17149,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17149,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17149,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17149,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17149,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,17149,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,98.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17149,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,17149,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,13150,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17149,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Pope,Pope County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17151,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Pope,Pope County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17151,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Pope,Pope County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17151,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Pope,Pope County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17151,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Pope,Pope County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17151,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Pope,Pope County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,3744,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17151,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Pope,Pope County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5097,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17151,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Pope,Pope County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5097,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17151,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Pope,Pope County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17151,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Pope,Pope County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17151,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Pope,Pope County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17151,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Pope,Pope County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17151,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Pope,Pope County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17151,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Pope,Pope County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17151,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Pope,Pope County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,11,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17151,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Pope,Pope County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,89,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17151,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Pope,Pope County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,560,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17151,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Pope,Pope County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,4537,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17151,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17153,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17153,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17153,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17153,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17153,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,5161,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17153,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2857,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17153,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2857,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17153,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,490,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17153,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17153,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17153,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,17.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17153,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17153,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17153,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,69.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17153,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,13.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17153,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1973,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17153,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,394,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17153,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17155,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17155,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17155,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17155,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17155,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,5635,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17155,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3286,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17155,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3286,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17155,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1358,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17155,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17155,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17155,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,41.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17155,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17155,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17155,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,19.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17155,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,39.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17155,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,629,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17155,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1299,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17155,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17157,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17157,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17157,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17157,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17157,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,30055,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17157,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,25113,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17157,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,25113,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17157,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17157,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17157,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17157,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17157,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17157,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17157,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,21.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17157,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,78.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17157,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,5471,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17157,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,19642,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17157,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Richland,Richland County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17159,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Richland,Richland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17159,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Richland,Richland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17159,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Richland,Richland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17159,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Richland,Richland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17159,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Richland,Richland County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,15803,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17159,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Richland,Richland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9599,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17159,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Richland,Richland County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9453,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17159,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Richland,Richland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,149,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17159,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Richland,Richland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,147,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17159,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Richland,Richland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17159,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Richland,Richland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17159,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Richland,Richland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17159,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Richland,Richland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17159,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Richland,Richland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,16.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17159,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Richland,Richland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,80.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17159,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Richland,Richland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1542,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17159,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Richland,Richland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,7762,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17159,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Rock Island,Rock Island County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,52,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17161,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Rock Island,Rock Island County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,38,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17161,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Rock Island,Rock Island County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,33,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17161,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Rock Island,Rock Island County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17161,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Rock Island,Rock Island County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17161,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Rock Island,Rock Island County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,144267,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17161,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Rock Island,Rock Island County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,120700,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17161,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Rock Island,Rock Island County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,106687,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17161,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Rock Island,Rock Island County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17161,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Rock Island,Rock Island County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,14013,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17161,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Rock Island,Rock Island County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,88.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17161,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Rock Island,Rock Island County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17161,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Rock Island,Rock Island County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,11.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17161,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Rock Island,Rock Island County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17161,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Rock Island,Rock Island County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,2.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17161,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Rock Island,Rock Island County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,86.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17161,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Rock Island,Rock Island County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2488,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17161,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Rock Island,Rock Island County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,104199,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17161,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Saline,Saline County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17165,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Saline,Saline County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17165,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Saline,Saline County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17165,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Saline,Saline County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17165,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Saline,Saline County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17165,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Saline,Saline County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,23634,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17165,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Saline,Saline County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,22268,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17165,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Saline,Saline County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,22268,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17165,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Saline,Saline County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17165,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Saline,Saline County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17165,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Saline,Saline County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17165,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Saline,Saline County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17165,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Saline,Saline County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17165,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Saline,Saline County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17165,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Saline,Saline County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,85.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17165,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Saline,Saline County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,14.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17165,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Saline,Saline County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,19001,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17165,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Saline,Saline County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3267,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17165,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Sangamon,Sangamon County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,24,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17167,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Sangamon,Sangamon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,24,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17167,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Sangamon,Sangamon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17167,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Sangamon,Sangamon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17167,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Sangamon,Sangamon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17167,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Sangamon,Sangamon County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,196012,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17167,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Sangamon,Sangamon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,147352,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17167,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Sangamon,Sangamon County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,147352,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17167,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Sangamon,Sangamon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17167,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Sangamon,Sangamon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17167,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Sangamon,Sangamon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17167,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Sangamon,Sangamon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17167,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Sangamon,Sangamon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17167,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Sangamon,Sangamon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17167,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Sangamon,Sangamon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,24.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17167,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Sangamon,Sangamon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,75.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17167,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Sangamon,Sangamon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,36173,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17167,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Sangamon,Sangamon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,111180,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17167,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Schuyler,Schuyler County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17169,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Schuyler,Schuyler County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17169,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Schuyler,Schuyler County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17169,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Schuyler,Schuyler County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17169,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Schuyler,Schuyler County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17169,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Schuyler,Schuyler County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,6875,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17169,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Schuyler,Schuyler County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,6443,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17169,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Schuyler,Schuyler County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6443,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17169,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Schuyler,Schuyler County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17169,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Schuyler,Schuyler County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17169,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Schuyler,Schuyler County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17169,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Schuyler,Schuyler County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17169,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Schuyler,Schuyler County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17169,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Schuyler,Schuyler County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17169,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Schuyler,Schuyler County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,55.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17169,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Schuyler,Schuyler County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,44.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17169,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Schuyler,Schuyler County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,3554,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17169,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Schuyler,Schuyler County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2889,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17169,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17171,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17171,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17171,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17171,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17171,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,4927,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17171,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5286,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17171,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5286,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17171,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17171,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17171,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17171,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17171,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17171,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17171,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,62.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17171,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,37.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17171,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,3281,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17171,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2006,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17171,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17173,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17173,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17173,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17173,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17173,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,20900,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17173,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,10802,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17173,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10802,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17173,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17173,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17173,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17173,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17173,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17173,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17173,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,17173,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17173,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,17173,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,10802,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17173,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,St. Clair,St. Clair County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,25,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17163,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,St. Clair,St. Clair County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,25,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17163,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,St. Clair,St. Clair County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17163,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,St. Clair,St. Clair County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17163,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,St. Clair,St. Clair County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17163,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,St. Clair,St. Clair County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,256789,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17163,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,St. Clair,St. Clair County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,351282,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17163,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,St. Clair,St. Clair County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,351282,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17163,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,St. Clair,St. Clair County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17163,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,St. Clair,St. Clair County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17163,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,St. Clair,St. Clair County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17163,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,St. Clair,St. Clair County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17163,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,St. Clair,St. Clair County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17163,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,St. Clair,St. Clair County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17163,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,St. Clair,St. Clair County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,58,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17163,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,St. Clair,St. Clair County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,42,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17163,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,St. Clair,St. Clair County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,203800,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17163,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,St. Clair,St. Clair County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,147482,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17163,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Stark,Stark County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17175,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Stark,Stark County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17175,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Stark,Stark County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17175,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Stark,Stark County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17175,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Stark,Stark County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17175,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Stark,Stark County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,5391,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17175,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Stark,Stark County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3564,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17175,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Stark,Stark County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3564,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17175,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Stark,Stark County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,2064,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17175,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Stark,Stark County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17175,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Stark,Stark County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17175,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Stark,Stark County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,57.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17175,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Stark,Stark County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17175,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Stark,Stark County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17175,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Stark,Stark County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,9.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17175,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Stark,Stark County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,32.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17175,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Stark,Stark County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,333,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17175,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Stark,Stark County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1167,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17175,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Stephenson,Stephenson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17177,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Stephenson,Stephenson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17177,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Stephenson,Stephenson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17177,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Stephenson,Stephenson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17177,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Stephenson,Stephenson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17177,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Stephenson,Stephenson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,44457,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17177,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Stephenson,Stephenson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,28717,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17177,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Stephenson,Stephenson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,28171,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17177,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Stephenson,Stephenson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17177,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Stephenson,Stephenson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,546,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17177,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Stephenson,Stephenson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17177,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Stephenson,Stephenson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17177,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Stephenson,Stephenson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17177,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Stephenson,Stephenson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17177,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Stephenson,Stephenson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,17177,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Stephenson,Stephenson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,98.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17177,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Stephenson,Stephenson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,17177,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Stephenson,Stephenson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,28171,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17177,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Tazewell,Tazewell County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,34,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17179,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Tazewell,Tazewell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,30,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17179,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Tazewell,Tazewell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,27,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17179,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Tazewell,Tazewell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17179,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Tazewell,Tazewell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17179,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Tazewell,Tazewell County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,131018,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17179,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Tazewell,Tazewell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,104071,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17179,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Tazewell,Tazewell County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,103527,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17179,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Tazewell,Tazewell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17179,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Tazewell,Tazewell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,544,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17179,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Tazewell,Tazewell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17179,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Tazewell,Tazewell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17179,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Tazewell,Tazewell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17179,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Tazewell,Tazewell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17179,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Tazewell,Tazewell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,1.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17179,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Tazewell,Tazewell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,98.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17179,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Tazewell,Tazewell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1212,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17179,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Tazewell,Tazewell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,102315,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17179,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17181,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17181,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17181,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17181,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17181,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,17179,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17181,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,10737,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17181,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10737,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17181,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17181,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17181,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17181,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17181,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17181,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17181,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,81.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17181,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,18.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17181,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,8718,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17181,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2019,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17181,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Vermilion,Vermilion County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,22,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17183,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Vermilion,Vermilion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,20,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17183,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Vermilion,Vermilion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17183,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Vermilion,Vermilion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17183,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Vermilion,Vermilion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17183,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Vermilion,Vermilion County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,73883,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17183,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Vermilion,Vermilion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,53067,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17183,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Vermilion,Vermilion County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,52442,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17183,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Vermilion,Vermilion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17183,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Vermilion,Vermilion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,625,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17183,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Vermilion,Vermilion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17183,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Vermilion,Vermilion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17183,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Vermilion,Vermilion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17183,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Vermilion,Vermilion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17183,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Vermilion,Vermilion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,10.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17183,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Vermilion,Vermilion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,88,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17183,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Vermilion,Vermilion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,5750,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17183,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Vermilion,Vermilion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,46693,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17183,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Wabash,Wabash County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17185,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Wabash,Wabash County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17185,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Wabash,Wabash County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17185,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Wabash,Wabash County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17185,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Wabash,Wabash County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17185,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Wabash,Wabash County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,11316,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17185,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Wabash,Wabash County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9400,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17185,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Wabash,Wabash County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9339,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17185,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Wabash,Wabash County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,272,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17185,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Wabash,Wabash County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,61,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17185,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Wabash,Wabash County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17185,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Wabash,Wabash County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,2.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17185,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Wabash,Wabash County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17185,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Wabash,Wabash County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17185,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Wabash,Wabash County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,25.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17185,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Wabash,Wabash County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,71.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17185,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Wabash,Wabash County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2380,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17185,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Wabash,Wabash County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,6688,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17185,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17187,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17187,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17187,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17187,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17187,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,16777,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17187,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,11167,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17187,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11167,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17187,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,9946,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17187,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17187,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17187,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,89.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17187,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17187,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17187,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,10.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17187,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,17187,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1221,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17187,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,17187,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17189,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17189,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17189,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17189,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17189,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,13711,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17189,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9393,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17189,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9393,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17189,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17189,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17189,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17189,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17189,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17189,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17189,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,63.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17189,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,36.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17189,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,6004,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17189,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3390,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17189,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17191,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17191,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17191,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17191,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17191,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,16121,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17191,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,13087,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17191,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11826,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17191,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,306,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17191,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1261,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17191,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,90.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17191,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,2.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17191,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,9.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17191,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17191,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,35.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17191,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,52.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17191,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,4625,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17191,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,6895,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17191,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,White,White County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17193,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,White,White County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17193,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,White,White County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17193,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,White,White County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17193,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,White,White County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17193,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,White,White County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,13808,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17193,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,White,White County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,12825,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17193,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,White,White County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,12825,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17193,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,White,White County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17193,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,White,White County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17193,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,White,White County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17193,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,White,White County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17193,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,White,White County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17193,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,White,White County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17193,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,White,White County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,33.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17193,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,White,White County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,66.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17193,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,White,White County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,4327,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17193,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,White,White County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,8498,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17193,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Whiteside,Whiteside County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17195,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Whiteside,Whiteside County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17195,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Whiteside,Whiteside County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17195,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Whiteside,Whiteside County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17195,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Whiteside,Whiteside County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17195,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Whiteside,Whiteside County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,55509,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17195,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Whiteside,Whiteside County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,32853,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17195,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Whiteside,Whiteside County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,32399,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17195,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Whiteside,Whiteside County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17195,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Whiteside,Whiteside County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,454,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17195,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Whiteside,Whiteside County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17195,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Whiteside,Whiteside County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17195,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Whiteside,Whiteside County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17195,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Whiteside,Whiteside County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17195,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Whiteside,Whiteside County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,17195,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Whiteside,Whiteside County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,98.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17195,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Whiteside,Whiteside County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,17195,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Whiteside,Whiteside County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,32399,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17195,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Will,Will County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,65,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17197,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Will,Will County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,49,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17197,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Will,Will County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,34,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17197,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Will,Will County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17197,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Will,Will County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17197,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Will,Will County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,695903,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17197,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Will,Will County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,420653,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17197,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Will,Will County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,368513,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17197,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Will,Will County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,121946,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17197,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Will,Will County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,52141,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17197,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Will,Will County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,87.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17197,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Will,Will County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,29,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17197,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Will,Will County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,12.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17197,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Will,Will County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17197,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Will,Will County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,25.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17197,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Will,Will County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,32.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17197,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Will,Will County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,108020,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17197,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Will,Will County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,138547,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17197,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Williamson,Williamson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,25,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17199,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Williamson,Williamson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,25,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17199,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Williamson,Williamson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17199,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Williamson,Williamson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,23,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17199,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Williamson,Williamson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17199,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Williamson,Williamson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,67094,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17199,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Williamson,Williamson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,61810,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17199,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Williamson,Williamson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,61810,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17199,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Williamson,Williamson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17199,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Williamson,Williamson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17199,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Williamson,Williamson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17199,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Williamson,Williamson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17199,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Williamson,Williamson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17199,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Williamson,Williamson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17199,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Williamson,Williamson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,62.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17199,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Williamson,Williamson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,37.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17199,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Williamson,Williamson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,38863,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17199,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Williamson,Williamson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,22946,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17199,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Winnebago,Winnebago County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,35,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17201,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Winnebago,Winnebago County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,21,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17201,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Winnebago,Winnebago County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,21,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17201,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Winnebago,Winnebago County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17201,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Winnebago,Winnebago County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17201,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Winnebago,Winnebago County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,284858,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17201,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Winnebago,Winnebago County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,203282,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17201,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Winnebago,Winnebago County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,200019,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17201,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Winnebago,Winnebago County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17201,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Winnebago,Winnebago County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3263,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17201,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Winnebago,Winnebago County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17201,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Winnebago,Winnebago County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17201,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Winnebago,Winnebago County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17201,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Winnebago,Winnebago County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17201,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Winnebago,Winnebago County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,17201,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Winnebago,Winnebago County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,98.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17201,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Winnebago,Winnebago County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,17201,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Winnebago,Winnebago County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,200019,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17201,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Woodford,Woodford County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,22,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17203,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Woodford,Woodford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,19,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17203,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Woodford,Woodford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,19,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17203,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Woodford,Woodford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17203,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Woodford,Woodford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17203,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Woodford,Woodford County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,38395,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17203,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Woodford,Woodford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,97289,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17203,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Woodford,Woodford County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,96901,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17203,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Woodford,Woodford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17203,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Woodford,Woodford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,388,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17203,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Woodford,Woodford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17203,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Woodford,Woodford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17203,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Woodford,Woodford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17203,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Woodford,Woodford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17203,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Woodford,Woodford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,17203,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Woodford,Woodford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,99.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17203,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Woodford,Woodford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,17203,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IL,Woodford,Woodford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,96901,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17203,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18001,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18001,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18001,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18001,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18001,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,35826,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18001,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,16255,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18001,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,15936,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18001,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,15064,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18001,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,320,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18001,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18001,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,92.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18001,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18001,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18001,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,5.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18001,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18001,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,871,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18001,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18001,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Allen,Allen County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18003,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Allen,Allen County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18003,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Allen,Allen County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18003,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Allen,Allen County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18003,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Allen,Allen County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18003,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Allen,Allen County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,385892,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18003,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Allen,Allen County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,323068,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18003,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Allen,Allen County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,312634,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18003,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Allen,Allen County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,29119,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18003,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Allen,Allen County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10434,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18003,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Allen,Allen County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,96.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18003,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Allen,Allen County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18003,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Allen,Allen County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,3.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18003,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Allen,Allen County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18003,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Allen,Allen County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,5.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18003,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Allen,Allen County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,82.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18003,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Allen,Allen County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,17789,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18003,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Allen,Allen County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,265726,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18003,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Bartholomew,Bartholomew County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18005,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Bartholomew,Bartholomew County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18005,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Bartholomew,Bartholomew County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18005,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Bartholomew,Bartholomew County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18005,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Bartholomew,Bartholomew County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18005,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Bartholomew,Bartholomew County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,82157,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18005,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Bartholomew,Bartholomew County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,69249,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18005,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Bartholomew,Bartholomew County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,68680,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18005,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Bartholomew,Bartholomew County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18005,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Bartholomew,Bartholomew County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,568,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18005,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Bartholomew,Bartholomew County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18005,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Bartholomew,Bartholomew County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18005,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Bartholomew,Bartholomew County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18005,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Bartholomew,Bartholomew County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18005,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Bartholomew,Bartholomew County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,15.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18005,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Bartholomew,Bartholomew County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,83.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18005,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Bartholomew,Bartholomew County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,10580,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18005,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Bartholomew,Bartholomew County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,58100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18005,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18007,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18007,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18007,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18007,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18007,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,8712,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18007,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,6073,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18007,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1261,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18007,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18007,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4812,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18007,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,20.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18007,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18007,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,79.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18007,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18007,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18007,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,20.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18007,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18007,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1261,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18007,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Blackford,Blackford County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18009,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Blackford,Blackford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18009,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Blackford,Blackford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18009,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Blackford,Blackford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18009,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Blackford,Blackford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18009,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Blackford,Blackford County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,12098,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18009,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Blackford,Blackford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9695,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18009,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Blackford,Blackford County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9695,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18009,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Blackford,Blackford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,9695,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18009,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Blackford,Blackford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18009,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Blackford,Blackford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18009,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Blackford,Blackford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18009,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Blackford,Blackford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18009,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Blackford,Blackford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18009,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Blackford,Blackford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18009,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Blackford,Blackford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18009,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Blackford,Blackford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18009,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Blackford,Blackford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18009,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18011,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18011,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18011,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18011,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18011,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,71169,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18011,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,36335,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18011,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,36143,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18011,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,17566,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18011,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,192,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18011,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18011,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,48.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18011,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18011,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18011,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,16.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18011,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,35,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18011,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,5874,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18011,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,12703,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18011,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18013,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18013,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18013,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18013,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18013,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,15470,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18013,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,14310,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18013,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,14310,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18013,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18013,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18013,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18013,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18013,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18013,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18013,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,47.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18013,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,52.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18013,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,6733,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18013,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,7577,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18013,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18015,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18015,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18015,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18015,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18015,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,20307,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18015,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,6542,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18015,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5905,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18015,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18015,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,637,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18015,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,90.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18015,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18015,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,9.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18015,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18015,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18015,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,90.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18015,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18015,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,5905,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18015,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18017,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18017,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18017,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18017,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18017,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,37771,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18017,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,35253,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18017,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1899,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18017,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1899,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18017,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,33354,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18017,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,5.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18017,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,5.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18017,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,94.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18017,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18017,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18017,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18017,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18017,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18017,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18019,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18019,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18019,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18019,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18019,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,121282,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18019,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,134822,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18019,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,127096,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18019,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18019,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7726,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18019,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,94.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18019,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18019,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,5.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18019,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18019,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,24.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18019,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,69.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18019,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,33612,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18019,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,93484,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18019,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18021,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18021,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18021,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18021,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18021,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,26432,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18021,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,17602,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18021,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,533,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18021,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,533,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18021,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,17068,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18021,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18021,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18021,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,97,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18021,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18021,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18021,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18021,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18021,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18021,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18023,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18023,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18023,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18023,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18023,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,33151,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18023,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,20873,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18023,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,19132,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18023,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,18443,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18023,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1741,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18023,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,91.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18023,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,88.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18023,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,8.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18023,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18023,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18023,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,3.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18023,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18023,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,689,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18023,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18025,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18025,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18025,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18025,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18025,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,10540,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18025,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9852,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18025,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7222,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18025,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1998,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18025,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2630,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18025,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,73.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18025,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,20.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18025,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,26.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18025,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18025,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,22,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18025,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,31,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18025,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2172,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18025,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3052,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18025,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Daviess,Daviess County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18027,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Daviess,Daviess County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18027,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Daviess,Daviess County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18027,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Daviess,Daviess County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18027,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Daviess,Daviess County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18027,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Daviess,Daviess County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,33391,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18027,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Daviess,Daviess County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,25698,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18027,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Daviess,Daviess County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,23643,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18027,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Daviess,Daviess County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18027,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Daviess,Daviess County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2055,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18027,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Daviess,Daviess County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,92,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18027,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Daviess,Daviess County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18027,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Daviess,Daviess County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18027,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Daviess,Daviess County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18027,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Daviess,Daviess County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,34.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18027,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Daviess,Daviess County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,57.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18027,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Daviess,Daviess County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,8861,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18027,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Daviess,Daviess County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,14782,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18027,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Dearborn,Dearborn County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18029,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Dearborn,Dearborn County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18029,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Dearborn,Dearborn County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18029,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Dearborn,Dearborn County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18029,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Dearborn,Dearborn County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18029,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Dearborn,Dearborn County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,50726,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18029,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Dearborn,Dearborn County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,44934,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18029,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Dearborn,Dearborn County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,29699,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18029,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Dearborn,Dearborn County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18029,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Dearborn,Dearborn County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,15234,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18029,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Dearborn,Dearborn County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,66.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18029,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Dearborn,Dearborn County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18029,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Dearborn,Dearborn County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,33.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18029,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Dearborn,Dearborn County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18029,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Dearborn,Dearborn County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,7.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18029,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Dearborn,Dearborn County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,59,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18029,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Dearborn,Dearborn County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,3192,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18029,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Dearborn,Dearborn County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,26508,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18029,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Decatur,Decatur County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18031,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Decatur,Decatur County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18031,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Decatur,Decatur County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18031,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Decatur,Decatur County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18031,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Decatur,Decatur County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18031,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Decatur,Decatur County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,26477,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18031,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Decatur,Decatur County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,19295,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18031,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Decatur,Decatur County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,18156,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18031,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Decatur,Decatur County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1596,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18031,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Decatur,Decatur County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1139,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18031,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Decatur,Decatur County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,94.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18031,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Decatur,Decatur County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,8.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18031,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Decatur,Decatur County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,5.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18031,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Decatur,Decatur County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18031,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Decatur,Decatur County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,16.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18031,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Decatur,Decatur County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,69.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18031,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Decatur,Decatur County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,3129,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18031,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Decatur,Decatur County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,13431,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18031,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18033,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18033,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18033,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18033,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18033,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,43274,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18033,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IN,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,26072,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18033,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,26072,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18033,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,26072,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18033,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18033,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18033,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18033,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18033,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18033,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18033,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18033,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18033,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18033,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Delaware,Delaware County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18035,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Delaware,Delaware County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18035,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Delaware,Delaware County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18035,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Delaware,Delaware County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18035,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Delaware,Delaware County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18035,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Delaware,Delaware County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,111669,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18035,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Delaware,Delaware County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,80015,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18035,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Delaware,Delaware County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,69178,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18035,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Delaware,Delaware County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,2163,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18035,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Delaware,Delaware County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10837,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18035,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Delaware,Delaware County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,86.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18035,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Delaware,Delaware County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,2.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18035,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Delaware,Delaware County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,13.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18035,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Delaware,Delaware County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18035,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Delaware,Delaware County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18035,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Delaware,Delaware County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,83.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18035,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Delaware,Delaware County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18035,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Delaware,Delaware County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,67015,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18035,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Dubois,Dubois County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18037,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Dubois,Dubois County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18037,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Dubois,Dubois County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18037,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Dubois,Dubois County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18037,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Dubois,Dubois County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18037,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Dubois,Dubois County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,43604,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18037,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Dubois,Dubois County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,50171,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18037,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Dubois,Dubois County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,50171,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18037,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Dubois,Dubois County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18037,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Dubois,Dubois County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18037,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Dubois,Dubois County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18037,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Dubois,Dubois County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18037,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Dubois,Dubois County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18037,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Dubois,Dubois County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18037,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Dubois,Dubois County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,43.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18037,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Dubois,Dubois County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,56.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18037,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Dubois,Dubois County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,22001,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18037,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Dubois,Dubois County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,28170,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18037,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Elkhart,Elkhart County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18039,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Elkhart,Elkhart County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18039,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Elkhart,Elkhart County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18039,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Elkhart,Elkhart County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18039,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Elkhart,Elkhart County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18039,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Elkhart,Elkhart County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,206842,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18039,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Elkhart,Elkhart County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,91996,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18039,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Elkhart,Elkhart County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,87533,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18039,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Elkhart,Elkhart County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18039,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Elkhart,Elkhart County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4463,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18039,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Elkhart,Elkhart County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,95.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18039,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Elkhart,Elkhart County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18039,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Elkhart,Elkhart County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,4.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18039,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Elkhart,Elkhart County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18039,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Elkhart,Elkhart County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18039,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Elkhart,Elkhart County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,95.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18039,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Elkhart,Elkhart County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18039,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Elkhart,Elkhart County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,87533,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18039,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18041,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18041,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18041,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18041,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18041,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,23333,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18041,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,17364,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18041,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,15496,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18041,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18041,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1868,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18041,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,89.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18041,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18041,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,10.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18041,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18041,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,2.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18041,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,86.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18041,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,499,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18041,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,14997,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18041,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18043,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18043,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18043,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18043,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18043,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,80437,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18043,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,64869,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18043,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,54257,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18043,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18043,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10612,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18043,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,83.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18043,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18043,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,16.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18043,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18043,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,12.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18043,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,71,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18043,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,8200,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18043,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,46058,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18043,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Fountain,Fountain County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18045,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Fountain,Fountain County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18045,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Fountain,Fountain County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18045,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Fountain,Fountain County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18045,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Fountain,Fountain County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18045,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Fountain,Fountain County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,16470,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18045,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Fountain,Fountain County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,10490,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18045,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Fountain,Fountain County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,509,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18045,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Fountain,Fountain County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,509,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18045,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Fountain,Fountain County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9981,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18045,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Fountain,Fountain County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,4.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18045,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Fountain,Fountain County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,4.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18045,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Fountain,Fountain County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,95.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18045,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Fountain,Fountain County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18045,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Fountain,Fountain County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18045,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Fountain,Fountain County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18045,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Fountain,Fountain County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18045,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Fountain,Fountain County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18045,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18047,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18047,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18047,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18047,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18047,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,22767,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18047,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,13155,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18047,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,12596,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18047,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18047,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,559,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18047,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,95.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18047,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18047,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,4.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18047,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18047,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,7.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18047,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,88.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18047,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,999,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18047,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,11597,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18047,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Fulton,Fulton County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18049,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Fulton,Fulton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18049,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Fulton,Fulton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18049,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Fulton,Fulton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18049,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Fulton,Fulton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18049,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Fulton,Fulton County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,20434,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18049,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Fulton,Fulton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,8172,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18049,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Fulton,Fulton County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6212,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18049,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Fulton,Fulton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18049,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Fulton,Fulton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1960,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18049,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Fulton,Fulton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,76,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18049,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Fulton,Fulton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18049,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Fulton,Fulton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,24,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18049,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Fulton,Fulton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18049,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Fulton,Fulton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18049,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Fulton,Fulton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,76,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18049,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Fulton,Fulton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18049,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Fulton,Fulton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,6212,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18049,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Gibson,Gibson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18051,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Gibson,Gibson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18051,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Gibson,Gibson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18051,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Gibson,Gibson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18051,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Gibson,Gibson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18051,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Gibson,Gibson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,33021,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18051,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Gibson,Gibson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,31836,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18051,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Gibson,Gibson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,31754,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18051,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Gibson,Gibson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,899,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18051,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Gibson,Gibson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,82,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18051,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Gibson,Gibson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18051,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Gibson,Gibson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,2.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18051,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Gibson,Gibson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18051,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Gibson,Gibson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18051,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Gibson,Gibson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,34.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18051,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Gibson,Gibson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,62.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18051,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Gibson,Gibson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,10873,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18051,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Gibson,Gibson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,19982,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18051,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18053,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18053,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18053,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18053,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18053,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,66446,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18053,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,44587,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18053,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,36390,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18053,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,8093,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18053,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8197,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18053,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,81.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18053,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,18.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18053,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,18.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18053,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18053,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18053,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,63.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18053,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18053,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,28298,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18053,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18055,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18055,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18055,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18055,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18055,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,30790,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18055,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,32074,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18055,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,21508,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18055,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18055,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10566,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18055,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,67.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18055,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18055,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,32.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18055,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18055,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18055,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,67.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18055,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18055,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,21508,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18055,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18057,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18057,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18057,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18057,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18057,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,348868,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18057,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,232999,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18057,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,230046,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18057,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,3152,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18057,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2953,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18057,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18057,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18057,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18057,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18057,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18057,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,97,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18057,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,915,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18057,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,225979,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18057,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18059,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18059,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18059,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18059,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18059,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,80156,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18059,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,34875,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18059,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,32630,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18059,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,22537,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18059,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2245,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18059,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,93.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18059,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,64.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18059,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,6.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18059,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18059,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18059,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,28.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18059,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18059,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,10094,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18059,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18061,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18061,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18061,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18061,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18061,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,39652,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18061,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,38631,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18061,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,34655,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18061,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18061,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3976,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18061,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,89.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18061,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18061,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,10.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18061,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18061,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,14.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18061,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,75.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18061,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,5429,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18061,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,29226,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18061,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Hendricks,Hendricks County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18063,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Hendricks,Hendricks County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18063,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Hendricks,Hendricks County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18063,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Hendricks,Hendricks County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18063,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Hendricks,Hendricks County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18063,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Hendricks,Hendricks County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,175528,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18063,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Hendricks,Hendricks County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,89004,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18063,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Hendricks,Hendricks County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,83901,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18063,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Hendricks,Hendricks County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,37186,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18063,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Hendricks,Hendricks County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5104,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18063,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Hendricks,Hendricks County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,94.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18063,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Hendricks,Hendricks County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,41.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18063,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Hendricks,Hendricks County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,5.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18063,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Hendricks,Hendricks County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18063,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Hendricks,Hendricks County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18063,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Hendricks,Hendricks County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,52.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18063,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Hendricks,Hendricks County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18063,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Hendricks,Hendricks County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,46715,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18063,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18065,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18065,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18065,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18065,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18065,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,48885,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18065,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,27000,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18065,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,23013,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18065,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,2701,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18065,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3987,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18065,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,85.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18065,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,10,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18065,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,14.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18065,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18065,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18065,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,75.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18065,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18065,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,20312,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18065,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18067,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18067,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18067,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18067,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18067,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,83619,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18067,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,59313,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18067,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,57943,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18067,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,3654,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18067,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1370,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18067,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,97.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18067,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,6.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18067,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18067,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18067,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18067,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,91.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18067,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18067,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,54289,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18067,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Huntington,Huntington County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18069,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Huntington,Huntington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18069,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Huntington,Huntington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18069,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Huntington,Huntington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18069,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Huntington,Huntington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18069,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Huntington,Huntington County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,36599,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18069,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Huntington,Huntington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,23664,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18069,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Huntington,Huntington County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,21714,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18069,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Huntington,Huntington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,21714,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18069,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Huntington,Huntington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1950,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18069,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Huntington,Huntington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,91.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18069,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Huntington,Huntington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,91.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18069,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Huntington,Huntington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,8.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18069,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Huntington,Huntington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18069,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Huntington,Huntington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18069,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Huntington,Huntington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18069,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Huntington,Huntington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18069,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Huntington,Huntington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18069,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,IN,Indiana,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,904,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,IN,IN,Indiana,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,471,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,IN,IN,Indiana,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,240,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,IN,IN,Indiana,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,133,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,IN,IN,Indiana,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,95,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,IN,IN,Indiana,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,6785644,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2020,IN,IN,Indiana,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5066252,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,IN,IN,Indiana,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4683083,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,IN,IN,Indiana,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,344628,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,IN,IN,Indiana,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,383169,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,IN,IN,Indiana,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,92.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,IN,IN,Indiana,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,6.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,IN,IN,Indiana,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,7.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,IN,IN,Indiana,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,433,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,IN,IN,Indiana,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,9.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,IN,IN,Indiana,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,75.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,IN,IN,Indiana,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,495156,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,IN,IN,Indiana,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3843300,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,IN,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18071,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18071,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18071,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18071,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18071,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,46373,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18071,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,37421,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18071,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,35001,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18071,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18071,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2421,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18071,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,93.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18071,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18071,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,6.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18071,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18071,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,2.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18071,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,90.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18071,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1079,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18071,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,33922,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18071,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18073,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18073,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18073,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18073,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18073,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,32906,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18073,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9518,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18073,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18073,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18073,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9518,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18073,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18073,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18073,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18073,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18073,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18073,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18073,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18073,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18073,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Jay,Jay County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18075,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Jay,Jay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18075,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Jay,Jay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18075,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Jay,Jay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18075,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Jay,Jay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18075,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Jay,Jay County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,20456,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18075,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Jay,Jay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,8264,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18075,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Jay,Jay County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8230,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18075,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Jay,Jay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,8230,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18075,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Jay,Jay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,35,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18075,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Jay,Jay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18075,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Jay,Jay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,99.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18075,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Jay,Jay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18075,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Jay,Jay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18075,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Jay,Jay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18075,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Jay,Jay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18075,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Jay,Jay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18075,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Jay,Jay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18075,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18077,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18077,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18077,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18077,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18077,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,33075,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18077,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,29549,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18077,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,28175,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18077,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18077,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1374,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18077,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,95.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18077,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18077,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,4.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18077,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18077,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,39.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18077,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,55.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18077,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,11800,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18077,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,16375,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18077,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Jennings,Jennings County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18079,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Jennings,Jennings County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18079,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Jennings,Jennings County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18079,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Jennings,Jennings County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18079,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Jennings,Jennings County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18079,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Jennings,Jennings County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,27564,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18079,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Jennings,Jennings County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,21720,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18079,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Jennings,Jennings County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,21430,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18079,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Jennings,Jennings County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18079,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Jennings,Jennings County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,290,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18079,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Jennings,Jennings County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18079,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Jennings,Jennings County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18079,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Jennings,Jennings County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18079,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Jennings,Jennings County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18079,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Jennings,Jennings County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,32.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18079,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Jennings,Jennings County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,65.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18079,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Jennings,Jennings County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,7133,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18079,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Jennings,Jennings County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,14297,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18079,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18081,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18081,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18081,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18081,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18081,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,162180,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18081,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,138511,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18081,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,137908,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18081,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18081,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,603,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18081,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18081,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18081,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18081,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18081,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,11.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18081,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,88.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18081,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,15651,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18081,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,122257,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18081,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18083,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18083,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18083,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18083,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18083,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,36244,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18083,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,30767,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18083,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,24752,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18083,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18083,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6015,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18083,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,80.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18083,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18083,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,19.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18083,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18083,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,11.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18083,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,68.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18083,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,3650,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18083,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,21102,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18083,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Kosciusko,Kosciusko County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,32,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18085,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Kosciusko,Kosciusko County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18085,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Kosciusko,Kosciusko County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18085,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Kosciusko,Kosciusko County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18085,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Kosciusko,Kosciusko County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18085,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Kosciusko,Kosciusko County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,80050,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18085,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Kosciusko,Kosciusko County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,25316,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18085,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Kosciusko,Kosciusko County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,19104,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18085,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Kosciusko,Kosciusko County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,2128,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18085,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Kosciusko,Kosciusko County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6212,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18085,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Kosciusko,Kosciusko County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,75.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18085,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Kosciusko,Kosciusko County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,8.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18085,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Kosciusko,Kosciusko County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,24.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18085,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Kosciusko,Kosciusko County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,27,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18085,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Kosciusko,Kosciusko County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18085,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Kosciusko,Kosciusko County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,67.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18085,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Kosciusko,Kosciusko County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18085,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Kosciusko,Kosciusko County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,16977,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18085,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,LaGrange,LaGrange County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18087,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,LaGrange,LaGrange County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18087,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,LaGrange,LaGrange County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18087,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,LaGrange,LaGrange County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18087,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,LaGrange,LaGrange County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18087,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,LaGrange,LaGrange County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,40515,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18087,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IN,LaGrange,LaGrange County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,6152,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18087,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,LaGrange,LaGrange County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5785,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18087,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,LaGrange,LaGrange County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18087,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,LaGrange,LaGrange County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,367,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18087,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,LaGrange,LaGrange County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,94,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18087,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,LaGrange,LaGrange County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18087,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,LaGrange,LaGrange County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18087,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,LaGrange,LaGrange County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18087,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,LaGrange,LaGrange County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18087,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,LaGrange,LaGrange County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,94,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18087,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,LaGrange,LaGrange County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18087,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,LaGrange,LaGrange County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,5785,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18087,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,32,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18089,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18089,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18089,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18089,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18089,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,498597,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18089,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,498991,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18089,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,490858,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18089,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,26526,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18089,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8133,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18089,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18089,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,5.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18089,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18089,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18089,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,30.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18089,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,62.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18089,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,151086,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18089,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,313246,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18089,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,LaPorte,LaPorte County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,33,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18091,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,LaPorte,LaPorte County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18091,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,LaPorte,LaPorte County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18091,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,LaPorte,LaPorte County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18091,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,LaPorte,LaPorte County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18091,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,LaPorte,LaPorte County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,112222,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18091,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IN,LaPorte,LaPorte County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,73940,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18091,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,LaPorte,LaPorte County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,63646,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18091,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,LaPorte,LaPorte County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18091,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,LaPorte,LaPorte County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10293,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18091,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,LaPorte,LaPorte County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,86.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18091,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,LaPorte,LaPorte County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18091,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,LaPorte,LaPorte County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,13.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18091,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,LaPorte,LaPorte County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,25,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18091,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,LaPorte,LaPorte County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,4.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18091,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,LaPorte,LaPorte County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,81.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18091,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,LaPorte,LaPorte County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,3437,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18091,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,LaPorte,LaPorte County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,60209,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18091,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18093,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18093,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18093,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18093,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18093,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,45022,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18093,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,47577,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18093,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,42582,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18093,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,6131,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18093,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4995,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18093,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,89.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18093,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,12.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18093,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,10.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18093,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18093,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,19.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18093,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,57.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18093,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,9180,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18093,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,27272,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18093,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18095,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18095,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18095,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18095,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18095,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,130065,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18095,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,95661,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18095,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,81358,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18095,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,9534,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18095,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,14303,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18095,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,85,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18095,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,10,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18095,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,15,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18095,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18095,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18095,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,75.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18095,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18095,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,71824,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18095,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18097,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18097,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18097,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18097,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18097,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,976770,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18097,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,819194,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18097,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,819194,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18097,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18097,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18097,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18097,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18097,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18097,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18097,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18097,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,99.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18097,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,3967,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18097,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,815227,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18097,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18099,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18099,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18099,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18099,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18099,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,46018,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18099,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,22592,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18099,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,15924,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18099,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,4511,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18099,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6668,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18099,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,70.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18099,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,20,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18099,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,29.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18099,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18099,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18099,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,50.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18099,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18099,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,11412,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18099,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18101,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18101,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18101,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18101,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18101,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,9786,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18101,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,15186,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18101,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,15186,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18101,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18101,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18101,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18101,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18101,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18101,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18101,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,7.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18101,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,92.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18101,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1119,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18101,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,14068,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18101,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Miami,Miami County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18103,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Miami,Miami County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18103,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Miami,Miami County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18103,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Miami,Miami County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18103,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Miami,Miami County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18103,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Miami,Miami County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,35924,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18103,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Miami,Miami County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,17391,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18103,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Miami,Miami County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,13666,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18103,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Miami,Miami County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,997,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18103,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Miami,Miami County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3725,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18103,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Miami,Miami County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,78.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18103,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Miami,Miami County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,5.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18103,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Miami,Miami County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,21.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18103,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Miami,Miami County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18103,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Miami,Miami County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18103,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Miami,Miami County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,72.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18103,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Miami,Miami County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18103,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Miami,Miami County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,12669,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18103,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18105,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18105,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18105,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18105,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18105,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,139517,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18105,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,126576,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18105,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,126486,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18105,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18105,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,90,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18105,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18105,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18105,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18105,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18105,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,33.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18105,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,66.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18105,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,42564,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18105,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,83921,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18105,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18107,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18107,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18107,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18107,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18107,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,37932,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18107,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,20740,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18107,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,16226,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18107,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18107,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4513,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18107,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,78.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18107,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18107,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,21.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18107,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18107,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18107,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,78.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18107,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18107,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,16226,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18107,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18109,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18109,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18109,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18109,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18109,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,71802,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18109,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,59353,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18109,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,56608,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18109,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18109,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2745,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18109,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,95.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18109,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18109,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,4.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18109,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18109,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,13,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18109,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,82.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18109,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,7735,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18109,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,48873,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18109,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18111,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18111,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18111,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18111,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18111,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,13796,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18111,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,6073,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18111,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3975,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18111,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1257,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18111,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2098,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18111,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,65.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18111,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,20.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18111,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,34.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18111,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18111,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18111,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,44.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18111,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18111,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2718,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18111,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Noble,Noble County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18113,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Noble,Noble County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18113,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Noble,Noble County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18113,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Noble,Noble County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18113,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Noble,Noble County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18113,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Noble,Noble County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,47379,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18113,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Noble,Noble County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,21851,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18113,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Noble,Noble County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,14939,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18113,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Noble,Noble County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,5044,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18113,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Noble,Noble County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6913,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18113,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Noble,Noble County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,68.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18113,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Noble,Noble County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,23.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18113,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Noble,Noble County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,31.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18113,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Noble,Noble County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18113,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Noble,Noble County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18113,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Noble,Noble County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,45.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18113,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Noble,Noble County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18113,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Noble,Noble County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,9895,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18113,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Ohio,Ohio County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18115,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Ohio,Ohio County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18115,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Ohio,Ohio County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18115,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Ohio,Ohio County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18115,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Ohio,Ohio County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18115,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Ohio,Ohio County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,5930,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18115,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Ohio,Ohio County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,6556,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18115,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Ohio,Ohio County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2398,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18115,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Ohio,Ohio County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18115,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Ohio,Ohio County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4159,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18115,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Ohio,Ohio County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,36.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18115,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Ohio,Ohio County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18115,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Ohio,Ohio County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,63.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18115,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Ohio,Ohio County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18115,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Ohio,Ohio County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18115,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Ohio,Ohio County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,36.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18115,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Ohio,Ohio County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18115,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Ohio,Ohio County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2398,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18115,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18117,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18117,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18117,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18117,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18117,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,19839,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18117,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,13792,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18117,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,13792,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18117,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,2140,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18117,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18117,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18117,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,15.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18117,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18117,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18117,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,57.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18117,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,26.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18117,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,7982,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18117,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3670,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18117,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Owen,Owen County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18119,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Owen,Owen County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18119,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Owen,Owen County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18119,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Owen,Owen County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18119,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Owen,Owen County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18119,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Owen,Owen County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,21298,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18119,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Owen,Owen County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,10515,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18119,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Owen,Owen County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,825,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18119,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Owen,Owen County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18119,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Owen,Owen County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9690,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18119,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Owen,Owen County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,7.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18119,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Owen,Owen County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18119,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Owen,Owen County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,92.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18119,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Owen,Owen County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18119,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Owen,Owen County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18119,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Owen,Owen County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,7.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18119,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Owen,Owen County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18119,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Owen,Owen County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,825,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18119,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Parke,Parke County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18121,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Parke,Parke County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18121,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Parke,Parke County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18121,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Parke,Parke County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18121,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Parke,Parke County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18121,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Parke,Parke County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,16154,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18121,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Parke,Parke County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7624,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18121,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Parke,Parke County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6775,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18121,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Parke,Parke County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,754,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18121,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Parke,Parke County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,849,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18121,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Parke,Parke County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,88.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18121,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Parke,Parke County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,9.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18121,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Parke,Parke County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,11.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18121,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Parke,Parke County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18121,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Parke,Parke County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18121,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Parke,Parke County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,79,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18121,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Parke,Parke County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18121,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Parke,Parke County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,6021,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18121,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18123,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18123,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18123,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18123,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18123,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,19150,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18123,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,16712,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18123,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,15490,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18123,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18123,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1222,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18123,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,92.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18123,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18123,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,7.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18123,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18123,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,20.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18123,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,72.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18123,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,3375,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18123,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,12116,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18123,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18125,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18125,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18125,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18125,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18125,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,12233,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18125,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,12836,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18125,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11762,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18125,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18125,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1074,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18125,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,91.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18125,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18125,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,8.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18125,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18125,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,44,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18125,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,47.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18125,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,5648,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18125,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,6114,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18125,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Porter,Porter County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,19,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18127,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Porter,Porter County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18127,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Porter,Porter County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18127,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Porter,Porter County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18127,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Porter,Porter County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18127,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Porter,Porter County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,173256,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18127,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Porter,Porter County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,50342,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18127,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Porter,Porter County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,46596,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18127,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Porter,Porter County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18127,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Porter,Porter County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3746,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18127,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Porter,Porter County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,92.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18127,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Porter,Porter County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18127,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Porter,Porter County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,7.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18127,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Porter,Porter County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18127,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Porter,Porter County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18127,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Porter,Porter County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,85.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18127,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Porter,Porter County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,3547,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18127,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Porter,Porter County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,43049,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18127,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Posey,Posey County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18129,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Posey,Posey County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18129,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Posey,Posey County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18129,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Posey,Posey County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18129,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Posey,Posey County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18129,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Posey,Posey County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,25161,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18129,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Posey,Posey County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,12517,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18129,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Posey,Posey County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,12418,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18129,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Posey,Posey County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18129,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Posey,Posey County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,99,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18129,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Posey,Posey County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18129,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Posey,Posey County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18129,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Posey,Posey County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18129,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Posey,Posey County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18129,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Posey,Posey County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,5.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18129,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Posey,Posey County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,93.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18129,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Posey,Posey County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,698,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18129,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Posey,Posey County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,11720,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18129,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18131,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18131,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18131,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18131,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18131,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,12488,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18131,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4500,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18131,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3532,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18131,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,613,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18131,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,968,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18131,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,78.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18131,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,13.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18131,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,21.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18131,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18131,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18131,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,64.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18131,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18131,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2919,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18131,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18133,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18133,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18133,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18133,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18133,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,36666,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18133,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,28800,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18133,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,21947,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18133,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18133,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6853,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18133,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,76.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18133,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18133,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,23.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18133,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18133,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,18.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18133,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,58,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18133,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,5236,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18133,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,16712,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18133,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18135,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18135,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18135,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18135,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18135,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,24375,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18135,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,13649,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18135,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,12760,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18135,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,6386,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18135,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,889,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18135,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,93.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18135,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,46.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18135,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,6.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18135,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18135,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18135,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,46.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18135,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18135,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,6373,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18135,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Ripley,Ripley County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18137,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Ripley,Ripley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18137,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Ripley,Ripley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18137,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Ripley,Ripley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18137,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Ripley,Ripley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18137,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Ripley,Ripley County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,28980,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18137,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Ripley,Ripley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,29045,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18137,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Ripley,Ripley County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,29045,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18137,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Ripley,Ripley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18137,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Ripley,Ripley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18137,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Ripley,Ripley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18137,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Ripley,Ripley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18137,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Ripley,Ripley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18137,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Ripley,Ripley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18137,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Ripley,Ripley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,37.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18137,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Ripley,Ripley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,62.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18137,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Ripley,Ripley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,10878,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18137,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Ripley,Ripley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,18167,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18137,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Rush,Rush County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18139,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Rush,Rush County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18139,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Rush,Rush County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18139,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Rush,Rush County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18139,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Rush,Rush County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18139,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Rush,Rush County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,16744,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18139,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Rush,Rush County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,8996,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18139,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Rush,Rush County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8097,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18139,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Rush,Rush County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,305,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18139,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Rush,Rush County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,899,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18139,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Rush,Rush County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,90,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18139,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Rush,Rush County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,3.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18139,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Rush,Rush County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,10,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18139,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Rush,Rush County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18139,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Rush,Rush County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18139,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Rush,Rush County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,86.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18139,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Rush,Rush County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18139,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Rush,Rush County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,7792,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18139,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18143,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18143,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18143,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18143,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18143,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,24336,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18143,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,27529,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18143,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,27529,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18143,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18143,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18143,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18143,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18143,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18143,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18143,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,2.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18143,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,97.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18143,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,686,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18143,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,26842,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18143,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18145,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18145,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18145,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18145,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18145,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,45026,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18145,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,20708,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18145,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,20220,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18145,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1217,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18145,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,487,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18145,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,97.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18145,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,5.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18145,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18145,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18145,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,5.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18145,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,86.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18145,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1147,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18145,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,17857,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18145,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Spencer,Spencer County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18147,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Spencer,Spencer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18147,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Spencer,Spencer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18147,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Spencer,Spencer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18147,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Spencer,Spencer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18147,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Spencer,Spencer County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,19820,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18147,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Spencer,Spencer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,20682,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18147,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Spencer,Spencer County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,20024,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18147,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Spencer,Spencer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18147,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Spencer,Spencer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,657,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18147,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Spencer,Spencer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,96.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18147,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Spencer,Spencer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18147,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Spencer,Spencer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,3.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18147,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Spencer,Spencer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18147,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Spencer,Spencer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,58.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18147,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Spencer,Spencer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,37.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18147,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Spencer,Spencer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,12182,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18147,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Spencer,Spencer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,7842,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18147,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,St. Joseph,St. Joseph County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,20,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18141,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,St. Joseph,St. Joseph County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18141,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,St. Joseph,St. Joseph County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18141,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,St. Joseph,St. Joseph County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18141,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,St. Joseph,St. Joseph County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18141,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,St. Joseph,St. Joseph County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,272549,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18141,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IN,St. Joseph,St. Joseph County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,181016,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18141,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,St. Joseph,St. Joseph County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,163251,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18141,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,St. Joseph,St. Joseph County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18141,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,St. Joseph,St. Joseph County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,17766,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18141,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,St. Joseph,St. Joseph County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,90.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18141,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,St. Joseph,St. Joseph County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18141,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,St. Joseph,St. Joseph County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,9.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18141,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,St. Joseph,St. Joseph County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18141,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,St. Joseph,St. Joseph County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18141,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,St. Joseph,St. Joseph County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,90.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18141,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,St. Joseph,St. Joseph County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18141,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,St. Joseph,St. Joseph County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,163251,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18141,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Starke,Starke County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18149,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Starke,Starke County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18149,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Starke,Starke County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18149,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Starke,Starke County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18149,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Starke,Starke County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18149,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Starke,Starke County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,23356,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18149,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Starke,Starke County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7093,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18149,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Starke,Starke County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5494,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18149,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Starke,Starke County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1798,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18149,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Starke,Starke County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1598,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18149,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Starke,Starke County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,77.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18149,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Starke,Starke County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,25.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18149,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Starke,Starke County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,22.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18149,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Starke,Starke County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18149,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Starke,Starke County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18149,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Starke,Starke County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,52.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18149,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Starke,Starke County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18149,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Starke,Starke County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3696,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18149,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Steuben,Steuben County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,19,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18151,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Steuben,Steuben County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18151,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Steuben,Steuben County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18151,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Steuben,Steuben County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18151,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Steuben,Steuben County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18151,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Steuben,Steuben County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,34440,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18151,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Steuben,Steuben County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,14217,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18151,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Steuben,Steuben County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,12408,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18151,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Steuben,Steuben County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,982,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18151,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Steuben,Steuben County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1809,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18151,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Steuben,Steuben County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,87.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18151,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Steuben,Steuben County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,6.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18151,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Steuben,Steuben County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,12.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18151,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Steuben,Steuben County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18151,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Steuben,Steuben County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,3.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18151,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Steuben,Steuben County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,76.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18151,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Steuben,Steuben County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,517,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18151,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Steuben,Steuben County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,10909,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18151,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Sullivan,Sullivan County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18153,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Sullivan,Sullivan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18153,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Sullivan,Sullivan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18153,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Sullivan,Sullivan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18153,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Sullivan,Sullivan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18153,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Sullivan,Sullivan County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,20803,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18153,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Sullivan,Sullivan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,18660,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18153,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Sullivan,Sullivan County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10209,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18153,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Sullivan,Sullivan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18153,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Sullivan,Sullivan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8450,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18153,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Sullivan,Sullivan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,54.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18153,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Sullivan,Sullivan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18153,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Sullivan,Sullivan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,45.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18153,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Sullivan,Sullivan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18153,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Sullivan,Sullivan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,6.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18153,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Sullivan,Sullivan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,48.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18153,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Sullivan,Sullivan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1169,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18153,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Sullivan,Sullivan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,9041,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18153,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Switzerland,Switzerland County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18155,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Switzerland,Switzerland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18155,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Switzerland,Switzerland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18155,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Switzerland,Switzerland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18155,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Switzerland,Switzerland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18155,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Switzerland,Switzerland County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,9724,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18155,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Switzerland,Switzerland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,13673,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18155,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Switzerland,Switzerland County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,13673,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18155,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Switzerland,Switzerland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18155,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Switzerland,Switzerland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18155,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Switzerland,Switzerland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18155,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Switzerland,Switzerland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18155,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Switzerland,Switzerland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18155,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Switzerland,Switzerland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18155,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Switzerland,Switzerland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18155,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Switzerland,Switzerland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18155,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Switzerland,Switzerland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18155,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Switzerland,Switzerland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,13673,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18155,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Tippecanoe,Tippecanoe County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18157,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Tippecanoe,Tippecanoe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18157,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Tippecanoe,Tippecanoe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18157,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Tippecanoe,Tippecanoe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18157,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Tippecanoe,Tippecanoe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18157,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Tippecanoe,Tippecanoe County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,186247,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18157,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Tippecanoe,Tippecanoe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,159956,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18157,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Tippecanoe,Tippecanoe County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,158230,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18157,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Tippecanoe,Tippecanoe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,659,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18157,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Tippecanoe,Tippecanoe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1726,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18157,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Tippecanoe,Tippecanoe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18157,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Tippecanoe,Tippecanoe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18157,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Tippecanoe,Tippecanoe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18157,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Tippecanoe,Tippecanoe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18157,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Tippecanoe,Tippecanoe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18157,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Tippecanoe,Tippecanoe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,97.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18157,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Tippecanoe,Tippecanoe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1419,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18157,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Tippecanoe,Tippecanoe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,156152,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18157,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Tipton,Tipton County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18159,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Tipton,Tipton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18159,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Tipton,Tipton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18159,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Tipton,Tipton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18159,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Tipton,Tipton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18159,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Tipton,Tipton County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,15365,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18159,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Tipton,Tipton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,6548,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18159,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Tipton,Tipton County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6508,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18159,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Tipton,Tipton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,6508,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18159,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Tipton,Tipton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,40,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18159,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Tipton,Tipton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18159,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Tipton,Tipton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,99.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18159,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Tipton,Tipton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18159,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Tipton,Tipton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18159,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Tipton,Tipton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18159,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Tipton,Tipton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18159,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Tipton,Tipton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18159,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Tipton,Tipton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18159,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18161,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18161,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18161,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18161,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18161,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,7090,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18161,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3010,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18161,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2485,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18161,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18161,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,524,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18161,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,82.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18161,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18161,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,17.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18161,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18161,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18161,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,82.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18161,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18161,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2485,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18161,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Vanderburgh,Vanderburgh County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18163,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Vanderburgh,Vanderburgh County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18163,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Vanderburgh,Vanderburgh County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18163,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Vanderburgh,Vanderburgh County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18163,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Vanderburgh,Vanderburgh County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18163,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Vanderburgh,Vanderburgh County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,180158,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18163,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Vanderburgh,Vanderburgh County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,184919,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18163,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Vanderburgh,Vanderburgh County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,184919,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18163,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Vanderburgh,Vanderburgh County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18163,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Vanderburgh,Vanderburgh County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18163,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Vanderburgh,Vanderburgh County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18163,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Vanderburgh,Vanderburgh County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18163,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Vanderburgh,Vanderburgh County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18163,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Vanderburgh,Vanderburgh County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18163,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Vanderburgh,Vanderburgh County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,6.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18163,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Vanderburgh,Vanderburgh County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,93.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18163,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Vanderburgh,Vanderburgh County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,12098,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18163,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Vanderburgh,Vanderburgh County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,172822,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18163,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Vermillion,Vermillion County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18165,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Vermillion,Vermillion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18165,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Vermillion,Vermillion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18165,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Vermillion,Vermillion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18165,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Vermillion,Vermillion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18165,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Vermillion,Vermillion County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,15388,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18165,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Vermillion,Vermillion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,13403,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18165,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Vermillion,Vermillion County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7822,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18165,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Vermillion,Vermillion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18165,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Vermillion,Vermillion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5581,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18165,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Vermillion,Vermillion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,58.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18165,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Vermillion,Vermillion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18165,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Vermillion,Vermillion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,41.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18165,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Vermillion,Vermillion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18165,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Vermillion,Vermillion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,21.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18165,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Vermillion,Vermillion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,36.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18165,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Vermillion,Vermillion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2934,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18165,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Vermillion,Vermillion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,4888,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18165,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Vigo,Vigo County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18167,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Vigo,Vigo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18167,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Vigo,Vigo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18167,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Vigo,Vigo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18167,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Vigo,Vigo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18167,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Vigo,Vigo County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,106007,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18167,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Vigo,Vigo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,81972,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18167,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Vigo,Vigo County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,73395,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18167,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Vigo,Vigo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18167,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Vigo,Vigo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8576,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18167,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Vigo,Vigo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,89.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18167,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Vigo,Vigo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18167,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Vigo,Vigo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,10.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18167,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Vigo,Vigo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18167,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Vigo,Vigo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,5.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18167,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Vigo,Vigo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,84.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18167,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Vigo,Vigo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,4483,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18167,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Vigo,Vigo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,68912,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18167,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Wabash,Wabash County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18169,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Wabash,Wabash County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18169,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Wabash,Wabash County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18169,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Wabash,Wabash County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18169,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Wabash,Wabash County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18169,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Wabash,Wabash County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,30888,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18169,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Wabash,Wabash County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,20027,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18169,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Wabash,Wabash County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,18546,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18169,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Wabash,Wabash County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,7312,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18169,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Wabash,Wabash County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1481,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18169,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Wabash,Wabash County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,92.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18169,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Wabash,Wabash County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,36.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18169,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Wabash,Wabash County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,7.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18169,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Wabash,Wabash County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18169,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Wabash,Wabash County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18169,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Wabash,Wabash County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,56.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18169,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Wabash,Wabash County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18169,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Wabash,Wabash County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,11233,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18169,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18171,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18171,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18171,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18171,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18171,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,8413,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18171,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2722,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18171,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2685,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18171,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,722,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18171,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,37,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18171,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18171,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,26.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18171,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18171,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18171,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18171,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,72.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18171,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18171,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1963,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18171,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Warrick,Warrick County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18173,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Warrick,Warrick County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18173,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Warrick,Warrick County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18173,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Warrick,Warrick County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18173,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Warrick,Warrick County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18173,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Warrick,Warrick County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,63966,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18173,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Warrick,Warrick County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,60006,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18173,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Warrick,Warrick County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,38611,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18173,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Warrick,Warrick County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18173,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Warrick,Warrick County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,21395,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18173,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Warrick,Warrick County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,64.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18173,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Warrick,Warrick County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18173,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Warrick,Warrick County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,35.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18173,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Warrick,Warrick County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18173,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Warrick,Warrick County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,13.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18173,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Warrick,Warrick County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,51.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18173,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Warrick,Warrick County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,7958,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18173,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Warrick,Warrick County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,30653,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18173,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18175,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18175,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18175,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18175,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18175,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,28220,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18175,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,23221,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18175,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,18664,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18175,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18175,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4557,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18175,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,80.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18175,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18175,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,19.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18175,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18175,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,45.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18175,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,35.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18175,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,10472,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18175,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,8192,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18175,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18177,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18177,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18177,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18177,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18177,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,66455,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18177,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,50371,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18177,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,46643,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18177,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,734,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18177,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3728,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18177,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,92.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18177,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18177,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,7.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18177,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18177,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18177,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,91.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18177,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18177,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,45909,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18177,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Wells,Wells County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18179,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Wells,Wells County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18179,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Wells,Wells County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18179,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Wells,Wells County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18179,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Wells,Wells County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18179,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Wells,Wells County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,28179,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18179,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Wells,Wells County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,13291,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18179,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Wells,Wells County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,13255,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18179,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Wells,Wells County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,13255,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18179,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Wells,Wells County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,36,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18179,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Wells,Wells County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18179,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Wells,Wells County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,99.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18179,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Wells,Wells County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18179,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Wells,Wells County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18179,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Wells,Wells County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18179,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Wells,Wells County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18179,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Wells,Wells County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18179,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Wells,Wells County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18179,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,White,White County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18181,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,White,White County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18181,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,White,White County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18181,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,White,White County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18181,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,White,White County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18181,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,White,White County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,24636,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18181,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IN,White,White County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,11773,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18181,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,White,White County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9594,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18181,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,White,White County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18181,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,White,White County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2179,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18181,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,White,White County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,81.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18181,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,White,White County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18181,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,White,White County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,18.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18181,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,White,White County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18181,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,White,White County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18181,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,White,White County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,81.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18181,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,White,White County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,18181,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,White,White County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,9594,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18181,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Whitley,Whitley County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18183,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Whitley,Whitley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18183,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Whitley,Whitley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18183,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Whitley,Whitley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18183,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Whitley,Whitley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18183,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Whitley,Whitley County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,34316,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18183,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Whitley,Whitley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,17085,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18183,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Whitley,Whitley County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,14924,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18183,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Whitley,Whitley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,12290,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18183,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Whitley,Whitley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2162,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18183,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Whitley,Whitley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,87.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18183,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Whitley,Whitley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,71.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18183,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Whitley,Whitley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,12.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18183,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Whitley,Whitley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18183,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Whitley,Whitley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,15.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18183,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Whitley,Whitley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,0.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18183,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Whitley,Whitley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2597,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18183,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,IN,Whitley,Whitley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,36,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18183,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Allen,Allen County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20001,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Allen,Allen County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20001,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Allen,Allen County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20001,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Allen,Allen County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20001,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Allen,Allen County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20001,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Allen,Allen County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,12537,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20001,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Allen,Allen County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9819,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20001,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Allen,Allen County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7952,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20001,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Allen,Allen County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20001,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Allen,Allen County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1867,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20001,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Allen,Allen County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,81,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20001,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Allen,Allen County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20001,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Allen,Allen County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,19,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20001,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Allen,Allen County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20001,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Allen,Allen County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,27.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20001,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Allen,Allen County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,53.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20001,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Allen,Allen County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2742,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20001,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Allen,Allen County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,5210,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20001,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Anderson,Anderson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20003,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Anderson,Anderson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20003,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Anderson,Anderson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20003,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Anderson,Anderson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20003,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Anderson,Anderson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20003,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Anderson,Anderson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,7850,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20003,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Anderson,Anderson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7311,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20003,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Anderson,Anderson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6124,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20003,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Anderson,Anderson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20003,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Anderson,Anderson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1187,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20003,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Anderson,Anderson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,83.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20003,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Anderson,Anderson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20003,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Anderson,Anderson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,16.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20003,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Anderson,Anderson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20003,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Anderson,Anderson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,36,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20003,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Anderson,Anderson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,43.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20003,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Anderson,Anderson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2631,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20003,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Anderson,Anderson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3200,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20003,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Atchison,Atchison County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20005,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Atchison,Atchison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20005,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Atchison,Atchison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20005,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Atchison,Atchison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20005,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Atchison,Atchison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20005,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Atchison,Atchison County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,16305,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20005,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Atchison,Atchison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,16187,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20005,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Atchison,Atchison County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,15505,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20005,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Atchison,Atchison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20005,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Atchison,Atchison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,682,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20005,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Atchison,Atchison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,95.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20005,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Atchison,Atchison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20005,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Atchison,Atchison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,4.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20005,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Atchison,Atchison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20005,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Atchison,Atchison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,31.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20005,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Atchison,Atchison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,64,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20005,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Atchison,Atchison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,5142,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20005,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Atchison,Atchison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,10363,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20005,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Barber,Barber County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20007,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Barber,Barber County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20007,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Barber,Barber County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20007,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Barber,Barber County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20007,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Barber,Barber County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20007,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Barber,Barber County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,4198,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20007,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Barber,Barber County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3764,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20007,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Barber,Barber County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1006,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20007,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Barber,Barber County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20007,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Barber,Barber County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2758,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20007,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Barber,Barber County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,26.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20007,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Barber,Barber County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20007,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Barber,Barber County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,73.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20007,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Barber,Barber County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20007,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Barber,Barber County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,2.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20007,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Barber,Barber County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,24.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20007,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Barber,Barber County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,85,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20007,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Barber,Barber County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,921,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20007,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Barton,Barton County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20009,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Barton,Barton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20009,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Barton,Barton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20009,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Barton,Barton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20009,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Barton,Barton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20009,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Barton,Barton County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,25419,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20009,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Barton,Barton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,21825,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20009,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Barton,Barton County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20009,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Barton,Barton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20009,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Barton,Barton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,21825,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20009,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Barton,Barton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20009,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Barton,Barton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20009,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Barton,Barton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20009,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Barton,Barton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20009,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Barton,Barton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20009,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Barton,Barton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20009,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Barton,Barton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20009,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Barton,Barton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20009,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Bourbon,Bourbon County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20011,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Bourbon,Bourbon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20011,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Bourbon,Bourbon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20011,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Bourbon,Bourbon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20011,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Bourbon,Bourbon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20011,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Bourbon,Bourbon County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,14333,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20011,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Bourbon,Bourbon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,16453,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20011,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Bourbon,Bourbon County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,15003,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20011,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Bourbon,Bourbon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20011,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Bourbon,Bourbon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1450,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20011,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Bourbon,Bourbon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,91.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20011,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Bourbon,Bourbon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20011,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Bourbon,Bourbon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,8.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20011,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Bourbon,Bourbon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20011,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Bourbon,Bourbon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,2.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20011,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Bourbon,Bourbon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,46.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20011,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Bourbon,Bourbon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,414,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20011,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Bourbon,Bourbon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,7614,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20011,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20013,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20013,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20013,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20013,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20013,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,9473,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20013,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7076,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20013,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20013,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20013,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1975,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20013,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,72.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20013,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20013,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,27.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20013,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20013,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,28.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20013,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,43.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20013,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2016,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20013,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3084,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20013,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,21,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20015,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20015,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20015,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20015,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20015,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,67401,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20015,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,46647,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20015,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,41590,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20015,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20015,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5057,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20015,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,89.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20015,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20015,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,10.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20015,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20015,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,56.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20015,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,27.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20015,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,26149,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20015,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,12814,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20015,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Chase,Chase County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20017,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Chase,Chase County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20017,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Chase,Chase County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20017,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Chase,Chase County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20017,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Chase,Chase County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20017,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Chase,Chase County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,2564,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20017,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Chase,Chase County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1751,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20017,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Chase,Chase County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20017,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Chase,Chase County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20017,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Chase,Chase County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1751,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20017,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Chase,Chase County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20017,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Chase,Chase County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20017,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Chase,Chase County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20017,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Chase,Chase County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20017,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Chase,Chase County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20017,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Chase,Chase County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20017,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Chase,Chase County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20017,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Chase,Chase County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20017,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Chautauqua,Chautauqua County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20019,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Chautauqua,Chautauqua County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20019,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Chautauqua,Chautauqua County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20019,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Chautauqua,Chautauqua County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20019,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Chautauqua,Chautauqua County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20019,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Chautauqua,Chautauqua County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,3386,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20019,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Chautauqua,Chautauqua County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2445,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20019,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Chautauqua,Chautauqua County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20019,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Chautauqua,Chautauqua County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20019,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Chautauqua,Chautauqua County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2445,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20019,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Chautauqua,Chautauqua County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20019,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Chautauqua,Chautauqua County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20019,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Chautauqua,Chautauqua County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20019,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Chautauqua,Chautauqua County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20019,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Chautauqua,Chautauqua County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20019,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Chautauqua,Chautauqua County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20019,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Chautauqua,Chautauqua County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20019,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Chautauqua,Chautauqua County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20019,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20021,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20021,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20021,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20021,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20021,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,19275,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20021,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,18611,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20021,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11727,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20021,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,8641,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20021,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6884,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20021,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,63,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20021,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,46.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20021,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,37,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20021,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20021,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20021,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20021,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,67,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20021,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20021,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Cheyenne,Cheyenne County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20023,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Cheyenne,Cheyenne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20023,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Cheyenne,Cheyenne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20023,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Cheyenne,Cheyenne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20023,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Cheyenne,Cheyenne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20023,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Cheyenne,Cheyenne County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,2620,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20023,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Cheyenne,Cheyenne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1705,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20023,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Cheyenne,Cheyenne County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1705,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20023,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Cheyenne,Cheyenne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1705,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20023,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Cheyenne,Cheyenne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20023,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Cheyenne,Cheyenne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20023,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Cheyenne,Cheyenne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20023,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Cheyenne,Cheyenne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20023,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Cheyenne,Cheyenne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20023,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Cheyenne,Cheyenne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20023,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Cheyenne,Cheyenne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20023,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Cheyenne,Cheyenne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20023,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Cheyenne,Cheyenne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20023,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20025,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20025,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20025,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20025,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20025,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,1973,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20025,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1507,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20025,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20025,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20025,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1507,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20025,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20025,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20025,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20025,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20025,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20025,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20025,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20025,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20025,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20027,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20027,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20027,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20027,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20027,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,8112,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20027,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,6316,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20027,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20027,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20027,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6316,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20027,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20027,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20027,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20027,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20027,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20027,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20027,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20027,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20027,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Cloud,Cloud County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20029,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Cloud,Cloud County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20029,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Cloud,Cloud County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20029,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Cloud,Cloud County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20029,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Cloud,Cloud County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20029,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Cloud,Cloud County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,8988,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20029,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Cloud,Cloud County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7238,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20029,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Cloud,Cloud County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20029,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Cloud,Cloud County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20029,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Cloud,Cloud County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7238,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20029,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Cloud,Cloud County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20029,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Cloud,Cloud County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20029,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Cloud,Cloud County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20029,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Cloud,Cloud County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20029,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Cloud,Cloud County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20029,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Cloud,Cloud County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20029,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Cloud,Cloud County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20029,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Cloud,Cloud County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20029,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Coffey,Coffey County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20031,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Coffey,Coffey County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20031,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Coffey,Coffey County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20031,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Coffey,Coffey County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20031,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Coffey,Coffey County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20031,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Coffey,Coffey County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,8370,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20031,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Coffey,Coffey County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9417,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20031,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Coffey,Coffey County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1240,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20031,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Coffey,Coffey County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20031,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Coffey,Coffey County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8177,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20031,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Coffey,Coffey County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,13.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20031,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Coffey,Coffey County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20031,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Coffey,Coffey County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,86.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20031,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Coffey,Coffey County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20031,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Coffey,Coffey County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,13.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20031,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Coffey,Coffey County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20031,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Coffey,Coffey County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1240,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20031,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Coffey,Coffey County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20031,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Comanche,Comanche County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20033,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Comanche,Comanche County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20033,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Comanche,Comanche County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20033,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Comanche,Comanche County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20033,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Comanche,Comanche County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20033,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Comanche,Comanche County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,1681,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20033,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Comanche,Comanche County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1355,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20033,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Comanche,Comanche County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20033,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Comanche,Comanche County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20033,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Comanche,Comanche County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1355,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20033,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Comanche,Comanche County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20033,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Comanche,Comanche County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20033,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Comanche,Comanche County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20033,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Comanche,Comanche County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20033,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Comanche,Comanche County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20033,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Comanche,Comanche County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20033,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Comanche,Comanche County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20033,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Comanche,Comanche County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20033,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Cowley,Cowley County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20035,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Cowley,Cowley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20035,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Cowley,Cowley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20035,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Cowley,Cowley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20035,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Cowley,Cowley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20035,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Cowley,Cowley County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,34498,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20035,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Cowley,Cowley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,33262,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20035,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Cowley,Cowley County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11543,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20035,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Cowley,Cowley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20035,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Cowley,Cowley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,21718,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20035,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Cowley,Cowley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,34.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20035,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Cowley,Cowley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20035,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Cowley,Cowley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,65.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20035,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Cowley,Cowley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20035,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Cowley,Cowley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20035,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Cowley,Cowley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,34.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20035,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Cowley,Cowley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20035,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Cowley,Cowley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,11543,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20035,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20037,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20037,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20037,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20037,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20037,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,38930,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20037,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,38372,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20037,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,26014,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20037,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,4511,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20037,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,12358,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20037,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,67.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20037,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,11.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20037,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,32.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20037,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20037,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20037,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,51.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20037,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,225,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20037,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,19834,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20037,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Decatur,Decatur County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20039,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Decatur,Decatur County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20039,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Decatur,Decatur County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20039,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Decatur,Decatur County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20039,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Decatur,Decatur County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20039,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Decatur,Decatur County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,2749,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20039,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Decatur,Decatur County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1915,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20039,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Decatur,Decatur County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1682,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20039,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Decatur,Decatur County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1682,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20039,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Decatur,Decatur County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,233,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20039,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Decatur,Decatur County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,87.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20039,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Decatur,Decatur County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,87.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20039,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Decatur,Decatur County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,12.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20039,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Decatur,Decatur County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20039,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Decatur,Decatur County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20039,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Decatur,Decatur County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20039,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Decatur,Decatur County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20039,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Decatur,Decatur County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20039,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Dickinson,Dickinson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20041,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Dickinson,Dickinson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20041,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Dickinson,Dickinson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20041,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Dickinson,Dickinson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20041,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Dickinson,Dickinson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20041,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Dickinson,Dickinson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,18353,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20041,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Dickinson,Dickinson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,14708,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20041,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Dickinson,Dickinson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10528,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20041,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Dickinson,Dickinson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20041,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Dickinson,Dickinson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4179,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20041,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Dickinson,Dickinson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,71.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20041,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Dickinson,Dickinson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20041,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Dickinson,Dickinson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,28.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20041,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Dickinson,Dickinson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20041,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Dickinson,Dickinson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,14.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20041,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Dickinson,Dickinson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,57.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20041,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Dickinson,Dickinson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2087,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20041,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Dickinson,Dickinson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,8441,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20041,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Doniphan,Doniphan County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20043,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Doniphan,Doniphan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20043,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Doniphan,Doniphan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20043,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Doniphan,Doniphan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20043,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Doniphan,Doniphan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20043,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Doniphan,Doniphan County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,7469,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20043,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Doniphan,Doniphan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,6494,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20043,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Doniphan,Doniphan County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4333,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20043,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Doniphan,Doniphan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20043,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Doniphan,Doniphan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2161,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20043,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Doniphan,Doniphan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,66.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20043,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Doniphan,Doniphan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20043,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Doniphan,Doniphan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,33.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20043,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Doniphan,Doniphan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20043,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Doniphan,Doniphan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,66.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20043,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Doniphan,Doniphan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20043,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Doniphan,Doniphan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,4333,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20043,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Doniphan,Doniphan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20043,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20045,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20045,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20045,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20045,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20045,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,118814,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20045,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,156341,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20045,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,144740,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20045,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20045,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11602,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20045,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,92.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20045,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20045,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,7.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20045,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20045,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,26.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20045,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,62.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20045,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,41013,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20045,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,97135,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20045,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Edwards,Edwards County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20047,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Edwards,Edwards County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20047,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Edwards,Edwards County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20047,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Edwards,Edwards County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20047,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Edwards,Edwards County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20047,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Edwards,Edwards County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,2898,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20047,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Edwards,Edwards County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2012,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20047,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Edwards,Edwards County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1519,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20047,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Edwards,Edwards County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,181,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20047,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Edwards,Edwards County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,493,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20047,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Edwards,Edwards County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,75.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20047,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Edwards,Edwards County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20047,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Edwards,Edwards County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,24.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20047,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Edwards,Edwards County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20047,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Edwards,Edwards County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20047,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Edwards,Edwards County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,66.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20047,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Edwards,Edwards County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20047,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Edwards,Edwards County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1338,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20047,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Elk,Elk County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20049,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Elk,Elk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20049,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Elk,Elk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20049,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Elk,Elk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20049,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Elk,Elk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20049,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Elk,Elk County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,2475,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20049,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Elk,Elk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2102,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20049,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Elk,Elk County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20049,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Elk,Elk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20049,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Elk,Elk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2102,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20049,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Elk,Elk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20049,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Elk,Elk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20049,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Elk,Elk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20049,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Elk,Elk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20049,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Elk,Elk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20049,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Elk,Elk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20049,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Elk,Elk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20049,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Elk,Elk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20049,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Ellis,Ellis County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20051,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Ellis,Ellis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20051,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Ellis,Ellis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20051,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Ellis,Ellis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20051,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Ellis,Ellis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20051,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Ellis,Ellis County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,28931,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20051,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Ellis,Ellis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,25407,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20051,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Ellis,Ellis County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20051,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Ellis,Ellis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20051,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Ellis,Ellis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,25407,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20051,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Ellis,Ellis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20051,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Ellis,Ellis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20051,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Ellis,Ellis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20051,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Ellis,Ellis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20051,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Ellis,Ellis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20051,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Ellis,Ellis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20051,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Ellis,Ellis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20051,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Ellis,Ellis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20051,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Ellsworth,Ellsworth County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20053,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Ellsworth,Ellsworth County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20053,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Ellsworth,Ellsworth County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20053,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Ellsworth,Ellsworth County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20053,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Ellsworth,Ellsworth County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20053,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Ellsworth,Ellsworth County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,6354,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20053,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Ellsworth,Ellsworth County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7226,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20053,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Ellsworth,Ellsworth County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3340,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20053,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Ellsworth,Ellsworth County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,411,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20053,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Ellsworth,Ellsworth County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3887,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20053,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Ellsworth,Ellsworth County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,46.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20053,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Ellsworth,Ellsworth County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,5.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20053,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Ellsworth,Ellsworth County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,53.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20053,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Ellsworth,Ellsworth County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20053,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Ellsworth,Ellsworth County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20053,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Ellsworth,Ellsworth County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,40.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20053,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Ellsworth,Ellsworth County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20053,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Ellsworth,Ellsworth County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2929,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20053,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Finney,Finney County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20055,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Finney,Finney County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20055,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Finney,Finney County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20055,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Finney,Finney County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20055,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Finney,Finney County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20055,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Finney,Finney County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,38297,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20055,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Finney,Finney County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,34163,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20055,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Finney,Finney County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,29611,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20055,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Finney,Finney County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20055,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Finney,Finney County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4551,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20055,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Finney,Finney County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,86.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20055,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Finney,Finney County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20055,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Finney,Finney County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,13.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20055,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Finney,Finney County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20055,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Finney,Finney County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,10.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20055,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Finney,Finney County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,76.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20055,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Finney,Finney County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,3488,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20055,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Finney,Finney County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,26123,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20055,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Ford,Ford County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20057,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Ford,Ford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20057,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Ford,Ford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20057,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Ford,Ford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20057,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Ford,Ford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20057,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Ford,Ford County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,34206,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20057,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Ford,Ford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,28692,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20057,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Ford,Ford County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,27716,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20057,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Ford,Ford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,904,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20057,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Ford,Ford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,976,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20057,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Ford,Ford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,96.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20057,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Ford,Ford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,3.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20057,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Ford,Ford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,3.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20057,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Ford,Ford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20057,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Ford,Ford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20057,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Ford,Ford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20057,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Ford,Ford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20057,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Ford,Ford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20057,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20059,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20059,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20059,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20059,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20059,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,26028,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20059,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,23373,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20059,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,17544,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20059,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20059,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5830,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20059,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,75.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20059,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20059,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,24.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20059,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20059,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,20.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20059,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,51.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20059,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,4764,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20059,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,12122,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20059,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Geary,Geary County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20061,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Geary,Geary County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20061,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Geary,Geary County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20061,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Geary,Geary County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20061,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Geary,Geary County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20061,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Geary,Geary County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,36747,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20061,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Geary,Geary County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,59514,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20061,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Geary,Geary County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,58451,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20061,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Geary,Geary County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,77,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20061,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Geary,Geary County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1062,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20061,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Geary,Geary County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20061,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Geary,Geary County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20061,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Geary,Geary County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20061,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Geary,Geary County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20061,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Geary,Geary County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,2.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20061,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Geary,Geary County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,95.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20061,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Geary,Geary County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1725,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20061,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Geary,Geary County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,56649,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20061,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Gove,Gove County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20063,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Gove,Gove County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20063,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Gove,Gove County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20063,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Gove,Gove County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20063,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Gove,Gove County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20063,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Gove,Gove County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,2694,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20063,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Gove,Gove County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1696,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20063,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Gove,Gove County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1626,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20063,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Gove,Gove County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1626,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20063,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Gove,Gove County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,69,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20063,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Gove,Gove County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,95.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20063,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Gove,Gove County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,95.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20063,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Gove,Gove County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,4.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20063,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Gove,Gove County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20063,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Gove,Gove County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20063,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Gove,Gove County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20063,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Gove,Gove County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20063,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Gove,Gove County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20063,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Graham,Graham County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20065,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Graham,Graham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20065,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Graham,Graham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20065,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Graham,Graham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20065,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Graham,Graham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20065,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Graham,Graham County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,2405,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20065,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Graham,Graham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1674,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20065,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Graham,Graham County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,144,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20065,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Graham,Graham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,144,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20065,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Graham,Graham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1529,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20065,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Graham,Graham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,8.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20065,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Graham,Graham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,8.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20065,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Graham,Graham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,91.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20065,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Graham,Graham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20065,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Graham,Graham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20065,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Graham,Graham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20065,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Graham,Graham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20065,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Graham,Graham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20065,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20067,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20067,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20067,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20067,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20067,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,7327,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20067,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5860,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20067,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5860,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20067,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,5860,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20067,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20067,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20067,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20067,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20067,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20067,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20067,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20067,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20067,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20067,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Gray,Gray County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20069,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Gray,Gray County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20069,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Gray,Gray County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20069,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Gray,Gray County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20069,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Gray,Gray County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20069,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Gray,Gray County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,5633,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20069,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Gray,Gray County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3892,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20069,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Gray,Gray County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,286,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20069,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Gray,Gray County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,286,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20069,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Gray,Gray County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3606,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20069,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Gray,Gray County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,7.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20069,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Gray,Gray County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,7.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20069,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Gray,Gray County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,92.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20069,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Gray,Gray County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20069,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Gray,Gray County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20069,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Gray,Gray County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20069,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Gray,Gray County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20069,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Gray,Gray County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20069,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Greeley,Greeley County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20071,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Greeley,Greeley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20071,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Greeley,Greeley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20071,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Greeley,Greeley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20071,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Greeley,Greeley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20071,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Greeley,Greeley County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,1277,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20071,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Greeley,Greeley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,802,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20071,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Greeley,Greeley County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,802,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20071,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Greeley,Greeley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,737,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20071,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Greeley,Greeley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20071,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Greeley,Greeley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20071,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Greeley,Greeley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,91.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20071,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Greeley,Greeley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20071,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Greeley,Greeley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20071,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Greeley,Greeley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,8.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20071,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Greeley,Greeley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20071,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Greeley,Greeley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,65,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20071,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Greeley,Greeley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20071,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Greenwood,Greenwood County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20073,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Greenwood,Greenwood County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20073,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Greenwood,Greenwood County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20073,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Greenwood,Greenwood County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20073,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Greenwood,Greenwood County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20073,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Greenwood,Greenwood County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,5972,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20073,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Greenwood,Greenwood County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,6917,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20073,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Greenwood,Greenwood County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5298,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20073,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Greenwood,Greenwood County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20073,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Greenwood,Greenwood County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1618,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20073,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Greenwood,Greenwood County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,76.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20073,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Greenwood,Greenwood County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20073,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Greenwood,Greenwood County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,23.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20073,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Greenwood,Greenwood County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20073,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Greenwood,Greenwood County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,43,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20073,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Greenwood,Greenwood County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,33.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20073,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Greenwood,Greenwood County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2978,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20073,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Greenwood,Greenwood County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2321,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20073,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20075,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20075,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20075,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20075,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20075,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,2494,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20075,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1881,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20075,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,193,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20075,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,193,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20075,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1688,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20075,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,10.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20075,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,10.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20075,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,89.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20075,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20075,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20075,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20075,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20075,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20075,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Harper,Harper County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20077,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Harper,Harper County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20077,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Harper,Harper County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20077,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Harper,Harper County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20077,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Harper,Harper County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20077,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Harper,Harper County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,5461,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20077,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Harper,Harper County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4613,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20077,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Harper,Harper County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20077,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Harper,Harper County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20077,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Harper,Harper County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4613,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20077,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Harper,Harper County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20077,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Harper,Harper County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20077,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Harper,Harper County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20077,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Harper,Harper County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20077,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Harper,Harper County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20077,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Harper,Harper County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20077,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Harper,Harper County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20077,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Harper,Harper County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20077,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Harvey,Harvey County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20079,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Harvey,Harvey County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20079,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Harvey,Harvey County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20079,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Harvey,Harvey County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20079,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Harvey,Harvey County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20079,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Harvey,Harvey County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,33942,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20079,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Harvey,Harvey County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,31812,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20079,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Harvey,Harvey County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,27763,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20079,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Harvey,Harvey County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20079,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Harvey,Harvey County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4049,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20079,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Harvey,Harvey County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,87.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20079,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Harvey,Harvey County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20079,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Harvey,Harvey County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,12.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20079,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Harvey,Harvey County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20079,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Harvey,Harvey County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,11.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20079,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Harvey,Harvey County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,75.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20079,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Harvey,Harvey County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,3660,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20079,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Harvey,Harvey County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,24102,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20079,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Haskell,Haskell County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20081,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Haskell,Haskell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20081,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Haskell,Haskell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20081,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Haskell,Haskell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20081,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Haskell,Haskell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20081,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Haskell,Haskell County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,3756,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20081,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Haskell,Haskell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2474,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20081,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Haskell,Haskell County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2442,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20081,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Haskell,Haskell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,2442,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20081,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Haskell,Haskell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,32,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20081,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Haskell,Haskell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20081,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Haskell,Haskell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,98.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20081,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Haskell,Haskell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20081,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Haskell,Haskell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20081,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Haskell,Haskell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20081,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Haskell,Haskell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20081,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Haskell,Haskell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20081,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Haskell,Haskell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20081,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Hodgeman,Hodgeman County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20083,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Hodgeman,Hodgeman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20083,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Hodgeman,Hodgeman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20083,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Hodgeman,Hodgeman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20083,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Hodgeman,Hodgeman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20083,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Hodgeman,Hodgeman County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,1718,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20083,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Hodgeman,Hodgeman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1003,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20083,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Hodgeman,Hodgeman County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1003,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20083,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Hodgeman,Hodgeman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,199,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20083,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Hodgeman,Hodgeman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20083,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Hodgeman,Hodgeman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20083,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Hodgeman,Hodgeman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,19.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20083,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Hodgeman,Hodgeman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20083,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Hodgeman,Hodgeman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20083,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Hodgeman,Hodgeman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20083,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Hodgeman,Hodgeman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20083,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Hodgeman,Hodgeman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20083,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Hodgeman,Hodgeman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20083,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20085,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20085,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20085,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20085,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20085,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,13230,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20085,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,11897,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20085,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8368,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20085,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20085,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3530,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20085,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,70.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20085,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20085,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,29.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20085,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20085,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,49.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20085,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20085,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,5895,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20085,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20085,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20087,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20087,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20087,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20087,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20087,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,18300,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20087,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,19364,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20087,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3596,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20087,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20087,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,15768,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20087,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,18.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20087,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20087,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,81.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20087,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20087,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,18.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20087,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20087,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,3596,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20087,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20087,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Jewell,Jewell County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20089,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Jewell,Jewell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20089,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Jewell,Jewell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20089,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Jewell,Jewell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20089,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Jewell,Jewell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20089,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Jewell,Jewell County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,2926,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20089,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Jewell,Jewell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2550,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20089,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Jewell,Jewell County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20089,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Jewell,Jewell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20089,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Jewell,Jewell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2550,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20089,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Jewell,Jewell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20089,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Jewell,Jewell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20089,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Jewell,Jewell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20089,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Jewell,Jewell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20089,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Jewell,Jewell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20089,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Jewell,Jewell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20089,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Jewell,Jewell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20089,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Jewell,Jewell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20089,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20091,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20091,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20091,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20091,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20091,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,610536,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20091,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,618062,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20091,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,607698,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20091,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20091,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10364,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20091,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20091,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20091,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20091,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20091,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20091,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,96.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20091,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,495,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20091,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,599051,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20091,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Kearny,Kearny County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20093,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Kearny,Kearny County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20093,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Kearny,Kearny County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20093,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Kearny,Kearny County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20093,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Kearny,Kearny County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20093,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Kearny,Kearny County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,3971,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20093,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Kearny,Kearny County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2800,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20093,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Kearny,Kearny County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2800,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20093,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Kearny,Kearny County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,2800,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20093,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Kearny,Kearny County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20093,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Kearny,Kearny County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20093,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Kearny,Kearny County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20093,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Kearny,Kearny County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20093,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Kearny,Kearny County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20093,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Kearny,Kearny County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20093,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Kearny,Kearny County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20093,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Kearny,Kearny County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20093,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Kearny,Kearny County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20093,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Kingman,Kingman County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20095,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Kingman,Kingman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20095,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Kingman,Kingman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20095,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Kingman,Kingman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20095,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Kingman,Kingman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20095,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Kingman,Kingman County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,7446,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20095,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Kingman,Kingman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4111,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20095,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Kingman,Kingman County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20095,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Kingman,Kingman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20095,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Kingman,Kingman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4111,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20095,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Kingman,Kingman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20095,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Kingman,Kingman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20095,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Kingman,Kingman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20095,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Kingman,Kingman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20095,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Kingman,Kingman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20095,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Kingman,Kingman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20095,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Kingman,Kingman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20095,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Kingman,Kingman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20095,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Kiowa,Kiowa County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20097,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Kiowa,Kiowa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20097,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Kiowa,Kiowa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20097,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Kiowa,Kiowa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20097,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Kiowa,Kiowa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20097,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Kiowa,Kiowa County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,2452,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20097,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Kiowa,Kiowa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1673,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20097,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Kiowa,Kiowa County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20097,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Kiowa,Kiowa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20097,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Kiowa,Kiowa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1673,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20097,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Kiowa,Kiowa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20097,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Kiowa,Kiowa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20097,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Kiowa,Kiowa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20097,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Kiowa,Kiowa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20097,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Kiowa,Kiowa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20097,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Kiowa,Kiowa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20097,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Kiowa,Kiowa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20097,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Kiowa,Kiowa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20097,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,KS,Kansas,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,890,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,KS,KS,Kansas,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,334,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,KS,KS,Kansas,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,62,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,KS,KS,Kansas,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,168,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,KS,KS,Kansas,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,76,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,KS,KS,Kansas,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,2935880,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2020,KS,KS,Kansas,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2785355,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,KS,KS,Kansas,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1820664,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,KS,KS,Kansas,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,68396,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,KS,KS,Kansas,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,964691,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,KS,KS,Kansas,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,65.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,KS,KS,Kansas,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,2.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,KS,KS,Kansas,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,34.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,KS,KS,Kansas,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,556,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,KS,KS,Kansas,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,KS,KS,Kansas,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,52.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,KS,KS,Kansas,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,223689,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,KS,KS,Kansas,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1454950,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,KS,Labette,Labette County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20099,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Labette,Labette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20099,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Labette,Labette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20099,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Labette,Labette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20099,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Labette,Labette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20099,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Labette,Labette County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,20119,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20099,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Labette,Labette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,19340,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20099,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Labette,Labette County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,16209,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20099,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Labette,Labette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20099,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Labette,Labette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3131,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20099,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Labette,Labette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,83.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20099,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Labette,Labette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20099,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Labette,Labette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,16.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20099,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Labette,Labette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20099,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Labette,Labette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,27.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20099,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Labette,Labette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,48.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20099,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Labette,Labette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,5380,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20099,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Labette,Labette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,9419,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20099,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Lane,Lane County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20101,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Lane,Lane County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20101,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Lane,Lane County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20101,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Lane,Lane County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20101,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Lane,Lane County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20101,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Lane,Lane County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,1568,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20101,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Lane,Lane County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1146,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20101,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Lane,Lane County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1146,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20101,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Lane,Lane County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,253,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20101,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Lane,Lane County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20101,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Lane,Lane County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20101,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Lane,Lane County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,22.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20101,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Lane,Lane County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20101,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Lane,Lane County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20101,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Lane,Lane County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20101,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Lane,Lane County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20101,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Lane,Lane County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20101,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Lane,Lane County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20101,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Leavenworth,Leavenworth County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20103,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Leavenworth,Leavenworth County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20103,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Leavenworth,Leavenworth County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20103,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Leavenworth,Leavenworth County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20103,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Leavenworth,Leavenworth County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20103,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Leavenworth,Leavenworth County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,81870,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20103,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Leavenworth,Leavenworth County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,79103,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20103,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Leavenworth,Leavenworth County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,72885,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20103,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Leavenworth,Leavenworth County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20103,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Leavenworth,Leavenworth County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6218,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20103,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Leavenworth,Leavenworth County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,92.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20103,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Leavenworth,Leavenworth County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20103,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Leavenworth,Leavenworth County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,7.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20103,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Leavenworth,Leavenworth County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20103,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Leavenworth,Leavenworth County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,31,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20103,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Leavenworth,Leavenworth County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,61.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20103,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Leavenworth,Leavenworth County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,24521,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20103,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Leavenworth,Leavenworth County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,48364,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20103,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20105,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20105,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20105,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20105,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20105,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,2947,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20105,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1639,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20105,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1168,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20105,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20105,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,471,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20105,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,71.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20105,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20105,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,28.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20105,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20105,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20105,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,71.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20105,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20105,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1168,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20105,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Linn,Linn County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20107,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Linn,Linn County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20107,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Linn,Linn County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20107,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Linn,Linn County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20107,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Linn,Linn County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20107,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Linn,Linn County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,9582,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20107,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Linn,Linn County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9938,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20107,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Linn,Linn County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2354,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20107,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Linn,Linn County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20107,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Linn,Linn County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7583,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20107,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Linn,Linn County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,23.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20107,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Linn,Linn County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20107,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Linn,Linn County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,76.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20107,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Linn,Linn County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20107,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Linn,Linn County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,2.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20107,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Linn,Linn County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20107,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Linn,Linn County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,265,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20107,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Linn,Linn County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20107,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20109,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20109,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20109,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20109,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20109,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,2743,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20109,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2211,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20109,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,157,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20109,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,157,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20109,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2054,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20109,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,7.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20109,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,7.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20109,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,92.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20109,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20109,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20109,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20109,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20109,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20109,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Lyon,Lyon County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20111,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Lyon,Lyon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20111,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Lyon,Lyon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20111,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Lyon,Lyon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20111,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Lyon,Lyon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20111,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Lyon,Lyon County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,32100,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20111,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Lyon,Lyon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,31031,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20111,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Lyon,Lyon County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,31031,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20111,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Lyon,Lyon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20111,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Lyon,Lyon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20111,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Lyon,Lyon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20111,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Lyon,Lyon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20111,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Lyon,Lyon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20111,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Lyon,Lyon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20111,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Lyon,Lyon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,21.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20111,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Lyon,Lyon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,78.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20111,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Lyon,Lyon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,6698,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20111,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Lyon,Lyon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,24333,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20111,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20115,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20115,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20115,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20115,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20115,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,11754,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20115,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9597,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20115,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3750,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20115,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,207,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20115,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5847,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20115,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,39.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20115,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,2.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20115,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,60.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20115,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20115,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,18.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20115,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,18.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20115,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1788,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20115,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1756,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20115,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20117,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20117,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20117,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20117,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20117,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,10014,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20117,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7770,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20117,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,145,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20117,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,145,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20117,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7625,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20117,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20117,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20117,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20117,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20117,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20117,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20117,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20117,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20117,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,McPherson,McPherson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20113,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,McPherson,McPherson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20113,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,McPherson,McPherson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20113,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,McPherson,McPherson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20113,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,McPherson,McPherson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20113,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,McPherson,McPherson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,30160,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20113,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,McPherson,McPherson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,23122,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20113,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,McPherson,McPherson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1849,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20113,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,McPherson,McPherson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20113,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,McPherson,McPherson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,21273,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20113,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,McPherson,McPherson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20113,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,McPherson,McPherson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20113,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,McPherson,McPherson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,92,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20113,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,McPherson,McPherson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20113,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,McPherson,McPherson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20113,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,McPherson,McPherson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20113,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,McPherson,McPherson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20113,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,McPherson,McPherson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1849,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20113,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Meade,Meade County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20119,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Meade,Meade County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20119,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Meade,Meade County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20119,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Meade,Meade County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20119,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Meade,Meade County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20119,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Meade,Meade County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,4045,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20119,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Meade,Meade County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3028,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20119,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Meade,Meade County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3028,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20119,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Meade,Meade County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,3028,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20119,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Meade,Meade County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20119,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Meade,Meade County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20119,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Meade,Meade County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20119,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Meade,Meade County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20119,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Meade,Meade County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20119,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Meade,Meade County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20119,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Meade,Meade County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20119,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Meade,Meade County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20119,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Meade,Meade County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20119,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Miami,Miami County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20121,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Miami,Miami County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20121,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Miami,Miami County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20121,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Miami,Miami County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20121,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Miami,Miami County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20121,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Miami,Miami County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,34183,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20121,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Miami,Miami County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,28120,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20121,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Miami,Miami County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,16071,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20121,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Miami,Miami County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20121,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Miami,Miami County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,12049,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20121,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Miami,Miami County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,57.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20121,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Miami,Miami County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20121,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Miami,Miami County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,42.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20121,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Miami,Miami County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20121,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Miami,Miami County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,36.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20121,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Miami,Miami County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,15.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20121,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Miami,Miami County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,10170,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20121,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Miami,Miami County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,4239,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20121,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Mitchell,Mitchell County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20123,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Mitchell,Mitchell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20123,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Mitchell,Mitchell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20123,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Mitchell,Mitchell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20123,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Mitchell,Mitchell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20123,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Mitchell,Mitchell County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,5764,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20123,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Mitchell,Mitchell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,8045,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20123,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Mitchell,Mitchell County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20123,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Mitchell,Mitchell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20123,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Mitchell,Mitchell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8045,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20123,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Mitchell,Mitchell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20123,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Mitchell,Mitchell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20123,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Mitchell,Mitchell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20123,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Mitchell,Mitchell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20123,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Mitchell,Mitchell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20123,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Mitchell,Mitchell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20123,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Mitchell,Mitchell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20123,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Mitchell,Mitchell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20123,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20125,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20125,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20125,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20125,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20125,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,31360,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20125,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,30880,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20125,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,28219,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20125,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20125,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2661,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20125,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,91.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20125,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20125,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,8.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20125,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20125,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,24.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20125,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,57,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20125,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,7459,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20125,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,17588,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20125,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Morris,Morris County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20127,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Morris,Morris County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20127,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Morris,Morris County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20127,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Morris,Morris County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20127,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Morris,Morris County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20127,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Morris,Morris County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,5360,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20127,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Morris,Morris County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4150,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20127,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Morris,Morris County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2098,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20127,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Morris,Morris County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20127,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Morris,Morris County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2052,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20127,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Morris,Morris County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,50.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20127,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Morris,Morris County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20127,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Morris,Morris County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,49.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20127,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Morris,Morris County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20127,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Morris,Morris County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20127,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Morris,Morris County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,50.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20127,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Morris,Morris County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20127,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Morris,Morris County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2098,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20127,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Morton,Morton County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20129,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Morton,Morton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20129,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Morton,Morton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20129,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Morton,Morton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20129,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Morton,Morton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20129,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Morton,Morton County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,2695,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20129,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Morton,Morton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2152,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20129,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Morton,Morton County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20129,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Morton,Morton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20129,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Morton,Morton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2152,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20129,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Morton,Morton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20129,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Morton,Morton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20129,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Morton,Morton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20129,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Morton,Morton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20129,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Morton,Morton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20129,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Morton,Morton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20129,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Morton,Morton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20129,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Morton,Morton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20129,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Nemaha,Nemaha County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20131,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Nemaha,Nemaha County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20131,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Nemaha,Nemaha County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20131,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Nemaha,Nemaha County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20131,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Nemaha,Nemaha County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20131,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Nemaha,Nemaha County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,10218,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20131,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Nemaha,Nemaha County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9561,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20131,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Nemaha,Nemaha County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4770,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20131,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Nemaha,Nemaha County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,162,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20131,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Nemaha,Nemaha County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4791,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20131,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Nemaha,Nemaha County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,49.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20131,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Nemaha,Nemaha County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20131,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Nemaha,Nemaha County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,50.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20131,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Nemaha,Nemaha County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20131,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Nemaha,Nemaha County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20131,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Nemaha,Nemaha County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,48.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20131,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Nemaha,Nemaha County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20131,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Nemaha,Nemaha County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,4608,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20131,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Neosho,Neosho County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20133,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Neosho,Neosho County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20133,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Neosho,Neosho County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20133,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Neosho,Neosho County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20133,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Neosho,Neosho County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20133,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Neosho,Neosho County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,15909,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20133,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Neosho,Neosho County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,17185,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20133,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Neosho,Neosho County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,13121,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20133,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Neosho,Neosho County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20133,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Neosho,Neosho County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4064,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20133,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Neosho,Neosho County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,76.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20133,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Neosho,Neosho County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20133,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Neosho,Neosho County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,23.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20133,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Neosho,Neosho County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20133,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Neosho,Neosho County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,12.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20133,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Neosho,Neosho County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,52,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20133,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Neosho,Neosho County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2104,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20133,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Neosho,Neosho County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,8945,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20133,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Ness,Ness County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20135,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Ness,Ness County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20135,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Ness,Ness County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20135,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Ness,Ness County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20135,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Ness,Ness County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20135,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Ness,Ness County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,2678,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20135,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Ness,Ness County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2040,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20135,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Ness,Ness County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1717,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20135,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Ness,Ness County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1717,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20135,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Ness,Ness County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,322,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20135,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Ness,Ness County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,84.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20135,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Ness,Ness County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,84.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20135,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Ness,Ness County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,15.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20135,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Ness,Ness County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20135,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Ness,Ness County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20135,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Ness,Ness County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20135,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Ness,Ness County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20135,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Ness,Ness County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20135,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Norton,Norton County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20137,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Norton,Norton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20137,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Norton,Norton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20137,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Norton,Norton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20137,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Norton,Norton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20137,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Norton,Norton County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,5435,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20137,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Norton,Norton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4337,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20137,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Norton,Norton County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,228,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20137,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Norton,Norton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,228,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20137,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Norton,Norton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4109,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20137,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Norton,Norton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,5.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20137,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Norton,Norton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,5.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20137,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Norton,Norton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,94.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20137,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Norton,Norton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20137,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Norton,Norton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20137,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Norton,Norton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20137,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Norton,Norton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20137,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Norton,Norton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20137,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Osage,Osage County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20139,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Osage,Osage County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20139,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Osage,Osage County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20139,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Osage,Osage County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20139,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Osage,Osage County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20139,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Osage,Osage County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,15724,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20139,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Osage,Osage County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,17215,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20139,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Osage,Osage County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8161,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20139,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Osage,Osage County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,495,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20139,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Osage,Osage County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9054,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20139,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Osage,Osage County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,47.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20139,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Osage,Osage County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,2.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20139,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Osage,Osage County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,52.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20139,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Osage,Osage County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20139,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Osage,Osage County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,28.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20139,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Osage,Osage County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,16.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20139,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Osage,Osage County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,4888,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20139,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Osage,Osage County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2779,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20139,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Osborne,Osborne County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20141,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Osborne,Osborne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20141,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Osborne,Osborne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20141,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Osborne,Osborne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20141,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Osborne,Osborne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20141,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Osborne,Osborne County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,3494,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20141,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Osborne,Osborne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2670,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20141,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Osborne,Osborne County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,805,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20141,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Osborne,Osborne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20141,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Osborne,Osborne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1865,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20141,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Osborne,Osborne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,30.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20141,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Osborne,Osborne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20141,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Osborne,Osborne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,69.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20141,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Osborne,Osborne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20141,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Osborne,Osborne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20141,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Osborne,Osborne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,30.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20141,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Osborne,Osborne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20141,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Osborne,Osborne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,805,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20141,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Ottawa,Ottawa County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20143,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Ottawa,Ottawa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20143,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Ottawa,Ottawa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20143,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Ottawa,Ottawa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20143,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Ottawa,Ottawa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20143,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Ottawa,Ottawa County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,5733,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20143,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Ottawa,Ottawa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5183,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20143,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Ottawa,Ottawa County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20143,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Ottawa,Ottawa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20143,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Ottawa,Ottawa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5183,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20143,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Ottawa,Ottawa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20143,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Ottawa,Ottawa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20143,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Ottawa,Ottawa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20143,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Ottawa,Ottawa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20143,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Ottawa,Ottawa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20143,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Ottawa,Ottawa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20143,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Ottawa,Ottawa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20143,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Ottawa,Ottawa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20143,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Pawnee,Pawnee County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20145,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Pawnee,Pawnee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20145,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Pawnee,Pawnee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20145,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Pawnee,Pawnee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20145,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Pawnee,Pawnee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20145,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Pawnee,Pawnee County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,6244,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20145,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Pawnee,Pawnee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,15824,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20145,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Pawnee,Pawnee County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,15685,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20145,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Pawnee,Pawnee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,3850,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20145,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Pawnee,Pawnee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,138,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20145,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Pawnee,Pawnee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20145,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Pawnee,Pawnee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,24.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20145,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Pawnee,Pawnee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20145,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Pawnee,Pawnee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20145,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Pawnee,Pawnee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,74.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20145,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Pawnee,Pawnee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20145,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Pawnee,Pawnee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,11835,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20145,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Pawnee,Pawnee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20145,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Phillips,Phillips County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20147,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Phillips,Phillips County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20147,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Phillips,Phillips County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20147,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Phillips,Phillips County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20147,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Phillips,Phillips County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20147,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Phillips,Phillips County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,4953,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20147,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Phillips,Phillips County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4129,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20147,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Phillips,Phillips County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2419,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20147,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Phillips,Phillips County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20147,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Phillips,Phillips County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1710,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20147,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Phillips,Phillips County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,58.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20147,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Phillips,Phillips County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20147,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Phillips,Phillips County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,41.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20147,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Phillips,Phillips County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20147,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Phillips,Phillips County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20147,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Phillips,Phillips County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,58.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20147,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Phillips,Phillips County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20147,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Phillips,Phillips County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2419,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20147,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Pottawatomie,Pottawatomie County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20149,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Pottawatomie,Pottawatomie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20149,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Pottawatomie,Pottawatomie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20149,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Pottawatomie,Pottawatomie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20149,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Pottawatomie,Pottawatomie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20149,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Pottawatomie,Pottawatomie County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,25392,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20149,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Pottawatomie,Pottawatomie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,22799,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20149,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Pottawatomie,Pottawatomie County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5515,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20149,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Pottawatomie,Pottawatomie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20149,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Pottawatomie,Pottawatomie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,17284,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20149,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Pottawatomie,Pottawatomie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,24.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20149,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Pottawatomie,Pottawatomie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20149,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Pottawatomie,Pottawatomie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,75.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20149,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Pottawatomie,Pottawatomie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20149,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Pottawatomie,Pottawatomie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20149,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Pottawatomie,Pottawatomie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,23.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20149,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Pottawatomie,Pottawatomie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,216,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20149,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Pottawatomie,Pottawatomie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,5299,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20149,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Pratt,Pratt County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20151,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Pratt,Pratt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20151,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Pratt,Pratt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20151,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Pratt,Pratt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20151,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Pratt,Pratt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20151,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Pratt,Pratt County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,9151,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20151,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Pratt,Pratt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7055,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20151,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Pratt,Pratt County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20151,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Pratt,Pratt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20151,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Pratt,Pratt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7055,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20151,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Pratt,Pratt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20151,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Pratt,Pratt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20151,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Pratt,Pratt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20151,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Pratt,Pratt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20151,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Pratt,Pratt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20151,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Pratt,Pratt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20151,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Pratt,Pratt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20151,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Pratt,Pratt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20151,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Rawlins,Rawlins County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20153,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Rawlins,Rawlins County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20153,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Rawlins,Rawlins County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20153,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Rawlins,Rawlins County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20153,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Rawlins,Rawlins County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20153,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Rawlins,Rawlins County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,2555,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20153,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Rawlins,Rawlins County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1488,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20153,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Rawlins,Rawlins County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1488,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20153,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Rawlins,Rawlins County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1488,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20153,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Rawlins,Rawlins County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20153,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Rawlins,Rawlins County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20153,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Rawlins,Rawlins County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20153,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Rawlins,Rawlins County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20153,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Rawlins,Rawlins County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20153,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Rawlins,Rawlins County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20153,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Rawlins,Rawlins County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20153,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Rawlins,Rawlins County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20153,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Rawlins,Rawlins County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20153,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Reno,Reno County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20155,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Reno,Reno County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20155,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Reno,Reno County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20155,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Reno,Reno County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20155,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Reno,Reno County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20155,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Reno,Reno County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,61808,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20155,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Reno,Reno County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,49404,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20155,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Reno,Reno County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1091,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20155,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Reno,Reno County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1091,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20155,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Reno,Reno County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,48313,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20155,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Reno,Reno County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20155,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Reno,Reno County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,2.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20155,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Reno,Reno County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,97.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20155,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Reno,Reno County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20155,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Reno,Reno County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20155,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Reno,Reno County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20155,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Reno,Reno County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20155,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Reno,Reno County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20155,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Republic,Republic County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20157,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Republic,Republic County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20157,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Republic,Republic County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20157,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Republic,Republic County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20157,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Republic,Republic County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20157,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Republic,Republic County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,4680,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20157,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Republic,Republic County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4620,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20157,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Republic,Republic County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20157,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Republic,Republic County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20157,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Republic,Republic County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4620,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20157,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Republic,Republic County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20157,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Republic,Republic County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20157,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Republic,Republic County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20157,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Republic,Republic County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20157,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Republic,Republic County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20157,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Republic,Republic County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20157,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Republic,Republic County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20157,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Republic,Republic County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20157,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Rice,Rice County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20159,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Rice,Rice County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20159,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Rice,Rice County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20159,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Rice,Rice County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20159,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Rice,Rice County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20159,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Rice,Rice County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,9374,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20159,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Rice,Rice County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,8073,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20159,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Rice,Rice County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6542,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20159,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Rice,Rice County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,2185,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20159,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Rice,Rice County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1531,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20159,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Rice,Rice County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,81,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20159,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Rice,Rice County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,27.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20159,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Rice,Rice County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,19,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20159,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Rice,Rice County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20159,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Rice,Rice County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,11,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20159,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Rice,Rice County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,42.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20159,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Rice,Rice County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,890,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20159,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Rice,Rice County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3466,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20159,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Riley,Riley County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20161,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Riley,Riley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20161,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Riley,Riley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20161,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Riley,Riley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20161,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Riley,Riley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20161,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Riley,Riley County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,71996,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20161,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Riley,Riley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,61409,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20161,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Riley,Riley County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,57519,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20161,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Riley,Riley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20161,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Riley,Riley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3890,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20161,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Riley,Riley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,93.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20161,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Riley,Riley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20161,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Riley,Riley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,6.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20161,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Riley,Riley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20161,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Riley,Riley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,5.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20161,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Riley,Riley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,88,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20161,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Riley,Riley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,3504,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20161,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Riley,Riley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,54016,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20161,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Rooks,Rooks County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20163,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Rooks,Rooks County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20163,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Rooks,Rooks County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20163,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Rooks,Rooks County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20163,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Rooks,Rooks County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20163,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Rooks,Rooks County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,4894,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20163,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Rooks,Rooks County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4013,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20163,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Rooks,Rooks County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1243,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20163,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Rooks,Rooks County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20163,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Rooks,Rooks County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2770,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20163,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Rooks,Rooks County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,31,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20163,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Rooks,Rooks County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20163,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Rooks,Rooks County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,69,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20163,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Rooks,Rooks County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20163,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Rooks,Rooks County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20163,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Rooks,Rooks County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,31,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20163,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Rooks,Rooks County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20163,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Rooks,Rooks County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1243,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20163,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Rush,Rush County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20165,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Rush,Rush County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20165,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Rush,Rush County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20165,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Rush,Rush County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20165,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Rush,Rush County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20165,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Rush,Rush County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,2944,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20165,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Rush,Rush County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2400,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20165,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Rush,Rush County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,415,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20165,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Rush,Rush County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,415,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20165,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Rush,Rush County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1984,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20165,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Rush,Rush County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,17.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20165,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Rush,Rush County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,17.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20165,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Rush,Rush County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,82.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20165,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Rush,Rush County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20165,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Rush,Rush County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20165,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Rush,Rush County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20165,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Rush,Rush County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20165,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Rush,Rush County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20165,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Russell,Russell County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20167,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Russell,Russell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20167,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Russell,Russell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20167,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Russell,Russell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20167,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Russell,Russell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20167,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Russell,Russell County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,6672,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20167,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Russell,Russell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7113,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20167,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Russell,Russell County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,93,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20167,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Russell,Russell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,93,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20167,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Russell,Russell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7020,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20167,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Russell,Russell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20167,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Russell,Russell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20167,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Russell,Russell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20167,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Russell,Russell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20167,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Russell,Russell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20167,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Russell,Russell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20167,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Russell,Russell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20167,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Russell,Russell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20167,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Saline,Saline County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20169,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Saline,Saline County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20169,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Saline,Saline County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20169,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Saline,Saline County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20169,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Saline,Saline County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20169,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Saline,Saline County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,54232,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20169,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Saline,Saline County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,50177,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20169,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Saline,Saline County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,46882,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20169,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Saline,Saline County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20169,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Saline,Saline County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3295,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20169,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Saline,Saline County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,93.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20169,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Saline,Saline County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20169,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Saline,Saline County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,6.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20169,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Saline,Saline County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20169,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Saline,Saline County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,1.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20169,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Saline,Saline County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,91.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20169,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Saline,Saline County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,834,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20169,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Saline,Saline County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,46048,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20169,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20171,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20171,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20171,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20171,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20171,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,5137,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20171,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3708,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20171,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3708,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20171,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,3708,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20171,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20171,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20171,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20171,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20171,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20171,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20171,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20171,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20171,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20171,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Sedgwick,Sedgwick County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,24,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20173,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Sedgwick,Sedgwick County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20173,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Sedgwick,Sedgwick County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20173,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Sedgwick,Sedgwick County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20173,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Sedgwick,Sedgwick County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20173,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Sedgwick,Sedgwick County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,524246,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20173,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Sedgwick,Sedgwick County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,482395,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20173,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Sedgwick,Sedgwick County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,15493,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20173,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Sedgwick,Sedgwick County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20173,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Sedgwick,Sedgwick County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,466902,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20173,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Sedgwick,Sedgwick County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,3.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20173,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Sedgwick,Sedgwick County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20173,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Sedgwick,Sedgwick County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,96.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20173,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Sedgwick,Sedgwick County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,20,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20173,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Sedgwick,Sedgwick County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20173,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Sedgwick,Sedgwick County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,3.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20173,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Sedgwick,Sedgwick County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20173,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Sedgwick,Sedgwick County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,15493,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20173,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Seward,Seward County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20175,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Seward,Seward County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20175,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Seward,Seward County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20175,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Seward,Seward County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20175,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Seward,Seward County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20175,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Seward,Seward County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,21832,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20175,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Seward,Seward County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,19537,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20175,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Seward,Seward County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,430,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20175,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Seward,Seward County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,430,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20175,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Seward,Seward County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,19107,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20175,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Seward,Seward County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20175,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Seward,Seward County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,2.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20175,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Seward,Seward County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,97.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20175,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Seward,Seward County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20175,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Seward,Seward County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20175,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Seward,Seward County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20175,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Seward,Seward County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20175,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Seward,Seward County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20175,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Shawnee,Shawnee County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20177,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Shawnee,Shawnee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20177,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Shawnee,Shawnee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20177,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Shawnee,Shawnee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20177,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Shawnee,Shawnee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20177,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Shawnee,Shawnee County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,178608,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20177,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Shawnee,Shawnee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,152289,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20177,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Shawnee,Shawnee County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,143087,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20177,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Shawnee,Shawnee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20177,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Shawnee,Shawnee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9203,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20177,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Shawnee,Shawnee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,94,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20177,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Shawnee,Shawnee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20177,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Shawnee,Shawnee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20177,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Shawnee,Shawnee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20177,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Shawnee,Shawnee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,12.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20177,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Shawnee,Shawnee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,81.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20177,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Shawnee,Shawnee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,19127,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20177,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Shawnee,Shawnee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,123960,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20177,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Sheridan,Sheridan County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20179,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Sheridan,Sheridan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20179,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Sheridan,Sheridan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20179,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Sheridan,Sheridan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20179,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Sheridan,Sheridan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20179,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Sheridan,Sheridan County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,2442,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20179,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Sheridan,Sheridan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1389,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20179,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Sheridan,Sheridan County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1389,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20179,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Sheridan,Sheridan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1389,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20179,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Sheridan,Sheridan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20179,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Sheridan,Sheridan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20179,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Sheridan,Sheridan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20179,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Sheridan,Sheridan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20179,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Sheridan,Sheridan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20179,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Sheridan,Sheridan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20179,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Sheridan,Sheridan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20179,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Sheridan,Sheridan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20179,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Sheridan,Sheridan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20179,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Sherman,Sherman County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20181,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Sherman,Sherman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20181,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Sherman,Sherman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20181,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Sherman,Sherman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20181,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Sherman,Sherman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20181,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Sherman,Sherman County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,5882,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20181,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Sherman,Sherman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4511,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20181,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Sherman,Sherman County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4511,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20181,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Sherman,Sherman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,4511,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20181,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Sherman,Sherman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20181,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Sherman,Sherman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20181,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Sherman,Sherman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20181,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Sherman,Sherman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20181,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Sherman,Sherman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20181,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Sherman,Sherman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20181,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Sherman,Sherman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20181,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Sherman,Sherman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20181,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Sherman,Sherman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20181,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Smith,Smith County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20183,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Smith,Smith County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20183,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Smith,Smith County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20183,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Smith,Smith County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20183,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Smith,Smith County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20183,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Smith,Smith County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,3559,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20183,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Smith,Smith County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2661,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20183,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Smith,Smith County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20183,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Smith,Smith County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20183,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Smith,Smith County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2661,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20183,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Smith,Smith County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20183,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Smith,Smith County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20183,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Smith,Smith County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20183,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Smith,Smith County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20183,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Smith,Smith County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20183,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Smith,Smith County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20183,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Smith,Smith County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20183,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Smith,Smith County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20183,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Stafford,Stafford County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20185,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Stafford,Stafford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20185,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Stafford,Stafford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20185,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Stafford,Stafford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20185,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Stafford,Stafford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20185,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Stafford,Stafford County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,4064,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20185,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Stafford,Stafford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2626,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20185,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Stafford,Stafford County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,524,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20185,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Stafford,Stafford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,524,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20185,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Stafford,Stafford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2102,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20185,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Stafford,Stafford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,20,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20185,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Stafford,Stafford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,20,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20185,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Stafford,Stafford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,80,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20185,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Stafford,Stafford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20185,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Stafford,Stafford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20185,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Stafford,Stafford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20185,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Stafford,Stafford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20185,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Stafford,Stafford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20185,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Stanton,Stanton County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20187,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Stanton,Stanton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20187,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Stanton,Stanton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20187,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Stanton,Stanton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20187,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Stanton,Stanton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20187,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Stanton,Stanton County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,2072,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20187,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Stanton,Stanton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1481,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20187,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Stanton,Stanton County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1481,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20187,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Stanton,Stanton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1481,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20187,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Stanton,Stanton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20187,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Stanton,Stanton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20187,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Stanton,Stanton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20187,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Stanton,Stanton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20187,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Stanton,Stanton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20187,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Stanton,Stanton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20187,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Stanton,Stanton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20187,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Stanton,Stanton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20187,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Stanton,Stanton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20187,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Stevens,Stevens County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20189,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Stevens,Stevens County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20189,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Stevens,Stevens County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20189,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Stevens,Stevens County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20189,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Stevens,Stevens County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20189,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Stevens,Stevens County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,5236,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20189,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Stevens,Stevens County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4000,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20189,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Stevens,Stevens County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,296,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20189,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Stevens,Stevens County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,296,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20189,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Stevens,Stevens County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3705,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20189,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Stevens,Stevens County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,7.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20189,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Stevens,Stevens County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,7.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20189,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Stevens,Stevens County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,92.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20189,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Stevens,Stevens County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20189,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Stevens,Stevens County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20189,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Stevens,Stevens County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20189,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Stevens,Stevens County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20189,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Stevens,Stevens County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20189,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Sumner,Sumner County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,19,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20191,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Sumner,Sumner County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20191,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Sumner,Sumner County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20191,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Sumner,Sumner County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20191,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Sumner,Sumner County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20191,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Sumner,Sumner County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,22332,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20191,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Sumner,Sumner County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,23410,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20191,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Sumner,Sumner County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,16090,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20191,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Sumner,Sumner County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20191,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Sumner,Sumner County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7320,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20191,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Sumner,Sumner County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,68.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20191,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Sumner,Sumner County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20191,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Sumner,Sumner County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,31.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20191,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Sumner,Sumner County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20191,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Sumner,Sumner County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,36.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20191,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Sumner,Sumner County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,32.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20191,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Sumner,Sumner County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,8510,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20191,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Sumner,Sumner County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,7579,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20191,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Thomas,Thomas County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20193,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Thomas,Thomas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20193,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Thomas,Thomas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20193,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Thomas,Thomas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20193,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Thomas,Thomas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20193,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Thomas,Thomas County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,7916,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20193,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Thomas,Thomas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5824,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20193,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Thomas,Thomas County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5824,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20193,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Thomas,Thomas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,5824,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20193,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Thomas,Thomas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20193,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Thomas,Thomas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20193,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Thomas,Thomas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20193,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Thomas,Thomas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20193,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Thomas,Thomas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20193,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Thomas,Thomas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20193,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Thomas,Thomas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20193,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Thomas,Thomas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20193,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Thomas,Thomas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20193,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Trego,Trego County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20195,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Trego,Trego County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20195,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Trego,Trego County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20195,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Trego,Trego County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20195,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Trego,Trego County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20195,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Trego,Trego County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,2808,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20195,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Trego,Trego County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3383,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20195,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Trego,Trego County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20195,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Trego,Trego County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20195,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Trego,Trego County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3383,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20195,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Trego,Trego County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20195,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Trego,Trego County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20195,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Trego,Trego County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20195,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Trego,Trego County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20195,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Trego,Trego County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20195,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Trego,Trego County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20195,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Trego,Trego County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20195,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Trego,Trego County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20195,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Wabaunsee,Wabaunsee County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20197,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Wabaunsee,Wabaunsee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20197,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Wabaunsee,Wabaunsee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20197,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Wabaunsee,Wabaunsee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20197,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Wabaunsee,Wabaunsee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20197,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Wabaunsee,Wabaunsee County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,6885,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20197,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Wabaunsee,Wabaunsee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5304,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20197,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Wabaunsee,Wabaunsee County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,245,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20197,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Wabaunsee,Wabaunsee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20197,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Wabaunsee,Wabaunsee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5059,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20197,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Wabaunsee,Wabaunsee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,4.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20197,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Wabaunsee,Wabaunsee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20197,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Wabaunsee,Wabaunsee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,95.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20197,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Wabaunsee,Wabaunsee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20197,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Wabaunsee,Wabaunsee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,4.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20197,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Wabaunsee,Wabaunsee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20197,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Wabaunsee,Wabaunsee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,245,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20197,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Wabaunsee,Wabaunsee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20197,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Wallace,Wallace County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20199,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Wallace,Wallace County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20199,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Wallace,Wallace County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20199,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Wallace,Wallace County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20199,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Wallace,Wallace County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20199,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Wallace,Wallace County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,1514,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20199,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Wallace,Wallace County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,974,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20199,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Wallace,Wallace County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,811,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20199,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Wallace,Wallace County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,811,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20199,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Wallace,Wallace County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,163,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20199,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Wallace,Wallace County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,83.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20199,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Wallace,Wallace County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,83.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20199,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Wallace,Wallace County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,16.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20199,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Wallace,Wallace County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20199,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Wallace,Wallace County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20199,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Wallace,Wallace County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20199,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Wallace,Wallace County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20199,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Wallace,Wallace County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20199,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20201,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20201,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20201,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20201,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20201,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,5526,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20201,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5080,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20201,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,75,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20201,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,75,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20201,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5004,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20201,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20201,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20201,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20201,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20201,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20201,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20201,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20201,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20201,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Wichita,Wichita County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20203,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Wichita,Wichita County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20203,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Wichita,Wichita County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20203,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Wichita,Wichita County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20203,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Wichita,Wichita County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20203,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Wichita,Wichita County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,2144,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20203,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Wichita,Wichita County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1432,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20203,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Wichita,Wichita County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1432,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20203,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Wichita,Wichita County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1432,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20203,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Wichita,Wichita County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20203,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Wichita,Wichita County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20203,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Wichita,Wichita County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20203,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Wichita,Wichita County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20203,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Wichita,Wichita County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20203,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Wichita,Wichita County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20203,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Wichita,Wichita County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20203,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Wichita,Wichita County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20203,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Wichita,Wichita County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,20203,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Wilson,Wilson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20205,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Wilson,Wilson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20205,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Wilson,Wilson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20205,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Wilson,Wilson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20205,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Wilson,Wilson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20205,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Wilson,Wilson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,8577,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20205,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Wilson,Wilson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,8840,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20205,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Wilson,Wilson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3153,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20205,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Wilson,Wilson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20205,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Wilson,Wilson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5687,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20205,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Wilson,Wilson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,35.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20205,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Wilson,Wilson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20205,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Wilson,Wilson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,64.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20205,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Wilson,Wilson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20205,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Wilson,Wilson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,2.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20205,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Wilson,Wilson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,25.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20205,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Wilson,Wilson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,183,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20205,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Wilson,Wilson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2238,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20205,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Woodson,Woodson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20207,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Woodson,Woodson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20207,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Woodson,Woodson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20207,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Woodson,Woodson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20207,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Woodson,Woodson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20207,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Woodson,Woodson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,3103,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20207,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Woodson,Woodson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3321,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20207,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Woodson,Woodson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3321,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20207,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Woodson,Woodson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20207,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Woodson,Woodson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20207,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Woodson,Woodson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20207,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Woodson,Woodson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20207,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Woodson,Woodson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20207,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Woodson,Woodson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20207,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Woodson,Woodson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,7.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20207,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Woodson,Woodson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,39.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20207,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Woodson,Woodson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,260,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20207,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Woodson,Woodson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1307,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20207,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Wyandotte,Wyandotte County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20209,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Wyandotte,Wyandotte County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20209,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Wyandotte,Wyandotte County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20209,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Wyandotte,Wyandotte County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20209,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Wyandotte,Wyandotte County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20209,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Wyandotte,Wyandotte County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,168873,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20209,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Wyandotte,Wyandotte County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,159133,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20209,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Wyandotte,Wyandotte County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,159133,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20209,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Wyandotte,Wyandotte County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20209,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Wyandotte,Wyandotte County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20209,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Wyandotte,Wyandotte County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20209,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Wyandotte,Wyandotte County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20209,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Wyandotte,Wyandotte County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20209,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Wyandotte,Wyandotte County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20209,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Wyandotte,Wyandotte County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20209,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Wyandotte,Wyandotte County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20209,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Wyandotte,Wyandotte County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20209,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KS,Wyandotte,Wyandotte County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,159133,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20209,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Adair,Adair County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21001,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Adair,Adair County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21001,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Adair,Adair County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21001,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Adair,Adair County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21001,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Adair,Adair County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21001,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Adair,Adair County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,18870,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21001,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Adair,Adair County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,19986,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21001,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Adair,Adair County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,19986,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21001,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Adair,Adair County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21001,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Adair,Adair County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21001,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Adair,Adair County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21001,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Adair,Adair County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21001,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Adair,Adair County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21001,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Adair,Adair County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21001,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Adair,Adair County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,21001,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Adair,Adair County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21001,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Adair,Adair County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,21001,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Adair,Adair County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,19986,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21001,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Allen,Allen County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21003,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Allen,Allen County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21003,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Allen,Allen County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21003,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Allen,Allen County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21003,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Allen,Allen County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21003,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Allen,Allen County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,20595,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21003,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Allen,Allen County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,19760,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21003,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Allen,Allen County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,19760,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21003,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Allen,Allen County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21003,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Allen,Allen County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21003,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Allen,Allen County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21003,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Allen,Allen County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21003,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Allen,Allen County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21003,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Allen,Allen County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21003,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Allen,Allen County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,68.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21003,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Allen,Allen County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,31.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21003,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Allen,Allen County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,13556,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21003,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Allen,Allen County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,6204,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21003,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Anderson,Anderson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21005,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Anderson,Anderson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21005,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Anderson,Anderson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21005,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Anderson,Anderson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21005,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Anderson,Anderson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21005,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Anderson,Anderson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,23869,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21005,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Anderson,Anderson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,20937,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21005,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Anderson,Anderson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,20937,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21005,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Anderson,Anderson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21005,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Anderson,Anderson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21005,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Anderson,Anderson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21005,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Anderson,Anderson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21005,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Anderson,Anderson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21005,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Anderson,Anderson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21005,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Anderson,Anderson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,36.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21005,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Anderson,Anderson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,63.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21005,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Anderson,Anderson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,7607,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21005,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Anderson,Anderson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,13329,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21005,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Ballard,Ballard County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21007,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Ballard,Ballard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21007,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Ballard,Ballard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21007,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Ballard,Ballard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21007,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Ballard,Ballard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21007,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Ballard,Ballard County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,7724,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21007,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Ballard,Ballard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4860,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21007,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Ballard,Ballard County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4860,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21007,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Ballard,Ballard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21007,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Ballard,Ballard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21007,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Ballard,Ballard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21007,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Ballard,Ballard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21007,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Ballard,Ballard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21007,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Ballard,Ballard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21007,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Ballard,Ballard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,21007,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Ballard,Ballard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21007,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Ballard,Ballard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,21007,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Ballard,Ballard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,4860,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21007,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Barren,Barren County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21009,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Barren,Barren County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21009,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Barren,Barren County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21009,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Barren,Barren County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21009,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Barren,Barren County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21009,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Barren,Barren County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,44445,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21009,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Barren,Barren County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,40026,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21009,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Barren,Barren County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,40026,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21009,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Barren,Barren County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21009,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Barren,Barren County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21009,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Barren,Barren County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21009,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Barren,Barren County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21009,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Barren,Barren County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21009,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Barren,Barren County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21009,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Barren,Barren County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,17,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21009,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Barren,Barren County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,83,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21009,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Barren,Barren County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,6797,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21009,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Barren,Barren County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,33229,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21009,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Bath,Bath County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21011,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Bath,Bath County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21011,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Bath,Bath County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21011,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Bath,Bath County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21011,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Bath,Bath County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21011,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Bath,Bath County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,12708,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21011,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Bath,Bath County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,14094,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21011,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Bath,Bath County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,14094,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21011,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Bath,Bath County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21011,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Bath,Bath County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21011,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Bath,Bath County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21011,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Bath,Bath County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21011,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Bath,Bath County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21011,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Bath,Bath County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21011,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Bath,Bath County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21011,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Bath,Bath County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,21011,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Bath,Bath County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,14094,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21011,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Bath,Bath County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,21011,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Bell,Bell County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21013,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Bell,Bell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21013,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Bell,Bell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21013,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Bell,Bell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21013,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Bell,Bell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21013,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Bell,Bell County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,23942,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21013,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Bell,Bell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,26093,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21013,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Bell,Bell County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,26093,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21013,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Bell,Bell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21013,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Bell,Bell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21013,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Bell,Bell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21013,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Bell,Bell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21013,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Bell,Bell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21013,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Bell,Bell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21013,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Bell,Bell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21013,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Bell,Bell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,99,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21013,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Bell,Bell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,249,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21013,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Bell,Bell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,25844,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21013,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21015,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21015,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21015,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21015,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21015,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,136403,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21015,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,86766,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21015,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,86518,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21015,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21015,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,248,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21015,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21015,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21015,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21015,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21015,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,99.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21015,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21015,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,86496,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21015,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,23,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21015,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Bourbon,Bourbon County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21017,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Bourbon,Bourbon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21017,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Bourbon,Bourbon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21017,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Bourbon,Bourbon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21017,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Bourbon,Bourbon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21017,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Bourbon,Bourbon County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,20285,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21017,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Bourbon,Bourbon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,14321,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21017,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Bourbon,Bourbon County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,14321,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21017,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Bourbon,Bourbon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21017,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Bourbon,Bourbon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21017,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Bourbon,Bourbon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21017,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Bourbon,Bourbon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21017,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Bourbon,Bourbon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21017,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Bourbon,Bourbon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21017,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Bourbon,Bourbon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,21017,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Bourbon,Bourbon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21017,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Bourbon,Bourbon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,21017,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Bourbon,Bourbon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,14321,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21017,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Boyd,Boyd County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21019,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Boyd,Boyd County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21019,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Boyd,Boyd County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21019,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Boyd,Boyd County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21019,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Boyd,Boyd County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21019,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Boyd,Boyd County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,48175,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21019,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Boyd,Boyd County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,60012,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21019,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Boyd,Boyd County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,60012,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21019,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Boyd,Boyd County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21019,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Boyd,Boyd County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21019,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Boyd,Boyd County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21019,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Boyd,Boyd County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21019,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Boyd,Boyd County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21019,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Boyd,Boyd County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21019,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Boyd,Boyd County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,33.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21019,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Boyd,Boyd County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,66.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21019,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Boyd,Boyd County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,19881,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21019,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Boyd,Boyd County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,40131,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21019,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Boyle,Boyle County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21021,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Boyle,Boyle County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21021,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Boyle,Boyle County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21021,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Boyle,Boyle County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21021,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Boyle,Boyle County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21021,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Boyle,Boyle County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,30701,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21021,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Boyle,Boyle County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,33315,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21021,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Boyle,Boyle County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,33315,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21021,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Boyle,Boyle County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21021,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Boyle,Boyle County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21021,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Boyle,Boyle County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21021,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Boyle,Boyle County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21021,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Boyle,Boyle County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21021,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Boyle,Boyle County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21021,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Boyle,Boyle County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,11.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21021,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Boyle,Boyle County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,88.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21021,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Boyle,Boyle County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,3851,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21021,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Boyle,Boyle County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,29464,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21021,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Bracken,Bracken County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21023,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Bracken,Bracken County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21023,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Bracken,Bracken County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21023,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Bracken,Bracken County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21023,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Bracken,Bracken County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21023,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Bracken,Bracken County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,8390,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21023,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Bracken,Bracken County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,8245,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21023,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Bracken,Bracken County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8245,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21023,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Bracken,Bracken County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21023,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Bracken,Bracken County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21023,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Bracken,Bracken County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21023,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Bracken,Bracken County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21023,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Bracken,Bracken County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21023,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Bracken,Bracken County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21023,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Bracken,Bracken County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,81.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21023,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Bracken,Bracken County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,18.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21023,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Bracken,Bracken County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,6718,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21023,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Bracken,Bracken County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1527,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21023,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Breathitt,Breathitt County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21025,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Breathitt,Breathitt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21025,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Breathitt,Breathitt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21025,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Breathitt,Breathitt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21025,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Breathitt,Breathitt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21025,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Breathitt,Breathitt County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,13679,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21025,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Breathitt,Breathitt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4342,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21025,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Breathitt,Breathitt County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4252,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21025,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Breathitt,Breathitt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21025,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Breathitt,Breathitt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,90,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21025,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Breathitt,Breathitt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,97.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21025,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Breathitt,Breathitt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21025,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Breathitt,Breathitt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21025,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Breathitt,Breathitt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21025,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Breathitt,Breathitt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,21025,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Breathitt,Breathitt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,97.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21025,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Breathitt,Breathitt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,21025,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Breathitt,Breathitt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,4252,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21025,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Breckinridge,Breckinridge County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21027,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Breckinridge,Breckinridge County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21027,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Breckinridge,Breckinridge County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21027,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Breckinridge,Breckinridge County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21027,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Breckinridge,Breckinridge County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21027,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Breckinridge,Breckinridge County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,20432,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21027,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Breckinridge,Breckinridge County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,18623,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21027,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Breckinridge,Breckinridge County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,18623,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21027,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Breckinridge,Breckinridge County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21027,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Breckinridge,Breckinridge County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21027,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Breckinridge,Breckinridge County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21027,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Breckinridge,Breckinridge County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21027,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Breckinridge,Breckinridge County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21027,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Breckinridge,Breckinridge County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21027,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Breckinridge,Breckinridge County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,15.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21027,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Breckinridge,Breckinridge County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,84.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21027,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Breckinridge,Breckinridge County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2880,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21027,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Breckinridge,Breckinridge County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,15743,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21027,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Bullitt,Bullitt County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21029,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Bullitt,Bullitt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21029,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Bullitt,Bullitt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21029,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Bullitt,Bullitt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21029,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Bullitt,Bullitt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21029,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Bullitt,Bullitt County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,82293,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21029,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Bullitt,Bullitt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,48468,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21029,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Bullitt,Bullitt County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,48468,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21029,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Bullitt,Bullitt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21029,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Bullitt,Bullitt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21029,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Bullitt,Bullitt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21029,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Bullitt,Bullitt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21029,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Bullitt,Bullitt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21029,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Bullitt,Bullitt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21029,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Bullitt,Bullitt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,49.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21029,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Bullitt,Bullitt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,50.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21029,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Bullitt,Bullitt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,24065,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21029,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Bullitt,Bullitt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,24403,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21029,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21031,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21031,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21031,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21031,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21031,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,12318,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21031,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,15260,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21031,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,15260,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21031,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21031,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21031,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21031,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21031,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21031,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21031,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,21031,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21031,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,21031,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,15260,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21031,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Caldwell,Caldwell County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21033,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Caldwell,Caldwell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21033,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Caldwell,Caldwell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21033,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Caldwell,Caldwell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21033,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Caldwell,Caldwell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21033,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Caldwell,Caldwell County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,12632,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21033,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Caldwell,Caldwell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,12696,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21033,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Caldwell,Caldwell County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,12696,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21033,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Caldwell,Caldwell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21033,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Caldwell,Caldwell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21033,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Caldwell,Caldwell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21033,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Caldwell,Caldwell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21033,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Caldwell,Caldwell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21033,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Caldwell,Caldwell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21033,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Caldwell,Caldwell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,50.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21033,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Caldwell,Caldwell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,49.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21033,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Caldwell,Caldwell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,6363,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21033,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Caldwell,Caldwell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,6333,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21033,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Calloway,Calloway County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21035,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Calloway,Calloway County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21035,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Calloway,Calloway County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21035,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Calloway,Calloway County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21035,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Calloway,Calloway County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21035,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Calloway,Calloway County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,37147,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21035,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Calloway,Calloway County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,28349,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21035,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Calloway,Calloway County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,27573,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21035,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Calloway,Calloway County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21035,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Calloway,Calloway County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,775,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21035,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Calloway,Calloway County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,97.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21035,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Calloway,Calloway County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21035,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Calloway,Calloway County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21035,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Calloway,Calloway County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21035,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Calloway,Calloway County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,13.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21035,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Calloway,Calloway County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,83.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21035,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Calloway,Calloway County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,3801,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21035,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Calloway,Calloway County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,23772,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21035,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Campbell,Campbell County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21037,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Campbell,Campbell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21037,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Campbell,Campbell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21037,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Campbell,Campbell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21037,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Campbell,Campbell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21037,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Campbell,Campbell County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,93086,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21037,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Campbell,Campbell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,80439,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21037,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Campbell,Campbell County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,80439,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21037,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Campbell,Campbell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21037,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Campbell,Campbell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21037,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Campbell,Campbell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21037,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Campbell,Campbell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21037,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Campbell,Campbell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21037,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Campbell,Campbell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21037,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Campbell,Campbell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,21037,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Campbell,Campbell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21037,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Campbell,Campbell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,21037,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Campbell,Campbell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,80439,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21037,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Carlisle,Carlisle County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21039,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Carlisle,Carlisle County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21039,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Carlisle,Carlisle County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21039,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Carlisle,Carlisle County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21039,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Carlisle,Carlisle County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21039,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Carlisle,Carlisle County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,4811,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21039,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Carlisle,Carlisle County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3471,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21039,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Carlisle,Carlisle County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3041,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21039,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Carlisle,Carlisle County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21039,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Carlisle,Carlisle County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,429,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21039,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Carlisle,Carlisle County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,87.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21039,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Carlisle,Carlisle County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21039,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Carlisle,Carlisle County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,12.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21039,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Carlisle,Carlisle County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21039,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Carlisle,Carlisle County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,13,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21039,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Carlisle,Carlisle County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,74.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21039,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Carlisle,Carlisle County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,452,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21039,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Carlisle,Carlisle County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2589,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21039,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21041,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21041,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21041,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21041,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21041,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,10833,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21041,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,13089,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21041,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,13089,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21041,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21041,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21041,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21041,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21041,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21041,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21041,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,19.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21041,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,80.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21041,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2548,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21041,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,10541,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21041,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Carter,Carter County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21043,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Carter,Carter County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21043,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Carter,Carter County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21043,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Carter,Carter County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21043,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Carter,Carter County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21043,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Carter,Carter County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,26575,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21043,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Carter,Carter County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,25947,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21043,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Carter,Carter County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,25947,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21043,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Carter,Carter County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21043,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Carter,Carter County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21043,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Carter,Carter County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21043,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Carter,Carter County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21043,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Carter,Carter County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21043,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Carter,Carter County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21043,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Carter,Carter County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,21043,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Carter,Carter County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21043,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Carter,Carter County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,21043,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Carter,Carter County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,25947,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21043,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Casey,Casey County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21045,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Casey,Casey County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21045,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Casey,Casey County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21045,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Casey,Casey County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21045,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Casey,Casey County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21045,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Casey,Casey County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,15886,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21045,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Casey,Casey County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,13342,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21045,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Casey,Casey County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,13342,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21045,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Casey,Casey County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21045,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Casey,Casey County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21045,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Casey,Casey County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21045,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Casey,Casey County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21045,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Casey,Casey County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21045,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Casey,Casey County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21045,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Casey,Casey County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,84.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21045,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Casey,Casey County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,15.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21045,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Casey,Casey County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,11261,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21045,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Casey,Casey County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2081,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21045,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Christian,Christian County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21047,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Christian,Christian County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21047,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Christian,Christian County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21047,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Christian,Christian County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21047,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Christian,Christian County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21047,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Christian,Christian County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,72696,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21047,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Christian,Christian County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,75878,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21047,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Christian,Christian County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,75878,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21047,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Christian,Christian County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21047,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Christian,Christian County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21047,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Christian,Christian County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21047,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Christian,Christian County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21047,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Christian,Christian County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21047,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Christian,Christian County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21047,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Christian,Christian County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,29.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21047,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Christian,Christian County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,70.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21047,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Christian,Christian County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,22236,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21047,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Christian,Christian County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,53641,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21047,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21049,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21049,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21049,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21049,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21049,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,36999,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21049,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,35772,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21049,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,35772,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21049,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21049,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21049,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21049,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21049,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21049,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21049,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,18.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21049,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,81.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21049,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,6657,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21049,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,29114,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21049,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21051,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21051,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21051,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21051,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21051,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,20294,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21051,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,15076,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21051,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,15076,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21051,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21051,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21051,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21051,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21051,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21051,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21051,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,32,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21051,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,68,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21051,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,4819,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21051,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,10257,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21051,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21053,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21053,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21053,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21053,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21053,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,9216,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21053,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,13288,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21053,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,13288,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21053,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21053,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21053,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21053,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21053,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21053,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21053,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,21053,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21053,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,21053,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,13288,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21053,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Crittenden,Crittenden County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21055,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Crittenden,Crittenden County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21055,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Crittenden,Crittenden County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21055,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Crittenden,Crittenden County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21055,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Crittenden,Crittenden County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21055,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Crittenden,Crittenden County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,8985,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21055,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Crittenden,Crittenden County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2747,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21055,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Crittenden,Crittenden County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2747,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21055,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Crittenden,Crittenden County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21055,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Crittenden,Crittenden County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21055,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Crittenden,Crittenden County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21055,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Crittenden,Crittenden County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21055,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Crittenden,Crittenden County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21055,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Crittenden,Crittenden County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21055,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Crittenden,Crittenden County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,21055,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Crittenden,Crittenden County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21055,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Crittenden,Crittenden County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,21055,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Crittenden,Crittenden County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2747,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21055,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21057,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21057,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21057,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21057,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21057,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,5856,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21057,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,8735,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21057,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8735,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21057,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21057,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21057,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21057,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21057,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21057,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21057,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,73.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21057,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,26.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21057,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,6416,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21057,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2319,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21057,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Daviess,Daviess County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21059,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Daviess,Daviess County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21059,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Daviess,Daviess County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21059,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Daviess,Daviess County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21059,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Daviess,Daviess County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21059,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Daviess,Daviess County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,103291,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21059,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Daviess,Daviess County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,95956,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21059,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Daviess,Daviess County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,95956,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21059,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Daviess,Daviess County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21059,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Daviess,Daviess County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21059,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Daviess,Daviess County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21059,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Daviess,Daviess County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21059,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Daviess,Daviess County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21059,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Daviess,Daviess County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21059,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Daviess,Daviess County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,45,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21059,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Daviess,Daviess County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,55,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21059,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Daviess,Daviess County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,43166,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21059,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Daviess,Daviess County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,52790,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21059,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Edmonson,Edmonson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21061,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Edmonson,Edmonson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21061,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Edmonson,Edmonson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21061,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Edmonson,Edmonson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21061,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Edmonson,Edmonson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21061,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Edmonson,Edmonson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,12132,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21061,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Edmonson,Edmonson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,32820,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21061,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Edmonson,Edmonson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,32820,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21061,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Edmonson,Edmonson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21061,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Edmonson,Edmonson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21061,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Edmonson,Edmonson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21061,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Edmonson,Edmonson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21061,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Edmonson,Edmonson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21061,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Edmonson,Edmonson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21061,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Edmonson,Edmonson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,17.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21061,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Edmonson,Edmonson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,82.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21061,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Edmonson,Edmonson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,5821,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21061,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Edmonson,Edmonson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,26999,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21061,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Elliott,Elliott County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21063,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Elliott,Elliott County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21063,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Elliott,Elliott County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21063,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Elliott,Elliott County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21063,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Elliott,Elliott County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21063,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Elliott,Elliott County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,7334,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21063,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Elliott,Elliott County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3189,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21063,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Elliott,Elliott County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3189,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21063,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Elliott,Elliott County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21063,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Elliott,Elliott County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21063,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Elliott,Elliott County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21063,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Elliott,Elliott County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21063,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Elliott,Elliott County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21063,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Elliott,Elliott County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21063,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Elliott,Elliott County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,21063,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Elliott,Elliott County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21063,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Elliott,Elliott County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,21063,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Elliott,Elliott County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3189,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21063,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Estill,Estill County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21065,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Estill,Estill County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21065,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Estill,Estill County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21065,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Estill,Estill County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21065,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Estill,Estill County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21065,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Estill,Estill County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,14134,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21065,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Estill,Estill County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,13693,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21065,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Estill,Estill County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,13693,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21065,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Estill,Estill County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21065,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Estill,Estill County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21065,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Estill,Estill County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21065,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Estill,Estill County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21065,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Estill,Estill County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21065,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Estill,Estill County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21065,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Estill,Estill County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,62.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21065,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Estill,Estill County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,37.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21065,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Estill,Estill County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,8587,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21065,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Estill,Estill County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,5106,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21065,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21067,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21067,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21067,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21067,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21067,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,322403,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21067,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,273404,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21067,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,273404,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21067,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21067,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21067,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21067,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21067,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21067,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21067,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21067,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,99,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21067,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2711,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21067,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,270692,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21067,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Fleming,Fleming County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21069,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Fleming,Fleming County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21069,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Fleming,Fleming County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21069,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Fleming,Fleming County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21069,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Fleming,Fleming County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21069,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Fleming,Fleming County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,15091,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21069,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Fleming,Fleming County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,12925,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21069,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Fleming,Fleming County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,12925,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21069,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Fleming,Fleming County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21069,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Fleming,Fleming County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21069,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Fleming,Fleming County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21069,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Fleming,Fleming County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21069,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Fleming,Fleming County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21069,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Fleming,Fleming County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21069,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Fleming,Fleming County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,67.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21069,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Fleming,Fleming County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,32.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21069,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Fleming,Fleming County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,8761,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21069,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Fleming,Fleming County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,4165,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21069,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21071,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21071,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21071,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21071,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21071,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,35756,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21071,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,41136,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21071,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,40721,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21071,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21071,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,415,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21071,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21071,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21071,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21071,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21071,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,2.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21071,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,96.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21071,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1055,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21071,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,39666,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21071,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21073,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21073,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21073,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21073,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21073,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,51569,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21073,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,59109,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21073,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,59109,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21073,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21073,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21073,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21073,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21073,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21073,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21073,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,20.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21073,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,79.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21073,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,11973,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21073,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,47136,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21073,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Fulton,Fulton County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21075,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Fulton,Fulton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21075,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Fulton,Fulton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21075,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Fulton,Fulton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21075,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Fulton,Fulton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21075,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Fulton,Fulton County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,6501,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21075,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Fulton,Fulton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7098,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21075,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Fulton,Fulton County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7098,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21075,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Fulton,Fulton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21075,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Fulton,Fulton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21075,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Fulton,Fulton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21075,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Fulton,Fulton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21075,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Fulton,Fulton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21075,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Fulton,Fulton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21075,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Fulton,Fulton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,21075,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Fulton,Fulton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21075,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Fulton,Fulton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,21075,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Fulton,Fulton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,7098,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21075,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Gallatin,Gallatin County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21077,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Gallatin,Gallatin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21077,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Gallatin,Gallatin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21077,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Gallatin,Gallatin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21077,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Gallatin,Gallatin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21077,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Gallatin,Gallatin County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,8667,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21077,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Gallatin,Gallatin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7093,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21077,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Gallatin,Gallatin County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7093,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21077,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Gallatin,Gallatin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21077,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Gallatin,Gallatin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21077,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Gallatin,Gallatin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21077,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Gallatin,Gallatin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21077,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Gallatin,Gallatin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21077,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Gallatin,Gallatin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21077,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Gallatin,Gallatin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,21077,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Gallatin,Gallatin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21077,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Gallatin,Gallatin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,21077,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Gallatin,Gallatin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,7093,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21077,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Garrard,Garrard County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21079,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Garrard,Garrard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21079,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Garrard,Garrard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21079,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Garrard,Garrard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21079,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Garrard,Garrard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21079,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Garrard,Garrard County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,16935,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21079,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Garrard,Garrard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,17515,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21079,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Garrard,Garrard County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,17515,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21079,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Garrard,Garrard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21079,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Garrard,Garrard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21079,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Garrard,Garrard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21079,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Garrard,Garrard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21079,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Garrard,Garrard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21079,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Garrard,Garrard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21079,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Garrard,Garrard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,76.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21079,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Garrard,Garrard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,23.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21079,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Garrard,Garrard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,13382,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21079,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Garrard,Garrard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,4133,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21079,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21081,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21081,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21081,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21081,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21081,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,25008,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21081,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,28092,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21081,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,28092,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21081,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21081,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21081,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21081,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21081,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21081,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21081,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,17.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21081,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,82.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21081,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,5006,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21081,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,23086,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21081,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Graves,Graves County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21083,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Graves,Graves County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21083,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Graves,Graves County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21083,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Graves,Graves County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21083,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Graves,Graves County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21083,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Graves,Graves County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,36512,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21083,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Graves,Graves County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,18689,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21083,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Graves,Graves County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,18689,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21083,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Graves,Graves County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21083,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Graves,Graves County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21083,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Graves,Graves County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21083,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Graves,Graves County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21083,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Graves,Graves County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21083,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Graves,Graves County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21083,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Graves,Graves County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,21083,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Graves,Graves County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21083,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Graves,Graves County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,21083,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Graves,Graves County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,18689,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21083,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Grayson,Grayson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21085,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Grayson,Grayson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21085,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Grayson,Grayson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21085,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Grayson,Grayson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21085,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Grayson,Grayson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21085,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Grayson,Grayson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,26410,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21085,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Grayson,Grayson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,27695,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21085,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Grayson,Grayson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,27695,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21085,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Grayson,Grayson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21085,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Grayson,Grayson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21085,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Grayson,Grayson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21085,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Grayson,Grayson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21085,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Grayson,Grayson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21085,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Grayson,Grayson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21085,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Grayson,Grayson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,7.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21085,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Grayson,Grayson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,92.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21085,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Grayson,Grayson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1962,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21085,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Grayson,Grayson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,25732,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21085,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Green,Green County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21087,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Green,Green County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21087,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Green,Green County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21087,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Green,Green County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21087,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Green,Green County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21087,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Green,Green County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,11112,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21087,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Green,Green County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,16172,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21087,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Green,Green County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,16172,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21087,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Green,Green County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21087,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Green,Green County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21087,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Green,Green County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21087,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Green,Green County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21087,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Green,Green County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21087,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Green,Green County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21087,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Green,Green County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,86.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21087,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Green,Green County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,13.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21087,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Green,Green County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,14006,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21087,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Green,Green County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2166,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21087,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Greenup,Greenup County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21089,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Greenup,Greenup County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21089,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Greenup,Greenup County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21089,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Greenup,Greenup County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21089,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Greenup,Greenup County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21089,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Greenup,Greenup County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,35852,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21089,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Greenup,Greenup County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,38086,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21089,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Greenup,Greenup County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,38086,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21089,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Greenup,Greenup County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21089,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Greenup,Greenup County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21089,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Greenup,Greenup County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21089,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Greenup,Greenup County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21089,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Greenup,Greenup County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21089,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Greenup,Greenup County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21089,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Greenup,Greenup County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,34.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21089,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Greenup,Greenup County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,65.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21089,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Greenup,Greenup County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,13254,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21089,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Greenup,Greenup County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,24831,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21089,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21091,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21091,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21091,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21091,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21091,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,9092,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21091,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5851,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21091,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5851,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21091,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21091,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21091,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21091,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21091,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21091,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21091,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,21091,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21091,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,21091,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,5851,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21091,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Hardin,Hardin County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21093,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Hardin,Hardin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21093,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Hardin,Hardin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21093,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Hardin,Hardin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21093,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Hardin,Hardin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21093,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Hardin,Hardin County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,110719,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21093,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Hardin,Hardin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,121686,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21093,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Hardin,Hardin County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,121686,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21093,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Hardin,Hardin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21093,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Hardin,Hardin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21093,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Hardin,Hardin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21093,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Hardin,Hardin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21093,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Hardin,Hardin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21093,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Hardin,Hardin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21093,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Hardin,Hardin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21093,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Hardin,Hardin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,95,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21093,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Hardin,Hardin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,6058,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21093,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Hardin,Hardin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,115628,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21093,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Harlan,Harlan County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21095,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Harlan,Harlan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21095,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Harlan,Harlan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21095,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Harlan,Harlan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21095,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Harlan,Harlan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21095,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Harlan,Harlan County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,26689,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21095,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Harlan,Harlan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,25076,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21095,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Harlan,Harlan County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,25076,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21095,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Harlan,Harlan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21095,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Harlan,Harlan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21095,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Harlan,Harlan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21095,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Harlan,Harlan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21095,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Harlan,Harlan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21095,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Harlan,Harlan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21095,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Harlan,Harlan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,31.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21095,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Harlan,Harlan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,68.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21095,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Harlan,Harlan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,7918,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21095,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Harlan,Harlan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,17158,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21095,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21097,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21097,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21097,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21097,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21097,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,18705,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21097,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,21691,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21097,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,21691,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21097,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21097,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21097,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21097,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21097,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21097,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21097,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,69.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21097,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,30.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21097,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,15126,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21097,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,6564,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21097,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Hart,Hart County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21099,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Hart,Hart County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21099,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Hart,Hart County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21099,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Hart,Hart County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21099,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Hart,Hart County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21099,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Hart,Hart County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,19271,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21099,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Hart,Hart County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,20822,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21099,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Hart,Hart County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,20822,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21099,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Hart,Hart County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21099,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Hart,Hart County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21099,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Hart,Hart County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21099,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Hart,Hart County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21099,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Hart,Hart County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21099,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Hart,Hart County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21099,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Hart,Hart County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,24.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21099,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Hart,Hart County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,75.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21099,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Hart,Hart County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,5068,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21099,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Hart,Hart County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,15754,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21099,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Henderson,Henderson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21101,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Henderson,Henderson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21101,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Henderson,Henderson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21101,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Henderson,Henderson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21101,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Henderson,Henderson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21101,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Henderson,Henderson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,44645,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21101,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Henderson,Henderson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,45884,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21101,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Henderson,Henderson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,45884,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21101,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Henderson,Henderson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21101,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Henderson,Henderson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21101,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Henderson,Henderson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21101,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Henderson,Henderson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21101,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Henderson,Henderson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21101,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Henderson,Henderson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21101,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Henderson,Henderson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,37.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21101,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Henderson,Henderson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,62.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21101,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Henderson,Henderson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,17180,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21101,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Henderson,Henderson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,28704,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21101,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21103,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21103,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21103,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21103,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21103,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,15666,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21103,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,20218,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21103,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,20218,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21103,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21103,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21103,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21103,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21103,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21103,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21103,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,20.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21103,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,79.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21103,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,4206,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21103,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,16012,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21103,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Hickman,Hickman County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21105,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Hickman,Hickman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21105,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Hickman,Hickman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21105,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Hickman,Hickman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21105,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Hickman,Hickman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21105,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Hickman,Hickman County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,4521,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21105,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Hickman,Hickman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1747,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21105,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Hickman,Hickman County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1476,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21105,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Hickman,Hickman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21105,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Hickman,Hickman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,271,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21105,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Hickman,Hickman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,84.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21105,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Hickman,Hickman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21105,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Hickman,Hickman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,15.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21105,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Hickman,Hickman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21105,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Hickman,Hickman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,21105,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Hickman,Hickman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,84.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21105,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Hickman,Hickman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,21105,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Hickman,Hickman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1476,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21105,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Hopkins,Hopkins County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21107,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Hopkins,Hopkins County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21107,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Hopkins,Hopkins County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21107,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Hopkins,Hopkins County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21107,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Hopkins,Hopkins County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21107,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Hopkins,Hopkins County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,45367,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21107,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Hopkins,Hopkins County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,52026,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21107,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Hopkins,Hopkins County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,52026,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21107,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Hopkins,Hopkins County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21107,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Hopkins,Hopkins County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21107,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Hopkins,Hopkins County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21107,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Hopkins,Hopkins County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21107,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Hopkins,Hopkins County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21107,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Hopkins,Hopkins County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21107,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Hopkins,Hopkins County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,37.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21107,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Hopkins,Hopkins County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,62.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21107,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Hopkins,Hopkins County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,19408,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21107,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Hopkins,Hopkins County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,32618,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21107,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21109,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21109,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21109,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21109,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21109,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,12951,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21109,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,13521,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21109,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,13521,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21109,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21109,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21109,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21109,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21109,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21109,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21109,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,21109,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21109,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,21109,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,13521,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21109,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21111,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21111,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21111,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21111,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21111,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,782123,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21111,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,666803,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21111,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,666803,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21111,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21111,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21111,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21111,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21111,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21111,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21111,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,21111,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21111,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,21111,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,666803,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21111,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Jessamine,Jessamine County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21113,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Jessamine,Jessamine County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21113,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Jessamine,Jessamine County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21113,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Jessamine,Jessamine County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21113,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Jessamine,Jessamine County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21113,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Jessamine,Jessamine County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,52972,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21113,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Jessamine,Jessamine County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,49987,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21113,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Jessamine,Jessamine County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,49987,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21113,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Jessamine,Jessamine County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21113,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Jessamine,Jessamine County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21113,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Jessamine,Jessamine County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21113,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Jessamine,Jessamine County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21113,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Jessamine,Jessamine County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21113,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Jessamine,Jessamine County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21113,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Jessamine,Jessamine County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,27.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21113,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Jessamine,Jessamine County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,72.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21113,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Jessamine,Jessamine County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,13821,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21113,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Jessamine,Jessamine County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,36166,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21113,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21115,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21115,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21115,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21115,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21115,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,22634,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21115,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,22011,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21115,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,22011,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21115,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21115,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21115,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21115,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21115,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21115,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21115,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,21115,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21115,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,21115,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,22011,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21115,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Kenton,Kenton County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21117,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Kenton,Kenton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21117,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Kenton,Kenton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21117,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Kenton,Kenton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21117,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Kenton,Kenton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21117,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Kenton,Kenton County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,169183,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21117,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Kenton,Kenton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,99835,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21117,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Kenton,Kenton County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,99835,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21117,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Kenton,Kenton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21117,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Kenton,Kenton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21117,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Kenton,Kenton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21117,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Kenton,Kenton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21117,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Kenton,Kenton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21117,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Kenton,Kenton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21117,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Kenton,Kenton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,21117,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Kenton,Kenton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21117,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Kenton,Kenton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,21117,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Kenton,Kenton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,99835,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21117,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Knott,Knott County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21119,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Knott,Knott County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21119,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Knott,Knott County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21119,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Knott,Knott County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21119,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Knott,Knott County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21119,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Knott,Knott County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,14160,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21119,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Knott,Knott County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,8350,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21119,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Knott,Knott County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8079,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21119,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Knott,Knott County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21119,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Knott,Knott County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,271,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21119,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Knott,Knott County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,96.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21119,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Knott,Knott County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21119,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Knott,Knott County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,3.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21119,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Knott,Knott County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21119,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Knott,Knott County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,21119,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Knott,Knott County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,96.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21119,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Knott,Knott County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,21119,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Knott,Knott County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,8079,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21119,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21121,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21121,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21121,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21121,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21121,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,30135,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21121,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,22354,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21121,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,22354,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21121,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21121,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21121,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21121,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21121,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21121,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21121,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,21121,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21121,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,21121,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,22354,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21121,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,KY,Kentucky,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,382,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,KY,KY,Kentucky,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,368,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,KY,KY,Kentucky,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,189,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,KY,KY,Kentucky,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,179,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,KY,KY,Kentucky,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,KY,KY,Kentucky,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,4503958,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2020,KY,KY,Kentucky,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4055441,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,KY,KY,Kentucky,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4050483,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,KY,KY,Kentucky,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,KY,KY,Kentucky,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4958,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,KY,KY,Kentucky,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,KY,KY,Kentucky,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,KY,KY,Kentucky,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,KY,KY,Kentucky,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,KY,KY,Kentucky,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,26.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,KY,KY,Kentucky,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,73.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,KY,KY,Kentucky,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1075193,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,KY,KY,Kentucky,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2975290,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,KY,Larue,Larue County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21123,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Larue,Larue County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21123,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Larue,Larue County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21123,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Larue,Larue County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21123,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Larue,Larue County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21123,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Larue,Larue County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,14870,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21123,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Larue,Larue County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,12374,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21123,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Larue,Larue County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,12374,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21123,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Larue,Larue County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21123,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Larue,Larue County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21123,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Larue,Larue County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21123,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Larue,Larue County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21123,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Larue,Larue County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21123,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Larue,Larue County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21123,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Larue,Larue County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,66.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21123,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Larue,Larue County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,33.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21123,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Larue,Larue County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,8190,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21123,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Larue,Larue County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,4184,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21123,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Laurel,Laurel County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21125,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Laurel,Laurel County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21125,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Laurel,Laurel County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21125,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Laurel,Laurel County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21125,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Laurel,Laurel County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21125,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Laurel,Laurel County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,62662,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21125,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Laurel,Laurel County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,65753,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21125,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Laurel,Laurel County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,65753,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21125,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Laurel,Laurel County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21125,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Laurel,Laurel County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21125,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Laurel,Laurel County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21125,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Laurel,Laurel County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21125,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Laurel,Laurel County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21125,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Laurel,Laurel County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21125,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Laurel,Laurel County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,41.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21125,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Laurel,Laurel County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,58.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21125,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Laurel,Laurel County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,27369,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21125,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Laurel,Laurel County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,38384,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21125,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21127,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21127,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21127,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21127,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21127,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,16288,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21127,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7444,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21127,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7444,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21127,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21127,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21127,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21127,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21127,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21127,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21127,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,21127,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21127,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,21127,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,7444,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21127,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21129,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21129,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21129,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21129,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21129,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,7360,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21129,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7617,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21129,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7617,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21129,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21129,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21129,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21129,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21129,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21129,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21129,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,21129,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21129,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,21129,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,7617,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21129,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Leslie,Leslie County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21131,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Leslie,Leslie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21131,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Leslie,Leslie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21131,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Leslie,Leslie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21131,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Leslie,Leslie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21131,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Leslie,Leslie County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,10455,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21131,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Leslie,Leslie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,8689,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21131,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Leslie,Leslie County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8689,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21131,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Leslie,Leslie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21131,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Leslie,Leslie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21131,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Leslie,Leslie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21131,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Leslie,Leslie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21131,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Leslie,Leslie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21131,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Leslie,Leslie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21131,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Leslie,Leslie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,21131,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Leslie,Leslie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21131,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Leslie,Leslie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,21131,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Leslie,Leslie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,8689,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21131,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Letcher,Letcher County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21133,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Letcher,Letcher County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21133,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Letcher,Letcher County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21133,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Letcher,Letcher County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21133,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Letcher,Letcher County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21133,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Letcher,Letcher County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,21428,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21133,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Letcher,Letcher County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,11347,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21133,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Letcher,Letcher County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11347,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21133,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Letcher,Letcher County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21133,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Letcher,Letcher County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21133,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Letcher,Letcher County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21133,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Letcher,Letcher County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21133,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Letcher,Letcher County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21133,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Letcher,Letcher County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21133,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Letcher,Letcher County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,21133,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Letcher,Letcher County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21133,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Letcher,Letcher County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,21133,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Letcher,Letcher County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,11347,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21133,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Lewis,Lewis County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21135,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Lewis,Lewis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21135,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Lewis,Lewis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21135,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Lewis,Lewis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21135,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Lewis,Lewis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21135,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Lewis,Lewis County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,13061,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21135,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Lewis,Lewis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9134,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21135,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Lewis,Lewis County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9134,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21135,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Lewis,Lewis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21135,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Lewis,Lewis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21135,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Lewis,Lewis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21135,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Lewis,Lewis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21135,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Lewis,Lewis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21135,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Lewis,Lewis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21135,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Lewis,Lewis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,21135,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Lewis,Lewis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21135,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Lewis,Lewis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,21135,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Lewis,Lewis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,9134,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21135,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21137,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21137,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21137,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21137,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21137,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,24238,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21137,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,19536,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21137,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,19536,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21137,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21137,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21137,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21137,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21137,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21137,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21137,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,57,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21137,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,43,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21137,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,11145,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21137,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,8391,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21137,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Livingston,Livingston County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21139,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Livingston,Livingston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21139,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Livingston,Livingston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21139,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Livingston,Livingston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21139,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Livingston,Livingston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21139,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Livingston,Livingston County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,8845,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21139,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Livingston,Livingston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,17645,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21139,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Livingston,Livingston County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,17645,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21139,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Livingston,Livingston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21139,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Livingston,Livingston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21139,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Livingston,Livingston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21139,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Livingston,Livingston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21139,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Livingston,Livingston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21139,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Livingston,Livingston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21139,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Livingston,Livingston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,31.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21139,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Livingston,Livingston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,68.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21139,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Livingston,Livingston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,5613,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21139,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Livingston,Livingston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,12032,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21139,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21141,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21141,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21141,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21141,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21141,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,27497,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21141,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,27033,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21141,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,27033,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21141,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21141,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21141,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21141,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21141,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21141,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21141,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21141,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,21141,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,27033,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21141,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,21141,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Lyon,Lyon County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21143,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Lyon,Lyon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21143,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Lyon,Lyon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21143,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Lyon,Lyon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21143,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Lyon,Lyon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21143,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Lyon,Lyon County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,8664,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21143,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Lyon,Lyon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,11686,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21143,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Lyon,Lyon County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10602,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21143,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Lyon,Lyon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21143,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Lyon,Lyon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1085,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21143,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Lyon,Lyon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,90.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21143,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Lyon,Lyon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21143,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Lyon,Lyon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,9.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21143,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Lyon,Lyon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21143,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Lyon,Lyon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,52.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21143,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Lyon,Lyon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,38.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21143,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Lyon,Lyon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,6095,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21143,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Lyon,Lyon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,4506,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21143,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21151,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21151,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21151,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21151,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21151,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,92920,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21151,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,82589,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21151,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,82589,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21151,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21151,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21151,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21151,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21151,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21151,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21151,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,50.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21151,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,49.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21151,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,41365,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21151,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,41225,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21151,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Magoffin,Magoffin County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21153,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Magoffin,Magoffin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21153,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Magoffin,Magoffin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21153,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Magoffin,Magoffin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21153,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Magoffin,Magoffin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21153,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Magoffin,Magoffin County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,11594,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21153,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Magoffin,Magoffin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,10804,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21153,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Magoffin,Magoffin County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10804,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21153,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Magoffin,Magoffin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21153,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Magoffin,Magoffin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21153,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Magoffin,Magoffin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21153,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Magoffin,Magoffin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21153,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Magoffin,Magoffin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21153,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Magoffin,Magoffin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21153,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Magoffin,Magoffin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,74.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21153,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Magoffin,Magoffin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,25.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21153,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Magoffin,Magoffin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,8067,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21153,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Magoffin,Magoffin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2738,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21153,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21155,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21155,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21155,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21155,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21155,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,19580,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21155,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,21649,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21155,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,21649,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21155,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21155,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21155,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21155,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21155,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21155,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21155,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,68.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21155,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,31.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21155,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,14742,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21155,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,6907,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21155,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21157,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21157,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21157,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21157,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21157,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,31665,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21157,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,31425,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21157,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,31425,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21157,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21157,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21157,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21157,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21157,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21157,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21157,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,4.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21157,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,95.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21157,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1452,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21157,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,29973,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21157,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21159,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21159,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21159,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21159,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21159,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,11228,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21159,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,15409,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21159,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,15409,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21159,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21159,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21159,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21159,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21159,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21159,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21159,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,21159,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21159,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,21159,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,15409,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21159,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Mason,Mason County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21161,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Mason,Mason County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21161,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Mason,Mason County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21161,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Mason,Mason County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21161,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Mason,Mason County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21161,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Mason,Mason County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,17085,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21161,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Mason,Mason County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,24983,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21161,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Mason,Mason County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,24983,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21161,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Mason,Mason County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21161,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Mason,Mason County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21161,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Mason,Mason County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21161,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Mason,Mason County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21161,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Mason,Mason County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21161,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Mason,Mason County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21161,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Mason,Mason County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,16.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21161,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Mason,Mason County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,83.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21161,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Mason,Mason County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,4080,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21161,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Mason,Mason County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,20903,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21161,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,McCracken,McCracken County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21145,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,McCracken,McCracken County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21145,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,McCracken,McCracken County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21145,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,McCracken,McCracken County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21145,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,McCracken,McCracken County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21145,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,McCracken,McCracken County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,67836,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21145,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,McCracken,McCracken County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,61841,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21145,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,McCracken,McCracken County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,61841,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21145,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,McCracken,McCracken County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21145,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,McCracken,McCracken County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21145,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,McCracken,McCracken County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21145,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,McCracken,McCracken County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21145,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,McCracken,McCracken County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21145,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,McCracken,McCracken County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21145,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,McCracken,McCracken County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,6.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21145,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,McCracken,McCracken County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,93.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21145,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,McCracken,McCracken County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,3986,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21145,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,McCracken,McCracken County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,57856,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21145,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,McCreary,McCreary County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21147,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,McCreary,McCreary County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21147,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,McCreary,McCreary County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21147,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,McCreary,McCreary County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21147,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,McCreary,McCreary County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21147,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,McCreary,McCreary County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,16851,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21147,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,McCreary,McCreary County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,15846,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21147,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,McCreary,McCreary County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,15846,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21147,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,McCreary,McCreary County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21147,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,McCreary,McCreary County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21147,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,McCreary,McCreary County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21147,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,McCreary,McCreary County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21147,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,McCreary,McCreary County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21147,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,McCreary,McCreary County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21147,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,McCreary,McCreary County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,21147,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,McCreary,McCreary County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21147,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,McCreary,McCreary County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,21147,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,McCreary,McCreary County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,15846,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21147,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,McLean,McLean County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21149,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,McLean,McLean County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21149,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,McLean,McLean County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21149,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,McLean,McLean County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21149,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,McLean,McLean County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21149,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,McLean,McLean County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,9114,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21149,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,McLean,McLean County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7693,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21149,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,McLean,McLean County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7693,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21149,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,McLean,McLean County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21149,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,McLean,McLean County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21149,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,McLean,McLean County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21149,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,McLean,McLean County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21149,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,McLean,McLean County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21149,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,McLean,McLean County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21149,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,McLean,McLean County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,63.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21149,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,McLean,McLean County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,36.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21149,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,McLean,McLean County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,4888,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21149,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,McLean,McLean County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2805,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21149,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Meade,Meade County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21163,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Meade,Meade County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21163,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Meade,Meade County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21163,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Meade,Meade County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21163,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Meade,Meade County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21163,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Meade,Meade County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,29981,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21163,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Meade,Meade County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,20229,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21163,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Meade,Meade County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,20229,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21163,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Meade,Meade County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21163,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Meade,Meade County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21163,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Meade,Meade County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21163,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Meade,Meade County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21163,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Meade,Meade County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21163,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Meade,Meade County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21163,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Meade,Meade County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,80.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21163,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Meade,Meade County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,19.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21163,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Meade,Meade County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,16313,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21163,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Meade,Meade County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3916,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21163,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Menifee,Menifee County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21165,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Menifee,Menifee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21165,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Menifee,Menifee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21165,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Menifee,Menifee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21165,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Menifee,Menifee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21165,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Menifee,Menifee County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,6115,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21165,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Menifee,Menifee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4904,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21165,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Menifee,Menifee County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4904,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21165,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Menifee,Menifee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21165,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Menifee,Menifee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21165,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Menifee,Menifee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21165,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Menifee,Menifee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21165,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Menifee,Menifee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21165,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Menifee,Menifee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21165,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Menifee,Menifee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,99.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21165,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Menifee,Menifee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,0.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21165,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Menifee,Menifee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,4881,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21165,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Menifee,Menifee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,23,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21165,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Mercer,Mercer County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21167,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Mercer,Mercer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21167,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Mercer,Mercer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21167,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Mercer,Mercer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21167,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Mercer,Mercer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21167,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Mercer,Mercer County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,22616,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21167,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Mercer,Mercer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,23830,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21167,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Mercer,Mercer County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,23830,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21167,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Mercer,Mercer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21167,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Mercer,Mercer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21167,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Mercer,Mercer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21167,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Mercer,Mercer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21167,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Mercer,Mercer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21167,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Mercer,Mercer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21167,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Mercer,Mercer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,68.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21167,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Mercer,Mercer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,31.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21167,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Mercer,Mercer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,16319,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21167,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Mercer,Mercer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,7511,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21167,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Metcalfe,Metcalfe County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21169,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Metcalfe,Metcalfe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21169,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Metcalfe,Metcalfe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21169,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Metcalfe,Metcalfe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21169,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Metcalfe,Metcalfe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21169,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Metcalfe,Metcalfe County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,10271,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21169,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Metcalfe,Metcalfe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7696,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21169,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Metcalfe,Metcalfe County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7696,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21169,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Metcalfe,Metcalfe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21169,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Metcalfe,Metcalfe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21169,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Metcalfe,Metcalfe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21169,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Metcalfe,Metcalfe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21169,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Metcalfe,Metcalfe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21169,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Metcalfe,Metcalfe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21169,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Metcalfe,Metcalfe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21169,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Metcalfe,Metcalfe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,21169,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Metcalfe,Metcalfe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,7696,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21169,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Metcalfe,Metcalfe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,21169,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21171,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21171,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21171,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21171,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21171,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,11301,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21171,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,12199,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21171,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,12199,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21171,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21171,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21171,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21171,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21171,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21171,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21171,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,82.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21171,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,17.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21171,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,10026,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21171,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2173,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21171,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21173,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21173,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21173,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21173,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21173,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,28091,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21173,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,31058,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21173,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,31058,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21173,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21173,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21173,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21173,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21173,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21173,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21173,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,52.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21173,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,47.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21173,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,16243,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21173,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,14814,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21173,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21175,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21175,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21175,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21175,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21175,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,13719,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21175,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,8920,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21175,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8920,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21175,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21175,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21175,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21175,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21175,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21175,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21175,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,76,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21175,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,24,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21175,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,6780,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21175,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2139,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21175,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Muhlenberg,Muhlenberg County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21177,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Muhlenberg,Muhlenberg County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21177,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Muhlenberg,Muhlenberg County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21177,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Muhlenberg,Muhlenberg County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21177,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Muhlenberg,Muhlenberg County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21177,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Muhlenberg,Muhlenberg County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,30875,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21177,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Muhlenberg,Muhlenberg County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,31782,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21177,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Muhlenberg,Muhlenberg County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,31782,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21177,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Muhlenberg,Muhlenberg County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21177,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Muhlenberg,Muhlenberg County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21177,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Muhlenberg,Muhlenberg County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21177,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Muhlenberg,Muhlenberg County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21177,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Muhlenberg,Muhlenberg County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21177,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Muhlenberg,Muhlenberg County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21177,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Muhlenberg,Muhlenberg County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,68,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21177,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Muhlenberg,Muhlenberg County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,32,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21177,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Muhlenberg,Muhlenberg County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,21614,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21177,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Muhlenberg,Muhlenberg County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,10168,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21177,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Nelson,Nelson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21179,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Nelson,Nelson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21179,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Nelson,Nelson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21179,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Nelson,Nelson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21179,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Nelson,Nelson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21179,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Nelson,Nelson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,46756,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21179,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Nelson,Nelson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,46707,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21179,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Nelson,Nelson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,46707,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21179,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Nelson,Nelson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21179,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Nelson,Nelson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21179,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Nelson,Nelson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21179,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Nelson,Nelson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21179,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Nelson,Nelson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21179,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Nelson,Nelson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21179,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Nelson,Nelson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,39.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21179,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Nelson,Nelson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,60.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21179,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Nelson,Nelson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,18522,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21179,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Nelson,Nelson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,28185,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21179,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Nicholas,Nicholas County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21181,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Nicholas,Nicholas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21181,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Nicholas,Nicholas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21181,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Nicholas,Nicholas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21181,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Nicholas,Nicholas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21181,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Nicholas,Nicholas County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,7536,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21181,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Nicholas,Nicholas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9409,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21181,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Nicholas,Nicholas County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9409,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21181,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Nicholas,Nicholas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21181,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Nicholas,Nicholas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21181,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Nicholas,Nicholas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21181,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Nicholas,Nicholas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21181,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Nicholas,Nicholas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21181,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Nicholas,Nicholas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21181,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Nicholas,Nicholas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,39.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21181,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Nicholas,Nicholas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,60.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21181,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Nicholas,Nicholas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,3696,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21181,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Nicholas,Nicholas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,5713,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21181,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Ohio,Ohio County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21183,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Ohio,Ohio County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21183,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Ohio,Ohio County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21183,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Ohio,Ohio County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21183,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Ohio,Ohio County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21183,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Ohio,Ohio County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,23726,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21183,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Ohio,Ohio County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,21841,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21183,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Ohio,Ohio County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,21841,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21183,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Ohio,Ohio County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21183,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Ohio,Ohio County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21183,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Ohio,Ohio County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21183,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Ohio,Ohio County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21183,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Ohio,Ohio County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21183,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Ohio,Ohio County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21183,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Ohio,Ohio County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,26.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21183,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Ohio,Ohio County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,73.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21183,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Ohio,Ohio County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,5706,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21183,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Ohio,Ohio County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,16135,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21183,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Oldham,Oldham County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21185,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Oldham,Oldham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21185,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Oldham,Oldham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21185,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Oldham,Oldham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21185,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Oldham,Oldham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21185,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Oldham,Oldham County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,67642,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21185,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Oldham,Oldham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,26790,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21185,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Oldham,Oldham County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,26790,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21185,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Oldham,Oldham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21185,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Oldham,Oldham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21185,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Oldham,Oldham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21185,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Oldham,Oldham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21185,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Oldham,Oldham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21185,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Oldham,Oldham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21185,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Oldham,Oldham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,33.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21185,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Oldham,Oldham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,66.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21185,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Oldham,Oldham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,8858,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21185,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Oldham,Oldham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,17932,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21185,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Owen,Owen County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21187,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Owen,Owen County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21187,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Owen,Owen County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21187,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Owen,Owen County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21187,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Owen,Owen County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21187,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Owen,Owen County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,11294,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21187,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Owen,Owen County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,21187,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Owen,Owen County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21187,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Owen,Owen County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21187,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Owen,Owen County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21187,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Owen,Owen County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21187,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Owen,Owen County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21187,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Owen,Owen County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21187,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Owen,Owen County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21187,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Owen,Owen County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,21187,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Owen,Owen County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,21187,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Owen,Owen County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,21187,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Owen,Owen County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,21187,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Owsley,Owsley County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21189,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Owsley,Owsley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21189,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Owsley,Owsley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21189,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Owsley,Owsley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21189,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Owsley,Owsley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21189,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Owsley,Owsley County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,4018,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21189,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Owsley,Owsley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4832,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21189,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Owsley,Owsley County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4832,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21189,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Owsley,Owsley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21189,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Owsley,Owsley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21189,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Owsley,Owsley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21189,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Owsley,Owsley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21189,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Owsley,Owsley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21189,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Owsley,Owsley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21189,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Owsley,Owsley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,21189,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Owsley,Owsley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21189,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Owsley,Owsley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,21189,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Owsley,Owsley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,4832,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21189,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Pendleton,Pendleton County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21191,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Pendleton,Pendleton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21191,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Pendleton,Pendleton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21191,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Pendleton,Pendleton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21191,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Pendleton,Pendleton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21191,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Pendleton,Pendleton County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,14640,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21191,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Pendleton,Pendleton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,14058,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21191,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Pendleton,Pendleton County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,14058,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21191,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Pendleton,Pendleton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21191,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Pendleton,Pendleton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21191,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Pendleton,Pendleton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21191,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Pendleton,Pendleton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21191,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Pendleton,Pendleton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21191,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Pendleton,Pendleton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21191,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Pendleton,Pendleton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,75.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21191,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Pendleton,Pendleton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,24.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21191,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Pendleton,Pendleton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,10568,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21191,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Pendleton,Pendleton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3490,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21191,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21193,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21193,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21193,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21193,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21193,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,28378,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21193,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,27338,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21193,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,27338,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21193,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21193,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21193,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21193,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21193,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21193,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21193,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,11.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21193,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,88.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21193,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,3179,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21193,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,24159,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21193,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21195,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21195,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21195,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21195,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21195,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,58408,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21195,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,47090,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21195,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,47090,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21195,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21195,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21195,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21195,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21195,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21195,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21195,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,3.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21195,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,96.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21195,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1557,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21195,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,45533,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21195,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Powell,Powell County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21197,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Powell,Powell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21197,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Powell,Powell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21197,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Powell,Powell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21197,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Powell,Powell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21197,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Powell,Powell County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,13085,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21197,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Powell,Powell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,14386,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21197,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Powell,Powell County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,14386,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21197,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Powell,Powell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21197,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Powell,Powell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21197,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Powell,Powell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21197,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Powell,Powell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21197,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Powell,Powell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21197,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Powell,Powell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21197,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Powell,Powell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,99.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21197,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Powell,Powell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,0.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21197,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Powell,Powell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,14363,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21197,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Powell,Powell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,23,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21197,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21199,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21199,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21199,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21199,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21199,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,65016,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21199,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,92319,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21199,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,91004,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21199,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21199,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1315,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21199,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21199,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21199,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21199,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21199,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,67.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21199,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,31.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21199,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,62096,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21199,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,28907,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21199,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Robertson,Robertson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21201,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Robertson,Robertson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21201,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Robertson,Robertson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21201,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Robertson,Robertson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21201,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Robertson,Robertson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21201,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Robertson,Robertson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,2184,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21201,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Robertson,Robertson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,736,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21201,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Robertson,Robertson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,736,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21201,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Robertson,Robertson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21201,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Robertson,Robertson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21201,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Robertson,Robertson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21201,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Robertson,Robertson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21201,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Robertson,Robertson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21201,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Robertson,Robertson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21201,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Robertson,Robertson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21201,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Robertson,Robertson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,21201,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Robertson,Robertson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,736,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21201,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Robertson,Robertson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,21201,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Rockcastle,Rockcastle County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21203,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Rockcastle,Rockcastle County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21203,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Rockcastle,Rockcastle County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21203,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Rockcastle,Rockcastle County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21203,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Rockcastle,Rockcastle County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21203,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Rockcastle,Rockcastle County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,16053,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21203,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Rockcastle,Rockcastle County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,19385,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21203,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Rockcastle,Rockcastle County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,19385,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21203,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Rockcastle,Rockcastle County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21203,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Rockcastle,Rockcastle County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21203,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Rockcastle,Rockcastle County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21203,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Rockcastle,Rockcastle County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21203,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Rockcastle,Rockcastle County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21203,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Rockcastle,Rockcastle County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21203,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Rockcastle,Rockcastle County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,76.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21203,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Rockcastle,Rockcastle County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,23.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21203,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Rockcastle,Rockcastle County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,14910,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21203,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Rockcastle,Rockcastle County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,4475,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21203,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Rowan,Rowan County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21205,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Rowan,Rowan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21205,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Rowan,Rowan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21205,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Rowan,Rowan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21205,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Rowan,Rowan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21205,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Rowan,Rowan County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,24732,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21205,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Rowan,Rowan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,31016,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21205,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Rowan,Rowan County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,31016,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21205,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Rowan,Rowan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21205,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Rowan,Rowan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21205,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Rowan,Rowan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21205,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Rowan,Rowan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21205,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Rowan,Rowan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21205,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Rowan,Rowan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21205,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Rowan,Rowan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,54.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21205,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Rowan,Rowan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,45.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21205,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Rowan,Rowan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,16960,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21205,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Rowan,Rowan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,14056,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21205,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Russell,Russell County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21207,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Russell,Russell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21207,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Russell,Russell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21207,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Russell,Russell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21207,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Russell,Russell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21207,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Russell,Russell County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,17975,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21207,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Russell,Russell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,17256,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21207,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Russell,Russell County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,17256,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21207,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Russell,Russell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21207,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Russell,Russell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21207,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Russell,Russell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21207,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Russell,Russell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21207,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Russell,Russell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21207,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Russell,Russell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21207,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Russell,Russell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,49.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21207,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Russell,Russell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,50.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21207,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Russell,Russell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,8504,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21207,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Russell,Russell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,8753,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21207,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21209,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21209,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21209,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21209,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21209,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,57477,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21209,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,32279,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21209,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,32279,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21209,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21209,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21209,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21209,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21209,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21209,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21209,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,21209,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21209,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,21209,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,32279,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21209,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21211,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21211,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21211,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21211,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21211,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,48179,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21211,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,45771,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21211,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,45771,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21211,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21211,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21211,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21211,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21211,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21211,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21211,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,53.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21211,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,46.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21211,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,24296,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21211,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,21475,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21211,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Simpson,Simpson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21213,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Simpson,Simpson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21213,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Simpson,Simpson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21213,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Simpson,Simpson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21213,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Simpson,Simpson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21213,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Simpson,Simpson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,19620,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21213,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Simpson,Simpson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,19896,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21213,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Simpson,Simpson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,19896,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21213,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Simpson,Simpson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21213,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Simpson,Simpson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21213,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Simpson,Simpson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21213,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Simpson,Simpson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21213,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Simpson,Simpson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21213,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Simpson,Simpson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21213,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Simpson,Simpson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,40.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21213,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Simpson,Simpson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,59.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21213,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Simpson,Simpson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,8085,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21213,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Simpson,Simpson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,11811,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21213,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Spencer,Spencer County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21215,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Spencer,Spencer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21215,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Spencer,Spencer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21215,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Spencer,Spencer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21215,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Spencer,Spencer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21215,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Spencer,Spencer County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,19564,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21215,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Spencer,Spencer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,17148,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21215,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Spencer,Spencer County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,17148,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21215,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Spencer,Spencer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21215,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Spencer,Spencer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21215,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Spencer,Spencer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21215,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Spencer,Spencer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21215,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Spencer,Spencer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21215,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Spencer,Spencer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21215,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Spencer,Spencer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21215,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Spencer,Spencer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,21215,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Spencer,Spencer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,17148,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21215,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Spencer,Spencer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,21215,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21217,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21217,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21217,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21217,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21217,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,26020,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21217,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,22481,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21217,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,22481,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21217,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21217,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21217,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21217,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21217,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21217,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21217,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,21217,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21217,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,21217,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,22481,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21217,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Todd,Todd County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21219,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Todd,Todd County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21219,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Todd,Todd County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21219,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Todd,Todd County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21219,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Todd,Todd County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21219,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Todd,Todd County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,12280,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21219,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Todd,Todd County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,14450,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21219,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Todd,Todd County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,14450,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21219,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Todd,Todd County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21219,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Todd,Todd County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21219,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Todd,Todd County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21219,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Todd,Todd County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21219,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Todd,Todd County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21219,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Todd,Todd County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21219,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Todd,Todd County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,99.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21219,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Todd,Todd County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,0.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21219,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Todd,Todd County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,14418,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21219,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Todd,Todd County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,33,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21219,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Trigg,Trigg County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21221,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Trigg,Trigg County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21221,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Trigg,Trigg County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21221,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Trigg,Trigg County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21221,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Trigg,Trigg County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21221,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Trigg,Trigg County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,14068,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21221,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Trigg,Trigg County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,18482,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21221,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Trigg,Trigg County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,18482,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21221,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Trigg,Trigg County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21221,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Trigg,Trigg County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21221,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Trigg,Trigg County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21221,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Trigg,Trigg County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21221,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Trigg,Trigg County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21221,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Trigg,Trigg County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21221,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Trigg,Trigg County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,21221,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Trigg,Trigg County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21221,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Trigg,Trigg County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,21221,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Trigg,Trigg County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,18482,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21221,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Trimble,Trimble County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21223,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Trimble,Trimble County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21223,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Trimble,Trimble County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21223,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Trimble,Trimble County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21223,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Trimble,Trimble County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21223,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Trimble,Trimble County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,8461,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21223,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Trimble,Trimble County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7237,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21223,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Trimble,Trimble County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7237,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21223,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Trimble,Trimble County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21223,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Trimble,Trimble County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21223,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Trimble,Trimble County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21223,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Trimble,Trimble County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21223,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Trimble,Trimble County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21223,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Trimble,Trimble County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21223,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Trimble,Trimble County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,21223,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Trimble,Trimble County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21223,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Trimble,Trimble County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,21223,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Trimble,Trimble County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,7237,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21223,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21225,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21225,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21225,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21225,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21225,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,13646,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21225,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,14708,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21225,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,14708,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21225,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21225,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21225,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21225,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21225,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21225,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21225,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,46.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21225,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,53.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21225,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,6881,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21225,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,7827,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21225,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21227,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21227,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21227,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21227,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21227,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,134933,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21227,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,107561,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21227,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,107561,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21227,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21227,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21227,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21227,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21227,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21227,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21227,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,62.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21227,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,37.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21227,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,66969,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21227,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,40592,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21227,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21229,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21229,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21229,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21229,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21229,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,12024,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21229,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,11935,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21229,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11935,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21229,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21229,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21229,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21229,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21229,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21229,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21229,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,21229,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21229,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,21229,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,11935,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21229,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21231,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21231,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21231,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21231,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21231,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,19528,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21231,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,18980,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21231,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,18980,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21231,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21231,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21231,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21231,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21231,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21231,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21231,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,21231,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21231,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,21231,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,18980,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21231,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21233,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21233,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21233,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21233,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21233,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,12989,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21233,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,14071,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21233,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,14071,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21233,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21233,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21233,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21233,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21233,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21233,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21233,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,32.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21233,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,67.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21233,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,4601,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21233,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,9470,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21233,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Whitley,Whitley County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21235,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Whitley,Whitley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21235,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Whitley,Whitley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21235,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Whitley,Whitley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21235,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Whitley,Whitley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21235,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Whitley,Whitley County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,36687,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21235,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Whitley,Whitley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,36875,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21235,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Whitley,Whitley County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,36816,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21235,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Whitley,Whitley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21235,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Whitley,Whitley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,59,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21235,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Whitley,Whitley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21235,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Whitley,Whitley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21235,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Whitley,Whitley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21235,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Whitley,Whitley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21235,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Whitley,Whitley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,46.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21235,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Whitley,Whitley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,53,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21235,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Whitley,Whitley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,17276,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21235,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Whitley,Whitley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,19539,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21235,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Wolfe,Wolfe County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21237,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Wolfe,Wolfe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21237,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Wolfe,Wolfe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21237,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Wolfe,Wolfe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21237,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Wolfe,Wolfe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21237,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Wolfe,Wolfe County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,6552,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21237,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Wolfe,Wolfe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,10546,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21237,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Wolfe,Wolfe County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10546,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21237,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Wolfe,Wolfe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21237,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Wolfe,Wolfe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21237,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Wolfe,Wolfe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21237,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Wolfe,Wolfe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21237,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Wolfe,Wolfe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21237,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Wolfe,Wolfe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21237,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Wolfe,Wolfe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,43.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21237,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Wolfe,Wolfe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,56.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21237,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Wolfe,Wolfe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,4581,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21237,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Wolfe,Wolfe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,5965,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21237,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Woodford,Woodford County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21239,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Woodford,Woodford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21239,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Woodford,Woodford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21239,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Woodford,Woodford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21239,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Woodford,Woodford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21239,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Woodford,Woodford County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,26892,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21239,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Woodford,Woodford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,24275,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21239,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Woodford,Woodford County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,24275,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21239,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Woodford,Woodford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21239,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Woodford,Woodford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21239,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Woodford,Woodford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21239,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Woodford,Woodford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21239,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Woodford,Woodford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21239,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Woodford,Woodford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21239,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Woodford,Woodford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,33.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21239,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Woodford,Woodford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,66.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21239,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Woodford,Woodford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,8167,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21239,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,KY,Woodford,Woodford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,16108,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21239,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Acadia,Acadia County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22001,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Acadia,Acadia County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22001,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Acadia,Acadia County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22001,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Acadia,Acadia County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22001,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Acadia,Acadia County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22001,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Acadia,Acadia County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,57455,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22001,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Acadia,Acadia County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,50201,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22001,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Acadia,Acadia County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,15880,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22001,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Acadia,Acadia County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22001,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Acadia,Acadia County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,34321,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22001,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Acadia,Acadia County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,31.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22001,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Acadia,Acadia County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22001,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Acadia,Acadia County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,68.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22001,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Acadia,Acadia County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22001,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Acadia,Acadia County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22001,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Acadia,Acadia County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,31.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22001,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Acadia,Acadia County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22001,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Acadia,Acadia County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,15880,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22001,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Allen,Allen County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22003,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Allen,Allen County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22003,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Allen,Allen County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22003,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Allen,Allen County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22003,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Allen,Allen County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22003,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Allen,Allen County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,22697,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22003,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Allen,Allen County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,20968,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22003,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Allen,Allen County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2543,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22003,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Allen,Allen County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,2543,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22003,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Allen,Allen County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,18425,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22003,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Allen,Allen County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,12.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22003,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Allen,Allen County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,12.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22003,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Allen,Allen County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,87.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22003,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Allen,Allen County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22003,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Allen,Allen County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22003,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Allen,Allen County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22003,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Allen,Allen County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22003,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Allen,Allen County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22003,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Ascension,Ascension County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,28,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22005,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Ascension,Ascension County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22005,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Ascension,Ascension County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22005,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Ascension,Ascension County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22005,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Ascension,Ascension County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22005,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Ascension,Ascension County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,126984,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22005,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Ascension,Ascension County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,26203,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22005,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Ascension,Ascension County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,12557,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22005,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Ascension,Ascension County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22005,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Ascension,Ascension County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,13646,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22005,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Ascension,Ascension County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,47.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22005,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Ascension,Ascension County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22005,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Ascension,Ascension County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,52.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22005,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Ascension,Ascension County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,27,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22005,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Ascension,Ascension County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22005,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Ascension,Ascension County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,47.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22005,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Ascension,Ascension County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22005,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Ascension,Ascension County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,12557,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22005,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Assumption,Assumption County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22007,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Assumption,Assumption County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22007,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Assumption,Assumption County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22007,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Assumption,Assumption County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22007,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Assumption,Assumption County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22007,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Assumption,Assumption County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,20968,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22007,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Assumption,Assumption County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,19108,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22007,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Assumption,Assumption County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,19108,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22007,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Assumption,Assumption County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22007,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Assumption,Assumption County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22007,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Assumption,Assumption County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22007,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Assumption,Assumption County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22007,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Assumption,Assumption County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22007,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Assumption,Assumption County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22007,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Assumption,Assumption County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22007,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Assumption,Assumption County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22007,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Assumption,Assumption County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22007,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Assumption,Assumption County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,19108,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22007,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Avoyelles,Avoyelles County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22009,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Avoyelles,Avoyelles County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22009,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Avoyelles,Avoyelles County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22009,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Avoyelles,Avoyelles County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22009,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Avoyelles,Avoyelles County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22009,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Avoyelles,Avoyelles County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,39616,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22009,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Avoyelles,Avoyelles County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,42739,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22009,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Avoyelles,Avoyelles County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2638,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22009,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Avoyelles,Avoyelles County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,2638,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22009,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Avoyelles,Avoyelles County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,40101,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22009,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Avoyelles,Avoyelles County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,6.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22009,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Avoyelles,Avoyelles County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,6.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22009,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Avoyelles,Avoyelles County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,93.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22009,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Avoyelles,Avoyelles County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22009,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Avoyelles,Avoyelles County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22009,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Avoyelles,Avoyelles County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22009,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Avoyelles,Avoyelles County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22009,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Avoyelles,Avoyelles County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22009,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Beauregard,Beauregard County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22011,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Beauregard,Beauregard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22011,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Beauregard,Beauregard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22011,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Beauregard,Beauregard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22011,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Beauregard,Beauregard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22011,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Beauregard,Beauregard County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,36573,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22011,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Beauregard,Beauregard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,38152,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22011,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Beauregard,Beauregard County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,12625,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22011,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Beauregard,Beauregard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,589,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22011,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Beauregard,Beauregard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,25527,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22011,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Beauregard,Beauregard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,33.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22011,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Beauregard,Beauregard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22011,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Beauregard,Beauregard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,66.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22011,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Beauregard,Beauregard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22011,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Beauregard,Beauregard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22011,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Beauregard,Beauregard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,31.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22011,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Beauregard,Beauregard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22011,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Beauregard,Beauregard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,12036,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22011,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Bienville,Bienville County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,23,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22013,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Bienville,Bienville County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22013,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Bienville,Bienville County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22013,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Bienville,Bienville County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22013,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Bienville,Bienville County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22013,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Bienville,Bienville County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,12899,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22013,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Bienville,Bienville County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,13607,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22013,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Bienville,Bienville County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22013,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Bienville,Bienville County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22013,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Bienville,Bienville County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,13607,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22013,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Bienville,Bienville County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22013,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Bienville,Bienville County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22013,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Bienville,Bienville County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22013,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Bienville,Bienville County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,23,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22013,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Bienville,Bienville County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22013,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Bienville,Bienville County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22013,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Bienville,Bienville County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22013,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Bienville,Bienville County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22013,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Bossier,Bossier County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,23,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22015,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Bossier,Bossier County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22015,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Bossier,Bossier County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22015,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Bossier,Bossier County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22015,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Bossier,Bossier County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22015,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Bossier,Bossier County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,128615,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22015,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Bossier,Bossier County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,103730,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22015,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Bossier,Bossier County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,81585,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22015,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Bossier,Bossier County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,246,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22015,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Bossier,Bossier County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,22145,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22015,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Bossier,Bossier County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,78.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22015,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Bossier,Bossier County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22015,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Bossier,Bossier County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,21.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22015,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Bossier,Bossier County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22015,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Bossier,Bossier County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,23.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22015,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Bossier,Bossier County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,54.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22015,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Bossier,Bossier County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,24426,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22015,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Bossier,Bossier County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,56913,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22015,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Caddo,Caddo County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,37,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22017,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Caddo,Caddo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22017,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Caddo,Caddo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22017,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Caddo,Caddo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22017,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Caddo,Caddo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22017,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Caddo,Caddo County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,237056,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22017,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Caddo,Caddo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,208532,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22017,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Caddo,Caddo County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,178282,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22017,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Caddo,Caddo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22017,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Caddo,Caddo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,30249,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22017,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Caddo,Caddo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,85.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22017,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Caddo,Caddo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22017,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Caddo,Caddo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,14.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22017,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Caddo,Caddo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,32,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22017,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Caddo,Caddo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,4.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22017,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Caddo,Caddo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,80.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22017,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Caddo,Caddo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,10285,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22017,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Caddo,Caddo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,167997,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22017,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Calcasieu,Calcasieu County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,46,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22019,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Calcasieu,Calcasieu County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22019,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Calcasieu,Calcasieu County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22019,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Calcasieu,Calcasieu County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22019,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Calcasieu,Calcasieu County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22019,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Calcasieu,Calcasieu County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,216416,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22019,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Calcasieu,Calcasieu County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,170651,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22019,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Calcasieu,Calcasieu County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,105703,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22019,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Calcasieu,Calcasieu County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22019,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Calcasieu,Calcasieu County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,64948,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22019,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Calcasieu,Calcasieu County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,61.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22019,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Calcasieu,Calcasieu County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22019,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Calcasieu,Calcasieu County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,38.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22019,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Calcasieu,Calcasieu County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,43,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22019,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Calcasieu,Calcasieu County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22019,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Calcasieu,Calcasieu County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,61.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22019,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Calcasieu,Calcasieu County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22019,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Calcasieu,Calcasieu County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,105703,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22019,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Caldwell,Caldwell County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22021,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Caldwell,Caldwell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22021,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Caldwell,Caldwell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22021,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Caldwell,Caldwell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22021,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Caldwell,Caldwell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22021,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Caldwell,Caldwell County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,9617,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22021,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Caldwell,Caldwell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,13199,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22021,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Caldwell,Caldwell County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2207,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22021,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Caldwell,Caldwell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,2207,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22021,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Caldwell,Caldwell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10993,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22021,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Caldwell,Caldwell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,16.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22021,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Caldwell,Caldwell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,16.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22021,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Caldwell,Caldwell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,83.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22021,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Caldwell,Caldwell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22021,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Caldwell,Caldwell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22021,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Caldwell,Caldwell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22021,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Caldwell,Caldwell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22021,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Caldwell,Caldwell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22021,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Cameron,Cameron County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22023,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Cameron,Cameron County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22023,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Cameron,Cameron County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22023,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Cameron,Cameron County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22023,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Cameron,Cameron County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22023,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Cameron,Cameron County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,5619,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22023,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Cameron,Cameron County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9854,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22023,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Cameron,Cameron County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22023,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Cameron,Cameron County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22023,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Cameron,Cameron County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9854,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22023,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Cameron,Cameron County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22023,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Cameron,Cameron County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22023,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Cameron,Cameron County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22023,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Cameron,Cameron County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22023,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Cameron,Cameron County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22023,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Cameron,Cameron County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22023,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Cameron,Cameron County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22023,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Cameron,Cameron County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22023,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Catahoula,Catahoula County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22025,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Catahoula,Catahoula County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22025,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Catahoula,Catahoula County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22025,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Catahoula,Catahoula County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22025,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Catahoula,Catahoula County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22025,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Catahoula,Catahoula County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,8859,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22025,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Catahoula,Catahoula County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,10830,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22025,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Catahoula,Catahoula County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22025,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Catahoula,Catahoula County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22025,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Catahoula,Catahoula County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10830,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22025,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Catahoula,Catahoula County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22025,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Catahoula,Catahoula County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22025,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Catahoula,Catahoula County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22025,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Catahoula,Catahoula County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22025,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Catahoula,Catahoula County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22025,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Catahoula,Catahoula County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22025,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Catahoula,Catahoula County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22025,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Catahoula,Catahoula County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22025,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Claiborne,Claiborne County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22027,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Claiborne,Claiborne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22027,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Claiborne,Claiborne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22027,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Claiborne,Claiborne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22027,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Claiborne,Claiborne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22027,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Claiborne,Claiborne County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,14109,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22027,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Claiborne,Claiborne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,15881,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22027,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Claiborne,Claiborne County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22027,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Claiborne,Claiborne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22027,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Claiborne,Claiborne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,15881,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22027,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Claiborne,Claiborne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22027,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Claiborne,Claiborne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22027,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Claiborne,Claiborne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22027,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Claiborne,Claiborne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22027,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Claiborne,Claiborne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22027,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Claiborne,Claiborne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22027,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Claiborne,Claiborne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22027,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Claiborne,Claiborne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22027,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Concordia,Concordia County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22029,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Concordia,Concordia County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22029,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Concordia,Concordia County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22029,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Concordia,Concordia County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22029,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Concordia,Concordia County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22029,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Concordia,Concordia County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,18589,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22029,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Concordia,Concordia County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,21987,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22029,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Concordia,Concordia County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6991,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22029,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Concordia,Concordia County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1605,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22029,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Concordia,Concordia County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,14996,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22029,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Concordia,Concordia County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,31.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22029,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Concordia,Concordia County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,7.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22029,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Concordia,Concordia County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,68.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22029,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Concordia,Concordia County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22029,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Concordia,Concordia County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22029,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Concordia,Concordia County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,24.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22029,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Concordia,Concordia County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,75,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22029,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Concordia,Concordia County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,5311,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22029,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,De Soto,De Soto County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22031,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,De Soto,De Soto County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22031,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,De Soto,De Soto County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22031,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,De Soto,De Soto County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22031,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,De Soto,De Soto County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22031,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,De Soto,De Soto County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,26854,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22031,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,LA,De Soto,De Soto County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,22955,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22031,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,De Soto,De Soto County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,702,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22031,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,De Soto,De Soto County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,702,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22031,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,De Soto,De Soto County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,22252,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22031,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,De Soto,De Soto County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,3.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22031,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,De Soto,De Soto County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,3.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22031,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,De Soto,De Soto County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,96.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22031,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,De Soto,De Soto County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22031,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,De Soto,De Soto County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22031,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,De Soto,De Soto County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22031,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,De Soto,De Soto County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22031,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,De Soto,De Soto County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22031,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,East Baton Rouge,East Baton Rouge County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22033,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,East Baton Rouge,East Baton Rouge County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22033,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,East Baton Rouge,East Baton Rouge County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22033,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,East Baton Rouge,East Baton Rouge County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22033,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,East Baton Rouge,East Baton Rouge County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22033,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,East Baton Rouge,East Baton Rouge County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,455884,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22033,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,LA,East Baton Rouge,East Baton Rouge County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,476510,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22033,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,East Baton Rouge,East Baton Rouge County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11580,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22033,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,East Baton Rouge,East Baton Rouge County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,11580,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22033,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,East Baton Rouge,East Baton Rouge County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,464930,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22033,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,East Baton Rouge,East Baton Rouge County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22033,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,East Baton Rouge,East Baton Rouge County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,2.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22033,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,East Baton Rouge,East Baton Rouge County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,97.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22033,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,East Baton Rouge,East Baton Rouge County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22033,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,East Baton Rouge,East Baton Rouge County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22033,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,East Baton Rouge,East Baton Rouge County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22033,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,East Baton Rouge,East Baton Rouge County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22033,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,East Baton Rouge,East Baton Rouge County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22033,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,East Carroll,East Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22035,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,East Carroll,East Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22035,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,East Carroll,East Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22035,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,East Carroll,East Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22035,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,East Carroll,East Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22035,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,East Carroll,East Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,7383,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22035,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,LA,East Carroll,East Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,6875,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22035,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,East Carroll,East Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4927,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22035,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,East Carroll,East Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,4889,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22035,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,East Carroll,East Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1948,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22035,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,East Carroll,East Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,71.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22035,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,East Carroll,East Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,71.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22035,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,East Carroll,East Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,28.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22035,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,East Carroll,East Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22035,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,East Carroll,East Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22035,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,East Carroll,East Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22035,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,East Carroll,East Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,38,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22035,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,East Carroll,East Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22035,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,East Feliciana,East Feliciana County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22037,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,East Feliciana,East Feliciana County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22037,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,East Feliciana,East Feliciana County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22037,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,East Feliciana,East Feliciana County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22037,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,East Feliciana,East Feliciana County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22037,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,East Feliciana,East Feliciana County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,19451,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22037,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,LA,East Feliciana,East Feliciana County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,23394,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22037,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,East Feliciana,East Feliciana County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,486,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22037,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,East Feliciana,East Feliciana County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,486,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22037,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,East Feliciana,East Feliciana County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,22908,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22037,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,East Feliciana,East Feliciana County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22037,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,East Feliciana,East Feliciana County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,2.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22037,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,East Feliciana,East Feliciana County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,97.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22037,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,East Feliciana,East Feliciana County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22037,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,East Feliciana,East Feliciana County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22037,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,East Feliciana,East Feliciana County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22037,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,East Feliciana,East Feliciana County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22037,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,East Feliciana,East Feliciana County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22037,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Evangeline,Evangeline County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22039,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Evangeline,Evangeline County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22039,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Evangeline,Evangeline County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22039,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Evangeline,Evangeline County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22039,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Evangeline,Evangeline County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22039,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Evangeline,Evangeline County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,32307,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22039,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Evangeline,Evangeline County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,33452,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22039,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Evangeline,Evangeline County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1211,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22039,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Evangeline,Evangeline County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1211,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22039,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Evangeline,Evangeline County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,32241,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22039,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Evangeline,Evangeline County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,3.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22039,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Evangeline,Evangeline County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,3.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22039,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Evangeline,Evangeline County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,96.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22039,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Evangeline,Evangeline County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22039,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Evangeline,Evangeline County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22039,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Evangeline,Evangeline County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22039,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Evangeline,Evangeline County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22039,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Evangeline,Evangeline County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22039,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22041,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22041,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22041,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22041,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22041,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,19721,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22041,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,17598,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22041,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22041,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22041,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,17598,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22041,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22041,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22041,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22041,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22041,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22041,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22041,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22041,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22041,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22043,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22043,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22043,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22043,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22043,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,22129,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22043,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,21230,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22043,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2608,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22043,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,2608,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22043,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,18623,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22043,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,12.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22043,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,12.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22043,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,87.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22043,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22043,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22043,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22043,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22043,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22043,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Iberia,Iberia County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22045,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Iberia,Iberia County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22045,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Iberia,Iberia County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22045,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Iberia,Iberia County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22045,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Iberia,Iberia County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22045,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Iberia,Iberia County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,69725,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22045,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Iberia,Iberia County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,64741,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22045,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Iberia,Iberia County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22045,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Iberia,Iberia County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22045,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Iberia,Iberia County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,64741,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22045,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Iberia,Iberia County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22045,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Iberia,Iberia County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22045,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Iberia,Iberia County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22045,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Iberia,Iberia County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22045,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Iberia,Iberia County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22045,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Iberia,Iberia County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22045,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Iberia,Iberia County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22045,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Iberia,Iberia County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22045,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Iberville,Iberville County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22047,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Iberville,Iberville County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22047,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Iberville,Iberville County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22047,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Iberville,Iberville County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22047,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Iberville,Iberville County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22047,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Iberville,Iberville County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,30095,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22047,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Iberville,Iberville County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,29809,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22047,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Iberville,Iberville County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2841,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22047,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Iberville,Iberville County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,2044,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22047,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Iberville,Iberville County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,26968,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22047,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Iberville,Iberville County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,9.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22047,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Iberville,Iberville County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,6.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22047,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Iberville,Iberville County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,90.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22047,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Iberville,Iberville County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22047,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Iberville,Iberville County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,2.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22047,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Iberville,Iberville County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22047,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Iberville,Iberville County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,797,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22047,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Iberville,Iberville County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22047,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,23,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22049,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22049,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22049,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22049,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22049,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,14989,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22049,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,15425,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22049,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,700,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22049,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,700,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22049,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,14725,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22049,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,4.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22049,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,4.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22049,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,95.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22049,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,20,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22049,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22049,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22049,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22049,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22049,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22051,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22051,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22051,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22051,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22051,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,439845,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22051,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,383541,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22051,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,376408,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22051,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22051,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7133,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22051,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22051,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22051,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22051,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22051,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22051,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,98.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22051,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22051,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,376408,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22051,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Jefferson Davis,Jefferson Davis County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22053,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Jefferson Davis,Jefferson Davis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22053,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Jefferson Davis,Jefferson Davis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22053,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Jefferson Davis,Jefferson Davis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22053,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Jefferson Davis,Jefferson Davis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22053,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Jefferson Davis,Jefferson Davis County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,32166,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22053,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Jefferson Davis,Jefferson Davis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,27392,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22053,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Jefferson Davis,Jefferson Davis County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,943,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22053,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Jefferson Davis,Jefferson Davis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22053,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Jefferson Davis,Jefferson Davis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,26449,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22053,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Jefferson Davis,Jefferson Davis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,3.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22053,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Jefferson Davis,Jefferson Davis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22053,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Jefferson Davis,Jefferson Davis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,96.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22053,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Jefferson Davis,Jefferson Davis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22053,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Jefferson Davis,Jefferson Davis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,3.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22053,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Jefferson Davis,Jefferson Davis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22053,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Jefferson Davis,Jefferson Davis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,943,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22053,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Jefferson Davis,Jefferson Davis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22053,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,LA,Louisiana,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1022,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,LA,LA,Louisiana,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,117,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,LA,LA,Louisiana,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,30,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,LA,LA,Louisiana,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,LA,LA,Louisiana,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,66,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,LA,LA,Louisiana,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,4651203,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2020,LA,LA,Louisiana,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4161676,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,LA,LA,Louisiana,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1582811,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,LA,LA,Louisiana,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,164540,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,LA,LA,Louisiana,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2578865,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,LA,LA,Louisiana,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,38,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,LA,LA,Louisiana,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,LA,LA,Louisiana,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,62,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,LA,LA,Louisiana,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,905,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,LA,LA,Louisiana,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,1.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,LA,LA,Louisiana,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,33,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,LA,LA,Louisiana,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,44864,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,LA,LA,Louisiana,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1373407,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,LA,La Salle,La Salle County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22059,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,La Salle,La Salle County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22059,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,La Salle,La Salle County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22059,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,La Salle,La Salle County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22059,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,La Salle,La Salle County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22059,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,La Salle,La Salle County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,14812,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22059,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,LA,La Salle,La Salle County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,15121,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22059,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,La Salle,La Salle County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,484,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22059,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,La Salle,La Salle County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,484,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22059,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,La Salle,La Salle County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,14637,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22059,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,La Salle,La Salle County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,3.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22059,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,La Salle,La Salle County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,3.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22059,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,La Salle,La Salle County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,96.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22059,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,La Salle,La Salle County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22059,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,La Salle,La Salle County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22059,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,La Salle,La Salle County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22059,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,La Salle,La Salle County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22059,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,La Salle,La Salle County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22059,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,64,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22055,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22055,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22055,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22055,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22055,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,242004,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22055,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,234812,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22055,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22055,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22055,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,234812,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22055,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22055,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22055,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22055,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,64,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22055,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22055,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22055,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22055,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22055,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Lafourche,Lafourche County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22057,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Lafourche,Lafourche County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22057,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Lafourche,Lafourche County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22057,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Lafourche,Lafourche County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22057,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Lafourche,Lafourche County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22057,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Lafourche,Lafourche County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,97495,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22057,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Lafourche,Lafourche County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,79042,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22057,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Lafourche,Lafourche County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,79042,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22057,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Lafourche,Lafourche County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22057,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Lafourche,Lafourche County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22057,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Lafourche,Lafourche County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22057,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Lafourche,Lafourche County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22057,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Lafourche,Lafourche County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22057,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Lafourche,Lafourche County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22057,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Lafourche,Lafourche County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22057,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Lafourche,Lafourche County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22057,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Lafourche,Lafourche County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22057,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Lafourche,Lafourche County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,79042,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22057,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,21,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22061,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22061,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22061,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22061,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22061,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,48259,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22061,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,49249,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22061,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22061,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22061,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,49249,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22061,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22061,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22061,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22061,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,21,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22061,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22061,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22061,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22061,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22061,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Livingston,Livingston County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,37,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22063,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Livingston,Livingston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22063,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Livingston,Livingston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22063,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Livingston,Livingston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22063,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Livingston,Livingston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22063,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Livingston,Livingston County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,142726,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22063,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Livingston,Livingston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,118719,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22063,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Livingston,Livingston County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,12908,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22063,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Livingston,Livingston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1600,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22063,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Livingston,Livingston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,105811,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22063,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Livingston,Livingston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,10.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22063,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Livingston,Livingston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22063,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Livingston,Livingston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,89.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22063,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Livingston,Livingston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,35,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22063,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Livingston,Livingston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22063,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Livingston,Livingston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,9.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22063,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Livingston,Livingston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22063,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Livingston,Livingston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,11308,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22063,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22065,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22065,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22065,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22065,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22065,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,9927,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22065,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,11208,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22065,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22065,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22065,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11208,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22065,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22065,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22065,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22065,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22065,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22065,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22065,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22065,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22065,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Morehouse,Morehouse County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22067,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Morehouse,Morehouse County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22067,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Morehouse,Morehouse County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22067,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Morehouse,Morehouse County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22067,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Morehouse,Morehouse County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22067,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Morehouse,Morehouse County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,25430,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22067,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Morehouse,Morehouse County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,27632,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22067,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Morehouse,Morehouse County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22067,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Morehouse,Morehouse County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22067,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Morehouse,Morehouse County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,27632,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22067,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Morehouse,Morehouse County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22067,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Morehouse,Morehouse County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22067,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Morehouse,Morehouse County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22067,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Morehouse,Morehouse County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22067,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Morehouse,Morehouse County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22067,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Morehouse,Morehouse County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22067,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Morehouse,Morehouse County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22067,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Morehouse,Morehouse County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22067,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Natchitoches,Natchitoches County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22069,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Natchitoches,Natchitoches County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22069,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Natchitoches,Natchitoches County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22069,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Natchitoches,Natchitoches County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22069,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Natchitoches,Natchitoches County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22069,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Natchitoches,Natchitoches County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,37349,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22069,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Natchitoches,Natchitoches County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,39558,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22069,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Natchitoches,Natchitoches County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,27174,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22069,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Natchitoches,Natchitoches County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1538,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22069,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Natchitoches,Natchitoches County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,12384,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22069,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Natchitoches,Natchitoches County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,68.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22069,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Natchitoches,Natchitoches County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,3.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22069,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Natchitoches,Natchitoches County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,31.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22069,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Natchitoches,Natchitoches County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22069,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Natchitoches,Natchitoches County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,1.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22069,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Natchitoches,Natchitoches County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,63.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22069,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Natchitoches,Natchitoches County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,562,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22069,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Natchitoches,Natchitoches County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,25074,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22069,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Orleans,Orleans County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22071,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Orleans,Orleans County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22071,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Orleans,Orleans County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22071,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Orleans,Orleans County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22071,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Orleans,Orleans County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22071,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Orleans,Orleans County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,383282,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22071,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Orleans,Orleans County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,287374,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22071,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Orleans,Orleans County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,287374,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22071,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Orleans,Orleans County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22071,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Orleans,Orleans County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22071,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Orleans,Orleans County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22071,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Orleans,Orleans County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22071,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Orleans,Orleans County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22071,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Orleans,Orleans County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22071,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Orleans,Orleans County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22071,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Orleans,Orleans County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22071,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Orleans,Orleans County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22071,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Orleans,Orleans County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,287374,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22071,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Ouachita,Ouachita County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,38,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22073,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Ouachita,Ouachita County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22073,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Ouachita,Ouachita County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22073,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Ouachita,Ouachita County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22073,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Ouachita,Ouachita County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22073,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Ouachita,Ouachita County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,160003,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22073,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Ouachita,Ouachita County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,145940,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22073,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Ouachita,Ouachita County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4979,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22073,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Ouachita,Ouachita County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,4979,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22073,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Ouachita,Ouachita County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,140961,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22073,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Ouachita,Ouachita County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,3.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22073,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Ouachita,Ouachita County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,3.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22073,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Ouachita,Ouachita County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,96.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22073,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Ouachita,Ouachita County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,32,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22073,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Ouachita,Ouachita County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22073,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Ouachita,Ouachita County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22073,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Ouachita,Ouachita County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22073,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Ouachita,Ouachita County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22073,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Plaquemines,Plaquemines County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22075,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Plaquemines,Plaquemines County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22075,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Plaquemines,Plaquemines County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22075,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Plaquemines,Plaquemines County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22075,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Plaquemines,Plaquemines County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22075,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Plaquemines,Plaquemines County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,23466,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22075,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Plaquemines,Plaquemines County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,23800,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22075,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Plaquemines,Plaquemines County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,23800,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22075,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Plaquemines,Plaquemines County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22075,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Plaquemines,Plaquemines County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22075,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Plaquemines,Plaquemines County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22075,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Plaquemines,Plaquemines County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22075,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Plaquemines,Plaquemines County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22075,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Plaquemines,Plaquemines County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22075,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Plaquemines,Plaquemines County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22075,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Plaquemines,Plaquemines County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22075,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Plaquemines,Plaquemines County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22075,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Plaquemines,Plaquemines County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,23800,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22075,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Pointe Coupee,Pointe Coupee County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22077,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Pointe Coupee,Pointe Coupee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22077,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Pointe Coupee,Pointe Coupee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22077,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Pointe Coupee,Pointe Coupee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22077,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Pointe Coupee,Pointe Coupee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22077,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Pointe Coupee,Pointe Coupee County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,20689,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22077,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Pointe Coupee,Pointe Coupee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,26871,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22077,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Pointe Coupee,Pointe Coupee County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,267,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22077,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Pointe Coupee,Pointe Coupee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,267,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22077,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Pointe Coupee,Pointe Coupee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,26604,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22077,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Pointe Coupee,Pointe Coupee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22077,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Pointe Coupee,Pointe Coupee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22077,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Pointe Coupee,Pointe Coupee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22077,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Pointe Coupee,Pointe Coupee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22077,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Pointe Coupee,Pointe Coupee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22077,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Pointe Coupee,Pointe Coupee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22077,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Pointe Coupee,Pointe Coupee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22077,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Pointe Coupee,Pointe Coupee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22077,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Rapides,Rapides County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,23,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22079,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Rapides,Rapides County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22079,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Rapides,Rapides County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22079,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Rapides,Rapides County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22079,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Rapides,Rapides County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22079,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Rapides,Rapides County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,129607,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22079,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Rapides,Rapides County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,134271,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22079,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Rapides,Rapides County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,69246,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22079,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Rapides,Rapides County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,64188,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22079,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Rapides,Rapides County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,65026,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22079,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Rapides,Rapides County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,51.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22079,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Rapides,Rapides County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,47.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22079,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Rapides,Rapides County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,48.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22079,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Rapides,Rapides County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22079,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Rapides,Rapides County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,3.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22079,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Rapides,Rapides County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22079,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Rapides,Rapides County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,5057,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22079,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Rapides,Rapides County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22079,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Red River,Red River County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22081,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Red River,Red River County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22081,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Red River,Red River County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22081,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Red River,Red River County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22081,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Red River,Red River County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22081,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Red River,Red River County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,7619,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22081,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Red River,Red River County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9847,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22081,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Red River,Red River County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22081,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Red River,Red River County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22081,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Red River,Red River County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9847,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22081,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Red River,Red River County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22081,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Red River,Red River County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22081,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Red River,Red River County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22081,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Red River,Red River County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22081,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Red River,Red River County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22081,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Red River,Red River County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22081,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Red River,Red River County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22081,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Red River,Red River County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22081,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Richland,Richland County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22083,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Richland,Richland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22083,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Richland,Richland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22083,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Richland,Richland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22083,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Richland,Richland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22083,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Richland,Richland County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,19997,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22083,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Richland,Richland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,18440,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22083,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Richland,Richland County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22083,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Richland,Richland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22083,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Richland,Richland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,18440,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22083,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Richland,Richland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22083,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Richland,Richland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22083,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Richland,Richland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22083,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Richland,Richland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22083,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Richland,Richland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22083,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Richland,Richland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22083,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Richland,Richland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22083,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Richland,Richland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22083,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Sabine,Sabine County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,19,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22085,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Sabine,Sabine County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22085,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Sabine,Sabine County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22085,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Sabine,Sabine County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22085,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Sabine,Sabine County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22085,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Sabine,Sabine County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,22118,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22085,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Sabine,Sabine County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,30778,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22085,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Sabine,Sabine County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4222,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22085,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Sabine,Sabine County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,2407,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22085,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Sabine,Sabine County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,26555,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22085,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Sabine,Sabine County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,13.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22085,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Sabine,Sabine County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,7.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22085,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Sabine,Sabine County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,86.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22085,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Sabine,Sabine County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22085,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Sabine,Sabine County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,5.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22085,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Sabine,Sabine County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22085,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Sabine,Sabine County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1815,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22085,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Sabine,Sabine County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22085,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Bernard,St. Bernard County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22087,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Bernard,St. Bernard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22087,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Bernard,St. Bernard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22087,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Bernard,St. Bernard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22087,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Bernard,St. Bernard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22087,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Bernard,St. Bernard County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,43838,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22087,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Bernard,St. Bernard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,36775,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22087,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Bernard,St. Bernard County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22087,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Bernard,St. Bernard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22087,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Bernard,St. Bernard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,36775,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22087,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Bernard,St. Bernard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22087,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Bernard,St. Bernard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22087,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Bernard,St. Bernard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22087,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Bernard,St. Bernard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22087,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Bernard,St. Bernard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22087,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Bernard,St. Bernard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22087,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Bernard,St. Bernard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22087,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Bernard,St. Bernard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22087,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Charles,St. Charles County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22089,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Charles,St. Charles County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22089,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Charles,St. Charles County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22089,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Charles,St. Charles County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22089,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Charles,St. Charles County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22089,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Charles,St. Charles County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,52481,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22089,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Charles,St. Charles County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,44197,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22089,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Charles,St. Charles County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,44197,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22089,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Charles,St. Charles County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22089,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Charles,St. Charles County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22089,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Charles,St. Charles County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22089,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Charles,St. Charles County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22089,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Charles,St. Charles County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22089,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Charles,St. Charles County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22089,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Charles,St. Charles County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22089,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Charles,St. Charles County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22089,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Charles,St. Charles County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22089,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Charles,St. Charles County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,44197,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22089,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Helena,St. Helena County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22091,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Helena,St. Helena County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22091,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Helena,St. Helena County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22091,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Helena,St. Helena County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22091,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Helena,St. Helena County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22091,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Helena,St. Helena County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,10889,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22091,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Helena,St. Helena County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,8522,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22091,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Helena,St. Helena County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,873,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22091,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Helena,St. Helena County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,873,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22091,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Helena,St. Helena County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7649,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22091,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Helena,St. Helena County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,10.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22091,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Helena,St. Helena County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,10.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22091,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Helena,St. Helena County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,89.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22091,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Helena,St. Helena County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22091,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Helena,St. Helena County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22091,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Helena,St. Helena County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22091,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Helena,St. Helena County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22091,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Helena,St. Helena County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22091,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. James,St. James County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22093,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. James,St. James County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22093,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. James,St. James County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22093,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. James,St. James County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22093,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. James,St. James County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22093,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. James,St. James County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,20127,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22093,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. James,St. James County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,19981,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22093,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. James,St. James County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22093,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. James,St. James County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22093,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. James,St. James County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,19981,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22093,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. James,St. James County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22093,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. James,St. James County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22093,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. James,St. James County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22093,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. James,St. James County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22093,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. James,St. James County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22093,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. James,St. James County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22093,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. James,St. James County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22093,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. James,St. James County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22093,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. John the Baptist,St. John the Baptist County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22095,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. John the Baptist,St. John the Baptist County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22095,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. John the Baptist,St. John the Baptist County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22095,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. John the Baptist,St. John the Baptist County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22095,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. John the Baptist,St. John the Baptist County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22095,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. John the Baptist,St. John the Baptist County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,42394,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22095,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. John the Baptist,St. John the Baptist County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,38987,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22095,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. John the Baptist,St. John the Baptist County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,38573,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22095,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. John the Baptist,St. John the Baptist County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,24967,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22095,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. John the Baptist,St. John the Baptist County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,414,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22095,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. John the Baptist,St. John the Baptist County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22095,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. John the Baptist,St. John the Baptist County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,64,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22095,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. John the Baptist,St. John the Baptist County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22095,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. John the Baptist,St. John the Baptist County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22095,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. John the Baptist,St. John the Baptist County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22095,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. John the Baptist,St. John the Baptist County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,34.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22095,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. John the Baptist,St. John the Baptist County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22095,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. John the Baptist,St. John the Baptist County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,13606,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22095,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Landry,St. Landry County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,30,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22097,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Landry,St. Landry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22097,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Landry,St. Landry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22097,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Landry,St. Landry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22097,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Landry,St. Landry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22097,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Landry,St. Landry County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,82273,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22097,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Landry,St. Landry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,91651,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22097,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Landry,St. Landry County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10215,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22097,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Landry,St. Landry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,9902,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22097,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Landry,St. Landry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,81436,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22097,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Landry,St. Landry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,11.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22097,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Landry,St. Landry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,10.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22097,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Landry,St. Landry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,88.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22097,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Landry,St. Landry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,26,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22097,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Landry,St. Landry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22097,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Landry,St. Landry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22097,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Landry,St. Landry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,313,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22097,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Landry,St. Landry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22097,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Martin,St. Martin County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,19,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22099,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Martin,St. Martin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22099,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Martin,St. Martin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22099,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Martin,St. Martin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22099,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Martin,St. Martin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22099,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Martin,St. Martin County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,51604,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22099,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Martin,St. Martin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,59864,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22099,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Martin,St. Martin County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22099,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Martin,St. Martin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22099,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Martin,St. Martin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,59864,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22099,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Martin,St. Martin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22099,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Martin,St. Martin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22099,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Martin,St. Martin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22099,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Martin,St. Martin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,19,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22099,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Martin,St. Martin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22099,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Martin,St. Martin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22099,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Martin,St. Martin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22099,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Martin,St. Martin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22099,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Mary,St. Mary County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22101,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Mary,St. Mary County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22101,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Mary,St. Mary County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22101,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Mary,St. Mary County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22101,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Mary,St. Mary County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22101,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Mary,St. Mary County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,49140,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22101,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Mary,St. Mary County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,51435,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22101,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Mary,St. Mary County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22101,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Mary,St. Mary County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22101,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Mary,St. Mary County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,51435,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22101,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Mary,St. Mary County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22101,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Mary,St. Mary County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22101,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Mary,St. Mary County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22101,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Mary,St. Mary County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22101,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Mary,St. Mary County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22101,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Mary,St. Mary County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22101,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Mary,St. Mary County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22101,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Mary,St. Mary County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22101,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Tammany,St. Tammany County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,99,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22103,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Tammany,St. Tammany County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22103,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Tammany,St. Tammany County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22103,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Tammany,St. Tammany County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22103,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Tammany,St. Tammany County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22103,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Tammany,St. Tammany County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,264933,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22103,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Tammany,St. Tammany County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,187823,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22103,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Tammany,St. Tammany County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2397,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22103,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Tammany,St. Tammany County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,2397,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22103,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Tammany,St. Tammany County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,185426,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22103,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Tammany,St. Tammany County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22103,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Tammany,St. Tammany County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22103,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Tammany,St. Tammany County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22103,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Tammany,St. Tammany County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,88,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22103,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Tammany,St. Tammany County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22103,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Tammany,St. Tammany County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22103,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Tammany,St. Tammany County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22103,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,St. Tammany,St. Tammany County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22103,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Tangipahoa,Tangipahoa County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,35,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22105,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Tangipahoa,Tangipahoa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22105,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Tangipahoa,Tangipahoa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22105,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Tangipahoa,Tangipahoa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22105,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Tangipahoa,Tangipahoa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22105,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Tangipahoa,Tangipahoa County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,133549,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22105,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Tangipahoa,Tangipahoa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,99955,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22105,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Tangipahoa,Tangipahoa County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22105,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Tangipahoa,Tangipahoa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22105,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Tangipahoa,Tangipahoa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,99955,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22105,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Tangipahoa,Tangipahoa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22105,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Tangipahoa,Tangipahoa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22105,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Tangipahoa,Tangipahoa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22105,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Tangipahoa,Tangipahoa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,35,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22105,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Tangipahoa,Tangipahoa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22105,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Tangipahoa,Tangipahoa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22105,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Tangipahoa,Tangipahoa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22105,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Tangipahoa,Tangipahoa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22105,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Tensas,Tensas County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22107,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Tensas,Tensas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22107,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Tensas,Tensas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22107,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Tensas,Tensas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22107,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Tensas,Tensas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22107,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Tensas,Tensas County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,4116,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22107,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Tensas,Tensas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,8439,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22107,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Tensas,Tensas County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22107,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Tensas,Tensas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22107,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Tensas,Tensas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8439,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22107,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Tensas,Tensas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22107,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Tensas,Tensas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22107,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Tensas,Tensas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22107,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Tensas,Tensas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22107,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Tensas,Tensas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22107,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Tensas,Tensas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22107,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Tensas,Tensas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22107,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Tensas,Tensas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22107,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Terrebonne,Terrebonne County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22109,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Terrebonne,Terrebonne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22109,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Terrebonne,Terrebonne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22109,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Terrebonne,Terrebonne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22109,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Terrebonne,Terrebonne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22109,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Terrebonne,Terrebonne County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,109319,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22109,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Terrebonne,Terrebonne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,107578,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22109,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Terrebonne,Terrebonne County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,107578,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22109,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Terrebonne,Terrebonne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22109,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Terrebonne,Terrebonne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22109,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Terrebonne,Terrebonne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22109,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Terrebonne,Terrebonne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22109,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Terrebonne,Terrebonne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22109,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Terrebonne,Terrebonne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22109,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Terrebonne,Terrebonne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22109,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Terrebonne,Terrebonne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22109,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Terrebonne,Terrebonne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22109,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Terrebonne,Terrebonne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,107578,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22109,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,23,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22111,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22111,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22111,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22111,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22111,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,21124,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22111,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,26448,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22111,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1610,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22111,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1610,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22111,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,24838,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22111,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,6.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22111,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,6.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22111,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,93.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22111,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,20,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22111,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22111,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22111,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22111,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22111,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Vermilion,Vermilion County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22113,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Vermilion,Vermilion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22113,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Vermilion,Vermilion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22113,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Vermilion,Vermilion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22113,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Vermilion,Vermilion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22113,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Vermilion,Vermilion County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,57289,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22113,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Vermilion,Vermilion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,56491,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22113,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Vermilion,Vermilion County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22113,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Vermilion,Vermilion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22113,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Vermilion,Vermilion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,56491,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22113,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Vermilion,Vermilion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22113,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Vermilion,Vermilion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22113,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Vermilion,Vermilion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22113,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Vermilion,Vermilion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22113,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Vermilion,Vermilion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22113,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Vermilion,Vermilion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22113,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Vermilion,Vermilion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22113,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Vermilion,Vermilion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22113,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Vernon,Vernon County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22115,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Vernon,Vernon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22115,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Vernon,Vernon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22115,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Vernon,Vernon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22115,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Vernon,Vernon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22115,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Vernon,Vernon County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,48582,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22115,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Vernon,Vernon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,41419,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22115,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Vernon,Vernon County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,14805,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22115,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Vernon,Vernon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,5291,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22115,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Vernon,Vernon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,26614,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22115,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Vernon,Vernon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,35.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22115,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Vernon,Vernon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,12.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22115,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Vernon,Vernon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,64.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22115,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Vernon,Vernon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22115,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Vernon,Vernon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22115,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Vernon,Vernon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,23,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22115,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Vernon,Vernon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22115,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Vernon,Vernon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,9515,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22115,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22117,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22117,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22117,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22117,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22117,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,45370,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22117,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,27021,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22117,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6352,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22117,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,6352,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22117,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,20669,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22117,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,23.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22117,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,23.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22117,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,76.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22117,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22117,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22117,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22117,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22117,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22117,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,32,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22119,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22119,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22119,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22119,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22119,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,36864,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22119,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,41035,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22119,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1128,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22119,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1128,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22119,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,39906,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22119,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22119,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,2.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22119,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,97.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22119,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,31,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22119,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22119,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22119,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22119,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22119,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,West Baton Rouge,West Baton Rouge County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22121,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,West Baton Rouge,West Baton Rouge County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22121,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,West Baton Rouge,West Baton Rouge County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22121,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,West Baton Rouge,West Baton Rouge County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22121,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,West Baton Rouge,West Baton Rouge County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22121,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,West Baton Rouge,West Baton Rouge County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,27236,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22121,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,LA,West Baton Rouge,West Baton Rouge County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,28185,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22121,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,West Baton Rouge,West Baton Rouge County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22121,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,West Baton Rouge,West Baton Rouge County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22121,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,West Baton Rouge,West Baton Rouge County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,28185,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22121,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,West Baton Rouge,West Baton Rouge County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22121,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,West Baton Rouge,West Baton Rouge County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22121,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,West Baton Rouge,West Baton Rouge County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22121,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,West Baton Rouge,West Baton Rouge County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22121,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,West Baton Rouge,West Baton Rouge County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22121,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,West Baton Rouge,West Baton Rouge County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22121,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,West Baton Rouge,West Baton Rouge County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22121,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,West Baton Rouge,West Baton Rouge County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22121,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,West Carroll,West Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22123,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,West Carroll,West Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22123,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,West Carroll,West Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22123,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,West Carroll,West Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22123,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,West Carroll,West Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22123,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,West Carroll,West Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,9694,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22123,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,LA,West Carroll,West Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,12372,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22123,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,West Carroll,West Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22123,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,West Carroll,West Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22123,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,West Carroll,West Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,12372,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22123,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,West Carroll,West Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22123,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,West Carroll,West Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22123,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,West Carroll,West Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22123,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,West Carroll,West Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22123,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,West Carroll,West Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22123,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,West Carroll,West Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22123,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,West Carroll,West Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22123,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,West Carroll,West Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22123,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,West Feliciana,West Feliciana County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22125,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,West Feliciana,West Feliciana County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22125,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,West Feliciana,West Feliciana County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22125,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,West Feliciana,West Feliciana County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22125,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,West Feliciana,West Feliciana County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22125,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,West Feliciana,West Feliciana County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,15256,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22125,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,LA,West Feliciana,West Feliciana County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,16621,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22125,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,West Feliciana,West Feliciana County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22125,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,West Feliciana,West Feliciana County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22125,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,West Feliciana,West Feliciana County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,16621,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22125,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,West Feliciana,West Feliciana County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22125,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,West Feliciana,West Feliciana County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22125,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,West Feliciana,West Feliciana County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22125,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,West Feliciana,West Feliciana County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22125,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,West Feliciana,West Feliciana County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22125,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,West Feliciana,West Feliciana County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22125,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,West Feliciana,West Feliciana County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22125,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,West Feliciana,West Feliciana County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22125,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Winn,Winn County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22127,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Winn,Winn County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22127,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Winn,Winn County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22127,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Winn,Winn County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22127,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Winn,Winn County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22127,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Winn,Winn County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,13721,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22127,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Winn,Winn County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,15654,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22127,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Winn,Winn County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3062,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22127,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Winn,Winn County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,2511,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22127,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Winn,Winn County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,12591,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22127,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Winn,Winn County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,19.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22127,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Winn,Winn County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,16,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22127,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Winn,Winn County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,80.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22127,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Winn,Winn County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22127,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Winn,Winn County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,3.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22127,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Winn,Winn County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22127,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Winn,Winn County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,552,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22127,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,LA,Winn,Winn County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,22127,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Barnstable,Barnstable County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,29,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25001,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Barnstable,Barnstable County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25001,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Barnstable,Barnstable County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25001,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Barnstable,Barnstable County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25001,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Barnstable,Barnstable County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25001,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Barnstable,Barnstable County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,228969,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25001,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Barnstable,Barnstable County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,485973,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25001,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Barnstable,Barnstable County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25001,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Barnstable,Barnstable County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25001,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Barnstable,Barnstable County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,485973,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25001,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Barnstable,Barnstable County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25001,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Barnstable,Barnstable County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25001,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Barnstable,Barnstable County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25001,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Barnstable,Barnstable County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,29,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25001,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Barnstable,Barnstable County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,25001,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Barnstable,Barnstable County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,25001,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Barnstable,Barnstable County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,25001,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Barnstable,Barnstable County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,25001,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Berkshire,Berkshire County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,44,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25003,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Berkshire,Berkshire County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25003,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Berkshire,Berkshire County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25003,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Berkshire,Berkshire County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25003,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Berkshire,Berkshire County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25003,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Berkshire,Berkshire County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,128758,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25003,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Berkshire,Berkshire County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,97653,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25003,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Berkshire,Berkshire County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25003,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Berkshire,Berkshire County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25003,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Berkshire,Berkshire County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,97653,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25003,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Berkshire,Berkshire County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25003,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Berkshire,Berkshire County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25003,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Berkshire,Berkshire County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25003,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Berkshire,Berkshire County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,44,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25003,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Berkshire,Berkshire County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,25003,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Berkshire,Berkshire County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,25003,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Berkshire,Berkshire County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,25003,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Berkshire,Berkshire County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,25003,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Bristol,Bristol County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,27,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25005,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Bristol,Bristol County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25005,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Bristol,Bristol County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25005,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Bristol,Bristol County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25005,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Bristol,Bristol County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25005,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Bristol,Bristol County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,579172,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25005,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Bristol,Bristol County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,505380,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25005,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Bristol,Bristol County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,359773,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25005,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Bristol,Bristol County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25005,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Bristol,Bristol County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,145607,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25005,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Bristol,Bristol County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,71.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25005,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Bristol,Bristol County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25005,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Bristol,Bristol County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,28.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25005,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Bristol,Bristol County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25005,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Bristol,Bristol County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,6.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25005,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Bristol,Bristol County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,65.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25005,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Bristol,Bristol County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,30736,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25005,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Bristol,Bristol County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,329037,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25005,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Dukes,Dukes County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25007,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Dukes,Dukes County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25007,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Dukes,Dukes County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25007,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Dukes,Dukes County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25007,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Dukes,Dukes County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25007,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Dukes,Dukes County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,20581,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25007,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Dukes,Dukes County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,30541,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25007,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Dukes,Dukes County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,19073,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25007,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Dukes,Dukes County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25007,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Dukes,Dukes County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11468,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25007,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Dukes,Dukes County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,62.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25007,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Dukes,Dukes County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25007,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Dukes,Dukes County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,37.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25007,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Dukes,Dukes County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25007,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Dukes,Dukes County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,25007,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Dukes,Dukes County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,62.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25007,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Dukes,Dukes County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,25007,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Dukes,Dukes County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,19073,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25007,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Essex,Essex County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,41,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25009,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Essex,Essex County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,29,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25009,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Essex,Essex County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,20,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25009,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Essex,Essex County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25009,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Essex,Essex County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25009,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Essex,Essex County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,809218,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25009,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Essex,Essex County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,724203,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25009,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Essex,Essex County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,629113,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25009,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Essex,Essex County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25009,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Essex,Essex County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,95090,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25009,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Essex,Essex County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,86.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25009,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Essex,Essex County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25009,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Essex,Essex County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,13.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25009,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Essex,Essex County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25009,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Essex,Essex County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,18.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25009,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Essex,Essex County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,68.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25009,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Essex,Essex County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,135989,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25009,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Essex,Essex County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,493125,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25009,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,30,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25011,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25011,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25011,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25011,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25011,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,70988,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25011,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,42625,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25011,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,68,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25011,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,68,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25011,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,42557,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25011,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25011,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25011,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25011,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,29,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25011,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,25011,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,25011,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,25011,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,25011,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Hampden,Hampden County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,28,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25013,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Hampden,Hampden County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25013,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Hampden,Hampden County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25013,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Hampden,Hampden County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25013,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Hampden,Hampden County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25013,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Hampden,Hampden County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,464908,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25013,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Hampden,Hampden County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,384341,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25013,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Hampden,Hampden County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,68420,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25013,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Hampden,Hampden County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,136,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25013,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Hampden,Hampden County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,315921,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25013,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Hampden,Hampden County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,17.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25013,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Hampden,Hampden County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25013,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Hampden,Hampden County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,82.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25013,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Hampden,Hampden County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,22,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25013,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Hampden,Hampden County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,14.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25013,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Hampden,Hampden County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,3.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25013,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Hampden,Hampden County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,55195,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25013,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Hampden,Hampden County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,13089,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25013,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Hampshire,Hampshire County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,33,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25015,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Hampshire,Hampshire County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25015,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Hampshire,Hampshire County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25015,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Hampshire,Hampshire County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25015,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Hampshire,Hampshire County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25015,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Hampshire,Hampshire County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,162064,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25015,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Hampshire,Hampshire County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,222720,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25015,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Hampshire,Hampshire County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,154157,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25015,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Hampshire,Hampshire County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25015,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Hampshire,Hampshire County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,68563,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25015,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Hampshire,Hampshire County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,69.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25015,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Hampshire,Hampshire County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25015,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Hampshire,Hampshire County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,30.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25015,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Hampshire,Hampshire County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,29,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25015,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Hampshire,Hampshire County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,54.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25015,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Hampshire,Hampshire County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,14.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25015,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Hampshire,Hampshire County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,121538,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25015,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Hampshire,Hampshire County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,32619,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25015,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MA,MA,Massachusetts,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,576,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,MA,MA,Massachusetts,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,161,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,MA,MA,Massachusetts,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,82,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,MA,MA,Massachusetts,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,65,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,MA,MA,Massachusetts,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,MA,MA,Massachusetts,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,7022220,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2020,MA,MA,Massachusetts,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,6385621,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,MA,MA,Massachusetts,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3691328,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,MA,MA,Massachusetts,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1649,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,MA,MA,Massachusetts,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2694293,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,MA,MA,Massachusetts,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,57.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,MA,MA,Massachusetts,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,MA,MA,Massachusetts,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,42.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,MA,MA,Massachusetts,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,415,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,MA,MA,Massachusetts,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,28.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,MA,MA,Massachusetts,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,29.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,MA,MA,Massachusetts,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1827603,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,MA,MA,Massachusetts,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1862077,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,MA,Middlesex,Middlesex County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,98,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25017,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Middlesex,Middlesex County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,42,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25017,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Middlesex,Middlesex County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,19,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25017,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Middlesex,Middlesex County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,21,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25017,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Middlesex,Middlesex County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25017,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Middlesex,Middlesex County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,1629422,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25017,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Middlesex,Middlesex County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1265022,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25017,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Middlesex,Middlesex County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1108195,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25017,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Middlesex,Middlesex County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,76,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25017,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Middlesex,Middlesex County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,156826,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25017,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Middlesex,Middlesex County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,87.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25017,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Middlesex,Middlesex County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25017,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Middlesex,Middlesex County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,12.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25017,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Middlesex,Middlesex County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,56,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25017,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Middlesex,Middlesex County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,47.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25017,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Middlesex,Middlesex County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,40.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25017,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Middlesex,Middlesex County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,597732,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25017,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Middlesex,Middlesex County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,510387,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25017,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Nantucket,Nantucket County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25019,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Nantucket,Nantucket County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25019,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Nantucket,Nantucket County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25019,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Nantucket,Nantucket County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25019,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Nantucket,Nantucket County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25019,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Nantucket,Nantucket County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,14244,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25019,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Nantucket,Nantucket County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,26082,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25019,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Nantucket,Nantucket County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25019,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Nantucket,Nantucket County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25019,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Nantucket,Nantucket County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,26082,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25019,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Nantucket,Nantucket County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25019,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Nantucket,Nantucket County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25019,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Nantucket,Nantucket County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25019,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Nantucket,Nantucket County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25019,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Nantucket,Nantucket County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,25019,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Nantucket,Nantucket County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,25019,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Nantucket,Nantucket County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,25019,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Nantucket,Nantucket County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,25019,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Norfolk,Norfolk County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,49,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25021,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Norfolk,Norfolk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,21,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25021,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Norfolk,Norfolk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25021,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Norfolk,Norfolk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25021,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Norfolk,Norfolk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25021,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Norfolk,Norfolk County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,726025,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25021,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Norfolk,Norfolk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,731832,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25021,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Norfolk,Norfolk County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,466523,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25021,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Norfolk,Norfolk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25021,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Norfolk,Norfolk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,265309,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25021,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Norfolk,Norfolk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,63.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25021,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Norfolk,Norfolk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25021,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Norfolk,Norfolk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,36.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25021,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Norfolk,Norfolk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,28,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25021,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Norfolk,Norfolk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,32.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25021,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Norfolk,Norfolk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,31.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25021,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Norfolk,Norfolk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,235783,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25021,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Norfolk,Norfolk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,230740,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25021,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Plymouth,Plymouth County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,49,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25023,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Plymouth,Plymouth County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25023,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Plymouth,Plymouth County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25023,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Plymouth,Plymouth County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25023,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Plymouth,Plymouth County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25023,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Plymouth,Plymouth County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,530979,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25023,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Plymouth,Plymouth County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,512634,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25023,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Plymouth,Plymouth County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,75460,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25023,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Plymouth,Plymouth County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,54,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25023,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Plymouth,Plymouth County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,437174,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25023,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Plymouth,Plymouth County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,14.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25023,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Plymouth,Plymouth County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25023,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Plymouth,Plymouth County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,85.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25023,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Plymouth,Plymouth County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,43,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25023,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Plymouth,Plymouth County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25023,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Plymouth,Plymouth County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,14.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25023,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Plymouth,Plymouth County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2380,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25023,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Plymouth,Plymouth County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,73025,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25023,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Suffolk,Suffolk County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25025,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Suffolk,Suffolk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25025,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Suffolk,Suffolk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25025,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Suffolk,Suffolk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25025,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Suffolk,Suffolk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25025,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Suffolk,Suffolk County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,795431,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25025,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Suffolk,Suffolk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,783278,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25025,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Suffolk,Suffolk County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,613350,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25025,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Suffolk,Suffolk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25025,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Suffolk,Suffolk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,169927,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25025,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Suffolk,Suffolk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,78.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25025,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Suffolk,Suffolk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25025,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Suffolk,Suffolk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,21.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25025,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Suffolk,Suffolk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25025,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Suffolk,Suffolk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,78.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25025,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Suffolk,Suffolk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25025,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Suffolk,Suffolk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,613349,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25025,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Suffolk,Suffolk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25025,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Worcester,Worcester County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,132,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25027,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Worcester,Worcester County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,29,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25027,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Worcester,Worcester County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25027,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Worcester,Worcester County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25027,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Worcester,Worcester County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25027,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Worcester,Worcester County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,861461,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25027,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Worcester,Worcester County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,573337,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25027,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Worcester,Worcester County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,179735,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25027,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Worcester,Worcester County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1325,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25027,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Worcester,Worcester County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,393602,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25027,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Worcester,Worcester County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,31.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25027,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Worcester,Worcester County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25027,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Worcester,Worcester County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,68.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25027,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Worcester,Worcester County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,103,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25027,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Worcester,Worcester County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,3.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25027,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Worcester,Worcester County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,27.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25027,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Worcester,Worcester County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,22460,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25027,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MA,Worcester,Worcester County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,155950,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25027,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Allegany,Allegany County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,20,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24001,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Allegany,Allegany County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24001,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Allegany,Allegany County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24001,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Allegany,Allegany County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24001,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Allegany,Allegany County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24001,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Allegany,Allegany County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,67947,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24001,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Allegany,Allegany County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,56286,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24001,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Allegany,Allegany County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,50584,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24001,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Allegany,Allegany County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24001,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Allegany,Allegany County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5702,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24001,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Allegany,Allegany County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,89.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24001,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Allegany,Allegany County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24001,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Allegany,Allegany County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,10.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24001,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Allegany,Allegany County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24001,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Allegany,Allegany County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,30.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24001,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Allegany,Allegany County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,59.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24001,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Allegany,Allegany County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,17283,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24001,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Allegany,Allegany County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,33301,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24001,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Anne Arundel,Anne Arundel County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,32,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24003,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Anne Arundel,Anne Arundel County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24003,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Anne Arundel,Anne Arundel County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24003,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Anne Arundel,Anne Arundel County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24003,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Anne Arundel,Anne Arundel County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24003,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Anne Arundel,Anne Arundel County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,588769,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24003,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Anne Arundel,Anne Arundel County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,443576,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24003,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Anne Arundel,Anne Arundel County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,428712,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24003,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Anne Arundel,Anne Arundel County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24003,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Anne Arundel,Anne Arundel County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,14864,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24003,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Anne Arundel,Anne Arundel County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,96.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24003,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Anne Arundel,Anne Arundel County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24003,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Anne Arundel,Anne Arundel County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,3.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24003,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Anne Arundel,Anne Arundel County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,22,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24003,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Anne Arundel,Anne Arundel County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,24003,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Anne Arundel,Anne Arundel County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,96.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24003,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Anne Arundel,Anne Arundel County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,24003,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Anne Arundel,Anne Arundel County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,428712,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24003,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Baltimore,Baltimore County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24005,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Baltimore,Baltimore County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24005,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Baltimore,Baltimore County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24005,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Baltimore,Baltimore County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24005,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Baltimore,Baltimore County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24005,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Baltimore,Baltimore County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,853073,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24005,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Baltimore,Baltimore County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,658419,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24005,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Baltimore,Baltimore County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,656588,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24005,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Baltimore,Baltimore County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24005,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Baltimore,Baltimore County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1831,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24005,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Baltimore,Baltimore County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24005,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Baltimore,Baltimore County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24005,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Baltimore,Baltimore County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24005,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Baltimore,Baltimore County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24005,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Baltimore,Baltimore County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,24005,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Baltimore,Baltimore County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,99.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24005,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Baltimore,Baltimore County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,24005,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Baltimore,Baltimore County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,656588,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24005,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Baltimore City,Baltimore City County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24510,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Baltimore City,Baltimore City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24510,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Baltimore City,Baltimore City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24510,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Baltimore City,Baltimore City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24510,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Baltimore City,Baltimore City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24510,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Baltimore City,Baltimore City County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,583132,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24510,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Baltimore City,Baltimore City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,744133,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24510,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Baltimore City,Baltimore City County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,744133,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24510,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Baltimore City,Baltimore City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24510,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Baltimore City,Baltimore City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24510,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Baltimore City,Baltimore City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24510,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Baltimore City,Baltimore City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24510,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Baltimore City,Baltimore City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24510,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Baltimore City,Baltimore City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24510,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Baltimore City,Baltimore City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,24510,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Baltimore City,Baltimore City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24510,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Baltimore City,Baltimore City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,24510,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Baltimore City,Baltimore City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,744133,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24510,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Calvert,Calvert County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,34,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24009,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Calvert,Calvert County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24009,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Calvert,Calvert County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24009,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Calvert,Calvert County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24009,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Calvert,Calvert County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24009,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Calvert,Calvert County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,92857,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24009,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Calvert,Calvert County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,30857,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24009,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Calvert,Calvert County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24009,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Calvert,Calvert County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24009,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Calvert,Calvert County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,30857,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24009,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Calvert,Calvert County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24009,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Calvert,Calvert County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24009,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Calvert,Calvert County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24009,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Calvert,Calvert County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,34,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24009,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Calvert,Calvert County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,24009,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Calvert,Calvert County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,24009,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Calvert,Calvert County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,24009,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Calvert,Calvert County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,24009,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Caroline,Caroline County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,20,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24011,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Caroline,Caroline County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24011,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Caroline,Caroline County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24011,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Caroline,Caroline County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24011,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Caroline,Caroline County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24011,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Caroline,Caroline County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,33290,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24011,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Caroline,Caroline County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,11126,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24011,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Caroline,Caroline County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8034,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24011,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Caroline,Caroline County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,8034,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24011,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Caroline,Caroline County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3092,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24011,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Caroline,Caroline County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,72.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24011,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Caroline,Caroline County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,72.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24011,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Caroline,Caroline County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,27.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24011,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Caroline,Caroline County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24011,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Caroline,Caroline County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,24011,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Caroline,Caroline County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,24011,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Caroline,Caroline County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,24011,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Caroline,Caroline County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,24011,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,26,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24013,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24013,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24013,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24013,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24013,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,172890,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24013,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,83769,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24013,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,63636,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24013,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24013,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,20133,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24013,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,76,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24013,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24013,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,24,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24013,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,21,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24013,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,1.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24013,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,74.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24013,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1313,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24013,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,62323,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24013,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Cecil,Cecil County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,46,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24015,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Cecil,Cecil County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24015,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Cecil,Cecil County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24015,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Cecil,Cecil County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24015,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Cecil,Cecil County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24015,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Cecil,Cecil County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,103740,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24015,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Cecil,Cecil County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,43895,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24015,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Cecil,Cecil County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10593,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24015,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Cecil,Cecil County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24015,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Cecil,Cecil County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,33302,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24015,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Cecil,Cecil County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,24.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24015,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Cecil,Cecil County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24015,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Cecil,Cecil County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,75.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24015,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Cecil,Cecil County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,44,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24015,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Cecil,Cecil County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24015,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Cecil,Cecil County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,17.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24015,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Cecil,Cecil County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,3064,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24015,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Cecil,Cecil County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,7529,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24015,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Charles,Charles County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,51,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24017,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Charles,Charles County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,27,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24017,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Charles,Charles County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24017,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Charles,Charles County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24017,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Charles,Charles County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,27,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24017,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Charles,Charles County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,166682,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24017,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Charles,Charles County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,101136,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24017,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Charles,Charles County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,88156,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24017,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Charles,Charles County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,88156,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24017,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Charles,Charles County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,12980,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24017,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Charles,Charles County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,87.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24017,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Charles,Charles County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,87.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24017,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Charles,Charles County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,12.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24017,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Charles,Charles County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,24,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24017,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Charles,Charles County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,24017,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Charles,Charles County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,24017,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Charles,Charles County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,24017,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Charles,Charles County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,24017,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Dorchester,Dorchester County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24019,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Dorchester,Dorchester County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24019,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Dorchester,Dorchester County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24019,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Dorchester,Dorchester County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24019,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Dorchester,Dorchester County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24019,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Dorchester,Dorchester County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,32508,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24019,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Dorchester,Dorchester County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,17691,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24019,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Dorchester,Dorchester County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,14811,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24019,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Dorchester,Dorchester County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,14548,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24019,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Dorchester,Dorchester County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2880,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24019,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Dorchester,Dorchester County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,83.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24019,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Dorchester,Dorchester County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,82.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24019,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Dorchester,Dorchester County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,16.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24019,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Dorchester,Dorchester County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24019,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Dorchester,Dorchester County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,1.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24019,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Dorchester,Dorchester County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,24019,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Dorchester,Dorchester County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,263,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24019,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Dorchester,Dorchester County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,24019,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Frederick,Frederick County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,30,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24021,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Frederick,Frederick County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24021,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Frederick,Frederick County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24021,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Frederick,Frederick County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24021,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Frederick,Frederick County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24021,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Frederick,Frederick County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,272737,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24021,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Frederick,Frederick County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,134918,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24021,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Frederick,Frederick County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,110006,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24021,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Frederick,Frederick County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24021,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Frederick,Frederick County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,24912,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24021,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Frederick,Frederick County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,81.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24021,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Frederick,Frederick County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24021,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Frederick,Frederick County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,18.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24021,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Frederick,Frederick County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,20,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24021,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Frederick,Frederick County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24021,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Frederick,Frederick County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,80.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24021,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Frederick,Frederick County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1321,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24021,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Frederick,Frederick County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,108685,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24021,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Garrett,Garrett County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24023,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Garrett,Garrett County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24023,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Garrett,Garrett County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24023,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Garrett,Garrett County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24023,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Garrett,Garrett County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24023,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Garrett,Garrett County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,28761,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24023,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Garrett,Garrett County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,8093,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24023,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Garrett,Garrett County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4484,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24023,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Garrett,Garrett County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24023,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Garrett,Garrett County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3609,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24023,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Garrett,Garrett County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,55.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24023,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Garrett,Garrett County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24023,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Garrett,Garrett County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,44.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24023,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Garrett,Garrett County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24023,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Garrett,Garrett County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,24023,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Garrett,Garrett County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,55.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24023,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Garrett,Garrett County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,24023,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Garrett,Garrett County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,4484,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24023,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Harford,Harford County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,19,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24025,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Harford,Harford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24025,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Harford,Harford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24025,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Harford,Harford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24025,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Harford,Harford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24025,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Harford,Harford County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,261122,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24025,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Harford,Harford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,151625,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24025,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Harford,Harford County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,148097,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24025,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Harford,Harford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24025,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Harford,Harford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3528,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24025,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Harford,Harford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,97.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24025,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Harford,Harford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24025,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Harford,Harford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24025,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Harford,Harford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24025,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Harford,Harford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,37.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24025,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Harford,Harford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,60.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24025,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Harford,Harford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,56554,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24025,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Harford,Harford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,91543,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24025,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24027,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24027,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24027,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24027,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24027,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,332722,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24027,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,250666,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24027,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,250517,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24027,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24027,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,149,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24027,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24027,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24027,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24027,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24027,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,99.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24027,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,24027,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,250517,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24027,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,24027,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Kent,Kent County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24029,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Kent,Kent County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24029,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Kent,Kent County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24029,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Kent,Kent County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24029,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Kent,Kent County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24029,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Kent,Kent County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,19142,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24029,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Kent,Kent County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,10024,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24029,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Kent,Kent County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6519,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24029,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Kent,Kent County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24029,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Kent,Kent County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3505,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24029,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Kent,Kent County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,65,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24029,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Kent,Kent County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24029,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Kent,Kent County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,35,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24029,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Kent,Kent County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24029,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Kent,Kent County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,2.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24029,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Kent,Kent County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,62.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24029,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Kent,Kent County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,259,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24029,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Kent,Kent County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,6259,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24029,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,MD,Maryland,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,492,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,MD,MD,Maryland,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,137,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,MD,MD,Maryland,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,49,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,MD,MD,Maryland,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,25,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,MD,MD,Maryland,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,62,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,MD,MD,Maryland,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,6172679,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2020,MD,MD,Maryland,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4709311,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,MD,MD,Maryland,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4410410,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,MD,MD,Maryland,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,136249,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,MD,MD,Maryland,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,298901,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,MD,MD,Maryland,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,93.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,MD,MD,Maryland,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,2.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,MD,MD,Maryland,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,6.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,MD,MD,Maryland,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,355,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,MD,MD,Maryland,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,7.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,MD,MD,Maryland,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,83.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,MD,MD,Maryland,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,338441,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,MD,MD,Maryland,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3935720,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,MD,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24031,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24031,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24031,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24031,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24031,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,1061243,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24031,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,995737,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24031,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,991010,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24031,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24031,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4727,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24031,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24031,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24031,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24031,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24031,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,24031,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,99.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24031,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,24031,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,991010,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24031,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Prince George's,Prince George's County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24033,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Prince George's,Prince George's County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24033,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Prince George's,Prince George's County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24033,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Prince George's,Prince George's County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24033,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Prince George's,Prince George's County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24033,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Prince George's,Prince George's County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,965601,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24033,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Prince George's,Prince George's County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,653686,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24033,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Prince George's,Prince George's County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,652211,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24033,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Prince George's,Prince George's County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24033,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Prince George's,Prince George's County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1475,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24033,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Prince George's,Prince George's County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24033,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Prince George's,Prince George's County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24033,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Prince George's,Prince George's County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24033,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Prince George's,Prince George's County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24033,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Prince George's,Prince George's County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,24033,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Prince George's,Prince George's County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,99.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24033,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Prince George's,Prince George's County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,24033,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Prince George's,Prince George's County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,652211,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24033,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Queen Anne's,Queen Anne's County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24035,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Queen Anne's,Queen Anne's County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24035,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Queen Anne's,Queen Anne's County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24035,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Queen Anne's,Queen Anne's County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24035,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Queen Anne's,Queen Anne's County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24035,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Queen Anne's,Queen Anne's County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,49983,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24035,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Queen Anne's,Queen Anne's County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,13008,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24035,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Queen Anne's,Queen Anne's County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,799,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24035,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Queen Anne's,Queen Anne's County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,799,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24035,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Queen Anne's,Queen Anne's County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,12209,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24035,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Queen Anne's,Queen Anne's County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,6.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24035,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Queen Anne's,Queen Anne's County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,6.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24035,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Queen Anne's,Queen Anne's County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,93.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24035,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Queen Anne's,Queen Anne's County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24035,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Queen Anne's,Queen Anne's County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,24035,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Queen Anne's,Queen Anne's County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,24035,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Queen Anne's,Queen Anne's County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,24035,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Queen Anne's,Queen Anne's County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,24035,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Somerset,Somerset County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24039,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Somerset,Somerset County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24039,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Somerset,Somerset County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24039,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Somerset,Somerset County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24039,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Somerset,Somerset County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24039,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Somerset,Somerset County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,24567,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24039,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Somerset,Somerset County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9792,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24039,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Somerset,Somerset County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6684,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24039,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Somerset,Somerset County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,6684,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24039,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Somerset,Somerset County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3108,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24039,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Somerset,Somerset County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,68.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24039,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Somerset,Somerset County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,68.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24039,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Somerset,Somerset County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,31.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24039,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Somerset,Somerset County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24039,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Somerset,Somerset County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,24039,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Somerset,Somerset County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,24039,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Somerset,Somerset County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,24039,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Somerset,Somerset County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,24039,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,St. Mary's,St. Mary's County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,38,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24037,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,St. Mary's,St. Mary's County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24037,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,St. Mary's,St. Mary's County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24037,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,St. Mary's,St. Mary's County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24037,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,St. Mary's,St. Mary's County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24037,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,St. Mary's,St. Mary's County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,113953,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24037,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MD,St. Mary's,St. Mary's County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,79275,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24037,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,St. Mary's,St. Mary's County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,21982,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24037,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,St. Mary's,St. Mary's County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,2722,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24037,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,St. Mary's,St. Mary's County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,57293,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24037,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,St. Mary's,St. Mary's County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,27.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24037,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,St. Mary's,St. Mary's County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,3.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24037,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,St. Mary's,St. Mary's County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,72.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24037,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,St. Mary's,St. Mary's County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,34,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24037,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,St. Mary's,St. Mary's County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,24037,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,St. Mary's,St. Mary's County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,24.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24037,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,St. Mary's,St. Mary's County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,24037,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,St. Mary's,St. Mary's County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,19260,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24037,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Talbot,Talbot County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24041,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Talbot,Talbot County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24041,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Talbot,Talbot County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24041,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Talbot,Talbot County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24041,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Talbot,Talbot County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24041,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Talbot,Talbot County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,37456,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24041,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Talbot,Talbot County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,19319,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24041,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Talbot,Talbot County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,15077,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24041,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Talbot,Talbot County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,15077,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24041,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Talbot,Talbot County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4242,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24041,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Talbot,Talbot County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,78,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24041,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Talbot,Talbot County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,78,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24041,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Talbot,Talbot County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,22,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24041,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Talbot,Talbot County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24041,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Talbot,Talbot County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,24041,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Talbot,Talbot County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,24041,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Talbot,Talbot County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,24041,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Talbot,Talbot County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,24041,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,26,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24043,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24043,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24043,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24043,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24043,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,154586,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24043,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,96199,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24043,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,94140,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24043,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,153,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24043,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2059,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24043,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,97.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24043,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24043,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24043,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24043,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,5.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24043,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,91.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24043,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,5678,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24043,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,88308,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24043,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Wicomico,Wicomico County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,24,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24045,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Wicomico,Wicomico County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24045,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Wicomico,Wicomico County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24045,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Wicomico,Wicomico County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24045,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Wicomico,Wicomico County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24045,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Wicomico,Wicomico County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,103473,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24045,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Wicomico,Wicomico County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,41416,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24045,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Wicomico,Wicomico County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,35750,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24045,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Wicomico,Wicomico County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,75,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24045,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Wicomico,Wicomico County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5666,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24045,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Wicomico,Wicomico County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,86.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24045,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Wicomico,Wicomico County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24045,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Wicomico,Wicomico County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,13.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24045,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Wicomico,Wicomico County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,20,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24045,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Wicomico,Wicomico County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,24045,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Wicomico,Wicomico County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,86.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24045,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Wicomico,Wicomico County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,24045,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Wicomico,Wicomico County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,35675,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24045,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Worcester,Worcester County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,25,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24047,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Worcester,Worcester County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24047,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Worcester,Worcester County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24047,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Worcester,Worcester County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24047,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Worcester,Worcester County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24047,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Worcester,Worcester County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,52445,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24047,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Worcester,Worcester County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,54664,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24047,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Worcester,Worcester County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7887,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24047,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Worcester,Worcester County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24047,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Worcester,Worcester County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,46777,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24047,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Worcester,Worcester County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,14.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24047,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Worcester,Worcester County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24047,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Worcester,Worcester County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,85.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24047,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Worcester,Worcester County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,21,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24047,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Worcester,Worcester County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24047,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Worcester,Worcester County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,10.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24047,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Worcester,Worcester County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2189,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24047,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MD,Worcester,Worcester County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,5698,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24047,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Androscoggin,Androscoggin County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,22,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23001,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Androscoggin,Androscoggin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23001,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Androscoggin,Androscoggin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23001,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Androscoggin,Androscoggin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23001,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Androscoggin,Androscoggin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23001,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Androscoggin,Androscoggin County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,111039,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23001,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Androscoggin,Androscoggin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,55823,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23001,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Androscoggin,Androscoggin County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,43302,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23001,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Androscoggin,Androscoggin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23001,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Androscoggin,Androscoggin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,12521,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23001,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Androscoggin,Androscoggin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,77.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23001,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Androscoggin,Androscoggin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23001,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Androscoggin,Androscoggin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,22.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23001,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Androscoggin,Androscoggin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,19,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23001,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Androscoggin,Androscoggin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,23001,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Androscoggin,Androscoggin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,77.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23001,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Androscoggin,Androscoggin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,23001,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Androscoggin,Androscoggin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,43302,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23001,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Aroostook,Aroostook County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,46,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23003,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Aroostook,Aroostook County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23003,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Aroostook,Aroostook County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23003,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Aroostook,Aroostook County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23003,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Aroostook,Aroostook County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23003,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Aroostook,Aroostook County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,66994,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23003,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Aroostook,Aroostook County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,32077,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23003,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Aroostook,Aroostook County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,28974,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23003,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Aroostook,Aroostook County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23003,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Aroostook,Aroostook County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3103,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23003,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Aroostook,Aroostook County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,90.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23003,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Aroostook,Aroostook County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23003,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Aroostook,Aroostook County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,9.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23003,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Aroostook,Aroostook County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,33,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23003,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Aroostook,Aroostook County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,23003,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Aroostook,Aroostook County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,90.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23003,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Aroostook,Aroostook County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,23003,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Aroostook,Aroostook County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,28974,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23003,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,32,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23005,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23005,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23005,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23005,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23005,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,303312,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23005,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,178119,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23005,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,162373,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23005,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23005,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,15746,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23005,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,91.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23005,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23005,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,8.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23005,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,26,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23005,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,23005,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,91.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23005,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,23005,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,162373,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23005,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23007,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23007,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23007,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23007,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23007,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,29418,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23007,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,15347,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23007,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23007,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23007,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,15347,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23007,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23007,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23007,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23007,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23007,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,23007,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,23007,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,23007,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,23007,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,29,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23009,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23009,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23009,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23009,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23009,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,55460,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23009,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,18272,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23009,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,12407,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23009,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23009,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5865,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23009,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,67.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23009,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23009,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,32.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23009,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,25,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23009,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,23009,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,67.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23009,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,23009,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,12407,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23009,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Kennebec,Kennebec County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,29,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23011,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Kennebec,Kennebec County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23011,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Kennebec,Kennebec County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23011,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Kennebec,Kennebec County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23011,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Kennebec,Kennebec County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23011,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Kennebec,Kennebec County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,123754,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23011,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Kennebec,Kennebec County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,56224,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23011,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Kennebec,Kennebec County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,53738,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23011,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Kennebec,Kennebec County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23011,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Kennebec,Kennebec County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2486,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23011,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Kennebec,Kennebec County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,95.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23011,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Kennebec,Kennebec County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23011,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Kennebec,Kennebec County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,4.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23011,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Kennebec,Kennebec County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,22,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23011,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Kennebec,Kennebec County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,9.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23011,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Kennebec,Kennebec County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,86.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23011,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Kennebec,Kennebec County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,5287,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23011,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Kennebec,Kennebec County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,48451,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23011,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23013,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23013,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23013,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23013,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23013,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,40609,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23013,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,23254,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23013,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,19645,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23013,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23013,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3609,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23013,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,84.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23013,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23013,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,15.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23013,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23013,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,23013,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,84.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23013,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,23013,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,19645,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23013,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23015,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23015,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23015,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23015,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23015,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,35192,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23015,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,16250,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23015,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,13106,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23015,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23015,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3143,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23015,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,80.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23015,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23015,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,19.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23015,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23015,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,11.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23015,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,69.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23015,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1870,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23015,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,11237,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23015,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,ME,Maine,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,384,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,ME,ME,Maine,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,74,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,ME,ME,Maine,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,67,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,ME,ME,Maine,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,ME,ME,Maine,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,ME,ME,Maine,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,1362280,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2020,ME,ME,Maine,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,685410,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,ME,ME,Maine,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,544916,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,ME,ME,Maine,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,ME,ME,Maine,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,140494,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,ME,ME,Maine,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,79.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,ME,ME,Maine,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,ME,ME,Maine,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,20.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,ME,ME,Maine,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,310,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,ME,ME,Maine,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,1.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,ME,ME,Maine,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,77.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,ME,ME,Maine,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,12954,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,ME,ME,Maine,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,531962,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,ME,Oxford,Oxford County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,20,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23017,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Oxford,Oxford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23017,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Oxford,Oxford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23017,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Oxford,Oxford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23017,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Oxford,Oxford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23017,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Oxford,Oxford County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,57849,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23017,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Oxford,Oxford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,20163,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23017,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Oxford,Oxford County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,13937,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23017,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Oxford,Oxford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23017,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Oxford,Oxford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6226,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23017,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Oxford,Oxford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,69.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23017,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Oxford,Oxford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23017,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Oxford,Oxford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,30.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23017,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Oxford,Oxford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23017,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Oxford,Oxford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,23017,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Oxford,Oxford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,69.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23017,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Oxford,Oxford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,23017,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Oxford,Oxford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,13937,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23017,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Penobscot,Penobscot County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,52,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23019,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Penobscot,Penobscot County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23019,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Penobscot,Penobscot County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23019,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Penobscot,Penobscot County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23019,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Penobscot,Penobscot County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23019,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Penobscot,Penobscot County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,152007,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23019,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Penobscot,Penobscot County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,74502,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23019,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Penobscot,Penobscot County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,65845,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23019,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Penobscot,Penobscot County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23019,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Penobscot,Penobscot County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8657,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23019,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Penobscot,Penobscot County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,88.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23019,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Penobscot,Penobscot County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23019,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Penobscot,Penobscot County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,11.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23019,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Penobscot,Penobscot County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,42,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23019,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Penobscot,Penobscot County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,6.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23019,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Penobscot,Penobscot County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,81.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23019,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Penobscot,Penobscot County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,4970,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23019,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Penobscot,Penobscot County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,60874,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23019,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Piscataquis,Piscataquis County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23021,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Piscataquis,Piscataquis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23021,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Piscataquis,Piscataquis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23021,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Piscataquis,Piscataquis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23021,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Piscataquis,Piscataquis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23021,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Piscataquis,Piscataquis County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,16768,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23021,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Piscataquis,Piscataquis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,8472,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23021,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Piscataquis,Piscataquis County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3869,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23021,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Piscataquis,Piscataquis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23021,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Piscataquis,Piscataquis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4604,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23021,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Piscataquis,Piscataquis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,45.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23021,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Piscataquis,Piscataquis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23021,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Piscataquis,Piscataquis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,54.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23021,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Piscataquis,Piscataquis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23021,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Piscataquis,Piscataquis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,23021,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Piscataquis,Piscataquis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,45.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23021,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Piscataquis,Piscataquis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,23021,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Piscataquis,Piscataquis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3869,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23021,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Sagadahoc,Sagadahoc County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23023,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Sagadahoc,Sagadahoc County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23023,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Sagadahoc,Sagadahoc County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23023,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Sagadahoc,Sagadahoc County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23023,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Sagadahoc,Sagadahoc County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23023,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Sagadahoc,Sagadahoc County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,36688,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23023,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Sagadahoc,Sagadahoc County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,12406,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23023,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Sagadahoc,Sagadahoc County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9588,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23023,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Sagadahoc,Sagadahoc County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23023,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Sagadahoc,Sagadahoc County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2818,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23023,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Sagadahoc,Sagadahoc County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,77.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23023,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Sagadahoc,Sagadahoc County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23023,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Sagadahoc,Sagadahoc County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,22.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23023,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Sagadahoc,Sagadahoc County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23023,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Sagadahoc,Sagadahoc County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,23023,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Sagadahoc,Sagadahoc County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,77.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23023,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Sagadahoc,Sagadahoc County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,23023,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Sagadahoc,Sagadahoc County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,9588,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23023,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Somerset,Somerset County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23025,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Somerset,Somerset County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23025,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Somerset,Somerset County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23025,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Somerset,Somerset County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23025,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Somerset,Somerset County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23025,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Somerset,Somerset County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,50404,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23025,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Somerset,Somerset County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,16837,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23025,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Somerset,Somerset County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11792,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23025,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Somerset,Somerset County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23025,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Somerset,Somerset County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5044,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23025,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Somerset,Somerset County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,70,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23025,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Somerset,Somerset County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23025,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Somerset,Somerset County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,30,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23025,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Somerset,Somerset County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23025,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Somerset,Somerset County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,23025,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Somerset,Somerset County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,70,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23025,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Somerset,Somerset County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,23025,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Somerset,Somerset County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,11792,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23025,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Waldo,Waldo County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23027,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Waldo,Waldo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23027,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Waldo,Waldo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23027,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Waldo,Waldo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23027,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Waldo,Waldo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23027,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Waldo,Waldo County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,39635,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23027,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Waldo,Waldo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,10490,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23027,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Waldo,Waldo County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6790,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23027,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Waldo,Waldo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23027,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Waldo,Waldo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3700,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23027,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Waldo,Waldo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,64.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23027,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Waldo,Waldo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23027,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Waldo,Waldo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,35.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23027,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Waldo,Waldo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23027,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Waldo,Waldo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,7.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23027,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Waldo,Waldo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,56.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23027,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Waldo,Waldo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,827,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23027,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Waldo,Waldo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,5963,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23027,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,25,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23029,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23029,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23029,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23029,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23029,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,31062,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23029,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,12915,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23029,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8236,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23029,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23029,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4679,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23029,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,63.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23029,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23029,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,36.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23029,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,19,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23029,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,23029,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,63.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23029,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,23029,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,8236,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23029,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,York,York County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,42,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23031,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,York,York County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23031,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,York,York County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23031,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,York,York County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23031,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,York,York County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23031,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,York,York County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,212089,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23031,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ME,York,York County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,134259,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23031,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,York,York County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,91314,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23031,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,York,York County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23031,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,York,York County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,42945,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23031,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,York,York County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,68,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23031,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ME,York,York County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23031,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ME,York,York County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,32,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23031,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ME,York,York County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,38,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23031,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ME,York,York County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,23031,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ME,York,York County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,68,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23031,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ME,York,York County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,23031,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ME,York,York County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,91314,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23031,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Alcona,Alcona County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26001,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Alcona,Alcona County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26001,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Alcona,Alcona County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26001,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Alcona,Alcona County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26001,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Alcona,Alcona County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26001,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Alcona,Alcona County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,10158,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26001,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Alcona,Alcona County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,684,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26001,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Alcona,Alcona County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26001,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Alcona,Alcona County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26001,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Alcona,Alcona County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,684,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26001,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Alcona,Alcona County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26001,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Alcona,Alcona County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26001,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Alcona,Alcona County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26001,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Alcona,Alcona County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26001,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Alcona,Alcona County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26001,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Alcona,Alcona County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26001,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Alcona,Alcona County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26001,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Alcona,Alcona County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26001,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Alger,Alger County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26003,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Alger,Alger County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26003,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Alger,Alger County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26003,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Alger,Alger County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26003,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Alger,Alger County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26003,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Alger,Alger County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,8834,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26003,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Alger,Alger County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4720,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26003,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Alger,Alger County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2785,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26003,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Alger,Alger County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26003,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Alger,Alger County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1935,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26003,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Alger,Alger County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,59,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26003,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Alger,Alger County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26003,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Alger,Alger County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,41,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26003,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Alger,Alger County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26003,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Alger,Alger County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26003,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Alger,Alger County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,59,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26003,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Alger,Alger County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26003,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Alger,Alger County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2785,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26003,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Allegan,Allegan County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,54,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26005,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Allegan,Allegan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26005,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Allegan,Allegan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26005,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Allegan,Allegan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26005,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Allegan,Allegan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26005,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Allegan,Allegan County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,120596,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26005,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Allegan,Allegan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,37328,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26005,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Allegan,Allegan County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,22338,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26005,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Allegan,Allegan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1112,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26005,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Allegan,Allegan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,14991,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26005,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Allegan,Allegan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,59.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26005,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Allegan,Allegan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26005,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Allegan,Allegan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,40.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26005,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Allegan,Allegan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,44,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26005,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Allegan,Allegan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,10.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26005,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Allegan,Allegan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,46.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26005,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Allegan,Allegan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,3918,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26005,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Allegan,Allegan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,17307,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26005,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Alpena,Alpena County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26007,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Alpena,Alpena County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26007,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Alpena,Alpena County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26007,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Alpena,Alpena County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26007,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Alpena,Alpena County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26007,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Alpena,Alpena County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,28877,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26007,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Alpena,Alpena County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,15808,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26007,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Alpena,Alpena County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,15808,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26007,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Alpena,Alpena County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,115,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26007,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Alpena,Alpena County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26007,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Alpena,Alpena County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26007,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Alpena,Alpena County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26007,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Alpena,Alpena County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26007,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Alpena,Alpena County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26007,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Alpena,Alpena County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,32.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26007,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Alpena,Alpena County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,66.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26007,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Alpena,Alpena County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,5201,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26007,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Alpena,Alpena County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,10492,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26007,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Antrim,Antrim County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26009,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Antrim,Antrim County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26009,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Antrim,Antrim County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26009,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Antrim,Antrim County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26009,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Antrim,Antrim County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26009,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Antrim,Antrim County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,23421,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26009,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Antrim,Antrim County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9789,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26009,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Antrim,Antrim County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2676,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26009,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Antrim,Antrim County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1033,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26009,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Antrim,Antrim County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7113,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26009,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Antrim,Antrim County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,27.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26009,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Antrim,Antrim County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,10.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26009,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Antrim,Antrim County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,72.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26009,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Antrim,Antrim County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26009,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Antrim,Antrim County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26009,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Antrim,Antrim County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,16.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26009,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Antrim,Antrim County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26009,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Antrim,Antrim County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1643,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26009,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Arenac,Arenac County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26011,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Arenac,Arenac County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26011,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Arenac,Arenac County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26011,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Arenac,Arenac County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26011,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Arenac,Arenac County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26011,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Arenac,Arenac County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,14990,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26011,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Arenac,Arenac County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,8504,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26011,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Arenac,Arenac County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1510,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26011,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Arenac,Arenac County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26011,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Arenac,Arenac County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6994,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26011,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Arenac,Arenac County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,17.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26011,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Arenac,Arenac County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26011,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Arenac,Arenac County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,82.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26011,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Arenac,Arenac County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26011,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Arenac,Arenac County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26011,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Arenac,Arenac County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,17.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26011,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Arenac,Arenac County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26011,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Arenac,Arenac County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1510,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26011,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Baraga,Baraga County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26013,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Baraga,Baraga County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26013,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Baraga,Baraga County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26013,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Baraga,Baraga County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26013,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Baraga,Baraga County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26013,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Baraga,Baraga County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,8128,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26013,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Baraga,Baraga County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4488,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26013,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Baraga,Baraga County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2141,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26013,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Baraga,Baraga County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26013,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Baraga,Baraga County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2347,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26013,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Baraga,Baraga County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,47.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26013,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Baraga,Baraga County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26013,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Baraga,Baraga County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,52.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26013,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Baraga,Baraga County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26013,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Baraga,Baraga County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26013,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Baraga,Baraga County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,47.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26013,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Baraga,Baraga County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26013,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Baraga,Baraga County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2141,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26013,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Barry,Barry County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26015,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Barry,Barry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26015,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Barry,Barry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26015,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Barry,Barry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26015,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Barry,Barry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26015,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Barry,Barry County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,62548,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26015,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Barry,Barry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,16584,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26015,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Barry,Barry County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8057,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26015,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Barry,Barry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,701,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26015,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Barry,Barry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8527,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26015,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Barry,Barry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,48.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26015,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Barry,Barry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,4.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26015,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Barry,Barry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,51.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26015,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Barry,Barry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26015,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Barry,Barry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26015,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Barry,Barry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,44.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26015,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Barry,Barry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26015,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Barry,Barry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,7356,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26015,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Bay,Bay County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,21,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26017,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Bay,Bay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26017,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Bay,Bay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26017,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Bay,Bay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26017,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Bay,Bay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26017,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Bay,Bay County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,103594,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26017,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Bay,Bay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,101260,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26017,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Bay,Bay County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2089,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26017,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Bay,Bay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26017,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Bay,Bay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,99172,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26017,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Bay,Bay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26017,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Bay,Bay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26017,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Bay,Bay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,97.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26017,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Bay,Bay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,19,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26017,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Bay,Bay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,2.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26017,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Bay,Bay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26017,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Bay,Bay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2089,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26017,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Bay,Bay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26017,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Benzie,Benzie County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26019,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Benzie,Benzie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26019,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Benzie,Benzie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26019,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Benzie,Benzie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26019,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Benzie,Benzie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26019,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Benzie,Benzie County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,17974,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26019,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Benzie,Benzie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4019,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26019,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Benzie,Benzie County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26019,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Benzie,Benzie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26019,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Benzie,Benzie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4019,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26019,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Benzie,Benzie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26019,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Benzie,Benzie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26019,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Benzie,Benzie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26019,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Benzie,Benzie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26019,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Benzie,Benzie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26019,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Benzie,Benzie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26019,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Benzie,Benzie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26019,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Benzie,Benzie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26019,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Berrien,Berrien County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,49,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26021,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Berrien,Berrien County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26021,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Berrien,Berrien County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26021,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Berrien,Berrien County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26021,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Berrien,Berrien County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26021,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Berrien,Berrien County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,154095,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26021,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Berrien,Berrien County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,109361,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26021,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Berrien,Berrien County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,81229,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26021,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Berrien,Berrien County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26021,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Berrien,Berrien County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,28132,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26021,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Berrien,Berrien County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,74.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26021,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Berrien,Berrien County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26021,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Berrien,Berrien County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,25.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26021,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Berrien,Berrien County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,36,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26021,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Berrien,Berrien County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,29.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26021,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Berrien,Berrien County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,44.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26021,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Berrien,Berrien County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,32436,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26021,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Berrien,Berrien County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,48793,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26021,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Branch,Branch County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26023,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Branch,Branch County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26023,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Branch,Branch County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26023,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Branch,Branch County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26023,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Branch,Branch County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26023,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Branch,Branch County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,44810,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26023,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Branch,Branch County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,19123,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26023,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Branch,Branch County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,17005,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26023,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Branch,Branch County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26023,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Branch,Branch County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2118,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26023,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Branch,Branch County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,88.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26023,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Branch,Branch County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26023,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Branch,Branch County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,11.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26023,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Branch,Branch County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26023,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Branch,Branch County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26023,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Branch,Branch County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,88.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26023,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Branch,Branch County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26023,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Branch,Branch County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,17005,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26023,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,20,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26025,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26025,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26025,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26025,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26025,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,134113,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26025,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,77008,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26025,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,66647,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26025,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26025,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10362,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26025,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,86.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26025,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26025,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,13.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26025,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26025,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,8.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26025,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,78.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26025,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,6389,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26025,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,60257,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26025,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,20,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26027,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26027,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26027,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26027,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26027,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,51563,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26027,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,13452,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26027,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9523,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26027,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26027,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3929,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26027,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,70.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26027,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26027,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,29.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26027,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26027,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,10,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26027,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,60.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26027,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1351,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26027,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,8172,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26027,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Charlevoix,Charlevoix County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26029,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Charlevoix,Charlevoix County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26029,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Charlevoix,Charlevoix County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26029,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Charlevoix,Charlevoix County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26029,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Charlevoix,Charlevoix County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26029,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Charlevoix,Charlevoix County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,26012,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26029,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Charlevoix,Charlevoix County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,13739,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26029,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Charlevoix,Charlevoix County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,12645,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26029,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Charlevoix,Charlevoix County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,3450,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26029,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Charlevoix,Charlevoix County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1095,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26029,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Charlevoix,Charlevoix County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,92,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26029,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Charlevoix,Charlevoix County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,25.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26029,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Charlevoix,Charlevoix County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26029,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Charlevoix,Charlevoix County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26029,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Charlevoix,Charlevoix County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26029,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Charlevoix,Charlevoix County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,66.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26029,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Charlevoix,Charlevoix County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,113,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26029,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Charlevoix,Charlevoix County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,9082,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26029,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Cheboygan,Cheboygan County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26031,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Cheboygan,Cheboygan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26031,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Cheboygan,Cheboygan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26031,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Cheboygan,Cheboygan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26031,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Cheboygan,Cheboygan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26031,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Cheboygan,Cheboygan County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,25599,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26031,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Cheboygan,Cheboygan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,6645,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26031,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Cheboygan,Cheboygan County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5662,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26031,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Cheboygan,Cheboygan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,5662,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26031,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Cheboygan,Cheboygan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,983,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26031,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Cheboygan,Cheboygan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,85.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26031,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Cheboygan,Cheboygan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,85.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26031,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Cheboygan,Cheboygan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,14.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26031,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Cheboygan,Cheboygan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26031,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Cheboygan,Cheboygan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26031,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Cheboygan,Cheboygan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26031,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Cheboygan,Cheboygan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26031,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Cheboygan,Cheboygan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26031,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Chippewa,Chippewa County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26033,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Chippewa,Chippewa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26033,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Chippewa,Chippewa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26033,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Chippewa,Chippewa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26033,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Chippewa,Chippewa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26033,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Chippewa,Chippewa County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,36744,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26033,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Chippewa,Chippewa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,23442,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26033,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Chippewa,Chippewa County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,14751,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26033,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Chippewa,Chippewa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,50,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26033,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Chippewa,Chippewa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8690,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26033,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Chippewa,Chippewa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,62.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26033,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Chippewa,Chippewa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26033,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Chippewa,Chippewa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,37.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26033,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Chippewa,Chippewa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26033,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Chippewa,Chippewa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26033,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Chippewa,Chippewa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,62.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26033,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Chippewa,Chippewa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26033,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Chippewa,Chippewa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,14701,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26033,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Clare,Clare County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26035,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Clare,Clare County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26035,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Clare,Clare County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26035,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Clare,Clare County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26035,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Clare,Clare County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26035,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Clare,Clare County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,30822,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26035,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Clare,Clare County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5164,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26035,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Clare,Clare County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3121,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26035,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Clare,Clare County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26035,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Clare,Clare County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2044,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26035,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Clare,Clare County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,60.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26035,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Clare,Clare County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26035,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Clare,Clare County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,39.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26035,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Clare,Clare County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26035,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Clare,Clare County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26035,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Clare,Clare County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,60.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26035,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Clare,Clare County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26035,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Clare,Clare County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3121,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26035,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26037,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26037,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26037,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26037,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26037,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,79128,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26037,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,14893,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26037,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9871,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26037,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1969,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26037,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5022,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26037,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,66.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26037,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,13.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26037,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,33.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26037,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26037,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26037,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,53.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26037,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26037,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,7903,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26037,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26039,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26039,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26039,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26039,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26039,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,12965,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26039,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2059,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26039,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1886,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26039,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26039,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,173,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26039,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,91.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26039,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26039,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,8.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26039,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26039,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26039,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,91.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26039,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26039,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1886,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26039,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Delta,Delta County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26041,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Delta,Delta County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26041,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Delta,Delta County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26041,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Delta,Delta County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26041,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Delta,Delta County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26041,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Delta,Delta County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,36842,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26041,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Delta,Delta County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,19096,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26041,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Delta,Delta County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,18726,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26041,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Delta,Delta County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,656,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26041,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Delta,Delta County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,370,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26041,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Delta,Delta County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26041,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Delta,Delta County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,3.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26041,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Delta,Delta County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26041,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Delta,Delta County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26041,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Delta,Delta County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26041,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Delta,Delta County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,94.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26041,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Delta,Delta County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26041,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Delta,Delta County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,18070,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26041,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Dickinson,Dickinson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26043,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Dickinson,Dickinson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26043,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Dickinson,Dickinson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26043,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Dickinson,Dickinson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26043,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Dickinson,Dickinson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26043,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Dickinson,Dickinson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,25886,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26043,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Dickinson,Dickinson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,20841,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26043,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Dickinson,Dickinson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3317,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26043,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Dickinson,Dickinson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26043,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Dickinson,Dickinson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,17525,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26043,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Dickinson,Dickinson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,15.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26043,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Dickinson,Dickinson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26043,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Dickinson,Dickinson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,84.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26043,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Dickinson,Dickinson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26043,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Dickinson,Dickinson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26043,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Dickinson,Dickinson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,15.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26043,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Dickinson,Dickinson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26043,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Dickinson,Dickinson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3317,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26043,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Eaton,Eaton County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26045,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Eaton,Eaton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26045,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Eaton,Eaton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26045,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Eaton,Eaton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26045,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Eaton,Eaton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26045,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Eaton,Eaton County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,109106,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26045,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Eaton,Eaton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,54207,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26045,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Eaton,Eaton County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,45219,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26045,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Eaton,Eaton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,66,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26045,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Eaton,Eaton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8988,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26045,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Eaton,Eaton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,83.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26045,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Eaton,Eaton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26045,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Eaton,Eaton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,16.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26045,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Eaton,Eaton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26045,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Eaton,Eaton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,40.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26045,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Eaton,Eaton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,42.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26045,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Eaton,Eaton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,22018,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26045,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Eaton,Eaton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,23134,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26045,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Emmet,Emmet County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,37,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26047,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Emmet,Emmet County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26047,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Emmet,Emmet County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26047,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Emmet,Emmet County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26047,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Emmet,Emmet County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26047,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Emmet,Emmet County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,34090,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26047,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Emmet,Emmet County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,17550,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26047,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Emmet,Emmet County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11600,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26047,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Emmet,Emmet County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,9910,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26047,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Emmet,Emmet County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5950,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26047,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Emmet,Emmet County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,66.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26047,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Emmet,Emmet County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,56.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26047,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Emmet,Emmet County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,33.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26047,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Emmet,Emmet County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,24,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26047,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Emmet,Emmet County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,2.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26047,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Emmet,Emmet County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,6.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26047,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Emmet,Emmet County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,494,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26047,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Emmet,Emmet County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1195,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26047,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Genesee,Genesee County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,49,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26049,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Genesee,Genesee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,39,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26049,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Genesee,Genesee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26049,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Genesee,Genesee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26049,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Genesee,Genesee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,26,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26049,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Genesee,Genesee County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,405648,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26049,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Genesee,Genesee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,287445,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26049,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Genesee,Genesee County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,277510,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26049,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Genesee,Genesee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,15054,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26049,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Genesee,Genesee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9935,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26049,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Genesee,Genesee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,96.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26049,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Genesee,Genesee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,5.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26049,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Genesee,Genesee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,3.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26049,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Genesee,Genesee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26049,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Genesee,Genesee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,59.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26049,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Genesee,Genesee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,32.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26049,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Genesee,Genesee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,170129,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26049,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Genesee,Genesee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,92327,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26049,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Gladwin,Gladwin County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26051,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Gladwin,Gladwin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26051,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Gladwin,Gladwin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26051,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Gladwin,Gladwin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26051,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Gladwin,Gladwin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26051,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Gladwin,Gladwin County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,25369,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26051,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Gladwin,Gladwin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4616,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26051,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Gladwin,Gladwin County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,466,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26051,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Gladwin,Gladwin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,466,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26051,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Gladwin,Gladwin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4149,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26051,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Gladwin,Gladwin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,10.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26051,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Gladwin,Gladwin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,10.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26051,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Gladwin,Gladwin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,89.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26051,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Gladwin,Gladwin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26051,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Gladwin,Gladwin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26051,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Gladwin,Gladwin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26051,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Gladwin,Gladwin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26051,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Gladwin,Gladwin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26051,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Gogebic,Gogebic County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26053,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Gogebic,Gogebic County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26053,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Gogebic,Gogebic County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26053,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Gogebic,Gogebic County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26053,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Gogebic,Gogebic County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26053,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Gogebic,Gogebic County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,14315,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26053,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Gogebic,Gogebic County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,12077,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26053,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Gogebic,Gogebic County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2059,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26053,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Gogebic,Gogebic County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26053,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Gogebic,Gogebic County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10018,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26053,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Gogebic,Gogebic County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,17,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26053,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Gogebic,Gogebic County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26053,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Gogebic,Gogebic County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,83,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26053,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Gogebic,Gogebic County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26053,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Gogebic,Gogebic County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,1.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26053,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Gogebic,Gogebic County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,15.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26053,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Gogebic,Gogebic County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,207,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26053,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Gogebic,Gogebic County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1852,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26053,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Grand Traverse,Grand Traverse County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,26,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26055,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Grand Traverse,Grand Traverse County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26055,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Grand Traverse,Grand Traverse County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26055,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Grand Traverse,Grand Traverse County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26055,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Grand Traverse,Grand Traverse County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26055,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Grand Traverse,Grand Traverse County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,95315,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26055,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Grand Traverse,Grand Traverse County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,42010,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26055,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Grand Traverse,Grand Traverse County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,30669,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26055,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Grand Traverse,Grand Traverse County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1423,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26055,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Grand Traverse,Grand Traverse County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11341,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26055,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Grand Traverse,Grand Traverse County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,73,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26055,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Grand Traverse,Grand Traverse County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,3.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26055,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Grand Traverse,Grand Traverse County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,27,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26055,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Grand Traverse,Grand Traverse County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,19,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26055,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Grand Traverse,Grand Traverse County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,35,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26055,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Grand Traverse,Grand Traverse County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,34.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26055,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Grand Traverse,Grand Traverse County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,14701,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26055,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Grand Traverse,Grand Traverse County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,14544,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26055,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Gratiot,Gratiot County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26057,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Gratiot,Gratiot County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26057,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Gratiot,Gratiot County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26057,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Gratiot,Gratiot County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26057,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Gratiot,Gratiot County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26057,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Gratiot,Gratiot County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,41662,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26057,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Gratiot,Gratiot County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,21883,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26057,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Gratiot,Gratiot County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,12825,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26057,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Gratiot,Gratiot County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,3635,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26057,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Gratiot,Gratiot County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9059,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26057,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Gratiot,Gratiot County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,58.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26057,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Gratiot,Gratiot County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,16.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26057,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Gratiot,Gratiot County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,41.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26057,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Gratiot,Gratiot County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26057,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Gratiot,Gratiot County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,42,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26057,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Gratiot,Gratiot County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26057,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Gratiot,Gratiot County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,9190,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26057,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Gratiot,Gratiot County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26057,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Hillsdale,Hillsdale County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26059,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Hillsdale,Hillsdale County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26059,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Hillsdale,Hillsdale County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26059,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Hillsdale,Hillsdale County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26059,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Hillsdale,Hillsdale County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26059,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Hillsdale,Hillsdale County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,45677,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26059,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Hillsdale,Hillsdale County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,14468,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26059,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Hillsdale,Hillsdale County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,12966,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26059,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Hillsdale,Hillsdale County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,2536,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26059,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Hillsdale,Hillsdale County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1502,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26059,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Hillsdale,Hillsdale County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,89.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26059,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Hillsdale,Hillsdale County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,17.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26059,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Hillsdale,Hillsdale County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,10.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26059,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Hillsdale,Hillsdale County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26059,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Hillsdale,Hillsdale County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26059,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Hillsdale,Hillsdale County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,72.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26059,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Hillsdale,Hillsdale County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26059,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Hillsdale,Hillsdale County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,10430,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26059,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Houghton,Houghton County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26061,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Houghton,Houghton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26061,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Houghton,Houghton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26061,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Houghton,Houghton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26061,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Houghton,Houghton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26061,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Houghton,Houghton County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,37160,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26061,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Houghton,Houghton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,29664,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26061,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Houghton,Houghton County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26061,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Houghton,Houghton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26061,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Houghton,Houghton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,29664,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26061,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Houghton,Houghton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26061,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Houghton,Houghton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26061,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Houghton,Houghton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26061,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Houghton,Houghton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26061,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Houghton,Houghton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26061,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Houghton,Houghton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26061,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Houghton,Houghton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26061,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Houghton,Houghton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26061,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Huron,Huron County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,23,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26063,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Huron,Huron County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26063,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Huron,Huron County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26063,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Huron,Huron County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26063,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Huron,Huron County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26063,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Huron,Huron County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,31351,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26063,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Huron,Huron County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,17269,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26063,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Huron,Huron County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9002,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26063,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Huron,Huron County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,4489,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26063,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Huron,Huron County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8268,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26063,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Huron,Huron County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,52.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26063,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Huron,Huron County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,26,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26063,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Huron,Huron County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,47.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26063,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Huron,Huron County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26063,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Huron,Huron County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,16.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26063,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Huron,Huron County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,9.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26063,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Huron,Huron County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2808,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26063,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Huron,Huron County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1704,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26063,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Ingham,Ingham County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,25,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26065,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Ingham,Ingham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26065,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Ingham,Ingham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26065,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Ingham,Ingham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26065,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Ingham,Ingham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26065,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Ingham,Ingham County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,284520,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26065,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Ingham,Ingham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,270262,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26065,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Ingham,Ingham County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,262427,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26065,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Ingham,Ingham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,5334,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26065,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Ingham,Ingham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7836,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26065,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Ingham,Ingham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,97.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26065,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Ingham,Ingham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26065,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Ingham,Ingham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26065,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Ingham,Ingham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26065,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Ingham,Ingham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,25.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26065,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Ingham,Ingham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,69.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26065,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Ingham,Ingham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,69890,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26065,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Ingham,Ingham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,187202,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26065,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Ionia,Ionia County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26067,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Ionia,Ionia County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26067,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Ionia,Ionia County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26067,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Ionia,Ionia County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26067,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Ionia,Ionia County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26067,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Ionia,Ionia County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,66861,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26067,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Ionia,Ionia County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,29415,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26067,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Ionia,Ionia County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,21250,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26067,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Ionia,Ionia County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,448,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26067,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Ionia,Ionia County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8165,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26067,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Ionia,Ionia County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,72.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26067,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Ionia,Ionia County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26067,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Ionia,Ionia County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,27.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26067,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Ionia,Ionia County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26067,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Ionia,Ionia County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26067,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Ionia,Ionia County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,70.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26067,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Ionia,Ionia County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26067,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Ionia,Ionia County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,20801,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26067,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Iosco,Iosco County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26069,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Iosco,Iosco County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26069,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Iosco,Iosco County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26069,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Iosco,Iosco County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26069,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Iosco,Iosco County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26069,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Iosco,Iosco County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,25191,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26069,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Iosco,Iosco County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,14581,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26069,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Iosco,Iosco County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,14342,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26069,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Iosco,Iosco County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26069,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Iosco,Iosco County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,239,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26069,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Iosco,Iosco County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26069,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Iosco,Iosco County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26069,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Iosco,Iosco County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26069,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Iosco,Iosco County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26069,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Iosco,Iosco County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,98.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26069,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Iosco,Iosco County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26069,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Iosco,Iosco County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,14341,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26069,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Iosco,Iosco County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26069,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Iron,Iron County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26071,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Iron,Iron County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26071,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Iron,Iron County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26071,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Iron,Iron County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26071,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Iron,Iron County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26071,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Iron,Iron County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,11637,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26071,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Iron,Iron County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,13153,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26071,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Iron,Iron County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26071,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Iron,Iron County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26071,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Iron,Iron County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,13153,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26071,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Iron,Iron County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26071,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Iron,Iron County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26071,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Iron,Iron County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26071,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Iron,Iron County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26071,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Iron,Iron County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26071,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Iron,Iron County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26071,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Iron,Iron County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26071,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Iron,Iron County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26071,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Isabella,Isabella County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26073,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Isabella,Isabella County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26073,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Isabella,Isabella County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26073,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Isabella,Isabella County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26073,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Isabella,Isabella County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26073,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Isabella,Isabella County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,64488,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26073,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Isabella,Isabella County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,41775,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26073,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Isabella,Isabella County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,26208,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26073,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Isabella,Isabella County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,102,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26073,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Isabella,Isabella County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,15567,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26073,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Isabella,Isabella County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,62.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26073,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Isabella,Isabella County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26073,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Isabella,Isabella County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,37.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26073,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Isabella,Isabella County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26073,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Isabella,Isabella County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26073,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Isabella,Isabella County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,62.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26073,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Isabella,Isabella County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26073,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Isabella,Isabella County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,26106,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26073,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,29,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26075,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26075,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26075,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26075,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26075,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,160200,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26075,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,78954,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26075,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,69322,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26075,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1211,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26075,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9632,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26075,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,87.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26075,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26075,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,12.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26075,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,19,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26075,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,17.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26075,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,68.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26075,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,13682,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26075,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,54428,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26075,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Kalamazoo,Kalamazoo County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,22,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26077,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Kalamazoo,Kalamazoo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26077,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Kalamazoo,Kalamazoo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26077,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Kalamazoo,Kalamazoo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26077,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Kalamazoo,Kalamazoo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26077,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Kalamazoo,Kalamazoo County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,261629,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26077,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Kalamazoo,Kalamazoo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,253644,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26077,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Kalamazoo,Kalamazoo County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,244217,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26077,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Kalamazoo,Kalamazoo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,30,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26077,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Kalamazoo,Kalamazoo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9427,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26077,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Kalamazoo,Kalamazoo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,96.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26077,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Kalamazoo,Kalamazoo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26077,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Kalamazoo,Kalamazoo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,3.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26077,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Kalamazoo,Kalamazoo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26077,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Kalamazoo,Kalamazoo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,18.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26077,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Kalamazoo,Kalamazoo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,78,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26077,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Kalamazoo,Kalamazoo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,46331,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26077,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Kalamazoo,Kalamazoo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,197856,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26077,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Kalkaska,Kalkaska County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26079,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Kalkaska,Kalkaska County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26079,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Kalkaska,Kalkaska County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26079,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Kalkaska,Kalkaska County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26079,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Kalkaska,Kalkaska County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26079,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Kalkaska,Kalkaska County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,17925,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26079,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Kalkaska,Kalkaska County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2068,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26079,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Kalkaska,Kalkaska County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,46,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26079,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Kalkaska,Kalkaska County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,46,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26079,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Kalkaska,Kalkaska County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2022,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26079,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Kalkaska,Kalkaska County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26079,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Kalkaska,Kalkaska County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,2.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26079,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Kalkaska,Kalkaska County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,97.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26079,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Kalkaska,Kalkaska County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26079,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Kalkaska,Kalkaska County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26079,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Kalkaska,Kalkaska County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26079,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Kalkaska,Kalkaska County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26079,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Kalkaska,Kalkaska County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26079,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Kent,Kent County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,48,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26081,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Kent,Kent County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,19,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26081,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Kent,Kent County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26081,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Kent,Kent County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26081,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Kent,Kent County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26081,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Kent,Kent County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,658040,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26081,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Kent,Kent County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,518327,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26081,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Kent,Kent County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,503054,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26081,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Kent,Kent County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1084,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26081,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Kent,Kent County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,15274,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26081,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Kent,Kent County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,97.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26081,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Kent,Kent County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26081,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Kent,Kent County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26081,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Kent,Kent County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,29,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26081,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Kent,Kent County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,21.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26081,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Kent,Kent County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,75.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26081,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Kent,Kent County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,109123,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26081,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Kent,Kent County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,392847,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26081,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Keweenaw,Keweenaw County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26083,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Keweenaw,Keweenaw County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26083,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Keweenaw,Keweenaw County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26083,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Keweenaw,Keweenaw County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26083,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Keweenaw,Keweenaw County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26083,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Keweenaw,Keweenaw County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,2055,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26083,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Keweenaw,Keweenaw County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,827,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26083,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Keweenaw,Keweenaw County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26083,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Keweenaw,Keweenaw County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26083,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Keweenaw,Keweenaw County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,827,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26083,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Keweenaw,Keweenaw County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26083,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Keweenaw,Keweenaw County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26083,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Keweenaw,Keweenaw County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26083,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Keweenaw,Keweenaw County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26083,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Keweenaw,Keweenaw County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26083,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Keweenaw,Keweenaw County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26083,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Keweenaw,Keweenaw County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26083,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Keweenaw,Keweenaw County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26083,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26085,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26085,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26085,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26085,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26085,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,12099,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26085,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3180,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26085,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,68,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26085,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,68,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26085,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3112,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26085,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26085,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,2.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26085,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,97.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26085,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26085,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26085,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26085,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26085,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26085,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Lapeer,Lapeer County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26087,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Lapeer,Lapeer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26087,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Lapeer,Lapeer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26087,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Lapeer,Lapeer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26087,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Lapeer,Lapeer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26087,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Lapeer,Lapeer County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,88528,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26087,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Lapeer,Lapeer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,20188,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26087,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Lapeer,Lapeer County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,19267,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26087,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Lapeer,Lapeer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,4160,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26087,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Lapeer,Lapeer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,921,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26087,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Lapeer,Lapeer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,95.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26087,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Lapeer,Lapeer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,20.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26087,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Lapeer,Lapeer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,4.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26087,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Lapeer,Lapeer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26087,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Lapeer,Lapeer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,74.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26087,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Lapeer,Lapeer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26087,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Lapeer,Lapeer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,15107,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26087,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Lapeer,Lapeer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26087,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Leelanau,Leelanau County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26089,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Leelanau,Leelanau County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26089,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Leelanau,Leelanau County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26089,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Leelanau,Leelanau County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26089,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Leelanau,Leelanau County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26089,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Leelanau,Leelanau County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,22302,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26089,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Leelanau,Leelanau County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5074,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26089,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Leelanau,Leelanau County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,981,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26089,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Leelanau,Leelanau County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,726,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26089,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Leelanau,Leelanau County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4093,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26089,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Leelanau,Leelanau County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,19.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26089,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Leelanau,Leelanau County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,14.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26089,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Leelanau,Leelanau County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,80.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26089,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Leelanau,Leelanau County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26089,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Leelanau,Leelanau County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26089,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Leelanau,Leelanau County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26089,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Leelanau,Leelanau County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,255,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26089,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Leelanau,Leelanau County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26089,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Lenawee,Lenawee County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,28,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26091,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Lenawee,Lenawee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26091,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Lenawee,Lenawee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26091,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Lenawee,Lenawee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26091,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Lenawee,Lenawee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26091,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Lenawee,Lenawee County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,99214,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26091,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Lenawee,Lenawee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,49855,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26091,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Lenawee,Lenawee County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,40737,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26091,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Lenawee,Lenawee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,7449,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26091,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Lenawee,Lenawee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9118,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26091,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Lenawee,Lenawee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,81.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26091,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Lenawee,Lenawee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,14.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26091,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Lenawee,Lenawee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,18.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26091,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Lenawee,Lenawee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26091,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Lenawee,Lenawee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26091,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Lenawee,Lenawee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,66.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26091,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Lenawee,Lenawee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,266,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26091,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Lenawee,Lenawee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,33022,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26091,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Livingston,Livingston County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,49,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26093,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Livingston,Livingston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26093,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Livingston,Livingston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26093,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Livingston,Livingston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26093,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Livingston,Livingston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26093,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Livingston,Livingston County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,193973,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26093,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Livingston,Livingston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,57005,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26093,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Livingston,Livingston County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,38309,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26093,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Livingston,Livingston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,8556,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26093,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Livingston,Livingston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,18696,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26093,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Livingston,Livingston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,67.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26093,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Livingston,Livingston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,15,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26093,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Livingston,Livingston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,32.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26093,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Livingston,Livingston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,31,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26093,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Livingston,Livingston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26093,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Livingston,Livingston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,52.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26093,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Livingston,Livingston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26093,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Livingston,Livingston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,29753,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26093,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Luce,Luce County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26095,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Luce,Luce County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26095,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Luce,Luce County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26095,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Luce,Luce County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26095,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Luce,Luce County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26095,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Luce,Luce County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,5325,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26095,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Luce,Luce County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3561,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26095,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Luce,Luce County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26095,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Luce,Luce County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26095,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Luce,Luce County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3561,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26095,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Luce,Luce County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26095,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Luce,Luce County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26095,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Luce,Luce County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26095,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Luce,Luce County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26095,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Luce,Luce County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26095,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Luce,Luce County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26095,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Luce,Luce County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26095,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Luce,Luce County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26095,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Mackinac,Mackinac County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26097,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Mackinac,Mackinac County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26097,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Mackinac,Mackinac County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26097,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Mackinac,Mackinac County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26097,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Mackinac,Mackinac County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26097,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Mackinac,Mackinac County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,10830,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26097,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Mackinac,Mackinac County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3472,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26097,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Mackinac,Mackinac County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3472,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26097,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Mackinac,Mackinac County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26097,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Mackinac,Mackinac County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26097,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Mackinac,Mackinac County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26097,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Mackinac,Mackinac County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,2.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26097,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Mackinac,Mackinac County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26097,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Mackinac,Mackinac County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26097,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Mackinac,Mackinac County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26097,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Mackinac,Mackinac County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,97.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26097,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Mackinac,Mackinac County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26097,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Mackinac,Mackinac County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3372,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26097,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Macomb,Macomb County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,26,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26099,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Macomb,Macomb County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,21,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26099,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Macomb,Macomb County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26099,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Macomb,Macomb County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26099,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Macomb,Macomb County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26099,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Macomb,Macomb County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,880349,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26099,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Macomb,Macomb County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,823493,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26099,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Macomb,Macomb County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,800251,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26099,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Macomb,Macomb County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,7833,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26099,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Macomb,Macomb County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,23242,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26099,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Macomb,Macomb County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,97.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26099,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Macomb,Macomb County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26099,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Macomb,Macomb County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26099,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Macomb,Macomb County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26099,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Macomb,Macomb County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,94.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26099,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Macomb,Macomb County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,1.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26099,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Macomb,Macomb County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,779688,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26099,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Macomb,Macomb County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,12731,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26099,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Manistee,Manistee County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26101,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Manistee,Manistee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26101,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Manistee,Manistee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26101,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Manistee,Manistee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26101,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Manistee,Manistee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26101,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Manistee,Manistee County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,25063,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26101,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Manistee,Manistee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9798,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26101,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Manistee,Manistee County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7316,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26101,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Manistee,Manistee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26101,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Manistee,Manistee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2482,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26101,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Manistee,Manistee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,74.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26101,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Manistee,Manistee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26101,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Manistee,Manistee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,25.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26101,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Manistee,Manistee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26101,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Manistee,Manistee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,11.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26101,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Manistee,Manistee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,63.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26101,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Manistee,Manistee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1111,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26101,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Manistee,Manistee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,6205,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26101,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Marquette,Marquette County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,25,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26103,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Marquette,Marquette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26103,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Marquette,Marquette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26103,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Marquette,Marquette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26103,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Marquette,Marquette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26103,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Marquette,Marquette County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,65931,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26103,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Marquette,Marquette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,46879,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26103,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Marquette,Marquette County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,38075,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26103,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Marquette,Marquette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26103,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Marquette,Marquette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8804,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26103,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Marquette,Marquette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,81.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26103,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Marquette,Marquette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26103,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Marquette,Marquette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,18.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26103,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Marquette,Marquette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26103,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Marquette,Marquette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,24.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26103,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Marquette,Marquette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,51.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26103,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Marquette,Marquette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,11352,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26103,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Marquette,Marquette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,24020,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26103,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Mason,Mason County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26105,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Mason,Mason County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26105,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Mason,Mason County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26105,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Mason,Mason County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26105,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Mason,Mason County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26105,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Mason,Mason County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,29064,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26105,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Mason,Mason County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,11249,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26105,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Mason,Mason County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10023,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26105,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Mason,Mason County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,290,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26105,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Mason,Mason County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1226,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26105,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Mason,Mason County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,89.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26105,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Mason,Mason County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,2.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26105,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Mason,Mason County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,10.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26105,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Mason,Mason County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26105,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Mason,Mason County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,14.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26105,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Mason,Mason County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,71.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26105,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Mason,Mason County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1650,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26105,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Mason,Mason County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,8083,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26105,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Mecosta,Mecosta County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26107,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Mecosta,Mecosta County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26107,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Mecosta,Mecosta County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26107,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Mecosta,Mecosta County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26107,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Mecosta,Mecosta County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26107,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Mecosta,Mecosta County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,39781,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26107,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Mecosta,Mecosta County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,12155,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26107,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Mecosta,Mecosta County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10690,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26107,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Mecosta,Mecosta County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,80,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26107,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Mecosta,Mecosta County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1465,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26107,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Mecosta,Mecosta County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,87.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26107,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Mecosta,Mecosta County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26107,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Mecosta,Mecosta County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,12.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26107,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Mecosta,Mecosta County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26107,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Mecosta,Mecosta County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26107,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Mecosta,Mecosta County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,87.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26107,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Mecosta,Mecosta County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26107,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Mecosta,Mecosta County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,10610,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26107,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Menominee,Menominee County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26109,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Menominee,Menominee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26109,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Menominee,Menominee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26109,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Menominee,Menominee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26109,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Menominee,Menominee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26109,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Menominee,Menominee County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,23423,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26109,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Menominee,Menominee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,11566,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26109,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Menominee,Menominee County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10007,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26109,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Menominee,Menominee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26109,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Menominee,Menominee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1558,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26109,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Menominee,Menominee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,86.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26109,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Menominee,Menominee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26109,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Menominee,Menominee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,13.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26109,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Menominee,Menominee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26109,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Menominee,Menominee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26109,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Menominee,Menominee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,86.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26109,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Menominee,Menominee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26109,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Menominee,Menominee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,10007,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26109,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,MI,Michigan,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1457,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,MI,MI,Michigan,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,599,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,MI,MI,Michigan,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,127,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,MI,MI,Michigan,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,232,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,MI,MI,Michigan,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,238,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,MI,MI,Michigan,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,10067664,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2020,MI,MI,Michigan,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7432372,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,MI,MI,Michigan,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6638231,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,MI,MI,Michigan,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,143370,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,MI,MI,Michigan,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,794141,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,MI,MI,Michigan,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,89.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,MI,MI,Michigan,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,MI,MI,Michigan,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,10.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,MI,MI,Michigan,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,858,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,MI,MI,Michigan,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,51.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,MI,MI,Michigan,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,35.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,MI,MI,Michigan,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,3828796,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,MI,MI,Michigan,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2663363,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,MI,Midland,Midland County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26111,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Midland,Midland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26111,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Midland,Midland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26111,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Midland,Midland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26111,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Midland,Midland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26111,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Midland,Midland County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,83476,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26111,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Midland,Midland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,62372,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26111,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Midland,Midland County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,60918,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26111,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Midland,Midland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,388,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26111,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Midland,Midland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1454,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26111,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Midland,Midland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,97.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26111,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Midland,Midland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26111,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Midland,Midland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26111,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Midland,Midland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26111,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Midland,Midland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,30.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26111,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Midland,Midland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,66.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26111,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Midland,Midland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,18789,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26111,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Midland,Midland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,41741,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26111,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Missaukee,Missaukee County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26113,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Missaukee,Missaukee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26113,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Missaukee,Missaukee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26113,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Missaukee,Missaukee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26113,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Missaukee,Missaukee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26113,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Missaukee,Missaukee County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,15067,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26113,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Missaukee,Missaukee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1516,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26113,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Missaukee,Missaukee County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,837,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26113,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Missaukee,Missaukee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,837,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26113,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Missaukee,Missaukee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,680,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26113,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Missaukee,Missaukee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,55.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26113,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Missaukee,Missaukee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,55.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26113,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Missaukee,Missaukee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,44.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26113,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Missaukee,Missaukee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26113,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Missaukee,Missaukee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26113,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Missaukee,Missaukee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26113,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Missaukee,Missaukee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26113,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Missaukee,Missaukee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26113,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26115,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26115,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26115,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26115,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26115,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,154796,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26115,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,123810,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26115,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,123654,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26115,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,901,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26115,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,156,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26115,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26115,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26115,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26115,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26115,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,46.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26115,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,52.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26115,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,57554,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26115,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,65199,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26115,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Montcalm,Montcalm County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26117,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Montcalm,Montcalm County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26117,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Montcalm,Montcalm County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26117,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Montcalm,Montcalm County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26117,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Montcalm,Montcalm County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26117,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Montcalm,Montcalm County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,66515,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26117,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Montcalm,Montcalm County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,18987,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26117,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Montcalm,Montcalm County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,12648,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26117,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Montcalm,Montcalm County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26117,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Montcalm,Montcalm County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6339,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26117,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Montcalm,Montcalm County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,66.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26117,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Montcalm,Montcalm County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26117,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Montcalm,Montcalm County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,33.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26117,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Montcalm,Montcalm County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26117,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Montcalm,Montcalm County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26117,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Montcalm,Montcalm County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,66.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26117,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Montcalm,Montcalm County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26117,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Montcalm,Montcalm County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,12648,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26117,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Montmorency,Montmorency County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26119,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Montmorency,Montmorency County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26119,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Montmorency,Montmorency County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26119,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Montmorency,Montmorency County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26119,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Montmorency,Montmorency County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26119,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Montmorency,Montmorency County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,9155,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26119,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Montmorency,Montmorency County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1169,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26119,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Montmorency,Montmorency County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26119,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Montmorency,Montmorency County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26119,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Montmorency,Montmorency County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1169,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26119,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Montmorency,Montmorency County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26119,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Montmorency,Montmorency County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26119,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Montmorency,Montmorency County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26119,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Montmorency,Montmorency County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26119,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Montmorency,Montmorency County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26119,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Montmorency,Montmorency County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26119,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Montmorency,Montmorency County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26119,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Montmorency,Montmorency County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26119,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Muskegon,Muskegon County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,23,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26121,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Muskegon,Muskegon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26121,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Muskegon,Muskegon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26121,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Muskegon,Muskegon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26121,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Muskegon,Muskegon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26121,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Muskegon,Muskegon County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,175817,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26121,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Muskegon,Muskegon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,111481,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26121,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Muskegon,Muskegon County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,100038,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26121,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Muskegon,Muskegon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26121,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Muskegon,Muskegon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11443,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26121,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Muskegon,Muskegon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,89.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26121,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Muskegon,Muskegon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26121,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Muskegon,Muskegon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,10.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26121,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Muskegon,Muskegon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26121,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Muskegon,Muskegon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,45.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26121,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Muskegon,Muskegon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,44.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26121,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Muskegon,Muskegon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,50709,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26121,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Muskegon,Muskegon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,49329,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26121,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Newaygo,Newaygo County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26123,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Newaygo,Newaygo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26123,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Newaygo,Newaygo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26123,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Newaygo,Newaygo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26123,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Newaygo,Newaygo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26123,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Newaygo,Newaygo County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,50042,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26123,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Newaygo,Newaygo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,10054,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26123,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Newaygo,Newaygo County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6062,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26123,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Newaygo,Newaygo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1978,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26123,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Newaygo,Newaygo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3992,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26123,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Newaygo,Newaygo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,60.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26123,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Newaygo,Newaygo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,19.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26123,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Newaygo,Newaygo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,39.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26123,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Newaygo,Newaygo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26123,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Newaygo,Newaygo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26123,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Newaygo,Newaygo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,40.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26123,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Newaygo,Newaygo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26123,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Newaygo,Newaygo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,4084,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26123,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Oakland,Oakland County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,121,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26125,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Oakland,Oakland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,49,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26125,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Oakland,Oakland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26125,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Oakland,Oakland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,35,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26125,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Oakland,Oakland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26125,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Oakland,Oakland County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,1272408,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26125,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Oakland,Oakland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1030947,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26125,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Oakland,Oakland County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,859120,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26125,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Oakland,Oakland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,5393,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26125,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Oakland,Oakland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,171827,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26125,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Oakland,Oakland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,83.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26125,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Oakland,Oakland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26125,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Oakland,Oakland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,16.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26125,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Oakland,Oakland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,72,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26125,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Oakland,Oakland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,81.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26125,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Oakland,Oakland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,1.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26125,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Oakland,Oakland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,836291,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26125,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Oakland,Oakland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,17436,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26125,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Oceana,Oceana County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26127,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Oceana,Oceana County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26127,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Oceana,Oceana County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26127,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Oceana,Oceana County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26127,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Oceana,Oceana County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26127,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Oceana,Oceana County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,26688,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26127,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Oceana,Oceana County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5310,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26127,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Oceana,Oceana County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26127,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Oceana,Oceana County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26127,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Oceana,Oceana County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5310,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26127,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Oceana,Oceana County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26127,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Oceana,Oceana County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26127,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Oceana,Oceana County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26127,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Oceana,Oceana County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26127,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Oceana,Oceana County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26127,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Oceana,Oceana County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26127,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Oceana,Oceana County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26127,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Oceana,Oceana County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26127,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Ogemaw,Ogemaw County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26129,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Ogemaw,Ogemaw County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26129,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Ogemaw,Ogemaw County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26129,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Ogemaw,Ogemaw County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26129,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Ogemaw,Ogemaw County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26129,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Ogemaw,Ogemaw County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,20740,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26129,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Ogemaw,Ogemaw County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2810,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26129,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Ogemaw,Ogemaw County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2141,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26129,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Ogemaw,Ogemaw County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26129,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Ogemaw,Ogemaw County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,670,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26129,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Ogemaw,Ogemaw County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,76.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26129,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Ogemaw,Ogemaw County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26129,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Ogemaw,Ogemaw County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,23.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26129,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Ogemaw,Ogemaw County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26129,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Ogemaw,Ogemaw County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26129,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Ogemaw,Ogemaw County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,76.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26129,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Ogemaw,Ogemaw County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26129,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Ogemaw,Ogemaw County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2141,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26129,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Ontonagon,Ontonagon County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26131,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Ontonagon,Ontonagon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26131,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Ontonagon,Ontonagon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26131,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Ontonagon,Ontonagon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26131,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Ontonagon,Ontonagon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26131,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Ontonagon,Ontonagon County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,5804,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26131,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Ontonagon,Ontonagon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3761,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26131,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Ontonagon,Ontonagon County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26131,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Ontonagon,Ontonagon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26131,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Ontonagon,Ontonagon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3761,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26131,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Ontonagon,Ontonagon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26131,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Ontonagon,Ontonagon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26131,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Ontonagon,Ontonagon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26131,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Ontonagon,Ontonagon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26131,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Ontonagon,Ontonagon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26131,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Ontonagon,Ontonagon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26131,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Ontonagon,Ontonagon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26131,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Ontonagon,Ontonagon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26131,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Osceola,Osceola County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26133,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Osceola,Osceola County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26133,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Osceola,Osceola County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26133,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Osceola,Osceola County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26133,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Osceola,Osceola County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26133,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Osceola,Osceola County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,22887,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26133,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Osceola,Osceola County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5437,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26133,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Osceola,Osceola County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26133,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Osceola,Osceola County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26133,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Osceola,Osceola County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5437,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26133,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Osceola,Osceola County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26133,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Osceola,Osceola County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26133,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Osceola,Osceola County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26133,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Osceola,Osceola County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26133,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Osceola,Osceola County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26133,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Osceola,Osceola County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26133,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Osceola,Osceola County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26133,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Osceola,Osceola County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26133,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Oscoda,Oscoda County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26135,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Oscoda,Oscoda County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26135,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Oscoda,Oscoda County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26135,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Oscoda,Oscoda County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26135,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Oscoda,Oscoda County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26135,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Oscoda,Oscoda County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,8234,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26135,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Oscoda,Oscoda County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,907,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26135,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Oscoda,Oscoda County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26135,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Oscoda,Oscoda County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26135,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Oscoda,Oscoda County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,907,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26135,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Oscoda,Oscoda County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26135,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Oscoda,Oscoda County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26135,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Oscoda,Oscoda County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26135,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Oscoda,Oscoda County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26135,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Oscoda,Oscoda County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26135,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Oscoda,Oscoda County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26135,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Oscoda,Oscoda County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26135,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Oscoda,Oscoda County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26135,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Otsego,Otsego County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26137,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Otsego,Otsego County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26137,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Otsego,Otsego County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26137,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Otsego,Otsego County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26137,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Otsego,Otsego County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26137,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Otsego,Otsego County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,25102,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26137,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Otsego,Otsego County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4486,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26137,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Otsego,Otsego County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,166,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26137,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Otsego,Otsego County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,166,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26137,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Otsego,Otsego County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4320,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26137,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Otsego,Otsego County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,3.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26137,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Otsego,Otsego County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,3.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26137,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Otsego,Otsego County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,96.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26137,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Otsego,Otsego County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26137,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Otsego,Otsego County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26137,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Otsego,Otsego County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26137,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Otsego,Otsego County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26137,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Otsego,Otsego County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26137,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Ottawa,Ottawa County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,28,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26139,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Ottawa,Ottawa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,19,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26139,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Ottawa,Ottawa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26139,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Ottawa,Ottawa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26139,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Ottawa,Ottawa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26139,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Ottawa,Ottawa County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,296787,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26139,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Ottawa,Ottawa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,204167,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26139,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Ottawa,Ottawa County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,200969,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26139,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Ottawa,Ottawa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26139,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Ottawa,Ottawa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3199,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26139,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Ottawa,Ottawa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26139,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Ottawa,Ottawa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26139,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Ottawa,Ottawa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26139,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Ottawa,Ottawa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26139,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Ottawa,Ottawa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,84.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26139,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Ottawa,Ottawa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,13.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26139,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Ottawa,Ottawa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,173432,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26139,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Ottawa,Ottawa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,27537,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26139,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Presque Isle,Presque Isle County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26141,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Presque Isle,Presque Isle County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26141,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Presque Isle,Presque Isle County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26141,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Presque Isle,Presque Isle County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26141,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Presque Isle,Presque Isle County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26141,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Presque Isle,Presque Isle County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,12979,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26141,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Presque Isle,Presque Isle County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4996,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26141,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Presque Isle,Presque Isle County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2167,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26141,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Presque Isle,Presque Isle County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,2167,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26141,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Presque Isle,Presque Isle County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2829,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26141,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Presque Isle,Presque Isle County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,43.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26141,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Presque Isle,Presque Isle County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,43.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26141,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Presque Isle,Presque Isle County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,56.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26141,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Presque Isle,Presque Isle County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26141,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Presque Isle,Presque Isle County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26141,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Presque Isle,Presque Isle County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26141,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Presque Isle,Presque Isle County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26141,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Presque Isle,Presque Isle County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26141,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Roscommon,Roscommon County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26143,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Roscommon,Roscommon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26143,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Roscommon,Roscommon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26143,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Roscommon,Roscommon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26143,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Roscommon,Roscommon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26143,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Roscommon,Roscommon County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,23432,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26143,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Roscommon,Roscommon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2001,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26143,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Roscommon,Roscommon County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26143,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Roscommon,Roscommon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26143,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Roscommon,Roscommon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2001,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26143,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Roscommon,Roscommon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26143,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Roscommon,Roscommon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26143,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Roscommon,Roscommon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26143,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Roscommon,Roscommon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26143,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Roscommon,Roscommon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26143,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Roscommon,Roscommon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26143,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Roscommon,Roscommon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26143,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Roscommon,Roscommon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26143,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Saginaw,Saginaw County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,28,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26145,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Saginaw,Saginaw County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,22,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26145,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Saginaw,Saginaw County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26145,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Saginaw,Saginaw County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,20,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26145,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Saginaw,Saginaw County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26145,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Saginaw,Saginaw County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,189831,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26145,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Saginaw,Saginaw County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,175322,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26145,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Saginaw,Saginaw County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,169974,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26145,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Saginaw,Saginaw County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,38,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26145,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Saginaw,Saginaw County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5348,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26145,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Saginaw,Saginaw County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,96.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26145,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Saginaw,Saginaw County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26145,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Saginaw,Saginaw County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,3.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26145,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Saginaw,Saginaw County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26145,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Saginaw,Saginaw County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,67.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26145,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Saginaw,Saginaw County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,29.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26145,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Saginaw,Saginaw County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,118385,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26145,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Saginaw,Saginaw County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,51551,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26145,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Sanilac,Sanilac County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,19,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26151,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Sanilac,Sanilac County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26151,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Sanilac,Sanilac County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26151,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Sanilac,Sanilac County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26151,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Sanilac,Sanilac County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26151,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Sanilac,Sanilac County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,40506,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26151,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Sanilac,Sanilac County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,18844,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26151,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Sanilac,Sanilac County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,14895,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26151,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Sanilac,Sanilac County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,8234,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26151,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Sanilac,Sanilac County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3948,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26151,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Sanilac,Sanilac County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,79,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26151,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Sanilac,Sanilac County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,43.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26151,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Sanilac,Sanilac County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,21,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26151,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Sanilac,Sanilac County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26151,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Sanilac,Sanilac County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,29.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26151,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Sanilac,Sanilac County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,6.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26151,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Sanilac,Sanilac County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,5483,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26151,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Sanilac,Sanilac County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1179,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26151,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Schoolcraft,Schoolcraft County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26153,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Schoolcraft,Schoolcraft County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26153,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Schoolcraft,Schoolcraft County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26153,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Schoolcraft,Schoolcraft County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26153,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Schoolcraft,Schoolcraft County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26153,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Schoolcraft,Schoolcraft County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,8041,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26153,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Schoolcraft,Schoolcraft County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3500,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26153,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Schoolcraft,Schoolcraft County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3400,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26153,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Schoolcraft,Schoolcraft County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,200,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26153,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Schoolcraft,Schoolcraft County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26153,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Schoolcraft,Schoolcraft County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,97.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26153,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Schoolcraft,Schoolcraft County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,5.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26153,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Schoolcraft,Schoolcraft County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26153,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Schoolcraft,Schoolcraft County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26153,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Schoolcraft,Schoolcraft County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26153,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Schoolcraft,Schoolcraft County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,91.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26153,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Schoolcraft,Schoolcraft County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26153,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Schoolcraft,Schoolcraft County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3200,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26153,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Shiawassee,Shiawassee County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,24,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26155,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Shiawassee,Shiawassee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26155,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Shiawassee,Shiawassee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26155,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Shiawassee,Shiawassee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26155,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Shiawassee,Shiawassee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26155,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Shiawassee,Shiawassee County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,67983,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26155,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Shiawassee,Shiawassee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,28456,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26155,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Shiawassee,Shiawassee County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,21803,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26155,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Shiawassee,Shiawassee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,3407,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26155,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Shiawassee,Shiawassee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6653,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26155,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Shiawassee,Shiawassee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,76.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26155,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Shiawassee,Shiawassee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,12,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26155,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Shiawassee,Shiawassee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,23.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26155,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Shiawassee,Shiawassee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26155,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Shiawassee,Shiawassee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,7.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26155,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Shiawassee,Shiawassee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,57.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26155,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Shiawassee,Shiawassee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2030,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26155,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Shiawassee,Shiawassee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,16367,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26155,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,St. Clair,St. Clair County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,24,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26147,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,St. Clair,St. Clair County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26147,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,St. Clair,St. Clair County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26147,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,St. Clair,St. Clair County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26147,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,St. Clair,St. Clair County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26147,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,St. Clair,St. Clair County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,160265,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26147,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MI,St. Clair,St. Clair County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,129318,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26147,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,St. Clair,St. Clair County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,114880,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26147,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,St. Clair,St. Clair County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,4028,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26147,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,St. Clair,St. Clair County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,14438,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26147,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,St. Clair,St. Clair County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,88.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26147,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,St. Clair,St. Clair County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,3.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26147,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,St. Clair,St. Clair County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,11.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26147,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,St. Clair,St. Clair County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26147,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,St. Clair,St. Clair County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,36.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26147,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,St. Clair,St. Clair County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,49.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26147,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,St. Clair,St. Clair County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,46945,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26147,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,St. Clair,St. Clair County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,63906,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26147,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,St. Joseph,St. Joseph County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26149,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,St. Joseph,St. Joseph County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26149,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,St. Joseph,St. Joseph County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26149,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,St. Joseph,St. Joseph County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26149,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,St. Joseph,St. Joseph County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26149,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,St. Joseph,St. Joseph County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,60902,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26149,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MI,St. Joseph,St. Joseph County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,31163,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26149,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,St. Joseph,St. Joseph County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11930,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26149,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,St. Joseph,St. Joseph County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26149,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,St. Joseph,St. Joseph County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,19233,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26149,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,St. Joseph,St. Joseph County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,38.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26149,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,St. Joseph,St. Joseph County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26149,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,St. Joseph,St. Joseph County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,61.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26149,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,St. Joseph,St. Joseph County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26149,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,St. Joseph,St. Joseph County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26149,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,St. Joseph,St. Joseph County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,38.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26149,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,St. Joseph,St. Joseph County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26149,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,St. Joseph,St. Joseph County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,11930,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26149,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Tuscola,Tuscola County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26157,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Tuscola,Tuscola County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26157,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Tuscola,Tuscola County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26157,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Tuscola,Tuscola County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26157,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Tuscola,Tuscola County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26157,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Tuscola,Tuscola County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,53274,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26157,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Tuscola,Tuscola County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,15333,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26157,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Tuscola,Tuscola County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,14480,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26157,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Tuscola,Tuscola County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,14261,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26157,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Tuscola,Tuscola County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,853,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26157,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Tuscola,Tuscola County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,94.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26157,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Tuscola,Tuscola County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,93,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26157,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Tuscola,Tuscola County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,5.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26157,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Tuscola,Tuscola County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26157,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Tuscola,Tuscola County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,1.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26157,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Tuscola,Tuscola County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26157,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Tuscola,Tuscola County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,219,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26157,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Tuscola,Tuscola County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26157,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Van Buren,Van Buren County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,29,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26159,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Van Buren,Van Buren County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26159,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Van Buren,Van Buren County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26159,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Van Buren,Van Buren County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26159,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Van Buren,Van Buren County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26159,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Van Buren,Van Buren County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,75556,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26159,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Van Buren,Van Buren County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,26721,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26159,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Van Buren,Van Buren County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,14166,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26159,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Van Buren,Van Buren County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,223,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26159,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Van Buren,Van Buren County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,12555,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26159,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Van Buren,Van Buren County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,53,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26159,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Van Buren,Van Buren County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26159,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Van Buren,Van Buren County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,47,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26159,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Van Buren,Van Buren County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,22,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26159,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Van Buren,Van Buren County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,18.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26159,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Van Buren,Van Buren County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,33.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26159,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Van Buren,Van Buren County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,4906,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26159,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Van Buren,Van Buren County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,9037,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26159,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Washtenaw,Washtenaw County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,30,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26161,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Washtenaw,Washtenaw County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,21,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26161,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Washtenaw,Washtenaw County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26161,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Washtenaw,Washtenaw County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26161,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Washtenaw,Washtenaw County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26161,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Washtenaw,Washtenaw County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,371656,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26161,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Washtenaw,Washtenaw County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,255052,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26161,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Washtenaw,Washtenaw County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,248930,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26161,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Washtenaw,Washtenaw County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,11304,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26161,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Washtenaw,Washtenaw County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6122,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26161,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Washtenaw,Washtenaw County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,97.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26161,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Washtenaw,Washtenaw County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,4.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26161,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Washtenaw,Washtenaw County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26161,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Washtenaw,Washtenaw County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26161,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Washtenaw,Washtenaw County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,38.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26161,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Washtenaw,Washtenaw County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,54.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26161,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Washtenaw,Washtenaw County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,99081,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26161,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Washtenaw,Washtenaw County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,138545,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26161,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,44,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26163,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,44,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26163,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26163,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,41,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26163,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26163,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,1790225,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26163,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1830896,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26163,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1830896,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26163,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26163,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26163,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26163,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26163,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26163,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26163,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,59,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26163,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,41,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26163,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1081131,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26163,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,749765,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26163,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Wexford,Wexford County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26165,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Wexford,Wexford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26165,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Wexford,Wexford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26165,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Wexford,Wexford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26165,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Wexford,Wexford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26165,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Wexford,Wexford County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,33676,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26165,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Wexford,Wexford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,13879,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26165,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Wexford,Wexford County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26165,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Wexford,Wexford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26165,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Wexford,Wexford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,13879,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26165,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Wexford,Wexford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26165,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Wexford,Wexford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26165,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Wexford,Wexford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26165,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Wexford,Wexford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26165,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Wexford,Wexford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26165,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Wexford,Wexford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26165,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Wexford,Wexford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26165,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MI,Wexford,Wexford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,26165,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Aitkin,Aitkin County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27001,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Aitkin,Aitkin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27001,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Aitkin,Aitkin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27001,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Aitkin,Aitkin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27001,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Aitkin,Aitkin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27001,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Aitkin,Aitkin County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,15693,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27001,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Aitkin,Aitkin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3407,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27001,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Aitkin,Aitkin County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3362,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27001,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Aitkin,Aitkin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27001,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Aitkin,Aitkin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,45,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27001,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Aitkin,Aitkin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27001,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Aitkin,Aitkin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27001,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Aitkin,Aitkin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27001,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Aitkin,Aitkin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27001,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Aitkin,Aitkin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27001,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Aitkin,Aitkin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,98.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27001,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Aitkin,Aitkin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27001,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Aitkin,Aitkin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3362,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27001,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Anoka,Anoka County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,33,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27003,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Anoka,Anoka County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,19,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27003,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Anoka,Anoka County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27003,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Anoka,Anoka County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27003,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Anoka,Anoka County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27003,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Anoka,Anoka County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,364299,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27003,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Anoka,Anoka County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,296386,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27003,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Anoka,Anoka County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,288720,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27003,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Anoka,Anoka County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27003,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Anoka,Anoka County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7666,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27003,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Anoka,Anoka County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,97.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27003,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Anoka,Anoka County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27003,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Anoka,Anoka County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27003,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Anoka,Anoka County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27003,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Anoka,Anoka County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,7.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27003,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Anoka,Anoka County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,89.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27003,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Anoka,Anoka County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,23378,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27003,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Anoka,Anoka County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,265342,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27003,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Becker,Becker County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27005,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Becker,Becker County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27005,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Becker,Becker County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27005,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Becker,Becker County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27005,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Becker,Becker County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27005,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Becker,Becker County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,35147,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27005,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Becker,Becker County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,12734,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27005,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Becker,Becker County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,12167,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27005,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Becker,Becker County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27005,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Becker,Becker County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,566,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27005,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Becker,Becker County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,95.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27005,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Becker,Becker County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27005,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Becker,Becker County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,4.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27005,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Becker,Becker County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27005,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Becker,Becker County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27005,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Becker,Becker County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,95.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27005,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Becker,Becker County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27005,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Becker,Becker County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,12167,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27005,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Beltrami,Beltrami County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27007,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Beltrami,Beltrami County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27007,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Beltrami,Beltrami County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27007,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Beltrami,Beltrami County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27007,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Beltrami,Beltrami County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27007,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Beltrami,Beltrami County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,46230,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27007,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Beltrami,Beltrami County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,17391,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27007,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Beltrami,Beltrami County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,16571,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27007,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Beltrami,Beltrami County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27007,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Beltrami,Beltrami County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,820,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27007,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Beltrami,Beltrami County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,95.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27007,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Beltrami,Beltrami County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27007,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Beltrami,Beltrami County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,4.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27007,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Beltrami,Beltrami County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27007,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Beltrami,Beltrami County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27007,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Beltrami,Beltrami County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,95.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27007,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Beltrami,Beltrami County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27007,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Beltrami,Beltrami County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,16571,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27007,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27009,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27009,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27009,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27009,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27009,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,41338,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27009,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,23768,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27009,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,23028,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27009,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27009,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,740,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27009,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,96.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27009,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27009,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,3.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27009,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27009,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27009,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,96.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27009,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27009,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,23028,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27009,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Big Stone,Big Stone County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27011,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Big Stone,Big Stone County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27011,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Big Stone,Big Stone County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27011,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Big Stone,Big Stone County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27011,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Big Stone,Big Stone County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27011,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Big Stone,Big Stone County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,5147,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27011,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Big Stone,Big Stone County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3533,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27011,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Big Stone,Big Stone County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3336,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27011,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Big Stone,Big Stone County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,71,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27011,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Big Stone,Big Stone County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,197,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27011,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Big Stone,Big Stone County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,94.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27011,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Big Stone,Big Stone County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27011,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Big Stone,Big Stone County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,5.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27011,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Big Stone,Big Stone County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27011,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Big Stone,Big Stone County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27011,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Big Stone,Big Stone County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,92.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27011,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Big Stone,Big Stone County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27011,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Big Stone,Big Stone County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3265,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27011,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Blue Earth,Blue Earth County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,20,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27013,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Blue Earth,Blue Earth County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27013,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Blue Earth,Blue Earth County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27013,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Blue Earth,Blue Earth County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27013,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Blue Earth,Blue Earth County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27013,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Blue Earth,Blue Earth County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,69173,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27013,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Blue Earth,Blue Earth County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,55255,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27013,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Blue Earth,Blue Earth County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,54885,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27013,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Blue Earth,Blue Earth County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27013,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Blue Earth,Blue Earth County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,370,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27013,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Blue Earth,Blue Earth County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27013,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Blue Earth,Blue Earth County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27013,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Blue Earth,Blue Earth County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27013,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Blue Earth,Blue Earth County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27013,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Blue Earth,Blue Earth County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27013,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Blue Earth,Blue Earth County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,99.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27013,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Blue Earth,Blue Earth County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27013,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Blue Earth,Blue Earth County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,54885,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27013,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27015,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27015,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27015,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27015,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27015,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,25885,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27015,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,20027,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27015,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,19937,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27015,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27015,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,90,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27015,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27015,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27015,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27015,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27015,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27015,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,99.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27015,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,86,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27015,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,19851,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27015,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Carlton,Carlton County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27017,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Carlton,Carlton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27017,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Carlton,Carlton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27017,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Carlton,Carlton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27017,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Carlton,Carlton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27017,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Carlton,Carlton County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,36156,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27017,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Carlton,Carlton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,17100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27017,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Carlton,Carlton County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,16125,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27017,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Carlton,Carlton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27017,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Carlton,Carlton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,976,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27017,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Carlton,Carlton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,94.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27017,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Carlton,Carlton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27017,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Carlton,Carlton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,5.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27017,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Carlton,Carlton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27017,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Carlton,Carlton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,6.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27017,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Carlton,Carlton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,87.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27017,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Carlton,Carlton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1141,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27017,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Carlton,Carlton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,14984,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27017,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Carver,Carver County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27019,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Carver,Carver County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27019,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Carver,Carver County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27019,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Carver,Carver County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27019,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Carver,Carver County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27019,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Carver,Carver County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,107286,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27019,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Carver,Carver County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,88364,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27019,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Carver,Carver County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,87844,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27019,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Carver,Carver County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27019,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Carver,Carver County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,520,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27019,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Carver,Carver County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27019,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Carver,Carver County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27019,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Carver,Carver County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27019,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Carver,Carver County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27019,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Carver,Carver County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27019,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Carver,Carver County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,99.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27019,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Carver,Carver County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27019,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Carver,Carver County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,87844,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27019,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27021,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27021,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27021,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27021,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27021,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,30125,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27021,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4157,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27021,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4028,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27021,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27021,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,129,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27021,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,96.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27021,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27021,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,3.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27021,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27021,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27021,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,96.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27021,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27021,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,4028,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27021,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Chippewa,Chippewa County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27023,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Chippewa,Chippewa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27023,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Chippewa,Chippewa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27023,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Chippewa,Chippewa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27023,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Chippewa,Chippewa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27023,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Chippewa,Chippewa County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,12593,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27023,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Chippewa,Chippewa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,8659,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27023,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Chippewa,Chippewa County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8659,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27023,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Chippewa,Chippewa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27023,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Chippewa,Chippewa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27023,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Chippewa,Chippewa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27023,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Chippewa,Chippewa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27023,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Chippewa,Chippewa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27023,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Chippewa,Chippewa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27023,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Chippewa,Chippewa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27023,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Chippewa,Chippewa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27023,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Chippewa,Chippewa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27023,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Chippewa,Chippewa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,8659,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27023,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Chisago,Chisago County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27025,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Chisago,Chisago County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27025,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Chisago,Chisago County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27025,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Chisago,Chisago County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27025,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Chisago,Chisago County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27025,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Chisago,Chisago County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,56670,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27025,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Chisago,Chisago County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,28092,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27025,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Chisago,Chisago County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,27052,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27025,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Chisago,Chisago County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27025,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Chisago,Chisago County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1040,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27025,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Chisago,Chisago County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,96.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27025,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Chisago,Chisago County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27025,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Chisago,Chisago County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,3.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27025,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Chisago,Chisago County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27025,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Chisago,Chisago County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27025,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Chisago,Chisago County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,96.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27025,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Chisago,Chisago County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27025,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Chisago,Chisago County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,27052,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27025,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27027,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27027,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27027,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27027,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27027,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,65351,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27027,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,54668,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27027,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,54398,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27027,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,95,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27027,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,270,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27027,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27027,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27027,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27027,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27027,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,8.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27027,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,91.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27027,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,4483,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27027,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,49821,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27027,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Clearwater,Clearwater County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27029,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Clearwater,Clearwater County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27029,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Clearwater,Clearwater County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27029,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Clearwater,Clearwater County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27029,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Clearwater,Clearwater County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27029,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Clearwater,Clearwater County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,8580,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27029,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Clearwater,Clearwater County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2229,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27029,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Clearwater,Clearwater County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2229,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27029,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Clearwater,Clearwater County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27029,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Clearwater,Clearwater County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27029,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Clearwater,Clearwater County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27029,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Clearwater,Clearwater County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27029,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Clearwater,Clearwater County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27029,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Clearwater,Clearwater County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27029,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Clearwater,Clearwater County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27029,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Clearwater,Clearwater County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27029,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Clearwater,Clearwater County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27029,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Clearwater,Clearwater County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2229,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27029,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Cook,Cook County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27031,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Cook,Cook County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27031,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Cook,Cook County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27031,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Cook,Cook County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27031,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Cook,Cook County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27031,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Cook,Cook County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,5592,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27031,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Cook,Cook County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1480,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27031,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Cook,Cook County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1420,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27031,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Cook,Cook County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27031,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Cook,Cook County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,60,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27031,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Cook,Cook County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,95.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27031,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Cook,Cook County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27031,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Cook,Cook County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,4.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27031,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Cook,Cook County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27031,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Cook,Cook County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27031,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Cook,Cook County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,95.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27031,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Cook,Cook County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27031,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Cook,Cook County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1420,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27031,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Cottonwood,Cottonwood County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27033,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Cottonwood,Cottonwood County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27033,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Cottonwood,Cottonwood County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27033,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Cottonwood,Cottonwood County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27033,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Cottonwood,Cottonwood County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27033,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Cottonwood,Cottonwood County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,11489,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27033,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Cottonwood,Cottonwood County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,14158,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27033,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Cottonwood,Cottonwood County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,14103,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27033,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Cottonwood,Cottonwood County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27033,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Cottonwood,Cottonwood County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,55,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27033,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Cottonwood,Cottonwood County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27033,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Cottonwood,Cottonwood County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27033,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Cottonwood,Cottonwood County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27033,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Cottonwood,Cottonwood County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27033,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Cottonwood,Cottonwood County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,42.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27033,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Cottonwood,Cottonwood County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,57,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27033,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Cottonwood,Cottonwood County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,6030,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27033,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Cottonwood,Cottonwood County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,8074,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27033,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Crow Wing,Crow Wing County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27035,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Crow Wing,Crow Wing County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27035,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Crow Wing,Crow Wing County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27035,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Crow Wing,Crow Wing County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27035,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Crow Wing,Crow Wing County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27035,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Crow Wing,Crow Wing County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,66236,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27035,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Crow Wing,Crow Wing County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,26852,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27035,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Crow Wing,Crow Wing County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,26069,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27035,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Crow Wing,Crow Wing County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27035,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Crow Wing,Crow Wing County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,782,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27035,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Crow Wing,Crow Wing County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,97.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27035,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Crow Wing,Crow Wing County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27035,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Crow Wing,Crow Wing County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27035,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Crow Wing,Crow Wing County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27035,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Crow Wing,Crow Wing County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27035,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Crow Wing,Crow Wing County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,97.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27035,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Crow Wing,Crow Wing County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27035,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Crow Wing,Crow Wing County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,26069,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27035,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Dakota,Dakota County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,21,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27037,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Dakota,Dakota County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27037,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Dakota,Dakota County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27037,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Dakota,Dakota County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27037,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Dakota,Dakota County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27037,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Dakota,Dakota County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,440317,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27037,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Dakota,Dakota County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,399197,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27037,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Dakota,Dakota County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,396801,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27037,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Dakota,Dakota County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27037,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Dakota,Dakota County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2396,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27037,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Dakota,Dakota County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27037,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Dakota,Dakota County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27037,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Dakota,Dakota County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27037,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Dakota,Dakota County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27037,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Dakota,Dakota County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27037,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Dakota,Dakota County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,99.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27037,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Dakota,Dakota County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27037,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Dakota,Dakota County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,396801,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27037,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Dodge,Dodge County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27039,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Dodge,Dodge County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27039,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Dodge,Dodge County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27039,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Dodge,Dodge County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27039,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Dodge,Dodge County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27039,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Dodge,Dodge County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,20861,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27039,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Dodge,Dodge County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,12706,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27039,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Dodge,Dodge County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,12706,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27039,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Dodge,Dodge County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27039,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Dodge,Dodge County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27039,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Dodge,Dodge County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27039,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Dodge,Dodge County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27039,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Dodge,Dodge County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27039,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Dodge,Dodge County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27039,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Dodge,Dodge County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27039,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Dodge,Dodge County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27039,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Dodge,Dodge County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27039,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Dodge,Dodge County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,12706,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27039,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27041,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27041,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27041,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27041,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27041,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,39079,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27041,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,17518,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27041,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,17368,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27041,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27041,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,150,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27041,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27041,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27041,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27041,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27041,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27041,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,99.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27041,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27041,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,17368,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27041,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Faribault,Faribault County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27043,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Faribault,Faribault County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27043,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Faribault,Faribault County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27043,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Faribault,Faribault County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27043,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Faribault,Faribault County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27043,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Faribault,Faribault County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,13888,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27043,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Faribault,Faribault County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9343,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27043,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Faribault,Faribault County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9193,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27043,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Faribault,Faribault County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27043,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Faribault,Faribault County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,149,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27043,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Faribault,Faribault County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27043,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Faribault,Faribault County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27043,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Faribault,Faribault County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27043,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Faribault,Faribault County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27043,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Faribault,Faribault County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27043,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Faribault,Faribault County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,98.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27043,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Faribault,Faribault County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27043,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Faribault,Faribault County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,9193,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27043,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Fillmore,Fillmore County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27045,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Fillmore,Fillmore County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27045,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Fillmore,Fillmore County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27045,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Fillmore,Fillmore County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27045,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Fillmore,Fillmore County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27045,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Fillmore,Fillmore County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,21246,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27045,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Fillmore,Fillmore County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,13057,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27045,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Fillmore,Fillmore County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,13007,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27045,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Fillmore,Fillmore County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27045,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Fillmore,Fillmore County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,50,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27045,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Fillmore,Fillmore County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27045,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Fillmore,Fillmore County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27045,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Fillmore,Fillmore County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27045,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Fillmore,Fillmore County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27045,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Fillmore,Fillmore County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27045,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Fillmore,Fillmore County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,99.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27045,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Fillmore,Fillmore County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27045,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Fillmore,Fillmore County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,13007,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27045,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Freeborn,Freeborn County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27047,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Freeborn,Freeborn County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27047,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Freeborn,Freeborn County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27047,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Freeborn,Freeborn County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27047,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Freeborn,Freeborn County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27047,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Freeborn,Freeborn County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,30883,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27047,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Freeborn,Freeborn County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,22658,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27047,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Freeborn,Freeborn County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,22444,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27047,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Freeborn,Freeborn County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27047,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Freeborn,Freeborn County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,214,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27047,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Freeborn,Freeborn County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27047,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Freeborn,Freeborn County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27047,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Freeborn,Freeborn County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27047,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Freeborn,Freeborn County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27047,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Freeborn,Freeborn County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27047,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Freeborn,Freeborn County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,99.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27047,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Freeborn,Freeborn County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27047,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Freeborn,Freeborn County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,22444,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27047,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Goodhue,Goodhue County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27049,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Goodhue,Goodhue County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27049,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Goodhue,Goodhue County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27049,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Goodhue,Goodhue County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27049,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Goodhue,Goodhue County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27049,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Goodhue,Goodhue County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,47536,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27049,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Goodhue,Goodhue County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,37560,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27049,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Goodhue,Goodhue County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,37430,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27049,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Goodhue,Goodhue County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27049,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Goodhue,Goodhue County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,130,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27049,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Goodhue,Goodhue County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27049,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Goodhue,Goodhue County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27049,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Goodhue,Goodhue County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27049,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Goodhue,Goodhue County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27049,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Goodhue,Goodhue County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27049,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Goodhue,Goodhue County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,99.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27049,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Goodhue,Goodhue County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27049,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Goodhue,Goodhue County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,37430,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27049,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27051,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27051,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27051,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27051,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27051,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,6080,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27051,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3380,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27051,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3330,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27051,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27051,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,50,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27051,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27051,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27051,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27051,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27051,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27051,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,98.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27051,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27051,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3330,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27051,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Hennepin,Hennepin County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,47,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27053,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Hennepin,Hennepin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,37,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27053,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Hennepin,Hennepin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,33,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27053,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Hennepin,Hennepin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27053,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Hennepin,Hennepin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27053,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Hennepin,Hennepin County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,1281267,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27053,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Hennepin,Hennepin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1197884,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27053,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Hennepin,Hennepin County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1195160,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27053,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Hennepin,Hennepin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27053,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Hennepin,Hennepin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2724,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27053,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Hennepin,Hennepin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27053,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Hennepin,Hennepin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27053,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Hennepin,Hennepin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27053,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Hennepin,Hennepin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27053,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Hennepin,Hennepin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,5.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27053,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Hennepin,Hennepin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,94.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27053,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Hennepin,Hennepin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,66956,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27053,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Hennepin,Hennepin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1128204,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27053,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Houston,Houston County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27055,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Houston,Houston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27055,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Houston,Houston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27055,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Houston,Houston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27055,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Houston,Houston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27055,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Houston,Houston County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,18818,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27055,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Houston,Houston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,10780,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27055,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Houston,Houston County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10780,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27055,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Houston,Houston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27055,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Houston,Houston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27055,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Houston,Houston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27055,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Houston,Houston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27055,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Houston,Houston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27055,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Houston,Houston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27055,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Houston,Houston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27055,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Houston,Houston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27055,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Houston,Houston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27055,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Houston,Houston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,10780,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27055,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Hubbard,Hubbard County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27057,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Hubbard,Hubbard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27057,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Hubbard,Hubbard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27057,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Hubbard,Hubbard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27057,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Hubbard,Hubbard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27057,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Hubbard,Hubbard County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,21380,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27057,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Hubbard,Hubbard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5217,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27057,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Hubbard,Hubbard County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5117,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27057,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Hubbard,Hubbard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27057,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Hubbard,Hubbard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27057,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Hubbard,Hubbard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27057,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Hubbard,Hubbard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27057,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Hubbard,Hubbard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27057,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Hubbard,Hubbard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27057,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Hubbard,Hubbard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27057,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Hubbard,Hubbard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,98.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27057,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Hubbard,Hubbard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27057,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Hubbard,Hubbard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,5117,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27057,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Isanti,Isanti County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27059,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Isanti,Isanti County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27059,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Isanti,Isanti County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27059,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Isanti,Isanti County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27059,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Isanti,Isanti County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27059,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Isanti,Isanti County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,41383,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27059,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Isanti,Isanti County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,16971,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27059,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Isanti,Isanti County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,16244,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27059,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Isanti,Isanti County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27059,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Isanti,Isanti County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,727,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27059,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Isanti,Isanti County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,95.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27059,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Isanti,Isanti County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27059,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Isanti,Isanti County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,4.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27059,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Isanti,Isanti County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27059,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Isanti,Isanti County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27059,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Isanti,Isanti County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,95.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27059,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Isanti,Isanti County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27059,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Isanti,Isanti County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,16244,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27059,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Itasca,Itasca County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,21,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27061,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Itasca,Itasca County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27061,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Itasca,Itasca County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27061,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Itasca,Itasca County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27061,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Itasca,Itasca County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27061,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Itasca,Itasca County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,44984,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27061,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Itasca,Itasca County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,17459,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27061,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Itasca,Itasca County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,16944,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27061,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Itasca,Itasca County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27061,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Itasca,Itasca County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,515,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27061,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Itasca,Itasca County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,97,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27061,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Itasca,Itasca County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27061,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Itasca,Itasca County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27061,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Itasca,Itasca County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27061,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Itasca,Itasca County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27061,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Itasca,Itasca County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,96,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27061,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Itasca,Itasca County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,180,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27061,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Itasca,Itasca County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,16764,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27061,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27063,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27063,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27063,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27063,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27063,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,9969,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27063,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,6048,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27063,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6048,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27063,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27063,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27063,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27063,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27063,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27063,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27063,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27063,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,99,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27063,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,60,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27063,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,5988,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27063,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Kanabec,Kanabec County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27065,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Kanabec,Kanabec County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27065,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Kanabec,Kanabec County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27065,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Kanabec,Kanabec County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27065,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Kanabec,Kanabec County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27065,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Kanabec,Kanabec County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,16040,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27065,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Kanabec,Kanabec County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3943,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27065,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Kanabec,Kanabec County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3873,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27065,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Kanabec,Kanabec County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27065,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Kanabec,Kanabec County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,70,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27065,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Kanabec,Kanabec County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27065,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Kanabec,Kanabec County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27065,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Kanabec,Kanabec County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27065,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Kanabec,Kanabec County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27065,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Kanabec,Kanabec County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27065,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Kanabec,Kanabec County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,98.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27065,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Kanabec,Kanabec County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27065,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Kanabec,Kanabec County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3873,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27065,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Kandiyohi,Kandiyohi County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27067,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Kandiyohi,Kandiyohi County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27067,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Kandiyohi,Kandiyohi County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27067,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Kandiyohi,Kandiyohi County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27067,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Kandiyohi,Kandiyohi County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27067,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Kandiyohi,Kandiyohi County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,43685,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27067,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Kandiyohi,Kandiyohi County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,28061,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27067,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Kandiyohi,Kandiyohi County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,27895,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27067,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Kandiyohi,Kandiyohi County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,497,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27067,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Kandiyohi,Kandiyohi County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,166,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27067,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Kandiyohi,Kandiyohi County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27067,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Kandiyohi,Kandiyohi County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27067,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Kandiyohi,Kandiyohi County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27067,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Kandiyohi,Kandiyohi County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27067,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Kandiyohi,Kandiyohi County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,9.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27067,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Kandiyohi,Kandiyohi County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,88.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27067,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Kandiyohi,Kandiyohi County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2630,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27067,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Kandiyohi,Kandiyohi County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,24768,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27067,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Kittson,Kittson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27069,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Kittson,Kittson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27069,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Kittson,Kittson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27069,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Kittson,Kittson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27069,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Kittson,Kittson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27069,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Kittson,Kittson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,4180,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27069,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Kittson,Kittson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4092,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27069,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Kittson,Kittson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4092,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27069,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Kittson,Kittson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,753,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27069,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Kittson,Kittson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27069,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Kittson,Kittson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27069,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Kittson,Kittson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,18.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27069,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Kittson,Kittson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27069,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Kittson,Kittson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27069,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Kittson,Kittson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,40,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27069,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Kittson,Kittson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,41.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27069,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Kittson,Kittson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1638,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27069,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Kittson,Kittson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1701,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27069,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Koochiching,Koochiching County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27071,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Koochiching,Koochiching County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27071,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Koochiching,Koochiching County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27071,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Koochiching,Koochiching County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27071,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Koochiching,Koochiching County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27071,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Koochiching,Koochiching County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,12031,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27071,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Koochiching,Koochiching County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7725,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27071,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Koochiching,Koochiching County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7725,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27071,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Koochiching,Koochiching County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27071,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Koochiching,Koochiching County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27071,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Koochiching,Koochiching County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27071,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Koochiching,Koochiching County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27071,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Koochiching,Koochiching County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27071,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Koochiching,Koochiching County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27071,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Koochiching,Koochiching County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,7.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27071,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Koochiching,Koochiching County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,92.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27071,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Koochiching,Koochiching County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,587,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27071,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Koochiching,Koochiching County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,7137,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27071,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Lac qui Parle,Lac qui Parle County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27073,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Lac qui Parle,Lac qui Parle County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27073,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Lac qui Parle,Lac qui Parle County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27073,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Lac qui Parle,Lac qui Parle County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27073,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Lac qui Parle,Lac qui Parle County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27073,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Lac qui Parle,Lac qui Parle County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,6701,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27073,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Lac qui Parle,Lac qui Parle County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3636,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27073,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Lac qui Parle,Lac qui Parle County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3636,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27073,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Lac qui Parle,Lac qui Parle County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27073,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Lac qui Parle,Lac qui Parle County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27073,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Lac qui Parle,Lac qui Parle County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27073,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Lac qui Parle,Lac qui Parle County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27073,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Lac qui Parle,Lac qui Parle County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27073,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Lac qui Parle,Lac qui Parle County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27073,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Lac qui Parle,Lac qui Parle County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,10.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27073,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Lac qui Parle,Lac qui Parle County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,89.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27073,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Lac qui Parle,Lac qui Parle County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,370,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27073,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Lac qui Parle,Lac qui Parle County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3266,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27073,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27075,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27075,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27075,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27075,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27075,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,10885,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27075,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5665,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27075,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5665,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27075,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27075,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27075,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27075,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27075,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27075,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27075,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27075,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27075,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27075,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,5665,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27075,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Lake of the Woods,Lake of the Woods County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27077,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Lake of the Woods,Lake of the Woods County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27077,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Lake of the Woods,Lake of the Woods County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27077,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Lake of the Woods,Lake of the Woods County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27077,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Lake of the Woods,Lake of the Woods County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27077,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Lake of the Woods,Lake of the Woods County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,3760,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27077,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Lake of the Woods,Lake of the Woods County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1177,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27077,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Lake of the Woods,Lake of the Woods County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1077,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27077,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Lake of the Woods,Lake of the Woods County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27077,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Lake of the Woods,Lake of the Woods County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27077,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Lake of the Woods,Lake of the Woods County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,91.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27077,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Lake of the Woods,Lake of the Woods County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27077,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Lake of the Woods,Lake of the Woods County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,8.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27077,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Lake of the Woods,Lake of the Woods County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27077,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Lake of the Woods,Lake of the Woods County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27077,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Lake of the Woods,Lake of the Woods County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,91.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27077,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Lake of the Woods,Lake of the Woods County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27077,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Lake of the Woods,Lake of the Woods County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1077,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27077,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Le Sueur,Le Sueur County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27079,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Le Sueur,Le Sueur County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27079,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Le Sueur,Le Sueur County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27079,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Le Sueur,Le Sueur County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27079,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Le Sueur,Le Sueur County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27079,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Le Sueur,Le Sueur County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,28627,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27079,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Le Sueur,Le Sueur County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,21309,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27079,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Le Sueur,Le Sueur County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,21187,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27079,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Le Sueur,Le Sueur County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27079,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Le Sueur,Le Sueur County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,122,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27079,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Le Sueur,Le Sueur County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27079,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Le Sueur,Le Sueur County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27079,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Le Sueur,Le Sueur County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27079,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Le Sueur,Le Sueur County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27079,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Le Sueur,Le Sueur County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27079,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Le Sueur,Le Sueur County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,99.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27079,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Le Sueur,Le Sueur County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27079,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Le Sueur,Le Sueur County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,21187,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27079,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27081,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27081,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27081,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27081,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27081,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,5628,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27081,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,15129,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27081,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,15129,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27081,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27081,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27081,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27081,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27081,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27081,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27081,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,21,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27081,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,79,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27081,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,3178,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27081,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,11951,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27081,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Lyon,Lyon County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27083,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Lyon,Lyon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27083,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Lyon,Lyon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27083,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Lyon,Lyon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27083,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Lyon,Lyon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27083,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Lyon,Lyon County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,25174,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27083,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Lyon,Lyon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,20625,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27083,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Lyon,Lyon County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,20625,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27083,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Lyon,Lyon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27083,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Lyon,Lyon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27083,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Lyon,Lyon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27083,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Lyon,Lyon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27083,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Lyon,Lyon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27083,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Lyon,Lyon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27083,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Lyon,Lyon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,14.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27083,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Lyon,Lyon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,85.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27083,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Lyon,Lyon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2930,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27083,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Lyon,Lyon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,17695,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27083,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Mahnomen,Mahnomen County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27087,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Mahnomen,Mahnomen County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27087,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Mahnomen,Mahnomen County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27087,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Mahnomen,Mahnomen County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27087,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Mahnomen,Mahnomen County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27087,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Mahnomen,Mahnomen County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,5374,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27087,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Mahnomen,Mahnomen County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1734,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27087,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Mahnomen,Mahnomen County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1734,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27087,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Mahnomen,Mahnomen County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27087,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Mahnomen,Mahnomen County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27087,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Mahnomen,Mahnomen County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27087,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Mahnomen,Mahnomen County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27087,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Mahnomen,Mahnomen County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27087,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Mahnomen,Mahnomen County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27087,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Mahnomen,Mahnomen County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27087,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Mahnomen,Mahnomen County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27087,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Mahnomen,Mahnomen County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27087,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Mahnomen,Mahnomen County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1734,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27087,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27089,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27089,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27089,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27089,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27089,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,9035,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27089,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9109,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27089,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9014,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27089,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,176,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27089,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,95,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27089,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27089,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27089,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27089,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27089,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,14.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27089,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,82.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27089,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1338,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27089,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,7500,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27089,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27091,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27091,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27091,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27091,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27091,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,19970,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27091,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,14989,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27091,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,14989,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27091,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27091,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27091,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27091,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27091,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27091,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27091,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27091,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,99.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27091,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,48,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27091,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,14941,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27091,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,McLeod,McLeod County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27085,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,McLeod,McLeod County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27085,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,McLeod,McLeod County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27085,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,McLeod,McLeod County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27085,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,McLeod,McLeod County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27085,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,McLeod,McLeod County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,36701,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27085,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MN,McLeod,McLeod County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,26634,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27085,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,McLeod,McLeod County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,26499,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27085,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,McLeod,McLeod County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27085,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,McLeod,McLeod County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,135,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27085,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,McLeod,McLeod County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27085,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,McLeod,McLeod County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27085,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,McLeod,McLeod County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27085,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,McLeod,McLeod County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27085,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,McLeod,McLeod County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27085,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,McLeod,McLeod County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,99.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27085,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,McLeod,McLeod County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27085,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,McLeod,McLeod County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,26499,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27085,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Meeker,Meeker County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27093,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Meeker,Meeker County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27093,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Meeker,Meeker County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27093,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Meeker,Meeker County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27093,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Meeker,Meeker County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27093,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Meeker,Meeker County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,23428,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27093,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Meeker,Meeker County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,11512,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27093,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Meeker,Meeker County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11512,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27093,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Meeker,Meeker County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27093,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Meeker,Meeker County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27093,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Meeker,Meeker County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27093,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Meeker,Meeker County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27093,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Meeker,Meeker County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27093,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Meeker,Meeker County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27093,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Meeker,Meeker County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,8.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27093,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Meeker,Meeker County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,91.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27093,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Meeker,Meeker County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,959,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27093,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Meeker,Meeker County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,10553,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27093,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Mille Lacs,Mille Lacs County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27095,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Mille Lacs,Mille Lacs County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27095,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Mille Lacs,Mille Lacs County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27095,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Mille Lacs,Mille Lacs County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27095,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Mille Lacs,Mille Lacs County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27095,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Mille Lacs,Mille Lacs County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,26410,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27095,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Mille Lacs,Mille Lacs County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,10521,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27095,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Mille Lacs,Mille Lacs County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9841,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27095,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Mille Lacs,Mille Lacs County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27095,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Mille Lacs,Mille Lacs County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,680,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27095,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Mille Lacs,Mille Lacs County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,93.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27095,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Mille Lacs,Mille Lacs County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27095,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Mille Lacs,Mille Lacs County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,6.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27095,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Mille Lacs,Mille Lacs County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27095,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Mille Lacs,Mille Lacs County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27095,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Mille Lacs,Mille Lacs County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,93.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27095,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Mille Lacs,Mille Lacs County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27095,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Mille Lacs,Mille Lacs County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,9841,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27095,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,MN,Minnesota,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,977,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,MN,MN,Minnesota,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,743,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,MN,MN,Minnesota,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,639,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,MN,MN,Minnesota,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,85,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,MN,MN,Minnesota,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,19,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,MN,MN,Minnesota,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,5707165,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2020,MN,MN,Minnesota,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4483603,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,MN,MN,Minnesota,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4432008,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,MN,MN,Minnesota,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,4525,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,MN,MN,Minnesota,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,51595,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,MN,MN,Minnesota,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,MN,MN,Minnesota,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,MN,MN,Minnesota,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,MN,MN,Minnesota,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,234,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,MN,MN,Minnesota,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,4.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,MN,MN,Minnesota,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,94.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,MN,MN,Minnesota,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,190467,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,MN,MN,Minnesota,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,4237017,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,MN,Morrison,Morrison County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27097,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Morrison,Morrison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27097,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Morrison,Morrison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27097,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Morrison,Morrison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27097,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Morrison,Morrison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27097,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Morrison,Morrison County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,33980,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27097,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Morrison,Morrison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,14060,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27097,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Morrison,Morrison County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,14060,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27097,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Morrison,Morrison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27097,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Morrison,Morrison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27097,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Morrison,Morrison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27097,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Morrison,Morrison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27097,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Morrison,Morrison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27097,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Morrison,Morrison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27097,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Morrison,Morrison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27097,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Morrison,Morrison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27097,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Morrison,Morrison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27097,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Morrison,Morrison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,14060,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27097,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Mower,Mower County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27099,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Mower,Mower County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27099,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Mower,Mower County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27099,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Mower,Mower County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27099,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Mower,Mower County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27099,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Mower,Mower County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,40049,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27099,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Mower,Mower County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,31044,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27099,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Mower,Mower County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,30884,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27099,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Mower,Mower County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27099,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Mower,Mower County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,160,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27099,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Mower,Mower County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27099,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Mower,Mower County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27099,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Mower,Mower County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27099,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Mower,Mower County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27099,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Mower,Mower County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27099,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Mower,Mower County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,99.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27099,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Mower,Mower County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27099,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Mower,Mower County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,30884,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27099,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Murray,Murray County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27101,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Murray,Murray County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27101,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Murray,Murray County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27101,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Murray,Murray County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27101,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Murray,Murray County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27101,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Murray,Murray County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,8168,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27101,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Murray,Murray County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4621,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27101,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Murray,Murray County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4152,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27101,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Murray,Murray County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27101,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Murray,Murray County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,468,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27101,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Murray,Murray County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,89.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27101,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Murray,Murray County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27101,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Murray,Murray County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,10.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27101,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Murray,Murray County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27101,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Murray,Murray County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,1.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27101,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Murray,Murray County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,88.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27101,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Murray,Murray County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,61,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27101,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Murray,Murray County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,4091,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27101,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Nicollet,Nicollet County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27103,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Nicollet,Nicollet County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27103,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Nicollet,Nicollet County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27103,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Nicollet,Nicollet County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27103,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Nicollet,Nicollet County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27103,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Nicollet,Nicollet County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,34490,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27103,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Nicollet,Nicollet County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,27572,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27103,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Nicollet,Nicollet County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,27518,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27103,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Nicollet,Nicollet County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27103,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Nicollet,Nicollet County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,54,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27103,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Nicollet,Nicollet County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27103,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Nicollet,Nicollet County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27103,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Nicollet,Nicollet County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27103,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Nicollet,Nicollet County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27103,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Nicollet,Nicollet County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27103,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Nicollet,Nicollet County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,99.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27103,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Nicollet,Nicollet County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27103,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Nicollet,Nicollet County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,27518,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27103,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Nobles,Nobles County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27105,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Nobles,Nobles County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27105,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Nobles,Nobles County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27105,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Nobles,Nobles County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27105,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Nobles,Nobles County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27105,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Nobles,Nobles County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,22183,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27105,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Nobles,Nobles County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,17350,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27105,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Nobles,Nobles County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,16881,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27105,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Nobles,Nobles County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27105,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Nobles,Nobles County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,469,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27105,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Nobles,Nobles County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,97.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27105,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Nobles,Nobles County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27105,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Nobles,Nobles County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27105,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Nobles,Nobles County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27105,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Nobles,Nobles County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,2.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27105,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Nobles,Nobles County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,95.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27105,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Nobles,Nobles County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,375,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27105,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Nobles,Nobles County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,16506,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27105,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Norman,Norman County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27107,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Norman,Norman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27107,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Norman,Norman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27107,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Norman,Norman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27107,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Norman,Norman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27107,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Norman,Norman County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,6422,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27107,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Norman,Norman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3877,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27107,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Norman,Norman County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3851,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27107,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Norman,Norman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,185,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27107,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Norman,Norman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,26,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27107,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Norman,Norman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27107,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Norman,Norman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,4.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27107,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Norman,Norman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27107,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Norman,Norman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27107,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Norman,Norman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27107,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Norman,Norman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,94.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27107,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Norman,Norman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27107,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Norman,Norman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3666,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27107,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Olmsted,Olmsted County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,19,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27109,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Olmsted,Olmsted County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27109,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Olmsted,Olmsted County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27109,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Olmsted,Olmsted County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27109,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Olmsted,Olmsted County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27109,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Olmsted,Olmsted County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,162991,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27109,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Olmsted,Olmsted County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,132247,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27109,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Olmsted,Olmsted County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,130322,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27109,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Olmsted,Olmsted County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27109,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Olmsted,Olmsted County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1925,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27109,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Olmsted,Olmsted County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27109,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Olmsted,Olmsted County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27109,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Olmsted,Olmsted County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27109,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Olmsted,Olmsted County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27109,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Olmsted,Olmsted County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27109,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Olmsted,Olmsted County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,98.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27109,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Olmsted,Olmsted County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27109,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Olmsted,Olmsted County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,130322,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27109,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Otter Tail,Otter Tail County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27111,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Otter Tail,Otter Tail County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27111,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Otter Tail,Otter Tail County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27111,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Otter Tail,Otter Tail County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27111,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Otter Tail,Otter Tail County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27111,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Otter Tail,Otter Tail County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,60024,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27111,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Otter Tail,Otter Tail County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,25701,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27111,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Otter Tail,Otter Tail County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,25524,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27111,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Otter Tail,Otter Tail County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27111,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Otter Tail,Otter Tail County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,177,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27111,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Otter Tail,Otter Tail County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27111,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Otter Tail,Otter Tail County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27111,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Otter Tail,Otter Tail County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27111,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Otter Tail,Otter Tail County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27111,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Otter Tail,Otter Tail County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,1.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27111,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Otter Tail,Otter Tail County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,97.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27111,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Otter Tail,Otter Tail County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,439,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27111,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Otter Tail,Otter Tail County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,25085,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27111,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Pennington,Pennington County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27113,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Pennington,Pennington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27113,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Pennington,Pennington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27113,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Pennington,Pennington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27113,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Pennington,Pennington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27113,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Pennington,Pennington County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,13939,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27113,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Pennington,Pennington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9517,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27113,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Pennington,Pennington County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9347,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27113,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Pennington,Pennington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27113,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Pennington,Pennington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,170,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27113,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Pennington,Pennington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27113,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Pennington,Pennington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27113,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Pennington,Pennington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27113,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Pennington,Pennington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27113,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Pennington,Pennington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27113,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Pennington,Pennington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,98.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27113,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Pennington,Pennington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27113,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Pennington,Pennington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,9347,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27113,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Pine,Pine County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27115,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Pine,Pine County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27115,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Pine,Pine County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27115,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Pine,Pine County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27115,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Pine,Pine County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27115,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Pine,Pine County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,28854,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27115,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Pine,Pine County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,10595,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27115,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Pine,Pine County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8047,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27115,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Pine,Pine County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27115,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Pine,Pine County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2549,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27115,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Pine,Pine County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,75.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27115,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Pine,Pine County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27115,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Pine,Pine County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,24.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27115,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Pine,Pine County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27115,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Pine,Pine County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27115,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Pine,Pine County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,75.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27115,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Pine,Pine County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27115,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Pine,Pine County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,8047,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27115,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Pipestone,Pipestone County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27117,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Pipestone,Pipestone County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27117,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Pipestone,Pipestone County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27117,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Pipestone,Pipestone County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27117,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Pipestone,Pipestone County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27117,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Pipestone,Pipestone County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,9405,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27117,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Pipestone,Pipestone County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,8601,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27117,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Pipestone,Pipestone County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8511,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27117,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Pipestone,Pipestone County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27117,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Pipestone,Pipestone County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,90,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27117,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Pipestone,Pipestone County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27117,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Pipestone,Pipestone County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27117,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Pipestone,Pipestone County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27117,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Pipestone,Pipestone County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27117,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Pipestone,Pipestone County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,13,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27117,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Pipestone,Pipestone County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,85.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27117,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Pipestone,Pipestone County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1122,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27117,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Pipestone,Pipestone County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,7389,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27117,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27119,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27119,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27119,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27119,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27119,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,31051,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27119,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,21466,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27119,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,21440,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27119,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,89,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27119,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,26,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27119,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27119,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27119,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27119,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27119,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27119,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,97.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27119,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,433,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27119,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,20917,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27119,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Pope,Pope County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27121,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Pope,Pope County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27121,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Pope,Pope County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27121,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Pope,Pope County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27121,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Pope,Pope County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27121,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Pope,Pope County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,11309,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27121,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Pope,Pope County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4519,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27121,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Pope,Pope County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4427,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27121,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Pope,Pope County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27121,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Pope,Pope County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,92,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27121,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Pope,Pope County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27121,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Pope,Pope County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27121,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Pope,Pope County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27121,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Pope,Pope County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27121,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Pope,Pope County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27121,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Pope,Pope County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,98,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27121,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Pope,Pope County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27121,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Pope,Pope County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,4427,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27121,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Ramsey,Ramsey County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27123,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Ramsey,Ramsey County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27123,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Ramsey,Ramsey County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27123,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Ramsey,Ramsey County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27123,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Ramsey,Ramsey County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27123,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Ramsey,Ramsey County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,551480,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27123,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Ramsey,Ramsey County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,548130,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27123,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Ramsey,Ramsey County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,546153,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27123,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Ramsey,Ramsey County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27123,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Ramsey,Ramsey County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1977,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27123,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Ramsey,Ramsey County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27123,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Ramsey,Ramsey County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27123,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Ramsey,Ramsey County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27123,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Ramsey,Ramsey County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27123,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Ramsey,Ramsey County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,10.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27123,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Ramsey,Ramsey County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,89.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27123,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Ramsey,Ramsey County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,55877,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27123,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Ramsey,Ramsey County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,490275,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27123,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Red Lake,Red Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27125,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Red Lake,Red Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27125,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Red Lake,Red Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27125,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Red Lake,Red Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27125,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Red Lake,Red Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27125,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Red Lake,Red Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,3936,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27125,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Red Lake,Red Lake County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2113,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27125,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Red Lake,Red Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2113,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27125,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Red Lake,Red Lake County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27125,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Red Lake,Red Lake County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27125,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Red Lake,Red Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27125,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Red Lake,Red Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27125,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Red Lake,Red Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27125,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Red Lake,Red Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27125,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Red Lake,Red Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27125,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Red Lake,Red Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27125,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Red Lake,Red Lake County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27125,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Red Lake,Red Lake County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2113,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27125,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Redwood,Redwood County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27127,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Redwood,Redwood County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27127,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Redwood,Redwood County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27127,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Redwood,Redwood County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27127,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Redwood,Redwood County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27127,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Redwood,Redwood County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,15391,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27127,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Redwood,Redwood County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,10389,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27127,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Redwood,Redwood County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10389,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27127,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Redwood,Redwood County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1596,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27127,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Redwood,Redwood County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27127,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Redwood,Redwood County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27127,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Redwood,Redwood County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,15.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27127,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Redwood,Redwood County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27127,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Redwood,Redwood County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27127,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Redwood,Redwood County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27127,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Redwood,Redwood County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,83.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27127,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Redwood,Redwood County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,80,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27127,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Redwood,Redwood County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,8713,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27127,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Renville,Renville County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27129,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Renville,Renville County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27129,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Renville,Renville County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27129,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Renville,Renville County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27129,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Renville,Renville County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27129,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Renville,Renville County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,14684,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27129,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Renville,Renville County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9706,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27129,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Renville,Renville County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9706,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27129,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Renville,Renville County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27129,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Renville,Renville County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27129,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Renville,Renville County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27129,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Renville,Renville County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27129,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Renville,Renville County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27129,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Renville,Renville County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27129,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Renville,Renville County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27129,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Renville,Renville County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27129,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Renville,Renville County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27129,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Renville,Renville County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,9706,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27129,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Rice,Rice County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27131,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Rice,Rice County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27131,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Rice,Rice County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27131,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Rice,Rice County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27131,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Rice,Rice County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27131,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Rice,Rice County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,67030,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27131,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Rice,Rice County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,55932,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27131,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Rice,Rice County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,53056,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27131,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Rice,Rice County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27131,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Rice,Rice County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2876,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27131,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Rice,Rice County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,94.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27131,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Rice,Rice County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27131,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Rice,Rice County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,5.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27131,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Rice,Rice County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27131,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Rice,Rice County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27131,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Rice,Rice County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,94.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27131,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Rice,Rice County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27131,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Rice,Rice County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,53056,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27131,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Rock,Rock County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27133,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Rock,Rock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27133,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Rock,Rock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27133,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Rock,Rock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27133,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Rock,Rock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27133,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Rock,Rock County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,9705,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27133,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Rock,Rock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,8579,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27133,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Rock,Rock County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8579,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27133,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Rock,Rock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27133,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Rock,Rock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27133,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Rock,Rock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27133,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Rock,Rock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27133,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Rock,Rock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27133,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Rock,Rock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27133,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Rock,Rock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,15.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27133,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Rock,Rock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,84.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27133,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Rock,Rock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1334,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27133,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Rock,Rock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,7245,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27133,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Roseau,Roseau County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27135,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Roseau,Roseau County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27135,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Roseau,Roseau County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27135,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Roseau,Roseau County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27135,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Roseau,Roseau County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27135,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Roseau,Roseau County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,15294,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27135,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Roseau,Roseau County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7055,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27135,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Roseau,Roseau County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5644,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27135,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Roseau,Roseau County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27135,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Roseau,Roseau County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1411,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27135,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Roseau,Roseau County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,80,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27135,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Roseau,Roseau County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27135,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Roseau,Roseau County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,20,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27135,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Roseau,Roseau County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27135,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Roseau,Roseau County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27135,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Roseau,Roseau County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,80,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27135,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Roseau,Roseau County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27135,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Roseau,Roseau County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,5644,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27135,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27139,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27139,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27139,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27139,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27139,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,151265,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27139,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,115550,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27139,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,113578,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27139,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27139,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1972,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27139,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27139,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27139,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27139,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27139,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27139,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,98.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27139,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27139,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,113578,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27139,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Sherburne,Sherburne County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27141,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Sherburne,Sherburne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27141,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Sherburne,Sherburne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27141,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Sherburne,Sherburne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27141,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Sherburne,Sherburne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27141,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Sherburne,Sherburne County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,97479,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27141,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Sherburne,Sherburne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,44039,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27141,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Sherburne,Sherburne County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,43579,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27141,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Sherburne,Sherburne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27141,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Sherburne,Sherburne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,460,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27141,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Sherburne,Sherburne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27141,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Sherburne,Sherburne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27141,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Sherburne,Sherburne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27141,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Sherburne,Sherburne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27141,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Sherburne,Sherburne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27141,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Sherburne,Sherburne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,99,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27141,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Sherburne,Sherburne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27141,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Sherburne,Sherburne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,43579,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27141,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Sibley,Sibley County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27143,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Sibley,Sibley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27143,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Sibley,Sibley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27143,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Sibley,Sibley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27143,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Sibley,Sibley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27143,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Sibley,Sibley County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,14802,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27143,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Sibley,Sibley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,8705,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27143,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Sibley,Sibley County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8605,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27143,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Sibley,Sibley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27143,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Sibley,Sibley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27143,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Sibley,Sibley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27143,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Sibley,Sibley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27143,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Sibley,Sibley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27143,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Sibley,Sibley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27143,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Sibley,Sibley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27143,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Sibley,Sibley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,98.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27143,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Sibley,Sibley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27143,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Sibley,Sibley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,8605,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27143,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,St. Louis,St. Louis County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,30,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27137,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,St. Louis,St. Louis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,28,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27137,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,St. Louis,St. Louis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,22,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27137,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,St. Louis,St. Louis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27137,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,St. Louis,St. Louis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27137,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,St. Louis,St. Louis County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,199962,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27137,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MN,St. Louis,St. Louis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,148568,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27137,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,St. Louis,St. Louis County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,148388,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27137,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,St. Louis,St. Louis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27137,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,St. Louis,St. Louis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,180,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27137,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,St. Louis,St. Louis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27137,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,St. Louis,St. Louis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27137,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,St. Louis,St. Louis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27137,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,St. Louis,St. Louis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27137,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,St. Louis,St. Louis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27137,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,St. Louis,St. Louis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,92.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27137,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,St. Louis,St. Louis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,10461,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27137,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,St. Louis,St. Louis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,137927,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27137,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Stearns,Stearns County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,34,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27145,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Stearns,Stearns County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,21,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27145,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Stearns,Stearns County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,20,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27145,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Stearns,Stearns County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27145,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Stearns,Stearns County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27145,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Stearns,Stearns County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,158349,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27145,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Stearns,Stearns County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,122204,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27145,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Stearns,Stearns County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,116488,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27145,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Stearns,Stearns County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27145,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Stearns,Stearns County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5716,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27145,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Stearns,Stearns County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,95.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27145,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Stearns,Stearns County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27145,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Stearns,Stearns County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,4.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27145,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Stearns,Stearns County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27145,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Stearns,Stearns County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,1.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27145,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Stearns,Stearns County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,94.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27145,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Stearns,Stearns County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1426,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27145,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Stearns,Stearns County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,115062,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27145,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Steele,Steele County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27147,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Steele,Steele County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27147,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Steele,Steele County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27147,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Steele,Steele County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27147,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Steele,Steele County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27147,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Steele,Steele County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,37352,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27147,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Steele,Steele County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,30083,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27147,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Steele,Steele County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,29607,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27147,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Steele,Steele County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27147,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Steele,Steele County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,476,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27147,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Steele,Steele County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27147,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Steele,Steele County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27147,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Steele,Steele County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27147,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Steele,Steele County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27147,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Steele,Steele County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27147,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Steele,Steele County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,98.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27147,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Steele,Steele County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27147,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Steele,Steele County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,29607,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27147,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Stevens,Stevens County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27149,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Stevens,Stevens County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27149,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Stevens,Stevens County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27149,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Stevens,Stevens County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27149,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Stevens,Stevens County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27149,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Stevens,Stevens County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,9646,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27149,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Stevens,Stevens County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,6832,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27149,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Stevens,Stevens County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6832,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27149,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Stevens,Stevens County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27149,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Stevens,Stevens County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27149,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Stevens,Stevens County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27149,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Stevens,Stevens County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27149,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Stevens,Stevens County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27149,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Stevens,Stevens County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27149,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Stevens,Stevens County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,1.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27149,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Stevens,Stevens County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,98.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27149,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Stevens,Stevens County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,97,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27149,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Stevens,Stevens County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,6735,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27149,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Swift,Swift County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27151,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Swift,Swift County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27151,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Swift,Swift County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27151,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Swift,Swift County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27151,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Swift,Swift County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27151,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Swift,Swift County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,9791,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27151,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Swift,Swift County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5858,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27151,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Swift,Swift County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5858,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27151,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Swift,Swift County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,85,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27151,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Swift,Swift County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27151,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Swift,Swift County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27151,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Swift,Swift County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27151,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Swift,Swift County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27151,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Swift,Swift County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27151,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Swift,Swift County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27151,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Swift,Swift County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,98.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27151,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Swift,Swift County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27151,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Swift,Swift County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,5773,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27151,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Todd,Todd County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27153,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Todd,Todd County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27153,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Todd,Todd County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27153,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Todd,Todd County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27153,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Todd,Todd County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27153,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Todd,Todd County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,25250,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27153,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Todd,Todd County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9464,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27153,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Todd,Todd County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9464,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27153,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Todd,Todd County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27153,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Todd,Todd County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27153,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Todd,Todd County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27153,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Todd,Todd County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27153,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Todd,Todd County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27153,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Todd,Todd County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27153,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Todd,Todd County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27153,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Todd,Todd County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27153,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Todd,Todd County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27153,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Todd,Todd County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,9464,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27153,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Traverse,Traverse County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27155,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Traverse,Traverse County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27155,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Traverse,Traverse County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27155,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Traverse,Traverse County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27155,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Traverse,Traverse County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27155,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Traverse,Traverse County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,3346,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27155,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Traverse,Traverse County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2099,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27155,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Traverse,Traverse County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2099,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27155,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Traverse,Traverse County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27155,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Traverse,Traverse County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27155,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Traverse,Traverse County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27155,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Traverse,Traverse County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27155,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Traverse,Traverse County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27155,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Traverse,Traverse County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27155,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Traverse,Traverse County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27155,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Traverse,Traverse County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27155,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Traverse,Traverse County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27155,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Traverse,Traverse County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2099,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27155,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Wabasha,Wabasha County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27157,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Wabasha,Wabasha County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27157,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Wabasha,Wabasha County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27157,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Wabasha,Wabasha County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27157,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Wabasha,Wabasha County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27157,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Wabasha,Wabasha County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,21417,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27157,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Wabasha,Wabasha County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,13868,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27157,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Wabasha,Wabasha County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,13773,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27157,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Wabasha,Wabasha County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27157,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Wabasha,Wabasha County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,95,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27157,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Wabasha,Wabasha County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27157,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Wabasha,Wabasha County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27157,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Wabasha,Wabasha County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27157,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Wabasha,Wabasha County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27157,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Wabasha,Wabasha County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27157,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Wabasha,Wabasha County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,99.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27157,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Wabasha,Wabasha County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27157,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Wabasha,Wabasha County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,13773,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27157,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Wadena,Wadena County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27159,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Wadena,Wadena County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27159,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Wadena,Wadena County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27159,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Wadena,Wadena County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27159,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Wadena,Wadena County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27159,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Wadena,Wadena County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,14107,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27159,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Wadena,Wadena County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,6814,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27159,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Wadena,Wadena County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6689,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27159,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Wadena,Wadena County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27159,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Wadena,Wadena County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,125,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27159,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Wadena,Wadena County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27159,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Wadena,Wadena County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27159,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Wadena,Wadena County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27159,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Wadena,Wadena County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27159,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Wadena,Wadena County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27159,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Wadena,Wadena County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,98.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27159,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Wadena,Wadena County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27159,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Wadena,Wadena County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,6689,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27159,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Waseca,Waseca County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27161,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Waseca,Waseca County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27161,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Waseca,Waseca County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27161,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Waseca,Waseca County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27161,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Waseca,Waseca County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27161,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Waseca,Waseca County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,18954,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27161,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Waseca,Waseca County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,12905,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27161,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Waseca,Waseca County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,12835,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27161,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Waseca,Waseca County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27161,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Waseca,Waseca County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,70,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27161,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Waseca,Waseca County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27161,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Waseca,Waseca County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27161,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Waseca,Waseca County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27161,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Waseca,Waseca County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27161,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Waseca,Waseca County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27161,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Waseca,Waseca County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,99.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27161,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Waseca,Waseca County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27161,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Waseca,Waseca County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,12835,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27161,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,29,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27163,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27163,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27163,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27163,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27163,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,268191,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27163,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,218596,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27163,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,214114,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27163,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27163,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4483,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27163,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,97.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27163,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27163,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27163,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27163,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27163,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,97.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27163,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1388,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27163,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,212726,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27163,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Watonwan,Watonwan County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27165,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Watonwan,Watonwan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27165,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Watonwan,Watonwan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27165,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Watonwan,Watonwan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27165,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Watonwan,Watonwan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27165,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Watonwan,Watonwan County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,11221,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27165,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Watonwan,Watonwan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,8113,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27165,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Watonwan,Watonwan County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8113,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27165,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Watonwan,Watonwan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27165,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Watonwan,Watonwan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27165,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Watonwan,Watonwan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27165,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Watonwan,Watonwan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27165,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Watonwan,Watonwan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27165,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Watonwan,Watonwan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27165,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Watonwan,Watonwan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,9.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27165,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Watonwan,Watonwan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,90.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27165,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Watonwan,Watonwan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,776,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27165,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Watonwan,Watonwan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,7336,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27165,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Wilkin,Wilkin County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27167,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Wilkin,Wilkin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27167,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Wilkin,Wilkin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27167,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Wilkin,Wilkin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27167,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Wilkin,Wilkin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27167,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Wilkin,Wilkin County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,6481,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27167,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Wilkin,Wilkin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4211,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27167,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Wilkin,Wilkin County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4211,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27167,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Wilkin,Wilkin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,237,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27167,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Wilkin,Wilkin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27167,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Wilkin,Wilkin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27167,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Wilkin,Wilkin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,5.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27167,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Wilkin,Wilkin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27167,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Wilkin,Wilkin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27167,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Wilkin,Wilkin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27167,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Wilkin,Wilkin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,94.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27167,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Wilkin,Wilkin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27167,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Wilkin,Wilkin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3974,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27167,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Winona,Winona County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27169,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Winona,Winona County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27169,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Winona,Winona County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27169,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Winona,Winona County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27169,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Winona,Winona County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27169,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Winona,Winona County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,49606,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27169,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Winona,Winona County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,40367,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27169,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Winona,Winona County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,40071,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27169,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Winona,Winona County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,464,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27169,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Winona,Winona County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,296,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27169,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Winona,Winona County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27169,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Winona,Winona County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27169,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Winona,Winona County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27169,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Winona,Winona County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27169,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Winona,Winona County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27169,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Winona,Winona County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,98.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27169,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Winona,Winona County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27169,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Winona,Winona County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,39606,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27169,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Wright,Wright County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,20,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27171,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Wright,Wright County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27171,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Wright,Wright County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27171,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Wright,Wright County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27171,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Wright,Wright County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27171,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Wright,Wright County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,141759,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27171,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Wright,Wright County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,92582,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27171,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Wright,Wright County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,90336,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27171,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Wright,Wright County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27171,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Wright,Wright County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2246,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27171,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Wright,Wright County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,97.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27171,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Wright,Wright County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27171,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Wright,Wright County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27171,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Wright,Wright County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27171,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Wright,Wright County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27171,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Wright,Wright County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,97.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27171,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Wright,Wright County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,27171,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Wright,Wright County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,90336,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27171,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Yellow Medicine,Yellow Medicine County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27173,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Yellow Medicine,Yellow Medicine County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27173,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Yellow Medicine,Yellow Medicine County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27173,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Yellow Medicine,Yellow Medicine County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27173,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Yellow Medicine,Yellow Medicine County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27173,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Yellow Medicine,Yellow Medicine County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,9492,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27173,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Yellow Medicine,Yellow Medicine County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5767,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27173,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Yellow Medicine,Yellow Medicine County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5766,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27173,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Yellow Medicine,Yellow Medicine County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,275,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27173,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Yellow Medicine,Yellow Medicine County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27173,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Yellow Medicine,Yellow Medicine County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27173,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Yellow Medicine,Yellow Medicine County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,4.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27173,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Yellow Medicine,Yellow Medicine County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27173,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Yellow Medicine,Yellow Medicine County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27173,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Yellow Medicine,Yellow Medicine County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,10.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27173,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Yellow Medicine,Yellow Medicine County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,84.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27173,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Yellow Medicine,Yellow Medicine County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,607,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27173,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MN,Yellow Medicine,Yellow Medicine County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,4884,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27173,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Adair,Adair County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29001,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Adair,Adair County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29001,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Adair,Adair County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29001,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Adair,Adair County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29001,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Adair,Adair County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29001,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Adair,Adair County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,25246,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29001,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Adair,Adair County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,25311,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29001,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Adair,Adair County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,25311,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29001,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Adair,Adair County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29001,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Adair,Adair County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29001,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Adair,Adair County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29001,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Adair,Adair County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29001,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Adair,Adair County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29001,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Adair,Adair County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29001,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Adair,Adair County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,32.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29001,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Adair,Adair County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,67.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29001,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Adair,Adair County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,8230,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29001,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Adair,Adair County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,17081,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29001,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Andrew,Andrew County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29003,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Andrew,Andrew County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29003,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Andrew,Andrew County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29003,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Andrew,Andrew County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29003,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Andrew,Andrew County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29003,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Andrew,Andrew County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,18083,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29003,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Andrew,Andrew County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,16136,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29003,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Andrew,Andrew County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,14007,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29003,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Andrew,Andrew County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29003,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Andrew,Andrew County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2129,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29003,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Andrew,Andrew County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,86.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29003,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Andrew,Andrew County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29003,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Andrew,Andrew County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,13.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29003,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Andrew,Andrew County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29003,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Andrew,Andrew County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,55.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29003,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Andrew,Andrew County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,30.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29003,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Andrew,Andrew County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,9015,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29003,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Andrew,Andrew County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,4992,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29003,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Atchison,Atchison County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29005,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Atchison,Atchison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29005,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Atchison,Atchison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29005,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Atchison,Atchison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29005,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Atchison,Atchison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29005,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Atchison,Atchison County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,5306,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29005,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Atchison,Atchison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4303,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29005,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Atchison,Atchison County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,161,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29005,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Atchison,Atchison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29005,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Atchison,Atchison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4142,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29005,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Atchison,Atchison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,3.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29005,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Atchison,Atchison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29005,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Atchison,Atchison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,96.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29005,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Atchison,Atchison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29005,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Atchison,Atchison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,3.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29005,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Atchison,Atchison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29005,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Atchison,Atchison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,161,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29005,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Atchison,Atchison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29005,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Audrain,Audrain County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29007,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Audrain,Audrain County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29007,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Audrain,Audrain County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29007,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Audrain,Audrain County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29007,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Audrain,Audrain County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29007,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Audrain,Audrain County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,24925,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29007,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Audrain,Audrain County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,18806,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29007,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Audrain,Audrain County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,18362,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29007,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Audrain,Audrain County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,12198,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29007,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Audrain,Audrain County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,444,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29007,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Audrain,Audrain County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,97.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29007,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Audrain,Audrain County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,64.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29007,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Audrain,Audrain County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29007,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Audrain,Audrain County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29007,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Audrain,Audrain County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,19.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29007,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Audrain,Audrain County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,13.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29007,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Audrain,Audrain County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,3667,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29007,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Audrain,Audrain County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2496,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29007,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Barry,Barry County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,22,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29009,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Barry,Barry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29009,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Barry,Barry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29009,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Barry,Barry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29009,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Barry,Barry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29009,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Barry,Barry County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,34539,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29009,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Barry,Barry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,18254,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29009,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Barry,Barry County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8910,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29009,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Barry,Barry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29009,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Barry,Barry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9344,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29009,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Barry,Barry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,48.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29009,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Barry,Barry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29009,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Barry,Barry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,51.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29009,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Barry,Barry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,21,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29009,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Barry,Barry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29009,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Barry,Barry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,48.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29009,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Barry,Barry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29009,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Barry,Barry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,8910,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29009,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Barton,Barton County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29011,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Barton,Barton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29011,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Barton,Barton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29011,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Barton,Barton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29011,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Barton,Barton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29011,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Barton,Barton County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,11613,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29011,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Barton,Barton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,15566,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29011,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Barton,Barton County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,14063,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29011,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Barton,Barton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,9590,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29011,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Barton,Barton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1503,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29011,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Barton,Barton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,90.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29011,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Barton,Barton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,61.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29011,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Barton,Barton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,9.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29011,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Barton,Barton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29011,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Barton,Barton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29011,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Barton,Barton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,28.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29011,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Barton,Barton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29011,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Barton,Barton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,4473,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29011,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Bates,Bates County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29013,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Bates,Bates County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29013,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Bates,Bates County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29013,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Bates,Bates County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29013,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Bates,Bates County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29013,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Bates,Bates County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,16044,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29013,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Bates,Bates County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,17384,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29013,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Bates,Bates County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29013,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Bates,Bates County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29013,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Bates,Bates County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,17384,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29013,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Bates,Bates County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29013,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Bates,Bates County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29013,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Bates,Bates County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29013,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Bates,Bates County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29013,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Bates,Bates County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29013,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Bates,Bates County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29013,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Bates,Bates County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29013,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Bates,Bates County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29013,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,19,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29015,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29015,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29015,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29015,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29015,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,19409,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29015,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7062,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29015,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29015,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29015,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7062,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29015,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29015,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29015,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29015,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,19,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29015,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29015,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29015,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29015,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29015,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Bollinger,Bollinger County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29017,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Bollinger,Bollinger County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29017,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Bollinger,Bollinger County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29017,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Bollinger,Bollinger County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29017,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Bollinger,Bollinger County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29017,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Bollinger,Bollinger County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,10525,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29017,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Bollinger,Bollinger County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1733,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29017,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Bollinger,Bollinger County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29017,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Bollinger,Bollinger County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29017,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Bollinger,Bollinger County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1733,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29017,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Bollinger,Bollinger County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29017,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Bollinger,Bollinger County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29017,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Bollinger,Bollinger County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29017,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Bollinger,Bollinger County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29017,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Bollinger,Bollinger County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29017,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Bollinger,Bollinger County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29017,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Bollinger,Bollinger County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29017,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Bollinger,Bollinger County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29017,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29019,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29019,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29019,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29019,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29019,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,183894,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29019,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,193439,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29019,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,189780,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29019,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,88105,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29019,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3659,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29019,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29019,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,45.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29019,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29019,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29019,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,1.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29019,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,51.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29019,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2243,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29019,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,99433,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29019,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Buchanan,Buchanan County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29021,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Buchanan,Buchanan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29021,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Buchanan,Buchanan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29021,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Buchanan,Buchanan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29021,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Buchanan,Buchanan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29021,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Buchanan,Buchanan County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,84615,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29021,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Buchanan,Buchanan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,72585,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29021,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Buchanan,Buchanan County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,72585,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29021,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Buchanan,Buchanan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29021,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Buchanan,Buchanan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29021,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Buchanan,Buchanan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29021,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Buchanan,Buchanan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29021,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Buchanan,Buchanan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29021,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Buchanan,Buchanan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29021,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Buchanan,Buchanan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,3.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29021,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Buchanan,Buchanan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,96.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29021,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Buchanan,Buchanan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2501,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29021,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Buchanan,Buchanan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,70084,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29021,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29023,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29023,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29023,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29023,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29023,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,42007,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29023,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,33669,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29023,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,19389,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29023,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29023,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,14279,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29023,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,57.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29023,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29023,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,42.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29023,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29023,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29023,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,57.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29023,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29023,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,19389,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29023,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Caldwell,Caldwell County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29025,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Caldwell,Caldwell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29025,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Caldwell,Caldwell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29025,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Caldwell,Caldwell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29025,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Caldwell,Caldwell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29025,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Caldwell,Caldwell County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,8806,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29025,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Caldwell,Caldwell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4819,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29025,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Caldwell,Caldwell County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,656,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29025,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Caldwell,Caldwell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29025,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Caldwell,Caldwell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4163,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29025,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Caldwell,Caldwell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,13.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29025,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Caldwell,Caldwell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29025,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Caldwell,Caldwell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,86.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29025,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Caldwell,Caldwell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29025,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Caldwell,Caldwell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,13.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29025,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Caldwell,Caldwell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29025,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Caldwell,Caldwell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,656,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29025,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Caldwell,Caldwell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29025,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Callaway,Callaway County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29027,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Callaway,Callaway County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29027,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Callaway,Callaway County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29027,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Callaway,Callaway County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29027,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Callaway,Callaway County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29027,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Callaway,Callaway County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,44288,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29027,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Callaway,Callaway County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,37049,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29027,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Callaway,Callaway County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,36194,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29027,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Callaway,Callaway County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,36194,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29027,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Callaway,Callaway County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,856,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29027,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Callaway,Callaway County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,97.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29027,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Callaway,Callaway County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,97.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29027,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Callaway,Callaway County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29027,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Callaway,Callaway County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29027,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Callaway,Callaway County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29027,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Callaway,Callaway County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29027,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Callaway,Callaway County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29027,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Callaway,Callaway County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29027,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Camden,Camden County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,38,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29029,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Camden,Camden County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29029,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Camden,Camden County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29029,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Camden,Camden County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29029,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Camden,Camden County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29029,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Camden,Camden County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,42784,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29029,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Camden,Camden County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,24044,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29029,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Camden,Camden County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8189,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29029,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Camden,Camden County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,109,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29029,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Camden,Camden County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,15855,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29029,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Camden,Camden County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,34.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29029,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Camden,Camden County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29029,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Camden,Camden County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,65.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29029,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Camden,Camden County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,34,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29029,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Camden,Camden County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29029,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Camden,Camden County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,33.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29029,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Camden,Camden County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,74,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29029,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Camden,Camden County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,8006,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29029,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Cape Girardeau,Cape Girardeau County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29031,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Cape Girardeau,Cape Girardeau County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29031,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Cape Girardeau,Cape Girardeau County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29031,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Cape Girardeau,Cape Girardeau County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29031,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Cape Girardeau,Cape Girardeau County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29031,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Cape Girardeau,Cape Girardeau County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,81788,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29031,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Cape Girardeau,Cape Girardeau County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,70271,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29031,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Cape Girardeau,Cape Girardeau County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,54693,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29031,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Cape Girardeau,Cape Girardeau County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29031,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Cape Girardeau,Cape Girardeau County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,15578,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29031,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Cape Girardeau,Cape Girardeau County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,77.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29031,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Cape Girardeau,Cape Girardeau County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29031,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Cape Girardeau,Cape Girardeau County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,22.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29031,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Cape Girardeau,Cape Girardeau County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29031,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Cape Girardeau,Cape Girardeau County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29031,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Cape Girardeau,Cape Girardeau County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,77.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29031,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Cape Girardeau,Cape Girardeau County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,479,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29031,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Cape Girardeau,Cape Girardeau County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,54214,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29031,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29033,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29033,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29033,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29033,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29033,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,8461,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29033,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,8316,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29033,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7205,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29033,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29033,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1111,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29033,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,86.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29033,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29033,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,13.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29033,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29033,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,47.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29033,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,39.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29033,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,3947,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29033,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3257,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29033,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Carter,Carter County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29035,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Carter,Carter County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29035,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Carter,Carter County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29035,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Carter,Carter County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29035,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Carter,Carter County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29035,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Carter,Carter County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,5207,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29035,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Carter,Carter County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2526,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29035,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Carter,Carter County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29035,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Carter,Carter County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29035,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Carter,Carter County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2526,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29035,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Carter,Carter County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29035,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Carter,Carter County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29035,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Carter,Carter County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29035,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Carter,Carter County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29035,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Carter,Carter County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29035,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Carter,Carter County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29035,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Carter,Carter County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29035,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Carter,Carter County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29035,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,28,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29037,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29037,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29037,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29037,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29037,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,108113,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29037,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,101157,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29037,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,66684,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29037,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29037,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,34473,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29037,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,65.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29037,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29037,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,34.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29037,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29037,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,57.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29037,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,8.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29037,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,57769,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29037,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,8915,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29037,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Cedar,Cedar County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29039,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Cedar,Cedar County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29039,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Cedar,Cedar County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29039,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Cedar,Cedar County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29039,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Cedar,Cedar County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29039,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Cedar,Cedar County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,14199,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29039,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Cedar,Cedar County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7493,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29039,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Cedar,Cedar County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29039,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Cedar,Cedar County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29039,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Cedar,Cedar County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7493,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29039,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Cedar,Cedar County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29039,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Cedar,Cedar County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29039,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Cedar,Cedar County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29039,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Cedar,Cedar County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29039,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Cedar,Cedar County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29039,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Cedar,Cedar County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29039,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Cedar,Cedar County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29039,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Cedar,Cedar County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29039,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Chariton,Chariton County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29041,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Chariton,Chariton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29041,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Chariton,Chariton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29041,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Chariton,Chariton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29041,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Chariton,Chariton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29041,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Chariton,Chariton County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,7380,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29041,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Chariton,Chariton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4184,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29041,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Chariton,Chariton County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2273,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29041,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Chariton,Chariton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29041,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Chariton,Chariton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1911,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29041,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Chariton,Chariton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,54.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29041,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Chariton,Chariton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29041,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Chariton,Chariton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,45.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29041,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Chariton,Chariton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29041,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Chariton,Chariton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,4.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29041,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Chariton,Chariton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,49.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29041,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Chariton,Chariton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,204,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29041,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Chariton,Chariton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2069,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29041,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Christian,Christian County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,26,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29043,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Christian,Christian County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29043,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Christian,Christian County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29043,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Christian,Christian County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29043,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Christian,Christian County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29043,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Christian,Christian County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,89224,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29043,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Christian,Christian County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,51464,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29043,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Christian,Christian County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,20729,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29043,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Christian,Christian County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29043,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Christian,Christian County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,30735,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29043,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Christian,Christian County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,40.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29043,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Christian,Christian County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29043,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Christian,Christian County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,59.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29043,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Christian,Christian County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,25,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29043,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Christian,Christian County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29043,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Christian,Christian County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,40.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29043,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Christian,Christian County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29043,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Christian,Christian County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,20729,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29043,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29045,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29045,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29045,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29045,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29045,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,6632,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29045,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9935,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29045,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9711,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29045,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29045,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,224,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29045,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,97.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29045,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29045,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29045,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29045,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,76.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29045,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,21.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29045,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,7574,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29045,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2137,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29045,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,19,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29047,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29047,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29047,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29047,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29047,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,253923,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29047,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,110398,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29047,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,53507,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29047,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29047,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,56891,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29047,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,48.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29047,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29047,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,51.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29047,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29047,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,12,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29047,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,36.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29047,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,13266,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29047,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,40242,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29047,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29049,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29049,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29049,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29049,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29049,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,21204,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29049,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,26674,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29049,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,26674,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29049,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29049,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29049,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29049,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29049,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29049,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29049,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,52.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29049,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,47.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29049,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,13942,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29049,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Clinton,Clinton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,12732,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29049,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Cole,Cole County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29051,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Cole,Cole County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29051,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Cole,Cole County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29051,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Cole,Cole County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29051,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Cole,Cole County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29051,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Cole,Cole County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,77198,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29051,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Cole,Cole County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,64350,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29051,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Cole,Cole County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,59347,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29051,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Cole,Cole County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29051,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Cole,Cole County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5004,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29051,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Cole,Cole County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,92.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29051,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Cole,Cole County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29051,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Cole,Cole County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,7.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29051,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Cole,Cole County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29051,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Cole,Cole County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29051,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Cole,Cole County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,92.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29051,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Cole,Cole County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29051,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Cole,Cole County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,59347,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29051,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Cooper,Cooper County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29053,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Cooper,Cooper County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29053,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Cooper,Cooper County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29053,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Cooper,Cooper County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29053,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Cooper,Cooper County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29053,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Cooper,Cooper County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,17089,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29053,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Cooper,Cooper County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,13216,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29053,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Cooper,Cooper County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,12293,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29053,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Cooper,Cooper County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1662,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29053,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Cooper,Cooper County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,923,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29053,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Cooper,Cooper County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,93,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29053,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Cooper,Cooper County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,12.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29053,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Cooper,Cooper County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29053,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Cooper,Cooper County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29053,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Cooper,Cooper County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,18.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29053,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Cooper,Cooper County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,62.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29053,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Cooper,Cooper County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2419,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29053,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Cooper,Cooper County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,8212,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29053,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29055,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29055,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29055,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29055,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29055,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,23026,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29055,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9171,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29055,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3264,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29055,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29055,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5907,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29055,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,35.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29055,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29055,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,64.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29055,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29055,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29055,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,35.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29055,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29055,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3264,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29055,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Dade,Dade County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29057,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Dade,Dade County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29057,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Dade,Dade County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29057,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Dade,Dade County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29057,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Dade,Dade County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29057,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Dade,Dade County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,7586,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29057,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Dade,Dade County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3008,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29057,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Dade,Dade County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29057,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Dade,Dade County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29057,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Dade,Dade County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3008,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29057,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Dade,Dade County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29057,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Dade,Dade County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29057,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Dade,Dade County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29057,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Dade,Dade County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29057,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Dade,Dade County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29057,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Dade,Dade County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29057,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Dade,Dade County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29057,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Dade,Dade County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29057,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Dallas,Dallas County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29059,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Dallas,Dallas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29059,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Dallas,Dallas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29059,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Dallas,Dallas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29059,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Dallas,Dallas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29059,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Dallas,Dallas County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,17099,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29059,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Dallas,Dallas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3614,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29059,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Dallas,Dallas County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29059,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Dallas,Dallas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29059,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Dallas,Dallas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3614,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29059,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Dallas,Dallas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29059,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Dallas,Dallas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29059,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Dallas,Dallas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29059,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Dallas,Dallas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29059,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Dallas,Dallas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29059,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Dallas,Dallas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29059,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Dallas,Dallas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29059,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Dallas,Dallas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29059,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Daviess,Daviess County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29061,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Daviess,Daviess County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29061,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Daviess,Daviess County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29061,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Daviess,Daviess County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29061,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Daviess,Daviess County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29061,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Daviess,Daviess County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,8427,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29061,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Daviess,Daviess County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,8114,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29061,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Daviess,Daviess County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29061,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Daviess,Daviess County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29061,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Daviess,Daviess County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8114,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29061,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Daviess,Daviess County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29061,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Daviess,Daviess County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29061,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Daviess,Daviess County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29061,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Daviess,Daviess County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29061,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Daviess,Daviess County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29061,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Daviess,Daviess County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29061,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Daviess,Daviess County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29061,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Daviess,Daviess County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29061,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29063,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29063,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29063,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29063,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29063,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,11014,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29063,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,10234,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29063,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9148,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29063,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29063,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1086,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29063,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,89.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29063,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29063,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,10.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29063,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29063,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,89.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29063,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29063,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,9148,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29063,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29063,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Dent,Dent County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29065,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Dent,Dent County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29065,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Dent,Dent County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29065,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Dent,Dent County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29065,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Dent,Dent County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29065,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Dent,Dent County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,14418,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29065,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Dent,Dent County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,6260,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29065,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Dent,Dent County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29065,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Dent,Dent County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29065,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Dent,Dent County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6260,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29065,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Dent,Dent County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29065,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Dent,Dent County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29065,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Dent,Dent County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29065,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Dent,Dent County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29065,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Dent,Dent County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29065,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Dent,Dent County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29065,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Dent,Dent County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29065,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Dent,Dent County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29065,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29067,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29067,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29067,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29067,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29067,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,11592,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29067,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3042,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29067,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29067,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29067,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3042,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29067,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29067,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29067,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29067,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29067,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29067,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29067,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29067,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29067,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Dunklin,Dunklin County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29069,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Dunklin,Dunklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29069,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Dunklin,Dunklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29069,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Dunklin,Dunklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29069,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Dunklin,Dunklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29069,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Dunklin,Dunklin County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,28178,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29069,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Dunklin,Dunklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,32863,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29069,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Dunklin,Dunklin County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,13326,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29069,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Dunklin,Dunklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1974,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29069,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Dunklin,Dunklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,19538,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29069,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Dunklin,Dunklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,40.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29069,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Dunklin,Dunklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29069,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Dunklin,Dunklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,59.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29069,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Dunklin,Dunklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29069,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Dunklin,Dunklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29069,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Dunklin,Dunklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,34.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29069,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Dunklin,Dunklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29069,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Dunklin,Dunklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,11352,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29069,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,35,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29071,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29071,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29071,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29071,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29071,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,104769,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29071,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,61603,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29071,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5923,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29071,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29071,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,55681,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29071,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,9.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29071,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29071,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,90.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29071,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,34,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29071,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29071,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,9.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29071,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29071,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,5923,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29071,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Gasconade,Gasconade County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29073,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Gasconade,Gasconade County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29073,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Gasconade,Gasconade County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29073,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Gasconade,Gasconade County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29073,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Gasconade,Gasconade County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29073,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Gasconade,Gasconade County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,14745,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29073,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Gasconade,Gasconade County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,6795,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29073,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Gasconade,Gasconade County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29073,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Gasconade,Gasconade County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29073,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Gasconade,Gasconade County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6795,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29073,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Gasconade,Gasconade County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29073,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Gasconade,Gasconade County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29073,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Gasconade,Gasconade County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29073,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Gasconade,Gasconade County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29073,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Gasconade,Gasconade County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29073,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Gasconade,Gasconade County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29073,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Gasconade,Gasconade County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29073,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Gasconade,Gasconade County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29073,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Gentry,Gentry County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29075,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Gentry,Gentry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29075,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Gentry,Gentry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29075,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Gentry,Gentry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29075,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Gentry,Gentry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29075,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Gentry,Gentry County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,6115,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29075,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Gentry,Gentry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,6700,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29075,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Gentry,Gentry County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3603,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29075,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Gentry,Gentry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29075,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Gentry,Gentry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3097,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29075,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Gentry,Gentry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,53.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29075,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Gentry,Gentry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29075,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Gentry,Gentry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,46.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29075,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Gentry,Gentry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29075,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Gentry,Gentry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,29.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29075,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Gentry,Gentry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,24.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29075,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Gentry,Gentry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1974,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29075,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Gentry,Gentry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1629,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29075,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,32,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29077,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29077,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29077,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29077,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29077,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,299060,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29077,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,210985,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29077,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,184245,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29077,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29077,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,26740,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29077,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,87.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29077,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29077,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,12.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29077,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,30,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29077,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29077,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,87.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29077,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29077,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,184245,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29077,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Grundy,Grundy County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29079,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Grundy,Grundy County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29079,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Grundy,Grundy County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29079,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Grundy,Grundy County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29079,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Grundy,Grundy County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29079,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Grundy,Grundy County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,9729,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29079,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Grundy,Grundy County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,10323,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29079,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Grundy,Grundy County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10323,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29079,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Grundy,Grundy County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29079,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Grundy,Grundy County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29079,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Grundy,Grundy County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29079,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Grundy,Grundy County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29079,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Grundy,Grundy County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29079,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Grundy,Grundy County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29079,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Grundy,Grundy County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,42.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29079,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Grundy,Grundy County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,57.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29079,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Grundy,Grundy County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,4399,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29079,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Grundy,Grundy County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,5924,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29079,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29081,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29081,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29081,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29081,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29081,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,8155,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29081,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9231,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29081,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3529,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29081,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29081,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5702,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29081,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,38.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29081,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29081,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,61.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29081,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29081,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29081,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,35.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29081,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,279,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29081,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3250,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29081,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29083,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29083,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29083,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29083,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29083,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,21949,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29083,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,20367,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29083,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3154,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29083,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,3154,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29083,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,17213,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29083,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,15.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29083,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,15.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29083,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,84.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29083,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29083,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29083,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29083,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29083,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29083,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Hickory,Hickory County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29085,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Hickory,Hickory County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29085,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Hickory,Hickory County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29085,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Hickory,Hickory County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29085,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Hickory,Hickory County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29085,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Hickory,Hickory County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,8303,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29085,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Hickory,Hickory County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2059,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29085,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Hickory,Hickory County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29085,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Hickory,Hickory County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29085,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Hickory,Hickory County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2059,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29085,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Hickory,Hickory County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29085,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Hickory,Hickory County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29085,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Hickory,Hickory County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29085,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Hickory,Hickory County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29085,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Hickory,Hickory County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29085,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Hickory,Hickory County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29085,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Hickory,Hickory County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29085,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Hickory,Hickory County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29085,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Holt,Holt County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29087,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Holt,Holt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29087,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Holt,Holt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29087,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Holt,Holt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29087,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Holt,Holt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29087,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Holt,Holt County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,4186,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29087,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Holt,Holt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5344,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29087,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Holt,Holt County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29087,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Holt,Holt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29087,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Holt,Holt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5344,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29087,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Holt,Holt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29087,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Holt,Holt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29087,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Holt,Holt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29087,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Holt,Holt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29087,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Holt,Holt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29087,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Holt,Holt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29087,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Holt,Holt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29087,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Holt,Holt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29087,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29089,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29089,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29089,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29089,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29089,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,10144,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29089,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,8109,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29089,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2173,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29089,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29089,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5936,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29089,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,26.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29089,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29089,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,73.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29089,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29089,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,13.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29089,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,13.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29089,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1084,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29089,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1089,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29089,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Howell,Howell County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29091,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Howell,Howell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29091,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Howell,Howell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29091,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Howell,Howell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29091,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Howell,Howell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29091,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Howell,Howell County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,39750,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29091,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Howell,Howell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,21873,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29091,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Howell,Howell County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29091,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Howell,Howell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29091,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Howell,Howell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,21873,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29091,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Howell,Howell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29091,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Howell,Howell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29091,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Howell,Howell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29091,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Howell,Howell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29091,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Howell,Howell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29091,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Howell,Howell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29091,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Howell,Howell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29091,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Howell,Howell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29091,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Iron,Iron County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29093,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Iron,Iron County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29093,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Iron,Iron County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29093,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Iron,Iron County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29093,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Iron,Iron County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29093,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Iron,Iron County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,9515,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29093,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Iron,Iron County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5047,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29093,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Iron,Iron County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1828,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29093,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Iron,Iron County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1038,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29093,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Iron,Iron County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3219,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29093,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Iron,Iron County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,36.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29093,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Iron,Iron County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,20.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29093,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Iron,Iron County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,63.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29093,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Iron,Iron County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29093,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Iron,Iron County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,15.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29093,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Iron,Iron County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29093,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Iron,Iron County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,790,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29093,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Iron,Iron County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29093,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,22,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29095,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29095,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29095,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29095,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29095,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,717243,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29095,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,845980,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29095,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,514844,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29095,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29095,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,331136,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29095,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,60.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29095,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29095,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,39.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29095,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29095,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,5.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29095,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,55,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29095,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,49167,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29095,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,465677,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29095,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29097,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29097,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29097,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29097,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29097,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,122766,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29097,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,105134,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29097,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,75743,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29097,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29097,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,29392,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29097,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,72,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29097,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29097,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,28,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29097,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29097,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,5.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29097,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,66.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29097,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,5429,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29097,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,70314,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29097,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,60,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29099,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29099,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29099,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29099,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29099,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,226929,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29099,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,173618,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29099,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,139268,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29099,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,260,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29099,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,34350,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29099,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,80.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29099,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29099,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,19.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29099,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,46,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29099,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,55.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29099,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,24.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29099,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,95815,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29099,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,43193,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29099,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29101,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29101,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29101,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29101,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29101,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,54002,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29101,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,55148,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29101,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,29039,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29101,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,25089,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29101,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,26109,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29101,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,52.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29101,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,45.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29101,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,47.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29101,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29101,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,7.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29101,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29101,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,3950,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29101,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29101,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29103,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29103,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29103,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29103,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29103,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,3732,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29103,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5381,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29103,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29103,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29103,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5381,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29103,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29103,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29103,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29103,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29103,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29103,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29103,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29103,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29103,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Laclede,Laclede County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29105,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Laclede,Laclede County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29105,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Laclede,Laclede County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29105,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Laclede,Laclede County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29105,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Laclede,Laclede County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29105,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Laclede,Laclede County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,36024,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29105,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Laclede,Laclede County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,31398,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29105,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Laclede,Laclede County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,14519,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29105,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Laclede,Laclede County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29105,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Laclede,Laclede County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,16879,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29105,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Laclede,Laclede County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,46.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29105,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Laclede,Laclede County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29105,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Laclede,Laclede County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,53.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29105,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Laclede,Laclede County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29105,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Laclede,Laclede County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29105,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Laclede,Laclede County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,46.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29105,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Laclede,Laclede County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29105,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Laclede,Laclede County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,14519,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29105,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29107,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29107,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29107,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29107,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29107,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,33001,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29107,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,34873,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29107,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5335,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29107,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29107,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,29538,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29107,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,15.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29107,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29107,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,84.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29107,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29107,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,1.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29107,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,13.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29107,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,600,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29107,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,4735,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29107,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29109,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29109,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29109,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29109,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29109,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,37963,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29109,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,17802,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29109,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29109,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29109,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,17802,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29109,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29109,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29109,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29109,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29109,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29109,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29109,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29109,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29109,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Lewis,Lewis County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29111,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Lewis,Lewis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29111,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Lewis,Lewis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29111,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Lewis,Lewis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29111,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Lewis,Lewis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29111,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Lewis,Lewis County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,10031,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29111,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Lewis,Lewis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,6324,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29111,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Lewis,Lewis County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3434,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29111,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Lewis,Lewis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29111,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Lewis,Lewis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2890,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29111,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Lewis,Lewis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,54.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29111,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Lewis,Lewis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29111,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Lewis,Lewis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,45.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29111,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Lewis,Lewis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29111,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Lewis,Lewis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29111,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Lewis,Lewis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,54.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29111,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Lewis,Lewis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29111,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Lewis,Lewis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3434,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29111,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,23,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29113,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,19,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29113,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29113,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29113,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29113,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,59829,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29113,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,31467,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29113,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,29197,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29113,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,15150,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29113,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2269,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29113,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,92.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29113,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,48.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29113,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,7.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29113,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29113,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,10.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29113,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29113,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,3189,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29113,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29113,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Linn,Linn County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29115,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Linn,Linn County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29115,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Linn,Linn County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29115,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Linn,Linn County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29115,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Linn,Linn County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29115,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Linn,Linn County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,11849,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29115,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Linn,Linn County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,16317,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29115,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Linn,Linn County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,14012,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29115,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Linn,Linn County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29115,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Linn,Linn County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2305,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29115,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Linn,Linn County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,85.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29115,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Linn,Linn County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29115,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Linn,Linn County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,14.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29115,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Linn,Linn County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29115,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Linn,Linn County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,42.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29115,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Linn,Linn County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,43.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29115,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Linn,Linn County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,6913,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29115,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Linn,Linn County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,7099,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29115,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Livingston,Livingston County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29117,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Livingston,Livingston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29117,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Livingston,Livingston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29117,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Livingston,Livingston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29117,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Livingston,Livingston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29117,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Livingston,Livingston County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,14562,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29117,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Livingston,Livingston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,18089,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29117,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Livingston,Livingston County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,15299,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29117,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Livingston,Livingston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29117,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Livingston,Livingston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2791,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29117,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Livingston,Livingston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,84.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29117,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Livingston,Livingston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29117,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Livingston,Livingston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,15.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29117,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Livingston,Livingston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29117,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Livingston,Livingston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,25.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29117,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Livingston,Livingston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,59.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29117,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Livingston,Livingston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,4574,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29117,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Livingston,Livingston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,10725,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29117,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29121,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29121,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29121,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29121,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29121,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,15182,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29121,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,19775,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29121,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,18427,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29121,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29121,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1348,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29121,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,93.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29121,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29121,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,6.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29121,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29121,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,65.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29121,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,27.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29121,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,13009,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29121,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,5418,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29121,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29123,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29123,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29123,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29123,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29123,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,12600,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29123,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,6134,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29123,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4221,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29123,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,197,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29123,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1913,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29123,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,68.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29123,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,3.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29123,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,31.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29123,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29123,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29123,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,65.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29123,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29123,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,4023,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29123,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Maries,Maries County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29125,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Maries,Maries County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29125,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Maries,Maries County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29125,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Maries,Maries County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29125,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Maries,Maries County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29125,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Maries,Maries County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,8427,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29125,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Maries,Maries County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2775,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29125,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Maries,Maries County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29125,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Maries,Maries County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29125,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Maries,Maries County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2775,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29125,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Maries,Maries County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29125,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Maries,Maries County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29125,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Maries,Maries County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29125,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Maries,Maries County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29125,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Maries,Maries County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29125,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Maries,Maries County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29125,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Maries,Maries County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29125,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Maries,Maries County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29125,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29127,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29127,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29127,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29127,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29127,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,28470,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29127,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,26070,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29127,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,17685,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29127,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29127,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8385,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29127,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,67.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29127,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29127,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,32.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29127,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29127,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29127,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,67.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29127,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29127,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,17685,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29127,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,McDonald,McDonald County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29119,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,McDonald,McDonald County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29119,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,McDonald,McDonald County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29119,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,McDonald,McDonald County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29119,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,McDonald,McDonald County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29119,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,McDonald,McDonald County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,23285,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29119,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,McDonald,McDonald County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,11952,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29119,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,McDonald,McDonald County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8941,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29119,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,McDonald,McDonald County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,8941,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29119,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,McDonald,McDonald County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3011,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29119,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,McDonald,McDonald County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,74.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29119,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,McDonald,McDonald County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,74.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29119,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,McDonald,McDonald County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,25.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29119,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,McDonald,McDonald County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29119,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,McDonald,McDonald County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29119,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,McDonald,McDonald County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29119,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,McDonald,McDonald County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29119,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,McDonald,McDonald County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29119,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Mercer,Mercer County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29129,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Mercer,Mercer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29129,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Mercer,Mercer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29129,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Mercer,Mercer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29129,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Mercer,Mercer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29129,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Mercer,Mercer County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,3515,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29129,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Mercer,Mercer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4619,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29129,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Mercer,Mercer County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29129,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Mercer,Mercer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29129,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Mercer,Mercer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4619,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29129,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Mercer,Mercer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29129,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Mercer,Mercer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29129,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Mercer,Mercer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29129,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Mercer,Mercer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29129,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Mercer,Mercer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29129,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Mercer,Mercer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29129,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Mercer,Mercer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29129,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Mercer,Mercer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29129,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Miller,Miller County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,20,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29131,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Miller,Miller County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29131,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Miller,Miller County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29131,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Miller,Miller County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29131,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Miller,Miller County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29131,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Miller,Miller County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,24733,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29131,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Miller,Miller County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,11226,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29131,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Miller,Miller County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1718,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29131,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Miller,Miller County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29131,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Miller,Miller County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9509,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29131,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Miller,Miller County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,15.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29131,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Miller,Miller County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29131,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Miller,Miller County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,84.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29131,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Miller,Miller County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,19,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29131,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Miller,Miller County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29131,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Miller,Miller County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,15.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29131,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Miller,Miller County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29131,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Miller,Miller County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1718,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29131,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Mississippi,Mississippi County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29133,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Mississippi,Mississippi County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29133,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Mississippi,Mississippi County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29133,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Mississippi,Mississippi County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29133,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Mississippi,Mississippi County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29133,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Mississippi,Mississippi County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,12537,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29133,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Mississippi,Mississippi County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,12675,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29133,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Mississippi,Mississippi County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5563,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29133,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Mississippi,Mississippi County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29133,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Mississippi,Mississippi County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7112,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29133,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Mississippi,Mississippi County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,43.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29133,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Mississippi,Mississippi County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29133,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Mississippi,Mississippi County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,56.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29133,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Mississippi,Mississippi County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29133,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Mississippi,Mississippi County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29133,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Mississippi,Mississippi County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,43.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29133,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Mississippi,Mississippi County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29133,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Mississippi,Mississippi County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,5563,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29133,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,MO,Missouri,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1313,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,MO,MO,Missouri,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,337,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,MO,MO,Missouri,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,95,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,MO,MO,Missouri,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,123,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,MO,MO,Missouri,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,105,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,MO,MO,Missouri,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,6154481,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2020,MO,MO,Missouri,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5323578,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,MO,MO,Missouri,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3843523,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,MO,MO,Missouri,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,235717,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,MO,MO,Missouri,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1480055,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,MO,MO,Missouri,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,72.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,MO,MO,Missouri,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,4.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,MO,MO,Missouri,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,27.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,MO,MO,Missouri,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,976,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,MO,MO,Missouri,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,8.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,MO,MO,Missouri,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,59.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,MO,MO,Missouri,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,452613,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,MO,MO,Missouri,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3150733,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,MO,Moniteau,Moniteau County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29135,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Moniteau,Moniteau County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29135,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Moniteau,Moniteau County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29135,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Moniteau,Moniteau County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29135,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Moniteau,Moniteau County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29135,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Moniteau,Moniteau County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,15464,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29135,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Moniteau,Moniteau County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9767,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29135,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Moniteau,Moniteau County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5531,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29135,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Moniteau,Moniteau County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29135,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Moniteau,Moniteau County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4237,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29135,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Moniteau,Moniteau County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,56.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29135,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Moniteau,Moniteau County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29135,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Moniteau,Moniteau County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,43.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29135,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Moniteau,Moniteau County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29135,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Moniteau,Moniteau County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,13.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29135,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Moniteau,Moniteau County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,43.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29135,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Moniteau,Moniteau County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1308,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29135,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Moniteau,Moniteau County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,4223,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29135,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29137,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29137,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29137,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29137,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29137,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,8666,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29137,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,12013,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29137,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2411,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29137,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29137,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9601,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29137,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,20.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29137,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29137,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,79.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29137,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29137,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29137,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,20.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29137,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29137,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2411,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29137,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29139,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29139,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29139,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29139,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29139,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,11262,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29139,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,6538,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29139,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5092,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29139,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,5092,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29139,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1446,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29139,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,77.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29139,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,77.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29139,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,22.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29139,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29139,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29139,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29139,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29139,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29139,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29141,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29141,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29141,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29141,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29141,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,20997,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29141,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7406,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29141,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29141,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29141,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7406,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29141,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29141,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29141,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29141,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29141,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29141,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29141,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29141,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29141,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,New Madrid,New Madrid County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29143,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,New Madrid,New Madrid County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29143,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,New Madrid,New Madrid County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29143,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,New Madrid,New Madrid County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29143,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,New Madrid,New Madrid County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29143,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,New Madrid,New Madrid County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,16329,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29143,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,New Madrid,New Madrid County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,15017,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29143,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,New Madrid,New Madrid County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6275,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29143,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,New Madrid,New Madrid County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29143,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,New Madrid,New Madrid County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8742,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29143,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,New Madrid,New Madrid County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,41.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29143,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,New Madrid,New Madrid County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29143,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,New Madrid,New Madrid County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,58.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29143,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,New Madrid,New Madrid County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29143,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,New Madrid,New Madrid County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,17.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29143,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,New Madrid,New Madrid County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,24.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29143,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,New Madrid,New Madrid County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2586,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29143,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,New Madrid,New Madrid County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3689,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29143,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29145,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29145,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29145,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29145,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29145,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,58613,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29145,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,22009,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29145,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29145,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29145,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,22009,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29145,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29145,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29145,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29145,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29145,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29145,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29145,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29145,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29145,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Nodaway,Nodaway County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29147,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Nodaway,Nodaway County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29147,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Nodaway,Nodaway County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29147,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Nodaway,Nodaway County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29147,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Nodaway,Nodaway County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29147,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Nodaway,Nodaway County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,21218,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29147,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Nodaway,Nodaway County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,20909,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29147,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Nodaway,Nodaway County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,18162,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29147,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Nodaway,Nodaway County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29147,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Nodaway,Nodaway County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2746,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29147,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Nodaway,Nodaway County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,86.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29147,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Nodaway,Nodaway County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29147,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Nodaway,Nodaway County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,13.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29147,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Nodaway,Nodaway County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29147,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Nodaway,Nodaway County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,30.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29147,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Nodaway,Nodaway County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,56.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29147,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Nodaway,Nodaway County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,6345,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29147,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Nodaway,Nodaway County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,11817,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29147,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Oregon,Oregon County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29149,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Oregon,Oregon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29149,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Oregon,Oregon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29149,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Oregon,Oregon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29149,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Oregon,Oregon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29149,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Oregon,Oregon County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,8617,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29149,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Oregon,Oregon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4229,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29149,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Oregon,Oregon County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29149,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Oregon,Oregon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29149,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Oregon,Oregon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4229,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29149,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Oregon,Oregon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29149,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Oregon,Oregon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29149,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Oregon,Oregon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29149,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Oregon,Oregon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29149,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Oregon,Oregon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29149,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Oregon,Oregon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29149,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Oregon,Oregon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29149,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Oregon,Oregon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29149,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Osage,Osage County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29151,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Osage,Osage County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29151,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Osage,Osage County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29151,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Osage,Osage County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29151,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Osage,Osage County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29151,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Osage,Osage County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,13249,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29151,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Osage,Osage County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,6474,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29151,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Osage,Osage County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29151,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Osage,Osage County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29151,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Osage,Osage County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6474,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29151,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Osage,Osage County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29151,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Osage,Osage County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29151,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Osage,Osage County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29151,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Osage,Osage County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29151,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Osage,Osage County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29151,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Osage,Osage County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29151,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Osage,Osage County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29151,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Osage,Osage County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29151,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Ozark,Ozark County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29153,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Ozark,Ozark County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29153,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Ozark,Ozark County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29153,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Ozark,Ozark County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29153,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Ozark,Ozark County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29153,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Ozark,Ozark County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,8514,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29153,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Ozark,Ozark County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1400,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29153,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Ozark,Ozark County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29153,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Ozark,Ozark County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29153,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Ozark,Ozark County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1400,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29153,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Ozark,Ozark County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29153,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Ozark,Ozark County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29153,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Ozark,Ozark County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29153,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Ozark,Ozark County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29153,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Ozark,Ozark County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29153,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Ozark,Ozark County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29153,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Ozark,Ozark County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29153,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Ozark,Ozark County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29153,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Pemiscot,Pemiscot County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29155,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Pemiscot,Pemiscot County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29155,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Pemiscot,Pemiscot County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29155,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Pemiscot,Pemiscot County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29155,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Pemiscot,Pemiscot County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29155,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Pemiscot,Pemiscot County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,15585,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29155,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Pemiscot,Pemiscot County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,17817,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29155,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Pemiscot,Pemiscot County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29155,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Pemiscot,Pemiscot County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29155,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Pemiscot,Pemiscot County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,17817,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29155,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Pemiscot,Pemiscot County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29155,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Pemiscot,Pemiscot County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29155,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Pemiscot,Pemiscot County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29155,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Pemiscot,Pemiscot County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29155,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Pemiscot,Pemiscot County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29155,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Pemiscot,Pemiscot County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29155,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Pemiscot,Pemiscot County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29155,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Pemiscot,Pemiscot County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29155,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29157,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29157,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29157,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29157,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29157,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,18960,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29157,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,13487,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29157,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8948,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29157,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,41,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29157,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4539,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29157,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,66.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29157,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29157,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,33.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29157,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29157,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,4.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29157,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,61.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29157,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,560,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29157,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,8347,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29157,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Pettis,Pettis County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,20,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29159,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Pettis,Pettis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29159,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Pettis,Pettis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29159,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Pettis,Pettis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29159,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Pettis,Pettis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29159,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Pettis,Pettis County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,42951,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29159,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Pettis,Pettis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,27145,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29159,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Pettis,Pettis County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,23368,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29159,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Pettis,Pettis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1652,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29159,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Pettis,Pettis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3777,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29159,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Pettis,Pettis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,86.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29159,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Pettis,Pettis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,6.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29159,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Pettis,Pettis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,13.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29159,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Pettis,Pettis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29159,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Pettis,Pettis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29159,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Pettis,Pettis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,80,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29159,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Pettis,Pettis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29159,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Pettis,Pettis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,21716,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29159,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Phelps,Phelps County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29161,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Phelps,Phelps County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29161,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Phelps,Phelps County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29161,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Phelps,Phelps County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29161,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Phelps,Phelps County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29161,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Phelps,Phelps County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,44517,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29161,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Phelps,Phelps County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,27725,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29161,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Phelps,Phelps County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,19307,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29161,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Phelps,Phelps County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29161,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Phelps,Phelps County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8419,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29161,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Phelps,Phelps County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,69.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29161,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Phelps,Phelps County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29161,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Phelps,Phelps County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,30.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29161,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Phelps,Phelps County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29161,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Phelps,Phelps County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29161,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Phelps,Phelps County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,69.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29161,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Phelps,Phelps County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29161,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Phelps,Phelps County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,19307,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29161,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29163,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29163,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29163,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29163,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29163,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,17613,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29163,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,16162,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29163,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3757,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29163,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,436,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29163,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,12405,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29163,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,23.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29163,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,2.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29163,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,76.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29163,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29163,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29163,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,20.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29163,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29163,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3321,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29163,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Platte,Platte County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29165,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Platte,Platte County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29165,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Platte,Platte County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29165,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Platte,Platte County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29165,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Platte,Platte County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29165,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Platte,Platte County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,107100,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29165,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Platte,Platte County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,48693,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29165,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Platte,Platte County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,13531,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29165,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Platte,Platte County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29165,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Platte,Platte County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,35162,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29165,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Platte,Platte County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,27.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29165,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Platte,Platte County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29165,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Platte,Platte County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,72.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29165,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Platte,Platte County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29165,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Platte,Platte County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,27.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29165,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Platte,Platte County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29165,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Platte,Platte County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,13531,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29165,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Platte,Platte County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29165,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29167,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29167,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29167,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29167,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29167,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,31577,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29167,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,15409,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29167,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29167,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29167,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,15409,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29167,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29167,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29167,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29167,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29167,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29167,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29167,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29167,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29167,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29169,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29169,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29169,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29169,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29169,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,53964,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29169,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,63087,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29169,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,39518,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29169,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29169,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,23569,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29169,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,62.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29169,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29169,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,37.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29169,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29169,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29169,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,62.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29169,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,259,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29169,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,39260,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29169,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29171,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29171,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29171,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29171,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29171,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,4676,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29171,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5377,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29171,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5377,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29171,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29171,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29171,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29171,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29171,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29171,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29171,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,65.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29171,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,34.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29171,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,3536,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29171,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1841,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29171,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Ralls,Ralls County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29173,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Ralls,Ralls County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29173,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Ralls,Ralls County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29173,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Ralls,Ralls County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29173,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Ralls,Ralls County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29173,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Ralls,Ralls County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,10351,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29173,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Ralls,Ralls County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,15386,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29173,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Ralls,Ralls County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6668,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29173,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Ralls,Ralls County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29173,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Ralls,Ralls County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8718,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29173,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Ralls,Ralls County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,43.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29173,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Ralls,Ralls County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29173,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Ralls,Ralls County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,56.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29173,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Ralls,Ralls County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29173,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Ralls,Ralls County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,84.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29173,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Ralls,Ralls County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29173,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Ralls,Ralls County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,13066,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29173,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Ralls,Ralls County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29173,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29175,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29175,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29175,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29175,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29175,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,24636,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29175,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,24518,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29175,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,12241,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29175,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29175,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,12277,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29175,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,49.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29175,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29175,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,50.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29175,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29175,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,1.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29175,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,48.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29175,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,296,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29175,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,11945,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29175,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Ray,Ray County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29177,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Ray,Ray County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29177,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Ray,Ray County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29177,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Ray,Ray County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29177,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Ray,Ray County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29177,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Ray,Ray County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,23100,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29177,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Ray,Ray County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,25395,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29177,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Ray,Ray County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1433,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29177,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Ray,Ray County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29177,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Ray,Ray County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,23962,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29177,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Ray,Ray County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,5.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29177,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Ray,Ray County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29177,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Ray,Ray County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,94.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29177,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Ray,Ray County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29177,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Ray,Ray County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,5.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29177,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Ray,Ray County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29177,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Ray,Ray County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1433,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29177,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Ray,Ray County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29177,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Reynolds,Reynolds County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29179,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Reynolds,Reynolds County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29179,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Reynolds,Reynolds County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29179,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Reynolds,Reynolds County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29179,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Reynolds,Reynolds County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29179,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Reynolds,Reynolds County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,6078,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29179,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Reynolds,Reynolds County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1566,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29179,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Reynolds,Reynolds County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29179,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Reynolds,Reynolds County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29179,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Reynolds,Reynolds County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1566,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29179,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Reynolds,Reynolds County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29179,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Reynolds,Reynolds County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29179,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Reynolds,Reynolds County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29179,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Reynolds,Reynolds County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29179,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Reynolds,Reynolds County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29179,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Reynolds,Reynolds County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29179,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Reynolds,Reynolds County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29179,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Reynolds,Reynolds County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29179,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Ripley,Ripley County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29181,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Ripley,Ripley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29181,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Ripley,Ripley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29181,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Ripley,Ripley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29181,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Ripley,Ripley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29181,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Ripley,Ripley County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,10680,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29181,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Ripley,Ripley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,8368,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29181,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Ripley,Ripley County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29181,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Ripley,Ripley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29181,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Ripley,Ripley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8368,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29181,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Ripley,Ripley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29181,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Ripley,Ripley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29181,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Ripley,Ripley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29181,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Ripley,Ripley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29181,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Ripley,Ripley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29181,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Ripley,Ripley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29181,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Ripley,Ripley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29181,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Ripley,Ripley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29181,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Saline,Saline County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29195,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Saline,Saline County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29195,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Saline,Saline County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29195,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Saline,Saline County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29195,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Saline,Saline County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29195,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Saline,Saline County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,23319,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29195,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Saline,Saline County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,20821,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29195,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Saline,Saline County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,19411,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29195,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Saline,Saline County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29195,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Saline,Saline County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1410,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29195,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Saline,Saline County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,93.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29195,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Saline,Saline County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29195,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Saline,Saline County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,6.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29195,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Saline,Saline County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29195,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Saline,Saline County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,22.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29195,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Saline,Saline County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,70.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29195,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Saline,Saline County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,4683,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29195,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Saline,Saline County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,14728,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29195,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Schuyler,Schuyler County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29197,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Schuyler,Schuyler County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29197,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Schuyler,Schuyler County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29197,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Schuyler,Schuyler County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29197,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Schuyler,Schuyler County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29197,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Schuyler,Schuyler County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,4007,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29197,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Schuyler,Schuyler County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4679,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29197,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Schuyler,Schuyler County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4679,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29197,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Schuyler,Schuyler County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29197,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Schuyler,Schuyler County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29197,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Schuyler,Schuyler County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29197,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Schuyler,Schuyler County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29197,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Schuyler,Schuyler County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29197,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Schuyler,Schuyler County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29197,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Schuyler,Schuyler County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29197,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Schuyler,Schuyler County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29197,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Schuyler,Schuyler County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,4679,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29197,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Schuyler,Schuyler County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29197,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Scotland,Scotland County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29199,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Scotland,Scotland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29199,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Scotland,Scotland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29199,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Scotland,Scotland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29199,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Scotland,Scotland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29199,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Scotland,Scotland County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,4698,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29199,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Scotland,Scotland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5115,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29199,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Scotland,Scotland County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5115,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29199,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Scotland,Scotland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29199,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Scotland,Scotland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29199,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Scotland,Scotland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29199,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Scotland,Scotland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29199,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Scotland,Scotland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29199,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Scotland,Scotland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29199,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Scotland,Scotland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,64.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29199,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Scotland,Scotland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,35.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29199,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Scotland,Scotland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,3317,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29199,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Scotland,Scotland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1798,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29199,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29201,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29201,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29201,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29201,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29201,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,38009,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29201,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,30120,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29201,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,23110,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29201,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29201,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7010,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29201,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,76.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29201,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29201,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,23.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29201,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29201,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,4.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29201,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,71.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29201,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1451,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29201,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,21659,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29201,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Shannon,Shannon County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29203,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Shannon,Shannon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29203,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Shannon,Shannon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29203,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Shannon,Shannon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29203,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Shannon,Shannon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29203,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Shannon,Shannon County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,7041,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29203,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Shannon,Shannon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3609,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29203,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Shannon,Shannon County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29203,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Shannon,Shannon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29203,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Shannon,Shannon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3609,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29203,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Shannon,Shannon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29203,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Shannon,Shannon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29203,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Shannon,Shannon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29203,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Shannon,Shannon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29203,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Shannon,Shannon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29203,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Shannon,Shannon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29203,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Shannon,Shannon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29203,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Shannon,Shannon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29203,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29205,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29205,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29205,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29205,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29205,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,6101,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29205,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,6357,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29205,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2551,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29205,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29205,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3806,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29205,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,40.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29205,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29205,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,59.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29205,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29205,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,12.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29205,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,27.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29205,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,803,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29205,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1748,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29205,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,St. Charles,St. Charles County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29183,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,St. Charles,St. Charles County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29183,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,St. Charles,St. Charles County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29183,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,St. Charles,St. Charles County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29183,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,St. Charles,St. Charles County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29183,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,St. Charles,St. Charles County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,406258,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29183,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,St. Charles,St. Charles County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,296095,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29183,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,St. Charles,St. Charles County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,262539,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29183,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,St. Charles,St. Charles County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1451,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29183,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,St. Charles,St. Charles County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,33556,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29183,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,St. Charles,St. Charles County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,88.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29183,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,St. Charles,St. Charles County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29183,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,St. Charles,St. Charles County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,11.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29183,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,St. Charles,St. Charles County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29183,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,St. Charles,St. Charles County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,12.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29183,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,St. Charles,St. Charles County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,75.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29183,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,St. Charles,St. Charles County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,37806,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29183,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,St. Charles,St. Charles County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,223282,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29183,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,St. Clair,St. Clair County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29185,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,St. Clair,St. Clair County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29185,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,St. Clair,St. Clair County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29185,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,St. Clair,St. Clair County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29185,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,St. Clair,St. Clair County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29185,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,St. Clair,St. Clair County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,9340,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29185,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,St. Clair,St. Clair County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3119,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29185,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,St. Clair,St. Clair County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,935,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29185,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,St. Clair,St. Clair County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29185,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,St. Clair,St. Clair County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2184,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29185,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,St. Clair,St. Clair County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,30,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29185,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,St. Clair,St. Clair County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29185,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,St. Clair,St. Clair County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,70,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29185,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,St. Clair,St. Clair County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29185,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,St. Clair,St. Clair County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29185,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,St. Clair,St. Clair County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,30,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29185,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,St. Clair,St. Clair County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29185,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,St. Clair,St. Clair County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,935,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29185,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,St. Francois,St. Francois County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29187,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,St. Francois,St. Francois County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29187,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,St. Francois,St. Francois County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29187,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,St. Francois,St. Francois County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29187,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,St. Francois,St. Francois County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29187,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,St. Francois,St. Francois County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,66900,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29187,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,St. Francois,St. Francois County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,40780,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29187,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,St. Francois,St. Francois County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8455,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29187,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,St. Francois,St. Francois County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29187,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,St. Francois,St. Francois County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,32324,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29187,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,St. Francois,St. Francois County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,20.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29187,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,St. Francois,St. Francois County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29187,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,St. Francois,St. Francois County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,79.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29187,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,St. Francois,St. Francois County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29187,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,St. Francois,St. Francois County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29187,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,St. Francois,St. Francois County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,20.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29187,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,St. Francois,St. Francois County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29187,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,St. Francois,St. Francois County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,8455,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29187,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,St. Louis,St. Louis County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29189,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,St. Louis,St. Louis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29189,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,St. Louis,St. Louis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29189,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,St. Louis,St. Louis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29189,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,St. Louis,St. Louis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29189,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,St. Louis,St. Louis County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,1002838,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29189,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,St. Louis,St. Louis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1125150,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29189,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,St. Louis,St. Louis County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1123877,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29189,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,St. Louis,St. Louis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29189,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,St. Louis,St. Louis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1273,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29189,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,St. Louis,St. Louis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29189,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,St. Louis,St. Louis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29189,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,St. Louis,St. Louis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29189,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,St. Louis,St. Louis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29189,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,St. Louis,St. Louis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,2.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29189,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,St. Louis,St. Louis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,97.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29189,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,St. Louis,St. Louis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,27639,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29189,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,St. Louis,St. Louis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1096238,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29189,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,St. Louis City,St. Louis City County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29510,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,St. Louis City,St. Louis City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29510,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,St. Louis City,St. Louis City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29510,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,St. Louis City,St. Louis City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29510,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,St. Louis City,St. Louis City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29510,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,St. Louis City,St. Louis City County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,300528,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29510,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,St. Louis City,St. Louis City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,311610,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29510,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,St. Louis City,St. Louis City County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,311610,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29510,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,St. Louis City,St. Louis City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29510,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,St. Louis City,St. Louis City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29510,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,St. Louis City,St. Louis City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29510,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,St. Louis City,St. Louis City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29510,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,St. Louis City,St. Louis City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29510,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,St. Louis City,St. Louis City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29510,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,St. Louis City,St. Louis City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29510,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,St. Louis City,St. Louis City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29510,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,St. Louis City,St. Louis City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29510,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,St. Louis City,St. Louis City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,311610,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29510,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Ste. Genevieve,Ste. Genevieve County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29186,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Ste. Genevieve,Ste. Genevieve County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29186,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Ste. Genevieve,Ste. Genevieve County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29186,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Ste. Genevieve,Ste. Genevieve County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29186,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Ste. Genevieve,Ste. Genevieve County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29186,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Ste. Genevieve,Ste. Genevieve County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,18476,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29186,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Ste. Genevieve,Ste. Genevieve County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,12202,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29186,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Ste. Genevieve,Ste. Genevieve County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29186,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Ste. Genevieve,Ste. Genevieve County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29186,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Ste. Genevieve,Ste. Genevieve County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,12202,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29186,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Ste. Genevieve,Ste. Genevieve County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29186,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Ste. Genevieve,Ste. Genevieve County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29186,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Ste. Genevieve,Ste. Genevieve County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29186,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Ste. Genevieve,Ste. Genevieve County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29186,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Ste. Genevieve,Ste. Genevieve County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29186,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Ste. Genevieve,Ste. Genevieve County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29186,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Ste. Genevieve,Ste. Genevieve County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29186,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Ste. Genevieve,Ste. Genevieve County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29186,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Stoddard,Stoddard County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29207,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Stoddard,Stoddard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29207,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Stoddard,Stoddard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29207,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Stoddard,Stoddard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29207,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Stoddard,Stoddard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29207,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Stoddard,Stoddard County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,28652,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29207,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Stoddard,Stoddard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,24002,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29207,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Stoddard,Stoddard County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10900,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29207,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Stoddard,Stoddard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,468,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29207,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Stoddard,Stoddard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,13102,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29207,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Stoddard,Stoddard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,45.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29207,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Stoddard,Stoddard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29207,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Stoddard,Stoddard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,54.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29207,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Stoddard,Stoddard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29207,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Stoddard,Stoddard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,3.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29207,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Stoddard,Stoddard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,40,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29207,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Stoddard,Stoddard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,830,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29207,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Stoddard,Stoddard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,9602,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29207,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Stone,Stone County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,74,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29209,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Stone,Stone County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29209,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Stone,Stone County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29209,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Stone,Stone County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29209,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Stone,Stone County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29209,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Stone,Stone County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,31175,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29209,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Stone,Stone County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,17954,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29209,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Stone,Stone County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1473,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29209,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Stone,Stone County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29209,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Stone,Stone County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,16481,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29209,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Stone,Stone County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,8.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29209,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Stone,Stone County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29209,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Stone,Stone County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,91.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29209,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Stone,Stone County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,73,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29209,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Stone,Stone County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29209,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Stone,Stone County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,8.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29209,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Stone,Stone County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29209,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Stone,Stone County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1473,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29209,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Sullivan,Sullivan County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29211,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Sullivan,Sullivan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29211,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Sullivan,Sullivan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29211,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Sullivan,Sullivan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29211,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Sullivan,Sullivan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29211,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Sullivan,Sullivan County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,5976,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29211,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Sullivan,Sullivan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7442,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29211,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Sullivan,Sullivan County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29211,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Sullivan,Sullivan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29211,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Sullivan,Sullivan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7442,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29211,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Sullivan,Sullivan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29211,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Sullivan,Sullivan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29211,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Sullivan,Sullivan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29211,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Sullivan,Sullivan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29211,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Sullivan,Sullivan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29211,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Sullivan,Sullivan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29211,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Sullivan,Sullivan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29211,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Sullivan,Sullivan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29211,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Taney,Taney County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,51,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29213,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Taney,Taney County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29213,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Taney,Taney County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29213,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Taney,Taney County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29213,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Taney,Taney County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29213,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Taney,Taney County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,56020,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29213,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Taney,Taney County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,54444,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29213,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Taney,Taney County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11727,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29213,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Taney,Taney County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29213,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Taney,Taney County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,42717,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29213,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Taney,Taney County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,21.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29213,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Taney,Taney County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29213,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Taney,Taney County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,78.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29213,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Taney,Taney County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,50,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29213,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Taney,Taney County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29213,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Taney,Taney County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,21.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29213,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Taney,Taney County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29213,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Taney,Taney County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,11727,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29213,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Texas,Texas County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29215,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Texas,Texas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29215,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Texas,Texas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29215,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Texas,Texas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29215,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Texas,Texas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29215,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Texas,Texas County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,24413,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29215,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Texas,Texas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,15289,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29215,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Texas,Texas County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2104,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29215,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Texas,Texas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29215,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Texas,Texas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,13185,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29215,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Texas,Texas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,13.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29215,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Texas,Texas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29215,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Texas,Texas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,86.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29215,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Texas,Texas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29215,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Texas,Texas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29215,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Texas,Texas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,13.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29215,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Texas,Texas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29215,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Texas,Texas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2104,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29215,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Vernon,Vernon County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29217,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Vernon,Vernon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29217,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Vernon,Vernon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29217,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Vernon,Vernon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29217,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Vernon,Vernon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29217,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Vernon,Vernon County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,19642,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29217,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Vernon,Vernon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,19860,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29217,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Vernon,Vernon County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3007,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29217,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Vernon,Vernon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1304,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29217,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Vernon,Vernon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,16854,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29217,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Vernon,Vernon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,15.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29217,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Vernon,Vernon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,6.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29217,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Vernon,Vernon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,84.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29217,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Vernon,Vernon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29217,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Vernon,Vernon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,8.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29217,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Vernon,Vernon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29217,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Vernon,Vernon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1703,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29217,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Vernon,Vernon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29217,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,22,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29219,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29219,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29219,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29219,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29219,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,35707,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29219,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,23874,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29219,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,21927,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29219,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,21611,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29219,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1947,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29219,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,91.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29219,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,90.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29219,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,8.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29219,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29219,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,1.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29219,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29219,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,316,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29219,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29219,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29221,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29221,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29221,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29221,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29221,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,23499,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29221,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,10733,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29221,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29221,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29221,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10733,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29221,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29221,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29221,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29221,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29221,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29221,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29221,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29221,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29221,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29223,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29223,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29223,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29223,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29223,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,10913,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29223,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7410,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29223,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29223,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29223,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7410,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29223,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29223,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29223,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29223,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29223,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29223,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29223,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29223,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29223,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29225,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29225,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29225,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29225,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29225,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,39168,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29225,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,14426,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29225,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29225,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29225,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,14426,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29225,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29225,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29225,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29225,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29225,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29225,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29225,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29225,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29225,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Worth,Worth County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29227,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Worth,Worth County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29227,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Worth,Worth County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29227,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Worth,Worth County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29227,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Worth,Worth County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29227,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Worth,Worth County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,1962,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29227,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Worth,Worth County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2401,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29227,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Worth,Worth County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29227,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Worth,Worth County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29227,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Worth,Worth County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2401,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29227,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Worth,Worth County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29227,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Worth,Worth County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29227,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Worth,Worth County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29227,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Worth,Worth County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29227,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Worth,Worth County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29227,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Worth,Worth County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29227,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Worth,Worth County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29227,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Worth,Worth County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29227,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Wright,Wright County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29229,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Wright,Wright County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29229,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Wright,Wright County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29229,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Wright,Wright County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29229,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Wright,Wright County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29229,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Wright,Wright County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,18180,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29229,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Wright,Wright County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,8545,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29229,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Wright,Wright County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29229,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Wright,Wright County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29229,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Wright,Wright County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8545,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29229,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Wright,Wright County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29229,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Wright,Wright County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29229,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Wright,Wright County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29229,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Wright,Wright County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29229,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Wright,Wright County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29229,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Wright,Wright County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29229,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Wright,Wright County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29229,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MO,Wright,Wright County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,29229,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28001,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28001,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28001,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28001,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28001,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,29405,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28001,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,27818,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28001,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,13074,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28001,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,240,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28001,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,14744,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28001,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,47,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28001,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28001,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,53,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28001,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28001,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28001,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,46.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28001,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28001,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,12834,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28001,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Alcorn,Alcorn County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28003,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Alcorn,Alcorn County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28003,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Alcorn,Alcorn County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28003,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Alcorn,Alcorn County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28003,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Alcorn,Alcorn County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28003,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Alcorn,Alcorn County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,34680,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28003,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Alcorn,Alcorn County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,33638,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28003,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Alcorn,Alcorn County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,18468,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28003,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Alcorn,Alcorn County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28003,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Alcorn,Alcorn County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,15169,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28003,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Alcorn,Alcorn County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,54.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28003,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Alcorn,Alcorn County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28003,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Alcorn,Alcorn County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,45.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28003,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Alcorn,Alcorn County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28003,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Alcorn,Alcorn County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28003,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Alcorn,Alcorn County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,54.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28003,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Alcorn,Alcorn County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28003,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Alcorn,Alcorn County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,18468,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28003,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Amite,Amite County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28005,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Amite,Amite County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28005,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Amite,Amite County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28005,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Amite,Amite County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28005,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Amite,Amite County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28005,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Amite,Amite County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,12698,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28005,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Amite,Amite County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7917,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28005,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Amite,Amite County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28005,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Amite,Amite County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28005,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Amite,Amite County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7917,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28005,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Amite,Amite County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28005,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Amite,Amite County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28005,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Amite,Amite County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28005,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Amite,Amite County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28005,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Amite,Amite County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28005,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Amite,Amite County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28005,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Amite,Amite County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28005,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Amite,Amite County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28005,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Attala,Attala County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28007,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Attala,Attala County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28007,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Attala,Attala County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28007,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Attala,Attala County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28007,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Attala,Attala County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28007,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Attala,Attala County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,17828,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28007,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Attala,Attala County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,17964,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28007,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Attala,Attala County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9341,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28007,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Attala,Attala County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28007,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Attala,Attala County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8624,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28007,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Attala,Attala County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,52,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28007,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Attala,Attala County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28007,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Attala,Attala County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,48,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28007,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Attala,Attala County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28007,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Attala,Attala County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,8.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28007,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Attala,Attala County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,43.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28007,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Attala,Attala County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1501,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28007,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Attala,Attala County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,7839,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28007,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28009,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28009,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28009,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28009,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28009,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,7661,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28009,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3878,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28009,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1551,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28009,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28009,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2327,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28009,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,40,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28009,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28009,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,60,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28009,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28009,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28009,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,40,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28009,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28009,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1551,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28009,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Bolivar,Bolivar County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,27,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28011,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Bolivar,Bolivar County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28011,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Bolivar,Bolivar County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28011,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Bolivar,Bolivar County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28011,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Bolivar,Bolivar County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28011,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Bolivar,Bolivar County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,30849,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28011,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Bolivar,Bolivar County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,28608,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28011,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Bolivar,Bolivar County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,12747,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28011,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Bolivar,Bolivar County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,2182,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28011,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Bolivar,Bolivar County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,15860,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28011,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Bolivar,Bolivar County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,44.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28011,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Bolivar,Bolivar County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,7.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28011,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Bolivar,Bolivar County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,55.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28011,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Bolivar,Bolivar County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,24,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28011,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Bolivar,Bolivar County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28011,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Bolivar,Bolivar County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,36.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28011,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Bolivar,Bolivar County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28011,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Bolivar,Bolivar County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,10565,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28011,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28013,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28013,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28013,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28013,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28013,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,13240,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28013,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,15094,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28013,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5780,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28013,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,995,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28013,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9314,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28013,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,38.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28013,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,6.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28013,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,61.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28013,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28013,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28013,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,31.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28013,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28013,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,4785,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28013,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28015,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28015,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28015,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28015,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28015,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,9941,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28015,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9123,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28015,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1972,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28015,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28015,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7151,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28015,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,21.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28015,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28015,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,78.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28015,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28015,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28015,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,21.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28015,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28015,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1972,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28015,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Chickasaw,Chickasaw County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28017,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Chickasaw,Chickasaw County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28017,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Chickasaw,Chickasaw County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28017,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Chickasaw,Chickasaw County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28017,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Chickasaw,Chickasaw County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28017,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Chickasaw,Chickasaw County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,17067,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28017,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Chickasaw,Chickasaw County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,15453,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28017,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Chickasaw,Chickasaw County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9827,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28017,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Chickasaw,Chickasaw County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,4575,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28017,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Chickasaw,Chickasaw County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5626,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28017,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Chickasaw,Chickasaw County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,63.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28017,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Chickasaw,Chickasaw County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,29.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28017,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Chickasaw,Chickasaw County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,36.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28017,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Chickasaw,Chickasaw County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28017,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Chickasaw,Chickasaw County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28017,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Chickasaw,Chickasaw County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,34,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28017,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Chickasaw,Chickasaw County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28017,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Chickasaw,Chickasaw County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,5253,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28017,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Choctaw,Choctaw County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28019,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Choctaw,Choctaw County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28019,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Choctaw,Choctaw County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28019,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Choctaw,Choctaw County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28019,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Choctaw,Choctaw County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28019,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Choctaw,Choctaw County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,8202,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28019,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Choctaw,Choctaw County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7618,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28019,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Choctaw,Choctaw County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3481,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28019,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Choctaw,Choctaw County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28019,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Choctaw,Choctaw County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4137,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28019,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Choctaw,Choctaw County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,45.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28019,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Choctaw,Choctaw County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28019,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Choctaw,Choctaw County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,54.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28019,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Choctaw,Choctaw County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28019,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Choctaw,Choctaw County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,11.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28019,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Choctaw,Choctaw County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,33.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28019,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Choctaw,Choctaw County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,900,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28019,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Choctaw,Choctaw County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2580,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28019,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Claiborne,Claiborne County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28021,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Claiborne,Claiborne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28021,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Claiborne,Claiborne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28021,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Claiborne,Claiborne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28021,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Claiborne,Claiborne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28021,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Claiborne,Claiborne County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,9093,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28021,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Claiborne,Claiborne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,11003,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28021,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Claiborne,Claiborne County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8321,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28021,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Claiborne,Claiborne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,2353,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28021,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Claiborne,Claiborne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2682,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28021,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Claiborne,Claiborne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,75.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28021,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Claiborne,Claiborne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,21.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28021,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Claiborne,Claiborne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,24.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28021,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Claiborne,Claiborne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28021,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Claiborne,Claiborne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28021,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Claiborne,Claiborne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,54.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28021,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Claiborne,Claiborne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28021,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Claiborne,Claiborne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,5968,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28021,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Clarke,Clarke County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28023,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Clarke,Clarke County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28023,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Clarke,Clarke County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28023,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Clarke,Clarke County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28023,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Clarke,Clarke County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28023,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Clarke,Clarke County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,15533,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28023,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Clarke,Clarke County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,11466,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28023,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Clarke,Clarke County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,528,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28023,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Clarke,Clarke County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28023,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Clarke,Clarke County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10938,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28023,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Clarke,Clarke County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,4.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28023,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Clarke,Clarke County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28023,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Clarke,Clarke County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,95.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28023,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Clarke,Clarke County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28023,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Clarke,Clarke County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28023,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Clarke,Clarke County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,4.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28023,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Clarke,Clarke County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28023,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Clarke,Clarke County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,528,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28023,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28025,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28025,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28025,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28025,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28025,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,18645,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28025,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,19266,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28025,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,17743,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28025,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,3676,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28025,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1523,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28025,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,92.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28025,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,19.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28025,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,7.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28025,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28025,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,9.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28025,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,63.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28025,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1826,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28025,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,12241,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28025,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Coahoma,Coahoma County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28027,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Coahoma,Coahoma County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28027,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Coahoma,Coahoma County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28027,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Coahoma,Coahoma County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28027,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Coahoma,Coahoma County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28027,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Coahoma,Coahoma County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,21232,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28027,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Coahoma,Coahoma County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,21531,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28027,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Coahoma,Coahoma County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,17199,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28027,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Coahoma,Coahoma County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,15573,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28027,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Coahoma,Coahoma County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4332,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28027,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Coahoma,Coahoma County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,79.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28027,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Coahoma,Coahoma County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,72.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28027,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Coahoma,Coahoma County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,20.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28027,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Coahoma,Coahoma County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28027,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Coahoma,Coahoma County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,7.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28027,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Coahoma,Coahoma County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28027,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Coahoma,Coahoma County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1625,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28027,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Coahoma,Coahoma County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28027,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Copiah,Copiah County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28029,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Copiah,Copiah County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28029,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Copiah,Copiah County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28029,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Copiah,Copiah County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28029,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Copiah,Copiah County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28029,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Copiah,Copiah County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,28293,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28029,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Copiah,Copiah County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,20904,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28029,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Copiah,Copiah County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,15757,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28029,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Copiah,Copiah County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,3345,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28029,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Copiah,Copiah County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5147,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28029,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Copiah,Copiah County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,75.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28029,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Copiah,Copiah County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,16,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28029,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Copiah,Copiah County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,24.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28029,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Copiah,Copiah County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28029,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Copiah,Copiah County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,1.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28029,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Copiah,Copiah County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,58,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28029,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Copiah,Copiah County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,296,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28029,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Copiah,Copiah County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,12116,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28029,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Covington,Covington County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28031,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Covington,Covington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28031,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Covington,Covington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28031,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Covington,Covington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28031,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Covington,Covington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28031,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Covington,Covington County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,18313,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28031,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Covington,Covington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,11459,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28031,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Covington,Covington County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2900,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28031,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Covington,Covington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28031,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Covington,Covington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8560,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28031,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Covington,Covington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,25.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28031,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Covington,Covington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28031,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Covington,Covington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,74.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28031,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Covington,Covington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28031,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Covington,Covington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28031,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Covington,Covington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,25.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28031,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Covington,Covington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28031,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Covington,Covington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2900,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28031,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,DeSoto,DeSoto County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28033,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,DeSoto,DeSoto County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28033,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,DeSoto,DeSoto County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28033,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,DeSoto,DeSoto County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28033,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,DeSoto,DeSoto County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28033,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,DeSoto,DeSoto County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,185902,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28033,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MS,DeSoto,DeSoto County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,146831,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28033,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,DeSoto,DeSoto County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,133009,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28033,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,DeSoto,DeSoto County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28033,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,DeSoto,DeSoto County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,13821,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28033,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,DeSoto,DeSoto County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,90.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28033,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,DeSoto,DeSoto County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28033,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,DeSoto,DeSoto County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,9.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28033,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,DeSoto,DeSoto County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28033,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,DeSoto,DeSoto County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28033,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,DeSoto,DeSoto County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,90.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28033,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,DeSoto,DeSoto County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28033,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,DeSoto,DeSoto County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,133009,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28033,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Forrest,Forrest County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28035,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Forrest,Forrest County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28035,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Forrest,Forrest County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28035,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Forrest,Forrest County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28035,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Forrest,Forrest County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28035,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Forrest,Forrest County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,78136,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28035,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Forrest,Forrest County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,70618,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28035,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Forrest,Forrest County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,59708,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28035,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Forrest,Forrest County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,4469,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28035,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Forrest,Forrest County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10910,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28035,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Forrest,Forrest County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,84.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28035,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Forrest,Forrest County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,6.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28035,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Forrest,Forrest County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,15.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28035,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Forrest,Forrest County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28035,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Forrest,Forrest County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28035,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Forrest,Forrest County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,78.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28035,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Forrest,Forrest County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28035,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Forrest,Forrest County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,55239,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28035,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28037,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28037,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28037,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28037,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28037,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,7653,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28037,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,6359,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28037,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1695,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28037,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1695,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28037,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4664,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28037,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,26.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28037,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,26.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28037,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,73.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28037,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28037,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28037,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28037,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28037,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28037,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,George,George County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28039,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,George,George County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28039,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,George,George County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28039,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,George,George County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28039,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,George,George County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28039,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,George,George County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,24335,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28039,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MS,George,George County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,11549,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28039,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,George,George County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9972,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28039,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,George,George County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1112,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28039,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,George,George County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1577,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28039,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,George,George County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,86.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28039,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,George,George County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,9.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28039,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,George,George County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,13.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28039,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,George,George County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28039,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,George,George County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,11.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28039,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,George,George County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,65.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28039,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,George,George County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1278,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28039,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,George,George County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,7582,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28039,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28041,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28041,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28041,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28041,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28041,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,13501,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28041,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,8968,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28041,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7813,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28041,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1180,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28041,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1154,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28041,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,87.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28041,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,13.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28041,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,12.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28041,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28041,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28041,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,74,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28041,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28041,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,6633,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28041,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Grenada,Grenada County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28043,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Grenada,Grenada County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28043,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Grenada,Grenada County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28043,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Grenada,Grenada County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28043,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Grenada,Grenada County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28043,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Grenada,Grenada County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,21581,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28043,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Grenada,Grenada County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,25287,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28043,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Grenada,Grenada County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,18497,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28043,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Grenada,Grenada County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28043,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Grenada,Grenada County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6789,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28043,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Grenada,Grenada County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,73.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28043,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Grenada,Grenada County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28043,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Grenada,Grenada County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,26.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28043,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Grenada,Grenada County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28043,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Grenada,Grenada County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28043,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Grenada,Grenada County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,73.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28043,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Grenada,Grenada County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28043,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Grenada,Grenada County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,18497,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28043,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28045,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28045,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28045,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28045,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28045,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,46075,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28045,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,32909,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28045,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,20456,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28045,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,20,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28045,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,12452,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28045,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,62.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28045,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28045,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,37.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28045,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28045,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28045,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,62.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28045,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28045,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,20436,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28045,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,28,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28047,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28047,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28047,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28047,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28047,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,208613,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28047,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,145972,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28047,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11504,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28047,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,2277,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28047,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,134467,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28047,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,7.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28047,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28047,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,92.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28047,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,25,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28047,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28047,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,6.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28047,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28047,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,9227,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28047,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Hinds,Hinds County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,20,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28049,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Hinds,Hinds County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28049,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Hinds,Hinds County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28049,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Hinds,Hinds County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28049,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Hinds,Hinds County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28049,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Hinds,Hinds County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,226636,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28049,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Hinds,Hinds County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,197656,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28049,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Hinds,Hinds County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,180756,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28049,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Hinds,Hinds County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,6039,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28049,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Hinds,Hinds County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,16900,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28049,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Hinds,Hinds County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,91.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28049,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Hinds,Hinds County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,3.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28049,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Hinds,Hinds County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,8.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28049,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Hinds,Hinds County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28049,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Hinds,Hinds County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28049,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Hinds,Hinds County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,88.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28049,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Hinds,Hinds County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28049,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Hinds,Hinds County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,174717,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28049,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Holmes,Holmes County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,20,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28051,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Holmes,Holmes County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28051,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Holmes,Holmes County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28051,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Holmes,Holmes County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28051,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Holmes,Holmes County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28051,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Holmes,Holmes County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,16912,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28051,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Holmes,Holmes County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,16900,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28051,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Holmes,Holmes County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7657,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28051,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Holmes,Holmes County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28051,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Holmes,Holmes County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9243,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28051,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Holmes,Holmes County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,45.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28051,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Holmes,Holmes County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28051,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Holmes,Holmes County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,54.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28051,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Holmes,Holmes County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28051,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Holmes,Holmes County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,2.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28051,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Holmes,Holmes County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,43.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28051,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Holmes,Holmes County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,364,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28051,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Holmes,Holmes County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,7293,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28051,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Humphreys,Humphreys County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28053,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Humphreys,Humphreys County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28053,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Humphreys,Humphreys County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28053,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Humphreys,Humphreys County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28053,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Humphreys,Humphreys County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28053,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Humphreys,Humphreys County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,7715,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28053,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Humphreys,Humphreys County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7128,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28053,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Humphreys,Humphreys County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4324,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28053,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Humphreys,Humphreys County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28053,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Humphreys,Humphreys County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2804,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28053,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Humphreys,Humphreys County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,60.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28053,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Humphreys,Humphreys County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28053,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Humphreys,Humphreys County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,39.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28053,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Humphreys,Humphreys County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28053,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Humphreys,Humphreys County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28053,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Humphreys,Humphreys County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,60.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28053,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Humphreys,Humphreys County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,34,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28053,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Humphreys,Humphreys County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,4290,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28053,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Issaquena,Issaquena County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28055,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Issaquena,Issaquena County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28055,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Issaquena,Issaquena County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28055,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Issaquena,Issaquena County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28055,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Issaquena,Issaquena County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28055,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Issaquena,Issaquena County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,1326,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28055,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Issaquena,Issaquena County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1271,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28055,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Issaquena,Issaquena County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,589,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28055,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Issaquena,Issaquena County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,589,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28055,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Issaquena,Issaquena County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,682,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28055,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Issaquena,Issaquena County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,46.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28055,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Issaquena,Issaquena County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,46.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28055,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Issaquena,Issaquena County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,53.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28055,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Issaquena,Issaquena County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28055,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Issaquena,Issaquena County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28055,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Issaquena,Issaquena County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28055,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Issaquena,Issaquena County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28055,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Issaquena,Issaquena County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28055,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Itawamba,Itawamba County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28057,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Itawamba,Itawamba County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28057,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Itawamba,Itawamba County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28057,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Itawamba,Itawamba County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28057,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Itawamba,Itawamba County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28057,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Itawamba,Itawamba County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,23824,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28057,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Itawamba,Itawamba County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,36906,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28057,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Itawamba,Itawamba County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,34853,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28057,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Itawamba,Itawamba County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28057,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Itawamba,Itawamba County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2052,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28057,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Itawamba,Itawamba County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,94.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28057,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Itawamba,Itawamba County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28057,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Itawamba,Itawamba County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,5.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28057,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Itawamba,Itawamba County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28057,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Itawamba,Itawamba County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,34.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28057,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Itawamba,Itawamba County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,59.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28057,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Itawamba,Itawamba County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,12856,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28057,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Itawamba,Itawamba County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,21997,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28057,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28059,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28059,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28059,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28059,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28059,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,143291,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28059,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,88858,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28059,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,49755,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28059,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,30501,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28059,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,39102,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28059,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,56,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28059,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,34.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28059,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,44,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28059,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28059,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28059,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,21.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28059,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28059,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,19255,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28059,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28061,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28061,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28061,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28061,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28061,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,16348,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28061,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,22810,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28061,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3326,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28061,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,3326,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28061,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,19484,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28061,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,14.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28061,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,14.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28061,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,85.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28061,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28061,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28061,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28061,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28061,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28061,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28063,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28063,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28063,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28063,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28063,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,7254,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28063,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,6370,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28063,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2651,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28063,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1625,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28063,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3719,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28063,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,41.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28063,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,25.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28063,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,58.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28063,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28063,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28063,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,16.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28063,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28063,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1026,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28063,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Jefferson Davis,Jefferson Davis County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28065,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Jefferson Davis,Jefferson Davis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28065,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Jefferson Davis,Jefferson Davis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28065,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Jefferson Davis,Jefferson Davis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28065,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Jefferson Davis,Jefferson Davis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28065,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Jefferson Davis,Jefferson Davis County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,11258,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28065,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Jefferson Davis,Jefferson Davis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,10811,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28065,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Jefferson Davis,Jefferson Davis County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2910,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28065,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Jefferson Davis,Jefferson Davis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28065,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Jefferson Davis,Jefferson Davis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7900,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28065,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Jefferson Davis,Jefferson Davis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,26.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28065,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Jefferson Davis,Jefferson Davis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28065,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Jefferson Davis,Jefferson Davis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,73.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28065,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Jefferson Davis,Jefferson Davis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28065,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Jefferson Davis,Jefferson Davis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28065,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Jefferson Davis,Jefferson Davis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,26.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28065,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Jefferson Davis,Jefferson Davis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28065,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Jefferson Davis,Jefferson Davis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2910,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28065,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Jones,Jones County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,21,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28067,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Jones,Jones County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28067,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Jones,Jones County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28067,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Jones,Jones County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28067,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Jones,Jones County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28067,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Jones,Jones County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,67142,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28067,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Jones,Jones County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,57857,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28067,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Jones,Jones County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,31802,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28067,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Jones,Jones County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,5077,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28067,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Jones,Jones County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,26055,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28067,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Jones,Jones County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,55,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28067,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Jones,Jones County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,8.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28067,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Jones,Jones County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,45,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28067,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Jones,Jones County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28067,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Jones,Jones County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28067,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Jones,Jones County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,46.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28067,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Jones,Jones County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28067,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Jones,Jones County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,26725,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28067,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Kemper,Kemper County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28069,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Kemper,Kemper County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28069,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Kemper,Kemper County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28069,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Kemper,Kemper County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28069,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Kemper,Kemper County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28069,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Kemper,Kemper County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,8983,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28069,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Kemper,Kemper County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9361,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28069,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Kemper,Kemper County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3053,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28069,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Kemper,Kemper County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1952,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28069,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Kemper,Kemper County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6308,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28069,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Kemper,Kemper County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,32.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28069,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Kemper,Kemper County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,20.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28069,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Kemper,Kemper County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,67.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28069,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Kemper,Kemper County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28069,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Kemper,Kemper County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,2.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28069,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Kemper,Kemper County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,9.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28069,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Kemper,Kemper County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,210,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28069,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Kemper,Kemper County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,890,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28069,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,21,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28071,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28071,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28071,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28071,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28071,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,55905,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28071,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,52917,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28071,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,38669,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28071,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,755,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28071,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,14248,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28071,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,73.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28071,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28071,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,26.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28071,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28071,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28071,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,71.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28071,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28071,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,37914,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28071,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lamar,Lamar County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28073,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lamar,Lamar County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28073,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lamar,Lamar County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28073,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lamar,Lamar County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28073,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lamar,Lamar County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28073,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lamar,Lamar County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,64368,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28073,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lamar,Lamar County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,50532,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28073,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lamar,Lamar County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9994,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28073,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lamar,Lamar County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28073,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lamar,Lamar County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,40538,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28073,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lamar,Lamar County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,19.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28073,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lamar,Lamar County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28073,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lamar,Lamar County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,80.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28073,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lamar,Lamar County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28073,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lamar,Lamar County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28073,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lamar,Lamar County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,19.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28073,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lamar,Lamar County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28073,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lamar,Lamar County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,9994,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28073,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lauderdale,Lauderdale County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28075,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lauderdale,Lauderdale County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28075,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lauderdale,Lauderdale County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28075,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lauderdale,Lauderdale County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28075,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lauderdale,Lauderdale County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28075,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lauderdale,Lauderdale County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,72706,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28075,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lauderdale,Lauderdale County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,69510,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28075,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lauderdale,Lauderdale County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,48102,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28075,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lauderdale,Lauderdale County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28075,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lauderdale,Lauderdale County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,21409,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28075,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lauderdale,Lauderdale County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,69.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28075,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lauderdale,Lauderdale County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28075,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lauderdale,Lauderdale County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,30.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28075,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lauderdale,Lauderdale County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28075,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lauderdale,Lauderdale County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28075,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lauderdale,Lauderdale County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,69.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28075,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lauderdale,Lauderdale County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28075,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lauderdale,Lauderdale County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,48102,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28075,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28077,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28077,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28077,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28077,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28077,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,11984,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28077,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,10379,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28077,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4873,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28077,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,3178,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28077,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5506,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28077,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,47,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28077,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,30.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28077,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,53,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28077,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28077,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,1.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28077,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,14.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28077,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,194,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28077,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1501,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28077,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Leake,Leake County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28079,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Leake,Leake County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28079,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Leake,Leake County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28079,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Leake,Leake County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28079,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Leake,Leake County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28079,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Leake,Leake County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,21247,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28079,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Leake,Leake County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,16497,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28079,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Leake,Leake County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10748,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28079,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Leake,Leake County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28079,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Leake,Leake County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5748,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28079,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Leake,Leake County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,65.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28079,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Leake,Leake County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28079,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Leake,Leake County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,34.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28079,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Leake,Leake County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28079,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Leake,Leake County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,1.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28079,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Leake,Leake County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,63.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28079,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Leake,Leake County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,271,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28079,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Leake,Leake County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,10478,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28079,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,22,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28081,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28081,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28081,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28081,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28081,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,83228,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28081,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,92999,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28081,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,63173,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28081,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,936,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28081,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,29826,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28081,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,67.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28081,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28081,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,32.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28081,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28081,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,31.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28081,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,35.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28081,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,29258,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28081,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,32979,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28081,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Leflore,Leflore County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28083,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Leflore,Leflore County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28083,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Leflore,Leflore County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28083,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Leflore,Leflore County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28083,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Leflore,Leflore County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28083,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Leflore,Leflore County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,28196,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28083,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Leflore,Leflore County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,22881,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28083,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Leflore,Leflore County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3004,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28083,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Leflore,Leflore County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,713,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28083,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Leflore,Leflore County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,19877,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28083,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Leflore,Leflore County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,13.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28083,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Leflore,Leflore County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,3.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28083,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Leflore,Leflore County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,86.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28083,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Leflore,Leflore County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28083,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Leflore,Leflore County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28083,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Leflore,Leflore County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,9.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28083,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Leflore,Leflore County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,219,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28083,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Leflore,Leflore County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2072,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28083,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28085,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28085,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28085,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28085,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28085,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,34815,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28085,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,26411,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28085,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,18831,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28085,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,4672,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28085,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7579,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28085,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,71.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28085,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,17.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28085,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,28.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28085,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28085,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28085,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,53.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28085,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28085,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,14160,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28085,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lowndes,Lowndes County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28087,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lowndes,Lowndes County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28087,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lowndes,Lowndes County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28087,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lowndes,Lowndes County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28087,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lowndes,Lowndes County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28087,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lowndes,Lowndes County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,58726,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28087,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lowndes,Lowndes County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,45226,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28087,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lowndes,Lowndes County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,38368,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28087,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lowndes,Lowndes County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28087,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lowndes,Lowndes County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6858,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28087,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lowndes,Lowndes County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,84.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28087,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lowndes,Lowndes County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28087,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lowndes,Lowndes County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,15.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28087,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lowndes,Lowndes County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28087,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lowndes,Lowndes County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,5.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28087,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lowndes,Lowndes County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,78.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28087,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lowndes,Lowndes County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2682,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28087,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Lowndes,Lowndes County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,35686,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28087,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28089,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28089,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28089,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28089,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28089,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,109222,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28089,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,96683,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28089,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,89881,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28089,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28089,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6802,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28089,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,93,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28089,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28089,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28089,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28089,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28089,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,93,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28089,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28089,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,89881,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28089,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28091,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28091,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28091,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28091,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28091,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,24399,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28091,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,18088,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28091,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9581,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28091,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28091,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8507,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28091,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,53,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28091,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28091,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,47,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28091,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28091,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28091,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,53,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28091,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28091,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,9581,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28091,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28093,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28093,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28093,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28093,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28093,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,33754,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28093,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,15247,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28093,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11198,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28093,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1191,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28093,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4049,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28093,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,73.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28093,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,7.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28093,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,26.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28093,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28093,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28093,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,65.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28093,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28093,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,10007,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28093,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28095,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28095,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28095,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28095,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28095,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,34093,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28095,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,31803,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28095,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,14827,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28095,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28095,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,16976,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28095,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,46.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28095,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28095,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,53.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28095,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28095,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28095,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,46.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28095,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28095,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,14827,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28095,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28097,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28097,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28097,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28097,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28097,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,9793,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28097,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,10740,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28097,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4642,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28097,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28097,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6098,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28097,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,43.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28097,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28097,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,56.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28097,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28097,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,5.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28097,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,38.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28097,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,544,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28097,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,4099,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28097,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,MS,Mississippi,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1001,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,MS,MS,Mississippi,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,356,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,MS,MS,Mississippi,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,230,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,MS,MS,Mississippi,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,48,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,MS,MS,Mississippi,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,76,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,MS,MS,Mississippi,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,2956870,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2020,MS,MS,Mississippi,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2527257,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,MS,MS,Mississippi,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1542928,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,MS,MS,Mississippi,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,129662,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,MS,MS,Mississippi,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,984329,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,MS,MS,Mississippi,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,61.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,MS,MS,Mississippi,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,5.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,MS,MS,Mississippi,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,38.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,MS,MS,Mississippi,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,645,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,MS,MS,Mississippi,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,2.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,MS,MS,Mississippi,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,53.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,MS,MS,Mississippi,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,68745,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,MS,MS,Mississippi,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1344521,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,MS,Neshoba,Neshoba County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28099,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Neshoba,Neshoba County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28099,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Neshoba,Neshoba County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28099,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Neshoba,Neshoba County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28099,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Neshoba,Neshoba County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28099,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Neshoba,Neshoba County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,28992,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28099,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Neshoba,Neshoba County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,23137,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28099,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Neshoba,Neshoba County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9188,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28099,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Neshoba,Neshoba County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28099,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Neshoba,Neshoba County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,13949,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28099,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Neshoba,Neshoba County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,39.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28099,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Neshoba,Neshoba County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28099,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Neshoba,Neshoba County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,60.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28099,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Neshoba,Neshoba County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28099,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Neshoba,Neshoba County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28099,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Neshoba,Neshoba County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,39.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28099,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Neshoba,Neshoba County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28099,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Neshoba,Neshoba County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,9188,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28099,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28101,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28101,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28101,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28101,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28101,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,21243,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28101,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,18405,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28101,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6640,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28101,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28101,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11765,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28101,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,36.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28101,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28101,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,63.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28101,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28101,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,1.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28101,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,34.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28101,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,249,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28101,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,6391,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28101,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Noxubee,Noxubee County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28103,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Noxubee,Noxubee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28103,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Noxubee,Noxubee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28103,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Noxubee,Noxubee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28103,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Noxubee,Noxubee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28103,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Noxubee,Noxubee County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,10231,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28103,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Noxubee,Noxubee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,8200,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28103,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Noxubee,Noxubee County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7078,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28103,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Noxubee,Noxubee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1183,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28103,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Noxubee,Noxubee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1122,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28103,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Noxubee,Noxubee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,86.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28103,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Noxubee,Noxubee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,14.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28103,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Noxubee,Noxubee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,13.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28103,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Noxubee,Noxubee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28103,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Noxubee,Noxubee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,3.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28103,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Noxubee,Noxubee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,68,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28103,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Noxubee,Noxubee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,316,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28103,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Noxubee,Noxubee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,5579,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28103,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Oktibbeha,Oktibbeha County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,24,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28105,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Oktibbeha,Oktibbeha County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28105,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Oktibbeha,Oktibbeha County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28105,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Oktibbeha,Oktibbeha County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28105,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Oktibbeha,Oktibbeha County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28105,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Oktibbeha,Oktibbeha County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,51710,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28105,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Oktibbeha,Oktibbeha County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,54812,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28105,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Oktibbeha,Oktibbeha County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,28149,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28105,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Oktibbeha,Oktibbeha County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1634,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28105,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Oktibbeha,Oktibbeha County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,26663,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28105,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Oktibbeha,Oktibbeha County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,51.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28105,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Oktibbeha,Oktibbeha County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28105,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Oktibbeha,Oktibbeha County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,48.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28105,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Oktibbeha,Oktibbeha County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28105,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Oktibbeha,Oktibbeha County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,1.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28105,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Oktibbeha,Oktibbeha County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,47.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28105,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Oktibbeha,Oktibbeha County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,629,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28105,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Oktibbeha,Oktibbeha County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,25887,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28105,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Panola,Panola County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,24,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28107,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Panola,Panola County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28107,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Panola,Panola County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28107,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Panola,Panola County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28107,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Panola,Panola County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28107,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Panola,Panola County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,33114,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28107,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Panola,Panola County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,28668,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28107,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Panola,Panola County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11470,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28107,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Panola,Panola County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28107,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Panola,Panola County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,17198,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28107,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Panola,Panola County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,40,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28107,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Panola,Panola County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28107,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Panola,Panola County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,60,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28107,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Panola,Panola County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,21,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28107,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Panola,Panola County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,2.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28107,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Panola,Panola County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,37.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28107,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Panola,Panola County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,607,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28107,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Panola,Panola County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,10863,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28107,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Pearl River,Pearl River County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28109,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Pearl River,Pearl River County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28109,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Pearl River,Pearl River County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28109,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Pearl River,Pearl River County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28109,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Pearl River,Pearl River County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28109,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Pearl River,Pearl River County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,56140,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28109,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Pearl River,Pearl River County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,38759,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28109,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Pearl River,Pearl River County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,18163,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28109,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Pearl River,Pearl River County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28109,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Pearl River,Pearl River County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,20597,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28109,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Pearl River,Pearl River County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,46.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28109,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Pearl River,Pearl River County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28109,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Pearl River,Pearl River County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,53.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28109,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Pearl River,Pearl River County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28109,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Pearl River,Pearl River County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28109,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Pearl River,Pearl River County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,46.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28109,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Pearl River,Pearl River County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28109,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Pearl River,Pearl River County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,18163,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28109,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28111,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28111,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28111,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28111,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28111,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,11470,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28111,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,8031,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28111,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,737,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28111,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,737,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28111,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7294,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28111,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,9.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28111,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,9.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28111,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,90.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28111,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28111,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28111,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28111,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28111,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28111,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28113,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28113,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28113,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28113,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28113,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,40209,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28113,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,28553,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28113,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,16527,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28113,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28113,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,12027,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28113,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,57.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28113,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28113,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,42.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28113,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28113,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28113,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,57.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28113,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28113,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Pike,Pike County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,16527,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28113,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Pontotoc,Pontotoc County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28115,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Pontotoc,Pontotoc County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28115,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Pontotoc,Pontotoc County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28115,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Pontotoc,Pontotoc County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28115,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Pontotoc,Pontotoc County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28115,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Pontotoc,Pontotoc County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,31206,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28115,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Pontotoc,Pontotoc County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,28084,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28115,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Pontotoc,Pontotoc County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10041,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28115,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Pontotoc,Pontotoc County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,2403,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28115,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Pontotoc,Pontotoc County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,18043,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28115,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Pontotoc,Pontotoc County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,35.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28115,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Pontotoc,Pontotoc County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,8.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28115,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Pontotoc,Pontotoc County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,64.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28115,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Pontotoc,Pontotoc County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28115,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Pontotoc,Pontotoc County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28115,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Pontotoc,Pontotoc County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,27.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28115,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Pontotoc,Pontotoc County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28115,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Pontotoc,Pontotoc County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,7638,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28115,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Prentiss,Prentiss County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28117,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Prentiss,Prentiss County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28117,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Prentiss,Prentiss County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28117,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Prentiss,Prentiss County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28117,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Prentiss,Prentiss County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28117,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Prentiss,Prentiss County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,24935,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28117,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Prentiss,Prentiss County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,24971,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28117,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Prentiss,Prentiss County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11396,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28117,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Prentiss,Prentiss County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28117,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Prentiss,Prentiss County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,13575,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28117,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Prentiss,Prentiss County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,45.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28117,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Prentiss,Prentiss County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28117,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Prentiss,Prentiss County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,54.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28117,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Prentiss,Prentiss County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28117,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Prentiss,Prentiss County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,3.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28117,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Prentiss,Prentiss County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,42,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28117,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Prentiss,Prentiss County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,896,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28117,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Prentiss,Prentiss County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,10500,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28117,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Quitman,Quitman County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28119,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Quitman,Quitman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28119,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Quitman,Quitman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28119,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Quitman,Quitman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28119,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Quitman,Quitman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28119,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Quitman,Quitman County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,6153,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28119,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Quitman,Quitman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5696,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28119,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Quitman,Quitman County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3984,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28119,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Quitman,Quitman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28119,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Quitman,Quitman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1712,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28119,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Quitman,Quitman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,69.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28119,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Quitman,Quitman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28119,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Quitman,Quitman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,30.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28119,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Quitman,Quitman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28119,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Quitman,Quitman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,11.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28119,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Quitman,Quitman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,58.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28119,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Quitman,Quitman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,671,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28119,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Quitman,Quitman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3313,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28119,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Rankin,Rankin County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,36,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28121,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Rankin,Rankin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28121,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Rankin,Rankin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28121,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Rankin,Rankin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28121,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Rankin,Rankin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28121,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Rankin,Rankin County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,157052,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28121,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Rankin,Rankin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,144631,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28121,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Rankin,Rankin County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,109387,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28121,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Rankin,Rankin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1289,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28121,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Rankin,Rankin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,35244,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28121,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Rankin,Rankin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,75.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28121,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Rankin,Rankin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28121,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Rankin,Rankin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,24.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28121,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Rankin,Rankin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28121,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Rankin,Rankin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28121,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Rankin,Rankin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,74.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28121,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Rankin,Rankin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28121,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Rankin,Rankin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,108098,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28121,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28123,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28123,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28123,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28123,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28123,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,27958,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28123,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,28941,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28123,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11788,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28123,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28123,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,17152,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28123,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,40.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28123,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28123,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,59.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28123,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28123,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28123,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,40.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28123,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28123,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,11788,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28123,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Sharkey,Sharkey County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28125,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Sharkey,Sharkey County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28125,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Sharkey,Sharkey County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28125,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Sharkey,Sharkey County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28125,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Sharkey,Sharkey County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28125,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Sharkey,Sharkey County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,3767,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28125,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Sharkey,Sharkey County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3465,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28125,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Sharkey,Sharkey County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1947,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28125,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Sharkey,Sharkey County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,206,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28125,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Sharkey,Sharkey County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1518,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28125,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Sharkey,Sharkey County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,56.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28125,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Sharkey,Sharkey County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,5.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28125,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Sharkey,Sharkey County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,43.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28125,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Sharkey,Sharkey County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28125,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Sharkey,Sharkey County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28125,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Sharkey,Sharkey County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,50.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28125,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Sharkey,Sharkey County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28125,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Sharkey,Sharkey County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1742,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28125,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Simpson,Simpson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28127,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Simpson,Simpson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28127,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Simpson,Simpson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28127,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Simpson,Simpson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28127,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Simpson,Simpson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28127,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Simpson,Simpson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,25893,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28127,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Simpson,Simpson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,28177,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28127,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Simpson,Simpson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,19092,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28127,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Simpson,Simpson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,714,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28127,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Simpson,Simpson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9085,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28127,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Simpson,Simpson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,67.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28127,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Simpson,Simpson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,2.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28127,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Simpson,Simpson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,32.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28127,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Simpson,Simpson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28127,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Simpson,Simpson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28127,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Simpson,Simpson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,65.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28127,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Simpson,Simpson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28127,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Simpson,Simpson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,18378,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28127,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Smith,Smith County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28129,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Smith,Smith County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28129,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Smith,Smith County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28129,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Smith,Smith County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28129,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Smith,Smith County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28129,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Smith,Smith County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,14204,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28129,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Smith,Smith County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,10139,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28129,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Smith,Smith County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4418,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28129,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Smith,Smith County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28129,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Smith,Smith County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5721,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28129,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Smith,Smith County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,43.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28129,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Smith,Smith County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28129,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Smith,Smith County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,56.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28129,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Smith,Smith County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28129,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Smith,Smith County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28129,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Smith,Smith County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,43.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28129,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Smith,Smith County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28129,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Smith,Smith County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,4418,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28129,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Stone,Stone County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28131,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Stone,Stone County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28131,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Stone,Stone County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28131,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Stone,Stone County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28131,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Stone,Stone County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28131,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Stone,Stone County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,18333,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28131,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Stone,Stone County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,11393,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28131,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Stone,Stone County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4953,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28131,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Stone,Stone County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28131,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Stone,Stone County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6440,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28131,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Stone,Stone County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,43.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28131,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Stone,Stone County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28131,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Stone,Stone County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,56.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28131,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Stone,Stone County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28131,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Stone,Stone County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,2.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28131,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Stone,Stone County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,41.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28131,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Stone,Stone County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,267,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28131,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Stone,Stone County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,4685,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28131,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Sunflower,Sunflower County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28133,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Sunflower,Sunflower County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28133,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Sunflower,Sunflower County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28133,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Sunflower,Sunflower County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28133,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Sunflower,Sunflower County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28133,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Sunflower,Sunflower County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,25826,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28133,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Sunflower,Sunflower County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,23102,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28133,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Sunflower,Sunflower County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,17210,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28133,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Sunflower,Sunflower County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28133,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Sunflower,Sunflower County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5891,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28133,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Sunflower,Sunflower County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,74.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28133,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Sunflower,Sunflower County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28133,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Sunflower,Sunflower County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,25.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28133,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Sunflower,Sunflower County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28133,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Sunflower,Sunflower County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,13.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28133,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Sunflower,Sunflower County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,60.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28133,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Sunflower,Sunflower County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,3178,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28133,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Sunflower,Sunflower County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,14032,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28133,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Tallahatchie,Tallahatchie County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28135,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Tallahatchie,Tallahatchie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28135,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Tallahatchie,Tallahatchie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28135,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Tallahatchie,Tallahatchie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28135,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Tallahatchie,Tallahatchie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28135,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Tallahatchie,Tallahatchie County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,12670,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28135,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Tallahatchie,Tallahatchie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,13417,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28135,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Tallahatchie,Tallahatchie County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28135,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Tallahatchie,Tallahatchie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28135,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Tallahatchie,Tallahatchie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,13417,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28135,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Tallahatchie,Tallahatchie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28135,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Tallahatchie,Tallahatchie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28135,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Tallahatchie,Tallahatchie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28135,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Tallahatchie,Tallahatchie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28135,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Tallahatchie,Tallahatchie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28135,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Tallahatchie,Tallahatchie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28135,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Tallahatchie,Tallahatchie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28135,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Tallahatchie,Tallahatchie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28135,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Tate,Tate County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28137,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Tate,Tate County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28137,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Tate,Tate County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28137,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Tate,Tate County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28137,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Tate,Tate County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28137,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Tate,Tate County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,28124,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28137,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Tate,Tate County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,11221,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28137,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Tate,Tate County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6395,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28137,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Tate,Tate County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28137,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Tate,Tate County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4826,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28137,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Tate,Tate County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,57,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28137,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Tate,Tate County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28137,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Tate,Tate County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,43,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28137,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Tate,Tate County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28137,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Tate,Tate County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28137,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Tate,Tate County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,57,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28137,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Tate,Tate County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28137,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Tate,Tate County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,6395,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28137,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Tippah,Tippah County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28139,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Tippah,Tippah County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28139,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Tippah,Tippah County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28139,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Tippah,Tippah County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28139,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Tippah,Tippah County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28139,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Tippah,Tippah County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,21732,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28139,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Tippah,Tippah County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,20320,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28139,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Tippah,Tippah County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7640,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28139,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Tippah,Tippah County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28139,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Tippah,Tippah County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,12680,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28139,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Tippah,Tippah County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,37.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28139,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Tippah,Tippah County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28139,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Tippah,Tippah County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,62.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28139,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Tippah,Tippah County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28139,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Tippah,Tippah County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28139,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Tippah,Tippah County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,37.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28139,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Tippah,Tippah County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28139,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Tippah,Tippah County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,7640,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28139,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Tishomingo,Tishomingo County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28141,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Tishomingo,Tishomingo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28141,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Tishomingo,Tishomingo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28141,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Tishomingo,Tishomingo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28141,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Tishomingo,Tishomingo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28141,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Tishomingo,Tishomingo County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,18822,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28141,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Tishomingo,Tishomingo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,19452,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28141,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Tishomingo,Tishomingo County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9179,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28141,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Tishomingo,Tishomingo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28141,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Tishomingo,Tishomingo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10274,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28141,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Tishomingo,Tishomingo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,47.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28141,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Tishomingo,Tishomingo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28141,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Tishomingo,Tishomingo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,52.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28141,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Tishomingo,Tishomingo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28141,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Tishomingo,Tishomingo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,14.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28141,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Tishomingo,Tishomingo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,32.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28141,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Tishomingo,Tishomingo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2869,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28141,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Tishomingo,Tishomingo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,6310,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28141,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Tunica,Tunica County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28143,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Tunica,Tunica County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28143,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Tunica,Tunica County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28143,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Tunica,Tunica County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28143,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Tunica,Tunica County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28143,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Tunica,Tunica County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,9720,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28143,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Tunica,Tunica County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9698,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28143,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Tunica,Tunica County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3594,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28143,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Tunica,Tunica County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28143,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Tunica,Tunica County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6104,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28143,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Tunica,Tunica County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,37.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28143,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Tunica,Tunica County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28143,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Tunica,Tunica County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,62.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28143,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Tunica,Tunica County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28143,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Tunica,Tunica County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28143,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Tunica,Tunica County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,37.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28143,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Tunica,Tunica County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28143,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Tunica,Tunica County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3594,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28143,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28145,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28145,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28145,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28145,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28145,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,27780,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28145,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,22795,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28145,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11051,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28145,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,3405,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28145,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11744,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28145,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,48.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28145,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,14.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28145,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,51.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28145,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28145,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,3.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28145,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,30.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28145,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,738,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28145,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,6908,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28145,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Walthall,Walthall County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28147,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Walthall,Walthall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28147,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Walthall,Walthall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28147,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Walthall,Walthall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28147,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Walthall,Walthall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28147,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Walthall,Walthall County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,13863,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28147,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Walthall,Walthall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,12767,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28147,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Walthall,Walthall County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3464,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28147,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Walthall,Walthall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28147,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Walthall,Walthall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9303,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28147,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Walthall,Walthall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,27.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28147,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Walthall,Walthall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28147,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Walthall,Walthall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,72.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28147,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Walthall,Walthall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28147,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Walthall,Walthall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28147,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Walthall,Walthall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,27.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28147,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Walthall,Walthall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28147,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Walthall,Walthall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3464,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28147,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28149,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28149,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28149,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28149,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28149,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,44548,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28149,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,48856,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28149,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,39462,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28149,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,4218,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28149,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9394,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28149,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,80.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28149,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,8.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28149,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,19.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28149,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28149,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,4.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28149,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,67.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28149,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2276,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28149,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,32968,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28149,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28151,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28151,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28151,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28151,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28151,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,44613,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28151,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,35861,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28151,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,33915,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28151,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,2447,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28151,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1946,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28151,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,94.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28151,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,6.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28151,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,5.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28151,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28151,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28151,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,87.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28151,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28151,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,31468,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28151,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28153,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28153,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28153,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28153,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28153,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,19778,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28153,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,16545,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28153,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11199,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28153,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,7181,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28153,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5346,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28153,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,67.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28153,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,43.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28153,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,32.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28153,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28153,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28153,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,24.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28153,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28153,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,4018,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28153,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28155,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28155,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28155,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28155,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28155,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,9921,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28155,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9868,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28155,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4854,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28155,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28155,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5014,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28155,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,49.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28155,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28155,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,50.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28155,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28155,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,6.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28155,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,42.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28155,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,655,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28155,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,4199,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28155,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Wilkinson,Wilkinson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28157,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Wilkinson,Wilkinson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28157,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Wilkinson,Wilkinson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28157,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Wilkinson,Wilkinson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28157,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Wilkinson,Wilkinson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28157,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Wilkinson,Wilkinson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,8525,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28157,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Wilkinson,Wilkinson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9957,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28157,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Wilkinson,Wilkinson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28157,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Wilkinson,Wilkinson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28157,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Wilkinson,Wilkinson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9957,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28157,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Wilkinson,Wilkinson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28157,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Wilkinson,Wilkinson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28157,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Wilkinson,Wilkinson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28157,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Wilkinson,Wilkinson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28157,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Wilkinson,Wilkinson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28157,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Wilkinson,Wilkinson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28157,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Wilkinson,Wilkinson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28157,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Wilkinson,Wilkinson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28157,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Winston,Winston County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28159,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Winston,Winston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28159,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Winston,Winston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28159,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Winston,Winston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28159,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Winston,Winston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28159,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Winston,Winston County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,17673,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28159,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Winston,Winston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,16859,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28159,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Winston,Winston County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6510,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28159,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Winston,Winston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28159,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Winston,Winston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10349,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28159,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Winston,Winston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,38.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28159,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Winston,Winston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28159,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Winston,Winston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,61.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28159,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Winston,Winston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28159,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Winston,Winston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28159,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Winston,Winston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,38.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28159,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Winston,Winston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28159,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Winston,Winston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,6510,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28159,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Yalobusha,Yalobusha County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28161,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Yalobusha,Yalobusha County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28161,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Yalobusha,Yalobusha County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28161,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Yalobusha,Yalobusha County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28161,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Yalobusha,Yalobusha County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28161,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Yalobusha,Yalobusha County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,12446,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28161,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Yalobusha,Yalobusha County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,11295,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28161,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Yalobusha,Yalobusha County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4090,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28161,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Yalobusha,Yalobusha County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28161,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Yalobusha,Yalobusha County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7206,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28161,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Yalobusha,Yalobusha County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,36.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28161,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Yalobusha,Yalobusha County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28161,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Yalobusha,Yalobusha County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,63.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28161,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Yalobusha,Yalobusha County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28161,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Yalobusha,Yalobusha County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,11.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28161,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Yalobusha,Yalobusha County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,24.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28161,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Yalobusha,Yalobusha County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1333,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28161,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Yalobusha,Yalobusha County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2757,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28161,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Yazoo,Yazoo County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,20,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28163,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Yazoo,Yazoo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28163,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Yazoo,Yazoo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28163,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Yazoo,Yazoo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28163,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Yazoo,Yazoo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28163,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Yazoo,Yazoo County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,26618,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28163,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Yazoo,Yazoo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,24113,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28163,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Yazoo,Yazoo County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,20495,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28163,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Yazoo,Yazoo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28163,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Yazoo,Yazoo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3617,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28163,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Yazoo,Yazoo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,85,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28163,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Yazoo,Yazoo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28163,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Yazoo,Yazoo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,15,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28163,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Yazoo,Yazoo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28163,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Yazoo,Yazoo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28163,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Yazoo,Yazoo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,85,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28163,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Yazoo,Yazoo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,28163,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MS,Yazoo,Yazoo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,20495,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28163,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,MT,MT,Montana,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,857,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,30,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,MT,MT,Montana,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,199,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,30,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,MT,MT,Montana,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,34,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,30,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,MT,MT,Montana,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,30,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,MT,MT,Montana,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,138,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,30,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,MT,MT,Montana,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,1086193,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,30,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,False,,WFR_ST
2020,MT,MT,Montana,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,765861,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,30,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,MT,MT,Montana,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,240294,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,30,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,MT,MT,Montana,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,107526,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,30,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,MT,MT,Montana,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,525567,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,30,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,MT,MT,Montana,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,31.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,30,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,MT,MT,Montana,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,14,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,30,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,MT,MT,Montana,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,68.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,30,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,MT,MT,Montana,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,658,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,30,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,MT,MT,Montana,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,2.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,30,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,MT,MT,Montana,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,14.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,30,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,MT,MT,Montana,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,21213,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,30,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,MT,MT,Montana,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,111555,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,30,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,NC,Alamance,Alamance County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,24,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37001,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Alamance,Alamance County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37001,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Alamance,Alamance County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37001,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Alamance,Alamance County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37001,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Alamance,Alamance County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37001,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Alamance,Alamance County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,171842,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37001,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Alamance,Alamance County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,96850,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37001,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Alamance,Alamance County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,92923,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37001,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Alamance,Alamance County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37001,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Alamance,Alamance County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3927,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37001,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Alamance,Alamance County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,95.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37001,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Alamance,Alamance County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37001,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Alamance,Alamance County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,4.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37001,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Alamance,Alamance County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37001,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Alamance,Alamance County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,32.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37001,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Alamance,Alamance County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,63.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37001,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Alamance,Alamance County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,31777,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37001,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Alamance,Alamance County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,61146,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37001,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Alexander,Alexander County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37003,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Alexander,Alexander County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37003,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Alexander,Alexander County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37003,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Alexander,Alexander County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37003,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Alexander,Alexander County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37003,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Alexander,Alexander County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,36430,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37003,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Alexander,Alexander County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,14470,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37003,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Alexander,Alexander County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,14061,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37003,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Alexander,Alexander County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37003,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Alexander,Alexander County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,409,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37003,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Alexander,Alexander County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,97.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37003,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Alexander,Alexander County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37003,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Alexander,Alexander County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37003,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Alexander,Alexander County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37003,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Alexander,Alexander County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,97.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37003,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Alexander,Alexander County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37003,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Alexander,Alexander County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,14061,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37003,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Alexander,Alexander County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37003,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Alleghany,Alleghany County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37005,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Alleghany,Alleghany County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37005,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Alleghany,Alleghany County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37005,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Alleghany,Alleghany County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37005,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Alleghany,Alleghany County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37005,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Alleghany,Alleghany County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,10899,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37005,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Alleghany,Alleghany County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3254,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37005,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Alleghany,Alleghany County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37005,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Alleghany,Alleghany County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37005,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Alleghany,Alleghany County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3254,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37005,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Alleghany,Alleghany County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37005,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Alleghany,Alleghany County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37005,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Alleghany,Alleghany County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37005,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Alleghany,Alleghany County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37005,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Alleghany,Alleghany County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37005,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Alleghany,Alleghany County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37005,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Alleghany,Alleghany County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37005,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Alleghany,Alleghany County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37005,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Anson,Anson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37007,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Anson,Anson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37007,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Anson,Anson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37007,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Anson,Anson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37007,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Anson,Anson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37007,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Anson,Anson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,22030,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37007,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Anson,Anson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,20645,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37007,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Anson,Anson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,20645,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37007,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Anson,Anson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37007,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Anson,Anson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37007,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Anson,Anson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37007,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Anson,Anson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37007,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Anson,Anson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37007,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Anson,Anson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37007,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Anson,Anson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,40.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37007,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Anson,Anson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,59.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37007,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Anson,Anson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,8451,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37007,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Anson,Anson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,12194,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37007,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Ashe,Ashe County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37009,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Ashe,Ashe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37009,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Ashe,Ashe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37009,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Ashe,Ashe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37009,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Ashe,Ashe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37009,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Ashe,Ashe County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,26569,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37009,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Ashe,Ashe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4582,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37009,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Ashe,Ashe County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37009,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Ashe,Ashe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37009,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Ashe,Ashe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4582,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37009,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Ashe,Ashe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37009,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Ashe,Ashe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37009,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Ashe,Ashe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37009,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Ashe,Ashe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37009,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Ashe,Ashe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37009,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Ashe,Ashe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37009,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Ashe,Ashe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37009,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Ashe,Ashe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37009,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Avery,Avery County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37011,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Avery,Avery County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37011,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Avery,Avery County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37011,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Avery,Avery County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37011,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Avery,Avery County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37011,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Avery,Avery County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,17798,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37011,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Avery,Avery County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,10320,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37011,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Avery,Avery County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37011,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Avery,Avery County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37011,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Avery,Avery County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10320,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37011,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Avery,Avery County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37011,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Avery,Avery County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37011,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Avery,Avery County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37011,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Avery,Avery County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37011,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Avery,Avery County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37011,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Avery,Avery County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37011,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Avery,Avery County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37011,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Avery,Avery County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37011,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Beaufort,Beaufort County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37013,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Beaufort,Beaufort County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37013,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Beaufort,Beaufort County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37013,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Beaufort,Beaufort County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37013,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Beaufort,Beaufort County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37013,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Beaufort,Beaufort County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,44618,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37013,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Beaufort,Beaufort County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,45076,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37013,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Beaufort,Beaufort County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,36248,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37013,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Beaufort,Beaufort County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,449,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37013,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Beaufort,Beaufort County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8828,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37013,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Beaufort,Beaufort County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,80.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37013,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Beaufort,Beaufort County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37013,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Beaufort,Beaufort County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,19.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37013,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Beaufort,Beaufort County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37013,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Beaufort,Beaufort County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,48.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37013,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Beaufort,Beaufort County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,30.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37013,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Beaufort,Beaufort County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,21866,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37013,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Beaufort,Beaufort County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,13933,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37013,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Bertie,Bertie County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37015,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Bertie,Bertie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37015,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Bertie,Bertie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37015,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Bertie,Bertie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37015,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Bertie,Bertie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37015,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Bertie,Bertie County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,17851,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37015,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Bertie,Bertie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,17053,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37015,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Bertie,Bertie County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,14883,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37015,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Bertie,Bertie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,14883,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37015,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Bertie,Bertie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2170,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37015,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Bertie,Bertie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,87.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37015,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Bertie,Bertie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,87.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37015,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Bertie,Bertie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,12.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37015,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Bertie,Bertie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37015,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Bertie,Bertie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37015,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Bertie,Bertie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37015,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Bertie,Bertie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37015,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Bertie,Bertie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37015,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Bladen,Bladen County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37017,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Bladen,Bladen County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37017,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Bladen,Bladen County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37017,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Bladen,Bladen County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37017,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Bladen,Bladen County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37017,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Bladen,Bladen County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,29599,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37017,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Bladen,Bladen County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,29871,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37017,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Bladen,Bladen County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37017,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Bladen,Bladen County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37017,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Bladen,Bladen County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,29871,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37017,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Bladen,Bladen County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37017,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Bladen,Bladen County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37017,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Bladen,Bladen County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37017,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Bladen,Bladen County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37017,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Bladen,Bladen County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37017,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Bladen,Bladen County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37017,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Bladen,Bladen County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37017,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Bladen,Bladen County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37017,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Brunswick,Brunswick County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37019,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Brunswick,Brunswick County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37019,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Brunswick,Brunswick County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37019,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Brunswick,Brunswick County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37019,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Brunswick,Brunswick County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37019,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Brunswick,Brunswick County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,138084,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37019,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Brunswick,Brunswick County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,180562,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37019,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Brunswick,Brunswick County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,180562,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37019,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Brunswick,Brunswick County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37019,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Brunswick,Brunswick County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37019,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Brunswick,Brunswick County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37019,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Brunswick,Brunswick County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37019,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Brunswick,Brunswick County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37019,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Brunswick,Brunswick County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37019,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Brunswick,Brunswick County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,43.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37019,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Brunswick,Brunswick County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,56.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37019,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Brunswick,Brunswick County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,79224,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37019,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Brunswick,Brunswick County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,101337,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37019,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Buncombe,Buncombe County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,35,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37021,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Buncombe,Buncombe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37021,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Buncombe,Buncombe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37021,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Buncombe,Buncombe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37021,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Buncombe,Buncombe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37021,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Buncombe,Buncombe County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,269621,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37021,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Buncombe,Buncombe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,170626,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37021,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Buncombe,Buncombe County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,157525,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37021,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Buncombe,Buncombe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37021,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Buncombe,Buncombe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,13101,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37021,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Buncombe,Buncombe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,92.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37021,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Buncombe,Buncombe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37021,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Buncombe,Buncombe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,7.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37021,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Buncombe,Buncombe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,25,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37021,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Buncombe,Buncombe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,10.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37021,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Buncombe,Buncombe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,82.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37021,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Buncombe,Buncombe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,17237,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37021,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Buncombe,Buncombe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,140288,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37021,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Burke,Burke County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37023,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Burke,Burke County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37023,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Burke,Burke County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37023,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Burke,Burke County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37023,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Burke,Burke County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37023,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Burke,Burke County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,87546,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37023,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Burke,Burke County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,72257,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37023,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Burke,Burke County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,71370,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37023,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Burke,Burke County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37023,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Burke,Burke County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,887,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37023,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Burke,Burke County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37023,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Burke,Burke County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37023,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Burke,Burke County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37023,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Burke,Burke County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37023,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Burke,Burke County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,34.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37023,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Burke,Burke County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,64.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37023,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Burke,Burke County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,24661,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37023,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Burke,Burke County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,46709,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37023,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Cabarrus,Cabarrus County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,40,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37025,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Cabarrus,Cabarrus County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37025,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Cabarrus,Cabarrus County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37025,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Cabarrus,Cabarrus County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37025,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Cabarrus,Cabarrus County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37025,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Cabarrus,Cabarrus County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,227065,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37025,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Cabarrus,Cabarrus County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,126530,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37025,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Cabarrus,Cabarrus County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,116316,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37025,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Cabarrus,Cabarrus County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37025,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Cabarrus,Cabarrus County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10214,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37025,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Cabarrus,Cabarrus County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,91.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37025,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Cabarrus,Cabarrus County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37025,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Cabarrus,Cabarrus County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,8.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37025,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Cabarrus,Cabarrus County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,33,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37025,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Cabarrus,Cabarrus County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,14.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37025,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Cabarrus,Cabarrus County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,77.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37025,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Cabarrus,Cabarrus County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,18630,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37025,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Cabarrus,Cabarrus County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,97686,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37025,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Caldwell,Caldwell County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37027,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Caldwell,Caldwell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37027,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Caldwell,Caldwell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37027,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Caldwell,Caldwell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37027,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Caldwell,Caldwell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37027,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Caldwell,Caldwell County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,80512,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37027,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Caldwell,Caldwell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,61961,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37027,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Caldwell,Caldwell County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,61568,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37027,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Caldwell,Caldwell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37027,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Caldwell,Caldwell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,394,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37027,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Caldwell,Caldwell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37027,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Caldwell,Caldwell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37027,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Caldwell,Caldwell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37027,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Caldwell,Caldwell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37027,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Caldwell,Caldwell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,54.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37027,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Caldwell,Caldwell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,45.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37027,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Caldwell,Caldwell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,33569,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37027,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Caldwell,Caldwell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,27999,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37027,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Camden,Camden County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37029,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Camden,Camden County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37029,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Camden,Camden County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37029,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Camden,Camden County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37029,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Camden,Camden County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37029,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Camden,Camden County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,10398,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37029,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Camden,Camden County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,6612,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37029,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Camden,Camden County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37029,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Camden,Camden County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37029,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Camden,Camden County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6612,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37029,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Camden,Camden County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37029,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Camden,Camden County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37029,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Camden,Camden County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37029,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Camden,Camden County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37029,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Camden,Camden County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37029,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Camden,Camden County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37029,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Camden,Camden County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37029,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Camden,Camden County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37029,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Carteret,Carteret County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,31,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37031,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Carteret,Carteret County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37031,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Carteret,Carteret County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37031,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Carteret,Carteret County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37031,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Carteret,Carteret County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37031,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Carteret,Carteret County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,67656,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37031,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Carteret,Carteret County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,53716,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37031,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Carteret,Carteret County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,25134,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37031,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Carteret,Carteret County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37031,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Carteret,Carteret County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,28582,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37031,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Carteret,Carteret County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,46.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37031,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Carteret,Carteret County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37031,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Carteret,Carteret County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,53.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37031,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Carteret,Carteret County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,25,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37031,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Carteret,Carteret County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,13.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37031,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Carteret,Carteret County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,33.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37031,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Carteret,Carteret County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,7263,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37031,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Carteret,Carteret County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,17871,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37031,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Caswell,Caswell County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37033,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Caswell,Caswell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37033,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Caswell,Caswell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37033,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Caswell,Caswell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37033,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Caswell,Caswell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37033,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Caswell,Caswell County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,22694,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37033,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Caswell,Caswell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2337,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37033,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Caswell,Caswell County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1785,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37033,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Caswell,Caswell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37033,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Caswell,Caswell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,552,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37033,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Caswell,Caswell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,76.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37033,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Caswell,Caswell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37033,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Caswell,Caswell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,23.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37033,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Caswell,Caswell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37033,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Caswell,Caswell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37033,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Caswell,Caswell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,76.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37033,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Caswell,Caswell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37033,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Caswell,Caswell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1785,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37033,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Catawba,Catawba County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,82,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37035,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Catawba,Catawba County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37035,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Catawba,Catawba County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37035,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Catawba,Catawba County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37035,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Catawba,Catawba County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37035,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Catawba,Catawba County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,160747,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37035,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Catawba,Catawba County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,106325,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37035,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Catawba,Catawba County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,97674,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37035,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Catawba,Catawba County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37035,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Catawba,Catawba County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8651,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37035,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Catawba,Catawba County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,91.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37035,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Catawba,Catawba County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37035,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Catawba,Catawba County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,8.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37035,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Catawba,Catawba County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,71,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37035,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Catawba,Catawba County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,25.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37035,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Catawba,Catawba County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,66,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37035,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Catawba,Catawba County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,27527,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37035,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Catawba,Catawba County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,70148,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37035,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Chatham,Chatham County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,21,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37037,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Chatham,Chatham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37037,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Chatham,Chatham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37037,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Chatham,Chatham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37037,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Chatham,Chatham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37037,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Chatham,Chatham County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,76611,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37037,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Chatham,Chatham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,33078,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37037,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Chatham,Chatham County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,32082,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37037,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Chatham,Chatham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37037,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Chatham,Chatham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,995,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37037,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Chatham,Chatham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,97,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37037,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Chatham,Chatham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37037,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Chatham,Chatham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37037,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Chatham,Chatham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37037,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Chatham,Chatham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,11.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37037,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Chatham,Chatham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,85.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37037,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Chatham,Chatham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,3747,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37037,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Chatham,Chatham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,28335,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37037,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37039,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37039,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37039,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37039,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37039,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,28833,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37039,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,8838,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37039,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37039,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37039,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8838,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37039,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37039,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37039,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37039,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37039,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37039,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37039,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37039,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37039,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Chowan,Chowan County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37041,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Chowan,Chowan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37041,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Chowan,Chowan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37041,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Chowan,Chowan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37041,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Chowan,Chowan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37041,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Chowan,Chowan County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,13666,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37041,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Chowan,Chowan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,14557,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37041,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Chowan,Chowan County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,14557,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37041,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Chowan,Chowan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37041,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Chowan,Chowan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37041,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Chowan,Chowan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37041,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Chowan,Chowan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37041,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Chowan,Chowan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37041,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Chowan,Chowan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37041,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Chowan,Chowan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37041,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Chowan,Chowan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37041,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Chowan,Chowan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,14557,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37041,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Chowan,Chowan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37041,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37043,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37043,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37043,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37043,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37043,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,11118,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37043,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1703,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37043,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37043,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37043,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1703,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37043,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37043,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37043,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37043,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37043,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37043,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37043,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37043,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37043,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Cleveland,Cleveland County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37045,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Cleveland,Cleveland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37045,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Cleveland,Cleveland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37045,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Cleveland,Cleveland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37045,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Cleveland,Cleveland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37045,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Cleveland,Cleveland County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,99725,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37045,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Cleveland,Cleveland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,84312,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37045,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Cleveland,Cleveland County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,83743,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37045,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Cleveland,Cleveland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37045,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Cleveland,Cleveland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,569,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37045,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Cleveland,Cleveland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37045,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Cleveland,Cleveland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37045,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Cleveland,Cleveland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37045,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Cleveland,Cleveland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37045,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Cleveland,Cleveland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,6.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37045,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Cleveland,Cleveland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,93,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37045,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Cleveland,Cleveland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,5332,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37045,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Cleveland,Cleveland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,78412,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37045,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Columbus,Columbus County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,20,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37047,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Columbus,Columbus County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37047,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Columbus,Columbus County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37047,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Columbus,Columbus County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37047,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Columbus,Columbus County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37047,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Columbus,Columbus County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,50505,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37047,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Columbus,Columbus County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,29586,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37047,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Columbus,Columbus County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7950,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37047,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Columbus,Columbus County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,3105,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37047,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Columbus,Columbus County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,21636,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37047,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Columbus,Columbus County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,26.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37047,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Columbus,Columbus County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,10.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37047,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Columbus,Columbus County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,73.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37047,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Columbus,Columbus County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37047,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Columbus,Columbus County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,16.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37047,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Columbus,Columbus County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37047,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Columbus,Columbus County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,4845,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37047,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Columbus,Columbus County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37047,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Craven,Craven County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37049,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Craven,Craven County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37049,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Craven,Craven County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37049,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Craven,Craven County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37049,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Craven,Craven County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37049,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Craven,Craven County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,100552,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37049,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Craven,Craven County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,99129,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37049,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Craven,Craven County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,62065,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37049,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Craven,Craven County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,26917,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37049,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Craven,Craven County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,37064,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37049,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Craven,Craven County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,62.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37049,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Craven,Craven County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,27.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37049,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Craven,Craven County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,37.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37049,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Craven,Craven County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37049,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Craven,Craven County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,35.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37049,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Craven,Craven County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37049,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Craven,Craven County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,35148,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37049,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Craven,Craven County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37049,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,39,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37051,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37051,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37051,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37051,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37051,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,334370,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37051,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,354001,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37051,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,320450,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37051,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37051,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,33550,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37051,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,90.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37051,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37051,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,9.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37051,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,25,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37051,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,38.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37051,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,51.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37051,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,136900,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37051,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,183551,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37051,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Currituck,Currituck County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37053,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Currituck,Currituck County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37053,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Currituck,Currituck County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37053,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Currituck,Currituck County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37053,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Currituck,Currituck County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37053,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Currituck,Currituck County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,28385,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37053,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Currituck,Currituck County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,14692,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37053,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Currituck,Currituck County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37053,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Currituck,Currituck County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37053,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Currituck,Currituck County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,14692,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37053,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Currituck,Currituck County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37053,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Currituck,Currituck County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37053,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Currituck,Currituck County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37053,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Currituck,Currituck County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37053,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Currituck,Currituck County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37053,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Currituck,Currituck County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37053,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Currituck,Currituck County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37053,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Currituck,Currituck County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37053,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Dare,Dare County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37055,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Dare,Dare County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37055,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Dare,Dare County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37055,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Dare,Dare County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37055,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Dare,Dare County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37055,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Dare,Dare County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,37001,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37055,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Dare,Dare County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,38822,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37055,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Dare,Dare County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,38773,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37055,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Dare,Dare County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37055,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Dare,Dare County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,48,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37055,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Dare,Dare County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37055,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Dare,Dare County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37055,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Dare,Dare County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37055,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Dare,Dare County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37055,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Dare,Dare County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,29.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37055,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Dare,Dare County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,70,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37055,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Dare,Dare County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,11604,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37055,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Dare,Dare County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,27170,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37055,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Davidson,Davidson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37057,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Davidson,Davidson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37057,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Davidson,Davidson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37057,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Davidson,Davidson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37057,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Davidson,Davidson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37057,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Davidson,Davidson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,169131,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37057,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Davidson,Davidson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,194556,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37057,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Davidson,Davidson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,194556,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37057,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Davidson,Davidson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37057,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Davidson,Davidson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37057,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Davidson,Davidson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37057,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Davidson,Davidson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37057,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Davidson,Davidson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37057,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Davidson,Davidson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37057,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Davidson,Davidson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,3.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37057,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Davidson,Davidson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,96.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37057,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Davidson,Davidson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,7071,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37057,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Davidson,Davidson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,187485,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37057,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Davie,Davie County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37059,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Davie,Davie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37059,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Davie,Davie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37059,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Davie,Davie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37059,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Davie,Davie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37059,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Davie,Davie County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,42806,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37059,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Davie,Davie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,32235,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37059,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Davie,Davie County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,31663,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37059,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Davie,Davie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37059,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Davie,Davie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,572,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37059,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Davie,Davie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37059,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Davie,Davie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37059,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Davie,Davie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37059,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Davie,Davie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37059,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Davie,Davie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37059,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Davie,Davie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,98.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37059,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Davie,Davie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37059,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Davie,Davie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,31663,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37059,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Duplin,Duplin County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37061,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Duplin,Duplin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37061,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Duplin,Duplin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37061,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Duplin,Duplin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37061,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Duplin,Duplin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37061,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Duplin,Duplin County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,48675,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37061,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Duplin,Duplin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,39038,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37061,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Duplin,Duplin County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37061,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Duplin,Duplin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37061,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Duplin,Duplin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,39038,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37061,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Duplin,Duplin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37061,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Duplin,Duplin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37061,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Duplin,Duplin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37061,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Duplin,Duplin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37061,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Duplin,Duplin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37061,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Duplin,Duplin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37061,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Duplin,Duplin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37061,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Duplin,Duplin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37061,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Durham,Durham County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,20,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37063,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Durham,Durham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37063,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Durham,Durham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37063,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Durham,Durham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37063,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Durham,Durham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37063,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Durham,Durham County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,325602,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37063,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Durham,Durham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,265563,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37063,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Durham,Durham County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,262049,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37063,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Durham,Durham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37063,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Durham,Durham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3514,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37063,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Durham,Durham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37063,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Durham,Durham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37063,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Durham,Durham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37063,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Durham,Durham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,19,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37063,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Durham,Durham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37063,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Durham,Durham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,98.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37063,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Durham,Durham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37063,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Durham,Durham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,262049,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37063,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Edgecombe,Edgecombe County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37065,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Edgecombe,Edgecombe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37065,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Edgecombe,Edgecombe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37065,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Edgecombe,Edgecombe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37065,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Edgecombe,Edgecombe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37065,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Edgecombe,Edgecombe County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,48697,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37065,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Edgecombe,Edgecombe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,14841,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37065,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Edgecombe,Edgecombe County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,13041,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37065,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Edgecombe,Edgecombe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,886,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37065,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Edgecombe,Edgecombe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1799,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37065,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Edgecombe,Edgecombe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,87.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37065,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Edgecombe,Edgecombe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37065,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Edgecombe,Edgecombe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,12.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37065,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Edgecombe,Edgecombe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37065,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Edgecombe,Edgecombe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,13.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37065,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Edgecombe,Edgecombe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,68.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37065,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Edgecombe,Edgecombe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2031,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37065,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Edgecombe,Edgecombe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,10124,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37065,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Forsyth,Forsyth County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37067,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Forsyth,Forsyth County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37067,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Forsyth,Forsyth County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37067,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Forsyth,Forsyth County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37067,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Forsyth,Forsyth County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37067,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Forsyth,Forsyth County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,382733,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37067,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Forsyth,Forsyth County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,336052,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37067,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Forsyth,Forsyth County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,332401,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37067,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Forsyth,Forsyth County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37067,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Forsyth,Forsyth County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3651,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37067,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Forsyth,Forsyth County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37067,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Forsyth,Forsyth County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37067,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Forsyth,Forsyth County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37067,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Forsyth,Forsyth County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37067,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Forsyth,Forsyth County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37067,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Forsyth,Forsyth County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,98.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37067,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Forsyth,Forsyth County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,243,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37067,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Forsyth,Forsyth County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,332157,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37067,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37069,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37069,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37069,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37069,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37069,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,69060,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37069,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,28690,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37069,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3781,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37069,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37069,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,24908,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37069,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,13.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37069,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37069,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,86.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37069,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37069,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37069,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,13.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37069,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37069,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3781,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37069,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Gaston,Gaston County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,142,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37071,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Gaston,Gaston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37071,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Gaston,Gaston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37071,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Gaston,Gaston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37071,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Gaston,Gaston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37071,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Gaston,Gaston County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,228269,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37071,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Gaston,Gaston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,159400,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37071,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Gaston,Gaston County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,142890,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37071,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Gaston,Gaston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37071,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Gaston,Gaston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,16510,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37071,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Gaston,Gaston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,89.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37071,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Gaston,Gaston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37071,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Gaston,Gaston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,10.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37071,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Gaston,Gaston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,125,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37071,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Gaston,Gaston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,14.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37071,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Gaston,Gaston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,75.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37071,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Gaston,Gaston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,22845,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37071,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Gaston,Gaston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,120045,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37071,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Gates,Gates County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37073,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Gates,Gates County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37073,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Gates,Gates County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37073,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Gates,Gates County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37073,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Gates,Gates County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37073,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Gates,Gates County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,10452,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37073,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Gates,Gates County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,10747,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37073,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Gates,Gates County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10747,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37073,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Gates,Gates County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,10403,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37073,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Gates,Gates County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37073,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Gates,Gates County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37073,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Gates,Gates County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,96.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37073,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Gates,Gates County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37073,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Gates,Gates County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37073,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Gates,Gates County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,3.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37073,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Gates,Gates County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37073,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Gates,Gates County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,345,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37073,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Gates,Gates County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37073,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Graham,Graham County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37075,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Graham,Graham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37075,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Graham,Graham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37075,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Graham,Graham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37075,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Graham,Graham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37075,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Graham,Graham County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,8016,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37075,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Graham,Graham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4199,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37075,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Graham,Graham County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37075,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Graham,Graham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37075,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Graham,Graham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4199,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37075,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Graham,Graham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37075,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Graham,Graham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37075,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Graham,Graham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37075,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Graham,Graham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37075,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Graham,Graham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37075,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Graham,Graham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37075,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Graham,Graham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37075,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Graham,Graham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37075,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Granville,Granville County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37077,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Granville,Granville County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37077,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Granville,Granville County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37077,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Granville,Granville County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37077,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Granville,Granville County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37077,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Granville,Granville County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,61041,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37077,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Granville,Granville County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,27788,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37077,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Granville,Granville County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,27244,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37077,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Granville,Granville County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37077,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Granville,Granville County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,544,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37077,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Granville,Granville County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37077,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Granville,Granville County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37077,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Granville,Granville County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37077,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Granville,Granville County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37077,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Granville,Granville County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,36.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37077,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Granville,Granville County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,61.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37077,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Granville,Granville County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,10043,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37077,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Granville,Granville County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,17201,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37077,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37079,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37079,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37079,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37079,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37079,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,20444,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37079,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,15491,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37079,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37079,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37079,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,15491,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37079,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37079,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37079,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37079,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37079,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37079,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37079,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37079,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37079,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Guilford,Guilford County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,47,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37081,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Guilford,Guilford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37081,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Guilford,Guilford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37081,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Guilford,Guilford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37081,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Guilford,Guilford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37081,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Guilford,Guilford County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,541347,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37081,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Guilford,Guilford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,379875,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37081,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Guilford,Guilford County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,374304,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37081,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Guilford,Guilford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37081,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Guilford,Guilford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5571,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37081,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Guilford,Guilford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37081,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Guilford,Guilford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37081,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Guilford,Guilford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37081,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Guilford,Guilford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,42,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37081,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Guilford,Guilford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,3.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37081,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Guilford,Guilford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,95.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37081,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Guilford,Guilford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,12320,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37081,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Guilford,Guilford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,361985,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37081,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Halifax,Halifax County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37083,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Halifax,Halifax County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37083,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Halifax,Halifax County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37083,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Halifax,Halifax County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37083,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Halifax,Halifax County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37083,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Halifax,Halifax County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,48495,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37083,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Halifax,Halifax County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,43002,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37083,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Halifax,Halifax County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,38477,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37083,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Halifax,Halifax County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37083,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Halifax,Halifax County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4525,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37083,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Halifax,Halifax County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,89.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37083,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Halifax,Halifax County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37083,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Halifax,Halifax County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,10.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37083,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Halifax,Halifax County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37083,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Halifax,Halifax County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,52.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37083,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Halifax,Halifax County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,37.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37083,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Halifax,Halifax County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,22466,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37083,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Halifax,Halifax County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,16012,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37083,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Harnett,Harnett County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37085,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Harnett,Harnett County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37085,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Harnett,Harnett County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37085,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Harnett,Harnett County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37085,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Harnett,Harnett County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37085,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Harnett,Harnett County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,133761,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37085,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Harnett,Harnett County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,127330,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37085,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Harnett,Harnett County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,127114,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37085,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Harnett,Harnett County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37085,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Harnett,Harnett County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,216,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37085,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Harnett,Harnett County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37085,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Harnett,Harnett County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37085,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Harnett,Harnett County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37085,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Harnett,Harnett County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37085,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Harnett,Harnett County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,19.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37085,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Harnett,Harnett County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,80.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37085,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Harnett,Harnett County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,24518,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37085,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Harnett,Harnett County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,102596,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37085,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Haywood,Haywood County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37087,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Haywood,Haywood County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37087,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Haywood,Haywood County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37087,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Haywood,Haywood County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37087,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Haywood,Haywood County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37087,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Haywood,Haywood County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,62131,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37087,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Haywood,Haywood County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,39781,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37087,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Haywood,Haywood County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,30537,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37087,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Haywood,Haywood County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37087,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Haywood,Haywood County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9244,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37087,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Haywood,Haywood County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,76.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37087,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Haywood,Haywood County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37087,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Haywood,Haywood County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,23.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37087,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Haywood,Haywood County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37087,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Haywood,Haywood County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,22.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37087,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Haywood,Haywood County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,54.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37087,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Haywood,Haywood County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,9008,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37087,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Haywood,Haywood County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,21529,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37087,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Henderson,Henderson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,26,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37089,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Henderson,Henderson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37089,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Henderson,Henderson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37089,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Henderson,Henderson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37089,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Henderson,Henderson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37089,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Henderson,Henderson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,116493,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37089,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Henderson,Henderson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,64286,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37089,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Henderson,Henderson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,61585,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37089,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Henderson,Henderson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37089,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Henderson,Henderson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2701,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37089,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Henderson,Henderson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,95.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37089,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Henderson,Henderson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37089,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Henderson,Henderson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,4.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37089,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Henderson,Henderson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37089,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Henderson,Henderson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,5.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37089,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Henderson,Henderson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,90.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37089,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Henderson,Henderson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,3401,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37089,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Henderson,Henderson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,58185,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37089,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Hertford,Hertford County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37091,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Hertford,Hertford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37091,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Hertford,Hertford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37091,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Hertford,Hertford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37091,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Hertford,Hertford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37091,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Hertford,Hertford County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,21451,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37091,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Hertford,Hertford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,18148,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37091,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Hertford,Hertford County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,677,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37091,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Hertford,Hertford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,677,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37091,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Hertford,Hertford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,17472,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37091,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Hertford,Hertford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,3.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37091,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Hertford,Hertford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,3.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37091,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Hertford,Hertford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,96.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37091,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Hertford,Hertford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37091,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Hertford,Hertford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37091,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Hertford,Hertford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37091,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Hertford,Hertford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37091,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Hertford,Hertford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37091,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Hoke,Hoke County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37093,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Hoke,Hoke County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37093,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Hoke,Hoke County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37093,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Hoke,Hoke County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37093,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Hoke,Hoke County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37093,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Hoke,Hoke County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,52223,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37093,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Hoke,Hoke County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,31484,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37093,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Hoke,Hoke County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,30876,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37093,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Hoke,Hoke County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37093,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Hoke,Hoke County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,609,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37093,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Hoke,Hoke County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37093,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Hoke,Hoke County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37093,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Hoke,Hoke County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37093,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Hoke,Hoke County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37093,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Hoke,Hoke County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,77.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37093,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Hoke,Hoke County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,20.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37093,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Hoke,Hoke County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,24503,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37093,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Hoke,Hoke County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,6373,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37093,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Hyde,Hyde County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37095,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Hyde,Hyde County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37095,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Hyde,Hyde County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37095,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Hyde,Hyde County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37095,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Hyde,Hyde County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37095,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Hyde,Hyde County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,4549,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37095,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Hyde,Hyde County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5751,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37095,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Hyde,Hyde County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4946,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37095,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Hyde,Hyde County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,4705,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37095,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Hyde,Hyde County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,806,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37095,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Hyde,Hyde County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,86,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37095,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Hyde,Hyde County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,81.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37095,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Hyde,Hyde County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,14,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37095,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Hyde,Hyde County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37095,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Hyde,Hyde County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37095,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Hyde,Hyde County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,4.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37095,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Hyde,Hyde County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37095,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Hyde,Hyde County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,241,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37095,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Iredell,Iredell County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,47,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37097,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Iredell,Iredell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37097,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Iredell,Iredell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37097,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Iredell,Iredell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37097,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Iredell,Iredell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37097,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Iredell,Iredell County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,187630,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37097,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Iredell,Iredell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,106416,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37097,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Iredell,Iredell County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,73668,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37097,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Iredell,Iredell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37097,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Iredell,Iredell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,32748,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37097,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Iredell,Iredell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,69.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37097,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Iredell,Iredell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37097,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Iredell,Iredell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,30.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37097,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Iredell,Iredell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,41,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37097,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Iredell,Iredell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,10.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37097,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Iredell,Iredell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,59.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37097,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Iredell,Iredell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,10788,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37097,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Iredell,Iredell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,62880,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37097,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,33,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37099,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37099,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37099,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37099,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37099,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,43134,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37099,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,20598,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37099,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37099,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37099,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,20598,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37099,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37099,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37099,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37099,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,33,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37099,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37099,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37099,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37099,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37099,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Johnston,Johnston County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,45,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37101,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Johnston,Johnston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37101,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Johnston,Johnston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37101,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Johnston,Johnston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37101,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Johnston,Johnston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37101,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Johnston,Johnston County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,217612,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37101,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Johnston,Johnston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,136365,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37101,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Johnston,Johnston County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,130269,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37101,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Johnston,Johnston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37101,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Johnston,Johnston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6096,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37101,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Johnston,Johnston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,95.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37101,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Johnston,Johnston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37101,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Johnston,Johnston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,4.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37101,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Johnston,Johnston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,29,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37101,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Johnston,Johnston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,24.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37101,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Johnston,Johnston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,71,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37101,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Johnston,Johnston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,33420,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37101,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Johnston,Johnston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,96850,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37101,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Jones,Jones County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37103,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Jones,Jones County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37103,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Jones,Jones County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37103,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Jones,Jones County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37103,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Jones,Jones County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37103,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Jones,Jones County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,9156,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37103,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Jones,Jones County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9872,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37103,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Jones,Jones County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9808,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37103,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Jones,Jones County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,8055,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37103,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Jones,Jones County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,64,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37103,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Jones,Jones County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37103,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Jones,Jones County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,81.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37103,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Jones,Jones County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37103,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Jones,Jones County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37103,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Jones,Jones County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,17.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37103,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Jones,Jones County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37103,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Jones,Jones County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1753,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37103,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Jones,Jones County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37103,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37105,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37105,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37105,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37105,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37105,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,63387,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37105,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,52323,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37105,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,51390,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37105,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37105,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,934,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37105,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37105,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37105,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37105,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37105,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,20.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37105,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,78.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37105,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,10527,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37105,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,40863,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37105,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Lenoir,Lenoir County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37107,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Lenoir,Lenoir County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37107,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Lenoir,Lenoir County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37107,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Lenoir,Lenoir County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37107,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Lenoir,Lenoir County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37107,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Lenoir,Lenoir County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,54995,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37107,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Lenoir,Lenoir County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,53679,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37107,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Lenoir,Lenoir County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,12785,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37107,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Lenoir,Lenoir County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37107,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Lenoir,Lenoir County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,40895,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37107,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Lenoir,Lenoir County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,23.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37107,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Lenoir,Lenoir County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37107,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Lenoir,Lenoir County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,76.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37107,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Lenoir,Lenoir County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37107,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Lenoir,Lenoir County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,23.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37107,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Lenoir,Lenoir County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37107,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Lenoir,Lenoir County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,12785,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37107,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Lenoir,Lenoir County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37107,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37109,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37109,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37109,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37109,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37109,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,87190,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37109,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,48232,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37109,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,47607,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37109,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37109,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,625,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37109,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37109,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37109,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37109,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37109,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37109,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,97.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37109,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,455,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37109,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,47152,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37109,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,20,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37113,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37113,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37113,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37113,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37113,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,37049,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37113,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,17538,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37113,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37113,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37113,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,17538,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37113,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37113,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37113,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37113,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,20,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37113,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37113,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37113,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37113,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37113,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37115,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37115,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37115,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37115,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37115,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,21209,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37115,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,6831,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37115,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37115,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37115,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6831,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37115,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37115,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37115,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37115,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37115,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37115,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37115,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37115,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37115,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37117,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37117,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37117,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37117,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37117,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,21949,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37117,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,11854,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37117,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11424,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37117,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,10814,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37117,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,430,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37117,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,96.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37117,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,91.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37117,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,3.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37117,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37117,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,5.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37117,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37117,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,610,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37117,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37117,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,McDowell,McDowell County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37111,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,McDowell,McDowell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37111,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,McDowell,McDowell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37111,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,McDowell,McDowell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37111,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,McDowell,McDowell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37111,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,McDowell,McDowell County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,44536,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37111,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,McDowell,McDowell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,12882,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37111,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,McDowell,McDowell County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9147,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37111,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,McDowell,McDowell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37111,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,McDowell,McDowell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3735,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37111,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,McDowell,McDowell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,71,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37111,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,McDowell,McDowell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37111,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,McDowell,McDowell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,29,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37111,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,McDowell,McDowell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37111,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,McDowell,McDowell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,5.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37111,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,McDowell,McDowell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,65.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37111,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,McDowell,McDowell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,766,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37111,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,McDowell,McDowell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,8380,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37111,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Mecklenburg,Mecklenburg County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,57,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37119,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Mecklenburg,Mecklenburg County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37119,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Mecklenburg,Mecklenburg County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37119,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Mecklenburg,Mecklenburg County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37119,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Mecklenburg,Mecklenburg County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37119,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Mecklenburg,Mecklenburg County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,1118340,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37119,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Mecklenburg,Mecklenburg County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,994318,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37119,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Mecklenburg,Mecklenburg County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,982258,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37119,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Mecklenburg,Mecklenburg County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37119,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Mecklenburg,Mecklenburg County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,12060,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37119,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Mecklenburg,Mecklenburg County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37119,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Mecklenburg,Mecklenburg County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37119,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Mecklenburg,Mecklenburg County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37119,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Mecklenburg,Mecklenburg County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,53,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37119,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Mecklenburg,Mecklenburg County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37119,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Mecklenburg,Mecklenburg County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,98.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37119,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Mecklenburg,Mecklenburg County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,3052,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37119,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Mecklenburg,Mecklenburg County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,979206,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37119,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Mitchell,Mitchell County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37121,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Mitchell,Mitchell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37121,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Mitchell,Mitchell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37121,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Mitchell,Mitchell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37121,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Mitchell,Mitchell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37121,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Mitchell,Mitchell County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,14881,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37121,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Mitchell,Mitchell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,6399,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37121,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Mitchell,Mitchell County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37121,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Mitchell,Mitchell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37121,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Mitchell,Mitchell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6399,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37121,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Mitchell,Mitchell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37121,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Mitchell,Mitchell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37121,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Mitchell,Mitchell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37121,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Mitchell,Mitchell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37121,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Mitchell,Mitchell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37121,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Mitchell,Mitchell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37121,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Mitchell,Mitchell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37121,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Mitchell,Mitchell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37121,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37123,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37123,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37123,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37123,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37123,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,25720,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37123,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,25915,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37123,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,25915,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37123,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37123,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37123,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37123,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37123,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37123,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37123,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,47.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37123,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,52.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37123,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,12396,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37123,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,13519,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37123,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Moore,Moore County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,31,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37125,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Moore,Moore County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37125,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Moore,Moore County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37125,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Moore,Moore County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37125,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Moore,Moore County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37125,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Moore,Moore County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,100168,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37125,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Moore,Moore County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,79416,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37125,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Moore,Moore County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,47391,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37125,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Moore,Moore County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37125,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Moore,Moore County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,32025,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37125,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Moore,Moore County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,59.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37125,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Moore,Moore County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37125,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Moore,Moore County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,40.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37125,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Moore,Moore County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37125,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Moore,Moore County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,18.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37125,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Moore,Moore County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,41.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37125,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Moore,Moore County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,14417,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37125,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Moore,Moore County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,32974,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37125,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Nash,Nash County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37127,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Nash,Nash County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37127,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Nash,Nash County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37127,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Nash,Nash County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37127,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Nash,Nash County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37127,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Nash,Nash County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,95027,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37127,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Nash,Nash County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,68320,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37127,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Nash,Nash County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,65070,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37127,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Nash,Nash County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37127,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Nash,Nash County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3249,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37127,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Nash,Nash County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,95.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37127,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Nash,Nash County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37127,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Nash,Nash County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,4.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37127,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Nash,Nash County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37127,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Nash,Nash County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,23.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37127,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Nash,Nash County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,71.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37127,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Nash,Nash County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,15939,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37127,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Nash,Nash County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,49131,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37127,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,NC,North Carolina,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2035,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,NC,NC,North Carolina,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,479,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,NC,NC,North Carolina,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,131,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,NC,NC,North Carolina,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,301,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,NC,NC,North Carolina,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,32,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,NC,NC,North Carolina,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,10457177,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2020,NC,NC,North Carolina,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7950174,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,NC,NC,North Carolina,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6985222,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,NC,NC,North Carolina,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,107675,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,NC,NC,North Carolina,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,964952,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,NC,NC,North Carolina,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,87.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,NC,NC,North Carolina,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,NC,NC,North Carolina,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,12.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,NC,NC,North Carolina,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1556,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,NC,NC,North Carolina,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,15.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,NC,NC,North Carolina,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,70.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,NC,NC,North Carolina,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1255600,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,NC,NC,North Carolina,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,5621947,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,NC,New Hanover,New Hanover County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,25,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37129,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,New Hanover,New Hanover County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37129,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,New Hanover,New Hanover County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37129,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,New Hanover,New Hanover County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37129,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,New Hanover,New Hanover County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37129,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,New Hanover,New Hanover County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,226060,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37129,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,New Hanover,New Hanover County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,206018,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37129,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,New Hanover,New Hanover County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,164788,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37129,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,New Hanover,New Hanover County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37129,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,New Hanover,New Hanover County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,41230,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37129,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,New Hanover,New Hanover County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,80,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37129,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,New Hanover,New Hanover County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37129,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,New Hanover,New Hanover County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,20,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37129,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,New Hanover,New Hanover County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,22,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37129,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,New Hanover,New Hanover County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37129,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,New Hanover,New Hanover County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,79.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37129,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,New Hanover,New Hanover County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1643,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37129,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,New Hanover,New Hanover County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,163145,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37129,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Northampton,Northampton County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37131,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Northampton,Northampton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37131,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Northampton,Northampton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37131,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Northampton,Northampton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37131,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Northampton,Northampton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37131,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Northampton,Northampton County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,17438,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37131,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Northampton,Northampton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,15019,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37131,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Northampton,Northampton County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7749,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37131,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Northampton,Northampton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1480,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37131,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Northampton,Northampton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7270,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37131,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Northampton,Northampton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,51.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37131,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Northampton,Northampton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,9.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37131,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Northampton,Northampton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,48.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37131,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Northampton,Northampton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37131,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Northampton,Northampton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,41.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37131,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Northampton,Northampton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37131,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Northampton,Northampton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,6270,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37131,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Northampton,Northampton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37131,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Onslow,Onslow County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37133,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Onslow,Onslow County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37133,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Onslow,Onslow County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37133,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Onslow,Onslow County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37133,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Onslow,Onslow County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37133,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Onslow,Onslow County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,204735,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37133,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Onslow,Onslow County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,235545,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37133,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Onslow,Onslow County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,219716,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37133,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Onslow,Onslow County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37133,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Onslow,Onslow County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,15828,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37133,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Onslow,Onslow County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,93.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37133,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Onslow,Onslow County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37133,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Onslow,Onslow County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,6.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37133,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Onslow,Onslow County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37133,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Onslow,Onslow County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,18.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37133,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Onslow,Onslow County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,74.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37133,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Onslow,Onslow County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,44348,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37133,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Onslow,Onslow County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,175368,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37133,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,36,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37135,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37135,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37135,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37135,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37135,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,148792,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37135,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,101882,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37135,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,98365,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37135,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37135,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3518,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37135,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,96.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37135,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37135,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,3.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37135,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,32,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37135,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37135,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,95.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37135,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1034,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37135,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,97331,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37135,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Pamlico,Pamlico County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37137,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Pamlico,Pamlico County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37137,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Pamlico,Pamlico County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37137,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Pamlico,Pamlico County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37137,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Pamlico,Pamlico County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37137,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Pamlico,Pamlico County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,12280,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37137,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Pamlico,Pamlico County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,18893,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37137,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Pamlico,Pamlico County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37137,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Pamlico,Pamlico County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37137,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Pamlico,Pamlico County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,18893,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37137,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Pamlico,Pamlico County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37137,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Pamlico,Pamlico County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37137,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Pamlico,Pamlico County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37137,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Pamlico,Pamlico County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37137,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Pamlico,Pamlico County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37137,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Pamlico,Pamlico County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37137,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Pamlico,Pamlico County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37137,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Pamlico,Pamlico County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37137,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Pasquotank,Pasquotank County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37139,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Pasquotank,Pasquotank County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37139,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Pasquotank,Pasquotank County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37139,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Pasquotank,Pasquotank County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37139,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Pasquotank,Pasquotank County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37139,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Pasquotank,Pasquotank County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,40645,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37139,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Pasquotank,Pasquotank County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,34614,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37139,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Pasquotank,Pasquotank County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,34614,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37139,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Pasquotank,Pasquotank County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37139,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Pasquotank,Pasquotank County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37139,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Pasquotank,Pasquotank County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37139,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Pasquotank,Pasquotank County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37139,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Pasquotank,Pasquotank County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37139,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Pasquotank,Pasquotank County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37139,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Pasquotank,Pasquotank County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,1.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37139,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Pasquotank,Pasquotank County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,98.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37139,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Pasquotank,Pasquotank County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,480,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37139,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Pasquotank,Pasquotank County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,34134,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37139,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Pender,Pender County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37141,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Pender,Pender County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37141,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Pender,Pender County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37141,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Pender,Pender County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37141,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Pender,Pender County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37141,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Pender,Pender County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,60563,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37141,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Pender,Pender County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,41377,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37141,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Pender,Pender County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4683,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37141,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Pender,Pender County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,4074,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37141,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Pender,Pender County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,36694,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37141,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Pender,Pender County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,11.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37141,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Pender,Pender County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,9.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37141,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Pender,Pender County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,88.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37141,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Pender,Pender County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37141,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Pender,Pender County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,1.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37141,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Pender,Pender County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37141,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Pender,Pender County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,610,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37141,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Pender,Pender County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37141,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Perquimans,Perquimans County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37143,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Perquimans,Perquimans County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37143,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Perquimans,Perquimans County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37143,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Perquimans,Perquimans County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37143,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Perquimans,Perquimans County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37143,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Perquimans,Perquimans County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,12997,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37143,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Perquimans,Perquimans County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,12219,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37143,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Perquimans,Perquimans County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37143,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Perquimans,Perquimans County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37143,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Perquimans,Perquimans County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,12219,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37143,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Perquimans,Perquimans County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37143,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Perquimans,Perquimans County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37143,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Perquimans,Perquimans County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37143,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Perquimans,Perquimans County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37143,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Perquimans,Perquimans County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37143,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Perquimans,Perquimans County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37143,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Perquimans,Perquimans County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37143,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Perquimans,Perquimans County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37143,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Person,Person County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37145,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Person,Person County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37145,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Person,Person County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37145,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Person,Person County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37145,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Person,Person County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37145,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Person,Person County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,39146,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37145,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Person,Person County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,11510,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37145,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Person,Person County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10013,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37145,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Person,Person County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37145,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Person,Person County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1497,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37145,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Person,Person County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,87,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37145,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Person,Person County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37145,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Person,Person County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,13,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37145,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Person,Person County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37145,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Person,Person County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37145,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Person,Person County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,87,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37145,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Person,Person County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37145,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Person,Person County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,10013,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37145,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Pitt,Pitt County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37147,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Pitt,Pitt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37147,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Pitt,Pitt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37147,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Pitt,Pitt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37147,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Pitt,Pitt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37147,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Pitt,Pitt County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,170570,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37147,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Pitt,Pitt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,163804,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37147,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Pitt,Pitt County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,149468,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37147,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Pitt,Pitt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,17037,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37147,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Pitt,Pitt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,14336,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37147,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Pitt,Pitt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,91.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37147,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Pitt,Pitt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,10.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37147,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Pitt,Pitt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,8.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37147,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Pitt,Pitt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37147,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Pitt,Pitt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,24.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37147,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Pitt,Pitt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,56.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37147,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Pitt,Pitt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,40105,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37147,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Pitt,Pitt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,92326,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37147,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37149,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37149,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37149,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37149,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37149,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,19372,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37149,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,8916,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37149,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1873,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37149,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37149,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7043,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37149,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,21,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37149,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37149,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,79,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37149,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37149,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,21,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37149,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37149,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1873,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37149,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37149,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,38,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37151,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37151,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37151,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37151,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37151,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,144334,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37151,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,51437,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37151,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,46054,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37151,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37151,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5383,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37151,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,89.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37151,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37151,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,10.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37151,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,28,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37151,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,39.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37151,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,49.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37151,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,20377,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37151,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,25676,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37151,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Richmond,Richmond County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37153,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Richmond,Richmond County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37153,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Richmond,Richmond County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37153,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Richmond,Richmond County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37153,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Richmond,Richmond County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37153,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Richmond,Richmond County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,42879,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37153,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Richmond,Richmond County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,41094,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37153,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Richmond,Richmond County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,41011,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37153,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Richmond,Richmond County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37153,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Richmond,Richmond County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,82,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37153,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Richmond,Richmond County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37153,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Richmond,Richmond County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37153,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Richmond,Richmond County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37153,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Richmond,Richmond County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37153,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Richmond,Richmond County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,3.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37153,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Richmond,Richmond County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,96.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37153,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Richmond,Richmond County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1468,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37153,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Richmond,Richmond County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,39543,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37153,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Robeson,Robeson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37155,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Robeson,Robeson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37155,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Robeson,Robeson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37155,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Robeson,Robeson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37155,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Robeson,Robeson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37155,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Robeson,Robeson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,116361,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37155,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Robeson,Robeson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,96693,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37155,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Robeson,Robeson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,96693,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37155,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Robeson,Robeson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37155,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Robeson,Robeson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37155,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Robeson,Robeson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37155,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Robeson,Robeson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37155,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Robeson,Robeson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37155,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Robeson,Robeson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37155,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Robeson,Robeson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,9.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37155,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Robeson,Robeson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,90.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37155,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Robeson,Robeson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,9566,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37155,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Robeson,Robeson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,87128,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37155,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Rockingham,Rockingham County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,32,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37157,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Rockingham,Rockingham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37157,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Rockingham,Rockingham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37157,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Rockingham,Rockingham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37157,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Rockingham,Rockingham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37157,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Rockingham,Rockingham County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,91080,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37157,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Rockingham,Rockingham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,46025,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37157,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Rockingham,Rockingham County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,39558,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37157,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Rockingham,Rockingham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37157,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Rockingham,Rockingham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6467,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37157,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Rockingham,Rockingham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,85.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37157,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Rockingham,Rockingham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37157,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Rockingham,Rockingham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,14.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37157,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Rockingham,Rockingham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,27,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37157,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Rockingham,Rockingham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,23.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37157,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Rockingham,Rockingham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,62,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37157,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Rockingham,Rockingham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,11006,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37157,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Rockingham,Rockingham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,28553,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37157,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Rowan,Rowan County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,43,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37159,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Rowan,Rowan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37159,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Rowan,Rowan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37159,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Rowan,Rowan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37159,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Rowan,Rowan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37159,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Rowan,Rowan County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,147027,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37159,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Rowan,Rowan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,99970,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37159,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Rowan,Rowan County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,93455,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37159,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Rowan,Rowan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37159,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Rowan,Rowan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6516,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37159,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Rowan,Rowan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,93.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37159,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Rowan,Rowan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37159,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Rowan,Rowan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,6.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37159,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Rowan,Rowan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,38,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37159,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Rowan,Rowan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,8.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37159,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Rowan,Rowan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,84.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37159,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Rowan,Rowan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,8634,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37159,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Rowan,Rowan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,84821,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37159,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Rutherford,Rutherford County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37161,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Rutherford,Rutherford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37161,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Rutherford,Rutherford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37161,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Rutherford,Rutherford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37161,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Rutherford,Rutherford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37161,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Rutherford,Rutherford County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,64421,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37161,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Rutherford,Rutherford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,43163,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37161,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Rutherford,Rutherford County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,38419,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37161,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Rutherford,Rutherford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,36,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37161,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Rutherford,Rutherford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4744,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37161,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Rutherford,Rutherford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,89,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37161,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Rutherford,Rutherford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37161,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Rutherford,Rutherford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,11,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37161,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Rutherford,Rutherford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37161,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Rutherford,Rutherford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,10.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37161,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Rutherford,Rutherford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,78.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37161,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Rutherford,Rutherford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,4363,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37161,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Rutherford,Rutherford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,34020,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37161,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Sampson,Sampson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,20,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37163,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Sampson,Sampson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37163,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Sampson,Sampson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37163,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Sampson,Sampson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37163,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Sampson,Sampson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37163,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Sampson,Sampson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,59021,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37163,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Sampson,Sampson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,29493,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37163,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Sampson,Sampson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,21066,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37163,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Sampson,Sampson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37163,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Sampson,Sampson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8428,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37163,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Sampson,Sampson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,71.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37163,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Sampson,Sampson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37163,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Sampson,Sampson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,28.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37163,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Sampson,Sampson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37163,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Sampson,Sampson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,33.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37163,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Sampson,Sampson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,37.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37163,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Sampson,Sampson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,9957,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37163,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Sampson,Sampson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,11109,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37163,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Scotland,Scotland County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37165,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Scotland,Scotland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37165,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Scotland,Scotland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37165,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Scotland,Scotland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37165,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Scotland,Scotland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37165,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Scotland,Scotland County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,34110,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37165,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Scotland,Scotland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,21624,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37165,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Scotland,Scotland County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,18730,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37165,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Scotland,Scotland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37165,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Scotland,Scotland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2894,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37165,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Scotland,Scotland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,86.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37165,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Scotland,Scotland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37165,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Scotland,Scotland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,13.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37165,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Scotland,Scotland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37165,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Scotland,Scotland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,10.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37165,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Scotland,Scotland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,75.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37165,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Scotland,Scotland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2360,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37165,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Scotland,Scotland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,16371,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37165,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Stanly,Stanly County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37167,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Stanly,Stanly County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37167,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Stanly,Stanly County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37167,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Stanly,Stanly County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37167,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Stanly,Stanly County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37167,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Stanly,Stanly County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,62609,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37167,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Stanly,Stanly County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,43318,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37167,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Stanly,Stanly County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,40618,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37167,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Stanly,Stanly County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37167,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Stanly,Stanly County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2700,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37167,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Stanly,Stanly County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,93.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37167,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Stanly,Stanly County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37167,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Stanly,Stanly County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,6.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37167,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Stanly,Stanly County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37167,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Stanly,Stanly County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,49.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37167,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Stanly,Stanly County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,44.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37167,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Stanly,Stanly County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,21383,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37167,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Stanly,Stanly County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,19235,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37167,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Stokes,Stokes County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37169,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Stokes,Stokes County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37169,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Stokes,Stokes County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37169,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Stokes,Stokes County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37169,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Stokes,Stokes County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37169,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Stokes,Stokes County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,44517,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37169,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Stokes,Stokes County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,21601,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37169,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Stokes,Stokes County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,376,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37169,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Stokes,Stokes County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37169,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Stokes,Stokes County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,21225,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37169,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Stokes,Stokes County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37169,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Stokes,Stokes County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37169,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Stokes,Stokes County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37169,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Stokes,Stokes County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37169,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Stokes,Stokes County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,1.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37169,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Stokes,Stokes County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37169,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Stokes,Stokes County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,376,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37169,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Stokes,Stokes County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37169,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Surry,Surry County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,44,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37171,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Surry,Surry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37171,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Surry,Surry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37171,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Surry,Surry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37171,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Surry,Surry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37171,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Surry,Surry County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,71253,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37171,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Surry,Surry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,21812,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37171,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Surry,Surry County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,17340,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37171,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Surry,Surry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37171,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Surry,Surry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4472,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37171,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Surry,Surry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,79.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37171,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Surry,Surry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37171,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Surry,Surry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,20.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37171,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Surry,Surry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,38,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37171,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Surry,Surry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,2.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37171,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Surry,Surry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,77.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37171,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Surry,Surry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,471,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37171,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Surry,Surry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,16869,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37171,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Swain,Swain County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37173,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Swain,Swain County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37173,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Swain,Swain County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37173,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Swain,Swain County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37173,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Swain,Swain County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37173,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Swain,Swain County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,14083,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37173,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Swain,Swain County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,13303,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37173,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Swain,Swain County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8782,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37173,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Swain,Swain County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37173,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Swain,Swain County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4521,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37173,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Swain,Swain County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,66,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37173,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Swain,Swain County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37173,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Swain,Swain County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,34,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37173,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Swain,Swain County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37173,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Swain,Swain County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,1.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37173,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Swain,Swain County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,64.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37173,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Swain,Swain County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,224,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37173,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Swain,Swain County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,8559,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37173,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Transylvania,Transylvania County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,19,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37175,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Transylvania,Transylvania County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37175,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Transylvania,Transylvania County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37175,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Transylvania,Transylvania County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37175,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Transylvania,Transylvania County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37175,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Transylvania,Transylvania County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,33009,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37175,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Transylvania,Transylvania County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,16348,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37175,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Transylvania,Transylvania County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,66,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37175,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Transylvania,Transylvania County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,66,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37175,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Transylvania,Transylvania County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,16282,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37175,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Transylvania,Transylvania County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37175,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Transylvania,Transylvania County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37175,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Transylvania,Transylvania County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37175,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Transylvania,Transylvania County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37175,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Transylvania,Transylvania County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37175,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Transylvania,Transylvania County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37175,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Transylvania,Transylvania County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37175,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Transylvania,Transylvania County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37175,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Tyrrell,Tyrrell County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37177,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Tyrrell,Tyrrell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37177,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Tyrrell,Tyrrell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37177,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Tyrrell,Tyrrell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37177,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Tyrrell,Tyrrell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37177,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Tyrrell,Tyrrell County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,3232,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37177,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Tyrrell,Tyrrell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3641,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37177,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Tyrrell,Tyrrell County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,798,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37177,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Tyrrell,Tyrrell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37177,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Tyrrell,Tyrrell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2844,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37177,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Tyrrell,Tyrrell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,21.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37177,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Tyrrell,Tyrrell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37177,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Tyrrell,Tyrrell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,78.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37177,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Tyrrell,Tyrrell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37177,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Tyrrell,Tyrrell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37177,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Tyrrell,Tyrrell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,21.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37177,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Tyrrell,Tyrrell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37177,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Tyrrell,Tyrrell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,798,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37177,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37179,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37179,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37179,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37179,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37179,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,239287,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37179,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,154834,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37179,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,154127,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37179,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37179,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,707,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37179,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37179,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37179,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37179,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37179,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,81.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37179,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,18.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37179,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,125985,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37179,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,28142,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37179,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Vance,Vance County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37181,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Vance,Vance County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37181,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Vance,Vance County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37181,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Vance,Vance County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37181,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Vance,Vance County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37181,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Vance,Vance County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,42529,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37181,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Vance,Vance County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,17661,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37181,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Vance,Vance County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,16437,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37181,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Vance,Vance County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37181,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Vance,Vance County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1225,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37181,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Vance,Vance County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,93.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37181,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Vance,Vance County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37181,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Vance,Vance County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,6.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37181,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Vance,Vance County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37181,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Vance,Vance County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,17.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37181,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Vance,Vance County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,75.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37181,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Vance,Vance County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,3142,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37181,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Vance,Vance County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,13295,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37181,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Wake,Wake County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,280,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37183,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Wake,Wake County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37183,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Wake,Wake County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37183,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Wake,Wake County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37183,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Wake,Wake County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37183,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Wake,Wake County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,1133553,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37183,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Wake,Wake County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,903363,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37183,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Wake,Wake County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,829037,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37183,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Wake,Wake County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37183,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Wake,Wake County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,74326,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37183,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Wake,Wake County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,91.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37183,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Wake,Wake County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37183,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Wake,Wake County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,8.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37183,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Wake,Wake County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,271,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37183,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Wake,Wake County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,13,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37183,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Wake,Wake County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,78.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37183,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Wake,Wake County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,117169,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37183,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Wake,Wake County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,711868,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37183,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37185,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37185,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37185,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37185,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37185,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,18598,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37185,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,13357,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37185,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,12443,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37185,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37185,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,914,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37185,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,93.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37185,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37185,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,6.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37185,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37185,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,93.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37185,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37185,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,12443,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37185,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37185,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37187,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37187,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37187,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37187,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37187,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,10955,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37187,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,10622,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37187,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10219,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37187,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,4047,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37187,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,403,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37187,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,96.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37187,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,38.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37187,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,3.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37187,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37187,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,58.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37187,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37187,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,6172,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37187,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37187,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Watauga,Watauga County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,27,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37189,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Watauga,Watauga County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37189,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Watauga,Watauga County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37189,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Watauga,Watauga County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37189,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Watauga,Watauga County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37189,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Watauga,Watauga County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,54072,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37189,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Watauga,Watauga County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,35364,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37189,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Watauga,Watauga County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,18539,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37189,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Watauga,Watauga County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,40,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37189,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Watauga,Watauga County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,16825,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37189,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Watauga,Watauga County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,52.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37189,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Watauga,Watauga County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37189,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Watauga,Watauga County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,47.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37189,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Watauga,Watauga County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,24,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37189,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Watauga,Watauga County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37189,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Watauga,Watauga County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,52.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37189,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Watauga,Watauga County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37189,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Watauga,Watauga County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,18498,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37189,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37191,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37191,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37191,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37191,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37191,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,117226,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37191,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,89089,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37191,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,83553,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37191,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37191,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5536,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37191,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,93.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37191,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37191,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,6.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37191,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37191,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,10,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37191,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,83.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37191,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,8909,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37191,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,74645,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37191,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Wilkes,Wilkes County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37193,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Wilkes,Wilkes County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37193,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Wilkes,Wilkes County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37193,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Wilkes,Wilkes County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37193,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Wilkes,Wilkes County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37193,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Wilkes,Wilkes County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,65871,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37193,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Wilkes,Wilkes County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,43076,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37193,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Wilkes,Wilkes County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,38818,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37193,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Wilkes,Wilkes County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37193,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Wilkes,Wilkes County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4258,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37193,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Wilkes,Wilkes County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,90.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37193,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Wilkes,Wilkes County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37193,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Wilkes,Wilkes County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,9.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37193,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Wilkes,Wilkes County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37193,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Wilkes,Wilkes County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,73.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37193,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Wilkes,Wilkes County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,16.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37193,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Wilkes,Wilkes County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,31702,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37193,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Wilkes,Wilkes County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,7116,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37193,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Wilson,Wilson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37195,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Wilson,Wilson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37195,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Wilson,Wilson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37195,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Wilson,Wilson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37195,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Wilson,Wilson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37195,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Wilson,Wilson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,78811,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37195,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Wilson,Wilson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,51845,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37195,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Wilson,Wilson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,48393,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37195,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Wilson,Wilson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37195,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Wilson,Wilson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3453,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37195,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Wilson,Wilson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,93.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37195,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Wilson,Wilson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37195,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Wilson,Wilson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,6.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37195,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Wilson,Wilson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37195,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Wilson,Wilson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,3.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37195,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Wilson,Wilson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,90,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37195,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Wilson,Wilson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1719,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37195,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Wilson,Wilson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,46674,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37195,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Yadkin,Yadkin County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37197,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Yadkin,Yadkin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37197,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Yadkin,Yadkin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37197,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Yadkin,Yadkin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37197,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Yadkin,Yadkin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37197,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Yadkin,Yadkin County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,37182,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37197,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Yadkin,Yadkin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,10924,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37197,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Yadkin,Yadkin County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5993,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37197,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Yadkin,Yadkin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37197,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Yadkin,Yadkin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4930,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37197,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Yadkin,Yadkin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,54.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37197,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Yadkin,Yadkin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37197,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Yadkin,Yadkin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,45.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37197,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Yadkin,Yadkin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37197,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Yadkin,Yadkin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37197,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Yadkin,Yadkin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,52.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37197,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Yadkin,Yadkin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,223,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37197,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Yadkin,Yadkin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,5770,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37197,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Yancey,Yancey County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,36,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37199,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Yancey,Yancey County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37199,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Yancey,Yancey County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37199,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Yancey,Yancey County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37199,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Yancey,Yancey County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37199,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Yancey,Yancey County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,18475,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37199,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Yancey,Yancey County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,29739,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37199,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Yancey,Yancey County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9492,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37199,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Yancey,Yancey County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37199,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Yancey,Yancey County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,20247,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37199,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Yancey,Yancey County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,31.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37199,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Yancey,Yancey County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37199,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Yancey,Yancey County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,68.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37199,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Yancey,Yancey County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,26,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37199,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Yancey,Yancey County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,31.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37199,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Yancey,Yancey County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37199,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Yancey,Yancey County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,9492,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37199,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NC,Yancey,Yancey County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,37199,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38001,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38001,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38001,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38001,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38001,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,2188,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38001,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2066,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38001,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2066,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38001,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38001,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38001,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38001,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38001,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38001,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38001,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,68.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38001,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,31.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38001,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1411,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38001,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,656,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38001,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Barnes,Barnes County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38003,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Barnes,Barnes County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38003,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Barnes,Barnes County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38003,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Barnes,Barnes County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38003,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Barnes,Barnes County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38003,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Barnes,Barnes County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,10836,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38003,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Barnes,Barnes County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,11978,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38003,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Barnes,Barnes County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11978,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38003,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Barnes,Barnes County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,53,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38003,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Barnes,Barnes County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38003,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Barnes,Barnes County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38003,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Barnes,Barnes County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38003,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Barnes,Barnes County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38003,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Barnes,Barnes County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38003,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Barnes,Barnes County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,7.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38003,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Barnes,Barnes County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,92,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38003,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Barnes,Barnes County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,909,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38003,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Barnes,Barnes County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,11016,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38003,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Benson,Benson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38005,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Benson,Benson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38005,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Benson,Benson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38005,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Benson,Benson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38005,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Benson,Benson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38005,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Benson,Benson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,5953,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38005,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Benson,Benson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5086,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38005,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Benson,Benson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4639,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38005,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Benson,Benson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,434,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38005,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Benson,Benson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,447,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38005,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Benson,Benson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,91.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38005,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Benson,Benson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,8.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38005,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Benson,Benson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,8.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38005,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Benson,Benson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38005,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Benson,Benson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,38005,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Benson,Benson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,82.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38005,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Benson,Benson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,38005,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Benson,Benson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,4205,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38005,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Billings,Billings County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38007,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Billings,Billings County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38007,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Billings,Billings County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38007,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Billings,Billings County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38007,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Billings,Billings County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38007,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Billings,Billings County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,931,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38007,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Billings,Billings County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,114,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38007,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Billings,Billings County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,114,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38007,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Billings,Billings County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38007,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Billings,Billings County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38007,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Billings,Billings County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38007,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Billings,Billings County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38007,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Billings,Billings County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38007,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Billings,Billings County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38007,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Billings,Billings County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38007,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Billings,Billings County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,38007,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Billings,Billings County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,114,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38007,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Billings,Billings County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,38007,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Bottineau,Bottineau County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38009,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Bottineau,Bottineau County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38009,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Bottineau,Bottineau County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38009,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Bottineau,Bottineau County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38009,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Bottineau,Bottineau County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38009,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Bottineau,Bottineau County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,6377,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38009,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Bottineau,Bottineau County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4950,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38009,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Bottineau,Bottineau County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3465,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38009,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Bottineau,Bottineau County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38009,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Bottineau,Bottineau County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1485,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38009,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Bottineau,Bottineau County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,70,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38009,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Bottineau,Bottineau County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38009,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Bottineau,Bottineau County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,30,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38009,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Bottineau,Bottineau County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38009,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Bottineau,Bottineau County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,24.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38009,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Bottineau,Bottineau County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,45.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38009,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Bottineau,Bottineau County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1218,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38009,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Bottineau,Bottineau County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2247,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38009,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Bowman,Bowman County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38011,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Bowman,Bowman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38011,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Bowman,Bowman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38011,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Bowman,Bowman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38011,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Bowman,Bowman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38011,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Bowman,Bowman County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,2981,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38011,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Bowman,Bowman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2135,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38011,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Bowman,Bowman County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2135,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38011,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Bowman,Bowman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1677,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38011,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Bowman,Bowman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38011,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Bowman,Bowman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38011,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Bowman,Bowman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,78.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38011,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Bowman,Bowman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38011,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Bowman,Bowman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38011,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Bowman,Bowman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,21.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38011,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Bowman,Bowman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,38011,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Bowman,Bowman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,457,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38011,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Bowman,Bowman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,38011,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Burke,Burke County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38013,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Burke,Burke County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38013,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Burke,Burke County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38013,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Burke,Burke County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38013,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Burke,Burke County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38013,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Burke,Burke County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,2189,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38013,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Burke,Burke County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1114,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38013,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Burke,Burke County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,672,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38013,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Burke,Burke County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,195,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38013,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Burke,Burke County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,442,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38013,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Burke,Burke County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,60.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38013,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Burke,Burke County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,17.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38013,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Burke,Burke County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,39.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38013,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Burke,Burke County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38013,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Burke,Burke County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,42.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38013,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Burke,Burke County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,38013,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Burke,Burke County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,477,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38013,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Burke,Burke County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,38013,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Burleigh,Burleigh County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38015,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Burleigh,Burleigh County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38015,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Burleigh,Burleigh County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38015,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Burleigh,Burleigh County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38015,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Burleigh,Burleigh County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38015,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Burleigh,Burleigh County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,98467,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38015,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Burleigh,Burleigh County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,93568,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38015,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Burleigh,Burleigh County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,93414,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38015,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Burleigh,Burleigh County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38015,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Burleigh,Burleigh County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,155,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38015,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Burleigh,Burleigh County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38015,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Burleigh,Burleigh County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38015,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Burleigh,Burleigh County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38015,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Burleigh,Burleigh County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38015,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Burleigh,Burleigh County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,10.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38015,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Burleigh,Burleigh County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,89.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38015,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Burleigh,Burleigh County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,9795,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38015,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Burleigh,Burleigh County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,83619,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38015,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,31,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38017,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,25,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38017,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38017,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38017,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38017,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,184868,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38017,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,179056,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38017,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,177281,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38017,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,46,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38017,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1776,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38017,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38017,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38017,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38017,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38017,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,25.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38017,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,73.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38017,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,45879,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38017,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,130923,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38017,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Cavalier,Cavalier County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38019,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Cavalier,Cavalier County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38019,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Cavalier,Cavalier County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38019,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Cavalier,Cavalier County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38019,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Cavalier,Cavalier County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38019,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Cavalier,Cavalier County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,3693,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38019,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Cavalier,Cavalier County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4872,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38019,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Cavalier,Cavalier County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4872,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38019,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Cavalier,Cavalier County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38019,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Cavalier,Cavalier County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38019,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Cavalier,Cavalier County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38019,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Cavalier,Cavalier County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38019,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Cavalier,Cavalier County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38019,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Cavalier,Cavalier County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38019,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Cavalier,Cavalier County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,95.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38019,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Cavalier,Cavalier County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,4.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38019,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Cavalier,Cavalier County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,4645,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38019,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Cavalier,Cavalier County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,227,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38019,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Dickey,Dickey County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38021,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Dickey,Dickey County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38021,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Dickey,Dickey County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38021,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Dickey,Dickey County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38021,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Dickey,Dickey County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38021,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Dickey,Dickey County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,4959,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38021,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Dickey,Dickey County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4417,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38021,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Dickey,Dickey County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2388,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38021,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Dickey,Dickey County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38021,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Dickey,Dickey County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2029,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38021,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Dickey,Dickey County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,54.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38021,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Dickey,Dickey County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38021,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Dickey,Dickey County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,45.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38021,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Dickey,Dickey County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38021,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Dickey,Dickey County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,39.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38021,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Dickey,Dickey County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,14.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38021,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Dickey,Dickey County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1732,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38021,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Dickey,Dickey County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,656,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38021,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Divide,Divide County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38023,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Divide,Divide County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38023,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Divide,Divide County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38023,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Divide,Divide County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38023,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Divide,Divide County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38023,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Divide,Divide County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,2198,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38023,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Divide,Divide County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1588,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38023,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Divide,Divide County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1588,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38023,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Divide,Divide County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38023,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Divide,Divide County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38023,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Divide,Divide County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38023,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Divide,Divide County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38023,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Divide,Divide County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38023,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Divide,Divide County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38023,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Divide,Divide County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38023,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Divide,Divide County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,38023,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Divide,Divide County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1588,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38023,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Divide,Divide County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,38023,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Dunn,Dunn County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38025,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Dunn,Dunn County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38025,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Dunn,Dunn County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38025,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Dunn,Dunn County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38025,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Dunn,Dunn County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38025,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Dunn,Dunn County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,4103,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38025,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Dunn,Dunn County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2395,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38025,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Dunn,Dunn County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2395,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38025,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Dunn,Dunn County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38025,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Dunn,Dunn County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38025,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Dunn,Dunn County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38025,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Dunn,Dunn County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38025,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Dunn,Dunn County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38025,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Dunn,Dunn County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38025,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Dunn,Dunn County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,72.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38025,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Dunn,Dunn County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,27.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38025,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Dunn,Dunn County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1737,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38025,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Dunn,Dunn County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,658,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38025,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Eddy,Eddy County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38027,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Eddy,Eddy County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38027,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Eddy,Eddy County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38027,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Eddy,Eddy County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38027,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Eddy,Eddy County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38027,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Eddy,Eddy County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,2333,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38027,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Eddy,Eddy County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1965,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38027,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Eddy,Eddy County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1414,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38027,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Eddy,Eddy County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38027,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Eddy,Eddy County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,551,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38027,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Eddy,Eddy County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,72,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38027,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Eddy,Eddy County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38027,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Eddy,Eddy County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,28,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38027,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Eddy,Eddy County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38027,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Eddy,Eddy County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,38027,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Eddy,Eddy County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,72,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38027,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Eddy,Eddy County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,38027,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Eddy,Eddy County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1414,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38027,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Emmons,Emmons County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38029,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Emmons,Emmons County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38029,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Emmons,Emmons County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38029,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Emmons,Emmons County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38029,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Emmons,Emmons County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38029,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Emmons,Emmons County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,3282,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38029,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Emmons,Emmons County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5662,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38029,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Emmons,Emmons County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5423,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38029,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Emmons,Emmons County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38029,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Emmons,Emmons County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,239,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38029,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Emmons,Emmons County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,95.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38029,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Emmons,Emmons County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38029,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Emmons,Emmons County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,4.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38029,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Emmons,Emmons County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38029,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Emmons,Emmons County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,35.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38029,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Emmons,Emmons County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,60.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38029,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Emmons,Emmons County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2015,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38029,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Emmons,Emmons County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3408,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38029,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Foster,Foster County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38031,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Foster,Foster County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38031,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Foster,Foster County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38031,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Foster,Foster County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38031,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Foster,Foster County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38031,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Foster,Foster County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,3389,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38031,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Foster,Foster County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2890,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38031,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Foster,Foster County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2840,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38031,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Foster,Foster County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38031,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Foster,Foster County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,50,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38031,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Foster,Foster County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38031,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Foster,Foster County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38031,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Foster,Foster County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38031,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Foster,Foster County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38031,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Foster,Foster County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,19.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38031,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Foster,Foster County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,72.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38031,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Foster,Foster County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,555,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38031,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Foster,Foster County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2099,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38031,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Golden Valley,Golden Valley County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38033,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Golden Valley,Golden Valley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38033,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Golden Valley,Golden Valley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38033,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Golden Valley,Golden Valley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38033,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Golden Valley,Golden Valley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38033,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Golden Valley,Golden Valley County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,1730,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38033,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Golden Valley,Golden Valley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1155,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38033,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Golden Valley,Golden Valley County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1155,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38033,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Golden Valley,Golden Valley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38033,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Golden Valley,Golden Valley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38033,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Golden Valley,Golden Valley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38033,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Golden Valley,Golden Valley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38033,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Golden Valley,Golden Valley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38033,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Golden Valley,Golden Valley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38033,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Golden Valley,Golden Valley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38033,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Golden Valley,Golden Valley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,38033,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Golden Valley,Golden Valley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1155,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38033,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Golden Valley,Golden Valley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,38033,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Grand Forks,Grand Forks County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38035,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Grand Forks,Grand Forks County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38035,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Grand Forks,Grand Forks County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38035,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Grand Forks,Grand Forks County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38035,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Grand Forks,Grand Forks County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38035,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Grand Forks,Grand Forks County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,73062,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38035,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Grand Forks,Grand Forks County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,73356,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38035,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Grand Forks,Grand Forks County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,73254,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38035,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Grand Forks,Grand Forks County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38035,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Grand Forks,Grand Forks County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,102,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38035,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Grand Forks,Grand Forks County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38035,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Grand Forks,Grand Forks County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38035,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Grand Forks,Grand Forks County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38035,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Grand Forks,Grand Forks County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38035,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Grand Forks,Grand Forks County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,7.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38035,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Grand Forks,Grand Forks County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,92.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38035,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Grand Forks,Grand Forks County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,5398,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38035,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Grand Forks,Grand Forks County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,67856,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38035,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38037,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38037,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38037,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38037,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38037,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,2281,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38037,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1480,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38037,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1446,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38037,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38037,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,34,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38037,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,97.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38037,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38037,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38037,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38037,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,79.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38037,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,18.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38037,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1175,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38037,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,271,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38037,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Griggs,Griggs County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38039,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Griggs,Griggs County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38039,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Griggs,Griggs County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38039,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Griggs,Griggs County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38039,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Griggs,Griggs County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38039,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Griggs,Griggs County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,2296,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38039,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Griggs,Griggs County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2733,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38039,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Griggs,Griggs County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2733,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38039,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Griggs,Griggs County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38039,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Griggs,Griggs County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38039,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Griggs,Griggs County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38039,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Griggs,Griggs County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38039,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Griggs,Griggs County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38039,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Griggs,Griggs County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38039,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Griggs,Griggs County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,6.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38039,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Griggs,Griggs County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,90.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38039,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Griggs,Griggs County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,186,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38039,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Griggs,Griggs County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2485,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38039,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Hettinger,Hettinger County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38041,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Hettinger,Hettinger County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38041,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Hettinger,Hettinger County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38041,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Hettinger,Hettinger County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38041,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Hettinger,Hettinger County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38041,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Hettinger,Hettinger County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,2474,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38041,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Hettinger,Hettinger County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2172,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38041,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Hettinger,Hettinger County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2172,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38041,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Hettinger,Hettinger County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38041,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Hettinger,Hettinger County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38041,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Hettinger,Hettinger County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38041,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Hettinger,Hettinger County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38041,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Hettinger,Hettinger County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38041,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Hettinger,Hettinger County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38041,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Hettinger,Hettinger County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,69.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38041,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Hettinger,Hettinger County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,30.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38041,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Hettinger,Hettinger County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1505,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38041,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Hettinger,Hettinger County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,667,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38041,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Kidder,Kidder County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38043,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Kidder,Kidder County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38043,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Kidder,Kidder County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38043,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Kidder,Kidder County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38043,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Kidder,Kidder County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38043,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Kidder,Kidder County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,2384,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38043,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Kidder,Kidder County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,856,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38043,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Kidder,Kidder County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,727,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38043,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Kidder,Kidder County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38043,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Kidder,Kidder County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,129,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38043,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Kidder,Kidder County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,84.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38043,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Kidder,Kidder County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38043,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Kidder,Kidder County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,15.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38043,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Kidder,Kidder County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38043,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Kidder,Kidder County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,38043,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Kidder,Kidder County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,84.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38043,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Kidder,Kidder County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,38043,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Kidder,Kidder County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,727,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38043,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,LaMoure,LaMoure County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38045,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,LaMoure,LaMoure County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38045,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,LaMoure,LaMoure County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38045,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,LaMoure,LaMoure County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38045,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,LaMoure,LaMoure County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38045,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,LaMoure,LaMoure County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,4083,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38045,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ND,LaMoure,LaMoure County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3154,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38045,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,LaMoure,LaMoure County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2956,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38045,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,LaMoure,LaMoure County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38045,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,LaMoure,LaMoure County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,198,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38045,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,LaMoure,LaMoure County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,93.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38045,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,LaMoure,LaMoure County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38045,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,LaMoure,LaMoure County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,6.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38045,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,LaMoure,LaMoure County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38045,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,LaMoure,LaMoure County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,64.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38045,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,LaMoure,LaMoure County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,27.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38045,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,LaMoure,LaMoure County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2030,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38045,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,LaMoure,LaMoure County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,864,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38045,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38047,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38047,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38047,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38047,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38047,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,1885,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38047,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1227,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38047,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,422,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38047,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38047,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,805,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38047,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,34.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38047,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38047,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,65.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38047,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38047,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,25.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38047,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,8.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38047,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,315,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38047,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,107,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38047,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,McHenry,McHenry County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38049,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,McHenry,McHenry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38049,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,McHenry,McHenry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38049,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,McHenry,McHenry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38049,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,McHenry,McHenry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38049,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,McHenry,McHenry County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,5322,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38049,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ND,McHenry,McHenry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2483,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38049,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,McHenry,McHenry County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1644,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38049,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,McHenry,McHenry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38049,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,McHenry,McHenry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,840,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38049,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,McHenry,McHenry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,66.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38049,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,McHenry,McHenry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38049,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,McHenry,McHenry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,33.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38049,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,McHenry,McHenry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38049,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,McHenry,McHenry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,38049,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,McHenry,McHenry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,66.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38049,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,McHenry,McHenry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,38049,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,McHenry,McHenry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1644,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38049,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,McIntosh,McIntosh County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38051,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,McIntosh,McIntosh County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38051,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,McIntosh,McIntosh County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38051,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,McIntosh,McIntosh County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38051,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,McIntosh,McIntosh County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38051,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,McIntosh,McIntosh County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,2512,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38051,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ND,McIntosh,McIntosh County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1898,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38051,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,McIntosh,McIntosh County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1816,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38051,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,McIntosh,McIntosh County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38051,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,McIntosh,McIntosh County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,81,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38051,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,McIntosh,McIntosh County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,95.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38051,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,McIntosh,McIntosh County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38051,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,McIntosh,McIntosh County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,4.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38051,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,McIntosh,McIntosh County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38051,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,McIntosh,McIntosh County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,4.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38051,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,McIntosh,McIntosh County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,91.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38051,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,McIntosh,McIntosh County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,87,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38051,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,McIntosh,McIntosh County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1729,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38051,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,McKenzie,McKenzie County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38053,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,McKenzie,McKenzie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38053,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,McKenzie,McKenzie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38053,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,McKenzie,McKenzie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38053,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,McKenzie,McKenzie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38053,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,McKenzie,McKenzie County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,14744,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38053,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ND,McKenzie,McKenzie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,12287,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38053,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,McKenzie,McKenzie County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11451,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38053,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,McKenzie,McKenzie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1389,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38053,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,McKenzie,McKenzie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,836,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38053,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,McKenzie,McKenzie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,93.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38053,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,McKenzie,McKenzie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,11.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38053,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,McKenzie,McKenzie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,6.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38053,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,McKenzie,McKenzie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38053,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,McKenzie,McKenzie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,63,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38053,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,McKenzie,McKenzie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,18.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38053,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,McKenzie,McKenzie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,7741,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38053,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,McKenzie,McKenzie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2321,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38053,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,McLean,McLean County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38055,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,McLean,McLean County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38055,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,McLean,McLean County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38055,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,McLean,McLean County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38055,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,McLean,McLean County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38055,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,McLean,McLean County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,9749,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38055,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ND,McLean,McLean County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,8021,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38055,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,McLean,McLean County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7519,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38055,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,McLean,McLean County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38055,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,McLean,McLean County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,502,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38055,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,McLean,McLean County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,93.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38055,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,McLean,McLean County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38055,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,McLean,McLean County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,6.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38055,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,McLean,McLean County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38055,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,McLean,McLean County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,49.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38055,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,McLean,McLean County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,44,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38055,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,McLean,McLean County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,3993,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38055,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,McLean,McLean County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3526,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38055,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Mercer,Mercer County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38057,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Mercer,Mercer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38057,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Mercer,Mercer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38057,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Mercer,Mercer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38057,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Mercer,Mercer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38057,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Mercer,Mercer County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,8330,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38057,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Mercer,Mercer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,10969,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38057,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Mercer,Mercer County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10969,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38057,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Mercer,Mercer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38057,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Mercer,Mercer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38057,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Mercer,Mercer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38057,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Mercer,Mercer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38057,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Mercer,Mercer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38057,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Mercer,Mercer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38057,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Mercer,Mercer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,30.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38057,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Mercer,Mercer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,69.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38057,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Mercer,Mercer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,3374,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38057,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Mercer,Mercer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,7595,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38057,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Morton,Morton County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38059,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Morton,Morton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38059,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Morton,Morton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38059,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Morton,Morton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38059,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Morton,Morton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38059,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Morton,Morton County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,33333,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38059,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Morton,Morton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,30425,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38059,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Morton,Morton County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,30425,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38059,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Morton,Morton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38059,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Morton,Morton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38059,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Morton,Morton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38059,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Morton,Morton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38059,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Morton,Morton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38059,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Morton,Morton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38059,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Morton,Morton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,12.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38059,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Morton,Morton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,73.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38059,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Morton,Morton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,3684,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38059,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Morton,Morton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,22367,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38059,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Mountrail,Mountrail County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38061,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Mountrail,Mountrail County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38061,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Mountrail,Mountrail County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38061,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Mountrail,Mountrail County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38061,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Mountrail,Mountrail County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38061,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Mountrail,Mountrail County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,9765,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38061,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Mountrail,Mountrail County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3003,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38061,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Mountrail,Mountrail County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2829,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38061,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Mountrail,Mountrail County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38061,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Mountrail,Mountrail County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,174,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38061,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Mountrail,Mountrail County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,94.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38061,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Mountrail,Mountrail County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38061,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Mountrail,Mountrail County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,5.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38061,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Mountrail,Mountrail County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38061,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Mountrail,Mountrail County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,94.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38061,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Mountrail,Mountrail County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,38061,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Mountrail,Mountrail County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2829,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38061,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Mountrail,Mountrail County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,38061,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,ND,North Dakota,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,385,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,ND,ND,North Dakota,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,311,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,ND,ND,North Dakota,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,105,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,ND,ND,North Dakota,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,180,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,ND,ND,North Dakota,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,ND,ND,North Dakota,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,778962,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2020,ND,ND,North Dakota,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,731260,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,ND,ND,North Dakota,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,705703,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,ND,ND,North Dakota,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,5144,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,ND,ND,North Dakota,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,25557,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,ND,ND,North Dakota,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,96.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,ND,ND,North Dakota,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,ND,ND,North Dakota,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,3.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,ND,ND,North Dakota,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,74,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,ND,ND,North Dakota,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,24.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,ND,ND,North Dakota,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,69.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,ND,ND,North Dakota,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,176448,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,ND,ND,North Dakota,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,511268,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,ND,Nelson,Nelson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38063,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Nelson,Nelson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38063,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Nelson,Nelson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38063,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Nelson,Nelson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38063,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Nelson,Nelson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38063,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Nelson,Nelson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,2989,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38063,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Nelson,Nelson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3022,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38063,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Nelson,Nelson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2723,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38063,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Nelson,Nelson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38063,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Nelson,Nelson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,299,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38063,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Nelson,Nelson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,90.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38063,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Nelson,Nelson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38063,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Nelson,Nelson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,9.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38063,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Nelson,Nelson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38063,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Nelson,Nelson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,15.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38063,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Nelson,Nelson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,74.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38063,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Nelson,Nelson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,466,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38063,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Nelson,Nelson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2258,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38063,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Oliver,Oliver County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38065,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Oliver,Oliver County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38065,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Oliver,Oliver County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38065,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Oliver,Oliver County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38065,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Oliver,Oliver County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38065,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Oliver,Oliver County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,1866,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38065,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Oliver,Oliver County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,846,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38065,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Oliver,Oliver County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,846,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38065,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Oliver,Oliver County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38065,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Oliver,Oliver County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38065,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Oliver,Oliver County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38065,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Oliver,Oliver County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38065,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Oliver,Oliver County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38065,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Oliver,Oliver County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38065,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Oliver,Oliver County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38065,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Oliver,Oliver County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,38065,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Oliver,Oliver County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,846,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38065,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Oliver,Oliver County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,38065,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Pembina,Pembina County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38067,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Pembina,Pembina County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38067,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Pembina,Pembina County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38067,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Pembina,Pembina County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38067,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Pembina,Pembina County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38067,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Pembina,Pembina County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,6827,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38067,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Pembina,Pembina County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7866,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38067,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Pembina,Pembina County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7866,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38067,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Pembina,Pembina County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38067,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Pembina,Pembina County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38067,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Pembina,Pembina County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38067,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Pembina,Pembina County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38067,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Pembina,Pembina County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38067,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Pembina,Pembina County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38067,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Pembina,Pembina County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,48,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38067,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Pembina,Pembina County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,52,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38067,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Pembina,Pembina County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,3777,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38067,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Pembina,Pembina County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,4089,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38067,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Pierce,Pierce County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38069,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Pierce,Pierce County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38069,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Pierce,Pierce County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38069,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Pierce,Pierce County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38069,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Pierce,Pierce County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38069,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Pierce,Pierce County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,3968,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38069,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Pierce,Pierce County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4070,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38069,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Pierce,Pierce County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4016,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38069,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Pierce,Pierce County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38069,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Pierce,Pierce County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,54,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38069,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Pierce,Pierce County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38069,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Pierce,Pierce County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38069,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Pierce,Pierce County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38069,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Pierce,Pierce County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38069,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Pierce,Pierce County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,26.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38069,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Pierce,Pierce County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,71.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38069,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Pierce,Pierce County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1093,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38069,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Pierce,Pierce County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2923,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38069,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Ramsey,Ramsey County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38071,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Ramsey,Ramsey County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38071,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Ramsey,Ramsey County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38071,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Ramsey,Ramsey County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38071,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Ramsey,Ramsey County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38071,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Ramsey,Ramsey County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,11555,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38071,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Ramsey,Ramsey County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,13091,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38071,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Ramsey,Ramsey County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,13091,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38071,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Ramsey,Ramsey County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38071,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Ramsey,Ramsey County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38071,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Ramsey,Ramsey County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38071,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Ramsey,Ramsey County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38071,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Ramsey,Ramsey County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38071,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Ramsey,Ramsey County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38071,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Ramsey,Ramsey County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,2.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38071,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Ramsey,Ramsey County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,97.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38071,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Ramsey,Ramsey County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,329,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38071,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Ramsey,Ramsey County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,12762,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38071,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Ransom,Ransom County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38073,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Ransom,Ransom County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38073,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Ransom,Ransom County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38073,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Ransom,Ransom County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38073,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Ransom,Ransom County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38073,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Ransom,Ransom County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,5703,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38073,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Ransom,Ransom County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4780,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38073,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Ransom,Ransom County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4780,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38073,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Ransom,Ransom County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38073,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Ransom,Ransom County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38073,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Ransom,Ransom County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38073,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Ransom,Ransom County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38073,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Ransom,Ransom County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38073,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Ransom,Ransom County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38073,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Ransom,Ransom County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,27.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38073,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Ransom,Ransom County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,72.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38073,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Ransom,Ransom County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1310,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38073,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Ransom,Ransom County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3470,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38073,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Renville,Renville County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38075,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Renville,Renville County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38075,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Renville,Renville County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38075,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Renville,Renville County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38075,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Renville,Renville County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38075,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Renville,Renville County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,2272,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38075,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Renville,Renville County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1428,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38075,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Renville,Renville County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1428,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38075,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Renville,Renville County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38075,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Renville,Renville County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38075,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Renville,Renville County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38075,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Renville,Renville County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38075,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Renville,Renville County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38075,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Renville,Renville County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38075,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Renville,Renville County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38075,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Renville,Renville County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,38075,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Renville,Renville County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1428,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38075,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Renville,Renville County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,38075,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Richland,Richland County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38077,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Richland,Richland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38077,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Richland,Richland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38077,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Richland,Richland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38077,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Richland,Richland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38077,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Richland,Richland County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,16524,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38077,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Richland,Richland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,14907,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38077,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Richland,Richland County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,14295,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38077,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Richland,Richland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,267,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38077,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Richland,Richland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,612,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38077,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Richland,Richland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,95.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38077,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Richland,Richland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38077,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Richland,Richland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,4.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38077,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Richland,Richland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38077,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Richland,Richland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,17.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38077,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Richland,Richland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,76.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38077,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Richland,Richland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2633,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38077,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Richland,Richland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,11396,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38077,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Rolette,Rolette County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38079,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Rolette,Rolette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38079,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Rolette,Rolette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38079,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Rolette,Rolette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38079,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Rolette,Rolette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38079,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Rolette,Rolette County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,12162,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38079,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Rolette,Rolette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3718,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38079,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Rolette,Rolette County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2087,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38079,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Rolette,Rolette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,786,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38079,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Rolette,Rolette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1631,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38079,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Rolette,Rolette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,56.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38079,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Rolette,Rolette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,21.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38079,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Rolette,Rolette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,43.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38079,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Rolette,Rolette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38079,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Rolette,Rolette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,38079,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Rolette,Rolette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,35,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38079,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Rolette,Rolette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,38079,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Rolette,Rolette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1301,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38079,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Sargent,Sargent County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38081,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Sargent,Sargent County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38081,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Sargent,Sargent County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38081,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Sargent,Sargent County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38081,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Sargent,Sargent County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38081,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Sargent,Sargent County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,3842,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38081,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Sargent,Sargent County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3600,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38081,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Sargent,Sargent County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2976,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38081,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Sargent,Sargent County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38081,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Sargent,Sargent County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,624,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38081,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Sargent,Sargent County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,82.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38081,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Sargent,Sargent County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38081,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Sargent,Sargent County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,17.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38081,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Sargent,Sargent County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38081,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Sargent,Sargent County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,38.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38081,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Sargent,Sargent County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,43.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38081,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Sargent,Sargent County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1399,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38081,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Sargent,Sargent County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1578,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38081,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Sheridan,Sheridan County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38083,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Sheridan,Sheridan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38083,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Sheridan,Sheridan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38083,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Sheridan,Sheridan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38083,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Sheridan,Sheridan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38083,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Sheridan,Sheridan County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,1258,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38083,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Sheridan,Sheridan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1052,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38083,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Sheridan,Sheridan County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,953,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38083,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Sheridan,Sheridan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38083,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Sheridan,Sheridan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,99,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38083,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Sheridan,Sheridan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,90.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38083,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Sheridan,Sheridan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,9.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38083,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Sheridan,Sheridan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,9.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38083,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Sheridan,Sheridan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38083,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Sheridan,Sheridan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,36.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38083,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Sheridan,Sheridan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,44.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38083,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Sheridan,Sheridan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,386,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38083,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Sheridan,Sheridan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,468,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38083,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Sioux,Sioux County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38085,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Sioux,Sioux County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38085,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Sioux,Sioux County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38085,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Sioux,Sioux County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38085,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Sioux,Sioux County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38085,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Sioux,Sioux County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,3884,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38085,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Sioux,Sioux County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7175,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38085,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Sioux,Sioux County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3627,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38085,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Sioux,Sioux County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,163,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38085,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Sioux,Sioux County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3548,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38085,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Sioux,Sioux County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,50.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38085,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Sioux,Sioux County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,2.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38085,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Sioux,Sioux County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,49.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38085,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Sioux,Sioux County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38085,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Sioux,Sioux County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,38085,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Sioux,Sioux County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,48.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38085,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Sioux,Sioux County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,38085,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Sioux,Sioux County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3464,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38085,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Slope,Slope County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38087,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Slope,Slope County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38087,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Slope,Slope County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38087,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Slope,Slope County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38087,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Slope,Slope County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38087,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Slope,Slope County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,701,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38087,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Slope,Slope County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,298,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38087,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Slope,Slope County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,160,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38087,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Slope,Slope County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38087,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Slope,Slope County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,138,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38087,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Slope,Slope County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,53.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38087,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Slope,Slope County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38087,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Slope,Slope County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,46.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38087,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Slope,Slope County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38087,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Slope,Slope County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,38087,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Slope,Slope County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,53.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38087,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Slope,Slope County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,38087,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Slope,Slope County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,160,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38087,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Stark,Stark County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38089,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Stark,Stark County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38089,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Stark,Stark County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38089,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Stark,Stark County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38089,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Stark,Stark County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38089,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Stark,Stark County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,33805,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38089,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Stark,Stark County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,31797,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38089,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Stark,Stark County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,31797,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38089,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Stark,Stark County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38089,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Stark,Stark County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38089,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Stark,Stark County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38089,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Stark,Stark County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38089,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Stark,Stark County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38089,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Stark,Stark County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38089,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Stark,Stark County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,80.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38089,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Stark,Stark County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,19.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38089,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Stark,Stark County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,25638,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38089,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Stark,Stark County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,6159,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38089,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Steele,Steele County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38091,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Steele,Steele County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38091,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Steele,Steele County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38091,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Steele,Steele County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38091,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Steele,Steele County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38091,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Steele,Steele County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,1797,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38091,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Steele,Steele County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2212,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38091,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Steele,Steele County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2212,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38091,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Steele,Steele County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38091,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Steele,Steele County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38091,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Steele,Steele County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38091,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Steele,Steele County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38091,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Steele,Steele County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38091,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Steele,Steele County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38091,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Steele,Steele County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,57.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38091,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Steele,Steele County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,42.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38091,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Steele,Steele County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1272,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38091,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Steele,Steele County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,940,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38091,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Stutsman,Stutsman County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38093,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Stutsman,Stutsman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38093,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Stutsman,Stutsman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38093,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Stutsman,Stutsman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38093,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Stutsman,Stutsman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38093,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Stutsman,Stutsman County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,21529,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38093,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Stutsman,Stutsman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,21929,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38093,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Stutsman,Stutsman County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,21730,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38093,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Stutsman,Stutsman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38093,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Stutsman,Stutsman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,199,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38093,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Stutsman,Stutsman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38093,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Stutsman,Stutsman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38093,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Stutsman,Stutsman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38093,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Stutsman,Stutsman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38093,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Stutsman,Stutsman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,1.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38093,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Stutsman,Stutsman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,73,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38093,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Stutsman,Stutsman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,389,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38093,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Stutsman,Stutsman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,16009,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38093,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Towner,Towner County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38095,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Towner,Towner County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38095,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Towner,Towner County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38095,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Towner,Towner County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38095,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Towner,Towner County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38095,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Towner,Towner County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,2138,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38095,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Towner,Towner County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1437,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38095,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Towner,Towner County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1207,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38095,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Towner,Towner County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38095,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Towner,Towner County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,231,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38095,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Towner,Towner County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,83.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38095,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Towner,Towner County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38095,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Towner,Towner County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,16.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38095,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Towner,Towner County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38095,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Towner,Towner County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,82.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38095,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Towner,Towner County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,1.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38095,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Towner,Towner County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1184,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38095,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Towner,Towner County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,22,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38095,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Traill,Traill County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38097,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Traill,Traill County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38097,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Traill,Traill County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38097,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Traill,Traill County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38097,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Traill,Traill County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38097,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Traill,Traill County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,7974,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38097,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Traill,Traill County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,8362,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38097,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Traill,Traill County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8362,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38097,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Traill,Traill County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38097,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Traill,Traill County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38097,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Traill,Traill County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38097,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Traill,Traill County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38097,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Traill,Traill County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38097,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Traill,Traill County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38097,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Traill,Traill County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,46.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38097,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Traill,Traill County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,53.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38097,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Traill,Traill County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,3855,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38097,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Traill,Traill County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,4507,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38097,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Walsh,Walsh County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38099,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Walsh,Walsh County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38099,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Walsh,Walsh County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38099,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Walsh,Walsh County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38099,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Walsh,Walsh County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38099,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Walsh,Walsh County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,10520,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38099,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Walsh,Walsh County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,10870,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38099,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Walsh,Walsh County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10870,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38099,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Walsh,Walsh County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38099,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Walsh,Walsh County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38099,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Walsh,Walsh County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38099,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Walsh,Walsh County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38099,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Walsh,Walsh County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38099,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Walsh,Walsh County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38099,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Walsh,Walsh County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,33.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38099,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Walsh,Walsh County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,66.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38099,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Walsh,Walsh County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,3631,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38099,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Walsh,Walsh County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,7239,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38099,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Ward,Ward County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38101,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Ward,Ward County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38101,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Ward,Ward County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38101,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Ward,Ward County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38101,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Ward,Ward County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38101,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Ward,Ward County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,69847,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38101,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Ward,Ward County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,66897,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38101,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Ward,Ward County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,63504,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38101,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Ward,Ward County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,35,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38101,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Ward,Ward County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3393,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38101,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Ward,Ward County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,94.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38101,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Ward,Ward County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38101,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Ward,Ward County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,5.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38101,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Ward,Ward County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38101,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Ward,Ward County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,17.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38101,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Ward,Ward County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,74.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38101,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Ward,Ward County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,11530,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38101,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Ward,Ward County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,49545,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38101,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Wells,Wells County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38103,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Wells,Wells County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38103,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Wells,Wells County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38103,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Wells,Wells County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38103,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Wells,Wells County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38103,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Wells,Wells County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,3955,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38103,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Wells,Wells County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5344,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38103,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Wells,Wells County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1812,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38103,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Wells,Wells County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38103,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Wells,Wells County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3531,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38103,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Wells,Wells County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,33.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38103,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Wells,Wells County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38103,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Wells,Wells County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,66.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38103,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Wells,Wells County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38103,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Wells,Wells County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,38103,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Wells,Wells County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,33.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38103,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Wells,Wells County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,38103,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Wells,Wells County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1812,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38103,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Williams,Williams County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38105,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Williams,Williams County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38105,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Williams,Williams County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38105,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Williams,Williams County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38105,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Williams,Williams County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38105,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Williams,Williams County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,41149,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38105,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Williams,Williams County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,37485,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38105,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Williams,Williams County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,37161,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38105,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Williams,Williams County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38105,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Williams,Williams County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,324,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38105,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Williams,Williams County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38105,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Williams,Williams County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38105,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Williams,Williams County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38105,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Williams,Williams County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38105,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Williams,Williams County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,24.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38105,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Williams,Williams County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,74.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38105,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Williams,Williams County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,9280,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38105,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,ND,Williams,Williams County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,27880,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38105,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31001,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31001,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31001,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31001,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31001,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,31147,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31001,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,31106,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31001,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31001,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31001,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,31106,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31001,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31001,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31001,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31001,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31001,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31001,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31001,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31001,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31001,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Antelope,Antelope County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31003,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Antelope,Antelope County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31003,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Antelope,Antelope County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31003,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Antelope,Antelope County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31003,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Antelope,Antelope County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31003,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Antelope,Antelope County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,6276,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31003,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Antelope,Antelope County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4249,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31003,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Antelope,Antelope County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2555,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31003,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Antelope,Antelope County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31003,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Antelope,Antelope County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1694,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31003,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Antelope,Antelope County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,60.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31003,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Antelope,Antelope County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31003,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Antelope,Antelope County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,39.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31003,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Antelope,Antelope County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31003,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Antelope,Antelope County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31003,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Antelope,Antelope County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,60.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31003,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Antelope,Antelope County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31003,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Antelope,Antelope County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2555,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31003,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Arthur,Arthur County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31005,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Arthur,Arthur County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31005,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Arthur,Arthur County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31005,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Arthur,Arthur County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31005,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Arthur,Arthur County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31005,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Arthur,Arthur County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,431,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31005,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Arthur,Arthur County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31005,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Arthur,Arthur County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31005,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Arthur,Arthur County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31005,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Arthur,Arthur County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31005,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Arthur,Arthur County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31005,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Arthur,Arthur County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31005,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Arthur,Arthur County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31005,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Arthur,Arthur County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31005,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Arthur,Arthur County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31005,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Arthur,Arthur County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31005,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Arthur,Arthur County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31005,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Arthur,Arthur County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31005,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Banner,Banner County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31007,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Banner,Banner County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31007,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Banner,Banner County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31007,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Banner,Banner County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31007,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Banner,Banner County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31007,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Banner,Banner County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,683,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31007,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Banner,Banner County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31007,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Banner,Banner County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31007,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Banner,Banner County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31007,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Banner,Banner County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31007,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Banner,Banner County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31007,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Banner,Banner County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31007,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Banner,Banner County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31007,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Banner,Banner County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31007,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Banner,Banner County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31007,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Banner,Banner County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31007,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Banner,Banner County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31007,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Banner,Banner County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31007,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Blaine,Blaine County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31009,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Blaine,Blaine County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31009,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Blaine,Blaine County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31009,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Blaine,Blaine County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31009,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Blaine,Blaine County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31009,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Blaine,Blaine County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,431,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31009,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Blaine,Blaine County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,124,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31009,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Blaine,Blaine County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31009,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Blaine,Blaine County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31009,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Blaine,Blaine County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,124,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31009,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Blaine,Blaine County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31009,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Blaine,Blaine County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31009,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Blaine,Blaine County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31009,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Blaine,Blaine County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31009,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Blaine,Blaine County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31009,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Blaine,Blaine County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31009,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Blaine,Blaine County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31009,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Blaine,Blaine County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31009,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31011,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31011,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31011,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31011,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31011,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,5351,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31011,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3540,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31011,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1861,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31011,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31011,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1679,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31011,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,52.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31011,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31011,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,47.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31011,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31011,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31011,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,52.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31011,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31011,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1861,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31011,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Box Butte,Box Butte County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31013,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Box Butte,Box Butte County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31013,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Box Butte,Box Butte County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31013,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Box Butte,Box Butte County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31013,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Box Butte,Box Butte County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31013,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Box Butte,Box Butte County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,10824,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31013,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Box Butte,Box Butte County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,10499,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31013,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Box Butte,Box Butte County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10499,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31013,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Box Butte,Box Butte County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,10499,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31013,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Box Butte,Box Butte County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31013,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Box Butte,Box Butte County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31013,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Box Butte,Box Butte County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31013,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Box Butte,Box Butte County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31013,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Box Butte,Box Butte County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31013,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Box Butte,Box Butte County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31013,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Box Butte,Box Butte County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31013,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Box Butte,Box Butte County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31013,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Box Butte,Box Butte County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31013,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Boyd,Boyd County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31015,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Boyd,Boyd County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31015,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Boyd,Boyd County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31015,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Boyd,Boyd County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31015,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Boyd,Boyd County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31015,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Boyd,Boyd County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,1806,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31015,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Boyd,Boyd County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1861,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31015,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Boyd,Boyd County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31015,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Boyd,Boyd County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31015,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Boyd,Boyd County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1861,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31015,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Boyd,Boyd County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31015,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Boyd,Boyd County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31015,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Boyd,Boyd County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31015,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Boyd,Boyd County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31015,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Boyd,Boyd County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31015,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Boyd,Boyd County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31015,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Boyd,Boyd County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31015,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Boyd,Boyd County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31015,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31017,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31017,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31017,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31017,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31017,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,2903,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31017,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2293,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31017,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31017,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31017,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2293,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31017,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31017,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31017,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31017,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31017,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31017,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31017,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31017,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31017,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Buffalo,Buffalo County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31019,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Buffalo,Buffalo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31019,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Buffalo,Buffalo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31019,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Buffalo,Buffalo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31019,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Buffalo,Buffalo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31019,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Buffalo,Buffalo County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,50129,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31019,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Buffalo,Buffalo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,42396,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31019,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Buffalo,Buffalo County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,34868,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31019,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Buffalo,Buffalo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31019,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Buffalo,Buffalo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7529,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31019,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Buffalo,Buffalo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,82.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31019,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Buffalo,Buffalo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31019,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Buffalo,Buffalo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,17.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31019,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Buffalo,Buffalo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31019,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Buffalo,Buffalo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31019,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Buffalo,Buffalo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,82.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31019,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Buffalo,Buffalo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31019,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Buffalo,Buffalo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,34868,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31019,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Burt,Burt County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31021,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Burt,Burt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31021,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Burt,Burt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31021,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Burt,Burt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31021,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Burt,Burt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31021,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Burt,Burt County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,6721,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31021,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Burt,Burt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,8684,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31021,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Burt,Burt County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2637,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31021,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Burt,Burt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1667,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31021,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Burt,Burt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6048,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31021,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Burt,Burt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,30.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31021,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Burt,Burt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,19.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31021,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Burt,Burt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,69.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31021,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Burt,Burt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31021,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Burt,Burt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31021,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Burt,Burt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,11.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31021,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Burt,Burt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31021,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Burt,Burt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,970,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31021,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31023,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31023,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31023,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31023,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31023,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,8349,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31023,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5342,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31023,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,73,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31023,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,73,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31023,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5269,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31023,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31023,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31023,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31023,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31023,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31023,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31023,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31023,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Butler,Butler County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31023,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,21,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31025,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31025,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31025,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31025,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31025,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,26593,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31025,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,25861,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31025,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,13005,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31025,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31025,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,12856,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31025,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,50.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31025,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31025,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,49.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31025,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31025,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,17.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31025,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,33.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31025,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,4424,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31025,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,8581,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31025,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Cedar,Cedar County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31027,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Cedar,Cedar County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31027,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Cedar,Cedar County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31027,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Cedar,Cedar County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31027,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Cedar,Cedar County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31027,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Cedar,Cedar County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,8373,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31027,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Cedar,Cedar County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,8099,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31027,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Cedar,Cedar County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6717,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31027,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Cedar,Cedar County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31027,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Cedar,Cedar County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1383,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31027,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Cedar,Cedar County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,82.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31027,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Cedar,Cedar County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31027,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Cedar,Cedar County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,17.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31027,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Cedar,Cedar County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31027,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Cedar,Cedar County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,5.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31027,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Cedar,Cedar County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,77.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31027,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Cedar,Cedar County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,473,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31027,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Cedar,Cedar County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,6244,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31027,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Chase,Chase County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31029,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Chase,Chase County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31029,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Chase,Chase County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31029,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Chase,Chase County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31029,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Chase,Chase County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31029,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Chase,Chase County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,3881,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31029,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Chase,Chase County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2986,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31029,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Chase,Chase County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2986,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31029,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Chase,Chase County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,2986,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31029,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Chase,Chase County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31029,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Chase,Chase County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31029,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Chase,Chase County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31029,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Chase,Chase County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31029,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Chase,Chase County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31029,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Chase,Chase County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31029,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Chase,Chase County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31029,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Chase,Chase County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31029,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Chase,Chase County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31029,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Cherry,Cherry County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31031,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Cherry,Cherry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31031,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Cherry,Cherry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31031,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Cherry,Cherry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31031,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Cherry,Cherry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31031,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Cherry,Cherry County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,5462,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31031,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Cherry,Cherry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3638,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31031,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Cherry,Cherry County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31031,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Cherry,Cherry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31031,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Cherry,Cherry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3638,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31031,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Cherry,Cherry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31031,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Cherry,Cherry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31031,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Cherry,Cherry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31031,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Cherry,Cherry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31031,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Cherry,Cherry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31031,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Cherry,Cherry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31031,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Cherry,Cherry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31031,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Cherry,Cherry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31031,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Cheyenne,Cheyenne County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31033,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Cheyenne,Cheyenne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31033,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Cheyenne,Cheyenne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31033,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Cheyenne,Cheyenne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31033,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Cheyenne,Cheyenne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31033,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Cheyenne,Cheyenne County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,9482,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31033,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Cheyenne,Cheyenne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9032,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31033,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Cheyenne,Cheyenne County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8203,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31033,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Cheyenne,Cheyenne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,8203,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31033,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Cheyenne,Cheyenne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,829,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31033,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Cheyenne,Cheyenne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,90.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31033,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Cheyenne,Cheyenne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,90.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31033,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Cheyenne,Cheyenne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,9.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31033,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Cheyenne,Cheyenne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31033,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Cheyenne,Cheyenne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31033,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Cheyenne,Cheyenne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31033,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Cheyenne,Cheyenne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31033,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Cheyenne,Cheyenne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31033,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31035,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31035,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31035,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31035,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31035,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,6101,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31035,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5428,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31035,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31035,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31035,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5428,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31035,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31035,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31035,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31035,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31035,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31035,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31035,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31035,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31035,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Colfax,Colfax County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31037,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Colfax,Colfax County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31037,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Colfax,Colfax County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31037,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Colfax,Colfax County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31037,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Colfax,Colfax County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31037,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Colfax,Colfax County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,10546,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31037,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Colfax,Colfax County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,8943,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31037,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Colfax,Colfax County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31037,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Colfax,Colfax County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31037,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Colfax,Colfax County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8943,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31037,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Colfax,Colfax County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31037,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Colfax,Colfax County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31037,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Colfax,Colfax County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31037,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Colfax,Colfax County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31037,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Colfax,Colfax County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31037,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Colfax,Colfax County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31037,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Colfax,Colfax County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31037,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Colfax,Colfax County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31037,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Cuming,Cuming County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31039,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Cuming,Cuming County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31039,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Cuming,Cuming County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31039,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Cuming,Cuming County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31039,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Cuming,Cuming County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31039,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Cuming,Cuming County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,9009,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31039,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Cuming,Cuming County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,8564,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31039,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Cuming,Cuming County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6015,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31039,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Cuming,Cuming County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31039,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Cuming,Cuming County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2549,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31039,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Cuming,Cuming County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,70.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31039,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Cuming,Cuming County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31039,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Cuming,Cuming County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,29.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31039,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Cuming,Cuming County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31039,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Cuming,Cuming County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,24.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31039,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Cuming,Cuming County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,45.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31039,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Cuming,Cuming County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2108,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31039,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Cuming,Cuming County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3908,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31039,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Custer,Custer County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31041,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Custer,Custer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31041,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Custer,Custer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31041,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Custer,Custer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31041,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Custer,Custer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31041,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Custer,Custer County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,10495,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31041,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Custer,Custer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7386,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31041,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Custer,Custer County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31041,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Custer,Custer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31041,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Custer,Custer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7386,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31041,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Custer,Custer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31041,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Custer,Custer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31041,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Custer,Custer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31041,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Custer,Custer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31041,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Custer,Custer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31041,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Custer,Custer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31041,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Custer,Custer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31041,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Custer,Custer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31041,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dakota,Dakota County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31043,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dakota,Dakota County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31043,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dakota,Dakota County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31043,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dakota,Dakota County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31043,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dakota,Dakota County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31043,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dakota,Dakota County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,21502,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31043,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dakota,Dakota County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,20670,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31043,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dakota,Dakota County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,15918,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31043,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dakota,Dakota County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,859,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31043,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dakota,Dakota County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4752,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31043,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dakota,Dakota County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,77,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31043,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dakota,Dakota County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,4.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31043,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dakota,Dakota County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,23,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31043,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dakota,Dakota County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31043,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dakota,Dakota County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31043,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dakota,Dakota County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,72.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31043,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dakota,Dakota County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31043,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dakota,Dakota County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,15058,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31043,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dawes,Dawes County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31045,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dawes,Dawes County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31045,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dawes,Dawes County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31045,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dawes,Dawes County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31045,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dawes,Dawes County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31045,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dawes,Dawes County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,8151,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31045,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dawes,Dawes County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9161,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31045,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dawes,Dawes County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31045,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dawes,Dawes County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31045,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dawes,Dawes County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9161,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31045,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dawes,Dawes County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31045,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dawes,Dawes County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31045,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dawes,Dawes County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31045,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dawes,Dawes County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31045,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dawes,Dawes County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31045,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dawes,Dawes County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31045,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dawes,Dawes County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31045,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dawes,Dawes County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31045,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dawson,Dawson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31047,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dawson,Dawson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31047,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dawson,Dawson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31047,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dawson,Dawson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31047,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dawson,Dawson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31047,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dawson,Dawson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,24039,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31047,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dawson,Dawson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,21640,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31047,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dawson,Dawson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31047,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dawson,Dawson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31047,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dawson,Dawson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,21640,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31047,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dawson,Dawson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31047,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dawson,Dawson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31047,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dawson,Dawson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31047,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dawson,Dawson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31047,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dawson,Dawson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31047,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dawson,Dawson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31047,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dawson,Dawson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31047,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dawson,Dawson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31047,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Deuel,Deuel County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31049,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Deuel,Deuel County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31049,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Deuel,Deuel County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31049,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Deuel,Deuel County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31049,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Deuel,Deuel County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31049,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Deuel,Deuel County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,1829,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31049,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Deuel,Deuel County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1557,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31049,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Deuel,Deuel County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1557,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31049,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Deuel,Deuel County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1557,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31049,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Deuel,Deuel County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31049,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Deuel,Deuel County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31049,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Deuel,Deuel County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31049,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Deuel,Deuel County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31049,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Deuel,Deuel County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31049,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Deuel,Deuel County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31049,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Deuel,Deuel County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31049,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Deuel,Deuel County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31049,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Deuel,Deuel County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31049,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dixon,Dixon County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31051,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dixon,Dixon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31051,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dixon,Dixon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31051,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dixon,Dixon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31051,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dixon,Dixon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31051,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dixon,Dixon County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,5580,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31051,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dixon,Dixon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4995,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31051,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dixon,Dixon County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2483,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31051,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dixon,Dixon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1084,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31051,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dixon,Dixon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2511,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31051,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dixon,Dixon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,49.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31051,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dixon,Dixon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,21.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31051,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dixon,Dixon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,50.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31051,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dixon,Dixon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31051,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dixon,Dixon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31051,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dixon,Dixon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,28,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31051,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dixon,Dixon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31051,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dixon,Dixon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1399,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31051,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dodge,Dodge County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31053,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dodge,Dodge County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31053,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dodge,Dodge County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31053,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dodge,Dodge County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31053,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dodge,Dodge County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31053,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dodge,Dodge County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,37102,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31053,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dodge,Dodge County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,37005,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31053,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dodge,Dodge County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,34200,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31053,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dodge,Dodge County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,310,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31053,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dodge,Dodge County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2805,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31053,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dodge,Dodge County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,92.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31053,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dodge,Dodge County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31053,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dodge,Dodge County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,7.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31053,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dodge,Dodge County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31053,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dodge,Dodge County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31053,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dodge,Dodge County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,91.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31053,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dodge,Dodge County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31053,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dodge,Dodge County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,33890,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31053,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31055,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31055,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31055,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31055,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31055,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,585010,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31055,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,633964,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31055,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,629932,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31055,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31055,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4032,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31055,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31055,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31055,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31055,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31055,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31055,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,99,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31055,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2374,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31055,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,627559,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31055,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dundy,Dundy County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31057,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dundy,Dundy County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31057,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dundy,Dundy County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31057,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dundy,Dundy County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31057,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dundy,Dundy County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31057,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dundy,Dundy County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,1647,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31057,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dundy,Dundy County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1253,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31057,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dundy,Dundy County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1253,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31057,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dundy,Dundy County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1253,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31057,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dundy,Dundy County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31057,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dundy,Dundy County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31057,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dundy,Dundy County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31057,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dundy,Dundy County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31057,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dundy,Dundy County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31057,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dundy,Dundy County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31057,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dundy,Dundy County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31057,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dundy,Dundy County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31057,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Dundy,Dundy County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31057,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Fillmore,Fillmore County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31059,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Fillmore,Fillmore County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31059,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Fillmore,Fillmore County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31059,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Fillmore,Fillmore County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31059,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Fillmore,Fillmore County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31059,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Fillmore,Fillmore County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,5567,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31059,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Fillmore,Fillmore County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4788,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31059,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Fillmore,Fillmore County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31059,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Fillmore,Fillmore County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31059,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Fillmore,Fillmore County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4788,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31059,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Fillmore,Fillmore County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31059,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Fillmore,Fillmore County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31059,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Fillmore,Fillmore County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31059,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Fillmore,Fillmore County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31059,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Fillmore,Fillmore County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31059,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Fillmore,Fillmore County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31059,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Fillmore,Fillmore County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31059,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Fillmore,Fillmore County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31059,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31061,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31061,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31061,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31061,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31061,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,2885,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31061,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2718,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31061,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31061,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31061,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2718,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31061,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31061,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31061,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31061,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31061,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31061,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31061,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31061,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31061,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Frontier,Frontier County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31063,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Frontier,Frontier County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31063,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Frontier,Frontier County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31063,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Frontier,Frontier County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31063,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Frontier,Frontier County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31063,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Frontier,Frontier County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,2510,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31063,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Frontier,Frontier County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1880,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31063,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Frontier,Frontier County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,334,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31063,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Frontier,Frontier County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,334,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31063,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Frontier,Frontier County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1546,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31063,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Frontier,Frontier County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,17.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31063,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Frontier,Frontier County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,17.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31063,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Frontier,Frontier County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,82.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31063,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Frontier,Frontier County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31063,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Frontier,Frontier County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31063,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Frontier,Frontier County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31063,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Frontier,Frontier County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31063,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Frontier,Frontier County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31063,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Furnas,Furnas County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31065,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Furnas,Furnas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31065,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Furnas,Furnas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31065,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Furnas,Furnas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31065,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Furnas,Furnas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31065,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Furnas,Furnas County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,4615,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31065,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Furnas,Furnas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3524,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31065,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Furnas,Furnas County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,80,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31065,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Furnas,Furnas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,80,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31065,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Furnas,Furnas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3444,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31065,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Furnas,Furnas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31065,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Furnas,Furnas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,2.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31065,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Furnas,Furnas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,97.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31065,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Furnas,Furnas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31065,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Furnas,Furnas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31065,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Furnas,Furnas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31065,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Furnas,Furnas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31065,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Furnas,Furnas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31065,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Gage,Gage County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31067,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Gage,Gage County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31067,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Gage,Gage County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31067,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Gage,Gage County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31067,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Gage,Gage County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31067,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Gage,Gage County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,21663,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31067,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Gage,Gage County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,19076,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31067,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Gage,Gage County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,645,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31067,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Gage,Gage County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31067,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Gage,Gage County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,18431,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31067,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Gage,Gage County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,3.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31067,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Gage,Gage County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31067,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Gage,Gage County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,96.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31067,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Gage,Gage County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31067,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Gage,Gage County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31067,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Gage,Gage County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,3.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31067,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Gage,Gage County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31067,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Gage,Gage County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,645,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31067,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Garden,Garden County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31069,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Garden,Garden County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31069,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Garden,Garden County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31069,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Garden,Garden County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31069,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Garden,Garden County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31069,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Garden,Garden County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,1883,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31069,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Garden,Garden County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,692,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31069,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Garden,Garden County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,639,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31069,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Garden,Garden County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,639,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31069,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Garden,Garden County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,53,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31069,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Garden,Garden County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,92.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31069,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Garden,Garden County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,92.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31069,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Garden,Garden County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,7.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31069,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Garden,Garden County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31069,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Garden,Garden County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31069,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Garden,Garden County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31069,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Garden,Garden County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31069,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Garden,Garden County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31069,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Garfield,Garfield County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31071,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Garfield,Garfield County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31071,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Garfield,Garfield County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31071,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Garfield,Garfield County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31071,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Garfield,Garfield County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31071,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Garfield,Garfield County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,1806,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31071,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Garfield,Garfield County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1365,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31071,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Garfield,Garfield County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1365,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31071,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Garfield,Garfield County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31071,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Garfield,Garfield County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31071,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Garfield,Garfield County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31071,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Garfield,Garfield County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31071,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Garfield,Garfield County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31071,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Garfield,Garfield County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31071,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Garfield,Garfield County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31071,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Garfield,Garfield County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31071,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Garfield,Garfield County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31071,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Garfield,Garfield County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1365,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31071,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Gosper,Gosper County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31073,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Gosper,Gosper County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31073,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Gosper,Gosper County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31073,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Gosper,Gosper County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31073,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Gosper,Gosper County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31073,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Gosper,Gosper County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,1891,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31073,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Gosper,Gosper County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,998,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31073,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Gosper,Gosper County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31073,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Gosper,Gosper County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31073,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Gosper,Gosper County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,998,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31073,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Gosper,Gosper County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31073,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Gosper,Gosper County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31073,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Gosper,Gosper County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31073,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Gosper,Gosper County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31073,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Gosper,Gosper County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31073,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Gosper,Gosper County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31073,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Gosper,Gosper County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31073,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Gosper,Gosper County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31073,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31075,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31075,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31075,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31075,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31075,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,611,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31075,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,237,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31075,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31075,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31075,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,237,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31075,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31075,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31075,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31075,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31075,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31075,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31075,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31075,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31075,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Greeley,Greeley County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31077,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Greeley,Greeley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31077,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Greeley,Greeley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31077,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Greeley,Greeley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31077,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Greeley,Greeley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31077,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Greeley,Greeley County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,2180,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31077,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Greeley,Greeley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1719,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31077,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Greeley,Greeley County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31077,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Greeley,Greeley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31077,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Greeley,Greeley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1719,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31077,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Greeley,Greeley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31077,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Greeley,Greeley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31077,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Greeley,Greeley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31077,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Greeley,Greeley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31077,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Greeley,Greeley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31077,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Greeley,Greeley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31077,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Greeley,Greeley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31077,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Greeley,Greeley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31077,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Hall,Hall County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31079,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Hall,Hall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31079,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Hall,Hall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31079,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Hall,Hall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31079,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Hall,Hall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31079,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Hall,Hall County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,62730,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31079,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Hall,Hall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,62007,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31079,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Hall,Hall County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31079,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Hall,Hall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31079,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Hall,Hall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,62007,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31079,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Hall,Hall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31079,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Hall,Hall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31079,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Hall,Hall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31079,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Hall,Hall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31079,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Hall,Hall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31079,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Hall,Hall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31079,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Hall,Hall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31079,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Hall,Hall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31079,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31081,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31081,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31081,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31081,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31081,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,9403,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31081,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,6692,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31081,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31081,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31081,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6692,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31081,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31081,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31081,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31081,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31081,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31081,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31081,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31081,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31081,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Harlan,Harlan County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31083,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Harlan,Harlan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31083,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Harlan,Harlan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31083,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Harlan,Harlan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31083,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Harlan,Harlan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31083,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Harlan,Harlan County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,3054,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31083,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Harlan,Harlan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2938,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31083,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Harlan,Harlan County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1278,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31083,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Harlan,Harlan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31083,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Harlan,Harlan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1660,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31083,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Harlan,Harlan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,43.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31083,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Harlan,Harlan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31083,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Harlan,Harlan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,56.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31083,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Harlan,Harlan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31083,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Harlan,Harlan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31083,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Harlan,Harlan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,43.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31083,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Harlan,Harlan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31083,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Harlan,Harlan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1278,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31083,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Hayes,Hayes County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31085,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Hayes,Hayes County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31085,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Hayes,Hayes County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31085,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Hayes,Hayes County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31085,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Hayes,Hayes County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31085,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Hayes,Hayes County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,855,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31085,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Hayes,Hayes County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,241,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31085,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Hayes,Hayes County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,241,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31085,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Hayes,Hayes County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,241,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31085,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Hayes,Hayes County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31085,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Hayes,Hayes County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31085,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Hayes,Hayes County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31085,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Hayes,Hayes County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31085,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Hayes,Hayes County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31085,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Hayes,Hayes County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31085,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Hayes,Hayes County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31085,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Hayes,Hayes County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31085,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Hayes,Hayes County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31085,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Hitchcock,Hitchcock County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31087,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Hitchcock,Hitchcock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31087,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Hitchcock,Hitchcock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31087,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Hitchcock,Hitchcock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31087,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Hitchcock,Hitchcock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31087,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Hitchcock,Hitchcock County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,2610,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31087,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Hitchcock,Hitchcock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2085,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31087,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Hitchcock,Hitchcock County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2085,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31087,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Hitchcock,Hitchcock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,2085,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31087,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Hitchcock,Hitchcock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31087,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Hitchcock,Hitchcock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31087,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Hitchcock,Hitchcock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31087,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Hitchcock,Hitchcock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31087,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Hitchcock,Hitchcock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31087,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Hitchcock,Hitchcock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31087,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Hitchcock,Hitchcock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31087,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Hitchcock,Hitchcock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31087,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Hitchcock,Hitchcock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31087,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Holt,Holt County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31089,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Holt,Holt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31089,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Holt,Holt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31089,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Holt,Holt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31089,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Holt,Holt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31089,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Holt,Holt County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,10083,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31089,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Holt,Holt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7340,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31089,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Holt,Holt County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5597,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31089,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Holt,Holt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31089,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Holt,Holt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1743,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31089,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Holt,Holt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,76.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31089,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Holt,Holt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31089,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Holt,Holt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,23.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31089,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Holt,Holt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31089,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Holt,Holt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31089,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Holt,Holt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,76.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31089,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Holt,Holt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31089,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Holt,Holt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,5597,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31089,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Hooker,Hooker County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31091,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Hooker,Hooker County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31091,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Hooker,Hooker County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31091,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Hooker,Hooker County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31091,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Hooker,Hooker County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31091,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Hooker,Hooker County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,707,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31091,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Hooker,Hooker County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,574,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31091,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Hooker,Hooker County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31091,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Hooker,Hooker County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31091,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Hooker,Hooker County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,574,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31091,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Hooker,Hooker County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31091,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Hooker,Hooker County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31091,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Hooker,Hooker County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31091,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Hooker,Hooker County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31091,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Hooker,Hooker County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31091,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Hooker,Hooker County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31091,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Hooker,Hooker County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31091,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Hooker,Hooker County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31091,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31093,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31093,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31093,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31093,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31093,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,6496,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31093,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3532,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31093,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31093,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31093,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3532,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31093,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31093,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31093,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31093,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31093,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31093,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31093,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31093,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31093,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31095,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31095,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31095,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31095,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31095,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,7260,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31095,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7330,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31095,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5917,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31095,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31095,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1413,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31095,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,80.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31095,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31095,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,19.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31095,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31095,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,23.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31095,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,57,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31095,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1737,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31095,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,4180,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31095,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31097,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31097,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31097,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31097,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31097,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,5288,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31097,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5156,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31097,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3364,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31097,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31097,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1792,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31097,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,65.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31097,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31097,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,34.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31097,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31097,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31097,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,65.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31097,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31097,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3364,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31097,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Kearney,Kearney County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31099,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Kearney,Kearney County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31099,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Kearney,Kearney County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31099,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Kearney,Kearney County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31099,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Kearney,Kearney County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31099,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Kearney,Kearney County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,6695,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31099,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Kearney,Kearney County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4813,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31099,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Kearney,Kearney County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3383,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31099,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Kearney,Kearney County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31099,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Kearney,Kearney County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1430,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31099,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Kearney,Kearney County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,70.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31099,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Kearney,Kearney County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31099,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Kearney,Kearney County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,29.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31099,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Kearney,Kearney County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31099,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Kearney,Kearney County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31099,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Kearney,Kearney County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,70.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31099,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Kearney,Kearney County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31099,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Kearney,Kearney County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3383,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31099,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Keith,Keith County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31101,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Keith,Keith County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31101,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Keith,Keith County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31101,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Keith,Keith County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31101,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Keith,Keith County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31101,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Keith,Keith County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,8322,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31101,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Keith,Keith County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,6393,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31101,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Keith,Keith County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5916,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31101,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Keith,Keith County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,574,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31101,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Keith,Keith County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,477,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31101,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Keith,Keith County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,92.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31101,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Keith,Keith County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31101,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Keith,Keith County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,7.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31101,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Keith,Keith County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31101,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Keith,Keith County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31101,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Keith,Keith County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,83.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31101,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Keith,Keith County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31101,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Keith,Keith County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,5342,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31101,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Keya Paha,Keya Paha County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31103,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Keya Paha,Keya Paha County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31103,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Keya Paha,Keya Paha County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31103,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Keya Paha,Keya Paha County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31103,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Keya Paha,Keya Paha County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31103,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Keya Paha,Keya Paha County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,763,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31103,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Keya Paha,Keya Paha County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31103,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Keya Paha,Keya Paha County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31103,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Keya Paha,Keya Paha County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31103,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Keya Paha,Keya Paha County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31103,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Keya Paha,Keya Paha County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31103,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Keya Paha,Keya Paha County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31103,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Keya Paha,Keya Paha County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31103,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Keya Paha,Keya Paha County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31103,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Keya Paha,Keya Paha County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31103,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Keya Paha,Keya Paha County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31103,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Keya Paha,Keya Paha County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31103,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Keya Paha,Keya Paha County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31103,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Kimball,Kimball County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31105,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Kimball,Kimball County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31105,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Kimball,Kimball County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31105,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Kimball,Kimball County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31105,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Kimball,Kimball County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31105,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Kimball,Kimball County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,3401,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31105,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Kimball,Kimball County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3329,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31105,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Kimball,Kimball County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,140,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31105,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Kimball,Kimball County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,140,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31105,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Kimball,Kimball County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3189,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31105,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Kimball,Kimball County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,4.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31105,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Kimball,Kimball County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,4.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31105,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Kimball,Kimball County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,95.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31105,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Kimball,Kimball County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31105,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Kimball,Kimball County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31105,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Kimball,Kimball County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31105,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Kimball,Kimball County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31105,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Kimball,Kimball County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31105,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31107,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31107,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31107,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31107,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31107,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,8383,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31107,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7548,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31107,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5801,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31107,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,34,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31107,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1747,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31107,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,76.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31107,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31107,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,23.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31107,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31107,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,11.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31107,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,65.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31107,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,850,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31107,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,4917,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31107,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Lancaster,Lancaster County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,23,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31109,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Lancaster,Lancaster County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31109,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Lancaster,Lancaster County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31109,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Lancaster,Lancaster County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31109,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Lancaster,Lancaster County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31109,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Lancaster,Lancaster County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,322910,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31109,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Lancaster,Lancaster County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,332425,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31109,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Lancaster,Lancaster County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,322840,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31109,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Lancaster,Lancaster County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,107,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31109,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Lancaster,Lancaster County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9586,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31109,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Lancaster,Lancaster County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,97.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31109,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Lancaster,Lancaster County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31109,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Lancaster,Lancaster County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31109,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Lancaster,Lancaster County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31109,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Lancaster,Lancaster County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31109,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Lancaster,Lancaster County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,97,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31109,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Lancaster,Lancaster County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,282,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31109,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Lancaster,Lancaster County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,322451,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31109,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31111,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31111,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31111,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31111,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31111,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,34551,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31111,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,31716,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31111,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31111,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31111,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,31716,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31111,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31111,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31111,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31111,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31111,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31111,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31111,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31111,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31111,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31113,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31113,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31113,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31113,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31113,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,714,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31113,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,344,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31113,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31113,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31113,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,344,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31113,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31113,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31113,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31113,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31113,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31113,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31113,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31113,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31113,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Loup,Loup County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31115,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Loup,Loup County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31115,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Loup,Loup County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31115,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Loup,Loup County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31115,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Loup,Loup County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31115,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Loup,Loup County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,606,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31115,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Loup,Loup County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31115,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Loup,Loup County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31115,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Loup,Loup County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31115,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Loup,Loup County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31115,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Loup,Loup County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31115,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Loup,Loup County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31115,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Loup,Loup County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31115,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Loup,Loup County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31115,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Loup,Loup County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31115,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Loup,Loup County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31115,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Loup,Loup County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31115,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Loup,Loup County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31115,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31119,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31119,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31119,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31119,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31119,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,35473,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31119,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,34824,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31119,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1072,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31119,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31119,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,33751,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31119,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,3.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31119,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31119,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,96.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31119,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31119,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31119,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,3.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31119,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31119,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1072,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31119,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,McPherson,McPherson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31117,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,McPherson,McPherson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31117,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,McPherson,McPherson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31117,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,McPherson,McPherson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31117,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,McPherson,McPherson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31117,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,McPherson,McPherson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,396,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31117,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,McPherson,McPherson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31117,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,McPherson,McPherson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31117,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,McPherson,McPherson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31117,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,McPherson,McPherson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31117,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,McPherson,McPherson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31117,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,McPherson,McPherson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31117,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,McPherson,McPherson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31117,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,McPherson,McPherson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31117,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,McPherson,McPherson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31117,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,McPherson,McPherson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31117,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,McPherson,McPherson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31117,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,McPherson,McPherson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31117,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Merrick,Merrick County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31121,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Merrick,Merrick County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31121,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Merrick,Merrick County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31121,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Merrick,Merrick County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31121,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Merrick,Merrick County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31121,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Merrick,Merrick County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,7659,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31121,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Merrick,Merrick County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5181,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31121,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Merrick,Merrick County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31121,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Merrick,Merrick County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31121,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Merrick,Merrick County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5181,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31121,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Merrick,Merrick County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31121,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Merrick,Merrick County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31121,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Merrick,Merrick County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31121,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Merrick,Merrick County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31121,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Merrick,Merrick County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31121,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Merrick,Merrick County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31121,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Merrick,Merrick County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31121,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Merrick,Merrick County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31121,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Morrill,Morrill County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31123,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Morrill,Morrill County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31123,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Morrill,Morrill County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31123,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Morrill,Morrill County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31123,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Morrill,Morrill County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31123,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Morrill,Morrill County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,4539,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31123,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Morrill,Morrill County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3246,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31123,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Morrill,Morrill County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,144,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31123,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Morrill,Morrill County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,144,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31123,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Morrill,Morrill County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3101,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31123,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Morrill,Morrill County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,4.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31123,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Morrill,Morrill County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,4.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31123,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Morrill,Morrill County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,95.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31123,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Morrill,Morrill County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31123,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Morrill,Morrill County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31123,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Morrill,Morrill County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31123,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Morrill,Morrill County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31123,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Morrill,Morrill County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31123,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Nance,Nance County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31125,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Nance,Nance County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31125,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Nance,Nance County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31125,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Nance,Nance County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31125,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Nance,Nance County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31125,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Nance,Nance County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,3382,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31125,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Nance,Nance County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2739,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31125,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Nance,Nance County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1525,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31125,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Nance,Nance County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31125,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Nance,Nance County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1215,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31125,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Nance,Nance County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,55.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31125,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Nance,Nance County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31125,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Nance,Nance County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,44.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31125,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Nance,Nance County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31125,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Nance,Nance County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31125,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Nance,Nance County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,55.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31125,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Nance,Nance County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31125,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Nance,Nance County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1525,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31125,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,NE,Nebraska,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,598,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,NE,NE,Nebraska,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,147,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,NE,NE,Nebraska,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,70,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,NE,NE,Nebraska,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,28,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,NE,NE,Nebraska,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,47,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,NE,NE,Nebraska,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,1961455,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2020,NE,NE,Nebraska,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1784114,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,NE,NE,Nebraska,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1317170,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,NE,NE,Nebraska,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,50710,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,NE,NE,Nebraska,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,466944,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,NE,NE,Nebraska,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,73.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,NE,NE,Nebraska,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,2.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,NE,NE,Nebraska,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,26.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,NE,NE,Nebraska,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,451,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,NE,NE,Nebraska,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,1.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,NE,NE,Nebraska,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,69.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,NE,NE,Nebraska,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,21838,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,NE,NE,Nebraska,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1244623,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,NE,Nemaha,Nemaha County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31127,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Nemaha,Nemaha County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31127,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Nemaha,Nemaha County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31127,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Nemaha,Nemaha County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31127,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Nemaha,Nemaha County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31127,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Nemaha,Nemaha County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,7088,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31127,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Nemaha,Nemaha County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7535,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31127,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Nemaha,Nemaha County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4196,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31127,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Nemaha,Nemaha County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,214,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31127,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Nemaha,Nemaha County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3339,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31127,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Nemaha,Nemaha County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,55.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31127,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Nemaha,Nemaha County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,2.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31127,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Nemaha,Nemaha County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,44.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31127,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Nemaha,Nemaha County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31127,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Nemaha,Nemaha County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,1.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31127,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Nemaha,Nemaha County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,51.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31127,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Nemaha,Nemaha County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,80,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31127,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Nemaha,Nemaha County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3902,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31127,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Nuckolls,Nuckolls County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31129,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Nuckolls,Nuckolls County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31129,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Nuckolls,Nuckolls County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31129,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Nuckolls,Nuckolls County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31129,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Nuckolls,Nuckolls County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31129,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Nuckolls,Nuckolls County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,4081,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31129,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Nuckolls,Nuckolls County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3423,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31129,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Nuckolls,Nuckolls County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3092,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31129,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Nuckolls,Nuckolls County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,343,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31129,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Nuckolls,Nuckolls County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,330,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31129,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Nuckolls,Nuckolls County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,90.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31129,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Nuckolls,Nuckolls County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,10,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31129,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Nuckolls,Nuckolls County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,9.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31129,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Nuckolls,Nuckolls County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31129,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Nuckolls,Nuckolls County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31129,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Nuckolls,Nuckolls County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,80.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31129,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Nuckolls,Nuckolls County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31129,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Nuckolls,Nuckolls County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2749,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31129,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Otoe,Otoe County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31131,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Otoe,Otoe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31131,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Otoe,Otoe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31131,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Otoe,Otoe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31131,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Otoe,Otoe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31131,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Otoe,Otoe County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,15892,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31131,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Otoe,Otoe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,16808,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31131,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Otoe,Otoe County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11914,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31131,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Otoe,Otoe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31131,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Otoe,Otoe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4894,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31131,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Otoe,Otoe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,70.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31131,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Otoe,Otoe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31131,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Otoe,Otoe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,29.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31131,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Otoe,Otoe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31131,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Otoe,Otoe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31131,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Otoe,Otoe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,61.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31131,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Otoe,Otoe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1504,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31131,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Otoe,Otoe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,10410,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31131,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Pawnee,Pawnee County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31133,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Pawnee,Pawnee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31133,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Pawnee,Pawnee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31133,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Pawnee,Pawnee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31133,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Pawnee,Pawnee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31133,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Pawnee,Pawnee County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,2536,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31133,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Pawnee,Pawnee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3358,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31133,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Pawnee,Pawnee County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31133,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Pawnee,Pawnee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31133,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Pawnee,Pawnee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3358,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31133,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Pawnee,Pawnee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31133,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Pawnee,Pawnee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31133,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Pawnee,Pawnee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31133,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Pawnee,Pawnee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31133,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Pawnee,Pawnee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31133,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Pawnee,Pawnee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31133,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Pawnee,Pawnee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31133,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Pawnee,Pawnee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31133,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Perkins,Perkins County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31135,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Perkins,Perkins County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31135,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Perkins,Perkins County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31135,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Perkins,Perkins County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31135,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Perkins,Perkins County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31135,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Perkins,Perkins County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,2851,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31135,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Perkins,Perkins County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2015,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31135,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Perkins,Perkins County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1658,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31135,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Perkins,Perkins County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1658,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31135,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Perkins,Perkins County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,357,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31135,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Perkins,Perkins County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,82.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31135,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Perkins,Perkins County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,82.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31135,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Perkins,Perkins County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,17.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31135,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Perkins,Perkins County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31135,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Perkins,Perkins County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31135,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Perkins,Perkins County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31135,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Perkins,Perkins County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31135,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Perkins,Perkins County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31135,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Phelps,Phelps County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31137,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Phelps,Phelps County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31137,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Phelps,Phelps County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31137,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Phelps,Phelps County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31137,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Phelps,Phelps County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31137,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Phelps,Phelps County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,8968,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31137,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Phelps,Phelps County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7919,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31137,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Phelps,Phelps County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6264,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31137,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Phelps,Phelps County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31137,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Phelps,Phelps County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1654,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31137,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Phelps,Phelps County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,79.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31137,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Phelps,Phelps County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31137,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Phelps,Phelps County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,20.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31137,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Phelps,Phelps County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31137,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Phelps,Phelps County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31137,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Phelps,Phelps County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,79.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31137,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Phelps,Phelps County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31137,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Phelps,Phelps County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,6264,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31137,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Pierce,Pierce County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31139,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Pierce,Pierce County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31139,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Pierce,Pierce County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31139,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Pierce,Pierce County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31139,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Pierce,Pierce County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31139,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Pierce,Pierce County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,7328,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31139,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Pierce,Pierce County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4461,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31139,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Pierce,Pierce County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,981,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31139,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Pierce,Pierce County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31139,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Pierce,Pierce County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3480,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31139,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Pierce,Pierce County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,22,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31139,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Pierce,Pierce County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31139,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Pierce,Pierce County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,78,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31139,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Pierce,Pierce County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31139,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Pierce,Pierce County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31139,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Pierce,Pierce County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,22,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31139,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Pierce,Pierce County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31139,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Pierce,Pierce County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,981,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31139,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Platte,Platte County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31141,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Platte,Platte County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31141,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Platte,Platte County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31141,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Platte,Platte County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31141,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Platte,Platte County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31141,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Platte,Platte County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,34280,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31141,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Platte,Platte County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,28512,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31141,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Platte,Platte County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,25708,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31141,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Platte,Platte County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31141,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Platte,Platte County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2803,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31141,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Platte,Platte County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,90.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31141,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Platte,Platte County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31141,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Platte,Platte County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,9.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31141,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Platte,Platte County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31141,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Platte,Platte County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31141,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Platte,Platte County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,90.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31141,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Platte,Platte County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31141,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Platte,Platte County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,25708,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31141,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31143,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31143,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31143,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31143,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31143,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,5225,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31143,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3493,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31143,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,805,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31143,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31143,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2687,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31143,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,23.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31143,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31143,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,76.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31143,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31143,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31143,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,23.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31143,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31143,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,805,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31143,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Red Willow,Red Willow County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31145,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Red Willow,Red Willow County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31145,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Red Willow,Red Willow County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31145,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Red Willow,Red Willow County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31145,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Red Willow,Red Willow County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31145,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Red Willow,Red Willow County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,10671,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31145,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Red Willow,Red Willow County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,12021,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31145,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Red Willow,Red Willow County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8673,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31145,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Red Willow,Red Willow County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,8673,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31145,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Red Willow,Red Willow County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3348,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31145,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Red Willow,Red Willow County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,72.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31145,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Red Willow,Red Willow County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,72.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31145,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Red Willow,Red Willow County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,27.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31145,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Red Willow,Red Willow County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31145,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Red Willow,Red Willow County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31145,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Red Willow,Red Willow County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31145,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Red Willow,Red Willow County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31145,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Red Willow,Red Willow County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31145,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Richardson,Richardson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31147,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Richardson,Richardson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31147,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Richardson,Richardson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31147,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Richardson,Richardson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31147,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Richardson,Richardson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31147,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Richardson,Richardson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,7836,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31147,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Richardson,Richardson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9042,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31147,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Richardson,Richardson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6660,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31147,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Richardson,Richardson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31147,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Richardson,Richardson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2382,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31147,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Richardson,Richardson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,73.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31147,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Richardson,Richardson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31147,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Richardson,Richardson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,26.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31147,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Richardson,Richardson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31147,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Richardson,Richardson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,17.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31147,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Richardson,Richardson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,55.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31147,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Richardson,Richardson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1615,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31147,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Richardson,Richardson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,5045,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31147,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Rock,Rock County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31149,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Rock,Rock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31149,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Rock,Rock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31149,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Rock,Rock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31149,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Rock,Rock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31149,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Rock,Rock County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,1267,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31149,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Rock,Rock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,788,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31149,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Rock,Rock County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31149,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Rock,Rock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31149,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Rock,Rock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,788,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31149,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Rock,Rock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31149,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Rock,Rock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31149,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Rock,Rock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31149,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Rock,Rock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31149,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Rock,Rock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31149,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Rock,Rock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31149,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Rock,Rock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31149,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Rock,Rock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31149,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Saline,Saline County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31151,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Saline,Saline County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31151,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Saline,Saline County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31151,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Saline,Saline County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31151,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Saline,Saline County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31151,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Saline,Saline County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,14249,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31151,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Saline,Saline County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,13177,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31151,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Saline,Saline County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31151,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Saline,Saline County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31151,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Saline,Saline County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,13177,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31151,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Saline,Saline County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31151,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Saline,Saline County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31151,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Saline,Saline County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31151,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Saline,Saline County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31151,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Saline,Saline County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31151,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Saline,Saline County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31151,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Saline,Saline County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31151,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Saline,Saline County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31151,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Sarpy,Sarpy County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31153,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Sarpy,Sarpy County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31153,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Sarpy,Sarpy County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31153,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Sarpy,Sarpy County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31153,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Sarpy,Sarpy County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31153,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Sarpy,Sarpy County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,191114,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31153,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Sarpy,Sarpy County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,53486,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31153,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Sarpy,Sarpy County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,48237,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31153,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Sarpy,Sarpy County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31153,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Sarpy,Sarpy County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5249,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31153,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Sarpy,Sarpy County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,90.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31153,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Sarpy,Sarpy County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31153,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Sarpy,Sarpy County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,9.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31153,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Sarpy,Sarpy County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31153,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Sarpy,Sarpy County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31153,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Sarpy,Sarpy County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,89.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31153,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Sarpy,Sarpy County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,443,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31153,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Sarpy,Sarpy County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,47793,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31153,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Saunders,Saunders County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,19,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31155,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Saunders,Saunders County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31155,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Saunders,Saunders County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31155,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Saunders,Saunders County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31155,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Saunders,Saunders County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31155,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Saunders,Saunders County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,22361,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31155,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Saunders,Saunders County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,15197,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31155,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Saunders,Saunders County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4488,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31155,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Saunders,Saunders County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1087,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31155,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Saunders,Saunders County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10709,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31155,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Saunders,Saunders County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,29.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31155,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Saunders,Saunders County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,7.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31155,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Saunders,Saunders County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,70.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31155,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Saunders,Saunders County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31155,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Saunders,Saunders County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31155,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Saunders,Saunders County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,22.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31155,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Saunders,Saunders County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31155,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Saunders,Saunders County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3401,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31155,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Scotts Bluff,Scotts Bluff County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31157,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Scotts Bluff,Scotts Bluff County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31157,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Scotts Bluff,Scotts Bluff County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31157,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Scotts Bluff,Scotts Bluff County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31157,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Scotts Bluff,Scotts Bluff County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31157,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Scotts Bluff,Scotts Bluff County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,36002,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31157,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Scotts Bluff,Scotts Bluff County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,34138,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31157,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Scotts Bluff,Scotts Bluff County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11375,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31157,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Scotts Bluff,Scotts Bluff County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1790,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31157,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Scotts Bluff,Scotts Bluff County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,22763,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31157,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Scotts Bluff,Scotts Bluff County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,33.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31157,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Scotts Bluff,Scotts Bluff County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,5.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31157,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Scotts Bluff,Scotts Bluff County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,66.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31157,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Scotts Bluff,Scotts Bluff County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31157,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Scotts Bluff,Scotts Bluff County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31157,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Scotts Bluff,Scotts Bluff County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,28.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31157,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Scotts Bluff,Scotts Bluff County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31157,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Scotts Bluff,Scotts Bluff County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,9586,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31157,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Seward,Seward County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31159,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Seward,Seward County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31159,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Seward,Seward County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31159,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Seward,Seward County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31159,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Seward,Seward County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31159,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Seward,Seward County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,17605,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31159,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Seward,Seward County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,13540,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31159,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Seward,Seward County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9310,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31159,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Seward,Seward County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,279,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31159,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Seward,Seward County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4230,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31159,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Seward,Seward County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,68.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31159,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Seward,Seward County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,2.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31159,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Seward,Seward County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,31.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31159,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Seward,Seward County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31159,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Seward,Seward County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31159,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Seward,Seward County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,66.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31159,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Seward,Seward County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31159,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Seward,Seward County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,9032,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31159,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Sheridan,Sheridan County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31161,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Sheridan,Sheridan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31161,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Sheridan,Sheridan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31161,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Sheridan,Sheridan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31161,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Sheridan,Sheridan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31161,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Sheridan,Sheridan County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,5097,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31161,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Sheridan,Sheridan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3602,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31161,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Sheridan,Sheridan County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2959,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31161,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Sheridan,Sheridan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31161,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Sheridan,Sheridan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,643,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31161,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Sheridan,Sheridan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,82.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31161,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Sheridan,Sheridan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31161,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Sheridan,Sheridan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,17.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31161,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Sheridan,Sheridan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31161,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Sheridan,Sheridan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31161,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Sheridan,Sheridan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,82.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31161,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Sheridan,Sheridan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31161,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Sheridan,Sheridan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2959,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31161,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Sherman,Sherman County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31163,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Sherman,Sherman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31163,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Sherman,Sherman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31163,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Sherman,Sherman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31163,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Sherman,Sherman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31163,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Sherman,Sherman County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,2956,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31163,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Sherman,Sherman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1702,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31163,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Sherman,Sherman County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31163,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Sherman,Sherman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31163,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Sherman,Sherman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1702,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31163,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Sherman,Sherman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31163,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Sherman,Sherman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31163,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Sherman,Sherman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31163,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Sherman,Sherman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31163,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Sherman,Sherman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31163,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Sherman,Sherman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31163,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Sherman,Sherman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31163,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Sherman,Sherman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31163,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Sioux,Sioux County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31165,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Sioux,Sioux County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31165,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Sioux,Sioux County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31165,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Sioux,Sioux County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31165,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Sioux,Sioux County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31165,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Sioux,Sioux County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,1144,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31165,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Sioux,Sioux County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,283,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31165,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Sioux,Sioux County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31165,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Sioux,Sioux County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31165,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Sioux,Sioux County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,283,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31165,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Sioux,Sioux County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31165,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Sioux,Sioux County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31165,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Sioux,Sioux County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31165,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Sioux,Sioux County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31165,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Sioux,Sioux County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31165,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Sioux,Sioux County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31165,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Sioux,Sioux County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31165,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Sioux,Sioux County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31165,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Stanton,Stanton County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31167,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Stanton,Stanton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31167,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Stanton,Stanton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31167,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Stanton,Stanton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31167,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Stanton,Stanton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31167,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Stanton,Stanton County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,5824,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31167,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Stanton,Stanton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3944,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31167,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Stanton,Stanton County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31167,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Stanton,Stanton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31167,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Stanton,Stanton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3944,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31167,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Stanton,Stanton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31167,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Stanton,Stanton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31167,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Stanton,Stanton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31167,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Stanton,Stanton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31167,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Stanton,Stanton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31167,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Stanton,Stanton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31167,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Stanton,Stanton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31167,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Stanton,Stanton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31167,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Thayer,Thayer County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31169,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Thayer,Thayer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31169,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Thayer,Thayer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31169,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Thayer,Thayer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31169,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Thayer,Thayer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31169,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Thayer,Thayer County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,5013,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31169,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Thayer,Thayer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3910,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31169,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Thayer,Thayer County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31169,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Thayer,Thayer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31169,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Thayer,Thayer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3910,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31169,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Thayer,Thayer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31169,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Thayer,Thayer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31169,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Thayer,Thayer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31169,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Thayer,Thayer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31169,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Thayer,Thayer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31169,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Thayer,Thayer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31169,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Thayer,Thayer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31169,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Thayer,Thayer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31169,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Thomas,Thomas County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31171,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Thomas,Thomas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31171,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Thomas,Thomas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31171,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Thomas,Thomas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31171,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Thomas,Thomas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31171,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Thomas,Thomas County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,671,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31171,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Thomas,Thomas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,226,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31171,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Thomas,Thomas County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31171,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Thomas,Thomas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31171,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Thomas,Thomas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,226,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31171,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Thomas,Thomas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31171,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Thomas,Thomas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31171,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Thomas,Thomas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31171,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Thomas,Thomas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31171,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Thomas,Thomas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31171,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Thomas,Thomas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31171,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Thomas,Thomas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31171,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Thomas,Thomas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31171,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Thurston,Thurston County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31173,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Thurston,Thurston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31173,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Thurston,Thurston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31173,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Thurston,Thurston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31173,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Thurston,Thurston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31173,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Thurston,Thurston County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,6769,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31173,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Thurston,Thurston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9820,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31173,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Thurston,Thurston County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9482,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31173,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Thurston,Thurston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,3796,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31173,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Thurston,Thurston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,338,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31173,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Thurston,Thurston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,96.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31173,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Thurston,Thurston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,38.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31173,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Thurston,Thurston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,3.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31173,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Thurston,Thurston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31173,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Thurston,Thurston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,8.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31173,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Thurston,Thurston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,49.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31173,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Thurston,Thurston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,837,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31173,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Thurston,Thurston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,4849,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31173,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Valley,Valley County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31175,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Valley,Valley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31175,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Valley,Valley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31175,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Valley,Valley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31175,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Valley,Valley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31175,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Valley,Valley County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,4048,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31175,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Valley,Valley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3067,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31175,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Valley,Valley County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31175,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Valley,Valley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31175,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Valley,Valley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3067,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31175,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Valley,Valley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31175,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Valley,Valley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31175,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Valley,Valley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31175,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Valley,Valley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31175,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Valley,Valley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31175,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Valley,Valley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31175,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Valley,Valley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31175,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Valley,Valley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31175,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31177,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31177,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31177,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31177,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31177,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,20904,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31177,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,17801,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31177,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,15645,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31177,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31177,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2156,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31177,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,87.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31177,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31177,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,12.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31177,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31177,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,28.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31177,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,59.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31177,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,5112,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31177,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,10533,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31177,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31179,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31179,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31179,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31179,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31179,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,9687,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31179,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7437,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31179,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6383,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31179,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31179,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1054,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31179,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,85.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31179,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31179,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,14.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31179,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31179,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31179,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,85.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31179,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31179,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,6383,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31179,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31181,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31181,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31181,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31181,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31181,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,3387,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31181,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3005,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31181,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2211,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31181,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31181,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,794,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31181,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,73.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31181,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31181,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,26.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31181,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31181,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31181,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,73.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31181,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31181,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2211,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31181,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Wheeler,Wheeler County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31183,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Wheeler,Wheeler County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31183,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Wheeler,Wheeler County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31183,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Wheeler,Wheeler County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31183,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Wheeler,Wheeler County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31183,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Wheeler,Wheeler County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,773,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31183,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Wheeler,Wheeler County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,218,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31183,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Wheeler,Wheeler County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31183,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Wheeler,Wheeler County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31183,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Wheeler,Wheeler County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,218,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31183,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Wheeler,Wheeler County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31183,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Wheeler,Wheeler County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31183,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Wheeler,Wheeler County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31183,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Wheeler,Wheeler County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31183,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Wheeler,Wheeler County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31183,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Wheeler,Wheeler County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31183,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Wheeler,Wheeler County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31183,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,Wheeler,Wheeler County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31183,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,York,York County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31185,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,York,York County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31185,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,York,York County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31185,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,York,York County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31185,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,York,York County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31185,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,York,York County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,14084,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31185,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NE,York,York County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,12463,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31185,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,York,York County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31185,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,York,York County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31185,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,York,York County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,12463,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31185,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,York,York County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31185,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,York,York County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31185,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,York,York County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31185,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,York,York County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31185,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NE,York,York County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31185,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,York,York County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31185,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NE,York,York County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31185,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NE,York,York County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,31185,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Belknap,Belknap County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,83,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,33001,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Belknap,Belknap County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,31,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,33001,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Belknap,Belknap County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,33001,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Belknap,Belknap County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,33001,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Belknap,Belknap County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,29,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,33001,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Belknap,Belknap County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,63743,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,33001,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Belknap,Belknap County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,37865,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33001,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Belknap,Belknap County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,23000,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33001,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Belknap,Belknap County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,7169,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33001,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Belknap,Belknap County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,14865,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33001,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Belknap,Belknap County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,60.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33001,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Belknap,Belknap County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,18.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33001,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Belknap,Belknap County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,39.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33001,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Belknap,Belknap County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,52,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,33001,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Belknap,Belknap County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33001,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Belknap,Belknap County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,40.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33001,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Belknap,Belknap County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,375,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33001,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Belknap,Belknap County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,15456,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33001,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,130,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,33003,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,88,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,33003,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,33003,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,33003,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,88,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,33003,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,50212,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,33003,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,39004,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33003,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,17112,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33003,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,17112,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33003,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,21892,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33003,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,43.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33003,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,43.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33003,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,56.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33003,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,42,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,33003,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,33003,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,33003,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,33003,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,33003,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Cheshire,Cheshire County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,40,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,33005,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Cheshire,Cheshire County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,33005,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Cheshire,Cheshire County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,33005,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Cheshire,Cheshire County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,33005,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Cheshire,Cheshire County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,33005,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Cheshire,Cheshire County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,76501,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,33005,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Cheshire,Cheshire County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,46977,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33005,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Cheshire,Cheshire County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2357,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33005,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Cheshire,Cheshire County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,2357,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33005,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Cheshire,Cheshire County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,44620,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33005,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Cheshire,Cheshire County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33005,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Cheshire,Cheshire County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33005,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Cheshire,Cheshire County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,95,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33005,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Cheshire,Cheshire County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,32,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,33005,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Cheshire,Cheshire County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,33005,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Cheshire,Cheshire County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,33005,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Cheshire,Cheshire County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,33005,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Cheshire,Cheshire County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,33005,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Coos,Coos County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,24,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,33007,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Coos,Coos County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,33007,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Coos,Coos County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,33007,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Coos,Coos County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,33007,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Coos,Coos County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,33007,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Coos,Coos County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,31173,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,33007,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Coos,Coos County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,23015,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33007,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Coos,Coos County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2422,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33007,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Coos,Coos County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,126,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33007,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Coos,Coos County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,20594,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33007,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Coos,Coos County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,10.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33007,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Coos,Coos County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33007,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Coos,Coos County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,89.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33007,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Coos,Coos County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,22,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,33007,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Coos,Coos County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,33007,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Coos,Coos County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,10,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33007,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Coos,Coos County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,33007,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Coos,Coos County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2295,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33007,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Grafton,Grafton County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,85,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,33009,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Grafton,Grafton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,35,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,33009,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Grafton,Grafton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,33009,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Grafton,Grafton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,33009,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Grafton,Grafton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,33,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,33009,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Grafton,Grafton County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,91123,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,33009,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Grafton,Grafton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,59568,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33009,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Grafton,Grafton County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,26222,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33009,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Grafton,Grafton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,8845,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33009,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Grafton,Grafton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,33347,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33009,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Grafton,Grafton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,44,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33009,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Grafton,Grafton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,14.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33009,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Grafton,Grafton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,56,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33009,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Grafton,Grafton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,50,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,33009,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Grafton,Grafton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,33009,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Grafton,Grafton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,29.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33009,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Grafton,Grafton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,33009,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Grafton,Grafton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,17377,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33009,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Hillsborough,Hillsborough County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,96,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,33011,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Hillsborough,Hillsborough County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,33,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,33011,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Hillsborough,Hillsborough County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,33011,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Hillsborough,Hillsborough County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,33011,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Hillsborough,Hillsborough County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,27,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,33011,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Hillsborough,Hillsborough County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,422705,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,33011,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Hillsborough,Hillsborough County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,294563,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33011,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Hillsborough,Hillsborough County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,135194,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33011,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Hillsborough,Hillsborough County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,7643,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33011,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Hillsborough,Hillsborough County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,159369,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33011,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Hillsborough,Hillsborough County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,45.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33011,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Hillsborough,Hillsborough County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,2.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33011,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Hillsborough,Hillsborough County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,54.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33011,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Hillsborough,Hillsborough County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,63,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,33011,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Hillsborough,Hillsborough County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33011,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Hillsborough,Hillsborough County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,42.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33011,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Hillsborough,Hillsborough County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2963,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33011,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Hillsborough,Hillsborough County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,124588,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33011,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Merrimack,Merrimack County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,62,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,33013,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Merrimack,Merrimack County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,24,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,33013,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Merrimack,Merrimack County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,33013,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Merrimack,Merrimack County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,33013,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Merrimack,Merrimack County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,19,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,33013,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Merrimack,Merrimack County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,153922,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,33013,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Merrimack,Merrimack County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,80786,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33013,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Merrimack,Merrimack County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,52179,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33013,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Merrimack,Merrimack County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,3791,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33013,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Merrimack,Merrimack County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,28607,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33013,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Merrimack,Merrimack County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,64.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33013,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Merrimack,Merrimack County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,4.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33013,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Merrimack,Merrimack County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,35.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33013,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Merrimack,Merrimack County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,38,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,33013,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Merrimack,Merrimack County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,8.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33013,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Merrimack,Merrimack County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,51,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33013,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Merrimack,Merrimack County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,7171,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33013,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Merrimack,Merrimack County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,41217,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33013,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NH,NH,New Hampshire,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,812,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,33,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,NH,NH,New Hampshire,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,304,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,33,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,NH,NH,New Hampshire,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,33,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,NH,NH,New Hampshire,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,33,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,NH,NH,New Hampshire,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,276,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,33,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,NH,NH,New Hampshire,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,1377848,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,33,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2020,NH,NH,New Hampshire,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,863017,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,NH,NH,New Hampshire,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,398698,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,NH,NH,New Hampshire,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,63898,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,NH,NH,New Hampshire,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,464319,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,NH,NH,New Hampshire,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,46.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,NH,NH,New Hampshire,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,7.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,NH,NH,New Hampshire,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,53.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,NH,NH,New Hampshire,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,508,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,33,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,NH,NH,New Hampshire,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,4.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,NH,NH,New Hampshire,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,34.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,NH,NH,New Hampshire,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,38318,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,NH,NH,New Hampshire,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,296483,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,NH,Rockingham,Rockingham County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,218,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,33015,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Rockingham,Rockingham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,57,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,33015,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Rockingham,Rockingham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,33015,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Rockingham,Rockingham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,33015,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Rockingham,Rockingham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,48,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,33015,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Rockingham,Rockingham County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,314430,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,33015,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Rockingham,Rockingham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,170668,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33015,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Rockingham,Rockingham County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,67366,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33015,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Rockingham,Rockingham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,8643,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33015,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Rockingham,Rockingham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,103302,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33015,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Rockingham,Rockingham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,39.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33015,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Rockingham,Rockingham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,5.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33015,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Rockingham,Rockingham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,60.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33015,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Rockingham,Rockingham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,161,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,33015,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Rockingham,Rockingham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,16.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33015,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Rockingham,Rockingham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,18.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33015,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Rockingham,Rockingham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,27809,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33015,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Rockingham,Rockingham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,30913,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33015,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Strafford,Strafford County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,46,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,33017,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Strafford,Strafford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,33017,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Strafford,Strafford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,33017,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Strafford,Strafford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,33017,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Strafford,Strafford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,33017,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Strafford,Strafford County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,131006,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,33017,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Strafford,Strafford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,85971,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33017,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Strafford,Strafford County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,66424,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33017,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Strafford,Strafford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1788,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33017,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Strafford,Strafford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,19546,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33017,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Strafford,Strafford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,77.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33017,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Strafford,Strafford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,2.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33017,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Strafford,Strafford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,22.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33017,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Strafford,Strafford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,29,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,33017,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Strafford,Strafford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,33017,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Strafford,Strafford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,75.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33017,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Strafford,Strafford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,33017,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Strafford,Strafford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,64636,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33017,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Sullivan,Sullivan County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,28,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,33019,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Sullivan,Sullivan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,33019,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Sullivan,Sullivan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,33019,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Sullivan,Sullivan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,33019,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Sullivan,Sullivan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,33019,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Sullivan,Sullivan County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,43033,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,33019,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Sullivan,Sullivan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,24600,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33019,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Sullivan,Sullivan County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6423,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33019,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Sullivan,Sullivan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,6423,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33019,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Sullivan,Sullivan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,18177,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33019,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Sullivan,Sullivan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,26.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33019,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Sullivan,Sullivan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,26.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33019,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Sullivan,Sullivan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,73.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33019,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Sullivan,Sullivan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,19,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,33019,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Sullivan,Sullivan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,33019,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Sullivan,Sullivan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,33019,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Sullivan,Sullivan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,33019,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NH,Sullivan,Sullivan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,33019,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NJ,NJ,New Jersey,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,666,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,34,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,NJ,NJ,New Jersey,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,63,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,34,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,NJ,NJ,New Jersey,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,20,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,34,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,NJ,NJ,New Jersey,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,34,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,NJ,NJ,New Jersey,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,30,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,34,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,NJ,NJ,New Jersey,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,9279743,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,34,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,False,,WFR_ST
2020,NJ,NJ,New Jersey,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,8279024,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,34,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,NJ,NJ,New Jersey,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1333544,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,34,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,NJ,NJ,New Jersey,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,149627,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,34,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,NJ,NJ,New Jersey,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6945480,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,34,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,NJ,NJ,New Jersey,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,16.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,34,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,NJ,NJ,New Jersey,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,34,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,NJ,NJ,New Jersey,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,83.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,34,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,NJ,NJ,New Jersey,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,603,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,34,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,NJ,NJ,New Jersey,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,2.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,34,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,NJ,NJ,New Jersey,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,11.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,34,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,NJ,NJ,New Jersey,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,228671,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,34,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,NJ,NJ,New Jersey,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,955246,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,34,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,NM,NM,New Mexico,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,729,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,35,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,NM,NM,New Mexico,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,384,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,35,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,NM,NM,New Mexico,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,70,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,35,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,NM,NM,New Mexico,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,35,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,NM,NM,New Mexico,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,286,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,35,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,NM,NM,New Mexico,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,2117566,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,35,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,False,,WFR_ST
2020,NM,NM,New Mexico,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1820853,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,35,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,NM,NM,New Mexico,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1398194,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,35,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,NM,NM,New Mexico,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,553038,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,35,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,NM,NM,New Mexico,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,422659,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,35,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,NM,NM,New Mexico,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,76.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,35,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,NM,NM,New Mexico,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,30.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,35,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,NM,NM,New Mexico,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,23.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,35,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,NM,NM,New Mexico,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,345,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,35,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,NM,NM,New Mexico,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,1.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,35,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,NM,NM,New Mexico,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,44.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,35,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,NM,NM,New Mexico,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,35031,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,35,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,NM,NM,New Mexico,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,810125,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,35,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,NV,Carson City,Carson City County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32510,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Carson City,Carson City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32510,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Carson City,Carson City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32510,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Carson City,Carson City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32510,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Carson City,Carson City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32510,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Carson City,Carson City County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,58677,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32510,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Carson City,Carson City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,56689,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32510,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Carson City,Carson City County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32510,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Carson City,Carson City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32510,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Carson City,Carson City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,56689,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32510,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Carson City,Carson City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32510,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Carson City,Carson City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32510,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Carson City,Carson City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32510,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Carson City,Carson City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32510,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Carson City,Carson City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,32510,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Carson City,Carson City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,32510,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Carson City,Carson City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,32510,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Carson City,Carson City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,32510,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Churchill,Churchill County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32001,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Churchill,Churchill County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32001,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Churchill,Churchill County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32001,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Churchill,Churchill County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32001,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Churchill,Churchill County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32001,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Churchill,Churchill County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,25539,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32001,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Churchill,Churchill County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,12869,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32001,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Churchill,Churchill County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11862,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32001,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Churchill,Churchill County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,8856,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32001,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Churchill,Churchill County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1007,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32001,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Churchill,Churchill County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,92.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32001,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Churchill,Churchill County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,68.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32001,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Churchill,Churchill County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,7.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32001,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Churchill,Churchill County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32001,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Churchill,Churchill County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,23.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32001,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Churchill,Churchill County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,32001,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Churchill,Churchill County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,3005,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32001,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Churchill,Churchill County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,32001,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,54,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32003,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,24,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32003,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32003,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32003,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32003,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,2273386,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32003,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2231035,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32003,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2191960,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32003,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,9661,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32003,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,39075,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32003,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32003,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32003,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32003,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,30,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32003,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,83.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32003,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,14.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32003,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1859729,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32003,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,322570,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32003,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,22,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32005,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32005,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32005,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32005,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32005,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,49468,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32005,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,40577,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32005,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,326,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32005,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,326,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32005,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,40252,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32005,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32005,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32005,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32005,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,21,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32005,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,32005,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,32005,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,32005,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,32005,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Elko,Elko County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,20,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32007,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Elko,Elko County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32007,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Elko,Elko County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32007,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Elko,Elko County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32007,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Elko,Elko County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32007,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Elko,Elko County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,53750,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32007,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Elko,Elko County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,46599,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32007,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Elko,Elko County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1332,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32007,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Elko,Elko County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,30,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32007,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Elko,Elko County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,45267,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32007,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Elko,Elko County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32007,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Elko,Elko County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32007,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Elko,Elko County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,97.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32007,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Elko,Elko County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32007,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Elko,Elko County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,32007,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Elko,Elko County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,2.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32007,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Elko,Elko County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,32007,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Elko,Elko County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1302,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32007,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Esmeralda,Esmeralda County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32009,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Esmeralda,Esmeralda County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32009,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Esmeralda,Esmeralda County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32009,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Esmeralda,Esmeralda County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32009,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Esmeralda,Esmeralda County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32009,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Esmeralda,Esmeralda County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,730,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32009,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Esmeralda,Esmeralda County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,489,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32009,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Esmeralda,Esmeralda County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,138,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32009,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Esmeralda,Esmeralda County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,138,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32009,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Esmeralda,Esmeralda County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,351,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32009,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Esmeralda,Esmeralda County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,28.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32009,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Esmeralda,Esmeralda County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,28.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32009,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Esmeralda,Esmeralda County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,71.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32009,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Esmeralda,Esmeralda County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32009,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Esmeralda,Esmeralda County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,32009,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Esmeralda,Esmeralda County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,32009,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Esmeralda,Esmeralda County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,32009,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Esmeralda,Esmeralda County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,32009,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Eureka,Eureka County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32011,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Eureka,Eureka County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32011,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Eureka,Eureka County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32011,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Eureka,Eureka County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32011,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Eureka,Eureka County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32011,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Eureka,Eureka County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,1847,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32011,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Eureka,Eureka County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,927,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32011,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Eureka,Eureka County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32011,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Eureka,Eureka County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32011,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Eureka,Eureka County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,927,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32011,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Eureka,Eureka County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32011,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Eureka,Eureka County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32011,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Eureka,Eureka County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32011,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Eureka,Eureka County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32011,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Eureka,Eureka County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,32011,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Eureka,Eureka County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,32011,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Eureka,Eureka County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,32011,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Eureka,Eureka County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,32011,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Humboldt,Humboldt County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32013,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Humboldt,Humboldt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32013,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Humboldt,Humboldt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32013,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Humboldt,Humboldt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32013,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Humboldt,Humboldt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32013,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Humboldt,Humboldt County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,17283,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32013,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Humboldt,Humboldt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,11078,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32013,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Humboldt,Humboldt County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,250,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32013,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Humboldt,Humboldt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32013,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Humboldt,Humboldt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10828,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32013,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Humboldt,Humboldt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32013,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Humboldt,Humboldt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32013,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Humboldt,Humboldt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,97.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32013,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Humboldt,Humboldt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32013,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Humboldt,Humboldt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,32013,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Humboldt,Humboldt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,2.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32013,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Humboldt,Humboldt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,32013,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Humboldt,Humboldt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,250,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32013,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Lander,Lander County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32015,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Lander,Lander County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32015,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Lander,Lander County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32015,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Lander,Lander County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32015,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Lander,Lander County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32015,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Lander,Lander County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,5725,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32015,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Lander,Lander County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4463,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32015,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Lander,Lander County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3762,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32015,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Lander,Lander County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,3642,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32015,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Lander,Lander County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,701,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32015,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Lander,Lander County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,84.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32015,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Lander,Lander County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,81.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32015,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Lander,Lander County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,15.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32015,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Lander,Lander County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32015,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Lander,Lander County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,32015,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Lander,Lander County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,2.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32015,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Lander,Lander County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,32015,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Lander,Lander County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,120,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32015,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32017,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32017,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32017,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32017,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32017,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,4502,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32017,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3667,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32017,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2905,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32017,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,2905,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32017,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,761,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32017,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,79.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32017,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,79.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32017,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,20.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32017,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32017,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,32017,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,32017,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,32017,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,32017,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Lyon,Lyon County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32019,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Lyon,Lyon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32019,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Lyon,Lyon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32019,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Lyon,Lyon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32019,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Lyon,Lyon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32019,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Lyon,Lyon County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,59431,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32019,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Lyon,Lyon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,47411,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32019,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Lyon,Lyon County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,944,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32019,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Lyon,Lyon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,426,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32019,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Lyon,Lyon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,46467,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32019,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Lyon,Lyon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32019,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Lyon,Lyon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32019,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Lyon,Lyon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32019,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Lyon,Lyon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32019,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Lyon,Lyon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,32019,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Lyon,Lyon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,1.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32019,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Lyon,Lyon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,32019,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Lyon,Lyon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,518,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32019,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Mineral,Mineral County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32021,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Mineral,Mineral County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32021,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Mineral,Mineral County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32021,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Mineral,Mineral County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32021,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Mineral,Mineral County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32021,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Mineral,Mineral County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,4553,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32021,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Mineral,Mineral County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3782,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32021,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Mineral,Mineral County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,676,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32021,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Mineral,Mineral County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,601,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32021,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Mineral,Mineral County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3106,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32021,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Mineral,Mineral County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,17.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32021,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Mineral,Mineral County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,15.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32021,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Mineral,Mineral County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,82.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32021,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Mineral,Mineral County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32021,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Mineral,Mineral County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32021,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Mineral,Mineral County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,32021,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Mineral,Mineral County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,75,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32021,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Mineral,Mineral County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,32021,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,NV,Nevada,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,246,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,NV,NV,Nevada,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,60,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,NV,NV,Nevada,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,NV,NV,Nevada,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,NV,NV,Nevada,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,35,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,NV,NV,Nevada,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,3114071,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2020,NV,NV,Nevada,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2906645,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,NV,NV,Nevada,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2220915,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,NV,NV,Nevada,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,32347,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,NV,NV,Nevada,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,685730,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,NV,NV,Nevada,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,76.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,NV,NV,Nevada,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,NV,NV,Nevada,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,23.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,NV,NV,Nevada,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,186,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,NV,NV,Nevada,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,64.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,NV,NV,Nevada,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,11.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,NV,NV,Nevada,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1862960,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,NV,NV,Nevada,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,325608,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,NV,Nye,Nye County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,24,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32023,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Nye,Nye County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32023,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Nye,Nye County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32023,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Nye,Nye County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32023,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Nye,Nye County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32023,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Nye,Nye County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,51968,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32023,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Nye,Nye County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,21135,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32023,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Nye,Nye County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4575,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32023,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Nye,Nye County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,4350,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32023,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Nye,Nye County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,16559,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32023,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Nye,Nye County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,21.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32023,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Nye,Nye County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,20.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32023,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Nye,Nye County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,78.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32023,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Nye,Nye County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32023,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Nye,Nye County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32023,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Nye,Nye County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,0.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32023,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Nye,Nye County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,150,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32023,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Nye,Nye County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,75,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32023,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Pershing,Pershing County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32027,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Pershing,Pershing County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32027,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Pershing,Pershing County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32027,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Pershing,Pershing County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32027,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Pershing,Pershing County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32027,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Pershing,Pershing County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,6639,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32027,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Pershing,Pershing County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5662,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32027,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Pershing,Pershing County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32027,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Pershing,Pershing County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32027,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Pershing,Pershing County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5662,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32027,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Pershing,Pershing County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32027,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Pershing,Pershing County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32027,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Pershing,Pershing County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32027,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Pershing,Pershing County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32027,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Pershing,Pershing County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,32027,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Pershing,Pershing County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,32027,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Pershing,Pershing County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,32027,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Pershing,Pershing County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,32027,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Storey,Storey County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32029,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Storey,Storey County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32029,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Storey,Storey County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32029,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Storey,Storey County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32029,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Storey,Storey County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32029,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Storey,Storey County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,4106,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32029,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Storey,Storey County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2855,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32029,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Storey,Storey County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,120,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32029,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Storey,Storey County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32029,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Storey,Storey County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2735,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32029,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Storey,Storey County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,4.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32029,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Storey,Storey County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32029,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Storey,Storey County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,95.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32029,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Storey,Storey County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32029,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Storey,Storey County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,32029,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Storey,Storey County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,4.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32029,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Storey,Storey County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,32029,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Storey,Storey County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,120,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32029,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Washoe,Washoe County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,46,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32031,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Washoe,Washoe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32031,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Washoe,Washoe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32031,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Washoe,Washoe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32031,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Washoe,Washoe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32031,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Washoe,Washoe County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,487388,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32031,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Washoe,Washoe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,407845,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32031,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Washoe,Washoe County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,531,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32031,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Washoe,Washoe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,80,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32031,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Washoe,Washoe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,407314,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32031,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Washoe,Washoe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32031,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Washoe,Washoe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32031,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Washoe,Washoe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32031,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Washoe,Washoe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,44,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32031,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Washoe,Washoe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,32031,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Washoe,Washoe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,0.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32031,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Washoe,Washoe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,32031,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,Washoe,Washoe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,451,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32031,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,White Pine,White Pine County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32033,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,White Pine,White Pine County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32033,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,White Pine,White Pine County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32033,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,White Pine,White Pine County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32033,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,White Pine,White Pine County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32033,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,White Pine,White Pine County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,9079,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32033,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,NV,White Pine,White Pine County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9563,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32033,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,White Pine,White Pine County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1533,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32033,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,White Pine,White Pine County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1332,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32033,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,White Pine,White Pine County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8031,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32033,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,White Pine,White Pine County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,16,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32033,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NV,White Pine,White Pine County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,13.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32033,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NV,White Pine,White Pine County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,84,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32033,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NV,White Pine,White Pine County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32033,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,NV,White Pine,White Pine County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,32033,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NV,White Pine,White Pine County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,2.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32033,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,NV,White Pine,White Pine County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,32033,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NV,White Pine,White Pine County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,200,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32033,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,NY,NY,New York,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2373,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,36,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,NY,NY,New York,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,415,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,36,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,NY,NY,New York,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,126,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,36,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,NY,NY,New York,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,255,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,36,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,NY,NY,New York,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,33,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,36,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,NY,NY,New York,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,20154933,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,36,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,False,,WFR_ST
2020,NY,NY,New York,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,17610152,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,36,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,NY,NY,New York,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,12596165,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,36,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,NY,NY,New York,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,12890,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,36,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,NY,NY,New York,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5013987,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,36,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,NY,NY,New York,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,71.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,36,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,NY,NY,New York,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,36,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,NY,NY,New York,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,28.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,36,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,NY,NY,New York,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1958,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,36,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,NY,NY,New York,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,8.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,36,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,NY,NY,New York,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,63.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,36,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,NY,NY,New York,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1454075,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,36,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,NY,NY,New York,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,11128417,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,36,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,OH,OH,Ohio,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1252,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,39,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,OH,OH,Ohio,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,722,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,39,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,OH,OH,Ohio,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,208,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,39,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,OH,OH,Ohio,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,248,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,39,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,OH,OH,Ohio,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,254,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,39,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,OH,OH,Ohio,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,11790587,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,39,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,False,,WFR_ST
2020,OH,OH,Ohio,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9901174,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,39,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,OH,OH,Ohio,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9177890,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,39,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,OH,OH,Ohio,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,261346,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,39,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,OH,OH,Ohio,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,723284,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,39,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,OH,OH,Ohio,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,92.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,39,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,OH,OH,Ohio,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,2.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,39,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,OH,OH,Ohio,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,7.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,39,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,OH,OH,Ohio,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,530,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,39,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,OH,OH,Ohio,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,15.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,39,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,OH,OH,Ohio,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,74,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,39,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,OH,OH,Ohio,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1498714,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,39,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,OH,OH,Ohio,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,7328805,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,39,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,OK,Adair,Adair County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40001,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Adair,Adair County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40001,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Adair,Adair County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40001,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Adair,Adair County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40001,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Adair,Adair County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40001,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Adair,Adair County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,19415,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40001,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Adair,Adair County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,12876,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40001,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Adair,Adair County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,12191,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40001,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Adair,Adair County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40001,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Adair,Adair County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,685,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40001,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Adair,Adair County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,94.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40001,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Adair,Adair County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40001,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Adair,Adair County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,5.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40001,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Adair,Adair County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40001,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Adair,Adair County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,69.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40001,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Adair,Adair County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,24.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40001,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Adair,Adair County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,8992,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40001,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Adair,Adair County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3199,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40001,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Alfalfa,Alfalfa County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40003,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Alfalfa,Alfalfa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40003,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Alfalfa,Alfalfa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40003,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Alfalfa,Alfalfa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40003,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Alfalfa,Alfalfa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40003,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Alfalfa,Alfalfa County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,5713,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40003,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Alfalfa,Alfalfa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4341,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40003,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Alfalfa,Alfalfa County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,486,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40003,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Alfalfa,Alfalfa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,225,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40003,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Alfalfa,Alfalfa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3855,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40003,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Alfalfa,Alfalfa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,11.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40003,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Alfalfa,Alfalfa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,5.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40003,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Alfalfa,Alfalfa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,88.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40003,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Alfalfa,Alfalfa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40003,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Alfalfa,Alfalfa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40003,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Alfalfa,Alfalfa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40003,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Alfalfa,Alfalfa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,262,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40003,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Alfalfa,Alfalfa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40003,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Atoka,Atoka County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40005,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Atoka,Atoka County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40005,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Atoka,Atoka County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40005,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Atoka,Atoka County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40005,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Atoka,Atoka County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40005,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Atoka,Atoka County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,14174,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40005,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Atoka,Atoka County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,10735,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40005,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Atoka,Atoka County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40005,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Atoka,Atoka County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40005,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Atoka,Atoka County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10735,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40005,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Atoka,Atoka County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40005,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Atoka,Atoka County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40005,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Atoka,Atoka County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40005,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Atoka,Atoka County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40005,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Atoka,Atoka County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40005,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Atoka,Atoka County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40005,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Atoka,Atoka County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40005,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Atoka,Atoka County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40005,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Beaver,Beaver County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40007,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Beaver,Beaver County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40007,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Beaver,Beaver County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40007,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Beaver,Beaver County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40007,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Beaver,Beaver County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40007,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Beaver,Beaver County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,5012,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40007,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Beaver,Beaver County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2721,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40007,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Beaver,Beaver County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1008,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40007,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Beaver,Beaver County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1008,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40007,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Beaver,Beaver County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1714,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40007,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Beaver,Beaver County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,37,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40007,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Beaver,Beaver County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,37,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40007,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Beaver,Beaver County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,63,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40007,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Beaver,Beaver County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40007,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Beaver,Beaver County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40007,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Beaver,Beaver County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40007,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Beaver,Beaver County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40007,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Beaver,Beaver County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40007,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Beckham,Beckham County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40009,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Beckham,Beckham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40009,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Beckham,Beckham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40009,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Beckham,Beckham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40009,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Beckham,Beckham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40009,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Beckham,Beckham County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,22302,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40009,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Beckham,Beckham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,19943,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40009,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Beckham,Beckham County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40009,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Beckham,Beckham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40009,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Beckham,Beckham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,19943,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40009,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Beckham,Beckham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40009,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Beckham,Beckham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40009,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Beckham,Beckham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40009,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Beckham,Beckham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40009,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Beckham,Beckham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40009,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Beckham,Beckham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40009,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Beckham,Beckham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40009,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Beckham,Beckham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40009,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Blaine,Blaine County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40011,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Blaine,Blaine County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40011,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Blaine,Blaine County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40011,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Blaine,Blaine County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40011,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Blaine,Blaine County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40011,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Blaine,Blaine County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,8711,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40011,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Blaine,Blaine County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9498,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40011,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Blaine,Blaine County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,54,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40011,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Blaine,Blaine County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,54,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40011,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Blaine,Blaine County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9444,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40011,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Blaine,Blaine County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40011,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Blaine,Blaine County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40011,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Blaine,Blaine County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40011,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Blaine,Blaine County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40011,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Blaine,Blaine County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40011,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Blaine,Blaine County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40011,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Blaine,Blaine County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40011,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Blaine,Blaine County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40011,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Bryan,Bryan County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40013,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Bryan,Bryan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40013,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Bryan,Bryan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40013,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Bryan,Bryan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40013,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Bryan,Bryan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40013,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Bryan,Bryan County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,46293,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40013,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Bryan,Bryan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,38040,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40013,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Bryan,Bryan County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,846,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40013,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Bryan,Bryan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,846,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40013,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Bryan,Bryan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,37195,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40013,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Bryan,Bryan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40013,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Bryan,Bryan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,2.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40013,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Bryan,Bryan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,97.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40013,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Bryan,Bryan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40013,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Bryan,Bryan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40013,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Bryan,Bryan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40013,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Bryan,Bryan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40013,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Bryan,Bryan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40013,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Caddo,Caddo County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40015,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Caddo,Caddo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40015,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Caddo,Caddo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40015,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Caddo,Caddo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40015,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Caddo,Caddo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40015,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Caddo,Caddo County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,26858,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40015,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Caddo,Caddo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,21131,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40015,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Caddo,Caddo County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40015,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Caddo,Caddo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40015,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Caddo,Caddo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,21131,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40015,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Caddo,Caddo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40015,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Caddo,Caddo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40015,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Caddo,Caddo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40015,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Caddo,Caddo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40015,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Caddo,Caddo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40015,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Caddo,Caddo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40015,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Caddo,Caddo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40015,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Caddo,Caddo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40015,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Canadian,Canadian County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40017,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Canadian,Canadian County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40017,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Canadian,Canadian County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40017,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Canadian,Canadian County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40017,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Canadian,Canadian County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40017,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Canadian,Canadian County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,155507,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40017,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Canadian,Canadian County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,65835,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40017,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Canadian,Canadian County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,39185,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40017,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Canadian,Canadian County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40017,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Canadian,Canadian County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,26650,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40017,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Canadian,Canadian County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,59.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40017,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Canadian,Canadian County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40017,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Canadian,Canadian County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,40.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40017,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Canadian,Canadian County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40017,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Canadian,Canadian County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,59.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40017,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Canadian,Canadian County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40017,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Canadian,Canadian County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,39185,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40017,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Canadian,Canadian County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40017,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Carter,Carter County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40019,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Carter,Carter County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40019,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Carter,Carter County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40019,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Carter,Carter County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40019,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Carter,Carter County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40019,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Carter,Carter County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,48003,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40019,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Carter,Carter County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,45984,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40019,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Carter,Carter County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,34825,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40019,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Carter,Carter County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,132,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40019,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Carter,Carter County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11159,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40019,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Carter,Carter County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,75.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40019,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Carter,Carter County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40019,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Carter,Carter County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,24.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40019,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Carter,Carter County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40019,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Carter,Carter County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,23.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40019,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Carter,Carter County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,51.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40019,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Carter,Carter County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,10984,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40019,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Carter,Carter County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,23709,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40019,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,24,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40021,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40021,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40021,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40021,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40021,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,47081,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40021,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,33964,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40021,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,23754,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40021,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,93,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40021,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10210,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40021,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,69.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40021,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40021,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,30.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40021,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40021,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,28.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40021,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,41.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40021,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,9545,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40021,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,14116,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40021,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Choctaw,Choctaw County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40023,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Choctaw,Choctaw County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40023,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Choctaw,Choctaw County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40023,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Choctaw,Choctaw County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40023,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Choctaw,Choctaw County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40023,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Choctaw,Choctaw County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,14196,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40023,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Choctaw,Choctaw County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,10874,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40023,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Choctaw,Choctaw County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40023,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Choctaw,Choctaw County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40023,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Choctaw,Choctaw County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10874,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40023,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Choctaw,Choctaw County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40023,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Choctaw,Choctaw County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40023,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Choctaw,Choctaw County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40023,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Choctaw,Choctaw County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40023,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Choctaw,Choctaw County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40023,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Choctaw,Choctaw County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40023,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Choctaw,Choctaw County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40023,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Choctaw,Choctaw County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40023,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Cimarron,Cimarron County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40025,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Cimarron,Cimarron County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40025,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Cimarron,Cimarron County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40025,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Cimarron,Cimarron County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40025,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Cimarron,Cimarron County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40025,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Cimarron,Cimarron County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,2290,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40025,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Cimarron,Cimarron County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1770,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40025,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Cimarron,Cimarron County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1770,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40025,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Cimarron,Cimarron County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1770,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40025,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Cimarron,Cimarron County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40025,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Cimarron,Cimarron County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40025,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Cimarron,Cimarron County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40025,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Cimarron,Cimarron County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40025,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Cimarron,Cimarron County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40025,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Cimarron,Cimarron County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40025,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Cimarron,Cimarron County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40025,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Cimarron,Cimarron County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40025,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Cimarron,Cimarron County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40025,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Cleveland,Cleveland County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40027,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Cleveland,Cleveland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40027,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Cleveland,Cleveland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40027,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Cleveland,Cleveland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40027,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Cleveland,Cleveland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40027,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Cleveland,Cleveland County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,296019,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40027,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Cleveland,Cleveland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,189351,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40027,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Cleveland,Cleveland County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,183464,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40027,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Cleveland,Cleveland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,5802,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40027,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Cleveland,Cleveland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5887,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40027,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Cleveland,Cleveland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,96.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40027,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Cleveland,Cleveland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,3.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40027,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Cleveland,Cleveland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,3.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40027,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Cleveland,Cleveland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40027,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Cleveland,Cleveland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,46.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40027,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Cleveland,Cleveland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,47.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40027,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Cleveland,Cleveland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,87586,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40027,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Cleveland,Cleveland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,90076,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40027,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Coal,Coal County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40029,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Coal,Coal County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40029,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Coal,Coal County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40029,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Coal,Coal County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40029,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Coal,Coal County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40029,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Coal,Coal County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,5279,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40029,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Coal,Coal County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3918,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40029,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Coal,Coal County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3532,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40029,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Coal,Coal County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40029,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Coal,Coal County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,387,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40029,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Coal,Coal County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,90.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40029,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Coal,Coal County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40029,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Coal,Coal County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,9.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40029,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Coal,Coal County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40029,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Coal,Coal County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,40.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40029,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Coal,Coal County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,50,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40029,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Coal,Coal County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1574,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40029,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Coal,Coal County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1958,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40029,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Comanche,Comanche County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,22,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40031,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Comanche,Comanche County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40031,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Comanche,Comanche County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40031,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Comanche,Comanche County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40031,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Comanche,Comanche County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40031,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Comanche,Comanche County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,121129,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40031,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Comanche,Comanche County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,132182,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40031,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Comanche,Comanche County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,120879,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40031,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Comanche,Comanche County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,2315,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40031,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Comanche,Comanche County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11303,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40031,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Comanche,Comanche County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,91.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40031,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Comanche,Comanche County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40031,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Comanche,Comanche County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,8.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40031,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Comanche,Comanche County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40031,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Comanche,Comanche County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,21.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40031,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Comanche,Comanche County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,68.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40031,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Comanche,Comanche County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,27998,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40031,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Comanche,Comanche County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,90565,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40031,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Cotton,Cotton County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40033,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Cotton,Cotton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40033,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Cotton,Cotton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40033,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Cotton,Cotton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40033,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Cotton,Cotton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40033,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Cotton,Cotton County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,5543,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40033,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Cotton,Cotton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,6295,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40033,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Cotton,Cotton County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40033,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Cotton,Cotton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40033,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Cotton,Cotton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6295,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40033,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Cotton,Cotton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40033,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Cotton,Cotton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40033,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Cotton,Cotton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40033,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Cotton,Cotton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40033,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Cotton,Cotton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40033,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Cotton,Cotton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40033,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Cotton,Cotton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40033,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Cotton,Cotton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40033,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Craig,Craig County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40035,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Craig,Craig County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40035,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Craig,Craig County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40035,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Craig,Craig County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40035,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Craig,Craig County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40035,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Craig,Craig County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,14146,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40035,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Craig,Craig County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,17656,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40035,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Craig,Craig County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2123,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40035,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Craig,Craig County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,2123,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40035,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Craig,Craig County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,15533,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40035,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Craig,Craig County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,12,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40035,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Craig,Craig County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,12,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40035,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Craig,Craig County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,88,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40035,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Craig,Craig County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40035,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Craig,Craig County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40035,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Craig,Craig County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40035,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Craig,Craig County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40035,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Craig,Craig County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40035,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Creek,Creek County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,19,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40037,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Creek,Creek County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40037,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Creek,Creek County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40037,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Creek,Creek County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40037,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Creek,Creek County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40037,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Creek,Creek County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,71776,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40037,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Creek,Creek County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,64248,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40037,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Creek,Creek County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,40362,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40037,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Creek,Creek County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40037,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Creek,Creek County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,23886,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40037,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Creek,Creek County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,62.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40037,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Creek,Creek County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40037,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Creek,Creek County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,37.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40037,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Creek,Creek County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40037,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Creek,Creek County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,13.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40037,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Creek,Creek County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,29.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40037,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Creek,Creek County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,8640,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40037,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Creek,Creek County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,19236,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40037,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Custer,Custer County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40039,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Custer,Custer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40039,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Custer,Custer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40039,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Custer,Custer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40039,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Custer,Custer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40039,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Custer,Custer County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,28423,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40039,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Custer,Custer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,23419,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40039,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Custer,Custer County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40039,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Custer,Custer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40039,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Custer,Custer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,23419,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40039,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Custer,Custer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40039,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Custer,Custer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40039,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Custer,Custer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40039,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Custer,Custer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40039,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Custer,Custer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40039,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Custer,Custer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40039,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Custer,Custer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40039,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Custer,Custer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40039,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Delaware,Delaware County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,25,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40041,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Delaware,Delaware County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40041,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Delaware,Delaware County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40041,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Delaware,Delaware County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40041,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Delaware,Delaware County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40041,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Delaware,Delaware County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,40400,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40041,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Delaware,Delaware County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,29008,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40041,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Delaware,Delaware County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4157,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40041,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Delaware,Delaware County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,3301,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40041,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Delaware,Delaware County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,24851,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40041,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Delaware,Delaware County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,14.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40041,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Delaware,Delaware County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,11.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40041,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Delaware,Delaware County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,85.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40041,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Delaware,Delaware County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40041,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Delaware,Delaware County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40041,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Delaware,Delaware County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40041,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Delaware,Delaware County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,856,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40041,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Delaware,Delaware County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40041,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Dewey,Dewey County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40043,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Dewey,Dewey County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40043,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Dewey,Dewey County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40043,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Dewey,Dewey County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40043,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Dewey,Dewey County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40043,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Dewey,Dewey County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,4466,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40043,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Dewey,Dewey County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2553,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40043,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Dewey,Dewey County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,840,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40043,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Dewey,Dewey County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,840,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40043,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Dewey,Dewey County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1714,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40043,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Dewey,Dewey County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,32.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40043,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Dewey,Dewey County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,32.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40043,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Dewey,Dewey County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,67.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40043,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Dewey,Dewey County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40043,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Dewey,Dewey County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40043,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Dewey,Dewey County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40043,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Dewey,Dewey County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40043,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Dewey,Dewey County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40043,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Ellis,Ellis County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40045,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Ellis,Ellis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40045,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Ellis,Ellis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40045,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Ellis,Ellis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40045,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Ellis,Ellis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40045,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Ellis,Ellis County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,3745,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40045,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Ellis,Ellis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2435,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40045,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Ellis,Ellis County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40045,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Ellis,Ellis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40045,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Ellis,Ellis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2435,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40045,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Ellis,Ellis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40045,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Ellis,Ellis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40045,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Ellis,Ellis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40045,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Ellis,Ellis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40045,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Ellis,Ellis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40045,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Ellis,Ellis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40045,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Ellis,Ellis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40045,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Ellis,Ellis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40045,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Garfield,Garfield County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,21,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40047,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Garfield,Garfield County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40047,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Garfield,Garfield County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40047,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Garfield,Garfield County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40047,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Garfield,Garfield County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40047,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Garfield,Garfield County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,62629,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40047,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Garfield,Garfield County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,60887,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40047,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Garfield,Garfield County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,54556,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40047,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Garfield,Garfield County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40047,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Garfield,Garfield County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6331,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40047,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Garfield,Garfield County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,89.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40047,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Garfield,Garfield County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40047,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Garfield,Garfield County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,10.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40047,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Garfield,Garfield County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40047,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Garfield,Garfield County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,10.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40047,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Garfield,Garfield County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,79.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40047,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Garfield,Garfield County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,6375,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40047,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Garfield,Garfield County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,48181,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40047,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Garvin,Garvin County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40049,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Garvin,Garvin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40049,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Garvin,Garvin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40049,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Garvin,Garvin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40049,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Garvin,Garvin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40049,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Garvin,Garvin County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,25627,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40049,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Garvin,Garvin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,23013,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40049,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Garvin,Garvin County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40049,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Garvin,Garvin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40049,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Garvin,Garvin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,23013,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40049,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Garvin,Garvin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40049,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Garvin,Garvin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40049,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Garvin,Garvin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40049,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Garvin,Garvin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40049,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Garvin,Garvin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40049,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Garvin,Garvin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40049,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Garvin,Garvin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40049,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Garvin,Garvin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40049,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Grady,Grady County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40051,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Grady,Grady County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40051,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Grady,Grady County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40051,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Grady,Grady County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40051,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Grady,Grady County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40051,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Grady,Grady County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,54805,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40051,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Grady,Grady County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,32357,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40051,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Grady,Grady County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,20807,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40051,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Grady,Grady County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40051,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Grady,Grady County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11550,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40051,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Grady,Grady County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,64.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40051,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Grady,Grady County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40051,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Grady,Grady County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,35.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40051,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Grady,Grady County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40051,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Grady,Grady County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,15.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40051,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Grady,Grady County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,48.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40051,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Grady,Grady County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,5150,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40051,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Grady,Grady County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,15657,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40051,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40053,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40053,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40053,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40053,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40053,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,4168,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40053,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4123,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40053,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1574,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40053,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1379,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40053,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2549,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40053,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,38.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40053,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,33.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40053,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,61.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40053,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40053,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,4.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40053,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40053,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,195,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40053,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40053,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Greer,Greer County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40055,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Greer,Greer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40055,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Greer,Greer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40055,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Greer,Greer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40055,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Greer,Greer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40055,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Greer,Greer County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,5488,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40055,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Greer,Greer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5766,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40055,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Greer,Greer County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2367,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40055,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Greer,Greer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,2367,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40055,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Greer,Greer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3400,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40055,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Greer,Greer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,41,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40055,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Greer,Greer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,41,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40055,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Greer,Greer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,59,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40055,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Greer,Greer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40055,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Greer,Greer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40055,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Greer,Greer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40055,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Greer,Greer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40055,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Greer,Greer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40055,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Harmon,Harmon County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40057,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Harmon,Harmon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40057,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Harmon,Harmon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40057,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Harmon,Harmon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40057,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Harmon,Harmon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40057,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Harmon,Harmon County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,2465,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40057,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Harmon,Harmon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3517,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40057,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Harmon,Harmon County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40057,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Harmon,Harmon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40057,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Harmon,Harmon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3517,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40057,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Harmon,Harmon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40057,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Harmon,Harmon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40057,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Harmon,Harmon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40057,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Harmon,Harmon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40057,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Harmon,Harmon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40057,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Harmon,Harmon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40057,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Harmon,Harmon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40057,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Harmon,Harmon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40057,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Harper,Harper County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40059,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Harper,Harper County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40059,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Harper,Harper County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40059,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Harper,Harper County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40059,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Harper,Harper County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40059,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Harper,Harper County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,3255,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40059,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Harper,Harper County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2436,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40059,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Harper,Harper County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1071,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40059,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Harper,Harper County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1071,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40059,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Harper,Harper County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1365,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40059,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Harper,Harper County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,44,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40059,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Harper,Harper County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,44,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40059,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Harper,Harper County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,56,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40059,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Harper,Harper County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40059,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Harper,Harper County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40059,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Harper,Harper County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40059,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Harper,Harper County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40059,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Harper,Harper County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40059,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Haskell,Haskell County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40061,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Haskell,Haskell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40061,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Haskell,Haskell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40061,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Haskell,Haskell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40061,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Haskell,Haskell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40061,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Haskell,Haskell County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,11549,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40061,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Haskell,Haskell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,6693,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40061,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Haskell,Haskell County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,547,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40061,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Haskell,Haskell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40061,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Haskell,Haskell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6146,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40061,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Haskell,Haskell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,8.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40061,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Haskell,Haskell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40061,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Haskell,Haskell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,91.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40061,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Haskell,Haskell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40061,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Haskell,Haskell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,8.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40061,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Haskell,Haskell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40061,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Haskell,Haskell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,547,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40061,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Haskell,Haskell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40061,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Hughes,Hughes County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40063,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Hughes,Hughes County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40063,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Hughes,Hughes County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40063,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Hughes,Hughes County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40063,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Hughes,Hughes County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40063,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Hughes,Hughes County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,13334,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40063,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Hughes,Hughes County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,12194,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40063,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Hughes,Hughes County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40063,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Hughes,Hughes County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40063,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Hughes,Hughes County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,12194,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40063,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Hughes,Hughes County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40063,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Hughes,Hughes County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40063,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Hughes,Hughes County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40063,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Hughes,Hughes County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40063,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Hughes,Hughes County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40063,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Hughes,Hughes County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40063,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Hughes,Hughes County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40063,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Hughes,Hughes County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40063,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40065,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40065,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40065,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40065,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40065,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,24731,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40065,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,31219,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40065,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,26910,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40065,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40065,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4310,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40065,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,86.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40065,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40065,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,13.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40065,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40065,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,19,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40065,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,67.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40065,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,5940,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40065,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,20970,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40065,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40067,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40067,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40067,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40067,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40067,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,5326,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40067,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,12500,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40067,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1212,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40067,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1172,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40067,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11289,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40067,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,9.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40067,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,9.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40067,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,90.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40067,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40067,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40067,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40067,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,40,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40067,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40067,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Johnston,Johnston County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40069,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Johnston,Johnston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40069,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Johnston,Johnston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40069,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Johnston,Johnston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40069,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Johnston,Johnston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40069,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Johnston,Johnston County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,10222,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40069,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Johnston,Johnston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9558,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40069,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Johnston,Johnston County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40069,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Johnston,Johnston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40069,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Johnston,Johnston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9558,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40069,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Johnston,Johnston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40069,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Johnston,Johnston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40069,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Johnston,Johnston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40069,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Johnston,Johnston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40069,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Johnston,Johnston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40069,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Johnston,Johnston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40069,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Johnston,Johnston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40069,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Johnston,Johnston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40069,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Kay,Kay County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40071,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Kay,Kay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40071,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Kay,Kay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40071,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Kay,Kay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40071,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Kay,Kay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40071,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Kay,Kay County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,43541,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40071,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Kay,Kay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,44553,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40071,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Kay,Kay County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,29262,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40071,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Kay,Kay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40071,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Kay,Kay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,15291,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40071,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Kay,Kay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,65.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40071,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Kay,Kay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40071,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Kay,Kay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,34.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40071,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Kay,Kay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40071,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Kay,Kay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,6.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40071,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Kay,Kay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,59.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40071,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Kay,Kay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2748,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40071,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Kay,Kay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,26513,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40071,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Kingfisher,Kingfisher County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40073,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Kingfisher,Kingfisher County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40073,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Kingfisher,Kingfisher County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40073,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Kingfisher,Kingfisher County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40073,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Kingfisher,Kingfisher County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40073,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Kingfisher,Kingfisher County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,15151,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40073,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Kingfisher,Kingfisher County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9870,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40073,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Kingfisher,Kingfisher County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,391,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40073,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Kingfisher,Kingfisher County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,391,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40073,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Kingfisher,Kingfisher County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9480,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40073,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Kingfisher,Kingfisher County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40073,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Kingfisher,Kingfisher County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40073,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Kingfisher,Kingfisher County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,96,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40073,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Kingfisher,Kingfisher County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40073,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Kingfisher,Kingfisher County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40073,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Kingfisher,Kingfisher County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40073,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Kingfisher,Kingfisher County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40073,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Kingfisher,Kingfisher County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40073,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Kiowa,Kiowa County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40075,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Kiowa,Kiowa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40075,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Kiowa,Kiowa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40075,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Kiowa,Kiowa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40075,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Kiowa,Kiowa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40075,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Kiowa,Kiowa County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,8487,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40075,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Kiowa,Kiowa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7557,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40075,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Kiowa,Kiowa County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40075,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Kiowa,Kiowa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40075,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Kiowa,Kiowa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7557,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40075,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Kiowa,Kiowa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40075,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Kiowa,Kiowa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40075,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Kiowa,Kiowa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40075,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Kiowa,Kiowa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40075,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Kiowa,Kiowa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40075,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Kiowa,Kiowa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40075,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Kiowa,Kiowa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40075,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Kiowa,Kiowa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40075,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Latimer,Latimer County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40077,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Latimer,Latimer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40077,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Latimer,Latimer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40077,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Latimer,Latimer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40077,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Latimer,Latimer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40077,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Latimer,Latimer County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,9461,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40077,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Latimer,Latimer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,8244,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40077,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Latimer,Latimer County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40077,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Latimer,Latimer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40077,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Latimer,Latimer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8244,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40077,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Latimer,Latimer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40077,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Latimer,Latimer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40077,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Latimer,Latimer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40077,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Latimer,Latimer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40077,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Latimer,Latimer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40077,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Latimer,Latimer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40077,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Latimer,Latimer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40077,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Latimer,Latimer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40077,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Leflore,Leflore County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,20,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40079,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Leflore,Leflore County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40079,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Leflore,Leflore County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40079,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Leflore,Leflore County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40079,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Leflore,Leflore County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40079,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Leflore,Leflore County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,48131,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40079,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Leflore,Leflore County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,46027,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40079,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Leflore,Leflore County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,41009,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40079,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Leflore,Leflore County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,3222,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40079,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Leflore,Leflore County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5019,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40079,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Leflore,Leflore County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,89.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40079,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Leflore,Leflore County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40079,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Leflore,Leflore County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,10.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40079,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Leflore,Leflore County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40079,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Leflore,Leflore County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,82.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40079,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Leflore,Leflore County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40079,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Leflore,Leflore County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,37777,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40079,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Leflore,Leflore County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,10,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40079,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40081,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40081,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40081,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40081,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40081,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,33469,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40081,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,15977,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40081,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2338,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40081,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,2338,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40081,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,13639,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40081,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,14.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40081,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,14.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40081,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,85.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40081,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40081,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40081,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40081,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40081,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40081,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40083,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40083,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40083,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40083,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40083,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,49726,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40083,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,25682,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40083,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9973,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40083,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40083,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,15709,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40083,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,38.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40083,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40083,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,61.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40083,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40083,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,1.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40083,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,37.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40083,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,282,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40083,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,9690,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40083,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Love,Love County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40085,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Love,Love County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40085,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Love,Love County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40085,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Love,Love County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40085,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Love,Love County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40085,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Love,Love County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,10143,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40085,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Love,Love County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5151,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40085,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Love,Love County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2564,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40085,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Love,Love County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,2564,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40085,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Love,Love County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2587,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40085,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Love,Love County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,49.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40085,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Love,Love County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,49.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40085,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Love,Love County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,50.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40085,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Love,Love County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40085,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Love,Love County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40085,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Love,Love County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40085,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Love,Love County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40085,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Love,Love County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40085,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Major,Major County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40093,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Major,Major County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40093,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Major,Major County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40093,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Major,Major County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40093,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Major,Major County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40093,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Major,Major County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,7750,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40093,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Major,Major County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4720,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40093,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Major,Major County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,194,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40093,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Major,Major County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40093,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Major,Major County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4525,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40093,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Major,Major County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,4.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40093,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Major,Major County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40093,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Major,Major County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,95.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40093,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Major,Major County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40093,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Major,Major County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,4.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40093,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Major,Major County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40093,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Major,Major County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,194,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40093,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Major,Major County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40093,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40095,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40095,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40095,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40095,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40095,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,15342,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40095,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,21895,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40095,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4562,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40095,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,207,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40095,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,17334,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40095,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,20.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40095,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40095,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,79.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40095,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40095,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,4.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40095,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,15.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40095,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1025,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40095,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3329,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40095,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Mayes,Mayes County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,22,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40097,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Mayes,Mayes County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40097,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Mayes,Mayes County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40097,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Mayes,Mayes County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40097,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Mayes,Mayes County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40097,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Mayes,Mayes County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,39066,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40097,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Mayes,Mayes County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,43460,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40097,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Mayes,Mayes County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,29245,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40097,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Mayes,Mayes County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40097,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Mayes,Mayes County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,14215,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40097,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Mayes,Mayes County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,67.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40097,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Mayes,Mayes County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40097,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Mayes,Mayes County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,32.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40097,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Mayes,Mayes County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40097,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Mayes,Mayes County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,58.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40097,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Mayes,Mayes County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40097,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Mayes,Mayes County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,25340,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40097,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Mayes,Mayes County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3905,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40097,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,McClain,McClain County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40087,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,McClain,McClain County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40087,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,McClain,McClain County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40087,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,McClain,McClain County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40087,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,McClain,McClain County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40087,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,McClain,McClain County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,41887,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40087,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OK,McClain,McClain County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,24946,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40087,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,McClain,McClain County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11821,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40087,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,McClain,McClain County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40087,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,McClain,McClain County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,13125,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40087,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,McClain,McClain County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,47.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40087,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,McClain,McClain County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40087,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,McClain,McClain County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,52.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40087,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,McClain,McClain County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40087,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,McClain,McClain County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,15.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40087,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,McClain,McClain County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,31.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40087,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,McClain,McClain County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,3895,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40087,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,McClain,McClain County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,7926,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40087,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,McCurtain,McCurtain County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40089,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,McCurtain,McCurtain County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40089,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,McCurtain,McCurtain County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40089,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,McCurtain,McCurtain County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40089,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,McCurtain,McCurtain County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40089,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,McCurtain,McCurtain County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,30786,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40089,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OK,McCurtain,McCurtain County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,28199,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40089,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,McCurtain,McCurtain County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40089,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,McCurtain,McCurtain County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40089,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,McCurtain,McCurtain County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,28199,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40089,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,McCurtain,McCurtain County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40089,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,McCurtain,McCurtain County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40089,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,McCurtain,McCurtain County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40089,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,McCurtain,McCurtain County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40089,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,McCurtain,McCurtain County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40089,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,McCurtain,McCurtain County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40089,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,McCurtain,McCurtain County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40089,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,McCurtain,McCurtain County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40089,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,McIntosh,McIntosh County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40091,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,McIntosh,McIntosh County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40091,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,McIntosh,McIntosh County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40091,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,McIntosh,McIntosh County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40091,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,McIntosh,McIntosh County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40091,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,McIntosh,McIntosh County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,18946,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40091,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OK,McIntosh,McIntosh County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,20387,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40091,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,McIntosh,McIntosh County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40091,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,McIntosh,McIntosh County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40091,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,McIntosh,McIntosh County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,20387,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40091,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,McIntosh,McIntosh County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40091,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,McIntosh,McIntosh County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40091,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,McIntosh,McIntosh County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40091,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,McIntosh,McIntosh County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40091,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,McIntosh,McIntosh County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40091,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,McIntosh,McIntosh County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40091,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,McIntosh,McIntosh County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40091,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,McIntosh,McIntosh County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40091,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Murray,Murray County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40099,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Murray,Murray County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40099,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Murray,Murray County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40099,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Murray,Murray County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40099,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Murray,Murray County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40099,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Murray,Murray County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,13869,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40099,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Murray,Murray County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,21796,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40099,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Murray,Murray County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40099,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Murray,Murray County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40099,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Murray,Murray County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,21796,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40099,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Murray,Murray County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40099,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Murray,Murray County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40099,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Murray,Murray County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40099,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Murray,Murray County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40099,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Murray,Murray County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40099,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Murray,Murray County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40099,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Murray,Murray County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40099,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Murray,Murray County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40099,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Muskogee,Muskogee County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,20,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40101,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Muskogee,Muskogee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40101,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Muskogee,Muskogee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40101,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Muskogee,Muskogee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40101,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Muskogee,Muskogee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40101,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Muskogee,Muskogee County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,66160,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40101,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Muskogee,Muskogee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,68944,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40101,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Muskogee,Muskogee County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,48413,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40101,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Muskogee,Muskogee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40101,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Muskogee,Muskogee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,20530,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40101,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Muskogee,Muskogee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,70.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40101,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Muskogee,Muskogee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40101,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Muskogee,Muskogee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,29.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40101,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Muskogee,Muskogee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40101,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Muskogee,Muskogee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,16,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40101,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Muskogee,Muskogee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,54.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40101,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Muskogee,Muskogee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,11009,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40101,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Muskogee,Muskogee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,37405,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40101,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Noble,Noble County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40103,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Noble,Noble County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40103,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Noble,Noble County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40103,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Noble,Noble County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40103,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Noble,Noble County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40103,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Noble,Noble County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,10900,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40103,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Noble,Noble County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9482,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40103,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Noble,Noble County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6571,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40103,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Noble,Noble County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40103,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Noble,Noble County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2911,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40103,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Noble,Noble County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,69.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40103,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Noble,Noble County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40103,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Noble,Noble County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,30.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40103,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Noble,Noble County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40103,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Noble,Noble County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40103,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Noble,Noble County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,53.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40103,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Noble,Noble County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40103,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Noble,Noble County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,5106,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40103,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Nowata,Nowata County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40105,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Nowata,Nowata County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40105,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Nowata,Nowata County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40105,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Nowata,Nowata County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40105,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Nowata,Nowata County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40105,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Nowata,Nowata County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,9296,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40105,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Nowata,Nowata County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9954,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40105,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Nowata,Nowata County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2576,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40105,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Nowata,Nowata County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,291,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40105,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Nowata,Nowata County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7378,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40105,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Nowata,Nowata County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,25.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40105,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Nowata,Nowata County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,2.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40105,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Nowata,Nowata County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,74.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40105,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Nowata,Nowata County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40105,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Nowata,Nowata County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,23,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40105,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Nowata,Nowata County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40105,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Nowata,Nowata County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2285,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40105,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Nowata,Nowata County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40105,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,OK,Oklahoma,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,909,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,OK,OK,Oklahoma,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,270,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,OK,OK,Oklahoma,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,39,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,OK,OK,Oklahoma,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,167,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,OK,OK,Oklahoma,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,59,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,OK,OK,Oklahoma,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,3962031,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2020,OK,OK,Oklahoma,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3600546,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,OK,OK,Oklahoma,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2447980,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,OK,OK,Oklahoma,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,59291,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,OK,OK,Oklahoma,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1152566,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,OK,OK,Oklahoma,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,68,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,OK,OK,Oklahoma,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,OK,OK,Oklahoma,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,32,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,OK,OK,Oklahoma,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,639,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,OK,OK,Oklahoma,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,12.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,OK,OK,Oklahoma,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,53,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,OK,OK,Oklahoma,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,466056,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,OK,OK,Oklahoma,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1908682,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,OK,Okfuskee,Okfuskee County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40107,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Okfuskee,Okfuskee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40107,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Okfuskee,Okfuskee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40107,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Okfuskee,Okfuskee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40107,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Okfuskee,Okfuskee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40107,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Okfuskee,Okfuskee County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,11238,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40107,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Okfuskee,Okfuskee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9239,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40107,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Okfuskee,Okfuskee County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6943,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40107,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Okfuskee,Okfuskee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40107,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Okfuskee,Okfuskee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2296,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40107,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Okfuskee,Okfuskee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,75.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40107,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Okfuskee,Okfuskee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40107,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Okfuskee,Okfuskee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,24.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40107,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Okfuskee,Okfuskee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40107,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Okfuskee,Okfuskee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,43,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40107,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Okfuskee,Okfuskee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,32.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40107,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Okfuskee,Okfuskee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,3977,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40107,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Okfuskee,Okfuskee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2966,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40107,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Oklahoma,Oklahoma County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,44,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40109,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Oklahoma,Oklahoma County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40109,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Oklahoma,Oklahoma County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40109,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Oklahoma,Oklahoma County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40109,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Oklahoma,Oklahoma County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40109,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Oklahoma,Oklahoma County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,797296,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40109,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Oklahoma,Oklahoma County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,859086,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40109,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Oklahoma,Oklahoma County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,731213,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40109,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Oklahoma,Oklahoma County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,98,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40109,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Oklahoma,Oklahoma County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,127873,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40109,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Oklahoma,Oklahoma County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,85.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40109,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Oklahoma,Oklahoma County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40109,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Oklahoma,Oklahoma County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,14.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40109,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Oklahoma,Oklahoma County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,38,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40109,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Oklahoma,Oklahoma County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40109,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Oklahoma,Oklahoma County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,84.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40109,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Oklahoma,Oklahoma County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2050,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40109,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Oklahoma,Oklahoma County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,729065,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40109,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Okmulgee,Okmulgee County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40111,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Okmulgee,Okmulgee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40111,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Okmulgee,Okmulgee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40111,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Okmulgee,Okmulgee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40111,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Okmulgee,Okmulgee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40111,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Okmulgee,Okmulgee County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,36679,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40111,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Okmulgee,Okmulgee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,43931,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40111,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Okmulgee,Okmulgee County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8172,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40111,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Okmulgee,Okmulgee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40111,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Okmulgee,Okmulgee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,35759,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40111,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Okmulgee,Okmulgee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,18.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40111,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Okmulgee,Okmulgee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40111,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Okmulgee,Okmulgee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,81.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40111,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Okmulgee,Okmulgee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40111,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Okmulgee,Okmulgee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,18.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40111,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Okmulgee,Okmulgee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40111,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Okmulgee,Okmulgee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,8172,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40111,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Okmulgee,Okmulgee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40111,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Osage,Osage County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,27,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40113,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Osage,Osage County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40113,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Osage,Osage County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40113,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Osage,Osage County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40113,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Osage,Osage County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40113,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Osage,Osage County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,45741,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40113,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Osage,Osage County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,31669,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40113,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Osage,Osage County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,21771,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40113,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Osage,Osage County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40113,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Osage,Osage County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9897,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40113,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Osage,Osage County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,68.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40113,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Osage,Osage County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40113,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Osage,Osage County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,31.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40113,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Osage,Osage County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40113,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Osage,Osage County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,35.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40113,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Osage,Osage County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,33.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40113,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Osage,Osage County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,11148,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40113,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Osage,Osage County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,10623,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40113,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Ottawa,Ottawa County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40115,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Ottawa,Ottawa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40115,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Ottawa,Ottawa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40115,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Ottawa,Ottawa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40115,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Ottawa,Ottawa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40115,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Ottawa,Ottawa County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,30209,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40115,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Ottawa,Ottawa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,23440,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40115,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Ottawa,Ottawa County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2719,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40115,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Ottawa,Ottawa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,2719,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40115,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Ottawa,Ottawa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,20721,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40115,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Ottawa,Ottawa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,11.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40115,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Ottawa,Ottawa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,11.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40115,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Ottawa,Ottawa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,88.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40115,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Ottawa,Ottawa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40115,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Ottawa,Ottawa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40115,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Ottawa,Ottawa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40115,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Ottawa,Ottawa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40115,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Ottawa,Ottawa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40115,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Pawnee,Pawnee County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40117,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Pawnee,Pawnee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40117,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Pawnee,Pawnee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40117,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Pawnee,Pawnee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40117,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Pawnee,Pawnee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40117,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Pawnee,Pawnee County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,15544,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40117,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Pawnee,Pawnee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,12914,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40117,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Pawnee,Pawnee County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40117,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Pawnee,Pawnee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40117,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Pawnee,Pawnee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,12914,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40117,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Pawnee,Pawnee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40117,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Pawnee,Pawnee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40117,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Pawnee,Pawnee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40117,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Pawnee,Pawnee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40117,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Pawnee,Pawnee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40117,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Pawnee,Pawnee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40117,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Pawnee,Pawnee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40117,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Pawnee,Pawnee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40117,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Payne,Payne County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40119,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Payne,Payne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40119,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Payne,Payne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40119,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Payne,Payne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40119,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Payne,Payne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40119,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Payne,Payne County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,81592,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40119,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Payne,Payne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,84720,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40119,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Payne,Payne County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,79351,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40119,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Payne,Payne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1367,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40119,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Payne,Payne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5369,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40119,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Payne,Payne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,93.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40119,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Payne,Payne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40119,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Payne,Payne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,6.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40119,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Payne,Payne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40119,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Payne,Payne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,6.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40119,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Payne,Payne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,85.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40119,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Payne,Payne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,5370,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40119,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Payne,Payne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,72614,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40119,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Pittsburg,Pittsburg County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,22,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40121,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Pittsburg,Pittsburg County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40121,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Pittsburg,Pittsburg County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40121,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Pittsburg,Pittsburg County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40121,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Pittsburg,Pittsburg County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40121,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Pittsburg,Pittsburg County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,43727,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40121,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Pittsburg,Pittsburg County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,49861,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40121,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Pittsburg,Pittsburg County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11934,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40121,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Pittsburg,Pittsburg County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40121,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Pittsburg,Pittsburg County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,37927,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40121,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Pittsburg,Pittsburg County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,23.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40121,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Pittsburg,Pittsburg County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40121,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Pittsburg,Pittsburg County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,76.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40121,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Pittsburg,Pittsburg County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40121,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Pittsburg,Pittsburg County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,16.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40121,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Pittsburg,Pittsburg County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,7.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40121,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Pittsburg,Pittsburg County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,8099,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40121,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Pittsburg,Pittsburg County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3835,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40121,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Pontotoc,Pontotoc County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40123,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Pontotoc,Pontotoc County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40123,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Pontotoc,Pontotoc County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40123,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Pontotoc,Pontotoc County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40123,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Pontotoc,Pontotoc County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40123,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Pontotoc,Pontotoc County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,38077,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40123,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Pontotoc,Pontotoc County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,35934,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40123,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Pontotoc,Pontotoc County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,29254,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40123,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Pontotoc,Pontotoc County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40123,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Pontotoc,Pontotoc County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6680,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40123,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Pontotoc,Pontotoc County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,81.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40123,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Pontotoc,Pontotoc County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40123,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Pontotoc,Pontotoc County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,18.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40123,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Pontotoc,Pontotoc County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40123,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Pontotoc,Pontotoc County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,20,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40123,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Pontotoc,Pontotoc County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,61.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40123,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Pontotoc,Pontotoc County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,7188,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40123,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Pontotoc,Pontotoc County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,22066,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40123,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Pottawatomie,Pottawatomie County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40125,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Pottawatomie,Pottawatomie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40125,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Pottawatomie,Pottawatomie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40125,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Pottawatomie,Pottawatomie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40125,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Pottawatomie,Pottawatomie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40125,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Pottawatomie,Pottawatomie County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,72441,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40125,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Pottawatomie,Pottawatomie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,47579,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40125,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Pottawatomie,Pottawatomie County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1251,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40125,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Pottawatomie,Pottawatomie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1251,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40125,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Pottawatomie,Pottawatomie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,46328,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40125,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Pottawatomie,Pottawatomie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40125,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Pottawatomie,Pottawatomie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,2.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40125,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Pottawatomie,Pottawatomie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,97.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40125,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Pottawatomie,Pottawatomie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40125,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Pottawatomie,Pottawatomie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40125,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Pottawatomie,Pottawatomie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40125,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Pottawatomie,Pottawatomie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40125,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Pottawatomie,Pottawatomie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40125,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Pushmataha,Pushmataha County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40127,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Pushmataha,Pushmataha County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40127,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Pushmataha,Pushmataha County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40127,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Pushmataha,Pushmataha County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40127,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Pushmataha,Pushmataha County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40127,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Pushmataha,Pushmataha County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,10797,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40127,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Pushmataha,Pushmataha County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,11015,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40127,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Pushmataha,Pushmataha County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40127,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Pushmataha,Pushmataha County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40127,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Pushmataha,Pushmataha County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11015,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40127,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Pushmataha,Pushmataha County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40127,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Pushmataha,Pushmataha County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40127,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Pushmataha,Pushmataha County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40127,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Pushmataha,Pushmataha County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40127,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Pushmataha,Pushmataha County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40127,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Pushmataha,Pushmataha County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40127,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Pushmataha,Pushmataha County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40127,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Pushmataha,Pushmataha County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40127,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Roger Mills,Roger Mills County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40129,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Roger Mills,Roger Mills County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40129,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Roger Mills,Roger Mills County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40129,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Roger Mills,Roger Mills County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40129,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Roger Mills,Roger Mills County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40129,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Roger Mills,Roger Mills County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,3427,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40129,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Roger Mills,Roger Mills County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2463,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40129,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Roger Mills,Roger Mills County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40129,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Roger Mills,Roger Mills County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40129,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Roger Mills,Roger Mills County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2463,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40129,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Roger Mills,Roger Mills County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40129,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Roger Mills,Roger Mills County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40129,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Roger Mills,Roger Mills County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40129,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Roger Mills,Roger Mills County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40129,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Roger Mills,Roger Mills County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40129,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Roger Mills,Roger Mills County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40129,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Roger Mills,Roger Mills County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40129,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Roger Mills,Roger Mills County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40129,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Rogers,Rogers County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40131,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Rogers,Rogers County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40131,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Rogers,Rogers County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40131,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Rogers,Rogers County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40131,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Rogers,Rogers County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40131,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Rogers,Rogers County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,95315,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40131,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Rogers,Rogers County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,73427,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40131,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Rogers,Rogers County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,41806,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40131,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Rogers,Rogers County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40131,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Rogers,Rogers County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,31621,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40131,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Rogers,Rogers County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,56.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40131,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Rogers,Rogers County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40131,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Rogers,Rogers County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,43.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40131,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Rogers,Rogers County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40131,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Rogers,Rogers County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,35.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40131,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Rogers,Rogers County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,21.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40131,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Rogers,Rogers County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,26308,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40131,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Rogers,Rogers County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,15498,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40131,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Seminole,Seminole County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40133,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Seminole,Seminole County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40133,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Seminole,Seminole County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40133,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Seminole,Seminole County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40133,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Seminole,Seminole County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40133,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Seminole,Seminole County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,23508,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40133,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Seminole,Seminole County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,15795,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40133,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Seminole,Seminole County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2770,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40133,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Seminole,Seminole County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,2441,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40133,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Seminole,Seminole County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,13025,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40133,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Seminole,Seminole County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,17.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40133,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Seminole,Seminole County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,15.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40133,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Seminole,Seminole County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,82.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40133,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Seminole,Seminole County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40133,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Seminole,Seminole County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,2.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40133,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Seminole,Seminole County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40133,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Seminole,Seminole County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,329,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40133,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Seminole,Seminole County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40133,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Sequoyah,Sequoyah County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40135,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Sequoyah,Sequoyah County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40135,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Sequoyah,Sequoyah County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40135,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Sequoyah,Sequoyah County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40135,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Sequoyah,Sequoyah County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40135,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Sequoyah,Sequoyah County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,39255,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40135,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Sequoyah,Sequoyah County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,38851,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40135,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Sequoyah,Sequoyah County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,14233,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40135,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Sequoyah,Sequoyah County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40135,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Sequoyah,Sequoyah County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,24618,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40135,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Sequoyah,Sequoyah County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,36.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40135,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Sequoyah,Sequoyah County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40135,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Sequoyah,Sequoyah County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,63.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40135,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Sequoyah,Sequoyah County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40135,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Sequoyah,Sequoyah County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,16.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40135,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Sequoyah,Sequoyah County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,20.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40135,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Sequoyah,Sequoyah County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,6432,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40135,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Sequoyah,Sequoyah County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,7800,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40135,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Stephens,Stephens County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40137,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Stephens,Stephens County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40137,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Stephens,Stephens County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40137,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Stephens,Stephens County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40137,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Stephens,Stephens County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40137,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Stephens,Stephens County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,42753,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40137,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Stephens,Stephens County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,37460,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40137,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Stephens,Stephens County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40137,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Stephens,Stephens County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40137,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Stephens,Stephens County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,37460,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40137,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Stephens,Stephens County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40137,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Stephens,Stephens County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40137,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Stephens,Stephens County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40137,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Stephens,Stephens County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40137,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Stephens,Stephens County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40137,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Stephens,Stephens County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40137,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Stephens,Stephens County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40137,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Stephens,Stephens County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40137,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Texas,Texas County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40139,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Texas,Texas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40139,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Texas,Texas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40139,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Texas,Texas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40139,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Texas,Texas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40139,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Texas,Texas County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,21283,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40139,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Texas,Texas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,17957,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40139,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Texas,Texas County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,17909,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40139,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Texas,Texas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,17909,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40139,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Texas,Texas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,49,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40139,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Texas,Texas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40139,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Texas,Texas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,99.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40139,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Texas,Texas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40139,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Texas,Texas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40139,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Texas,Texas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40139,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Texas,Texas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40139,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Texas,Texas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40139,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Texas,Texas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40139,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Tillman,Tillman County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40141,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Tillman,Tillman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40141,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Tillman,Tillman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40141,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Tillman,Tillman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40141,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Tillman,Tillman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40141,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Tillman,Tillman County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,6956,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40141,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Tillman,Tillman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7986,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40141,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Tillman,Tillman County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40141,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Tillman,Tillman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40141,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Tillman,Tillman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7986,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40141,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Tillman,Tillman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40141,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Tillman,Tillman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40141,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Tillman,Tillman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40141,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Tillman,Tillman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40141,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Tillman,Tillman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40141,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Tillman,Tillman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40141,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Tillman,Tillman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40141,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Tillman,Tillman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40141,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Tulsa,Tulsa County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40143,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Tulsa,Tulsa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40143,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Tulsa,Tulsa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40143,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Tulsa,Tulsa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40143,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Tulsa,Tulsa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40143,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Tulsa,Tulsa County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,670157,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40143,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Tulsa,Tulsa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,689154,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40143,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Tulsa,Tulsa County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,664378,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40143,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Tulsa,Tulsa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40143,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Tulsa,Tulsa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,24775,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40143,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Tulsa,Tulsa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,96.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40143,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Tulsa,Tulsa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40143,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Tulsa,Tulsa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,3.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40143,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Tulsa,Tulsa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40143,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Tulsa,Tulsa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,11,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40143,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Tulsa,Tulsa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,85.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40143,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Tulsa,Tulsa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,75643,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40143,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Tulsa,Tulsa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,588735,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40143,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Wagoner,Wagoner County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40145,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Wagoner,Wagoner County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40145,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Wagoner,Wagoner County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40145,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Wagoner,Wagoner County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40145,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Wagoner,Wagoner County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40145,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Wagoner,Wagoner County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,81377,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40145,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Wagoner,Wagoner County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,58847,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40145,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Wagoner,Wagoner County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3196,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40145,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Wagoner,Wagoner County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40145,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Wagoner,Wagoner County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,55651,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40145,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Wagoner,Wagoner County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,5.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40145,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Wagoner,Wagoner County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40145,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Wagoner,Wagoner County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,94.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40145,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Wagoner,Wagoner County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40145,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Wagoner,Wagoner County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,5.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40145,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Wagoner,Wagoner County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40145,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Wagoner,Wagoner County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,3196,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40145,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Wagoner,Wagoner County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40145,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40147,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40147,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40147,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40147,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40147,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,52593,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40147,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,44612,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40147,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,43645,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40147,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40147,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,968,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40147,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,97.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40147,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40147,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40147,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40147,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,21.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40147,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,76,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40147,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,9718,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40147,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,33927,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40147,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Washita,Washita County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40149,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Washita,Washita County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40149,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Washita,Washita County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40149,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Washita,Washita County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40149,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Washita,Washita County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40149,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Washita,Washita County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,10903,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40149,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Washita,Washita County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,8927,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40149,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Washita,Washita County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40149,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Washita,Washita County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40149,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Washita,Washita County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8927,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40149,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Washita,Washita County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40149,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Washita,Washita County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40149,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Washita,Washita County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40149,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Washita,Washita County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40149,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Washita,Washita County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40149,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Washita,Washita County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40149,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Washita,Washita County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40149,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Washita,Washita County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40149,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Woods,Woods County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40151,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Woods,Woods County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40151,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Woods,Woods County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40151,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Woods,Woods County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40151,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Woods,Woods County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40151,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Woods,Woods County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,8587,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40151,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Woods,Woods County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7296,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40151,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Woods,Woods County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40151,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Woods,Woods County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40151,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Woods,Woods County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7296,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40151,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Woods,Woods County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40151,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Woods,Woods County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40151,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Woods,Woods County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40151,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Woods,Woods County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40151,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Woods,Woods County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40151,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Woods,Woods County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40151,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Woods,Woods County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40151,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Woods,Woods County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40151,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Woodward,Woodward County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40153,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Woodward,Woodward County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40153,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Woodward,Woodward County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40153,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Woodward,Woodward County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40153,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Woodward,Woodward County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40153,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Woodward,Woodward County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,20385,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40153,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Woodward,Woodward County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,18496,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40153,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Woodward,Woodward County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40153,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Woodward,Woodward County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40153,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Woodward,Woodward County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,18496,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40153,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Woodward,Woodward County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40153,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Woodward,Woodward County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40153,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Woodward,Woodward County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40153,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Woodward,Woodward County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40153,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Woodward,Woodward County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40153,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Woodward,Woodward County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40153,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Woodward,Woodward County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40153,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OK,Woodward,Woodward County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,40153,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Baker,Baker County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41001,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Baker,Baker County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41001,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Baker,Baker County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41001,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Baker,Baker County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41001,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Baker,Baker County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41001,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Baker,Baker County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,16689,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41001,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Baker,Baker County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,11924,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41001,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Baker,Baker County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41001,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Baker,Baker County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41001,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Baker,Baker County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11924,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41001,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Baker,Baker County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41001,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Baker,Baker County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41001,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Baker,Baker County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41001,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Baker,Baker County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41001,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Baker,Baker County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41001,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Baker,Baker County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41001,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Baker,Baker County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41001,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Baker,Baker County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41001,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41003,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41003,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41003,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41003,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41003,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,95167,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41003,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,65240,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41003,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,63028,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41003,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,81,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41003,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2211,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41003,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,96.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41003,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41003,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,3.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41003,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41003,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,1.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41003,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,94.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41003,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1146,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41003,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,61801,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41003,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Clackamas,Clackamas County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,84,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41005,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Clackamas,Clackamas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41005,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Clackamas,Clackamas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41005,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Clackamas,Clackamas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41005,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Clackamas,Clackamas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41005,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Clackamas,Clackamas County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,422160,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41005,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Clackamas,Clackamas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,356660,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41005,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Clackamas,Clackamas County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,153,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41005,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Clackamas,Clackamas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,153,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41005,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Clackamas,Clackamas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,356507,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41005,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Clackamas,Clackamas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41005,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Clackamas,Clackamas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41005,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Clackamas,Clackamas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41005,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Clackamas,Clackamas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,83,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41005,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Clackamas,Clackamas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41005,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Clackamas,Clackamas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41005,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Clackamas,Clackamas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41005,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Clackamas,Clackamas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41005,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Clatsop,Clatsop County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,21,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41007,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Clatsop,Clatsop County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41007,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Clatsop,Clatsop County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41007,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Clatsop,Clatsop County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41007,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Clatsop,Clatsop County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41007,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Clatsop,Clatsop County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,41089,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41007,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Clatsop,Clatsop County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,38810,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41007,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Clatsop,Clatsop County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,32201,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41007,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Clatsop,Clatsop County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41007,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Clatsop,Clatsop County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6609,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41007,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Clatsop,Clatsop County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,83,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41007,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Clatsop,Clatsop County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41007,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Clatsop,Clatsop County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,17,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41007,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Clatsop,Clatsop County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41007,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Clatsop,Clatsop County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,9.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41007,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Clatsop,Clatsop County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,73.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41007,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Clatsop,Clatsop County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,3642,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41007,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Clatsop,Clatsop County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,28560,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41007,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Columbia,Columbia County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,32,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41009,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Columbia,Columbia County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41009,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Columbia,Columbia County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41009,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Columbia,Columbia County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41009,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Columbia,Columbia County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41009,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Columbia,Columbia County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,52631,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41009,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Columbia,Columbia County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,36578,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41009,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Columbia,Columbia County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6825,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41009,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Columbia,Columbia County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41009,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Columbia,Columbia County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,29753,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41009,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Columbia,Columbia County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,18.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41009,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Columbia,Columbia County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41009,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Columbia,Columbia County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,81.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41009,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Columbia,Columbia County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,31,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41009,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Columbia,Columbia County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41009,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Columbia,Columbia County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,18.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41009,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Columbia,Columbia County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41009,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Columbia,Columbia County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,6825,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41009,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Coos,Coos County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41011,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Coos,Coos County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41011,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Coos,Coos County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41011,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Coos,Coos County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41011,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Coos,Coos County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41011,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Coos,Coos County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,64887,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41011,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Coos,Coos County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,48999,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41011,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Coos,Coos County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,39886,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41011,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Coos,Coos County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41011,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Coos,Coos County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9113,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41011,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Coos,Coos County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,81.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41011,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Coos,Coos County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41011,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Coos,Coos County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,18.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41011,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Coos,Coos County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41011,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Coos,Coos County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,1.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41011,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Coos,Coos County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,79.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41011,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Coos,Coos County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,805,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41011,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Coos,Coos County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,39081,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41011,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Crook,Crook County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,21,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41013,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Crook,Crook County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41013,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Crook,Crook County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41013,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Crook,Crook County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41013,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Crook,Crook County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41013,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Crook,Crook County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,24923,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41013,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Crook,Crook County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,12932,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41013,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Crook,Crook County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,558,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41013,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Crook,Crook County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,558,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41013,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Crook,Crook County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,12373,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41013,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Crook,Crook County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,4.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41013,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Crook,Crook County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,4.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41013,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Crook,Crook County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,95.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41013,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Crook,Crook County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41013,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Crook,Crook County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41013,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Crook,Crook County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41013,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Crook,Crook County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41013,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Crook,Crook County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41013,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Curry,Curry County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41015,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Curry,Curry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41015,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Curry,Curry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41015,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Curry,Curry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41015,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Curry,Curry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41015,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Curry,Curry County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,23503,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41015,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Curry,Curry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,16126,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41015,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Curry,Curry County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41015,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Curry,Curry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41015,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Curry,Curry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,16126,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41015,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Curry,Curry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41015,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Curry,Curry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41015,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Curry,Curry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41015,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Curry,Curry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41015,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Curry,Curry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41015,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Curry,Curry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41015,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Curry,Curry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41015,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Curry,Curry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41015,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Deschutes,Deschutes County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,59,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41017,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Deschutes,Deschutes County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41017,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Deschutes,Deschutes County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41017,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Deschutes,Deschutes County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41017,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Deschutes,Deschutes County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41017,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Deschutes,Deschutes County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,199355,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41017,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Deschutes,Deschutes County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,158044,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41017,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Deschutes,Deschutes County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41017,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Deschutes,Deschutes County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41017,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Deschutes,Deschutes County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,158044,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41017,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Deschutes,Deschutes County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41017,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Deschutes,Deschutes County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41017,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Deschutes,Deschutes County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41017,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Deschutes,Deschutes County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,59,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41017,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Deschutes,Deschutes County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41017,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Deschutes,Deschutes County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41017,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Deschutes,Deschutes County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41017,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Deschutes,Deschutes County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41017,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,27,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41019,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41019,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41019,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41019,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41019,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,111235,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41019,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,84348,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41019,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41019,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41019,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,84348,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41019,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41019,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41019,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41019,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,27,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41019,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41019,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41019,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41019,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41019,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Gilliam,Gilliam County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41021,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Gilliam,Gilliam County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41021,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Gilliam,Gilliam County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41021,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Gilliam,Gilliam County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41021,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Gilliam,Gilliam County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41021,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Gilliam,Gilliam County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,2016,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41021,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Gilliam,Gilliam County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1324,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41021,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Gilliam,Gilliam County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,621,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41021,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Gilliam,Gilliam County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,621,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41021,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Gilliam,Gilliam County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,703,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41021,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Gilliam,Gilliam County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,46.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41021,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Gilliam,Gilliam County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,46.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41021,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Gilliam,Gilliam County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,53.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41021,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Gilliam,Gilliam County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41021,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Gilliam,Gilliam County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41021,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Gilliam,Gilliam County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41021,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Gilliam,Gilliam County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41021,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Gilliam,Gilliam County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41021,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41023,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41023,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41023,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41023,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41023,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,7223,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41023,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4641,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41023,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41023,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41023,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4641,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41023,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41023,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41023,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41023,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41023,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41023,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41023,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41023,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41023,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Harney,Harney County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41025,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Harney,Harney County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41025,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Harney,Harney County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41025,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Harney,Harney County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41025,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Harney,Harney County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41025,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Harney,Harney County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,7491,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41025,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Harney,Harney County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4480,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41025,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Harney,Harney County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41025,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Harney,Harney County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41025,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Harney,Harney County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4480,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41025,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Harney,Harney County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41025,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Harney,Harney County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41025,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Harney,Harney County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41025,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Harney,Harney County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41025,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Harney,Harney County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41025,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Harney,Harney County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41025,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Harney,Harney County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41025,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Harney,Harney County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41025,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Hood River,Hood River County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41027,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Hood River,Hood River County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41027,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Hood River,Hood River County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41027,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Hood River,Hood River County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41027,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Hood River,Hood River County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41027,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Hood River,Hood River County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,23943,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41027,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Hood River,Hood River County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,22387,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41027,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Hood River,Hood River County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41027,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Hood River,Hood River County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41027,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Hood River,Hood River County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,22387,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41027,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Hood River,Hood River County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41027,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Hood River,Hood River County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41027,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Hood River,Hood River County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41027,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Hood River,Hood River County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41027,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Hood River,Hood River County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41027,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Hood River,Hood River County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41027,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Hood River,Hood River County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41027,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Hood River,Hood River County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41027,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,53,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41029,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41029,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41029,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41029,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41029,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,223394,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41029,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,163539,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41029,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,440,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41029,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,440,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41029,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,163099,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41029,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41029,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41029,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41029,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,48,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41029,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41029,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41029,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41029,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41029,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41031,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41031,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41031,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41031,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41031,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,24518,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41031,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,20796,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41031,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1604,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41031,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41031,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,19191,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41031,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,7.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41031,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41031,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,92.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41031,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41031,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41031,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,7.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41031,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41031,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1604,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41031,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Josephine,Josephine County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,33,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41033,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Josephine,Josephine County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41033,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Josephine,Josephine County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41033,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Josephine,Josephine County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41033,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Josephine,Josephine County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41033,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Josephine,Josephine County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,88105,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41033,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Josephine,Josephine County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,42820,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41033,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Josephine,Josephine County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,81,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41033,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Josephine,Josephine County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,81,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41033,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Josephine,Josephine County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,42738,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41033,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Josephine,Josephine County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41033,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Josephine,Josephine County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41033,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Josephine,Josephine County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41033,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Josephine,Josephine County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,32,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41033,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Josephine,Josephine County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41033,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Josephine,Josephine County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41033,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Josephine,Josephine County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41033,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Josephine,Josephine County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41033,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Klamath,Klamath County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,27,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41035,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Klamath,Klamath County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41035,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Klamath,Klamath County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41035,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Klamath,Klamath County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41035,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Klamath,Klamath County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41035,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Klamath,Klamath County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,69504,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41035,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Klamath,Klamath County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,49422,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41035,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Klamath,Klamath County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41035,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Klamath,Klamath County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41035,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Klamath,Klamath County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,49422,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41035,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Klamath,Klamath County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41035,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Klamath,Klamath County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41035,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Klamath,Klamath County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41035,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Klamath,Klamath County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,27,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41035,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Klamath,Klamath County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41035,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Klamath,Klamath County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41035,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Klamath,Klamath County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41035,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Klamath,Klamath County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41035,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41037,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41037,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41037,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41037,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41037,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,8149,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41037,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3509,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41037,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2343,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41037,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,2343,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41037,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1166,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41037,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,66.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41037,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,66.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41037,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,33.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41037,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41037,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41037,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41037,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41037,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41037,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Lane,Lane County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,70,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41039,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Lane,Lane County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41039,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Lane,Lane County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41039,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Lane,Lane County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41039,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Lane,Lane County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41039,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Lane,Lane County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,382940,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41039,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Lane,Lane County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,289207,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41039,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Lane,Lane County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9015,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41039,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Lane,Lane County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41039,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Lane,Lane County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,280192,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41039,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Lane,Lane County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,3.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41039,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Lane,Lane County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41039,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Lane,Lane County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,96.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41039,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Lane,Lane County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,69,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41039,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Lane,Lane County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41039,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Lane,Lane County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,3.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41039,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Lane,Lane County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41039,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Lane,Lane County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,9015,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41039,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,28,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41041,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41041,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41041,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41041,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41041,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,50472,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41041,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,58391,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41041,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41041,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41041,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,58391,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41041,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41041,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41041,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41041,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,28,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41041,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41041,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41041,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41041,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41041,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Linn,Linn County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,44,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41043,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Linn,Linn County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41043,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Linn,Linn County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41043,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Linn,Linn County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41043,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Linn,Linn County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41043,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Linn,Linn County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,128936,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41043,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Linn,Linn County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,98511,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41043,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Linn,Linn County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,82187,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41043,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Linn,Linn County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41043,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Linn,Linn County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,16324,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41043,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Linn,Linn County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,83.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41043,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Linn,Linn County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41043,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Linn,Linn County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,16.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41043,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Linn,Linn County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,41,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41043,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Linn,Linn County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41043,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Linn,Linn County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,83.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41043,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Linn,Linn County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41043,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Linn,Linn County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,82187,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41043,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Malheur,Malheur County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41045,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Malheur,Malheur County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41045,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Malheur,Malheur County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41045,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Malheur,Malheur County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41045,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Malheur,Malheur County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41045,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Malheur,Malheur County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,31608,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41045,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Malheur,Malheur County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,20622,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41045,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Malheur,Malheur County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,18570,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41045,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Malheur,Malheur County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,18570,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41045,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Malheur,Malheur County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2053,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41045,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Malheur,Malheur County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,90,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41045,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Malheur,Malheur County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,90,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41045,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Malheur,Malheur County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,10,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41045,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Malheur,Malheur County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41045,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Malheur,Malheur County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41045,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Malheur,Malheur County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41045,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Malheur,Malheur County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41045,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Malheur,Malheur County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41045,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,74,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41047,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41047,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41047,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41047,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41047,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,346202,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41047,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,325628,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41047,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,263221,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41047,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41047,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,62407,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41047,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,80.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41047,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41047,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,19.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41047,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,68,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41047,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,4.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41047,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,75.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41047,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,16110,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41047,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,247112,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41047,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Morrow,Morrow County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41049,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Morrow,Morrow County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41049,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Morrow,Morrow County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41049,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Morrow,Morrow County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41049,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Morrow,Morrow County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41049,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Morrow,Morrow County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,12191,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41049,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Morrow,Morrow County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,8991,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41049,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Morrow,Morrow County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,41,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41049,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Morrow,Morrow County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,41,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41049,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Morrow,Morrow County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8950,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41049,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Morrow,Morrow County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41049,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Morrow,Morrow County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41049,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Morrow,Morrow County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41049,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Morrow,Morrow County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41049,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Morrow,Morrow County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41049,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Morrow,Morrow County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41049,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Morrow,Morrow County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41049,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Morrow,Morrow County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41049,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Multnomah,Multnomah County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,23,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41051,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Multnomah,Multnomah County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41051,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Multnomah,Multnomah County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41051,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Multnomah,Multnomah County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41051,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Multnomah,Multnomah County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41051,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Multnomah,Multnomah County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,815871,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41051,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Multnomah,Multnomah County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,803527,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41051,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Multnomah,Multnomah County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41051,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Multnomah,Multnomah County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41051,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Multnomah,Multnomah County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,803527,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41051,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Multnomah,Multnomah County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41051,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Multnomah,Multnomah County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41051,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Multnomah,Multnomah County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41051,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Multnomah,Multnomah County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,23,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41051,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Multnomah,Multnomah County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41051,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Multnomah,Multnomah County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41051,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Multnomah,Multnomah County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41051,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Multnomah,Multnomah County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41051,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,OR,Oregon,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,901,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,OR,OR,Oregon,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,84,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,OR,OR,Oregon,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,27,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,OR,OR,Oregon,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,OR,OR,Oregon,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,42,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,OR,OR,Oregon,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,4241544,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2020,OR,OR,Oregon,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3576686,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,OR,OR,Oregon,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,944045,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,OR,OR,Oregon,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,60456,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,OR,OR,Oregon,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2632641,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,OR,OR,Oregon,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,26.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,OR,OR,Oregon,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,OR,OR,Oregon,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,73.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,OR,OR,Oregon,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,817,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,OR,OR,Oregon,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,OR,OR,Oregon,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,24.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,OR,OR,Oregon,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,21906,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,OR,OR,Oregon,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,861683,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,OR,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41053,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41053,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41053,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41053,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41053,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,87863,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41053,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,45556,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41053,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,33773,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41053,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41053,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11783,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41053,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,74.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41053,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41053,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,25.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41053,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41053,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41053,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,74.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41053,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41053,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,33773,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41053,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Sherman,Sherman County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41055,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Sherman,Sherman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41055,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Sherman,Sherman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41055,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Sherman,Sherman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41055,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Sherman,Sherman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41055,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Sherman,Sherman County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,1872,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41055,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Sherman,Sherman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1227,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41055,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Sherman,Sherman County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,275,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41055,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Sherman,Sherman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,275,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41055,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Sherman,Sherman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,952,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41055,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Sherman,Sherman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,22.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41055,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Sherman,Sherman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,22.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41055,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Sherman,Sherman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,77.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41055,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Sherman,Sherman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41055,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Sherman,Sherman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41055,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Sherman,Sherman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41055,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Sherman,Sherman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41055,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Sherman,Sherman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41055,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Tillamook,Tillamook County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,34,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41057,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Tillamook,Tillamook County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41057,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Tillamook,Tillamook County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41057,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Tillamook,Tillamook County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41057,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Tillamook,Tillamook County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41057,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Tillamook,Tillamook County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,27471,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41057,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Tillamook,Tillamook County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,28356,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41057,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Tillamook,Tillamook County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41057,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Tillamook,Tillamook County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41057,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Tillamook,Tillamook County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,28356,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41057,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Tillamook,Tillamook County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41057,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Tillamook,Tillamook County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41057,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Tillamook,Tillamook County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41057,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Tillamook,Tillamook County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,34,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41057,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Tillamook,Tillamook County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41057,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Tillamook,Tillamook County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41057,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Tillamook,Tillamook County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41057,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Tillamook,Tillamook County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41057,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Umatilla,Umatilla County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,36,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41059,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Umatilla,Umatilla County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41059,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Umatilla,Umatilla County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41059,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Umatilla,Umatilla County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41059,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Umatilla,Umatilla County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41059,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Umatilla,Umatilla County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,80011,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41059,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Umatilla,Umatilla County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,61183,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41059,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Umatilla,Umatilla County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,31424,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41059,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Umatilla,Umatilla County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,30711,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41059,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Umatilla,Umatilla County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,29759,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41059,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Umatilla,Umatilla County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,51.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41059,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Umatilla,Umatilla County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,50.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41059,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Umatilla,Umatilla County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,48.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41059,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Umatilla,Umatilla County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,24,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41059,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Umatilla,Umatilla County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41059,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Umatilla,Umatilla County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,1.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41059,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Umatilla,Umatilla County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41059,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Umatilla,Umatilla County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,713,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41059,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41061,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41061,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41061,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41061,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41061,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,26149,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41061,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,20252,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41061,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,311,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41061,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,311,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41061,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,19941,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41061,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41061,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41061,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41061,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41061,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41061,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41061,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41061,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41061,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Wallowa,Wallowa County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41063,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Wallowa,Wallowa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41063,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Wallowa,Wallowa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41063,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Wallowa,Wallowa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41063,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Wallowa,Wallowa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41063,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Wallowa,Wallowa County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,7387,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41063,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Wallowa,Wallowa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4594,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41063,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Wallowa,Wallowa County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41063,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Wallowa,Wallowa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41063,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Wallowa,Wallowa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4594,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41063,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Wallowa,Wallowa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41063,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Wallowa,Wallowa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41063,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Wallowa,Wallowa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41063,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Wallowa,Wallowa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41063,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Wallowa,Wallowa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41063,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Wallowa,Wallowa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41063,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Wallowa,Wallowa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41063,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Wallowa,Wallowa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41063,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Wasco,Wasco County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,20,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41065,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Wasco,Wasco County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41065,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Wasco,Wasco County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41065,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Wasco,Wasco County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41065,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Wasco,Wasco County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41065,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Wasco,Wasco County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,26611,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41065,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Wasco,Wasco County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,21119,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41065,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Wasco,Wasco County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,18411,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41065,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Wasco,Wasco County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,5684,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41065,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Wasco,Wasco County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2709,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41065,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Wasco,Wasco County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,87.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41065,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Wasco,Wasco County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,26.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41065,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Wasco,Wasco County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,12.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41065,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Wasco,Wasco County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41065,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Wasco,Wasco County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41065,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Wasco,Wasco County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,60.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41065,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Wasco,Wasco County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41065,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Wasco,Wasco County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,12727,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41065,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,35,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41067,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41067,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41067,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41067,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41067,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,600689,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41067,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,469805,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41067,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,297687,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41067,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,41,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41067,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,172117,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41067,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,63.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41067,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41067,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,36.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41067,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,31,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41067,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41067,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,63.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41067,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,204,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41067,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,297443,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41067,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Wheeler,Wheeler County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41069,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Wheeler,Wheeler County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41069,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Wheeler,Wheeler County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41069,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Wheeler,Wheeler County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41069,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Wheeler,Wheeler County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41069,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Wheeler,Wheeler County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,1457,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41069,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Wheeler,Wheeler County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1344,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41069,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Wheeler,Wheeler County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,527,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41069,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Wheeler,Wheeler County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,527,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41069,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Wheeler,Wheeler County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,817,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41069,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Wheeler,Wheeler County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,39.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41069,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Wheeler,Wheeler County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,39.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41069,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Wheeler,Wheeler County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,60.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41069,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Wheeler,Wheeler County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41069,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Wheeler,Wheeler County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41069,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Wheeler,Wheeler County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41069,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Wheeler,Wheeler County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41069,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Wheeler,Wheeler County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41069,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Yamhill,Yamhill County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,45,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41071,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Yamhill,Yamhill County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41071,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Yamhill,Yamhill County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41071,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Yamhill,Yamhill County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41071,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Yamhill,Yamhill County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41071,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Yamhill,Yamhill County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,107832,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41071,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Yamhill,Yamhill County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,175795,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41071,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Yamhill,Yamhill County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,40863,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41071,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Yamhill,Yamhill County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,19,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41071,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Yamhill,Yamhill County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,134932,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41071,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Yamhill,Yamhill County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,23.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41071,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Yamhill,Yamhill County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41071,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Yamhill,Yamhill County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,76.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41071,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Yamhill,Yamhill County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,42,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41071,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Yamhill,Yamhill County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41071,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Yamhill,Yamhill County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,23.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41071,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Yamhill,Yamhill County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,41071,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,OR,Yamhill,Yamhill County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,40843,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41071,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,PA,PA,Pennsylvania,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1897,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,42,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,PA,PA,Pennsylvania,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,251,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,42,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,PA,PA,Pennsylvania,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,176,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,42,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,PA,PA,Pennsylvania,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,75,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,42,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,PA,PA,Pennsylvania,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,42,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,PA,PA,Pennsylvania,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,12989625,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,42,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2020,PA,PA,Pennsylvania,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9468135,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,42,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,PA,PA,Pennsylvania,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5680881,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,42,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,PA,PA,Pennsylvania,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,42,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,PA,PA,Pennsylvania,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3787254,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,42,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,PA,PA,Pennsylvania,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,60,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,42,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,PA,PA,Pennsylvania,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,42,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,PA,PA,Pennsylvania,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,40,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,42,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,PA,PA,Pennsylvania,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1646,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,42,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,PA,PA,Pennsylvania,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,5.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,42,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,PA,PA,Pennsylvania,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,54.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,42,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,PA,PA,Pennsylvania,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,485655,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,42,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,PA,PA,Pennsylvania,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,5195226,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,42,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,RI,Bristol,Bristol County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,44001,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,RI,Bristol,Bristol County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,44001,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,RI,Bristol,Bristol County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,44001,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,RI,Bristol,Bristol County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,44001,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,RI,Bristol,Bristol County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,44001,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,RI,Bristol,Bristol County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,50750,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,44001,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,RI,Bristol,Bristol County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,49186,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,44001,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,RI,Bristol,Bristol County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,48970,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,44001,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,RI,Bristol,Bristol County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,44001,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,RI,Bristol,Bristol County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,216,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,44001,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,RI,Bristol,Bristol County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,44001,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,RI,Bristol,Bristol County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,44001,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,RI,Bristol,Bristol County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,44001,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,RI,Bristol,Bristol County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,44001,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,RI,Bristol,Bristol County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,99.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,44001,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,RI,Bristol,Bristol County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,44001,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,RI,Bristol,Bristol County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,48970,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,44001,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,RI,Bristol,Bristol County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,44001,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,RI,Kent,Kent County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,44003,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,RI,Kent,Kent County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,44003,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,RI,Kent,Kent County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,44003,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,RI,Kent,Kent County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,44003,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,RI,Kent,Kent County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,44003,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,RI,Kent,Kent County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,170323,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,44003,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,RI,Kent,Kent County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,159839,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,44003,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,RI,Kent,Kent County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,159523,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,44003,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,RI,Kent,Kent County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,44003,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,RI,Kent,Kent County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,316,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,44003,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,RI,Kent,Kent County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,44003,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,RI,Kent,Kent County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,44003,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,RI,Kent,Kent County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,44003,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,RI,Kent,Kent County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,44003,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,RI,Kent,Kent County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,99.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,44003,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,RI,Kent,Kent County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,44003,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,RI,Kent,Kent County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,159523,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,44003,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,RI,Kent,Kent County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,44003,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,RI,Newport,Newport County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,44005,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,RI,Newport,Newport County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,44005,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,RI,Newport,Newport County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,44005,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,RI,Newport,Newport County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,44005,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,RI,Newport,Newport County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,44005,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,RI,Newport,Newport County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,85388,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,44005,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,RI,Newport,Newport County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,83590,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,44005,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,RI,Newport,Newport County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,56803,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,44005,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,RI,Newport,Newport County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,44005,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,RI,Newport,Newport County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,26787,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,44005,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,RI,Newport,Newport County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,68,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,44005,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,RI,Newport,Newport County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,44005,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,RI,Newport,Newport County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,32,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,44005,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,RI,Newport,Newport County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,44005,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,RI,Newport,Newport County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,9.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,44005,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,RI,Newport,Newport County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,58.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,44005,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,RI,Newport,Newport County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,7863,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,44005,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,RI,Newport,Newport County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,48940,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,44005,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,RI,Providence,Providence County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,27,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,44007,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,RI,Providence,Providence County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,44007,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,RI,Providence,Providence County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,44007,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,RI,Providence,Providence County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,44007,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,RI,Providence,Providence County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,44007,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,RI,Providence,Providence County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,660015,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,44007,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,RI,Providence,Providence County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,551380,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,44007,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,RI,Providence,Providence County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,543589,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,44007,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,RI,Providence,Providence County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,288,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,44007,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,RI,Providence,Providence County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7791,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,44007,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,RI,Providence,Providence County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,44007,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,RI,Providence,Providence County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,44007,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,RI,Providence,Providence County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,44007,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,RI,Providence,Providence County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,44007,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,RI,Providence,Providence County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,15.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,44007,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,RI,Providence,Providence County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,82.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,44007,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,RI,Providence,Providence County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,87936,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,44007,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,RI,Providence,Providence County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,455365,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,44007,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,RI,RI,Rhode Island,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,87,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,44,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,RI,RI,Rhode Island,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,26,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,44,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,RI,RI,Rhode Island,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,44,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,RI,RI,Rhode Island,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,44,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,RI,RI,Rhode Island,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,44,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,RI,RI,Rhode Island,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,1096229,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,44,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2020,RI,RI,Rhode Island,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,979110,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,44,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,RI,RI,Rhode Island,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,809308,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,44,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,RI,RI,Rhode Island,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,711,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,44,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,RI,RI,Rhode Island,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,169802,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,44,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,RI,RI,Rhode Island,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,82.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,44,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,RI,RI,Rhode Island,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,44,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,RI,RI,Rhode Island,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,17.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,44,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,RI,RI,Rhode Island,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,61,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,44,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,RI,RI,Rhode Island,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,31.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,44,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,RI,RI,Rhode Island,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,51.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,44,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,RI,RI,Rhode Island,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,304292,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,44,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,RI,RI,Rhode Island,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,504305,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,44,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,RI,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,38,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,44009,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,RI,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,44009,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,RI,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,44009,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,RI,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,44009,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,RI,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,44009,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,RI,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,129753,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,44009,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,RI,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,135114,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,44009,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,RI,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,422,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,44009,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,RI,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,422,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,44009,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,RI,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,134692,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,44009,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,RI,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,44009,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,RI,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,44009,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,RI,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,44009,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,RI,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,34,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,44009,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,RI,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,44009,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,RI,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,44009,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,RI,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,44009,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,RI,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,44009,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Abbeville,Abbeville County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45001,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Abbeville,Abbeville County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45001,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Abbeville,Abbeville County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45001,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Abbeville,Abbeville County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45001,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Abbeville,Abbeville County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45001,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Abbeville,Abbeville County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,24212,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45001,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Abbeville,Abbeville County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,12752,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45001,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Abbeville,Abbeville County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4953,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45001,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Abbeville,Abbeville County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45001,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Abbeville,Abbeville County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7800,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45001,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Abbeville,Abbeville County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,38.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45001,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Abbeville,Abbeville County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45001,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Abbeville,Abbeville County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,61.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45001,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Abbeville,Abbeville County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45001,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Abbeville,Abbeville County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,38.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45001,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Abbeville,Abbeville County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,45001,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Abbeville,Abbeville County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,4953,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45001,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Abbeville,Abbeville County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,45001,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Aiken,Aiken County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,27,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45003,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Aiken,Aiken County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45003,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Aiken,Aiken County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45003,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Aiken,Aiken County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45003,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Aiken,Aiken County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45003,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Aiken,Aiken County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,169032,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45003,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Aiken,Aiken County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,120951,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45003,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Aiken,Aiken County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,83639,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45003,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Aiken,Aiken County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45003,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Aiken,Aiken County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,37313,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45003,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Aiken,Aiken County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,69.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45003,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Aiken,Aiken County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45003,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Aiken,Aiken County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,30.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45003,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Aiken,Aiken County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,21,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45003,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Aiken,Aiken County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,13.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45003,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Aiken,Aiken County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,55,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45003,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Aiken,Aiken County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,15926,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45003,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Aiken,Aiken County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,66556,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45003,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Allendale,Allendale County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45005,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Allendale,Allendale County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45005,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Allendale,Allendale County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45005,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Allendale,Allendale County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45005,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Allendale,Allendale County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45005,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Allendale,Allendale County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,7990,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45005,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Allendale,Allendale County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7961,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45005,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Allendale,Allendale County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45005,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Allendale,Allendale County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45005,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Allendale,Allendale County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7961,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45005,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Allendale,Allendale County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45005,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Allendale,Allendale County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45005,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Allendale,Allendale County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45005,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Allendale,Allendale County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45005,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Allendale,Allendale County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,45005,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Allendale,Allendale County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,45005,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Allendale,Allendale County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,45005,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Allendale,Allendale County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,45005,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Anderson,Anderson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,36,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45007,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Anderson,Anderson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,32,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45007,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Anderson,Anderson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45007,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Anderson,Anderson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,30,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45007,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Anderson,Anderson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45007,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Anderson,Anderson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,204032,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45007,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Anderson,Anderson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,175843,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45007,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Anderson,Anderson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,175307,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45007,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Anderson,Anderson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45007,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Anderson,Anderson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,536,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45007,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Anderson,Anderson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45007,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Anderson,Anderson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45007,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Anderson,Anderson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45007,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Anderson,Anderson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45007,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Anderson,Anderson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,98.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45007,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Anderson,Anderson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,1.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45007,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Anderson,Anderson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,173225,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45007,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Anderson,Anderson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2082,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45007,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Bamberg,Bamberg County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45009,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Bamberg,Bamberg County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45009,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Bamberg,Bamberg County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45009,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Bamberg,Bamberg County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45009,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Bamberg,Bamberg County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45009,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Bamberg,Bamberg County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,13251,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45009,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Bamberg,Bamberg County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7619,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45009,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Bamberg,Bamberg County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45009,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Bamberg,Bamberg County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45009,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Bamberg,Bamberg County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7619,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45009,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Bamberg,Bamberg County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45009,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Bamberg,Bamberg County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45009,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Bamberg,Bamberg County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45009,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Bamberg,Bamberg County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45009,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Bamberg,Bamberg County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,45009,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Bamberg,Bamberg County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,45009,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Bamberg,Bamberg County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,45009,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Bamberg,Bamberg County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,45009,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Barnwell,Barnwell County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45011,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Barnwell,Barnwell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45011,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Barnwell,Barnwell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45011,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Barnwell,Barnwell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45011,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Barnwell,Barnwell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45011,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Barnwell,Barnwell County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,20567,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45011,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Barnwell,Barnwell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,10343,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45011,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Barnwell,Barnwell County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45011,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Barnwell,Barnwell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45011,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Barnwell,Barnwell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10343,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45011,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Barnwell,Barnwell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45011,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Barnwell,Barnwell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45011,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Barnwell,Barnwell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45011,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Barnwell,Barnwell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45011,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Barnwell,Barnwell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,45011,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Barnwell,Barnwell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,45011,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Barnwell,Barnwell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,45011,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Barnwell,Barnwell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,45011,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Beaufort,Beaufort County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45013,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Beaufort,Beaufort County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45013,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Beaufort,Beaufort County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45013,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Beaufort,Beaufort County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45013,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Beaufort,Beaufort County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45013,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Beaufort,Beaufort County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,187691,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45013,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Beaufort,Beaufort County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,168441,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45013,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Beaufort,Beaufort County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,167069,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45013,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Beaufort,Beaufort County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,17471,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45013,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Beaufort,Beaufort County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1372,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45013,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Beaufort,Beaufort County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45013,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Beaufort,Beaufort County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,10.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45013,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Beaufort,Beaufort County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45013,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Beaufort,Beaufort County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45013,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Beaufort,Beaufort County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,20.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45013,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Beaufort,Beaufort County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,68,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45013,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Beaufort,Beaufort County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,35080,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45013,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Beaufort,Beaufort County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,114518,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45013,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Berkeley,Berkeley County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45015,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Berkeley,Berkeley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45015,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Berkeley,Berkeley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45015,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Berkeley,Berkeley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45015,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Berkeley,Berkeley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45015,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Berkeley,Berkeley County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,231568,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45015,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Berkeley,Berkeley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,103591,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45015,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Berkeley,Berkeley County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,102698,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45015,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Berkeley,Berkeley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1011,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45015,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Berkeley,Berkeley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,893,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45015,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Berkeley,Berkeley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45015,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Berkeley,Berkeley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45015,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Berkeley,Berkeley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45015,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Berkeley,Berkeley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45015,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Berkeley,Berkeley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,98.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45015,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Berkeley,Berkeley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45015,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Berkeley,Berkeley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,101664,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45015,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Berkeley,Berkeley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,24,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45015,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45017,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45017,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45017,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45017,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45017,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,14125,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45017,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5400,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45017,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45017,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45017,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5400,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45017,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45017,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45017,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45017,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45017,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,45017,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,45017,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,45017,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,45017,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Charleston,Charleston County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45019,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Charleston,Charleston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45019,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Charleston,Charleston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45019,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Charleston,Charleston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45019,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Charleston,Charleston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45019,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Charleston,Charleston County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,409418,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45019,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Charleston,Charleston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,346984,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45019,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Charleston,Charleston County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,346312,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45019,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Charleston,Charleston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,194,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45019,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Charleston,Charleston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,671,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45019,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Charleston,Charleston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45019,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Charleston,Charleston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45019,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Charleston,Charleston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45019,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Charleston,Charleston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45019,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Charleston,Charleston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,33,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45019,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Charleston,Charleston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,64.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45019,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Charleston,Charleston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,114662,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45019,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Charleston,Charleston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,223188,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45019,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45021,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45021,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45021,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45021,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45021,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,56179,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45021,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,42667,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45021,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4588,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45021,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45021,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,38079,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45021,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,10.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45021,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45021,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,89.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45021,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45021,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,10.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45021,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,45021,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,4588,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45021,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,45021,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Chester,Chester County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45023,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Chester,Chester County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45023,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Chester,Chester County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45023,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Chester,Chester County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45023,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Chester,Chester County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45023,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Chester,Chester County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,32276,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45023,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Chester,Chester County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,12114,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45023,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Chester,Chester County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,12114,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45023,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Chester,Chester County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45023,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Chester,Chester County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45023,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Chester,Chester County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45023,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Chester,Chester County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45023,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Chester,Chester County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45023,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Chester,Chester County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45023,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Chester,Chester County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,45023,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Chester,Chester County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45023,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Chester,Chester County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,45023,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Chester,Chester County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,12114,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45023,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Chesterfield,Chesterfield County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45025,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Chesterfield,Chesterfield County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45025,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Chesterfield,Chesterfield County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45025,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Chesterfield,Chesterfield County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45025,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Chesterfield,Chesterfield County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45025,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Chesterfield,Chesterfield County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,43258,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45025,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Chesterfield,Chesterfield County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,35209,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45025,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Chesterfield,Chesterfield County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,30352,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45025,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Chesterfield,Chesterfield County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,63,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45025,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Chesterfield,Chesterfield County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4856,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45025,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Chesterfield,Chesterfield County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,86.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45025,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Chesterfield,Chesterfield County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45025,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Chesterfield,Chesterfield County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,13.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45025,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Chesterfield,Chesterfield County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45025,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Chesterfield,Chesterfield County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,13.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45025,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Chesterfield,Chesterfield County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,17.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45025,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Chesterfield,Chesterfield County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,4732,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45025,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Chesterfield,Chesterfield County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,6281,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45025,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Clarendon,Clarendon County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45027,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Clarendon,Clarendon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45027,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Clarendon,Clarendon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45027,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Clarendon,Clarendon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45027,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Clarendon,Clarendon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45027,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Clarendon,Clarendon County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,31093,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45027,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Clarendon,Clarendon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,15763,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45027,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Clarendon,Clarendon County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4796,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45027,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Clarendon,Clarendon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,4796,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45027,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Clarendon,Clarendon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10967,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45027,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Clarendon,Clarendon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,30.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45027,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Clarendon,Clarendon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,30.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45027,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Clarendon,Clarendon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,69.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45027,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Clarendon,Clarendon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45027,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Clarendon,Clarendon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,45027,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Clarendon,Clarendon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,45027,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Clarendon,Clarendon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,45027,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Clarendon,Clarendon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,45027,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Colleton,Colleton County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45029,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Colleton,Colleton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45029,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Colleton,Colleton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45029,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Colleton,Colleton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45029,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Colleton,Colleton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45029,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Colleton,Colleton County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,38543,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45029,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Colleton,Colleton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,16949,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45029,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Colleton,Colleton County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,16436,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45029,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Colleton,Colleton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,16436,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45029,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Colleton,Colleton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,512,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45029,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Colleton,Colleton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,97,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45029,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Colleton,Colleton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,97,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45029,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Colleton,Colleton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45029,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Colleton,Colleton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45029,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Colleton,Colleton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,45029,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Colleton,Colleton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,45029,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Colleton,Colleton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,45029,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Colleton,Colleton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,45029,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Darlington,Darlington County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45031,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Darlington,Darlington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45031,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Darlington,Darlington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45031,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Darlington,Darlington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45031,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Darlington,Darlington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45031,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Darlington,Darlington County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,62833,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45031,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Darlington,Darlington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,58407,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45031,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Darlington,Darlington County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,58407,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45031,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Darlington,Darlington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45031,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Darlington,Darlington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45031,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Darlington,Darlington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45031,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Darlington,Darlington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45031,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Darlington,Darlington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45031,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Darlington,Darlington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45031,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Darlington,Darlington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,1.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45031,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Darlington,Darlington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,98.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45031,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Darlington,Darlington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,933,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45031,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Darlington,Darlington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,57474,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45031,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Dillon,Dillon County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45033,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Dillon,Dillon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45033,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Dillon,Dillon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45033,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Dillon,Dillon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45033,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Dillon,Dillon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45033,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Dillon,Dillon County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,28284,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45033,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Dillon,Dillon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,23925,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45033,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Dillon,Dillon County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5947,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45033,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Dillon,Dillon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45033,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Dillon,Dillon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,17978,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45033,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Dillon,Dillon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,24.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45033,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Dillon,Dillon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45033,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Dillon,Dillon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,75.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45033,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Dillon,Dillon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45033,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Dillon,Dillon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,45033,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Dillon,Dillon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,24.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45033,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Dillon,Dillon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,45033,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Dillon,Dillon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,5947,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45033,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Dorchester,Dorchester County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45035,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Dorchester,Dorchester County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45035,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Dorchester,Dorchester County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45035,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Dorchester,Dorchester County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45035,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Dorchester,Dorchester County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45035,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Dorchester,Dorchester County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,161975,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45035,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Dorchester,Dorchester County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,130178,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45035,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Dorchester,Dorchester County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,124095,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45035,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Dorchester,Dorchester County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45035,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Dorchester,Dorchester County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6083,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45035,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Dorchester,Dorchester County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,95.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45035,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Dorchester,Dorchester County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45035,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Dorchester,Dorchester County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,4.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45035,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Dorchester,Dorchester County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45035,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Dorchester,Dorchester County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,95.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45035,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Dorchester,Dorchester County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,45035,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Dorchester,Dorchester County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,124095,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45035,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Dorchester,Dorchester County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,45035,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Edgefield,Edgefield County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45037,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Edgefield,Edgefield County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45037,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Edgefield,Edgefield County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45037,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Edgefield,Edgefield County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45037,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Edgefield,Edgefield County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45037,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Edgefield,Edgefield County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,25675,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45037,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Edgefield,Edgefield County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,23828,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45037,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Edgefield,Edgefield County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,23790,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45037,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Edgefield,Edgefield County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45037,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Edgefield,Edgefield County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,38,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45037,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Edgefield,Edgefield County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45037,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Edgefield,Edgefield County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45037,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Edgefield,Edgefield County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45037,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Edgefield,Edgefield County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45037,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Edgefield,Edgefield County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,45037,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Edgefield,Edgefield County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,99.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45037,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Edgefield,Edgefield County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,45037,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Edgefield,Edgefield County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,23790,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45037,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Fairfield,Fairfield County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45039,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Fairfield,Fairfield County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45039,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Fairfield,Fairfield County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45039,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Fairfield,Fairfield County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45039,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Fairfield,Fairfield County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45039,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Fairfield,Fairfield County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,20858,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45039,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Fairfield,Fairfield County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,17273,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45039,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Fairfield,Fairfield County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,17209,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45039,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Fairfield,Fairfield County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45039,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Fairfield,Fairfield County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,65,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45039,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Fairfield,Fairfield County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45039,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Fairfield,Fairfield County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45039,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Fairfield,Fairfield County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45039,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Fairfield,Fairfield County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45039,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Fairfield,Fairfield County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,56.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45039,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Fairfield,Fairfield County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,43.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45039,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Fairfield,Fairfield County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,9696,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45039,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Fairfield,Fairfield County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,7513,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45039,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Florence,Florence County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45041,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Florence,Florence County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45041,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Florence,Florence County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45041,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Florence,Florence County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45041,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Florence,Florence County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45041,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Florence,Florence County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,136805,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45041,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Florence,Florence County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,85406,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45041,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Florence,Florence County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,72388,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45041,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Florence,Florence County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,4836,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45041,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Florence,Florence County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,13018,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45041,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Florence,Florence County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,84.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45041,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Florence,Florence County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,5.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45041,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Florence,Florence County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,15.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45041,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Florence,Florence County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45041,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Florence,Florence County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,45041,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Florence,Florence County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,79.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45041,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Florence,Florence County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,45041,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Florence,Florence County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,67552,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45041,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Georgetown,Georgetown County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45043,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Georgetown,Georgetown County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45043,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Georgetown,Georgetown County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45043,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Georgetown,Georgetown County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45043,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Georgetown,Georgetown County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45043,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Georgetown,Georgetown County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,63440,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45043,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Georgetown,Georgetown County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,67481,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45043,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Georgetown,Georgetown County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,57584,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45043,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Georgetown,Georgetown County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,18214,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45043,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Georgetown,Georgetown County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9898,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45043,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Georgetown,Georgetown County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,85.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45043,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Georgetown,Georgetown County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,27,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45043,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Georgetown,Georgetown County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,14.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45043,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Georgetown,Georgetown County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45043,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Georgetown,Georgetown County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,4.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45043,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Georgetown,Georgetown County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,54.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45043,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Georgetown,Georgetown County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2831,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45043,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Georgetown,Georgetown County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,36539,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45043,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Greenville,Greenville County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45045,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Greenville,Greenville County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45045,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Greenville,Greenville County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45045,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Greenville,Greenville County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45045,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Greenville,Greenville County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45045,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Greenville,Greenville County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,526980,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45045,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Greenville,Greenville County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,419609,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45045,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Greenville,Greenville County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,418766,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45045,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Greenville,Greenville County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,86,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45045,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Greenville,Greenville County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,843,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45045,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Greenville,Greenville County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45045,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Greenville,Greenville County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45045,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Greenville,Greenville County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45045,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Greenville,Greenville County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45045,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Greenville,Greenville County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,8.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45045,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Greenville,Greenville County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,91.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45045,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Greenville,Greenville County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,34478,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45045,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Greenville,Greenville County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,384202,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45045,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Greenwood,Greenwood County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45047,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Greenwood,Greenwood County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45047,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Greenwood,Greenwood County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45047,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Greenwood,Greenwood County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45047,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Greenwood,Greenwood County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45047,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Greenwood,Greenwood County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,69380,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45047,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Greenwood,Greenwood County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,51090,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45047,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Greenwood,Greenwood County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,50660,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45047,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Greenwood,Greenwood County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45047,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Greenwood,Greenwood County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,430,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45047,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Greenwood,Greenwood County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45047,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Greenwood,Greenwood County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45047,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Greenwood,Greenwood County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45047,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Greenwood,Greenwood County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45047,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Greenwood,Greenwood County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,9.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45047,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Greenwood,Greenwood County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,89.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45047,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Greenwood,Greenwood County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,4994,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45047,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Greenwood,Greenwood County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,45667,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45047,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Hampton,Hampton County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45049,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Hampton,Hampton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45049,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Hampton,Hampton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45049,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Hampton,Hampton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45049,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Hampton,Hampton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45049,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Hampton,Hampton County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,18512,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45049,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Hampton,Hampton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9082,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45049,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Hampton,Hampton County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2003,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45049,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Hampton,Hampton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,2003,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45049,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Hampton,Hampton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7079,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45049,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Hampton,Hampton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,22.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45049,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Hampton,Hampton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,22.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45049,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Hampton,Hampton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,77.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45049,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Hampton,Hampton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45049,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Hampton,Hampton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,45049,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Hampton,Hampton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,45049,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Hampton,Hampton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,45049,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Hampton,Hampton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,45049,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Horry,Horry County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45051,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Horry,Horry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45051,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Horry,Horry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45051,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Horry,Horry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45051,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Horry,Horry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45051,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Horry,Horry County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,353498,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45051,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Horry,Horry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,324993,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45051,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Horry,Horry County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,324993,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45051,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Horry,Horry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,40,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45051,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Horry,Horry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45051,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Horry,Horry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45051,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Horry,Horry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45051,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Horry,Horry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45051,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Horry,Horry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45051,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Horry,Horry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,49.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45051,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Horry,Horry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,50.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45051,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Horry,Horry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,161094,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45051,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Horry,Horry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,163859,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45051,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45053,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45053,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45053,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45053,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45053,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,29073,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45053,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2742,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45053,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45053,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45053,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2742,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45053,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45053,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45053,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45053,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45053,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,45053,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,45053,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,45053,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,45053,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Kershaw,Kershaw County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45055,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Kershaw,Kershaw County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45055,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Kershaw,Kershaw County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45055,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Kershaw,Kershaw County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45055,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Kershaw,Kershaw County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45055,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Kershaw,Kershaw County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,65536,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45055,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Kershaw,Kershaw County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,61694,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45055,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Kershaw,Kershaw County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,58596,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45055,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Kershaw,Kershaw County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45055,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Kershaw,Kershaw County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3098,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45055,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Kershaw,Kershaw County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,95,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45055,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Kershaw,Kershaw County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45055,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Kershaw,Kershaw County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45055,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Kershaw,Kershaw County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45055,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Kershaw,Kershaw County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,45055,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Kershaw,Kershaw County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,56.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45055,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Kershaw,Kershaw County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,45055,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Kershaw,Kershaw County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,34727,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45055,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Lancaster,Lancaster County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45057,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Lancaster,Lancaster County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45057,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Lancaster,Lancaster County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45057,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Lancaster,Lancaster County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45057,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Lancaster,Lancaster County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45057,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Lancaster,Lancaster County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,96652,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45057,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Lancaster,Lancaster County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,77427,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45057,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Lancaster,Lancaster County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,77427,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45057,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Lancaster,Lancaster County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45057,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Lancaster,Lancaster County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45057,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Lancaster,Lancaster County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45057,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Lancaster,Lancaster County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45057,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Lancaster,Lancaster County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45057,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Lancaster,Lancaster County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45057,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Lancaster,Lancaster County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45057,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Lancaster,Lancaster County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45057,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Lancaster,Lancaster County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,77403,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45057,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Lancaster,Lancaster County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,24,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45057,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Laurens,Laurens County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45059,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Laurens,Laurens County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45059,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Laurens,Laurens County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45059,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Laurens,Laurens County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45059,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Laurens,Laurens County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45059,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Laurens,Laurens County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,67551,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45059,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Laurens,Laurens County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,58550,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45059,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Laurens,Laurens County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,58455,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45059,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Laurens,Laurens County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45059,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Laurens,Laurens County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,95,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45059,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Laurens,Laurens County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45059,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Laurens,Laurens County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45059,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Laurens,Laurens County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45059,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Laurens,Laurens County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45059,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Laurens,Laurens County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,60.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45059,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Laurens,Laurens County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,39,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45059,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Laurens,Laurens County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,35605,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45059,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Laurens,Laurens County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,22850,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45059,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45061,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45061,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45061,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45061,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45061,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,16458,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45061,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4094,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45061,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45061,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45061,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4094,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45061,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45061,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45061,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45061,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45061,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,45061,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,45061,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,45061,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,45061,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Lexington,Lexington County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,91,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45063,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Lexington,Lexington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,25,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45063,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Lexington,Lexington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45063,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Lexington,Lexington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45063,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Lexington,Lexington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45063,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Lexington,Lexington County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,294891,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45063,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Lexington,Lexington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,175273,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45063,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Lexington,Lexington County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,156664,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45063,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Lexington,Lexington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,6766,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45063,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Lexington,Lexington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,18609,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45063,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Lexington,Lexington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,89.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45063,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Lexington,Lexington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,3.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45063,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Lexington,Lexington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,10.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45063,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Lexington,Lexington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,66,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45063,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Lexington,Lexington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,39.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45063,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Lexington,Lexington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,46.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45063,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Lexington,Lexington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,68706,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45063,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Lexington,Lexington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,81192,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45063,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45067,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45067,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45067,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45067,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45067,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,29043,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45067,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,29298,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45067,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,22902,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45067,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,22300,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45067,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6396,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45067,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,78.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45067,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,76.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45067,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,21.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45067,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45067,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,2.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45067,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,45067,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,603,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45067,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,45067,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Marlboro,Marlboro County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45069,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Marlboro,Marlboro County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45069,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Marlboro,Marlboro County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45069,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Marlboro,Marlboro County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45069,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Marlboro,Marlboro County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45069,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Marlboro,Marlboro County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,26537,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45069,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Marlboro,Marlboro County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,18603,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45069,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Marlboro,Marlboro County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,18603,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45069,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Marlboro,Marlboro County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45069,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Marlboro,Marlboro County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45069,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Marlboro,Marlboro County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45069,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Marlboro,Marlboro County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45069,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Marlboro,Marlboro County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45069,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Marlboro,Marlboro County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45069,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Marlboro,Marlboro County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,38.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45069,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Marlboro,Marlboro County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,46.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45069,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Marlboro,Marlboro County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,7176,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45069,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Marlboro,Marlboro County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,8639,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45069,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,McCormick,McCormick County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45065,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,McCormick,McCormick County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45065,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,McCormick,McCormick County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45065,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,McCormick,McCormick County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45065,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,McCormick,McCormick County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45065,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,McCormick,McCormick County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,9513,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45065,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,SC,McCormick,McCormick County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,10041,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45065,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,McCormick,McCormick County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10041,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45065,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,McCormick,McCormick County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45065,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,McCormick,McCormick County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45065,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,McCormick,McCormick County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45065,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,McCormick,McCormick County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45065,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,McCormick,McCormick County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45065,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,McCormick,McCormick County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45065,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,McCormick,McCormick County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,80.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45065,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,McCormick,McCormick County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,19.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45065,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,McCormick,McCormick County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,8096,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45065,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,McCormick,McCormick County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1945,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45065,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Newberry,Newberry County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45071,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Newberry,Newberry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45071,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Newberry,Newberry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45071,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Newberry,Newberry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45071,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Newberry,Newberry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45071,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Newberry,Newberry County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,37715,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45071,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Newberry,Newberry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,21665,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45071,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Newberry,Newberry County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,21551,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45071,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Newberry,Newberry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45071,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Newberry,Newberry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,114,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45071,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Newberry,Newberry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45071,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Newberry,Newberry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45071,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Newberry,Newberry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45071,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Newberry,Newberry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45071,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Newberry,Newberry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45071,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Newberry,Newberry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,94.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45071,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Newberry,Newberry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1078,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45071,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Newberry,Newberry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,20473,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45071,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Oconee,Oconee County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,21,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45073,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Oconee,Oconee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45073,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Oconee,Oconee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45073,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Oconee,Oconee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45073,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Oconee,Oconee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45073,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Oconee,Oconee County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,78638,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45073,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Oconee,Oconee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,79631,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45073,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Oconee,Oconee County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,79181,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45073,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Oconee,Oconee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,110,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45073,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Oconee,Oconee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,450,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45073,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Oconee,Oconee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45073,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Oconee,Oconee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45073,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Oconee,Oconee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45073,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Oconee,Oconee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45073,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Oconee,Oconee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,30.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45073,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Oconee,Oconee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,68.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45073,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Oconee,Oconee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,24523,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45073,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Oconee,Oconee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,54549,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45073,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Orangeburg,Orangeburg County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45075,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Orangeburg,Orangeburg County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45075,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Orangeburg,Orangeburg County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45075,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Orangeburg,Orangeburg County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45075,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Orangeburg,Orangeburg County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45075,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Orangeburg,Orangeburg County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,83958,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45075,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Orangeburg,Orangeburg County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,55365,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45075,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Orangeburg,Orangeburg County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,42623,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45075,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Orangeburg,Orangeburg County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45075,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Orangeburg,Orangeburg County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,12743,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45075,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Orangeburg,Orangeburg County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,77,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45075,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Orangeburg,Orangeburg County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45075,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Orangeburg,Orangeburg County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,23,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45075,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Orangeburg,Orangeburg County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45075,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Orangeburg,Orangeburg County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,5.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45075,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Orangeburg,Orangeburg County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,71.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45075,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Orangeburg,Orangeburg County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,3154,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45075,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Orangeburg,Orangeburg County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,39469,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45075,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Pickens,Pickens County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45077,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Pickens,Pickens County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45077,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Pickens,Pickens County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45077,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Pickens,Pickens County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45077,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Pickens,Pickens County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45077,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Pickens,Pickens County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,131602,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45077,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Pickens,Pickens County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,113125,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45077,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Pickens,Pickens County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,112839,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45077,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Pickens,Pickens County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45077,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Pickens,Pickens County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,287,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45077,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Pickens,Pickens County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45077,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Pickens,Pickens County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45077,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Pickens,Pickens County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45077,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Pickens,Pickens County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45077,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Pickens,Pickens County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,62.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45077,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Pickens,Pickens County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,37,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45077,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Pickens,Pickens County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,70951,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45077,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Pickens,Pickens County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,41887,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45077,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Richland,Richland County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,32,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45079,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Richland,Richland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45079,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Richland,Richland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45079,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Richland,Richland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45079,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Richland,Richland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45079,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Richland,Richland County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,416527,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45079,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Richland,Richland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,312480,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45079,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Richland,Richland County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,306236,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45079,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Richland,Richland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45079,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Richland,Richland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6244,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45079,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Richland,Richland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45079,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Richland,Richland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45079,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Richland,Richland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45079,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Richland,Richland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,29,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45079,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Richland,Richland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,10.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45079,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Richland,Richland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,87.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45079,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Richland,Richland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,31612,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45079,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Richland,Richland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,274624,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45079,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Saluda,Saluda County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45081,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Saluda,Saluda County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45081,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Saluda,Saluda County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45081,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Saluda,Saluda County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45081,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Saluda,Saluda County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45081,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Saluda,Saluda County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,18830,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45081,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Saluda,Saluda County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,8461,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45081,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Saluda,Saluda County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8325,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45081,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Saluda,Saluda County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45081,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Saluda,Saluda County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,136,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45081,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Saluda,Saluda County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45081,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Saluda,Saluda County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45081,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Saluda,Saluda County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45081,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Saluda,Saluda County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45081,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Saluda,Saluda County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,98.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45081,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Saluda,Saluda County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,45081,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Saluda,Saluda County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,8325,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45081,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Saluda,Saluda County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,45081,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,SC,South Carolina,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,596,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,SC,SC,South Carolina,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,267,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,SC,SC,South Carolina,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,51,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,SC,SC,South Carolina,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,164,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,SC,SC,South Carolina,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,41,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,SC,SC,South Carolina,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,5130729,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2020,SC,SC,South Carolina,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3891342,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,SC,SC,South Carolina,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3567836,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,SC,SC,South Carolina,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,116297,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,SC,SC,South Carolina,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,323506,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,SC,SC,South Carolina,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,91.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,SC,SC,South Carolina,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,SC,SC,South Carolina,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,8.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,SC,SC,South Carolina,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,329,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,SC,SC,South Carolina,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,33.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,SC,SC,South Carolina,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,54.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,SC,SC,South Carolina,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1286728,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,SC,SC,South Carolina,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2109451,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,SC,Spartanburg,Spartanburg County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45083,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Spartanburg,Spartanburg County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45083,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Spartanburg,Spartanburg County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45083,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Spartanburg,Spartanburg County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45083,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Spartanburg,Spartanburg County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45083,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Spartanburg,Spartanburg County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,329364,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45083,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Spartanburg,Spartanburg County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,275401,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45083,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Spartanburg,Spartanburg County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,213625,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45083,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Spartanburg,Spartanburg County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45083,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Spartanburg,Spartanburg County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,61776,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45083,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Spartanburg,Spartanburg County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,77.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45083,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Spartanburg,Spartanburg County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45083,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Spartanburg,Spartanburg County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,22.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45083,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Spartanburg,Spartanburg County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45083,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Spartanburg,Spartanburg County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,19.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45083,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Spartanburg,Spartanburg County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,58.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45083,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Spartanburg,Spartanburg County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,53049,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45083,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Spartanburg,Spartanburg County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,160576,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45083,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Sumter,Sumter County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,21,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45085,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Sumter,Sumter County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45085,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Sumter,Sumter County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45085,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Sumter,Sumter County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45085,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Sumter,Sumter County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45085,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Sumter,Sumter County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,105417,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45085,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Sumter,Sumter County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,80148,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45085,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Sumter,Sumter County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,70247,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45085,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Sumter,Sumter County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,4881,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45085,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Sumter,Sumter County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9901,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45085,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Sumter,Sumter County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,87.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45085,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Sumter,Sumter County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,6.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45085,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Sumter,Sumter County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,12.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45085,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Sumter,Sumter County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45085,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Sumter,Sumter County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,3.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45085,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Sumter,Sumter County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,77.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45085,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Sumter,Sumter County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,3126,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45085,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Sumter,Sumter County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,62240,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45085,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45087,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45087,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45087,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45087,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45087,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,27148,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45087,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,29346,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45087,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,29346,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45087,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45087,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45087,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45087,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45087,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45087,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45087,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,61.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45087,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,38.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45087,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,18148,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45087,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,11198,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45087,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Williamsburg,Williamsburg County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45089,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Williamsburg,Williamsburg County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45089,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Williamsburg,Williamsburg County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45089,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Williamsburg,Williamsburg County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45089,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Williamsburg,Williamsburg County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45089,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Williamsburg,Williamsburg County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,30902,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45089,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Williamsburg,Williamsburg County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,18069,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45089,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Williamsburg,Williamsburg County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,18069,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45089,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Williamsburg,Williamsburg County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,16544,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45089,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Williamsburg,Williamsburg County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45089,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Williamsburg,Williamsburg County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45089,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Williamsburg,Williamsburg County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,91.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45089,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Williamsburg,Williamsburg County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45089,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Williamsburg,Williamsburg County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45089,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Williamsburg,Williamsburg County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,8.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45089,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Williamsburg,Williamsburg County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,45089,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Williamsburg,Williamsburg County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1525,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45089,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,Williamsburg,Williamsburg County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,45089,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,York,York County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,72,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45091,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,York,York County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45091,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,York,York County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45091,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,York,York County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45091,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,York,York County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45091,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,York,York County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,283899,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45091,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,SC,York,York County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,166067,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45091,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,York,York County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,159001,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45091,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,York,York County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,548,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45091,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,York,York County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7066,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45091,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,York,York County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,95.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45091,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,York,York County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45091,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,York,York County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,4.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45091,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,York,York County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,54,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45091,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,SC,York,York County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,48.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45091,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,York,York County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,46.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45091,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,SC,York,York County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,80700,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45091,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SC,York,York County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,77753,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45091,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,SD,SD,South Dakota,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,508,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,46,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,SD,SD,South Dakota,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,320,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,46,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,SD,SD,South Dakota,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,83,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,46,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,SD,SD,South Dakota,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,175,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,46,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,SD,SD,South Dakota,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,52,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,46,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,SD,SD,South Dakota,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,887355,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,46,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,False,,WFR_ST
2020,SD,SD,South Dakota,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,757461,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,46,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,SD,SD,South Dakota,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,710136,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,46,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,SD,SD,South Dakota,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,189728,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,46,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,SD,SD,South Dakota,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,47325,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,46,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,SD,SD,South Dakota,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,93.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,46,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,SD,SD,South Dakota,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,25,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,46,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,SD,SD,South Dakota,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,6.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,46,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,SD,SD,South Dakota,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,188,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,46,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,SD,SD,South Dakota,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,21.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,46,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,SD,SD,South Dakota,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,47,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,46,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,SD,SD,South Dakota,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,164395,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,46,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,SD,SD,South Dakota,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,356013,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,46,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,TN,Anderson,Anderson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47001,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Anderson,Anderson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47001,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Anderson,Anderson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47001,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Anderson,Anderson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47001,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Anderson,Anderson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47001,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Anderson,Anderson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,77209,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47001,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Anderson,Anderson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,74763,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47001,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Anderson,Anderson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,74763,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47001,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Anderson,Anderson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47001,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Anderson,Anderson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47001,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Anderson,Anderson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47001,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Anderson,Anderson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47001,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Anderson,Anderson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47001,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Anderson,Anderson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47001,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Anderson,Anderson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,3.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47001,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Anderson,Anderson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,96.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47001,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Anderson,Anderson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2836,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47001,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Anderson,Anderson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,71926,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47001,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Bedford,Bedford County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47003,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Bedford,Bedford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47003,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Bedford,Bedford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47003,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Bedford,Bedford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47003,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Bedford,Bedford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47003,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Bedford,Bedford County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,50302,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47003,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Bedford,Bedford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,51973,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47003,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Bedford,Bedford County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,51973,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47003,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Bedford,Bedford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47003,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Bedford,Bedford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47003,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Bedford,Bedford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47003,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Bedford,Bedford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47003,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Bedford,Bedford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47003,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Bedford,Bedford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47003,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Bedford,Bedford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,13.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47003,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Bedford,Bedford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,86.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47003,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Bedford,Bedford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,7126,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47003,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Bedford,Bedford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,44847,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47003,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47005,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47005,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47005,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47005,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47005,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,15812,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47005,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,10104,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47005,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47005,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47005,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10104,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47005,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47005,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47005,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47005,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47005,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47005,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47005,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47005,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Benton,Benton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47005,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Bledsoe,Bledsoe County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47007,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Bledsoe,Bledsoe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47007,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Bledsoe,Bledsoe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47007,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Bledsoe,Bledsoe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47007,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Bledsoe,Bledsoe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47007,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Bledsoe,Bledsoe County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,14930,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47007,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Bledsoe,Bledsoe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4886,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47007,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Bledsoe,Bledsoe County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47007,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Bledsoe,Bledsoe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47007,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Bledsoe,Bledsoe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4886,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47007,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Bledsoe,Bledsoe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47007,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Bledsoe,Bledsoe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47007,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Bledsoe,Bledsoe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47007,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Bledsoe,Bledsoe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47007,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Bledsoe,Bledsoe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47007,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Bledsoe,Bledsoe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47007,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Bledsoe,Bledsoe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47007,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Bledsoe,Bledsoe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47007,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Blount,Blount County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47009,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Blount,Blount County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47009,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Blount,Blount County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47009,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Blount,Blount County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47009,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Blount,Blount County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47009,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Blount,Blount County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,135566,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47009,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Blount,Blount County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,121768,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47009,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Blount,Blount County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,121592,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47009,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Blount,Blount County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47009,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Blount,Blount County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,175,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47009,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Blount,Blount County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47009,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Blount,Blount County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47009,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Blount,Blount County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47009,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Blount,Blount County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47009,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Blount,Blount County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,12.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47009,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Blount,Blount County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,87.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47009,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Blount,Blount County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,14853,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47009,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Blount,Blount County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,106739,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47009,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Bradley,Bradley County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47011,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Bradley,Bradley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47011,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Bradley,Bradley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47011,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Bradley,Bradley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47011,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Bradley,Bradley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47011,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Bradley,Bradley County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,108741,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47011,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Bradley,Bradley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,97089,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47011,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Bradley,Bradley County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,79210,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47011,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Bradley,Bradley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47011,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Bradley,Bradley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,17879,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47011,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Bradley,Bradley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,81.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47011,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Bradley,Bradley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47011,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Bradley,Bradley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,18.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47011,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Bradley,Bradley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47011,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Bradley,Bradley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47011,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Bradley,Bradley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,81.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47011,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Bradley,Bradley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47011,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Bradley,Bradley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,79210,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47011,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Campbell,Campbell County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47013,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Campbell,Campbell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47013,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Campbell,Campbell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47013,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Campbell,Campbell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47013,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Campbell,Campbell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47013,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Campbell,Campbell County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,39277,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47013,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Campbell,Campbell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,39389,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47013,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Campbell,Campbell County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,38436,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47013,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Campbell,Campbell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47013,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Campbell,Campbell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,952,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47013,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Campbell,Campbell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,97.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47013,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Campbell,Campbell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47013,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Campbell,Campbell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47013,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Campbell,Campbell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47013,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Campbell,Campbell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47013,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Campbell,Campbell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,97.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47013,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Campbell,Campbell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47013,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Campbell,Campbell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,38436,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47013,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Cannon,Cannon County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47015,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Cannon,Cannon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47015,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Cannon,Cannon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47015,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Cannon,Cannon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47015,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Cannon,Cannon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47015,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Cannon,Cannon County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,14547,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47015,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Cannon,Cannon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9196,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47015,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Cannon,Cannon County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9196,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47015,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Cannon,Cannon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47015,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Cannon,Cannon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47015,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Cannon,Cannon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47015,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Cannon,Cannon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47015,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Cannon,Cannon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47015,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Cannon,Cannon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47015,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Cannon,Cannon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47015,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Cannon,Cannon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47015,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Cannon,Cannon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47015,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Cannon,Cannon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,9196,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47015,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47017,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47017,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47017,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47017,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47017,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,28415,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47017,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,17128,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47017,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11453,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47017,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47017,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5675,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47017,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,66.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47017,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47017,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,33.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47017,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47017,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47017,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,66.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47017,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47017,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,11453,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47017,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Carter,Carter County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47019,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Carter,Carter County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47019,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Carter,Carter County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47019,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Carter,Carter County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47019,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Carter,Carter County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47019,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Carter,Carter County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,56315,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47019,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Carter,Carter County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,51131,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47019,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Carter,Carter County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,29961,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47019,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Carter,Carter County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47019,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Carter,Carter County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,21169,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47019,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Carter,Carter County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,58.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47019,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Carter,Carter County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47019,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Carter,Carter County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,41.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47019,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Carter,Carter County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47019,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Carter,Carter County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,2.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47019,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Carter,Carter County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,56.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47019,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Carter,Carter County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1210,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47019,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Carter,Carter County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,28751,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47019,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Cheatham,Cheatham County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47021,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Cheatham,Cheatham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47021,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Cheatham,Cheatham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47021,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Cheatham,Cheatham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47021,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Cheatham,Cheatham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47021,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Cheatham,Cheatham County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,41087,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47021,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Cheatham,Cheatham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,48766,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47021,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Cheatham,Cheatham County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8134,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47021,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Cheatham,Cheatham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47021,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Cheatham,Cheatham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,40633,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47021,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Cheatham,Cheatham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,16.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47021,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Cheatham,Cheatham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47021,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Cheatham,Cheatham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,83.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47021,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Cheatham,Cheatham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47021,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Cheatham,Cheatham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47021,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Cheatham,Cheatham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,16.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47021,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Cheatham,Cheatham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47021,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Cheatham,Cheatham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,8134,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47021,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Chester,Chester County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47023,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Chester,Chester County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47023,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Chester,Chester County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47023,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Chester,Chester County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47023,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Chester,Chester County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47023,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Chester,Chester County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,17347,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47023,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Chester,Chester County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7910,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47023,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Chester,Chester County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7910,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47023,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Chester,Chester County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47023,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Chester,Chester County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47023,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Chester,Chester County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47023,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Chester,Chester County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47023,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Chester,Chester County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47023,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Chester,Chester County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47023,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Chester,Chester County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47023,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Chester,Chester County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47023,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Chester,Chester County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47023,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Chester,Chester County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,7910,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47023,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Claiborne,Claiborne County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47025,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Claiborne,Claiborne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47025,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Claiborne,Claiborne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47025,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Claiborne,Claiborne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47025,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Claiborne,Claiborne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47025,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Claiborne,Claiborne County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,32038,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47025,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Claiborne,Claiborne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,27888,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47025,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Claiborne,Claiborne County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,24313,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47025,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Claiborne,Claiborne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47025,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Claiborne,Claiborne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3575,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47025,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Claiborne,Claiborne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,87.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47025,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Claiborne,Claiborne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47025,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Claiborne,Claiborne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,12.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47025,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Claiborne,Claiborne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47025,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Claiborne,Claiborne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47025,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Claiborne,Claiborne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,87.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47025,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Claiborne,Claiborne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47025,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Claiborne,Claiborne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,24313,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47025,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47027,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47027,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47027,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47027,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47027,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,7554,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47027,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,8755,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47027,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8755,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47027,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47027,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47027,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47027,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47027,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47027,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47027,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47027,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47027,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47027,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,8755,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47027,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Cocke,Cocke County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47029,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Cocke,Cocke County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47029,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Cocke,Cocke County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47029,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Cocke,Cocke County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47029,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Cocke,Cocke County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47029,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Cocke,Cocke County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,36022,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47029,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Cocke,Cocke County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,27845,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47029,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Cocke,Cocke County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,27845,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47029,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Cocke,Cocke County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47029,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Cocke,Cocke County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47029,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Cocke,Cocke County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47029,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Cocke,Cocke County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47029,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Cocke,Cocke County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47029,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Cocke,Cocke County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47029,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Cocke,Cocke County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47029,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Cocke,Cocke County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47029,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Cocke,Cocke County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47029,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Cocke,Cocke County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,27845,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47029,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Coffee,Coffee County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47031,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Coffee,Coffee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47031,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Coffee,Coffee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47031,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Coffee,Coffee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47031,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Coffee,Coffee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47031,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Coffee,Coffee County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,58102,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47031,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Coffee,Coffee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,50904,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47031,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Coffee,Coffee County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,50781,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47031,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Coffee,Coffee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47031,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Coffee,Coffee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,123,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47031,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Coffee,Coffee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47031,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Coffee,Coffee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47031,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Coffee,Coffee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47031,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Coffee,Coffee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47031,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Coffee,Coffee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,99.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47031,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Coffee,Coffee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47031,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Coffee,Coffee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,50759,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47031,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Coffee,Coffee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,22,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47031,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Crockett,Crockett County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47033,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Crockett,Crockett County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47033,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Crockett,Crockett County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47033,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Crockett,Crockett County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47033,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Crockett,Crockett County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47033,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Crockett,Crockett County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,13884,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47033,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Crockett,Crockett County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,14820,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47033,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Crockett,Crockett County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4999,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47033,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Crockett,Crockett County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47033,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Crockett,Crockett County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9821,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47033,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Crockett,Crockett County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,33.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47033,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Crockett,Crockett County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47033,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Crockett,Crockett County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,66.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47033,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Crockett,Crockett County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47033,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Crockett,Crockett County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47033,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Crockett,Crockett County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,33.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47033,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Crockett,Crockett County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47033,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Crockett,Crockett County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,4999,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47033,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47035,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47035,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47035,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47035,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47035,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,61272,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47035,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,61316,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47035,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,56423,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47035,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47035,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4894,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47035,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,92,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47035,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47035,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47035,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47035,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,16.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47035,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,75.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47035,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,10125,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47035,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,46298,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47035,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Davidson,Davidson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47037,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Davidson,Davidson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47037,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Davidson,Davidson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47037,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Davidson,Davidson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47037,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Davidson,Davidson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47037,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Davidson,Davidson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,715486,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47037,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Davidson,Davidson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,740061,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47037,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Davidson,Davidson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,740061,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47037,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Davidson,Davidson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47037,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Davidson,Davidson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47037,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Davidson,Davidson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47037,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Davidson,Davidson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47037,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Davidson,Davidson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47037,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Davidson,Davidson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47037,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Davidson,Davidson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47037,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Davidson,Davidson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47037,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Davidson,Davidson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47037,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Davidson,Davidson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,740061,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47037,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Decatur,Decatur County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47039,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Decatur,Decatur County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47039,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Decatur,Decatur County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47039,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Decatur,Decatur County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47039,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Decatur,Decatur County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47039,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Decatur,Decatur County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,11402,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47039,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Decatur,Decatur County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,11314,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47039,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Decatur,Decatur County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6433,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47039,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Decatur,Decatur County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47039,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Decatur,Decatur County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4881,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47039,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Decatur,Decatur County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,56.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47039,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Decatur,Decatur County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47039,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Decatur,Decatur County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,43.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47039,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Decatur,Decatur County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47039,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Decatur,Decatur County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,25.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47039,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Decatur,Decatur County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,31.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47039,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Decatur,Decatur County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2879,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47039,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Decatur,Decatur County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3553,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47039,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47041,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47041,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47041,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47041,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47041,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,20171,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47041,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,22111,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47041,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,19872,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47041,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47041,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2238,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47041,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,89.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47041,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47041,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,10.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47041,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47041,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,59.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47041,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,30.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47041,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,13174,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47041,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,DeKalb,DeKalb County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,6698,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47041,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Dickson,Dickson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47043,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Dickson,Dickson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47043,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Dickson,Dickson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47043,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Dickson,Dickson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47043,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Dickson,Dickson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47043,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Dickson,Dickson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,54432,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47043,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Dickson,Dickson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,57919,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47043,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Dickson,Dickson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,55297,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47043,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Dickson,Dickson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47043,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Dickson,Dickson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2622,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47043,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Dickson,Dickson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,95.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47043,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Dickson,Dickson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47043,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Dickson,Dickson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,4.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47043,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Dickson,Dickson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47043,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Dickson,Dickson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,7.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47043,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Dickson,Dickson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,87.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47043,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Dickson,Dickson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,4581,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47043,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Dickson,Dickson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,50716,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47043,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Dyer,Dyer County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47045,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Dyer,Dyer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47045,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Dyer,Dyer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47045,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Dyer,Dyer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47045,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Dyer,Dyer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47045,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Dyer,Dyer County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,36646,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47045,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Dyer,Dyer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,33197,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47045,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Dyer,Dyer County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,26308,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47045,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Dyer,Dyer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47045,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Dyer,Dyer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6889,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47045,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Dyer,Dyer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,79.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47045,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Dyer,Dyer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47045,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Dyer,Dyer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,20.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47045,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Dyer,Dyer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47045,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Dyer,Dyer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47045,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Dyer,Dyer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,79.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47045,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Dyer,Dyer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47045,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Dyer,Dyer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,26308,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47045,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47047,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47047,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47047,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47047,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47047,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,42139,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47047,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,21815,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47047,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,18792,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47047,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47047,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3023,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47047,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,86.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47047,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47047,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,13.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47047,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47047,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,8.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47047,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,77.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47047,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1949,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47047,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,16843,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47047,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Fentress,Fentress County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47049,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Fentress,Fentress County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47049,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Fentress,Fentress County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47049,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Fentress,Fentress County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47049,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Fentress,Fentress County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47049,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Fentress,Fentress County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,18522,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47049,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Fentress,Fentress County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,21424,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47049,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Fentress,Fentress County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,21424,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47049,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Fentress,Fentress County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47049,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Fentress,Fentress County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47049,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Fentress,Fentress County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47049,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Fentress,Fentress County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47049,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Fentress,Fentress County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47049,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Fentress,Fentress County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47049,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Fentress,Fentress County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,85.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47049,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Fentress,Fentress County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,14.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47049,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Fentress,Fentress County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,18253,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47049,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Fentress,Fentress County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3172,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47049,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47051,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47051,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47051,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47051,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47051,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,42781,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47051,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,42770,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47051,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,34486,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47051,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47051,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8284,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47051,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,80.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47051,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47051,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,19.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47051,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47051,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47051,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,80.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47051,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47051,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,34486,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47051,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Gibson,Gibson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47053,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Gibson,Gibson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47053,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Gibson,Gibson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47053,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Gibson,Gibson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47053,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Gibson,Gibson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47053,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Gibson,Gibson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,50375,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47053,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Gibson,Gibson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,36518,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47053,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Gibson,Gibson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,26603,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47053,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Gibson,Gibson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47053,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Gibson,Gibson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9915,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47053,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Gibson,Gibson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,72.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47053,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Gibson,Gibson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47053,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Gibson,Gibson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,27.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47053,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Gibson,Gibson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47053,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Gibson,Gibson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47053,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Gibson,Gibson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,72.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47053,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Gibson,Gibson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47053,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Gibson,Gibson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,26603,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47053,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Giles,Giles County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47055,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Giles,Giles County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47055,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Giles,Giles County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47055,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Giles,Giles County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47055,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Giles,Giles County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47055,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Giles,Giles County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,30295,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47055,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Giles,Giles County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,28327,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47055,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Giles,Giles County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,26847,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47055,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Giles,Giles County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47055,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Giles,Giles County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1480,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47055,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Giles,Giles County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,94.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47055,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Giles,Giles County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47055,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Giles,Giles County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,5.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47055,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Giles,Giles County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47055,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Giles,Giles County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,61.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47055,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Giles,Giles County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,33,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47055,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Giles,Giles County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,17512,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47055,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Giles,Giles County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,9335,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47055,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Grainger,Grainger County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47057,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Grainger,Grainger County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47057,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Grainger,Grainger County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47057,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Grainger,Grainger County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47057,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Grainger,Grainger County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47057,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Grainger,Grainger County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,23525,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47057,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Grainger,Grainger County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9677,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47057,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Grainger,Grainger County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9677,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47057,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Grainger,Grainger County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47057,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Grainger,Grainger County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47057,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Grainger,Grainger County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47057,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Grainger,Grainger County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47057,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Grainger,Grainger County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47057,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Grainger,Grainger County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47057,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Grainger,Grainger County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47057,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Grainger,Grainger County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47057,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Grainger,Grainger County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,9677,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47057,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Grainger,Grainger County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47057,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47059,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47059,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47059,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47059,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47059,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,70220,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47059,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,74370,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47059,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,74370,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47059,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47059,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47059,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47059,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47059,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47059,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47059,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,56.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47059,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,43.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47059,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,42313,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47059,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,32058,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47059,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Grundy,Grundy County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47061,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Grundy,Grundy County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47061,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Grundy,Grundy County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47061,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Grundy,Grundy County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47061,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Grundy,Grundy County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47061,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Grundy,Grundy County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,13531,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47061,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Grundy,Grundy County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,14072,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47061,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Grundy,Grundy County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,14072,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47061,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Grundy,Grundy County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47061,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Grundy,Grundy County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47061,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Grundy,Grundy County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47061,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Grundy,Grundy County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47061,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Grundy,Grundy County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47061,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Grundy,Grundy County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47061,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Grundy,Grundy County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47061,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Grundy,Grundy County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47061,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Grundy,Grundy County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47061,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Grundy,Grundy County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,14072,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47061,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hamblen,Hamblen County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47063,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hamblen,Hamblen County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47063,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hamblen,Hamblen County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47063,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hamblen,Hamblen County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47063,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hamblen,Hamblen County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47063,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hamblen,Hamblen County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,64435,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47063,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hamblen,Hamblen County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,70239,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47063,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hamblen,Hamblen County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,70239,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47063,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hamblen,Hamblen County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47063,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hamblen,Hamblen County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47063,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hamblen,Hamblen County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47063,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hamblen,Hamblen County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47063,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hamblen,Hamblen County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47063,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hamblen,Hamblen County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47063,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hamblen,Hamblen County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,53.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47063,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hamblen,Hamblen County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,46.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47063,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hamblen,Hamblen County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,37302,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47063,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hamblen,Hamblen County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,32938,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47063,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47065,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47065,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47065,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47065,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47065,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,366991,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47065,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,335940,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47065,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,335940,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47065,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47065,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47065,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47065,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47065,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47065,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47065,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,4.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47065,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,95.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47065,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,14138,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47065,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,321802,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47065,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47067,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47067,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47067,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47067,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47067,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,6622,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47067,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2017,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47067,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47067,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47067,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2017,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47067,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47067,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47067,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47067,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47067,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47067,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47067,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47067,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47067,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hardeman,Hardeman County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47069,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hardeman,Hardeman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47069,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hardeman,Hardeman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47069,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hardeman,Hardeman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47069,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hardeman,Hardeman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47069,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hardeman,Hardeman County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,25410,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47069,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hardeman,Hardeman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,15831,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47069,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hardeman,Hardeman County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11757,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47069,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hardeman,Hardeman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47069,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hardeman,Hardeman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4074,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47069,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hardeman,Hardeman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,74.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47069,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hardeman,Hardeman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47069,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hardeman,Hardeman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,25.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47069,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hardeman,Hardeman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47069,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hardeman,Hardeman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,21.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47069,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hardeman,Hardeman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,53.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47069,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hardeman,Hardeman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,3344,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47069,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hardeman,Hardeman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,8413,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47069,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hardin,Hardin County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47071,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hardin,Hardin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47071,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hardin,Hardin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47071,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hardin,Hardin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47071,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hardin,Hardin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47071,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hardin,Hardin County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,26800,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47071,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hardin,Hardin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,25114,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47071,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hardin,Hardin County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,17245,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47071,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hardin,Hardin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47071,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hardin,Hardin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7869,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47071,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hardin,Hardin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,68.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47071,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hardin,Hardin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47071,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hardin,Hardin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,31.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47071,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hardin,Hardin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47071,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hardin,Hardin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,3.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47071,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hardin,Hardin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,65.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47071,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hardin,Hardin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,869,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47071,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hardin,Hardin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,16376,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47071,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hawkins,Hawkins County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47073,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hawkins,Hawkins County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47073,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hawkins,Hawkins County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47073,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hawkins,Hawkins County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47073,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hawkins,Hawkins County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47073,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hawkins,Hawkins County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,56669,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47073,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hawkins,Hawkins County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,39630,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47073,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hawkins,Hawkins County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,28918,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47073,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hawkins,Hawkins County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47073,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hawkins,Hawkins County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10713,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47073,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hawkins,Hawkins County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,73,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47073,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hawkins,Hawkins County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47073,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hawkins,Hawkins County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,27,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47073,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hawkins,Hawkins County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47073,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hawkins,Hawkins County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,1.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47073,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hawkins,Hawkins County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,71.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47073,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hawkins,Hawkins County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,451,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47073,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hawkins,Hawkins County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,28467,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47073,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Haywood,Haywood County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47075,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Haywood,Haywood County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47075,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Haywood,Haywood County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47075,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Haywood,Haywood County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47075,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Haywood,Haywood County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47075,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Haywood,Haywood County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,17795,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47075,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Haywood,Haywood County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,13516,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47075,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Haywood,Haywood County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,12927,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47075,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Haywood,Haywood County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47075,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Haywood,Haywood County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,589,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47075,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Haywood,Haywood County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,95.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47075,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Haywood,Haywood County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47075,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Haywood,Haywood County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,4.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47075,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Haywood,Haywood County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47075,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Haywood,Haywood County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,8.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47075,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Haywood,Haywood County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,86.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47075,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Haywood,Haywood County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1193,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47075,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Haywood,Haywood County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,11734,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47075,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Henderson,Henderson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47077,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Henderson,Henderson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47077,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Henderson,Henderson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47077,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Henderson,Henderson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47077,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Henderson,Henderson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47077,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Henderson,Henderson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,27818,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47077,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Henderson,Henderson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,26351,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47077,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Henderson,Henderson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,21510,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47077,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Henderson,Henderson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47077,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Henderson,Henderson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4841,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47077,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Henderson,Henderson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,81.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47077,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Henderson,Henderson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47077,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Henderson,Henderson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,18.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47077,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Henderson,Henderson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47077,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Henderson,Henderson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47077,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Henderson,Henderson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,81.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47077,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Henderson,Henderson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47077,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Henderson,Henderson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,21510,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47077,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47079,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47079,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47079,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47079,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47079,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,32115,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47079,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,19659,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47079,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,14913,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47079,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47079,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4747,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47079,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,75.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47079,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47079,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,24.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47079,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47079,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,14.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47079,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,61.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47079,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2801,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47079,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,12111,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47079,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hickman,Hickman County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47081,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hickman,Hickman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47081,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hickman,Hickman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47081,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hickman,Hickman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47081,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hickman,Hickman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47081,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hickman,Hickman County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,24942,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47081,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hickman,Hickman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,19362,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47081,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hickman,Hickman County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,17998,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47081,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hickman,Hickman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47081,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hickman,Hickman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1364,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47081,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hickman,Hickman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,93,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47081,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hickman,Hickman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47081,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hickman,Hickman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47081,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hickman,Hickman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47081,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hickman,Hickman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47081,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hickman,Hickman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,93,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47081,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hickman,Hickman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47081,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Hickman,Hickman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,17998,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47081,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Houston,Houston County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47083,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Houston,Houston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47083,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Houston,Houston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47083,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Houston,Houston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47083,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Houston,Houston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47083,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Houston,Houston County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,8285,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47083,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Houston,Houston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9482,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47083,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Houston,Houston County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6376,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47083,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Houston,Houston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47083,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Houston,Houston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3106,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47083,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Houston,Houston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,67.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47083,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Houston,Houston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47083,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Houston,Houston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,32.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47083,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Houston,Houston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47083,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Houston,Houston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47083,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Houston,Houston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,67.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47083,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Houston,Houston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47083,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Houston,Houston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,6376,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47083,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Humphreys,Humphreys County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47085,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Humphreys,Humphreys County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47085,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Humphreys,Humphreys County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47085,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Humphreys,Humphreys County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47085,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Humphreys,Humphreys County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47085,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Humphreys,Humphreys County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,18974,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47085,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Humphreys,Humphreys County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,11969,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47085,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Humphreys,Humphreys County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7234,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47085,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Humphreys,Humphreys County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47085,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Humphreys,Humphreys County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4734,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47085,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Humphreys,Humphreys County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,60.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47085,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Humphreys,Humphreys County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47085,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Humphreys,Humphreys County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,39.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47085,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Humphreys,Humphreys County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47085,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Humphreys,Humphreys County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47085,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Humphreys,Humphreys County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,60.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47085,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Humphreys,Humphreys County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47085,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Humphreys,Humphreys County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,7234,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47085,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47087,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47087,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47087,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47087,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47087,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,11617,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47087,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,8960,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47087,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2948,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47087,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47087,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6012,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47087,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,32.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47087,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47087,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,67.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47087,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47087,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,32.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47087,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47087,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2948,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47087,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47087,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47089,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47089,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47089,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47089,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47089,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,54870,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47089,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,42994,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47089,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,39590,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47089,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47089,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3404,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47089,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,92.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47089,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47089,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,7.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47089,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47089,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,72.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47089,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,19.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47089,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,31335,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47089,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,8255,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47089,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47091,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47091,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47091,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47091,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47091,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,17966,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47091,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,12321,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47091,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10084,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47091,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47091,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2237,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47091,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,81.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47091,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47091,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,18.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47091,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47091,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,2.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47091,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,79.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47091,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,287,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47091,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,9797,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47091,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47093,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47093,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47093,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47093,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47093,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,480126,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47093,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,461363,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47093,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,461363,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47093,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47093,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47093,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47093,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47093,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47093,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47093,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47093,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47093,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47093,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,461363,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47093,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47095,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47095,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47095,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47095,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47095,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,6980,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47095,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4381,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47095,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1769,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47095,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47095,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2612,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47095,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,40.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47095,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47095,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,59.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47095,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47095,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47095,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,40.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47095,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47095,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Lake,Lake County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1769,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47095,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Lauderdale,Lauderdale County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47097,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Lauderdale,Lauderdale County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47097,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Lauderdale,Lauderdale County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47097,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Lauderdale,Lauderdale County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47097,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Lauderdale,Lauderdale County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47097,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Lauderdale,Lauderdale County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,25100,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47097,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Lauderdale,Lauderdale County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,28167,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47097,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Lauderdale,Lauderdale County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,14449,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47097,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Lauderdale,Lauderdale County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47097,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Lauderdale,Lauderdale County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,13718,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47097,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Lauderdale,Lauderdale County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,51.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47097,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Lauderdale,Lauderdale County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47097,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Lauderdale,Lauderdale County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,48.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47097,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Lauderdale,Lauderdale County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47097,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Lauderdale,Lauderdale County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47097,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Lauderdale,Lauderdale County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,51.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47097,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Lauderdale,Lauderdale County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47097,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Lauderdale,Lauderdale County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,14449,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47097,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47099,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47099,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47099,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47099,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47099,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,44189,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47099,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,35862,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47099,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47099,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47099,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,35862,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47099,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47099,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47099,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47099,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47099,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47099,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47099,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47099,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Lawrence,Lawrence County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47099,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Lewis,Lewis County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47101,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Lewis,Lewis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47101,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Lewis,Lewis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47101,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Lewis,Lewis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47101,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Lewis,Lewis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47101,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Lewis,Lewis County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,12602,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47101,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Lewis,Lewis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9714,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47101,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Lewis,Lewis County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47101,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Lewis,Lewis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47101,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Lewis,Lewis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9714,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47101,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Lewis,Lewis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47101,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Lewis,Lewis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47101,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Lewis,Lewis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47101,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Lewis,Lewis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47101,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Lewis,Lewis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47101,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Lewis,Lewis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47101,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Lewis,Lewis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47101,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Lewis,Lewis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47101,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47103,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47103,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47103,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47103,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47103,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,35309,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47103,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,33242,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47103,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,13812,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47103,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47103,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,19431,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47103,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,41.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47103,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47103,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,58.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47103,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47103,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,8.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47103,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,33.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47103,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2721,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47103,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,11091,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47103,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Loudon,Loudon County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47105,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Loudon,Loudon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47105,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Loudon,Loudon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47105,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Loudon,Loudon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47105,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Loudon,Loudon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47105,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Loudon,Loudon County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,55097,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47105,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Loudon,Loudon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,53180,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47105,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Loudon,Loudon County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,53180,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47105,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Loudon,Loudon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47105,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Loudon,Loudon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47105,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Loudon,Loudon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47105,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Loudon,Loudon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47105,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Loudon,Loudon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47105,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Loudon,Loudon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47105,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Loudon,Loudon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,26.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47105,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Loudon,Loudon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,73.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47105,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Loudon,Loudon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,14061,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47105,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Loudon,Loudon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,39119,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47105,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47111,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47111,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47111,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47111,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47111,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,25243,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47111,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,21858,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47111,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47111,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47111,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,21858,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47111,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47111,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47111,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47111,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47111,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47111,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47111,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47111,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Macon,Macon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47111,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47113,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47113,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47113,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47113,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47113,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,98777,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47113,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,83850,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47113,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,83604,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47113,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47113,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,246,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47113,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47113,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47113,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47113,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47113,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47113,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,99.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47113,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47113,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,83604,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47113,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47115,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47115,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47115,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47115,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47115,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,28834,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47115,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,22342,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47115,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,22297,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47115,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47115,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,46,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47115,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47115,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47115,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47115,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47115,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,4.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47115,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,95.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47115,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,921,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47115,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,21376,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47115,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47117,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47117,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47117,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47117,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47117,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,34441,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47117,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,28357,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47117,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47117,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47117,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,28357,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47117,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47117,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47117,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47117,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47117,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47117,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47117,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47117,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47117,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Maury,Maury County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47119,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Maury,Maury County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47119,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Maury,Maury County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47119,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Maury,Maury County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47119,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Maury,Maury County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47119,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Maury,Maury County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,101700,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47119,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Maury,Maury County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,119658,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47119,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Maury,Maury County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47119,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Maury,Maury County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47119,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Maury,Maury County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,119658,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47119,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Maury,Maury County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47119,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Maury,Maury County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47119,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Maury,Maury County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47119,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Maury,Maury County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47119,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Maury,Maury County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47119,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Maury,Maury County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47119,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Maury,Maury County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47119,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Maury,Maury County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47119,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,McMinn,McMinn County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47107,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,McMinn,McMinn County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47107,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,McMinn,McMinn County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47107,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,McMinn,McMinn County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47107,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,McMinn,McMinn County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47107,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,McMinn,McMinn County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,53315,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47107,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,McMinn,McMinn County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,44483,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47107,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,McMinn,McMinn County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,44483,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47107,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,McMinn,McMinn County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47107,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,McMinn,McMinn County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47107,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,McMinn,McMinn County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47107,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,McMinn,McMinn County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47107,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,McMinn,McMinn County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47107,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,McMinn,McMinn County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47107,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,McMinn,McMinn County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,19.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47107,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,McMinn,McMinn County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,80.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47107,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,McMinn,McMinn County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,8569,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47107,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,McMinn,McMinn County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,35914,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47107,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,McNairy,McNairy County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47109,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,McNairy,McNairy County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47109,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,McNairy,McNairy County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47109,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,McNairy,McNairy County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47109,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,McNairy,McNairy County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47109,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,McNairy,McNairy County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,25839,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47109,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,McNairy,McNairy County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,30005,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47109,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,McNairy,McNairy County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47109,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,McNairy,McNairy County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47109,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,McNairy,McNairy County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,30005,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47109,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,McNairy,McNairy County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47109,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,McNairy,McNairy County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47109,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,McNairy,McNairy County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47109,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,McNairy,McNairy County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47109,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,McNairy,McNairy County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47109,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,McNairy,McNairy County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47109,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,McNairy,McNairy County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47109,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,McNairy,McNairy County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47109,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Meigs,Meigs County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47121,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Meigs,Meigs County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47121,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Meigs,Meigs County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47121,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Meigs,Meigs County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47121,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Meigs,Meigs County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47121,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Meigs,Meigs County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,12785,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47121,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Meigs,Meigs County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5232,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47121,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Meigs,Meigs County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5232,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47121,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Meigs,Meigs County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47121,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Meigs,Meigs County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47121,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Meigs,Meigs County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47121,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Meigs,Meigs County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47121,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Meigs,Meigs County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47121,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Meigs,Meigs County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47121,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Meigs,Meigs County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47121,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Meigs,Meigs County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47121,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Meigs,Meigs County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47121,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Meigs,Meigs County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,5232,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47121,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47123,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47123,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47123,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47123,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47123,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,46384,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47123,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,40334,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47123,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,34549,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47123,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47123,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5785,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47123,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,85.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47123,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47123,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,14.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47123,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47123,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,31.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47123,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,54.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47123,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,12630,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47123,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,21920,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47123,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47125,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47125,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47125,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47125,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47125,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,221160,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47125,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,248118,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47125,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,232370,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47125,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47125,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,15748,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47125,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,93.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47125,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47125,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,6.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47125,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47125,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47125,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,93.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47125,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47125,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,232370,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47125,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Moore,Moore County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47127,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Moore,Moore County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47127,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Moore,Moore County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47127,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Moore,Moore County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47127,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Moore,Moore County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47127,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Moore,Moore County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,6457,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47127,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Moore,Moore County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5766,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47127,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Moore,Moore County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5766,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47127,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Moore,Moore County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47127,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Moore,Moore County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47127,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Moore,Moore County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47127,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Moore,Moore County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47127,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Moore,Moore County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47127,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Moore,Moore County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47127,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Moore,Moore County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,3.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47127,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Moore,Moore County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,96.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47127,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Moore,Moore County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,211,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47127,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Moore,Moore County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,5555,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47127,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47129,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47129,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47129,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47129,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47129,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,21020,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47129,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,11593,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47129,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11593,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47129,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47129,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47129,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47129,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47129,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47129,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47129,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47129,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,98,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47129,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,228,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47129,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,11365,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47129,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Obion,Obion County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47131,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Obion,Obion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47131,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Obion,Obion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47131,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Obion,Obion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47131,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Obion,Obion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47131,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Obion,Obion County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,30716,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47131,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Obion,Obion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,27878,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47131,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Obion,Obion County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,22490,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47131,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Obion,Obion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47131,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Obion,Obion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5388,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47131,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Obion,Obion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,80.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47131,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Obion,Obion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47131,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Obion,Obion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,19.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47131,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Obion,Obion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47131,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Obion,Obion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,6.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47131,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Obion,Obion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,74.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47131,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Obion,Obion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1845,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47131,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Obion,Obion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,20644,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47131,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Overton,Overton County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47133,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Overton,Overton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47133,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Overton,Overton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47133,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Overton,Overton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47133,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Overton,Overton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47133,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Overton,Overton County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,22588,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47133,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Overton,Overton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,26716,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47133,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Overton,Overton County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,23902,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47133,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Overton,Overton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47133,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Overton,Overton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2814,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47133,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Overton,Overton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,89.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47133,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Overton,Overton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47133,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Overton,Overton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,10.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47133,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Overton,Overton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47133,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Overton,Overton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,42.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47133,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Overton,Overton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,47.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47133,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Overton,Overton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,11306,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47133,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Overton,Overton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,12596,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47133,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47135,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47135,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47135,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47135,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47135,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,8360,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47135,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,8183,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47135,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8183,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47135,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47135,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47135,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47135,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47135,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47135,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47135,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47135,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47135,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47135,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Perry,Perry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,8183,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47135,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Pickett,Pickett County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47137,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Pickett,Pickett County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47137,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Pickett,Pickett County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47137,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Pickett,Pickett County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47137,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Pickett,Pickett County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47137,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Pickett,Pickett County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,4995,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47137,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Pickett,Pickett County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5129,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47137,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Pickett,Pickett County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5129,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47137,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Pickett,Pickett County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47137,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Pickett,Pickett County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47137,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Pickett,Pickett County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47137,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Pickett,Pickett County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47137,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Pickett,Pickett County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47137,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Pickett,Pickett County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47137,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Pickett,Pickett County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47137,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Pickett,Pickett County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47137,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Pickett,Pickett County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47137,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Pickett,Pickett County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,5129,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47137,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47139,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47139,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47139,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47139,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47139,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,17569,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47139,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,6164,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47139,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47139,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47139,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6164,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47139,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47139,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47139,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47139,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47139,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47139,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47139,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47139,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47139,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47141,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47141,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47141,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47141,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47141,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,79982,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47141,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,85446,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47141,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,81404,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47141,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47141,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4043,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47141,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,95.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47141,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47141,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,4.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47141,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47141,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,45,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47141,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,50.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47141,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,38438,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47141,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,42966,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47141,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Rhea,Rhea County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47143,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Rhea,Rhea County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47143,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Rhea,Rhea County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47143,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Rhea,Rhea County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47143,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Rhea,Rhea County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47143,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Rhea,Rhea County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,32903,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47143,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Rhea,Rhea County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,43270,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47143,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Rhea,Rhea County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,29615,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47143,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Rhea,Rhea County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47143,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Rhea,Rhea County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,13655,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47143,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Rhea,Rhea County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,68.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47143,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Rhea,Rhea County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47143,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Rhea,Rhea County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,31.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47143,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Rhea,Rhea County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47143,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Rhea,Rhea County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,9.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47143,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Rhea,Rhea County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,58.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47143,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Rhea,Rhea County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,4258,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47143,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Rhea,Rhea County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,25357,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47143,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Roane,Roane County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47145,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Roane,Roane County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47145,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Roane,Roane County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47145,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Roane,Roane County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47145,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Roane,Roane County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47145,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Roane,Roane County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,53513,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47145,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Roane,Roane County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,56880,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47145,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Roane,Roane County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,52212,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47145,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Roane,Roane County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47145,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Roane,Roane County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4668,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47145,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Roane,Roane County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,91.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47145,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Roane,Roane County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47145,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Roane,Roane County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,8.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47145,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Roane,Roane County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47145,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Roane,Roane County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,14.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47145,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Roane,Roane County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,77,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47145,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Roane,Roane County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,8429,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47145,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Roane,Roane County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,43782,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47145,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Robertson,Robertson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47147,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Robertson,Robertson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47147,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Robertson,Robertson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47147,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Robertson,Robertson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47147,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Robertson,Robertson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47147,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Robertson,Robertson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,72860,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47147,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Robertson,Robertson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,47675,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47147,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Robertson,Robertson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,42928,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47147,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Robertson,Robertson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47147,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Robertson,Robertson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4747,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47147,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Robertson,Robertson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,90,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47147,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Robertson,Robertson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47147,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Robertson,Robertson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,10,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47147,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Robertson,Robertson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47147,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Robertson,Robertson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,15.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47147,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Robertson,Robertson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,74.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47147,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Robertson,Robertson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,7459,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47147,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Robertson,Robertson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,35469,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47147,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Rutherford,Rutherford County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47149,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Rutherford,Rutherford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47149,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Rutherford,Rutherford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47149,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Rutherford,Rutherford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47149,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Rutherford,Rutherford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47149,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Rutherford,Rutherford County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,343128,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47149,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Rutherford,Rutherford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,316577,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47149,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Rutherford,Rutherford County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,316577,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47149,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Rutherford,Rutherford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47149,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Rutherford,Rutherford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47149,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Rutherford,Rutherford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47149,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Rutherford,Rutherford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47149,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Rutherford,Rutherford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47149,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Rutherford,Rutherford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47149,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Rutherford,Rutherford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47149,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Rutherford,Rutherford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47149,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Rutherford,Rutherford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47149,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Rutherford,Rutherford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,316577,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47149,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47151,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47151,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47151,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47151,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47151,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,21842,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47151,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,21243,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47151,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,21243,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47151,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47151,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47151,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47151,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47151,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47151,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47151,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47151,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47151,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47151,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,21243,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47151,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Sequatchie,Sequatchie County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47153,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Sequatchie,Sequatchie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47153,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Sequatchie,Sequatchie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47153,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Sequatchie,Sequatchie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47153,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Sequatchie,Sequatchie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47153,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Sequatchie,Sequatchie County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,15863,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47153,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Sequatchie,Sequatchie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,8942,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47153,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Sequatchie,Sequatchie County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8942,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47153,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Sequatchie,Sequatchie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47153,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Sequatchie,Sequatchie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47153,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Sequatchie,Sequatchie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47153,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Sequatchie,Sequatchie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47153,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Sequatchie,Sequatchie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47153,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Sequatchie,Sequatchie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47153,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Sequatchie,Sequatchie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,28.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47153,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Sequatchie,Sequatchie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,71.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47153,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Sequatchie,Sequatchie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2555,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47153,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Sequatchie,Sequatchie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,6387,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47153,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Sevier,Sevier County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47155,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Sevier,Sevier County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47155,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Sevier,Sevier County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47155,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Sevier,Sevier County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47155,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Sevier,Sevier County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47155,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Sevier,Sevier County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,98497,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47155,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Sevier,Sevier County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,57673,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47155,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Sevier,Sevier County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,52953,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47155,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Sevier,Sevier County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47155,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Sevier,Sevier County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4719,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47155,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Sevier,Sevier County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,91.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47155,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Sevier,Sevier County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47155,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Sevier,Sevier County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,8.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47155,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Sevier,Sevier County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47155,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Sevier,Sevier County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,9.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47155,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Sevier,Sevier County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,82.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47155,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Sevier,Sevier County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,5515,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47155,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Sevier,Sevier County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,47438,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47155,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47157,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47157,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47157,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47157,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47157,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,928644,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47157,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,750646,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47157,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,750646,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47157,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47157,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47157,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47157,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47157,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47157,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47157,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47157,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47157,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47157,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,750646,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47157,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Smith,Smith County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47159,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Smith,Smith County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47159,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Smith,Smith County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47159,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Smith,Smith County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47159,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Smith,Smith County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47159,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Smith,Smith County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,19939,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47159,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Smith,Smith County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,18374,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47159,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Smith,Smith County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,535,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47159,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Smith,Smith County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47159,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Smith,Smith County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,17839,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47159,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Smith,Smith County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47159,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Smith,Smith County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47159,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Smith,Smith County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,97.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47159,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Smith,Smith County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47159,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Smith,Smith County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,2.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47159,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Smith,Smith County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47159,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Smith,Smith County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,535,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47159,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Smith,Smith County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47159,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Stewart,Stewart County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47161,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Stewart,Stewart County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47161,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Stewart,Stewart County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47161,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Stewart,Stewart County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47161,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Stewart,Stewart County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47161,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Stewart,Stewart County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,13683,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47161,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Stewart,Stewart County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,10556,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47161,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Stewart,Stewart County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9801,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47161,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Stewart,Stewart County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47161,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Stewart,Stewart County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,755,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47161,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Stewart,Stewart County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,92.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47161,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Stewart,Stewart County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47161,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Stewart,Stewart County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,7.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47161,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Stewart,Stewart County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47161,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Stewart,Stewart County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,8.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47161,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Stewart,Stewart County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,83.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47161,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Stewart,Stewart County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,943,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47161,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Stewart,Stewart County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,8858,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47161,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Sullivan,Sullivan County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47163,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Sullivan,Sullivan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47163,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Sullivan,Sullivan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47163,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Sullivan,Sullivan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47163,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Sullivan,Sullivan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47163,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Sullivan,Sullivan County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,158092,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47163,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Sullivan,Sullivan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,151668,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47163,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Sullivan,Sullivan County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,143765,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47163,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Sullivan,Sullivan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47163,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Sullivan,Sullivan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7903,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47163,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Sullivan,Sullivan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,94.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47163,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Sullivan,Sullivan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47163,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Sullivan,Sullivan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,5.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47163,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Sullivan,Sullivan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47163,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Sullivan,Sullivan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,5.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47163,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Sullivan,Sullivan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,89.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47163,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Sullivan,Sullivan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,8222,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47163,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Sullivan,Sullivan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,135543,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47163,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Sumner,Sumner County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47165,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Sumner,Sumner County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47165,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Sumner,Sumner County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47165,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Sumner,Sumner County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47165,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Sumner,Sumner County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47165,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Sumner,Sumner County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,197272,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47165,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Sumner,Sumner County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,214243,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47165,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Sumner,Sumner County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,214243,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47165,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Sumner,Sumner County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47165,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Sumner,Sumner County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47165,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Sumner,Sumner County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47165,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Sumner,Sumner County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47165,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Sumner,Sumner County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47165,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Sumner,Sumner County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47165,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Sumner,Sumner County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,6.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47165,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Sumner,Sumner County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,93.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47165,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Sumner,Sumner County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,14698,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47165,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Sumner,Sumner County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,199544,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47165,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Tipton,Tipton County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47167,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Tipton,Tipton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47167,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Tipton,Tipton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47167,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Tipton,Tipton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47167,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Tipton,Tipton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47167,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Tipton,Tipton County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,60961,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47167,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Tipton,Tipton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,59240,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47167,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Tipton,Tipton County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,32390,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47167,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Tipton,Tipton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47167,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Tipton,Tipton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,26850,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47167,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Tipton,Tipton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,54.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47167,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Tipton,Tipton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47167,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Tipton,Tipton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,45.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47167,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Tipton,Tipton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47167,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Tipton,Tipton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,13.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47167,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Tipton,Tipton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,40.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47167,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Tipton,Tipton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,8173,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47167,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Tipton,Tipton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,24217,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47167,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,TN,Tennessee,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,462,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,TN,TN,Tennessee,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,277,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,TN,TN,Tennessee,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,178,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,TN,TN,Tennessee,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,99,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,TN,TN,Tennessee,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,TN,TN,Tennessee,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,6920119,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2020,TN,TN,Tennessee,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,6296831,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,TN,TN,Tennessee,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5592155,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,TN,TN,Tennessee,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,TN,TN,Tennessee,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,704676,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,TN,TN,Tennessee,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,88.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,TN,TN,Tennessee,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,TN,TN,Tennessee,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,11.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,TN,TN,Tennessee,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,185,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,TN,TN,Tennessee,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,8.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,TN,TN,Tennessee,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,80,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,TN,TN,Tennessee,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,556216,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,TN,TN,Tennessee,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,5035939,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,TN,Trousdale,Trousdale County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47169,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Trousdale,Trousdale County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47169,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Trousdale,Trousdale County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47169,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Trousdale,Trousdale County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47169,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Trousdale,Trousdale County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47169,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Trousdale,Trousdale County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,11661,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47169,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Trousdale,Trousdale County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7132,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47169,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Trousdale,Trousdale County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7132,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47169,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Trousdale,Trousdale County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47169,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Trousdale,Trousdale County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47169,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Trousdale,Trousdale County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47169,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Trousdale,Trousdale County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47169,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Trousdale,Trousdale County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47169,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Trousdale,Trousdale County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47169,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Trousdale,Trousdale County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47169,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Trousdale,Trousdale County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47169,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Trousdale,Trousdale County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47169,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Trousdale,Trousdale County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,7132,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47169,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Unicoi,Unicoi County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47171,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Unicoi,Unicoi County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47171,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Unicoi,Unicoi County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47171,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Unicoi,Unicoi County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47171,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Unicoi,Unicoi County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47171,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Unicoi,Unicoi County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,17867,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47171,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Unicoi,Unicoi County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,19552,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47171,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Unicoi,Unicoi County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,19552,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47171,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Unicoi,Unicoi County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47171,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Unicoi,Unicoi County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47171,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Unicoi,Unicoi County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47171,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Unicoi,Unicoi County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47171,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Unicoi,Unicoi County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47171,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Unicoi,Unicoi County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47171,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Unicoi,Unicoi County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,19.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47171,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Unicoi,Unicoi County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,80.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47171,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Unicoi,Unicoi County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,3812,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47171,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Unicoi,Unicoi County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,15740,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47171,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47173,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47173,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47173,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47173,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47173,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,19820,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47173,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,14247,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47173,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,14247,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47173,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47173,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47173,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47173,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47173,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47173,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47173,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,2.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47173,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,97.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47173,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,297,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47173,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Union,Union County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,13951,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47173,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Van Buren,Van Buren County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47175,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Van Buren,Van Buren County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47175,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Van Buren,Van Buren County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47175,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Van Buren,Van Buren County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47175,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Van Buren,Van Buren County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47175,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Van Buren,Van Buren County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,6171,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47175,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Van Buren,Van Buren County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,8792,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47175,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Van Buren,Van Buren County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4645,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47175,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Van Buren,Van Buren County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47175,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Van Buren,Van Buren County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4147,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47175,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Van Buren,Van Buren County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,52.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47175,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Van Buren,Van Buren County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47175,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Van Buren,Van Buren County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,47.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47175,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Van Buren,Van Buren County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47175,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Van Buren,Van Buren County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47175,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Van Buren,Van Buren County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,52.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47175,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Van Buren,Van Buren County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47175,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Van Buren,Van Buren County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,4645,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47175,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47177,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47177,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47177,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47177,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47177,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,41023,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47177,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,49931,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47177,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,49931,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47177,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47177,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47177,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47177,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47177,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47177,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47177,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47177,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47177,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47177,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,49931,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47177,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47179,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47179,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47179,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47179,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47179,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,133080,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47179,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,117876,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47179,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,117876,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47179,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47179,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47179,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47179,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47179,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47179,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47179,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47179,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47179,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47179,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,117876,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47179,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47181,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47181,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47181,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47181,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47181,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,16202,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47181,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9106,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47181,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3608,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47181,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47181,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5499,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47181,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,39.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47181,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47181,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,60.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47181,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47181,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47181,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,38.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47181,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,78,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47181,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3530,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47181,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Weakley,Weakley County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47183,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Weakley,Weakley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47183,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Weakley,Weakley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47183,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Weakley,Weakley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47183,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Weakley,Weakley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47183,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Weakley,Weakley County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,32864,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47183,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Weakley,Weakley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,17796,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47183,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Weakley,Weakley County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,15645,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47183,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Weakley,Weakley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47183,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Weakley,Weakley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2151,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47183,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Weakley,Weakley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,87.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47183,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Weakley,Weakley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47183,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Weakley,Weakley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,12.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47183,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Weakley,Weakley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47183,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Weakley,Weakley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47183,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Weakley,Weakley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,87.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47183,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Weakley,Weakley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,47183,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Weakley,Weakley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,15645,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47183,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,White,White County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47185,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,White,White County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47185,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,White,White County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47185,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,White,White County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47185,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,White,White County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47185,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,White,White County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,27424,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47185,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,White,White County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,30836,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47185,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,White,White County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,27450,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47185,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,White,White County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47185,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,White,White County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3386,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47185,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,White,White County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,89,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47185,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,White,White County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47185,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,White,White County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,11,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47185,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,White,White County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47185,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,White,White County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,59.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47185,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,White,White County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,29.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47185,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,White,White County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,18379,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47185,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,White,White County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,9071,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47185,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Williamson,Williamson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47187,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Williamson,Williamson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47187,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Williamson,Williamson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47187,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Williamson,Williamson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47187,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Williamson,Williamson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47187,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Williamson,Williamson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,249424,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47187,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Williamson,Williamson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,177824,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47187,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Williamson,Williamson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,151904,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47187,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Williamson,Williamson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47187,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Williamson,Williamson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,25920,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47187,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Williamson,Williamson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,85.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47187,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Williamson,Williamson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47187,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Williamson,Williamson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,14.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47187,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Williamson,Williamson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47187,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Williamson,Williamson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,40.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47187,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Williamson,Williamson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,45.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47187,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Williamson,Williamson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,71324,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47187,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Williamson,Williamson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,80580,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47187,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Wilson,Wilson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47189,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Wilson,Wilson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47189,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Wilson,Wilson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47189,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Wilson,Wilson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47189,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Wilson,Wilson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47189,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Wilson,Wilson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,148564,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47189,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Wilson,Wilson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,147142,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47189,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Wilson,Wilson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,101078,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47189,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Wilson,Wilson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47189,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Wilson,Wilson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,46064,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47189,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Wilson,Wilson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,68.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47189,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Wilson,Wilson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47189,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Wilson,Wilson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,31.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47189,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Wilson,Wilson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47189,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Wilson,Wilson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,12.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47189,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Wilson,Wilson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,56,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47189,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Wilson,Wilson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,18694,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47189,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TN,Wilson,Wilson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,82384,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47189,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Anderson,Anderson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,28,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48001,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Anderson,Anderson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48001,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Anderson,Anderson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48001,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Anderson,Anderson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48001,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Anderson,Anderson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48001,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Anderson,Anderson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,57881,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48001,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Anderson,Anderson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,76400,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48001,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Anderson,Anderson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,34286,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48001,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Anderson,Anderson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,6753,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48001,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Anderson,Anderson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,42114,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48001,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Anderson,Anderson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,44.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48001,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Anderson,Anderson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,8.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48001,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Anderson,Anderson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,55.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48001,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Anderson,Anderson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,21,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48001,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Anderson,Anderson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,1.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48001,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Anderson,Anderson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,34.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48001,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Anderson,Anderson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1347,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48001,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Anderson,Anderson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,26186,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48001,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Andrews,Andrews County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48003,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Andrews,Andrews County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48003,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Andrews,Andrews County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48003,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Andrews,Andrews County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48003,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Andrews,Andrews County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48003,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Andrews,Andrews County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,18612,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48003,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Andrews,Andrews County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,13446,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48003,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Andrews,Andrews County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,13446,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48003,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Andrews,Andrews County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,13446,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48003,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Andrews,Andrews County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48003,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Andrews,Andrews County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48003,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Andrews,Andrews County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48003,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Andrews,Andrews County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48003,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Andrews,Andrews County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48003,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Andrews,Andrews County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48003,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Andrews,Andrews County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48003,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Andrews,Andrews County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48003,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Andrews,Andrews County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48003,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Angelina,Angelina County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,26,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48005,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Angelina,Angelina County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48005,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Angelina,Angelina County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48005,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Angelina,Angelina County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48005,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Angelina,Angelina County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48005,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Angelina,Angelina County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,86345,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48005,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Angelina,Angelina County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,88470,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48005,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Angelina,Angelina County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,58696,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48005,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Angelina,Angelina County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,58696,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48005,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Angelina,Angelina County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,29774,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48005,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Angelina,Angelina County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,66.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48005,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Angelina,Angelina County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,66.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48005,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Angelina,Angelina County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,33.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48005,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Angelina,Angelina County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48005,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Angelina,Angelina County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,13.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48005,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Angelina,Angelina County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48005,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Angelina,Angelina County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,11955,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48005,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Angelina,Angelina County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48005,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Aransas,Aransas County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48007,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Aransas,Aransas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48007,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Aransas,Aransas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48007,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Aransas,Aransas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48007,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Aransas,Aransas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48007,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Aransas,Aransas County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,23916,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48007,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Aransas,Aransas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,32705,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48007,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Aransas,Aransas County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,32085,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48007,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Aransas,Aransas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,3770,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48007,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Aransas,Aransas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,619,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48007,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Aransas,Aransas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48007,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Aransas,Aransas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,11.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48007,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Aransas,Aransas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48007,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Aransas,Aransas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48007,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Aransas,Aransas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,86.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48007,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Aransas,Aransas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48007,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Aransas,Aransas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,28315,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48007,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Aransas,Aransas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48007,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Archer,Archer County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48009,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Archer,Archer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48009,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Archer,Archer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48009,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Archer,Archer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48009,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Archer,Archer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48009,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Archer,Archer County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,8557,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48009,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Archer,Archer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,8166,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48009,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Archer,Archer County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6227,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48009,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Archer,Archer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48009,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Archer,Archer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1939,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48009,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Archer,Archer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,76.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48009,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Archer,Archer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48009,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Archer,Archer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,23.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48009,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Archer,Archer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48009,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Archer,Archer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,57.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48009,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Archer,Archer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,18.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48009,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Archer,Archer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,4697,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48009,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Archer,Archer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1530,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48009,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Armstrong,Armstrong County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48011,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Armstrong,Armstrong County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48011,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Armstrong,Armstrong County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48011,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Armstrong,Armstrong County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48011,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Armstrong,Armstrong County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48011,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Armstrong,Armstrong County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,1847,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48011,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Armstrong,Armstrong County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1274,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48011,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Armstrong,Armstrong County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1274,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48011,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Armstrong,Armstrong County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1274,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48011,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Armstrong,Armstrong County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48011,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Armstrong,Armstrong County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48011,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Armstrong,Armstrong County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48011,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Armstrong,Armstrong County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48011,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Armstrong,Armstrong County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48011,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Armstrong,Armstrong County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48011,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Armstrong,Armstrong County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48011,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Armstrong,Armstrong County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48011,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Armstrong,Armstrong County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48011,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Atascosa,Atascosa County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48013,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Atascosa,Atascosa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48013,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Atascosa,Atascosa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48013,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Atascosa,Atascosa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48013,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Atascosa,Atascosa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48013,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Atascosa,Atascosa County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,49089,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48013,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Atascosa,Atascosa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,36365,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48013,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Atascosa,Atascosa County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4594,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48013,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Atascosa,Atascosa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,4594,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48013,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Atascosa,Atascosa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,31771,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48013,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Atascosa,Atascosa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,12.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48013,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Atascosa,Atascosa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,12.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48013,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Atascosa,Atascosa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,87.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48013,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Atascosa,Atascosa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48013,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Atascosa,Atascosa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48013,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Atascosa,Atascosa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48013,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Atascosa,Atascosa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48013,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Atascosa,Atascosa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48013,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Austin,Austin County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48015,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Austin,Austin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48015,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Austin,Austin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48015,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Austin,Austin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48015,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Austin,Austin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48015,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Austin,Austin County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,30109,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48015,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Austin,Austin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,17685,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48015,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Austin,Austin County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1118,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48015,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Austin,Austin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1118,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48015,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Austin,Austin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,16567,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48015,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Austin,Austin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,6.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48015,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Austin,Austin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,6.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48015,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Austin,Austin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,93.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48015,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Austin,Austin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48015,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Austin,Austin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48015,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Austin,Austin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48015,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Austin,Austin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48015,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Austin,Austin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48015,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bailey,Bailey County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48017,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bailey,Bailey County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48017,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bailey,Bailey County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48017,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bailey,Bailey County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48017,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bailey,Bailey County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48017,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bailey,Bailey County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,6859,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48017,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bailey,Bailey County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4963,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48017,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bailey,Bailey County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,48,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48017,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bailey,Bailey County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,48,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48017,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bailey,Bailey County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4916,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48017,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bailey,Bailey County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48017,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bailey,Bailey County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48017,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bailey,Bailey County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48017,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bailey,Bailey County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48017,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bailey,Bailey County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48017,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bailey,Bailey County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48017,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bailey,Bailey County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48017,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bailey,Bailey County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48017,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bandera,Bandera County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,21,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48019,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bandera,Bandera County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48019,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bandera,Bandera County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48019,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bandera,Bandera County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48019,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bandera,Bandera County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48019,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bandera,Bandera County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,20987,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48019,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bandera,Bandera County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,12368,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48019,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bandera,Bandera County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8118,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48019,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bandera,Bandera County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,8118,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48019,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bandera,Bandera County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4250,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48019,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bandera,Bandera County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,65.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48019,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bandera,Bandera County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,65.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48019,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bandera,Bandera County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,34.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48019,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bandera,Bandera County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48019,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bandera,Bandera County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48019,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bandera,Bandera County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48019,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bandera,Bandera County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48019,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bandera,Bandera County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48019,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bastrop,Bastrop County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48021,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bastrop,Bastrop County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48021,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bastrop,Bastrop County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48021,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bastrop,Bastrop County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48021,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bastrop,Bastrop County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48021,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bastrop,Bastrop County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,97983,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48021,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bastrop,Bastrop County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,85689,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48021,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bastrop,Bastrop County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,14985,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48021,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bastrop,Bastrop County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,5019,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48021,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bastrop,Bastrop County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,70703,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48021,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bastrop,Bastrop County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,17.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48021,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bastrop,Bastrop County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,5.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48021,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bastrop,Bastrop County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,82.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48021,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bastrop,Bastrop County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48021,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bastrop,Bastrop County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48021,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bastrop,Bastrop County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,10.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48021,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bastrop,Bastrop County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,859,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48021,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bastrop,Bastrop County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,9108,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48021,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Baylor,Baylor County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48023,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Baylor,Baylor County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48023,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Baylor,Baylor County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48023,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Baylor,Baylor County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48023,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Baylor,Baylor County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48023,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Baylor,Baylor County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,3464,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48023,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Baylor,Baylor County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4954,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48023,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Baylor,Baylor County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4954,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48023,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Baylor,Baylor County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,4954,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48023,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Baylor,Baylor County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48023,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Baylor,Baylor County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48023,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Baylor,Baylor County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48023,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Baylor,Baylor County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48023,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Baylor,Baylor County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48023,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Baylor,Baylor County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48023,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Baylor,Baylor County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48023,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Baylor,Baylor County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48023,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Baylor,Baylor County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48023,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bee,Bee County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48025,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bee,Bee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48025,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bee,Bee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48025,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bee,Bee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48025,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bee,Bee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48025,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bee,Bee County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,30990,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48025,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bee,Bee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,25333,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48025,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bee,Bee County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7482,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48025,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bee,Bee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,7482,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48025,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bee,Bee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,17851,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48025,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bee,Bee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,29.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48025,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bee,Bee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,29.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48025,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bee,Bee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,70.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48025,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bee,Bee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48025,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bee,Bee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48025,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bee,Bee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48025,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bee,Bee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48025,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bee,Bee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48025,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bell,Bell County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,29,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48027,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bell,Bell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48027,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bell,Bell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48027,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bell,Bell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48027,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bell,Bell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48027,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bell,Bell County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,371981,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48027,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bell,Bell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,371295,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48027,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bell,Bell County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48027,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bell,Bell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48027,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bell,Bell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,371295,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48027,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bell,Bell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48027,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bell,Bell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48027,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bell,Bell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48027,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bell,Bell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,29,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48027,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bell,Bell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48027,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bell,Bell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48027,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bell,Bell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48027,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bell,Bell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48027,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bexar,Bexar County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,75,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48029,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bexar,Bexar County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,23,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48029,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bexar,Bexar County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48029,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bexar,Bexar County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48029,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bexar,Bexar County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48029,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bexar,Bexar County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,2014052,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48029,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bexar,Bexar County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2221979,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48029,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bexar,Bexar County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2103455,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48029,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bexar,Bexar County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,18610,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48029,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bexar,Bexar County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,118524,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48029,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bexar,Bexar County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,94.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48029,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bexar,Bexar County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48029,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bexar,Bexar County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,5.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48029,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bexar,Bexar County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,52,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48029,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bexar,Bexar County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48029,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bexar,Bexar County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,93,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48029,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bexar,Bexar County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,19339,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48029,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bexar,Bexar County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2065507,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48029,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Blanco,Blanco County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48031,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Blanco,Blanco County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48031,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Blanco,Blanco County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48031,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Blanco,Blanco County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48031,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Blanco,Blanco County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48031,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Blanco,Blanco County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,11454,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48031,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Blanco,Blanco County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5666,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48031,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Blanco,Blanco County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5041,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48031,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Blanco,Blanco County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1998,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48031,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Blanco,Blanco County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,625,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48031,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Blanco,Blanco County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,89,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48031,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Blanco,Blanco County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,35.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48031,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Blanco,Blanco County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,11,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48031,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Blanco,Blanco County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48031,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Blanco,Blanco County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48031,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Blanco,Blanco County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,53.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48031,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Blanco,Blanco County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48031,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Blanco,Blanco County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3042,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48031,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Borden,Borden County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48033,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Borden,Borden County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48033,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Borden,Borden County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48033,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Borden,Borden County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48033,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Borden,Borden County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48033,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Borden,Borden County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,641,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48033,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Borden,Borden County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,286,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48033,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Borden,Borden County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,286,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48033,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Borden,Borden County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,286,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48033,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Borden,Borden County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48033,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Borden,Borden County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48033,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Borden,Borden County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48033,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Borden,Borden County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48033,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Borden,Borden County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48033,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Borden,Borden County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48033,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Borden,Borden County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48033,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Borden,Borden County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48033,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Borden,Borden County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48033,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bosque,Bosque County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,26,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48035,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bosque,Bosque County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48035,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bosque,Bosque County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48035,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bosque,Bosque County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48035,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bosque,Bosque County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48035,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bosque,Bosque County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,18239,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48035,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bosque,Bosque County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,17196,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48035,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bosque,Bosque County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2839,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48035,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bosque,Bosque County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,2839,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48035,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bosque,Bosque County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,14357,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48035,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bosque,Bosque County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,16.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48035,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bosque,Bosque County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,16.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48035,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bosque,Bosque County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,83.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48035,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bosque,Bosque County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,20,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48035,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bosque,Bosque County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48035,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bosque,Bosque County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48035,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bosque,Bosque County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48035,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bosque,Bosque County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48035,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bowie,Bowie County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,22,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48037,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bowie,Bowie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48037,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bowie,Bowie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48037,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bowie,Bowie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48037,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bowie,Bowie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48037,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bowie,Bowie County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,92792,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48037,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bowie,Bowie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,93341,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48037,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bowie,Bowie County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,289,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48037,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bowie,Bowie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,289,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48037,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bowie,Bowie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,93053,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48037,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bowie,Bowie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48037,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bowie,Bowie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48037,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bowie,Bowie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48037,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bowie,Bowie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,21,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48037,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bowie,Bowie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48037,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bowie,Bowie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48037,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bowie,Bowie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48037,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Bowie,Bowie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48037,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Brazoria,Brazoria County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,176,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48039,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Brazoria,Brazoria County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,123,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48039,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Brazoria,Brazoria County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48039,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Brazoria,Brazoria County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48039,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Brazoria,Brazoria County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,116,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48039,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Brazoria,Brazoria County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,373368,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48039,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Brazoria,Brazoria County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,329960,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48039,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Brazoria,Brazoria County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,255329,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48039,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Brazoria,Brazoria County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,87207,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48039,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Brazoria,Brazoria County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,74632,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48039,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Brazoria,Brazoria County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,77.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48039,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Brazoria,Brazoria County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,26.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48039,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Brazoria,Brazoria County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,22.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48039,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Brazoria,Brazoria County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,53,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48039,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Brazoria,Brazoria County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,5.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48039,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Brazoria,Brazoria County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,8.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48039,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Brazoria,Brazoria County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,19213,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48039,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Brazoria,Brazoria County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,27399,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48039,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Brazos,Brazos County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,19,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48041,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Brazos,Brazos County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48041,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Brazos,Brazos County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48041,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Brazos,Brazos County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48041,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Brazos,Brazos County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48041,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Brazos,Brazos County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,234480,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48041,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Brazos,Brazos County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,283696,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48041,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Brazos,Brazos County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,15574,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48041,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Brazos,Brazos County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,15574,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48041,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Brazos,Brazos County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,268122,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48041,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Brazos,Brazos County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,5.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48041,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Brazos,Brazos County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,5.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48041,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Brazos,Brazos County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,94.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48041,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Brazos,Brazos County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48041,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Brazos,Brazos County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48041,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Brazos,Brazos County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48041,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Brazos,Brazos County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48041,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Brazos,Brazos County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48041,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Brewster,Brewster County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48043,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Brewster,Brewster County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48043,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Brewster,Brewster County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48043,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Brewster,Brewster County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48043,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Brewster,Brewster County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48043,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Brewster,Brewster County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,9566,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48043,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Brewster,Brewster County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,8236,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48043,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Brewster,Brewster County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7508,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48043,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Brewster,Brewster County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,7508,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48043,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Brewster,Brewster County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,728,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48043,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Brewster,Brewster County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,91.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48043,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Brewster,Brewster County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,91.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48043,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Brewster,Brewster County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,8.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48043,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Brewster,Brewster County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48043,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Brewster,Brewster County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48043,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Brewster,Brewster County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48043,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Brewster,Brewster County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48043,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Brewster,Brewster County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48043,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Briscoe,Briscoe County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48045,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Briscoe,Briscoe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48045,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Briscoe,Briscoe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48045,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Briscoe,Briscoe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48045,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Briscoe,Briscoe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48045,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Briscoe,Briscoe County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,1421,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48045,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Briscoe,Briscoe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1620,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48045,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Briscoe,Briscoe County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1620,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48045,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Briscoe,Briscoe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,571,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48045,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Briscoe,Briscoe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48045,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Briscoe,Briscoe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48045,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Briscoe,Briscoe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,35.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48045,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Briscoe,Briscoe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48045,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Briscoe,Briscoe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48045,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Briscoe,Briscoe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,64.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48045,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Briscoe,Briscoe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48045,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Briscoe,Briscoe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1049,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48045,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Briscoe,Briscoe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48045,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Brooks,Brooks County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48047,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Brooks,Brooks County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48047,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Brooks,Brooks County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48047,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Brooks,Brooks County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48047,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Brooks,Brooks County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48047,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Brooks,Brooks County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,7030,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48047,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Brooks,Brooks County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7362,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48047,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Brooks,Brooks County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7148,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48047,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Brooks,Brooks County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,7148,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48047,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Brooks,Brooks County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,214,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48047,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Brooks,Brooks County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,97.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48047,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Brooks,Brooks County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,97.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48047,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Brooks,Brooks County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48047,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Brooks,Brooks County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48047,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Brooks,Brooks County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48047,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Brooks,Brooks County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48047,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Brooks,Brooks County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48047,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Brooks,Brooks County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48047,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48049,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48049,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48049,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48049,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48049,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,38002,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48049,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,42180,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48049,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48049,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48049,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,42180,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48049,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48049,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48049,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48049,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48049,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48049,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48049,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48049,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48049,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Burleson,Burleson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,24,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48051,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Burleson,Burleson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48051,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Burleson,Burleson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48051,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Burleson,Burleson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48051,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Burleson,Burleson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48051,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Burleson,Burleson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,17644,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48051,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Burleson,Burleson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,13889,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48051,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Burleson,Burleson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3137,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48051,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Burleson,Burleson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,3137,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48051,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Burleson,Burleson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10752,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48051,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Burleson,Burleson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,22.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48051,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Burleson,Burleson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,22.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48051,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Burleson,Burleson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,77.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48051,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Burleson,Burleson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48051,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Burleson,Burleson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48051,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Burleson,Burleson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48051,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Burleson,Burleson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48051,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Burleson,Burleson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48051,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Burnet,Burnet County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,49,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48053,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Burnet,Burnet County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48053,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Burnet,Burnet County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48053,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Burnet,Burnet County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48053,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Burnet,Burnet County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48053,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Burnet,Burnet County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,49427,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48053,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Burnet,Burnet County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,36530,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48053,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Burnet,Burnet County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10396,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48053,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Burnet,Burnet County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,3715,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48053,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Burnet,Burnet County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,26134,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48053,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Burnet,Burnet County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,28.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48053,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Burnet,Burnet County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,10.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48053,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Burnet,Burnet County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,71.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48053,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Burnet,Burnet County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,34,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48053,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Burnet,Burnet County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48053,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Burnet,Burnet County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,18.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48053,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Burnet,Burnet County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48053,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Burnet,Burnet County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,6682,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48053,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Caldwell,Caldwell County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48055,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Caldwell,Caldwell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48055,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Caldwell,Caldwell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48055,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Caldwell,Caldwell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48055,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Caldwell,Caldwell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48055,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Caldwell,Caldwell County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,45967,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48055,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Caldwell,Caldwell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,40176,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48055,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Caldwell,Caldwell County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,21067,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48055,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Caldwell,Caldwell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48055,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Caldwell,Caldwell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,19109,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48055,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Caldwell,Caldwell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,52.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48055,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Caldwell,Caldwell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48055,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Caldwell,Caldwell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,47.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48055,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Caldwell,Caldwell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48055,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Caldwell,Caldwell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,17.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48055,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Caldwell,Caldwell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,35,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48055,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Caldwell,Caldwell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,7018,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48055,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Caldwell,Caldwell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,14049,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48055,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48057,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48057,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48057,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48057,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48057,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,20047,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48057,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,21017,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48057,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,19168,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48057,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,2548,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48057,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1849,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48057,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,91.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48057,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,12.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48057,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,8.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48057,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48057,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,79.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48057,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48057,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,16620,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48057,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48057,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Callahan,Callahan County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48059,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Callahan,Callahan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48059,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Callahan,Callahan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48059,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Callahan,Callahan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48059,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Callahan,Callahan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48059,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Callahan,Callahan County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,13750,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48059,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Callahan,Callahan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,11070,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48059,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Callahan,Callahan County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11023,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48059,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Callahan,Callahan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,935,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48059,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Callahan,Callahan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,48,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48059,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Callahan,Callahan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48059,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Callahan,Callahan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,8.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48059,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Callahan,Callahan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48059,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Callahan,Callahan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48059,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Callahan,Callahan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,61.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48059,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Callahan,Callahan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48059,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Callahan,Callahan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,6857,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48059,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Callahan,Callahan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48059,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cameron,Cameron County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,22,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48061,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cameron,Cameron County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48061,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cameron,Cameron County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48061,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cameron,Cameron County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48061,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cameron,Cameron County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48061,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cameron,Cameron County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,421191,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48061,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cameron,Cameron County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,361103,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48061,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cameron,Cameron County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,112601,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48061,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cameron,Cameron County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,81864,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48061,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cameron,Cameron County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,248502,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48061,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cameron,Cameron County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,31.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48061,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cameron,Cameron County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,22.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48061,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cameron,Cameron County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,68.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48061,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cameron,Cameron County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48061,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cameron,Cameron County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,8.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48061,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cameron,Cameron County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48061,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cameron,Cameron County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,30168,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48061,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cameron,Cameron County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48061,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Camp,Camp County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48063,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Camp,Camp County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48063,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Camp,Camp County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48063,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Camp,Camp County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48063,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Camp,Camp County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48063,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Camp,Camp County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,12450,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48063,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Camp,Camp County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,16917,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48063,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Camp,Camp County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48063,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Camp,Camp County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48063,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Camp,Camp County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,16917,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48063,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Camp,Camp County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48063,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Camp,Camp County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48063,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Camp,Camp County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48063,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Camp,Camp County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48063,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Camp,Camp County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48063,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Camp,Camp County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48063,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Camp,Camp County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48063,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Camp,Camp County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48063,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Carson,Carson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48065,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Carson,Carson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48065,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Carson,Carson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48065,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Carson,Carson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48065,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Carson,Carson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48065,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Carson,Carson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,5808,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48065,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Carson,Carson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,8906,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48065,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Carson,Carson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8906,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48065,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Carson,Carson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,8906,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48065,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Carson,Carson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48065,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Carson,Carson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48065,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Carson,Carson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48065,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Carson,Carson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48065,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Carson,Carson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48065,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Carson,Carson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48065,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Carson,Carson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48065,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Carson,Carson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48065,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Carson,Carson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48065,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,23,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48067,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48067,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48067,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48067,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48067,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,28399,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48067,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,24728,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48067,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,252,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48067,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,252,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48067,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,24476,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48067,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48067,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48067,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48067,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,22,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48067,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48067,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48067,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48067,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cass,Cass County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48067,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Castro,Castro County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48069,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Castro,Castro County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48069,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Castro,Castro County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48069,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Castro,Castro County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48069,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Castro,Castro County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48069,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Castro,Castro County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,7337,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48069,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Castro,Castro County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5625,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48069,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Castro,Castro County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5625,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48069,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Castro,Castro County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,5625,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48069,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Castro,Castro County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48069,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Castro,Castro County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48069,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Castro,Castro County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48069,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Castro,Castro County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48069,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Castro,Castro County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48069,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Castro,Castro County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48069,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Castro,Castro County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48069,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Castro,Castro County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48069,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Castro,Castro County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48069,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Chambers,Chambers County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,33,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48071,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Chambers,Chambers County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,27,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48071,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Chambers,Chambers County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48071,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Chambers,Chambers County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48071,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Chambers,Chambers County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,26,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48071,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Chambers,Chambers County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,47051,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48071,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Chambers,Chambers County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,35306,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48071,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Chambers,Chambers County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,26233,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48071,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Chambers,Chambers County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,23577,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48071,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Chambers,Chambers County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9074,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48071,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Chambers,Chambers County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,74.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48071,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Chambers,Chambers County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,66.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48071,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Chambers,Chambers County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,25.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48071,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Chambers,Chambers County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48071,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Chambers,Chambers County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,7.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48071,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Chambers,Chambers County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48071,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Chambers,Chambers County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2656,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48071,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Chambers,Chambers County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48071,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,29,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48073,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48073,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48073,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48073,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48073,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,50477,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48073,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,53653,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48073,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,35164,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48073,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,8401,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48073,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,18489,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48073,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,65.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48073,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,15.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48073,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,34.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48073,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48073,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,24,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48073,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,25.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48073,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,12903,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48073,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cherokee,Cherokee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,13861,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48073,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Childress,Childress County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48075,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Childress,Childress County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48075,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Childress,Childress County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48075,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Childress,Childress County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48075,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Childress,Childress County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48075,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Childress,Childress County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,6648,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48075,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Childress,Childress County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7090,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48075,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Childress,Childress County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7090,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48075,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Childress,Childress County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48075,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Childress,Childress County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48075,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Childress,Childress County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48075,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Childress,Childress County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48075,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Childress,Childress County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48075,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Childress,Childress County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48075,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Childress,Childress County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48075,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Childress,Childress County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48075,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Childress,Childress County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,7090,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48075,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Childress,Childress County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48075,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48077,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48077,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48077,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48077,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48077,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,10245,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48077,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,10564,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48077,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7903,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48077,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,510,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48077,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2661,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48077,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,74.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48077,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,4.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48077,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,25.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48077,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48077,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,41.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48077,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,28.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48077,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,4399,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48077,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2994,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48077,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cochran,Cochran County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48079,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cochran,Cochran County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48079,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cochran,Cochran County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48079,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cochran,Cochran County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48079,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cochran,Cochran County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48079,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cochran,Cochran County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,2559,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48079,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cochran,Cochran County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2822,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48079,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cochran,Cochran County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2822,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48079,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cochran,Cochran County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,2822,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48079,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cochran,Cochran County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48079,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cochran,Cochran County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48079,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cochran,Cochran County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48079,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cochran,Cochran County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48079,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cochran,Cochran County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48079,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cochran,Cochran County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48079,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cochran,Cochran County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48079,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cochran,Cochran County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48079,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cochran,Cochran County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48079,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Coke,Coke County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48081,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Coke,Coke County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48081,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Coke,Coke County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48081,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Coke,Coke County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48081,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Coke,Coke County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48081,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Coke,Coke County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,3288,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48081,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Coke,Coke County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2564,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48081,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Coke,Coke County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2564,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48081,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Coke,Coke County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1206,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48081,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Coke,Coke County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48081,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Coke,Coke County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48081,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Coke,Coke County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,47,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48081,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Coke,Coke County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48081,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Coke,Coke County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48081,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Coke,Coke County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,53,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48081,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Coke,Coke County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48081,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Coke,Coke County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1358,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48081,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Coke,Coke County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48081,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Coleman,Coleman County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48083,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Coleman,Coleman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48083,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Coleman,Coleman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48083,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Coleman,Coleman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48083,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Coleman,Coleman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48083,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Coleman,Coleman County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,7671,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48083,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Coleman,Coleman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,10300,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48083,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Coleman,Coleman County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48083,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Coleman,Coleman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48083,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Coleman,Coleman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10300,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48083,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Coleman,Coleman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48083,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Coleman,Coleman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48083,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Coleman,Coleman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48083,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Coleman,Coleman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48083,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Coleman,Coleman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48083,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Coleman,Coleman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48083,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Coleman,Coleman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48083,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Coleman,Coleman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48083,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Collin,Collin County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,40,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48085,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Collin,Collin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,39,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48085,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Collin,Collin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48085,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Collin,Collin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,27,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48085,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Collin,Collin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48085,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Collin,Collin County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,1073149,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48085,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Collin,Collin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,975776,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48085,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Collin,Collin County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,975061,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48085,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Collin,Collin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,30160,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48085,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Collin,Collin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,715,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48085,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Collin,Collin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48085,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Collin,Collin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,3.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48085,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Collin,Collin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48085,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Collin,Collin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48085,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Collin,Collin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,96.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48085,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Collin,Collin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48085,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Collin,Collin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,944795,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48085,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Collin,Collin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,106,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48085,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Collingsworth,Collingsworth County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48087,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Collingsworth,Collingsworth County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48087,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Collingsworth,Collingsworth County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48087,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Collingsworth,Collingsworth County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48087,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Collingsworth,Collingsworth County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48087,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Collingsworth,Collingsworth County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,2635,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48087,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Collingsworth,Collingsworth County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2772,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48087,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Collingsworth,Collingsworth County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48087,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Collingsworth,Collingsworth County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48087,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Collingsworth,Collingsworth County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2772,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48087,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Collingsworth,Collingsworth County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48087,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Collingsworth,Collingsworth County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48087,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Collingsworth,Collingsworth County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48087,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Collingsworth,Collingsworth County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48087,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Collingsworth,Collingsworth County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48087,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Collingsworth,Collingsworth County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48087,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Collingsworth,Collingsworth County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48087,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Collingsworth,Collingsworth County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48087,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Colorado,Colorado County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,28,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48089,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Colorado,Colorado County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48089,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Colorado,Colorado County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48089,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Colorado,Colorado County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48089,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Colorado,Colorado County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48089,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Colorado,Colorado County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,20566,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48089,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Colorado,Colorado County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,14631,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48089,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Colorado,Colorado County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3482,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48089,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Colorado,Colorado County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,24,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48089,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Colorado,Colorado County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11148,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48089,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Colorado,Colorado County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,23.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48089,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Colorado,Colorado County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48089,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Colorado,Colorado County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,76.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48089,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Colorado,Colorado County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,26,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48089,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Colorado,Colorado County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48089,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Colorado,Colorado County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,23.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48089,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Colorado,Colorado County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48089,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Colorado,Colorado County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3458,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48089,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Comal,Comal County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,113,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48091,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Comal,Comal County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,41,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48091,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Comal,Comal County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48091,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Comal,Comal County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48091,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Comal,Comal County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,39,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48091,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Comal,Comal County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,163573,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48091,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Comal,Comal County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,152700,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48091,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Comal,Comal County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,83826,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48091,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Comal,Comal County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,15591,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48091,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Comal,Comal County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,68874,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48091,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Comal,Comal County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,54.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48091,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Comal,Comal County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,10.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48091,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Comal,Comal County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,45.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48091,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Comal,Comal County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,72,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48091,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Comal,Comal County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48091,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Comal,Comal County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,44.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48091,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Comal,Comal County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48091,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Comal,Comal County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,67435,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48091,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Comanche,Comanche County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48093,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Comanche,Comanche County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48093,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Comanche,Comanche County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48093,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Comanche,Comanche County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48093,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Comanche,Comanche County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48093,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Comanche,Comanche County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,13600,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48093,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Comanche,Comanche County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,10526,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48093,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Comanche,Comanche County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,127,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48093,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Comanche,Comanche County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,127,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48093,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Comanche,Comanche County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10399,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48093,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Comanche,Comanche County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48093,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Comanche,Comanche County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48093,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Comanche,Comanche County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48093,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Comanche,Comanche County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48093,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Comanche,Comanche County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48093,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Comanche,Comanche County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48093,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Comanche,Comanche County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48093,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Comanche,Comanche County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48093,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Concho,Concho County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48095,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Concho,Concho County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48095,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Concho,Concho County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48095,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Concho,Concho County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48095,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Concho,Concho County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48095,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Concho,Concho County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,3319,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48095,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Concho,Concho County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,6996,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48095,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Concho,Concho County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2731,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48095,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Concho,Concho County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,2731,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48095,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Concho,Concho County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4265,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48095,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Concho,Concho County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,39,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48095,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Concho,Concho County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,39,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48095,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Concho,Concho County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,61,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48095,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Concho,Concho County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48095,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Concho,Concho County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48095,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Concho,Concho County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48095,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Concho,Concho County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48095,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Concho,Concho County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48095,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cooke,Cooke County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,23,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48097,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cooke,Cooke County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48097,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cooke,Cooke County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48097,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cooke,Cooke County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48097,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cooke,Cooke County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48097,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cooke,Cooke County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,41697,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48097,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cooke,Cooke County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,37121,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48097,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cooke,Cooke County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1483,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48097,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cooke,Cooke County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48097,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cooke,Cooke County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,35638,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48097,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cooke,Cooke County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48097,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cooke,Cooke County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48097,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cooke,Cooke County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,96,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48097,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cooke,Cooke County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,22,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48097,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cooke,Cooke County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48097,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cooke,Cooke County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48097,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cooke,Cooke County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48097,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cooke,Cooke County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1483,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48097,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Coryell,Coryell County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48099,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Coryell,Coryell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48099,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Coryell,Coryell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48099,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Coryell,Coryell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48099,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Coryell,Coryell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48099,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Coryell,Coryell County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,83096,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48099,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Coryell,Coryell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,67541,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48099,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Coryell,Coryell County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1010,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48099,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Coryell,Coryell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1010,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48099,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Coryell,Coryell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,66531,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48099,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Coryell,Coryell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48099,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Coryell,Coryell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48099,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Coryell,Coryell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48099,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Coryell,Coryell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48099,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Coryell,Coryell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48099,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Coryell,Coryell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48099,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Coryell,Coryell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48099,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Coryell,Coryell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48099,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cottle,Cottle County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48101,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cottle,Cottle County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48101,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cottle,Cottle County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48101,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cottle,Cottle County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48101,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cottle,Cottle County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48101,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cottle,Cottle County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,1374,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48101,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cottle,Cottle County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1835,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48101,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cottle,Cottle County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,704,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48101,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cottle,Cottle County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,704,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48101,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cottle,Cottle County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1130,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48101,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cottle,Cottle County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,38.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48101,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cottle,Cottle County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,38.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48101,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cottle,Cottle County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,61.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48101,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cottle,Cottle County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48101,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cottle,Cottle County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48101,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cottle,Cottle County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48101,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cottle,Cottle County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48101,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Cottle,Cottle County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48101,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Crane,Crane County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48103,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Crane,Crane County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48103,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Crane,Crane County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48103,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Crane,Crane County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48103,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Crane,Crane County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48103,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Crane,Crane County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,4668,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48103,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Crane,Crane County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3026,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48103,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Crane,Crane County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3002,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48103,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Crane,Crane County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,3002,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48103,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Crane,Crane County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,24,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48103,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Crane,Crane County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48103,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Crane,Crane County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,99.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48103,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Crane,Crane County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48103,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Crane,Crane County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48103,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Crane,Crane County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48103,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Crane,Crane County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48103,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Crane,Crane County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48103,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Crane,Crane County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48103,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Crockett,Crockett County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48105,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Crockett,Crockett County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48105,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Crockett,Crockett County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48105,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Crockett,Crockett County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48105,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Crockett,Crockett County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48105,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Crockett,Crockett County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,3111,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48105,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Crockett,Crockett County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3744,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48105,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Crockett,Crockett County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3698,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48105,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Crockett,Crockett County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,3698,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48105,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Crockett,Crockett County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,47,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48105,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Crockett,Crockett County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48105,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Crockett,Crockett County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,98.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48105,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Crockett,Crockett County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48105,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Crockett,Crockett County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48105,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Crockett,Crockett County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48105,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Crockett,Crockett County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48105,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Crockett,Crockett County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48105,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Crockett,Crockett County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48105,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Crosby,Crosby County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48107,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Crosby,Crosby County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48107,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Crosby,Crosby County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48107,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Crosby,Crosby County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48107,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Crosby,Crosby County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48107,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Crosby,Crosby County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,5098,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48107,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Crosby,Crosby County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5299,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48107,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Crosby,Crosby County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5289,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48107,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Crosby,Crosby County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1694,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48107,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Crosby,Crosby County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48107,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Crosby,Crosby County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48107,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Crosby,Crosby County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,32,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48107,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Crosby,Crosby County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48107,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Crosby,Crosby County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48107,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Crosby,Crosby County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,67.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48107,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Crosby,Crosby County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48107,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Crosby,Crosby County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,3596,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48107,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Crosby,Crosby County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48107,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Culberson,Culberson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48109,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Culberson,Culberson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48109,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Culberson,Culberson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48109,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Culberson,Culberson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48109,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Culberson,Culberson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48109,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Culberson,Culberson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,2193,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48109,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Culberson,Culberson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2612,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48109,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Culberson,Culberson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2443,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48109,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Culberson,Culberson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,2443,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48109,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Culberson,Culberson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,170,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48109,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Culberson,Culberson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,93.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48109,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Culberson,Culberson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,93.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48109,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Culberson,Culberson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,6.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48109,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Culberson,Culberson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48109,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Culberson,Culberson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48109,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Culberson,Culberson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48109,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Culberson,Culberson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48109,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Culberson,Culberson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48109,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Dallam,Dallam County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48111,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Dallam,Dallam County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48111,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Dallam,Dallam County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48111,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Dallam,Dallam County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48111,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Dallam,Dallam County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48111,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Dallam,Dallam County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,7116,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48111,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Dallam,Dallam County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,8365,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48111,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Dallam,Dallam County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8365,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48111,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Dallam,Dallam County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,8365,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48111,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Dallam,Dallam County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48111,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Dallam,Dallam County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48111,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Dallam,Dallam County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48111,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Dallam,Dallam County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48111,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Dallam,Dallam County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48111,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Dallam,Dallam County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48111,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Dallam,Dallam County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48111,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Dallam,Dallam County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48111,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Dallam,Dallam County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48111,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Dallas,Dallas County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,39,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48113,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Dallas,Dallas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,36,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48113,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Dallas,Dallas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48113,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Dallas,Dallas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,26,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48113,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Dallas,Dallas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48113,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Dallas,Dallas County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,2610957,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48113,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Dallas,Dallas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2688547,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48113,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Dallas,Dallas County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2658428,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48113,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Dallas,Dallas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1125,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48113,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Dallas,Dallas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,30119,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48113,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Dallas,Dallas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48113,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Dallas,Dallas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48113,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Dallas,Dallas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48113,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Dallas,Dallas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48113,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Dallas,Dallas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,46.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48113,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Dallas,Dallas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,45.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48113,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Dallas,Dallas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1253099,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48113,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Dallas,Dallas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1225942,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48113,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Dawson,Dawson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48115,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Dawson,Dawson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48115,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Dawson,Dawson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48115,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Dawson,Dawson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48115,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Dawson,Dawson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48115,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Dawson,Dawson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,12439,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48115,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Dawson,Dawson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9782,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48115,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Dawson,Dawson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9782,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48115,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Dawson,Dawson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,785,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48115,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Dawson,Dawson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48115,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Dawson,Dawson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48115,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Dawson,Dawson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48115,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Dawson,Dawson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48115,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Dawson,Dawson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48115,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Dawson,Dawson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,92,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48115,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Dawson,Dawson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48115,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Dawson,Dawson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,8996,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48115,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Dawson,Dawson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48115,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Deaf Smith,Deaf Smith County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48117,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Deaf Smith,Deaf Smith County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48117,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Deaf Smith,Deaf Smith County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48117,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Deaf Smith,Deaf Smith County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48117,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Deaf Smith,Deaf Smith County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48117,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Deaf Smith,Deaf Smith County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,18503,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48117,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Deaf Smith,Deaf Smith County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,15351,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48117,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Deaf Smith,Deaf Smith County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,15351,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48117,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Deaf Smith,Deaf Smith County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,15351,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48117,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Deaf Smith,Deaf Smith County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48117,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Deaf Smith,Deaf Smith County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48117,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Deaf Smith,Deaf Smith County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48117,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Deaf Smith,Deaf Smith County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48117,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Deaf Smith,Deaf Smith County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48117,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Deaf Smith,Deaf Smith County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48117,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Deaf Smith,Deaf Smith County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48117,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Deaf Smith,Deaf Smith County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48117,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Deaf Smith,Deaf Smith County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48117,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Delta,Delta County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48119,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Delta,Delta County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48119,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Delta,Delta County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48119,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Delta,Delta County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48119,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Delta,Delta County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48119,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Delta,Delta County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,5233,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48119,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Delta,Delta County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,6538,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48119,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Delta,Delta County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,237,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48119,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Delta,Delta County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,237,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48119,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Delta,Delta County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6300,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48119,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Delta,Delta County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,3.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48119,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Delta,Delta County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,3.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48119,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Delta,Delta County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,96.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48119,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Delta,Delta County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48119,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Delta,Delta County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48119,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Delta,Delta County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48119,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Delta,Delta County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48119,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Delta,Delta County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48119,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Denton,Denton County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,133,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48121,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Denton,Denton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,72,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48121,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Denton,Denton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48121,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Denton,Denton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,29,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48121,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Denton,Denton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,41,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48121,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Denton,Denton County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,913900,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48121,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Denton,Denton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,651535,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48121,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Denton,Denton County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,609788,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48121,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Denton,Denton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,18252,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48121,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Denton,Denton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,41747,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48121,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Denton,Denton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,93.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48121,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Denton,Denton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,2.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48121,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Denton,Denton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,6.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48121,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Denton,Denton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,61,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48121,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Denton,Denton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,65,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48121,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Denton,Denton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,19.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48121,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Denton,Denton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,423196,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48121,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Denton,Denton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,125524,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48121,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,DeWitt,DeWitt County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48123,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,DeWitt,DeWitt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48123,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,DeWitt,DeWitt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48123,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,DeWitt,DeWitt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48123,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,DeWitt,DeWitt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48123,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,DeWitt,DeWitt County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,19809,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48123,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,DeWitt,DeWitt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,17722,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48123,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,DeWitt,DeWitt County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,15319,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48123,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,DeWitt,DeWitt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,15319,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48123,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,DeWitt,DeWitt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2404,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48123,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,DeWitt,DeWitt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,86.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48123,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,DeWitt,DeWitt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,86.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48123,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,DeWitt,DeWitt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,13.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48123,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,DeWitt,DeWitt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48123,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,DeWitt,DeWitt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48123,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,DeWitt,DeWitt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48123,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,DeWitt,DeWitt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48123,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,DeWitt,DeWitt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48123,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Dickens,Dickens County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48125,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Dickens,Dickens County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48125,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Dickens,Dickens County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48125,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Dickens,Dickens County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48125,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Dickens,Dickens County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48125,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Dickens,Dickens County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,1760,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48125,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Dickens,Dickens County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1591,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48125,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Dickens,Dickens County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1591,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48125,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Dickens,Dickens County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,285,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48125,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Dickens,Dickens County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48125,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Dickens,Dickens County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48125,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Dickens,Dickens County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,17.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48125,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Dickens,Dickens County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48125,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Dickens,Dickens County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48125,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Dickens,Dickens County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,82.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48125,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Dickens,Dickens County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48125,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Dickens,Dickens County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1306,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48125,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Dickens,Dickens County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48125,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Dimmit,Dimmit County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48127,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Dimmit,Dimmit County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48127,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Dimmit,Dimmit County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48127,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Dimmit,Dimmit County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48127,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Dimmit,Dimmit County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48127,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Dimmit,Dimmit County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,8563,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48127,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Dimmit,Dimmit County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9358,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48127,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Dimmit,Dimmit County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,659,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48127,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Dimmit,Dimmit County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,659,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48127,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Dimmit,Dimmit County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8698,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48127,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Dimmit,Dimmit County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48127,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Dimmit,Dimmit County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48127,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Dimmit,Dimmit County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,93,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48127,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Dimmit,Dimmit County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48127,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Dimmit,Dimmit County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48127,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Dimmit,Dimmit County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48127,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Dimmit,Dimmit County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48127,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Dimmit,Dimmit County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48127,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Donley,Donley County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48129,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Donley,Donley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48129,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Donley,Donley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48129,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Donley,Donley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48129,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Donley,Donley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48129,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Donley,Donley County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,3269,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48129,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Donley,Donley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2931,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48129,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Donley,Donley County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2931,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48129,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Donley,Donley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,572,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48129,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Donley,Donley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48129,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Donley,Donley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48129,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Donley,Donley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,19.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48129,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Donley,Donley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48129,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Donley,Donley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48129,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Donley,Donley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,80.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48129,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Donley,Donley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48129,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Donley,Donley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2359,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48129,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Donley,Donley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48129,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Duval,Duval County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48131,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Duval,Duval County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48131,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Duval,Duval County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48131,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Duval,Duval County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48131,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Duval,Duval County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48131,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Duval,Duval County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,9808,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48131,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Duval,Duval County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,11499,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48131,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Duval,Duval County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11499,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48131,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Duval,Duval County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,10980,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48131,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Duval,Duval County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48131,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Duval,Duval County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48131,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Duval,Duval County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,95.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48131,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Duval,Duval County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48131,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Duval,Duval County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48131,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Duval,Duval County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,4.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48131,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Duval,Duval County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48131,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Duval,Duval County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,519,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48131,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Duval,Duval County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48131,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Eastland,Eastland County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48133,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Eastland,Eastland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48133,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Eastland,Eastland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48133,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Eastland,Eastland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48133,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Eastland,Eastland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48133,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Eastland,Eastland County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,17754,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48133,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Eastland,Eastland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,17264,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48133,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Eastland,Eastland County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,796,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48133,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Eastland,Eastland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,796,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48133,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Eastland,Eastland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,16468,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48133,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Eastland,Eastland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,4.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48133,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Eastland,Eastland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,4.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48133,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Eastland,Eastland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,95.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48133,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Eastland,Eastland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48133,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Eastland,Eastland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48133,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Eastland,Eastland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48133,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Eastland,Eastland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48133,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Eastland,Eastland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48133,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Ector,Ector County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,23,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48135,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Ector,Ector County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48135,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Ector,Ector County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48135,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Ector,Ector County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48135,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Ector,Ector County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48135,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Ector,Ector County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,165467,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48135,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Ector,Ector County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,112212,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48135,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Ector,Ector County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4071,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48135,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Ector,Ector County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,3760,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48135,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Ector,Ector County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,108141,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48135,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Ector,Ector County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,3.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48135,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Ector,Ector County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,3.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48135,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Ector,Ector County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,96.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48135,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Ector,Ector County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48135,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Ector,Ector County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48135,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Ector,Ector County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48135,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Ector,Ector County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,312,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48135,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Ector,Ector County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48135,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Edwards,Edwards County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48137,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Edwards,Edwards County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48137,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Edwards,Edwards County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48137,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Edwards,Edwards County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48137,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Edwards,Edwards County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48137,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Edwards,Edwards County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,1414,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48137,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Edwards,Edwards County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2007,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48137,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Edwards,Edwards County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48137,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Edwards,Edwards County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48137,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Edwards,Edwards County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2007,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48137,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Edwards,Edwards County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48137,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Edwards,Edwards County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48137,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Edwards,Edwards County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48137,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Edwards,Edwards County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48137,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Edwards,Edwards County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48137,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Edwards,Edwards County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48137,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Edwards,Edwards County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48137,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Edwards,Edwards County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48137,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,El Paso,El Paso County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,49,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48141,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,El Paso,El Paso County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,30,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48141,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,El Paso,El Paso County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48141,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,El Paso,El Paso County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48141,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,El Paso,El Paso County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,21,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48141,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,El Paso,El Paso County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,866093,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48141,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,El Paso,El Paso County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,807972,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48141,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,El Paso,El Paso County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,796363,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48141,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,El Paso,El Paso County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,714197,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48141,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,El Paso,El Paso County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11609,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48141,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,El Paso,El Paso County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48141,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,El Paso,El Paso County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,88.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48141,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,El Paso,El Paso County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48141,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,El Paso,El Paso County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,19,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48141,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,El Paso,El Paso County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,10.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48141,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,El Paso,El Paso County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48141,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,El Paso,El Paso County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,82166,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48141,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,El Paso,El Paso County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48141,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Ellis,Ellis County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,31,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48139,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Ellis,Ellis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,20,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48139,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Ellis,Ellis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48139,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Ellis,Ellis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48139,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Ellis,Ellis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48139,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Ellis,Ellis County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,194272,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48139,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Ellis,Ellis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,176084,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48139,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Ellis,Ellis County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,81510,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48139,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Ellis,Ellis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,30883,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48139,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Ellis,Ellis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,94575,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48139,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Ellis,Ellis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,46.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48139,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Ellis,Ellis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,17.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48139,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Ellis,Ellis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,53.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48139,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Ellis,Ellis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48139,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Ellis,Ellis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48139,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Ellis,Ellis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,19.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48139,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Ellis,Ellis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,15915,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48139,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Ellis,Ellis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,34711,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48139,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Erath,Erath County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,21,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48143,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Erath,Erath County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48143,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Erath,Erath County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48143,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Erath,Erath County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48143,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Erath,Erath County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48143,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Erath,Erath County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,42715,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48143,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Erath,Erath County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,29102,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48143,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Erath,Erath County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,906,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48143,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Erath,Erath County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48143,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Erath,Erath County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,28196,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48143,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Erath,Erath County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,3.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48143,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Erath,Erath County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48143,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Erath,Erath County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,96.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48143,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Erath,Erath County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,20,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48143,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Erath,Erath County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48143,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Erath,Erath County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48143,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Erath,Erath County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48143,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Erath,Erath County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48143,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Falls,Falls County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48145,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Falls,Falls County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48145,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Falls,Falls County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48145,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Falls,Falls County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48145,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Falls,Falls County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48145,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Falls,Falls County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,16961,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48145,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Falls,Falls County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,19550,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48145,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Falls,Falls County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10322,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48145,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Falls,Falls County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,9808,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48145,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Falls,Falls County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9228,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48145,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Falls,Falls County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,52.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48145,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Falls,Falls County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,50.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48145,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Falls,Falls County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,47.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48145,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Falls,Falls County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48145,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Falls,Falls County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,2.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48145,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Falls,Falls County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48145,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Falls,Falls County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,514,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48145,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Falls,Falls County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48145,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Fannin,Fannin County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,23,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48147,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Fannin,Fannin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,23,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48147,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Fannin,Fannin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48147,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Fannin,Fannin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48147,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Fannin,Fannin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,20,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48147,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Fannin,Fannin County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,35732,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48147,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Fannin,Fannin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,38639,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48147,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Fannin,Fannin County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,38639,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48147,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Fannin,Fannin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,28501,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48147,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Fannin,Fannin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48147,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Fannin,Fannin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48147,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Fannin,Fannin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,73.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48147,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Fannin,Fannin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48147,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Fannin,Fannin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48147,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Fannin,Fannin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,26.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48147,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Fannin,Fannin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48147,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Fannin,Fannin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,10138,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48147,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Fannin,Fannin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48147,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48149,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48149,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48149,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48149,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48149,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,24452,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48149,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,19707,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48149,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5132,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48149,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,5132,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48149,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,14575,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48149,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,26,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48149,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,26,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48149,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,74,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48149,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48149,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48149,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48149,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48149,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48149,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Fisher,Fisher County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48151,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Fisher,Fisher County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48151,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Fisher,Fisher County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48151,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Fisher,Fisher County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48151,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Fisher,Fisher County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48151,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Fisher,Fisher County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,3677,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48151,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Fisher,Fisher County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2442,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48151,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Fisher,Fisher County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2442,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48151,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Fisher,Fisher County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48151,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Fisher,Fisher County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48151,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Fisher,Fisher County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48151,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Fisher,Fisher County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48151,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Fisher,Fisher County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48151,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Fisher,Fisher County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48151,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Fisher,Fisher County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,40.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48151,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Fisher,Fisher County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48151,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Fisher,Fisher County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,998,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48151,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Fisher,Fisher County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48151,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48153,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48153,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48153,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48153,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48153,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,5378,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48153,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4999,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48153,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4617,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48153,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,140,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48153,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,381,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48153,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,92.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48153,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,2.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48153,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,7.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48153,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48153,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,89.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48153,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48153,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,4477,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48153,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48153,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Foard,Foard County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48155,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Foard,Foard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48155,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Foard,Foard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48155,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Foard,Foard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48155,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Foard,Foard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48155,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Foard,Foard County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,1086,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48155,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Foard,Foard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1137,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48155,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Foard,Foard County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1137,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48155,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Foard,Foard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48155,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Foard,Foard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48155,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Foard,Foard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48155,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Foard,Foard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48155,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Foard,Foard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48155,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Foard,Foard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48155,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Foard,Foard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48155,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Foard,Foard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48155,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Foard,Foard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1137,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48155,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Foard,Foard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48155,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Fort Bend,Fort Bend County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,217,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48157,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Fort Bend,Fort Bend County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,40,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48157,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Fort Bend,Fort Bend County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48157,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Fort Bend,Fort Bend County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48157,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Fort Bend,Fort Bend County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48157,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Fort Bend,Fort Bend County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,828632,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48157,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Fort Bend,Fort Bend County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,675441,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48157,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Fort Bend,Fort Bend County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,176219,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48157,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Fort Bend,Fort Bend County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,30071,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48157,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Fort Bend,Fort Bend County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,499223,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48157,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Fort Bend,Fort Bend County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,26.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48157,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Fort Bend,Fort Bend County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,4.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48157,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Fort Bend,Fort Bend County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,73.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48157,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Fort Bend,Fort Bend County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,177,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48157,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Fort Bend,Fort Bend County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,9.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48157,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Fort Bend,Fort Bend County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,12.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48157,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Fort Bend,Fort Bend County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,65558,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48157,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Fort Bend,Fort Bend County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,83420,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48157,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48159,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48159,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48159,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48159,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48159,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,10366,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48159,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,16600,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48159,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48159,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48159,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,16600,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48159,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48159,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48159,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48159,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48159,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48159,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48159,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48159,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48159,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Freestone,Freestone County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,23,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48161,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Freestone,Freestone County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48161,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Freestone,Freestone County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48161,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Freestone,Freestone County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48161,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Freestone,Freestone County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48161,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Freestone,Freestone County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,19445,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48161,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Freestone,Freestone County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,24581,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48161,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Freestone,Freestone County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1023,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48161,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Freestone,Freestone County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48161,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Freestone,Freestone County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,23559,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48161,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Freestone,Freestone County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,4.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48161,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Freestone,Freestone County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48161,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Freestone,Freestone County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,95.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48161,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Freestone,Freestone County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,22,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48161,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Freestone,Freestone County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,4.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48161,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Freestone,Freestone County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48161,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Freestone,Freestone County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1023,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48161,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Freestone,Freestone County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48161,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Frio,Frio County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48163,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Frio,Frio County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48163,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Frio,Frio County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48163,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Frio,Frio County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48163,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Frio,Frio County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48163,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Frio,Frio County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,18366,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48163,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Frio,Frio County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,18124,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48163,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Frio,Frio County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48163,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Frio,Frio County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48163,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Frio,Frio County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,18124,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48163,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Frio,Frio County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48163,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Frio,Frio County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48163,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Frio,Frio County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48163,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Frio,Frio County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48163,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Frio,Frio County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48163,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Frio,Frio County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48163,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Frio,Frio County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48163,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Frio,Frio County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48163,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Gaines,Gaines County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48165,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Gaines,Gaines County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48165,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Gaines,Gaines County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48165,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Gaines,Gaines County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48165,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Gaines,Gaines County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48165,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Gaines,Gaines County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,21701,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48165,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Gaines,Gaines County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,11186,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48165,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Gaines,Gaines County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11186,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48165,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Gaines,Gaines County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,11186,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48165,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Gaines,Gaines County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48165,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Gaines,Gaines County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48165,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Gaines,Gaines County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48165,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Gaines,Gaines County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48165,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Gaines,Gaines County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48165,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Gaines,Gaines County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48165,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Gaines,Gaines County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48165,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Gaines,Gaines County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48165,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Gaines,Gaines County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48165,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Galveston,Galveston County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,52,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48167,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Galveston,Galveston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,49,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48167,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Galveston,Galveston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48167,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Galveston,Galveston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48167,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Galveston,Galveston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,31,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48167,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Galveston,Galveston County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,351458,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48167,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Galveston,Galveston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,343957,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48167,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Galveston,Galveston County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,327287,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48167,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Galveston,Galveston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,3135,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48167,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Galveston,Galveston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,16670,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48167,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Galveston,Galveston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,95.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48167,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Galveston,Galveston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48167,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Galveston,Galveston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,4.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48167,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Galveston,Galveston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48167,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Galveston,Galveston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,94.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48167,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Galveston,Galveston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48167,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Galveston,Galveston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,324152,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48167,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Galveston,Galveston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48167,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Garza,Garza County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48169,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Garza,Garza County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48169,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Garza,Garza County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48169,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Garza,Garza County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48169,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Garza,Garza County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48169,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Garza,Garza County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,5794,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48169,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Garza,Garza County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5786,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48169,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Garza,Garza County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5786,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48169,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Garza,Garza County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,572,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48169,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Garza,Garza County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48169,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Garza,Garza County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48169,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Garza,Garza County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,9.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48169,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Garza,Garza County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48169,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Garza,Garza County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48169,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Garza,Garza County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48169,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Garza,Garza County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48169,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Garza,Garza County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48169,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Garza,Garza County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48169,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Gillespie,Gillespie County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,25,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48171,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Gillespie,Gillespie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48171,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Gillespie,Gillespie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48171,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Gillespie,Gillespie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48171,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Gillespie,Gillespie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48171,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Gillespie,Gillespie County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,26732,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48171,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Gillespie,Gillespie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,19438,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48171,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Gillespie,Gillespie County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,16807,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48171,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Gillespie,Gillespie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,2989,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48171,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Gillespie,Gillespie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2630,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48171,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Gillespie,Gillespie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,86.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48171,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Gillespie,Gillespie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,15.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48171,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Gillespie,Gillespie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,13.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48171,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Gillespie,Gillespie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48171,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Gillespie,Gillespie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48171,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Gillespie,Gillespie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,71.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48171,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Gillespie,Gillespie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48171,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Gillespie,Gillespie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,13819,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48171,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Glasscock,Glasscock County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48173,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Glasscock,Glasscock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48173,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Glasscock,Glasscock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48173,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Glasscock,Glasscock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48173,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Glasscock,Glasscock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48173,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Glasscock,Glasscock County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,1114,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48173,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Glasscock,Glasscock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,429,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48173,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Glasscock,Glasscock County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,429,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48173,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Glasscock,Glasscock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,429,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48173,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Glasscock,Glasscock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48173,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Glasscock,Glasscock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48173,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Glasscock,Glasscock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48173,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Glasscock,Glasscock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48173,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Glasscock,Glasscock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48173,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Glasscock,Glasscock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48173,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Glasscock,Glasscock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48173,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Glasscock,Glasscock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48173,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Glasscock,Glasscock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48173,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Goliad,Goliad County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48175,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Goliad,Goliad County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48175,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Goliad,Goliad County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48175,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Goliad,Goliad County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48175,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Goliad,Goliad County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48175,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Goliad,Goliad County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,7005,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48175,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Goliad,Goliad County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2770,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48175,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Goliad,Goliad County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2723,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48175,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Goliad,Goliad County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,2723,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48175,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Goliad,Goliad County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,48,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48175,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Goliad,Goliad County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48175,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Goliad,Goliad County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,98.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48175,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Goliad,Goliad County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48175,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Goliad,Goliad County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48175,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Goliad,Goliad County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48175,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Goliad,Goliad County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48175,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Goliad,Goliad County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48175,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Goliad,Goliad County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48175,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Gonzales,Gonzales County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48177,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Gonzales,Gonzales County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48177,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Gonzales,Gonzales County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48177,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Gonzales,Gonzales County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48177,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Gonzales,Gonzales County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48177,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Gonzales,Gonzales County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,19653,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48177,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Gonzales,Gonzales County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,19298,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48177,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Gonzales,Gonzales County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48177,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Gonzales,Gonzales County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48177,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Gonzales,Gonzales County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,19298,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48177,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Gonzales,Gonzales County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48177,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Gonzales,Gonzales County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48177,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Gonzales,Gonzales County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48177,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Gonzales,Gonzales County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48177,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Gonzales,Gonzales County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48177,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Gonzales,Gonzales County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48177,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Gonzales,Gonzales County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48177,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Gonzales,Gonzales County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48177,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Gray,Gray County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48179,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Gray,Gray County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48179,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Gray,Gray County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48179,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Gray,Gray County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48179,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Gray,Gray County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48179,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Gray,Gray County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,21179,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48179,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Gray,Gray County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,20460,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48179,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Gray,Gray County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,19224,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48179,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Gray,Gray County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,19224,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48179,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Gray,Gray County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1236,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48179,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Gray,Gray County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,94,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48179,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Gray,Gray County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,94,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48179,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Gray,Gray County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48179,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Gray,Gray County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48179,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Gray,Gray County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48179,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Gray,Gray County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48179,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Gray,Gray County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48179,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Gray,Gray County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48179,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Grayson,Grayson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,57,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48181,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Grayson,Grayson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,37,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48181,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Grayson,Grayson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48181,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Grayson,Grayson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48181,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Grayson,Grayson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,24,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48181,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Grayson,Grayson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,136014,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48181,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Grayson,Grayson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,139728,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48181,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Grayson,Grayson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,114638,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48181,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Grayson,Grayson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,36103,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48181,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Grayson,Grayson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,25090,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48181,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Grayson,Grayson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,82,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48181,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Grayson,Grayson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,25.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48181,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Grayson,Grayson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,18,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48181,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Grayson,Grayson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,20,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48181,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Grayson,Grayson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,10.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48181,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Grayson,Grayson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,44.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48181,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Grayson,Grayson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,14659,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48181,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Grayson,Grayson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,62369,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48181,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Gregg,Gregg County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48183,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Gregg,Gregg County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48183,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Gregg,Gregg County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48183,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Gregg,Gregg County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48183,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Gregg,Gregg County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48183,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Gregg,Gregg County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,124175,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48183,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Gregg,Gregg County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,135580,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48183,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Gregg,Gregg County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,99404,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48183,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Gregg,Gregg County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,4838,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48183,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Gregg,Gregg County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,36176,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48183,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Gregg,Gregg County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,73.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48183,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Gregg,Gregg County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,3.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48183,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Gregg,Gregg County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,26.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48183,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Gregg,Gregg County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48183,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Gregg,Gregg County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,13.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48183,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Gregg,Gregg County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,56.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48183,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Gregg,Gregg County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,17892,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48183,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Gregg,Gregg County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,76675,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48183,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Grimes,Grimes County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,25,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48185,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Grimes,Grimes County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48185,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Grimes,Grimes County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48185,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Grimes,Grimes County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48185,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Grimes,Grimes County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48185,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Grimes,Grimes County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,29414,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48185,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Grimes,Grimes County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,20877,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48185,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Grimes,Grimes County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,13457,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48185,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Grimes,Grimes County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,10050,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48185,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Grimes,Grimes County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7420,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48185,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Grimes,Grimes County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,64.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48185,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Grimes,Grimes County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,48.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48185,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Grimes,Grimes County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,35.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48185,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Grimes,Grimes County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48185,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Grimes,Grimes County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,16.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48185,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Grimes,Grimes County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48185,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Grimes,Grimes County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,3407,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48185,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Grimes,Grimes County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48185,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Guadalupe,Guadalupe County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48187,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Guadalupe,Guadalupe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48187,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Guadalupe,Guadalupe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48187,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Guadalupe,Guadalupe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48187,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Guadalupe,Guadalupe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48187,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Guadalupe,Guadalupe County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,173541,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48187,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Guadalupe,Guadalupe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,164581,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48187,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Guadalupe,Guadalupe County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,64978,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48187,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Guadalupe,Guadalupe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48187,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Guadalupe,Guadalupe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,99604,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48187,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Guadalupe,Guadalupe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,39.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48187,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Guadalupe,Guadalupe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48187,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Guadalupe,Guadalupe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,60.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48187,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Guadalupe,Guadalupe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48187,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Guadalupe,Guadalupe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48187,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Guadalupe,Guadalupe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,39.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48187,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Guadalupe,Guadalupe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,294,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48187,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Guadalupe,Guadalupe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,64683,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48187,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hale,Hale County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48189,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hale,Hale County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48189,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hale,Hale County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48189,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hale,Hale County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48189,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hale,Hale County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48189,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hale,Hale County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,32439,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48189,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hale,Hale County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,30072,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48189,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hale,Hale County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,29987,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48189,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hale,Hale County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,29987,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48189,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hale,Hale County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,86,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48189,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hale,Hale County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48189,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hale,Hale County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,99.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48189,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hale,Hale County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48189,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hale,Hale County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48189,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hale,Hale County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48189,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hale,Hale County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48189,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hale,Hale County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48189,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hale,Hale County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48189,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hall,Hall County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48191,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hall,Hall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48191,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hall,Hall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48191,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hall,Hall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48191,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hall,Hall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48191,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hall,Hall County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,2801,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48191,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hall,Hall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3002,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48191,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hall,Hall County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,674,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48191,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hall,Hall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,401,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48191,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hall,Hall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2328,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48191,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hall,Hall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,22.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48191,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hall,Hall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,13.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48191,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hall,Hall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,77.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48191,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hall,Hall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48191,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hall,Hall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,9.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48191,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hall,Hall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48191,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hall,Hall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,273,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48191,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hall,Hall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48191,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48193,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48193,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48193,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48193,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48193,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,8230,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48193,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4399,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48193,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,152,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48193,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,152,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48193,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4247,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48193,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,3.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48193,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,3.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48193,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,96.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48193,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48193,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48193,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48193,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48193,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hamilton,Hamilton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48193,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hansford,Hansford County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48195,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hansford,Hansford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48195,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hansford,Hansford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48195,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hansford,Hansford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48195,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hansford,Hansford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48195,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hansford,Hansford County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,5255,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48195,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hansford,Hansford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4590,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48195,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hansford,Hansford County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4566,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48195,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hansford,Hansford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,4566,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48195,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hansford,Hansford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,24,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48195,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hansford,Hansford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48195,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hansford,Hansford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,99.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48195,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hansford,Hansford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48195,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hansford,Hansford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48195,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hansford,Hansford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48195,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hansford,Hansford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48195,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hansford,Hansford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48195,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hansford,Hansford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48195,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hardeman,Hardeman County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48197,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hardeman,Hardeman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48197,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hardeman,Hardeman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48197,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hardeman,Hardeman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48197,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hardeman,Hardeman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48197,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hardeman,Hardeman County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,3559,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48197,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hardeman,Hardeman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3716,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48197,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hardeman,Hardeman County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3716,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48197,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hardeman,Hardeman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48197,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hardeman,Hardeman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48197,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hardeman,Hardeman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48197,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hardeman,Hardeman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48197,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hardeman,Hardeman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48197,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hardeman,Hardeman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48197,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hardeman,Hardeman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48197,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hardeman,Hardeman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48197,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hardeman,Hardeman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,3716,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48197,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hardeman,Hardeman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48197,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hardin,Hardin County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,24,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48199,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hardin,Hardin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48199,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hardin,Hardin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48199,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hardin,Hardin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48199,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hardin,Hardin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48199,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hardin,Hardin County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,56277,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48199,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hardin,Hardin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,55044,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48199,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hardin,Hardin County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,38846,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48199,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hardin,Hardin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,3235,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48199,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hardin,Hardin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,16198,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48199,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hardin,Hardin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,70.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48199,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hardin,Hardin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,5.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48199,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hardin,Hardin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,29.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48199,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hardin,Hardin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,19,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48199,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hardin,Hardin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48199,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hardin,Hardin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,64.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48199,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hardin,Hardin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48199,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hardin,Hardin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,35610,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48199,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Harris,Harris County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,936,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48201,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Harris,Harris County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,304,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48201,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Harris,Harris County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48201,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Harris,Harris County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,122,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48201,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Harris,Harris County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,148,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48201,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Harris,Harris County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,4732491,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48201,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Harris,Harris County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4646404,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48201,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Harris,Harris County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3487487,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48201,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Harris,Harris County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,299183,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48201,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Harris,Harris County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1158917,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48201,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Harris,Harris County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,75.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48201,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Harris,Harris County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,6.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48201,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Harris,Harris County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,24.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48201,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Harris,Harris County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,632,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48201,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Harris,Harris County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,21.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48201,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Harris,Harris County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,46.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48201,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Harris,Harris County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1010970,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48201,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Harris,Harris County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2177561,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48201,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,43,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48203,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48203,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48203,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48203,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48203,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,68778,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48203,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,65958,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48203,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,42364,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48203,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,7789,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48203,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,23595,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48203,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,64.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48203,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,11.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48203,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,35.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48203,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,31,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48203,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,19.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48203,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,33.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48203,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,12568,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48203,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,22006,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48203,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hartley,Hartley County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48205,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hartley,Hartley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48205,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hartley,Hartley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48205,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hartley,Hartley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48205,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hartley,Hartley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48205,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hartley,Hartley County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,5362,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48205,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hartley,Hartley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,730,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48205,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hartley,Hartley County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,730,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48205,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hartley,Hartley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,730,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48205,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hartley,Hartley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48205,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hartley,Hartley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48205,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hartley,Hartley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48205,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hartley,Hartley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48205,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hartley,Hartley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48205,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hartley,Hartley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48205,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hartley,Hartley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48205,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hartley,Hartley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48205,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hartley,Hartley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48205,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Haskell,Haskell County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48207,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Haskell,Haskell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48207,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Haskell,Haskell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48207,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Haskell,Haskell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48207,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Haskell,Haskell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48207,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Haskell,Haskell County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,5424,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48207,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Haskell,Haskell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4981,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48207,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Haskell,Haskell County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4664,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48207,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Haskell,Haskell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,154,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48207,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Haskell,Haskell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,317,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48207,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Haskell,Haskell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,93.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48207,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Haskell,Haskell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,3.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48207,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Haskell,Haskell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,6.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48207,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Haskell,Haskell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48207,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Haskell,Haskell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,82,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48207,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Haskell,Haskell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48207,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Haskell,Haskell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,4086,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48207,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Haskell,Haskell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48207,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hays,Hays County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,79,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48209,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hays,Hays County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,32,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48209,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hays,Hays County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48209,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hays,Hays County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48209,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hays,Hays County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,30,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48209,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hays,Hays County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,243809,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48209,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hays,Hays County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,235888,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48209,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hays,Hays County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,75666,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48209,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hays,Hays County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,73278,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48209,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hays,Hays County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,160222,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48209,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hays,Hays County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,32.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48209,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hays,Hays County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,31.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48209,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hays,Hays County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,67.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48209,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hays,Hays County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,47,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48209,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hays,Hays County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48209,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hays,Hays County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48209,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hays,Hays County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2387,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48209,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hays,Hays County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48209,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hemphill,Hemphill County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48211,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hemphill,Hemphill County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48211,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hemphill,Hemphill County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48211,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hemphill,Hemphill County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48211,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hemphill,Hemphill County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48211,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hemphill,Hemphill County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,3368,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48211,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hemphill,Hemphill County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2119,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48211,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hemphill,Hemphill County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2119,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48211,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hemphill,Hemphill County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,2119,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48211,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hemphill,Hemphill County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48211,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hemphill,Hemphill County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48211,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hemphill,Hemphill County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48211,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hemphill,Hemphill County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48211,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hemphill,Hemphill County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48211,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hemphill,Hemphill County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48211,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hemphill,Hemphill County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48211,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hemphill,Hemphill County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48211,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hemphill,Hemphill County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48211,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Henderson,Henderson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,85,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48213,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Henderson,Henderson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48213,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Henderson,Henderson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48213,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Henderson,Henderson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48213,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Henderson,Henderson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48213,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Henderson,Henderson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,82348,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48213,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Henderson,Henderson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,119821,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48213,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Henderson,Henderson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,19571,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48213,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Henderson,Henderson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48213,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Henderson,Henderson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,100250,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48213,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Henderson,Henderson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,16.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48213,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Henderson,Henderson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48213,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Henderson,Henderson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,83.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48213,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Henderson,Henderson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,82,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48213,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Henderson,Henderson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48213,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Henderson,Henderson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,15.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48213,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Henderson,Henderson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1029,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48213,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Henderson,Henderson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,18542,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48213,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hidalgo,Hidalgo County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,30,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48215,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hidalgo,Hidalgo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48215,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hidalgo,Hidalgo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48215,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hidalgo,Hidalgo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48215,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hidalgo,Hidalgo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48215,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hidalgo,Hidalgo County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,872204,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48215,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hidalgo,Hidalgo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,799678,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48215,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hidalgo,Hidalgo County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,222110,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48215,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hidalgo,Hidalgo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,89493,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48215,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hidalgo,Hidalgo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,577567,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48215,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hidalgo,Hidalgo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,27.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48215,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hidalgo,Hidalgo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,11.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48215,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hidalgo,Hidalgo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,72.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48215,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hidalgo,Hidalgo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,20,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48215,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hidalgo,Hidalgo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48215,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hidalgo,Hidalgo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48215,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hidalgo,Hidalgo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48215,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hidalgo,Hidalgo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48215,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hill,Hill County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,41,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48217,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hill,Hill County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,21,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48217,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hill,Hill County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48217,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hill,Hill County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48217,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hill,Hill County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,20,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48217,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hill,Hill County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,35965,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48217,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hill,Hill County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,44270,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48217,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hill,Hill County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,13857,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48217,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hill,Hill County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,11791,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48217,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hill,Hill County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,30414,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48217,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hill,Hill County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,31.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48217,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hill,Hill County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,26.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48217,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hill,Hill County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,68.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48217,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hill,Hill County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,20,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48217,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hill,Hill County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,4.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48217,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hill,Hill County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48217,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hill,Hill County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2066,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48217,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hill,Hill County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48217,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hockley,Hockley County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48219,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hockley,Hockley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48219,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hockley,Hockley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48219,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hockley,Hockley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48219,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hockley,Hockley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48219,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hockley,Hockley County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,21490,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48219,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hockley,Hockley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,17223,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48219,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hockley,Hockley County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,16747,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48219,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hockley,Hockley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,3842,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48219,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hockley,Hockley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,476,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48219,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hockley,Hockley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,97.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48219,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hockley,Hockley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,22.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48219,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hockley,Hockley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48219,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hockley,Hockley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48219,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hockley,Hockley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,74.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48219,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hockley,Hockley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48219,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hockley,Hockley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,12906,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48219,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hockley,Hockley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48219,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hood,Hood County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,69,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48221,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hood,Hood County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48221,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hood,Hood County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48221,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hood,Hood County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48221,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hood,Hood County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48221,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hood,Hood County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,61953,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48221,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hood,Hood County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,58378,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48221,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hood,Hood County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5514,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48221,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hood,Hood County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,5514,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48221,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hood,Hood County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,52864,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48221,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hood,Hood County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,9.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48221,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hood,Hood County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,9.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48221,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hood,Hood County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,90.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48221,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hood,Hood County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,57,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48221,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hood,Hood County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48221,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hood,Hood County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48221,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hood,Hood County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48221,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hood,Hood County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48221,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hopkins,Hopkins County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48223,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hopkins,Hopkins County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48223,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hopkins,Hopkins County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48223,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hopkins,Hopkins County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48223,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hopkins,Hopkins County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48223,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hopkins,Hopkins County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,36795,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48223,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hopkins,Hopkins County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,39078,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48223,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hopkins,Hopkins County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,30215,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48223,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hopkins,Hopkins County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,2616,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48223,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hopkins,Hopkins County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8863,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48223,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hopkins,Hopkins County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,77.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48223,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hopkins,Hopkins County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,6.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48223,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hopkins,Hopkins County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,22.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48223,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hopkins,Hopkins County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48223,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hopkins,Hopkins County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,29.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48223,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hopkins,Hopkins County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,37.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48223,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hopkins,Hopkins County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,11515,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48223,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hopkins,Hopkins County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,14723,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48223,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Houston,Houston County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,24,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48225,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Houston,Houston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48225,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Houston,Houston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48225,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Houston,Houston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48225,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Houston,Houston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48225,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Houston,Houston County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,22068,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48225,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Houston,Houston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,37436,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48225,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Houston,Houston County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,18333,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48225,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Houston,Houston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48225,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Houston,Houston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,19103,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48225,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Houston,Houston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,49,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48225,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Houston,Houston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48225,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Houston,Houston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,51,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48225,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Houston,Houston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48225,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Houston,Houston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,48.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48225,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Houston,Houston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,0.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48225,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Houston,Houston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,18287,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48225,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Houston,Houston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,46,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48225,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48227,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48227,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48227,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48227,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48227,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,34797,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48227,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,29834,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48227,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,289,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48227,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,289,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48227,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,29545,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48227,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48227,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48227,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48227,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48227,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48227,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48227,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48227,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Howard,Howard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48227,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hudspeth,Hudspeth County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48229,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hudspeth,Hudspeth County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48229,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hudspeth,Hudspeth County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48229,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hudspeth,Hudspeth County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48229,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hudspeth,Hudspeth County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48229,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hudspeth,Hudspeth County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,3196,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48229,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hudspeth,Hudspeth County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5015,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48229,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hudspeth,Hudspeth County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5015,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48229,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hudspeth,Hudspeth County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,4939,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48229,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hudspeth,Hudspeth County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48229,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hudspeth,Hudspeth County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48229,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hudspeth,Hudspeth County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,98.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48229,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hudspeth,Hudspeth County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48229,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hudspeth,Hudspeth County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48229,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hudspeth,Hudspeth County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,1.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48229,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hudspeth,Hudspeth County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48229,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hudspeth,Hudspeth County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,76,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48229,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hudspeth,Hudspeth County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48229,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hunt,Hunt County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,34,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48231,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hunt,Hunt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48231,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hunt,Hunt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48231,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hunt,Hunt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48231,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hunt,Hunt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48231,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hunt,Hunt County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,100231,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48231,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hunt,Hunt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,108940,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48231,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hunt,Hunt County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,56676,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48231,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hunt,Hunt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,7678,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48231,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hunt,Hunt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,52264,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48231,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hunt,Hunt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,52,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48231,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hunt,Hunt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48231,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hunt,Hunt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,48,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48231,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hunt,Hunt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48231,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hunt,Hunt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,20.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48231,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hunt,Hunt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,24.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48231,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hunt,Hunt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,22694,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48231,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hunt,Hunt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,26303,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48231,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hutchinson,Hutchinson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48233,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hutchinson,Hutchinson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48233,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hutchinson,Hutchinson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48233,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hutchinson,Hutchinson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48233,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hutchinson,Hutchinson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48233,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hutchinson,Hutchinson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,20539,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48233,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hutchinson,Hutchinson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,27503,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48233,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hutchinson,Hutchinson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,17925,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48233,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hutchinson,Hutchinson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,17694,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48233,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hutchinson,Hutchinson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9578,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48233,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hutchinson,Hutchinson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,65.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48233,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hutchinson,Hutchinson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,64.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48233,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hutchinson,Hutchinson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,34.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48233,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hutchinson,Hutchinson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48233,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hutchinson,Hutchinson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48233,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hutchinson,Hutchinson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48233,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hutchinson,Hutchinson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,232,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48233,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Hutchinson,Hutchinson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48233,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Irion,Irion County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48235,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Irion,Irion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48235,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Irion,Irion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48235,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Irion,Irion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48235,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Irion,Irion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48235,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Irion,Irion County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,1522,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48235,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Irion,Irion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,842,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48235,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Irion,Irion County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,810,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48235,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Irion,Irion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,810,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48235,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Irion,Irion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,31,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48235,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Irion,Irion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,96.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48235,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Irion,Irion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,96.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48235,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Irion,Irion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,3.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48235,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Irion,Irion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48235,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Irion,Irion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48235,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Irion,Irion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48235,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Irion,Irion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48235,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Irion,Irion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48235,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jack,Jack County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48237,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jack,Jack County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48237,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jack,Jack County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48237,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jack,Jack County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48237,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jack,Jack County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48237,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jack,Jack County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,8492,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48237,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jack,Jack County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5542,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48237,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jack,Jack County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,709,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48237,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jack,Jack County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,709,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48237,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jack,Jack County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4833,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48237,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jack,Jack County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,12.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48237,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jack,Jack County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,12.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48237,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jack,Jack County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,87.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48237,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jack,Jack County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48237,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jack,Jack County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48237,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jack,Jack County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48237,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jack,Jack County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48237,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jack,Jack County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48237,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48239,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48239,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48239,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48239,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48239,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,15000,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48239,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,12493,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48239,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10394,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48239,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,10394,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48239,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2099,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48239,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,83.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48239,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,83.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48239,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,16.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48239,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48239,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48239,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48239,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48239,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48239,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,27,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48241,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48241,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48241,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48241,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48241,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,32900,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48241,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,34103,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48241,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,14619,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48241,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48241,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,19483,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48241,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,42.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48241,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48241,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,57.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48241,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,25,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48241,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48241,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,42.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48241,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48241,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jasper,Jasper County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,14619,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48241,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jeff Davis,Jeff Davis County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48243,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jeff Davis,Jeff Davis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48243,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jeff Davis,Jeff Davis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48243,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jeff Davis,Jeff Davis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48243,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jeff Davis,Jeff Davis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48243,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jeff Davis,Jeff Davis County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,1978,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48243,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jeff Davis,Jeff Davis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1984,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48243,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jeff Davis,Jeff Davis County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1984,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48243,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jeff Davis,Jeff Davis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1984,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48243,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jeff Davis,Jeff Davis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48243,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jeff Davis,Jeff Davis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48243,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jeff Davis,Jeff Davis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48243,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jeff Davis,Jeff Davis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48243,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jeff Davis,Jeff Davis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48243,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jeff Davis,Jeff Davis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48243,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jeff Davis,Jeff Davis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48243,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jeff Davis,Jeff Davis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48243,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jeff Davis,Jeff Davis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48243,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,22,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48245,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48245,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48245,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48245,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48245,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,255979,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48245,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,229365,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48245,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,166208,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48245,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,6629,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48245,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,63156,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48245,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,72.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48245,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,2.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48245,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,27.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48245,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48245,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,2.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48245,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,66.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48245,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,6215,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48245,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,153364,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48245,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jim Hogg,Jim Hogg County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48247,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jim Hogg,Jim Hogg County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48247,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jim Hogg,Jim Hogg County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48247,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jim Hogg,Jim Hogg County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48247,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jim Hogg,Jim Hogg County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48247,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jim Hogg,Jim Hogg County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,4839,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48247,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jim Hogg,Jim Hogg County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5051,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48247,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jim Hogg,Jim Hogg County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5051,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48247,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jim Hogg,Jim Hogg County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,5051,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48247,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jim Hogg,Jim Hogg County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48247,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jim Hogg,Jim Hogg County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48247,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jim Hogg,Jim Hogg County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48247,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jim Hogg,Jim Hogg County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48247,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jim Hogg,Jim Hogg County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48247,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jim Hogg,Jim Hogg County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48247,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jim Hogg,Jim Hogg County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48247,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jim Hogg,Jim Hogg County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48247,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jim Hogg,Jim Hogg County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48247,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jim Wells,Jim Wells County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48249,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jim Wells,Jim Wells County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48249,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jim Wells,Jim Wells County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48249,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jim Wells,Jim Wells County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48249,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jim Wells,Jim Wells County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48249,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jim Wells,Jim Wells County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,38813,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48249,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jim Wells,Jim Wells County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,25485,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48249,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jim Wells,Jim Wells County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,25454,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48249,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jim Wells,Jim Wells County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,5594,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48249,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jim Wells,Jim Wells County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,30,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48249,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jim Wells,Jim Wells County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48249,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jim Wells,Jim Wells County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,22,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48249,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jim Wells,Jim Wells County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48249,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jim Wells,Jim Wells County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48249,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jim Wells,Jim Wells County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,7.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48249,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jim Wells,Jim Wells County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,70.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48249,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jim Wells,Jim Wells County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1801,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48249,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jim Wells,Jim Wells County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,18059,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48249,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,73,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48251,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,37,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48251,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48251,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48251,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,33,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48251,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,180733,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48251,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,198670,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48251,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,152313,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48251,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,29666,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48251,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,46357,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48251,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,76.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48251,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,14.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48251,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,23.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48251,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,36,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48251,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,61.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48251,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48251,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,122647,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48251,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Johnson,Johnson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48251,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jones,Jones County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48253,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jones,Jones County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48253,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jones,Jones County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48253,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jones,Jones County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48253,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jones,Jones County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48253,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jones,Jones County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,19676,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48253,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jones,Jones County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,15544,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48253,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jones,Jones County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9590,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48253,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jones,Jones County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48253,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jones,Jones County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5953,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48253,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jones,Jones County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,61.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48253,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jones,Jones County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48253,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jones,Jones County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,38.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48253,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jones,Jones County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48253,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jones,Jones County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,61.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48253,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jones,Jones County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48253,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jones,Jones County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,9590,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48253,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Jones,Jones County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48253,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Karnes,Karnes County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48255,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Karnes,Karnes County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48255,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Karnes,Karnes County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48255,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Karnes,Karnes County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48255,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Karnes,Karnes County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48255,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Karnes,Karnes County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,14721,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48255,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Karnes,Karnes County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,20471,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48255,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Karnes,Karnes County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,20471,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48255,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Karnes,Karnes County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,20471,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48255,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Karnes,Karnes County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48255,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Karnes,Karnes County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48255,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Karnes,Karnes County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48255,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Karnes,Karnes County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48255,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Karnes,Karnes County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48255,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Karnes,Karnes County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48255,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Karnes,Karnes County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48255,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Karnes,Karnes County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48255,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Karnes,Karnes County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48255,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kaufman,Kaufman County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,28,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48257,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kaufman,Kaufman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,26,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48257,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kaufman,Kaufman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48257,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kaufman,Kaufman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,24,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48257,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kaufman,Kaufman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48257,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kaufman,Kaufman County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,146986,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48257,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kaufman,Kaufman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,139542,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48257,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kaufman,Kaufman County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,137283,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48257,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kaufman,Kaufman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48257,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kaufman,Kaufman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2259,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48257,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kaufman,Kaufman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48257,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kaufman,Kaufman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48257,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kaufman,Kaufman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48257,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kaufman,Kaufman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48257,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kaufman,Kaufman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,90.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48257,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kaufman,Kaufman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,7.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48257,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kaufman,Kaufman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,126467,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48257,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kaufman,Kaufman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,10816,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48257,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kendall,Kendall County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,35,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48259,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kendall,Kendall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,23,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48259,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kendall,Kendall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48259,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kendall,Kendall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48259,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kendall,Kendall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,23,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48259,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kendall,Kendall County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,44527,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48259,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kendall,Kendall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,28685,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48259,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kendall,Kendall County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6912,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48259,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kendall,Kendall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,6912,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48259,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kendall,Kendall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,21773,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48259,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kendall,Kendall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,24.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48259,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kendall,Kendall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,24.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48259,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kendall,Kendall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,75.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48259,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kendall,Kendall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48259,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kendall,Kendall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48259,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kendall,Kendall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48259,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kendall,Kendall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48259,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kendall,Kendall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48259,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kenedy,Kenedy County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48261,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kenedy,Kenedy County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48261,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kenedy,Kenedy County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48261,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kenedy,Kenedy County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48261,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kenedy,Kenedy County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48261,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kenedy,Kenedy County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,346,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48261,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kenedy,Kenedy County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,392,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48261,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kenedy,Kenedy County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,392,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48261,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kenedy,Kenedy County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,392,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48261,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kenedy,Kenedy County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48261,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kenedy,Kenedy County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48261,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kenedy,Kenedy County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48261,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kenedy,Kenedy County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48261,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kenedy,Kenedy County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48261,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kenedy,Kenedy County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48261,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kenedy,Kenedy County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48261,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kenedy,Kenedy County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48261,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kenedy,Kenedy County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48261,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kent,Kent County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48263,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kent,Kent County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48263,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kent,Kent County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48263,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kent,Kent County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48263,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kent,Kent County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48263,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kent,Kent County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,759,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48263,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kent,Kent County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,677,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48263,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kent,Kent County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,191,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48263,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kent,Kent County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,191,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48263,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kent,Kent County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,486,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48263,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kent,Kent County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,28.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48263,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kent,Kent County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,28.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48263,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kent,Kent County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,71.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48263,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kent,Kent County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48263,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kent,Kent County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48263,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kent,Kent County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48263,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kent,Kent County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48263,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kent,Kent County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48263,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kerr,Kerr County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,97,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48265,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kerr,Kerr County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,89,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48265,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kerr,Kerr County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48265,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kerr,Kerr County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48265,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kerr,Kerr County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,89,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48265,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kerr,Kerr County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,52676,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48265,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kerr,Kerr County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,51110,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48265,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kerr,Kerr County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,29107,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48265,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kerr,Kerr County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,29107,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48265,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kerr,Kerr County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,22003,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48265,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kerr,Kerr County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,56.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48265,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kerr,Kerr County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,56.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48265,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kerr,Kerr County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,43.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48265,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kerr,Kerr County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48265,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kerr,Kerr County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48265,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kerr,Kerr County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48265,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kerr,Kerr County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48265,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kerr,Kerr County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48265,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kimble,Kimble County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48267,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kimble,Kimble County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48267,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kimble,Kimble County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48267,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kimble,Kimble County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48267,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kimble,Kimble County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48267,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kimble,Kimble County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,4289,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48267,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kimble,Kimble County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3551,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48267,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kimble,Kimble County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,453,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48267,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kimble,Kimble County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,453,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48267,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kimble,Kimble County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3098,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48267,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kimble,Kimble County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,12.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48267,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kimble,Kimble County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,12.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48267,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kimble,Kimble County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,87.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48267,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kimble,Kimble County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48267,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kimble,Kimble County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48267,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kimble,Kimble County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48267,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kimble,Kimble County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48267,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kimble,Kimble County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48267,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,King,King County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48269,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,King,King County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48269,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,King,King County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48269,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,King,King County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48269,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,King,King County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48269,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,King,King County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,270,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48269,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,King,King County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,346,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48269,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,King,King County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48269,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,King,King County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48269,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,King,King County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,346,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48269,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,King,King County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48269,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,King,King County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48269,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,King,King County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48269,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,King,King County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48269,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,King,King County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48269,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,King,King County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48269,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,King,King County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48269,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,King,King County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48269,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kinney,Kinney County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48271,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kinney,Kinney County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48271,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kinney,Kinney County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48271,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kinney,Kinney County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48271,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kinney,Kinney County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48271,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kinney,Kinney County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,3127,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48271,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kinney,Kinney County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3498,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48271,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kinney,Kinney County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48271,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kinney,Kinney County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48271,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kinney,Kinney County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3498,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48271,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kinney,Kinney County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48271,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kinney,Kinney County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48271,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kinney,Kinney County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48271,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kinney,Kinney County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48271,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kinney,Kinney County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48271,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kinney,Kinney County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48271,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kinney,Kinney County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48271,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kinney,Kinney County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48271,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kleberg,Kleberg County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48273,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kleberg,Kleberg County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48273,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kleberg,Kleberg County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48273,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kleberg,Kleberg County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48273,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kleberg,Kleberg County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48273,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kleberg,Kleberg County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,30958,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48273,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kleberg,Kleberg County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,44097,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48273,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kleberg,Kleberg County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,43929,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48273,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kleberg,Kleberg County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,2606,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48273,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kleberg,Kleberg County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,168,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48273,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kleberg,Kleberg County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48273,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kleberg,Kleberg County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,5.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48273,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kleberg,Kleberg County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48273,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kleberg,Kleberg County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48273,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kleberg,Kleberg County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,93.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48273,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kleberg,Kleberg County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48273,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kleberg,Kleberg County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,41324,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48273,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Kleberg,Kleberg County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48273,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48275,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48275,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48275,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48275,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48275,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,3361,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48275,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3162,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48275,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2994,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48275,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48275,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,168,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48275,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,94.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48275,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48275,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,5.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48275,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48275,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,90.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48275,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48275,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2869,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48275,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Knox,Knox County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,126,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48275,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,La Salle,La Salle County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48283,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,La Salle,La Salle County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48283,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,La Salle,La Salle County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48283,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,La Salle,La Salle County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48283,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,La Salle,La Salle County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48283,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,La Salle,La Salle County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,6642,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48283,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,La Salle,La Salle County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,6850,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48283,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,La Salle,La Salle County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,134,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48283,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,La Salle,La Salle County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,134,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48283,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,La Salle,La Salle County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6716,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48283,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,La Salle,La Salle County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48283,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,La Salle,La Salle County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48283,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,La Salle,La Salle County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48283,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,La Salle,La Salle County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48283,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,La Salle,La Salle County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48283,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,La Salle,La Salle County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48283,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,La Salle,La Salle County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48283,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,La Salle,La Salle County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48283,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lamar,Lamar County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48277,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lamar,Lamar County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48277,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lamar,Lamar County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48277,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lamar,Lamar County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48277,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lamar,Lamar County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48277,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lamar,Lamar County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,50077,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48277,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lamar,Lamar County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,54119,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48277,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lamar,Lamar County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,54119,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48277,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lamar,Lamar County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,886,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48277,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lamar,Lamar County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48277,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lamar,Lamar County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48277,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lamar,Lamar County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48277,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lamar,Lamar County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48277,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lamar,Lamar County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48277,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lamar,Lamar County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,54,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48277,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lamar,Lamar County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,44.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48277,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lamar,Lamar County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,29244,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48277,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lamar,Lamar County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,23988,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48277,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lamb,Lamb County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48279,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lamb,Lamb County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48279,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lamb,Lamb County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48279,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lamb,Lamb County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48279,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lamb,Lamb County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48279,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lamb,Lamb County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,12984,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48279,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lamb,Lamb County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,11213,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48279,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lamb,Lamb County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11213,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48279,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lamb,Lamb County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,11123,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48279,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lamb,Lamb County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48279,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lamb,Lamb County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48279,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lamb,Lamb County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,99.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48279,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lamb,Lamb County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48279,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lamb,Lamb County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48279,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lamb,Lamb County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48279,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lamb,Lamb County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48279,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lamb,Lamb County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,91,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48279,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lamb,Lamb County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48279,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lampasas,Lampasas County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48281,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lampasas,Lampasas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48281,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lampasas,Lampasas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48281,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lampasas,Lampasas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48281,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lampasas,Lampasas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48281,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lampasas,Lampasas County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,21707,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48281,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lampasas,Lampasas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,28863,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48281,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lampasas,Lampasas County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48281,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lampasas,Lampasas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48281,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lampasas,Lampasas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,28863,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48281,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lampasas,Lampasas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48281,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lampasas,Lampasas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48281,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lampasas,Lampasas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48281,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lampasas,Lampasas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48281,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lampasas,Lampasas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48281,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lampasas,Lampasas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48281,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lampasas,Lampasas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48281,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lampasas,Lampasas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48281,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lavaca,Lavaca County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48285,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lavaca,Lavaca County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48285,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lavaca,Lavaca County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48285,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lavaca,Lavaca County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48285,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lavaca,Lavaca County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48285,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lavaca,Lavaca County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,20338,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48285,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lavaca,Lavaca County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5443,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48285,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lavaca,Lavaca County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4578,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48285,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lavaca,Lavaca County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,4578,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48285,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lavaca,Lavaca County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,864,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48285,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lavaca,Lavaca County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,84.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48285,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lavaca,Lavaca County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,84.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48285,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lavaca,Lavaca County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,15.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48285,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lavaca,Lavaca County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48285,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lavaca,Lavaca County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48285,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lavaca,Lavaca County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48285,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lavaca,Lavaca County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48285,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lavaca,Lavaca County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48285,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48287,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48287,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48287,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48287,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48287,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,17499,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48287,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,21967,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48287,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11465,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48287,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,11465,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48287,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10502,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48287,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,52.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48287,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,52.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48287,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,47.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48287,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48287,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,3.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48287,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48287,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,715,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48287,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48287,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Leon,Leon County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,22,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48289,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Leon,Leon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48289,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Leon,Leon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48289,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Leon,Leon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48289,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Leon,Leon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48289,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Leon,Leon County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,15727,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48289,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Leon,Leon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,21238,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48289,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Leon,Leon County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,276,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48289,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Leon,Leon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,276,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48289,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Leon,Leon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,20962,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48289,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Leon,Leon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48289,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Leon,Leon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48289,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Leon,Leon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48289,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Leon,Leon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,21,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48289,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Leon,Leon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48289,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Leon,Leon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48289,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Leon,Leon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48289,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Leon,Leon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48289,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Liberty,Liberty County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,74,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48291,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Liberty,Liberty County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,25,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48291,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Liberty,Liberty County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48291,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Liberty,Liberty County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48291,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Liberty,Liberty County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,24,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48291,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Liberty,Liberty County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,92351,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48291,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Liberty,Liberty County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,58296,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48291,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Liberty,Liberty County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10015,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48291,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Liberty,Liberty County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,8629,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48291,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Liberty,Liberty County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,48281,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48291,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Liberty,Liberty County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,17.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48291,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Liberty,Liberty County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,14.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48291,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Liberty,Liberty County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,82.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48291,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Liberty,Liberty County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,49,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48291,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Liberty,Liberty County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,2.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48291,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Liberty,Liberty County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48291,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Liberty,Liberty County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1387,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48291,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Liberty,Liberty County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48291,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Limestone,Limestone County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,20,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48293,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Limestone,Limestone County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48293,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Limestone,Limestone County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48293,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Limestone,Limestone County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48293,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Limestone,Limestone County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48293,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Limestone,Limestone County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,22103,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48293,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Limestone,Limestone County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,24798,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48293,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Limestone,Limestone County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,15667,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48293,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Limestone,Limestone County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,2016,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48293,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Limestone,Limestone County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9132,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48293,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Limestone,Limestone County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,63.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48293,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Limestone,Limestone County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,8.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48293,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Limestone,Limestone County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,36.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48293,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Limestone,Limestone County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48293,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Limestone,Limestone County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,52.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48293,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Limestone,Limestone County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,2.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48293,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Limestone,Limestone County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,12945,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48293,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Limestone,Limestone County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,706,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48293,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lipscomb,Lipscomb County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48295,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lipscomb,Lipscomb County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48295,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lipscomb,Lipscomb County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48295,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lipscomb,Lipscomb County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48295,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lipscomb,Lipscomb County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48295,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lipscomb,Lipscomb County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,3042,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48295,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lipscomb,Lipscomb County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2269,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48295,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lipscomb,Lipscomb County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1869,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48295,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lipscomb,Lipscomb County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1869,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48295,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lipscomb,Lipscomb County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,400,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48295,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lipscomb,Lipscomb County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,82.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48295,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lipscomb,Lipscomb County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,82.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48295,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lipscomb,Lipscomb County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,17.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48295,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lipscomb,Lipscomb County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48295,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lipscomb,Lipscomb County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48295,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lipscomb,Lipscomb County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48295,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lipscomb,Lipscomb County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48295,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lipscomb,Lipscomb County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48295,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Live Oak,Live Oak County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48297,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Live Oak,Live Oak County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48297,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Live Oak,Live Oak County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48297,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Live Oak,Live Oak County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48297,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Live Oak,Live Oak County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48297,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Live Oak,Live Oak County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,11343,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48297,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Live Oak,Live Oak County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,11644,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48297,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Live Oak,Live Oak County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5651,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48297,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Live Oak,Live Oak County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,5651,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48297,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Live Oak,Live Oak County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5993,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48297,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Live Oak,Live Oak County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,48.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48297,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Live Oak,Live Oak County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,48.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48297,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Live Oak,Live Oak County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,51.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48297,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Live Oak,Live Oak County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48297,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Live Oak,Live Oak County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48297,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Live Oak,Live Oak County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48297,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Live Oak,Live Oak County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48297,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Live Oak,Live Oak County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48297,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Llano,Llano County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,34,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48299,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Llano,Llano County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48299,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Llano,Llano County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48299,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Llano,Llano County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48299,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Llano,Llano County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48299,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Llano,Llano County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,21249,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48299,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Llano,Llano County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,34318,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48299,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Llano,Llano County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3966,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48299,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Llano,Llano County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,3966,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48299,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Llano,Llano County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,30353,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48299,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Llano,Llano County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,11.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48299,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Llano,Llano County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,11.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48299,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Llano,Llano County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,88.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48299,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Llano,Llano County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48299,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Llano,Llano County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48299,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Llano,Llano County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48299,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Llano,Llano County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48299,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Llano,Llano County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48299,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Loving,Loving County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48301,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Loving,Loving County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48301,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Loving,Loving County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48301,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Loving,Loving County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48301,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Loving,Loving County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48301,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Loving,Loving County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,67,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48301,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Loving,Loving County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,157,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48301,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Loving,Loving County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48301,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Loving,Loving County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48301,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Loving,Loving County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,157,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48301,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Loving,Loving County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48301,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Loving,Loving County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48301,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Loving,Loving County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48301,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Loving,Loving County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48301,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Loving,Loving County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48301,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Loving,Loving County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48301,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Loving,Loving County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48301,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Loving,Loving County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48301,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lubbock,Lubbock County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,79,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48303,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lubbock,Lubbock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,77,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48303,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lubbock,Lubbock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48303,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lubbock,Lubbock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48303,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lubbock,Lubbock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,70,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48303,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lubbock,Lubbock County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,311419,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48303,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lubbock,Lubbock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,282934,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48303,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lubbock,Lubbock County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,282739,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48303,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lubbock,Lubbock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,270854,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48303,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lubbock,Lubbock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,194,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48303,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lubbock,Lubbock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48303,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lubbock,Lubbock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,95.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48303,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lubbock,Lubbock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48303,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lubbock,Lubbock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48303,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lubbock,Lubbock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,4.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48303,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lubbock,Lubbock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48303,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lubbock,Lubbock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,11885,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48303,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lubbock,Lubbock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48303,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lynn,Lynn County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48305,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lynn,Lynn County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48305,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lynn,Lynn County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48305,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lynn,Lynn County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48305,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lynn,Lynn County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48305,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lynn,Lynn County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,5606,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48305,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lynn,Lynn County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4103,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48305,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lynn,Lynn County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4103,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48305,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lynn,Lynn County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,847,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48305,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lynn,Lynn County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48305,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lynn,Lynn County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48305,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lynn,Lynn County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,20.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48305,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lynn,Lynn County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48305,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lynn,Lynn County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48305,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lynn,Lynn County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,79.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48305,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lynn,Lynn County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48305,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lynn,Lynn County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,3256,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48305,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Lynn,Lynn County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48305,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48313,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48313,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48313,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48313,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48313,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,13445,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48313,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,10486,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48313,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4670,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48313,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,217,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48313,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5816,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48313,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,44.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48313,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,2.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48313,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,55.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48313,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48313,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48313,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,42.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48313,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48313,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,4452,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48313,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,20,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48315,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48315,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48315,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48315,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48315,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,9752,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48315,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,12217,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48315,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4972,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48315,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,4972,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48315,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7245,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48315,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,40.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48315,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,40.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48315,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,59.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48315,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48315,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48315,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48315,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48315,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48315,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48317,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48317,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48317,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48317,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48317,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,5250,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48317,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3038,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48317,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2760,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48317,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,2760,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48317,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,278,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48317,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,90.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48317,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,90.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48317,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,9.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48317,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48317,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48317,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48317,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48317,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Martin,Martin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48317,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Mason,Mason County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48319,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Mason,Mason County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48319,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Mason,Mason County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48319,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Mason,Mason County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48319,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Mason,Mason County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48319,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Mason,Mason County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,3964,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48319,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Mason,Mason County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2015,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48319,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Mason,Mason County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48319,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Mason,Mason County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48319,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Mason,Mason County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2015,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48319,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Mason,Mason County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48319,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Mason,Mason County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48319,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Mason,Mason County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48319,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Mason,Mason County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48319,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Mason,Mason County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48319,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Mason,Mason County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48319,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Mason,Mason County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48319,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Mason,Mason County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48319,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Matagorda,Matagorda County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,36,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48321,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Matagorda,Matagorda County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,24,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48321,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Matagorda,Matagorda County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48321,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Matagorda,Matagorda County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48321,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Matagorda,Matagorda County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,24,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48321,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Matagorda,Matagorda County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,36269,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48321,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Matagorda,Matagorda County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,35557,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48321,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Matagorda,Matagorda County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,14704,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48321,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Matagorda,Matagorda County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,14704,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48321,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Matagorda,Matagorda County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,20853,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48321,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Matagorda,Matagorda County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,41.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48321,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Matagorda,Matagorda County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,41.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48321,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Matagorda,Matagorda County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,58.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48321,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Matagorda,Matagorda County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48321,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Matagorda,Matagorda County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48321,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Matagorda,Matagorda County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48321,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Matagorda,Matagorda County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48321,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Matagorda,Matagorda County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48321,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Maverick,Maverick County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48323,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Maverick,Maverick County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48323,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Maverick,Maverick County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48323,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Maverick,Maverick County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48323,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Maverick,Maverick County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48323,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Maverick,Maverick County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,57844,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48323,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Maverick,Maverick County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,64984,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48323,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Maverick,Maverick County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7291,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48323,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Maverick,Maverick County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,7291,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48323,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Maverick,Maverick County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,57694,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48323,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Maverick,Maverick County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,11.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48323,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Maverick,Maverick County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,11.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48323,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Maverick,Maverick County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,88.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48323,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Maverick,Maverick County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48323,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Maverick,Maverick County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48323,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Maverick,Maverick County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48323,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Maverick,Maverick County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48323,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Maverick,Maverick County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48323,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,McCulloch,McCulloch County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48307,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,McCulloch,McCulloch County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48307,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,McCulloch,McCulloch County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48307,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,McCulloch,McCulloch County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48307,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,McCulloch,McCulloch County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48307,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,McCulloch,McCulloch County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,7567,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48307,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,McCulloch,McCulloch County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,6820,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48307,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,McCulloch,McCulloch County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6820,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48307,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,McCulloch,McCulloch County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,6771,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48307,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,McCulloch,McCulloch County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48307,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,McCulloch,McCulloch County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48307,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,McCulloch,McCulloch County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,99.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48307,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,McCulloch,McCulloch County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48307,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,McCulloch,McCulloch County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48307,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,McCulloch,McCulloch County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48307,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,McCulloch,McCulloch County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48307,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,McCulloch,McCulloch County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,49,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48307,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,McCulloch,McCulloch County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48307,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,McLennan,McLennan County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,67,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48309,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,McLennan,McLennan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,54,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48309,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,McLennan,McLennan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48309,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,McLennan,McLennan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48309,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,McLennan,McLennan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,44,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48309,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,McLennan,McLennan County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,261023,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48309,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,McLennan,McLennan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,254455,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48309,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,McLennan,McLennan County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,220164,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48309,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,McLennan,McLennan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,43892,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48309,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,McLennan,McLennan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,34291,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48309,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,McLennan,McLennan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,86.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48309,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,McLennan,McLennan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,17.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48309,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,McLennan,McLennan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,13.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48309,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,McLennan,McLennan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48309,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,McLennan,McLennan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,19.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48309,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,McLennan,McLennan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,48.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48309,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,McLennan,McLennan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,50524,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48309,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,McLennan,McLennan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,124077,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48309,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,McMullen,McMullen County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48311,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,McMullen,McMullen County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48311,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,McMullen,McMullen County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48311,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,McMullen,McMullen County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48311,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,McMullen,McMullen County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48311,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,McMullen,McMullen County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,599,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48311,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,McMullen,McMullen County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1598,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48311,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,McMullen,McMullen County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,875,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48311,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,McMullen,McMullen County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,875,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48311,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,McMullen,McMullen County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,723,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48311,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,McMullen,McMullen County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,54.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48311,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,McMullen,McMullen County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,54.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48311,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,McMullen,McMullen County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,45.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48311,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,McMullen,McMullen County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48311,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,McMullen,McMullen County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48311,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,McMullen,McMullen County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48311,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,McMullen,McMullen County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48311,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,McMullen,McMullen County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48311,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Medina,Medina County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,32,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48325,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Medina,Medina County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48325,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Medina,Medina County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48325,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Medina,Medina County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48325,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Medina,Medina County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48325,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Medina,Medina County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,50920,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48325,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Medina,Medina County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,65673,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48325,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Medina,Medina County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2627,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48325,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Medina,Medina County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,2627,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48325,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Medina,Medina County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,63046,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48325,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Medina,Medina County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48325,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Medina,Medina County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48325,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Medina,Medina County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,96,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48325,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Medina,Medina County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,28,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48325,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Medina,Medina County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48325,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Medina,Medina County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48325,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Medina,Medina County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48325,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Medina,Medina County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48325,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Menard,Menard County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48327,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Menard,Menard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48327,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Menard,Menard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48327,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Menard,Menard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48327,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Menard,Menard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48327,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Menard,Menard County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,1971,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48327,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Menard,Menard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1402,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48327,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Menard,Menard County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48327,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Menard,Menard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48327,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Menard,Menard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1402,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48327,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Menard,Menard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48327,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Menard,Menard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48327,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Menard,Menard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48327,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Menard,Menard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48327,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Menard,Menard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48327,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Menard,Menard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48327,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Menard,Menard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48327,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Menard,Menard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48327,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Midland,Midland County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,22,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48329,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Midland,Midland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48329,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Midland,Midland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48329,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Midland,Midland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48329,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Midland,Midland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48329,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Midland,Midland County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,170221,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48329,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Midland,Midland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,134437,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48329,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Midland,Midland County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6599,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48329,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Midland,Midland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,6599,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48329,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Midland,Midland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,127839,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48329,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Midland,Midland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,4.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48329,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Midland,Midland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,4.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48329,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Midland,Midland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,95.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48329,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Midland,Midland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48329,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Midland,Midland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48329,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Midland,Midland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48329,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Midland,Midland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48329,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Midland,Midland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48329,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Milam,Milam County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48331,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Milam,Milam County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48331,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Milam,Milam County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48331,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Milam,Milam County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48331,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Milam,Milam County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48331,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Milam,Milam County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,24724,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48331,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Milam,Milam County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,30095,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48331,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Milam,Milam County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1372,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48331,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Milam,Milam County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48331,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Milam,Milam County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,28723,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48331,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Milam,Milam County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,4.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48331,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Milam,Milam County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48331,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Milam,Milam County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,95.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48331,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Milam,Milam County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48331,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Milam,Milam County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48331,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Milam,Milam County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,4.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48331,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Milam,Milam County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48331,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Milam,Milam County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1372,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48331,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Mills,Mills County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48333,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Mills,Mills County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48333,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Mills,Mills County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48333,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Mills,Mills County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48333,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Mills,Mills County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48333,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Mills,Mills County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,4439,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48333,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Mills,Mills County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2377,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48333,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Mills,Mills County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,349,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48333,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Mills,Mills County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,349,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48333,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Mills,Mills County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2028,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48333,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Mills,Mills County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,14.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48333,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Mills,Mills County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,14.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48333,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Mills,Mills County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,85.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48333,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Mills,Mills County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48333,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Mills,Mills County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48333,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Mills,Mills County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48333,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Mills,Mills County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48333,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Mills,Mills County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48333,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Mitchell,Mitchell County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48335,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Mitchell,Mitchell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48335,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Mitchell,Mitchell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48335,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Mitchell,Mitchell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48335,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Mitchell,Mitchell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48335,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Mitchell,Mitchell County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,8985,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48335,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Mitchell,Mitchell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,8010,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48335,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Mitchell,Mitchell County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8010,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48335,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Mitchell,Mitchell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,7735,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48335,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Mitchell,Mitchell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48335,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Mitchell,Mitchell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48335,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Mitchell,Mitchell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,96.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48335,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Mitchell,Mitchell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48335,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Mitchell,Mitchell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48335,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Mitchell,Mitchell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,3.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48335,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Mitchell,Mitchell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48335,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Mitchell,Mitchell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,275,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48335,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Mitchell,Mitchell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48335,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Montague,Montague County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48337,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Montague,Montague County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48337,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Montague,Montague County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48337,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Montague,Montague County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48337,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Montague,Montague County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48337,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Montague,Montague County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,19969,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48337,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Montague,Montague County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,13098,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48337,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Montague,Montague County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2684,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48337,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Montague,Montague County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,2684,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48337,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Montague,Montague County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10415,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48337,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Montague,Montague County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,20.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48337,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Montague,Montague County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,20.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48337,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Montague,Montague County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,79.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48337,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Montague,Montague County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48337,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Montague,Montague County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48337,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Montague,Montague County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48337,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Montague,Montague County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48337,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Montague,Montague County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48337,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,324,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48339,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48339,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48339,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48339,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48339,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,624938,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48339,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,528877,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48339,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,51803,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48339,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,32542,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48339,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,477074,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48339,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,9.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48339,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,6.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48339,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,90.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48339,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,308,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48339,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,1.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48339,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,2.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48339,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,6613,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48339,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,12648,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48339,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Moore,Moore County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48341,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Moore,Moore County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48341,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Moore,Moore County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48341,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Moore,Moore County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48341,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Moore,Moore County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48341,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Moore,Moore County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,21273,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48341,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Moore,Moore County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,20794,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48341,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Moore,Moore County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,20651,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48341,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Moore,Moore County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,20518,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48341,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Moore,Moore County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,143,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48341,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Moore,Moore County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48341,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Moore,Moore County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,98.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48341,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Moore,Moore County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48341,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Moore,Moore County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48341,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Moore,Moore County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48341,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Moore,Moore County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48341,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Moore,Moore County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,133,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48341,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Moore,Moore County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48341,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Morris,Morris County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48343,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Morris,Morris County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48343,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Morris,Morris County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48343,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Morris,Morris County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48343,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Morris,Morris County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48343,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Morris,Morris County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,11963,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48343,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Morris,Morris County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,11517,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48343,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Morris,Morris County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48343,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Morris,Morris County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48343,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Morris,Morris County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11517,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48343,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Morris,Morris County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48343,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Morris,Morris County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48343,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Morris,Morris County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48343,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Morris,Morris County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48343,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Morris,Morris County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48343,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Morris,Morris County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48343,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Morris,Morris County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48343,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Morris,Morris County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48343,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Motley,Motley County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48345,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Motley,Motley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48345,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Motley,Motley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48345,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Motley,Motley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48345,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Motley,Motley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48345,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Motley,Motley County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,1052,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48345,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Motley,Motley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,849,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48345,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Motley,Motley County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,801,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48345,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Motley,Motley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,801,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48345,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Motley,Motley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,48,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48345,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Motley,Motley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,94.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48345,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Motley,Motley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,94.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48345,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Motley,Motley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,5.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48345,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Motley,Motley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48345,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Motley,Motley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48345,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Motley,Motley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48345,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Motley,Motley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48345,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Motley,Motley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48345,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Nacogdoches,Nacogdoches County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48347,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Nacogdoches,Nacogdoches County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48347,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Nacogdoches,Nacogdoches County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48347,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Nacogdoches,Nacogdoches County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48347,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Nacogdoches,Nacogdoches County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48347,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Nacogdoches,Nacogdoches County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,64624,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48347,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Nacogdoches,Nacogdoches County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,73615,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48347,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Nacogdoches,Nacogdoches County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,51022,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48347,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Nacogdoches,Nacogdoches County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,2061,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48347,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Nacogdoches,Nacogdoches County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,22593,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48347,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Nacogdoches,Nacogdoches County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,69.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48347,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Nacogdoches,Nacogdoches County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,2.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48347,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Nacogdoches,Nacogdoches County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,30.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48347,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Nacogdoches,Nacogdoches County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48347,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Nacogdoches,Nacogdoches County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48347,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Nacogdoches,Nacogdoches County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,62.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48347,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Nacogdoches,Nacogdoches County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2927,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48347,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Nacogdoches,Nacogdoches County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,46034,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48347,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Navarro,Navarro County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,22,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48349,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Navarro,Navarro County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,20,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48349,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Navarro,Navarro County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48349,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Navarro,Navarro County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,19,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48349,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Navarro,Navarro County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48349,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Navarro,Navarro County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,52784,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48349,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Navarro,Navarro County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,55482,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48349,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Navarro,Navarro County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,46706,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48349,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Navarro,Navarro County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48349,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Navarro,Navarro County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8775,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48349,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Navarro,Navarro County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,84.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48349,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Navarro,Navarro County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48349,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Navarro,Navarro County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,15.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48349,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Navarro,Navarro County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48349,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Navarro,Navarro County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,43.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48349,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Navarro,Navarro County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,40.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48349,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Navarro,Navarro County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,24053,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48349,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Navarro,Navarro County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,22653,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48349,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48351,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48351,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48351,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48351,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48351,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,12163,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48351,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,10720,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48351,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48351,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48351,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10720,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48351,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48351,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48351,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48351,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48351,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48351,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48351,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48351,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Newton,Newton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48351,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Nolan,Nolan County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48353,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Nolan,Nolan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48353,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Nolan,Nolan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48353,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Nolan,Nolan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48353,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Nolan,Nolan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48353,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Nolan,Nolan County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,14721,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48353,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Nolan,Nolan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,15756,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48353,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Nolan,Nolan County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,15489,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48353,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Nolan,Nolan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,15489,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48353,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Nolan,Nolan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,267,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48353,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Nolan,Nolan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48353,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Nolan,Nolan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,98.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48353,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Nolan,Nolan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48353,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Nolan,Nolan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48353,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Nolan,Nolan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48353,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Nolan,Nolan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48353,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Nolan,Nolan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48353,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Nolan,Nolan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48353,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Nueces,Nueces County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48355,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Nueces,Nueces County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48355,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Nueces,Nueces County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48355,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Nueces,Nueces County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48355,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Nueces,Nueces County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48355,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Nueces,Nueces County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,353090,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48355,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Nueces,Nueces County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,361482,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48355,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Nueces,Nueces County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,361482,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48355,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Nueces,Nueces County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,4034,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48355,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Nueces,Nueces County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48355,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Nueces,Nueces County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48355,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Nueces,Nueces County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48355,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Nueces,Nueces County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48355,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Nueces,Nueces County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48355,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Nueces,Nueces County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,9.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48355,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Nueces,Nueces County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,89.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48355,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Nueces,Nueces County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,33098,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48355,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Nueces,Nueces County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,324350,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48355,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Ochiltree,Ochiltree County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48357,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Ochiltree,Ochiltree County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48357,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Ochiltree,Ochiltree County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48357,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Ochiltree,Ochiltree County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48357,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Ochiltree,Ochiltree County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48357,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Ochiltree,Ochiltree County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,9960,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48357,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Ochiltree,Ochiltree County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,8730,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48357,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Ochiltree,Ochiltree County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8730,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48357,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Ochiltree,Ochiltree County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,8730,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48357,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Ochiltree,Ochiltree County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48357,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Ochiltree,Ochiltree County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48357,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Ochiltree,Ochiltree County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48357,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Ochiltree,Ochiltree County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48357,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Ochiltree,Ochiltree County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48357,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Ochiltree,Ochiltree County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48357,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Ochiltree,Ochiltree County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48357,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Ochiltree,Ochiltree County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48357,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Ochiltree,Ochiltree County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48357,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Oldham,Oldham County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48359,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Oldham,Oldham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48359,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Oldham,Oldham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48359,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Oldham,Oldham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48359,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Oldham,Oldham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48359,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Oldham,Oldham County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,1761,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48359,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Oldham,Oldham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2450,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48359,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Oldham,Oldham County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2450,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48359,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Oldham,Oldham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,2450,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48359,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Oldham,Oldham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48359,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Oldham,Oldham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48359,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Oldham,Oldham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48359,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Oldham,Oldham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48359,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Oldham,Oldham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48359,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Oldham,Oldham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48359,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Oldham,Oldham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48359,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Oldham,Oldham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48359,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Oldham,Oldham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48359,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,70,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48361,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,22,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48361,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48361,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48361,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,22,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48361,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,84702,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48361,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,74545,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48361,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,29112,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48361,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,29112,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48361,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,45433,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48361,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,39.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48361,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,39.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48361,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,60.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48361,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,48,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48361,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48361,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48361,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48361,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48361,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Palo Pinto,Palo Pinto County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,19,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48363,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Palo Pinto,Palo Pinto County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48363,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Palo Pinto,Palo Pinto County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48363,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Palo Pinto,Palo Pinto County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48363,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Palo Pinto,Palo Pinto County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48363,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Palo Pinto,Palo Pinto County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,28427,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48363,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Palo Pinto,Palo Pinto County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,35744,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48363,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Palo Pinto,Palo Pinto County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,715,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48363,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Palo Pinto,Palo Pinto County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,477,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48363,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Palo Pinto,Palo Pinto County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,35029,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48363,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Palo Pinto,Palo Pinto County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48363,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Palo Pinto,Palo Pinto County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48363,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Palo Pinto,Palo Pinto County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48363,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Palo Pinto,Palo Pinto County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48363,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Palo Pinto,Palo Pinto County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48363,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Palo Pinto,Palo Pinto County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48363,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Palo Pinto,Palo Pinto County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48363,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Palo Pinto,Palo Pinto County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48363,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Panola,Panola County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,21,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48365,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Panola,Panola County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48365,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Panola,Panola County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48365,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Panola,Panola County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48365,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Panola,Panola County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48365,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Panola,Panola County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,22513,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48365,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Panola,Panola County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,22097,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48365,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Panola,Panola County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5344,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48365,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Panola,Panola County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,5344,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48365,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Panola,Panola County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,16753,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48365,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Panola,Panola County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,24.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48365,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Panola,Panola County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,24.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48365,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Panola,Panola County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,75.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48365,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Panola,Panola County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48365,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Panola,Panola County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48365,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Panola,Panola County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48365,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Panola,Panola County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48365,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Panola,Panola County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48365,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Parker,Parker County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,76,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48367,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Parker,Parker County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,19,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48367,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Parker,Parker County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48367,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Parker,Parker County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48367,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Parker,Parker County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48367,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Parker,Parker County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,149432,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48367,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Parker,Parker County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,91605,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48367,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Parker,Parker County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,41281,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48367,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Parker,Parker County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,12119,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48367,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Parker,Parker County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,50324,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48367,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Parker,Parker County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,45.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48367,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Parker,Parker County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,13.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48367,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Parker,Parker County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,54.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48367,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Parker,Parker County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,57,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48367,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Parker,Parker County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,2.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48367,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Parker,Parker County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,29,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48367,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Parker,Parker County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2573,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48367,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Parker,Parker County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,26589,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48367,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Parmer,Parmer County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48369,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Parmer,Parmer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48369,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Parmer,Parmer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48369,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Parmer,Parmer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48369,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Parmer,Parmer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48369,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Parmer,Parmer County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,9851,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48369,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Parmer,Parmer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,8742,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48369,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Parmer,Parmer County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8742,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48369,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Parmer,Parmer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,8742,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48369,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Parmer,Parmer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48369,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Parmer,Parmer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48369,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Parmer,Parmer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48369,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Parmer,Parmer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48369,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Parmer,Parmer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48369,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Parmer,Parmer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48369,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Parmer,Parmer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48369,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Parmer,Parmer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48369,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Parmer,Parmer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48369,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Pecos,Pecos County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48371,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Pecos,Pecos County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48371,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Pecos,Pecos County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48371,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Pecos,Pecos County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48371,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Pecos,Pecos County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48371,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Pecos,Pecos County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,15165,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48371,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Pecos,Pecos County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,18823,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48371,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Pecos,Pecos County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,18585,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48371,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Pecos,Pecos County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,18585,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48371,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Pecos,Pecos County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,238,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48371,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Pecos,Pecos County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48371,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Pecos,Pecos County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,98.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48371,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Pecos,Pecos County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48371,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Pecos,Pecos County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48371,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Pecos,Pecos County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48371,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Pecos,Pecos County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48371,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Pecos,Pecos County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48371,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Pecos,Pecos County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48371,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,80,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48373,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,30,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48373,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48373,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48373,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,28,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48373,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,50505,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48373,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,50394,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48373,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,27504,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48373,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,16361,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48373,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,22890,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48373,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,54.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48373,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,32.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48373,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,45.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48373,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,50,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48373,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,22.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48373,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48373,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,11143,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48373,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48373,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Potter,Potter County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48375,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Potter,Potter County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48375,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Potter,Potter County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48375,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Potter,Potter County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48375,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Potter,Potter County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48375,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Potter,Potter County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,118173,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48375,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Potter,Potter County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,135312,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48375,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Potter,Potter County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,135312,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48375,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Potter,Potter County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,135312,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48375,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Potter,Potter County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48375,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Potter,Potter County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48375,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Potter,Potter County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48375,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Potter,Potter County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48375,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Potter,Potter County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48375,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Potter,Potter County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48375,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Potter,Potter County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48375,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Potter,Potter County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48375,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Potter,Potter County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48375,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Presidio,Presidio County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48377,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Presidio,Presidio County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48377,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Presidio,Presidio County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48377,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Presidio,Presidio County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48377,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Presidio,Presidio County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48377,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Presidio,Presidio County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,6102,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48377,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Presidio,Presidio County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7334,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48377,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Presidio,Presidio County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7334,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48377,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Presidio,Presidio County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,7334,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48377,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Presidio,Presidio County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48377,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Presidio,Presidio County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48377,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Presidio,Presidio County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48377,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Presidio,Presidio County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48377,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Presidio,Presidio County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48377,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Presidio,Presidio County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48377,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Presidio,Presidio County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48377,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Presidio,Presidio County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48377,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Presidio,Presidio County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48377,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Rains,Rains County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48379,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Rains,Rains County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48379,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Rains,Rains County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48379,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Rains,Rains County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48379,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Rains,Rains County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48379,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Rains,Rains County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,12199,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48379,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Rains,Rains County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,10412,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48379,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Rains,Rains County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48379,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Rains,Rains County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48379,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Rains,Rains County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10412,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48379,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Rains,Rains County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48379,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Rains,Rains County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48379,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Rains,Rains County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48379,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Rains,Rains County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48379,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Rains,Rains County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48379,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Rains,Rains County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48379,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Rains,Rains County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48379,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Rains,Rains County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48379,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Randall,Randall County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,33,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48381,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Randall,Randall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,33,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48381,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Randall,Randall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48381,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Randall,Randall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48381,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Randall,Randall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,32,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48381,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Randall,Randall County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,141231,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48381,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Randall,Randall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,75751,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48381,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Randall,Randall County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,75751,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48381,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Randall,Randall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,61932,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48381,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Randall,Randall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48381,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Randall,Randall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48381,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Randall,Randall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,81.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48381,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Randall,Randall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48381,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Randall,Randall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48381,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Randall,Randall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,18.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48381,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Randall,Randall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48381,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Randall,Randall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,13819,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48381,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Randall,Randall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48381,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Reagan,Reagan County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48383,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Reagan,Reagan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48383,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Reagan,Reagan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48383,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Reagan,Reagan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48383,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Reagan,Reagan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48383,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Reagan,Reagan County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,3376,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48383,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Reagan,Reagan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2798,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48383,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Reagan,Reagan County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2798,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48383,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Reagan,Reagan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48383,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Reagan,Reagan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48383,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Reagan,Reagan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48383,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Reagan,Reagan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48383,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Reagan,Reagan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48383,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Reagan,Reagan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48383,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Reagan,Reagan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48383,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Reagan,Reagan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48383,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Reagan,Reagan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2798,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48383,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Reagan,Reagan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48383,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Real,Real County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48385,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Real,Real County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48385,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Real,Real County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48385,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Real,Real County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48385,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Real,Real County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48385,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Real,Real County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,2743,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48385,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Real,Real County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4779,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48385,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Real,Real County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,83,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48385,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Real,Real County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,83,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48385,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Real,Real County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4696,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48385,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Real,Real County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48385,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Real,Real County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48385,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Real,Real County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48385,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Real,Real County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48385,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Real,Real County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48385,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Real,Real County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48385,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Real,Real County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48385,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Real,Real County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48385,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Red River,Red River County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48387,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Red River,Red River County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48387,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Red River,Red River County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48387,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Red River,Red River County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48387,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Red River,Red River County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48387,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Red River,Red River County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,11550,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48387,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Red River,Red River County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,15183,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48387,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Red River,Red River County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2980,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48387,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Red River,Red River County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48387,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Red River,Red River County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,12202,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48387,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Red River,Red River County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,19.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48387,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Red River,Red River County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48387,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Red River,Red River County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,80.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48387,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Red River,Red River County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48387,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Red River,Red River County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,19.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48387,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Red River,Red River County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48387,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Red River,Red River County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2980,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48387,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Red River,Red River County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48387,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Reeves,Reeves County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48389,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Reeves,Reeves County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48389,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Reeves,Reeves County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48389,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Reeves,Reeves County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48389,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Reeves,Reeves County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48389,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Reeves,Reeves County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,14730,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48389,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Reeves,Reeves County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,14539,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48389,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Reeves,Reeves County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,13858,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48389,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Reeves,Reeves County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,13858,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48389,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Reeves,Reeves County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,681,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48389,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Reeves,Reeves County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,95.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48389,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Reeves,Reeves County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,95.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48389,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Reeves,Reeves County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,4.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48389,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Reeves,Reeves County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48389,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Reeves,Reeves County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48389,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Reeves,Reeves County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48389,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Reeves,Reeves County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48389,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Reeves,Reeves County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48389,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Refugio,Refugio County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48391,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Refugio,Refugio County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48391,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Refugio,Refugio County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48391,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Refugio,Refugio County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48391,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Refugio,Refugio County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48391,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Refugio,Refugio County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,6747,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48391,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Refugio,Refugio County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5378,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48391,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Refugio,Refugio County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5378,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48391,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Refugio,Refugio County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,5378,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48391,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Refugio,Refugio County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48391,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Refugio,Refugio County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48391,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Refugio,Refugio County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48391,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Refugio,Refugio County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48391,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Refugio,Refugio County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48391,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Refugio,Refugio County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48391,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Refugio,Refugio County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48391,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Refugio,Refugio County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48391,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Refugio,Refugio County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48391,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Roberts,Roberts County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48393,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Roberts,Roberts County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48393,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Roberts,Roberts County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48393,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Roberts,Roberts County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48393,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Roberts,Roberts County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48393,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Roberts,Roberts County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,823,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48393,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Roberts,Roberts County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,477,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48393,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Roberts,Roberts County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,477,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48393,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Roberts,Roberts County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,477,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48393,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Roberts,Roberts County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48393,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Roberts,Roberts County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48393,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Roberts,Roberts County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48393,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Roberts,Roberts County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48393,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Roberts,Roberts County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48393,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Roberts,Roberts County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48393,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Roberts,Roberts County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48393,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Roberts,Roberts County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48393,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Roberts,Roberts County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48393,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Robertson,Robertson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48395,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Robertson,Robertson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48395,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Robertson,Robertson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48395,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Robertson,Robertson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48395,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Robertson,Robertson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48395,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Robertson,Robertson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,16740,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48395,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Robertson,Robertson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,13906,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48395,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Robertson,Robertson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3124,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48395,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Robertson,Robertson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1584,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48395,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Robertson,Robertson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10782,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48395,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Robertson,Robertson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,22.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48395,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Robertson,Robertson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,11.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48395,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Robertson,Robertson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,77.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48395,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Robertson,Robertson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48395,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Robertson,Robertson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48395,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Robertson,Robertson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,10.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48395,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Robertson,Robertson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,50,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48395,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Robertson,Robertson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1491,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48395,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Rockwall,Rockwall County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48397,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Rockwall,Rockwall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48397,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Rockwall,Rockwall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48397,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Rockwall,Rockwall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48397,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Rockwall,Rockwall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48397,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Rockwall,Rockwall County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,109090,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48397,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Rockwall,Rockwall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,89669,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48397,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Rockwall,Rockwall County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,89669,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48397,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Rockwall,Rockwall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48397,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Rockwall,Rockwall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48397,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Rockwall,Rockwall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48397,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Rockwall,Rockwall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48397,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Rockwall,Rockwall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48397,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Rockwall,Rockwall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48397,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Rockwall,Rockwall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48397,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Rockwall,Rockwall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48397,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Rockwall,Rockwall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,89669,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48397,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Rockwall,Rockwall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48397,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Runnels,Runnels County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48399,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Runnels,Runnels County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48399,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Runnels,Runnels County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48399,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Runnels,Runnels County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48399,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Runnels,Runnels County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48399,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Runnels,Runnels County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,9921,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48399,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Runnels,Runnels County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,10145,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48399,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Runnels,Runnels County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4047,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48399,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Runnels,Runnels County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48399,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Runnels,Runnels County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6097,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48399,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Runnels,Runnels County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,39.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48399,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Runnels,Runnels County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48399,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Runnels,Runnels County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,60.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48399,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Runnels,Runnels County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48399,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Runnels,Runnels County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,39.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48399,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Runnels,Runnels County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48399,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Runnels,Runnels County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,4047,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48399,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Runnels,Runnels County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48399,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Rusk,Rusk County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,36,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48401,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Rusk,Rusk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48401,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Rusk,Rusk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48401,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Rusk,Rusk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48401,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Rusk,Rusk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48401,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Rusk,Rusk County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,52225,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48401,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Rusk,Rusk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,50757,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48401,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Rusk,Rusk County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,14102,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48401,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Rusk,Rusk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,11866,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48401,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Rusk,Rusk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,36655,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48401,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Rusk,Rusk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,27.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48401,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Rusk,Rusk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,23.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48401,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Rusk,Rusk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,72.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48401,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Rusk,Rusk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,24,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48401,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Rusk,Rusk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48401,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Rusk,Rusk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,4.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48401,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Rusk,Rusk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48401,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Rusk,Rusk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2236,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48401,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Sabine,Sabine County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48403,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Sabine,Sabine County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48403,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Sabine,Sabine County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48403,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Sabine,Sabine County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48403,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Sabine,Sabine County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48403,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Sabine,Sabine County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,9881,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48403,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Sabine,Sabine County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,18529,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48403,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Sabine,Sabine County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48403,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Sabine,Sabine County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48403,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Sabine,Sabine County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,18529,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48403,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Sabine,Sabine County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48403,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Sabine,Sabine County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48403,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Sabine,Sabine County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48403,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Sabine,Sabine County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48403,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Sabine,Sabine County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48403,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Sabine,Sabine County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48403,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Sabine,Sabine County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48403,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Sabine,Sabine County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48403,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,San Augustine,San Augustine County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48405,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,San Augustine,San Augustine County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48405,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,San Augustine,San Augustine County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48405,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,San Augustine,San Augustine County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48405,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,San Augustine,San Augustine County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48405,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,San Augustine,San Augustine County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,7919,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48405,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,San Augustine,San Augustine County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7319,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48405,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,San Augustine,San Augustine County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,780,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48405,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,San Augustine,San Augustine County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,780,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48405,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,San Augustine,San Augustine County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6540,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48405,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,San Augustine,San Augustine County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,10.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48405,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,San Augustine,San Augustine County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,10.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48405,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,San Augustine,San Augustine County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,89.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48405,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,San Augustine,San Augustine County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48405,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,San Augustine,San Augustine County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48405,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,San Augustine,San Augustine County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48405,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,San Augustine,San Augustine County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48405,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,San Augustine,San Augustine County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48405,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,San Jacinto,San Jacinto County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,35,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48407,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,San Jacinto,San Jacinto County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48407,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,San Jacinto,San Jacinto County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48407,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,San Jacinto,San Jacinto County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48407,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,San Jacinto,San Jacinto County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48407,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,San Jacinto,San Jacinto County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,27483,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48407,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,San Jacinto,San Jacinto County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,29032,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48407,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,San Jacinto,San Jacinto County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11632,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48407,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,San Jacinto,San Jacinto County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,11632,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48407,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,San Jacinto,San Jacinto County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,17400,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48407,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,San Jacinto,San Jacinto County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,40.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48407,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,San Jacinto,San Jacinto County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,40.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48407,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,San Jacinto,San Jacinto County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,59.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48407,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,San Jacinto,San Jacinto County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,22,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48407,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,San Jacinto,San Jacinto County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48407,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,San Jacinto,San Jacinto County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48407,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,San Jacinto,San Jacinto County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48407,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,San Jacinto,San Jacinto County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48407,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,San Patricio,San Patricio County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48409,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,San Patricio,San Patricio County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48409,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,San Patricio,San Patricio County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48409,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,San Patricio,San Patricio County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48409,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,San Patricio,San Patricio County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48409,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,San Patricio,San Patricio County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,68772,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48409,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,San Patricio,San Patricio County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,67780,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48409,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,San Patricio,San Patricio County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,62831,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48409,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,San Patricio,San Patricio County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,7069,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48409,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,San Patricio,San Patricio County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4948,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48409,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,San Patricio,San Patricio County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,92.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48409,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,San Patricio,San Patricio County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,10.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48409,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,San Patricio,San Patricio County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,7.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48409,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,San Patricio,San Patricio County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48409,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,San Patricio,San Patricio County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,82.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48409,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,San Patricio,San Patricio County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,0.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48409,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,San Patricio,San Patricio County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,55629,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48409,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,San Patricio,San Patricio County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,134,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48409,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,San Saba,San Saba County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48411,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,San Saba,San Saba County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48411,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,San Saba,San Saba County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48411,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,San Saba,San Saba County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48411,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,San Saba,San Saba County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48411,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,San Saba,San Saba County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,5730,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48411,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,San Saba,San Saba County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7544,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48411,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,San Saba,San Saba County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3763,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48411,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,San Saba,San Saba County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48411,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,San Saba,San Saba County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3781,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48411,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,San Saba,San Saba County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,49.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48411,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,San Saba,San Saba County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48411,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,San Saba,San Saba County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,50.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48411,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,San Saba,San Saba County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48411,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,San Saba,San Saba County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,10.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48411,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,San Saba,San Saba County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,39.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48411,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,San Saba,San Saba County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,810,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48411,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,San Saba,San Saba County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2953,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48411,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Schleicher,Schleicher County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48413,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Schleicher,Schleicher County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48413,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Schleicher,Schleicher County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48413,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Schleicher,Schleicher County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48413,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Schleicher,Schleicher County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48413,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Schleicher,Schleicher County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,2442,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48413,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Schleicher,Schleicher County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2059,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48413,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Schleicher,Schleicher County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1993,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48413,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Schleicher,Schleicher County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1993,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48413,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Schleicher,Schleicher County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,67,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48413,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Schleicher,Schleicher County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,96.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48413,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Schleicher,Schleicher County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,96.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48413,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Schleicher,Schleicher County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,3.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48413,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Schleicher,Schleicher County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48413,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Schleicher,Schleicher County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48413,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Schleicher,Schleicher County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48413,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Schleicher,Schleicher County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48413,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Schleicher,Schleicher County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48413,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Scurry,Scurry County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48415,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Scurry,Scurry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48415,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Scurry,Scurry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48415,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Scurry,Scurry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48415,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Scurry,Scurry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48415,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Scurry,Scurry County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,16931,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48415,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Scurry,Scurry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,11923,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48415,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Scurry,Scurry County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1647,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48415,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Scurry,Scurry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,546,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48415,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Scurry,Scurry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10276,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48415,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Scurry,Scurry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,13.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48415,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Scurry,Scurry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,4.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48415,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Scurry,Scurry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,86.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48415,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Scurry,Scurry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48415,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Scurry,Scurry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48415,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Scurry,Scurry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48415,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Scurry,Scurry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48415,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Scurry,Scurry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48415,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Shackelford,Shackelford County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48417,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Shackelford,Shackelford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48417,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Shackelford,Shackelford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48417,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Shackelford,Shackelford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48417,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Shackelford,Shackelford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48417,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Shackelford,Shackelford County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,3122,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48417,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Shackelford,Shackelford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4932,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48417,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Shackelford,Shackelford County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48417,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Shackelford,Shackelford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48417,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Shackelford,Shackelford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4932,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48417,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Shackelford,Shackelford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48417,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Shackelford,Shackelford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48417,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Shackelford,Shackelford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48417,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Shackelford,Shackelford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48417,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Shackelford,Shackelford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48417,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Shackelford,Shackelford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48417,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Shackelford,Shackelford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48417,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Shackelford,Shackelford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48417,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,21,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48419,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48419,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48419,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48419,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48419,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,23926,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48419,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,24349,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48419,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11272,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48419,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,11272,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48419,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,13076,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48419,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,46.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48419,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,46.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48419,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,53.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48419,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48419,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48419,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48419,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48419,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Shelby,Shelby County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48419,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Sherman,Sherman County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48421,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Sherman,Sherman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48421,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Sherman,Sherman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48421,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Sherman,Sherman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48421,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Sherman,Sherman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48421,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Sherman,Sherman County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,2780,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48421,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Sherman,Sherman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2154,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48421,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Sherman,Sherman County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2154,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48421,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Sherman,Sherman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,2154,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48421,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Sherman,Sherman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48421,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Sherman,Sherman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48421,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Sherman,Sherman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48421,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Sherman,Sherman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48421,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Sherman,Sherman County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48421,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Sherman,Sherman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48421,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Sherman,Sherman County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48421,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Sherman,Sherman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48421,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Sherman,Sherman County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48421,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Smith,Smith County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,47,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48423,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Smith,Smith County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48423,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Smith,Smith County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48423,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Smith,Smith County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48423,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Smith,Smith County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48423,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Smith,Smith County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,234063,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48423,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Smith,Smith County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,243529,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48423,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Smith,Smith County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,120907,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48423,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Smith,Smith County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,5229,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48423,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Smith,Smith County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,122622,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48423,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Smith,Smith County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,49.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48423,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Smith,Smith County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,2.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48423,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Smith,Smith County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,50.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48423,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Smith,Smith County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,40,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48423,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Smith,Smith County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,6.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48423,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Smith,Smith County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,41,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48423,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Smith,Smith County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,15804,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48423,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Smith,Smith County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,99874,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48423,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Somervell,Somervell County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48425,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Somervell,Somervell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48425,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Somervell,Somervell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48425,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Somervell,Somervell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48425,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Somervell,Somervell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48425,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Somervell,Somervell County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,9214,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48425,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Somervell,Somervell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9296,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48425,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Somervell,Somervell County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,500,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48425,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Somervell,Somervell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,500,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48425,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Somervell,Somervell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8795,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48425,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Somervell,Somervell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,5.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48425,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Somervell,Somervell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,5.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48425,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Somervell,Somervell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,94.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48425,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Somervell,Somervell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48425,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Somervell,Somervell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48425,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Somervell,Somervell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48425,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Somervell,Somervell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48425,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Somervell,Somervell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48425,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Starr,Starr County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48427,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Starr,Starr County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48427,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Starr,Starr County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48427,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Starr,Starr County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48427,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Starr,Starr County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48427,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Starr,Starr County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,65835,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48427,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Starr,Starr County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,64585,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48427,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Starr,Starr County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3722,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48427,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Starr,Starr County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,3722,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48427,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Starr,Starr County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,60863,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48427,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Starr,Starr County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,5.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48427,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Starr,Starr County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,5.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48427,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Starr,Starr County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,94.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48427,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Starr,Starr County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48427,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Starr,Starr County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48427,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Starr,Starr County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48427,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Starr,Starr County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48427,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Starr,Starr County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48427,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Stephens,Stephens County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48429,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Stephens,Stephens County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48429,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Stephens,Stephens County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48429,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Stephens,Stephens County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48429,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Stephens,Stephens County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48429,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Stephens,Stephens County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,9079,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48429,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Stephens,Stephens County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,8551,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48429,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Stephens,Stephens County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48429,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Stephens,Stephens County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48429,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Stephens,Stephens County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8551,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48429,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Stephens,Stephens County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48429,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Stephens,Stephens County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48429,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Stephens,Stephens County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48429,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Stephens,Stephens County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48429,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Stephens,Stephens County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48429,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Stephens,Stephens County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48429,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Stephens,Stephens County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48429,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Stephens,Stephens County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48429,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Sterling,Sterling County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48431,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Sterling,Sterling County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48431,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Sterling,Sterling County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48431,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Sterling,Sterling County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48431,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Sterling,Sterling County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48431,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Sterling,Sterling County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,1383,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48431,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Sterling,Sterling County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,846,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48431,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Sterling,Sterling County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,846,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48431,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Sterling,Sterling County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,846,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48431,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Sterling,Sterling County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48431,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Sterling,Sterling County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48431,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Sterling,Sterling County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48431,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Sterling,Sterling County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48431,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Sterling,Sterling County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48431,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Sterling,Sterling County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48431,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Sterling,Sterling County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48431,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Sterling,Sterling County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48431,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Sterling,Sterling County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48431,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Stonewall,Stonewall County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48433,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Stonewall,Stonewall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48433,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Stonewall,Stonewall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48433,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Stonewall,Stonewall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48433,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Stonewall,Stonewall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48433,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Stonewall,Stonewall County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,1245,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48433,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Stonewall,Stonewall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,987,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48433,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Stonewall,Stonewall County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,987,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48433,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Stonewall,Stonewall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48433,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Stonewall,Stonewall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48433,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Stonewall,Stonewall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48433,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Stonewall,Stonewall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48433,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Stonewall,Stonewall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48433,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Stonewall,Stonewall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48433,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Stonewall,Stonewall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48433,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Stonewall,Stonewall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48433,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Stonewall,Stonewall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,987,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48433,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Stonewall,Stonewall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48433,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Sutton,Sutton County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48435,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Sutton,Sutton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48435,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Sutton,Sutton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48435,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Sutton,Sutton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48435,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Sutton,Sutton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48435,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Sutton,Sutton County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,3362,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48435,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Sutton,Sutton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2636,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48435,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Sutton,Sutton County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2636,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48435,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Sutton,Sutton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,2636,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48435,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Sutton,Sutton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48435,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Sutton,Sutton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48435,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Sutton,Sutton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48435,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Sutton,Sutton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48435,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Sutton,Sutton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48435,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Sutton,Sutton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48435,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Sutton,Sutton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48435,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Sutton,Sutton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48435,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Sutton,Sutton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48435,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Swisher,Swisher County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48437,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Swisher,Swisher County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48437,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Swisher,Swisher County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48437,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Swisher,Swisher County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48437,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Swisher,Swisher County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48437,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Swisher,Swisher County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,6957,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48437,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Swisher,Swisher County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5822,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48437,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Swisher,Swisher County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5822,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48437,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Swisher,Swisher County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1360,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48437,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Swisher,Swisher County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48437,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Swisher,Swisher County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48437,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Swisher,Swisher County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,23.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48437,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Swisher,Swisher County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48437,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Swisher,Swisher County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48437,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Swisher,Swisher County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,76.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48437,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Swisher,Swisher County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48437,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Swisher,Swisher County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,4462,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48437,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Swisher,Swisher County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48437,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Tarrant,Tarrant County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,107,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48439,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Tarrant,Tarrant County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,67,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48439,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Tarrant,Tarrant County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48439,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Tarrant,Tarrant County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,23,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48439,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Tarrant,Tarrant County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,38,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48439,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Tarrant,Tarrant County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,2114709,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48439,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Tarrant,Tarrant County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1843083,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48439,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Tarrant,Tarrant County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1800221,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48439,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Tarrant,Tarrant County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,30670,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48439,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Tarrant,Tarrant County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,42863,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48439,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Tarrant,Tarrant County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,97.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48439,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Tarrant,Tarrant County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48439,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Tarrant,Tarrant County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48439,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Tarrant,Tarrant County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,40,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48439,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Tarrant,Tarrant County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,25.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48439,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Tarrant,Tarrant County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,70.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48439,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Tarrant,Tarrant County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,467753,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48439,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Tarrant,Tarrant County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1301797,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48439,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48441,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48441,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48441,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48441,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48441,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,143383,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48441,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,152290,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48441,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,150603,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48441,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48441,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1687,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48441,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48441,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48441,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48441,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48441,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,21.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48441,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,77.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48441,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,32538,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48441,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,118065,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48441,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Terrell,Terrell County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48443,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Terrell,Terrell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48443,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Terrell,Terrell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48443,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Terrell,Terrell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48443,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Terrell,Terrell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48443,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Terrell,Terrell County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,744,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48443,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Terrell,Terrell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,762,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48443,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Terrell,Terrell County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48443,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Terrell,Terrell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48443,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Terrell,Terrell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,762,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48443,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Terrell,Terrell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48443,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Terrell,Terrell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48443,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Terrell,Terrell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48443,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Terrell,Terrell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48443,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Terrell,Terrell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48443,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Terrell,Terrell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48443,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Terrell,Terrell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48443,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Terrell,Terrell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48443,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Terry,Terry County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48445,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Terry,Terry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48445,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Terry,Terry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48445,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Terry,Terry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48445,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Terry,Terry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48445,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Terry,Terry County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,11792,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48445,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Terry,Terry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9959,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48445,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Terry,Terry County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9959,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48445,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Terry,Terry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,756,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48445,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Terry,Terry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48445,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Terry,Terry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48445,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Terry,Terry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,7.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48445,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Terry,Terry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48445,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Terry,Terry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48445,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Terry,Terry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,92.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48445,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Terry,Terry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48445,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Terry,Terry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,9203,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48445,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Terry,Terry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48445,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Throckmorton,Throckmorton County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48447,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Throckmorton,Throckmorton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48447,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Throckmorton,Throckmorton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48447,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Throckmorton,Throckmorton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48447,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Throckmorton,Throckmorton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48447,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Throckmorton,Throckmorton County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,1443,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48447,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Throckmorton,Throckmorton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,787,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48447,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Throckmorton,Throckmorton County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48447,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Throckmorton,Throckmorton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48447,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Throckmorton,Throckmorton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,787,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48447,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Throckmorton,Throckmorton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48447,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Throckmorton,Throckmorton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48447,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Throckmorton,Throckmorton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48447,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Throckmorton,Throckmorton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48447,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Throckmorton,Throckmorton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48447,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Throckmorton,Throckmorton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48447,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Throckmorton,Throckmorton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48447,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Throckmorton,Throckmorton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48447,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Titus,Titus County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48449,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Titus,Titus County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48449,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Titus,Titus County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48449,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Titus,Titus County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48449,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Titus,Titus County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48449,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Titus,Titus County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,31264,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48449,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Titus,Titus County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,33408,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48449,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Titus,Titus County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48449,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Titus,Titus County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48449,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Titus,Titus County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,33408,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48449,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Titus,Titus County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48449,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Titus,Titus County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48449,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Titus,Titus County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48449,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Titus,Titus County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48449,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Titus,Titus County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48449,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Titus,Titus County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48449,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Titus,Titus County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48449,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Titus,Titus County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48449,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Tom Green,Tom Green County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48451,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Tom Green,Tom Green County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48451,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Tom Green,Tom Green County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48451,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Tom Green,Tom Green County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48451,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Tom Green,Tom Green County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48451,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Tom Green,Tom Green County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,120105,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48451,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Tom Green,Tom Green County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,112804,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48451,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Tom Green,Tom Green County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6372,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48451,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Tom Green,Tom Green County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,6372,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48451,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Tom Green,Tom Green County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,106432,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48451,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Tom Green,Tom Green County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,5.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48451,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Tom Green,Tom Green County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,5.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48451,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Tom Green,Tom Green County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,94.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48451,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Tom Green,Tom Green County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48451,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Tom Green,Tom Green County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48451,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Tom Green,Tom Green County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48451,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Tom Green,Tom Green County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48451,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Tom Green,Tom Green County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48451,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Travis,Travis County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,108,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48453,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Travis,Travis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,45,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48453,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Travis,Travis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48453,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Travis,Travis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,19,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48453,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Travis,Travis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,22,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48453,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Travis,Travis County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,1296100,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48453,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Travis,Travis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1373865,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48453,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Travis,Travis County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1157026,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48453,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Travis,Travis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,29758,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48453,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Travis,Travis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,216839,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48453,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Travis,Travis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,84.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48453,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Travis,Travis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,2.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48453,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Travis,Travis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,15.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48453,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Travis,Travis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,63,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48453,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Travis,Travis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,4.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48453,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Travis,Travis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,76.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48453,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Travis,Travis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,67749,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48453,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Travis,Travis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1052465,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48453,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Trinity,Trinity County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48455,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Trinity,Trinity County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48455,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Trinity,Trinity County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48455,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Trinity,Trinity County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48455,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Trinity,Trinity County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48455,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Trinity,Trinity County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,13623,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48455,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Trinity,Trinity County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,16560,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48455,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Trinity,Trinity County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10667,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48455,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Trinity,Trinity County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,56,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48455,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Trinity,Trinity County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5893,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48455,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Trinity,Trinity County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,64.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48455,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Trinity,Trinity County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48455,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Trinity,Trinity County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,35.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48455,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Trinity,Trinity County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48455,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Trinity,Trinity County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,64.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48455,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Trinity,Trinity County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48455,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Trinity,Trinity County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,10611,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48455,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Trinity,Trinity County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48455,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,TX,Texas,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6046,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,TX,TX,Texas,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2573,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,TX,TX,Texas,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,104,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,TX,TX,Texas,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,519,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,TX,TX,Texas,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1794,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,TX,TX,Texas,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,29217653,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2020,TX,TX,Texas,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,27818869,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,TX,TX,Texas,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,19743163,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,TX,TX,Texas,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,3424303,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,TX,TX,Texas,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8075706,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,TX,TX,Texas,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,71,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,TX,TX,Texas,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,12.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,TX,TX,Texas,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,29,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,TX,TX,Texas,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3473,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,TX,TX,Texas,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,21.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,TX,TX,Texas,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,35.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,TX,TX,Texas,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,5869593,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,TX,TX,Texas,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,9954792,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,TX,Tyler,Tyler County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,20,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48457,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Tyler,Tyler County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48457,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Tyler,Tyler County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48457,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Tyler,Tyler County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48457,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Tyler,Tyler County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48457,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Tyler,Tyler County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,19797,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48457,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Tyler,Tyler County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,19411,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48457,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Tyler,Tyler County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48457,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Tyler,Tyler County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48457,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Tyler,Tyler County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,19411,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48457,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Tyler,Tyler County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48457,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Tyler,Tyler County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48457,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Tyler,Tyler County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48457,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Tyler,Tyler County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,20,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48457,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Tyler,Tyler County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48457,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Tyler,Tyler County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48457,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Tyler,Tyler County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48457,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Tyler,Tyler County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48457,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Upshur,Upshur County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48459,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Upshur,Upshur County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48459,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Upshur,Upshur County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48459,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Upshur,Upshur County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48459,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Upshur,Upshur County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48459,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Upshur,Upshur County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,40975,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48459,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Upshur,Upshur County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,38012,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48459,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Upshur,Upshur County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6833,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48459,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Upshur,Upshur County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,6833,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48459,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Upshur,Upshur County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,31179,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48459,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Upshur,Upshur County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,18,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48459,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Upshur,Upshur County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,18,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48459,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Upshur,Upshur County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,82,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48459,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Upshur,Upshur County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48459,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Upshur,Upshur County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48459,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Upshur,Upshur County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48459,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Upshur,Upshur County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48459,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Upshur,Upshur County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48459,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Upton,Upton County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48461,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Upton,Upton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48461,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Upton,Upton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48461,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Upton,Upton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48461,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Upton,Upton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48461,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Upton,Upton County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,3296,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48461,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Upton,Upton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2603,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48461,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Upton,Upton County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2603,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48461,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Upton,Upton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48461,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Upton,Upton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48461,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Upton,Upton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48461,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Upton,Upton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48461,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Upton,Upton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48461,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Upton,Upton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48461,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Upton,Upton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48461,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Upton,Upton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48461,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Upton,Upton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2603,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48461,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Upton,Upton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48461,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Uvalde,Uvalde County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48463,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Uvalde,Uvalde County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48463,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Uvalde,Uvalde County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48463,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Uvalde,Uvalde County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48463,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Uvalde,Uvalde County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48463,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Uvalde,Uvalde County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,24540,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48463,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Uvalde,Uvalde County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,24777,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48463,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Uvalde,Uvalde County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1897,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48463,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Uvalde,Uvalde County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1897,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48463,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Uvalde,Uvalde County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,22879,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48463,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Uvalde,Uvalde County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,7.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48463,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Uvalde,Uvalde County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,7.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48463,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Uvalde,Uvalde County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,92.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48463,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Uvalde,Uvalde County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48463,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Uvalde,Uvalde County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48463,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Uvalde,Uvalde County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48463,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Uvalde,Uvalde County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48463,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Uvalde,Uvalde County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48463,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Val Verde,Val Verde County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48465,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Val Verde,Val Verde County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48465,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Val Verde,Val Verde County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48465,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Val Verde,Val Verde County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48465,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Val Verde,Val Verde County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48465,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Val Verde,Val Verde County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,47582,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48465,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Val Verde,Val Verde County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,41151,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48465,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Val Verde,Val Verde County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,39017,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48465,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Val Verde,Val Verde County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,404,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48465,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Val Verde,Val Verde County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2135,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48465,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Val Verde,Val Verde County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,94.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48465,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Val Verde,Val Verde County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48465,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Val Verde,Val Verde County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,5.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48465,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Val Verde,Val Verde County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48465,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Val Verde,Val Verde County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,9.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48465,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Val Verde,Val Verde County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,84.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48465,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Val Verde,Val Verde County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,3822,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48465,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Val Verde,Val Verde County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,34791,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48465,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Van Zandt,Van Zandt County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,23,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48467,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Van Zandt,Van Zandt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48467,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Van Zandt,Van Zandt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48467,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Van Zandt,Van Zandt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48467,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Van Zandt,Van Zandt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48467,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Van Zandt,Van Zandt County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,59690,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48467,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Van Zandt,Van Zandt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,48342,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48467,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Van Zandt,Van Zandt County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,12588,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48467,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Van Zandt,Van Zandt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48467,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Van Zandt,Van Zandt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,35753,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48467,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Van Zandt,Van Zandt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,26,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48467,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Van Zandt,Van Zandt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48467,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Van Zandt,Van Zandt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,74,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48467,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Van Zandt,Van Zandt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,21,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48467,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Van Zandt,Van Zandt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,13.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48467,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Van Zandt,Van Zandt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,12.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48467,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Van Zandt,Van Zandt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,6504,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48467,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Van Zandt,Van Zandt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,6084,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48467,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Victoria,Victoria County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48469,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Victoria,Victoria County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48469,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Victoria,Victoria County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48469,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Victoria,Victoria County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48469,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Victoria,Victoria County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48469,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Victoria,Victoria County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,91236,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48469,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Victoria,Victoria County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,70305,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48469,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Victoria,Victoria County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,66493,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48469,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Victoria,Victoria County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,3062,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48469,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Victoria,Victoria County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3812,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48469,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Victoria,Victoria County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,94.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48469,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Victoria,Victoria County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,4.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48469,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Victoria,Victoria County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,5.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48469,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Victoria,Victoria County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48469,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Victoria,Victoria County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48469,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Victoria,Victoria County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,90.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48469,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Victoria,Victoria County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48469,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Victoria,Victoria County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,63431,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48469,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Walker,Walker County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,27,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48471,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Walker,Walker County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48471,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Walker,Walker County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48471,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Walker,Walker County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48471,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Walker,Walker County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48471,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Walker,Walker County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,76543,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48471,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Walker,Walker County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,75371,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48471,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Walker,Walker County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,60920,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48471,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Walker,Walker County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,8486,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48471,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Walker,Walker County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,14452,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48471,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Walker,Walker County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,80.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48471,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Walker,Walker County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,11.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48471,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Walker,Walker County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,19.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48471,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Walker,Walker County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48471,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Walker,Walker County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48471,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Walker,Walker County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,69.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48471,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Walker,Walker County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48471,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Walker,Walker County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,52434,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48471,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Waller,Waller County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,26,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48473,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Waller,Waller County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48473,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Waller,Waller County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48473,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Waller,Waller County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48473,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Waller,Waller County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48473,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Waller,Waller County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,57349,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48473,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Waller,Waller County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,39260,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48473,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Waller,Waller County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6453,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48473,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Waller,Waller County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,6453,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48473,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Waller,Waller County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,32807,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48473,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Waller,Waller County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,16.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48473,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Waller,Waller County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,16.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48473,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Waller,Waller County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,83.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48473,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Waller,Waller County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,24,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48473,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Waller,Waller County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48473,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Waller,Waller County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48473,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Waller,Waller County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48473,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Waller,Waller County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48473,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Ward,Ward County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48475,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Ward,Ward County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48475,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Ward,Ward County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48475,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Ward,Ward County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48475,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Ward,Ward County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48475,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Ward,Ward County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,11656,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48475,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Ward,Ward County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,11218,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48475,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Ward,Ward County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11218,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48475,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Ward,Ward County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,7543,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48475,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Ward,Ward County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48475,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Ward,Ward County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48475,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Ward,Ward County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,67.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48475,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Ward,Ward County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48475,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Ward,Ward County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48475,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Ward,Ward County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,32.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48475,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Ward,Ward County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48475,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Ward,Ward County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,3675,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48475,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Ward,Ward County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48475,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48477,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48477,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48477,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48477,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48477,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,35837,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48477,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,25332,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48477,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,17265,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48477,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48477,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8067,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48477,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,68.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48477,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48477,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,31.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48477,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48477,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,4.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48477,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,63.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48477,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1144,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48477,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,16121,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48477,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Webb,Webb County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48479,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Webb,Webb County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48479,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Webb,Webb County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48479,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Webb,Webb County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48479,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Webb,Webb County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48479,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Webb,Webb County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,267234,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48479,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Webb,Webb County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,256627,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48479,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Webb,Webb County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,248236,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48479,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Webb,Webb County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,247664,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48479,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Webb,Webb County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8391,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48479,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Webb,Webb County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,96.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48479,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Webb,Webb County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,96.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48479,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Webb,Webb County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,3.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48479,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Webb,Webb County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48479,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Webb,Webb County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48479,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Webb,Webb County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48479,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Webb,Webb County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,572,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48479,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Webb,Webb County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48479,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wharton,Wharton County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48481,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wharton,Wharton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48481,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wharton,Wharton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48481,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wharton,Wharton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48481,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wharton,Wharton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48481,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wharton,Wharton County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,41550,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48481,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wharton,Wharton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,25061,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48481,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wharton,Wharton County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8345,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48481,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wharton,Wharton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48481,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wharton,Wharton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,16717,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48481,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wharton,Wharton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,33.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48481,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wharton,Wharton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48481,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wharton,Wharton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,66.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48481,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wharton,Wharton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48481,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wharton,Wharton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48481,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wharton,Wharton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,33.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48481,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wharton,Wharton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48481,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wharton,Wharton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,8345,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48481,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wheeler,Wheeler County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48483,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wheeler,Wheeler County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48483,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wheeler,Wheeler County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48483,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wheeler,Wheeler County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48483,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wheeler,Wheeler County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48483,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wheeler,Wheeler County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,4980,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48483,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wheeler,Wheeler County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3742,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48483,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wheeler,Wheeler County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,148,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48483,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wheeler,Wheeler County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,148,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48483,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wheeler,Wheeler County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3594,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48483,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wheeler,Wheeler County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,3.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48483,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wheeler,Wheeler County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,3.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48483,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wheeler,Wheeler County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,96.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48483,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wheeler,Wheeler County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48483,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wheeler,Wheeler County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48483,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wheeler,Wheeler County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48483,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wheeler,Wheeler County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48483,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wheeler,Wheeler County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48483,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wichita,Wichita County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48485,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wichita,Wichita County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48485,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wichita,Wichita County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48485,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wichita,Wichita County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48485,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wichita,Wichita County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48485,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wichita,Wichita County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,129546,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48485,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wichita,Wichita County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,144713,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48485,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wichita,Wichita County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,144713,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48485,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wichita,Wichita County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48485,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wichita,Wichita County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48485,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wichita,Wichita County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48485,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wichita,Wichita County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48485,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wichita,Wichita County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48485,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wichita,Wichita County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48485,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wichita,Wichita County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,31.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48485,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wichita,Wichita County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,68.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48485,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wichita,Wichita County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,45072,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48485,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wichita,Wichita County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,99641,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48485,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wilbarger,Wilbarger County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48487,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wilbarger,Wilbarger County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48487,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wilbarger,Wilbarger County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48487,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wilbarger,Wilbarger County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48487,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wilbarger,Wilbarger County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48487,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wilbarger,Wilbarger County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,12846,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48487,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wilbarger,Wilbarger County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,11993,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48487,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wilbarger,Wilbarger County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,262,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48487,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wilbarger,Wilbarger County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48487,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wilbarger,Wilbarger County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11731,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48487,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wilbarger,Wilbarger County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48487,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wilbarger,Wilbarger County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48487,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wilbarger,Wilbarger County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,97.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48487,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wilbarger,Wilbarger County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48487,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wilbarger,Wilbarger County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,2.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48487,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wilbarger,Wilbarger County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48487,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wilbarger,Wilbarger County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,262,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48487,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wilbarger,Wilbarger County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48487,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Willacy,Willacy County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48489,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Willacy,Willacy County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48489,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Willacy,Willacy County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48489,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Willacy,Willacy County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48489,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Willacy,Willacy County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48489,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Willacy,Willacy County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,20129,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48489,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Willacy,Willacy County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,15962,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48489,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Willacy,Willacy County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,334,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48489,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Willacy,Willacy County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48489,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Willacy,Willacy County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,15629,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48489,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Willacy,Willacy County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48489,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Willacy,Willacy County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48489,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Willacy,Willacy County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,97.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48489,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Willacy,Willacy County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48489,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Willacy,Willacy County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48489,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Willacy,Willacy County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48489,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Willacy,Willacy County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48489,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Willacy,Willacy County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48489,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Williamson,Williamson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,48,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48491,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Williamson,Williamson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,21,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48491,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Williamson,Williamson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48491,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Williamson,Williamson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48491,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Williamson,Williamson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48491,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Williamson,Williamson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,615266,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48491,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Williamson,Williamson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,483898,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48491,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Williamson,Williamson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,178048,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48491,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Williamson,Williamson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,33131,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48491,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Williamson,Williamson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,305850,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48491,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Williamson,Williamson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,36.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48491,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Williamson,Williamson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,6.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48491,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Williamson,Williamson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,63.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48491,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Williamson,Williamson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,27,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48491,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Williamson,Williamson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,13.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48491,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Williamson,Williamson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,16.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48491,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Williamson,Williamson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,66052,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48491,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Williamson,Williamson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,78866,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48491,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wilson,Wilson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,19,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48493,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wilson,Wilson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48493,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wilson,Wilson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48493,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wilson,Wilson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48493,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wilson,Wilson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48493,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wilson,Wilson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,49994,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48493,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wilson,Wilson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,48159,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48493,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wilson,Wilson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2001,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48493,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wilson,Wilson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,2001,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48493,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wilson,Wilson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,46157,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48493,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wilson,Wilson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,4.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48493,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wilson,Wilson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,4.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48493,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wilson,Wilson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,95.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48493,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wilson,Wilson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48493,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wilson,Wilson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48493,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wilson,Wilson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48493,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wilson,Wilson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48493,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wilson,Wilson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48493,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Winkler,Winkler County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48495,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Winkler,Winkler County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48495,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Winkler,Winkler County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48495,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Winkler,Winkler County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48495,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Winkler,Winkler County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48495,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Winkler,Winkler County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,7749,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48495,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Winkler,Winkler County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7192,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48495,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Winkler,Winkler County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7192,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48495,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Winkler,Winkler County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,7192,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48495,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Winkler,Winkler County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48495,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Winkler,Winkler County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48495,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Winkler,Winkler County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48495,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Winkler,Winkler County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48495,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Winkler,Winkler County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48495,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Winkler,Winkler County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48495,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Winkler,Winkler County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48495,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Winkler,Winkler County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48495,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Winkler,Winkler County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48495,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wise,Wise County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,44,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48497,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wise,Wise County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48497,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wise,Wise County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48497,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wise,Wise County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48497,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wise,Wise County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48497,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wise,Wise County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,68866,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48497,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wise,Wise County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,33056,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48497,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wise,Wise County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9946,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48497,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wise,Wise County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1471,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48497,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wise,Wise County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,23111,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48497,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wise,Wise County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,30.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48497,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wise,Wise County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,4.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48497,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wise,Wise County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,69.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48497,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wise,Wise County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,36,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48497,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wise,Wise County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48497,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wise,Wise County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48497,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wise,Wise County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48497,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wise,Wise County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48497,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wood,Wood County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,22,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48499,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wood,Wood County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48499,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wood,Wood County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48499,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wood,Wood County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48499,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wood,Wood County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48499,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wood,Wood County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,45010,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48499,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wood,Wood County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,63683,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48499,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wood,Wood County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4303,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48499,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wood,Wood County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48499,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wood,Wood County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,59381,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48499,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wood,Wood County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,6.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48499,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wood,Wood County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48499,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wood,Wood County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,93.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48499,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wood,Wood County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,21,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48499,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wood,Wood County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48499,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wood,Wood County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,6.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48499,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wood,Wood County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48499,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Wood,Wood County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,4303,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48499,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Yoakum,Yoakum County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48501,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Yoakum,Yoakum County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48501,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Yoakum,Yoakum County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48501,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Yoakum,Yoakum County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48501,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Yoakum,Yoakum County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48501,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Yoakum,Yoakum County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,7669,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48501,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Yoakum,Yoakum County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,6653,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48501,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Yoakum,Yoakum County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6653,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48501,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Yoakum,Yoakum County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,6653,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48501,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Yoakum,Yoakum County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48501,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Yoakum,Yoakum County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48501,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Yoakum,Yoakum County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48501,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Yoakum,Yoakum County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48501,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Yoakum,Yoakum County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48501,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Yoakum,Yoakum County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48501,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Yoakum,Yoakum County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48501,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Yoakum,Yoakum County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48501,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Yoakum,Yoakum County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48501,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Young,Young County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48503,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Young,Young County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48503,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Young,Young County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48503,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Young,Young County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48503,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Young,Young County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48503,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Young,Young County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,17839,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48503,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Young,Young County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,19446,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48503,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Young,Young County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3321,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48503,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Young,Young County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,191,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48503,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Young,Young County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,16125,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48503,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Young,Young County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,17.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48503,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Young,Young County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48503,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Young,Young County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,82.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48503,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Young,Young County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48503,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Young,Young County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48503,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Young,Young County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,16.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48503,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Young,Young County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48503,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Young,Young County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3131,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48503,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Zapata,Zapata County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48505,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Zapata,Zapata County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48505,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Zapata,Zapata County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48505,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Zapata,Zapata County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48505,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Zapata,Zapata County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48505,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Zapata,Zapata County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,13884,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48505,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Zapata,Zapata County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,14557,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48505,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Zapata,Zapata County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,672,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48505,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Zapata,Zapata County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48505,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Zapata,Zapata County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,13885,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48505,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Zapata,Zapata County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,4.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48505,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Zapata,Zapata County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48505,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Zapata,Zapata County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,95.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48505,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Zapata,Zapata County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48505,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Zapata,Zapata County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48505,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Zapata,Zapata County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48505,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Zapata,Zapata County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48505,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Zapata,Zapata County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48505,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Zavala,Zavala County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48507,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Zavala,Zavala County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48507,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Zavala,Zavala County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48507,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Zavala,Zavala County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48507,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Zavala,Zavala County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48507,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Zavala,Zavala County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,9652,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48507,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Zavala,Zavala County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,10482,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48507,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Zavala,Zavala County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48507,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Zavala,Zavala County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48507,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Zavala,Zavala County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10482,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48507,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Zavala,Zavala County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48507,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Zavala,Zavala County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48507,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Zavala,Zavala County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48507,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Zavala,Zavala County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48507,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Zavala,Zavala County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48507,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Zavala,Zavala County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48507,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Zavala,Zavala County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48507,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,TX,Zavala,Zavala County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,48507,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,US,US,United States,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,51373,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,59,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,US,US,United States,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17558,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,59,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,US,US,United States,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5728,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,59,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,US,US,United States,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5696,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,59,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,US,US,United States,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5636,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,59,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,US,US,United States,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,331501080,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,59,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2020,US,US,United States,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,287798584,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,59,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,US,US,United States,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,209145650,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,59,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,US,US,United States,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,11578079,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,59,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,US,US,United States,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,78652934,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,59,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,US,US,United States,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,72.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,59,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,US,US,United States,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,59,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,US,US,United States,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,27.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,59,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,US,US,United States,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,33815,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,59,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,US,US,United States,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,18.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,59,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,US,US,United States,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,50.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,59,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,US,US,United States,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,53292298,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,59,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,US,US,United States,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,144275272,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,59,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,UT,Beaver,Beaver County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49001,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Beaver,Beaver County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49001,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Beaver,Beaver County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49001,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Beaver,Beaver County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49001,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Beaver,Beaver County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49001,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Beaver,Beaver County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,7076,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49001,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Beaver,Beaver County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5696,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49001,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Beaver,Beaver County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2417,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49001,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Beaver,Beaver County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,2417,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49001,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Beaver,Beaver County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3279,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49001,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Beaver,Beaver County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,42.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49001,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Beaver,Beaver County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,42.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49001,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Beaver,Beaver County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,57.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49001,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Beaver,Beaver County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49001,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Beaver,Beaver County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49001,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Beaver,Beaver County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49001,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Beaver,Beaver County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49001,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Beaver,Beaver County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49001,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Box Elder,Box Elder County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,32,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49003,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Box Elder,Box Elder County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49003,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Box Elder,Box Elder County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49003,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Box Elder,Box Elder County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49003,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Box Elder,Box Elder County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49003,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Box Elder,Box Elder County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,57908,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49003,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Box Elder,Box Elder County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,51121,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49003,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Box Elder,Box Elder County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,21195,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49003,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Box Elder,Box Elder County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1726,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49003,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Box Elder,Box Elder County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,29925,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49003,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Box Elder,Box Elder County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,41.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49003,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Box Elder,Box Elder County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,3.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49003,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Box Elder,Box Elder County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,58.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49003,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Box Elder,Box Elder County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,26,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49003,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Box Elder,Box Elder County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49003,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Box Elder,Box Elder County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,37.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49003,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Box Elder,Box Elder County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,392,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49003,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Box Elder,Box Elder County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,19078,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49003,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Cache,Cache County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,23,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49005,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Cache,Cache County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49005,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Cache,Cache County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49005,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Cache,Cache County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49005,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Cache,Cache County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49005,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Cache,Cache County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,133527,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49005,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Cache,Cache County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,110570,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49005,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Cache,Cache County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,271,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49005,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Cache,Cache County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,271,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49005,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Cache,Cache County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,110299,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49005,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Cache,Cache County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49005,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Cache,Cache County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49005,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Cache,Cache County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49005,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Cache,Cache County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,22,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49005,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Cache,Cache County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49005,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Cache,Cache County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49005,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Cache,Cache County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49005,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Cache,Cache County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49005,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Carbon,Carbon County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49007,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Carbon,Carbon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49007,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Carbon,Carbon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49007,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Carbon,Carbon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49007,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Carbon,Carbon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49007,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Carbon,Carbon County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,20465,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49007,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Carbon,Carbon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,22756,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49007,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Carbon,Carbon County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2008,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49007,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Carbon,Carbon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49007,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Carbon,Carbon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,20748,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49007,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Carbon,Carbon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,8.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49007,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Carbon,Carbon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49007,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Carbon,Carbon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,91.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49007,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Carbon,Carbon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49007,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Carbon,Carbon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49007,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Carbon,Carbon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,8.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49007,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Carbon,Carbon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49007,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Carbon,Carbon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2008,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49007,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Daggett,Daggett County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49009,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Daggett,Daggett County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49009,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Daggett,Daggett County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49009,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Daggett,Daggett County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49009,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Daggett,Daggett County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49009,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Daggett,Daggett County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,952,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49009,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Daggett,Daggett County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1406,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49009,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Daggett,Daggett County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,704,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49009,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Daggett,Daggett County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,704,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49009,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Daggett,Daggett County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,702,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49009,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Daggett,Daggett County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,50.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49009,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Daggett,Daggett County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,50.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49009,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Daggett,Daggett County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,49.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49009,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Daggett,Daggett County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49009,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Daggett,Daggett County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49009,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Daggett,Daggett County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49009,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Daggett,Daggett County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49009,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Daggett,Daggett County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49009,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Davis,Davis County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,20,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49011,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Davis,Davis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,19,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49011,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Davis,Davis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49011,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Davis,Davis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49011,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Davis,Davis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49011,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Davis,Davis County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,363492,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49011,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Davis,Davis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,353934,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49011,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Davis,Davis County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,342587,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49011,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Davis,Davis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49011,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Davis,Davis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11346,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49011,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Davis,Davis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,96.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49011,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Davis,Davis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49011,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Davis,Davis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,3.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49011,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Davis,Davis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49011,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Davis,Davis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,96.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49011,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Davis,Davis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49011,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Davis,Davis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,342587,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49011,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Davis,Davis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49011,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Duchesne,Duchesne County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49013,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Duchesne,Duchesne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49013,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Duchesne,Duchesne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49013,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Duchesne,Duchesne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49013,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Duchesne,Duchesne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49013,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Duchesne,Duchesne County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,19581,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49013,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Duchesne,Duchesne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,15584,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49013,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Duchesne,Duchesne County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2109,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49013,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Duchesne,Duchesne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,2109,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49013,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Duchesne,Duchesne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,13475,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49013,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Duchesne,Duchesne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,13.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49013,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Duchesne,Duchesne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,13.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49013,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Duchesne,Duchesne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,86.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49013,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Duchesne,Duchesne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49013,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Duchesne,Duchesne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49013,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Duchesne,Duchesne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49013,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Duchesne,Duchesne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49013,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Duchesne,Duchesne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49013,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Emery,Emery County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49015,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Emery,Emery County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49015,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Emery,Emery County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49015,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Emery,Emery County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49015,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Emery,Emery County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49015,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Emery,Emery County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,9837,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49015,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Emery,Emery County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,10813,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49015,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Emery,Emery County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49015,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Emery,Emery County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49015,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Emery,Emery County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10813,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49015,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Emery,Emery County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49015,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Emery,Emery County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49015,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Emery,Emery County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49015,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Emery,Emery County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49015,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Emery,Emery County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49015,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Emery,Emery County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49015,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Emery,Emery County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49015,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Emery,Emery County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49015,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Garfield,Garfield County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49017,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Garfield,Garfield County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49017,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Garfield,Garfield County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49017,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Garfield,Garfield County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49017,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Garfield,Garfield County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49017,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Garfield,Garfield County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,5090,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49017,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Garfield,Garfield County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4488,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49017,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Garfield,Garfield County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49017,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Garfield,Garfield County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49017,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Garfield,Garfield County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4488,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49017,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Garfield,Garfield County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49017,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Garfield,Garfield County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49017,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Garfield,Garfield County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49017,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Garfield,Garfield County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49017,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Garfield,Garfield County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49017,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Garfield,Garfield County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49017,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Garfield,Garfield County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49017,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Garfield,Garfield County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49017,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Grand,Grand County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49019,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Grand,Grand County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49019,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Grand,Grand County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49019,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Grand,Grand County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49019,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Grand,Grand County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49019,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Grand,Grand County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,9681,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49019,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Grand,Grand County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,13183,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49019,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Grand,Grand County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49019,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Grand,Grand County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49019,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Grand,Grand County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,13183,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49019,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Grand,Grand County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49019,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Grand,Grand County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49019,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Grand,Grand County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49019,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Grand,Grand County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49019,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Grand,Grand County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49019,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Grand,Grand County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49019,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Grand,Grand County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49019,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Grand,Grand County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49019,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Iron,Iron County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,24,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49021,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Iron,Iron County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49021,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Iron,Iron County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49021,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Iron,Iron County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49021,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Iron,Iron County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49021,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Iron,Iron County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,57640,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49021,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Iron,Iron County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,48523,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49021,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Iron,Iron County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49021,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Iron,Iron County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49021,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Iron,Iron County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,48523,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49021,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Iron,Iron County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49021,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Iron,Iron County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49021,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Iron,Iron County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49021,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Iron,Iron County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,24,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49021,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Iron,Iron County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49021,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Iron,Iron County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49021,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Iron,Iron County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49021,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Iron,Iron County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49021,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Juab,Juab County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49023,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Juab,Juab County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49023,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Juab,Juab County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49023,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Juab,Juab County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49023,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Juab,Juab County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49023,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Juab,Juab County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,11824,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49023,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Juab,Juab County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,10471,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49023,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Juab,Juab County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49023,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Juab,Juab County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49023,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Juab,Juab County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10471,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49023,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Juab,Juab County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49023,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Juab,Juab County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49023,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Juab,Juab County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49023,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Juab,Juab County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49023,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Juab,Juab County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49023,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Juab,Juab County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49023,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Juab,Juab County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49023,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Juab,Juab County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49023,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Kane,Kane County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49025,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Kane,Kane County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49025,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Kane,Kane County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49025,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Kane,Kane County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49025,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Kane,Kane County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49025,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Kane,Kane County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,7673,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49025,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Kane,Kane County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,11565,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49025,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Kane,Kane County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2962,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49025,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Kane,Kane County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,2962,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49025,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Kane,Kane County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8603,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49025,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Kane,Kane County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,25.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49025,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Kane,Kane County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,25.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49025,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Kane,Kane County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,74.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49025,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Kane,Kane County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49025,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Kane,Kane County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49025,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Kane,Kane County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49025,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Kane,Kane County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49025,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Kane,Kane County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49025,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Millard,Millard County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49027,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Millard,Millard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49027,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Millard,Millard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49027,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Millard,Millard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49027,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Millard,Millard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49027,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Millard,Millard County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,13015,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49027,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Millard,Millard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9987,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49027,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Millard,Millard County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1222,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49027,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Millard,Millard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,544,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49027,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Millard,Millard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8765,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49027,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Millard,Millard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,12.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49027,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Millard,Millard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,5.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49027,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Millard,Millard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,87.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49027,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Millard,Millard County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49027,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Millard,Millard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,6.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49027,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Millard,Millard County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49027,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Millard,Millard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,678,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49027,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Millard,Millard County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49027,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49029,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49029,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49029,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49029,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49029,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,12392,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49029,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,8548,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49029,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49029,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49029,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8548,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49029,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49029,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49029,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49029,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49029,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49029,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49029,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49029,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49029,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Piute,Piute County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49031,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Piute,Piute County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49031,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Piute,Piute County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49031,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Piute,Piute County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49031,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Piute,Piute County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49031,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Piute,Piute County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,1437,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49031,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Piute,Piute County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1296,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49031,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Piute,Piute County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,382,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49031,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Piute,Piute County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,382,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49031,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Piute,Piute County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,915,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49031,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Piute,Piute County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,29.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49031,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Piute,Piute County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,29.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49031,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Piute,Piute County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,70.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49031,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Piute,Piute County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49031,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Piute,Piute County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49031,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Piute,Piute County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49031,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Piute,Piute County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49031,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Piute,Piute County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49031,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Rich,Rich County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49033,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Rich,Rich County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49033,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Rich,Rich County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49033,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Rich,Rich County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49033,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Rich,Rich County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49033,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Rich,Rich County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,2504,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49033,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Rich,Rich County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1905,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49033,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Rich,Rich County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49033,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Rich,Rich County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49033,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Rich,Rich County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1905,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49033,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Rich,Rich County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49033,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Rich,Rich County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49033,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Rich,Rich County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49033,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Rich,Rich County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49033,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Rich,Rich County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49033,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Rich,Rich County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49033,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Rich,Rich County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49033,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Rich,Rich County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49033,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Salt Lake,Salt Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,34,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49035,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Salt Lake,Salt Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,20,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49035,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Salt Lake,Salt Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49035,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Salt Lake,Salt Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49035,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Salt Lake,Salt Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49035,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Salt Lake,Salt Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,1186236,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49035,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Salt Lake,Salt Lake County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1266805,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49035,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Salt Lake,Salt Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1220093,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49035,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Salt Lake,Salt Lake County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,251,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49035,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Salt Lake,Salt Lake County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,46712,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49035,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Salt Lake,Salt Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,96.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49035,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Salt Lake,Salt Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49035,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Salt Lake,Salt Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,3.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49035,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Salt Lake,Salt Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49035,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Salt Lake,Salt Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,96.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49035,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Salt Lake,Salt Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49035,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Salt Lake,Salt Lake County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1219842,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49035,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Salt Lake,Salt Lake County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49035,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,San Juan,San Juan County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49037,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,San Juan,San Juan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49037,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,San Juan,San Juan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49037,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,San Juan,San Juan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49037,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,San Juan,San Juan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49037,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,San Juan,San Juan County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,14525,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49037,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,UT,San Juan,San Juan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7065,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49037,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,San Juan,San Juan County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,90,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49037,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,San Juan,San Juan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,90,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49037,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,San Juan,San Juan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6974,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49037,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,San Juan,San Juan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49037,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,San Juan,San Juan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49037,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,San Juan,San Juan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49037,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,San Juan,San Juan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49037,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,San Juan,San Juan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49037,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,San Juan,San Juan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49037,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,San Juan,San Juan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49037,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,San Juan,San Juan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49037,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Sanpete,Sanpete County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,19,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49039,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Sanpete,Sanpete County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49039,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Sanpete,Sanpete County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49039,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Sanpete,Sanpete County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49039,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Sanpete,Sanpete County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49039,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Sanpete,Sanpete County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,28508,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49039,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Sanpete,Sanpete County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,25520,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49039,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Sanpete,Sanpete County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,301,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49039,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Sanpete,Sanpete County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,301,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49039,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Sanpete,Sanpete County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,25219,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49039,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Sanpete,Sanpete County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49039,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Sanpete,Sanpete County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49039,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Sanpete,Sanpete County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49039,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Sanpete,Sanpete County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49039,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Sanpete,Sanpete County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49039,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Sanpete,Sanpete County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49039,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Sanpete,Sanpete County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49039,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Sanpete,Sanpete County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49039,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Sevier,Sevier County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49041,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Sevier,Sevier County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49041,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Sevier,Sevier County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49041,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Sevier,Sevier County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49041,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Sevier,Sevier County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49041,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Sevier,Sevier County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,21546,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49041,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Sevier,Sevier County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,17837,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49041,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Sevier,Sevier County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1586,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49041,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Sevier,Sevier County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1586,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49041,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Sevier,Sevier County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,16250,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49041,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Sevier,Sevier County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,8.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49041,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Sevier,Sevier County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,8.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49041,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Sevier,Sevier County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,91.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49041,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Sevier,Sevier County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49041,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Sevier,Sevier County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49041,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Sevier,Sevier County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49041,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Sevier,Sevier County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49041,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Sevier,Sevier County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49041,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Summit,Summit County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,24,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49043,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Summit,Summit County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49043,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Summit,Summit County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49043,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Summit,Summit County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49043,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Summit,Summit County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49043,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Summit,Summit County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,42452,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49043,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Summit,Summit County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,39498,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49043,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Summit,Summit County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49043,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Summit,Summit County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49043,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Summit,Summit County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,39498,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49043,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Summit,Summit County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49043,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Summit,Summit County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49043,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Summit,Summit County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49043,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Summit,Summit County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,24,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49043,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Summit,Summit County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49043,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Summit,Summit County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49043,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Summit,Summit County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49043,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Summit,Summit County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49043,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Tooele,Tooele County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49045,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Tooele,Tooele County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49045,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Tooele,Tooele County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49045,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Tooele,Tooele County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49045,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Tooele,Tooele County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49045,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Tooele,Tooele County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,73281,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49045,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Tooele,Tooele County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,59967,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49045,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Tooele,Tooele County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,602,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49045,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Tooele,Tooele County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49045,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Tooele,Tooele County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,59364,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49045,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Tooele,Tooele County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49045,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Tooele,Tooele County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49045,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Tooele,Tooele County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49045,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Tooele,Tooele County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49045,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Tooele,Tooele County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49045,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Tooele,Tooele County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49045,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Tooele,Tooele County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49045,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Tooele,Tooele County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,602,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49045,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Uintah,Uintah County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49047,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Uintah,Uintah County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49047,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Uintah,Uintah County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49047,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Uintah,Uintah County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49047,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Uintah,Uintah County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49047,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Uintah,Uintah County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,35618,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49047,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Uintah,Uintah County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,32854,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49047,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Uintah,Uintah County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1449,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49047,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Uintah,Uintah County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1449,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49047,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Uintah,Uintah County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,31405,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49047,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Uintah,Uintah County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,4.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49047,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Uintah,Uintah County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,4.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49047,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Uintah,Uintah County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,95.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49047,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Uintah,Uintah County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49047,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Uintah,Uintah County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49047,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Uintah,Uintah County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49047,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Uintah,Uintah County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49047,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Uintah,Uintah County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49047,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,UT,Utah,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,463,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,UT,UT,Utah,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,68,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,UT,UT,Utah,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,UT,UT,Utah,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,36,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,UT,UT,Utah,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,25,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,UT,UT,Utah,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,3281684,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2020,UT,UT,Utah,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3214451,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,UT,UT,Utah,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1637472,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,UT,UT,Utah,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,52284,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,UT,UT,Utah,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1576979,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,UT,UT,Utah,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,50.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,UT,UT,Utah,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,UT,UT,Utah,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,49.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,UT,UT,Utah,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,395,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,UT,UT,Utah,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,48.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,UT,UT,Utah,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,0.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,UT,UT,Utah,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1563499,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,UT,UT,Utah,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,21688,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,UT,Utah,Utah County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,40,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49049,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Utah,Utah County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49049,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Utah,Utah County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49049,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Utah,Utah County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49049,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Utah,Utah County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49049,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Utah,Utah County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,663143,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49049,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Utah,Utah County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,617611,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49049,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Utah,Utah County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,36538,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49049,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Utah,Utah County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,36538,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49049,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Utah,Utah County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,581073,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49049,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Utah,Utah County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,5.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49049,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Utah,Utah County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,5.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49049,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Utah,Utah County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,94.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49049,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Utah,Utah County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,38,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49049,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Utah,Utah County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49049,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Utah,Utah County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49049,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Utah,Utah County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49049,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Utah,Utah County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49049,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Wasatch,Wasatch County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,19,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49051,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Wasatch,Wasatch County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49051,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Wasatch,Wasatch County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49051,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Wasatch,Wasatch County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49051,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Wasatch,Wasatch County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49051,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Wasatch,Wasatch County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,35032,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49051,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Wasatch,Wasatch County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,34289,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49051,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Wasatch,Wasatch County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49051,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Wasatch,Wasatch County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49051,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Wasatch,Wasatch County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,34289,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49051,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Wasatch,Wasatch County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49051,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Wasatch,Wasatch County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49051,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Wasatch,Wasatch County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49051,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Wasatch,Wasatch County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,19,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49051,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Wasatch,Wasatch County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49051,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Wasatch,Wasatch County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49051,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Wasatch,Wasatch County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49051,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Wasatch,Wasatch County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49051,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,36,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49053,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49053,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49053,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49053,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49053,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,181924,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49053,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,175813,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49053,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,954,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49053,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,954,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49053,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,174859,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49053,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49053,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49053,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49053,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,35,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49053,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49053,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49053,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49053,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49053,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49055,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49055,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49055,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49055,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49055,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,2497,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49055,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3735,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49055,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49055,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49055,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3735,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49055,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49055,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49055,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49055,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49055,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49055,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49055,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49055,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49055,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Weber,Weber County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,27,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49057,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Weber,Weber County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49057,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Weber,Weber County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49057,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Weber,Weber County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49057,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Weber,Weber County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49057,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Weber,Weber County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,262828,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49057,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Weber,Weber County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,251613,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49057,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Weber,Weber County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49057,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Weber,Weber County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49057,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Weber,Weber County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,251613,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49057,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Weber,Weber County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49057,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Weber,Weber County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49057,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Weber,Weber County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49057,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Weber,Weber County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,27,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49057,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Weber,Weber County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49057,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Weber,Weber County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49057,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Weber,Weber County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49057,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,UT,Weber,Weber County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,49057,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Accomack,Accomack County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51001,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Accomack,Accomack County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51001,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Accomack,Accomack County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51001,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Accomack,Accomack County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51001,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Accomack,Accomack County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51001,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Accomack,Accomack County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,33348,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51001,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Accomack,Accomack County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,12925,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51001,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Accomack,Accomack County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2076,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51001,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Accomack,Accomack County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,620,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51001,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Accomack,Accomack County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10849,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51001,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Accomack,Accomack County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,16.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51001,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Accomack,Accomack County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,4.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51001,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Accomack,Accomack County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,83.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51001,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Accomack,Accomack County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51001,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Accomack,Accomack County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51001,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Accomack,Accomack County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,11.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51001,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Accomack,Accomack County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51001,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Accomack,Accomack County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1455,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51001,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Albemarle,Albemarle County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,25,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51003,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Albemarle,Albemarle County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51003,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Albemarle,Albemarle County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51003,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Albemarle,Albemarle County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51003,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Albemarle,Albemarle County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51003,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Albemarle,Albemarle County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,112496,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51003,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Albemarle,Albemarle County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,81869,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51003,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Albemarle,Albemarle County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,79836,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51003,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Albemarle,Albemarle County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,213,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51003,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Albemarle,Albemarle County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2034,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51003,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Albemarle,Albemarle County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,97.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51003,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Albemarle,Albemarle County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51003,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Albemarle,Albemarle County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51003,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Albemarle,Albemarle County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51003,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Albemarle,Albemarle County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,97.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51003,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Albemarle,Albemarle County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51003,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Albemarle,Albemarle County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,79623,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51003,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Albemarle,Albemarle County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51003,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Alexandria City,Alexandria City County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51510,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Alexandria City,Alexandria City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51510,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Alexandria City,Alexandria City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51510,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Alexandria City,Alexandria City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51510,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Alexandria City,Alexandria City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51510,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Alexandria City,Alexandria City County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,159097,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51510,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Alexandria City,Alexandria City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,140253,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51510,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Alexandria City,Alexandria City County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,140253,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51510,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Alexandria City,Alexandria City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51510,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Alexandria City,Alexandria City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51510,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Alexandria City,Alexandria City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51510,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Alexandria City,Alexandria City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51510,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Alexandria City,Alexandria City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51510,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Alexandria City,Alexandria City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51510,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Alexandria City,Alexandria City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51510,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Alexandria City,Alexandria City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51510,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Alexandria City,Alexandria City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,140253,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51510,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Alexandria City,Alexandria City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51510,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Alleghany,Alleghany County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51005,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Alleghany,Alleghany County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51005,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Alleghany,Alleghany County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51005,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Alleghany,Alleghany County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51005,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Alleghany,Alleghany County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51005,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Alleghany,Alleghany County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,15161,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51005,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Alleghany,Alleghany County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,12006,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51005,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Alleghany,Alleghany County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11918,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51005,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Alleghany,Alleghany County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51005,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Alleghany,Alleghany County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,88,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51005,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Alleghany,Alleghany County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51005,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Alleghany,Alleghany County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51005,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Alleghany,Alleghany County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51005,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Alleghany,Alleghany County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51005,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Alleghany,Alleghany County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,68.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51005,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Alleghany,Alleghany County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,30.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51005,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Alleghany,Alleghany County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,8220,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51005,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Alleghany,Alleghany County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3698,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51005,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Amelia,Amelia County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51007,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Amelia,Amelia County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51007,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Amelia,Amelia County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51007,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Amelia,Amelia County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51007,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Amelia,Amelia County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51007,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Amelia,Amelia County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,13246,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51007,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Amelia,Amelia County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2958,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51007,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Amelia,Amelia County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51007,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Amelia,Amelia County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51007,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Amelia,Amelia County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2958,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51007,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Amelia,Amelia County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51007,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Amelia,Amelia County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51007,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Amelia,Amelia County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51007,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Amelia,Amelia County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51007,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Amelia,Amelia County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51007,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Amelia,Amelia County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51007,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Amelia,Amelia County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51007,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Amelia,Amelia County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51007,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Amherst,Amherst County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51009,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Amherst,Amherst County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51009,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Amherst,Amherst County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51009,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Amherst,Amherst County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51009,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Amherst,Amherst County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51009,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Amherst,Amherst County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,31262,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51009,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Amherst,Amherst County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,15724,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51009,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Amherst,Amherst County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,15564,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51009,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Amherst,Amherst County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51009,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Amherst,Amherst County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,160,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51009,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Amherst,Amherst County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51009,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Amherst,Amherst County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51009,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Amherst,Amherst County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51009,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Amherst,Amherst County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51009,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Amherst,Amherst County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51009,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Amherst,Amherst County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,99,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51009,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Amherst,Amherst County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51009,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Amherst,Amherst County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,15564,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51009,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Appomattox,Appomattox County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51011,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Appomattox,Appomattox County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51011,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Appomattox,Appomattox County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51011,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Appomattox,Appomattox County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51011,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Appomattox,Appomattox County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51011,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Appomattox,Appomattox County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,16133,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51011,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Appomattox,Appomattox County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1896,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51011,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Appomattox,Appomattox County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1681,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51011,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Appomattox,Appomattox County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51011,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Appomattox,Appomattox County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,216,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51011,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Appomattox,Appomattox County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,88.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51011,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Appomattox,Appomattox County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51011,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Appomattox,Appomattox County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,11.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51011,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Appomattox,Appomattox County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51011,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Appomattox,Appomattox County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,88.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51011,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Appomattox,Appomattox County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51011,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Appomattox,Appomattox County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1681,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51011,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Appomattox,Appomattox County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51011,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Arlington,Arlington County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51013,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Arlington,Arlington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51013,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Arlington,Arlington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51013,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Arlington,Arlington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51013,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Arlington,Arlington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51013,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Arlington,Arlington County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,238766,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51013,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Arlington,Arlington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,207922,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51013,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Arlington,Arlington County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,207731,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51013,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Arlington,Arlington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51013,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Arlington,Arlington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,191,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51013,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Arlington,Arlington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51013,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Arlington,Arlington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51013,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Arlington,Arlington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51013,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Arlington,Arlington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51013,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Arlington,Arlington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,99.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51013,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Arlington,Arlington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51013,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Arlington,Arlington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,207730,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51013,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Arlington,Arlington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51013,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Augusta,Augusta County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,22,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51015,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Augusta,Augusta County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51015,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Augusta,Augusta County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51015,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Augusta,Augusta County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51015,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Augusta,Augusta County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51015,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Augusta,Augusta County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,77512,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51015,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Augusta,Augusta County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,39619,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51015,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Augusta,Augusta County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,36170,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51015,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Augusta,Augusta County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51015,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Augusta,Augusta County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3449,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51015,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Augusta,Augusta County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,91.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51015,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Augusta,Augusta County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51015,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Augusta,Augusta County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,8.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51015,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Augusta,Augusta County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51015,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Augusta,Augusta County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,2.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51015,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Augusta,Augusta County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,88.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51015,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Augusta,Augusta County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1160,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51015,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Augusta,Augusta County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,35009,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51015,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Bath,Bath County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51017,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Bath,Bath County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51017,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Bath,Bath County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51017,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Bath,Bath County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51017,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Bath,Bath County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51017,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Bath,Bath County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,4196,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51017,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Bath,Bath County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5262,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51017,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Bath,Bath County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51017,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Bath,Bath County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51017,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Bath,Bath County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5262,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51017,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Bath,Bath County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51017,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Bath,Bath County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51017,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Bath,Bath County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51017,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Bath,Bath County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51017,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Bath,Bath County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51017,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Bath,Bath County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51017,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Bath,Bath County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51017,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Bath,Bath County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51017,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Bedford,Bedford County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51019,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Bedford,Bedford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51019,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Bedford,Bedford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51019,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Bedford,Bedford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51019,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Bedford,Bedford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51019,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Bedford,Bedford County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,79504,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51019,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Bedford,Bedford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,21933,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51019,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Bedford,Bedford County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,18879,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51019,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Bedford,Bedford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,172,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51019,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Bedford,Bedford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3054,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51019,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Bedford,Bedford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,86.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51019,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Bedford,Bedford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51019,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Bedford,Bedford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,13.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51019,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Bedford,Bedford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51019,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Bedford,Bedford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,85.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51019,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Bedford,Bedford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51019,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Bedford,Bedford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,18707,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51019,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Bedford,Bedford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51019,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Bland,Bland County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51021,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Bland,Bland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51021,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Bland,Bland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51021,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Bland,Bland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51021,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Bland,Bland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51021,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Bland,Bland County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,6247,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51021,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Bland,Bland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2162,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51021,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Bland,Bland County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,940,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51021,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Bland,Bland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51021,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Bland,Bland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1222,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51021,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Bland,Bland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,43.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51021,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Bland,Bland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51021,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Bland,Bland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,56.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51021,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Bland,Bland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51021,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Bland,Bland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,43.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51021,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Bland,Bland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51021,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Bland,Bland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,940,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51021,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Bland,Bland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51021,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Botetourt,Botetourt County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,34,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51023,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Botetourt,Botetourt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51023,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Botetourt,Botetourt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51023,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Botetourt,Botetourt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51023,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Botetourt,Botetourt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51023,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Botetourt,Botetourt County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,33614,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51023,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Botetourt,Botetourt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,21450,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51023,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Botetourt,Botetourt County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11191,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51023,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Botetourt,Botetourt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,4196,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51023,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Botetourt,Botetourt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10259,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51023,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Botetourt,Botetourt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,52.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51023,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Botetourt,Botetourt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,19.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51023,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Botetourt,Botetourt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,47.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51023,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Botetourt,Botetourt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,22,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51023,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Botetourt,Botetourt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51023,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Botetourt,Botetourt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,32.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51023,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Botetourt,Botetourt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,29,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51023,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Botetourt,Botetourt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,6966,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51023,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Bristol City,Bristol City County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51520,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Bristol City,Bristol City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51520,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Bristol City,Bristol City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51520,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Bristol City,Bristol City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51520,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Bristol City,Bristol City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51520,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Bristol City,Bristol City County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,17259,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51520,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Bristol City,Bristol City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,16882,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51520,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Bristol City,Bristol City County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,16882,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51520,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Bristol City,Bristol City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51520,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Bristol City,Bristol City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51520,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Bristol City,Bristol City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51520,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Bristol City,Bristol City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51520,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Bristol City,Bristol City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51520,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Bristol City,Bristol City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51520,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Bristol City,Bristol City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51520,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Bristol City,Bristol City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51520,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Bristol City,Bristol City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51520,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Bristol City,Bristol City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,16882,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51520,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Brunswick,Brunswick County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51025,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Brunswick,Brunswick County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51025,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Brunswick,Brunswick County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51025,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Brunswick,Brunswick County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51025,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Brunswick,Brunswick County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51025,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Brunswick,Brunswick County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,15806,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51025,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Brunswick,Brunswick County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5905,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51025,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Brunswick,Brunswick County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5574,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51025,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Brunswick,Brunswick County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,29,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51025,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Brunswick,Brunswick County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,331,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51025,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Brunswick,Brunswick County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,94.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51025,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Brunswick,Brunswick County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51025,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Brunswick,Brunswick County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,5.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51025,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Brunswick,Brunswick County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51025,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Brunswick,Brunswick County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,10,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51025,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Brunswick,Brunswick County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,83.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51025,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Brunswick,Brunswick County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,589,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51025,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Brunswick,Brunswick County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,4957,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51025,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Buchanan,Buchanan County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51027,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Buchanan,Buchanan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51027,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Buchanan,Buchanan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51027,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Buchanan,Buchanan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51027,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Buchanan,Buchanan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51027,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Buchanan,Buchanan County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,20216,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51027,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Buchanan,Buchanan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,18991,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51027,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Buchanan,Buchanan County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,18863,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51027,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Buchanan,Buchanan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51027,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Buchanan,Buchanan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,128,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51027,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Buchanan,Buchanan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51027,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Buchanan,Buchanan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51027,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Buchanan,Buchanan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51027,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Buchanan,Buchanan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51027,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Buchanan,Buchanan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,99.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51027,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Buchanan,Buchanan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51027,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Buchanan,Buchanan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,18863,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51027,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Buchanan,Buchanan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51027,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Buckingham,Buckingham County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51029,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Buckingham,Buckingham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51029,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Buckingham,Buckingham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51029,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Buckingham,Buckingham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51029,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Buckingham,Buckingham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51029,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Buckingham,Buckingham County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,16820,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51029,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Buckingham,Buckingham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5579,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51029,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Buckingham,Buckingham County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5496,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51029,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Buckingham,Buckingham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51029,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Buckingham,Buckingham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,83,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51029,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Buckingham,Buckingham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51029,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Buckingham,Buckingham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51029,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Buckingham,Buckingham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51029,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Buckingham,Buckingham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51029,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Buckingham,Buckingham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51029,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Buckingham,Buckingham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,98.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51029,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Buckingham,Buckingham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51029,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Buckingham,Buckingham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,5496,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51029,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Buena Vista City,Buena Vista City County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51530,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Buena Vista City,Buena Vista City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51530,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Buena Vista City,Buena Vista City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51530,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Buena Vista City,Buena Vista City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51530,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Buena Vista City,Buena Vista City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51530,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Buena Vista City,Buena Vista City County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,6620,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51530,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Buena Vista City,Buena Vista City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,6346,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51530,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Buena Vista City,Buena Vista City County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6346,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51530,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Buena Vista City,Buena Vista City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51530,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Buena Vista City,Buena Vista City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51530,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Buena Vista City,Buena Vista City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51530,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Buena Vista City,Buena Vista City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51530,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Buena Vista City,Buena Vista City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51530,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Buena Vista City,Buena Vista City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51530,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Buena Vista City,Buena Vista City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51530,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Buena Vista City,Buena Vista City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51530,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Buena Vista City,Buena Vista City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51530,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Buena Vista City,Buena Vista City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,6346,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51530,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Campbell,Campbell County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51031,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Campbell,Campbell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51031,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Campbell,Campbell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51031,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Campbell,Campbell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51031,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Campbell,Campbell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51031,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Campbell,Campbell County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,55638,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51031,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Campbell,Campbell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,31030,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51031,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Campbell,Campbell County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,29758,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51031,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Campbell,Campbell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51031,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Campbell,Campbell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1272,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51031,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Campbell,Campbell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,95.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51031,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Campbell,Campbell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51031,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Campbell,Campbell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,4.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51031,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Campbell,Campbell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51031,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Campbell,Campbell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,7.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51031,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Campbell,Campbell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,88.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51031,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Campbell,Campbell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2391,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51031,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Campbell,Campbell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,27367,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51031,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Caroline,Caroline County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,21,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51033,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Caroline,Caroline County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51033,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Caroline,Caroline County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51033,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Caroline,Caroline County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51033,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Caroline,Caroline County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51033,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Caroline,Caroline County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,30905,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51033,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Caroline,Caroline County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,19458,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51033,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Caroline,Caroline County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2645,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51033,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Caroline,Caroline County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,2645,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51033,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Caroline,Caroline County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,16813,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51033,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Caroline,Caroline County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,13.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51033,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Caroline,Caroline County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,13.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51033,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Caroline,Caroline County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,86.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51033,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Caroline,Caroline County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51033,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Caroline,Caroline County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51033,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Caroline,Caroline County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51033,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Caroline,Caroline County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51033,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Caroline,Caroline County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51033,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51035,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51035,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51035,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51035,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51035,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,29130,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51035,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,12344,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51035,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9986,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51035,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51035,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2358,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51035,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,80.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51035,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51035,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,19.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51035,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51035,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,60,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51035,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,20.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51035,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,7405,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51035,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Carroll,Carroll County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2580,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51035,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Charles City,Charles City County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51036,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Charles City,Charles City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51036,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Charles City,Charles City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51036,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Charles City,Charles City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51036,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Charles City,Charles City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51036,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Charles City,Charles City County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,6733,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51036,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Charles City,Charles City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,738,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51036,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Charles City,Charles City County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,655,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51036,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Charles City,Charles City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,655,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51036,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Charles City,Charles City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,83,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51036,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Charles City,Charles City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,88.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51036,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Charles City,Charles City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,88.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51036,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Charles City,Charles City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,11.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51036,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Charles City,Charles City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51036,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Charles City,Charles City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51036,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Charles City,Charles City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51036,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Charles City,Charles City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51036,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Charles City,Charles City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51036,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Charlotte,Charlotte County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51037,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Charlotte,Charlotte County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51037,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Charlotte,Charlotte County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51037,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Charlotte,Charlotte County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51037,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Charlotte,Charlotte County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51037,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Charlotte,Charlotte County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,11506,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51037,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Charlotte,Charlotte County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3351,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51037,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Charlotte,Charlotte County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51037,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Charlotte,Charlotte County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51037,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Charlotte,Charlotte County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3351,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51037,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Charlotte,Charlotte County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51037,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Charlotte,Charlotte County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51037,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Charlotte,Charlotte County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51037,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Charlotte,Charlotte County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51037,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Charlotte,Charlotte County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51037,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Charlotte,Charlotte County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51037,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Charlotte,Charlotte County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51037,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Charlotte,Charlotte County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51037,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Charlottesville City,Charlottesville City County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51540,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Charlottesville City,Charlottesville City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51540,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Charlottesville City,Charlottesville City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51540,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Charlottesville City,Charlottesville City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51540,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Charlottesville City,Charlottesville City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51540,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Charlottesville City,Charlottesville City County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,46423,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51540,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Charlottesville City,Charlottesville City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,41053,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51540,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Charlottesville City,Charlottesville City County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,41053,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51540,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Charlottesville City,Charlottesville City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51540,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Charlottesville City,Charlottesville City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51540,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Charlottesville City,Charlottesville City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51540,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Charlottesville City,Charlottesville City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51540,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Charlottesville City,Charlottesville City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51540,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Charlottesville City,Charlottesville City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51540,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Charlottesville City,Charlottesville City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51540,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Charlottesville City,Charlottesville City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51540,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Charlottesville City,Charlottesville City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,41053,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51540,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Charlottesville City,Charlottesville City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51540,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Chesapeake,Chesapeake County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51550,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Chesapeake,Chesapeake County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51550,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Chesapeake,Chesapeake County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51550,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Chesapeake,Chesapeake County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51550,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Chesapeake,Chesapeake County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51550,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Chesapeake,Chesapeake County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,249679,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51550,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Chesapeake,Chesapeake County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,223762,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51550,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Chesapeake,Chesapeake County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,217396,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51550,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Chesapeake,Chesapeake County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,243,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51550,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Chesapeake,Chesapeake County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6366,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51550,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Chesapeake,Chesapeake County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,97.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51550,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Chesapeake,Chesapeake County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51550,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Chesapeake,Chesapeake County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51550,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Chesapeake,Chesapeake County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51550,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Chesapeake,Chesapeake County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,26,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51550,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Chesapeake,Chesapeake County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,71.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51550,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Chesapeake,Chesapeake County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,58067,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51550,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Chesapeake,Chesapeake County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,159085,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51550,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Chesterfield,Chesterfield County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51041,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Chesterfield,Chesterfield County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51041,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Chesterfield,Chesterfield County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51041,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Chesterfield,Chesterfield County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51041,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Chesterfield,Chesterfield County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51041,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Chesterfield,Chesterfield County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,365566,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51041,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Chesterfield,Chesterfield County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,309012,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51041,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Chesterfield,Chesterfield County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,308611,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51041,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Chesterfield,Chesterfield County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51041,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Chesterfield,Chesterfield County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,401,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51041,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Chesterfield,Chesterfield County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51041,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Chesterfield,Chesterfield County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51041,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Chesterfield,Chesterfield County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51041,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Chesterfield,Chesterfield County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51041,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Chesterfield,Chesterfield County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51041,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Chesterfield,Chesterfield County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,99.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51041,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Chesterfield,Chesterfield County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51041,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Chesterfield,Chesterfield County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,308611,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51041,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Clarke,Clarke County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51043,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Clarke,Clarke County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51043,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Clarke,Clarke County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51043,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Clarke,Clarke County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51043,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Clarke,Clarke County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51043,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Clarke,Clarke County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,14788,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51043,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Clarke,Clarke County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5605,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51043,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Clarke,Clarke County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3994,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51043,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Clarke,Clarke County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51043,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Clarke,Clarke County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1611,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51043,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Clarke,Clarke County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,71.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51043,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Clarke,Clarke County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51043,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Clarke,Clarke County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,28.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51043,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Clarke,Clarke County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51043,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Clarke,Clarke County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51043,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Clarke,Clarke County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,71.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51043,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Clarke,Clarke County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51043,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Clarke,Clarke County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3994,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51043,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Colonial Heights,Colonial Heights County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51570,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Colonial Heights,Colonial Heights County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51570,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Colonial Heights,Colonial Heights County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51570,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Colonial Heights,Colonial Heights County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51570,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Colonial Heights,Colonial Heights County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51570,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Colonial Heights,Colonial Heights County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,18191,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51570,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Colonial Heights,Colonial Heights County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,16496,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51570,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Colonial Heights,Colonial Heights County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,16496,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51570,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Colonial Heights,Colonial Heights County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51570,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Colonial Heights,Colonial Heights County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51570,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Colonial Heights,Colonial Heights County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51570,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Colonial Heights,Colonial Heights County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51570,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Colonial Heights,Colonial Heights County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51570,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Colonial Heights,Colonial Heights County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51570,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Colonial Heights,Colonial Heights County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51570,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Colonial Heights,Colonial Heights County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51570,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Colonial Heights,Colonial Heights County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,16496,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51570,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Colonial Heights,Colonial Heights County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51570,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Covington City,Covington City County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51580,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Covington City,Covington City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51580,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Covington City,Covington City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51580,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Covington City,Covington City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51580,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Covington City,Covington City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51580,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Covington City,Covington City County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,5721,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51580,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Covington City,Covington City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5689,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51580,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Covington City,Covington City County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5689,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51580,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Covington City,Covington City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51580,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Covington City,Covington City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51580,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Covington City,Covington City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51580,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Covington City,Covington City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51580,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Covington City,Covington City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51580,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Covington City,Covington City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51580,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Covington City,Covington City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51580,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Covington City,Covington City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51580,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Covington City,Covington City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51580,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Covington City,Covington City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,5689,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51580,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Craig,Craig County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51045,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Craig,Craig County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51045,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Craig,Craig County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51045,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Craig,Craig County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51045,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Craig,Craig County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51045,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Craig,Craig County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,4880,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51045,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Craig,Craig County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1181,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51045,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Craig,Craig County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51045,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Craig,Craig County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51045,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Craig,Craig County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1181,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51045,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Craig,Craig County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51045,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Craig,Craig County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51045,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Craig,Craig County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51045,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Craig,Craig County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51045,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Craig,Craig County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51045,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Craig,Craig County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51045,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Craig,Craig County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51045,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Craig,Craig County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51045,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Culpeper,Culpeper County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,35,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51047,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Culpeper,Culpeper County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51047,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Culpeper,Culpeper County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51047,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Culpeper,Culpeper County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51047,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Culpeper,Culpeper County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51047,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Culpeper,Culpeper County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,52717,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51047,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Culpeper,Culpeper County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,22388,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51047,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Culpeper,Culpeper County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,16655,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51047,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Culpeper,Culpeper County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,40,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51047,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Culpeper,Culpeper County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5732,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51047,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Culpeper,Culpeper County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,74.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51047,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Culpeper,Culpeper County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51047,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Culpeper,Culpeper County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,25.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51047,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Culpeper,Culpeper County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,33,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51047,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Culpeper,Culpeper County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51047,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Culpeper,Culpeper County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,74.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51047,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Culpeper,Culpeper County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51047,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Culpeper,Culpeper County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,16615,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51047,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51049,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51049,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51049,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51049,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51049,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,9656,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51049,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2021,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51049,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51049,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51049,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2021,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51049,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51049,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51049,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51049,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51049,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51049,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51049,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51049,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Cumberland,Cumberland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51049,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Danville City,Danville City County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51590,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Danville City,Danville City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51590,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Danville City,Danville City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51590,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Danville City,Danville City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51590,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Danville City,Danville City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51590,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Danville City,Danville City County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,42465,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51590,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Danville City,Danville City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,40894,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51590,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Danville City,Danville City County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,40894,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51590,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Danville City,Danville City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51590,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Danville City,Danville City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51590,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Danville City,Danville City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51590,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Danville City,Danville City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51590,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Danville City,Danville City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51590,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Danville City,Danville City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51590,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Danville City,Danville City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51590,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Danville City,Danville City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51590,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Danville City,Danville City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51590,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Danville City,Danville City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,40894,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51590,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Dickenson,Dickenson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,19,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51051,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Dickenson,Dickenson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,19,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51051,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Dickenson,Dickenson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51051,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Dickenson,Dickenson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51051,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Dickenson,Dickenson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51051,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Dickenson,Dickenson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,14045,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51051,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Dickenson,Dickenson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,15480,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51051,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Dickenson,Dickenson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,15480,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51051,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Dickenson,Dickenson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51051,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Dickenson,Dickenson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51051,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Dickenson,Dickenson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51051,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Dickenson,Dickenson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51051,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Dickenson,Dickenson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51051,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Dickenson,Dickenson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51051,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Dickenson,Dickenson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51051,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Dickenson,Dickenson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51051,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Dickenson,Dickenson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,15480,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51051,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Dickenson,Dickenson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51051,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Dinwiddie,Dinwiddie County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51053,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Dinwiddie,Dinwiddie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51053,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Dinwiddie,Dinwiddie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51053,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Dinwiddie,Dinwiddie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51053,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Dinwiddie,Dinwiddie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51053,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Dinwiddie,Dinwiddie County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,27900,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51053,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Dinwiddie,Dinwiddie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,8185,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51053,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Dinwiddie,Dinwiddie County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7367,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51053,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Dinwiddie,Dinwiddie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,124,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51053,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Dinwiddie,Dinwiddie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,818,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51053,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Dinwiddie,Dinwiddie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,90,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51053,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Dinwiddie,Dinwiddie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51053,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Dinwiddie,Dinwiddie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,10,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51053,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Dinwiddie,Dinwiddie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51053,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Dinwiddie,Dinwiddie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,88.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51053,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Dinwiddie,Dinwiddie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51053,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Dinwiddie,Dinwiddie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,7243,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51053,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Dinwiddie,Dinwiddie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51053,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Emporia City,Emporia City County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51595,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Emporia City,Emporia City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51595,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Emporia City,Emporia City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51595,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Emporia City,Emporia City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51595,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Emporia City,Emporia City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51595,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Emporia City,Emporia City County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,5716,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51595,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Emporia City,Emporia City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5344,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51595,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Emporia City,Emporia City County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5344,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51595,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Emporia City,Emporia City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51595,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Emporia City,Emporia City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51595,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Emporia City,Emporia City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51595,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Emporia City,Emporia City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51595,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Emporia City,Emporia City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51595,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Emporia City,Emporia City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51595,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Emporia City,Emporia City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51595,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Emporia City,Emporia City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51595,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Emporia City,Emporia City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51595,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Emporia City,Emporia City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,5344,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51595,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Essex,Essex County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51057,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Essex,Essex County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51057,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Essex,Essex County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51057,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Essex,Essex County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51057,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Essex,Essex County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51057,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Essex,Essex County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,10591,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51057,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Essex,Essex County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3337,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51057,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Essex,Essex County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3280,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51057,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Essex,Essex County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,3280,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51057,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Essex,Essex County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,57,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51057,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Essex,Essex County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51057,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Essex,Essex County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,98.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51057,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Essex,Essex County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51057,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Essex,Essex County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51057,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Essex,Essex County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51057,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Essex,Essex County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51057,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Essex,Essex County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51057,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Essex,Essex County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51057,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Fairfax City,Fairfax City County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51600,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Fairfax City,Fairfax City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51600,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Fairfax City,Fairfax City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51600,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Fairfax City,Fairfax City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51600,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Fairfax City,Fairfax City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51600,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Fairfax City,Fairfax City County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,24129,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51600,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Fairfax City,Fairfax City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,22903,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51600,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Fairfax City,Fairfax City County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,22903,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51600,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Fairfax City,Fairfax City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51600,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Fairfax City,Fairfax City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51600,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Fairfax City,Fairfax City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51600,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Fairfax City,Fairfax City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51600,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Fairfax City,Fairfax City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51600,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Fairfax City,Fairfax City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51600,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Fairfax City,Fairfax City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51600,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Fairfax City,Fairfax City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51600,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Fairfax City,Fairfax City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,22903,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51600,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Fairfax City,Fairfax City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51600,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Fairfax County,Fairfax County County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51059,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Fairfax County,Fairfax County County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51059,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Fairfax County,Fairfax County County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51059,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Fairfax County,Fairfax County County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51059,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Fairfax County,Fairfax County County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51059,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Fairfax County,Fairfax County County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,1148472,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51059,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Fairfax County,Fairfax County County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1238735,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51059,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Fairfax County,Fairfax County County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1238496,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51059,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Fairfax County,Fairfax County County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51059,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Fairfax County,Fairfax County County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,239,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51059,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Fairfax County,Fairfax County County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51059,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Fairfax County,Fairfax County County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51059,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Fairfax County,Fairfax County County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51059,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Fairfax County,Fairfax County County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51059,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Fairfax County,Fairfax County County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,17.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51059,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Fairfax County,Fairfax County County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,82.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51059,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Fairfax County,Fairfax County County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,213179,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51059,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Fairfax County,Fairfax County County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1025318,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51059,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Falls Church City,Falls Church City County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51610,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Falls Church City,Falls Church City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51610,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Falls Church City,Falls Church City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51610,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Falls Church City,Falls Church City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51610,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Falls Church City,Falls Church City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51610,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Falls Church City,Falls Church City County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,14654,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51610,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Falls Church City,Falls Church City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51610,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Falls Church City,Falls Church City County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51610,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Falls Church City,Falls Church City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51610,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Falls Church City,Falls Church City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51610,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Falls Church City,Falls Church City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51610,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Falls Church City,Falls Church City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51610,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Falls Church City,Falls Church City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51610,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Falls Church City,Falls Church City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51610,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Falls Church City,Falls Church City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51610,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Falls Church City,Falls Church City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51610,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Falls Church City,Falls Church City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51610,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Falls Church City,Falls Church City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51610,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Fauquier,Fauquier County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,22,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51061,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Fauquier,Fauquier County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51061,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Fauquier,Fauquier County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51061,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Fauquier,Fauquier County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51061,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Fauquier,Fauquier County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51061,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Fauquier,Fauquier County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,72938,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51061,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Fauquier,Fauquier County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,34164,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51061,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Fauquier,Fauquier County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,12173,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51061,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Fauquier,Fauquier County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1076,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51061,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Fauquier,Fauquier County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,21991,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51061,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Fauquier,Fauquier County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,35.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51061,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Fauquier,Fauquier County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,3.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51061,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Fauquier,Fauquier County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,64.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51061,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Fauquier,Fauquier County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,20,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51061,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Fauquier,Fauquier County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51061,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Fauquier,Fauquier County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,32.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51061,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Fauquier,Fauquier County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51061,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Fauquier,Fauquier County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,11097,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51061,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51063,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51063,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51063,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51063,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51063,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,15474,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51063,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2252,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51063,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51063,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51063,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2252,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51063,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51063,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51063,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51063,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51063,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51063,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51063,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51063,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Floyd,Floyd County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51063,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Fluvanna,Fluvanna County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51065,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Fluvanna,Fluvanna County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51065,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Fluvanna,Fluvanna County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51065,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Fluvanna,Fluvanna County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51065,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Fluvanna,Fluvanna County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51065,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Fluvanna,Fluvanna County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,27280,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51065,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Fluvanna,Fluvanna County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,15221,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51065,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Fluvanna,Fluvanna County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11168,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51065,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Fluvanna,Fluvanna County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51065,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Fluvanna,Fluvanna County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4053,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51065,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Fluvanna,Fluvanna County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,73.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51065,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Fluvanna,Fluvanna County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51065,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Fluvanna,Fluvanna County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,26.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51065,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Fluvanna,Fluvanna County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51065,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Fluvanna,Fluvanna County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51065,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Fluvanna,Fluvanna County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,73.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51065,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Fluvanna,Fluvanna County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51065,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Fluvanna,Fluvanna County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,11168,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51065,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,41,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51067,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51067,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51067,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51067,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51067,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,54469,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51067,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,17770,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51067,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5986,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51067,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,261,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51067,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11784,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51067,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,33.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51067,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51067,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,66.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51067,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,38,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51067,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51067,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,32.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51067,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51067,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,5726,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51067,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Franklin City,Franklin City County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51620,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Franklin City,Franklin City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51620,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Franklin City,Franklin City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51620,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Franklin City,Franklin City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51620,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Franklin City,Franklin City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51620,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Franklin City,Franklin City County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,8171,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51620,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Franklin City,Franklin City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,8589,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51620,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Franklin City,Franklin City County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8589,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51620,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Franklin City,Franklin City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,8589,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51620,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Franklin City,Franklin City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51620,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Franklin City,Franklin City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51620,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Franklin City,Franklin City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51620,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Franklin City,Franklin City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51620,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Franklin City,Franklin City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51620,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Franklin City,Franklin City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51620,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Franklin City,Franklin City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51620,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Franklin City,Franklin City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51620,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Franklin City,Franklin City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51620,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Frederick,Frederick County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51069,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Frederick,Frederick County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51069,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Frederick,Frederick County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51069,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Frederick,Frederick County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51069,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Frederick,Frederick County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51069,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Frederick,Frederick County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,91766,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51069,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Frederick,Frederick County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,52032,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51069,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Frederick,Frederick County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,49443,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51069,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Frederick,Frederick County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51069,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Frederick,Frederick County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2589,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51069,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Frederick,Frederick County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,95,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51069,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Frederick,Frederick County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51069,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Frederick,Frederick County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51069,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Frederick,Frederick County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51069,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Frederick,Frederick County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,6.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51069,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Frederick,Frederick County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,88.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51069,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Frederick,Frederick County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,3204,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51069,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Frederick,Frederick County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,46240,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51069,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Fredericksburg City,Fredericksburg City County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51630,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Fredericksburg City,Fredericksburg City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51630,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Fredericksburg City,Fredericksburg City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51630,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Fredericksburg City,Fredericksburg City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51630,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Fredericksburg City,Fredericksburg City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51630,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Fredericksburg City,Fredericksburg City County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,27995,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51630,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Fredericksburg City,Fredericksburg City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,27054,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51630,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Fredericksburg City,Fredericksburg City County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,27054,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51630,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Fredericksburg City,Fredericksburg City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51630,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Fredericksburg City,Fredericksburg City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51630,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Fredericksburg City,Fredericksburg City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51630,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Fredericksburg City,Fredericksburg City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51630,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Fredericksburg City,Fredericksburg City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51630,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Fredericksburg City,Fredericksburg City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51630,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Fredericksburg City,Fredericksburg City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51630,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Fredericksburg City,Fredericksburg City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51630,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Fredericksburg City,Fredericksburg City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,27054,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51630,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Fredericksburg City,Fredericksburg City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51630,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Galax City,Galax City County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51640,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Galax City,Galax City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51640,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Galax City,Galax City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51640,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Galax City,Galax City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51640,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Galax City,Galax City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51640,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Galax City,Galax City County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,6691,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51640,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Galax City,Galax City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,6525,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51640,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Galax City,Galax City County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6525,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51640,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Galax City,Galax City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51640,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Galax City,Galax City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51640,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Galax City,Galax City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51640,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Galax City,Galax City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51640,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Galax City,Galax City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51640,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Galax City,Galax City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51640,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Galax City,Galax City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51640,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Galax City,Galax City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51640,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Galax City,Galax City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51640,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Galax City,Galax City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,6525,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51640,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Giles,Giles County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51071,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Giles,Giles County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51071,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Giles,Giles County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51071,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Giles,Giles County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51071,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Giles,Giles County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51071,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Giles,Giles County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,16754,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51071,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Giles,Giles County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9408,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51071,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Giles,Giles County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9256,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51071,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Giles,Giles County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51071,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Giles,Giles County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,153,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51071,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Giles,Giles County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51071,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Giles,Giles County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51071,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Giles,Giles County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51071,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Giles,Giles County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51071,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Giles,Giles County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,98.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51071,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Giles,Giles County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51071,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Giles,Giles County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,9256,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51071,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Giles,Giles County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51071,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Gloucester,Gloucester County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51073,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Gloucester,Gloucester County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51073,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Gloucester,Gloucester County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51073,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Gloucester,Gloucester County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51073,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Gloucester,Gloucester County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51073,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Gloucester,Gloucester County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,38688,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51073,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Gloucester,Gloucester County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,10320,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51073,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Gloucester,Gloucester County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,200,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51073,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Gloucester,Gloucester County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,200,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51073,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Gloucester,Gloucester County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10119,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51073,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Gloucester,Gloucester County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51073,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Gloucester,Gloucester County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51073,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Gloucester,Gloucester County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51073,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Gloucester,Gloucester County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51073,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Gloucester,Gloucester County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51073,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Gloucester,Gloucester County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51073,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Gloucester,Gloucester County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51073,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Gloucester,Gloucester County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51073,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Goochland,Goochland County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51075,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Goochland,Goochland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51075,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Goochland,Goochland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51075,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Goochland,Goochland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51075,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Goochland,Goochland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51075,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Goochland,Goochland County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,24828,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51075,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Goochland,Goochland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,13932,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51075,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Goochland,Goochland County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,12656,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51075,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Goochland,Goochland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51075,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Goochland,Goochland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1276,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51075,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Goochland,Goochland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,90.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51075,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Goochland,Goochland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51075,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Goochland,Goochland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,9.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51075,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Goochland,Goochland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51075,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Goochland,Goochland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,43.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51075,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Goochland,Goochland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,47.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51075,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Goochland,Goochland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,6069,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51075,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Goochland,Goochland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,6587,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51075,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Grayson,Grayson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51077,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Grayson,Grayson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51077,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Grayson,Grayson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51077,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Grayson,Grayson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51077,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Grayson,Grayson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51077,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Grayson,Grayson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,15300,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51077,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Grayson,Grayson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2888,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51077,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Grayson,Grayson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1131,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51077,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Grayson,Grayson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51077,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Grayson,Grayson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1757,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51077,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Grayson,Grayson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,39.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51077,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Grayson,Grayson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51077,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Grayson,Grayson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,60.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51077,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Grayson,Grayson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51077,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Grayson,Grayson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,23.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51077,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Grayson,Grayson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,16,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51077,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Grayson,Grayson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,669,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51077,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Grayson,Grayson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,462,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51077,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51079,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51079,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51079,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51079,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51079,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,20591,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51079,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,10048,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51079,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8005,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51079,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,248,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51079,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2043,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51079,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,79.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51079,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,2.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51079,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,20.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51079,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51079,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51079,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,76.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51079,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,38,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51079,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Greene,Greene County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,7718,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51079,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Greensville,Greensville County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51081,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Greensville,Greensville County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51081,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Greensville,Greensville County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51081,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Greensville,Greensville County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51081,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Greensville,Greensville County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51081,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Greensville,Greensville County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,11393,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51081,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Greensville,Greensville County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,6892,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51081,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Greensville,Greensville County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6861,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51081,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Greensville,Greensville County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51081,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Greensville,Greensville County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,31,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51081,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Greensville,Greensville County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51081,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Greensville,Greensville County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51081,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Greensville,Greensville County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51081,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Greensville,Greensville County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51081,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Greensville,Greensville County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51081,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Greensville,Greensville County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,99.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51081,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Greensville,Greensville County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51081,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Greensville,Greensville County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,6861,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51081,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Halifax,Halifax County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51083,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Halifax,Halifax County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51083,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Halifax,Halifax County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51083,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Halifax,Halifax County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51083,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Halifax,Halifax County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51083,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Halifax,Halifax County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,33901,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51083,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Halifax,Halifax County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,10287,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51083,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Halifax,Halifax County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9381,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51083,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Halifax,Halifax County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,445,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51083,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Halifax,Halifax County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,907,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51083,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Halifax,Halifax County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,91.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51083,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Halifax,Halifax County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,4.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51083,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Halifax,Halifax County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,8.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51083,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Halifax,Halifax County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51083,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Halifax,Halifax County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51083,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Halifax,Halifax County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,86.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51083,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Halifax,Halifax County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51083,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Halifax,Halifax County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,8936,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51083,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Hampton City,Hampton City County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51650,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Hampton City,Hampton City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51650,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Hampton City,Hampton City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51650,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Hampton City,Hampton City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51650,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Hampton City,Hampton City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51650,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Hampton City,Hampton City County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,137131,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51650,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Hampton City,Hampton City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,140622,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51650,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Hampton City,Hampton City County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,140622,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51650,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Hampton City,Hampton City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51650,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Hampton City,Hampton City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51650,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Hampton City,Hampton City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51650,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Hampton City,Hampton City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51650,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Hampton City,Hampton City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51650,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Hampton City,Hampton City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51650,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Hampton City,Hampton City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,7.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51650,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Hampton City,Hampton City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,92.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51650,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Hampton City,Hampton City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,10961,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51650,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Hampton City,Hampton City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,129661,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51650,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Hanover,Hanover County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,22,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51085,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Hanover,Hanover County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51085,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Hanover,Hanover County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51085,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Hanover,Hanover County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51085,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Hanover,Hanover County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51085,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Hanover,Hanover County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,110102,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51085,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Hanover,Hanover County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,77904,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51085,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Hanover,Hanover County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,70851,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51085,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Hanover,Hanover County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51085,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Hanover,Hanover County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7053,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51085,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Hanover,Hanover County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,90.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51085,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Hanover,Hanover County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51085,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Hanover,Hanover County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,9.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51085,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Hanover,Hanover County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51085,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Hanover,Hanover County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,2.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51085,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Hanover,Hanover County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,88.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51085,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Hanover,Hanover County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2141,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51085,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Hanover,Hanover County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,68709,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51085,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Harrisonburg City,Harrisonburg City County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51660,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Harrisonburg City,Harrisonburg City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51660,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Harrisonburg City,Harrisonburg City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51660,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Harrisonburg City,Harrisonburg City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51660,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Harrisonburg City,Harrisonburg City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51660,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Harrisonburg City,Harrisonburg City County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,51675,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51660,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Harrisonburg City,Harrisonburg City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,42802,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51660,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Harrisonburg City,Harrisonburg City County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,42802,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51660,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Harrisonburg City,Harrisonburg City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51660,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Harrisonburg City,Harrisonburg City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51660,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Harrisonburg City,Harrisonburg City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51660,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Harrisonburg City,Harrisonburg City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51660,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Harrisonburg City,Harrisonburg City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51660,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Harrisonburg City,Harrisonburg City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51660,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Harrisonburg City,Harrisonburg City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51660,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Harrisonburg City,Harrisonburg City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51660,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Harrisonburg City,Harrisonburg City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51660,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Harrisonburg City,Harrisonburg City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,42802,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51660,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Henrico,Henrico County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51087,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Henrico,Henrico County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51087,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Henrico,Henrico County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51087,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Henrico,Henrico County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51087,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Henrico,Henrico County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51087,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Henrico,Henrico County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,334298,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51087,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Henrico,Henrico County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,278655,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51087,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Henrico,Henrico County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,278655,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51087,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Henrico,Henrico County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51087,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Henrico,Henrico County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51087,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Henrico,Henrico County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51087,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Henrico,Henrico County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51087,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Henrico,Henrico County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51087,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Henrico,Henrico County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51087,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Henrico,Henrico County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51087,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Henrico,Henrico County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51087,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Henrico,Henrico County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51087,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Henrico,Henrico County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,278655,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51087,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51089,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51089,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51089,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51089,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51089,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,50782,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51089,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,32270,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51089,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,31293,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51089,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,40,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51089,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,976,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51089,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,97,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51089,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51089,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51089,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51089,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,2.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51089,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,94.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51089,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,755,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51089,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Henry,Henry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,30498,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51089,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Highland,Highland County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51091,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Highland,Highland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51091,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Highland,Highland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51091,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Highland,Highland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51091,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Highland,Highland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51091,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Highland,Highland County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,2236,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51091,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Highland,Highland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,539,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51091,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Highland,Highland County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51091,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Highland,Highland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51091,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Highland,Highland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,539,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51091,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Highland,Highland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51091,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Highland,Highland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51091,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Highland,Highland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51091,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Highland,Highland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51091,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Highland,Highland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51091,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Highland,Highland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51091,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Highland,Highland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51091,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Highland,Highland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51091,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Hopewell City,Hopewell City County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51670,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Hopewell City,Hopewell City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51670,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Hopewell City,Hopewell City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51670,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Hopewell City,Hopewell City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51670,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Hopewell City,Hopewell City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51670,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Hopewell City,Hopewell City County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,22967,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51670,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Hopewell City,Hopewell City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,21548,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51670,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Hopewell City,Hopewell City County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,21548,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51670,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Hopewell City,Hopewell City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51670,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Hopewell City,Hopewell City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51670,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Hopewell City,Hopewell City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51670,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Hopewell City,Hopewell City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51670,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Hopewell City,Hopewell City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51670,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Hopewell City,Hopewell City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51670,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Hopewell City,Hopewell City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51670,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Hopewell City,Hopewell City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51670,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Hopewell City,Hopewell City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51670,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Hopewell City,Hopewell City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,21548,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51670,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Isle of Wight,Isle of Wight County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,31,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51093,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Isle of Wight,Isle of Wight County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,31,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51093,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Isle of Wight,Isle of Wight County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51093,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Isle of Wight,Isle of Wight County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51093,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Isle of Wight,Isle of Wight County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,26,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51093,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Isle of Wight,Isle of Wight County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,38658,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51093,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Isle of Wight,Isle of Wight County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,23472,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51093,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Isle of Wight,Isle of Wight County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,23472,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51093,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Isle of Wight,Isle of Wight County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,6704,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51093,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Isle of Wight,Isle of Wight County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51093,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Isle of Wight,Isle of Wight County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51093,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Isle of Wight,Isle of Wight County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,28.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51093,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Isle of Wight,Isle of Wight County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51093,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Isle of Wight,Isle of Wight County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51093,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Isle of Wight,Isle of Wight County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,38.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51093,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Isle of Wight,Isle of Wight County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51093,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Isle of Wight,Isle of Wight County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,9049,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51093,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Isle of Wight,Isle of Wight County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51093,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,James City,James City County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51095,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,James City,James City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51095,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,James City,James City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51095,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,James City,James City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51095,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,James City,James City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51095,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,James City,James City County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,78412,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51095,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,James City,James City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,63870,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51095,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,James City,James City County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,63293,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51095,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,James City,James City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,49797,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51095,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,James City,James City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,577,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51095,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,James City,James City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51095,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,James City,James City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,78,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51095,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,James City,James City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51095,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,James City,James City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51095,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,James City,James City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51095,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,James City,James City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,21.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51095,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,James City,James City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51095,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,James City,James City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,13496,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51095,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,King and Queen,King and Queen County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51097,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,King and Queen,King and Queen County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51097,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,King and Queen,King and Queen County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51097,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,King and Queen,King and Queen County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51097,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,King and Queen,King and Queen County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51097,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,King and Queen,King and Queen County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,6590,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51097,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,King and Queen,King and Queen County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,324,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51097,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,King and Queen,King and Queen County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,324,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51097,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,King and Queen,King and Queen County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,324,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51097,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,King and Queen,King and Queen County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51097,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,King and Queen,King and Queen County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51097,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,King and Queen,King and Queen County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51097,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,King and Queen,King and Queen County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51097,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,King and Queen,King and Queen County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51097,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,King and Queen,King and Queen County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51097,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,King and Queen,King and Queen County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51097,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,King and Queen,King and Queen County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51097,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,King and Queen,King and Queen County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51097,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,King George,King George County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,25,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51099,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,King George,King George County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51099,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,King George,King George County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51099,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,King George,King George County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51099,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,King George,King George County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51099,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,King George,King George County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,26806,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51099,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,King George,King George County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,25164,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51099,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,King George,King George County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,17786,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51099,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,King George,King George County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,17786,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51099,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,King George,King George County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7378,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51099,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,King George,King George County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,70.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51099,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,King George,King George County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,70.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51099,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,King George,King George County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,29.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51099,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,King George,King George County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51099,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,King George,King George County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51099,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,King George,King George County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51099,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,King George,King George County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51099,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,King George,King George County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51099,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,King William,King William County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51101,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,King William,King William County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51101,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,King William,King William County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51101,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,King William,King William County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51101,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,King William,King William County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51101,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,King William,King William County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,17905,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51101,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,King William,King William County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7105,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51101,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,King William,King William County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3405,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51101,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,King William,King William County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,3405,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51101,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,King William,King William County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3700,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51101,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,King William,King William County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,47.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51101,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,King William,King William County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,47.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51101,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,King William,King William County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,52.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51101,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,King William,King William County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51101,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,King William,King William County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51101,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,King William,King William County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51101,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,King William,King William County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51101,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,King William,King William County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51101,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Lancaster,Lancaster County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,28,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51103,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Lancaster,Lancaster County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,28,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51103,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Lancaster,Lancaster County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51103,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Lancaster,Lancaster County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51103,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Lancaster,Lancaster County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,28,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51103,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Lancaster,Lancaster County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,10910,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51103,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Lancaster,Lancaster County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,6746,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51103,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Lancaster,Lancaster County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6746,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51103,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Lancaster,Lancaster County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,6746,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51103,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Lancaster,Lancaster County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51103,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Lancaster,Lancaster County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51103,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Lancaster,Lancaster County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51103,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Lancaster,Lancaster County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51103,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Lancaster,Lancaster County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51103,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Lancaster,Lancaster County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51103,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Lancaster,Lancaster County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51103,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Lancaster,Lancaster County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51103,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Lancaster,Lancaster County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51103,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51105,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51105,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51105,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51105,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51105,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,22084,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51105,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,16395,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51105,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2485,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51105,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51105,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,13910,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51105,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,15.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51105,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51105,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,84.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51105,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51105,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,15.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51105,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51105,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2485,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51105,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Lee,Lee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51105,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Lexington City,Lexington City County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51678,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Lexington City,Lexington City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51678,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Lexington City,Lexington City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51678,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Lexington City,Lexington City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51678,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Lexington City,Lexington City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51678,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Lexington City,Lexington City County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,7313,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51678,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Lexington City,Lexington City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,6425,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51678,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Lexington City,Lexington City County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6425,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51678,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Lexington City,Lexington City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51678,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Lexington City,Lexington City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51678,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Lexington City,Lexington City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51678,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Lexington City,Lexington City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51678,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Lexington City,Lexington City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51678,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Lexington City,Lexington City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51678,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Lexington City,Lexington City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51678,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Lexington City,Lexington City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51678,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Lexington City,Lexington City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,6425,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51678,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Lexington City,Lexington City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51678,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Loudoun,Loudoun County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,22,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51107,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Loudoun,Loudoun County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51107,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Loudoun,Loudoun County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51107,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Loudoun,Loudoun County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51107,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Loudoun,Loudoun County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51107,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Loudoun,Loudoun County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,422597,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51107,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Loudoun,Loudoun County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,382390,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51107,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Loudoun,Loudoun County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,374914,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51107,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Loudoun,Loudoun County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,3335,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51107,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Loudoun,Loudoun County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7476,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51107,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Loudoun,Loudoun County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51107,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Loudoun,Loudoun County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51107,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Loudoun,Loudoun County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51107,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Loudoun,Loudoun County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51107,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Loudoun,Loudoun County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51107,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Loudoun,Loudoun County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,97.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51107,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Loudoun,Loudoun County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51107,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Loudoun,Loudoun County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,371578,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51107,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Louisa,Louisa County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51109,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Louisa,Louisa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51109,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Louisa,Louisa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51109,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Louisa,Louisa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51109,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Louisa,Louisa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51109,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Louisa,Louisa County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,37757,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51109,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Louisa,Louisa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,11022,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51109,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Louisa,Louisa County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5544,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51109,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Louisa,Louisa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51109,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Louisa,Louisa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5479,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51109,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Louisa,Louisa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,50.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51109,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Louisa,Louisa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51109,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Louisa,Louisa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,49.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51109,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Louisa,Louisa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51109,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Louisa,Louisa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,13.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51109,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Louisa,Louisa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,36.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51109,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Louisa,Louisa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1484,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51109,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Louisa,Louisa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,4060,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51109,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Lunenburg,Lunenburg County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51111,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Lunenburg,Lunenburg County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51111,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Lunenburg,Lunenburg County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51111,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Lunenburg,Lunenburg County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51111,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Lunenburg,Lunenburg County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51111,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Lunenburg,Lunenburg County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,11930,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51111,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Lunenburg,Lunenburg County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3149,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51111,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Lunenburg,Lunenburg County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3149,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51111,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Lunenburg,Lunenburg County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51111,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Lunenburg,Lunenburg County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51111,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Lunenburg,Lunenburg County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51111,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Lunenburg,Lunenburg County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51111,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Lunenburg,Lunenburg County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51111,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Lunenburg,Lunenburg County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51111,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Lunenburg,Lunenburg County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51111,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Lunenburg,Lunenburg County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51111,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Lunenburg,Lunenburg County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51111,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Lunenburg,Lunenburg County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3149,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51111,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Lynchburg City,Lynchburg City County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51680,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Lynchburg City,Lynchburg City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51680,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Lynchburg City,Lynchburg City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51680,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Lynchburg City,Lynchburg City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51680,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Lynchburg City,Lynchburg City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51680,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Lynchburg City,Lynchburg City County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,78871,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51680,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Lynchburg City,Lynchburg City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,75321,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51680,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Lynchburg City,Lynchburg City County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,75321,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51680,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Lynchburg City,Lynchburg City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51680,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Lynchburg City,Lynchburg City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51680,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Lynchburg City,Lynchburg City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51680,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Lynchburg City,Lynchburg City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51680,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Lynchburg City,Lynchburg City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51680,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Lynchburg City,Lynchburg City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51680,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Lynchburg City,Lynchburg City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51680,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Lynchburg City,Lynchburg City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51680,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Lynchburg City,Lynchburg City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51680,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Lynchburg City,Lynchburg City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,75321,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51680,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51113,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51113,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51113,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51113,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51113,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,13837,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51113,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1976,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51113,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,705,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51113,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51113,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1271,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51113,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,35.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51113,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51113,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,64.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51113,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51113,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,35.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51113,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51113,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,705,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51113,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Madison,Madison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51113,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Manassas City,Manassas City County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51683,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Manassas City,Manassas City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51683,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Manassas City,Manassas City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51683,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Manassas City,Manassas City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51683,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Manassas City,Manassas City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51683,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Manassas City,Manassas City County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,42728,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51683,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Manassas City,Manassas City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,39849,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51683,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Manassas City,Manassas City County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,39849,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51683,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Manassas City,Manassas City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51683,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Manassas City,Manassas City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51683,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Manassas City,Manassas City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51683,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Manassas City,Manassas City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51683,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Manassas City,Manassas City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51683,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Manassas City,Manassas City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51683,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Manassas City,Manassas City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51683,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Manassas City,Manassas City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51683,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Manassas City,Manassas City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51683,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Manassas City,Manassas City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,39849,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51683,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Manassas Park City,Manassas Park City County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51685,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Manassas Park City,Manassas Park City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51685,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Manassas Park City,Manassas Park City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51685,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Manassas Park City,Manassas Park City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51685,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Manassas Park City,Manassas Park City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51685,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Manassas Park City,Manassas Park City County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,17140,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51685,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Manassas Park City,Manassas Park City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,11492,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51685,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Manassas Park City,Manassas Park City County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11492,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51685,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Manassas Park City,Manassas Park City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51685,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Manassas Park City,Manassas Park City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51685,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Manassas Park City,Manassas Park City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51685,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Manassas Park City,Manassas Park City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51685,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Manassas Park City,Manassas Park City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51685,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Manassas Park City,Manassas Park City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51685,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Manassas Park City,Manassas Park City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51685,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Manassas Park City,Manassas Park City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51685,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Manassas Park City,Manassas Park City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,11492,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51685,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Manassas Park City,Manassas Park City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51685,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Martinsville City,Martinsville City County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51690,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Martinsville City,Martinsville City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51690,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Martinsville City,Martinsville City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51690,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Martinsville City,Martinsville City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51690,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Martinsville City,Martinsville City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51690,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Martinsville City,Martinsville City County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,13422,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51690,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Martinsville City,Martinsville City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,10649,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51690,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Martinsville City,Martinsville City County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10649,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51690,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Martinsville City,Martinsville City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51690,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Martinsville City,Martinsville City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51690,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Martinsville City,Martinsville City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51690,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Martinsville City,Martinsville City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51690,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Martinsville City,Martinsville City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51690,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Martinsville City,Martinsville City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51690,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Martinsville City,Martinsville City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51690,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Martinsville City,Martinsville City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51690,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Martinsville City,Martinsville City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51690,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Martinsville City,Martinsville City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,10649,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51690,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Mathews,Mathews County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51115,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Mathews,Mathews County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51115,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Mathews,Mathews County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51115,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Mathews,Mathews County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51115,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Mathews,Mathews County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51115,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Mathews,Mathews County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,8524,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51115,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Mathews,Mathews County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,474,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51115,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Mathews,Mathews County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51115,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Mathews,Mathews County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51115,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Mathews,Mathews County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,474,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51115,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Mathews,Mathews County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51115,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Mathews,Mathews County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51115,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Mathews,Mathews County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51115,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Mathews,Mathews County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51115,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Mathews,Mathews County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51115,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Mathews,Mathews County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51115,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Mathews,Mathews County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51115,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Mathews,Mathews County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51115,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Mecklenburg,Mecklenburg County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,25,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51117,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Mecklenburg,Mecklenburg County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51117,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Mecklenburg,Mecklenburg County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51117,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Mecklenburg,Mecklenburg County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51117,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Mecklenburg,Mecklenburg County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51117,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Mecklenburg,Mecklenburg County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,30287,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51117,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Mecklenburg,Mecklenburg County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,20500,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51117,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Mecklenburg,Mecklenburg County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,18303,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51117,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Mecklenburg,Mecklenburg County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,113,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51117,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Mecklenburg,Mecklenburg County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2197,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51117,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Mecklenburg,Mecklenburg County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,89.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51117,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Mecklenburg,Mecklenburg County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51117,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Mecklenburg,Mecklenburg County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,10.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51117,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Mecklenburg,Mecklenburg County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51117,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Mecklenburg,Mecklenburg County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,44.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51117,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Mecklenburg,Mecklenburg County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,44.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51117,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Mecklenburg,Mecklenburg County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,9135,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51117,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Mecklenburg,Mecklenburg County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,9056,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51117,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Middlesex,Middlesex County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51119,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Middlesex,Middlesex County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51119,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Middlesex,Middlesex County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51119,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Middlesex,Middlesex County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51119,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Middlesex,Middlesex County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51119,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Middlesex,Middlesex County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,10623,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51119,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Middlesex,Middlesex County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2585,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51119,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Middlesex,Middlesex County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1888,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51119,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Middlesex,Middlesex County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1888,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51119,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Middlesex,Middlesex County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,698,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51119,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Middlesex,Middlesex County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,73,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51119,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Middlesex,Middlesex County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,73,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51119,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Middlesex,Middlesex County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,27,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51119,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Middlesex,Middlesex County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51119,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Middlesex,Middlesex County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51119,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Middlesex,Middlesex County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51119,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Middlesex,Middlesex County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51119,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Middlesex,Middlesex County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51119,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,23,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51121,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51121,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51121,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51121,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51121,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,99508,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51121,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,69981,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51121,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,67717,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51121,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51121,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2264,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51121,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,96.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51121,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51121,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,3.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51121,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51121,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,93.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51121,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,3.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51121,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,65390,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51121,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Montgomery,Montgomery County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2327,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51121,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Nelson,Nelson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51125,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Nelson,Nelson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51125,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Nelson,Nelson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51125,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Nelson,Nelson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51125,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Nelson,Nelson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51125,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Nelson,Nelson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,14732,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51125,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Nelson,Nelson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,10433,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51125,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Nelson,Nelson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9437,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51125,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Nelson,Nelson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51125,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Nelson,Nelson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,996,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51125,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Nelson,Nelson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,90.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51125,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Nelson,Nelson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51125,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Nelson,Nelson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,9.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51125,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Nelson,Nelson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51125,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Nelson,Nelson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,1.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51125,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Nelson,Nelson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,88.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51125,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Nelson,Nelson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,193,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51125,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Nelson,Nelson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,9244,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51125,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,New Kent,New Kent County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51127,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,New Kent,New Kent County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51127,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,New Kent,New Kent County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51127,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,New Kent,New Kent County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51127,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,New Kent,New Kent County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51127,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,New Kent,New Kent County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,23086,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51127,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,New Kent,New Kent County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,10185,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51127,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,New Kent,New Kent County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8617,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51127,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,New Kent,New Kent County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,8617,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51127,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,New Kent,New Kent County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1568,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51127,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,New Kent,New Kent County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,84.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51127,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,New Kent,New Kent County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,84.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51127,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,New Kent,New Kent County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,15.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51127,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,New Kent,New Kent County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51127,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,New Kent,New Kent County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51127,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,New Kent,New Kent County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51127,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,New Kent,New Kent County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51127,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,New Kent,New Kent County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51127,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Newport News City,Newport News City County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51700,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Newport News City,Newport News City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51700,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Newport News City,Newport News City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51700,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Newport News City,Newport News City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51700,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Newport News City,Newport News City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51700,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Newport News City,Newport News City County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,185916,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51700,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Newport News City,Newport News City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,204690,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51700,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Newport News City,Newport News City County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,204690,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51700,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Newport News City,Newport News City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51700,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Newport News City,Newport News City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51700,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Newport News City,Newport News City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51700,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Newport News City,Newport News City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51700,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Newport News City,Newport News City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51700,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Newport News City,Newport News City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51700,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Newport News City,Newport News City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,7.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51700,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Newport News City,Newport News City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,92.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51700,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Newport News City,Newport News City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,16128,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51700,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Newport News City,Newport News City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,188562,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51700,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Norfolk City,Norfolk City County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51710,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Norfolk City,Norfolk City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51710,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Norfolk City,Norfolk City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51710,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Norfolk City,Norfolk City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51710,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Norfolk City,Norfolk City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51710,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Norfolk City,Norfolk City County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,237591,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51710,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Norfolk City,Norfolk City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,269608,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51710,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Norfolk City,Norfolk City County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,269608,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51710,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Norfolk City,Norfolk City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51710,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Norfolk City,Norfolk City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51710,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Norfolk City,Norfolk City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51710,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Norfolk City,Norfolk City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51710,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Norfolk City,Norfolk City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51710,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Norfolk City,Norfolk City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51710,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Norfolk City,Norfolk City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,17.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51710,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Norfolk City,Norfolk City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,82.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51710,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Norfolk City,Norfolk City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,46093,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51710,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Norfolk City,Norfolk City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,223515,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51710,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Northampton,Northampton County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51131,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Northampton,Northampton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51131,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Northampton,Northampton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51131,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Northampton,Northampton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51131,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Northampton,Northampton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51131,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Northampton,Northampton County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,12232,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51131,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Northampton,Northampton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5845,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51131,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Northampton,Northampton County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2172,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51131,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Northampton,Northampton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51131,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Northampton,Northampton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3673,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51131,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Northampton,Northampton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,37.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51131,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Northampton,Northampton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51131,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Northampton,Northampton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,62.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51131,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Northampton,Northampton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51131,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Northampton,Northampton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51131,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Northampton,Northampton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,37.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51131,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Northampton,Northampton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51131,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Northampton,Northampton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2172,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51131,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Northumberland,Northumberland County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,35,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51133,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Northumberland,Northumberland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,32,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51133,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Northumberland,Northumberland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51133,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Northumberland,Northumberland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51133,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Northumberland,Northumberland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,32,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51133,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Northumberland,Northumberland County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,11839,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51133,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Northumberland,Northumberland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5277,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51133,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Northumberland,Northumberland County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4918,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51133,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Northumberland,Northumberland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,4918,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51133,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Northumberland,Northumberland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,359,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51133,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Northumberland,Northumberland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,93.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51133,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Northumberland,Northumberland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,93.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51133,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Northumberland,Northumberland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,6.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51133,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Northumberland,Northumberland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51133,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Northumberland,Northumberland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51133,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Northumberland,Northumberland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51133,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Northumberland,Northumberland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51133,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Northumberland,Northumberland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51133,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Norton City,Norton City County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51720,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Norton City,Norton City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51720,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Norton City,Norton City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51720,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Norton City,Norton City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51720,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Norton City,Norton City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51720,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Norton City,Norton City County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,3679,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51720,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Norton City,Norton City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3777,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51720,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Norton City,Norton City County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3777,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51720,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Norton City,Norton City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51720,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Norton City,Norton City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51720,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Norton City,Norton City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51720,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Norton City,Norton City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51720,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Norton City,Norton City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51720,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Norton City,Norton City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51720,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Norton City,Norton City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51720,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Norton City,Norton City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51720,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Norton City,Norton City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51720,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Norton City,Norton City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3777,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51720,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Nottoway,Nottoway County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51135,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Nottoway,Nottoway County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51135,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Nottoway,Nottoway County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51135,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Nottoway,Nottoway County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51135,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Nottoway,Nottoway County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51135,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Nottoway,Nottoway County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,15614,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51135,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Nottoway,Nottoway County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9855,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51135,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Nottoway,Nottoway County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3388,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51135,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Nottoway,Nottoway County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,48,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51135,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Nottoway,Nottoway County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6467,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51135,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Nottoway,Nottoway County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,34.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51135,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Nottoway,Nottoway County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51135,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Nottoway,Nottoway County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,65.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51135,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Nottoway,Nottoway County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51135,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Nottoway,Nottoway County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51135,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Nottoway,Nottoway County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,33.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51135,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Nottoway,Nottoway County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51135,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Nottoway,Nottoway County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3340,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51135,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51137,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51137,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51137,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51137,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51137,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,36396,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51137,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,18259,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51137,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,18222,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51137,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51137,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,36,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51137,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51137,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51137,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51137,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51137,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,12.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51137,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,86.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51137,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2358,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51137,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,15864,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51137,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Page,Page County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51139,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Page,Page County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51139,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Page,Page County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51139,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Page,Page County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51139,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Page,Page County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51139,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Page,Page County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,23693,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51139,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Page,Page County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,11528,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51139,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Page,Page County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4643,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51139,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Page,Page County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51139,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Page,Page County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6885,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51139,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Page,Page County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,40.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51139,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Page,Page County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51139,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Page,Page County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,59.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51139,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Page,Page County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51139,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Page,Page County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51139,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Page,Page County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,40.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51139,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Page,Page County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51139,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Page,Page County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,4643,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51139,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Patrick,Patrick County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51141,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Patrick,Patrick County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51141,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Patrick,Patrick County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51141,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Patrick,Patrick County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51141,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Patrick,Patrick County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51141,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Patrick,Patrick County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,17560,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51141,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Patrick,Patrick County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1527,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51141,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Patrick,Patrick County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1431,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51141,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Patrick,Patrick County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51141,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Patrick,Patrick County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,95,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51141,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Patrick,Patrick County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,93.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51141,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Patrick,Patrick County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51141,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Patrick,Patrick County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,6.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51141,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Patrick,Patrick County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51141,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Patrick,Patrick County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51141,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Patrick,Patrick County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,93.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51141,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Patrick,Patrick County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51141,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Patrick,Patrick County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1431,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51141,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Petersburg City,Petersburg City County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51730,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Petersburg City,Petersburg City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51730,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Petersburg City,Petersburg City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51730,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Petersburg City,Petersburg City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51730,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Petersburg City,Petersburg City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51730,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Petersburg City,Petersburg City County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,33428,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51730,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Petersburg City,Petersburg City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,29818,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51730,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Petersburg City,Petersburg City County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,29818,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51730,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Petersburg City,Petersburg City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51730,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Petersburg City,Petersburg City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51730,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Petersburg City,Petersburg City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51730,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Petersburg City,Petersburg City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51730,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Petersburg City,Petersburg City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51730,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Petersburg City,Petersburg City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51730,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Petersburg City,Petersburg City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51730,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Petersburg City,Petersburg City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51730,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Petersburg City,Petersburg City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,29818,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51730,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Petersburg City,Petersburg City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51730,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Pittsylvania,Pittsylvania County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,22,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51143,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Pittsylvania,Pittsylvania County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51143,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Pittsylvania,Pittsylvania County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51143,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Pittsylvania,Pittsylvania County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51143,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Pittsylvania,Pittsylvania County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51143,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Pittsylvania,Pittsylvania County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,60312,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51143,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Pittsylvania,Pittsylvania County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,15281,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51143,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Pittsylvania,Pittsylvania County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,14672,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51143,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Pittsylvania,Pittsylvania County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,61,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51143,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Pittsylvania,Pittsylvania County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,609,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51143,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Pittsylvania,Pittsylvania County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,96,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51143,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Pittsylvania,Pittsylvania County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51143,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Pittsylvania,Pittsylvania County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51143,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Pittsylvania,Pittsylvania County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51143,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Pittsylvania,Pittsylvania County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,63.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51143,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Pittsylvania,Pittsylvania County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,32.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51143,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Pittsylvania,Pittsylvania County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,9646,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51143,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Pittsylvania,Pittsylvania County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,4965,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51143,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Poquoson,Poquoson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51735,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Poquoson,Poquoson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51735,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Poquoson,Poquoson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51735,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Poquoson,Poquoson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51735,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Poquoson,Poquoson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51735,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Poquoson,Poquoson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,12455,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51735,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Poquoson,Poquoson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,11255,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51735,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Poquoson,Poquoson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11255,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51735,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Poquoson,Poquoson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51735,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Poquoson,Poquoson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51735,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Poquoson,Poquoson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51735,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Poquoson,Poquoson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51735,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Poquoson,Poquoson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51735,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Poquoson,Poquoson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51735,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Poquoson,Poquoson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51735,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Poquoson,Poquoson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51735,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Poquoson,Poquoson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51735,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Poquoson,Poquoson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,11255,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51735,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Portsmouth City,Portsmouth City County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51740,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Portsmouth City,Portsmouth City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51740,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Portsmouth City,Portsmouth City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51740,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Portsmouth City,Portsmouth City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51740,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Portsmouth City,Portsmouth City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51740,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Portsmouth City,Portsmouth City County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,98015,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51740,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Portsmouth City,Portsmouth City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,131120,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51740,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Portsmouth City,Portsmouth City County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,131120,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51740,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Portsmouth City,Portsmouth City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51740,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Portsmouth City,Portsmouth City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51740,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Portsmouth City,Portsmouth City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51740,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Portsmouth City,Portsmouth City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51740,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Portsmouth City,Portsmouth City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51740,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Portsmouth City,Portsmouth City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51740,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Portsmouth City,Portsmouth City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,12.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51740,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Portsmouth City,Portsmouth City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,87.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51740,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Portsmouth City,Portsmouth City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,16223,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51740,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Portsmouth City,Portsmouth City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,114897,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51740,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Powhatan,Powhatan County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51145,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Powhatan,Powhatan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51145,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Powhatan,Powhatan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51145,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Powhatan,Powhatan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51145,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Powhatan,Powhatan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51145,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Powhatan,Powhatan County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,30433,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51145,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Powhatan,Powhatan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4417,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51145,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Powhatan,Powhatan County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1639,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51145,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Powhatan,Powhatan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,332,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51145,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Powhatan,Powhatan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2778,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51145,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Powhatan,Powhatan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,37.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51145,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Powhatan,Powhatan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,7.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51145,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Powhatan,Powhatan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,62.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51145,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Powhatan,Powhatan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51145,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Powhatan,Powhatan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,21.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51145,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Powhatan,Powhatan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,8.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51145,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Powhatan,Powhatan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,935,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51145,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Powhatan,Powhatan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,372,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51145,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Prince Edward,Prince Edward County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51147,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Prince Edward,Prince Edward County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51147,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Prince Edward,Prince Edward County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51147,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Prince Edward,Prince Edward County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51147,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Prince Edward,Prince Edward County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51147,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Prince Edward,Prince Edward County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,21853,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51147,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Prince Edward,Prince Edward County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,8817,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51147,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Prince Edward,Prince Edward County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7837,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51147,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Prince Edward,Prince Edward County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51147,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Prince Edward,Prince Edward County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,980,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51147,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Prince Edward,Prince Edward County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,88.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51147,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Prince Edward,Prince Edward County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51147,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Prince Edward,Prince Edward County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,11.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51147,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Prince Edward,Prince Edward County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51147,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Prince Edward,Prince Edward County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51147,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Prince Edward,Prince Edward County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,88.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51147,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Prince Edward,Prince Edward County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51147,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Prince Edward,Prince Edward County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,7837,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51147,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Prince George,Prince George County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51149,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Prince George,Prince George County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51149,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Prince George,Prince George County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51149,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Prince George,Prince George County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51149,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Prince George,Prince George County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51149,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Prince George,Prince George County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,43023,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51149,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Prince George,Prince George County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,46512,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51149,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Prince George,Prince George County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,42444,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51149,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Prince George,Prince George County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51149,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Prince George,Prince George County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4068,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51149,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Prince George,Prince George County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,91.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51149,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Prince George,Prince George County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51149,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Prince George,Prince George County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,8.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51149,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Prince George,Prince George County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51149,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Prince George,Prince George County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,80.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51149,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Prince George,Prince George County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,11.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51149,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Prince George,Prince George County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,37272,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51149,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Prince George,Prince George County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,5172,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51149,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Prince William,Prince William County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51153,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Prince William,Prince William County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51153,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Prince William,Prince William County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51153,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Prince William,Prince William County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51153,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Prince William,Prince William County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51153,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Prince William,Prince William County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,482738,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51153,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Prince William,Prince William County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,372091,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51153,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Prince William,Prince William County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,368976,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51153,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Prince William,Prince William County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51153,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Prince William,Prince William County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3115,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51153,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Prince William,Prince William County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51153,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Prince William,Prince William County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51153,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Prince William,Prince William County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51153,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Prince William,Prince William County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51153,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Prince William,Prince William County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,94.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51153,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Prince William,Prince William County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,4.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51153,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Prince William,Prince William County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,350844,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51153,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Prince William,Prince William County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,18132,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51153,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51155,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51155,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51155,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51155,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51155,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,33760,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51155,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,25583,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51155,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,15800,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51155,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51155,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9782,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51155,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,61.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51155,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51155,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,38.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51155,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51155,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,26.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51155,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,35.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51155,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,6780,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51155,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Pulaski,Pulaski County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,9020,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51155,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Radford City,Radford City County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51750,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Radford City,Radford City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51750,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Radford City,Radford City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51750,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Radford City,Radford City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51750,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Radford City,Radford City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51750,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Radford City,Radford City County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,16089,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51750,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Radford City,Radford City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,13909,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51750,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Radford City,Radford City County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,13909,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51750,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Radford City,Radford City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51750,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Radford City,Radford City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51750,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Radford City,Radford City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51750,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Radford City,Radford City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51750,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Radford City,Radford City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51750,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Radford City,Radford City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51750,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Radford City,Radford City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51750,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Radford City,Radford City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51750,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Radford City,Radford City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51750,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Radford City,Radford City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,13909,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51750,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Rappahannock,Rappahannock County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51157,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Rappahannock,Rappahannock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51157,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Rappahannock,Rappahannock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51157,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Rappahannock,Rappahannock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51157,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Rappahannock,Rappahannock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51157,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Rappahannock,Rappahannock County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,7312,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51157,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Rappahannock,Rappahannock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,189,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51157,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Rappahannock,Rappahannock County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51157,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Rappahannock,Rappahannock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51157,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Rappahannock,Rappahannock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,189,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51157,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Rappahannock,Rappahannock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51157,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Rappahannock,Rappahannock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51157,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Rappahannock,Rappahannock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51157,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Rappahannock,Rappahannock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51157,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Rappahannock,Rappahannock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51157,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Rappahannock,Rappahannock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51157,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Rappahannock,Rappahannock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51157,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Rappahannock,Rappahannock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51157,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Richmond,Richmond County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51159,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Richmond,Richmond County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51159,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Richmond,Richmond County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51159,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Richmond,Richmond County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51159,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Richmond,Richmond County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51159,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Richmond,Richmond County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,8920,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51159,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Richmond,Richmond County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3172,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51159,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Richmond,Richmond County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3099,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51159,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Richmond,Richmond County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,3099,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51159,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Richmond,Richmond County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,73,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51159,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Richmond,Richmond County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,97.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51159,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Richmond,Richmond County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,97.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51159,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Richmond,Richmond County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51159,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Richmond,Richmond County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51159,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Richmond,Richmond County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51159,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Richmond,Richmond County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51159,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Richmond,Richmond County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51159,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Richmond,Richmond County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51159,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Richmond City,Richmond City County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51760,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Richmond City,Richmond City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51760,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Richmond City,Richmond City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51760,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Richmond City,Richmond City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51760,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Richmond City,Richmond City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51760,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Richmond City,Richmond City County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,226670,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51760,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Richmond City,Richmond City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,184062,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51760,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Richmond City,Richmond City County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,184062,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51760,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Richmond City,Richmond City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51760,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Richmond City,Richmond City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51760,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Richmond City,Richmond City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51760,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Richmond City,Richmond City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51760,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Richmond City,Richmond City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51760,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Richmond City,Richmond City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51760,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Richmond City,Richmond City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51760,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Richmond City,Richmond City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51760,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Richmond City,Richmond City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51760,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Richmond City,Richmond City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,184062,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51760,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Roanoke,Roanoke County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51161,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Roanoke,Roanoke County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51161,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Roanoke,Roanoke County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51161,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Roanoke,Roanoke County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51161,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Roanoke,Roanoke County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51161,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Roanoke,Roanoke County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,96845,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51161,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Roanoke,Roanoke County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,61667,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51161,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Roanoke,Roanoke County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,60168,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51161,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Roanoke,Roanoke County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,12215,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51161,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Roanoke,Roanoke County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1498,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51161,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Roanoke,Roanoke County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,97.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51161,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Roanoke,Roanoke County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,19.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51161,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Roanoke,Roanoke County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51161,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Roanoke,Roanoke County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51161,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Roanoke,Roanoke County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51161,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Roanoke,Roanoke County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,77.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51161,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Roanoke,Roanoke County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,260,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51161,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Roanoke,Roanoke County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,47694,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51161,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Roanoke City,Roanoke City County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51770,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Roanoke City,Roanoke City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51770,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Roanoke City,Roanoke City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51770,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Roanoke City,Roanoke City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51770,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Roanoke City,Roanoke City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51770,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Roanoke City,Roanoke City County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,99875,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51770,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Roanoke City,Roanoke City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,99936,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51770,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Roanoke City,Roanoke City County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,99936,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51770,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Roanoke City,Roanoke City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51770,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Roanoke City,Roanoke City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51770,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Roanoke City,Roanoke City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51770,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Roanoke City,Roanoke City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51770,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Roanoke City,Roanoke City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51770,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Roanoke City,Roanoke City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51770,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Roanoke City,Roanoke City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51770,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Roanoke City,Roanoke City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51770,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Roanoke City,Roanoke City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51770,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Roanoke City,Roanoke City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,99936,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51770,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Rockbridge,Rockbridge County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51163,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Rockbridge,Rockbridge County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51163,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Rockbridge,Rockbridge County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51163,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Rockbridge,Rockbridge County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51163,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Rockbridge,Rockbridge County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51163,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Rockbridge,Rockbridge County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,22610,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51163,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Rockbridge,Rockbridge County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,6455,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51163,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Rockbridge,Rockbridge County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5175,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51163,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Rockbridge,Rockbridge County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51163,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Rockbridge,Rockbridge County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1280,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51163,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Rockbridge,Rockbridge County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,80.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51163,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Rockbridge,Rockbridge County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51163,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Rockbridge,Rockbridge County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,19.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51163,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Rockbridge,Rockbridge County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51163,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Rockbridge,Rockbridge County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,63.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51163,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Rockbridge,Rockbridge County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,16.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51163,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Rockbridge,Rockbridge County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,4094,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51163,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Rockbridge,Rockbridge County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1081,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51163,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Rockingham,Rockingham County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,22,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51165,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Rockingham,Rockingham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51165,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Rockingham,Rockingham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51165,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Rockingham,Rockingham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51165,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Rockingham,Rockingham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51165,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Rockingham,Rockingham County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,83758,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51165,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Rockingham,Rockingham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,40894,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51165,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Rockingham,Rockingham County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,36435,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51165,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Rockingham,Rockingham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51165,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Rockingham,Rockingham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4459,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51165,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Rockingham,Rockingham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,89.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51165,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Rockingham,Rockingham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51165,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Rockingham,Rockingham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,10.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51165,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Rockingham,Rockingham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51165,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Rockingham,Rockingham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,4.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51165,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Rockingham,Rockingham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,84.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51165,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Rockingham,Rockingham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1934,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51165,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Rockingham,Rockingham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,34501,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51165,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Russell,Russell County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51167,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Russell,Russell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51167,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Russell,Russell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51167,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Russell,Russell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51167,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Russell,Russell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51167,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Russell,Russell County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,25726,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51167,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Russell,Russell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,17213,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51167,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Russell,Russell County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1894,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51167,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Russell,Russell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,391,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51167,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Russell,Russell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,15318,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51167,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Russell,Russell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,11,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51167,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Russell,Russell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,2.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51167,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Russell,Russell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,89,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51167,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Russell,Russell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51167,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Russell,Russell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,8.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51167,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Russell,Russell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51167,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Russell,Russell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1503,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51167,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Russell,Russell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51167,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Salem City,Salem City County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51775,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Salem City,Salem City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51775,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Salem City,Salem City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51775,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Salem City,Salem City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51775,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Salem City,Salem City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51775,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Salem City,Salem City County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,25374,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51775,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Salem City,Salem City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,24471,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51775,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Salem City,Salem City County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,24471,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51775,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Salem City,Salem City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51775,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Salem City,Salem City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51775,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Salem City,Salem City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51775,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Salem City,Salem City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51775,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Salem City,Salem City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51775,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Salem City,Salem City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51775,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Salem City,Salem City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51775,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Salem City,Salem City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51775,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Salem City,Salem City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51775,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Salem City,Salem City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,24471,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51775,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51169,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51169,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51169,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51169,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51169,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,21547,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51169,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,14924,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51169,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,13502,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51169,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51169,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1422,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51169,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,90.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51169,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51169,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,9.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51169,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51169,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,13.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51169,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,77,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51169,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2007,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51169,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Scott,Scott County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,11495,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51169,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Shenandoah,Shenandoah County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51171,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Shenandoah,Shenandoah County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51171,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Shenandoah,Shenandoah County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51171,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Shenandoah,Shenandoah County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51171,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Shenandoah,Shenandoah County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51171,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Shenandoah,Shenandoah County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,44255,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51171,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Shenandoah,Shenandoah County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,22360,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51171,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Shenandoah,Shenandoah County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,12726,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51171,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Shenandoah,Shenandoah County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51171,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Shenandoah,Shenandoah County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9635,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51171,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Shenandoah,Shenandoah County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,56.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51171,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Shenandoah,Shenandoah County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51171,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Shenandoah,Shenandoah County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,43.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51171,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Shenandoah,Shenandoah County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51171,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Shenandoah,Shenandoah County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,3.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51171,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Shenandoah,Shenandoah County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,53.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51171,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Shenandoah,Shenandoah County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,845,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51171,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Shenandoah,Shenandoah County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,11881,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51171,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Smyth,Smyth County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51173,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Smyth,Smyth County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51173,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Smyth,Smyth County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51173,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Smyth,Smyth County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51173,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Smyth,Smyth County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51173,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Smyth,Smyth County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,29730,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51173,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Smyth,Smyth County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,24026,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51173,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Smyth,Smyth County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,15328,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51173,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Smyth,Smyth County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51173,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Smyth,Smyth County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8698,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51173,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Smyth,Smyth County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,63.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51173,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Smyth,Smyth County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51173,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Smyth,Smyth County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,36.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51173,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Smyth,Smyth County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51173,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Smyth,Smyth County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,7.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51173,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Smyth,Smyth County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,56.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51173,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Smyth,Smyth County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1773,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51173,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Smyth,Smyth County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,13555,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51173,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Southampton,Southampton County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,20,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51175,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Southampton,Southampton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51175,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Southampton,Southampton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51175,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Southampton,Southampton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51175,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Southampton,Southampton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51175,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Southampton,Southampton County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,17949,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51175,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Southampton,Southampton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,8978,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51175,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Southampton,Southampton County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3659,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51175,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Southampton,Southampton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,3659,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51175,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Southampton,Southampton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5319,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51175,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Southampton,Southampton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,40.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51175,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Southampton,Southampton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,40.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51175,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Southampton,Southampton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,59.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51175,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Southampton,Southampton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51175,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Southampton,Southampton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51175,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Southampton,Southampton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51175,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Southampton,Southampton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51175,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Southampton,Southampton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51175,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Spotsylvania,Spotsylvania County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51177,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Spotsylvania,Spotsylvania County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51177,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Spotsylvania,Spotsylvania County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51177,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Spotsylvania,Spotsylvania County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51177,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Spotsylvania,Spotsylvania County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51177,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Spotsylvania,Spotsylvania County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,140475,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51177,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Spotsylvania,Spotsylvania County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,83697,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51177,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Spotsylvania,Spotsylvania County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,80636,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51177,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Spotsylvania,Spotsylvania County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51177,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Spotsylvania,Spotsylvania County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3060,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51177,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Spotsylvania,Spotsylvania County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,96.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51177,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Spotsylvania,Spotsylvania County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51177,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Spotsylvania,Spotsylvania County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,3.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51177,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Spotsylvania,Spotsylvania County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51177,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Spotsylvania,Spotsylvania County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51177,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Spotsylvania,Spotsylvania County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,96.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51177,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Spotsylvania,Spotsylvania County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,103,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51177,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Spotsylvania,Spotsylvania County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,80533,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51177,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Stafford,Stafford County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51179,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Stafford,Stafford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51179,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Stafford,Stafford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51179,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Stafford,Stafford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51179,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Stafford,Stafford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51179,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Stafford,Stafford County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,157604,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51179,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Stafford,Stafford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,153197,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51179,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Stafford,Stafford County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,152960,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51179,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Stafford,Stafford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51179,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Stafford,Stafford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,238,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51179,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Stafford,Stafford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51179,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Stafford,Stafford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51179,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Stafford,Stafford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51179,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Stafford,Stafford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51179,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Stafford,Stafford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51179,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Stafford,Stafford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,99.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51179,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Stafford,Stafford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51179,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Stafford,Stafford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,152960,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51179,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Staunton City,Staunton City County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51790,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Staunton City,Staunton City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51790,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Staunton City,Staunton City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51790,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Staunton City,Staunton City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51790,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Staunton City,Staunton City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51790,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Staunton City,Staunton City County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,25800,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51790,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Staunton City,Staunton City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,23793,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51790,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Staunton City,Staunton City County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,23793,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51790,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Staunton City,Staunton City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51790,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Staunton City,Staunton City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51790,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Staunton City,Staunton City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51790,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Staunton City,Staunton City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51790,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Staunton City,Staunton City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51790,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Staunton City,Staunton City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51790,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Staunton City,Staunton City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51790,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Staunton City,Staunton City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51790,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Staunton City,Staunton City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51790,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Staunton City,Staunton City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,23793,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51790,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Suffolk,Suffolk County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51800,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Suffolk,Suffolk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51800,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Suffolk,Suffolk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51800,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Suffolk,Suffolk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51800,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Suffolk,Suffolk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51800,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Suffolk,Suffolk County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,94685,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51800,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Suffolk,Suffolk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,64770,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51800,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Suffolk,Suffolk County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,64770,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51800,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Suffolk,Suffolk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1184,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51800,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Suffolk,Suffolk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51800,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Suffolk,Suffolk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51800,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Suffolk,Suffolk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51800,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Suffolk,Suffolk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51800,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Suffolk,Suffolk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51800,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Suffolk,Suffolk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51800,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Suffolk,Suffolk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,98.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51800,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Suffolk,Suffolk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51800,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Suffolk,Suffolk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,63586,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51800,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Surry,Surry County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51181,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Surry,Surry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51181,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Surry,Surry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51181,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Surry,Surry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51181,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Surry,Surry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51181,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Surry,Surry County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,6546,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51181,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Surry,Surry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1381,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51181,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Surry,Surry County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,670,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51181,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Surry,Surry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,670,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51181,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Surry,Surry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,711,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51181,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Surry,Surry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,48.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51181,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Surry,Surry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,48.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51181,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Surry,Surry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,51.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51181,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Surry,Surry County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51181,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Surry,Surry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51181,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Surry,Surry County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51181,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Surry,Surry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51181,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Surry,Surry County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51181,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Sussex,Sussex County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51183,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Sussex,Sussex County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51183,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Sussex,Sussex County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51183,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Sussex,Sussex County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51183,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Sussex,Sussex County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51183,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Sussex,Sussex County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,10768,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51183,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Sussex,Sussex County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,6856,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51183,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Sussex,Sussex County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51183,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Sussex,Sussex County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51183,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Sussex,Sussex County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6856,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51183,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Sussex,Sussex County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51183,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Sussex,Sussex County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51183,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Sussex,Sussex County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51183,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Sussex,Sussex County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51183,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Sussex,Sussex County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51183,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Sussex,Sussex County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51183,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Sussex,Sussex County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51183,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Sussex,Sussex County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51183,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Tazewell,Tazewell County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,20,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51185,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Tazewell,Tazewell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51185,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Tazewell,Tazewell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51185,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Tazewell,Tazewell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51185,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Tazewell,Tazewell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51185,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Tazewell,Tazewell County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,40343,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51185,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Tazewell,Tazewell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,33352,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51185,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Tazewell,Tazewell County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,22763,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51185,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Tazewell,Tazewell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51185,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Tazewell,Tazewell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10589,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51185,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Tazewell,Tazewell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,68.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51185,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Tazewell,Tazewell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51185,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Tazewell,Tazewell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,31.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51185,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Tazewell,Tazewell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51185,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Tazewell,Tazewell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,42.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51185,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Tazewell,Tazewell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,26.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51185,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Tazewell,Tazewell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,14047,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51185,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Tazewell,Tazewell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,8716,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51185,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,VA,Virginia,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1181,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,VA,VA,Virginia,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,588,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,VA,VA,Virginia,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,157,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,VA,VA,Virginia,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,199,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,VA,VA,Virginia,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,228,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,VA,VA,Virginia,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,8632044,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2020,VA,VA,Virginia,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7027639,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,VA,VA,Virginia,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6713205,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,VA,VA,Virginia,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,162843,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,VA,VA,Virginia,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,314434,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,VA,VA,Virginia,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,95.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,VA,VA,Virginia,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,2.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,VA,VA,Virginia,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,4.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,VA,VA,Virginia,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,593,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,VA,VA,Virginia,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,28.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,VA,VA,Virginia,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,64.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,VA,VA,Virginia,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2033019,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,VA,VA,Virginia,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,4509632,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,VA,Virginia Beach,Virginia Beach County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51810,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Virginia Beach,Virginia Beach County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51810,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Virginia Beach,Virginia Beach County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51810,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Virginia Beach,Virginia Beach County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51810,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Virginia Beach,Virginia Beach County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51810,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Virginia Beach,Virginia Beach County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,459373,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51810,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Virginia Beach,Virginia Beach County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,446984,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51810,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Virginia Beach,Virginia Beach County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,446984,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51810,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Virginia Beach,Virginia Beach County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51810,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Virginia Beach,Virginia Beach County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51810,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Virginia Beach,Virginia Beach County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51810,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Virginia Beach,Virginia Beach County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51810,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Virginia Beach,Virginia Beach County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51810,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Virginia Beach,Virginia Beach County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51810,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Virginia Beach,Virginia Beach County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51810,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Virginia Beach,Virginia Beach County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51810,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Virginia Beach,Virginia Beach County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,446984,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51810,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Virginia Beach,Virginia Beach County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51810,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51187,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51187,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51187,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51187,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51187,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,40782,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51187,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,17189,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51187,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,15126,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51187,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,811,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51187,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2063,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51187,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,88,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51187,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,4.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51187,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,12,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51187,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51187,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51187,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,83.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51187,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51187,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Warren,Warren County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,14314,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51187,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51191,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51191,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51191,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51191,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51191,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,53839,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51191,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,48125,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51191,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,47990,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51191,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51191,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,136,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51191,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51191,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51191,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51191,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51191,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51191,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,98.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51191,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,386,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51191,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,47604,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51191,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Waynesboro City,Waynesboro City County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51820,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Waynesboro City,Waynesboro City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51820,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Waynesboro City,Waynesboro City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51820,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Waynesboro City,Waynesboro City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51820,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Waynesboro City,Waynesboro City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51820,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Waynesboro City,Waynesboro City County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,22279,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51820,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Waynesboro City,Waynesboro City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,20046,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51820,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Waynesboro City,Waynesboro City County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,20046,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51820,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Waynesboro City,Waynesboro City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51820,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Waynesboro City,Waynesboro City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51820,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Waynesboro City,Waynesboro City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51820,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Waynesboro City,Waynesboro City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51820,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Waynesboro City,Waynesboro City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51820,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Waynesboro City,Waynesboro City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51820,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Waynesboro City,Waynesboro City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51820,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Waynesboro City,Waynesboro City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51820,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Waynesboro City,Waynesboro City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51820,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Waynesboro City,Waynesboro City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,20046,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51820,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Westmoreland,Westmoreland County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,23,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51193,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Westmoreland,Westmoreland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,21,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51193,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Westmoreland,Westmoreland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51193,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Westmoreland,Westmoreland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51193,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Westmoreland,Westmoreland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,21,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51193,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Westmoreland,Westmoreland County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,18496,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51193,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Westmoreland,Westmoreland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,12841,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51193,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Westmoreland,Westmoreland County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,12555,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51193,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Westmoreland,Westmoreland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,12555,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51193,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Westmoreland,Westmoreland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,286,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51193,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Westmoreland,Westmoreland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,97.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51193,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Westmoreland,Westmoreland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,97.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51193,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Westmoreland,Westmoreland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51193,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Westmoreland,Westmoreland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51193,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Westmoreland,Westmoreland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51193,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Westmoreland,Westmoreland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51193,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Westmoreland,Westmoreland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51193,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Westmoreland,Westmoreland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51193,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Williamsburg City,Williamsburg City County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51830,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Williamsburg City,Williamsburg City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51830,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Williamsburg City,Williamsburg City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51830,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Williamsburg City,Williamsburg City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51830,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Williamsburg City,Williamsburg City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51830,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Williamsburg City,Williamsburg City County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,15445,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51830,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Williamsburg City,Williamsburg City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,15555,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51830,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Williamsburg City,Williamsburg City County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,15555,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51830,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Williamsburg City,Williamsburg City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51830,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Williamsburg City,Williamsburg City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51830,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Williamsburg City,Williamsburg City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51830,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Williamsburg City,Williamsburg City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51830,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Williamsburg City,Williamsburg City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51830,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Williamsburg City,Williamsburg City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51830,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Williamsburg City,Williamsburg City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51830,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Williamsburg City,Williamsburg City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51830,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Williamsburg City,Williamsburg City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51830,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Williamsburg City,Williamsburg City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,15555,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51830,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Winchester City,Winchester City County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51840,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Winchester City,Winchester City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51840,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Winchester City,Winchester City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51840,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Winchester City,Winchester City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51840,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Winchester City,Winchester City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51840,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Winchester City,Winchester City County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,28008,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51840,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Winchester City,Winchester City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,24812,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51840,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Winchester City,Winchester City County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,24812,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51840,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Winchester City,Winchester City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51840,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Winchester City,Winchester City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51840,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Winchester City,Winchester City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51840,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Winchester City,Winchester City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51840,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Winchester City,Winchester City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51840,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Winchester City,Winchester City County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51840,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Winchester City,Winchester City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51840,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Winchester City,Winchester City County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51840,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Winchester City,Winchester City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,51840,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Winchester City,Winchester City County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,24812,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51840,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Wise,Wise County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51195,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Wise,Wise County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51195,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Wise,Wise County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51195,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Wise,Wise County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51195,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Wise,Wise County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51195,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Wise,Wise County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,36018,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51195,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Wise,Wise County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,37575,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51195,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Wise,Wise County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,37472,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51195,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Wise,Wise County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51195,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Wise,Wise County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,103,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51195,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Wise,Wise County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51195,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Wise,Wise County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51195,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Wise,Wise County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51195,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Wise,Wise County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51195,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Wise,Wise County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,4.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51195,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Wise,Wise County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,95.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51195,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Wise,Wise County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1574,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51195,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Wise,Wise County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,35899,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51195,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Wythe,Wythe County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51197,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Wythe,Wythe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51197,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Wythe,Wythe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51197,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Wythe,Wythe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51197,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Wythe,Wythe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51197,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Wythe,Wythe County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,28274,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51197,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Wythe,Wythe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,16047,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51197,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Wythe,Wythe County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,15908,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51197,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Wythe,Wythe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51197,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Wythe,Wythe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,139,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51197,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Wythe,Wythe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51197,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Wythe,Wythe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51197,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Wythe,Wythe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51197,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Wythe,Wythe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51197,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Wythe,Wythe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,37.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51197,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Wythe,Wythe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,61.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51197,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Wythe,Wythe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,6075,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51197,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,Wythe,Wythe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,9833,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51197,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,York,York County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51199,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,York,York County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51199,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,York,York County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51199,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,York,York County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51199,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,York,York County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51199,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,York,York County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,70154,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51199,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VA,York,York County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,56105,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51199,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,York,York County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,56105,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51199,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,York,York County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1291,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51199,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,York,York County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51199,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,York,York County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51199,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,York,York County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,2.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51199,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,York,York County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51199,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,York,York County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51199,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VA,York,York County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,16.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51199,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,York,York County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,81.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51199,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VA,York,York County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,9103,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51199,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VA,York,York County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,45711,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51199,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Addison,Addison County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50001,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Addison,Addison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50001,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Addison,Addison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50001,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Addison,Addison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50001,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Addison,Addison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50001,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Addison,Addison County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,37292,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50001,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Addison,Addison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,17791,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50001,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Addison,Addison County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11490,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50001,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Addison,Addison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50001,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Addison,Addison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6301,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50001,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Addison,Addison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,64.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50001,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Addison,Addison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50001,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Addison,Addison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,35.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50001,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Addison,Addison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50001,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Addison,Addison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,1.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50001,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Addison,Addison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,62.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50001,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Addison,Addison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,306,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50001,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Addison,Addison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,11184,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50001,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Bennington,Bennington County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,36,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50003,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Bennington,Bennington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50003,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Bennington,Bennington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50003,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Bennington,Bennington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50003,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Bennington,Bennington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50003,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Bennington,Bennington County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,37271,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50003,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Bennington,Bennington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,26662,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50003,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Bennington,Bennington County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50003,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Bennington,Bennington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50003,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Bennington,Bennington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,26662,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50003,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Bennington,Bennington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50003,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Bennington,Bennington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50003,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Bennington,Bennington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50003,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Bennington,Bennington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,36,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50003,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Bennington,Bennington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,50003,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Bennington,Bennington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,50003,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Bennington,Bennington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,50003,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Bennington,Bennington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,50003,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Caledonia,Caledonia County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,24,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50005,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Caledonia,Caledonia County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50005,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Caledonia,Caledonia County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50005,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Caledonia,Caledonia County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50005,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Caledonia,Caledonia County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50005,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Caledonia,Caledonia County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,30184,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50005,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Caledonia,Caledonia County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,13303,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50005,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Caledonia,Caledonia County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4827,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50005,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Caledonia,Caledonia County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50005,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Caledonia,Caledonia County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8476,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50005,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Caledonia,Caledonia County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,36.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50005,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Caledonia,Caledonia County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50005,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Caledonia,Caledonia County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,63.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50005,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Caledonia,Caledonia County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,20,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50005,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Caledonia,Caledonia County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,4.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50005,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Caledonia,Caledonia County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,32.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50005,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Caledonia,Caledonia County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,558,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50005,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Caledonia,Caledonia County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,4269,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50005,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Chittenden,Chittenden County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,57,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50007,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Chittenden,Chittenden County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,31,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50007,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Chittenden,Chittenden County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50007,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Chittenden,Chittenden County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,25,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50007,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Chittenden,Chittenden County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50007,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Chittenden,Chittenden County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,168289,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50007,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Chittenden,Chittenden County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,118080,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50007,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Chittenden,Chittenden County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,113700,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50007,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Chittenden,Chittenden County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,55,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50007,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Chittenden,Chittenden County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4380,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50007,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Chittenden,Chittenden County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,96.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50007,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Chittenden,Chittenden County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50007,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Chittenden,Chittenden County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,3.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50007,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Chittenden,Chittenden County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,26,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50007,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Chittenden,Chittenden County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,62.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50007,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Chittenden,Chittenden County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,33.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50007,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Chittenden,Chittenden County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,73839,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50007,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Chittenden,Chittenden County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,39805,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50007,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Essex,Essex County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50009,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Essex,Essex County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50009,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Essex,Essex County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50009,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Essex,Essex County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50009,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Essex,Essex County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50009,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Essex,Essex County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,5910,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50009,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Essex,Essex County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3631,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50009,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Essex,Essex County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,128,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50009,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Essex,Essex County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,128,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50009,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Essex,Essex County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3503,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50009,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Essex,Essex County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,3.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50009,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Essex,Essex County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,3.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50009,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Essex,Essex County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,96.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50009,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Essex,Essex County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50009,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Essex,Essex County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,50009,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Essex,Essex County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,50009,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Essex,Essex County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,50009,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Essex,Essex County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,50009,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,26,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50011,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50011,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50011,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50011,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50011,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,49996,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50011,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,19586,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50011,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,12573,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50011,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50011,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7013,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50011,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,64.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50011,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50011,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,35.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50011,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,22,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50011,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50011,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,63.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50011,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,73,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50011,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Franklin,Franklin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,12500,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50011,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Grand Isle,Grand Isle County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50013,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Grand Isle,Grand Isle County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50013,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Grand Isle,Grand Isle County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50013,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Grand Isle,Grand Isle County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50013,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Grand Isle,Grand Isle County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50013,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Grand Isle,Grand Isle County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,7278,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50013,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Grand Isle,Grand Isle County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,6065,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50013,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Grand Isle,Grand Isle County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,620,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50013,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Grand Isle,Grand Isle County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50013,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Grand Isle,Grand Isle County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5445,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50013,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Grand Isle,Grand Isle County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,10.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50013,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Grand Isle,Grand Isle County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50013,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Grand Isle,Grand Isle County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,89.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50013,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Grand Isle,Grand Isle County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50013,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Grand Isle,Grand Isle County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,2.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50013,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Grand Isle,Grand Isle County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,8.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50013,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Grand Isle,Grand Isle County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,128,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50013,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Grand Isle,Grand Isle County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,492,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50013,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Lamoille,Lamoille County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,26,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50015,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Lamoille,Lamoille County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50015,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Lamoille,Lamoille County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50015,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Lamoille,Lamoille County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50015,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Lamoille,Lamoille County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50015,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Lamoille,Lamoille County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,25914,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50015,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Lamoille,Lamoille County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,12286,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50015,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Lamoille,Lamoille County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2506,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50015,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Lamoille,Lamoille County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50015,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Lamoille,Lamoille County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9780,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50015,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Lamoille,Lamoille County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,20.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50015,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Lamoille,Lamoille County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50015,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Lamoille,Lamoille County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,79.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50015,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Lamoille,Lamoille County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,25,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50015,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Lamoille,Lamoille County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,50015,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Lamoille,Lamoille County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,20.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50015,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Lamoille,Lamoille County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,50015,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Lamoille,Lamoille County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2506,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50015,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,25,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50017,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50017,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50017,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50017,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50017,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,29259,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50017,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9206,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50017,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4006,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50017,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50017,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5200,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50017,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,43.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50017,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50017,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,56.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50017,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,22,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50017,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,50017,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,43.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50017,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,50017,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Orange,Orange County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,4006,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50017,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Orleans,Orleans County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,27,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50019,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Orleans,Orleans County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50019,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Orleans,Orleans County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50019,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Orleans,Orleans County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50019,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Orleans,Orleans County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50019,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Orleans,Orleans County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,27355,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50019,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Orleans,Orleans County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,17648,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50019,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Orleans,Orleans County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4791,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50019,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Orleans,Orleans County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50019,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Orleans,Orleans County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,12857,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50019,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Orleans,Orleans County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,27.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50019,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Orleans,Orleans County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50019,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Orleans,Orleans County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,72.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50019,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Orleans,Orleans County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,25,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50019,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Orleans,Orleans County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,50019,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Orleans,Orleans County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,27.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50019,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Orleans,Orleans County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,50019,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Orleans,Orleans County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,4791,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50019,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Rutland,Rutland County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,61,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50021,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Rutland,Rutland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50021,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Rutland,Rutland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50021,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Rutland,Rutland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50021,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Rutland,Rutland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50021,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Rutland,Rutland County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,60455,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50021,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Rutland,Rutland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,39522,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50021,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Rutland,Rutland County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,20111,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50021,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Rutland,Rutland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50021,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Rutland,Rutland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,19411,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50021,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Rutland,Rutland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,50.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50021,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Rutland,Rutland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50021,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Rutland,Rutland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,49.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50021,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Rutland,Rutland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,53,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50021,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Rutland,Rutland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,1.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50021,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Rutland,Rutland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,49.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50021,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Rutland,Rutland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,686,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50021,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Rutland,Rutland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,19550,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50021,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VT,VT,Vermont,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,464,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,VT,VT,Vermont,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,74,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,VT,VT,Vermont,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,29,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,VT,VT,Vermont,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,41,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,VT,VT,Vermont,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,VT,VT,Vermont,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,642495,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2020,VT,VT,Vermont,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,392292,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,VT,VT,Vermont,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,221018,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,VT,VT,Vermont,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,436,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,VT,VT,Vermont,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,171274,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,VT,VT,Vermont,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,56.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,VT,VT,Vermont,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,VT,VT,Vermont,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,43.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,VT,VT,Vermont,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,390,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,VT,VT,Vermont,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,19.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,VT,VT,Vermont,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,36.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,VT,VT,Vermont,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,77909,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,VT,VT,Vermont,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,142673,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,VT,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,53,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50023,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50023,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50023,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50023,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50023,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,59748,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50023,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,41163,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50023,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,31341,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50023,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50023,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9822,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50023,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,76.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50023,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50023,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,23.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50023,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,45,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50023,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,5.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50023,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,70.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50023,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2444,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50023,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,28897,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50023,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Windham,Windham County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,47,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50025,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Windham,Windham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50025,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Windham,Windham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50025,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Windham,Windham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50025,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Windham,Windham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50025,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Windham,Windham County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,45844,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50025,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Windham,Windham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,30726,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50025,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Windham,Windham County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3411,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50025,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Windham,Windham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,253,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50025,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Windham,Windham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,27315,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50025,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Windham,Windham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,11.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50025,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Windham,Windham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50025,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Windham,Windham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,88.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50025,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Windham,Windham County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,44,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50025,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Windham,Windham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,50025,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Windham,Windham County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,10.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50025,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Windham,Windham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,50025,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Windham,Windham County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3159,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50025,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Windsor,Windsor County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,51,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50027,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Windsor,Windsor County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50027,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Windsor,Windsor County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50027,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Windsor,Windsor County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50027,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Windsor,Windsor County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50027,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Windsor,Windsor County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,57700,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50027,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Windsor,Windsor County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,36624,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50027,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Windsor,Windsor County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11515,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50027,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Windsor,Windsor County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50027,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Windsor,Windsor County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,25109,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50027,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Windsor,Windsor County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,31.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50027,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Windsor,Windsor County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50027,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Windsor,Windsor County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,68.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50027,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Windsor,Windsor County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,48,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50027,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Windsor,Windsor County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,50027,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Windsor,Windsor County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,31.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50027,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Windsor,Windsor County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,50027,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,VT,Windsor,Windsor County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,11515,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50027,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WA,WA,Washington,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2386,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,53,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,WA,WA,Washington,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,209,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,53,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,WA,WA,Washington,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,62,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,53,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,WA,WA,Washington,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,129,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,53,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,WA,WA,Washington,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,53,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,WA,WA,Washington,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,7718785,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,53,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,False,,WFR_ST
2020,WA,WA,Washington,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,6616621,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,53,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,WA,WA,Washington,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4304476,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,53,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,WA,WA,Washington,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,85399,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,53,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,WA,WA,Washington,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2312145,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,53,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,WA,WA,Washington,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,65.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,53,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,WA,WA,Washington,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,53,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,WA,WA,Washington,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,34.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,53,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,WA,WA,Washington,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2177,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,53,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,WA,WA,Washington,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,31.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,53,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,WA,WA,Washington,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,32.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,53,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,WA,WA,Washington,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2056474,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,53,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,WA,WA,Washington,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2162603,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,53,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,WI,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55001,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55001,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55001,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55001,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55001,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,20673,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55001,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7666,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55001,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5653,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55001,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55001,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2012,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55001,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,73.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55001,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55001,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,26.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55001,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55001,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,10.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55001,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,63.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55001,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,817,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55001,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Adams,Adams County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,4836,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55001,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Ashland,Ashland County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55003,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Ashland,Ashland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55003,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Ashland,Ashland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55003,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Ashland,Ashland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55003,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Ashland,Ashland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55003,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Ashland,Ashland County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,15977,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55003,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Ashland,Ashland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,11933,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55003,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Ashland,Ashland County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10087,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55003,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Ashland,Ashland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55003,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Ashland,Ashland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1846,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55003,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Ashland,Ashland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,84.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55003,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Ashland,Ashland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55003,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Ashland,Ashland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,15.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55003,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Ashland,Ashland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55003,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Ashland,Ashland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55003,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Ashland,Ashland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,84.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55003,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Ashland,Ashland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55003,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Ashland,Ashland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,10087,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55003,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Barron,Barron County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55005,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Barron,Barron County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55005,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Barron,Barron County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55005,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Barron,Barron County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55005,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Barron,Barron County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55005,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Barron,Barron County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,46643,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55005,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Barron,Barron County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,21411,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55005,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Barron,Barron County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8685,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55005,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Barron,Barron County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55005,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Barron,Barron County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,12726,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55005,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Barron,Barron County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,40.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55005,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Barron,Barron County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55005,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Barron,Barron County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,59.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55005,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Barron,Barron County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55005,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Barron,Barron County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55005,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Barron,Barron County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,40.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55005,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Barron,Barron County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55005,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Barron,Barron County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,8685,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55005,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Bayfield,Bayfield County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55007,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Bayfield,Bayfield County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55007,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Bayfield,Bayfield County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55007,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Bayfield,Bayfield County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55007,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Bayfield,Bayfield County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55007,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Bayfield,Bayfield County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,16229,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55007,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Bayfield,Bayfield County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4692,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55007,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Bayfield,Bayfield County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,441,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55007,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Bayfield,Bayfield County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55007,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Bayfield,Bayfield County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4251,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55007,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Bayfield,Bayfield County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,9.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55007,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Bayfield,Bayfield County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55007,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Bayfield,Bayfield County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,90.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55007,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Bayfield,Bayfield County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55007,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Bayfield,Bayfield County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55007,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Bayfield,Bayfield County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,9.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55007,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Bayfield,Bayfield County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55007,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Bayfield,Bayfield County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,441,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55007,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,21,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55009,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55009,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55009,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55009,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55009,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,268741,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55009,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,237601,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55009,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,230704,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55009,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,4159,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55009,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6897,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55009,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,97.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55009,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55009,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55009,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55009,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,47.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55009,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,47.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55009,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,113289,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55009,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Brown,Brown County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,113256,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55009,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Buffalo,Buffalo County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55011,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Buffalo,Buffalo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55011,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Buffalo,Buffalo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55011,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Buffalo,Buffalo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55011,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Buffalo,Buffalo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55011,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Buffalo,Buffalo County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,13320,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55011,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Buffalo,Buffalo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5147,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55011,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Buffalo,Buffalo County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3595,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55011,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Buffalo,Buffalo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55011,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Buffalo,Buffalo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1552,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55011,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Buffalo,Buffalo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,69.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55011,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Buffalo,Buffalo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55011,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Buffalo,Buffalo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,30.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55011,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Buffalo,Buffalo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55011,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Buffalo,Buffalo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55011,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Buffalo,Buffalo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,69.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55011,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Buffalo,Buffalo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55011,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Buffalo,Buffalo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3595,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55011,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Burnett,Burnett County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55013,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Burnett,Burnett County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55013,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Burnett,Burnett County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55013,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Burnett,Burnett County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55013,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Burnett,Burnett County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55013,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Burnett,Burnett County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,16588,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55013,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Burnett,Burnett County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3823,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55013,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Burnett,Burnett County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,209,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55013,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Burnett,Burnett County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55013,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Burnett,Burnett County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3614,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55013,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Burnett,Burnett County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,5.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55013,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Burnett,Burnett County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55013,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Burnett,Burnett County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,94.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55013,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Burnett,Burnett County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55013,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Burnett,Burnett County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55013,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Burnett,Burnett County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,5.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55013,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Burnett,Burnett County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55013,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Burnett,Burnett County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,209,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55013,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Calumet,Calumet County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55015,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Calumet,Calumet County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55015,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Calumet,Calumet County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55015,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Calumet,Calumet County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55015,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Calumet,Calumet County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55015,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Calumet,Calumet County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,52476,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55015,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Calumet,Calumet County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,22595,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55015,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Calumet,Calumet County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,17171,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55015,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Calumet,Calumet County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,680,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55015,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Calumet,Calumet County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5424,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55015,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Calumet,Calumet County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,76,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55015,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Calumet,Calumet County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55015,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Calumet,Calumet County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,24,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55015,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Calumet,Calumet County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55015,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Calumet,Calumet County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,39.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55015,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Calumet,Calumet County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,33.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55015,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Calumet,Calumet County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,9013,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55015,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Calumet,Calumet County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,7477,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55015,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Chippewa,Chippewa County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55017,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Chippewa,Chippewa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55017,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Chippewa,Chippewa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55017,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Chippewa,Chippewa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55017,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Chippewa,Chippewa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55017,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Chippewa,Chippewa County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,66279,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55017,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Chippewa,Chippewa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,32773,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55017,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Chippewa,Chippewa County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5117,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55017,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Chippewa,Chippewa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55017,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Chippewa,Chippewa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,27656,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55017,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Chippewa,Chippewa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,15.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55017,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Chippewa,Chippewa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55017,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Chippewa,Chippewa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,84.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55017,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Chippewa,Chippewa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55017,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Chippewa,Chippewa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55017,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Chippewa,Chippewa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,15.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55017,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Chippewa,Chippewa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55017,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Chippewa,Chippewa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,5117,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55017,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55019,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55019,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55019,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55019,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55019,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,34628,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55019,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,13485,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55019,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8094,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55019,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55019,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5392,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55019,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,60,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55019,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55019,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,40,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55019,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55019,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55019,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,60,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55019,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55019,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Clark,Clark County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,8094,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55019,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Columbia,Columbia County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,25,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55021,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Columbia,Columbia County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55021,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Columbia,Columbia County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55021,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Columbia,Columbia County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55021,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Columbia,Columbia County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55021,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Columbia,Columbia County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,58510,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55021,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Columbia,Columbia County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,38256,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55021,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Columbia,Columbia County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,29064,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55021,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Columbia,Columbia County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55021,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Columbia,Columbia County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9192,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55021,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Columbia,Columbia County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,76,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55021,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Columbia,Columbia County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55021,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Columbia,Columbia County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,24,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55021,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Columbia,Columbia County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55021,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Columbia,Columbia County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55021,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Columbia,Columbia County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,76,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55021,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Columbia,Columbia County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55021,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Columbia,Columbia County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,29064,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55021,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55023,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55023,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55023,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55023,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55023,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,16086,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55023,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9607,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55023,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55023,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55023,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9607,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55023,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55023,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55023,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55023,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55023,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55023,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55023,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55023,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Crawford,Crawford County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55023,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Dane,Dane County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,48,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55025,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Dane,Dane County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,28,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55025,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Dane,Dane County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,25,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55025,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Dane,Dane County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55025,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Dane,Dane County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55025,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Dane,Dane County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,562306,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55025,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Dane,Dane County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,451226,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55025,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Dane,Dane County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,445839,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55025,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Dane,Dane County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55025,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Dane,Dane County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5387,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55025,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Dane,Dane County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55025,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Dane,Dane County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55025,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Dane,Dane County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55025,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Dane,Dane County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,20,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55025,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Dane,Dane County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55025,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Dane,Dane County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,98.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55025,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Dane,Dane County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,3293,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55025,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Dane,Dane County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,442546,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55025,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Dodge,Dodge County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,25,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55027,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Dodge,Dodge County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55027,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Dodge,Dodge County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55027,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Dodge,Dodge County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55027,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Dodge,Dodge County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55027,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Dodge,Dodge County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,89262,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55027,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Dodge,Dodge County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,56511,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55027,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Dodge,Dodge County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,40190,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55027,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Dodge,Dodge County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55027,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Dodge,Dodge County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,16321,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55027,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Dodge,Dodge County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,71.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55027,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Dodge,Dodge County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55027,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Dodge,Dodge County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,28.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55027,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Dodge,Dodge County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,19,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55027,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Dodge,Dodge County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55027,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Dodge,Dodge County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,71.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55027,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Dodge,Dodge County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55027,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Dodge,Dodge County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,40190,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55027,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Door,Door County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55029,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Door,Door County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55029,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Door,Door County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55029,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Door,Door County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55029,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Door,Door County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55029,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Door,Door County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,30102,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55029,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Door,Door County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,11230,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55029,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Door,Door County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9940,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55029,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Door,Door County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55029,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Door,Door County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1289,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55029,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Door,Door County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,88.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55029,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Door,Door County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55029,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Door,Door County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,11.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55029,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Door,Door County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55029,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Door,Door County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55029,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Door,Door County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,88.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55029,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Door,Door County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55029,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Door,Door County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,9940,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55029,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55031,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55031,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55031,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55031,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55031,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,44275,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55031,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,31376,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55031,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,31067,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55031,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,126,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55031,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,309,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55031,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55031,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55031,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55031,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55031,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55031,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,98.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55031,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55031,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Douglas,Douglas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,30942,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55031,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Dunn,Dunn County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55033,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Dunn,Dunn County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55033,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Dunn,Dunn County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55033,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Dunn,Dunn County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55033,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Dunn,Dunn County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55033,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Dunn,Dunn County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,45440,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55033,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Dunn,Dunn County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,22218,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55033,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Dunn,Dunn County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,17606,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55033,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Dunn,Dunn County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55033,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Dunn,Dunn County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4612,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55033,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Dunn,Dunn County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,79.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55033,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Dunn,Dunn County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55033,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Dunn,Dunn County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,20.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55033,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Dunn,Dunn County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55033,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Dunn,Dunn County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55033,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Dunn,Dunn County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,79.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55033,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Dunn,Dunn County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55033,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Dunn,Dunn County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,17606,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55033,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Eau Claire,Eau Claire County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55035,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Eau Claire,Eau Claire County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55035,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Eau Claire,Eau Claire County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55035,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Eau Claire,Eau Claire County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55035,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Eau Claire,Eau Claire County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55035,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Eau Claire,Eau Claire County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,105818,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55035,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Eau Claire,Eau Claire County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,82801,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55035,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Eau Claire,Eau Claire County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,69122,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55035,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Eau Claire,Eau Claire County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55035,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Eau Claire,Eau Claire County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,13679,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55035,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Eau Claire,Eau Claire County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,83.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55035,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Eau Claire,Eau Claire County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55035,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Eau Claire,Eau Claire County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,16.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55035,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Eau Claire,Eau Claire County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55035,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Eau Claire,Eau Claire County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55035,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Eau Claire,Eau Claire County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,83.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55035,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Eau Claire,Eau Claire County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55035,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Eau Claire,Eau Claire County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,69122,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55035,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Florence,Florence County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55037,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Florence,Florence County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55037,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Florence,Florence County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55037,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Florence,Florence County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55037,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Florence,Florence County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55037,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Florence,Florence County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,4556,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55037,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Florence,Florence County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1893,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55037,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Florence,Florence County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1893,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55037,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Florence,Florence County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55037,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Florence,Florence County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55037,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Florence,Florence County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55037,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Florence,Florence County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55037,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Florence,Florence County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55037,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Florence,Florence County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55037,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Florence,Florence County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55037,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Florence,Florence County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55037,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Florence,Florence County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55037,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Florence,Florence County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1893,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55037,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Fond du Lac,Fond du Lac County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55039,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Fond du Lac,Fond du Lac County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55039,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Fond du Lac,Fond du Lac County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55039,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Fond du Lac,Fond du Lac County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55039,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Fond du Lac,Fond du Lac County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55039,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Fond du Lac,Fond du Lac County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,104076,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55039,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Fond du Lac,Fond du Lac County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,67911,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55039,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Fond du Lac,Fond du Lac County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,14193,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55039,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Fond du Lac,Fond du Lac County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,52,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55039,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Fond du Lac,Fond du Lac County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,53718,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55039,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Fond du Lac,Fond du Lac County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,20.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55039,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Fond du Lac,Fond du Lac County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55039,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Fond du Lac,Fond du Lac County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,79.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55039,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Fond du Lac,Fond du Lac County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55039,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Fond du Lac,Fond du Lac County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,1.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55039,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Fond du Lac,Fond du Lac County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,19.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55039,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Fond du Lac,Fond du Lac County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,732,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55039,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Fond du Lac,Fond du Lac County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,13408,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55039,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Forest,Forest County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55041,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Forest,Forest County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55041,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Forest,Forest County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55041,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Forest,Forest County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55041,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Forest,Forest County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55041,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Forest,Forest County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,9160,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55041,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Forest,Forest County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4131,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55041,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Forest,Forest County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55041,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Forest,Forest County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55041,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Forest,Forest County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4131,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55041,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Forest,Forest County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55041,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Forest,Forest County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55041,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Forest,Forest County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55041,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Forest,Forest County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55041,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Forest,Forest County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55041,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Forest,Forest County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55041,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Forest,Forest County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55041,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Forest,Forest County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55041,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,28,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55043,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55043,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55043,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55043,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55043,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,51934,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55043,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,36400,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55043,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,30774,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55043,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55043,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5625,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55043,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,84.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55043,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55043,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,15.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55043,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55043,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55043,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,84.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55043,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55043,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,30774,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55043,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Green,Green County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55045,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Green,Green County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55045,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Green,Green County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55045,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Green,Green County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55045,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Green,Green County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55045,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Green,Green County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,36992,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55045,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Green,Green County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,20278,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55045,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Green,Green County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,19690,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55045,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Green,Green County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55045,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Green,Green County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,588,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55045,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Green,Green County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,97.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55045,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Green,Green County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55045,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Green,Green County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,2.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55045,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Green,Green County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55045,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Green,Green County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55045,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Green,Green County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,97.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55045,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Green,Green County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55045,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Green,Green County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,19690,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55045,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Green Lake,Green Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55047,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Green Lake,Green Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55047,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Green Lake,Green Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55047,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Green Lake,Green Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55047,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Green Lake,Green Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55047,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Green Lake,Green Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,18997,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55047,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Green Lake,Green Lake County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9567,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55047,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Green Lake,Green Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55047,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Green Lake,Green Lake County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55047,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Green Lake,Green Lake County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9567,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55047,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Green Lake,Green Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55047,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Green Lake,Green Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55047,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Green Lake,Green Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55047,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Green Lake,Green Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55047,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Green Lake,Green Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55047,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Green Lake,Green Lake County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55047,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Green Lake,Green Lake County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55047,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Green Lake,Green Lake County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55047,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Iowa,Iowa County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55049,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Iowa,Iowa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55049,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Iowa,Iowa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55049,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Iowa,Iowa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55049,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Iowa,Iowa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55049,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Iowa,Iowa County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,23676,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55049,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Iowa,Iowa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,13873,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55049,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Iowa,Iowa County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10253,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55049,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Iowa,Iowa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55049,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Iowa,Iowa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3619,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55049,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Iowa,Iowa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,73.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55049,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Iowa,Iowa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55049,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Iowa,Iowa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,26.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55049,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Iowa,Iowa County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55049,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Iowa,Iowa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55049,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Iowa,Iowa County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,73.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55049,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Iowa,Iowa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55049,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Iowa,Iowa County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,10253,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55049,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Iron,Iron County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55051,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Iron,Iron County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55051,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Iron,Iron County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55051,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Iron,Iron County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55051,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Iron,Iron County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55051,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Iron,Iron County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,6128,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55051,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Iron,Iron County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3729,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55051,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Iron,Iron County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55051,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Iron,Iron County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55051,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Iron,Iron County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3729,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55051,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Iron,Iron County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55051,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Iron,Iron County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55051,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Iron,Iron County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55051,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Iron,Iron County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55051,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Iron,Iron County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55051,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Iron,Iron County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55051,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Iron,Iron County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55051,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Iron,Iron County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55051,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55053,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55053,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55053,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55053,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55053,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,21102,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55053,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9478,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55053,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3775,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55053,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55053,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5703,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55053,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,39.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55053,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55053,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,60.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55053,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55053,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55053,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,39.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55053,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55053,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3775,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55053,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,23,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55055,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55055,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55055,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55055,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55055,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,84858,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55055,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,63430,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55055,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,55883,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55055,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55055,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7547,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55055,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,88.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55055,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55055,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,11.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55055,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55055,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55055,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,88.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55055,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55055,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,55883,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55055,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Juneau,Juneau County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55057,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Juneau,Juneau County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55057,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Juneau,Juneau County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55057,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Juneau,Juneau County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55057,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Juneau,Juneau County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55057,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Juneau,Juneau County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,26759,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55057,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Juneau,Juneau County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,12790,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55057,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Juneau,Juneau County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7150,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55057,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Juneau,Juneau County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,220,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55057,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Juneau,Juneau County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5640,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55057,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Juneau,Juneau County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,55.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55057,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Juneau,Juneau County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55057,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Juneau,Juneau County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,44.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55057,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Juneau,Juneau County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55057,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Juneau,Juneau County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55057,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Juneau,Juneau County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,54.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55057,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Juneau,Juneau County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55057,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Juneau,Juneau County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,6930,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55057,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Kenosha,Kenosha County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,35,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55059,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Kenosha,Kenosha County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55059,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Kenosha,Kenosha County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55059,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Kenosha,Kenosha County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55059,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Kenosha,Kenosha County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55059,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Kenosha,Kenosha County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,169073,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55059,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Kenosha,Kenosha County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,122253,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55059,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Kenosha,Kenosha County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,120194,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55059,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Kenosha,Kenosha County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,3105,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55059,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Kenosha,Kenosha County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2059,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55059,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Kenosha,Kenosha County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55059,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Kenosha,Kenosha County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,2.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55059,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Kenosha,Kenosha County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55059,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Kenosha,Kenosha County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55059,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Kenosha,Kenosha County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,10.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55059,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Kenosha,Kenosha County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,84.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55059,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Kenosha,Kenosha County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,13272,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55059,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Kenosha,Kenosha County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,103817,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55059,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Kewaunee,Kewaunee County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55061,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Kewaunee,Kewaunee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55061,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Kewaunee,Kewaunee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55061,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Kewaunee,Kewaunee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55061,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Kewaunee,Kewaunee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55061,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Kewaunee,Kewaunee County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,20539,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55061,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Kewaunee,Kewaunee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9038,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55061,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Kewaunee,Kewaunee County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9038,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55061,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Kewaunee,Kewaunee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,9038,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55061,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Kewaunee,Kewaunee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55061,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Kewaunee,Kewaunee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55061,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Kewaunee,Kewaunee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55061,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Kewaunee,Kewaunee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55061,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Kewaunee,Kewaunee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55061,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Kewaunee,Kewaunee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55061,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Kewaunee,Kewaunee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55061,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Kewaunee,Kewaunee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55061,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Kewaunee,Kewaunee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55061,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,La Crosse,La Crosse County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,20,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55063,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,La Crosse,La Crosse County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55063,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,La Crosse,La Crosse County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55063,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,La Crosse,La Crosse County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55063,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,La Crosse,La Crosse County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55063,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,La Crosse,La Crosse County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,120852,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55063,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WI,La Crosse,La Crosse County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,96116,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55063,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,La Crosse,La Crosse County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,91749,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55063,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,La Crosse,La Crosse County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,89,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55063,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,La Crosse,La Crosse County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4367,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55063,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,La Crosse,La Crosse County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,95.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55063,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,La Crosse,La Crosse County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55063,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,La Crosse,La Crosse County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,4.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55063,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,La Crosse,La Crosse County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55063,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,La Crosse,La Crosse County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55063,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,La Crosse,La Crosse County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,95.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55063,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,La Crosse,La Crosse County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55063,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,La Crosse,La Crosse County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,91660,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55063,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55065,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55065,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55065,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55065,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55065,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,16605,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55065,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,8247,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55065,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5675,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55065,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55065,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2572,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55065,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,68.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55065,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55065,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,31.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55065,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55065,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55065,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,68.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55065,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55065,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Lafayette,Lafayette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,5675,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55065,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Langlade,Langlade County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55067,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Langlade,Langlade County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55067,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Langlade,Langlade County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55067,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Langlade,Langlade County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55067,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Langlade,Langlade County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55067,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Langlade,Langlade County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,19438,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55067,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Langlade,Langlade County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9402,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55067,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Langlade,Langlade County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8616,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55067,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Langlade,Langlade County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55067,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Langlade,Langlade County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,786,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55067,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Langlade,Langlade County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,91.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55067,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Langlade,Langlade County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55067,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Langlade,Langlade County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,8.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55067,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Langlade,Langlade County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55067,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Langlade,Langlade County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55067,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Langlade,Langlade County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,91.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55067,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Langlade,Langlade County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55067,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Langlade,Langlade County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,8616,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55067,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55069,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55069,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55069,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55069,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55069,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,28374,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55069,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,14701,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55069,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,14054,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55069,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55069,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,648,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55069,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,95.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55069,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55069,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,4.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55069,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55069,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55069,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,95.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55069,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55069,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,14054,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55069,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Manitowoc,Manitowoc County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55071,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Manitowoc,Manitowoc County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55071,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Manitowoc,Manitowoc County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55071,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Manitowoc,Manitowoc County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55071,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Manitowoc,Manitowoc County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55071,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Manitowoc,Manitowoc County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,81250,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55071,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Manitowoc,Manitowoc County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,59873,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55071,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Manitowoc,Manitowoc County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,51256,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55071,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Manitowoc,Manitowoc County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1582,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55071,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Manitowoc,Manitowoc County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8617,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55071,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Manitowoc,Manitowoc County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,85.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55071,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Manitowoc,Manitowoc County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,2.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55071,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Manitowoc,Manitowoc County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,14.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55071,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Manitowoc,Manitowoc County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55071,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Manitowoc,Manitowoc County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55071,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Manitowoc,Manitowoc County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,83,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55071,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Manitowoc,Manitowoc County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55071,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Manitowoc,Manitowoc County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,49674,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55071,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Marathon,Marathon County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,22,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55073,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Marathon,Marathon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55073,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Marathon,Marathon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55073,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Marathon,Marathon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55073,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Marathon,Marathon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55073,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Marathon,Marathon County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,137954,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55073,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Marathon,Marathon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,88441,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55073,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Marathon,Marathon County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,82615,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55073,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Marathon,Marathon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55073,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Marathon,Marathon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5826,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55073,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Marathon,Marathon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,93.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55073,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Marathon,Marathon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55073,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Marathon,Marathon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,6.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55073,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Marathon,Marathon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55073,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Marathon,Marathon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55073,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Marathon,Marathon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,93.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55073,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Marathon,Marathon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,146,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55073,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Marathon,Marathon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,82469,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55073,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Marinette,Marinette County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55075,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Marinette,Marinette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55075,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Marinette,Marinette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55075,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Marinette,Marinette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55075,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Marinette,Marinette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55075,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Marinette,Marinette County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,41869,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55075,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Marinette,Marinette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,19964,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55075,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Marinette,Marinette County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,16775,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55075,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Marinette,Marinette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55075,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Marinette,Marinette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3189,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55075,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Marinette,Marinette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,84,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55075,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Marinette,Marinette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55075,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Marinette,Marinette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,16,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55075,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Marinette,Marinette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55075,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Marinette,Marinette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55075,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Marinette,Marinette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,84,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55075,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Marinette,Marinette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55075,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Marinette,Marinette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,16775,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55075,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Marquette,Marquette County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55077,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Marquette,Marquette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55077,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Marquette,Marquette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55077,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Marquette,Marquette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55077,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Marquette,Marquette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55077,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Marquette,Marquette County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,15584,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55077,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Marquette,Marquette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1533,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55077,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Marquette,Marquette County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55077,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Marquette,Marquette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55077,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Marquette,Marquette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1533,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55077,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Marquette,Marquette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55077,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Marquette,Marquette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55077,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Marquette,Marquette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55077,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Marquette,Marquette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55077,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Marquette,Marquette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55077,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Marquette,Marquette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55077,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Marquette,Marquette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55077,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Marquette,Marquette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55077,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Menominee,Menominee County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55078,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Menominee,Menominee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55078,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Menominee,Menominee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55078,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Menominee,Menominee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55078,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Menominee,Menominee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55078,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Menominee,Menominee County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,4255,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55078,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Menominee,Menominee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3453,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55078,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Menominee,Menominee County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3453,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55078,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Menominee,Menominee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55078,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Menominee,Menominee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55078,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Menominee,Menominee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55078,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Menominee,Menominee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55078,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Menominee,Menominee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55078,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Menominee,Menominee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55078,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Menominee,Menominee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55078,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Menominee,Menominee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55078,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Menominee,Menominee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55078,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Menominee,Menominee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3453,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55078,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Milwaukee,Milwaukee County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,19,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55079,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Milwaukee,Milwaukee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55079,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Milwaukee,Milwaukee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55079,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Milwaukee,Milwaukee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55079,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Milwaukee,Milwaukee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55079,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Milwaukee,Milwaukee County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,938149,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55079,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Milwaukee,Milwaukee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,950955,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55079,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Milwaukee,Milwaukee County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,950745,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55079,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Milwaukee,Milwaukee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1709,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55079,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Milwaukee,Milwaukee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,209,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55079,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Milwaukee,Milwaukee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55079,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Milwaukee,Milwaukee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55079,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Milwaukee,Milwaukee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55079,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Milwaukee,Milwaukee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55079,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Milwaukee,Milwaukee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,23,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55079,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Milwaukee,Milwaukee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,76.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55079,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Milwaukee,Milwaukee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,218420,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55079,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Milwaukee,Milwaukee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,730617,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55079,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55081,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55081,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55081,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55081,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55081,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,46281,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55081,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,26642,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55081,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9963,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55081,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55081,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,16679,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55081,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,37.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55081,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55081,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,62.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55081,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55081,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55081,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,37.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55081,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55081,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,9963,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55081,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Oconto,Oconto County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55083,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Oconto,Oconto County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55083,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Oconto,Oconto County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55083,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Oconto,Oconto County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55083,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Oconto,Oconto County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55083,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Oconto,Oconto County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,39043,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55083,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Oconto,Oconto County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,11031,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55083,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Oconto,Oconto County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5091,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55083,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Oconto,Oconto County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,5091,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55083,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Oconto,Oconto County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5940,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55083,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Oconto,Oconto County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,46.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55083,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Oconto,Oconto County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,46.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55083,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Oconto,Oconto County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,53.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55083,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Oconto,Oconto County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55083,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Oconto,Oconto County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55083,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Oconto,Oconto County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55083,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Oconto,Oconto County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55083,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Oconto,Oconto County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55083,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Oneida,Oneida County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55085,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Oneida,Oneida County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55085,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Oneida,Oneida County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55085,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Oneida,Oneida County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55085,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Oneida,Oneida County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55085,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Oneida,Oneida County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,37839,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55085,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Oneida,Oneida County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,11660,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55085,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Oneida,Oneida County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7771,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55085,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Oneida,Oneida County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55085,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Oneida,Oneida County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3888,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55085,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Oneida,Oneida County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,66.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55085,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Oneida,Oneida County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55085,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Oneida,Oneida County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,33.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55085,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Oneida,Oneida County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55085,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Oneida,Oneida County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55085,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Oneida,Oneida County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,66.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55085,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Oneida,Oneida County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55085,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Oneida,Oneida County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,7771,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55085,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Outagamie,Outagamie County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,19,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55087,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Outagamie,Outagamie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55087,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Outagamie,Outagamie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55087,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Outagamie,Outagamie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55087,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Outagamie,Outagamie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55087,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Outagamie,Outagamie County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,190832,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55087,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Outagamie,Outagamie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,172364,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55087,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Outagamie,Outagamie County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,165396,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55087,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Outagamie,Outagamie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,38299,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55087,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Outagamie,Outagamie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6969,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55087,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Outagamie,Outagamie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,96,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55087,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Outagamie,Outagamie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,22.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55087,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Outagamie,Outagamie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55087,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Outagamie,Outagamie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55087,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Outagamie,Outagamie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,22.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55087,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Outagamie,Outagamie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,51.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55087,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Outagamie,Outagamie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,38898,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55087,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Outagamie,Outagamie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,88198,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55087,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Ozaukee,Ozaukee County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,47,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55089,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Ozaukee,Ozaukee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,27,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55089,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Ozaukee,Ozaukee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55089,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Ozaukee,Ozaukee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55089,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Ozaukee,Ozaukee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,23,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55089,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Ozaukee,Ozaukee County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,91569,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55089,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Ozaukee,Ozaukee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,65317,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55089,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Ozaukee,Ozaukee County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,56532,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55089,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Ozaukee,Ozaukee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,7463,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55089,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Ozaukee,Ozaukee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8785,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55089,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Ozaukee,Ozaukee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,86.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55089,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Ozaukee,Ozaukee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,11.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55089,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Ozaukee,Ozaukee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,13.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55089,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Ozaukee,Ozaukee County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,20,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55089,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Ozaukee,Ozaukee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55089,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Ozaukee,Ozaukee County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,57.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55089,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Ozaukee,Ozaukee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55089,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Ozaukee,Ozaukee County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,37400,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55089,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Pepin,Pepin County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55091,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Pepin,Pepin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55091,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Pepin,Pepin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55091,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Pepin,Pepin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55091,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Pepin,Pepin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55091,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Pepin,Pepin County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,7335,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55091,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Pepin,Pepin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2871,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55091,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Pepin,Pepin County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55091,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Pepin,Pepin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55091,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Pepin,Pepin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2871,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55091,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Pepin,Pepin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55091,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Pepin,Pepin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55091,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Pepin,Pepin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55091,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Pepin,Pepin County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55091,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Pepin,Pepin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55091,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Pepin,Pepin County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55091,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Pepin,Pepin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55091,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Pepin,Pepin County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55091,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Pierce,Pierce County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55093,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Pierce,Pierce County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55093,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Pierce,Pierce County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55093,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Pierce,Pierce County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55093,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Pierce,Pierce County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55093,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Pierce,Pierce County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,42191,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55093,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Pierce,Pierce County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,27110,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55093,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Pierce,Pierce County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,25268,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55093,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Pierce,Pierce County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55093,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Pierce,Pierce County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1842,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55093,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Pierce,Pierce County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,93.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55093,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Pierce,Pierce County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55093,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Pierce,Pierce County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,6.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55093,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Pierce,Pierce County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55093,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Pierce,Pierce County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55093,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Pierce,Pierce County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,93.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55093,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Pierce,Pierce County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55093,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Pierce,Pierce County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,25268,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55093,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55095,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55095,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55095,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55095,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55095,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,45006,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55095,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,16513,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55095,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7202,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55095,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55095,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9310,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55095,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,43.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55095,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55095,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,56.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55095,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55095,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55095,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,43.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55095,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55095,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Polk,Polk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,7202,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55095,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Portage,Portage County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55097,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Portage,Portage County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55097,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Portage,Portage County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55097,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Portage,Portage County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55097,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Portage,Portage County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55097,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Portage,Portage County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,70378,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55097,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Portage,Portage County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,42866,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55097,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Portage,Portage County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,40509,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55097,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Portage,Portage County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55097,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Portage,Portage County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2357,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55097,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Portage,Portage County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,94.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55097,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Portage,Portage County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55097,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Portage,Portage County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,5.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55097,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Portage,Portage County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55097,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Portage,Portage County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55097,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Portage,Portage County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,94.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55097,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Portage,Portage County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55097,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Portage,Portage County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,40509,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55097,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Price,Price County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55099,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Price,Price County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55099,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Price,Price County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55099,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Price,Price County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55099,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Price,Price County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55099,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Price,Price County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,14015,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55099,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Price,Price County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5936,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55099,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Price,Price County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4884,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55099,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Price,Price County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55099,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Price,Price County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1052,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55099,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Price,Price County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,82.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55099,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Price,Price County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55099,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Price,Price County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,17.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55099,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Price,Price County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55099,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Price,Price County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55099,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Price,Price County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,82.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55099,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Price,Price County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55099,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Price,Price County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,4884,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55099,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Racine,Racine County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55101,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Racine,Racine County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55101,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Racine,Racine County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55101,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Racine,Racine County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55101,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Racine,Racine County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55101,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Racine,Racine County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,197440,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55101,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Racine,Racine County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,158498,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55101,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Racine,Racine County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,142158,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55101,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Racine,Racine County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,7468,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55101,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Racine,Racine County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,16340,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55101,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Racine,Racine County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,89.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55101,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Racine,Racine County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,4.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55101,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Racine,Racine County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,10.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55101,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Racine,Racine County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55101,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Racine,Racine County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,85,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55101,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Racine,Racine County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55101,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Racine,Racine County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,134690,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55101,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Racine,Racine County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55101,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Richland,Richland County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55103,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Richland,Richland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55103,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Richland,Richland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55103,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Richland,Richland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55103,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Richland,Richland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55103,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Richland,Richland County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,17274,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55103,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Richland,Richland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7391,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55103,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Richland,Richland County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6273,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55103,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Richland,Richland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55103,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Richland,Richland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1119,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55103,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Richland,Richland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,84.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55103,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Richland,Richland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55103,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Richland,Richland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,15.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55103,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Richland,Richland County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55103,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Richland,Richland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55103,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Richland,Richland County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,84.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55103,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Richland,Richland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55103,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Richland,Richland County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,6273,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55103,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Rock,Rock County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,21,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55105,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Rock,Rock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55105,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Rock,Rock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55105,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Rock,Rock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55105,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Rock,Rock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55105,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Rock,Rock County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,163643,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55105,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Rock,Rock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,128506,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55105,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Rock,Rock County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,122441,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55105,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Rock,Rock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55105,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Rock,Rock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6066,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55105,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Rock,Rock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,95.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55105,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Rock,Rock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55105,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Rock,Rock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,4.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55105,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Rock,Rock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55105,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Rock,Rock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55105,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Rock,Rock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,95.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55105,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Rock,Rock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,209,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55105,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Rock,Rock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,122231,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55105,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Rusk,Rusk County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55107,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Rusk,Rusk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55107,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Rusk,Rusk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55107,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Rusk,Rusk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55107,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Rusk,Rusk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55107,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Rusk,Rusk County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,14168,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55107,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Rusk,Rusk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5127,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55107,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Rusk,Rusk County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3332,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55107,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Rusk,Rusk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55107,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Rusk,Rusk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1796,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55107,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Rusk,Rusk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,65,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55107,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Rusk,Rusk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55107,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Rusk,Rusk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,35,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55107,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Rusk,Rusk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55107,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Rusk,Rusk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55107,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Rusk,Rusk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,65,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55107,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Rusk,Rusk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55107,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Rusk,Rusk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3332,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55107,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Sauk,Sauk County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,23,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55111,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Sauk,Sauk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55111,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Sauk,Sauk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55111,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Sauk,Sauk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55111,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Sauk,Sauk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55111,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Sauk,Sauk County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,65718,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55111,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Sauk,Sauk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,41801,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55111,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Sauk,Sauk County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,36450,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55111,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Sauk,Sauk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55111,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Sauk,Sauk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5351,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55111,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Sauk,Sauk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,87.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55111,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Sauk,Sauk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55111,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Sauk,Sauk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,12.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55111,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Sauk,Sauk County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55111,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Sauk,Sauk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,3.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55111,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Sauk,Sauk County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,83.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55111,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Sauk,Sauk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1480,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55111,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Sauk,Sauk County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,34970,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55111,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Sawyer,Sawyer County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55113,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Sawyer,Sawyer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55113,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Sawyer,Sawyer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55113,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Sawyer,Sawyer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55113,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Sawyer,Sawyer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55113,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Sawyer,Sawyer County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,18107,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55113,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Sawyer,Sawyer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4405,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55113,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Sawyer,Sawyer County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3169,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55113,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Sawyer,Sawyer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55113,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Sawyer,Sawyer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1236,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55113,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Sawyer,Sawyer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,71.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55113,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Sawyer,Sawyer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55113,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Sawyer,Sawyer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,28.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55113,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Sawyer,Sawyer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55113,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Sawyer,Sawyer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55113,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Sawyer,Sawyer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,71.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55113,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Sawyer,Sawyer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55113,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Sawyer,Sawyer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3169,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55113,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Shawano,Shawano County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55115,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Shawano,Shawano County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55115,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Shawano,Shawano County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55115,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Shawano,Shawano County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55115,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Shawano,Shawano County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55115,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Shawano,Shawano County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,40838,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55115,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Shawano,Shawano County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,21371,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55115,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Shawano,Shawano County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1134,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55115,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Shawano,Shawano County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,716,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55115,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Shawano,Shawano County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,20237,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55115,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Shawano,Shawano County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,5.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55115,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Shawano,Shawano County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,3.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55115,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Shawano,Shawano County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,94.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55115,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Shawano,Shawano County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55115,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Shawano,Shawano County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55115,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Shawano,Shawano County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55115,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Shawano,Shawano County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55115,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Shawano,Shawano County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,419,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55115,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Sheboygan,Sheboygan County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55117,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Sheboygan,Sheboygan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55117,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Sheboygan,Sheboygan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55117,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Sheboygan,Sheboygan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55117,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Sheboygan,Sheboygan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55117,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Sheboygan,Sheboygan County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,117937,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55117,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Sheboygan,Sheboygan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,88336,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55117,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Sheboygan,Sheboygan County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,63388,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55117,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Sheboygan,Sheboygan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,2319,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55117,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Sheboygan,Sheboygan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,24947,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55117,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Sheboygan,Sheboygan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,71.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55117,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Sheboygan,Sheboygan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,2.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55117,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Sheboygan,Sheboygan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,28.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55117,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Sheboygan,Sheboygan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55117,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Sheboygan,Sheboygan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,11.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55117,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Sheboygan,Sheboygan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,57.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55117,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Sheboygan,Sheboygan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,10502,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55117,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Sheboygan,Sheboygan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,50567,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55117,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,St. Croix,St. Croix County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55109,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,St. Croix,St. Croix County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55109,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,St. Croix,St. Croix County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55109,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,St. Croix,St. Croix County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55109,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,St. Croix,St. Croix County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55109,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,St. Croix,St. Croix County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,93797,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55109,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WI,St. Croix,St. Croix County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,43094,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55109,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,St. Croix,St. Croix County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,30314,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55109,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,St. Croix,St. Croix County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55109,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,St. Croix,St. Croix County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,12780,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55109,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,St. Croix,St. Croix County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,70.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55109,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,St. Croix,St. Croix County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55109,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,St. Croix,St. Croix County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,29.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55109,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,St. Croix,St. Croix County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55109,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,St. Croix,St. Croix County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55109,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,St. Croix,St. Croix County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,70.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55109,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,St. Croix,St. Croix County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55109,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,St. Croix,St. Croix County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,30314,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55109,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55119,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55119,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55119,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55119,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55119,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,19897,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55119,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,6693,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55119,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55119,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55119,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6693,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55119,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55119,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55119,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55119,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55119,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55119,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55119,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55119,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55119,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Trempealeau,Trempealeau County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55121,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Trempealeau,Trempealeau County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55121,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Trempealeau,Trempealeau County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55121,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Trempealeau,Trempealeau County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55121,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Trempealeau,Trempealeau County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55121,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Trempealeau,Trempealeau County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,30776,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55121,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Trempealeau,Trempealeau County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,17374,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55121,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Trempealeau,Trempealeau County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10208,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55121,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Trempealeau,Trempealeau County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55121,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Trempealeau,Trempealeau County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7165,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55121,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Trempealeau,Trempealeau County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,58.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55121,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Trempealeau,Trempealeau County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55121,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Trempealeau,Trempealeau County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,41.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55121,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Trempealeau,Trempealeau County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55121,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Trempealeau,Trempealeau County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,1.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55121,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Trempealeau,Trempealeau County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,57,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55121,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Trempealeau,Trempealeau County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,314,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55121,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Trempealeau,Trempealeau County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,9894,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55121,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Vernon,Vernon County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55123,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Vernon,Vernon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55123,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Vernon,Vernon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55123,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Vernon,Vernon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55123,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Vernon,Vernon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55123,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Vernon,Vernon County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,30693,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55123,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Vernon,Vernon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,13330,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55123,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Vernon,Vernon County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55123,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Vernon,Vernon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55123,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Vernon,Vernon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,13330,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55123,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Vernon,Vernon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55123,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Vernon,Vernon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55123,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Vernon,Vernon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55123,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Vernon,Vernon County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55123,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Vernon,Vernon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55123,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Vernon,Vernon County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55123,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Vernon,Vernon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55123,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Vernon,Vernon County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55123,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Vilas,Vilas County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55125,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Vilas,Vilas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55125,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Vilas,Vilas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55125,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Vilas,Vilas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55125,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Vilas,Vilas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55125,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Vilas,Vilas County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,23076,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55125,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Vilas,Vilas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4166,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55125,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Vilas,Vilas County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2977,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55125,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Vilas,Vilas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55125,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Vilas,Vilas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1189,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55125,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Vilas,Vilas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,71.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55125,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Vilas,Vilas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55125,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Vilas,Vilas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,28.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55125,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Vilas,Vilas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55125,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Vilas,Vilas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55125,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Vilas,Vilas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,71.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55125,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Vilas,Vilas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55125,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Vilas,Vilas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2977,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55125,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Walworth,Walworth County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,30,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55127,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Walworth,Walworth County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55127,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Walworth,Walworth County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55127,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Walworth,Walworth County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55127,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Walworth,Walworth County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55127,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Walworth,Walworth County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,106499,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55127,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Walworth,Walworth County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,70324,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55127,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Walworth,Walworth County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,42181,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55127,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Walworth,Walworth County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,94,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55127,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Walworth,Walworth County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,28143,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55127,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Walworth,Walworth County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,60,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55127,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Walworth,Walworth County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55127,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Walworth,Walworth County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,40,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55127,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Walworth,Walworth County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,22,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55127,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Walworth,Walworth County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55127,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Walworth,Walworth County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,59.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55127,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Walworth,Walworth County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55127,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Walworth,Walworth County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,42087,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55127,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Washburn,Washburn County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55129,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Washburn,Washburn County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55129,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Washburn,Washburn County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55129,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Washburn,Washburn County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55129,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Washburn,Washburn County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55129,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Washburn,Washburn County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,16597,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55129,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Washburn,Washburn County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5126,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55129,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Washburn,Washburn County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2985,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55129,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Washburn,Washburn County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55129,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Washburn,Washburn County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2141,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55129,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Washburn,Washburn County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,58.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55129,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Washburn,Washburn County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55129,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Washburn,Washburn County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,41.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55129,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Washburn,Washburn County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55129,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Washburn,Washburn County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,4.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55129,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Washburn,Washburn County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,54.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55129,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Washburn,Washburn County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,209,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55129,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Washburn,Washburn County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2776,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55129,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55131,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55131,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55131,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55131,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55131,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,136732,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55131,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,90991,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55131,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,75084,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55131,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55131,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,15907,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55131,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,82.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55131,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55131,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,17.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55131,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55131,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55131,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,82.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55131,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55131,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Washington,Washington County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,75084,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55131,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Waukesha,Waukesha County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,69,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55133,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Waukesha,Waukesha County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55133,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Waukesha,Waukesha County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55133,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Waukesha,Waukesha County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55133,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Waukesha,Waukesha County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55133,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Waukesha,Waukesha County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,407148,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55133,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Waukesha,Waukesha County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,255656,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55133,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Waukesha,Waukesha County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,209062,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55133,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Waukesha,Waukesha County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,32819,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55133,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Waukesha,Waukesha County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,46594,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55133,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Waukesha,Waukesha County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,81.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55133,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Waukesha,Waukesha County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,12.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55133,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Waukesha,Waukesha County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,18.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55133,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Waukesha,Waukesha County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,51,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55133,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Waukesha,Waukesha County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,22,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55133,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Waukesha,Waukesha County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,47,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55133,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Waukesha,Waukesha County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,56134,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55133,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Waukesha,Waukesha County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,120109,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55133,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Waupaca,Waupaca County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55135,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Waupaca,Waupaca County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55135,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Waupaca,Waupaca County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55135,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Waupaca,Waupaca County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55135,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Waupaca,Waupaca County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55135,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Waupaca,Waupaca County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,51713,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55135,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Waupaca,Waupaca County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,25044,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55135,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Waupaca,Waupaca County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,17096,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55135,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Waupaca,Waupaca County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,4924,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55135,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Waupaca,Waupaca County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7947,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55135,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Waupaca,Waupaca County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,68.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55135,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Waupaca,Waupaca County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,19.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55135,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Waupaca,Waupaca County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,31.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55135,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Waupaca,Waupaca County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55135,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Waupaca,Waupaca County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55135,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Waupaca,Waupaca County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,48.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55135,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Waupaca,Waupaca County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55135,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Waupaca,Waupaca County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,12172,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55135,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Waushara,Waushara County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55137,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Waushara,Waushara County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55137,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Waushara,Waushara County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55137,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Waushara,Waushara County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55137,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Waushara,Waushara County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55137,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Waushara,Waushara County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,24511,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55137,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Waushara,Waushara County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,6562,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55137,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Waushara,Waushara County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2386,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55137,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Waushara,Waushara County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55137,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Waushara,Waushara County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4176,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55137,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Waushara,Waushara County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,36.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55137,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Waushara,Waushara County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55137,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Waushara,Waushara County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,63.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55137,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Waushara,Waushara County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55137,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Waushara,Waushara County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55137,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Waushara,Waushara County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,36.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55137,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Waushara,Waushara County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55137,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Waushara,Waushara County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2386,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55137,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,WI,Wisconsin,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1020,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,WI,WI,Wisconsin,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,362,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,WI,WI,Wisconsin,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,230,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,WI,WI,Wisconsin,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,45,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,WI,WI,Wisconsin,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,84,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,WI,WI,Wisconsin,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,5892323,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2020,WI,WI,Wisconsin,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4260757,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,WI,WI,Wisconsin,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3695850,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,WI,WI,Wisconsin,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,120187,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,WI,WI,Wisconsin,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,564907,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,WI,WI,Wisconsin,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,86.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,WI,WI,Wisconsin,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,2.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,WI,WI,Wisconsin,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,13.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,WI,WI,Wisconsin,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,658,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,WI,WI,Wisconsin,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,14.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,WI,WI,Wisconsin,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,69.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,WI,WI,Wisconsin,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,612853,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,WI,WI,Wisconsin,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2951141,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,WI,Winnebago,Winnebago County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55139,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Winnebago,Winnebago County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55139,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Winnebago,Winnebago County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55139,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Winnebago,Winnebago County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55139,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Winnebago,Winnebago County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55139,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Winnebago,Winnebago County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,171646,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55139,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Winnebago,Winnebago County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,144339,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55139,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Winnebago,Winnebago County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,125241,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55139,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Winnebago,Winnebago County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55139,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Winnebago,Winnebago County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,19098,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55139,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Winnebago,Winnebago County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,86.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55139,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Winnebago,Winnebago County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55139,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Winnebago,Winnebago County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,13.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55139,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Winnebago,Winnebago County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55139,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Winnebago,Winnebago County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,7.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55139,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Winnebago,Winnebago County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,78.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55139,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Winnebago,Winnebago County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,11434,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55139,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Winnebago,Winnebago County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,113807,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55139,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Wood,Wood County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55141,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Wood,Wood County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55141,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Wood,Wood County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55141,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Wood,Wood County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55141,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Wood,Wood County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55141,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Wood,Wood County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,74091,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55141,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Wood,Wood County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,48510,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55141,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Wood,Wood County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,46989,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55141,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Wood,Wood County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,235,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55141,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Wood,Wood County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1521,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55141,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Wood,Wood County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,96.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55141,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Wood,Wood County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55141,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Wood,Wood County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,3.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55141,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Wood,Wood County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55141,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Wood,Wood County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55141,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Wood,Wood County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,96.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55141,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Wood,Wood County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,55141,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WI,Wood,Wood County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,46753,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55141,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Barbour,Barbour County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54001,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Barbour,Barbour County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54001,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Barbour,Barbour County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54001,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Barbour,Barbour County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54001,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Barbour,Barbour County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54001,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Barbour,Barbour County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,15440,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54001,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Barbour,Barbour County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,14034,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54001,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Barbour,Barbour County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,14034,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54001,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Barbour,Barbour County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54001,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Barbour,Barbour County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54001,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Barbour,Barbour County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54001,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Barbour,Barbour County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54001,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Barbour,Barbour County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54001,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Barbour,Barbour County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54001,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Barbour,Barbour County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,64.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54001,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Barbour,Barbour County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,35.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54001,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Barbour,Barbour County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,9029,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54001,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Barbour,Barbour County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,5005,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54001,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Berkeley,Berkeley County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54003,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Berkeley,Berkeley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54003,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Berkeley,Berkeley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54003,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Berkeley,Berkeley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54003,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Berkeley,Berkeley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54003,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Berkeley,Berkeley County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,122654,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54003,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Berkeley,Berkeley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,76442,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54003,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Berkeley,Berkeley County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,68582,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54003,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Berkeley,Berkeley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,91,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54003,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Berkeley,Berkeley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7860,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54003,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Berkeley,Berkeley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,89.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54003,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Berkeley,Berkeley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54003,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Berkeley,Berkeley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,10.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54003,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Berkeley,Berkeley County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54003,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Berkeley,Berkeley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,54003,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Berkeley,Berkeley County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,89.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54003,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Berkeley,Berkeley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,54003,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Berkeley,Berkeley County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,68491,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54003,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54005,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54005,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54005,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54005,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54005,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,21714,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54005,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,12427,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54005,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,12427,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54005,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54005,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54005,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54005,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54005,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54005,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54005,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,54005,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54005,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,54005,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Boone,Boone County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,12427,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54005,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Braxton,Braxton County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54007,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Braxton,Braxton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54007,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Braxton,Braxton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54007,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Braxton,Braxton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54007,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Braxton,Braxton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54007,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Braxton,Braxton County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,12386,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54007,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Braxton,Braxton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7957,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54007,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Braxton,Braxton County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7957,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54007,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Braxton,Braxton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54007,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Braxton,Braxton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54007,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Braxton,Braxton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54007,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Braxton,Braxton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54007,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Braxton,Braxton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54007,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Braxton,Braxton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54007,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Braxton,Braxton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,3.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54007,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Braxton,Braxton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,96.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54007,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Braxton,Braxton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,310,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54007,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Braxton,Braxton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,7647,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54007,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Brooke,Brooke County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54009,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Brooke,Brooke County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54009,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Brooke,Brooke County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54009,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Brooke,Brooke County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54009,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Brooke,Brooke County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54009,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Brooke,Brooke County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,22469,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54009,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Brooke,Brooke County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,37275,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54009,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Brooke,Brooke County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,34693,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54009,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Brooke,Brooke County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54009,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Brooke,Brooke County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2582,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54009,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Brooke,Brooke County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,93.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54009,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Brooke,Brooke County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54009,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Brooke,Brooke County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,6.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54009,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Brooke,Brooke County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54009,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Brooke,Brooke County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,9.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54009,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Brooke,Brooke County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,83.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54009,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Brooke,Brooke County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,3519,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54009,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Brooke,Brooke County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,31174,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54009,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Cabell,Cabell County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54011,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Cabell,Cabell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54011,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Cabell,Cabell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54011,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Cabell,Cabell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54011,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Cabell,Cabell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54011,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Cabell,Cabell County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,94137,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54011,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Cabell,Cabell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,97593,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54011,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Cabell,Cabell County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,97593,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54011,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Cabell,Cabell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54011,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Cabell,Cabell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54011,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Cabell,Cabell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54011,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Cabell,Cabell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54011,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Cabell,Cabell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54011,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Cabell,Cabell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54011,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Cabell,Cabell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,54011,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Cabell,Cabell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54011,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Cabell,Cabell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,54011,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Cabell,Cabell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,97593,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54011,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54013,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54013,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54013,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54013,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54013,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,6199,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54013,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2911,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54013,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2911,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54013,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54013,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54013,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54013,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54013,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54013,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54013,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,81.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54013,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,18.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54013,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2384,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54013,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Calhoun,Calhoun County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,527,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54013,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54015,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54015,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54015,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54015,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54015,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,8006,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54015,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4456,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54015,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54015,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54015,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4456,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54015,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54015,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54015,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54015,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54015,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,54015,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,54015,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,54015,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Clay,Clay County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,54015,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Doddridge,Doddridge County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54017,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Doddridge,Doddridge County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54017,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Doddridge,Doddridge County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54017,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Doddridge,Doddridge County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54017,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Doddridge,Doddridge County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54017,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Doddridge,Doddridge County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,7786,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54017,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Doddridge,Doddridge County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1794,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54017,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Doddridge,Doddridge County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1794,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54017,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Doddridge,Doddridge County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54017,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Doddridge,Doddridge County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54017,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Doddridge,Doddridge County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54017,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Doddridge,Doddridge County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54017,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Doddridge,Doddridge County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54017,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Doddridge,Doddridge County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54017,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Doddridge,Doddridge County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,2.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54017,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Doddridge,Doddridge County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,97.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54017,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Doddridge,Doddridge County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,44,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54017,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Doddridge,Doddridge County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1750,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54017,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54019,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54019,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54019,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54019,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54019,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,40358,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54019,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,36653,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54019,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,32384,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54019,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,509,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54019,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4269,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54019,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,88.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54019,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54019,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,11.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54019,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54019,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,1.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54019,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,74.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54019,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,704,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54019,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Fayette,Fayette County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,27323,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54019,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Gilmer,Gilmer County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54021,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Gilmer,Gilmer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54021,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Gilmer,Gilmer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54021,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Gilmer,Gilmer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54021,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Gilmer,Gilmer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54021,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Gilmer,Gilmer County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,7378,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54021,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Gilmer,Gilmer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,6251,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54021,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Gilmer,Gilmer County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6251,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54021,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Gilmer,Gilmer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54021,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Gilmer,Gilmer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54021,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Gilmer,Gilmer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54021,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Gilmer,Gilmer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54021,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Gilmer,Gilmer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54021,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Gilmer,Gilmer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54021,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Gilmer,Gilmer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,67.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54021,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Gilmer,Gilmer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,32.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54021,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Gilmer,Gilmer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,4238,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54021,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Gilmer,Gilmer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2013,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54021,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54023,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54023,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54023,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54023,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54023,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,10954,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54023,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,10307,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54023,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8394,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54023,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54023,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1913,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54023,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,81.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54023,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54023,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,18.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54023,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54023,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,56,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54023,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,25.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54023,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,5770,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54023,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Grant,Grant County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2623,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54023,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Greenbrier,Greenbrier County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54025,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Greenbrier,Greenbrier County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54025,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Greenbrier,Greenbrier County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54025,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Greenbrier,Greenbrier County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54025,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Greenbrier,Greenbrier County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54025,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Greenbrier,Greenbrier County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,32866,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54025,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Greenbrier,Greenbrier County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,23865,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54025,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Greenbrier,Greenbrier County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,17046,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54025,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Greenbrier,Greenbrier County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54025,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Greenbrier,Greenbrier County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6819,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54025,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Greenbrier,Greenbrier County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,71.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54025,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Greenbrier,Greenbrier County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54025,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Greenbrier,Greenbrier County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,28.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54025,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Greenbrier,Greenbrier County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54025,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Greenbrier,Greenbrier County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,8.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54025,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Greenbrier,Greenbrier County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,63.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54025,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Greenbrier,Greenbrier County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1939,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54025,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Greenbrier,Greenbrier County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,15107,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54025,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Hampshire,Hampshire County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54027,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Hampshire,Hampshire County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54027,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Hampshire,Hampshire County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54027,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Hampshire,Hampshire County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54027,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Hampshire,Hampshire County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54027,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Hampshire,Hampshire County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,23067,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54027,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Hampshire,Hampshire County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5690,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54027,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Hampshire,Hampshire County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4004,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54027,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Hampshire,Hampshire County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54027,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Hampshire,Hampshire County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1686,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54027,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Hampshire,Hampshire County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,70.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54027,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Hampshire,Hampshire County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54027,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Hampshire,Hampshire County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,29.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54027,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Hampshire,Hampshire County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54027,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Hampshire,Hampshire County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,40.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54027,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Hampshire,Hampshire County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,29.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54027,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Hampshire,Hampshire County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2319,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54027,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Hampshire,Hampshire County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1685,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54027,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54029,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54029,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54029,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54029,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54029,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,29019,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54029,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,11332,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54029,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11332,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54029,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54029,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54029,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54029,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54029,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54029,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54029,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,37.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54029,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,62.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54029,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,4251,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54029,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Hancock,Hancock County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,7081,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54029,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Hardy,Hardy County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54031,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Hardy,Hardy County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54031,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Hardy,Hardy County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54031,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Hardy,Hardy County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54031,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Hardy,Hardy County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54031,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Hardy,Hardy County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,14240,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54031,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Hardy,Hardy County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7138,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54031,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Hardy,Hardy County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54031,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Hardy,Hardy County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54031,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Hardy,Hardy County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7138,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54031,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Hardy,Hardy County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54031,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Hardy,Hardy County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54031,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Hardy,Hardy County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54031,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Hardy,Hardy County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54031,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Hardy,Hardy County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,54031,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Hardy,Hardy County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,54031,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Hardy,Hardy County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,54031,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Hardy,Hardy County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,54031,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,21,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54033,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,21,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54033,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54033,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54033,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54033,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,65771,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54033,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,55774,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54033,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,55774,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54033,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54033,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54033,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54033,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54033,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54033,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54033,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,60.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54033,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,39.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54033,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,33560,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54033,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Harrison,Harrison County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,22213,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54033,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54035,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54035,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54035,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54035,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54035,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,27735,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54035,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,19364,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54035,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,16527,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54035,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54035,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2837,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54035,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,85.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54035,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54035,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,14.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54035,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54035,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,40,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54035,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,45.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54035,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,7755,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54035,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Jackson,Jackson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,8772,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54035,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54037,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54037,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54037,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54037,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54037,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,57732,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54037,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,27411,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54037,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,19308,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54037,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54037,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8103,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54037,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,70.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54037,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54037,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,29.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54037,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54037,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,54037,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,70.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54037,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,54037,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Jefferson,Jefferson County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,19308,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54037,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Kanawha,Kanawha County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54039,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Kanawha,Kanawha County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54039,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Kanawha,Kanawha County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54039,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Kanawha,Kanawha County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54039,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Kanawha,Kanawha County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54039,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Kanawha,Kanawha County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,180048,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54039,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Kanawha,Kanawha County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,181606,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54039,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Kanawha,Kanawha County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,181606,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54039,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Kanawha,Kanawha County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54039,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Kanawha,Kanawha County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54039,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Kanawha,Kanawha County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54039,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Kanawha,Kanawha County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54039,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Kanawha,Kanawha County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54039,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Kanawha,Kanawha County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54039,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Kanawha,Kanawha County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54039,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Kanawha,Kanawha County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,99.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54039,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Kanawha,Kanawha County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,901,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54039,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Kanawha,Kanawha County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,180704,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54039,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Lewis,Lewis County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54041,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Lewis,Lewis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54041,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Lewis,Lewis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54041,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Lewis,Lewis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54041,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Lewis,Lewis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54041,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Lewis,Lewis County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,17009,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54041,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Lewis,Lewis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,12393,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54041,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Lewis,Lewis County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,12393,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54041,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Lewis,Lewis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54041,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Lewis,Lewis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54041,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Lewis,Lewis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54041,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Lewis,Lewis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54041,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Lewis,Lewis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54041,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Lewis,Lewis County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54041,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Lewis,Lewis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,9.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54041,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Lewis,Lewis County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,90.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54041,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Lewis,Lewis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1223,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54041,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Lewis,Lewis County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,11170,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54041,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54043,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54043,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54043,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54043,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54043,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,20337,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54043,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,12940,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54043,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7803,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54043,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54043,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5137,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54043,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,60.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54043,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54043,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,39.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54043,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54043,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,15.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54043,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,45.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54043,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1972,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54043,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Lincoln,Lincoln County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,5830,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54043,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54045,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54045,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54045,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54045,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54045,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,32473,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54045,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,32245,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54045,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,32245,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54045,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54045,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54045,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54045,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54045,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54045,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54045,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,17.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54045,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,82.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54045,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,5534,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54045,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Logan,Logan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,26711,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54045,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,28,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54049,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,28,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54049,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54049,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,25,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54049,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54049,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,56157,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54049,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,53920,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54049,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,53920,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54049,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54049,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54049,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54049,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54049,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54049,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54049,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,40.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54049,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,59.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54049,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,21773,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54049,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Marion,Marion County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,32147,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54049,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54051,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54051,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54051,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54051,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54051,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,30444,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54051,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,26950,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54051,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,20748,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54051,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,170,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54051,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6202,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54051,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,77,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54051,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54051,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,23,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54051,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54051,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,21.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54051,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,55.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54051,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,5685,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54051,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Marshall,Marshall County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,14893,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54051,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Mason,Mason County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54053,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Mason,Mason County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54053,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Mason,Mason County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54053,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Mason,Mason County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54053,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Mason,Mason County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54053,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Mason,Mason County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,25356,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54053,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Mason,Mason County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,22658,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54053,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Mason,Mason County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,10220,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54053,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Mason,Mason County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54053,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Mason,Mason County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,12438,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54053,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Mason,Mason County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,45.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54053,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Mason,Mason County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54053,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Mason,Mason County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,54.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54053,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Mason,Mason County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54053,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Mason,Mason County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,7.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54053,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Mason,Mason County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,37.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54053,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Mason,Mason County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1659,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54053,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Mason,Mason County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,8561,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54053,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,McDowell,McDowell County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,22,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54047,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,McDowell,McDowell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54047,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,McDowell,McDowell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54047,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,McDowell,McDowell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54047,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,McDowell,McDowell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54047,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,McDowell,McDowell County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,18916,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54047,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WV,McDowell,McDowell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,13271,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54047,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,McDowell,McDowell County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6763,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54047,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,McDowell,McDowell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54047,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,McDowell,McDowell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6508,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54047,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,McDowell,McDowell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,51,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54047,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,McDowell,McDowell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54047,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,McDowell,McDowell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,49,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54047,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,McDowell,McDowell County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54047,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,McDowell,McDowell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,6.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54047,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,McDowell,McDowell County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,44.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54047,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,McDowell,McDowell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,844,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54047,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,McDowell,McDowell County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,5919,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54047,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Mercer,Mercer County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54055,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Mercer,Mercer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54055,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Mercer,Mercer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54055,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Mercer,Mercer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54055,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Mercer,Mercer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54055,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Mercer,Mercer County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,59462,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54055,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Mercer,Mercer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,28899,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54055,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Mercer,Mercer County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,28659,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54055,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Mercer,Mercer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54055,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Mercer,Mercer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,240,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54055,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Mercer,Mercer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54055,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Mercer,Mercer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54055,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Mercer,Mercer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54055,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Mercer,Mercer County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54055,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Mercer,Mercer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54055,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Mercer,Mercer County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,98.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54055,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Mercer,Mercer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,185,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54055,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Mercer,Mercer County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,28474,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54055,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Mineral,Mineral County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54057,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Mineral,Mineral County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54057,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Mineral,Mineral County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54057,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Mineral,Mineral County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54057,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Mineral,Mineral County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54057,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Mineral,Mineral County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,26877,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54057,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Mineral,Mineral County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,17869,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54057,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Mineral,Mineral County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,14470,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54057,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Mineral,Mineral County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54057,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Mineral,Mineral County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3399,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54057,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Mineral,Mineral County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,81,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54057,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Mineral,Mineral County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54057,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Mineral,Mineral County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,19,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54057,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Mineral,Mineral County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54057,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Mineral,Mineral County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,19.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54057,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Mineral,Mineral County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,61.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54057,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Mineral,Mineral County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,3490,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54057,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Mineral,Mineral County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,10979,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54057,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Mingo,Mingo County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54059,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Mingo,Mingo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54059,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Mingo,Mingo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54059,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Mingo,Mingo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54059,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Mingo,Mingo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54059,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Mingo,Mingo County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,23455,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54059,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Mingo,Mingo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,17942,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54059,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Mingo,Mingo County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,17942,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54059,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Mingo,Mingo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54059,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Mingo,Mingo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54059,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Mingo,Mingo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54059,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Mingo,Mingo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54059,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Mingo,Mingo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54059,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Mingo,Mingo County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54059,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Mingo,Mingo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,22.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54059,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Mingo,Mingo County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,76,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54059,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Mingo,Mingo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,4097,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54059,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Mingo,Mingo County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,13638,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54059,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Monongalia,Monongalia County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54061,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Monongalia,Monongalia County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54061,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Monongalia,Monongalia County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54061,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Monongalia,Monongalia County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54061,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Monongalia,Monongalia County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54061,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Monongalia,Monongalia County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,105916,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54061,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Monongalia,Monongalia County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,80049,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54061,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Monongalia,Monongalia County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,80049,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54061,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Monongalia,Monongalia County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54061,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Monongalia,Monongalia County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54061,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Monongalia,Monongalia County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54061,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Monongalia,Monongalia County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54061,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Monongalia,Monongalia County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54061,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Monongalia,Monongalia County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54061,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Monongalia,Monongalia County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,30.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54061,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Monongalia,Monongalia County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,69.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54061,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Monongalia,Monongalia County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,24309,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54061,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Monongalia,Monongalia County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,55740,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54061,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54063,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54063,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54063,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54063,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54063,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,12330,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54063,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,6054,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54063,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5692,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54063,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,50,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54063,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,362,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54063,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,94,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54063,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54063,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54063,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54063,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,54063,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,93.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54063,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,54063,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Monroe,Monroe County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,5642,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54063,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54065,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54065,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54065,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54065,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54065,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,17037,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54065,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4445,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54065,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,451,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54065,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54065,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3995,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54065,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,10.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54065,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54065,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,89.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54065,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54065,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,54065,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,10.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54065,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,54065,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Morgan,Morgan County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,451,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54065,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Nicholas,Nicholas County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54067,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Nicholas,Nicholas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54067,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Nicholas,Nicholas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54067,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Nicholas,Nicholas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54067,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Nicholas,Nicholas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54067,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Nicholas,Nicholas County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,24523,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54067,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Nicholas,Nicholas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,20246,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54067,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Nicholas,Nicholas County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,17255,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54067,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Nicholas,Nicholas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54067,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Nicholas,Nicholas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2991,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54067,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Nicholas,Nicholas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,85.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54067,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Nicholas,Nicholas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54067,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Nicholas,Nicholas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,14.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54067,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Nicholas,Nicholas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54067,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Nicholas,Nicholas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,7.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54067,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Nicholas,Nicholas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,77.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54067,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Nicholas,Nicholas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1530,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54067,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Nicholas,Nicholas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,15725,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54067,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Ohio,Ohio County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54069,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Ohio,Ohio County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54069,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Ohio,Ohio County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54069,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Ohio,Ohio County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54069,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Ohio,Ohio County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54069,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Ohio,Ohio County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,42264,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54069,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Ohio,Ohio County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,39988,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54069,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Ohio,Ohio County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,39988,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54069,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Ohio,Ohio County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54069,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Ohio,Ohio County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54069,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Ohio,Ohio County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54069,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Ohio,Ohio County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54069,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Ohio,Ohio County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54069,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Ohio,Ohio County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54069,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Ohio,Ohio County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,31,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54069,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Ohio,Ohio County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,69,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54069,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Ohio,Ohio County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,12379,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54069,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Ohio,Ohio County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,27609,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54069,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Pendleton,Pendleton County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54071,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Pendleton,Pendleton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54071,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Pendleton,Pendleton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54071,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Pendleton,Pendleton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54071,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Pendleton,Pendleton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54071,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Pendleton,Pendleton County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,6134,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54071,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Pendleton,Pendleton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2951,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54071,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Pendleton,Pendleton County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1281,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54071,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Pendleton,Pendleton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54071,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Pendleton,Pendleton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1670,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54071,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Pendleton,Pendleton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,43.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54071,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Pendleton,Pendleton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54071,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Pendleton,Pendleton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,56.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54071,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Pendleton,Pendleton County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54071,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Pendleton,Pendleton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,54071,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Pendleton,Pendleton County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,43.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54071,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Pendleton,Pendleton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,54071,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Pendleton,Pendleton County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1281,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54071,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Pleasants,Pleasants County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54073,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Pleasants,Pleasants County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54073,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Pleasants,Pleasants County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54073,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Pleasants,Pleasants County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54073,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Pleasants,Pleasants County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54073,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Pleasants,Pleasants County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,7649,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54073,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Pleasants,Pleasants County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5648,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54073,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Pleasants,Pleasants County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5648,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54073,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Pleasants,Pleasants County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54073,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Pleasants,Pleasants County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54073,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Pleasants,Pleasants County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54073,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Pleasants,Pleasants County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54073,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Pleasants,Pleasants County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54073,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Pleasants,Pleasants County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54073,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Pleasants,Pleasants County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,38.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54073,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Pleasants,Pleasants County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,61.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54073,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Pleasants,Pleasants County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2176,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54073,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Pleasants,Pleasants County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3471,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54073,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Pocahontas,Pocahontas County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54075,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Pocahontas,Pocahontas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54075,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Pocahontas,Pocahontas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54075,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Pocahontas,Pocahontas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54075,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Pocahontas,Pocahontas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54075,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Pocahontas,Pocahontas County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,7847,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54075,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Pocahontas,Pocahontas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4486,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54075,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Pocahontas,Pocahontas County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1258,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54075,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Pocahontas,Pocahontas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54075,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Pocahontas,Pocahontas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3228,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54075,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Pocahontas,Pocahontas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,28,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54075,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Pocahontas,Pocahontas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54075,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Pocahontas,Pocahontas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,72,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54075,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Pocahontas,Pocahontas County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54075,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Pocahontas,Pocahontas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,54075,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Pocahontas,Pocahontas County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,28,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54075,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Pocahontas,Pocahontas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,54075,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Pocahontas,Pocahontas County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1258,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54075,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Preston,Preston County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,16,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54077,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Preston,Preston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54077,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Preston,Preston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54077,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Preston,Preston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54077,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Preston,Preston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54077,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Preston,Preston County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,34176,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54077,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Preston,Preston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,26445,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54077,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Preston,Preston County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,14617,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54077,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Preston,Preston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54077,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Preston,Preston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11829,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54077,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Preston,Preston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,55.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54077,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Preston,Preston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54077,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Preston,Preston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,44.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54077,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Preston,Preston County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54077,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Preston,Preston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,13.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54077,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Preston,Preston County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,41.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54077,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Preston,Preston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,3568,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54077,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Preston,Preston County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,11049,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54077,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54079,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54079,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54079,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54079,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54079,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,57399,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54079,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,28796,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54079,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,28724,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54079,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54079,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,72,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54079,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54079,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54079,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54079,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54079,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,54079,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,99.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54079,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,54079,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Putnam,Putnam County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,28724,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54079,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Raleigh,Raleigh County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54081,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Raleigh,Raleigh County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54081,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Raleigh,Raleigh County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54081,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Raleigh,Raleigh County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54081,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Raleigh,Raleigh County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54081,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Raleigh,Raleigh County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,74349,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54081,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Raleigh,Raleigh County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,68077,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54081,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Raleigh,Raleigh County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,67857,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54081,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Raleigh,Raleigh County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54081,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Raleigh,Raleigh County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,220,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54081,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Raleigh,Raleigh County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54081,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Raleigh,Raleigh County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54081,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Raleigh,Raleigh County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54081,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Raleigh,Raleigh County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54081,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Raleigh,Raleigh County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,29.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54081,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Raleigh,Raleigh County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,3.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54081,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Raleigh,Raleigh County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,19874,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54081,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Raleigh,Raleigh County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2682,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54081,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54083,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54083,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54083,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54083,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54083,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,27852,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54083,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,23795,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54083,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,22846,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54083,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54083,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,949,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54083,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,96,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54083,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54083,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54083,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54083,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,19.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54083,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,57.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54083,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,4673,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54083,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Randolph,Randolph County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,13682,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54083,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Ritchie,Ritchie County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54085,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Ritchie,Ritchie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54085,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Ritchie,Ritchie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54085,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Ritchie,Ritchie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54085,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Ritchie,Ritchie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54085,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Ritchie,Ritchie County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,8424,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54085,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Ritchie,Ritchie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4063,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54085,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Ritchie,Ritchie County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4063,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54085,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Ritchie,Ritchie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54085,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Ritchie,Ritchie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54085,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Ritchie,Ritchie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54085,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Ritchie,Ritchie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54085,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Ritchie,Ritchie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54085,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Ritchie,Ritchie County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54085,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Ritchie,Ritchie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54085,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Ritchie,Ritchie County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54085,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Ritchie,Ritchie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,4062,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54085,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Ritchie,Ritchie County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54085,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Roane,Roane County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54087,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Roane,Roane County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54087,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Roane,Roane County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54087,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Roane,Roane County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54087,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Roane,Roane County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54087,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Roane,Roane County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,13977,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54087,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Roane,Roane County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7098,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54087,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Roane,Roane County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7098,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54087,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Roane,Roane County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54087,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Roane,Roane County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54087,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Roane,Roane County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54087,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Roane,Roane County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54087,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Roane,Roane County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54087,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Roane,Roane County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54087,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Roane,Roane County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,16.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54087,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Roane,Roane County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,83.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54087,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Roane,Roane County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1184,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54087,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Roane,Roane County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,5914,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54087,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Summers,Summers County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54089,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Summers,Summers County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54089,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Summers,Summers County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54089,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Summers,Summers County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54089,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Summers,Summers County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54089,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Summers,Summers County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,11915,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54089,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Summers,Summers County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,26051,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54089,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Summers,Summers County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,26051,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54089,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Summers,Summers County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54089,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Summers,Summers County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54089,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Summers,Summers County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54089,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Summers,Summers County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54089,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Summers,Summers County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54089,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Summers,Summers County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54089,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Summers,Summers County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,54089,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Summers,Summers County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54089,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Summers,Summers County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,54089,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Summers,Summers County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,26051,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54089,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54091,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54091,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54091,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54091,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54091,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,16701,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54091,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,15514,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54091,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,15514,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54091,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54091,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54091,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54091,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54091,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54091,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54091,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,92.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54091,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,7.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54091,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,14321,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54091,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Taylor,Taylor County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1193,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54091,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Tucker,Tucker County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54093,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Tucker,Tucker County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54093,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Tucker,Tucker County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54093,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Tucker,Tucker County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54093,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Tucker,Tucker County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54093,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Tucker,Tucker County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,6752,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54093,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Tucker,Tucker County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5016,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54093,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Tucker,Tucker County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1435,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54093,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Tucker,Tucker County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54093,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Tucker,Tucker County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3581,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54093,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Tucker,Tucker County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,28.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54093,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Tucker,Tucker County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54093,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Tucker,Tucker County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,71.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54093,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Tucker,Tucker County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54093,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Tucker,Tucker County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,54093,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Tucker,Tucker County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,28.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54093,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Tucker,Tucker County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,54093,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Tucker,Tucker County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1435,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54093,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Tyler,Tyler County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54095,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Tyler,Tyler County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54095,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Tyler,Tyler County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54095,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Tyler,Tyler County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54095,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Tyler,Tyler County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54095,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Tyler,Tyler County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,8279,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54095,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Tyler,Tyler County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4899,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54095,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Tyler,Tyler County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2917,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54095,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Tyler,Tyler County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54095,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Tyler,Tyler County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1982,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54095,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Tyler,Tyler County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,59.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54095,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Tyler,Tyler County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54095,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Tyler,Tyler County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,40.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54095,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Tyler,Tyler County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54095,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Tyler,Tyler County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,54095,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Tyler,Tyler County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,59.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54095,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Tyler,Tyler County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,54095,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Tyler,Tyler County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2917,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54095,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Upshur,Upshur County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54097,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Upshur,Upshur County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54097,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Upshur,Upshur County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54097,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Upshur,Upshur County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54097,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Upshur,Upshur County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54097,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Upshur,Upshur County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,23783,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54097,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Upshur,Upshur County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,20697,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54097,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Upshur,Upshur County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,20697,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54097,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Upshur,Upshur County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54097,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Upshur,Upshur County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54097,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Upshur,Upshur County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54097,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Upshur,Upshur County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54097,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Upshur,Upshur County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54097,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Upshur,Upshur County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54097,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Upshur,Upshur County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,61.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54097,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Upshur,Upshur County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,38.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54097,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Upshur,Upshur County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,12727,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54097,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Upshur,Upshur County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,7970,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54097,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54099,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54099,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54099,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54099,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54099,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,38830,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54099,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,27186,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54099,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,25693,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54099,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54099,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1493,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54099,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,94.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54099,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54099,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,5.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54099,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54099,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,35.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54099,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,48.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54099,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,9542,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54099,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Wayne,Wayne County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,13296,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54099,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54101,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54101,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54101,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54101,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54101,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,8329,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54101,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5281,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54101,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5281,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54101,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54101,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54101,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54101,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54101,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54101,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54101,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,6.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54101,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,93.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54101,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,347,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54101,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Webster,Webster County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,4934,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54101,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Wetzel,Wetzel County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54103,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Wetzel,Wetzel County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54103,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Wetzel,Wetzel County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54103,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Wetzel,Wetzel County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54103,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Wetzel,Wetzel County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54103,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Wetzel,Wetzel County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,14382,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54103,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Wetzel,Wetzel County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,11827,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54103,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Wetzel,Wetzel County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3345,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54103,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Wetzel,Wetzel County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,589,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54103,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Wetzel,Wetzel County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8481,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54103,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Wetzel,Wetzel County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,28.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54103,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Wetzel,Wetzel County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54103,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Wetzel,Wetzel County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,71.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54103,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Wetzel,Wetzel County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54103,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Wetzel,Wetzel County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,54103,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Wetzel,Wetzel County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,23.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54103,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Wetzel,Wetzel County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,54103,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Wetzel,Wetzel County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2756,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54103,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Wirt,Wirt County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54105,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Wirt,Wirt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54105,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Wirt,Wirt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54105,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Wirt,Wirt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54105,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Wirt,Wirt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54105,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Wirt,Wirt County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,5183,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54105,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Wirt,Wirt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1913,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54105,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Wirt,Wirt County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1913,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54105,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Wirt,Wirt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54105,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Wirt,Wirt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54105,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Wirt,Wirt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54105,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Wirt,Wirt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54105,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Wirt,Wirt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54105,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Wirt,Wirt County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54105,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Wirt,Wirt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54105,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Wirt,Wirt County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,54105,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Wirt,Wirt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1913,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54105,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Wirt,Wirt County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,54105,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Wood,Wood County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54107,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Wood,Wood County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54107,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Wood,Wood County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54107,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Wood,Wood County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54107,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Wood,Wood County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54107,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Wood,Wood County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,83996,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54107,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Wood,Wood County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,76627,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54107,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Wood,Wood County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,76627,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54107,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Wood,Wood County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54107,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Wood,Wood County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54107,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Wood,Wood County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54107,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Wood,Wood County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54107,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Wood,Wood County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54107,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Wood,Wood County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54107,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Wood,Wood County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,8.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54107,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Wood,Wood County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,91.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54107,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Wood,Wood County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,6549,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54107,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Wood,Wood County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,70078,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54107,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,WV,West Virginia,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,435,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,WV,WV,West Virginia,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,299,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,WV,WV,West Virginia,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,127,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,WV,WV,West Virginia,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,150,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,WV,WV,West Virginia,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,WV,WV,West Virginia,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,1789798,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2020,WV,WV,West Virginia,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1409744,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,WV,WV,West Virginia,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1280760,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,WV,WV,West Virginia,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1409,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,WV,WV,West Virginia,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,128984,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,WV,WV,West Virginia,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,90.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,WV,WV,West Virginia,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,WV,WV,West Virginia,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,9.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,WV,WV,West Virginia,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,136,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,WV,WV,West Virginia,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,17.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,WV,WV,West Virginia,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,69.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,WV,WV,West Virginia,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,243615,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,WV,WV,West Virginia,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,979035,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,WV,Wyoming,Wyoming County,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54109,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Wyoming,Wyoming County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54109,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Wyoming,Wyoming County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54109,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Wyoming,Wyoming County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54109,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Wyoming,Wyoming County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54109,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Wyoming,Wyoming County,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,21326,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54109,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Wyoming,Wyoming County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,13225,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54109,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Wyoming,Wyoming County,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6682,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54109,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Wyoming,Wyoming County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54109,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Wyoming,Wyoming County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6543,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54109,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Wyoming,Wyoming County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,50.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54109,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Wyoming,Wyoming County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54109,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Wyoming,Wyoming County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,49.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54109,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Wyoming,Wyoming County,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54109,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Wyoming,Wyoming County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,9.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54109,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Wyoming,Wyoming County,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,40.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54109,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Wyoming,Wyoming County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1272,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54109,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WV,Wyoming,Wyoming County,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,5409,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54109,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_CT
2020,WY,WY,Wyoming,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,302,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,56,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,WY,WY,Wyoming,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,117,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,56,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,WY,WY,Wyoming,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,56,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,WY,WY,Wyoming,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,56,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,WY,WY,Wyoming,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,81,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,56,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,WY,WY,Wyoming,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,577267,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,56,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,False,,WFR_ST
2020,WY,WY,Wyoming,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,459997,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,56,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,WY,WY,Wyoming,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,255654,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,56,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,WY,WY,Wyoming,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,71325,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,56,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,WY,WY,Wyoming,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,204343,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,56,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,WY,WY,Wyoming,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,55.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,56,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,WY,WY,Wyoming,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,15.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,56,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,WY,WY,Wyoming,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,44.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,56,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,WY,WY,Wyoming,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,185,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,56,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2020,WY,WY,Wyoming,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,17.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,56,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,WY,WY,Wyoming,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,22.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,56,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2020,WY,WY,Wyoming,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,82053,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,56,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2020,WY,WY,Wyoming,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,102180,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,56,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,AK,AK,Alaska,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,647,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,2,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,AK,AK,Alaska,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,31,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,2,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,AK,AK,Alaska,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,23,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,2,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,AK,AK,Alaska,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,2,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,AK,AK,Alaska,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,2,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,AK,AK,Alaska,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,735925,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,2,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2018,AK,AK,Alaska,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,548898,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,2,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,AK,AK,Alaska,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,272280,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,2,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,AK,AK,Alaska,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,2,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,AK,AK,Alaska,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,276618,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,2,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,AK,AK,Alaska,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,49.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,2,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,AK,AK,Alaska,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,2,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,AK,AK,Alaska,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,50.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,2,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,AK,AK,Alaska,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,616,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,2,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,AK,AK,Alaska,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,2.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,2,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,AK,AK,Alaska,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,46.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,2,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,AK,AK,Alaska,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,16157,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,2,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,AK,AK,Alaska,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,256123,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,2,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,AL,AL,Alabama,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,531,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,AL,AL,Alabama,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,263,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,AL,AL,Alabama,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,106,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,AL,AL,Alabama,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,145,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,AL,AL,Alabama,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,AL,AL,Alabama,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,4887871,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2018,AL,AL,Alabama,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4345270,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,AL,AL,Alabama,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3388374,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,AL,AL,Alabama,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,54764,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,AL,AL,Alabama,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,956896,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,AL,AL,Alabama,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,78,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,AL,AL,Alabama,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,AL,AL,Alabama,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,22,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,AL,AL,Alabama,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,268,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,AL,AL,Alabama,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,16.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,AL,AL,Alabama,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,60.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,AL,AL,Alabama,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,708883,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,AL,AL,Alabama,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2624727,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,AR,AR,Arkansas,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,676,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,AR,AR,Arkansas,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,350,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,AR,AR,Arkansas,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,113,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,AR,AR,Arkansas,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,223,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,AR,AR,Arkansas,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,AR,AR,Arkansas,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,3013825,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2018,AR,AR,Arkansas,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2867653,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,AR,AR,Arkansas,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2448389,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,AR,AR,Arkansas,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,7242,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,AR,AR,Arkansas,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,419264,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,AR,AR,Arkansas,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,85.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,AR,AR,Arkansas,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,AR,AR,Arkansas,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,14.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,AR,AR,Arkansas,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,326,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,AR,AR,Arkansas,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,29,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,AR,AR,Arkansas,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,56.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,AR,AR,Arkansas,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,832757,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,AR,AR,Arkansas,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1608390,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,AZ,AZ,Arizona,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,951,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,4,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,AZ,AZ,Arizona,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,298,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,4,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,AZ,AZ,Arizona,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,68,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,4,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,AZ,AZ,Arizona,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,4,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,AZ,AZ,Arizona,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,228,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,4,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,AZ,AZ,Arizona,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,7171646,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,4,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2018,AZ,AZ,Arizona,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,6942498,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,4,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,AZ,AZ,Arizona,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4028381,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,4,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,AZ,AZ,Arizona,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,560771,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,4,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,AZ,AZ,Arizona,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2914117,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,4,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,AZ,AZ,Arizona,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,58,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,4,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,AZ,AZ,Arizona,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,8.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,4,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,AZ,AZ,Arizona,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,42,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,4,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,AZ,AZ,Arizona,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,653,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,4,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,AZ,AZ,Arizona,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,4,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,AZ,AZ,Arizona,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,49.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,4,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,AZ,AZ,Arizona,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2605,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,4,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,AZ,AZ,Arizona,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3465006,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,4,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,CA,CA,California,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3057,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,CA,CA,California,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,420,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,CA,CA,California,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,55,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,CA,CA,California,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,186,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,CA,CA,California,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,151,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,CA,CA,California,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,39557045,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2018,CA,CA,California,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,38106418,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,CA,CA,California,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,22613284,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,CA,CA,California,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,550370,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,CA,CA,California,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,15493134,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,CA,CA,California,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,59.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,CA,CA,California,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,CA,CA,California,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,40.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,CA,CA,California,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2637,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,CA,CA,California,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,31.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,CA,CA,California,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,25.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,CA,CA,California,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,12101648,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,CA,CA,California,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,9624367,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,CO,CO,Colorado,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,830,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,CO,CO,Colorado,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,406,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,CO,CO,Colorado,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,55,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,CO,CO,Colorado,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,98,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,CO,CO,Colorado,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,227,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,CO,CO,Colorado,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,5695564,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2018,CO,CO,Colorado,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5396543,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,CO,CO,Colorado,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4040612,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,CO,CO,Colorado,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,644260,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,CO,CO,Colorado,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1355931,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,CO,CO,Colorado,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,74.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,CO,CO,Colorado,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,11.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,CO,CO,Colorado,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,25.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,CO,CO,Colorado,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,424,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,CO,CO,Colorado,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,16.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,CO,CO,Colorado,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,43.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,CO,CO,Colorado,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,902602,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,CO,CO,Colorado,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2359611,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,CT,CT,Connecticut,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,466,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,9,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,CT,CT,Connecticut,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,87,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,9,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,CT,CT,Connecticut,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,31,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,9,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,CT,CT,Connecticut,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,33,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,9,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,CT,CT,Connecticut,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,23,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,9,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,CT,CT,Connecticut,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,3572665,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,9,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2018,CT,CT,Connecticut,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2715564,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,CT,CT,Connecticut,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2431568,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,CT,CT,Connecticut,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,3896,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,CT,CT,Connecticut,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,283996,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,CT,CT,Connecticut,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,89.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,CT,CT,Connecticut,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,CT,CT,Connecticut,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,10.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,CT,CT,Connecticut,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,379,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,9,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,CT,CT,Connecticut,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,CT,CT,Connecticut,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,84.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,CT,CT,Connecticut,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,134719,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,CT,CT,Connecticut,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2292953,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,DC,DC,District of Columbia,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,11,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,DC,DC,District of Columbia,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,11,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,DC,DC,District of Columbia,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,11,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,DC,DC,District of Columbia,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,11,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,DC,DC,District of Columbia,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,11,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,DC,DC,District of Columbia,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,702455,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,11,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,False,,WFR_ST
2018,DC,DC,District of Columbia,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,702455,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,11,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,DC,DC,District of Columbia,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,702455,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,11,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,DC,DC,District of Columbia,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,11,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,DC,DC,District of Columbia,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,11,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,DC,DC,District of Columbia,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,11,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,DC,DC,District of Columbia,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,11,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,DC,DC,District of Columbia,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,11,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,DC,DC,District of Columbia,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,11,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,DC,DC,District of Columbia,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,11,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,DC,DC,District of Columbia,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,11,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,DC,DC,District of Columbia,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,702455,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,11,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,DC,DC,District of Columbia,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,11,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,DE,DE,Delaware,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,225,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,10,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,DE,DE,Delaware,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,46,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,10,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,DE,DE,Delaware,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,34,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,10,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,DE,DE,Delaware,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,10,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,DE,DE,Delaware,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,10,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,DE,DE,Delaware,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,967171,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,10,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2018,DE,DE,Delaware,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,781453,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,10,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,DE,DE,Delaware,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,670879,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,10,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,DE,DE,Delaware,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,8677,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,10,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,DE,DE,Delaware,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,110574,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,10,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,DE,DE,Delaware,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,85.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,10,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,DE,DE,Delaware,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,10,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,DE,DE,Delaware,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,14.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,10,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,DE,DE,Delaware,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,179,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,10,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,DE,DE,Delaware,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,10,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,DE,DE,Delaware,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,84.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,10,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,DE,DE,Delaware,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,680,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,10,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,DE,DE,Delaware,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,661523,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,10,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,FL,FL,Florida,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1570,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,FL,FL,Florida,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,293,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,FL,FL,Florida,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,122,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,FL,FL,Florida,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,113,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,FL,FL,Florida,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,48,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,FL,FL,Florida,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,21299325,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2018,FL,FL,Florida,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,18714257,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,FL,FL,Florida,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,14566063,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,FL,FL,Florida,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1310093,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,FL,FL,Florida,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4148194,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,FL,FL,Florida,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,77.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,FL,FL,Florida,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,FL,FL,Florida,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,22.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,FL,FL,Florida,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1277,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,FL,FL,Florida,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,7.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,FL,FL,Florida,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,63,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,FL,FL,Florida,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1457239,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,FL,FL,Florida,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,11798732,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,GA,GA,Georgia,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1728,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,GA,GA,Georgia,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,572,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,GA,GA,Georgia,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,326,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,GA,GA,Georgia,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,99,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,GA,GA,Georgia,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,144,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,GA,GA,Georgia,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,10519475,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2018,GA,GA,Georgia,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,8959918,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,GA,GA,Georgia,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8531824,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,GA,GA,Georgia,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,144234,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,GA,GA,Georgia,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,428094,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,GA,GA,Georgia,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,95.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,GA,GA,Georgia,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,GA,GA,Georgia,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,4.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,GA,GA,Georgia,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1156,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,GA,GA,Georgia,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,13.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,GA,GA,Georgia,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,79.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,GA,GA,Georgia,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1189016,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,GA,GA,Georgia,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,7122450,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,HI,HI,Hawaii,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,117,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,15,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,HI,HI,Hawaii,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,15,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,HI,HI,Hawaii,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,15,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,HI,HI,Hawaii,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,15,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,HI,HI,Hawaii,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,15,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,HI,HI,Hawaii,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,1420491,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,15,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,False,,WFR_ST
2018,HI,HI,Hawaii,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1364632,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,15,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,HI,HI,Hawaii,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,120106,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,15,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,HI,HI,Hawaii,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,15,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,HI,HI,Hawaii,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1244528,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,15,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,HI,HI,Hawaii,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,8.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,15,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,HI,HI,Hawaii,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,15,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,HI,HI,Hawaii,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,91.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,15,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,HI,HI,Hawaii,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,111,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,15,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,HI,HI,Hawaii,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,15,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,HI,HI,Hawaii,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,8.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,15,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,HI,HI,Hawaii,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,6034,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,15,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,HI,HI,Hawaii,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,114070,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,15,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,IA,IA,Iowa,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1069,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,IA,IA,Iowa,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,553,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,IA,IA,Iowa,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,151,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,IA,IA,Iowa,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,159,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,IA,IA,Iowa,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,200,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,IA,IA,Iowa,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,3156145,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2018,IA,IA,Iowa,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2657024,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,IA,IA,Iowa,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2396677,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,IA,IA,Iowa,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,360933,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,IA,IA,Iowa,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,260347,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,IA,IA,Iowa,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,90.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,IA,IA,Iowa,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,13.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,IA,IA,Iowa,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,9.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,IA,IA,Iowa,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,516,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,IA,IA,Iowa,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,15.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,IA,IA,Iowa,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,56.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,IA,IA,Iowa,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,408537,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,IA,IA,Iowa,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1505065,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,ID,ID,Idaho,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,715,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,ID,ID,Idaho,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,99,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,ID,ID,Idaho,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,ID,ID,Idaho,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,ID,ID,Idaho,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,90,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,ID,ID,Idaho,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,1754208,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2018,ID,ID,Idaho,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1334224,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,ID,ID,Idaho,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,422483,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,ID,ID,Idaho,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,391581,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,ID,ID,Idaho,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,911741,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,ID,ID,Idaho,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,31.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,ID,ID,Idaho,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,29.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,ID,ID,Idaho,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,68.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,ID,ID,Idaho,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,616,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,ID,ID,Idaho,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,ID,ID,Idaho,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,0.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,ID,ID,Idaho,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Controlled,16,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,ID,ID,Idaho,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,8680,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,IL,IL,Illinois,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1815,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,IL,IL,Illinois,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1639,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,IL,IL,Illinois,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,859,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,IL,IL,Illinois,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,622,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,IL,IL,Illinois,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,151,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,IL,IL,Illinois,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,12741080,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2018,IL,IL,Illinois,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,11600611,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,IL,IL,Illinois,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11386618,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,IL,IL,Illinois,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,493407,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,IL,IL,Illinois,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,213993,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,IL,IL,Illinois,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,IL,IL,Illinois,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,4.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,IL,IL,Illinois,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,IL,IL,Illinois,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,176,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,IL,IL,Illinois,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,34.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,IL,IL,Illinois,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,59.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,IL,IL,Illinois,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,4029244,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,IL,IL,Illinois,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,6863967,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,IN,IN,Indiana,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,903,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,IN,IN,Indiana,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,479,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,IN,IN,Indiana,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,249,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,IN,IN,Indiana,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,132,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,IN,IN,Indiana,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,95,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,IN,IN,Indiana,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,6691878,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2018,IN,IN,Indiana,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4996245,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,IN,IN,Indiana,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4615264,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,IN,IN,Indiana,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,350945,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,IN,IN,Indiana,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,380981,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,IN,IN,Indiana,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,92.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,IN,IN,Indiana,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,IN,IN,Indiana,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,7.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,IN,IN,Indiana,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,424,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,IN,IN,Indiana,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,10,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,IN,IN,Indiana,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,75.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,IN,IN,Indiana,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,500441,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,IN,IN,Indiana,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3763878,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,KS,KS,Kansas,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,890,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,KS,KS,Kansas,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,334,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,KS,KS,Kansas,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,62,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,KS,KS,Kansas,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,168,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,KS,KS,Kansas,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,76,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,KS,KS,Kansas,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,2911505,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2018,KS,KS,Kansas,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2762230,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,KS,KS,Kansas,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1799573,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,KS,KS,Kansas,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,69367,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,KS,KS,Kansas,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,962657,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,KS,KS,Kansas,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,65.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,KS,KS,Kansas,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,2.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,KS,KS,Kansas,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,34.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,KS,KS,Kansas,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,556,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,KS,KS,Kansas,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,7.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,KS,KS,Kansas,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,52.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,KS,KS,Kansas,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,213062,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,KS,KS,Kansas,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1443039,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,KY,KY,Kentucky,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,382,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,KY,KY,Kentucky,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,368,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,KY,KY,Kentucky,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,189,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,KY,KY,Kentucky,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,179,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,KY,KY,Kentucky,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,KY,KY,Kentucky,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,4468402,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2018,KY,KY,Kentucky,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4023426,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,KY,KY,Kentucky,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4016850,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,KY,KY,Kentucky,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,KY,KY,Kentucky,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6576,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,KY,KY,Kentucky,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,KY,KY,Kentucky,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,KY,KY,Kentucky,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,KY,KY,Kentucky,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,KY,KY,Kentucky,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,26,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,KY,KY,Kentucky,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,73.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,KY,KY,Kentucky,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1047778,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,KY,KY,Kentucky,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2969072,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,LA,LA,Louisiana,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1020,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,LA,LA,Louisiana,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,115,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,LA,LA,Louisiana,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,30,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,LA,LA,Louisiana,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,LA,LA,Louisiana,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,66,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,LA,LA,Louisiana,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,4659978,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2018,LA,LA,Louisiana,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4169527,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,LA,LA,Louisiana,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1627351,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,LA,LA,Louisiana,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,153315,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,LA,LA,Louisiana,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2542176,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,LA,LA,Louisiana,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,39,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,LA,LA,Louisiana,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,3.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,LA,LA,Louisiana,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,61,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,LA,LA,Louisiana,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,905,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,LA,LA,Louisiana,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,LA,LA,Louisiana,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,34.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,LA,LA,Louisiana,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,42290,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,LA,LA,Louisiana,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1431747,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,MA,MA,Massachusetts,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,573,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,MA,MA,Massachusetts,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,158,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,MA,MA,Massachusetts,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,80,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,MA,MA,Massachusetts,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,64,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,MA,MA,Massachusetts,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,MA,MA,Massachusetts,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,6902149,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2018,MA,MA,Massachusetts,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,6276435,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,MA,MA,Massachusetts,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3593419,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,MA,MA,Massachusetts,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1672,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,MA,MA,Massachusetts,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2683016,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,MA,MA,Massachusetts,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,57.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,MA,MA,Massachusetts,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,MA,MA,Massachusetts,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,42.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,MA,MA,Massachusetts,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,415,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,MA,MA,Massachusetts,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,27,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,MA,MA,Massachusetts,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,30.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,MA,MA,Massachusetts,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1697394,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,MA,MA,Massachusetts,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1894353,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,MD,MD,Maryland,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,492,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,MD,MD,Maryland,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,137,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,MD,MD,Maryland,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,49,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,MD,MD,Maryland,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,25,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,MD,MD,Maryland,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,62,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,MD,MD,Maryland,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,6042718,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2018,MD,MD,Maryland,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4610160,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,MD,MD,Maryland,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4317542,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,MD,MD,Maryland,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,135487,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,MD,MD,Maryland,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,292618,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,MD,MD,Maryland,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,93.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,MD,MD,Maryland,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,2.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,MD,MD,Maryland,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,6.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,MD,MD,Maryland,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,355,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,MD,MD,Maryland,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,6.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,MD,MD,Maryland,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,84.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,MD,MD,Maryland,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,300985,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,MD,MD,Maryland,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3881070,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,ME,ME,Maine,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,384,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,ME,ME,Maine,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,74,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,ME,ME,Maine,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,67,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,ME,ME,Maine,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,ME,ME,Maine,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,ME,ME,Maine,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,1338404,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2018,ME,ME,Maine,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,673397,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,ME,ME,Maine,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,533959,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,ME,ME,Maine,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,ME,ME,Maine,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,139438,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,ME,ME,Maine,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,79.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,ME,ME,Maine,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,ME,ME,Maine,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,20.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,ME,ME,Maine,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,310,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,ME,ME,Maine,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,1.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,ME,ME,Maine,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,77.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,ME,ME,Maine,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,10218,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,ME,ME,Maine,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,523741,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,MI,MI,Michigan,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1457,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,MI,MI,Michigan,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,599,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,MI,MI,Michigan,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,128,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,MI,MI,Michigan,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,231,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,MI,MI,Michigan,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,238,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,MI,MI,Michigan,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,9995915,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2018,MI,MI,Michigan,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7379404,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,MI,MI,Michigan,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6605118,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,MI,MI,Michigan,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,143597,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,MI,MI,Michigan,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,774286,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,MI,MI,Michigan,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,89.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,MI,MI,Michigan,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,MI,MI,Michigan,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,10.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,MI,MI,Michigan,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,858,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,MI,MI,Michigan,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,53,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,MI,MI,Michigan,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,34.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,MI,MI,Michigan,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,3910553,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,MI,MI,Michigan,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2548364,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,MN,MN,Minnesota,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,975,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,MN,MN,Minnesota,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,741,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,MN,MN,Minnesota,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,638,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,MN,MN,Minnesota,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,84,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,MN,MN,Minnesota,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,19,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,MN,MN,Minnesota,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,5611179,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2018,MN,MN,Minnesota,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4408195,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,MN,MN,Minnesota,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4356770,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,MN,MN,Minnesota,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,4639,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,MN,MN,Minnesota,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,51425,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,MN,MN,Minnesota,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,MN,MN,Minnesota,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,MN,MN,Minnesota,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,MN,MN,Minnesota,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,234,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,MN,MN,Minnesota,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,4.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,MN,MN,Minnesota,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,94.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,MN,MN,Minnesota,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,188844,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,MN,MN,Minnesota,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,4163286,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,MO,MO,Missouri,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1293,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,MO,MO,Missouri,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,444,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,MO,MO,Missouri,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,169,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,MO,MO,Missouri,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,177,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,MO,MO,Missouri,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,84,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,MO,MO,Missouri,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,6126452,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2018,MO,MO,Missouri,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5299333,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,MO,MO,Missouri,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4007462,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,MO,MO,Missouri,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,188560,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,MO,MO,Missouri,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1291871,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,MO,MO,Missouri,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,75.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,MO,MO,Missouri,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,3.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,MO,MO,Missouri,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,24.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,MO,MO,Missouri,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,849,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,MO,MO,Missouri,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,10.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,MO,MO,Missouri,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,61.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,MO,MO,Missouri,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,551070,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,MO,MO,Missouri,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3256375,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,MS,MS,Mississippi,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1001,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,MS,MS,Mississippi,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,356,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,MS,MS,Mississippi,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,230,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,MS,MS,Mississippi,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,48,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,MS,MS,Mississippi,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,76,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,MS,MS,Mississippi,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,2986530,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2018,MS,MS,Mississippi,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2552607,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,MS,MS,Mississippi,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1549996,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,MS,MS,Mississippi,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,137434,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,MS,MS,Mississippi,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1002611,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,MS,MS,Mississippi,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,60.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,MS,MS,Mississippi,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,5.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,MS,MS,Mississippi,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,39.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,MS,MS,Mississippi,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,645,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,MS,MS,Mississippi,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,2.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,MS,MS,Mississippi,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,52.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,MS,MS,Mississippi,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,72788,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,MS,MS,Mississippi,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1339774,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,MT,MT,Montana,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,857,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,30,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,MT,MT,Montana,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,199,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,30,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,MT,MT,Montana,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,34,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,30,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,MT,MT,Montana,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,30,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,MT,MT,Montana,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,138,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,30,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,MT,MT,Montana,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,1062305,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,30,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,False,,WFR_ST
2018,MT,MT,Montana,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,749018,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,30,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,MT,MT,Montana,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,229620,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,30,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,MT,MT,Montana,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,108553,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,30,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,MT,MT,Montana,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,519398,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,30,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,MT,MT,Montana,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,30.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,30,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,MT,MT,Montana,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,14.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,30,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,MT,MT,Montana,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,69.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,30,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,MT,MT,Montana,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,658,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,30,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,MT,MT,Montana,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,2.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,30,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,MT,MT,Montana,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,13.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,30,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,MT,MT,Montana,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,19780,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,30,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,MT,MT,Montana,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,101287,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,30,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,NC,NC,North Carolina,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2035,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,NC,NC,North Carolina,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,479,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,NC,NC,North Carolina,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,131,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,NC,NC,North Carolina,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,301,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,NC,NC,North Carolina,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,32,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,NC,NC,North Carolina,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,10383620,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2018,NC,NC,North Carolina,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7894251,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,NC,NC,North Carolina,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6915858,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,NC,NC,North Carolina,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,111736,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,NC,NC,North Carolina,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,978393,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,NC,NC,North Carolina,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,87.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,NC,NC,North Carolina,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,NC,NC,North Carolina,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,12.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,NC,NC,North Carolina,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1556,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,NC,NC,North Carolina,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,15.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,NC,NC,North Carolina,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,70.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,NC,NC,North Carolina,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1253389,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,NC,NC,North Carolina,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,5550733,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,ND,ND,North Dakota,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,385,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,ND,ND,North Dakota,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,311,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,ND,ND,North Dakota,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,105,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,ND,ND,North Dakota,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,180,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,ND,ND,North Dakota,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,ND,ND,North Dakota,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,760077,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2018,ND,ND,North Dakota,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,713531,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,ND,ND,North Dakota,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,688710,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,ND,ND,North Dakota,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,5022,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,ND,ND,North Dakota,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,24821,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,ND,ND,North Dakota,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,96.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,ND,ND,North Dakota,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,ND,ND,North Dakota,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,3.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,ND,ND,North Dakota,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,74,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,ND,ND,North Dakota,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,24.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,ND,ND,North Dakota,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,70,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,ND,ND,North Dakota,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,171894,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,ND,ND,North Dakota,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,499256,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,NE,NE,Nebraska,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,598,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,NE,NE,Nebraska,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,147,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,NE,NE,Nebraska,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,70,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,NE,NE,Nebraska,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,28,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,NE,NE,Nebraska,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,47,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,NE,NE,Nebraska,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,1929268,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2018,NE,NE,Nebraska,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1754837,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,NE,NE,Nebraska,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1293907,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,NE,NE,Nebraska,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,50349,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,NE,NE,Nebraska,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,460930,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,NE,NE,Nebraska,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,73.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,NE,NE,Nebraska,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,2.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,NE,NE,Nebraska,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,26.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,NE,NE,Nebraska,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,451,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,NE,NE,Nebraska,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,1.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,NE,NE,Nebraska,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,69.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,NE,NE,Nebraska,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,20984,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,NE,NE,Nebraska,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1222575,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,NH,NH,New Hampshire,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,810,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,33,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,NH,NH,New Hampshire,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,304,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,33,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,NH,NH,New Hampshire,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,33,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,NH,NH,New Hampshire,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,33,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,NH,NH,New Hampshire,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,276,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,33,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,NH,NH,New Hampshire,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,1356458,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,33,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2018,NH,NH,New Hampshire,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,849619,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,NH,NH,New Hampshire,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,396895,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,NH,NH,New Hampshire,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,62962,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,NH,NH,New Hampshire,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,452724,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,NH,NH,New Hampshire,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,46.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,NH,NH,New Hampshire,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,7.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,NH,NH,New Hampshire,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,53.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,NH,NH,New Hampshire,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,506,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,33,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,NH,NH,New Hampshire,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,4.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,NH,NH,New Hampshire,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,34.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,NH,NH,New Hampshire,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,37515,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,NH,NH,New Hampshire,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,296419,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,NJ,NJ,New Jersey,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,666,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,34,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,NJ,NJ,New Jersey,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,63,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,34,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,NJ,NJ,New Jersey,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,20,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,34,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,NJ,NJ,New Jersey,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,34,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,NJ,NJ,New Jersey,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,30,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,34,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,NJ,NJ,New Jersey,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,8908520,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,34,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,False,,WFR_ST
2018,NJ,NJ,New Jersey,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7947833,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,34,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,NJ,NJ,New Jersey,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1291123,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,34,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,NJ,NJ,New Jersey,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,150150,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,34,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,NJ,NJ,New Jersey,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6656710,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,34,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,NJ,NJ,New Jersey,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,16.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,34,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,NJ,NJ,New Jersey,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,34,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,NJ,NJ,New Jersey,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,83.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,34,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,NJ,NJ,New Jersey,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,603,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,34,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,NJ,NJ,New Jersey,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,2.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,34,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,NJ,NJ,New Jersey,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,11.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,34,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,NJ,NJ,New Jersey,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,214642,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,34,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,NJ,NJ,New Jersey,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,926332,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,34,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,NM,NM,New Mexico,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,729,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,35,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,NM,NM,New Mexico,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,384,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,35,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,NM,NM,New Mexico,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,70,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,35,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,NM,NM,New Mexico,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,35,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,NM,NM,New Mexico,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,286,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,35,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,NM,NM,New Mexico,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,2095428,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,35,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,False,,WFR_ST
2018,NM,NM,New Mexico,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1801817,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,35,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,NM,NM,New Mexico,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1381128,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,35,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,NM,NM,New Mexico,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,536929,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,35,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,NM,NM,New Mexico,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,420689,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,35,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,NM,NM,New Mexico,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,76.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,35,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,NM,NM,New Mexico,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,29.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,35,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,NM,NM,New Mexico,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,23.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,35,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,NM,NM,New Mexico,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,345,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,35,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,NM,NM,New Mexico,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,1.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,35,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,NM,NM,New Mexico,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,44.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,35,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,NM,NM,New Mexico,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,34887,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,35,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,NM,NM,New Mexico,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,809312,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,35,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,NV,NV,Nevada,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,246,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,NV,NV,Nevada,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,60,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,NV,NV,Nevada,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,NV,NV,Nevada,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,NV,NV,Nevada,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,35,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,NV,NV,Nevada,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,3034392,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2018,NV,NV,Nevada,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2832273,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,NV,NV,Nevada,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2124516,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,NV,NV,Nevada,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,30736,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,NV,NV,Nevada,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,707757,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,NV,NV,Nevada,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,75,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,NV,NV,Nevada,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,NV,NV,Nevada,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,25,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,NV,NV,Nevada,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,186,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,NV,NV,Nevada,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,63.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,NV,NV,Nevada,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,10.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,NV,NV,Nevada,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1800312,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,NV,NV,Nevada,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,293468,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,NY,NY,New York,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2365,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,36,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,NY,NY,New York,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,412,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,36,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,NY,NY,New York,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,126,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,36,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,NY,NY,New York,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,252,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,36,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,NY,NY,New York,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,33,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,36,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,NY,NY,New York,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,19542209,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,36,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,False,,WFR_ST
2018,NY,NY,New York,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,17074791,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,36,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,NY,NY,New York,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,12200464,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,36,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,NY,NY,New York,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,12519,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,36,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,NY,NY,New York,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4874327,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,36,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,NY,NY,New York,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,71.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,36,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,NY,NY,New York,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,36,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,NY,NY,New York,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,28.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,36,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,NY,NY,New York,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1953,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,36,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,NY,NY,New York,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,8.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,36,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,NY,NY,New York,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,63.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,36,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,NY,NY,New York,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1395749,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,36,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,NY,NY,New York,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,10791434,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,36,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,OH,OH,Ohio,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1252,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,39,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,OH,OH,Ohio,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,722,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,39,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,OH,OH,Ohio,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,208,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,39,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,OH,OH,Ohio,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,248,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,39,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,OH,OH,Ohio,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,254,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,39,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,OH,OH,Ohio,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,11689442,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,39,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,False,,WFR_ST
2018,OH,OH,Ohio,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9816237,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,39,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,OH,OH,Ohio,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9083082,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,39,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,OH,OH,Ohio,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,261728,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,39,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,OH,OH,Ohio,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,733155,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,39,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,OH,OH,Ohio,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,92.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,39,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,OH,OH,Ohio,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,2.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,39,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,OH,OH,Ohio,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,7.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,39,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,OH,OH,Ohio,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,530,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,39,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,OH,OH,Ohio,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,15,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,39,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,OH,OH,Ohio,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,74,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,39,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,OH,OH,Ohio,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1474650,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,39,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,OH,OH,Ohio,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,7259525,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,39,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,OK,OK,Oklahoma,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,909,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,OK,OK,Oklahoma,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,270,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,OK,OK,Oklahoma,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,39,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,OK,OK,Oklahoma,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,167,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,OK,OK,Oklahoma,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,59,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,OK,OK,Oklahoma,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,3943079,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2018,OK,OK,Oklahoma,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3583323,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,OK,OK,Oklahoma,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2417819,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,OK,OK,Oklahoma,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,60820,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,OK,OK,Oklahoma,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1165504,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,OK,OK,Oklahoma,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,67.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,OK,OK,Oklahoma,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,OK,OK,Oklahoma,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,32.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,OK,OK,Oklahoma,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,639,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,OK,OK,Oklahoma,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,12.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,OK,OK,Oklahoma,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,52.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,OK,OK,Oklahoma,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,457869,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,OK,OK,Oklahoma,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1885987,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,OR,OR,Oregon,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,901,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,OR,OR,Oregon,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,84,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,OR,OR,Oregon,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,27,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,OR,OR,Oregon,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,OR,OR,Oregon,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,42,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,OR,OR,Oregon,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,4190713,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2018,OR,OR,Oregon,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3533823,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,OR,OR,Oregon,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,930527,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,OR,OR,Oregon,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,60293,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,OR,OR,Oregon,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2603296,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,OR,OR,Oregon,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,26.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,OR,OR,Oregon,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,OR,OR,Oregon,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,73.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,OR,OR,Oregon,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,817,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,OR,OR,Oregon,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,OR,OR,Oregon,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,24,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,OR,OR,Oregon,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,21637,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,OR,OR,Oregon,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,848596,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,PA,PA,Pennsylvania,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1833,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,42,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,PA,PA,Pennsylvania,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,187,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,42,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,PA,PA,Pennsylvania,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,106,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,42,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,PA,PA,Pennsylvania,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,81,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,42,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,PA,PA,Pennsylvania,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,42,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,PA,PA,Pennsylvania,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,12807060,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,42,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2018,PA,PA,Pennsylvania,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9335064,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,42,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,PA,PA,Pennsylvania,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5203809,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,42,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,PA,PA,Pennsylvania,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,42,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,PA,PA,Pennsylvania,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4131255,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,42,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,PA,PA,Pennsylvania,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,55.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,42,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,PA,PA,Pennsylvania,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,42,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,PA,PA,Pennsylvania,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,44.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,42,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,PA,PA,Pennsylvania,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1646,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,42,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,PA,PA,Pennsylvania,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,4.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,42,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,PA,PA,Pennsylvania,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,50.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,42,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,PA,PA,Pennsylvania,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,460535,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,42,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,PA,PA,Pennsylvania,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,4743273,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,42,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,RI,RI,Rhode Island,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,87,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,44,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,RI,RI,Rhode Island,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,26,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,44,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,RI,RI,Rhode Island,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,44,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,RI,RI,Rhode Island,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,44,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,RI,RI,Rhode Island,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,44,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,RI,RI,Rhode Island,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,1057315,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,44,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2018,RI,RI,Rhode Island,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,944353,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,44,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,RI,RI,Rhode Island,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,785748,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,44,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,RI,RI,Rhode Island,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,689,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,44,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,RI,RI,Rhode Island,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,158605,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,44,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,RI,RI,Rhode Island,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,83.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,44,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,RI,RI,Rhode Island,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,44,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,RI,RI,Rhode Island,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,16.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,44,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,RI,RI,Rhode Island,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,61,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,44,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,RI,RI,Rhode Island,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,31.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,44,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,RI,RI,Rhode Island,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,51.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,44,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,RI,RI,Rhode Island,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,295311,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,44,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,RI,RI,Rhode Island,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,489748,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,44,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,SC,SC,South Carolina,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,595,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,SC,SC,South Carolina,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,268,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,SC,SC,South Carolina,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,52,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,SC,SC,South Carolina,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,165,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,SC,SC,South Carolina,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,40,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,SC,SC,South Carolina,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,5084127,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2018,SC,SC,South Carolina,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3855997,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,SC,SC,South Carolina,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3543429,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,SC,SC,South Carolina,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,243154,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,SC,SC,South Carolina,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,312568,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,SC,SC,South Carolina,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,91.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,SC,SC,South Carolina,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,6.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,SC,SC,South Carolina,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,8.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,SC,SC,South Carolina,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,327,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,SC,SC,South Carolina,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,30.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,SC,SC,South Carolina,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,53.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,SC,SC,South Carolina,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1182410,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,SC,SC,South Carolina,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2061700,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,SD,SD,South Dakota,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,508,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,46,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,SD,SD,South Dakota,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,320,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,46,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,SD,SD,South Dakota,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,83,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,46,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,SD,SD,South Dakota,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,175,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,46,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,SD,SD,South Dakota,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,52,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,46,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,SD,SD,South Dakota,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,881854,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,46,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,False,,WFR_ST
2018,SD,SD,South Dakota,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,753308,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,46,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,SD,SD,South Dakota,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,706191,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,46,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,SD,SD,South Dakota,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,181426,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,46,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,SD,SD,South Dakota,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,47117,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,46,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,SD,SD,South Dakota,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,93.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,46,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,SD,SD,South Dakota,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,24.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,46,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,SD,SD,South Dakota,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,6.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,46,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,SD,SD,South Dakota,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,188,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,46,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,SD,SD,South Dakota,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,22,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,46,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,SD,SD,South Dakota,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,47.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,46,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,SD,SD,South Dakota,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,165361,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,46,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,SD,SD,South Dakota,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,359404,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,46,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,TN,TN,Tennessee,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,462,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,TN,TN,Tennessee,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,277,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,TN,TN,Tennessee,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,177,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,TN,TN,Tennessee,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,100,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,TN,TN,Tennessee,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,TN,TN,Tennessee,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,6770010,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2018,TN,TN,Tennessee,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,6160242,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,TN,TN,Tennessee,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5470615,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,TN,TN,Tennessee,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,TN,TN,Tennessee,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,689627,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,TN,TN,Tennessee,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,88.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,TN,TN,Tennessee,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,TN,TN,Tennessee,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,11.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,TN,TN,Tennessee,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,185,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,TN,TN,Tennessee,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,TN,TN,Tennessee,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,79.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,TN,TN,Tennessee,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,552258,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,TN,TN,Tennessee,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,4918357,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,TX,TX,Texas,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6035,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,TX,TX,Texas,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2638,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,TX,TX,Texas,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,111,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,TX,TX,Texas,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,526,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,TX,TX,Texas,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1852,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,TX,TX,Texas,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,28701845,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2018,TX,TX,Texas,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,27327755,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,TX,TX,Texas,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,19861964,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,TX,TX,Texas,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,3919654,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,TX,TX,Texas,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,7465791,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,TX,TX,Texas,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,72.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,TX,TX,Texas,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,14.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,TX,TX,Texas,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,27.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,TX,TX,Texas,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3397,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,TX,TX,Texas,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,22.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,TX,TX,Texas,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,36.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,TX,TX,Texas,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,6040924,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,TX,TX,Texas,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,9900443,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,US,US,United States,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,51282,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,59,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,US,US,United States,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17766,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,59,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,US,US,United States,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5865,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,59,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,US,US,United States,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5754,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,59,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,US,US,United States,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5661,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,59,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,US,US,United States,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,327165540,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,59,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2018,US,US,United States,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,284075868,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,59,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,US,US,United States,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,207426536,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,59,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,US,US,United States,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,11886103,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,59,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,US,US,United States,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,76649332,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,59,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,US,US,United States,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,73,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,59,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,US,US,United States,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,4.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,59,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,US,US,United States,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,27,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,59,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,US,US,United States,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,33516,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,59,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,US,US,United States,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,18.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,59,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,US,US,United States,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,50.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,59,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,US,US,United States,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,51303331,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,59,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,US,US,United States,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,142433542,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,59,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,UT,UT,Utah,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,463,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,UT,UT,Utah,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,68,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,UT,UT,Utah,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,UT,UT,Utah,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,36,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,UT,UT,Utah,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,25,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,UT,UT,Utah,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,3161105,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2018,UT,UT,Utah,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3096343,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,UT,UT,Utah,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1614982,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,UT,UT,Utah,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,40497,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,UT,UT,Utah,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1481361,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,UT,UT,Utah,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,52.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,UT,UT,Utah,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,UT,UT,Utah,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,47.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,UT,UT,Utah,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,395,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,UT,UT,Utah,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,50,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,UT,UT,Utah,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,0.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,UT,UT,Utah,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1549569,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,UT,UT,Utah,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,24917,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,VA,VA,Virginia,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1180,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,VA,VA,Virginia,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,614,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,VA,VA,Virginia,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,164,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,VA,VA,Virginia,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,218,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,VA,VA,Virginia,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,228,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,VA,VA,Virginia,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,8517685,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2018,VA,VA,Virginia,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,6934535,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,VA,VA,Virginia,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6675987,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,VA,VA,Virginia,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,153979,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,VA,VA,Virginia,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,258548,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,VA,VA,Virginia,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,96.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,VA,VA,Virginia,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,2.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,VA,VA,Virginia,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,3.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,VA,VA,Virginia,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,566,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,VA,VA,Virginia,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,28.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,VA,VA,Virginia,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,65.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,VA,VA,Virginia,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1981685,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,VA,VA,Virginia,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,4532441,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,VT,VT,Vermont,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,460,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,VT,VT,Vermont,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,70,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,VT,VT,Vermont,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,29,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,VT,VT,Vermont,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,41,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,VT,VT,Vermont,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,VT,VT,Vermont,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,626299,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2018,VT,VT,Vermont,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,382403,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,VT,VT,Vermont,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,214896,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,VT,VT,Vermont,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,VT,VT,Vermont,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,167507,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,VT,VT,Vermont,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,56.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,VT,VT,Vermont,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,VT,VT,Vermont,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,43.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,VT,VT,Vermont,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,390,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,VT,VT,Vermont,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,20.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,VT,VT,Vermont,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,36.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,VT,VT,Vermont,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,76752,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,VT,VT,Vermont,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,138143,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,WA,WA,Washington,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2386,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,53,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,WA,WA,Washington,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,209,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,53,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,WA,WA,Washington,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,62,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,53,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,WA,WA,Washington,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,129,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,53,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,WA,WA,Washington,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,53,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,WA,WA,Washington,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,7535591,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,53,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,False,,WFR_ST
2018,WA,WA,Washington,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,6459585,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,53,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,WA,WA,Washington,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4128148,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,53,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,WA,WA,Washington,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,101607,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,53,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,WA,WA,Washington,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2331437,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,53,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,WA,WA,Washington,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,63.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,53,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,WA,WA,Washington,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,53,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,WA,WA,Washington,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,36.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,53,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,WA,WA,Washington,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2177,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,53,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,WA,WA,Washington,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,29.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,53,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,WA,WA,Washington,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,32.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,53,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,WA,WA,Washington,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1933907,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,53,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,WA,WA,Washington,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2092634,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,53,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,WI,WI,Wisconsin,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1020,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,WI,WI,Wisconsin,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,368,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,WI,WI,Wisconsin,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,236,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,WI,WI,Wisconsin,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,45,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,WI,WI,Wisconsin,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,84,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,WI,WI,Wisconsin,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,5813568,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2018,WI,WI,Wisconsin,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4203809,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,WI,WI,Wisconsin,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3670473,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,WI,WI,Wisconsin,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,115870,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,WI,WI,Wisconsin,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,533336,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,WI,WI,Wisconsin,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,87.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,WI,WI,Wisconsin,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,2.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,WI,WI,Wisconsin,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,12.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,WI,WI,Wisconsin,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,652,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,WI,WI,Wisconsin,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,14.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,WI,WI,Wisconsin,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,70,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,WI,WI,Wisconsin,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,600305,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,WI,WI,Wisconsin,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2942734,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,WV,WV,West Virginia,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,429,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,WV,WV,West Virginia,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,297,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,WV,WV,West Virginia,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,127,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,WV,WV,West Virginia,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,147,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,WV,WV,West Virginia,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,WV,WV,West Virginia,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,1805832,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2018,WV,WV,West Virginia,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1422373,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,WV,WV,West Virginia,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1290637,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,WV,WV,West Virginia,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1454,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,WV,WV,West Virginia,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,131736,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,WV,WV,West Virginia,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,90.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,WV,WV,West Virginia,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,WV,WV,West Virginia,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,9.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,WV,WV,West Virginia,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,132,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,WV,WV,West Virginia,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,17.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,WV,WV,West Virginia,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,69.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,WV,WV,West Virginia,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,245546,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,WV,WV,West Virginia,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,985561,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,WY,WY,Wyoming,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,302,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,56,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,WY,WY,Wyoming,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,119,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,56,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,WY,WY,Wyoming,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,56,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,WY,WY,Wyoming,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,56,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,WY,WY,Wyoming,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,81,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,56,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,WY,WY,Wyoming,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,577737,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,56,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,False,,WFR_ST
2018,WY,WY,Wyoming,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,460371,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,56,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,WY,WY,Wyoming,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,262712,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,56,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,WY,WY,Wyoming,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,67557,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,56,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,WY,WY,Wyoming,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,197659,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,56,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,WY,WY,Wyoming,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,57.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,56,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,WY,WY,Wyoming,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,14.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,56,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,WY,WY,Wyoming,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,42.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,56,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,WY,WY,Wyoming,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,183,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,56,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2018,WY,WY,Wyoming,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,18,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,56,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,WY,WY,Wyoming,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,24.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,56,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2018,WY,WY,Wyoming,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,82794,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,56,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2018,WY,WY,Wyoming,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,112257,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,56,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,AK,AK,Alaska,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,641,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,2,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,AK,AK,Alaska,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,31,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,2,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,AK,AK,Alaska,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,23,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,2,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,AK,AK,Alaska,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,2,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,AK,AK,Alaska,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,2,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,AK,AK,Alaska,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,737458,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,2,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2016,AK,AK,Alaska,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,469850,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,2,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,AK,AK,Alaska,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,233192,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,2,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,AK,AK,Alaska,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,2,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,AK,AK,Alaska,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,236658,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,2,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,AK,AK,Alaska,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,49.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,2,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,AK,AK,Alaska,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,2,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,AK,AK,Alaska,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,50.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,2,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,AK,AK,Alaska,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,610,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,2,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,AK,AK,Alaska,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,2,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,AK,AK,Alaska,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,46.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,2,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,AK,AK,Alaska,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,13917,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,2,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,AK,AK,Alaska,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,219276,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,2,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,AL,AL,Alabama,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,531,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,AL,AL,Alabama,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,263,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,AL,AL,Alabama,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,105,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,AL,AL,Alabama,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,146,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,AL,AL,Alabama,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,AL,AL,Alabama,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,4858979,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2016,AL,AL,Alabama,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4314476,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,AL,AL,Alabama,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3367031,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,AL,AL,Alabama,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,54376,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,AL,AL,Alabama,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,947445,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,AL,AL,Alabama,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,78,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,AL,AL,Alabama,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,AL,AL,Alabama,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,22,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,AL,AL,Alabama,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,268,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,1,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,AL,AL,Alabama,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,16.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,AL,AL,Alabama,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,60.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,AL,AL,Alabama,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,710453,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,AL,AL,Alabama,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2602202,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,1,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,AR,AR,Arkansas,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,676,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,AR,AR,Arkansas,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,353,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,AR,AR,Arkansas,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,114,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,AR,AR,Arkansas,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,225,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,AR,AR,Arkansas,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,AR,AR,Arkansas,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,2978204,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2016,AR,AR,Arkansas,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2840231,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,AR,AR,Arkansas,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2431541,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,AR,AR,Arkansas,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,7173,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,AR,AR,Arkansas,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,408690,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,AR,AR,Arkansas,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,85.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,AR,AR,Arkansas,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,AR,AR,Arkansas,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,14.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,AR,AR,Arkansas,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,323,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,5,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,AR,AR,Arkansas,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,29.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,AR,AR,Arkansas,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,56.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,AR,AR,Arkansas,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,828393,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,AR,AR,Arkansas,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1595975,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,5,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,AZ,AZ,Arizona,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,951,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,4,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,AZ,AZ,Arizona,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,298,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,4,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,AZ,AZ,Arizona,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,68,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,4,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,AZ,AZ,Arizona,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,4,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,AZ,AZ,Arizona,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,228,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,4,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,AZ,AZ,Arizona,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,6828065,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,4,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2016,AZ,AZ,Arizona,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,6694514,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,4,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,AZ,AZ,Arizona,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3868308,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,4,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,AZ,AZ,Arizona,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,513700,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,4,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,AZ,AZ,Arizona,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2826206,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,4,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,AZ,AZ,Arizona,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,57.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,4,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,AZ,AZ,Arizona,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,7.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,4,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,AZ,AZ,Arizona,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,42.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,4,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,AZ,AZ,Arizona,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,653,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,4,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,AZ,AZ,Arizona,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,4,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,AZ,AZ,Arizona,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,50.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,4,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,AZ,AZ,Arizona,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,2345,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,4,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,AZ,AZ,Arizona,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3352263,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,4,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,CA,CA,California,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3023,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,CA,CA,California,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,371,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,CA,CA,California,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,58,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,CA,CA,California,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,98,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,CA,CA,California,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,214,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,CA,CA,California,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,39144818,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2016,CA,CA,California,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,36641304,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,CA,CA,California,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,22201744,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,CA,CA,California,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,550370,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,CA,CA,California,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,14436673,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,CA,CA,California,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,60.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,CA,CA,California,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,CA,CA,California,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,39.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,CA,CA,California,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2652,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,6,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,CA,CA,California,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,33,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,CA,CA,California,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,26.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,CA,CA,California,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,12101648,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,CA,CA,California,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,9549726,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,6,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,CO,CO,Colorado,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,825,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,CO,CO,Colorado,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,404,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,CO,CO,Colorado,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,54,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,CO,CO,Colorado,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,97,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,CO,CO,Colorado,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,228,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,CO,CO,Colorado,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,5456574,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2016,CO,CO,Colorado,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5197242,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,CO,CO,Colorado,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3893189,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,CO,CO,Colorado,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,645353,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,CO,CO,Colorado,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1304053,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,CO,CO,Colorado,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,74.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,CO,CO,Colorado,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,12.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,CO,CO,Colorado,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,25.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,CO,CO,Colorado,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,421,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,8,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,CO,CO,Colorado,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,17.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,CO,CO,Colorado,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,42.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,CO,CO,Colorado,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,926757,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,CO,CO,Colorado,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2190844,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,8,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,CT,CT,Connecticut,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,465,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,9,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,CT,CT,Connecticut,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,85,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,9,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,CT,CT,Connecticut,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,31,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,9,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,CT,CT,Connecticut,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,31,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,9,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,CT,CT,Connecticut,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,23,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,9,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,CT,CT,Connecticut,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,3590886,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,9,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2016,CT,CT,Connecticut,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2704505,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,CT,CT,Connecticut,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2421487,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,CT,CT,Connecticut,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,3891,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,CT,CT,Connecticut,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,283018,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,CT,CT,Connecticut,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,89.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,CT,CT,Connecticut,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,CT,CT,Connecticut,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,10.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,CT,CT,Connecticut,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,380,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,9,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,CT,CT,Connecticut,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,4.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,CT,CT,Connecticut,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,84.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,CT,CT,Connecticut,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,132821,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,CT,CT,Connecticut,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2284774,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,9,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,DC,DC,District of Columbia,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,11,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,DC,DC,District of Columbia,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,11,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,DC,DC,District of Columbia,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,11,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,DC,DC,District of Columbia,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,11,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,DC,DC,District of Columbia,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,11,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,DC,DC,District of Columbia,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,672228,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,11,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,False,,WFR_ST
2016,DC,DC,District of Columbia,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,681170,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,11,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,DC,DC,District of Columbia,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,681170,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,11,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,DC,DC,District of Columbia,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,11,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,DC,DC,District of Columbia,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,11,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,DC,DC,District of Columbia,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,11,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,DC,DC,District of Columbia,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,11,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,DC,DC,District of Columbia,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,11,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,DC,DC,District of Columbia,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,11,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,DC,DC,District of Columbia,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,100,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,11,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,DC,DC,District of Columbia,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,11,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,DC,DC,District of Columbia,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,681170,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,11,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,DC,DC,District of Columbia,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,11,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,DE,DE,Delaware,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,225,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,10,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,DE,DE,Delaware,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,45,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,10,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,DE,DE,Delaware,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,33,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,10,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,DE,DE,Delaware,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,10,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,DE,DE,Delaware,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,10,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,DE,DE,Delaware,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,945934,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,10,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2016,DE,DE,Delaware,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,755629,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,10,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,DE,DE,Delaware,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,660276,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,10,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,DE,DE,Delaware,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,8000,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,10,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,DE,DE,Delaware,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,95353,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,10,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,DE,DE,Delaware,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,87.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,10,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,DE,DE,Delaware,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,10,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,DE,DE,Delaware,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,12.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,10,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,DE,DE,Delaware,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,180,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,10,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,DE,DE,Delaware,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,10,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,DE,DE,Delaware,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,86.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,10,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,DE,DE,Delaware,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,627,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,10,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,DE,DE,Delaware,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,651649,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,10,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,FL,FL,Florida,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1559,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,FL,FL,Florida,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,253,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,FL,FL,Florida,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,121,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,FL,FL,Florida,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,85,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,FL,FL,Florida,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,42,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,FL,FL,Florida,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,20271272,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2016,FL,FL,Florida,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,18521077,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,FL,FL,Florida,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,14269078,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,FL,FL,Florida,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1257303,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,FL,FL,Florida,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4251999,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,FL,FL,Florida,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,77,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,FL,FL,Florida,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,6.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,FL,FL,Florida,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,23,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,FL,FL,Florida,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1306,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,12,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,FL,FL,Florida,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,FL,FL,Florida,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,63.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,FL,FL,Florida,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1290365,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,FL,FL,Florida,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,11721410,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,12,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,GA,GA,Georgia,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1696,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,GA,GA,Georgia,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,557,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,GA,GA,Georgia,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,327,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,GA,GA,Georgia,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,85,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,GA,GA,Georgia,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,144,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,GA,GA,Georgia,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,10214860,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2016,GA,GA,Georgia,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,8681891,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,GA,GA,Georgia,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8348197,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,GA,GA,Georgia,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,97246,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,GA,GA,Georgia,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,333694,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,GA,GA,Georgia,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,96.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,GA,GA,Georgia,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,GA,GA,Georgia,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,3.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,GA,GA,Georgia,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1139,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,13,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,GA,GA,Georgia,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,10.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,GA,GA,Georgia,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,84.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,GA,GA,Georgia,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,941462,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,GA,GA,Georgia,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,7297820,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,13,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,HI,HI,Hawaii,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,101,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,15,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,HI,HI,Hawaii,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,11,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,15,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,HI,HI,Hawaii,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,15,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,HI,HI,Hawaii,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,4,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,15,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,HI,HI,Hawaii,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,15,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,HI,HI,Hawaii,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,1431603,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,15,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,False,,WFR_ST
2016,HI,HI,Hawaii,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1370079,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,15,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,HI,HI,Hawaii,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,154360,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,15,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,HI,HI,Hawaii,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,15,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,HI,HI,Hawaii,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1215719,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,15,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,HI,HI,Hawaii,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,11.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,15,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,HI,HI,Hawaii,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,15,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,HI,HI,Hawaii,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,88.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,15,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,HI,HI,Hawaii,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,90,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,15,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,HI,HI,Hawaii,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,15,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,HI,HI,Hawaii,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,10.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,15,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,HI,HI,Hawaii,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,11274,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,15,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,HI,HI,Hawaii,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,143086,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,15,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,IA,IA,Iowa,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1060,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,IA,IA,Iowa,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,555,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,IA,IA,Iowa,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,162,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,IA,IA,Iowa,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,160,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,IA,IA,Iowa,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,200,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,IA,IA,Iowa,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,3123899,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2016,IA,IA,Iowa,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2526141,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,IA,IA,Iowa,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2280194,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,IA,IA,Iowa,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,341665,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,IA,IA,Iowa,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,245947,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,IA,IA,Iowa,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,90.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,IA,IA,Iowa,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,13.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,IA,IA,Iowa,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,9.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,IA,IA,Iowa,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,505,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,19,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,IA,IA,Iowa,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,17.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,IA,IA,Iowa,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,58,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,IA,IA,Iowa,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,445418,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,IA,IA,Iowa,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1464369,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,19,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,ID,ID,Idaho,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,706,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,ID,ID,Idaho,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,100,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,ID,ID,Idaho,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,ID,ID,Idaho,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,ID,ID,Idaho,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,89,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,ID,ID,Idaho,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,1654930,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2016,ID,ID,Idaho,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1219353,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,ID,ID,Idaho,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,392745,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,ID,ID,Idaho,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,362835,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,ID,ID,Idaho,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,826608,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,ID,ID,Idaho,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,32.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,ID,ID,Idaho,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,29.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,ID,ID,Idaho,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,67.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,ID,ID,Idaho,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,606,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,16,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,ID,ID,Idaho,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,ID,ID,Idaho,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,0.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,ID,ID,Idaho,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,60,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,ID,ID,Idaho,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,8867,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,16,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,IL,IL,Illinois,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1815,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,IL,IL,Illinois,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1639,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,IL,IL,Illinois,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,859,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,IL,IL,Illinois,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,622,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,IL,IL,Illinois,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,151,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,IL,IL,Illinois,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,12859995,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2016,IL,IL,Illinois,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,11648817,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,IL,IL,Illinois,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,11474462,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,IL,IL,Illinois,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,313845,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,IL,IL,Illinois,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,174355,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,IL,IL,Illinois,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,IL,IL,Illinois,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,2.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,IL,IL,Illinois,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,IL,IL,Illinois,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,176,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,17,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,IL,IL,Illinois,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,40.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,IL,IL,Illinois,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,55.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,IL,IL,Illinois,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,4708834,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,IL,IL,Illinois,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,6451783,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,17,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,IN,IN,Indiana,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,903,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,IN,IN,Indiana,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,504,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,IN,IN,Indiana,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,273,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,IN,IN,Indiana,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,134,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,IN,IN,Indiana,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,94,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,IN,IN,Indiana,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,6619680,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2016,IN,IN,Indiana,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4936187,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,IN,IN,Indiana,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4652921,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,IN,IN,Indiana,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,336225,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,IN,IN,Indiana,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,283266,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,IN,IN,Indiana,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,94.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,IN,IN,Indiana,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,6.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,IN,IN,Indiana,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,5.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,IN,IN,Indiana,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,399,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,18,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,IN,IN,Indiana,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,10,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,IN,IN,Indiana,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,77.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,IN,IN,Indiana,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,494237,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,IN,IN,Indiana,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3822459,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,18,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,KS,KS,Kansas,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,889,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,KS,KS,Kansas,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,368,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,KS,KS,Kansas,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,63,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,KS,KS,Kansas,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,178,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,KS,KS,Kansas,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,89,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,KS,KS,Kansas,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,2911641,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2016,KS,KS,Kansas,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2753541,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,KS,KS,Kansas,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1829273,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,KS,KS,Kansas,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,133897,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,KS,KS,Kansas,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,924268,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,KS,KS,Kansas,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,66.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,KS,KS,Kansas,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,4.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,KS,KS,Kansas,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,33.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,KS,KS,Kansas,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,521,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,20,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,KS,KS,Kansas,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,KS,KS,Kansas,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,50.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,KS,KS,Kansas,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,220515,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,KS,KS,Kansas,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1392184,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,20,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,KY,KY,Kentucky,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,382,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,KY,KY,Kentucky,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,368,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,KY,KY,Kentucky,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,189,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,KY,KY,Kentucky,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,179,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,KY,KY,Kentucky,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,KY,KY,Kentucky,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,4425092,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2016,KY,KY,Kentucky,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3758413,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,KY,KY,Kentucky,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3753680,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,KY,KY,Kentucky,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,KY,KY,Kentucky,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4733,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,KY,KY,Kentucky,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,99.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,KY,KY,Kentucky,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,KY,KY,Kentucky,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,0.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,KY,KY,Kentucky,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,21,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,KY,KY,Kentucky,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,23.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,KY,KY,Kentucky,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,76,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,KY,KY,Kentucky,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,899954,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,KY,KY,Kentucky,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2853726,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,21,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,LA,LA,Louisiana,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1016,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,LA,LA,Louisiana,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,115,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,LA,LA,Louisiana,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,30,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,LA,LA,Louisiana,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,LA,LA,Louisiana,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,66,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,LA,LA,Louisiana,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,4670724,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2016,LA,LA,Louisiana,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4074943,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,LA,LA,Louisiana,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1801324,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,LA,LA,Louisiana,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,156709,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,LA,LA,Louisiana,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2273619,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,LA,LA,Louisiana,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,44.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,LA,LA,Louisiana,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,3.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,LA,LA,Louisiana,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,55.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,LA,LA,Louisiana,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,901,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,22,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,LA,LA,Louisiana,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,1.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,LA,LA,Louisiana,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,39.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,LA,LA,Louisiana,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,45640,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,LA,LA,Louisiana,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1598975,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,22,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,MA,MA,Massachusetts,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,573,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,MA,MA,Massachusetts,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,158,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,MA,MA,Massachusetts,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,80,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,MA,MA,Massachusetts,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,64,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,MA,MA,Massachusetts,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,14,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,MA,MA,Massachusetts,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,6794422,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2016,MA,MA,Massachusetts,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,6256423,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,MA,MA,Massachusetts,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3621778,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,MA,MA,Massachusetts,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1712,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,MA,MA,Massachusetts,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2634645,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,MA,MA,Massachusetts,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,57.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,MA,MA,Massachusetts,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,MA,MA,Massachusetts,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,42.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,MA,MA,Massachusetts,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,415,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,25,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,MA,MA,Massachusetts,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,27.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,MA,MA,Massachusetts,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,30.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,MA,MA,Massachusetts,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1720780,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,MA,MA,Massachusetts,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1899286,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,25,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,MD,MD,Maryland,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,492,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,MD,MD,Maryland,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,133,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,MD,MD,Maryland,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,50,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,MD,MD,Maryland,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,26,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,MD,MD,Maryland,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,57,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,MD,MD,Maryland,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,6006401,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2016,MD,MD,Maryland,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4901590,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,MD,MD,Maryland,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4579173,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,MD,MD,Maryland,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,52643,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,MD,MD,Maryland,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,322417,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,MD,MD,Maryland,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,93.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,MD,MD,Maryland,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,MD,MD,Maryland,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,6.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,MD,MD,Maryland,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,359,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,24,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,MD,MD,Maryland,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,12,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,MD,MD,Maryland,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,80.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,MD,MD,Maryland,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,588320,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,MD,MD,Maryland,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3938211,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,24,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,ME,ME,Maine,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,384,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,ME,ME,Maine,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,74,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,ME,ME,Maine,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,67,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,ME,ME,Maine,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,ME,ME,Maine,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,ME,ME,Maine,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,1329328,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2016,ME,ME,Maine,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,769362,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,ME,ME,Maine,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,610053,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,ME,ME,Maine,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,ME,ME,Maine,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,159309,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,ME,ME,Maine,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,79.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,ME,ME,Maine,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,ME,ME,Maine,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,20.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,ME,ME,Maine,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,310,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,23,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,ME,ME,Maine,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,1.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,ME,ME,Maine,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,77.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,ME,ME,Maine,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,11674,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,ME,ME,Maine,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,598379,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,23,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,MI,MI,Michigan,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1453,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,MI,MI,Michigan,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,599,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,MI,MI,Michigan,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,127,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,MI,MI,Michigan,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,232,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,MI,MI,Michigan,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,238,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,MI,MI,Michigan,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,9922576,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2016,MI,MI,Michigan,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7240436,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,MI,MI,Michigan,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6492531,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,MI,MI,Michigan,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,140995,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,MI,MI,Michigan,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,747905,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,MI,MI,Michigan,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,89.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,MI,MI,Michigan,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,MI,MI,Michigan,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,10.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,MI,MI,Michigan,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,854,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,26,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,MI,MI,Michigan,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,54.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,MI,MI,Michigan,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,33.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,MI,MI,Michigan,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,3922285,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,MI,MI,Michigan,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2426691,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,26,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,MN,MN,Minnesota,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,975,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,MN,MN,Minnesota,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,741,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,MN,MN,Minnesota,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,636,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,MN,MN,Minnesota,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,86,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,MN,MN,Minnesota,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,19,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,MN,MN,Minnesota,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,5489594,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2016,MN,MN,Minnesota,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4346035,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,MN,MN,Minnesota,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4294393,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,MN,MN,Minnesota,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,4788,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,MN,MN,Minnesota,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,51642,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,MN,MN,Minnesota,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,98.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,MN,MN,Minnesota,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,MN,MN,Minnesota,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,1.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,MN,MN,Minnesota,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,234,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,27,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,MN,MN,Minnesota,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,6.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,MN,MN,Minnesota,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,92.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,MN,MN,Minnesota,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,284740,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,MN,MN,Minnesota,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,4004865,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,27,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,MO,MO,Missouri,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1293,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,MO,MO,Missouri,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,444,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,MO,MO,Missouri,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,169,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,MO,MO,Missouri,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,177,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,MO,MO,Missouri,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,84,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,MO,MO,Missouri,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,6083672,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2016,MO,MO,Missouri,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,5194390,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,MO,MO,Missouri,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3986715,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,MO,MO,Missouri,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,286659,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,MO,MO,Missouri,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1207675,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,MO,MO,Missouri,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,76.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,MO,MO,Missouri,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,5.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,MO,MO,Missouri,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,23.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,MO,MO,Missouri,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,849,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,29,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,MO,MO,Missouri,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,13.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,MO,MO,Missouri,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,57.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,MO,MO,Missouri,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,684836,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,MO,MO,Missouri,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,3006902,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,29,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,MS,MS,Mississippi,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1001,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,MS,MS,Mississippi,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,356,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,MS,MS,Mississippi,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,230,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,MS,MS,Mississippi,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,48,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,MS,MS,Mississippi,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,76,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,MS,MS,Mississippi,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,2992333,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2016,MS,MS,Mississippi,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2539375,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,MS,MS,Mississippi,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1548369,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,MS,MS,Mississippi,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,136540,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,MS,MS,Mississippi,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,990286,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,MS,MS,Mississippi,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,61,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,MS,MS,Mississippi,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,5.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,MS,MS,Mississippi,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,39,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,MS,MS,Mississippi,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,645,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,28,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,MS,MS,Mississippi,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,2.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,MS,MS,Mississippi,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,52.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,MS,MS,Mississippi,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,71933,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,MS,MS,Mississippi,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1340616,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,28,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,MT,MT,Montana,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,857,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,30,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,MT,MT,Montana,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,208,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,30,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,MT,MT,Montana,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,37,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,30,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,MT,MT,Montana,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,30,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,MT,MT,Montana,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,138,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,30,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,MT,MT,Montana,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,1032949,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,30,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,False,,WFR_ST
2016,MT,MT,Montana,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,742072,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,30,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,MT,MT,Montana,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,250037,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,30,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,MT,MT,Montana,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,105572,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,30,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,MT,MT,Montana,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,492035,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,30,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,MT,MT,Montana,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,33.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,30,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,MT,MT,Montana,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,14.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,30,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,MT,MT,Montana,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,66.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,30,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,MT,MT,Montana,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,649,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,30,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,MT,MT,Montana,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,3.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,30,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,MT,MT,Montana,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,15.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,30,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,MT,MT,Montana,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,27242,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,30,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,MT,MT,Montana,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,117222,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,30,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,NC,NC,North Carolina,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1995,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,NC,NC,North Carolina,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,425,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,NC,NC,North Carolina,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,133,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,NC,NC,North Carolina,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,246,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,NC,NC,North Carolina,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,32,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,NC,NC,North Carolina,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,10042802,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2016,NC,NC,North Carolina,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,6631229,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,NC,NC,North Carolina,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5814174,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,NC,NC,North Carolina,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,98869,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,NC,NC,North Carolina,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,817055,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,NC,NC,North Carolina,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,87.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,NC,NC,North Carolina,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,NC,NC,North Carolina,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,12.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,NC,NC,North Carolina,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1570,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,37,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,NC,NC,North Carolina,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,11.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,NC,NC,North Carolina,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,74.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,NC,NC,North Carolina,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,784632,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,NC,NC,North Carolina,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,4930673,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,37,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,ND,ND,North Dakota,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,385,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,ND,ND,North Dakota,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,311,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,ND,ND,North Dakota,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,108,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,ND,ND,North Dakota,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,177,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,ND,ND,North Dakota,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,ND,ND,North Dakota,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,756927,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2016,ND,ND,North Dakota,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,702333,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,ND,ND,North Dakota,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,672662,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,ND,ND,North Dakota,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,5374,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,ND,ND,North Dakota,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,29671,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,ND,ND,North Dakota,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,95.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,ND,ND,North Dakota,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,ND,ND,North Dakota,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,4.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,ND,ND,North Dakota,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,74,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,38,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,ND,ND,North Dakota,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,19,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,ND,ND,North Dakota,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,74.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,ND,ND,North Dakota,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,133732,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,ND,ND,North Dakota,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,522918,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,38,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,NE,NE,Nebraska,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,598,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,NE,NE,Nebraska,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,148,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,NE,NE,Nebraska,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,71,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,NE,NE,Nebraska,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,28,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,NE,NE,Nebraska,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,47,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,NE,NE,Nebraska,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,1896190,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2016,NE,NE,Nebraska,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1545849,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,NE,NE,Nebraska,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1106087,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,NE,NE,Nebraska,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,51023,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,NE,NE,Nebraska,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,439762,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,NE,NE,Nebraska,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,71.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,NE,NE,Nebraska,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,3.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,NE,NE,Nebraska,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,28.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,NE,NE,Nebraska,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,450,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,31,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,NE,NE,Nebraska,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,1.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,NE,NE,Nebraska,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,67.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,NE,NE,Nebraska,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,18218,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,NE,NE,Nebraska,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1036845,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,31,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,NH,NH,New Hampshire,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,810,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,33,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,NH,NH,New Hampshire,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,304,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,33,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,NH,NH,New Hampshire,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,10,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,33,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,NH,NH,New Hampshire,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,18,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,33,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,NH,NH,New Hampshire,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,276,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,33,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,NH,NH,New Hampshire,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,1330608,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,33,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2016,NH,NH,New Hampshire,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,883053,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,NH,NH,New Hampshire,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,410339,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,NH,NH,New Hampshire,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,65169,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,NH,NH,New Hampshire,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,472714,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,NH,NH,New Hampshire,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,46.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,NH,NH,New Hampshire,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,7.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,NH,NH,New Hampshire,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,53.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,NH,NH,New Hampshire,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,506,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,33,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,NH,NH,New Hampshire,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,3.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,NH,NH,New Hampshire,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,35.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,NH,NH,New Hampshire,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,34781,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,NH,NH,New Hampshire,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,310390,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,33,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,NJ,NJ,New Jersey,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,666,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,34,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,NJ,NJ,New Jersey,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,63,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,34,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,NJ,NJ,New Jersey,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,20,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,34,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,NJ,NJ,New Jersey,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,12,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,34,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,NJ,NJ,New Jersey,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,30,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,34,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,NJ,NJ,New Jersey,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,8958013,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,34,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,False,,WFR_ST
2016,NJ,NJ,New Jersey,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,7963631,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,34,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,NJ,NJ,New Jersey,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1159594,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,34,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,NJ,NJ,New Jersey,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,147644,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,34,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,NJ,NJ,New Jersey,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6804037,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,34,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,NJ,NJ,New Jersey,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,14.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,34,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,NJ,NJ,New Jersey,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,34,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,NJ,NJ,New Jersey,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,85.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,34,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,NJ,NJ,New Jersey,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,603,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,34,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,NJ,NJ,New Jersey,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,2.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,34,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,NJ,NJ,New Jersey,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,10.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,34,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,NJ,NJ,New Jersey,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,201660,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,34,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,NJ,NJ,New Jersey,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,810290,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,34,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,NM,NM,New Mexico,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,729,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,35,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,NM,NM,New Mexico,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,384,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,35,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,NM,NM,New Mexico,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,70,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,35,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,NM,NM,New Mexico,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,35,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,NM,NM,New Mexico,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,286,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,35,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,NM,NM,New Mexico,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,2085109,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,35,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,False,,WFR_ST
2016,NM,NM,New Mexico,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1774661,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,35,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,NM,NM,New Mexico,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1367330,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,35,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,NM,NM,New Mexico,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,539225,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,35,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,NM,NM,New Mexico,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,407331,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,35,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,NM,NM,New Mexico,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,77,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,35,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,NM,NM,New Mexico,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,30.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,35,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,NM,NM,New Mexico,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,23,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,35,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,NM,NM,New Mexico,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,345,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,35,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,NM,NM,New Mexico,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,2.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,35,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,NM,NM,New Mexico,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,43.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,35,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,NM,NM,New Mexico,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,49499,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,35,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,NM,NM,New Mexico,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,778606,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,35,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,NV,NV,Nevada,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,246,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,NV,NV,Nevada,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,60,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,NV,NV,Nevada,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,NV,NV,Nevada,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,8,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,NV,NV,Nevada,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,35,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,NV,NV,Nevada,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,2890845,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2016,NV,NV,Nevada,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2768047,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,NV,NV,Nevada,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2076200,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,NV,NV,Nevada,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,30039,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,NV,NV,Nevada,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,691847,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,NV,NV,Nevada,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,75,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,NV,NV,Nevada,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,NV,NV,Nevada,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,25,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,NV,NV,Nevada,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,186,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,32,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,NV,NV,Nevada,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,63.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,NV,NV,Nevada,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,10.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,NV,NV,Nevada,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1759487,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,NV,NV,Nevada,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,286674,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,32,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,NY,NY,New York,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2345,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,36,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,NY,NY,New York,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,413,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,36,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,NY,NY,New York,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,127,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,36,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,NY,NY,New York,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,249,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,36,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,NY,NY,New York,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,37,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,36,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,NY,NY,New York,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,19795791,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,36,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,False,,WFR_ST
2016,NY,NY,New York,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,17660481,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,36,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,NY,NY,New York,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,12655170,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,36,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,NY,NY,New York,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,12412,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,36,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,NY,NY,New York,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5005311,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,36,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,NY,NY,New York,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,71.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,36,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,NY,NY,New York,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,36,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,NY,NY,New York,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,28.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,36,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,NY,NY,New York,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1932,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,36,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,NY,NY,New York,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,8.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,36,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,NY,NY,New York,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,63.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,36,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,NY,NY,New York,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1451717,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,36,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,NY,NY,New York,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,11191040,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,36,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,OH,OH,Ohio,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1252,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,39,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,OH,OH,Ohio,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,722,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,39,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,OH,OH,Ohio,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,208,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,39,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,OH,OH,Ohio,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,248,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,39,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,OH,OH,Ohio,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,254,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,39,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,OH,OH,Ohio,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,11613423,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,39,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,False,,WFR_ST
2016,OH,OH,Ohio,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9771921,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,39,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,OH,OH,Ohio,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,9042076,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,39,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,OH,OH,Ohio,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,260546,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,39,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,OH,OH,Ohio,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,729845,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,39,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,OH,OH,Ohio,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,92.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,39,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,OH,OH,Ohio,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,2.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,39,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,OH,OH,Ohio,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,7.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,39,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,OH,OH,Ohio,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,530,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,39,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,OH,OH,Ohio,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,15,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,39,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,OH,OH,Ohio,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,74,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,39,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,OH,OH,Ohio,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1467993,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,39,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,OH,OH,Ohio,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,7226751,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,39,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,OK,OK,Oklahoma,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,905,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,OK,OK,Oklahoma,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,273,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,OK,OK,Oklahoma,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,41,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,OK,OK,Oklahoma,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,169,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,OK,OK,Oklahoma,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,57,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,OK,OK,Oklahoma,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,3911338,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2016,OK,OK,Oklahoma,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3593399,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,OK,OK,Oklahoma,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2499519,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,OK,OK,Oklahoma,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,59946,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,OK,OK,Oklahoma,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1093880,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,OK,OK,Oklahoma,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,69.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,OK,OK,Oklahoma,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,OK,OK,Oklahoma,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,30.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,OK,OK,Oklahoma,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,632,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,40,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,OK,OK,Oklahoma,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,14.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,OK,OK,Oklahoma,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,53.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,OK,OK,Oklahoma,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,510926,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,OK,OK,Oklahoma,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1915274,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,40,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,OR,OR,Oregon,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,896,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,OR,OR,Oregon,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,84,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,OR,OR,Oregon,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,27,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,OR,OR,Oregon,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,OR,OR,Oregon,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,42,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,OR,OR,Oregon,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,4028977,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2016,OR,OR,Oregon,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3445307,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,OR,OR,Oregon,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,778590,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,OR,OR,Oregon,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,48582,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,OR,OR,Oregon,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2666717,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,OR,OR,Oregon,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,22.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,OR,OR,Oregon,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,OR,OR,Oregon,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,77.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,OR,OR,Oregon,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,812,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,41,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,OR,OR,Oregon,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,0.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,OR,OR,Oregon,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,20.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,OR,OR,Oregon,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,17343,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,OR,OR,Oregon,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,712665,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,41,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,PA,PA,Pennsylvania,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1833,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,42,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,PA,PA,Pennsylvania,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,187,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,42,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,PA,PA,Pennsylvania,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,106,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,42,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,PA,PA,Pennsylvania,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,81,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,42,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,PA,PA,Pennsylvania,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,42,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,PA,PA,Pennsylvania,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,12802503,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,42,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2016,PA,PA,Pennsylvania,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,9417111,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,42,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,PA,PA,Pennsylvania,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5138572,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,42,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,PA,PA,Pennsylvania,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,42,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,PA,PA,Pennsylvania,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,4278539,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,42,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,PA,PA,Pennsylvania,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,54.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,42,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,PA,PA,Pennsylvania,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,42,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,PA,PA,Pennsylvania,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,45.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,42,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,PA,PA,Pennsylvania,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1646,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,42,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,PA,PA,Pennsylvania,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,5.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,42,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,PA,PA,Pennsylvania,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,49.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,42,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,PA,PA,Pennsylvania,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,496503,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,42,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,PA,PA,Pennsylvania,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,4642069,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,42,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,RI,RI,Rhode Island,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,87,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,44,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,RI,RI,Rhode Island,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,26,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,44,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,RI,RI,Rhode Island,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,44,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,RI,RI,Rhode Island,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,13,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,44,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,RI,RI,Rhode Island,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,7,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,44,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,RI,RI,Rhode Island,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,1056298,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,44,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2016,RI,RI,Rhode Island,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,943071,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,44,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,RI,RI,Rhode Island,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,796730,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,44,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,RI,RI,Rhode Island,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,613,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,44,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,RI,RI,Rhode Island,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,146341,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,44,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,RI,RI,Rhode Island,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,84.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,44,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,RI,RI,Rhode Island,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,44,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,RI,RI,Rhode Island,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,15.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,44,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,RI,RI,Rhode Island,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,61,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,44,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,RI,RI,Rhode Island,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,31.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,44,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,RI,RI,Rhode Island,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,52.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,44,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,RI,RI,Rhode Island,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,300455,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,44,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,RI,RI,Rhode Island,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,494662,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,44,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,SC,SC,South Carolina,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,595,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,SC,SC,South Carolina,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,267,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,SC,SC,South Carolina,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,52,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,SC,SC,South Carolina,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,165,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,SC,SC,South Carolina,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,40,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,SC,SC,South Carolina,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,4896146,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2016,SC,SC,South Carolina,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,3725371,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,SC,SC,South Carolina,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3404278,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,SC,SC,South Carolina,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,108161,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,SC,SC,South Carolina,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,321093,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,SC,SC,South Carolina,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,91.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,SC,SC,South Carolina,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,2.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,SC,SC,South Carolina,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,8.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,SC,SC,South Carolina,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,328,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,45,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,SC,SC,South Carolina,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,31.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,SC,SC,South Carolina,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,55.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,SC,SC,South Carolina,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1171515,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,SC,SC,South Carolina,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2069962,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,45,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,SD,SD,South Dakota,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,508,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,46,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,SD,SD,South Dakota,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,320,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,46,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,SD,SD,South Dakota,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,83,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,46,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,SD,SD,South Dakota,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,175,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,46,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,SD,SD,South Dakota,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,52,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,46,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,SD,SD,South Dakota,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,858024,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,46,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,False,,WFR_ST
2016,SD,SD,South Dakota,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,785109,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,46,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,SD,SD,South Dakota,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,734542,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,46,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,SD,SD,South Dakota,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,167224,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,46,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,SD,SD,South Dakota,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,50567,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,46,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,SD,SD,South Dakota,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,93.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,46,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,SD,SD,South Dakota,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,21.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,46,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,SD,SD,South Dakota,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,6.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,46,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,SD,SD,South Dakota,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,188,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,46,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,SD,SD,South Dakota,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,22.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,46,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,SD,SD,South Dakota,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,49.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,46,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,SD,SD,South Dakota,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,179343,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,46,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,SD,SD,South Dakota,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,387975,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,46,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,TN,TN,Tennessee,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,462,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,TN,TN,Tennessee,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,278,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,TN,TN,Tennessee,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,178,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,TN,TN,Tennessee,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,100,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,TN,TN,Tennessee,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,TN,TN,Tennessee,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,6600299,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2016,TN,TN,Tennessee,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,6087058,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,TN,TN,Tennessee,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,5382302,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,TN,TN,Tennessee,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,TN,TN,Tennessee,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,704756,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,TN,TN,Tennessee,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,88.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,TN,TN,Tennessee,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,TN,TN,Tennessee,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,11.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,TN,TN,Tennessee,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,184,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,47,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,TN,TN,Tennessee,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,TN,TN,Tennessee,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,79.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,TN,TN,Tennessee,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,550555,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,TN,TN,Tennessee,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,4831748,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,47,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,TX,TX,Texas,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5987,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,TX,TX,Texas,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2655,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,TX,TX,Texas,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,128,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,TX,TX,Texas,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,493,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,TX,TX,Texas,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1882,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,TX,TX,Texas,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,27469114,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2016,TX,TX,Texas,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,25158299,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,TX,TX,Texas,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,17017307,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,TX,TX,Texas,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,3737088,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,TX,TX,Texas,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,8140992,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,TX,TX,Texas,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,67.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,TX,TX,Texas,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,14.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,TX,TX,Texas,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,32.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,TX,TX,Texas,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,3332,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,48,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,TX,TX,Texas,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,19,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,TX,TX,Texas,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,33.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,TX,TX,Texas,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,4775081,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,TX,TX,Texas,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,8508479,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,48,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,US,US,United States,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,51029,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,59,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,US,US,United States,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17709,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,59,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,US,US,United States,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5944,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,59,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,US,US,United States,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5552,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,59,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,US,US,United States,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5758,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,59,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,US,US,United States,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,325664300,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,59,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2016,US,US,United States,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,276969134,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,59,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,US,US,United States,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,201565162,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,59,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,US,US,United States,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,11711599,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,59,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,US,US,United States,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,75403972,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,59,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,US,US,United States,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,72.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,59,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,US,US,United States,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,4.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,59,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,US,US,United States,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,27.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,59,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,US,US,United States,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,33320,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,59,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,US,US,United States,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,16.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,59,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,US,US,United States,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,51.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,59,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,US,US,United States,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,45550907,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,59,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,US,US,United States,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,143790630,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,59,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,UT,UT,Utah,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,462,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,UT,UT,Utah,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,68,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,UT,UT,Utah,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,6,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,UT,UT,Utah,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,36,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,UT,UT,Utah,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,25,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,UT,UT,Utah,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,2995919,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2016,UT,UT,Utah,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,2995452,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,UT,UT,Utah,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1578107,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,UT,UT,Utah,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,34122,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,UT,UT,Utah,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1417345,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,UT,UT,Utah,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,52.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,UT,UT,Utah,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,UT,UT,Utah,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,47.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,UT,UT,Utah,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,394,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,49,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,UT,UT,Utah,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,50.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,UT,UT,Utah,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,0.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,UT,UT,Utah,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1518721,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,UT,UT,Utah,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,25263,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,49,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,VA,VA,Virginia,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1179,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,VA,VA,Virginia,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,614,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,VA,VA,Virginia,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,164,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,VA,VA,Virginia,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,217,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,VA,VA,Virginia,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,229,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,VA,VA,Virginia,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,12629892,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2016,VA,VA,Virginia,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,6677652,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,VA,VA,Virginia,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,6428007,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,VA,VA,Virginia,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,149506,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,VA,VA,Virginia,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,249645,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,VA,VA,Virginia,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,96.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,VA,VA,Virginia,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,2.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,VA,VA,Virginia,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,3.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,VA,VA,Virginia,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,565,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,51,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,VA,VA,Virginia,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,28.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,VA,VA,Virginia,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,65,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,VA,VA,Virginia,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1927917,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,VA,VA,Virginia,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,4342778,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,51,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,VT,VT,Vermont,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,460,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,VT,VT,Vermont,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,70,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,VT,VT,Vermont,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,29,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,VT,VT,Vermont,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,41,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,VT,VT,Vermont,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,0,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,VT,VT,Vermont,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,626042,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2016,VT,VT,Vermont,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,443316,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,VT,VT,Vermont,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,249073,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,VT,VT,Vermont,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,VT,VT,Vermont,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,194243,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,VT,VT,Vermont,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,56.2,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,VT,VT,Vermont,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,VT,VT,Vermont,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,43.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,VT,VT,Vermont,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,390,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,50,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,VT,VT,Vermont,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,19,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,VT,VT,Vermont,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,37.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,VT,VT,Vermont,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,84419,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,VT,VT,Vermont,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,164654,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,50,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,WA,WA,Washington,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2386,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,53,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,WA,WA,Washington,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,209,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,53,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,WA,WA,Washington,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,62,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,53,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,WA,WA,Washington,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,129,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,53,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,WA,WA,Washington,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,17,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,53,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,WA,WA,Washington,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,7170351,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,53,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,False,,WFR_ST
2016,WA,WA,Washington,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,6201066,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,53,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,WA,WA,Washington,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3962936,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,53,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,WA,WA,Washington,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,97541,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,53,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,WA,WA,Washington,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,2238130,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,53,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,WA,WA,Washington,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,63.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,53,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,WA,WA,Washington,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,1.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,53,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,WA,WA,Washington,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,36.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,53,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,WA,WA,Washington,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,2177,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,53,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,WA,WA,Washington,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,29.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,53,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,WA,WA,Washington,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,32.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,53,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,WA,WA,Washington,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,1856510,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,53,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,WA,WA,Washington,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2008885,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,53,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,WI,WI,Wisconsin,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,1019,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,WI,WI,Wisconsin,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,378,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,WI,WI,Wisconsin,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,247,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,WI,WI,Wisconsin,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,45,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,WI,WI,Wisconsin,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,84,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,WI,WI,Wisconsin,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,5771337,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2016,WI,WI,Wisconsin,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,4107306,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,WI,WI,Wisconsin,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,3625881,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,WI,WI,Wisconsin,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,113238,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,WI,WI,Wisconsin,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,481425,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,WI,WI,Wisconsin,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,88.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,WI,WI,Wisconsin,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,2.8,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,WI,WI,Wisconsin,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,11.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,WI,WI,Wisconsin,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,641,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,55,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,WI,WI,Wisconsin,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,14,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,WI,WI,Wisconsin,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,71.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,WI,WI,Wisconsin,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,573646,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,WI,WI,Wisconsin,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,2931254,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,55,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,WV,WV,West Virginia,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,428,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,WV,WV,West Virginia,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,296,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,WV,WV,West Virginia,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,127,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,WV,WV,West Virginia,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,147,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,WV,WV,West Virginia,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,5,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,WV,WV,West Virginia,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,1844128,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,True,,WFR_ST
2016,WV,WV,West Virginia,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,1442417,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,WV,WV,West Virginia,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,1301998,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,WV,WV,West Virginia,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,1511,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,WV,WV,West Virginia,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,140419,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,WV,WV,West Virginia,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,90.3,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,WV,WV,West Virginia,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,0.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,WV,WV,West Virginia,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,9.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,WV,WV,West Virginia,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,132,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,54,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,True,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,WV,WV,West Virginia,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,16.6,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,WV,WV,West Virginia,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,69.5,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,True,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,WV,WV,West Virginia,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,238867,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,WV,WV,West Virginia,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,1002080,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,54,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,True,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,WY,WY,Wyoming,Water Fluoridation,Total number of PWS,Number of Systems,Total,WFRS,,Number of PWS,302,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,56,Type1,BOD1,FLR1_1,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,WY,WY,Wyoming,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS providing fluoridated water,Number of Systems,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,119,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,56,Type2,BOD1,FLR1_2,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,WY,WY,Wyoming,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS adjusting fluoride,Number of Systems,Adjusted,WFRS,,Number of PWS,9,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,56,Type3,BOD1,FLR1_3,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,WY,WY,Wyoming,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Number of Systems,Consecutive,WFRS,,Number of PWS,15,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,56,Type4,BOD1,FLR1_4,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,WY,WY,Wyoming,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with naturally occurring fluoride at or above optimal levels,Number of Systems,Natural,WFRS,,Number of PWS,81,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,56,Type5,BOD1,FLR1_5,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,WY,WY,Wyoming,Water Fluoridation,Census population,,Census,WFRS,,Population,586107,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,56,Type7,BOD1,FLR1_6,False,,WFR_ST
2016,WY,WY,Wyoming,Water Fluoridation,PWS population,Population,Total,WFRS,,Population,466949,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,56,Type1,BOD2,FLR1_8,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,WY,WY,Wyoming,Water Fluoridation,Population on fluoridated drinking water systems,Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,266465,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,56,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_10,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,WY,WY,Wyoming,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Population,Natural,WFRS,,Population,68522,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,56,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_14,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,WY,WY,Wyoming,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving water from PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Population,200484,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,56,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_16,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,WY,WY,Wyoming,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water,Percent of Population,Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,57.1,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,56,Type2,BOD2,FLR1_17,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,WY,WY,Wyoming,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS with natural fluoride at or above the recommended level,Percent of Population,Natural,WFRS,%,Percent,14.7,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,56,Type5,BOD2,FLR1_21,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,WY,WY,Wyoming,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving water from PWS with less than the recommended level,Percent of Population,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,%,Percent,42.9,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,56,Type6,BOD2,FLR1_22,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,WY,WY,Wyoming,Water Fluoridation,Number of PWS with fluoride below the recommended level,Number of Systems,Non-Fluoridated,WFRS,,Number of PWS,183,NULL,NULL,,Control factor,Not Controlled,56,Type6,BOD1,FLR1_29,False,IG_3,WFR_ST
2016,WY,WY,Wyoming,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Percent of Population,Consecutive,WFRS,%,Percent,18,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,56,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_34,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,WY,WY,Wyoming,Water Fluoridation,Percentage of PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Percent of Population,Adjusted,WFRS,%,Percent,24.4,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,56,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_35,False,IG_1,WFR_ST
2016,WY,WY,Wyoming,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS consecutive to systems with optimal fluoride levels,Population,Consecutive,WFRS,,Population,83977,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,56,Type4,BOD2,FLR1_36,False,IG_2,WFR_ST
2016,WY,WY,Wyoming,Water Fluoridation,PWS population receiving fluoridated water from PWS adjusting fluoride,Population,Adjusted,WFRS,,Population,113860,*,The value is an adjusted Estimate,,Control factor,Controlled,56,Type3,BOD2,FLR1_37,False,IG_2,WFR_ST